Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Minutes 04-30-1973 Speciali v O U E M I NUIT ES SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING APRIL 30, 1973 A special meeting of the Plymouth Village 7:40 p;m. in the Council Chambers of the North, Plymouth, on April 30, 1973. Council was called to order by Mayor Hilde at Public Works Building, 14900 Twenty-third Avenue PRESENT: Mayor Hilde, Councilmen Hunt, Spaeth, Neils and Seibold (arrived at 7:50 p.m.), Manager Willis, Attorney Lefler, Engineer Goldberg, Planner Overhiser and Park Director Burton ABSENT: None MOTION was made by Councilman Neils, seconded by Councilman Spaeth, to approve the minutes of the April 23, 1973 Special Council Meeting. Motion carried, five ayes. Richard O'Fallon, Plymouth representative to the Bassett Creek Flood Control Commission, appeared before the Council explaining that it is proposed that the public coordination requirements of the Phase II study be met by the creation of nine separate citizen advisory commissions, one in each member community. Mr. O'Fallon indicated the first meeting would he a public hearing with proper notices in the newspaper and notices also being sent to a list of public minded citizens. Depending on the outcome of this first meeting, either a citizens committee would be formed or the matter would be continued on a heariny basis similar to the first meeting. It 1s anticipated f;)ur meetings will be required in Plymouth. The Council expressed sme concern over the actual authority of this citizen advisory commission. Mr. O'Fallon assured the Council they would be acting only as advisors to the local Bessett Creek representative. The Council indicated its approval and support of the proposal adding that the two County Commissioners represent- ing Plymouth should be added to the mailing list. 'The date for the public: hearing was set for 7:30 p.m. Thursday, May 17, in the Coun- cil Chambers, The Council requested that a policy resolution be drafted out- lining the intended use of Park Dedication Funds, Pete Thomsen, Chairman of the Parks and Recreatiin Advisory Commission, was in attendance at the meeting and explained to the Council that at their meeting of March 8 th.. i-evi ewed this matter and recommended that 50% of the funds be spent `%ir the acquisition and development of the central park areas and t. +i trail system which both serve the entire community; that 25% be spent on community type parks serving several walking neighborhoods; and that. 25% be spent on the neighborhood parks which serve only the walking neighborhood. MINUTES - APRIL SPECIAL MEETING 23, 1973 BASSETT CREEK FLOOD CONTROL COMMISSION - PHASE II STUDY POLICY ON USE OF DEDICATION FUNDS special Council Meeting Aprit 30, 1973 Page Two Councilman Hunt stated his concern was for the man who purchased 'a home which provided in the purchase price a neighborhood park built by the developer, Not only would he pay 1n part for his own park but a portion of his money was also put into the park dedication fund, one-quarter of which under this proposed allocation system would go towards build- ing somebody else's neighborhood park. He stated he felt it is the best possible method of meeting neighborhood park requirements to have the developer put them in but that in such cases the developer's contribution to the park dedication fund should be something like 2/3 to the central park and 1/3 to the regional park and nothing to the neighborhood parks. Mayor Hilde stated he was concerned that we account for the funds properly and suggested that three separate funds be established for the three categories. In terms of neighborhood or regional parks, Councilman Neils suggested that some con- sideration be given along the lines' of re -investing that portion of the dedication fv4ds in the general area of the Village From where it came. When we approach saturation de- velopment in a portion of the Village, the need for parks and park development becomes more severe in that area because there is iEss open space left. Councilman Seibold stated he felt this formula would work out fine if every neigaborhood was developed with planned unit developments but that is not the case. You may have five or six de- velopers in one neighborhood. If one developer provides a park in his development and you say these people have