Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Minutes 06-29-1972 SpecialN-INUTES SPECIAL COUNCIL "EETING PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA JUNE 29, 1972 A special meeting of the Plymouth Village t:caunci 1 was called to order by Mayor Hilde at 7:37 p.m. in the Council Ctoiibers of the Public Works Build- ing, 14900 Twenty-third Avenue North, on June 29, 1972, PRESENT: Mayor Hilde, Councilman Spaeth and Neils, Manager Willis, Planner Overhiser and Finance Director Ricker, ABSENT: Councilman Seibold and Hunt MINUTES: MOTION was made by Councilman Neils, seconded by Council- man Spaeth, to approve the minutes of the June 12, 1972 special meeting. Motion carried, three ayes. MOTION wa-s made by Councilman Spaeth, seconded by Councilman Neils, to approve the minutes rf the June 19, 1972 regular meeting. Motion carried, three ayes. REPORTS BY OFFICERS, WRDS b COMMITTEES: Manager Willis explained ;tis is a problem that comes up this time of year •here merchants display, merchandise in their yards. He i•idicated that unless the Council wants to amend the ordinance, the staff feels we should go ahead and enforce the ordinance. JUNE 12, 1972 ft SPECIAL MEETIAlb JUNE 1911 1972 REGULAR MEETING Storage and merchandising in tno.: -2 Shopping Center Busi- ness District was considered first. Councilman Spaeth asked if merchandise which is not left outside overnight was considered storage. Attorney Lefler stated he felt It was a type of storagk and pointed out that in the 64 district all business must be condurted within an enclosed yard or Wilding. Councilman Neils pointed out that the ordinance requires a certain amount of parking spaces for the size of the build- ing, and that if a businessman expands outside he expands his business to a point where his parka:g and sidewalks are not adequate. Attorney Lefler added that in an area where there is a fair amount of traffic the display of merchandise cin bEcome a safety factor. STORAGE & MERCHAND I S- ING IN FRONT, S'DE a REAR YARD AREAS Item 5-A B-2 DISTRICT A 0 i A A special meeting of the Plymouth Village t:caunci 1 was called to order by Mayor Hilde at 7:37 p.m. in the Council Ctoiibers of the Public Works Build- ing, 14900 Twenty-third Avenue North, on June 29, 1972, PRESENT: Mayor Hilde, Councilman Spaeth and Neils, Manager Willis, Planner Overhiser and Finance Director Ricker, ABSENT: Councilman Seibold and Hunt MINUTES: MOTION was made by Councilman Neils, seconded by Council- man Spaeth, to approve the minutes of the June 12, 1972 special meeting. Motion carried, three ayes. MOTION wa-s made by Councilman Spaeth, seconded by Councilman Neils, to approve the minutes rf the June 19, 1972 regular meeting. Motion carried, three ayes. REPORTS BY OFFICERS, WRDS b COMMITTEES: Manager Willis explained ;tis is a problem that comes up this time of year •here merchants display, merchandise in their yards. He i•idicated that unless the Council wants to amend the ordinance, the staff feels we should go ahead and enforce the ordinance. JUNE 12, 1972 ft SPECIAL MEETIAlb JUNE 1911 1972 REGULAR MEETING Storage and merchandising in tno.: -2 Shopping Center Busi- ness District was considered first. Councilman Spaeth asked if merchandise which is not left outside overnight was considered storage. Attorney Lefler stated he felt It was a type of storagk and pointed out that in the 64 district all business must be condurted within an enclosed yard or Wilding. Councilman Neils pointed out that the ordinance requires a certain amount of parking spaces for the size of the build- ing, and that if a businessman expands outside he expands his business to a point where his parka:g and sidewalks are not adequate. Attorney Lefler added that in an area where there is a fair amount of traffic the display of merchandise cin bEcome a safety factor. STORAGE & MERCHAND I S- ING IN FRONT, S'DE a REAR YARD AREAS Item 5-A B-2 DISTRICT A Reaular Council Meeting June 29, 1972 Page Two Mayor Wilde suggested they indicate to the staff that the Council would be interested in a less harsh type 'of ordi - nand: in respect to this matter but that they wouldn't want to loosen it up to a point where it becomes an administrative problem. MOTION was made by Councilman Spaeth, seconded by Council- man Neils to allow businesses to display a certain number of items lin the vicinity of 2 to 4 items) during hours of operation b that these items must be removed from that area during the hours when the business is closed. MOTION was made by Councilman Neils, seconded by Council- m,: