Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Minutes 08-25-1980 SpecialIt Page 280 A special meeting of at 7:30 p.m. in the on August 25, 1980: M I N U T E S S'ECIAL COUNCIL MEETING August 25, 1980 the Plymouth City Council was called to order by Mayor Hunt Council Chambers of the City Center at 3400 Plymouth Boulevard PRESENT: Mayor Hunt. Councilmembers Davenport, Hoyt, Reils and Schneider, Maruger Willis, Administrative Assistant Boyles, Engineer Moore, Planner Tremere, Finance Director Ricker and Attorney Lefler, ABSENT: None. CONSENT AGENDA MOTION was made by Councilmpn;ber Hoyt; seconded by Council- CONSENT AGENDA mecher Nei1s9to adept the items Gn the Consent Agenda with the Item 4 exception of Item 9-A. Motion carried on a Roll Cal' vote, five a%/es. MINUTES MOTION was made by Councilmember Schneider, seconded by Council- MINUTES - REGULAR member Hoyt, to approve the minutes of the August 18, 1980 COUNCIL MEETING regular Council meeting as submitted. AUGUST 18, 1980 Item 5• Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes. Mayor Hunt requested Council to defer Item 6 till later in the 1980 IMPROVEMENT meeting in deference to the people in attendance for the public BOND SALE hearings. Item 6 PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Assessment Roll. Project 909 - 26th Avenr Improvement Engineer Moore reviewed Project 909 in detail and the costs involved and stated the City has received no written objec- tions to the project. Mayor Hunt opened the public hearing at 7:55 p.m. No one chose to speak and the hearing was closed at 7:55 p.m. MOTION was made by Counrilmember Davenport, seconded by Cournil- member Neils, to adopt RESOLUTION N0. 80-5811 A RESOLUTION ADOPTING ASSESSMENTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $86,341.38 FOR PROJECT N0. 909, 26TH AVENUE IMPROVEMENT. Motion carried on a Roll Call vote. five ayes. 480- PUBLIC HEARINGS ASSESSMENT ROLL PROJECT 909 26TH AVE. IMPROVEMENT Item 7-A RESOLUTION N0. 80-581 ADOPTING ASSESSMENTS' PROJECT 909 26TH AVE. IMPROVEMENT Item 7-A Special Council Meeting August 25, 1980 Page 281 '\ B. Assessment Roll - Project 829 - Ridgecrest Area Improvements PUBLIC HEARING ASSESSMENT ROLL Engineer Moore reviewed the project in detail and the costs PROJECT 829 involved. Manager Willis stated no written objections to RIDGECREST AREA the project have been received. Item 7-B Mayor Hunt opened the public hearing at 7:56 p.m. ShirleyStensrud, 3051 Quaker Lane, expressed concern about the pond on her property that was draired during the storm sewer project. Ms. Stensrud stated she (lid not wish to lose the pond or the wildlife in the area and DNi requires teat it be restored. Consulting Engineer Olson stated the pond was-eestablished as part of the storm sewer project a id the inlet to the storm .ewer can be adjusted to increase the level of water in the po,id- Mr. Olson stated they have complied with the DNR pe nait required for this project. Ms. Stensrud inquired who was filling the pond on the south side. Engineer Mo%,.•e replied Mr. Dempsey, a developer in Mission Ridge, has been servtc! a stol rder but he has continued to fill the pond. Mr. Moore stated ONR n also been notified of his actions. Ms. Stansrud stated a sma'1 section of blacktop on the west end of 31st Avenue has been dug up and restored, leaving a hole with a jagged edge in the street. Ms. Stensrud also requested that 31st be posted as a dead erd street. Carmen Vethe, 10210 - 31st Avenue N.. requested that the hole on JISt Avenue be repaired and the street be posted as a dead end. Mr. Vethe also inquired why their assessment was for a 5 -year period rather than 15 years. Mayor Hunt replied this project was done on the basis of a development contract. which has a 5 -year assessment period. Claes Svensson, 2935 Quaker Lane, inquired when tip drainage problems in Lhe area w 11 be corrected and questioned the ownership of 15 feet at the north end of his property. Audra Preu, 2925 Quaker Lane, asked when the drainage prcblem on ie IOL w be corrected. Consulting Engineer Harlan Olson replied it will be corrected when the final clean-up is completed. Mr. Olson commented with regard to the pond in the area that DNR requires that it be restored to the dimensions of 50 x 50 x 2 feet. Paul Preus, 2925 Quaker Lane, asked whether the pond in question was on the east or west side of Quaker Lane, Nick Loscheider, 1425 Louisiana Avenue h., inquired if his 25% develop- ment eposit was included in this assessment. Engineer Moore replied his assessment reflected the remainder of the costs after the 25% deposit. Parwood 'Hmeggen, 5027 Sheridan Lane, stated the pond in q%aestion was once a gar en until the creek was dammed up. Mr. Heggen stated he owns two lots in the area that he wishes to build on and he would like to see the pond completely drained. He stated 1f the pond 6's drained it will affect the size of his lots. Engineer Moore replied this piece of property is classified as wetland. 