paid for their neighborhood park, what happens co those people who are still s part of that neighborhood but are without a park. Councilman Spaeth stated it was his opinion in areas that have already developed we must use ad valorem taxes to develop weighborhood parks to bring these areas into line with the over-all Village plan. Mayor Hilde pointed out that the only, other place you get park develop- ment money is from a bond issue. He stated he assumes the highest degree of ad valorem participation will have to come from the central and regional parks because they will cost more to develop, All three categories, however, will need ad valorem help, if this is true, he questioned whether it is so important to go to great detail in terms of exactly where the money in each of the last two categories is obtained because what- ever is not spent there is going to be made up by the public at large anyway. Councilman Neils stAted he suspects the largest amounts of dedication will come from developers cf high density complexes where a specific load is being placed on a limited neighborhood area, He stated his concern 'a that this money will be used to develop neighborhood parks in another area of the A llage and that the area that generated the heavy load of people and the money will gn aithout a park. Councilman Hunt stated he felt one of our g- ez%test tools in meeting the requirements in the last two categories is to let as much h;4%p n as possible in new developments, specifically in high density areas, He state& ;,e felt that the 25% credit formula will not encourage this, Councilman Sraeth agra%d and pointed out that neighborhood parks are built in areas of heavy saturation, therefore, these people should pay this through ad valorem, He further stated that in cases where a developer provides amenities with- in their own development which are specifically for the use of the residents of that development, that developer should also be given some credit because he has helped to alleviate a portion of the burden on the Village for park facilities for these people, It was suggested that developers be given up to 76% credit against the amount required for park dedication for whatever he dots in providing parks assuring these parks are public parks. Some credit for any parks that he builds that are strictly for the de- velopment should also be provided, up to 25%. Mayor Hilde pointed out that encouraging developers to provide their own park areas actually makes money for the Village in two areas. The developer can probably make these improvements at less cost than the Village, and the Village also benefits because ho is not given full credit for these improvements, Councilman Hunt pointed out that the oumber of years you have to maintain a facility is also a factor and that there J l U Special Council Meeting Aprtl 30, 1973 Page Three should be different treatment given in those'cases where the homeowners will, do the main- tenance. The Manager indicated he felt a formula could be worked out oiong the lines of the foregoing discussion, however pointed out that our dedication policy applies to value of Lind rather than value of improvements. He stated he felt it is possible that develop- ers will spend substantially more on a private Nark than we could ever gat from him in cash because it is going to help sell his property. The only negative aspect of this is that you will have to use,ad valorem taxes in other areas and this might raise the argu- ment from people in developments which provided their own parks that they have already paid their share. Councilman Neils stated he had three points he wished to make: (1) He stated he would be reluctant to see the village completely reorganize our policies on the basis of favorable experience with a few developers because all developers are not alike. From previous experience the general tendency has been f•-ir the developer to consider anything along the lines of dedicating land for parks or making any investment in that park area as nothing but a nuisance. (2) At some point the park type improvements made by a; developer exceeds those improvements we would require for a neighborhood park. At that point It is a matter between private parties and no longer a Village concern. It must be determined what is a public necessity and what is a luxury for