Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Minutes 04-16-1973MINUTES REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING APRIL 16, 1973 A regular meeting of the Plymouth Village Council was called to order by Mayor Hilde at 7:35 p.m, in the Council Chambers of the Public Works Building, 14900 Twenty-third Avenue North, Plymouth, on April 169 1973. G PRESENT: Mayor Hi 1 de, , Counci 1 men Hunt, Spaeth, Seibold and Neils-, Manager Willis, Attorney c Lefler and Planner Overhiser'r1, ABSENT: None PUBLIC HEARING The Manager explained the public hearing has been called in order FOX MEADOWS STORM SEWER that the Village might undertake certain corrective actions to REPAIR PROJECT NO, 232 the storm sewer which was constructed by agents of the Regional Item 4-A Development Corporation for the Fox Meadows complex. This system has not been deemed by the Village to be satisfactory and has not passed the tests and must be in a substantial degr,e reconstructed. He advised the Council that Regional Development Corporation has undertaken repairs to the system, This work is being inspected by the Village, and should they continue to do the work to the satis- faction of the Village, there would be no need for the Village to order the project, Mayor Hilde Questioned whether or not the Village will be able to collect the expenses incurred in this in- spection and the preparation of the reports. Manager Willis indi- cated it is his judgment that these charges can be collected from the developer, The public hearing was opened at 7:45 p.m,. and there being no one present to speak before the Council, the public hearing was closed, MOTION was made by Councilman Spaeth, seconded by Councilman Hunt, to defer action on this project until the item is again placed on the Council agenda by the staff, Motion carried, five ayes, MINUTES , MOTION was made by Councilman Neils, seconded by Councilman Seibold, to ap hove the minutes, of the April 2, 1973 Regular Meeting with t e following corrections and additions: Page 4, paragraph 3: Motion to amend Resolution No. 73-136 carried, three ayes. with Councilmen Hunt,and Spaeth voting nay, Page 6, paragraph 3. line 3: " . the proposal for the study to re-evaluate the comprehensive sewer plan to consider flows t.0 LdPMnDrtD a: outlined In 6111 REGULAR MEETING APRIL 2, 1973 Item SmA 0 0 O 1; Regular Council Meet1'og'i April 16, 1973 Page Two Page 7, paragraph 3, line 6:; change "this extension" to "the Amber Moods development". Motion carried, five ayes. LICENSES b PERMITS Seven garbage hau'ers licenses were presented to the Council for, GARBAGE HAULER'S renewal fora one-year period. At the meeting of April 2,.the LICENSE RENWLS Council discussed at length various methods of general Village Item 8-B Al,ean-up and directives were given to the staff to implement, these plans. Councilman Neils stated that the level of service', offered by these haulers and whether the Plymouth citizens buy that service has a direct relation on whether their garbage ends up in landfills or along roadways. •_n licensing haulers to operate in Plymouth, the Village incurs the responsibility to insure that haulers provide the services they are Itc'ensed for, and we,should also have some'means of determining who is or is not actually buy- ing these services. MOTION was made by Councilman Neils, seconded by Councilman Seibold, granting the current license application renewals conditionally for sixty days, 'o be reconsidered at the end of that period, and direct- ing the Manager to prepare recommendations for requiring license applicants to define their policies and levels of service to be offer- ed as a licensee and recommendations for identifying which residents do or do not purchase a regular haulers service. Mayor- Hilde stited that while last year's clean-up program was suc- cessful, it in effect subsidized the fact that some haulers do not pick up everyth,jng. The information requested of the staff would give us some inlOormation for subsequent years of whether we should prescribe minimum levels of service and also give us the information of what people do subscribe to this service and whether we should make it mand*,tory for a resident to subscribe to a hauler's service. If everybody had this service, it would, not be necessary for the Village to subsieize these services by pick-ups such as last year's. There was'some concern expressed that setting minimum levels of ser- vice would give haulers the incentive to raise rates. Mayor Hilde stated he did not believe the Council should take the stand that we should do nothing that would tsquire that the fees be increased as this 4ould very well be the best expenditures our citizens can make. Motion carried, five ayes. Councilman Seibold stated that while