291 y J O Special Council Meeting August 25, 1980 Page 282 K man, 2885 Quaker Lane N., stateH all the problems in the project area should have been correcfpd before tht assessment hearing. The hearing was closed at 8:35 p.m. NOTION was made by Mayor hunt, seconded by Councilmember Hoyt to direct staff to investigate DNR's requirements for restoration of the pond, and accomplish the blacktop corrections, restaking of lots, and all items mentioned at the hearing including clean-up of the area and resodding. Motion carried, five ayes. 140TION was made by Councilmember Neils, seconded by Council - member Hoyt, to aJopt RESOLUTION NO, 80-5829 A RESOLUTION ADOPTING ASSEFSMENTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $4359181.61 FOR PROJECT NO. 829 - RIDCECREST AREA IMPROVEMENTS. Motion carried an a Roll Call vote, five ayes. MOT'ON was made by Councilmember Neils, seconded by Council- membL•r Hoyt, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 80-582A, A RESOLUTION ADOPTING ASSESSMENTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $1129100.11 FOR PRO- JECT NO. 829 - rIDGECREST AREA I:",:'ROVEMENTS. Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes. C. Assessm-nt Rall - Pro ect 924 - 163th Avenue Improveavnts Manager Willis stated Mr. Kurt Woodhouse of Trammel -Crow has indicated he was satisfied with the project costs. Mayor Hunt opened the public hearing at 8:40 p.m. No one chose to speak and the hearing was closed at 8:4v p.m. RESOLUTION NO. 80-682 ADOPTINEISSESSMENTS, PROJECT 829 RIDGECREST AREA Item 7.6 RESOLUTION NO. 80-582A D SSESSI E'NTS PROJECT 820 RIDGECREST AREA Item 7-B PUBLIC HEARING ASSESSMENT ROLL PROJCCT 924 13TH AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS Item 7-C MOTION was made by Councilmember Hoyt, seconded by Council- RESOLUTION N0. 80-583 member Mails, to adopt RESOLUTION N0, 80-583, A RESOLUTION ADOPTING A.SSTSSMENTF ADOPTING ASSESSMENTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $82,623.91 FOR PROJECT PROJECT 924 NO. 924- 13TH AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS. 13Th AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five a.es. Item 7-C D. Assessment Roll - Project 006 - Empire 1_3ne Improvements PUBLIC HEARING Manager Willis stated the City has received no written objections to Project 006. Mayer Hunt opned the public hearing at 8:41 p.m. No one ct:ase to speak and the hearing wa! closed at 8:41 p.m, MOTION was made by Councilmember Hoyt, seconded by Councilmember Schneider, to adopt a Resolution Adopting Assessments in the amount o $9.269.74 for Project No. 006 - Empre Lane Improvements, SUBSTITUTE MOTION was made by Councilmember Hoyt. seconded by Councilmember Schneider, to defer action on Project 006 until after consideration of Item 6. Substitute motion carried, five ayes. 282- Special Council Meeting August 25, 1980 Page "1.83 E. Assessment W1 - Project 707 - Seven Ponds Area Improvements PUBLIC HEARING ASSESSMENT ROLL Engineer Moore reviewed Project 707 in detail and the costs PROJECT 707 involved. Manager Willis stated he Inas received written SEVEN PONOS AREA objections to the project from the following: Carle T. Item ;-E Anderson, Jr, in behalf of Mr. & Mrs. Douglas Hart, Charlton Consolidated Cos., Inc. and Al Hilde, Jr, Mayr Hunt opened the public hearing at 8:44 p.m. Earle T. Anderson Jr. representing Mr, & Mrs. Douglas Hart, Tb b -County Road 24, objected to the assessment for three lots and claimed due to the configuration and topography of the property, it is undel:eopable without extensive expense. He stated the three ponds on the property also make it not easily divisible. Mr. Anderson claimed the $48,000 assessment makes -he property unsaleable, and he asked that it be assesseA as a single parcel. Counzilmember Neils replied the assessment v -as based on the fact that three lots can be placed on the 400 feet of frontage along the north side of the property. John Nelson, 17130 County Road 24, stated there was a discrepan=y be- tweentmensions of his lot on the plat map and his recorded deed and he asked which takes pvecedence. Manager Willis stat_d this 12 feet was part of a conveyance of property that involved subdivision of a parcel that has nc,t yet been filed. Maycr Hunt asked the staff to research this and report back to Council. James Johnston, representing Charlton Cos., Inc., questioned the defer- ment of theirsewer and water assessment. Manager Willis stated their parcel Is only a portion of a larger holding and because the sanitary sewer lateral bctnefi t was not extended to the rest of the parcel, he recommended deferring the assessment until development plans are for- mulated for tnat parcel. Councilmember