a given private development in terms of parks. (3) There is some room for consideration as to a different method of applying whatever credit is allowed so that a minimum amount of credit is given for the initial increment within a development and a progressive amourt of credit for further improve- ments to encourage the latter. MOTION was made by Mayor Hilde, seconded by Councilman Spaeth, directing the staff to develop a resolution by the next meeting which will constitute direction to the staff and Park, Commission which will ask them to develop a recoa:.iended policy for us that would deal with'how we derive dedication funds and the calculation of credits from developers and that it be divided into two parts: (1) Public Parks -- that we consider allowing develop- ers a percentage credit of whatever value of contribution to the park system regardless of the type of nark that 1t is. (2) Private Parks -- that we consider the issue of should we grant any type of credit whatsoever for private parks ghat are built by the developer. Councilman Hunt added that the Park Coninission should also define what amenities are applicable to this policy. Motion carried, three ayes, with Councilmen Neils and Seibold voting nAv. The staff had prepared a proposed resolutinn sitting forth the 50/25/25 percent appropria- tion of funds as recommended by the Park Commission. MOTION was made by Councilman Neils, econd d by Councilman Spaeth, to adopt the Resolution for the appropriation of park dedication funds as proposed in the staff report dated April 20, 1973. MOTION was made by Mayor Hilde, s conded by Councilman Neils, to amend the k.solution by adding a paragraph 06: "The Manager shall set up accurate fin;4ncial records for trans- actions within the atove three categeries o)f acccunts." Mution carried, five ayes. MOTION was .Wade by Councilman Seibold, seconoed by Councilman Hurt, to furtUr amend the Resolution by changi nq the word ng i r, the third paragroph to redo " . . that the V111 aqe Manager operate with6 the following guide lines in making recommendations to the Village Council . . " Motion carried, five ayes. MOTION was made by Councilman Hunt, seconded b Councilman Spaeth, to further amend the Resolution by dropping the word "approximately' in Paragraphs 01, #2 and #3. Motion carried, five ayes . 0 J J 1 G l Special Council Meeting April 30, 1973 Page Four MOTION was made ky Councilman Spaeth, seconded by Councilman Neils, to further amend the Resolution by'adding a paragraph #7: "At the time that a developer's contribution and credit is determined, it shall be further determined which account the remaining cash contribution shall be applied to." Motion carried, four ayes, with Councilman Hunt voting nay. MOTION was made by Councilman Neils, seconded by Councilman Spaeth', to make a further amEndmen;, by changing this from a Resolution to a Motion directing the staff to prepare a cogent r?solution in accordance with the !lotion. Motion carried, five ayes. Motion as amended carried, five ayes. Park Director Roger Burton reported on the sta10 s of the park im- 1973 PARK IMPROVEMENTS provements previously approved by the Council and presented pro- posed park improvements for East and West Medicine Lake Parks ani a portion of the '.rail system around the Workhouse property. East Medicine Lake Park Mr. Burton explained there are three items in the improvement play, that are compulsory: (1) the agreement with Ryerson to install a il foot high chain link fence; (2) the 9 ton street access for Ryerson; and (3) the widenin; of 18th Avenue to handle traffic dive rt4d by the closing of a portion of East Medicine Lake Boulevard. Councilman Spaeth brougo t lip the point that about 7 years ago there was an agreement with Ryerson which called for them to install a fence, and the staff was requested to check this out. The matter of up -grading 18th Avenue was discussed, and it was agreed that up -grading this road would only en- courage more traffic through there. With 25th Avenue and 13th Avenue both beinq local thoroughfares, it was not felt this improvement was necessary. The Council felt the amount of parking shown on the south side if thv. park was not ade- quate, and after further study of the matter decided that the parking area should tie moved further to the south to preserve more recreational