HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Minutes 03-26-1974 SpecialC
Page 107
n
MINUTES
SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING
March 26, 1974
MINUTES
SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING
March 26, 1974
A special meeting for public hearings on the proposed public improvement Project
No. 305 - Vicksburg Lane Street Improvement - from Courty Road,6 to County Road
15 - was called to order by Mayor'Hilde at 7:40 P.M. in the Wayzata High 'School
Cafeteria, 305 Vicksburg Lane, Wayzata,
PRESENT: Mayor Hilde, Councilmen Hunt, Neils, Spaeth and Seibold, Manager Willis,
Engineer Goldberg, Planner Overhiser, Consulting Engineers Otto Bonestroo
and Jim Olson, and Attorney John Drawz,
4BSENT: None.
Mayor Hilde welcomed the citizens and introduced the Council and staff members,
Manager Willis explained the purposes of this meeting. He stated since the
initial building of the roadway and community development, that there has been
an awareness of an ultimate need for an improvement of Vicksburg Lane, The'
Council and staff, after much deliberation and consideration, have decided to
consider the installation of improvements at this time. He pointed out Uat the
citizens would have the opportunity to question the proposed improvements and
express their views.
Mr. Willis also rept\rtes that the meeting NO been announced, through (a) notices
published in the off-Jci ' newspaper, the Plymouth Sun, (March 14 and March 21);
b) notices mailed to each property owner in the improvement areas as shown by
the records of the Hennepin County Auditor's tax statement mailing list; (c) announce-
ment, and discussions at Council meetings; and (d) newspaper write-ups which reported
the Council's discussion of the subject,
Pts, cited the staff preparation of informational sheets, distributed to attendants,
which included clarification and examples of the City's assessment policies.
Mr. Willis reviewed the prepared matter for purposes of further clarification.
He explained that the project, as proposed by the Preliminary Report, considers
F the construction of a 9 ton, 44 foot wide bituminous roaday with concrete curb
and gutter, storm sewer, 6 foot wide sidewalk, 8 foot wide bituminous bicycle
path and providing for sanitary sewer and water main service to the unpl atted
property north of 3rd Avenue on the east side of Vicksburg !ane. He also pointed
to the estimated cost distribution, as follows: Residential Assessments, $99,866,00;
Commercial/Industrial Assessments, $199,545,00; Plymouth's Share, (which will
come from MSA funds), $212,144 -- for a total cost of $511,555,00,
Mr. Willis pointed out that the meeting is for the purpose of an improvement
hearing, not an assessment nearing, Should the project be approved, an assessment
hearing would be held sometime in the future:, following construction,
Mayor Hilde offered comments re the amount of time the Council and staff have
devoted to consideration of the project. He cited four criteria: (a) there is
no need for a big, fast road; (b) a new toad surface is needed; (c) we need a
safe place for bikers and walkers; and (d) we should attempt to utilize State
in7.
0
0
G
A special meeting for public hearings on the proposed public improvement Project
No. 305 - Vicksburg Lane Street Improvement - from Courty Road,6 to County Road
15 - was called to order by Mayor'Hilde at 7:40 P.M. in the Wayzata High 'School
Cafeteria, 305 Vicksburg Lane, Wayzata,
PRESENT: Mayor Hilde, Councilmen Hunt, Neils, Spaeth and Seibold, Manager Willis,
Engineer Goldberg, Planner Overhiser, Consulting Engineers Otto Bonestroo
and Jim Olson, and Attorney John Drawz,
4BSENT: None.
Mayor Hilde welcomed the citizens and introduced the Council and staff members,
Manager Willis explained the purposes of this meeting. He stated since the
initial building of the roadway and community development, that there has been
an awareness of an ultimate need for an improvement of Vicksburg Lane, The'
Council and staff, after much deliberation and consideration, have decided to
consider the installation of improvements at this time. He pointed out Uat the
citizens would have the opportunity to question the proposed improvements and
express their views.
