HomeMy WebLinkAboutCouncil Information Memorandum 08-18-1988PLYMOUTH
CITY COUNCIL INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM
August 18, 1988
RECYCLING CASH DRAWING
August 18: No winner
Next Week: $ 300 Cash Award
UPCOMING MEETINGS AND EVENTS.....
1. GROUND BREAKING FOR FIRE STATION NO. 3 -- Monday, August 22,
3: 0 p.m. Invitation attached. M -1
2. COUNCIL MEETING -- Monday, August 22, 7 :30 p.m. Special City
Council meeting in Council chambers.
3. PLANNING COMMISSION -- Wednesday, August 24, 7:30 p.m. Planning
Commission will meet in the City Council Chambers. Agenda
attached. (M -3)
4. MEETING CALENDARS -- The August and September meeting calendars are
attached. M -4
FOR YOUR INFORMATION...
1. FORMER JEFF HOWARD RESIDENCE - The home of Jeff Howard has been
sold. The new owners are expected to execute the purchase around
the first of September. I am informed that they have already begun
to clean up the lot, which will include the removal of all junk
which is one of the last vestiges of Mr. Howard. The new owners are
Bruce and Barbara Dow.
2. SCOTT McLELLAN -- Scott McLellan, Assistant Building Official, has
submitted his resignation effective August 25. Scott accepted a
position with the State Building Code Division as a Code
Consultant. Recruitment efforts to fill Scott's vacancy are
underway with an advertisement placed in the state -wide edition of
the Star Tribune last Sunday.
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447, TELEPHONE (612) 559 -2800
CITY COUNCIL INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM
August 18, 1988
Page 2
r
3. MINUTES:
a. Planning Commission, August 10, 1988 (I -3)
4. COUNCIL FOLLOW -UPS:
a. Concession Stands - -- ,Attached is a comparison of the total
dollar amount received by the City versus actual sales for the
concession stands at Zachary playfield and Parkers Lake Park.
The concessionaire's agreement provides for the City to receive
15 percent of the net sales. (I -4a)
b. Political Campaign Signs -- Several calls have been received
concerning the City's requirements on the legal placement of
political campaign signs. Attached is the zoning ordinance
section pertaining to campaign signs should Councilmembers
receive any inquiries. (I -4b)
c. Basketball Hoops on City Rights-of-Way -- ,Attached is a report
from Sergeant Larry Rogers on his investigation of enforcement
actions to remove basketball hoops that are installed within the
road right -of -way. (I -4c)
5. CORRESPONDENCE:
a. Letter from Patricia Thornton notifying the City of termination
of agreement to sell property to Dimension Associates and Mr.
Robert Wachter. (I -5a)
b. Letter from Douglas Farrow, 2045 Black Oaks Lane, concerning the
City's water system. (I -5b)
c. Letter mailed to Homeowner Association Presidents and Social
Service Agency advising of the September 13 City budget public
hearing. (I -5c)
d. Letter to Mr. and Mrs. Ralph Durand, from Mayor Schenider,
addressing their concern about the pumping of water from Bass
Lake for lawn sprinkling. (I -5d)
e. Letter from Leo Wasescha, 12210 - 60th Avenue North, to Scott
Hovet, regarding the assessed valuation of his property. (I -5e)
f. Letter to Lyle Robinson, from Robert Hennessey, Fire Chief, and
Dean Monney, Public Safety Director for the City of Golden
Valley, for assistance provided at a house fire by the Plymouth
Fire Department. (I -5f)
g. Letters from Plymouth Civic League to the Fire and Police
Departments for their help at this year's Music In Plymouth
concert. (I -5g)
CITY COUNCIL INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDLki.
August 18, 1988
Page 3
h. Letter to Chief Judge Peter Linberg, from City Manager, on the
solution to the matter of jury trails in suburban locations.
(I -5h)
i. Letter from Mayor Schneider, to Editor, Plymouth Post, in
response to an August 18 letter on the 1988 tax bill. (I -51)
James G. Willis
City Manager
JGW:jm
attachments
PLANNING COM1,IISSION MEFTING AGENDA
WEDHESDA ', August 24, 1988
WHERE: Plymouth City Center
3400, Piymout'l
Plymouth, M',! 55447
CONSENT AGENO-\
All items listed with an asterisk ( *) are considered to be routine by the Planni_n';
Commission and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of
these items unless a Commissioner, citizen or petitioner so requests, in which event
the item will he removed from the consent agenda and considered in normal segrience on
the agenda.
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. ROLL CALL
3.* CONSENT AGENDA
4.* APPROVAL OF MINUTES
5. PUBLIC HEARINGS
7:30 P.M.
August 10, 1988
A. Wayzata Evangelical Free Church. Preliminary Plat, Site Plan, and Conditional
Use Permit for seven single family residential lots and one lot for the
church with parking lot expansion on property at 705 County Road 101 (formerly
Highway 101.) (88026)
B. Richard and Colleen Weber. Preliminary and Final Plat for two single family
residential lots to be located at the southeast corner of Gleason Lake Drive
and Ranchview Lane North. (88077)
C. Gerald Grabowski. Rezoning and Preliminary Plat for two single family resi-
dential lots to be located between Pineview Lane and Bass Lake, at approxi-
mately 56th Avenue North (extended). (88083)
D. United Properties, Inc. for Parkers Lake Corporate Center. Mixed Planned Unit
Development (MPUD) Preliminary Plan /Plat, Conditional Use Permit, and Sign
Location Variance for industrial property located in the northwest quadrant of
21st Avenue North and Niagara Lane. (88089)
E. James and Deborah Matteson. Planned Unit Development Plan Conditional Use
Permit Amendment to allow the construction of a deck to the residence at 4535
Trenton Circle North (Woodlands RPUD 84 -6) (88092)
F. Bob Hunter, Bob's Energy Savings Service. Planned Unit Development Plan
Conditional Use Permit Amendment to allow the construction of three 3- season
porches at locations within the Cimarron Ponds RPUD located at 13th Avenue and
Vicksburg Lane North. (88093)
G. Trammell Crow Company. Final Plat For Carlson Center Eleventh Addition,
Conditional Use Permits, and Site Plans for two industrial lots and the con-
struction of two office /warehouse buildings to be located in the southeast
quadrant of Cheshire Lane and 1st Avenue North. (88094/88095)
H. 1989 -1993 Capital Improvements Program (CIP) for the City of Plymouth.
6. NEW BUSINESS
7. OLD BUSINESS
8. OTHER BUSINESS
9. ADJOURNMENT 10:30 P.M.
C6 r+ w
cr
CC.,
f
a
cc
C
Uc2
c z
J
C- n U
w s U
cr
v
o
C!�
J
z
c
x �O
6c
9
a
z
o a
om
M
0
N
Cr
U cn z
N
M
PL,
r"{
aLO O
C
U
A z
o
pq
LO
U
a U
z
a¢
a`
N
oZ)
01
°o�
00
o
cUCU
N
UoU;
N
^
H
t� H
I�
H U
O
C�7 C7
W C7 C
E-4 U
C6 r+ w
� O
RE
I �
I� N
�w
�II ,
Cl.
r
V �
C,
Iv
G1
�H
cr
CC
�y n
r-
V— G
V.
G
k
x
�
W
W
z
Lr)
W V V
z
Lr) H J N
H P. H
r� N
W
r
WP•�
M
O
Q M
r�,P.,�c�
U
k
O
>4 O
A
HH
z
Ca [n
a
x
�
W
W
z
Lr)
W V V
z
N P
H P. H
HHz p U
G�
M L)
a o
O L) c..
O
r�,P.,�c�
Nona !, N
O
>4 O
A
HH
z
Ca [n
a
tr
z
Ho
H
N P
O x
G�
M L)
O
P H;
O L) c..
�w
W
Nona !, N
��
aw
o
M
W Ea
OC
PG
! n C)
K
M�
C"' N
� N
d N O
cc N N
r N 00
Ki
i
�J
H
H
N[-�H
z
� N
I
N P
CC
��
E- �
C� d
dfs.A H
I i
HOP.
OVO O
O O
C7
u N
N C ' N M W
W H
U I
I I
I
M�
C"' N
� N
d N O
cc N N
r N 00
Ki
i
�J
H
H
N[-�H
z
� N
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
AUGUST 10, 1988
The Regular Meeting of the Plymouth Planninq Commission was
called to order at 7:30 P.M.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Vice Chairman Plufka, Commissioners
Wire, Zylla, Marofsky and Tierney
MEMBERS ABSENT Chairman Pauba and Commissioner
Stulberg
STAFF PRESENT: Community Development Coordinator
Chuck Dillerud
Public Works Director Fred Moore
Planning Secretary Grace Wineman
*MINUTES
Motion by Commissioner Wire, seconded by Commissioner Zylla MOTION TO APPROVE
to approve the July 27, 1988 Planning Commission as submit-
ted with the followinq addition: Page 183. "Commissioner
Wire stated that he would second the Motion for approval on
the basis that the request meets the six criteria for
approving a Conditional Use Permit.
Vote. 4 Ayes. Commissioner Marofsky abstained. VOTE - MOTION CARRIED
PUBLIC HEARINGS
VOTE. 7 Ayes. MOTION carried.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Vice Chairman
Plufka introduced
the request and explained
HANS HAGEN HOMES,
that the item
was scheduled for
the July 27, 1988 Planning
INC. AMENDMENT TO
Commission Agenda and opened for
discussion. Because of an
THE PLANNED UNIT
error in the
Legal Notice, the
Notice was published and
DEVELOPMENT PLAN
property owners notified of the
continued hearing on this
CONDITIONAL USE
request.