the foregoing information would be valuable in the future, it will not solve our problem for this year, and he introduced a MOTION, seconded by Councilman Neils, directing the staff to proceed with a clean-up program for 19?3 similar to the pro- gram used last year. MOTION was made by Mayor Hilde, seconded by Coun- cilman Hunt, to emend the motion requesting the staff to report back to the Council with estimates of the costs involved and a detail of the plan that would be used, where we would dump it; etc. Motion to amend the motion carried, five ayes. Motion as amanded cerried, five ayes. i J Seven garbage hau'ers licenses were presented to the Council for, GARBAGE HAULER'S renewal fora one-year period. At the meeting of April 2,.the LICENSE RENWLS Council discussed at length various methods of general Village Item 8-B Al,ean-up and directives were given to the staff to implement, these plans. Councilman Neils stated that the level of service', offered by these haulers and whether the Plymouth citizens buy that service has a direct relation on whether their garbage ends up in landfills or along roadways. •_n licensing haulers to operate in Plymouth, the Village incurs the responsibility to insure that haulers provide the services they are Itc'ensed for, and we,should also have some'means of determining who is or is not actually buy- ing these services. MOTION was made by Councilman Neils, seconded by Councilman Seibold, granting the current license application renewals conditionally for sixty days, 'o be reconsidered at the end of that period, and direct- ing the Manager to prepare recommendations for requiring license applicants to define their policies and levels of service to be offer- ed as a licensee and recommendations for identifying which residents do or do not purchase a regular haulers service. Mayor- Hilde stited that while last year's clean-up program was suc- cessful, it in effect subsidized the fact that some haulers do not pick up everyth,jng. The information requested of the staff would give us some inlOormation for subsequent years of whether we should prescribe minimum levels of service and also give us the information of what people do subscribe to this service and whether we should make it mand*,tory for a resident to subscribe to a hauler's service. If everybody had this service, it would, not be necessary for the Village to subsieize these services by pick-ups such as last year's. There was'some concern expressed that setting minimum levels of ser- vice would give haulers the incentive to raise rates. Mayor Hilde stated he did not believe the Council should take the stand that we should do nothing that would tsquire that the fees be increased as this 4ould very well be the best expenditures our citizens can make. Motion carried, five ayes. Councilman Seibold stated that while the foregoing information would be valuable in the future, it will not solve our problem for this year, and he introduced a MOTION, seconded by Councilman Neils, directing the staff to proceed with a clean-up program for 19?3 similar to the pro- gram used last year. MOTION was made by Mayor Hilde, seconded by Coun- cilman Hunt, to emend the motion requesting the staff to report back to the Council with estimates of the costs involved and a detail of the plan that would be used, where we would dump it; etc. Motion to amend the motion carried, five ayes. Motion as amanded cerried, five ayes. i J,j Revu'lar Council Meeting ApH1 16,.,1973 Page Three PET_ ONS1 REQUESTS 8 COMMUNICATIONS The Wayzata School District ,requested the Vil l age waive the 1,182 building permit fee for the addition to the Senior High School. The W eager expl ai ne0l this request was tirade because ov- additional costs in construction ,for which they did not provide adequate funds. 143TION was made by Councilman Hunt, seconded by Councilman Spaeth, to adopt RESOLUTION 110.13449'A RESOLUTION `IAIVING THE EUILUING PERMIT FEE OF $16-182 FAR THE ADDITION TO THF WAYZATA SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL, Councilman Spaeth stated he would not be in favor of Waiving'these permit fees in the future if the Village staff cohtinues.to be re- quired to spend as much time reviewing plans ,to bring'them up; to code as in this Instance, Mayor Hiide suggested that a letter be sent to the school district indicating that we have spent too much time and effort in bringing these,plans up to code and that the Council feels that in the futum we, cannot waive, these' fees unless the time and money spent in making inspections is more minimal. Motion to adopt RESOLUTION N0. 