Mr. Willis also rept\rtes that the meeting NO been announced, through (a) notices
published in the off-Jci ' newspaper, the Plymouth Sun, (March 14 and March 21);
b) notices mailed to each property owner in the improvement areas as shown by
the records of the Hennepin County Auditor's tax statement mailing list; (c) announce-
ment, and discussions at Council meetings; and (d) newspaper write-ups which reported
the Council's discussion of the subject,
Pts, cited the staff preparation of informational sheets, distributed to attendants,
which included clarification and examples of the City's assessment policies.
Mr. Willis reviewed the prepared matter for purposes of further clarification.
He explained that the project, as proposed by the Preliminary Report, considers
F the construction of a 9 ton, 44 foot wide bituminous roaday with concrete curb
and gutter, storm sewer, 6 foot wide sidewalk, 8 foot wide bituminous bicycle
path and providing for sanitary sewer and water main service to the unpl atted
property north of 3rd Avenue on the east side of Vicksburg !ane. He also pointed
to the estimated cost distribution, as follows: Residential Assessments, $99,866,00;
Commercial/Industrial Assessments, $199,545,00; Plymouth's Share, (which will
come from MSA funds), $212,144 -- for a total cost of $511,555,00,
Mr. Willis pointed out that the meeting is for the purpose of an improvement
hearing, not an assessment nearing, Should the project be approved, an assessment
hearing would be held sometime in the future:, following construction,
Mayor Hilde offered comments re the amount of time the Council and staff have
devoted to consideration of the project. He cited four criteria: (a) there is
no need for a big, fast road; (b) a new toad surface is needed; (c) we need a
safe place for bikers and walkers; and (d) we should attempt to utilize State
in7.
0
0
li Special Council Meeting
Marsh 26, 1974
Page 108
Ai d+s for thf r project., He explained the concept of State Aids,
Planner Overhiser reported on the background and development of' the Thoroughfare
Plan. He also explained the terminology used and the classification system for
roadways.
Manager Willis introduced Jim.01son, Consulting EAgireer from the firm of
6onestroo, Rosene, Anderlik and Associates, Inc. Mr. Olson explained what the
project would include and showed a,slide presentation, which indicated problems
of the existing surfacing and drainage, and gave examples of sidewalk and retai ntng
Wall- placement.
Man:N,ger Willis explained the procedure for the open hearing. The public hearing
opened at 9:05 P.M. by Mayor Hilde,
Ed Ginsbach, 15610 5th Avenue North, resented a petition, sined by 467 persons,
Which asked the Council to consider their ct.,Ientions that (a? a rural section
roadway is adequate; ;b) a rural section will qualify for State Aids; (c) an
expanded thoroughfare is not needed; (d) a thoroughfare of four lanes will
en'dhnger the lives of young people.in the area.
Frank Ferrin, 715 Vicksburg Lane, stated that for expediency, the next three
speakers would represent area residents.
Mike Andei*t, 600 Vicksburg Lane, related a concern about safety, primarily
for ;.hi ldren.
Josef K. Wang, M.D., 310 Vicksburg Lane, expressed a concern that the widening
of Vicksburg Lane would produce reckless di ri of ng and noise and air pollution.
He said it would change the now peaceful neighborhood. And could provide a
deterioration cf the qu.0 ity of life. He urged a more conservation project.
Al Osmera, 625 Vicksburg Lane, asked the following questions:
1. Why couldn't a rural section be used, rather than an urban section?
2. Why is backs 1 opi ng required?
3. Why not use a 40 frot roadway, rather than 44 foot? Mr. Osmera stated
that he oel ieved 40 Foot would meet State Aid requirements,
0
4, How much traffic is the roadway expected to carry?
5. Were not bike paths eliminated from consideration at previous Council
consideration?
6. When was the traffic count taken? At what time of ,yea"? How is it corp.rable
to today's standards?
74 Who is responsible for snow removal?
R. The estimated cost is $511,000 -- what if the bid comes it: for $700,000,
will they, proceed?
Re safety, Manager Willis indicated that a safety feature was being t glad, in
that the sidewalks will encourage children to use the walks rather than, the street.