Neils suggested a petition for consolidation of the parcel viould express their inLEnt of development. The hearir.; ;zs closed at 9.00 p.m. MOTION was made by Councilmember Hoyt, seconded by Councilmember Neils, to defer action on Project 707 until further review by the Assessment Committee. Motion curriF d, five ayes. F, Assessment Roll - Project 944 - Wlndsong Addition Improver,,ents PUBLIC HEARING ASSESSMENT ROIL Manager Willis stated the City has not received any writteK PROJECT 944 objections to Project 944, WINDSONG ADDITION Mayor Hunt opened the public hearing at 9:02 p,m, Item 7-F John Nelson, 17330 County Roa4 24, stated he was oriSinal1v included n the even Ponds Area and asked why he is not part of that project, Councilmember Neils stated the plat was pr000sed after the Seven Ponds project was ordered. The Learing was closed at 9:03 p.m, G. H, Special Council Meeting August 25, 1980 Page 284 MOTION was made by Councilmember Davenport, seconded by Councilmember Neils, to defer action on Project 944 until further reaiew by the Assessment Committee. Motion carried, five ayes. Assessment Roll - Project 921 - Hadley P'lacelQueensland Lane Engineer Moore reviewed the project in detail and the costs involved. Mayor Hunt opened the public hearing at 9:05 p.m. Manager Willis stated the City has received no written ob- jections to Project 921, Susan Sorrentino, 525 Queensland Lane, objected to Tor sanitary sewer along Hadley Lake and inquired assessed twice for sewer. Mayor Hunt stated part sewer along Hadley Lake was assumed by the City as they were being assessed for area charges only at their property is developed, they will be assessed The hearing was closed at 9:12 p.m, PUBLIC HEARING ASSESSMENT ROLL PROJECT 921 HADLEY PLACE/ QUEENSLAND LANE AREA Item 7-G the assessment if they were being of the cost for the a trunk cost, and this time. When for lateral benefit. MOTION was made ty Councilmember Neils, seconded by Council - member Hoyt, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 80-584, A RESOLUTION ADOPTING ASSESSMENTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $92,999.59 FOR PROJECT NO. 921, HADLEY GLACE/QUEENSLAND LANE AREA IMPROVEMENTS. Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes. MOTION was made 16y Councilmember Neils, seconded by Council - member Hoyt, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 80-580, A RESOLUTION ADOPTING ASSESSMENTS IN THE 101OUNT OF $4.7099.10 FOR PROJECT NO. 921, HADLEY PLACE/QUEENSLAND LANE AREA IMPROVEMENTS. Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes. Assessment Roll - Project 809 - Pike Lake Area Improvements Engineer Mcore reviewed the project in detail ind the costs involved. Maycr Hunt opened the public hearing at 9:15 p,m. Manager Willis stated he has received written objections to assessments for Project 809 from the following: Darrell D. Hanmiond, Dr. Patrick D. Jemerson, Dr. 8 Mrs, Ronald E. White, John A, Watkins, Bary Kaurala, Ronald J. Peschon, Mr- $ Mrs, Richard C. Vierzbe, Mr, Mrs. Norman C. Wold, Mr. S .ors. John M. Priestley, Mr. 8 Mrs. E. ,1, Mosby, Mr, Roger W, Heuer, Mr, Donald Gustayson, Judith Bakken, Mr. 8 Mrs. Donald R. Noble, Rosemary Preschl, Robert M. Stoffen, Chryl Hall, Mr. 8 Mrs, William Sylvester, M.•. A Mrs, Joseph F. Walter. John A. Chan, Mr, 8 Mrs, Michael A. Flynn, Mr, A Mrs, John R. DeHaven, Mr. John R, Schwartz, Mr. 8 Mrs, David Blashack, Judy Betterath, and Lot 2, Hemlock Lane Addition, 284 - RESOLUTION NO. 80-584 ADOPT1%S EOT PROJECT 921 HADLEY PLACE/QUEENSLAND Item 7-G RESOLUTION NO, 80-584A ADOPTING ASSESSMENTS PROJECT 921 HADLEY PLACE/QUEENSLAND Item 7-G PUBLIC HEARING PROJECT 809 PIKE LAKE AREA Item 7-H AREA AREA Special Council Meeting August 25, 1980 Page 285 Or, Patrick D. Jimerson, 11615 - 61st Av3nue N,, stated he objected to e bids e ng exceeded by as much as 70% in some cases; 2) the cost of construction errors on 61st Avenue; and 3) he would have liked to have had a better explanation of the project by staff, Councilmember Neils explained the-tethod used to determine estimated costs and Engineer James Olson explained the drastic increases in the cost of bituminous material and oil contributed to the rapid escala- tion of street construction costs, Engineer Moore stated there was a large difference between the costs estimated in the preliminary engineering report and the final costs, but the difference betwetr the contractor's bid and final costs was minimal, Ron Peschon, 5960 Hemlock Lane, objected to his assessment for 61st v3ienue s- nce he has no access to it. Mr. Peschon expressed concern that he will be assessed for Hemlock Lane in the future and stated this assessment, added to future assessments for sewer and water, would be substantially more than the increase ire the value of his property, Kathie Chan, 6000 Goldenrod Lane, objected to the increase in costs for streets and stated that the project should have been completed with more expediency and the long delays caused the increase in costs, Jeannine Jennwold, 11715 - 61st Avenue h,, asked whn will pay for the cost for street repairs on 61st Avenue, Councilmen er Neils stated there is a two-year warranty on road work. Engineer Olson stated settlemen', and corrective work was done by the contractor at his expense anu none of these extra costs were included in the costs assessed, Mike Flynn. 