HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Minutes 08-25-1980 SpecialIt
Page 280
A special meeting of
at 7:30 p.m. in the
on August 25, 1980:
M I N U T E S
S'ECIAL COUNCIL MEETING
August 25, 1980
the Plymouth City Council was called to order by Mayor Hunt
Council Chambers of the City Center at 3400 Plymouth Boulevard
PRESENT: Mayor Hunt. Councilmembers Davenport, Hoyt, Reils and Schneider, Maruger
Willis, Administrative Assistant Boyles, Engineer Moore, Planner Tremere,
Finance Director Ricker and Attorney Lefler,
ABSENT: None.
CONSENT AGENDA
MOTION was made by Councilmpn;ber Hoyt; seconded by Council- CONSENT AGENDA
mecher Nei1s9to adept the items Gn the Consent Agenda with the Item 4
exception of Item 9-A.
Motion carried on a Roll Cal' vote, five a%/es.
MINUTES
MOTION was made by Councilmember Schneider, seconded by Council- MINUTES - REGULAR
member Hoyt, to approve the minutes of the August 18, 1980 COUNCIL MEETING
regular Council meeting as submitted. AUGUST 18, 1980
Item 5•
Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes.
Mayor Hunt requested Council to defer Item 6 till later in the 1980 IMPROVEMENT
meeting in deference to the people in attendance for the public BOND SALE
hearings. Item 6
PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Assessment Roll. Project 909 - 26th Avenr Improvement
Engineer Moore reviewed Project 909 in detail and the costs
involved and stated the City has received no written objec-
tions to the project.
Mayor Hunt opened the public hearing at 7:55 p.m.
No one chose to speak and the hearing was closed at 7:55 p.m.
MOTION was made by Counrilmember Davenport, seconded by Cournil-
member Neils, to adopt RESOLUTION N0. 80-5811 A RESOLUTION
ADOPTING ASSESSMENTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $86,341.38 FOR PROJECT
N0. 909, 26TH AVENUE IMPROVEMENT.
Motion carried on a Roll Call vote. five ayes.
480-
PUBLIC HEARINGS
ASSESSMENT ROLL
PROJECT 909
26TH AVE. IMPROVEMENT
Item 7-A
RESOLUTION N0. 80-581
ADOPTING ASSESSMENTS'
PROJECT 909
26TH AVE. IMPROVEMENT
Item 7-A
Special Council Meeting
August 25, 1980
Page 281 '\
B. Assessment Roll - Project 829 - Ridgecrest Area Improvements PUBLIC HEARING
ASSESSMENT ROLL
Engineer Moore reviewed the project in detail and the costs PROJECT 829
involved. Manager Willis stated no written objections to RIDGECREST AREA
the project have been received. Item 7-B
Mayor Hunt opened the public hearing at 7:56 p.m.
ShirleyStensrud, 3051 Quaker Lane, expressed concern about the
pond on her property that was draired during the storm sewer
project. Ms. Stensrud stated she (lid not wish to lose the pond
or the wildlife in the area and DNi requires teat it be restored.
Consulting Engineer Olson stated the pond was-eestablished as
part of the storm sewer project a id the inlet to the storm .ewer
can be adjusted to increase the level of water in the po,id- Mr.
Olson stated they have complied with the DNR pe nait required for
this project. Ms. Stensrud inquired who was filling the pond on
the south side. Engineer Mo%,.•e replied Mr. Dempsey, a developer
in Mission Ridge, has been servtc! a stol rder but he has continued
to fill the pond. Mr. Moore stated ONR n also been notified of
his actions. Ms. Stansrud stated a sma'1 section of blacktop on the
west end of 31st Avenue has been dug up and restored, leaving a hole
with a jagged edge in the street. Ms. Stensrud also requested that
31st be posted as a dead erd street.
Carmen Vethe, 10210 - 31st Avenue N.. requested that the hole on
JISt Avenue be repaired and the street be posted as a dead end.
Mr. Vethe also inquired why their assessment was for a 5 -year period
rather than 15 years. Mayor Hunt replied this project was done on
the basis of a development contract. which has a 5 -year assessment
period.
Claes Svensson, 2935 Quaker Lane, inquired when tip drainage problems
in Lhe area w 11 be corrected and questioned the ownership of 15 feet
at the north end of his property.
Audra Preu, 2925 Quaker Lane, asked when the drainage prcblem on
ie IOL w be corrected. Consulting Engineer Harlan Olson replied
it will be corrected when the final clean-up is completed. Mr. Olson
commented with regard to the pond in the area that DNR requires that
it be restored to the dimensions of 50 x 50 x 2 feet.
Paul Preus, 2925 Quaker Lane, asked whether the pond in question was
on the east or west side of Quaker Lane,
Nick Loscheider, 1425 Louisiana Avenue h., inquired if his 25% develop-
ment eposit was included in this assessment. Engineer Moore replied
his assessment reflected the remainder of the costs after the 25% deposit.
Parwood 'Hmeggen, 5027 Sheridan Lane, stated the pond in q%aestion was
once a gar en until the creek was dammed up. Mr. Heggen stated he
owns two lots in the area that he wishes to build on and he would like
to see the pond completely drained. He stated 1f the pond 6's drained
it will affect the size of his lots. Engineer Moore replied this piece
of property is classified as wetland.