area and to also allow for more park- ing area. Mr. Thomsen stated he would like to do away with the boat launching site on the east side of the lake, The Councii agreed that it is not a good idea to have boat launching this close to swimming areas and that there are probably better areas to the northeast that can be used for this purpose. It was felt that we have too little land to allocate to the laur ching of boats and the parking of trailers. Following amend the this discussion of the improvement plans, the following actions were taken to piano. MOTION was made by Councilman Neils, seconded by Councilman Spaeth, that 18th Aventlo, not be up -graded and that East Medicine Lake Boulevard be closed and terminated in , cul-de-sac at that point, MOTIOM was made by Councilman Hunt, seconded by Councilman Cuibold, to an*nd the motion that .ast Medicine Lake Boulevard not; be dead -envied at this time because of the safety problem that it could cause. Moti ' n to amend the motion carried, five ayes. Motion as amended carried, five ayes. MOTION was made by Councilma i Hunt, seconded by Councilman Seibole, that the parking irea on the south portion of the project be moved tr. the south in the area of land owned bl the Village, that th. access road be termi.iate+ in a cul - de -sac in such a way to al l c.w 0 iIl 0 0 5pec1ai round i meeting April 309 1973 Page Five those residents who live along the lake access and i turn -around space, and that thejerking, area shown on'the proposed,sketch be shown as park land. Motion carried, five ayes. MOTION wa'i made by Councilman Hunt, secobded by Councilman Seibold, that the boat launching site be restricted to non -motorized boats such as sailboats and canoes,,' The Maha_ger _ stated he felt there would be a problem with' enforcement if it is not specified that motor boats can be launched at some other site. ;Councilman Neils stated he did not think the Village would be acting responsible if it encouraged further use of pc:wer boats- on Medicine, Lake and that we must realize that it will' be necessary to prohibit motorized boating on the lake at some time in the future. Mt:1 Thomsen pointed out that it is nct %eally necessary to have a launching area for sail boats or canoes. The motion an skcond for the above motion were withdrawn. JI MOTION was made by Councilman Hunt, seconded by Councilman Seibold`* that thelboat,leunching areas on Medicine Lake be eliminated from both the East and West Medicine Lake Park plans" and that the land be put toa better more usable park purpose. Motion calrried, five,ayes. West MedicinE Lake_ ` Me. Burton presented the plan for the West Medicine Lake Park and indicated he had some concerns about the park lying on both sides of the road. For this reason a fence was proposed along the west side of West Medicine Lahe Road extending from the parking lot past the volleyball court and picnic areas. The Council expressed concern regarding the limited visibility ,for south -bound traffic approaching*the pedestrian cross -walk arid/ suggested that some type of warning signals be'instalied at the top of the hill. MOTION was made by Councilman EJunt, seconded by Councilman Neils, that the parking lot proposed he limited in size to'just serve the beach area at this time and the direction be towards acquisition of enough right of way to provide some parking on the south side of the creek and that the,land acquisition to the north be the major park area. Motion carried, five ayes. It was further suggested that a fishing dock with ample capacity be developed in the area previously proposed for boat launching. MOTION was made by Councilman Hunt. seconded by Councilman REQ SOLUTION N0+ 73-1611, Seibold, to adopt RESOLUTION N0, 73-161. A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLANS AS AMENDED FOR THE EAST AND WEST MEDICINE LAKE PARKS. Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes. Workhouse Farm T1ail The Planner µ,^esented the plans for the development of a trail around the Workhouse Farm and down to the Luce Line Railroad. He explained improvements would be of a minimum nature at this time merely to open up the trail. The only areas where easements are acquired are along Niagara Lane. and through Chelsea Woods. He reviewed the status of the easements over the remainder' of the property as reported in his memo dated April 26. MOTION was made by Councilman Hunt. zecdnded by Councilman Spaeth, RESOLUTION . 