PERMIT FOR LOT
COVERAGE IN TYRELL
Vice Chairman
Plufka opened the Public
Hearing; as there was
SECOND, FOURTH, FIFTH
no one present
to speak on this item,
the Public Hearing was
AND SIXTH ADDITIONS
closed.
(88032)
Commissioner Wire inquired about the list of 19 lots that
would be affected by this request. Coordinator Dillerud
and Hans Hagen, developer, confirmed that the list submitted
shows six lots in the Second and Fifth Additions; the
balance would be within the future Eighth Addition.
-186-
P a q e 1 S 7
Planning Commission Hinutes
August 10, 19SS
The Second Addition shows Lot 6, Block 2; the Fifth Addition
shows Lots 2, 3, 4, and 6 Block 2; arid, Lot 13, Block 1.
The remaininq 13 lots would be within the future Tyrell
Eighth Addition.
Mr. Hans Hagen stated they have selected to list the lots
and they request that it not be necessary to go through an
additional Public Hearing for the future Addition.
Commissioner Wire inquired about the number of lots for the -
future Eighth Addition. Mr Hagen stated there would be
approximately 36 single family lots.
Commissioner Marofsky inquired about the square footage of
those lots listed for increased lot coverage. Mr. Hagen
stated he was not sure, but believed they are all in excess
of 13,000 sq. ft. Commissioner Marofsky inquired if the
lots would be the same size, on average, as all lots in each
Addition. Mr. Hagen stated they are slightly larger, but
close to the same size.
Commissioner Zylla inquired if Mr. Hagen would oppose the
Commission establishing an upper limit of lot coverage as a
condition of approval. Mr. Hagen stated, no, the request is
simply to allow the construction of decks. The problem has
arisen because people want to build larger homes and also
construct decks that are figured into that minimum lot
coverage.
MOTION by Commissoner Zylla, seconded by Commissioner Wire
to recommend approval for Amendment to the Planned Unit
Development Plan Conditional Use Permit to exclude decks
from the 20% lot coverage for 19 lots within the Tyrell
Planned Unit Development; and, to grant specific approval on
six lots within the Tyrell Second and Fifth Additions. (Lot
6, Block 2, Tyrell Fifth Addition and Lots 2, 3, 4, and 6
Block 2; and, Lot 13, Block 1, Tyrell Sixth Addition).
Commissioner Marofsky stated he could not agree with this
method of granting approval for increased lot coverage. He
concurs with staff that an amendment to the PUD standards of
the Zoning Ordinance should be considered.
Commissioner Zylla noted that the Motion is still as recom-
mended by staff, on the merits for increased lot coverage on
a lot -by -lot basis; and, that the plat conservation design
efforts must be demonstrated graphically prior to final
approval.
Mr. Hagen confirmed this would be submitted to staff for
review by the Planning Commission and City Council.
Commissioner Zylla noted that it is clear, considering prior
City Council action, approval is granted only for those
cases where there is proven preservation of natural
resources and unique topography.
MOTION TO APPROVE
Page 188
Planning Commission Minutes
August 10, 1988
Coordinator Dillerud confirmed that that language concerning
the preservation of mature trees, and natural site features,
is a condition of final approval.
Public Works Director Moore stated that the lots would be
reviewed after grading, so that a judgment can be made on
preservation throughout the entire plat.
Vice Chairman Plufka stated that it would be a necessary
condition on the future Eighth Addition, which would be
closely reviewed in this regard.
Mr. Hans Hagen stated that there has been a distinct change
in the marketplace which has brought about the need to
accommodate the wishes of prospective home buyers and
citizens; and, that customer preference cannot always be
reflected in the Ordinance. City staff requested they bring
in the list of lots to be considered, and it was their
understanding, that they could gain approval on all those
lots listed, rather than having to go back through the
Public Hearing process.
Vice Chairman Plufka noted that there is no information from
the developer saying where those 13 lots would be at this
time. Mr. Hagen stated they would provide the lot layout
with their submittal for the Eighth Addition.
Vice Chairman Plufka stated that City Council actions may
concede that it would not be necessary for the approval
process for the'Eighth Addition to include processing those
specific lots through a Public Hearing.
Roll Call Vote. 4 Ayes. Commissioner Marofsky, Nay. VOTE - MOTION CARRIED
MOTION carried.
Administrative MOTION by Commissioner Marofsky, seconded by ADMINISTRATIVE
Commissioner Wire that the recommendation be made to the MOTION
City Council that an Ordinance amendment be considered that
would delete "decks" from the minimum lot coverage, up to a
certain percentage, to be addressed by the Council and City
staff.
Vote. 5 Ayes. MOTION carried. VOTE ADMINISTRATIVE
MOTION - MOTION CARRIED
Page 189
Planning Commission Minutes
August 10, 1985
Vice Chairman Plufka introduced the request and an overvie%,
of the August 1, 1988 staff report was provided by Coordin-
ator Dillerud. Coordinator Dillerud explained that the Lot
and Block shown on the preliminary plat across the road
right -of -way to the southwest should be designated as an
outlot.
Vice Chairman Plufka introduced Mr. Stan Tikkanen, Director
of Finance and Administration for School District 284. Mr.
Tikkanen stated they have reviewed the staff report and
would point out two issues: Item No. 4 of the Engineer's
Memorandum dealing with assessment for sanitary sewer which
would be levied per acre. They ask for a review as to
whether this should be done on that basis in this case.
Vice Chairman Plufka explained that the City Council is the
forum for discussing the financial considerations of
development such as assessments to be levied.
Mr. Tikkanen stated the other issue is on Item 24 -8 and 24 -C
of the Engineer's Memorandum regarding realignment and
construction of 1st Avenue North. It is the School Board's
position that this is a public benefit and one which has
resulted from City development. They suggest that the cost
be shared by all public entities, the City of Wayzata, the
City of Plymouth, Hennepin County, and the School District.
Commissioner Marofsky asked that it be verified that the
Site Plan does not in fact show the landscaping intended,
but that the Landscape Plan shows all landscaping that would
be provided.
Coordinator Dillerud and Stan Tikkanen verified that the
Landscape Plan is in compliance with the City's Landscape
Policy, and that a tree count had been done.
Commissioner Marofsky noted that vari - colored brick is shown
on the plans and asked if they would be showing colored
prints. Mr. Tikkanen stated they do not have these avail-
able this evening and explained that the building exterior
would be earth -tone and would blend in with the existing
administration building.
Vice Chairman Plufka opened the Public Hearing.
Mr. Robert Peterson, 335 Inland Lane, stated he is President
of the Kingswood Homeowners Association. He stated that the
Association became concerned with the "rather arrogant
position" of the School Board, who met with the Association
and stated they proposed closing 1st Avenue North. Mr.
Peterson stated at that time, they had not been notified
SCHOOL DISTRICT 284
PRELIMINARY PLAT AND
CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT FOR GLEASON
LAKE ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL (88036)
Paqe 190
Planning Commission Minutes
August 10, 1988
by the City, and subsequently, City Manager_ James Willis and
Public Works Director Fred Moore provided a briefing where
the Association came away with the feeling that "this was a
reasonable compromise. He thanked City staff for explain -
ing this proposal, and, specifically personnel from Public
Works who staked the area to prove to the residents that the
car lights at the "curve" would strike the berm between the
property at Jewell and Kimberly Lanes.
Mr. Peterson stated the Kingswood Homeowners Association
wants to go on record with the remaining concerns which are
the City's ability to protect their investment in their
entrance and in the irrigation and electrical system that is
located in the median of existing First Avenue North. The
Association concurs with the plans as submitted by the
School District, but they do not believe they should suffer
in any way monetarily from this development.
Mr. Peterson asked if the District will be required to fence
the pond? Vice Chairman Plufka noted there did not appear
to be any fencing illustrated on the plans.
Mr. Peterson stated that for public safety, especially the
children, there should be fencing at the area where there is
high water; he suggested a chain link fence be placed around
the property.
Mr. Peterson also inquired about the lift station that
serves the 112 homes. Who would pay for the additional
burden? He noted that there have been on- street parking
problems in the'past; and, that there may now be a greater
intrusion of parking on 1st Avenue and Kimberly Lane. He
noted the problems with no sanitary facilities at the play
fields during athletic events. He noted at one time there
was a Satellite in place.
Commissioner Tierney inquired if the entrance noted on the
Site Plan is the only access for Kingswood. Mr. Peterson
answered affirmatively.
Mr. Peterson stated the Homeowners Association wants to know
that the School District is developing plans that assure
they will continue to be good neighbors. The 112 homes, in
Kingswood, also contribute to school taxes.
Merrill Stodgehill, Kingswood Resident, inquired if there is
a right turn lane proposed onto Highway 101, or will it
remain as it is today; and, will the Kingswood entrance /exit
traffic yield to the school traffic on 1st Avenue North?
Page 191
Planninq Commission Minutes
August 10, 1955
Vice Chairman Plufka stated that according to the plans,
there is a right -turn lane, and 1st Avenue North would have
the riqht -of -way.
Vice Chairman Plufka inquired if it would be necessary to
increase the size of the lift station and upgrade the water
system. Public Works Director Moore stated this would be
the case, and that the cost would be a responsibility of the
School District.
Vice Chairman Plufka inquired if the District has an agree-
ment with the Kingswood HOA concerning the relocation of
their entrance sign, the equipment within the island and,
the berm extension? Mr. Tikkanen stated that, yes, in
principle, the District would be responsible for the cost of
relocation.
Mr. Tikkanen further explained that the Citv of Plymouth
placed the Satellite, as seen by Mr. Peterson, during their
athletic event; this was not a school function.