291 y
J
O
Special Council Meeting
August 25, 1980
Page 282
K man, 2885 Quaker Lane N., stateH all the problems in the project
area should have been correcfpd before tht assessment hearing.
The hearing was closed at 8:35 p.m.
NOTION was made by Mayor hunt, seconded by Councilmember Hoyt to direct
staff to investigate DNR's requirements for restoration of the pond,
and accomplish the blacktop corrections, restaking of lots, and all
items mentioned at the hearing including clean-up of the area and resodding.
Motion carried, five ayes.
140TION was made by Councilmember Neils, seconded by Council -
member Hoyt, to aJopt RESOLUTION NO, 80-5829 A RESOLUTION
ADOPTING ASSEFSMENTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $4359181.61 FOR PROJECT
NO. 829 - RIDCECREST AREA IMPROVEMENTS.
Motion carried an a Roll Call vote, five ayes.
MOT'ON was made by Councilmember Neils, seconded by Council-
membL•r Hoyt, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 80-582A, A RESOLUTION
ADOPTING ASSESSMENTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $1129100.11 FOR PRO-
JECT NO. 829 - rIDGECREST AREA I:",:'ROVEMENTS.
Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes.
C. Assessm-nt Rall - Pro ect 924 - 163th Avenue Improveavnts
Manager Willis stated Mr. Kurt Woodhouse of Trammel -Crow
has indicated he was satisfied with the project costs.
Mayor Hunt opened the public hearing at 8:40 p.m.
No one chose to speak and the hearing was closed at 8:4v p.m.
RESOLUTION NO. 80-682
ADOPTINEISSESSMENTS,
PROJECT 829
RIDGECREST AREA
Item 7.6
RESOLUTION NO. 80-582A
D SSESSI E'NTS
PROJECT 820
RIDGECREST AREA
Item 7-B
PUBLIC HEARING
ASSESSMENT ROLL
PROJCCT 924
13TH AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS
Item 7-C
MOTION was made by Councilmember Hoyt, seconded by Council- RESOLUTION N0. 80-583
member Mails, to adopt RESOLUTION N0, 80-583, A RESOLUTION ADOPTING A.SSTSSMENTF
ADOPTING ASSESSMENTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $82,623.91 FOR PROJECT PROJECT 924
NO. 924- 13TH AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS. 13Th AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS
Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five a.es.
Item 7-C
D. Assessment Roll - Project 006 - Empire 1_3ne Improvements PUBLIC HEARING
Manager Willis stated the City has received no written
objections to Project 006.
Mayer Hunt opned the public hearing at 8:41 p.m.
No one ct:ase to speak and the hearing wa! closed at 8:41 p.m,
MOTION was made by Councilmember Hoyt, seconded by Councilmember
Schneider, to adopt a Resolution Adopting Assessments in the
amount o $9.269.74 for Project No. 006 - Empre Lane Improvements,
SUBSTITUTE MOTION was made by Councilmember Hoyt. seconded by
Councilmember Schneider, to defer action on Project 006 until
after consideration of Item 6.
Substitute motion carried, five ayes.
282-
Special Council Meeting
August 25, 1980
Page "1.83
E. Assessment W1 - Project 707 - Seven Ponds Area Improvements PUBLIC HEARING
ASSESSMENT ROLL
Engineer Moore reviewed Project 707 in detail and the costs PROJECT 707
involved. Manager Willis stated he Inas received written SEVEN PONOS AREA
objections to the project from the following: Carle T. Item ;-E
Anderson, Jr, in behalf of Mr. & Mrs. Douglas Hart, Charlton
Consolidated Cos., Inc. and Al Hilde, Jr,
Mayr Hunt opened the public hearing at 8:44 p.m.
Earle T. Anderson Jr. representing Mr, & Mrs. Douglas Hart,
Tb b -County Road 24, objected to the assessment for three lots and
claimed due to the configuration and topography of the property, it
is undel:eopable without extensive expense. He stated the three ponds
on the property also make it not easily divisible. Mr. Anderson claimed
the $48,000 assessment makes -he property unsaleable, and he asked that
it be assesseA as a single parcel. Counzilmember Neils replied the
assessment v -as based on the fact that three lots can be placed on the
400 feet of frontage along the north side of the property.
John Nelson, 17130 County Road 24, stated there was a discrepan=y be-
tweentmensions of his lot on the plat map and his recorded deed
and he asked which takes pvecedence. Manager Willis stat_d this 12
feet was part of a conveyance of property that involved subdivision
of a parcel that has nc,t yet been filed. Maycr Hunt asked the staff
to research this and report back to Council.
James Johnston, representing Charlton Cos., Inc., questioned the defer-
ment of theirsewer and water assessment. Manager Willis stated their
parcel Is only a portion of a larger holding and because the sanitary
sewer lateral bctnefi t was not extended to the rest of the parcel, he
recommended deferring the assessment until development plans are for-
mulated for tnat parcel. Councilmember Neils suggested a petition for
consolidation of the parcel viould express their inLEnt of development.
The hearir.; ;zs closed at 9.00 p.m.
MOTION was made by Councilmember Hoyt, seconded by Councilmember Neils,
to defer action on Project 707 until further review by the Assessment Committee.
Motion curriF d, five ayes.