11805 - 61st Avenue, objected to the excessive cost oorrst- reet construction, Dar ell Hammond, 5075 Goldenrod Lane, objected estimated costs and claimed his assessment was exceed the value of his property. Mr. Hammond ment be reduced to $5,314. to the increase over excessive and would asked that his assess - Ronald E. White, 11605 - 61st Avenue, asked that the term of the assessment be increased from 15 to 20 years to give property owners some relief, John DeHaven. 11515 - 61st Avenue, questioned lift station costs, and objecte7 to delays in construction and the mistakes made by the contractor, Engineer Moore explained what costs the Water Trunk Fuld paid iii the project. M.•, DeHaven questioned huw residents benefitted from the extra depth of the sanitary sewer on 61st Avenue, Engineer Muore explained only lots benefitting from it were paying the cost for the extra depth, 285- F] Special Council Meeting August 25. 1980 P?ge 286 Faith Vierzba, 6015 Goldenrod Lane, asked why the cul-de-sac on Odenrod was removed. Engineer Moore stated the cul-de-sac would have increased the project costs and the curbing •1oilowed the are of the right-of-way. E. T. Mosb . 60''; Goldenrod, objected to removal of the cul-ue-sac and a s e when t street will be cleaned up and the lot lines determined. Engineer Olson replied consideration was given to cutting down the cul-de-sac because the land was so wet it would be difficult to build a road there that would not break down. Mr. Mosby asked wiry the manhole was left outside the curbing. Engineer Olson replied it is a sanitary sewer manhole and is not for drainage. Councilmember Neils stated during the final clean-up the unused area behind the curb will be graded and covered with grPss and those costs are included the project costs. Kathleen Chan, 0000 Goldenrod, stated the lift station is one- haaTir acre6779-ound at the bottom of her property and she asked if this area rill be landscaped. Mrs. Chan stated the area will never be restored to its former condition due to the great degree of erosion that took place durieg construction. Joe Welter. 5920 Hemlock Lane, questioned who would pay for the upgradtiTof Hemlock Lane in the future. Mayor Hunt stated the developer will pay for his half of the road and there will be a public hearing for beriritting properties who will be assessed for the remaining portion. toe DeHaven requested the Council to work with the Asses!ment rom itt a 7o relieve the property owners of the excessive burden of this assessment. Mr. DeHaven inquired how he can be sure the final clean-up of the project will be completed. Mayor Hunt asked Mr. DeHaven to work with the City Engineer and to keep him advised of the progress of the clean-up work. Ronald White stated he has a problem with hic eeive and he would a7t to be corrected during the final clean-up* The hearing was closed at 10:30 p.m. Councilmember Neils stated he was in favor of increasing the time period over which the assessments are spread with the Manager's input relative to the payback period for the bonds. Manager Willis stated it could be done in this instance given the magnitude of these assessments. MOTION was made by Councilmember Davenport, seconded by Council- member Neils. to defer action on Project 908 for further review by the Assessment Committee. Motion carried, five ayes. Council recessed from 10:45 to 10:55 p.m. 286. Special Council Meeting August 25, 1980 Page 287 I. Assessment Roll - Prt ject 813 - Oakview Lane Improvement Engineer Wore reviewed the project in detail and the costs involved stating the extra construction costs due to the contractor's errors were not included in the cost of the project. Mayor Hunt open -i the public hearing at 10:55 p.m. Manager Willis stated the City received written objections to the assessment for Project 813 from the following: Jon D. LaVasseur, Irene Rasp, Mr. b Mrs. Alden Ranisati, Mr. b Mrs. Earl W. Rowbottom, Mr. B Mrs. W. 9. Leyendecker, Mr. & Mrs. Roy Hemenway, Mr. & Mrs. Donald Roiger, Mr. 8 Mrs. Herbert R. Childs, Mr. b Mrs. Marc Weisenburger, Mr. b Mrs. Jerry L. Olson, Mr. a Mrs. Lars Korsgren, Mr. 8 Mrs. John Hedstrom, Mr. 8 Mrs. Mark Markkula, Mr. a Mrs. James Holmlund, Mr. d Mrs. Kenneth F. Mix, Mr. A Mrs. Kevin DeJohnson, Mr. & Mrs. Robert E. Sundin, David C. Rahn, Mr. a Mrs. Dale 