Spaeth to amend the motion to limit it to a specific number of items or a square footage so that it does not become an objectionable obstruction. Attorney Lefler asked for clariticatiwi of number of items - types of merchandise or specific number of items? Council- man Spaeth felt it should be limited to specific number of items. Mayor Hilde stated he felt it should be limited to a certain number of items or square footage, All agreed. The motion to amend the notion carried, three aye... The motion as amended carried, three ayes. Manager WI lis explained ned Industrial District that manuf,ncturers will areas, that the problem in the I-1 Plan- I -i DISTRICT was a different type of problem in store their product in the yard Councilman Neils stated he felt the Village should dis- courage businesses who occupy a good size parcel of land, erect a small building on the lot and spread their mercnan- dise all over ;he yard. The violators should be notified inasmuch as the ordinance carries a remedy in the form of a fenced yard. MOTION was made by Councilman Neils, seconded by Mayor Hide, that violators in industrial zones should be noti- fied of the intent and purpose of the ordinance. Councilman Spaeth stated he did not feel the Village should harass the people in the industrial zones in view of the fact that this matter was brought up because of a few violators in the B-2 zones. Manager Willis stated he did not feel the Village should overlook a violation just because it has been done in the past. Mo ,ion carried, two ayes, with Councilman Spaeth voting nay. 0 0 4 a 1 0 4 Re!1u14r Council Meeting \ 1June2991972 Page Three Manager Willis explained that the subject aarcel had re- ceived a water assessment in 1969 ds part of the trunk waterm3in project and that they had again been assessed in error for water under the Southeast Water Project i:., 1971. MOTION was made by Councilman Spaeth, seconded by Council- man Neils, to adopt RESOLUTION N0, 72-2281 A RESOLUTION TO ABATE THE ASSESSMENTS LEVIED AGAINST PLAT 437.369 PARCEL 5210, LEVY N0, 5332. Motion carried on a roll call vote, three ayes. Manner Overhiser the Comprehensive explained that it ing neighborhood in :,find in future parks. presented the draft report and map of Land Use Guide Plan tc the Council and basically follows the walking and uriv- concept. These concepts should be kept platting along with the development of He presented the area calculations for the neighborhoods and the factors used for determining the population: LA -1 4 persons per dwelling unit LA -2 3 persons per dwelling unit LA -3 2.7 persons per dwelling unit LA -4 2.2 persons per dwelling unit ABATEMENT OF SE WATE" ASSESSMENTS 1100 HIGHWAY 55 PLAT 43736, PAKt.EL 5210 Item 8-B RFSOLUTION NO. 72-228 COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE GUIDE PLAN Item 5-B 1-3 units per acre 3-5 units per acre 5-10 units per acre 10-20 uni is pt r acre The number of dwelling units at time of total saturation if development is kept to the lower side of each range would be 401262. If development is kept to the high side of each range, the number of dwelling units could reach 68,137. The population range would be from 134,800 up to 221,700 with an average being 150,000. Councilman Neils stated he felt the Village will run into some transitional problems between the adoption of the guide plan and the changes in the Zoning Ordinance and that some definitive direction should be g,iver( by the Council by reso- lution, Mayor Hilde stated another so'ution might be to adopt the guide plan at the same time a new Zoning Ordinance is adopted. Planner Overhiser did n)t feel there would be any major changes in the ordinance. only interject more flexi- bility. lexi- bi1ity. Mayor Hilde pointed out treat much of the preparatory work has been done - the Multiple Development Improvement, Committee report would serve much of this. Mayor Hilde re- quested Councilman Neils to try to work out a solution to this problem and report back to the Council. Councilman Spaeth questioned why there Nere high density uses crowded in around the Nolth and West sides of Medicine Lake and pointed out that one-third of the Village (Northwest portion) had no high density, Planner Overhiser explained they 7el t this arra had good access butt from County Road S and Highway 55, Councilman, Neils states he felt it will take a great deal of discipline and continuity on behalf of the Planning Commission and Council to reali,`e the population I Regular Courci 1 Meeting June 29, 1972 Page Four figure that was g 'leen, even