F, Assessment Roll - Project 944 - Wlndsong Addition Improver,,ents PUBLIC HEARING
ASSESSMENT ROIL
Manager Willis stated the City has not received any writteK PROJECT 944
objections to Project 944, WINDSONG ADDITION
Mayor Hunt opened the public hearing at 9:02 p,m, Item 7-F
John Nelson, 17330 County Roa4 24, stated he was oriSinal1v included
n the even Ponds Area and asked why he is not part of that project,
Councilmember Neils stated the plat was pr000sed after the Seven Ponds
project was ordered.
The Learing was closed at 9:03 p.m,
G.
H,
Special Council Meeting
August 25, 1980
Page 284
MOTION was made by Councilmember Davenport, seconded by Councilmember
Neils, to defer action on Project 944 until further reaiew by the
Assessment Committee.
Motion carried, five ayes.
Assessment Roll - Project 921 - Hadley P'lacelQueensland Lane
Engineer Moore reviewed the project in detail and the costs
involved. Mayor Hunt opened the public hearing at 9:05 p.m.
Manager Willis stated the City has received no written ob-
jections to Project 921,
Susan Sorrentino, 525 Queensland Lane, objected to
Tor sanitary sewer along Hadley Lake and inquired
assessed twice for sewer. Mayor Hunt stated part
sewer along Hadley Lake was assumed by the City as
they were being assessed for area charges only at
their property is developed, they will be assessed
The hearing was closed at 9:12 p.m,
PUBLIC HEARING
ASSESSMENT ROLL
PROJECT 921
HADLEY PLACE/
QUEENSLAND LANE AREA
Item 7-G
the assessment
if they were being
of the cost for the
a trunk cost, and
this time. When
for lateral benefit.
MOTION was made ty Councilmember Neils, seconded by Council -
member Hoyt, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 80-584, A RESOLUTION
ADOPTING ASSESSMENTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $92,999.59 FOR PROJECT
NO. 921, HADLEY GLACE/QUEENSLAND LANE AREA IMPROVEMENTS.
Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes.
MOTION was made 16y Councilmember Neils, seconded by Council -
member Hoyt, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 80-580, A RESOLUTION
ADOPTING ASSESSMENTS IN THE 101OUNT OF $4.7099.10 FOR PROJECT
NO. 921, HADLEY PLACE/QUEENSLAND LANE AREA IMPROVEMENTS.
Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes.
Assessment Roll - Project 809 - Pike Lake Area Improvements
Engineer Mcore reviewed the project in detail ind the costs
involved. Maycr Hunt opened the public hearing at 9:15 p,m.
Manager Willis stated he has received written objections to
assessments for Project 809 from the following: Darrell D.
Hanmiond, Dr. Patrick D. Jemerson, Dr. 8 Mrs, Ronald E. White,
John A, Watkins, Bary Kaurala, Ronald J. Peschon, Mr- $ Mrs,
Richard C. Vierzbe, Mr, Mrs. Norman C. Wold, Mr. S .ors. John
M. Priestley, Mr. 8 Mrs. E. ,1, Mosby, Mr, Roger W, Heuer, Mr,
Donald Gustayson, Judith Bakken, Mr. 8 Mrs. Donald R. Noble,
Rosemary Preschl, Robert M. Stoffen, Chryl Hall, Mr. 8 Mrs,
William Sylvester, M.•. A Mrs, Joseph F. Walter. John A. Chan,
Mr, 8 Mrs, Michael A. Flynn, Mr, A Mrs, John R. DeHaven, Mr.
John R, Schwartz, Mr. 8 Mrs, David Blashack, Judy Betterath,
and Lot 2, Hemlock Lane Addition,
284 -
RESOLUTION NO. 80-584
ADOPT1%S EOT
PROJECT 921
HADLEY PLACE/QUEENSLAND
Item 7-G
RESOLUTION NO, 80-584A
ADOPTING ASSESSMENTS
PROJECT 921
HADLEY PLACE/QUEENSLAND
Item 7-G
PUBLIC HEARING
PROJECT 809
PIKE LAKE AREA
Item 7-H
AREA
AREA
Special Council Meeting
August 25, 1980
Page 285
Or, Patrick D. Jimerson, 11615 - 61st Av3nue N,, stated he objected
to e bids e ng exceeded by as much as 70% in some cases; 2)
the cost of construction errors on 61st Avenue; and 3) he would have
liked to have had a better explanation of the project by staff,
Councilmember Neils explained the-tethod used to determine estimated
costs and Engineer James Olson explained the drastic increases in the
cost of bituminous material and oil contributed to the rapid escala-
tion of street construction costs, Engineer Moore stated there was
a large difference between the costs estimated in the preliminary
engineering report and the final costs, but the difference betwetr
the contractor's bid and final costs was minimal,
Ron Peschon, 5960 Hemlock Lane, objected to his assessment for 61st
v3ienue s- nce he has no access to it. Mr. Peschon expressed concern
that he will be assessed for Hemlock Lane in the future and stated
this assessment, added to future assessments for sewer and water,
would be substantially more than the increase ire the value of his
property,
Kathie Chan, 6000 Goldenrod Lane, objected to the increase in costs
for streets and stated that the project should have been completed
with more expediency and the long delays caused the increase in costs,
Jeannine Jennwold, 11715 - 61st Avenue h,, asked whn will pay for the
cost for street repairs on 61st Avenue, Councilmen er Neils stated
there is a two-year warranty on road work. Engineer Olson stated
settlemen', and corrective work was done by the contractor at his
expense anu none of these extra costs were included in the costs
assessed,
Mike Flynn. 11805 - 61st Avenue, objected to the excessive cost
oorrst- reet construction,
Dar ell Hammond, 5075 Goldenrod Lane, objected
estimated costs and claimed his assessment was
exceed the value of his property. Mr. Hammond
ment be reduced to $5,314.