07x444 carried on a Roll Call vote, three ayes, with Councilman Neils voting nay and ,Councilman Spaeth abstaining, WAYZATP yStHODL DISTRICT WAIVER OF BUILDING PER- MIT FEE_, Item 6=h- RESOLUTION ril, 173444 i t r l , J U MOTION was made by Councilman Neils, seconded,hy Councilman Hunt, directing the Manager to send a letter to all four school districts expressing our concern for the policy of continuing to waive permit fees and advising them that we may not do this in the future. Motion carried, five ayts,, The Council recently dete%irined that the strict application of PARK DEDICATION POLICY the park deo cation policy is not always equit6le iw the cases AMENDMENT of small parcels of Band, The staff was requested to draft an Item 74 amendment to the policy which would recognize the value of small- er parcels of land as being determined as if the smaller parcel were a part of a larger developilig parcel. There was discussion regarding the application of these park dedi- cation funds as they apply to neighborhood parks vs. central parks. It was agrees` this matter will be studied as a separate issue to the near future, MOTION was made by Councilman Sp4eth, seconded by Councilman RESOLUTION NO. 73-145 Neils, to adopt RESOLUTION N0. 13-145, A RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 7242 (THE 411K DEDICATION PGLICY) BY ADDING A NEW PARAGRAPH #4 AS FOLLOWS: In those cases where subdividers and developers of land within the Village of Plymouth elect to make cash contributions in lieu of park land dedication, it shill be understood that cash contra„ buttons not to exceed a maximum of $100 per dwelling unit shall be deemed to meet the requirements of this policy, Regular Counti 1 Neetfng 1 ry April 16. 1973 Page Four NOTION was'made by,-'Councilman Neils seconded by Mayor Hilde, to amend , RESOLUTION NO. 73445 to establish WO as the maximum figure. Notion carried, four"ayes.1, with Councilman Spaeth voting nay, 1'!^9' was made by-Mayor Hilde, seconded by Councilman Neils, to fur- ther amend the Resolution by changing the language to read as follows: 1 In those cases where it is determined that a cash contributt n shall be made in lieu of park land dedication . . Motion carried, five ayes. Motion to adopt RESOLUTION N0, 73-145 as amended carried on a Roll Call vote, four ayes, with Councilman Spaeth voting nay, The petitioners requested the creation of one additional_ilot out ROBERT G, RODERICK 8 of the existing Lots 11 and 12, Block 4, Greentree Forest 2nd WALLACE B. BLACK Addition, Parcel A, the new building lot, would be created by DIVISION OF PLATTED dividing off a trlangu'ar portion of land from Lot 11 and a por- LOTS tion of Lot 12. Both fit ;posed Parcels B and C contain existing Item 6-D houses'. NOTION was made by Councilman Seibold to deny the request for the division of Lots 11 and 12. Block 4, Greentree Forest 2nd Addition requested by Robert G, Roderick and Wallace B, Black because it would not be in the best interest of the neiglaborhood, Councilman Hunt seconded the motion adding that the land to the west is not developed, and it might be necessary to extend 27th Avenue and re- quire street riqht of way in the future, Wallace B. Black, 18620 27th Avenue North, appeared before the Council and explained that his request should be handled in two parts. The petitioners requested the triangular piece at the north end of Lot i.Ila annexed to Lot 12 because it is impossible for the owner of Lot 11 to gain access to this piece of land across the pond without traversing Lot 12, Mr, Black indicated he and Mr. Roderick have agreed to this, transfer whether or not the three-lot division is approved, With reference to the new lot they request be cheated, Mr. Black stated this lot would be equal in sire if not larger than most of the lots around the pond and that access would be via a driveway between Parcels B and C. Stephen W. Collins, President of the Greenoaks Homeowners Associa- tion, appeared before the Council and reviewed his letter of Apr,', 11, 1973 directed to the Village setting forth their objections to this division of lots, This letter marked EXHIBIT A is attached and made a part of these minutes, Councilman Neils pointed out that this plat is not very old and that the land was platted as such when the present owners purchased 'their lots. He stated he did not think the Village acted unwisely when the plat was approved and that he could see no hardship on the part of the landowners. Mr. Black pointed out that the adjacent lot was built 60 with only 10,000 square feet of buildable land and this new lot wou,Jd be totally buildable. o Regular Council Meeting Aprtl 169 . Page Five Motion to deny the division of lots carried, five ayes. As Mr. Black had left the Council Chambers at this point, the staff was requested to contact him to,determine if they still want to follow through on the transfer of the triangular piece of land from Lot 11. Councilman