8runeau, Mr. b Mrs. Robert J. Rowbottom, Judd A. Kotte, Mr. 8 Mrs. Kenneth W. Larson, Mr. & Mrs. Robert E. Cope, Mr. b Mrs. Cecil Grandprey, Mr. 8 Mrs. Walter C. Nielsen, Mr. 8 Mrs. William 1.6 Kramer, Mr. A Mrs. Karl G. Tomaschewski, Mr. 8 Mrs. J. Makela, Mr. 8 Mrs. lames E. Kuzmic, Mr. a Mrs. Arthur E. Larson. PUBLIC HEARING ASSESSMENT ROU PROJECT 813 OAKVIEW LANE IMPROVEMEN' Item 7-I Mickey Singer, attorney for Oakview residents, stated the residents claim the storm sewer was not a public improvement and i benefits only one piece of property, Mr. Schumacher at 1900 Oakview Lane, Mr. Singer claimed none of the residents had a drainage problem on their property and they have not benefitted from this project. He stated further the problem on Mr. Schumacher's lot still exists. Mr. Singer stated the residents asked for relief from the storm sewer assessment and feel it should be borne by the City of by Mr. Schumacher. Mr. Singer stated the residents also objected to the ?ncrease in costs over the bids. Engineer Moore stated the bid does not include the engineering costs, inspection costs and easement costs and all other costs associated with the project, which generally run approximately 20% of the overall construction costs. Mr. Singer objected to the increa!e in the area costs from the time of the original public hearing. Doris Kramer, 2125 Oakview Lane, objected to the increase 1n area costs from"those—indicated at the first hearing. Ms. Kramer asked someone to inspect the culvert next to her house which is deeper than it was originally and could'be dangerous. Donald Roi er, 1745 Oakview Lane, stated he lives in the southern part Of e pro ect and his water does not drain into the storm sewer. He stated the cost of the project shoul be spread over both sides of the roaJ and complained that the project Looks two years' time to construct. Mrs. Herbert Childs, 1805 Ua kv i ew Lane, claimed there has been no improve- ment of the draIRRge across her lot since the storm sewer was installed and she has not received any benefit from the project. 287. 9 Special Council Mee -e : ng August 25, 1980 Page 288 Bob Sundin, 2001 Oakview lane, claimed the former storm sewer was a equate or the area and the project was unnecessary. He objected to the increased area charges and felt the construction delays added to the cost of the project and resulted in them having to pay the Increased area charges. We Sundin asW that consideration be given to charging the original area charges indicated at the first hearing. Ken Mix, 1417 Oakview Lane, objected to the project because it changed the grade of the rosd and has resulted in causing water to back up into his backyard. Mr.. Mix objem, . to paying the increased area charges because of delays in coiestruction. Mr. Si er stated the contras tor's error in tearing up the whole ro nad of half the road delayed the project and resulted in higher area charges for the project. Dolores Sundin, 2001 Oakview lane, claimed the assessment hearing was plannedfor January or February at which time they .+ould have been charged the original area charges. Mayor Hunt rept i Qd assessment hearings are always held in the late summer ana *0',. The hearing was closed at 11:30 p.m. Mayor Hunt requested staff to provide timetables as to what effect the construction delays had on this project. MOTION was made by Courrcilmember Neils, seconded by Councilmember Davenport, to defer action on Project 813 until the Assessment Committee reviews the storm sewer assessment and area charges. Motion carried, five ayes. J. Assessment Roll - Project 806 - Supplemental Heari TARCe - - - -0003 Hunt opened the public hearing at 11:34 p.m. on PUBLIC HEARING ASSESSMENT ROLL PROJECT 806 PARCEL 2-118-22-33-0003 item 1-J Sherman Goldbe , representing Luncgre n Bros. Construction, std eter Pflawn had expressed his objection to the assess- ment for Project 806 in his letter dated August 22, 1980. The hearing was closed at 11:35 p.m. MUNN was made by Councilmember DIeils, seconded by Councilmember Schneider, to defer action on Project 806 until further review by the Assessment Committee. Motion carried, five ayes. Special Council Meeting August 25, 1988 Page 28'9 K. Vacation of Drainage and Utility Easements - Circle Star Business Center Addition Mayor Hunt opened the public hearing at 11.40 p.m. Jin Benson, representing the developer, spnk-ts ir, favor or vacs n9 "the easements. The hearing was clued at 11:41 p.m. MOTION was made by Couixilmuiber Hoyt, seconded by Councilmember Neils, to adopt RESOLUTION N0. 