to the increase over
excessive and would
asked that his assess -
Ronald E. White, 11605 - 61st Avenue, asked that the term of the
assessment be increased from 15 to 20 years to give property owners
some relief,
John DeHaven. 11515 - 61st Avenue, questioned lift station costs,
and objecte7 to delays in construction and the mistakes made by
the contractor, Engineer Moore explained what costs the Water Trunk
Fuld paid iii the project. M.•, DeHaven questioned huw residents
benefitted from the extra depth of the sanitary sewer on 61st Avenue,
Engineer Muore explained only lots benefitting from it were paying
the cost for the extra depth,
285-
F]
Special Council Meeting
August 25. 1980
P?ge 286
Faith Vierzba, 6015 Goldenrod Lane, asked why the cul-de-sac on
Odenrod was removed. Engineer Moore stated the cul-de-sac would
have increased the project costs and the curbing •1oilowed the are
of the right-of-way.
E. T. Mosb . 60''; Goldenrod, objected to removal of the cul-ue-sac
and a s e when t street will be cleaned up and the lot lines
determined. Engineer Olson replied consideration was given to
cutting down the cul-de-sac because the land was so wet it would
be difficult to build a road there that would not break down.
Mr. Mosby asked wiry the manhole was left outside the curbing.
Engineer Olson replied it is a sanitary sewer manhole and is
not for drainage. Councilmember Neils stated during the final
clean-up the unused area behind the curb will be graded and
covered with grPss and those costs are included the project costs.
Kathleen Chan, 0000 Goldenrod, stated the lift station is one-
haaTir acre6779-ound at the bottom of her property and she asked
if this area rill be landscaped. Mrs. Chan stated the area will
never be restored to its former condition due to the great degree
of erosion that took place durieg construction.
Joe Welter. 5920 Hemlock Lane, questioned who would pay for the
upgradtiTof Hemlock Lane in the future. Mayor Hunt stated the
developer will pay for his half of the road and there will be
a public hearing for beriritting properties who will be assessed
for the remaining portion.
toe DeHaven requested the Council to work with the Asses!ment
rom itt a 7o relieve the property owners of the excessive
burden of this assessment. Mr. DeHaven inquired how he can
be sure the final clean-up of the project will be completed.
Mayor Hunt asked Mr. DeHaven to work with the City Engineer
and to keep him advised of the progress of the clean-up work.
Ronald White stated he has a problem with hic eeive and he
would a7t to be corrected during the final clean-up*
The hearing was closed at 10:30 p.m.
Councilmember Neils stated he was in favor of increasing the time
period over which the assessments are spread with the Manager's
input relative to the payback period for the bonds. Manager Willis
stated it could be done in this instance given the magnitude of
these assessments.
MOTION was made by Councilmember Davenport, seconded by Council-
member Neils. to defer action on Project 908 for further review
by the Assessment Committee.
Motion carried, five ayes.
Council recessed from 10:45 to 10:55 p.m.
286.
Special Council Meeting
August 25, 1980
Page 287
I. Assessment Roll - Prt ject 813 - Oakview Lane Improvement
Engineer Wore reviewed the project in detail and the costs
involved stating the extra construction costs due to the
contractor's errors were not included in the cost of the
project.
Mayor Hunt open -i the public hearing at 10:55 p.m.
Manager Willis stated the City received written objections
to the assessment for Project 813 from the following:
Jon D. LaVasseur, Irene Rasp, Mr. b Mrs. Alden Ranisati,
Mr. b Mrs. Earl W. Rowbottom, Mr. B Mrs. W. 9. Leyendecker,
Mr. & Mrs. Roy Hemenway, Mr. & Mrs. Donald Roiger, Mr. 8 Mrs.
Herbert R. Childs, Mr. b Mrs. Marc Weisenburger, Mr. b Mrs.
Jerry L. Olson, Mr. a Mrs. Lars Korsgren, Mr. 8 Mrs. John
Hedstrom, Mr. 8 Mrs. Mark Markkula, Mr. a Mrs. James Holmlund,
Mr. d Mrs. Kenneth F. Mix, Mr. A Mrs. Kevin DeJohnson, Mr. &
Mrs. Robert E. Sundin, David C. Rahn, Mr. a Mrs. Dale 8runeau,
Mr. b Mrs. Robert J. Rowbottom, Judd A. Kotte, Mr. 8 Mrs.
Kenneth W. Larson, Mr. & Mrs. Robert E. Cope, Mr. b Mrs. Cecil
Grandprey, Mr. 8 Mrs. Walter C. Nielsen, Mr. 8 Mrs. William 1.6
Kramer, Mr. A Mrs. Karl G. Tomaschewski, Mr. 8 Mrs. J. Makela,
Mr. 8 Mrs. lames E. Kuzmic, Mr. a Mrs. Arthur E. Larson.