ti; la,, maximum figure, espe sally in view of the fact ihrat one quadrant of the Village is reserved for LA -1. Mayor Hilde directeu Overhiser to check with the Villages of Maple Cove and Medina to see what their plans are that would direct :ails area as LA -1. He added there had boon some disr.ussion as,to whether or not this area should be planned at all, but that the decision had been made to giv1 it some treatmerfor a very gr'~ •ra 1 cui de . Page 9) Mayo,,: Hilde pointed out that the village is over the avera,e in the 25 to 34 age group, which is the most mobile age. This high rate of turnover haot,a great effect on schools and tax planning. Page 27, paragraph 4 and Page 29 "Publi*: Utilities") Mayor Hilde felt this was too permissive and suggested changing it to "no development without sewer". Counc;lman Spaeth agreed, and Councilman Neils stated he felt some district lines must be drawn to implement such a policy such as (1) no utilities - no platting considered, (2) utilities 5 years or so in the future, and (3) utilities. -available. Mayor Hilde polled the C;uncil and a'i agreed no platting should h,e allowed; without sewer and water. Page 30, paragraph 3) Mayor Hilde stated he felt this was a go.,d idea when consi c.ari ng undev6l oped land but not when there is some development started. He suggested some qualifications so that developers are not encouraged to develop only high density uses it these areas. Councilman Spaeth agreed but stated that with a Guide Plan this criteria is not necessary. Page 31 and Page 60?) Mayor Hilde stated he felt the trail system should not b. iimitod to recreational areas but should also include sidewalks aLd paths connecting non -recreational areas or a';ong major thoroughfares. Councilman Neils pointed out that the Village has had opportunities for this in resi- dential development but had a reluctance to allow the develop- ment that would promote such trails and have insisted that this be left as orivate land under a homeowners association. Mayor Hilde stated that in having this as a goal, the Village must be sure to follow through on plat approval. This system will cost the Village money in the future, but it shouldn't cost too much money. Mayar Hilde asked why the Planned Unit Development concept had not been carried over from the LA -1 area into the LA -2 and LA -3 areas. Ptanner Overhiser stated this was an oversito and wGuld be corrected, Page 46, paragraph 6) Maynr Hilde stated he did not fee! vll should discourage the development of neinh,orhood stores with- i. a residential development as this adds i iiyterest to a ntigh- borhoou. Planner Overtiiser stated he hopes that when the Toning Orainance is rewritten soii.e industrial or commercial uses could be permitted. Council lan N%! i 1 s poi r.ted out the need for a 0-2 district of less thin 5 acre) to accommodate this idea. L. o Regular Council Meeting June 29, 1972; G Page Five' 7 In conclusion, Mayor Hi lde stated he'.\had 3 points he wished tc\` to make: 1. The staff should contact all of the neighboring com- munities, school d-istricts, County and State to advise thera' of what -we are doting. 2. Prior to Council con's'ideration of this (either) just before the public heafli ngs or after) a letter, from the Mayor )representing the Village Council should be,'sent to these same people asking -for comments r,n out, plan. 3,, Either before or after Council adoption of the Guide Plan, it should be sent to the Metropolitan Council for approval, reasons for this blei ng to coordinate with surrounding communit fts and our interest that we con- form with the overall metropolitan,.plan, He felt the Council should at some future timediscuss the timing on this. Mayor Hilde recessed the n-a0ing at 9:10 p,.m.; meeting called back to order at 9:17 p.m. 11 Tte Council continued with their review of the proposed amendments to the Zoning Ordinance relating to Sign Regu- latlons beginnii)g with Section 17, Subdivision 5 "Signs In rY-1 PLANNED INDUSTRIAL DISTRICTS and -2 GENERAL INDUS- TRIAL DISTRICTS. D PROPOSED: "eme (1) business sign located on the industrial 'prop- erty provided the total surface area shall not exceed five (5) percent of the building facing area, or nipetyft six (06) suare feet in area, whichever is lesser, tw shsll two ?2) or more smaller sichs be so arranged and integrated as to create a surface area in excess of } thus? 1 imi tati ons DISCUSSION: Councilman Neils stated he felt in some i-n- stancet 96 feet would not be adequate but that there are significant differences in the