Discussion ensued regarding bus stacking, sign location, and
stop light activation.
Public Works Director Moore stated that the Commission may
want to note the Kingswood Entrance sign location as part of
the conditions of approval within the Resolution, but this
would be no problem for staff. He stated further that the
traffic lights are fully activated.
Vice Chairman Plufka closed the Public Hearing.
MOTION by Commissioner Marofsky, seconded by Commissioner
NOTION TO APPROVE
Wire, to recommend approval for the Preliminary Plat and
Conditional Use Permit for School District No. 284 for the
new Gleason lake Elementary School, subject to the 12
conditions listed in the August 1, 1988 staff report and
adding Condition No. 13: The developer shall relocate the
entrance sign for the Kingswood Homeowners Association to
the south side of "new" 1st Avenue North; and, shall
complete the relocation of the mechanical /electrical systems
installed to serve the residents of the Kingswood Residen-
tial Planned Unit Development.
MOTION by Commissioner Wire, seconded by Commissioner
NOTION TO AMEND
Tierney to Amend the Motion to add Condition No. 14: The
developer shall provide fencing around the pondinq area
behind the school, shown on the Preliminary Plan as "swamp ".
Roll Call Vote on Amendment. 5 Ayes. MOTION carried.
VOTE NT
Page 192
Planning Commission Minutes
August 10, 1985
Commissioner Tierney expressed concern regardinq the bus
parking area, and whether they would pull in at an angle, or
straight on; and, in any case would their backing -up maneu-
vers be a safety hazard. Mr. Tikkanen pointed out that,
pulling in and backing out is efficient for bus maneuvers,
there will be no cars using that area, and the parking would
only be available for after - school activities.
Roll Call Vote on Main MOTION as once amended. 5 Ayes.
MOTION carried.
Vice Chairman Plufka called an in -place Recess at 8:30 P.M.
to accommodate the clearing of the Chamber.
Vice Chairman Plufka called the meeting to order.
Vice Chairman Plufka introduced the request and an overview
of the August 1, 1988 staff report was provided by Coordin-
ator Dillerud.
Vice Chairman Plufka introduced Mr. Stan Tikkanen, Director
of Finance and Administration for the School District. Mr.
Tikkanen stated they have reviewed and concur with the staff
report. They do have concerns relating to Items 27 -B and
27 -C of the Engineer's Memorandum. He said those items
should be considered over the "long- term" and have little
relativity to this proposal.
Public Works Director Moore noted that these are existing
conditions that require modification.
Stan Tikkanen stated they are upgrading the current media
center and that additional technology does not increase the
number of students, their student population has in fact
declined and they view the traffic considerations as long-
term problems that are not related to this proposed
construction.
Public Works Director Moore explained the deficiencies with
current multiple access to Vicksburg Lane from the parking
lot. The City is asking for a plan to be prepared by a
Traffic Engineer to correct those problems along with the
construction as proposed.
Vice Chairman Plufka noted that the Commission would not, in
any case, change the recommendation by the Engineer's Memor-
andum. It will go forward to the City Council as written.
Vice Chairman Plufka opened the Public Hearing.
VOTE ON MAIN MOTION
MOTION CARRIED
IN -PLACE RECESS
SCHOOL DISTRICT 284
CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT AND SITE PLAN
FOR WAYZATA SENIOR
HIGH SCHOOL (88069)
Page 193
Planning Commission Minutes
August 10, 1988
Russell Almquist, 15905 4th Avenue North, stated that he
does not oppose the proposed plans for the media center,
however, he would like to see additional supervision of
students. He noted that they have had a problem from the
"mess" created by students wandering in the neighbhorhood.
Mr. Tikkanen inquired if this problem is because the
students are using off - campus areas as a "smoking lounge ?"
He noted that State law prohibits smoking and the campus is
smoke -free; however, once the students leave the campus,
they are no longer under the Jurisdiction of the District.
Mr. Almquist stated that it is not only the smoking, but
litter and trash left by the students and the guards seem to
ignore it all.
Vice Chairman Plufka stated the Commission are not police
and this would be best discussed with the Department of
Public Safety.
Bill Mapp, 240 Black Oaks Lane, stated his concern regarding
any possible problems with run -off (drainage) caused by
construction. The plan was displayed and no impact was
noted.
Vice Chairman Plufka closed the Public Hearing.
MOTION by Commissioner Wire, seconded by Commissioner Zylla MOTION TO APPROVE
to recommend approval for the Conditional Use Permit and
Site Plan for expansion to the Wayzata Senior High School,
subject to the conditions listed in the August 1, 1988 staff
report.
Roll Call Vote. 5 Ayes. MOTION carried.
Vice Chairman Plufka introduced the request and an overview
of the August 1, 1988 Planning Staff Report was provided by
Coordinator Dillerud.
Vice Chairman Plufka noted the comments as submitted by the
petitioner's consultant, Sherman Goldberg.
Vice Chairman Plufka introduced Mr. Sherman Goldberg, who
discussed the traffic study. He noted that Hennepin County
has also stated that the traffic level would be acceptable
for traffic control. Mr. Goldberg stated that the proposal
would not be detrimental to other property owners. He noted
that Mr. Libby has owned this property for a number of
years, makes his living here, and wants to continue the use
VOTE - MOTION CARRIED
RONALD L. LIBBY
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
AND LAND USE GUIDE
PLAN AMENDMENT TO
RECLASSIFY LAND
(88066)
Paae 194
Planning Commission Minutes
August 10, 1985
of his property by requidinq a portion of the property to
upgrade the existing development. He stated that 40% of
this property is now guided as that proposed for the balance
of the property owned by Mr. Libby.
Commissioner Zylla inquired if the Commission were to see a
Site Plan, would the County support signals at Deerwood
Lane, and when?
Mr. Goldberg stated that the signals would be warranted for
the volume of traffic from the north. Commissioner Zylla
inquired if Mr. Goldberg would say, that at the time of a
Site Plan proposal, the County would install those signals.
Mr. Goldberg stated they would at least install underground
conduits. The signals would be installed when the warrants
were actually realized.
Commissioner Tierney inquired about the plan for gas pumps
with CN (neighborhood shopping) guiding. Mr. Goldberg
stated that this was only an indication, a Conditional Use
Permit would be required if such were proposed.
Commissioner Marofsky inquired whether at Level C, a traffic
signal would be warranted? Mr. Goldberg read from page 3 of
the study and discussed the forecasts.
Commissioner Zylla inquired if there is traffic data that
would suggest a hazardous situation in that area now.
Public Works Director Moore stated yes, the Public Safety
Department has discussed this problem. There is paving
across the entire front of the existing store with no
defined curb, and this is something that would not be
permitted today. There is a problem with traffic accidents,
and this would be corrected when the County upgrades County
Road 10.
Commissioner Marofsky inquired if a proposed access at Deer -
wood Lane would be the superior access point, even without
the increase in use? Public Works Director Moore stated,
yes, it would be for the existing use in that protected left
turn lanes could be provided. However, with the existing
uses and guiding, the traffic signal would not be
warranted.
Commissioner Marofksy inquired if the proposal for the
congregate housing generated the same traffic volumes.
Public Works Director Moore stated, no, this use would have
much different peak hours. Traffic to and from a
convenience center would coincide with the peak rush -hour
traffic periods.
Page 195
Planning Commission Minutes
August 10, 1985
Vice Chairman Plufka opened the Public Hearing.
MaryAnn Bealles, 11610 57th Avenue North, stated she opposes
the request. She stated that there are ample shopping areas
within easy driving distance of these neighborhoods. This
is a lovely area in which residents were moving to enjoy the
"peace and quiet" of residential life. This would be
diminished by further commercial development in the area,
especially with respect to noise, light and glare, and traf-
fic. She stated that realtors have told her that there
would be a reduction in the value of homes in an area where
commercial development takes place.
Vice Chairman Plufka closed the Public Hearing.
Commissioner Zylla inquired what the net increase in square
footage would be with the new construction. Coordinator
Dillerud stated that the petitioner has noted the present
facility is approximately 6,000 sq. ft. with a possible
30,000 sq. ft. for the proposed facility.
Mr. Sherman Goldberg reiterated that Mr. Libby has done
business in this area for many years and believes this
location to be appropriate for the use proposed and desires
to upgrade his property.
Commissioner Zylla stated that this seems to be a logical
extension of the existing land use; however, there are traf-
fic safety matters to take into account. A 4 -way stop at
the Deerwood Lane /County Road 10 intersection would improve
the traffic hazard conditions that now exist.
MOTION by Commissioner Zylla, seconded by Commissioner
Marofsky to recommend approval of the Comprehensive Plan and
Land Use Guide Plan Amendment to reclassify approximately
4.27 acres from LA -1 (low density residential) to CN (neigh-
borhood shopping center), located at the northwest quadrant
of County Road 10 and Deerwood Lane North, adding the
following conditions.
1. The developer shall submit and gain approval for
Landscape and Site Plans within one year of City
Council approval of the Land Use Guide Plan
Amendment, or the guiding shall revert to LA -1.
2. The developer shall submit, along with the Site
Plan, a timetable for the removal of the existing
structures, to be approved by the City Council.
3. The development plans are subject to Hennepin
County approvals and permits for the Deerwood Lane
access to County Road 10.
NOTION TO APPROVE
Paqe 196
Plannina Commission Minutes
August 10, 1955
Discussion ensued regarding specific direction for the Site
Plan. Commissioner Zvlla noted that Site Plan submittal
would occur within one year, subject to this approval, and
would need to comply with all Ordinance standards.
Commissioner Marofsky stated that he seconded the Motion
based on what he believes to be a reasonable alternative.