73462 to adopt RESOLUTION N0, 13-162. A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE GENERAL "` PIAN OF THE WORKHOUSE FARM TRAIL, Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, f i ve ayes a, N I Special council Meeting April 30, 1973 Page Six The estimated improvement costs for the above three items are: East 4dicine Lake Park 39,592, West Medicine Lake park $16.736, and Trails.. $20,133 for ,a total oft 76;461. In addition to this $18J2$ in park improvements werti!approvt'+d by the Council on February 26/for a total of $95,186. Subtracting the 08,190 Lxisting park budget aid the $6,466 ' in 1970 County fundi 'al located,,for Medicine Lake ft' provetiots., there re- mains a balance of $50.528 which 04 staff recommended be appropriated fom)the Park Dedication Fund. It was pointed out that these figures will be reduced,.iomewhat by the changes made to the plans by,,th. Ccjuncil. I 1 The staff was questioned regarding the manner in which the bids would be ''etl\1or this work. The Manager-roplained that some of the improvements could be handled t Baugh price quotes rdceived by iie Purchasing Department and that a portion of the wort` woutd be done by part-time Village employees. Councilman Spaeth stated he would lika to see the < st et work done on a competitive basis rather than change order. Concilman Neils st ted he felt that if the staff combined all similar types of work together and nego- tiated three prices for it, this would be satisfactory. MOTION wds made by Counci 1Ran Neils, seconded by Councilman Punt, auth ri;zirig Ahe staff to proceed on construction of the East .=end West Medicine Lake`Parks a« directing the staff -to prepare for the Council a firm resolution incorporating those'amehdmen%,s in the funding appropriations to fund from the Park Dedication Fund for these mprovemeits. MOTION was made by Councilman Seibold, seconded by,,Counciiman Hunt, to mend the lotion to include the Trail System around the 'Workhouse. Councilman Neils stated'he would not be in favor of appropriating funds on property that is not in our control. The Mioager was asked what would happen if the Workhouse did not give us the easements, and he\,Me- plied that we would not proceed with the plan. Motion to amend the motioh carried, ;five ayes. MOTION was made by Mayor Hilde, seconded by Cjuncilmao Hunt, to amend the motion direct, ing that the staff not proceed to spend any of the money on the Trail SystOm until they-;\ are assured of having a viable amount of trail to serve the public and unti'l it is sub- sequently approved by the Council,, Motion carried. five ayes. Motion as amended carried, five ayes. MOTION was made by Councilman Spaeth, seconded by Councilman staff proceed with caution on bidding out this work and that a public advertisement for bids. Motion carried, four ayes, voting nay% 0 Hunt, directing that the anyti ng ever $2,;000 go to with Councilman Neils The Manager indicated this lot is part of the George Mollen estate and that the Village has been approached by a realtor relative to the purchase of the lot by the Village for park use. He explained that Lots 2. 3, 4 and 5 to the east are unbuildabie and"might also he considered for purchase for park in the future.1 The Manager proposed negotiating with the owner offering A price of $86000 excluding %aecial assessments, and the Council agreed to authorize this action. ALOUISITIO14 OF LOT FOR PARK USE - LOT 1, BLOCK 2. RATH`S 2'ND ADDITION I C, 0 i 3 o \\ Special Council April 30, 1973 Page Seven R 6 Meeting The Engineer recommended an addetkdum be made to the Preliminary PROJEV :NO. 341,- XENIUM Report on Project No. 301 to add additional excavation and storM LANE 8 lti'P,AVENUE - se weer 1n the total amount of $16,360, ADDENDUM 1`0 r' SIBILITY ° REPORT NOTION was made by Coancilinan Hunt, seconded by Councilman Seibold,, t.1 adopt RESPLUTION NO, 73-163, A RESOLUTION RECEIVING RES_ OL'FI ON N0.13-16 THE ADDENDUM DATEDAPR-IL 26, 1973 TO THE PRELININARY REPORT ON PROJECT NO. 301 FOR A TOTAL IMPROVEMENT COST OF =297060.00. Motion carried on a Roll'Call,.vote, five ayes. There was discussion regarding the assessment pol-icy on this ,project:. \\ and,a MOTION was made by Mayor Hilde, seconded by Councilma 11s directing