PUBLIC HEARING
ASSESSMENT ROU
PROJECT 813
OAKVIEW LANE IMPROVEMEN'
Item 7-I
Mickey Singer, attorney for Oakview residents, stated the residents
claim the storm sewer was not a public improvement and i benefits
only one piece of property, Mr. Schumacher at 1900 Oakview Lane,
Mr. Singer claimed none of the residents had a drainage problem
on their property and they have not benefitted from this project.
He stated further the problem on Mr. Schumacher's lot still exists.
Mr. Singer stated the residents asked for relief from the storm sewer
assessment and feel it should be borne by the City of by Mr. Schumacher.
Mr. Singer stated the residents also objected to the ?ncrease in costs
over the bids. Engineer Moore stated the bid does not include the
engineering costs, inspection costs and easement costs and all other
costs associated with the project, which generally run approximately
20% of the overall construction costs. Mr. Singer objected to the
increa!e in the area costs from the time of the original public hearing.
Doris Kramer, 2125 Oakview Lane, objected to the increase 1n area costs
from"those—indicated at the first hearing. Ms. Kramer asked someone to
inspect the culvert next to her house which is deeper than it was
originally and could'be dangerous.
Donald Roi er, 1745 Oakview Lane, stated he lives in the southern part
Of e pro ect and his water does not drain into the storm sewer.
He stated the cost of the project shoul be spread over both sides of
the roaJ and complained that the project Looks two years' time to construct.
Mrs. Herbert Childs, 1805 Ua kv i ew Lane, claimed there has been no improve-
ment of the draIRRge across her lot since the storm sewer was installed
and she has not received any benefit from the project.
287.
9
Special Council Mee -e : ng
August 25, 1980
Page 288
Bob Sundin, 2001 Oakview lane, claimed the former storm sewer was
a equate or the area and the project was unnecessary. He objected
to the increased area charges and felt the construction delays added
to the cost of the project and resulted in them having to pay the
Increased area charges. We Sundin asW that consideration be
given to charging the original area charges indicated at the first
hearing.
Ken Mix, 1417 Oakview Lane, objected to the project because it
changed the grade of the rosd and has resulted in causing water
to back up into his backyard. Mr.. Mix objem, . to paying the
increased area charges because of delays in coiestruction.
Mr. Si er stated the contras tor's error in tearing up the whole
ro nad of half the road delayed the project and resulted in
higher area charges for the project.
Dolores Sundin, 2001 Oakview lane, claimed the assessment hearing
was plannedfor January or February at which time they .+ould have
been charged the original area charges. Mayor Hunt rept i Qd
assessment hearings are always held in the late summer ana *0',.
The hearing was closed at 11:30 p.m.
Mayor Hunt requested staff to provide timetables as to what effect
the construction delays had on this project.
MOTION was made by Courrcilmember Neils, seconded by Councilmember
Davenport, to defer action on Project 813 until the Assessment
Committee reviews the storm sewer assessment and area charges.
Motion carried, five ayes.
J. Assessment Roll - Project 806 - Supplemental Heari
TARCe - - - -0003
Hunt opened the public hearing at 11:34 p.m.
on PUBLIC HEARING
ASSESSMENT ROLL
PROJECT 806
PARCEL 2-118-22-33-0003
item 1-J
Sherman Goldbe , representing Luncgre n Bros. Construction,
std eter Pflawn had expressed his objection to the assess-
ment for Project 806 in his letter dated August 22, 1980.
The hearing was closed at 11:35 p.m.
MUNN was made by Councilmember DIeils, seconded by Councilmember
Schneider, to defer action on Project 806 until further review by
the Assessment Committee.
Motion carried, five ayes.
Special Council Meeting
August 25, 1988
Page 28'9
K. Vacation of Drainage and Utility Easements - Circle Star
Business Center Addition
Mayor Hunt opened the public hearing at 11.40 p.m.
Jin Benson, representing the developer, spnk-ts ir, favor or
vacs n9 "the easements.
The hearing was clued at 11:41 p.m.
MOTION was made by Couixilmuiber Hoyt, seconded by Councilmember
Neils, to adopt RESOLUTION N0. 80-5859 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING
THE VACATION OF A PORTION OF THE DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT
ON LOT 1, BLOC': 1, CIRCLE STAR BUSINESS CENTER ADDITION.
Notion carried on a Rol! Call vote, five ayes.
L.Vacation of Oakview Lane and Adjacent Easements in Wind
4 at a =s a a AdditiFn
Mayor Hunt opened the public hearing at 11:42 p.m.
Sher -+an Goldberg, representing Lundgren Bros. Construction,
spool'ee inof vor of the vacation.
The hearing was closed at 11:43 p.m.
MOTION was made by Ccuncilmember Schneider, seconded by Council -
member Neils, to adopt RESOLUTION N0. 80-586, A RESOLUTION
AUTHORIZING VACATION OF OAKVIEW LANE AND ADJACENT EASEMENTS
IN WIND RIDGE AT BASS LAKE ADDITION.
Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes.
M. Vacation of Street and Easements - Mission Ponds 2nd Addition
Mayor Hunt opened the public hearing at '11:44 p.m.
Sherman Goldberg, representing Lundgren Bros. Construction,
spa a in favor of the vacation.
The hearing was closed at 11:45 p.m.
MOTION was made by Councilmember Davenport, seconded by Colinil-
member Neils, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 80-587, A RESOLPTION
AUTHORIZING THE VACATION OF ALL EASEMENT IN MISSION PONDS 2ND
ADD IT ION.
