HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Minutes 11-20-1972n
4
M,1 NUTES
REMILAR COUNCIL MEETING
NOVEMBER 20, 1972
A regular aye ting of the Plymouth Village Couocil was called to 2rder by 1
Mayor Hilde'At 7:35 p.m, in the Council Chambers of the Public Works Build -
Inge 14900 Twenty-third Avenue North, Plymouth, on November 20, 1972. i
PRESENT: Nay r Hilde, ;Councilren Hunt, Seibold, Neils and Spaeth rrived /
at 7:50 p.m j , Manager Willis, Attorney Lefler, Engineer udrud
Consultant Ing,inoer Bonest.rog, inance Director Ricker and Pla ner
Overhiser,
ABSENT: None.
l
PETITIONS. REQUESTS S COMMUNICATIONS
NOTION was made by Councilman Hunt, seconded by Councilman RESOLUTION N0. 12_
Seibold, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 724749 A RESOLUTION APP SYANLEY 0, KLIhk
PROVING THE SUBDIVISION VARIANCE REQUESTE.O BY STANLF;Y D. SUBDIVISION VARIANCE
KLINK ON LOT 76 BLOCK 20 OF SUNSET ACRES TO CREATE TWO PAR- Item 4-A
CELS, Motion carried on a Roll Call rote, four ayes.
NOT10N was made by Coun,ci loran Hunt, seconded by Councilman RESOLUTION NO, 72475
Seibold, to adopt RESOLUTIGN N0,, 72-4750 A RESOLUTION SET-
TING FORTH TWO CONDI IONS AS SET FORTH IN THE STAFF REPORT
DATED NOVEMBER 15, 1172 WHICH MUST BE MET BEFORE THE SUB-
DIVISION APPROVED BY 1ESOLUTION NO, 72 474 CAN RE FILED,
Motion carried on a toll Call vote, four ayes.
Donald C. Russ, owneto of Fox Meadows Apartments, appeared FOX MEADOWS APARTMENTS
before the Council rrequestino a revision Io the General REVISION TO GENERAL
Development Plan to allow him to remove two garage st;ruc- DEVELOPMENT PLAN
tures containing 52 enclosed parking spaces to be replaced Item 4-8
with 55 open parking spaces, He explained that a: 80%
occupancy much congestion has occurred in the open parking
areas. Approximately one-third of the tenants with garages
use themm, and another one-third use thein garages only in
bad weather. The; petitioner will be submitting a request
for a Subdivisior Variance in the future which would move
his South property line 40 feat to the South,
Councilman Neils pointed out tRat item, such as details of
landscaping, drainage, etc, were not included in this re-
vision as required under site plan approvals and proposed a
revision to the Resolution proposed by the staff to include
this%
The Council discussed the fact that these changes would go
against presort Ordinance requirements for multiplo develop-
ments and whether these variances were justified. It was,
0
IG,
1.
RegYlar 1 Ileltilig " ' '
November 20, 1972
Page Two
agreed that the revisions would
other residents in the area and
enhance the type of tenants and
would be a. positive stop.
0
not adversely effect the
th4t if these changes would
th* occvpancyr ratio i t `
NOTION was made by Councilman Seibold, seconded by Coun-
cilman Neils, to Odopt RESOLUTION NO. 72.476, A RESOLU-
TION APPROVING THREVISIONS TO THE GENERAL DEVELOPMENT
PLAN FOR FOX READ WS APARTNENTS AS SET FORTH IN THE STAFF
REPORT DATED NOVEMBER.16., 1972.
NOTION was made by Councilman Neils, seconded by Coucil-
man Hunt, to amend the Resolution to set forth the tlree
specific revisions being approved:,
le To remove 11 open parking stalls along the South wall of Build-
ing #2 and replace with a landscaped yard about 30 feet in depth
from the building lines;
2. To add 32 ope^ parking spaces on 40 feet of additional property
to be acquired along the Souter line of the existing site;
3. To remove the raw of garages nearest the South wall of Building
2 and repiaHe with W open parking stalls in the same location;
RESOLUTION 0,72-476
and further that no work may proceed on said revisions until:
le The property to be acquired is in fact acquired and joined to
the existing site 4s one parcel;
2. A detailed Site Plan is prepared and approved in the manner
preswrited by Ordinance for now projects;
3. The petitioner provide surety that the landscaping and all other
parts of the revision are completed in accordance with the Site
Plan.