I-1 zone as opposed to the business districts in that there is not the necessity of retail type identification, Councilman Spaeth indicated he thov'g)ht 20 percent would bo too great and added that^ he thougat al addi tion .should be made to the ordinance which would require siren, pplana to be submitted with building plans. CountO lmen Neils felt any use a requiring site plan approval should he inclu3ed in this, Mayor Hilde stated he did not feel 96 feet would be a problem. Approval as submitted with one change - cl.Ange lesser" tt "greater° . Three- aye's $ a AMENDMENTS TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE SIGN REGULATIONS Item 5-C D a AMENDMENTS TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE SIGN REGULATIONS Item 5-C rJ ° i J U o Regular Council Meating.' Juni 29, 1972' 1 Page Six 1 PRQPOSED: Eath in4ustrial:,development of over 20 acres shall be per- mitted 'orie' (1) pylon sign not over sixty-four,, (64) square feet in s4rface area' or thirty-six (36) feet in height and located ori the industrial property." DISC SSIbN,, P.n\ a er Willis ex lained that the' staff's thinkingr .. 9 p g _ in limiting square footage to 64 sg4zlre' feet was that titin appeal could be made for anything greater. Pp They had concern there, wouid be too nany large signs I in tW Village. Councilman Spaeth pointed out.,that only one sign would be allowed. Mayor Hilde stated j he felt 2nO feet is too large but 64,As,too small. Both Councilman Neils and Councilm41.1'-)3paeth did not think a developer would want to p,ut` up too lerge a., sign. MOTION was made by Councilman Spaeth, secot der' _Dy Coonci In?fin' Nei is. to allow up to 160 square,' lee.t. t Mo't i On cirri ed, three ayes. PROOSED: Advertising `;signs shall be permitted, only within the 1*1 Plsnned Industibial and I-2 General Industrial Districts . . " DISCUSSION: Manager Wi i 1 i s\\stated that Naegel a feels that B-3 and B-4 districts are permitted zones for advertising signs because with the growth of the Village we will have greater demands for advertising signs in these ' zones. Staff's objection is that i.t would interfere with the advertising of the businesses located in the district. 0 I Councilman Spaeth felt limiting signs to industrial zones is eery limited and with the business district's regulations, lie didn't think there would be too many signs. Mayor Hildt steted 'he didn't think they would detract from the on -premise signs as they would actually add to the comme•,cial atmosphere of a commercial area; however, they should not be allowed to he bigger than, the business signs on the same site. Regulating spacing of these signs would preclude there being too many signs too'clos,e together. Councilman Neils stated he felt they were biased by existiwig zoning circumstances in that we have spot zones of husinss zoning. He staked he would not like to see one of these locations become a sign location, and added that 8-3 districts that have any development need help In looking decent when they are finishedMayor Hilde felt this problem could be solved by limiting the business districts to E acres or more, 0 1 i C Regular Council MeetingJune29,; ;1972 Page Seven MOTION was made by. -'Councilman Nei 1 s . ,)ebnded' ,by Counci1roan,Spaeth that outdoor advertising signs be allowed by conditional use permit in the 84 and, B 4 di s,tri cts, with general criteria to be cons4dored in the`., granti ng e:f the co-ndi tiona,l use permi t tc, i ncl ude consideration of site',location. not detracting' from the bustness signs of estib,l)shed businesses in the district and other items slush, ,as the i ft -f ri ngement- _oil I djacent residential _Q i,::trict\s and whatever other criteria the staff migh- ,.1yoeminecessary. Cqunci lman Spaeth questa one'd' why the B14' and' B-2 districts could not be incl'6de4, Councilman Neils point«;d out that `the B-1 is a v sry restrictive district with more care, taken with regard -to, ameni ties. etc. Bob Naegele added that it is difficult to lease land in these,areas, and they feel they are better suite -d, to other zoning areas. Motion cerried. three ayes.' Ed Wasick from the StateofMinnesota was present to explain and answer' questions relative to the State sign regulations. lie explained that State statute controls only those signs visible from State or Federal highways and that these signs'hiust he located in 4dustriel or, commer- cial districts. The State considers all signs on 1 eased,land to be a commercial entity. In answer to Councilman Spaeth's qui,stions regarding directional sig.es, he