PUBLIC HEARING
EASEMENT VACATION
CIRCLE STAR BUSINE DN
Item 7-K
RESOLUTION NO. 80-585
OF
DRAINAGE b UTILITY
EASEMENTS - CIRCLE STAR
BUSINESS CENTER ADDITION
Item 7-K
PUBLIC HEARING
STREET VACATION
WIND RIDGE AT BASS LAKE
Item 7-L
RESOLUTION N0. 80-586
OAKVIEW LANE a EASEMENTS
WIND RIDGE AT BASS LAKE
Item 7-L
PUBLIC HEARING
STREET VACATION
MISSION PONDS 2ND ADDN.
Item 7-M
RESOLUTION N0. 80-587
ALL EASEMENTS IN
MISSION PONDS 2ND ADDN.
Item 7-M
Motion carrieO on a Roll Call vote, five ayes.
N. Revenue Sharing Proposed Use Hearing PUBLIC HEARING
REVENUE SNARING
Mayor Hunt opened the public hearing at 11:45 p.m. PROPOSED USE
Item 7-N
2e9-
Special Council Meeting
August 25, 1980
Page 290
Manager Willis stated he recommended that the 1981 allocation of
135,000 of revenue sharing funds be used for expansion of the
northwest parkin lot at the City Center and to finish the expansion
space in the lower level of the City Center to make it available for
rental. The Manalger stated revenue sharing funds have traditionally
been used for non-recurring capital expenditures.
The hearing was closed at 11:46 p.m.
Councilme,nber Davenport spoke ,igainst the proposed use of $74,000 for
the expansion of the City Center parking lot.
MOTION was made by Mayor Hunt, seconded by Councilmember Neils,
to accept the recommendation of the staff with the provision
that a public hearing be called if there is a change in the
proposed use of these funds.
Motion carried, five ayes.
PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
Manager Willis stated the B -T LAnd Company
to the development contract for Cedar Ridge
assessments for Project 804 and eliminating
of costs associated with that project,
is s requested amendments
Plat II stipulating the
references made to bonding
Rick Murray, representing B -T Land Company, spoke in favor of the
contract amendment.
MOTION was made by Councilmember Neils, seconded by Councilmember
Hoyt, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 80-588, A RESOLUTION AMENDING
DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT FOR CEDAR RIDGE PLAT II.
Motion carried on a Roll Cali vote, five ayes.
MOTION was made by Counc i 1 member Hoyt,, seconded by Councilmember
Neils, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 80-589, A RESOLUTION APPROVING
SITE PLAN AMENDMENT FOR BUHLER-MIAG, INC. AT 1100 XENIUM LANE.
Motion carried on a Poll Call vote, five ayes.
MOTION was made by Councilmember Hoyt, seconded by Counc i i irember
Neils, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 80-590, A RESOLUTION APPROVING
SITE PLAN AMENDMENT FOR TRAMMEL-CROWE COMPANY FOR SITE LOCATED
EAST OF I-494 SOUTH OF 13TH AVENUE NORTH (79003).
Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes.
Councilmember Neils left the table.
Manager Willis introduced request for approval of revised Pre-
f i,iwary Plat for Wind Ridge at Bass Lake (A-755).
Sherman Goldberg, representing Lundgren Bros. Construction,
requested the Assessment Committee to review the assessment
for Pineview lane, Project 806.
290-
RESOLUTION N0. 80-588
AMENDING DEVELOPMENT
CONTRACT FOR CEDAR
RIDGE PLAT 1I
Item 8-A
RESOLUTION N0. 80-589
APPROVING SITE P -LAK
AMENDMENT FOR
BUHLER-MIAG, INC.
A-646) Item 8-8*
RESOLUTION N0. 80-590
APPROVING SITE L
AMENDMENT FOR
TRAMMEL -CROW CO.
79003) Item 8-C*
REVISED PRELIMINARY PLAT
WIND RIDGE AT BASS LAKE
Item 8-D
Special Council W.eting
August 25, 1980
Pa ge 291
MOTION was made by Councilmember Schneider, seconded by Lcuncil..
member Hoyt, to adopt RESOLUTION N0. 80-591, A RESOLUTION
APPROVING REVISED PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR LUNDGREN BROS. CONS-TRUCTION
CO. FOR WIND RIDGE AT BASS LAKE AT THE NORTHEAST QUADRANT OF THE
SOO LINE RAILROAD TRACKS AND PINEVIEW LANE (A-755).
Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, four ayes..
MOTION was made by Cc ,mc 11 member Hoyt, sec ondPi by Council-
member
ounci1-
member Schneider, to adopt RESOLUTION N0,, 80-592, A RESOLUTION
APPROVING FINAL PLAT AND OEVE!.OPMENT CONTRACT FOR WIND RIDGE
AT BASS LAKE 2ND ADDITIOII FGR LUNDGREN BROS. CGIISTRUCTiON CO.
Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, four ayes.
MOTION was made by Councilmember Schneider, secondee by Council -
member Hoyt, to adopt RESOLUTION N0. 80-593, 4 RESOLUTION
SETTING CONDITIONS TO BE MET PRIOR TO FLING FINAL PLAT FOR
WIND RIDGE AT BASS LAKE 2WO ADDITION FOR LUND(AEN BROS.
CONSTRUCTION CG. (A-755).
Motion carri,d on a Roll Call vote, four ayes.