Motton to amend the Resolution carried, four ayes. Notion
to adopt the Resolution as amended carried on a Roll Cali
vote, four ayes. (Councilman Spaeth, who arrived during
the discussion of the above matter, abstained from the
voting.)
The petitioner has submitted a Site Plan for construction
of Office Building 03 and requests a Subdivision Variance
which would divide Lot 2, Block 2, Fox Meadows 1st Addi-
tion into Parcel A (Office Building N3) and Parcel B
Office Suil0ing #2 and Train Car -Recreation Building).
The question was raised if there would be sufficient park-
ing for Building /3 if it were ever divided off from the
rest of the complex. It was noted that the parking does
meet mihlmum Ordinance requirement! the same as Building
2 and that the total parking available for Buildings 01,
BELMAR BUILDERS
SUBDIVISION VARIANCE d
SITE PLAN FOR OFFICE
BUILDING #3
Item 4-C
I r council Voting
Nov:Zr 20, 1972
Page Three
Ot and 03 is approximately twice the Ordinance requirements.
Councilman Nails questioned what assurances, shoulO be given
to future owners of Parce'i 6 that they can contine, to use
the street between Buildings 02 and 93 if they and :in sep-
arate ownership. Attorney Lefler indicated this ShouYd be
handled by mutual easements.
The CouncIl agreed that the Ordinance requirements for park-
ing as well as trash disposal facilities for office build-
ings should be examined sometime in the future.
NOTION was made by Councilman Neils, seconded by Council- RESOLUTION NO. 720477
man Seibold, to adopt RESOLUTION NQ, 72-477, A RESOLUTION
APPROVING THE SITE Plan FOR OFFICE BUILDING f3 SUBJECT TO
THE FOLLOVING CONDITIONS:
1. Petitioner relocate p:.oposed building to maintain a 75 foot seta
hack consistent with Ordinance requirements;
2. Petitioner provide th• Village Engineer with a complete drainage
plan showing site plan with 2 -foot contour intervals of topography;
3. Petitioner indicate size and location of identification sign;
4. Two additional fire hydrants be provided subject to review and
final approval by the Village Fire Chief;
S. The trash dumpster be housed in a structure part of the principal
structure,
MOTION was made by Coincilman Seibold, seconded by Council-
man Neils, to amend the Resrlution to add a sixth condition;
6. That nutuel easements be prepared for the purpose of parking
privileges for each between Parcels A and 8 in perpetuity,
Motion to ameno the Resolution carried, five ayes,
MOTION was made by Councilman Neils. seconded by Councilman
Hunt, to further amend the Resolution by changing i,ordition
1 to read:
1, ?etitioner relocate proposed Building 0, to maintain a setback
consistent with Building #2,
Planner Overhiser pointed out that Building #3 1s across
from a residential district and that Ordinance Calls fpr a
75 foot setback, Motion to amend the Resolution failed on
a vote if 1-4 with Councilman Neils voting aye.
MOTIQN was made by Counr-ilman Neils, seconded by Councilman
Spaeth. to further amend the Resolution by changing condition
2 to read:
I
0
1.y
Regular Council fteting
alovember 20, 197L
Page Frur
x, Petitioner provide complete drainage pian showing site plan witto
2 -foot contour intervals of topography subject to the approval
of the Village Engineer.
Motion to amend the Resolution carried, five ayes.
YAT ION was made by Councilman Neils, seconded by Council %
sianiSpaeth to further awend the Resolution by adding a
fondition 07 as follows:
7, The Petitioner enter into an agreement with the IlillaV prow
viding surety that landscaping and draintle features are ccm
pleted in accordance with the approved site plan.