Neils stated he would also like the staff to re- port as to whether In fact access to that triangle is denied to the owner of Lot 11 because of the pond configuration, At,the April 2 meeting the Council approved a division of platted HALVORSON*SMITH AND lots to create three parcels from an existing parcel described as BETZLER - DIVISION OF the west 300 feet of Lots 13 and 14, Block 3, Wilshire Gardens, PLATTED LOTS At that time the Council instructed that the division not be filed Item 6-C with the County until the park dedication and assessment matters had been resolved. The staff advised that Parcels A and'C would be required to pay water and sewer REC charges and that'lateral service is stubbed to the three lots. -There was a question raised as to the lateral assessments applied to these lots and on the corner lot on Magnolia. The staff'wss requested to check into this matter. MOTION was made by Councilman Neils, seconded by Councilman RESOLUTION NO. 73446 Seibold, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 734466 A RESOLUTION ORDERING THAT RESOLUTION N0, 73-138 ADOPTED APRIL 21 1973 APPROVING THE DIVISION OF PLAT 446800 PARCEL 8220 INTO THREE LOTS NOT BE FILED WITH THE COUNTY UNTIL THE FOLLOWING THREE CONDITIONS ARE MET: 1. That $300 be paid to the Village as the required park dona- tion for the two new lots to be created; 2, That the water and sewer REC charges for the two additional lots to be created shall be paid to the Village at the time building permits are issued; 3, That lateral assessments as appropriate be applied as addi- tional charges under the rules that would have pertained under the improvement had the lots been divided as proposed. Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes. The petitioner requested a variance frau the Board of Zoning Adjustment to place a sign at the property line in front of their building at 10700 Highway 55. Ordinance requires this sign be placed 50 feet back from the property line. The build- ing itself is 50 feet from the property line. This request was denied by the Board of Zoning Adjustment on the basis that the petitioner had not demonstrated a hardship, and the petitioner appealed that decision to the Council. NORTHERN HOLDING B DEVELOP= MENT COMPANY - APPEAL FROM BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT FOR SIGN Item 6-F i o Regular CounciV Meeting April 169 1973 Page *31 MOTION was made by Councilman Neils, r tonded by Councilman Seibold, to deny the petitioners appeal of the Board of Zoning Adjustment which denied their request for placement of the sign at zero foot setback, The petitioner Gary Freund explained to the Council this would be an identification sign only giving the address of the building and that the location a$ proposed would align this sign with the others exist= ing along the highway. He stated they wished this sign at this location so that it can be seen by motorists on the highway and that they did not feel the architecture of the building would lend itself to a sign on the facepf the building as would be required by the ordinance, He indicated this location would place the sign approximately 15 feet off the traveled portion of the highway, Councilman Hunt stated he objected to the alternatives of either placing the sign,an the face of the building or on top of the building, Mayor Hi l de questio4ned whether it has ever been the Council's thi n'•,i ngg that weshouldattempttohavethesesignsalongHighway55moved;t,Iring;them into compliance with the Code, The Manager explained tha` as pro 'rty develops we will try to get them in more compliance with tie,101, It was pointed out that under present ordinance requirements, sign, ations must be presented for approval along with site pl_ansobut-that,this site plan was approved prior to these ordinance amendments, Councilman Neils stated that if this were an advertising sign rather than a location or name plate sign the Council would have no alternative but to deny 1t, The problem does exist of the other signs on the road each blocking out the next from line of sight, but we have to draw the line some place, Motion to deny the petitioners appeal failed on a vote of 24, with Mayor H11de and Councilmen Hunt and Spaeth voting nay. MOTION was made by Councilman Hunt, seconded by Councilman Spaeth, that the sign be allowed to be placed not closer than 15 feet from the property line at its closest point, MOTION was made by Councilman Spaeth to amend the motion that the sign be placed so that it lines up with the other signs in the area. Motion failed for lack of second, Councilman Neils stated that when we are talking about an identification sign the need to place it out in front of the others is diminished, He also stated he did not like the idea of the Council