80-5859 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE VACATION OF A PORTION OF THE DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT ON LOT 1, BLOC': 1, CIRCLE STAR BUSINESS CENTER ADDITION. Notion carried on a Rol! Call vote, five ayes. L.Vacation of Oakview Lane and Adjacent Easements in Wind 4 at a =s a a AdditiFn Mayor Hunt opened the public hearing at 11:42 p.m. Sher -+an Goldberg, representing Lundgren Bros. Construction, spool'ee inof vor of the vacation. The hearing was closed at 11:43 p.m. MOTION was made by Ccuncilmember Schneider, seconded by Council - member Neils, to adopt RESOLUTION N0. 80-586, A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING VACATION OF OAKVIEW LANE AND ADJACENT EASEMENTS IN WIND RIDGE AT BASS LAKE ADDITION. Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes. M. Vacation of Street and Easements - Mission Ponds 2nd Addition Mayor Hunt opened the public hearing at '11:44 p.m. Sherman Goldberg, representing Lundgren Bros. Construction, spa a in favor of the vacation. The hearing was closed at 11:45 p.m. MOTION was made by Councilmember Davenport, seconded by Colinil- member Neils, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 80-587, A RESOLPTION AUTHORIZING THE VACATION OF ALL EASEMENT IN MISSION PONDS 2ND ADD IT ION. PUBLIC HEARING EASEMENT VACATION CIRCLE STAR BUSINE DN Item 7-K RESOLUTION NO. 80-585 OF DRAINAGE b UTILITY EASEMENTS - CIRCLE STAR BUSINESS CENTER ADDITION Item 7-K PUBLIC HEARING STREET VACATION WIND RIDGE AT BASS LAKE Item 7-L RESOLUTION N0. 80-586 OAKVIEW LANE a EASEMENTS WIND RIDGE AT BASS LAKE Item 7-L PUBLIC HEARING STREET VACATION MISSION PONDS 2ND ADDN. Item 7-M RESOLUTION N0. 80-587 ALL EASEMENTS IN MISSION PONDS 2ND ADDN. Item 7-M Motion carrieO on a Roll Call vote, five ayes. N. Revenue Sharing Proposed Use Hearing PUBLIC HEARING REVENUE SNARING Mayor Hunt opened the public hearing at 11:45 p.m. PROPOSED USE Item 7-N 2e9- Special Council Meeting August 25, 1980 Page 290 Manager Willis stated he recommended that the 1981 allocation of 135,000 of revenue sharing funds be used for expansion of the northwest parkin lot at the City Center and to finish the expansion space in the lower level of the City Center to make it available for rental. The Manalger stated revenue sharing funds have traditionally been used for non-recurring capital expenditures. The hearing was closed at 11:46 p.m. Councilme,nber Davenport spoke ,igainst the proposed use of $74,000 for the expansion of the City Center parking lot. MOTION was made by Mayor Hunt, seconded by Councilmember Neils, to accept the recommendation of the staff with the provision that a public hearing be called if there is a change in the proposed use of these funds. Motion carried, five ayes. PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS Manager Willis stated the B -T LAnd Company to the development contract for Cedar Ridge assessments for Project 804 and eliminating of costs associated with that project, is s requested amendments Plat II stipulating the references made to bonding Rick Murray, representing B -T Land Company, spoke in favor of the contract amendment. MOTION was made by Councilmember Neils, seconded by Councilmember Hoyt, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 80-588, A RESOLUTION AMENDING DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT FOR CEDAR RIDGE PLAT II. Motion carried on a Roll Cali vote, five ayes. MOTION was made by Counc i 1 member Hoyt,, seconded by Councilmember Neils, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 80-589, A RESOLUTION APPROVING SITE PLAN AMENDMENT FOR BUHLER-MIAG, INC. AT 1100 XENIUM LANE. Motion carried on a Poll Call vote, five ayes. MOTION was made by Councilmember Hoyt, seconded by Counc i i irember Neils, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 80-590, A RESOLUTION APPROVING SITE PLAN AMENDMENT FOR TRAMMEL-CROWE COMPANY FOR SITE LOCATED EAST OF I-494 SOUTH OF 13TH AVENUE NORTH (79003). Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes. Councilmember Neils left the table. Manager Willis introduced request for approval of revised Pre- f i,iwary Plat for Wind Ridge at Bass Lake (A-755). Sherman Goldberg, representing Lundgren Bros. Construction, requested the Assessment Committee to review the assessment for Pineview lane, Project 806. 290- RESOLUTION N0. 80-588 AMENDING DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT FOR CEDAR RIDGE PLAT 1I Item 8-A RESOLUTION N0. 80-589 APPROVING SITE P -LAK AMENDMENT FOR BUHLER-MIAG, INC. A-646) Item 8-8* RESOLUTION N0. 80-590 APPROVING SITE L AMENDMENT FOR TRAMMEL -CROW CO. 79003) Item 8-C* REVISED PRELIMINARY PLAT WIND RIDGE AT BASS LAKE Item 8-D Special Council W.eting August 25, 1980 Pa ge 291 MOTION was made by Councilmember Schneider, seconded by Lcuncil.. member Hoyt, to adopt RESOLUTION N0. 80-591, A RESOLUTION APPROVING REVISED PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR LUNDGREN BROS. CONS-TRUCTION CO. FOR WIND RIDGE AT BASS LAKE AT THE NORTHEAST QUADRANT OF THE SOO LINE RAILROAD TRACKS AND PINEVIEW LANE (A-755). Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, four ayes.. MOTION was made by Cc ,mc 11 member Hoyt, sec ondPi by Council- member ounci1- member Schneider, to adopt RESOLUTION N0,, 80-592, A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT AND OEVE!.OPMENT CONTRACT FOR WIND RIDGE AT BASS LAKE 2ND ADDITIOII FGR LUNDGREN BROS. CGIISTRUCTiON CO. Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, four ayes. MOTION was made by Councilmember Schneider, secondee by Council - member Hoyt, to adopt RESOLUTION N0. 80-593, 4 RESOLUTION SETTING CONDITIONS TO BE MET PRIOR TO FLING FINAL PLAT FOR WIND RIDGE AT BASS LAKE 2WO ADDITION FOR LUND(AEN BROS. CONSTRUCTION CG. (A-755). Motion carri,d on a Roll Call vote, four ayes. Councilmember "eils returned to the table. MOTION was made by Councilmember Hoyt, seconded by Council - member Schneider, to adopt RESOLUTION N0. 80-594, A RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT AND FINAL RPUD PLAN FOR MISSION PONDS SECOND ADDITIOM REVISED FOR MISSION PARTNERSHIP (A-338). Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes. MOTION was made by Councilmember Hz)yt. seconded by Council - member Schneider, to adopt A RESOLUTION SETTING CONDITIONS TO BE MET PRIOR 70 FILING OF FINAL PLAT OF MISSION PONDS 2nd ADDITION REVISED FOR MISSION PARTNERSHIP (A-338). Sherman Goldberg. representing Mission Partnership. requested that lteF77nThe Engineer's Memorandum requiring utility services for six units that will not be used to be disconnected and removed from the sewer ind water main. Mr. Goldberg asked that they be allowed to rcw.ove the stem instead of disconnecting the line. Engineer Moore stated problems would result if service disconnectioas are not done properlto to prevent leakage in the future. MOTION TO AMEND was made by `ayor Hunt, seconded by Councilmember Neils, to substitute the following for Item 7 of the Engineer's Memorandum: "stater services shat! be required to have stem removed and indicated on as -built drawings and sewer services not used also designated on the as -built drawings* Mbtion to amend carried, five ayes. 291. RES L,U T ON N0. 80-5.8 nEVISED PRELIMINARY PLAT WIND RIDGE AT BASS LAKE A-155) Item 8-D RESOLUTION N0APPROVINGr 80 a DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT WIND RIDGE AT BASS LAKE 2ND ADDITION (A-155) Item 8-D RESOLUTION N0. 80-593 c TTING CONDITIONS FOR FINAL PLAT WIND RIDGE AT BASS LAKE 2ND ADDITION (A-755) Item 8-D RESOLUTION h0. 80-'. a FINAL RPUD PLAN MISSION PONDS 2ND ADDN.. REVISED (A-338) Item 6-E RESOLUTION N0. 80-595 FOR FINAL PLAT MISSION PONDS 2ND ADDN. REVISED (A-338) Item 8-E Special Council Meeting August 25, 1980 Pa ge 292 Mr. Guldberg objected to Item 4 of the Engineer's Memorandiffn statina the trail corridor is not part of the Mission Ponds Second Addition, but part of the Mission hills Park Addition, and it is not in keeping with City policy to require asphalt trails without giving credit for park dedication. Councilmember Neils asked it it was the developer's intention tG grade the trail all along Zachary lane. Mr. Goldberg replied the trail would be graded to the end of the Fourth Addition, MOTION TO AMEND was made by Mayor Hunt, seconded by Councifi eember Neils, substituting the foilo-ring for Item 4 of the Engineer's Memorandum: "The developer smallppave the trail from 36th Avenue North to the south line of Block 3, Lot 3, of Mission Hills Park and the City will pay the cost of blacktopl,ing from the south line of Block 3, Lot 3, northerly tt) 39u Avenue North, with appropriate amendment to Item 13.1 of the development contract." Motion to amend carried, ;ive ayes. MOTION to adopt RESCLUTI.IN NO. 80-595, as amended, carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes. MOTION was made by Councilmember Hoyt, seconded by Council - member Neils, to adopt RESOLUCION N0, 80-5960 A RESOLUTION APPROVING LOT CONSOL'"1TION FOR MAE COTTRELL FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2320 LARCH LANE NORTH (19052). Motion carried on a Roll Call vot(%. five ayes. WO'ION was made by Councilmember Hoyt, seconded by Council - member Neils, to adopt RESOLUTION N0. 80-597, A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING PETITION FOR IMPROVEMENT TO 19TH AVENUE NORTH IN OAKDALE WEST VIA A PROPOSED CONNECTION TO HIGHWAY 101. Motion carried on a Rol'i Call vote, five ayes. MOTION was made by Councilmember Hoyt, seconded by Council - member Neils;, to adopt RESOLUTION N0. 80-598, A RESOLUTION APPROVING REDUCTION OF DEVELOPMENT BOND FOR FOX GLEN ADDITION TO THE AMOUNT OF $349922 TO REFLECT THE COMPLETED WORK. Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes. MOTION was made by Councilmember Hoyt, member Neils. to adopt RESOLUTION NO. APPROVING RELEASE OF DEVELOPMENT BOND TO REFLECT THE COMPLETED WORK. seconded by Counc i 1- 80-599, A RESOLUTION FO% WESTLAWN ADDITION Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes. MOTION was made by Councilmember Hoyt, seconded by Co+mci1- member Neils, to adop' RESOLUTION N0. 