explained that any signs on the highway for directional purplises to a development would be prol,,ibited outside of the commercial or industrial zones. On -premise advertising signs are per- mitted, however. a PROPOSED; "The maximum height of advertising signs shall not exceed thirty six (36) feet above grade." DISCUSSION: Councilman Neils stated he felt there were circumstances where the Village could allow on advertising sign on top' of a building, All agreed. PROPOSED: "The minimum distance between advertising signs shall be based upon the pasted speed limit of the highway. , 1b It DISCUSSION: Bob Naegele stated he thought this was a good approach, Councilman Neils added he assumes this applies to day- time speeds only, All agreed, LIM PROPOSED; "No advertising signs or structure shall be located closer than two hundred (200) feet to any residential district, park, play- ground. school or church located on the same side of the street or intersection of streets," DISCUSSION% Mayor Ni lde questioned whether this shouldn't be 200 feet from a residential structure rather than from land beginning, Manager Willis pointed out that this could create problems because it would be difficult when and where a residential structure would be built, All agreed,, not to make the chenge, Regular Council Meeting June 29, 1972 Page 'Ei gh t O C n PROPOSED: Eliminate paragraph 5: "Advertising signs shall not be erected within a zoned district, of less than twenty (20) acres." ° Add new paragraph 5: "Advertising sign3 may be located in the required setback areas if the conditions in t 29 3 and 4.above are adhered to." DISCUSSION: Counci 1 me -n Neils pointed out that thenecessary controls for' the 6-3 and B4 dl),ttri cts are set up by issuance of thle conditional 'use permit. A11 agreed. 4 PROPOSCD: "Pol i ti cal' signs may be permitted for a period of not more thar, thirty (30) days before and ten (10) days after an election., Poli ticdl signs shall conform toth,i s ordinance with permit, fee end setback requirements waived." DISCUSSION: Councilman Neil s stated he felt the 30 and 10 day limits were probably unreasonable for a,, general election. Councilman Spaeth agreed and suggested changing the 30 days to 60 days, but added thai this is a difficult ordi- nance to enforce anyway. All agreed. The remaining portions of the proposed ordinance were reviewed by the Council, and no changes were recommended. MOTION was made ,by Councilman N01s, seconded by Councilman Spaeth, -to direct the staff to take all- of the discussions of the Council and draft another ordinance for,t heir further review. Motion carried, three ayes. Bob Naegele referred back to paragraph 4 under advertising signs in the I-1, I-2, B-3 and B-4 districts prohibiting advertising signs or structures closer than 200 feet from any residential district, park, playground, etc., and cited examples where he felt this unreasonable. Attorney Lefler suggested changging it to read "2QO feet from the boundary of any R-1, R-2, R-3 or R-4 district or 200 feet from a residential structure in an R4 district." All agreed. Ed Wasock brought up the matter of abatement of nuisance signs and aske dfor a more definite program or understand- ing between the State and Village on this matter. Mayor Hilde directed the staff to investigate this matter and find a solution. mr. Waslck also pointed out that variances would not be accepted by the State on signs under their jurisdiction. Attorney Lefler stated he felt the Zoning Ordinance,as a whole handles this matter. Mayor Hilde directed the staff to make sure the language of the ordinance is such to handle this% 0 J C Regular Council Meeting., June 29, 1972 ;_ Page Nine v 4- Manager Willis indicated he wanted to review this matter PROPOSEP 1972 with the Council in the eventthey had different direction. BOND ISSUE There is 2,391,500 of additional work to bond for. The Iten, 5»E Sinking Fuad as of December 31 was $?,70,237. They pro- pose to use $1,856,125 in the refinancing of the temporary ` issues leaving aoprox.ieA tely 5900,000 for debt service. They are propostfig a 15 year issue to get the Village in a more favorable bonding rating status. He suggetted the following timetable: Council authorize on July 10 the sale of $4.7 million issue for on or bbout August 15 with delivery anticipated 30 days thereafter which would give the Village about 2 weeks to get the money and pay off the bonds that come due in October. In January we would refund the bonds that are payable in July which are out at 6 ;percent. Mayor Hilde asked