11 0
Special Council Meeting;
March 26,, 1974
Page. 109
Re traffic, Mr. Olson indicated the ire would probably be a slight increase Immedi-
ately.
mmedi-
ately. He )believed traffic would b) grow ling regardless of an improvement project,
Re neighborhood deterioration, Planner Overhiser reiterated that every effort
was being made to save trees and that safety would be improved.
Re backsloping, Mr. Olson explainedthat curb and gutter would be used, as
opposed to retaining walls and shallow ditchs for a rural section, because the
latter would be costlier,
Re State Aids, Engineer Goldberg explained that the minimum desirable width for a
two lane street for State Aids was 44 foot, and that 44 foot road is considered
a two lane roadway.
Re bike patios, Mayor Hilde explained that bike paths were included in the Preliminary
Report, on the east side of the road. The Council has discussed the possibility
of having a bike path in the Street,
Re traffic count, Engineer Goldberg explained that the count is based on a combination
of weekly and daily averages, tabulated on a week per month and two day (48 hour)
count process. He added that a count is taken every five years, per State requirement,
Re snow removal on sidewalks, Manager Willis s`._ted that this problem will take
further consideration.
Re cost estimates, Mayor Hilde explained that the Council has ai rected the staff
to bring in higher quality prelininary reports. Mr. Olson added that his firm
made every effort to be conservative and to take into consideration the volatile
cost structure.
Bruce Chase, 15920 14th Avenue North, asked if State Aids had been used for the
improvement of 36th Avenue. Reply: no,
Mr, Chase also asked if there was a master plan to extend Vicksburg Lane to Wayzata
Boulevard. Reply: no,
J. Gasner, 16110 9th Avenue Nortl, said that the proposal would provide drainage
into his backyard, and would cause flooding. Mr, Olson replied that Mr. Gasner
was correct, but that the City of Plymouth would follow due process regarding
any necessary easements,
George Kreatz, 16010 14th Avenue North, expressed a concern over the costs to
other than residential property owners.
Richard Corby, 210 Vicksburg Lane, expressed concern over a traffic build-up
on Vicksburg lane, He also said the chunk holes serve to slow traffic.
KCn Wagner, 15900 9th Avenue North, asked host much State Aid money had been
collected for Vicksburg Lane, and how much will go back to the street, Manager
Willis stated that substantially less had been received for the street than
would be expended on it, Councilman Hunt added that the street had been originally
built with MSA funds,
Councilman Hunt at this time replied to an earlier question of Mr, dsmera,
re bids substantially higher than Qstimates. He and Mayor Hilde related a provious
109-
Special Council -Meeting
March 26, 1974
Page 110
experience whereby a special meeting was called, at which the putiic had the
opportunity to express their views,on higrer bid prices than had been expected.
Pat Dye, 15820 7th Avenue North, asked if there would be another public hearing
if the roadway were to become four lane at some futuve time, Mav)r Hilde
responded that it would not be legally required, lut that the future Council
could decide to act accordingly. Ms. Dye also noted that. the State did not
require 44 foot, but found it'desiraole, Mayor Hilde concurred, but added
that the Council had the responsibility of determining what the community's needs
are,
Gordon W, Rabens, 16320 9th Avenue North, expressed a concern re snow removal.
Mayor Hilde explained that there was no easy answer, reiterating the dileffea
of saving trees vs. snow removal problems, Mr, RabarS suggeste! moving the
roa:way on the east side. Mayor,Hilde acknowledged that as a possibility;
and Mr. Olson saki, that from an engineering standpoint, the suggestion was
feasible and would create no unusual construction p;•oblems,
Rc ger Rausch, 715 Ranchvi ew Lar,e, disputed the need for a four lane ; oadway
and compared the proposal for Vicksburg Lane to Highway 55,
11
john Millet-, 16035 8th Avenue North, asked if the thorough,`are benefits the
entire community, why the Vicksburg Lane area is being assessed, , Manager
illis explained that residents are to be assessed only as they WouU be on any
esidential street the rest is naid for by the City of Plymouth,
Mr, Miller also asked why they were to be assessed ftTr storm sewer if not di i ectly
affected. Mayor Hilde explained the City's assessment policy,
el D. Martin, 15615 3rd Avenue North, made the folioiving points: (a) the refer-
ence to "ultimate four lane bothered him; (b) he disagreed that there would
be substantial additional traffic; (c) he would like a c,trrent traffic count;
d) there are not many other bike paths and si dewal ins in the area; and (e) with
increased traffic c:ming from outside the neighborhood, will there be a decrease
in their assessments?