Councilmember "eils returned to the table.
MOTION was made by Councilmember Hoyt, seconded by Council -
member Schneider, to adopt RESOLUTION N0. 80-594, A RESOLUTION
APPROVING FINAL PLAT AND FINAL RPUD PLAN FOR MISSION PONDS
SECOND ADDITIOM REVISED FOR MISSION PARTNERSHIP (A-338).
Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes.
MOTION was made by Councilmember Hz)yt. seconded by Council -
member Schneider, to adopt A RESOLUTION SETTING CONDITIONS
TO BE MET PRIOR 70 FILING OF FINAL PLAT OF MISSION PONDS
2nd ADDITION REVISED FOR MISSION PARTNERSHIP (A-338).
Sherman Goldberg. representing Mission Partnership. requested
that lteF77nThe Engineer's Memorandum requiring utility
services for six units that will not be used to be disconnected
and removed from the sewer ind water main. Mr. Goldberg asked
that they be allowed to rcw.ove the stem instead of disconnecting
the line. Engineer Moore stated problems would result if service
disconnectioas are not done properlto to prevent leakage in the
future.
MOTION TO AMEND was made by `ayor Hunt, seconded by Councilmember
Neils, to substitute the following for Item 7 of the Engineer's
Memorandum: "stater services shat! be required to have stem removed
and indicated on as -built drawings and sewer services not used
also designated on the as -built drawings*
Mbtion to amend carried, five ayes.
291.
RES L,U T ON N0. 80-5.8
nEVISED
PRELIMINARY PLAT
WIND RIDGE AT BASS LAKE
A-155) Item 8-D
RESOLUTION N0APPROVINGr
80
a
DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT
WIND RIDGE AT BASS LAKE
2ND ADDITION (A-155)
Item 8-D
RESOLUTION N0. 80-593
c TTING CONDITIONS
FOR FINAL PLAT
WIND RIDGE AT BASS LAKE
2ND ADDITION (A-755)
Item 8-D
RESOLUTION h0. 80-'.
a FINAL RPUD PLAN
MISSION PONDS 2ND ADDN..
REVISED (A-338)
Item 6-E
RESOLUTION N0. 80-595
FOR FINAL PLAT
MISSION PONDS 2ND ADDN.
REVISED (A-338)
Item 8-E
Special Council Meeting
August 25, 1980
Pa ge 292
Mr. Guldberg objected to Item 4 of the Engineer's Memorandiffn
statina the trail corridor is not part of the Mission Ponds
Second Addition, but part of the Mission hills Park Addition, and
it is not in keeping with City policy to require asphalt trails
without giving credit for park dedication. Councilmember Neils
asked it it was the developer's intention tG grade the trail
all along Zachary lane. Mr. Goldberg replied the trail would
be graded to the end of the Fourth Addition,
MOTION TO AMEND was made by Mayor Hunt, seconded by Councifi eember
Neils, substituting the foilo-ring for Item 4 of the Engineer's
Memorandum: "The developer smallppave the trail from 36th Avenue
North to the south line of Block 3, Lot 3, of Mission Hills Park
and the City will pay the cost of blacktopl,ing from the south
line of Block 3, Lot 3, northerly tt) 39u Avenue North, with
appropriate amendment to Item 13.1 of the development contract."
Motion to amend carried, ;ive ayes.
MOTION to adopt RESCLUTI.IN NO. 80-595, as amended, carried on a
Roll Call vote, five ayes.
MOTION was made by Councilmember Hoyt, seconded by Council -
member Neils, to adopt RESOLUCION N0, 80-5960 A RESOLUTION
APPROVING LOT CONSOL'"1TION FOR MAE COTTRELL FOR PROPERTY
LOCATED AT 2320 LARCH LANE NORTH (19052).
Motion carried on a Roll Call vot(%. five ayes.
WO'ION was made by Councilmember Hoyt, seconded by Council -
member Neils, to adopt RESOLUTION N0. 80-597, A RESOLUTION
ACCEPTING PETITION FOR IMPROVEMENT TO 19TH AVENUE NORTH IN
OAKDALE WEST VIA A PROPOSED CONNECTION TO HIGHWAY 101.
Motion carried on a Rol'i Call vote, five ayes.
MOTION was made by Councilmember Hoyt, seconded by Council -
member Neils;, to adopt RESOLUTION N0. 80-598, A RESOLUTION
APPROVING REDUCTION OF DEVELOPMENT BOND FOR FOX GLEN ADDITION
TO THE AMOUNT OF $349922 TO REFLECT THE COMPLETED WORK.
Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes.
MOTION was made by Councilmember Hoyt,
member Neils. to adopt RESOLUTION NO.
APPROVING RELEASE OF DEVELOPMENT BOND
TO REFLECT THE COMPLETED WORK.
seconded by Counc i 1-
80-599, A RESOLUTION
FO% WESTLAWN ADDITION
Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes.
MOTION was made by Councilmember Hoyt, seconded by Co+mci1-
member Neils, to adop' RESOLUTION N0. 80-600. A RESOLUTION
APPROVING CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 FOR PROJECT N0. 8021 LARCH
LANE STREET IMPROVEMENT, BY ADDING $21.125.00 TO THE
EXISTING CONTRACT PRICE OF $424,997.6ii.
29Z.