The subject property could develop with six single family
homes that would also need access to Bass Lake Road; how-
ever, this may not be the highest and best use for the
property. Signalization of the Deerwood Lane /County Road 10
intersection would benefit those residents living on Deer -
wood Lane and would provide the safety factor needed. The
reguiding generates the warrants for a needed siqnalization
of County Road 10 at this location.
Commissioner Zylla emphasized that he would oppose any Site
Plan proposal, unless he is assured of quality construction
and architecture that would be compatible with its
surroundings.
Vice Chairman Plufka stated he would speak against the
Motion. This is a non - conforming use, and even though it
has been in place over a long period of time, and is now
guided CN, it is still inappropriately placed. Traffic
generation and signalization should riot dictate land use.
The City must plan for road connections and intersections,
however, new development should not exacerbate the problem.
Commissioner Tierney agreed. She noted that this is a
"peculiar spot " - for commercial development and she has
concern about the City picking up the 75% of the cost for
signalization where relatively few people will benefit from
it.
MOTION by Commissioner Marofsky, seconded by Commissioner
Wire to Amend the Main Motion, adding Condition No. 4. The
developer will pay for the cost of the signals at Deerwood
Lane and County Road 10.
Roll Call Vote on Amendment. 5 Ayes. MOTION carried.
Roll Call Vote on Main Motion as once amended. 3 Ayes.
Vice Chairman Plufka and Commissioner Tierney, Nay.
NOTION TO AMEND
VOTE - AMENDMENT
MOTION CARRIED
VOTE - MAIN MOTION
NOTION CARRIED
Vice Chairman Plufka introduced the request
and noted that
PRIME DEVELOPMENT
it was the
consensus of City staff and the petitioner to
PRELIMINARY PLAT
request the
Commission to recommend deferral
for redesign as
GENERAL DEVELOPMENT
discussed;
however, the petitioner will answer questions and
PLAN AND VARIANCE
the Public
Hearing input will be part of the
record.
(88057)
Paqe 197
Planning Commission Minutes
August 10, 1985
Vice Chairman Plufka requested that Coordinator Dillerud
provide an overvieA of the August 4, 1958 staff report.
Coordinator Dillerud showed graphics of the existing
conditions on the site and explained that the decision to
request deferral for this application was made during staff
review which detected a flaw in the application as pro-
posed. The flaw was of such consequence to not allow the
application to proceed. He pointed out the Zoning District
boundary changes accomplished in 1984 that now impact the
site arrangement as proposed. He noted that the parcel was
under single ownership.
Coordinator Dillerud noted the two alternatives to go for-
ward with this development plan; the applicant may petition
to reguide and rezone the property; or, the structure could
be re- oriented on the site to be within the appropriate
zoning district.
Vice Chairman Plufka inquired how much of the property to
the south, in the R -1,A Zoning District, would be buildable?
Coordinator Dillerud stated there could be little if any
thing built without a great amount of fill. Vice Chairman
Plufka inquired if this would be protected wetland? Co-
ordinator Dillerud stated permits would be required and the
area is part of the City Storm Water Drainage Plan.
Ponding and capacity were discussed. Public Works Director
Fred Moore explained the acre feet of storage required; and
that much of the pond is on property not associated with
this development,proposal.
Vice Chairman Plufka introduced Ron Erickson, KKE Archi-
tects, and Greg Frank, McCombs, Frank, Roos & Associates.
Mr. Ron Erickson stated he has worked closely with staff
regarding the road configuration for this area, based on the
report submitted by Strgar- Roscoe. The ponding area would
not be develored in any case and would be encumbered with
drainage easements. Initially, they were not aware of the
zoning boundary error. The Site Plan would require only a
minor modification to enable them to go forward with
development plans. He noted that they concurred with staff
regarding the request to defer for redesign.
Commissioner Marofsky stated concern that the proposed
right -of -way for road construction comes from the residen-
tial lots.
Mr. Erickson stated that their plan reflects access and
roadways directed by the City and the Strgar- Roscoe report
Paqe 19S
Planning Commission f1inutes
August 10, 1988
Commissioner Marofsky inquired if this would anticipate tak-
ing half the right -of -way for Nest Medicine Lake Road from
the residential property.
Coordinator Dillerud and Public Works Director Moore stated
this would be the case.
Commissioner Tierney inquired if the petitioner finds it
more satisfactory to move the proposed facility, rather than
petitioning for a rezoning.
Mr. Ron Erickson stated that revising the Site Plan would be
best, as it is a very minor revision and would have no
impact on the parking or building.
Vice Chairman Plufka opened the Public Hearing.
Len Lindeloe, 620 Cottonwood Lane, stated he is a 30 -year
resident and he would ask that the City protect the resi-
dential property and not "give -in" to commercial property
interests. He is concerned that the installation of sewer,
allowing the filling of ponding areas, and removal of trees
is not conducive to protecting residential property. He
stated he is speaking for the residents of Cottonwood Lane
and they are asking for the City's protection.
Mr. Marlow Risberg, 710 Cottonwood Lane, stated he is a 30-
year resident and that 25% of his property would go for the
proposed road extension and he is opposed to the City's
plans.
Bruce Thompson, 11018 Old County Road 15, stated he lives at
the southeast corner of the property proposed for develop-
ment. He stated he had talked with the Corps of Engineers
and that development would need to meet their requirements.
He stated concern about fill that has already been brought
in, and that the City could give no information concerning
those persons who have been working in the area and bringing
in the fill. He stated there are wetlands, wildlife, mature
vegetation, and the area is unique and should protected. He
noted he would like to have specific information relating to
the traffic and road construction.
Vice Chairman Plufka pointed out the location of the B -2
Zoning that allows the re- development of the shopping
center.
Mr. Thompson stated his concern regarding noise and lighting
from the center that would impact the residents whose
property abuts the proposed area of development. He stated
he has also talked with the Department of Natural Resources.
Their opinion was that filling and construction could cause
Paqe 199
Planning Commission Minutes
August 10, 1988
substantial run -off and would impact the "wetlands ". He
does not believe that the natural areas could be retained
with the plans for excavation for 6th Avenue North
construction. He stated that he has been told he would lose
25% of the value of his property.
Dr. Besse Yap, 610 Cottonwood Lane, stated he is upset by
the proposed road construction and development underway near
his home. He believes the excavation work is being
performed by the same developer.
Vice Chairman Plufka inquired where the work was taking
place. Director Moore confirmed that the work is being done
for the plat known as "Wood Pointe" which was recently
approved for residential homes. The developer is Schoell &
Madson.
Dr. Yapp stated he and his family selected Plymouth because
of the private nature of the area where they bought their
home; now the wildlife, wetlands, and woodlands are disap-
pearing. He believes there should be a value placed on
humanity and nature versus that placed on profit- making
commercial ventures.
Vice Chairman Plufka and Public Works Director Moore
reviewed the City's Thoroughfare Guide Plan, and explained
to Dr. Yap, that this plan has been in place for 16 years,
since 1972.
Dr. Yap reiterated his concerns regarding the loss of priv-
acy and property values; and, stated his opposition to the
road construction and the development proposal under
consideration.
MOTION by Commissioner Marofksy, seconded by Commissioner
Wire to defer this item based on the staff recommendation
that plan revisions be made to reflect the zoning district
boundary and any changes necessitated by the Strgar- Roscoe
Report; and, any alternative road alignments that could
impact this development proposal be reviewed by the Planning
Commission.
Commissioner Marofsky reiterated his concern regarding the
impacts to residential property by this proposal and the
City's plans for road construction.
Vice Chairman Plufka stated that it would be logical that
staff would pursue any action which would ensure minimal
disturbance in the residential areas relating to grading and
fill.
MOTION TO DEFER
Page 200
Planninq Commission Minutes
August 10, 1985
Commissioner Marofsky stated his main concern is with the
extension of the road through the wetland, (such as the
problems seen with County Road 61) and, if it can be
avoided, now is the time to do it.
Mr. Ron Erickson stated they understand the City's plans for
street and road construction; however, they don't believe
this would affect their plan.
Commissioner Marofsky read from the Strgar- Roscoe Report,
page 5., No. 7, that lists their recommendations and
alternatives relative to the proposed site; and, that it is
important for the Commission to see what they have in mind.
Mr. Ron Erickson inquired if the Commission would want a
representative from Strgar- Roscoe present at the time the
revised plans for this proposal are reviewed.
Vice Chairman Plufka stated that the record is clear on the
concerns expressed regarding the roadway construction and
the preservation of residential and natural property
features.
Public Works Director Moore stated there are no additional
studies underway. These comments are in conjunction with
the City's Thoroughfare Guide Plan and this proposal would
not affect the alignment. He noted that the road would
skirt the wetlands.
MOTION by Vice Chairman Plufka, seconded by Commissioner MOTION TO AMEND
Tierney to Amend the Motion by deleting reference to the
Strgar- Roscoe Report.
Commissioner Marofsky stated, that without knowing what
Strgar- Roscoe may recommend, he believes it could impact the
proposed site, however, he does not want to hold up the re-
view of Prime Development Corporation revised plans. He
would want to see any further information available from
Strgar- Roscoe or the City pertaining to road construction in
this area.
Roll Call Vote on the Amendment. 3 Ayes. Commissioners VOTE - AMENDMENT
Wire and Marofsky, Nay. MOTION CARRIED
Roll Call Vote on Main Motion as once Amended. 5 Ayes. VOTE - MAIN MOTION
MOTION carried. MOTION CARRIED
Vice Chairman Plufka stated that those who spoke on this
agenda item, will be notified when it returns for Planning
Commission review.