Motion to amend the Resolution carried, five ares.
The motion to adopt RFSOLV7.:ON NO. 72.477 as amended three
times carried on a Roll Call vote, five ayes,
It was the staff's recommendation that tfe proposed sub- PHILLIP J. RUNES
division of Lot 1, block 1, Cavanaugh Addition i-ato two SUSDIVISION VARIANCE
parcels containing approximately 11,280 and 11,:75 slmarc# Item 4-D
feet each be denied because it itould be t«Lonsistent with
the exiscing platting and development a1 trip area sur nand%
inQ 4ubJect parcel.
MOTION wos ridde by Councilman Neils ndad by Council-
man ounci1manSeibold, to adopt. a PESOLUTION DEF ,f 6 T14E SUBDI l;5lON
vARTANCE FAR THE REASON! AS STATED IN lit `TAFF R.EPONT DATED
NOVEMBER 15, 1972.
Mrs. Phillip Runes a speared before th a inc i l and :_ *pl ai rsed
that hf. portion of !-.he tat they wish r. lie divided )ff i;
very lot* and would require considerab : i I to be a,iIdaWe.
She requested the Co incil appoint a Po' ,it.:e to fut -J,er in-
vestigate the topography of the lot beto,•: taking ark uctiein,
She a 1 se indicated r,he hac', talked with se -ira 1 of tl ; nei gho
b,)rs and did not feel there was any opposition to th a sub-
division,
Motion to deny the subdivision variance failed on a Roll
Call vote, 2"1, with Mayor Hilde and Councilmen Hunt and
Spaeth voting nay,
r.ouncilmen Hunt and Seibold volunteered to investigate the
matter as suggested by the Petitioner.
REPORTS Y nF}" I.I.S,. 80ARQ; AND COhtMt TTS
MOTION was mad- by Cooncilman Neils, seconded byOm3n. Hunt, to adopt RESOLUTION NO, 72-478, A RfSOLOTION
A CEPTING THE SEVEN NOT EASEMENT ALONG THE WESTERI,Y EDGE
OF L0l' 44 RLOCK 14 INDUSTR!AL PARD 494, Motion carried
n41 a Roll Call vote, five ayes.
RESOLUTION NO, 72,478
MAGNEY CONSTRUCTI0411
EASEMENT GE,DICATI01%
Item S-A
TS
A
O
Regular Council Neeting
November`rd, 1972
Page Five
NOTION was made by Councilman Neils, seconded by Council-
man Spaeth, to adopt RESOLUTION N0. 72.479, A RESOLUTION
VACATING THE TRIANGULAR EASEMENT ON THE SOUTHWEST CORKER
OF LOT 49 BLOCK 1, INDUSTRIAL PARK 494. Motion carried
on a Roll Call vote. five ayes.
RESCL 2 N NO: 72-479
NAG NEY;CONSTRUCTION
EASEMENT VACATION
The Site Plan for the Petitioner's proposed 192 unit NETRA14 PROPERTIES CO.
apartment project was approved by the Council on,Aprgust CONDITIONS TO SITE PLAN
21. 1972 with six conditions to be met before a building Iters 5•C
permit, is issued. The ^etitioner requested that he be
given`'i building permit subject to his'posting`a bond to',
cover the improvements to the drainage ponds with a com-
pletion date of December 1. 1973, and a bond t4 cover th6
landscaping, Also to be included would be a park donation
in the amount of $18,018.
Councilman Spaeth stated he preferred to see the completion
date for the pond improvements moved ahead so,that if the
work is not done. the Village would still have time to award
bids and get the work completed before Winter.
The Council reviewed Exhibits A and 6 presented by .the staff
displaying the proposed pond improvements. the Councfl
agreed the specifications set out in the exhibits should be
specifically incorporated into a -n agreement including plans
for the walkway from Pilgrim Lane to the pro,aosed shopping
center East of Lancaster Lane.