Manager Willis responded that it is reasonable to assume that traffic wi;l continue
to hui 1 d up, as it has continued to grow in the past, Mayor Hi l tie stated that
bike paths and sidewalks are relatively nel, in Plymouth, and arti: being implemented
on all new projects where practiceab:e.
Councilman Neils commented that oth v comparable streets have nct encountered
traffic problems, tie also noted that neilhborlinod streets normally do not carry
more than 400 vehicular trips per day, as compared to the approximate 4400 of
Vicksburg Lane, demonstrating that it is oot merely a neighborhood street.
He asserted that if it is approved as a neighborhood street, the rest of
Plymouth will not help iii payment for i t .
Coun.i lman Hunt poi ntea out that this im)roynent would take approximately 50%
n' trh* available State Aids, ar,l that a determinant for State Aid funding is
that it sarve a rnnmuni ty-wi ee need,
110-
n
A
v
Special Counci 1 o Meeti ng
March 26, 1974
Page 11i
Epi O'Gara, 505 Upland Lane, said he did not believe the cuncil was listening
r to the people. He also spoke in favor of a 40 foot roadMay, as opposed to
44 foot.
Mayor Hi1de explained the Council's roaso! :)r their detailed presentation
at the beginning of the meeting. He also 'd to Mr. O'Gara that he, and the
Council members, had used great care in dt mg fairly ani ope0y with this subject.
James B. Lawter, 16030,9th Avenue North, said he did not foresee a traffic increase.
He asked what Minnetonka was likely to do south of County Road 15, might there
be a feeder into Highwayl2. Mayer Hilde responded that in drawing up their
guide.plans,' the Council had communicated with other communities. Planner
Overhi.ser stated that there ire no plans for extension of Vicksburg Lane to
HigLway 12 by Minnetonka or Plymouth.
Frank Ferrin, (sae above for address), said that he viewed the project as a
liability to his home valuation, and opposed assessment on that basis. He believed
the entire coiamuni ty should share in the total cast.
John Koplin, 16025 5th Avenue North, commented that the Council was speaking of
desirables" and not "musts". He asked what the procedure froti this point forth
would be, in terms of Council action. Mayor Hide explained thit the Counci l
would consider further action tonight.
Arthur R. Hart, 815C Vicksburg Lane, a 25 -year resident, asked that the Council
give due consideration to the petitionresented earlier. He also c+ted his
personal objections to the project: (a) a 40 foot, or 2 lane, roadway is sufficient;
b) snow removal roblems would be greater than what exists now; (c) atmosphere
would be lost; (d the environment would be ruined by pollution; (e) it would be
asking for trouble, in that students using the road would do more "dragging".
Manager Willis then read the petition above cited,
Manager Willis also read a letter received of Carl Ross, 300 Vicksburg Lane.
Mr. Ross proposed a 40 foot roadway with curbs, gutters. storm sewers and a
sidewalk/bi cle path system, He cited reasons, as follows: (a) safety for
children; (b minimized cost; (c) 40 foot road capability for traffic demand;
d) change in automobile usage due to energy crisis; (e) the 40 foot would
quo ify for State Aid; (f) preserving the Vicksburg neighborhood,
Mantger Willis read a letter recei v,ed of Richard r. Palmer, 345 No. Ferndale,
0o apposed usage of the school buses as a determining factor in approving
a 9 ton roadway, He also opposed having the High School on a major thoroughfare,
Maiiagt,r Willis read a letter requesting the upgrading of Vicksburg Lane to a
9 ton Mead from County Road 6 to Counq Roar;,15. The letter cited the extensive
usai,ye 0 school buses and other large commercial vehicles. The letter war, signed
by Dames Nanus, President, Hanus Bus Company, Inc.; David C. Mayer, President,
Waytita `transportation, Inc.; Marvin R. Johnson, President, Medicine Lake Bus
Company, Inc.; and Robert D. Sryder, Superintendent, Wayzata School District 284.