Vice Chairman Plufka called a Recess at 10:30 P.M. RECESS
Page 201
Planning Commission Minutes
August 10, 1955
Vice Chairman Plufka introduced the proposed Amendment re- ZONING ORDINANCE
garding the Home Occupation Conditional Use Permits as AMENDMENT
defined in the Zoning Ordinance. It was the consensus of HOME OCCUPATIONS
the Commission to delete the examples as shown with each
definition.
Vice Chairman Plufka opened the Public Hearing.
Sherman Goldberg, 12115 48th Avenue North, inquired about
the language in those definition. These were read by Vice
Chairman Plufka.
Vice Chairman Plufka closed the Public Hearinq.
Commissioner Zylla stated that he does not see the need for
the "Conditional" Home Occupation definition; he would like
to see these melded together. Where there would be
employees, equipment, parking areas, et al; constitutes a
business and would be disruptive to a residential neighbor-
hood. He distributed copies of the language he has drafted
for Commission review.
It was the consensus of the Commission to Table the item to
the end of this meeting.
NEW BUSINESS
Vice Chairman Plufka introduced the request and reading of
the duly 7, 1988 Staff Report was waived.
Commissioner Wire inquired if this site was approved for
outside storage. Coordinator Dillerud answered that this
was not the case.
Commissioner Marofsky inquired if the developer would be
cutting down the berm along Vicksburg Lane.
Ray Carlson, Centurion Companies, stated that it had been
designed to be removed.
Commissioner Marofsky inquired if additional berming would
be installed on the north property line. Greg Frank,
McCombs, Frank, Roos, Associates, stated berming was not
planned, but they would be installing trees.
Discussion ensued regarding the retaining wall and site
elevations. Mr. Carlson stated that the retaining wall
would be approximately 3 ft. in height along Vicksburg Lane;
and, that the parking lot would be realigned.
Commissioner Marofsky inquired about the sign plan and if
the Commission is asked to approve it with this applica-
tion. Coordinator Dillerud stated that any proposed signage
which would exceed the Ordinance standards would require a
variance and would not be part of this approval.
RICHARD NESLUND
SITE PLAN FOR
1113 VICKSBURG
LANE NORTH
(88081)
Page: 21)2
Planning Commission Minutes
August 10, 19SS
MOTION by Commissioner Wire, seconded by Commissioner Z_vll.a
to recommend approval for the Site Plan for Richard Neslund,
subject to the 11 conditions listed in the duly 7, 1988
staff report.
Commissioner Marofsky stated that he is concerned about the
existing outside storage that is not justified for this
property.
Mr. Ray Carlson stated that the materials stored outside are
from only one tenant who is vacating the premises.
Vote. 5 Ayes. MOTION carried.
OLD BUSINESS
Vice Chairman Plufka introduced the request and reading of
the August 2, 1988 staff report was waived.
Vice Chairman Plufka confirmed that the proposal complies
with the conditions in Resolution No. 88 -299 as directed by
the City Council.
MOTION by Commissioner Wire, seconded by Vice Chairman
Plufka to recommend the application be forwarded to the City
Council; and, that it conforms to the Council direction
regarding satisfaction of Condition Nos. 9, 10, 11, and 13
of Resolution No. 88 -299 that approves the Residential
Planned Unit Development Concept Plan for Dimension
Associates.
Vote. 5 Ayes. MOTION carried.
Vice Chairman Plufka placed the Ordinance Amendment back on
the Table for further discussion.
MOTION by Commissioner Wire, seconded by Commissioner Plufka
to recommend the approval for the Ordinance Amendment re-
garding Home Occupation Conditional Use Permits, deleting
the "Examples" given, and to delete the word "service" or
develop a language change, since a "service" activity is a
part of such Home Occupations as, beauty shop, piano
teacher, or bookkeeping /secretarial.
Commissioner Marofsky noted a correction, changing the word
"or" to "of not more than one person who is a non- resident
of the premises;"
Vice Chairman Plufka noted the review and approval process
for Conditional Use Permits for Home Occupations have been,
and would be reviewed on the merits of the application and
meeting the Conditional Use Permit criteria.
MOTION TO APPROVE
VOTE - MOTION CARRIED
DIMENSION ASSOCIATES
PUD PRELIMINARY PLAT/
PLAN AND CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT (88018)
MOTION FOR APPROVAL
VOTE - MOTION CARRIED
CONTINUATION ZONING
ORDINANCE AMENDMENT
MOTION TO APPROVE
Page 203
Planning Commission Minutes
August 10, 1988
Vote. Commissioner Zvlla reiterated his concern that the
adoption of the language for the Home Occupation Conditional
Use would allow for a more intense business use in a
residential neighborhood.
Commissioner Marofsky stated that Commissioner Zylla's pro-
posed language for the Home Occupation definition should be
forwarded to the City Council for their review.
Roll Call Vote. 5 Ayes. MOTION carried.
OTHER BUSINESS
Public Works Director Fred Moore reviewed the proposed
Capital Improvements Program scheduled for Public Hearing on
August 2.4, 1988.
The status of seal coating streets in the City was discus-
sed. Public Works Director Moore explained the study done a
year ago, and that construction standards for installing
streets and roads has changed to lengthen the life of the
street and road surfaces.
Commissioner Wire inquired about assessments for resurfacing
and reconstruction of streets and roads. Director Moore
stated that the City Council has adopted a financing plan
where 20% would be charged to the abutting property owners.
Further discussion ensued regarding the sanitary sewer, the
problems with sump pumps. Director Moore explained the
City's actions in this regard and that residents have been
very cooperative.
Commissioner Marofsky requested that Director Moore bring
maps to the hearing on August 24, 1988, to point out the
areas under consideration within this CIP.
ADJOURNMENT:
The meeting adjourned at 11:42 P.M.
MOTION CARRIED
REVIEW OF
1989 -1993 CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM
CIP
Concession Report
Actual Sales vs. City (15 %)
MAY
Actual
Sales City
ZACHARY $ 440.05 $ 66.01
PARKERS LAKE 264.51 39.67
$ 704.56 $ 105.68
TOTAL ACTUAL SALES - $ 704.56
2,842.96
2,637.98
$ 6,185.50
DUNE DULY
Actual Actual
Sales City Sales City
$ 29017.67 $ 310.75 $ 2,637.98 $ 395.70
771.29 115.69 - - - - -- _____
$ 29842.96 $ 426.44 $ 2,637.98 $ 395.70
TOTAL CITY - $ 105.68
426.44
395.70
$ 927.82
r. O� S,<tit' S.i u rCt3L r
parce:s prir',d'. buA c , aril; of areas k% _�� [irimc'.i'�
inns sha l be less thar, so. ft it, surface area, shall he located or
subject property, and shall be removed where the intended purpose has hr•_
fulfilled. The owner or manager of the sign arid the owner of the la ,
shall be equally responsible for the proper location, maintenance, ar
ultimate removal of the sign. Setback requirements mar be waived for sue'
signs,provided that they are located on private property with the e.xpres,
consent of the property owner, and provided that they do riot impede safer;
by obstructing vision of pedestrians or motor vehicle operators.
3) One Temporary Real Estate Sign located off the site being developer i,..
Plymouth shall riot exceed 16 sq. ft. in surface area, shall not exceed e
ft. in height, and shall not exceed 8 ft. in width. Such signs shall bu
setback at least 20 ft. from front property lines. Off -site Temporary Dir-
ectional signs sr,all be located at least 200 ft. from any other sion, un-
less grouped with other temporary directional signs, provided that the tot-
al surface area of all such grouped signs shall not exceed 32 sq. ft. The-
signs shall be located on private property with the express consent of the
property owner who, with the owner or manager of the sign shall be equally
responsible for the property location, maintenance, arid ultimate removal of
the sign. Such signs shall be allowed for three years from the date of
original Buildinq Permit issuance, or until 85% of the construction in the
development is completed, which ever occurs first, unless otherwise specif-
ically provided in this Subdivision.
4) Temporary Signs for political campaigns shall be a maximum 32 sq. ft. ir,
surface area, and shall be removed when the intended purpose has beer-,
fulfilled.
Temporary political campaign signs shall he removed not more than five days
after an election.
The owner or manaaer of the sign, the owner of the land, or the political
candidate shall be equally responsible for the proper location, mainten-
ance, and ultimate removal of the sign. Setback requirements may be waiver,
for such signs, provided that they are located on private property with th,-
express consent of the property owner, and provided that they do riot impede
safety by obstructing vision of pedestrians or motor vehicle operators.
5) Temporary Signs for non - commercial announcements by civic groups shall be a
maximum 32 sq. ft. in surface area, provided that a maximum of three such
signs may exceed 32 sq. ft., to a maximum 300 sq. ft., in surface area
provided that the larger signs are for city -wide and free community e.ents.
Temporary Signs for non - commercial announcements by civic groups shall be
removed when the intended purpose has been fulfilled. Signs with a surface
area greater than 32 sq. ft. are allowed for a maximum of ten days.
Continued:
10 -17
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
3400 PLYMOUTH BLVD.. PLYMOUTH. MINNESOTA 55447
TELEPHONE (612) 559 -2800
MEMO
DATE: August 2, 1988
TO: Community Service Officers through Larry `ogers, Sergeant
FROM: Frank Boyles, Assistant City Manager l
SUBJECT BASKETBALL HOOPS ON CITY RIGHTS -OF -WAY
Bob Zitur reports that there are basketball hoops which have been installed
just adjacent to the curb at approximately:
1. 48th and Magnolia
2. 49th and Saratoga
Would you inspect the properties to determine if this is true. If so, the
owners should be advised that the basketball hopps should be relocated on
private property in such a fashion that the actual basketball play area is
also on private property. In doing so, the property owners will:
1. Minimize risk to players and conflict between pedestrians and
motorized vehicles on the public roadway; and
2. Eliminate liability to the property owner and City in the event
that a city plow or private vehicle is damaged because of
collision with the hoop withn the road right -of -way.