MOTION was made by Councilman Hunt, seconded by Councilman
Seibold, to defer action on'this matter until the next
regular Ctuncil meeting and directing the staff to draft a
revised Resolution tp include the foregoing recommendations.
Notion carried. five oyes.
MOTION was made by Councilman Spaeth, seconied by Coun-
cilman Hunt, to adopt RESOLUTION NO, 72480, A RESOLU-
TION AUT14ORIZING THE GEORGE M. HANSEN COMPANY TO CONDUCT
THE 1972 AUDIT OF THE VILLAGE OF PLYMOUTH,
RESOLUTION NO,, 72480.
MINSEMSEEN
1972 AUDIT OF VII,LAGF.
Item 5-H
NOTION was made by Councilman Neils, secon(ed by Council-
mart Hunt, to amend the Resolution to the e)tent that a
different member of the firm be involved iii the 1972 audit.
Motion to amend the Resolution carried, fila ayes.
Motion to adopt RESOLUTION NO, 12.480 as Aiended carried
on a Roll Call vote, five ayes,
Manager W'iilis explained the budgets have been mudlfied
to reflect the charges for metropolitan sewers and the
amount to be ItVied for metropolitan sewer debt service.
The Council rev'ewed the proposed budgets in det.01 , and
the follow±ng were points of discussion or charge:
1973 WATER 4 SANITARY
SEWER FUND dUDGEIS
Item 5-E
ular rnc11 Meeting
veebe!r f!, 172
P ge Six
Whenestianed re ardin tae increase in Per,onel Services. 4 g Finance
O!irector Ricker explained"this is because of Interdepartmental salaries,
hf)wever, the number of pa(ple involved remains unchanged.
M;''iyor H11de bsked what thl: actual experience for 1972 is.Mr. Ricker ex•,,
plained that we, are slip h,:ly udder at the present time and will probably
come out very close to th,a projected expenditures at year end.
Tncie was discussion regard -Ing the disposition of funds charged out to proj-
ects. Mr. Ricker explained that any water and sewer fund surpluses would be
t,ronsferred to surplus and from there to the sinking fund. The Council
agreed they would prefer not to see transfers out of the utility operating
funds occur except by explicit Council authorization, In some cases it might
be preferable Ito leave any surpluses in the operating fund budgets to cover"
certain capita's expenditures.
lender Materials and Supplies - water Meters, Mr. Ricker explained that the'-,,
38,400 requested included the alteration of approximately 150 inside meter's
to outside reading, MOTION was made by Mayor Hilde, seconded by Councilman
Neils, directing thestaff to prepare an analysis and report for the Councl1
which i.ndicate# the nimber of replacements necessary and the approximate
cost for both materials and labor to accomplish this along with a cost esti-
niate of not doing the replacements. Motion carried, five ayes..
l'nder Materials and,Supplies Hater Valves and Curb Steps, it was agreed
1 hat every effort sviuld be made to go back to the co,itralctor to replace
wrater valves and curs steps. It'vas also agreed that these items should be
vart of building inspection.
Under Contractial Services- Consulting Engineer, the Council directed the
r tataff two make every effort to bit both tou4.h tnd reasonable when calling a
onsultant engineer out to solve special protlems so that we do not pay f;lr
iromething we have already paid for.
0
The Council questioned the $5,000 incre s in Rental of Private Equipment
n view of the fact that the purchase of !4uipment previously rented was
nlso budgeted. Mt. Ricker indicated a portion of this figure was payment
t)n the computer and accountingvequipmen,t. Thr: Council questioned if this
figure also appeared in the 19 2 ex;enditares and requested more information
n this subject.
IOTION was made by Councilman Hunt, secondiaki by Councilman Neils, tp elimi-
iate $490 from Contractual Services- Confo-ia4nclss (line 012), money allocated
or the national convention. Motiao carr'ilid, Five ayes.
At the conclusion of their review, the Coitircil decided to defer a-loption of
the budgets until clarification is, i,r:ceived f,o%om the staff on the questioned
items.