RESOLUTION N0. £0-596
XMWMNG LOT CONSOL-
MAE COTTRELL 179052)
Item b -f*
RESOLUTION N0. 80-597
XCCEPTMG-PETITIOMIR
IMPROVEMENT TO 19TH AVE.
IN OAKDALE WEST
Item 6-0
RESOLUTION N0. 80-1%498
APPROVING BOND REUt ION
FOX GLEN ADDITION
A-814) Item 8-H-1+
RESOLUTION N0. 80-599
APPROVINd BOND RELE
WESTLAWN ADDITION
A-267) Iter. 8-H-2*
RESOLUTION NO* 80-600APPROVINGCHANGEM
PROJECT N0. 802
LARCH LANE STREETS
Item 8-I•
Special Council Meeting
August 25, 1980
Page 293
Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes.
MOTION was made by founci Imerber Hoyt, seconded
member Neils, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 80-601, A
AUTHORItIN6 PAYMENT ON REQUEST FOR PAYMENT N0.
OF $950.59 TO PSG/AMERICAN CONSULTING SERVICES
1979 SANIT;RY SEWER TV WORK.
Notion carried on a Roll Cali vote, five ayes.
REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
by Cou nc i 1-
RFSOLUTION
4 IN THE AMOUNT
FOR PROJECT 951,
Manager Willis reviewed the proposal for constructing and financing
a new building to house the League of Minnesota Cities in St. Paul
and recommending Option 1 -Lump Sum Payment be selected for payment.
MOTION was made by Councilmember Hoyt, seconded by Councilmember
Neils, to adopt RESOLUTION N0. 80-6039 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE
PAYMENT OF $89108 TO THE LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES FOR PLYMOUTH'S
SHARE OF THE PROPOSED BUILDING PROJECT TO BE PAID BY OPTION 1.
Notion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes.
The Mayor announced that the Council would consider the bids which
had been received fGr the purchase of $6,660,000 General ubligation
Bonds of 1980, consisting of $5,900,000 General Obligation Bnnds of
1980 and $375,000 General Obligation Storm Sewer Bonds of 1980, as
advertised for sale. The City Clerk presented affidavits showing
publication of notice of sale in the official newspaper and in Com-
mercial West, a financial paper published in Minneapolis, Minnesota,
which affidavits were examined and found satisfactory and ordered
placed on file. The City Clerk presented the sealed bids which had
been received prior to the time specified in the notice of sale,
which were then opened and tabulated. The bids were as follows:
Bid #1 - Price $6,555,662.60
Net Interest Cost $3,225,156.15
Net Incerest Rate 7,3819%
Piper, .,affray 8 Hopwood S Assoc-iatgs, Minneapolis, MN
Bid #2 - Price $6,558,385.19
Net Interest Cost $3009,621.04
Net Interest Rate 7.5752%
Continental Illinois National Bank 8 Trust Company,
Chicago, Illinois
MOTION was made by Councilmember Hoyt, seconded by Council -
member Davenpo"t, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 80-602, A RESOLUTION
AWARDING THE SALE OF $61,66U,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS OF 1980;
LONSISTING OF $5,900,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT BONDS OF
1980; AND $385.000 GENERAL OBLIGATION STORM SEWER BONDS OF 1980;
AND $375,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION WATER AND SEWER REVENUE BONDS OF
1980; FIXING THEIR FORM AND SPECIFICATIONS; DIRECTING THEIR
EXECUTION AND DELIVERY; AND PROVIDING FOR THEIR PAYMENT TO PIPER,
JAFFRAY 8 HOPWOOD 8 ASSOCIATES OF MINNEAPOLIS. MN.
Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes.
99.
I;f SOLUTION N0. 80-1
1T=ST M_V9VR RT
PROJECT N0. 951
1979 SANI'iARY SEWER
TV WORK Item 8-J•
RESOLUTION N0. 80-603
LEAGUE OF MN. CITIES
BUILDING PROJECT
Item 9-A'
1980 GENERAL
BOND SALE
Item 6
OBLIGATION
RESOLUTION N0. 80.602
AgARDING 0
GENERAL OBLIGATIO
IMPROVEMENT BONDS
Item 5
Special Council Meeting
August 25, 1980
Page 294
MOTION was made by Councilmember Hoyt, seconded by %ouncil-
member Davenport, to adopt RESOLUTION N0, 80-6049 A RZSOLUTION
ADOPTING ASSESSMENTS IN THE AMWAT OF $499269.74 FOR PROJECT
N0, 0069 EMPIRE LANE IMPROVEMEt:TS.
Motion carried on a Roll Call Note, five ayes.
Council deferred review of the Second Quarter Financial Report
until the September 2 Council meeting.
MOTION was made by Councilmember Hoyt, seconded by Council -
member Neils, to approve staff's recomwndation`or the pro-
posal to lease the lower level expansion space of the City
Center to the Hennepin County Agricultural Extension Service.
Motion ca:•ri epi , five ayes.
The meeting adjourned at 12:50 a.m.
11
r
RESOLUTION NO. 80-604
ADOPTINGE NS
PROJECT 110. 006
EMPIRE LANE IMPROVEMENT
Item 7-D
SECOND QUARTER
FINANCIAL REPORT
Item 9-E3
LEASE: OF CITY CENTER
EXPANSION SPACE TO
HENNEPIN COUNTY
AG 'EXTENSION SERVICE
I tem 9-C•