C,
I
a -'40 ,s 1t T y 1 _
i
Noy, .
March 26o"1974
Page 112
Mary Rasmussen;, 440 Westin Lane, asked about the application of the assessm6pt-,
policy to her individual lot Manager Willis answered.
The public hearing closed at 11:25 P.M.
puri ng'lthe public -hearing, Councilman Spaeth left the meeting.)
Mayor Hilde explained the alternativesen to Countpp it members. (a) deferopen
discussion to another time, and ask staff to consolidate notes- rindmi,nutet'-from
this evening's meetingi or (b) determine that there has been en'U6jh preparation
and adopt a cotirse of action,
MOTION was made1 by Councilman Neils , , seconded by Counci l - COI NCIIAC11ON
man Seibold, that final action be taken on the improvement PR04ECTN06 305 -
tonight. Motion carried, four"ayes. VICXS8Ul2G LANE STREET'
IMPROVEMENT - FROM
There was a consensus that the speakers at the open hearing COUNTY RbAD 6 f0
expressed the greatest interest in having a 40 foot roadway, COUNTY ROAD 15
as opposed to 44 foot; and they further agreed that this might
be considered as an alternative.
MOTION was made by Councilman Neils. seconded by Councilman RESOLUTION NO, 74- l 73
Hunt, to adopt RESOLUTION N0, 74-1731 A RESOLUTION DIRECTING
THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH TO ORDER FINAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR
THE VICKSBURG LANE IMPRgVEMENT %-.,PROJECT NO. 305 - ON THE BASIS
OF A 40 FOOT URBAN SECTION, 9 TQN, CURB AND GUTTER, WATER IM-
PROVEMENTS AND STORM SEWER: WITH SIDEWALK ON THE WEST SIDE ONLY;
AND THAT THE CENTER LINE AND COMBINATION OF SIDEWALK AND STREET
BE SHIFTED EAST SO THAT THE CURB GN .THE EAST SIDE AND AVERAGE
SIDEWALK ON THE WEST SIDE ARE THE SAME DISTANCE FROM THE PROPERTY
LINE; AND FURTHER TO CONSIDER THE POSSIBILITY OF A 44 FOOT SECTION
NORTH OF THE RAXLROAD RIGHT OF WAY.
Elimination of bike paths was discussed. 'It was pointed out .
that the 40 foot roadway would provide room for bikers, and that
a path could be added at some time 'n the future.
MOTION was made by Councilman Hunt, seconded by Councilman Neils,
to amend Resolution No. 74-173 per figure No. 1 of the handouts
presented, to show, in the Typical Section North of R.R., the
second diagrammed line from the top, with figures changed
as follows. 3' changed to 4'; 22' changed to 20'; 22' changed to
20'; d' inserted next; 6' changed to 4'. He said that this
would mo;+e the center line 6 feet. Motion to Amend carried,
four kies
MOTION was made by Mayor Hilde, seconded by Councilman Hunt, to
amend Resolk tion No. 74-173 to add that it is understood that
it is contingent upon receiving State Aid approval for the
project to the extent discussed in the proposal. and that
the staff will do the utmost to secure State Aid funds, not-
wi thstanding personal feelings; and they shall elicit Council
assistance if necessary. Motion to amend carried, four ayes.
112-
L
9
Special CouncilCouncil Meeting
Mare1: 96, 1974
Pagkf" 113
MotitA to adopt Resolution No. 74-173,, as amended, carvied on 1'
a, rotl' call vote, four ayes.