The Council previously reviewed the Intercaptov Project
Preliminary Report ano requested that some addttipnal
work be done concmrning the possibility of alte,#Aatives
to the gravity interceptor, i.e., force mains oh a con-
tinued series of force mains until ultimate capacity is
INTERCEPTOR SEWER
PROJECT N0, 202
Item 5-8
o
Regular Council Meeting.
November 20, 1972
Page Seven
reached or a force main now with a gravity line later on. The Supplemental j
Report with cost comparisons of the Various alternatives prepared by the
staff was reviewed.
Councilman, -,Neil asked whether we have metered flows for the existing lift
station in terns of current average daily flow through it nw or an est;iraate
of average ,dail; Vc-q from pumping times to study relative ,o the capaCi-y
of that lift stvi i;n as it exists. He questioned, if the i'irce main to
be, _-ibandoned, ts' '11 reasonable' vor another year or two t ;;jo to a hi over
pumping heaOr an41gat the line wear out from a higher velocity. Ae 'question-
ed how compel ing-. too reason for making a major investment right now.,
Engineer Rudrad indicated that the peak flows exceed the capacity 'of that
lift station. ,Engineer Bonestroo stated he felt we have just about gotten
as,much out of`,the lift station as possible. He suggested there are other/
things that. can be done in the interim to boost capacity, but in the mean=
time we haJ better get going on the grant application as it will probabll
take about two years.
Councilman Neils stated he had some concerns regarding the design presented
in the Preliminary Report: (1) The route chosen given no Assessable lateral
benefit. (2) He a reed with the Preliminary Report that there are difficult
soil conditions. 13) If we are planning on using the same route fcr a
gravity. 1 i ne, it will have to be a much deeper cut. He expressed concern
over the .cost of having to shore up the force main whla digging on top of
of 1t. Mi-, Bonestroo explained the force main will have to be above ground
while wo,rklr'a on the trench. (4) By paralleling thi's same route, re are
digging an a Snod amount of service road and c*possings. Including overhead,
we have about -$100,000 by virtue of this choice of route. He questioned if
we have looked at the possibility of avoiding this bad soil andparalleling
by (a) persuading the Highway Department to go down the median where the
soil is not so bad; bth side where we would have some
lateral benefit; or c,
going on the Northepossibilityofmakingacrossingsomewherebe-
tween 10th and 12th Avenues where we are going to need a road sohietime in
the future.
Engineer Rudrud indicated there has been some discussion on several different
alternatives including going part on the South side and part on the North
side for reasons of assessability and servicing. He suggested some addi%
tional work be done on the alignment after the preliminary report is adopted.
Mr. Bonestroo stated there are several utility lines plus a concrete service
road on the North side with very little room to work in, He felt it would
be far less expensive to go an the South side of the highway. The possi-
bility of using the median was investigated, but the Hignw3y Department
opposes such a plan because of the ultimate expressway design of the highway,
Councilman Hunt stated he felt the key to the decision is the EPA's attitude
in appro+ing a grant based on the alternatives as opposed to the interceptor
and if Owe would be a variance in the percentage of aid received. Mr.
Bonestroo -stated he felt we could get 15% assistance on the interceptor. It
was agreed that the bill should be researched along with some high level
staff conferences on the matter.
Councilman Seibold questioned how much lateral assesoble benefit 1s in the
curront route. Manager Willis stated he felt there would be very little.
Counl,iln;an Seibold asked how much operational costs would be saved by the
i
1 ar Cocci 1 meeting
Nov,111i r 2q, 1912
Page Eight a,
o
construction of the --interceptor and the eliwknatio.n of the
Quaker Lane-lift,.station, Manager Willis expl,aintd it would
be the cost of a new lift station - approximately $15,000 to"
20, 000.