Please share any correspondence on this subject with me. By copy of this
memo to Helen LaFave, I am suggesting that a notice appear in Plymouth on
Parade discouraging such installations.
FB:kec
cc: James G. Willis, City Manager
Helen LaFave, Communications Coordinator
S.F. 8/12/88
Bob Zitur
DATE: 8/16/88
TO: Administration, Planning, Community Services
FROM: Sgt. Rogers
SUBJ: Basketball Hoops vs. Rights -of -way.
I have received three complaints concerning residents
that have built basketball hoops within the right -of -way
near cul -de -sacs. In two of the complaints, the hoops
have not been removed upon our request. This has
requir 3 us to search for a more formal resolution.
A preliminary review of state statutes indicates that
there may be no misdemeanor infraction that can be pur-
sued for which a citation can be issued for maintaining
such an object within the right -of -way. The statutes
only seem to pertain to schrubs, trees, buildings,
structures, vehicles, culverts, drainage and fences.
A preliminary review of the City Ordinances with var-
ious personnel indicates are that there may be no clear
enforcement, or removal options that are available at
this time. There is no visual obstruction to traffic,
and there have been no pedestriation /traffic complaints
where enforcement action is applicable.
At Frank Boyles' request, I've reviewed the matter with
Jim Thomson. Steve Tallen will be assigned research
duties on the subject and respond accordingly.
cc: Chief Carlquist
Frank Boyles
John Sigfrinius
Myra Wicklacz
Helen LaFave
August 12, 1988}
Ms. Patricia Ann Thornton
870 Hillside Drive
Long Beach, CA 90815
Dear Ms. Thornton:
We have received your letter of August 8, notifying us of the termination of
your agreement to sell certain property to Dimension Associates and
Mr. Robert Wachter. Thank you for sharing this information with us.
Yours truly,
63a s G. Willis
Manager
OW:kec
cc: Mayor & City Council
Blair Tremere, Director of Planning & Community Development
ESOTA 55441 . TELEPHONE (612) 559 -2800
Patricia Ann Thornton
870 Hillside Drive
Long Beach, CA 90815
August 8, 1988
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
3400 Plymouth Blvd.
Plymouth, MN 55447
RE: TERMINATION OF REAL ESTATE AGREEMENT WITH DIMENSION
Associates and its assignee Robert G. Wachter as
Shown in attached Termination Agreement dated 8 -5 -88
Please find enclosed a copy of the Termination of Real
Estate Agreement signed by Robert G. Wachter.
Although there is now no Sales Agreement regarding the
following property, the property remains on the market.
14815 County Road 9 and 14915 County Road 9,
Plymouth, Minnesota 55446.
Very truly yours,
Patricia A. Thornton, Owner
Franci's J. Thornton, Owner
Enclosure.
TER`iINATION OF REAL ESTATE AGREEMENT
IT IS HEREBY AGREED between Francis J. Thornton and Patrici
A. Thornton who are named as Seller and Dimension Associates who is
named as Buyer in that certain Real Estate Agreement dated Januar-
15, 1988, and the Supplements thereto, respecting the sale an
purchase of a certain parcel of real estate, located in Hennepi.
County, Minnesota, legally described as:
North 744 feet of the NW1 /4 of the SE1 /4 lying East of the
West 726 feet thereof, and that part of the SW1 /4 of the
NE1 /4 Tying South of County Road 9; Section 16, Township
118, Range 22; that part of the NW1 /4 of the SE1 /4 lying
South of the North 744 feet and East of the West 726 feet
thereof; Section 16, Township 118, Range 22; that part of
the West 726 feet of the NW1 /4 of the SE1 /4 lying South of
the North 594 feet thereof; Section 16, Township 118, Range
22; and North 594 feet of the West 726 feet of the NW1 /4 of
the SE1 /4 except road; Section 16, Township 118, Range 22,
Hennepin County, Minnesota.
that said Real Estate Agreement is on this date unconditionall,_.,
cancelled and is of no further force or effect.
Upon receipt of a copy of this Termination of Real Estate
Agreement, signed by all parties, the listing Real Estate Broker is
hereby directed and authorized to release and pay to Buyer the su.,.
of Twenty -two Thousand and 00 /100 Dollars ($22,000.00) as and for
refund of Earnest Money. All other sums paid by Buyer to Seller ar�2
hereby forfeited to Seller, as provided for in said Real Estate:
Agreement.
Dated: ti� — _, 19.
Dimer ion Associates, Buyer Francis J. Thornton, Seller
By Ro ert G. Wachter r`
Its M Waging Partner ✓ �L ��
Patricia A. Thornton, Seller
Douglas B. Farrow
Attorney at Law
2045 Black Oaks Lane
Plymouth, Minnesota 55447
(612) 623 -6769
August 16, 1988
City Council
City of Plymouth
3400 Plymouth Boulevard
Plymouth, Minnesota 55447
Dear Sirs and Madames:
While I realize this summer's water shortage has been hard on
all of us, I feel the need to express my displeasure with the city's
handling of the situation (or at least my perception thereof).
The rationing of water during at least the last two summers
would appear to be indicative of poor planning and forecasting as to
the amount of water needed. While Plymouth is indeed a growing
community, other growing suburbs (Maple Grove, Brooklyn Center,
Brooklyn Park) have managed to provide a water supply sufficient to
obviate the need for rationing. Earlier this year in the Star Tribune, a
state water official indicated that groundwater levels were entirely
satisfactory (even if no more rain fell the rest of the summer) and that
any shortage in communities served by wells would be due to a lack of
pumping capacity.
Budget constraints are a fact of life. However, provision of an
adequate supply of water should be high on the list of municipal
priorities behind only police and fire protection. While I like and
enjoy the new park at Parker's Lake, I (and I suspect most others)
would gladly give up, that and comparable projects in favor of a
dependable water s, apply,
My last concern is the rationing system as currently instituted.
Except for weekends, it is extremely difficult for households
composed of working adults to water at a time when they aren't
sleeping or at work. While timers can help the matter, the current
system discriminates in favor of those households with people at home
during the morning.
I would appreciate the opportunity to talk to one of you (the
Council) about this matter. The at -large nature of the Council does not
Page 2
August 16, 1988
present a single person to whom a resident can go with a problem. To
the extent I am misinformed, I would appreciate learning the true
situation. I suspect this situation raises a larger communications issue
(opportunity) for other residents as well.
Yours very truly,
Douglas B. Farrow
DBF:ds
cc: Plymouth City Engineering Dept.
t
ILI�.
CITY OF
August 17, 1988 PLYNou i' +
Arne Kolbjornsen
TROY RIDGE HOA
5605 Vagabond Lane No.
Plymouth, MN 55446
SUBJECT: INVITATION TO ATTEND 1989/90 CITY BUDGET PUBLIC HEARING
Dear Mr. Kolbjornsen:
This letter is to advise you that the Plymouth City Council has scheduled
Tuesday, September 13th at 8 p.m. for the public hearing on the 1989/90 City
Budgets at Plymouth City Center, 3400 Plymouth Boulevard. This is your
opportunity to address the Council on issues of concern which may be
contained in the City budget document!
A copy of the draft 1988/1989 Budget Summary will be available at the City
Center reception area beginning Tuesday, September 6.
If you are unable to attend the meeting in person, feel free to submit your
written comments to me for conveyance to the City Council prior to the
public hearing.
The City Council welcomes and encourages your input on the proposed budget
documents.
Sincerely,
Frank Boyles
Assistant City Manager
FB:kec
cc: Mayor & City Council
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447, TELEPHONE (612) 559 -2800
CITY Or
August 16, 1985 PLy1 ' t0 UT `
Mr. & Mrs. Ralph Durand
12000 - 53rd Avenue North
Plymouth, MN 55442
SUBJECT -:, WATER CONSERVATION CONCERNS
Dear mss. Durand:
You have expressed concern about the use of Bass Lake water for lawn
sprinkling purposes by various residents along the lake. Councilmember
Vasiliou shared this concern with the Council. I am taking this opportunity
to provide you with information on this subject. In addition, Councilmember
�• Vasiliou has asked me to attach an article on this subject.
The Department of Natural Resources requires that a private party obtain a
pumping permit when,:
1. More than 10,000 gallons per day is being pumped from the lake; or
2. More than 19000,000 gallons per year is pumped from the lake.
For illustrative purposes, 1,000,000 gallons per year amounts to 7 gallons
per minute, 24 hours a day for 100 days. Since none of the 11 properties is
pumping this amount, no permit is necessary.
The question about whether the lake's water level is significantly reduced
is a good one. To respond to that question, let us assume that each lot for
the 11 households pumping from the lake is just over one -half acre in size.
This would amount to some 15,000 square feet of sod. Sod needs one inch of
water weekly for optimal growth. This would require 9,000 gallons of water
each week for 12 weeks, or 961000 gallons per year per household. You
should remember that this assumes that it does not rain even once during the
entire summer. Assuming this worst case, the 11 pumps pumping from Bass
Lake would pump 96,000 gallons per year times 11 pumps, or 1,056,000
gallons.
Bass Lake is approximately 175 acres. One inch of water measured at the
surface of the lake is approximately 4,760,000 gallons. Therefore, the
1,056,000 gallons pumped by the 11 properties under a worst case scenario
amounts to .22 inches of water taken from the lake, or just over 1 /5th of an
inch of water each year.