thec'taff to prgp4re a recommended assessment plan for the `r ' F:jbl iC hearing on `this project in view of the seecific use that Northwestern Bell Tel eaho.Companly is making"of the, improvement area and directing that this in;,naatibn be returned to the Council at a reasonable ,time before the heari6,, for Council approval. Motion carried, five ayes. The Council reviewed the FIasi b'i l i ty Report for the extension PROJECT NO. 3t 3 - 28TH of sanitary sewer and street restoration for 28tti,Avenue from AVENUE 8 ORLEARS LANE 190 feet east.of Orleans Lane west to Quaker Lane' It was de -ACCEPTANCE OF FEASIBILITY cided to go tb the public hearing with Alternate N1 which is REPORT gravel street restto.,ati on. MOTION was made by Councilman Seibold, seconded by Councilman RESOLUTION NO. 73464 Neils, to adopt RESOLUTION. NO, 73M164, A RESOLUTION RECEIVING THE PRELININARY REPORT ON PROJECT N0, 303 AT AN ESTIMATED TOTAL COST OF $117,86"00 AND ORDERING'% A PUBLIC NEARING TO 6E HELD ON MAY 21, 1913\AT' 7:30 P.M. Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes., The Council previously reviewed ordlNance recommendations which ORDINANCE FOR CONTROL would regulate the height of grass Ond other vegetation 1n OF WEEDS AND VEGETATION platted areas of the Village and directed that an ordinance amendment be prepared along these lines. This proposed ordinance amending Chapter V, Section 12 of this Village Code was presented to the Council. MOTION was made by Councilman Hunt, ;?econded by Councilman Seibald,, to adopt the Ordinance amending Chapter V of the Village Code by adding a provision for the control of weeds ani vegetation. ihe e was disr ussion regarding Section 12.05 of this proposed ordi- nance dealing with the grading and removal of debris. As stated It would require any pay° ::1 of land ' ocated either within or wi th- in 100 Beet t,f the res' t'f41'.zones to be graded and kept free of debris. It was pointed -t v, ;'that there are areas in the Village that are toned R-1 but will'not be platted for some time and are still aricultural in nature. The staff was requested to re -write this seltion so that it is more equitablq in such instances. 9 Speci ai Counci l Met:; i ng Apri 1 30,,-=1973 Page Eight 0 Sects on,1z, 04 requi i - d that a person receiving a notice' to 'comply ti0i th the ordthance must c so within five days." It was felt in so* into stances this--might t- an unreAsonable hength of time, and a MOTION was, made by ,Mayorll tl-de, Al seconded by Councilman Spaeth, to amend Section 12.04 to change it f,jen, 6 days to 10 days. Motion carried, four ayes, with Councilman Sei Wldwoti ng nay, The motion and seccnefor.;the Opption of the Ordinance were withdrawn, and a MOTION was made,,by Councilman\Hunt, seconded by Councilman Spaeth.. to refer the ordinance amendmentobaci,Ao the staff for further amendment in line with the Couki 1 recommendati ons Motion carried, five ayes Vhen considering the v-riance for Northern Holding Company for a, ZONING ORDINANCE sign, the Council directed the staff to draft a memo of direction VARIANCE REVIEW to the Board of Zoning,Adjustment. This was presented to the PROCEDURE Council for ,approval , Councilman Oils stated `the draft memo essentially directed the Board to compromise the ordinance by "working with developers". Instead it shnuld referene the ordinance,amendment which provides for consideration'of identification signs as part of site plan re- view for new buildings ana,huilding additions by the Planning Com- mission, He felt di recti ons should be that the Board review business - and identification signs in ,th,e same general contea of compatibility,,, with the site plan and,general intent of the ordinance rather than. the more rigid ordinance appy+cation which should quite propeeiy apply to advertising signs, MOTION was made by Mayor Hilde, seconded by Councilmar: Neils, re- ferring, the matter back to the staff to re -write and give couidera- tion to Councilman Neils's comments. Motion carried, five ayes, On April 2 the Council received a report prepared by the Metro Rate Authority and approved the execution of a Joint Powers Agreement. The Village was now requested to consider adopting an ordinance granting a franchise to NSP in the Village, MOTION was made by Councilman Seibold, seconded by Councilman Hurt, to adopt ORDINANCE NO, 