Councilmen Neils questioned if we stay with a 1 i t station
at Quaker's' Lane woult,, the rep: acer.ent be required to handle
all of the area down to the'Shelerd Park area. Mr. ^ciestroo
explained the Vi l l age, paid for a line under County R:: d 18
into Golden Valley several years ago at about .Betty Croaker'
Drive and stated he believed we could still use it. That area
might also be able to connectup with St. Louis Parko The
question was raised if the Freie;.an property was 4elerted from
the previous area charge assessments, and the staff was direct-
ed to i nvesti' gate this
Councilman Seibold stated that even if Federal ai,d is 75% for
all of the alternatives as well as th; interceptor, he felt we
would be better off to go to the interceptor now to eliminate.
the operational and maintenance cost, right now. (
Councilman Spaeth stated he felt spending the money for a
short-term solution,would be foolish as it might cost much
more to re -do it at some point in the future,
NOTION was made by Councilman Seibold, seconded by Coun- RESOLUTION NO. 72-481
cilman Hurst, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 72-4819,A RESOLUTION
APPROVING AND ACCEPTING THE 1"REL141NARY REPORT FOR PROJECT
NO. 202 DATED DECEMBER 9, 1971 AND THE SUPPLEMENT DATED
OCTOBER 17, 19+2. Motion carried in a Roll Call vote, five
eyes.
MOTION was made by Councilman Hint, seconded by Council- RESOLUTION N0. '2-482
RD man Seibold, to adopt RESOLUTION .NO. 72,4820 A RESOLUTION
DIRECTING THE STAFF TO PROCEED WI1H THE PREPARATION OF THE
APPLICATION FOR GRANTS BASED ON CONSTRUCTION OF A GRAVITY
INTERCEPTOR PIPE ALTERNATC, Motion carried on a Roll Clill
vote, five ayes.
Councilman Hunt requested the staff research the amount of
assessable front footage available on the project before
we go to the Federal government for a.grant, Engineer
Rudrud stated he felt it would be better to go to them with
the total amount prior to assessment, The Council decided
they desired this toformation whether or not it was sub-
mittud with the application.
At this point, Cotincilman Spaeth left the meeting,
The Council reviewed the draftext for the Comprehensivo DRAFT TEXT FOR COMPRE-
Guide Plan which was recommonue for approval by the HENSIVE GUIDE PLAN
Planning Commission Item 5-0
I !
Rain , Council Neiting -
I vec"r 20. 1972
Page Ni ne
The, Couny 1 agreed that the legend appearing on the map, side
of the ,-fide Plan should include th;*! statement 'This is Not 1
a Zoni n!' Map".
There Bras discussion on the kriteria for living areas speci-
ftcall, in the LA 1 district and whether this should be more
compatible with the present Rol zoning. MOTION was made by
Councilman Neils, seconded by Councilman Hunt, to amend the '
Summary of Criteria for Ltving Areas" (page 7) that the
Minimum net lot area per single family detached dwelling
Under LA 1 Nithotot PUD be 189 500 and, that under type of de-
Yelopment in the LA I cotego ry this'be changed to read "single
family det&ch d,up'to 2 dwelling units attached in PUDp.
Moticro carried, four ayes.
MOTION was made by Councilman Hunt. seconded by Councilman
Neils, to approve the proposed text for the Comprehensipe
Guide Plan as amended. Motion carried, four ayes.
Manager Willis presented the agreement which has been MEMORANDUM OF UNDER, -
worked out with the Plymouth police officers and review- STANDING -- PLYMOUTH
ed his report dated November 15, 1972 outlining the POLICE OFFICERS b
essential- elements of this agreement. THE VILLAGE
Item 5-F
MOTION was made by Councilman Hunt, seconded by Council-
man Seibold. to adopt RESOLUTION N0, 72-483, A RESOLUTION RESOLU'rION NO., 72483
AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND MANAGER TO EXECUTE ON BEHALF OF
THE VILLAGE THE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE
VILLAGE AND THE PLYMOUTH POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION DATED
NOVEMBER, 1972. Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, four
ayes.