3400 PLYt,4,_)UTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MIS: ^lESOTA 55447, TELEPHONE 1612) 559 -2800
4r. & Mrs. Ralph dirand
August 16, 1988
Page 2
As you can see, pumping has no significant effect on the lake. What is
significant is the amount of evaporation which can occur daily. I am told
by experts that on one of our very hot and windy days the lake level can be
reduced as much as 112 inch for that day alone. As you know, the lake is
down some three feet now, and I would expect that evaporation has played the
largest role in this loss.
Thanks for sharing your concern with us. I hope that you find this
information helpful.
Sincerely,
1-d"L J,
Virgil Schneider
Mayor
VS:kec
cc: Councilmembers
c'
Pumping will not affect lake level
I read with interest the article
on pumping [water] from Lake
Minnetonka that appeared in the
July 18 Sailor.
The article suggests that Mr.
Rascop has not read, or has
forgotten, Mr. Dick Gray's
(founder of Gray Freshwaters
Biological Institute) newspaper
articles of the recent past in
which it was pointed out Chat all
the pumping fro*n the lake for
household and irrigation needs,
even at greatly accelerated
rates, would have a negative im-
pact on the lake's level of but an
inch or less totally for the whole
season ... not much considering
the evaporation resulting from a
very hot and windy day can
reduce the level by a half inch or
mo^e Just for that day.
While I'd happily defer to any
technical information available
on this subject, in its absence it
would seem that Mr. Gray's
reputation is such that his corn- -
ments regarding, pumping and
the lake's level would indicate
concern over pumping from the
lake was largely unfounded due
to its minimal effect on the level
of the lake.
Jim VVver
Deephaven
�?14n, SSd2tidi!S.•2!. f.!�5`r io.f'Ge2�trtS.2,S �'`. . ��i•?`Li.... <.��;c,fa u;:- .�.C':S.!t °;do-•: .f�:,i,. �_ :... 4. .. ? .c. <..G�sd!i� :': +..Maa�!�r Y ?R�i>,°i : >7^n•3!,�`.•;•;�!�•rcaa!?. ........... t .. ...,. -. i�. . <. C... , t: . e,�; .;,,,,�..;:.
6COT( KU��/
(�llY �S3|SSi,<
Cl�Y '/F PLY/iOoT|�
3400 PLY��iilH ii-V��
PLYMUUTH, MN. 5544:
RE: PROPERTY ID 02 11E 2T 24 =1
DEAR MR HUVET,
THIS LETTER CONF]!{ME A MwETIN6
THAT WAS HELD 10 JUNE
BETWEEN MYSELF AND SUL MAJDLREF1 OF
YUw STAFF,
DURlN, THAT MLITlNG lm ASsE9S[D
VALUAlIo|i OF lHF Aw[mE
PROPERTY WAS DISCUSSED.
BH1EFL\, Tv`khE 1s uI6ASHEIhLN!
*t Q V:.Unllwn. u-3P`lL
REPEATED ATTEMPTS, MO. MAUDEREk
EXAMPLE OF A CUMIARAQLE PROPERTY AT
01, SAME VALL'A1I14 b�
MIhE. THE CLOSEST EXAMPLE PROVIDLU
WAS A FROpLKTw LOLA\ED AT
2305 TROY LAN|T, lMFERlAL HAL'LS. THlS
Pu[/[TRlY CAkKJED A
VALUATION OF $115,000, OVEk ob,0ow
LEnj |HA;q HI;q[.
DESPITE !HE LOWER VALUHl1iON, )
FLL` Ad TKlEPENDLN|
APPRAISAL WOULD 2H0A TkAl hv KODF'EFTv
WOULD BL Y4L-ET LESS
THAN HER [xHMPLE FOP: it, NAACP [EAS[:A,`.
FIRS[, HER COMPARABLE
EXAM['LE HAD AN EXTRA BATHROOM OFT' THE
MASTER bEDROOh.
SECOND, MY PROF'EKTV lS LOCATED ALONG
CO]NTY ROAD 10 WHlCh
CARRIES HEAVY TRAFFl;
TO CONVEQT THE
ROADWAY IN7U A MAJOK DIVIDED FQUR-LANE RJADwAf. MS.
MAUDERERS EXAMPLE PROPERlY IS LOCPTED
�
IN A WUIET RESlDEkTlA�
NElGHBORHOOD.'
BASIS SEVERAL DISLUSSIONS 4ITH
KLALTURS AS TO w�ol T/1E''
COULD SELL THE PROPERTY FOR ]T APPEmRS
THAT THE ClTY QF
PLYMOUTH'S VALUATlON IS APPROXlMATEL\
7%-102 TOO HIGH.
IN A CONVERSATION WITH MAYOR VIRGIL SCHNEIDER DURING
AND AFTER CITY HEARINGS REGARDING THL
EXPANSION AND
IMPROVEMENT OF COUNTY ROAD 10, THE
MAYOR ASSURED ME THA�
PROPERTY VALUES ALONG THE ROUTE OF
THE PROJECT WOULD BE
REVIEWED. THIS LETTER IS NOTICE THAT [ WILP BE DISCUSSING
THE REDUCTION OF THE VALUATION OF MY
PROPERTY WITH MS,
MAUDERER PRIOR TO NEXT JUNE'S APPEAL
DATE AS TO THE FOLLOWING
YEAR VALUATION.
THANK YOU.
/
�
LEO WASESCHA
12210 60TH AVE NORTH
PLYMOUTH, MN. 55442
/
CL: MAYOR SCHNEIDE
`
i'
August 8, 1988
Lyle C. Robinson, Fire Chief
City of Plymouth
3400 Plymouth Blvd.
Plymouth, MN 55447
Dear Chief:
During the early morning of Friday, August 5th, your
Department was called to assist the Golden Valley Fire
Department as we were battling a difficult house fire in our
City. With your help and the aid of other Fire Departments
that assisted, we were able to extinguish the fire and save
much of the structure and its contents. On behalf of our
Department, we wish to express our appreciation to your Fire
Fighters for the very timely and able assistance we
received.
Teamwork is the key, and your help as always is most needed
and appreciated.
Sincerely
Robert Hennesse re Chief
Dean Moone ,Public Safety Director
DM: ms
Civic Center, 7800 Golden Valley Rd., Golden Valley, Minnesota 55427, (612) 593 -8000
T Gim I�eo e
3400 PIymouth Boulevard
PIymouth, Minnesota 55447
August 10, 1988
Plymouth Fire Department
3400 Plymouth Boulevard
Plymouth, MN 55447
Dear Department Members:
On behalf of the Plymouth Civic League I would like to thank you
for your efforts at the Music In Plymouth concert. We are always
pleased to have you in attendance and we appreciate your
assistance.
Sincerely,
j
Sandy Adolfson
President
August 10, 1988
The Plymouth We Lease
3400 Plymouth Boulevard
Plymouth, Minnesota 55447
Plymouth Police Department
3400 Plymouth Boulevard
Plymouth, MN 55447
Dear Department Members:
On behalf of the Plymouth Civic League I would like to thank you
for your help and attendance at this year's MUSIC IN PLYMOUTH
concert. We are proud of the City of Plymouth and its citizens
- and we are grateful to the organizations that volunteer their
time in order to make the concert a success.
Thank you also to your Police Explorers and Police Reserves.
Sincerely,
Sandy Adolf son
President
�1 jy
Ulf t' vi et
PNORPT
August 18, 1988
Chief fudge Peter J. Linberg
Fourth Judicial District Court
Hennepin County Government Center
Minneapolis, MN 55487
Dear fudge Linberg:
Thank you for your letter of August 15 conveying the solution to the matter
of jury trials in suburban locations.
I personally appreciate your openness and working with those who were
concerned with the original proposal. The solution appears to be reasonable
to the majority of the parties concerned and I believe represents a positive
step forward in maintaining constructive relationships between the courts,
law enforcement agencies and suburban municipalities.
Suburban communities are concerned, as you can appreciate, about being
confronted with basic changes in their operating procedures without adequate
prior discussions. The relationship which has been established between
suburban communities, prosecutors and the court in this matter should be
maintained if future changes are required in court operations effecting us.
WE all want to be part of a positive solution - not part of the problem.
Thank you for your assistance in working out what could have been a very
difficult problem for those of us in local government.
Yours truly,
�c
James G. Willis
City Manager
JW:kec
cc: Mayor and City Council
City Attorney
I.— ni vkeni iTU oni 11 wean PI VAACII ITH MINNESOTA 55447. TELEPHONE (612) 559 -2800
7 7 _ S C-
August 13, 1938
T0: all Suburban Cit-y Managers,
Administrators, and Clerics
This letter is in response to the many calls, letters,
and resolutions we have received from the various city
governments, city managers, administrators, and /or clerks
of various co- ;tmunit_es in suburban Hennepin County. The
comments were directed at the District Court in regard to
a : 000sal to hcld jury trials in the Hennepin County
Government Center rather than the three suburban locations
where trials have been held for the past few vears.
The proposal came about as a res, -,lt of the Minnesota
Supreme Court's recent decision mandating 12- person uries
for all criminal trials. That includes the full range of
:misdemeanor crimes tha_ are principally the crimes charged
by suburbar. coirmunit :es .
.t was apparent i-umediate v that the cost to Hennepin
.olln"1 c_ - mple ^e. ^.t_ C t e decision would be substantial in
terms Of increased numbers of jurors, and the potential pur-
chase of additional vans and /or buses. It was the thought
of the District Court that the trials could more economically
and effic_eatly be :ie1.: in the Government Center.