being required to choose the specific point where a sign should be placed. It was suNjustmested the matter be referred back to either the staff or Board of Zoning me to arrive at a solution, The motion and second for the previous motion were withdrawn, Mr. Freund stateA that if the zero foot setback location could not be approved, they would be agreeable to a 10 or 15 foot setback, MOTION was made by Councilman Neils, seconded by Councilman Seibold, to defer action on the matter and refer it back to the Board of Zoning Adjust- ment to work out a solution, Motion carried, four ayes, with Councilman Hunt voting nay. It was felt that some direction should be given to the 0 11 c Regular Council Meeting Apri 1 16, 1973 Page Seven Ro'ard of Zoning Adjustment explaining the reasons for denial and re- questing that they find same iiddi# ground solution to the matter. It wbs-also pointed out that because this board only meets once a month there would be approximately p month's delay before this matter could be, again considered. MOTION was made by Mayor Hide, seconded by Councilman Neils, to re- consider the previous motion, Notion carried, four ayes. with Council- man Seib;,ld voting nay. The motion ,_to defer action and refer to the Board of Zoning Adjustment was then defeated on a vote of 0-5. MOTION was made by Councilman Hunt, seconded by Councilman Neils, re- ferring the matter to the staff to work out a recommendation for the Council by the next meeting. Motion carried, five acres. MOTION was made by Councilman Hunt, seconded by Councilman Neils, direct- ing the staff to develop a short policy directive from the Council to the Board of Zoning Adjustment for Council approval at the next meeting. Motion carried, five ayes. By Resole tion No. 73-135 adopted April 2, 1973 the Council approved the d!vis+on of Lots 1 and 2, Block 2, Med-O-lake Acres 2nd Addition to create three lots. Also adopted at that meeting was Resolution No. 73.136 providing that the division not be filed with tht County until four conditions were met. Condition 3 of that Resolution states! that additional lateral assessments for sewer and water be charged, The staff advised these charges to be $791.51 for water and $435,20 for sewer, MOTION was made by Councilman Spaeth, seconded by Councilman Seibold, to adopt RES01UTION N0, 73-141, A RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION N0, 73-136 B`" CHM!GING CONDITION #3 TO READ: 3, Thz* $791.51 for water lateral charges and $435,20 for sew;_ % lateral charr%es be paid to the Village. AND ADDING A STH CONDITION TO READ: 5. That the aaveloprr of Parcel 3 be required to provide water and sanitary sere- stubs to the property line. MOTION was made by Count:111man Neils, seconded by Councilman Seibold, to further amend RESOLUTION NO. 73-136 by adding a 6th condition: 6. That $150 be paid to the Village is the required park donation for the newly created lot. Motion to amend the Resolution carried, four ayes (Councilman Hunt absent from the room at the time of the vote). Motion to adopt RESOLUTION N0. 73-147 as amended carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes. WAYNE R. JOPP DIVISION OF PLATTED LOTS Item a -F RESOLUTION N0. 73447 o Ro'ard of Zoning Adjustment explaining the reasons for denial and re- questing that they find same iiddi# ground solution to the matter. It wbs-also pointed out that because this board only meets once a month there would be approximately p month's delay before this matter could be, again considered. MOTION was made by Mayor Hide, seconded by Councilman Neils, to re- consider the previous motion, Notion carried, four ayes. with Council- man Seib;,ld voting nay. The motion ,_to defer action and refer to the Board of Zoning Adjustment was then defeated on a vote of 0-5. MOTION was made by Councilman Hunt, seconded by Councilman Neils, re- ferring the matter to the staff to work out a recommendation for the Council by the next meeting. Motion carried, five acres. MOTION was made by Councilman Hunt, seconded by Councilman Neils, direct- ing the staff to develop a short policy directive from the Council to the Board of Zoning Adjustment for Council approval at the next meeting. Motion carried, five ayes. By Resole tion No. 73-135 adopted April 2, 1973 the Council approved the d!vis+on of Lots 1 and 2, Block 2, Med-O-lake Acres 2nd Addition to create three lots. Also adopted at that meeting was Resolution No. 73.136 providing that the division not be filed with tht County until four conditions were met. Condition 3 of that Resolution states! that additional lateral assessments for sewer and water be charged, The staff advised these charges to be $791.51 for water and $435,20 for sewer, MOTION was made by Councilman Spaeth, seconded by Councilman