if they had considered two matters: (1) the belief among financial people that interest rates are oing to go up now and pro a51 stay up in the future, and 2) the offset of having all fat excess cash from the bond sale coming in in August and not being able to pay off the bonds until Jan©ary 1. Finance Director Ricker indicated they have taken these points' into account.. Councilman Spaeth questioned the adjusted figures on the West Medicine Lake water contract. Manager Willis in6icated i is i s - a means for bonding for w_l l #3 as the well cannot b shown in the 'pillage's bonding as a separate project as it not 20% assessable. Mayor Hilde explained that the Si nk\;,ng Fund is a balance that is built up with financing, and the only place that the Village can get this well financed is to put it in like this. Manager Willis stated that the Village is approximately $4.15 million behind in our Sinking Fund joday in terms of total obligation over the term of all 'our bond indebtedness. Mayor Hilde pointed out that the Village must catch up by earning interest and by upping area charges. Councilman Spaeth questioned why 15 year bonding rather than shorter term bonding. Manager Willis stated the `tillage is not going to improve its ability to borrow capital on a long teem basis by selling temporary issues and that interest rates on those would be rather severe. Councilman Neils stated there should be an appropriate mix between the short term and long term obligations. As the Village's borrowing strength increases there are some short term obligations that would be favorable to carry. Councilman Neils questioned the amount of reserve against short term debt obligations that should he ca,r,oied In the Sinking Fund as the Sinking Fund will be depleted down to 9006000. Ma oar Hilde pointed out that we will k10t have any short Cerin obligatiors, however, and it will cover two years of normal debt service. Councilman Neils questioned if this is sufficient for future years. Manager Willis stated this can only be answered after the Council decides what will be doe on area charges.. Mr. Ricker stated that any balances held in the Sinking Fund should carry us through th i s pro,j Oct firtantime s_a th_ere. will to no need for short term financingo r J J r 1-1 Regular Council Meriting June 29. 1972 Page Ten Councilman Spaeth stated he would tike to see an accounting or report on where the Sinking Fund is spent or used. ' i MOTION was made by ouncilman Spaeth. seconded byrCouncilman Neils. directing the staff to proceed in the li W they have recommended and send the'Council something to look at at the July 10, 1972 meeting, Motion carried,, three ayes. Manager Willis briefly reviewod hi s, report regarding the Vicksburg right-of-way acquisition and the assessments on the Minneapolis Workhouse property. Councilman Spaeth questioned whether the $9,000 cut from the assessments had been picked up in the assessments that had not been levied yet, Manager Willis indicated they had bern picked up in the construction cost of Vicksburg Lane, It was agreed to defer action on this matter until all members of the Council were present. IN0 Councilman Spaeth stated he would tike to see an accounting or report on where the Sinking Fund is spent or used. ' i MOTION was made by ouncilman Spaeth. seconded byrCouncilman Neils. directing the staff to proceed in the li W they have recommended and send the'Council something to look at at the July 10, 1972 meeting, Motion carried,, three ayes. Manager Willis briefly reviewod hi s, report regarding the Vicksburg right-of-way acquisition and the assessments on the Minneapolis Workhouse property. Councilman Spaeth questioned whether the $9,000 cut from the assessments had been picked up in the assessments that had not been levied yet, Manager Willis indicated they had bern picked up in the construction cost of Vicksburg Lane, It was agreed to defer action on this matter until all members of the Council were present. IN PROJECT, N0, 201 VICKSBURG LAAv' CSAH #6 TO 261-i AYE: , , Item 5-D APPOINTMENTS TO BOARp OF ZONING ADJUSWNT Item 6 LICENSES b PERMITS MOTION was made by Councilman Spaeth, seconded by Council. RESOLUTION NO. 72-22ff' man Neils to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 72-228. A RESOLUTION LICENSES APPROVING THE RENEWAL OF ON SALE NON -INTOXICATING MALT Items 74. Be C 8 D LIQbOR LICENSES FOR HAMPTON HILLS GOLF COURSE, WEST MEDI- CINE LAKE COMMUNITY CLUB AND V,F,W, POST #5903; APPROVING THE RENEWAL OF ON SALE NON -INTOXICATING MALT LIQUOR LICENSES FOR HORSTMAN