6
NOTION was made by Councilman Hunt, seconded by Council. ORDINANCE NO. 72020
man Neils. to adopt ORDINANCE NO% 72-20, AN ORDINANCE ANENOMENT TO CODE
AMENDING CHAPTER VI, SECTION 10 OF THE VILLAGE CODE AUTH- ESTABLISHING FIRE LANtS
ORIZING THE MANAGER TO ESTABLISH FIRE LANES ON EITHER Item 5-G
PUBLIC OR PRIVATE PROPERTY IN ORDER TO INSURE THE. INGRESS
AND EGRESS OF FIRE FIGHTING EQUIPMENT. Motion curried on
a Roll Call vote, four ayes.
MOTION was made by Councilman Hunt, seconded by Councilo
man Neils, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 72-484. A RESOLUTION
PROTESTING THE ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OPINION THAT VACANT,
UNIMPROVED LOTS BE CLASSIFIED AS CLASS 4 PROPERTY AND
URGING THE 1973 LEGISLATURE. TO CLEARLY ESTABLISH THE
CLASSIFICATION AS CLASS 3D. Motion carried or a Roll
Call vote, four ayes.
I
li
RESOLUTION N0. 72484
ATTORNEY GENERAL'S
OPINION REGARDING ASSESS-
MENT CL4SSIF:CATION OF
VACANT, UNIMPROVED LOTS
Item 5-I
N
I
i
Rtgula council Meet 9
Nov r 20. 1972 I
Page Ten
I
IF
MOTION was jade by„ 7ou;cilman Hunt,, seco4ded ey Council RESOLUTION NO. 72-485 %
man Nei 1 s, to adopt;. RESOLUTION NO. 72-4859 A RTSOLUTIONI APPOAL OF JUDGES
APPROVING THE ELEC1ION JUDGES FOR THE. CECEMBER 5. 1912.FOR VILLAGE ELEY;Tj01I
VILLAGE-' ELECTION. Motions carried on a Rpl l Call vote. Item S-J'
four ayes'.
i
00T I ON wa l*ade by Counci 1 ears 'Hu' -.itss seconded by Caunc 1. RESOLUTIONS imt
elan Sei bold; tto adopt RESOLUt ON NO. 724861 A RESOLD DISTRI COURT ORDER
TTIN DIRECTING THE MANAGER TO1,COMPLf WITH THE ORDER 01F RE: PINE TREE -, POND
THE,,HENREPIN COUNTY DISTRICT COURT DATEV NOV MBEA 16
12,RELATING TO WATERS DISCHAR3ED INTO PINE TREE POND140 ;Ok THIS LIMITED PURPOSE,1 WAIVING CHAPTER VIII.
SECTIO, 5.21 (f THE VILLAGE CODE. Notion carried on, a
Roll Ca?\,,l vote, four ayes.
Mayor Hil.de adjourned the meetiing at 11:45 p.mo. I
I
I
I
Sandra 'L. Haagen
Vi l l aqq Clerk.
Im
m
i
N
4
PAGE 4:
i
3
AMENDMENT TO ?HF MINIES
RESULAR COUs4C KeP.& I NG
NOVEMB0 20. 197
RELHAR BUILDERS SUBDIVISION VARIANCE 8'SIei
BUILDING 03 (Itep.4•C)
Following' the adoption of Resolu7tion No. 72.477. a'
Resgl"tion approving the Site Phn for,Office Bvil'O-
ing N3, a "-OT1ON was made. by Councilman Seibold,
seconded by Councilman Neil -s. tc adopt RESOLUTION
N0. 12.477 "a); A RESOLUTION, APF!ROVING THE, SUBOIVISIM
VARIANCE REQUESTED BY BELMAR BU`iLDERS-,V4lC,M MOULD
DIVIDE 'LOT ' 2, BLOCK 21, FOX MEAD -)M$ FIRST ADDITION INTO
A "PARCEL A" AND A "PARCEL. B". Motion carried on a,
Roll Car vote, five ayes.
u
Approved by Village Council
on December 19. .0,12
Sandra L. Haugen
Village Clerk
i
I