Seibold, to adopt RES01UTION N0, 73-141, A RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION N0, 73-136 B`" CHM!GING CONDITION #3 TO READ: 3, Thz* $791.51 for water lateral charges and $435,20 for sew;_ % lateral charr%es be paid to the Village. AND ADDING A STH CONDITION TO READ: 5. That the aaveloprr of Parcel 3 be required to provide water and sanitary sere- stubs to the property line. MOTION was made by Count:111man Neils, seconded by Councilman Seibold, to further amend RESOLUTION NO. 73-136 by adding a 6th condition: 6. That $150 be paid to the Village is the required park donation for the newly created lot. Motion to amend the Resolution carried, four ayes (Councilman Hunt absent from the room at the time of the vote). Motion to adopt RESOLUTION N0. 73-147 as amended carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes. WAYNE R. JOPP DIVISION OF PLATTED LOTS Item a -F RESOLUTION N0. 73447 1 Regular Council Meeting April 16, 1973 Page Eight At the April 2 Council meeting the petitioner requested the divi- sion of Lot 1, Lake Park Acres, into two parcels. It was the staff's recommendation at that time the division be denied be,, cause sewer is not avai`3ble to this property. At that meeting action was deferred pending further information regarding both the sewer availability and the pkrk dedication policy. The Manager indicated that water has been extended to the southern portion of the lot and that sewer is presently terminated just east of the street right of way east,of the'lot in question and could be ex- tended further to the west to take in the subject parcel and the house to the west of that. Mr. Juei'Svenkerud, 6421 Westchester Drive, read to the Council a short message from the petitioner indicating that the buyer of the southern portion -of the lot agrees to assume the assessments)and that the owner of the lot with the house on it also agrees to this extension, MOTION was made by Councilman Seibold, seconded by Councilman Spaeth, to defer action on this requested division and directing the staff to contact the petitioner relative to the sewer exten- sion, and if it is their request to continue with this division, that the staff prepare a resolution. Motion carried, five ayes. Councilman Neils suggested that it may be well worth while to con- tact the property owners all the way over to Quaker Lane. The' Manager questioned what would be done with the land on the south side of the street as there is no way of determining what benefit would be derived here. The Final Plat and Development Contract for Williams Woods were presented to the Council for approval. The Manager indicated it was the staff's recommendation that the Council establish $300 as the park dedication charge on the basis that there was one site there before platting, Two corrections in the Development Con- tract were noted: Page 1, paragraph 2 of the Contract and Page 1, Section 2.1 of the Special Conditions should both refer to bituminous" curb and gutter rather than concrete, ORPHA KRANZ - DIVISION OF PLATTED LOT Item 6-6 WILLIAMS WOODS - FINAL PLAT 6 DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT Item 6-H There was discussion regarding Section 8.3 of the Special Condi- tions calling for a water area assessment of $675, Mayor Hilde pointed out that in view of the Council's current discussions and changes in assessment policy, we may not charge water area charges in this situation. MOTION was made by Councilman Spaeth. seconded by Councilman Hunt, to eliminate paragraph 8.3. MOTION was made by Mayor Hildeb seconded by Councilman Spaeth, to amend this motion to add this is being cane because the property is totally surrotmded by a water project area where no such charges existed, Motion to amend the motion carried. three k4es. with Councilmen Neils and Seibold voting nay. After further discussion on whether or not these assessments ;should be deleted or could be held in abeyance until the over-all Village policy is determined, it was decided this r U Regular Council Meeting Aparil 16, 1973 Page Nine seutior would be left in vi sed that he. may get al resolves this particular delete Section 8.3 from 2-3 with Mayor Hilde and the contract and the petitioner would be ad - 1 or part of this money back when the Council problem for the whole Village. The mo'c'ion to the Development Contract failed on a vote of Councilmen Seibold and Neils voting nay. MOTION was made by Councilman Spaeth, seconded by Councilman Seibold, to amend Section 13.1 of the Development Contract by deleting the figure of $1,500 and replacing it with the sum of $300 as the park dedication fee. Motion carried, five ayes. MOTION was made by Councilman Seibold, seconded by Councilman RESOLUTION N0, 73-148 Neils, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 73-1489 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FINAL PLAT AND DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT AS AMENDED FOR WILLIAMS WOODS. Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes. MOTION was made by Councilman Spaeth, seconded by Councilman Seibold, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 73-1499 A RESOLUTION APPROVING A SETBACK VARIANCE OF 35 FEET ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF LOT 39 BLOCK 19 AND A 10 FOOT VARIANCE ON THE NORTH SIDE OF LOT 39 BLOCK 19 WILLIAMS WOODS. Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes. In 1966 bots 9 and 10, Block . Elmhurst Gateway Addition, were apr %oved for consolidation by the Council. However, at that time a Resolution was not adopted effecting same, and the action was never filed with the County. The petitioner requested eche Council re -confirm this action so that the consolidation could be implemented. MOTION was made by Councilman Spaeth, seconded by Councilman Neils, tc adopt RESOLUTION N0, 73-150, A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE CONSOLIDATION OF LOTS 9 AND 10, BLOCK 2, ELMHURST GATEWAY ADDITION REQUESTED BY PETER KUCHMAN, Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes. REPORTS BY OFF IC S b COMMITT MOTION was made by Councilman Spaeth, seconded by Councilman Hunt, receiving the Storm tv inage Plan prepared by Bonestrro, Rosene, Anderlik and Associates, Inc. Motion carried, five ayes. It was agreed that at the study session later in the month the Council would set a date for review of this report. The Preliminary Report on Project No. 301, main and street improvements on Xenium LAne was reviewed by the Council, sanit?ry sewer, water ano 15th Avenue North MOTION was made t=y Councilman Hunt, seconded by councilman Spaeth, to adopt RESOLUTION! NO, 73-1511 A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE PRELIMINARY REPORT ON PROJUCT N0. 3016 RESOLUTION N0, 73-149 PETER KUCHMAN LOT CONSOLIDATION Item 6-B RESOLUTION N0, 73-150 STORM DRAINAGE Item 7-B PROJECT N0. ANE b 15TH Item 7-C PLAN 301 - XEN,IUM AVENUE NORTH RESOLUTION N0. 73-151 r J J Regular Council Meeting April 16, .1973 Page Ten The Council requested this matter be placed on the agenda again for review prior to the public nearing, and in reviewing the preliminary report requested the following items for further information: 1. Page 1, paragraph 4: Questioned the cosi` for jacking under the railroad. 2. Page 1, paragraph 5: Identify where the 14,300 assessable feet benefiting by sanitary sewer are. 3. Page 2, paragraph 3: Requested maps for the water main on 15th Avenue from Pineview to the Minneapolis Industrial Railroad, 4, Page 2, paragraph 4: Further explanation of the $10.00 and $7,30 per foot figures. 5. Page 3, paragraph 7: Questioned the extension of the water main from Pineview to the Minneapolis Industrial Railroad unless it is needed by the abutting properties. Motion to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 73-151 carried on a Roll Call vote, five dyes. 5 MOTION was made by Councilman Hunt, seconded b% Councilman RESOLUTION NO. 73-152 Spaeth, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 73-151, A RESOLUTION ORDERING A PUBLIC HEARING TO BE HELD ON PROJECT N0, 301 ON MAY 21, 1973 AT 7:30 P.M. Councilman Neils suggested that if a substantial cost reduction could be -accomplished by including the Gates property it this proj- ect, it should be included. The staff was requested to make con- tact with the property owner to see if they would be interested. Motion to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 73-152 carried on a Roil Call vote, five ayes. MOTION was made by Councilman Hunt, seconded by Councilman Neils, RESOLUTION N0. 73-153 to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 73-153, A RESOLUTION GIVING AUT11ORILATION TO PAIMTING ELEVATED TOWER ENTER INTO A CONTRACT WITH ABHE AND SVOBODA FOR THE PAINTING NO. 1 - PROJECT N0, OF THE ELEVATED TOWER NO, 1 FOR THE LOW BID BASE PRICE OF 501-501-901-010 111,230 AND $110 PER CUBIC YARD FOR SAND REMOVAL, Motion Item 7-D carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes. A letter was receiv?d from the consulting engineers for the Village of Medicine Lake relative to a strert resurfac-ng proj- ect within that village which =16 Le extended to include a short ;piece of street within Plymouth. rhe Manager advised the estimated cost of the project would bar $2,6CO and that this would require a public Hearing. The ,oad in question is at present, a dirt road, VILLAGE OF MEDICINE ' AKE MEET RESURFtCING PROJECT I tam 7-E i L r Ir Regular Council Meeting Apri l - .o, 1973 Page Eleven 0 MOTION was made by Councilman Hunt, seconded/by Councilman Seibold, accepting the