73-6, AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A FRANCHISE FOR NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY IN THE VILLAGE OF PLYMOUTH, Motion carried,on a Roll Call vote, three ayes, with Councilmen Neils and Spaeth abstaining, The Revenue Sharing Act calls for annual reporting of the use of Revenue Sharing monies, At this time a report must be submitted indicating the disposition of our funds for the period of January 1 through June 30, 1973, The Manager prepared a report indicating the expenditures were made for public safety and pre- sented this to the Council for approval, O , Y METROPOLITAN RATE AUTHORITY FRANCHISE ORDINANCE ORDINANCE NO. 734 REVENUE SHARING^ 9 9 Special Council Meeting a April 30, 1973 Page Nine MOTION vas(made by Councilman Hunt, seconded by Councilman Spaeth, that the Revenue Sharing be)directed towards parks and trails in the Village, The Manager acknowledged that this is a need in the Village but that the Village must be able to demonstrate that the entire sun was in deed spent withfi,: the specified period of time, and whfle this money can be dIre sted towards parks and trails in ' the future, he did not feel i t ,possible with this report. Council- man Spaeth with6r- his second of.the above motion, and the motion failed for lack of_a second, _ MOTION was grade, by Councilman Neil ;, seconded ;by Councilman Spaeth, to approve the Manager's reprr_t-„f1 the use of Revenue Sharing Funds for the period of January 1 through June 30,,1973. Motion carried, four ayes, with Councilman Hunt voting nay. 1 A letter dated April U 1973 was received._frum John J. Slavics expressing concern overltt' a essenti-,16lly' unre tricted operation of mi n1 bi kes , trail bikes ,end other types of a,1;1 terrain vehicles within the Village and requesting the_Council adopt an ordinance relative to their control,• MOTION was made by Mayor Hilde, seconded by Councilman Nems, directing the Park and Recreation Advisory Commission to develop recommendations regarding the use of moto ri Od all terrain vehicles in the Village, such recommondations to include criteria for the drafting of an ordinance. These recommendations will be drafted into ordinance form and reviewed by the Village staff and attorney prior to being submitted to the Council for consideration, Motion carried, five ayes, School Districts -- Councilman Neils asked the status of the staff recommendations on the busing/walking policy, The Manager stated that staff has not yet met with the school districts on this but that there have been recent communications on the matter, Building Codes Ad-isort' Commission -- They are neviewir g the status of existing Village codes as they relate to the new State Building Code and will have information for the Council on this in the near future, Human Rights Commission -- The Manaqer stated he has sent;a draft of the Joint Powers A reement with the West Suburban Communities Human Services Council to the Attorney, This will be reviewed with the Chairmah of the Human -Rights Commission shortly. Metropolitan Council -- The Manager reported there will be a meet- ing with staff members of the Metropolitan Council on Tuesday, May 8, to review the Sanitary Sewer Plan, Guide Plan and E.P.A. Sewer Grant, Mbtropolitan Sewer Board -- The Engineer advised that the Sewer Plan has been tentatively approved by the Metropolitan Council, M J o OPERATION OF MOTORIZED, ALL TERRAIN VEHICLES C.C.R. REPORTS J I c 0 M J o OPERATION OF MOTORIZED, ALL TERRAIN VEHICLES C.C.R. REPORTS J I J Special Council Meeting April 30, 1973Ij Page Ten U The Council reviewed their calendor for the month of May and set CALENDAR FOR MAY the following meeting dates: May 7Regular Meeting Maty 14 - Guide Plan ISAtuA,v Session o May 15 - Bus tour",on Guide Plan 13:00 POM -0) May 17 - Public,Hdaring for Bassett Creek Flood Control Commission Phase II Study May 21 - Regular Mdet+,ng (r evi ew 1i l l age Audit if ccuyrpl eted ) may 29 Study, Session to replace meeting of 28th' (V:41 i day) (Amend. 5=7-73) M - g June 11 -adopt Guide -Plan and begin review of St9re.,%Sewer Plan r , NOTION was made by Councilman Ne.ls.;seconded by Co«ncIlman Spaeth, to approve the above schedule cf meeting dates. Motion carried, five,'ayes. J Mayor Hilde Wourned,the meeting at,l:0.0 a.m. 8 I Sandra L. Flauglin Village Clerk 0 i u 1 , n