Mayor w11de adjourned the meeting at 12:15 A.M,
rLynn BoInICk
Deputy'City Clerk
d
STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO, 3D5
ON
v
VICKSPURG LANE
FROM
COUNTY ROAD 6 TO COUNTY MAD 15 '
ESTIMATED CONS
I Z:tidential Colza Ind Plymouth's Notal
Description Assessuk:nts Assessments Share Cost
Street Construction $S00518600 $142, 563, 00 $130, S994 00 "$323868'9M
Pedestrian Sidewalk;$ $ -C= $ 30;0(10, 00 $ 28,445'00$ 58,445.0
Bicycle Paths $ _0_ $ _ 0_ $ 30,000.06 $ X10,000,00
Storm Sewer 42,298,00 $ 26,982,00
1141$
230100.00 $ 9,,,,380.00
Utilities so_nQ
Totals 992666.00 $1990S4SsOO 12,144.Q0 511;355.00
The protect, as proposed in the,.Praliminary Report, c.onsilers the constructiori of a 9 toi,,
44 foot wide bituminous roadway with concrete curb and gutter, storm sewer, 6 foot wideCsidewalk, R foot wide bituminous bicycle path and the providing for sanitary sewer and
water wain service to the w:pla,tted property north of 3rd Avenue. on the east side of
Vicksburg Lane,
The roadway, as proposed, is a two lane facility one lane in each direction ,wiP1YC ) th a
cohtinunus shoulder on each side. This facility is to be 44 feet wide which is the
minimwn dosirable width as provided for by the Municipal State Aid Standards (EISA) ,
It provides for two 12 fcot'lanes (24 feet); 2 foot driver reaction on each gide (4 feet);
and two 8 foot wide continous shoulders on each side (16); for a total of 4•' t,
Anything less than 44 feet would fall below the minimum desirable standar& at
forth in the M.S,A,, manual.
l
In order to sive th„ residents an idea as to what the estimated costs and assessments
night be, we have prepared some examp!,es, The examples are based on a lot with 100
feet of frontage on Vicksburg Lane and utilizes the following estimated assessment rates:
Streets
1. 7 ton bihmiinous street, 32 feet wide with concrete curb anal gutter a $16.00/ft.
Applied to Residentia1 Single Family),
2. Concrete curb arA gutter only' c $4420/ft, (Applied to Residential Single family).
3. 9 ton bitumi.nouy 8trrot, 44 feet wide with Cor.crota curb and gutter = $27,15/ft4
Applied to Lonvnercital, Industrial, Schools, ;nd till Other than Single Family Residents),
Storm Sewer
924.00/:acro (Applied to all propvrtics within Drainago District).
Sidewalks
1.67/sq. ft. ( ApplLed to all properties except Kesielertittl Single Family %1•10 will not be
assessed)
a ge3 1
1 ,
61cycle Paths
Wo -assessments, ,
Utilit4es
Assess' to benefitting properties.
Example I (see attached ma
Single Family Residential - This is an interior lot with driveway access on to Vicksburg
Lane,
Frontage on Vicksburg Lane a 1.00 feet', Lot Area = 188SUOse;. it. a 0.425 acres
Street: Estimated Rate = $16.00/fr:; ('7 ton street, 32 feet wide)
Estimated Street Assessment a, 100 ft. x $15.00/ft, = $1,600.00
For comparison if the interior lot shown in Example I were Commercial, I'dustria1 etc,
the street assessment would be:
Estimated Rate = $27.75 ( 9 ton, 44 .feet wide)
Estimated Assessment = 100 feet x $27,7S/ft, _ $2775,00 with the difference of $1,17S.00
2p775,,00 - `$1,600, 00) being financed from Plymouth` funds. This me. r,s the residential
lot is beinIT assessed approximately S8) of the total street cost,
Storm Sewer
Estimates Rate = $924,00/acre
isEstimated Sewer Assessment 0.42S acre x $924.00/acre a $393.00
Sidewalk
No Assessment,
Bicycle Path
No Assessment
TOTAL ESTIMTED ASSESMIENT a $1, 953, 00 ,
Sin
Example II sec attached m i )
an 1• Residential This is a corner 10t with driveway access on to minor street
not on Vicksburg Lane) rontage on Vicksburg Lane a 185 foot Lot Area = 180500 sq, ft.