enggineers report on the project and referring the matter to the Villace Engineer to centact t e residents effected to see if they want the iW. vement. Councilman Neils questioned whether sewer nd water service ii in- stalled on this street and stated that he uld not be interestpd in ordering this project if these, serviceare not in the ground. The staff was also requested to check int this matter. Motion carried, five ayes. f\ The Council agreed to hold a joint "ouncil and Planning Commis- sion meeting on April ?3 for the purrppoose of reviewing the propos- ed Land Use Guide Plan. The regularly scheduled study session for that evening will be held on April 30, 0 t LICENSES 6 PERMITS MOTION was made by Councilman Hunt, seconded by Councilman Seibold, to adopt RESOLUTION NO,, 73454, A RESOLUTION,APPROVING THE WELL DRILLING LICENSE RENEWALS FOR ONE YEAR COMME41tING ON MAY Is 1973 FOR THE FOLLOWING: (1) Henry Gess Well C6tnpany, 2) Torgerson Well Company, (3) Mork Well Company, k4. Purlarlo Well Compaq. and (5) Stevens Wel-1 Drilling Company., Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ages. MOTION was made by Councilman Hunt, seconded by Councilman Spaeth, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 73455, A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SERVICE STATION LICENSE RENEWAL FOR THE PLYMOUTH OIL COMPANY FOR A PERIOD OF NINE MONTHS COMMENCING ON APRIL 16, 1973 AND EXPIRING DECEMBER 31, 1913. Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes. DISBURSEMENTS MOTION was made by Councilman Spaeth, seconded by Councilman Seibold, to adopt RESOLUTION N0, 73456s A RESOLUTION APPRO'- ING THE DISBURSEMENTS FROM THE GENERAL FUND, CONSTRUCTION FUND, WATER FUND, SEWER FUND AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT FUND IN THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF $560471.58 FOR THE PERIOD ENDING APRIL 9, 1973. Motion carried on a Roll -Call vote, five ayes. LAND USE GUIDE PLAN Item 7-F RESOLUTION N0, 73454 WELL DRILLING LICENSE RENEWALS Item 8-A RESOLUTION N0. 73-155 PLYMOUTH OIL COMPANY SERVICE STATION LICENSE RENEWAL Item 8-C RESOLUTION N0, 73-156 DISBURSEMENTS FOR PERIOD ENDING APRIL 9, 1973 Item 94 1 t, LAND USE GUIDE PLAN Item 7-F RESOLUTION N0, 73454 WELL DRILLING LICENSE RENEWALS Item 8-A RESOLUTION N0. 73-155 PLYMOUTH OIL COMPANY SERVICE STATION LICENSE RENEWAL Item 8-C RESOLUTION N0, 73-156 DISBURSEMENTS FOR PERIOD ENDING APRIL 9, 1973 Item 94 0 r N + WOV,H y 0 g y• eRqIa • A r rI fl 00 e 9Ma1••oe a encso< r •fy OAp o °. ft 1,t a o"JMO b, RN 1 b1+« ' VA_ OM O r•N S3 »» f9- A •1 y• < V% + MN 12H1 M• IO 4 e • O p r fy O C 0 N/ 141a N ` baw a ,O A O1~••ir W rt i N p a nrpr. ,Ta MM; IfA o •• 00 0 a fq t4 il 7,Of'p b' s • ., .. %0 to r o AA f o'. w n fo o a M o iV1 Od a0nr ft 40A; h e orb Oaa0Og i . fa=0 1o O< < y o M r O O 9''h O O pr r^ O O i R ` S[ r M IM•• H o + O a 0 0 03 1-844 a [ 0 010+ A q Z ft o rr Kehetaii a t ger r• no o° . rr r p r• et C •' a p e a to w o5:wn BgMefrea pop 6a 10j'n tW - 00OMao 0 OM MOOr,D1•• 00006 ° cr• IV ~ f,..A OMCI F 0r a .. n •. $ M rr a ppp • g g p / e M •MWER ffA 11 an-.. rgCt.M r MT.u. N1 •Ti 1w . app rr w r o.30r o w . w n'g w M4vet`t. K W ff `• 'a a r e o 0 err •o h g• h a .° o ii ~ M •e r • e O • fr 1 t3 tr h .. o w r f.• f.r. aoes w a anr a,e O"MN `' ora:'a•a•e R a a g •, f+f INC R f•• • eRR h 1cm. 04 0 1•• a ! A A fs A g d tr, ASIA 161t 1••8 M^d1+ ORO , Or \. F+O A O q Irto CDN lo r rM ` & now A \' p all 0 a %foeOr fft01109 a <+r hW M' it A AAv t! Op A 1V •<OA 04. A \ f • w ft w ;M• A O O A w en w O f JO Mf.1• i pMe p hg eon at w w Is IL 0 1 a J 0 IF N 1 Fr 0 r N + WOV,H y 0 g y• eRqIa • A r rI fl 00 e 9Ma1••oe a encso< r •fy OAp o °. ft 1,t a o"JMO b, RN 1 b1+« ' VA_ OM O r•N S3 »» f9- A •1 y• < V% + MN 12H1 M• IO 4 e • O p r fy O C 0 N/ 141a N ` baw a ,O A O1~••ir W rt i N p a nrpr. ,Ta MM; IfA o •• 00 0 a fq t4 il 7,Of'p b' s • ., .. %0 to r o AA f o'. w n fo o a M o iV1 Od a0nr ft 40A; h e orb Oaa0Og i . fa=0 1o O< < y o M r O O 9''h O O pr r^ O O i R ` S[ r M IM•• H o + O a 0 0 03 1-844 a [ 0 010+ A q Z ft o rr Kehetaii a t ger r• no o° . rr r p r• et C •' a p e a to w o5:wn BgMefrea pop 6a 10j'n tW - 00OMao 0 OM MOOr,D1•• 00006 ° cr• IV ~ f,..A OMCI F 0r a .. n •. $ M rr a ppp • g g p / e M •MWER ffA 11 an-.. rgCt.M r MT.u. N1 •Ti 1w . app rr w r o.30r o w . w n'g w M4vet`t. K W ff `• 'a a r e o 0 err •o h g• h a .° o ii ~ M •e r • e O • fr 1 t3 tr h .. o w r f.• f.r. aoes w a anr a,e O"MN `' ora:'a•a•e R a a g •, f+f INC R f•• • eRR h 1cm. 04 0 1•• a ! A A fs A g d tr, ASIA 161t 1••8 M^d1+ ORO , Or \. F+O A O q Irto CDN lo r rM ` & now A \' p all 0 a %foeOr fft01109 a <+r hW M' it A AAv t! Op A 1V •<OA 04. A \ f • w ft w ;M• A O O A w en w O f JO Mf.1• i pMe p hg eon at w w Is IL 0 1 a J 0 IF N 1 F