80-600. A RESOLUTION APPROVING CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 FOR PROJECT N0. 8021 LARCH LANE STREET IMPROVEMENT, BY ADDING $21.125.00 TO THE EXISTING CONTRACT PRICE OF $424,997.6ii. 29Z. RESOLUTION N0. £0-596 XMWMNG LOT CONSOL- MAE COTTRELL 179052) Item b -f* RESOLUTION N0. 80-597 XCCEPTMG-PETITIOMIR IMPROVEMENT TO 19TH AVE. IN OAKDALE WEST Item 6-0 RESOLUTION N0. 80-1%498 APPROVING BOND REUt ION FOX GLEN ADDITION A-814) Item 8-H-1+ RESOLUTION N0. 80-599 APPROVINd BOND RELE WESTLAWN ADDITION A-267) Iter. 8-H-2* RESOLUTION NO* 80-600APPROVINGCHANGEM PROJECT N0. 802 LARCH LANE STREETS Item 8-I• Special Council Meeting August 25, 1980 Page 293 Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes. MOTION was made by founci Imerber Hoyt, seconded member Neils, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 80-601, A AUTHORItIN6 PAYMENT ON REQUEST FOR PAYMENT N0. OF $950.59 TO PSG/AMERICAN CONSULTING SERVICES 1979 SANIT;RY SEWER TV WORK. Notion carried on a Roll Cali vote, five ayes. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS by Cou nc i 1- RFSOLUTION 4 IN THE AMOUNT FOR PROJECT 951, Manager Willis reviewed the proposal for constructing and financing a new building to house the League of Minnesota Cities in St. Paul and recommending Option 1 -Lump Sum Payment be selected for payment. MOTION was made by Councilmember Hoyt, seconded by Councilmember Neils, to adopt RESOLUTION N0. 80-6039 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PAYMENT OF $89108 TO THE LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES FOR PLYMOUTH'S SHARE OF THE PROPOSED BUILDING PROJECT TO BE PAID BY OPTION 1. Notion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes. The Mayor announced that the Council would consider the bids which had been received fGr the purchase of $6,660,000 General ubligation Bonds of 1980, consisting of $5,900,000 General Obligation Bnnds of 1980 and $375,000 General Obligation Storm Sewer Bonds of 1980, as advertised for sale. The City Clerk presented affidavits showing publication of notice of sale in the official newspaper and in Com- mercial West, a financial paper published in Minneapolis, Minnesota, which affidavits were examined and found satisfactory and ordered placed on file. The City Clerk presented the sealed bids which had been received prior to the time specified in the notice of sale, which were then opened and tabulated. The bids were as follows: Bid #1 - Price $6,555,662.60 Net Interest Cost $3,225,156.15 Net Incerest Rate 7,3819% Piper, .,affray 8 Hopwood S Assoc-iatgs, Minneapolis, MN Bid #2 - Price $6,558,385.19 Net Interest Cost $3009,621.04 Net Interest Rate 7.5752% Continental Illinois National Bank 8 Trust Company, Chicago, Illinois MOTION was made by Councilmember Hoyt, seconded by Council - member Davenpo"t, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 80-602, A RESOLUTION AWARDING THE SALE OF $61,66U,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS OF 1980; LONSISTING OF $5,900,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT BONDS OF 1980; AND $385.000 GENERAL OBLIGATION STORM SEWER BONDS OF 1980; AND $375,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION WATER AND SEWER REVENUE BONDS OF 1980; FIXING THEIR FORM AND SPECIFICATIONS; DIRECTING THEIR EXECUTION AND DELIVERY; AND PROVIDING FOR THEIR PAYMENT TO PIPER, JAFFRAY 8 HOPWOOD 8 ASSOCIATES OF MINNEAPOLIS. MN. Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes. 99. I;f SOLUTION N0. 80-1 1T=ST M_V9VR RT PROJECT N0. 951 1979 SANI'iARY SEWER TV WORK Item 8-J• RESOLUTION N0. 80-603 LEAGUE OF MN. CITIES BUILDING PROJECT Item 9-A' 1980 GENERAL BOND SALE Item 6 OBLIGATION RESOLUTION N0. 80.602 AgARDING 0 GENERAL OBLIGATIO IMPROVEMENT BONDS Item 5 Special Council Meeting August 25, 1980 Page 294 MOTION was made by Councilmember Hoyt, seconded by %ouncil- member Davenport, to adopt RESOLUTION N0, 80-6049 A RZSOLUTION ADOPTING ASSESSMENTS IN THE AMWAT OF $499269.74 FOR PROJECT N0, 0069 EMPIRE LANE IMPROVEMEt:TS. Motion carried on a Roll Call Note, five ayes. Council deferred review of the Second Quarter Financial Report until the September 2 Council meeting. MOTION was made by Councilmember Hoyt, seconded by Council - member Neils, to approve staff's recomwndation`or the pro- posal to lease the lower level expansion space of the City Center to the Hennepin County Agricultural Extension Service. Motion ca:•ri epi , five ayes. The meeting adjourned at 12:50 a.m. 11 r RESOLUTION NO. 80-604 ADOPTINGE NS PROJECT 110. 006 EMPIRE LANE IMPROVEMENT Item 7-D SECOND QUARTER FINANCIAL REPORT Item 9-E3 LEASE: OF CITY CENTER EXPANSION SPACE TO HENNEPIN COUNTY AG 'EXTENSION SERVICE I tem 9-C•