M 0,425 acre
Std: Ustimatcd [tate = $4 %10/ft. (,concrete curb and gutter only)
Estimated Street Assessment = 185 feet & 2 x $4.20/ft, r4583,00
For comparison if the corner tit shown in Example 11 were Commarcial,Industrial, etc,_
the street assessment would he:
stimatod Rate = $"747S/Ct% (11 ton, 44 Pert wide
Estimated Assessment 1 fett x $27, 7C/I't. = C 1 x'1,00 with the difference of
4674(
4t)() ($x,,131- w=a`' ) b,%I-lIt; tiin"sliced f olll rl)Iilrut.I%I S funds, This means the
residential lent is bring; te, sessed approximatoly 8 % of the total s ,reet cost,
rage -21
a
O 1
1
Storm Sewer
1
Estimated Rate = $924.00/acre '
Estimated Sewer Assessment = 0.425 acres`x $924:00/acre $393.00
Sidewalk -
C;
U
No Assessment
Bicycle' Path
No Assessment
J
TOTAL ESTIMATED ASSESMENr $603,00
Example III (see attached map)
Single Family ''ns dential - This is a double, fronting lot, with driveway, access on to minor
street (not on to, sjurg Lane)
Frontage on Vicksburg Lane - 100 feet:
Lot Area a 186 00 sq. ft. = 0.425 acre
Street
Estimated RW a $4,20/ft. (concrete curb and gutter only)
Estimated Assessment = 100 feet = 2 x $4.20/ft. = $210,00
1
For comparison, if the double fronting lot shown in Example III were Commercial, Industrial,
etc. the strc et assessment w6uld be:
1 r
Estimated Rate = $27.7S/ft. (9 ton, 44 feet idde)
Estimated) Assessment = 100 fest x $27.75/ft. = $2,775.00 with the difference of
2,S65,00 ($2775 - $210) being financed from Plymouth's funds, This means the
residential lot is being assessed approximately M o,: the total street costs,
Storm Sever
Estimated Rate = $424.00/ac,Me
Estimated Assessment = 0.425 acres x $924.00/,acre = $393.00
Sidewalk
No Assessment,
Bicycle Path
NO Assessment$
Page ,3
TOTAL ESTDL'1"i ED ASSGSSMUNtr $603600
2
I
MINOR
wm
O
z
7i
S
185.00'
1$5.00,
01
STREET
w N
m
1
0 W
W 0
o
N
W
V o Q
w
a Nx
1 ao v O
a
CL
Q w a o
W a o
w y N
I
S
0
1$5.00,
01
STREET
w N
m
1
0 W
100.00
o CL
o 2
V o Q
w
a Nx
imi 1
a
CL
a U
x, .
w y N
O
0
W
0 OC ,
V
m a
n N'`
a
V o ,
Q
0
1$5.00,
01
w N
m 0 W
c
Y
o CL
o 2
V o Q
a Nx
w rr o
a
1100
Mango
I-`L._
N
8888`+
b00 0 66
8060.••. 1
so
888,8•• 6,606;.
L
0;;;;;•
00.
0690,
46
0;•;•
6.68
0•6.6••
0 0
8888 '
l
10
0005j
go
UNION worm=
88'86
Limb tS Of
Drainage
i s t riot
0,
1
1 WAY ZATA
SE N 10
IGfU S
0
8888 ,••,••f,•••,••••••.
00•,.,•y
6.88• • •• . •••
a 6• •
8868••.
7'••••••••••••••.•.•.•••.•••,•.
o.•
so 66 • 0 • 0 • 0• a8888•••
f•
0 & 0 0 0 0 0 •,
888,6f
6666 ............
r rowY•
M• N N E A P IS •'•'• •''•'•`•'•'•'•'•'-' 8.88 •••••••••••• •.•.•..
1NORK USE `•'•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:
6,•,•,•,•••, 8086
i
itA
AV LNut
I
T,
r
V: L LA C
Ftl'I v T '"!T«gni"d,'` '.wii :.w w •',
e. •.;.
r. .
I
I,w
I
0
t
yi
1 .I
r, •i
L
Tp R .V'i
1.., t.
Q:
Q:
I .
040
t
yi
1 .I
r, •i
L
Tp R .V'i
1.., t.
Q:
Q:
040
0
N
0
F- t
V j--
1.i, l
f ) V) I 1.,.
n
J
U
n