PURITY DAIRY STORE AND V.F.W. POST #5903; APPROVING THE RENEWAL OF LICENSES TO PERMIT CONSUMPTION OF INTOXICATING LIQUOR FOR IVY'S PLACE, WEST MEDICINE LAKE COM- MUNITY CLUB, V,F,W, POST #5903. THE APPLE BLOOSOM INN AND THE WATERFRONT TAVERN; AND APPROVING GARBAGE HAULERS LICSNSES FOR EDEN PRAIRIE SANITATION AND MIDWEST SANITATION. INC. Motion carried, three ayes. MOTION was made by Councilman Neils directing the staff to communicate with the licensed garbage haulers and request of them a proposal of the scope of service that sho0ld be included under hauler's licenses. Mayor tfilde indicated this matter had been discussed during the peevious year and requested Councilman Neils to review that information, MOTION was made by Councilman Neils, seconded by Council- man Spaeth, directing the staff to prepare a recommendation concerning the scope of service as a requirement of licensed haulers. Motion carried, three ayes, J PROJECT, N0, 201 VICKSBURG LAAv' CSAH #6 TO 261-i AYE: , , Item 5-D APPOINTMENTS TO BOARp OF ZONING ADJUSWNT Item 6 LICENSES b PERMITS MOTION was made by Councilman Spaeth, seconded by Council. RESOLUTION NO. 72-22ff' man Neils to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 72-228. A RESOLUTION LICENSES APPROVING THE RENEWAL OF ON SALE NON -INTOXICATING MALT Items 74. Be C 8 D LIQbOR LICENSES FOR HAMPTON HILLS GOLF COURSE, WEST MEDI- CINE LAKE COMMUNITY CLUB AND V,F,W, POST #5903; APPROVING THE RENEWAL OF ON SALE NON -INTOXICATING MALT LIQUOR LICENSES FOR HORSTMAN PURITY DAIRY STORE AND V.F.W. POST #5903; APPROVING THE RENEWAL OF LICENSES TO PERMIT CONSUMPTION OF INTOXICATING LIQUOR FOR IVY'S PLACE, WEST MEDICINE LAKE COM- MUNITY CLUB, V,F,W, POST #5903. THE APPLE BLOOSOM INN AND THE WATERFRONT TAVERN; AND APPROVING GARBAGE HAULERS LICSNSES FOR EDEN PRAIRIE SANITATION AND MIDWEST SANITATION. INC. Motion carried, three ayes. MOTION was made by Councilman Neils directing the staff to communicate with the licensed garbage haulers and request of them a proposal of the scope of service that sho0ld be included under hauler's licenses. Mayor tfilde indicated this matter had been discussed during the peevious year and requested Councilman Neils to review that information, MOTION was made by Councilman Neils, seconded by Council- man Spaeth, directing the staff to prepare a recommendation concerning the scope of service as a requirement of licensed haulers. Motion carried, three ayes, a Regular Coo cil 'Meeting June 299 i92 Page Eleven Manainer, 'Willits explained that the County's districts are VOTING PRECINCTS` s not confoiftmance with the Village's precincts and that Item 8-A the County nnot change their districts until after the 1S 1980' Cenisus.;.f He presented l alternate plans for Council consideration, a 6 pre inct plan and a 7 precinct plan He.,stated hO felt the precinct plan would be more equal 1zed. MOTLON was made by Councilman Neils, seconded ty Coggcll- man Spa,gth, to adopt RESOLUTION N0. 72-22.79 A RESOLUYION REMUTION NO. 72-227 CREATING SEVEN PRECINCTS WITHIN SHE VILLAGE OF PLYMOUTH. Motion carried'on roll call vote, three ayes. - Manager Willis reported that a real for had advised him LALIBERTE SUBDIVISION that harry LaLiberte had sold that portion' of his property which he previously requested the Council to subdivide from that parcel containing his home. This request for subdivision was denied by the Council due to the fact that. litigation was pending between the Village and Mr. LaLiberte, Mayor Hilde directed Manager Willis to determine whether or not the property had in fact been sold and if the purchaser had knowledge of the assessments on the strip of laid so that the Council could make a decision on the subdivision request. MOTION was mads, by Councilman Spaeth, seconded by Counci 1 - man Neils, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 72429, A RESOLUTION ORDERING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR BONSTRUCTION OF THE STORM SEWER ON PROJECT N0. 1169 SUBPROJECT 001, AS OUT- LINED IN THE FOUR PARTY AGREEMENT W141CH WAS PREVIOUSLY ACCEPTED BY THE COUNCIL ON JUNE 5, 1972. Motion carried, three ayes. MOTION was made by Councilman Neils, seconded by Council- man Spaeth to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 72-226, A RESOLUTION APPOINTING SANDRA L. HAUGEN AS VILLAGE CLERK, Motion carried, three ayes. Mgor Hilde adjourned the meeting at 12;15 a,m. Sandra L. Haugen Village Clerk Village of Plymouth PROJECT N0. 116 CSAR 46 6 TH 101 STORM SEWER RESOLUTION NO. 72-229 RESOLUTION NO. 72-226 APPOINTMENT OF VILLAGE CLERK