Clear from the ma.. ^.V comments and 1 °_tiers we have
received that suburban communities were not in favor of that
proposal. The Court :.as reviewed its proposal after receipt
of the various resolutions and city manager comments. In
addition I have met with the Suburban Prosecutors Association
on two occasions.
It was recommended by the prosecutors after lengthy dis-
cussion that jury trials that are scheduled for trial in a
suburban location will be handled in the fol'_owing manner:
(1) Voir dire, or selection of the fury panel, will be commenced
at the Henrecin Count Government Center with the suburban trial
judge who will follow the case downtown; (2) If the jury selec-
tion process is not ccmoleted in the -first afternoon it is con-
te:lp_at8d tna_ the zone_ O_ _, .:eza,,;se of _ne se_ect.cn
'Ocess, w: be S'... o _ s,:.c__c_ t na= the
arrive at 12 for ,.he our - rese ;..
i
vans would suf_ic:e to transccrt the remaining 4urcrs to the
suburban locations fer the completic.-. of the voir dire and
trial; (3) in addition, if the voir dire process is not com-
pleted on the first afternoon o= selection the judge wi_:
suggest to those jurors who can and are able to drive an auto-
mobile that they drive their persona_ cars to the suburban
court location.
It aonears that this is a worcable solution and will be
implemented forthwith. The District Court understands the
position of the various communities suburban Hennepin
County and _s attempting to accommocate the problems of the
Fourth judicial �iS �� t _n re _at= on to t e suburban corTL't13.. -
needs. While the prosecutOrs ks-sociat-ion recommended the above
_I an , there were a cou :: Ie of corm;,uni ti es that in fact were
adamant in their Ot00sit_O...
I think on balance _VOu will find that the solution outlined
above wil_ meet the needs of 'iou: cCmilunJ tie _-, your -Oli: e
departments and others who are a_rect y involved i.. the suburban
ury trial process. If you have any uestions, feel free to
drop me a note.
August 18, 1938
Editor
Plymouth Post
8801 Bass Lake Road
New Hope, MN 55428
Dear Sir /Madam:
Reader Mattson suggested that I may not understand the implications of
recent state tax legislation. I do and the news is BAD.
The Minnesota House Research Department has prepared projections of the tax
impacts of the recently adopted tax "reforms." Statewide, property taxes
are projected to increase $178,285,000 in 1989. Of this amount, property
taxpayers in the Twin City Metropolitan Area will pay $170,741,000, or
nearly 97% of the increase. Residents in outstate Minnesota will see their
property taxes increase by $5,544,000, or slightly more than 3 %. Why does
the Legislature think outstate homeowners need property tax relief when the
average property tax bill in the metro area is twice as much as outstate?
Metropolitan taxpayers, particularly those living in the western suburbs,
cannot afford this type of "tax reform."
The fact is, very substantial sums of state income tax monies, largely paid
for by metropolitan residents, are being used to subsidize property tax
relief for outstate residents.
Reader Mattson believes that the Legislature has given us a tax cut.
Nothing could be further from the truth. The net impact of the last session
of the Legislature represents a substantial shift of state financing
mechanisms, the effect of which is to place higher property tax burdens on
suburban residents. The data is public and I would be pleased to provide
reader Mattson, or others with a copy of it if they would contact me.
Sincerely,
Vi y '1 Schneider
Mayor - Plymouth
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD. PLYMOUTH. MINNESOTA 55447. TELEPHONE (612) 559 -2800
S1A.TE'�-'!-I
F R O F E
i. T Y T
A X S 1 h. L A'
r
' 7i
BASE.IN`I:
ESTIMATE:
PAYAE:E 196'_:
CJ;FI►' LA,
r r t r r r r r r r r
VS.
r r r r
r r r
ALTERNATIVE:
PRDJECTED
PAY 8S: REVISEC
DIS;APITY AIC
PROPERTY TA): IMPACTS
B`' PROrER'Y TYPE
MARKET VALUE
ASSESSED
VA:L'E
GROSS TAX BUR Ek
NET TAX BURDEk
..............
EFFE :TIVE
...................
TAY: Rt';
PROPERTY CLASS
............
CHANGE PCT CHG
..............
CHANGE PCT CHG
......•.•..•....
CHANGE PCT CHG
CHANGE PCT CHC
........ .......
BASELINE
........
ALTERkt':..
......... .-
...............
AG HOMESTEAD
. ....... .......
- 447407. -3.1
........
-2063362.
.......
-87.9
...•.... .......
1341. .5
379.
.3
.83
AG NOk-HMSTD
-204938. -3.4
- 941235.
•87.7
2100. 1.9
2436.
2.9
1.43
1.5:
TIMBERLAND
-6329. -2.4
- 41550.
•87,8
52. .9
45.
1.1
1.62
1.6£
SEAS-REC-RES'AL
100080. 3.0
- 622715.
•8°.7
-2101. -2.8
8749.
13.7
1.93
2.1:
RESIDENTIAL HS
3360321. 5.6
- 9710006.
- 87.0
84043. 6.3
6169E.
7.8
1.32
1.3:
RES NON-HS
245887. 3.8
- 1561764.
-87.0
12413. 5.7
12413.
5.7
3.41
3.47
APARTMENTS
183670. 3.5
- 1552993.
-87.4
6248. 2.9
5612.
2.6
4.04
4.C"
SUBSIDIZED APTS
29381. 2.5
- 208515.
-87.1
811. 2.7
811.
2.7
2.56
2.57
C/I UNDER 60 K
16952. .7
- 601975.
•88.2
-6040. -6.9
6736.
9.1
2.96
3.2.
C/I OVER 60 K
877554. 4.9
-6704365.
•87.4
38269. 4.2
49334.
5.4
5.08
5.11
UTILITY t PERS
3008:1. 6.4
-15636,):.
-86.4
21023. 10.5
21,"
1C.5
4.2--
4.41
ENTERPRISE ZONE
-819. •.7
- 3609;.
-E7-.8
-275. -4.9
6 S.
-16.8
4.14
3.4'
VACANT LAND
57894. 4.7
-4248:-4•
-66.3
855C. 14.7
8549.
14.7
4.71
5.16
RAILROAD
0 0
- 9148--.
-87.8
-193. -1.5
•193.
-1.5
5.29
5.22
MINERAL
0 0
- 11515.
•89.5
-643. -28.5
-643.
-28.5
8.76
6.26
DISABLED HMSTD
6. 0
-5492.
-82.6
317. 37.6
159.
.........
40.1
......
.30
.....
.42
.....
TOTAL
......... .. - -•- .........
4513106. 3.6 •26141510.
....•.
-87.3
......... ......
165898. 4.7
176285.
6.3
2.25
2.31
LEVIES
(1000'S)
ASSESSED VALUES
00001S)
TAX
TAX
FISC DISP
FIS: D::'
COUNTY CITY /TOWN
SCHOOL
SPECIAL
TOTAL INCREMENT
INCREMENT
..........
CONTRIBUTN
..........
DISTRI6. "r
.........
.... ...... ... ....... ..........
BASELINE: 936081. 633828.
1496470.
..........
109975.
•..•...... .........
3176353. 146826.
1201667.
1761676. 17616 -!
ALTERNATIVE: 997648. 536307.
1620635.
118E3C^.
3273420. 166642.
165719.
........•.
251373. 20946::.
-- ----- --- ......•...
.......... .......... ..........
CHANGE: 61567. - 97521.
124165.
..........
8°55.
...•...... .........
97067.
19816.
- 1035948.
- 1510303.
3324` -
PCT. CHANGE:
6.6 -15.4
8.3
8.1
3.1
13.5
-86.2
•85.7
1E.,
+ + + + + +
+ TOTAL MILL
RATE
BASELINE:
117.7
ALTERNATIVE:
.963
+ +
+ + + + +
TAX
CREDITS 00001S)
HSTD CRED HSTD CRED
HSTD CRED
TAC CRED
TAC CRED TAC CRED
MISC.
AG NON -AG
TOTAL
AG
NDN -AG TOTAL
AG CREOT
MISC. AG BUSINESS
........ ........
........
TOTAL
BASELINE:
........ .. ......
61583. 543739.
........
605321.
. .......
445.
........ ........
10249. 10693.
........
105183.
1064.
24539.
746801.
ALTERNATIVE:
63352. 569448.
632800.
450.
7031. 7480.
93937.
0
........ ........
2199.
........
736416.
............
CHANGE:
........ ........
1769. 25709.
........
27479.
........
5.
........ ........
-3218. -3213.
........
- 11246.
-1064.
- 22340.
- 10385.
PCT. CHANGE:
2.9 4.7
4.5
1.1
-31.4 -30.0
-10.7
-100.0
-91.0
-1.4
NC». ME1F: AF- A,
1
1
4
I I I I I I I I t I i l
F F C F E F 1 t 1 A r S: k L A T I C
6AS..1 ►t. E T;h: / ?E: PA`A.E 1S .. CJ P. LA.
ALTERW IV:. P €3.ECT'E: PAY 8 =. REVISED DISFA.,'T AI.
MARKET VALUE
PROPERTY CLASS CHANGE PCT CHG
AG HOMESTEAD
- 461173.
-3.4
AG NON-HMSTD
- 2D9859.
-3.8
TIMBERLAND
-6328.
-2.4
SEAS- REC-RES'AL
98925.
3.1
RESIDENTIAL HS
392140.
2.1
RES NON -HS
16558.
.9
APARTMENTS
-1868.
-.2
SUBSIDIZED APTS
2096.
.4
C/I UNDER 60 K
9834.
.6
C/I OVER 60 K
13981.
.4
UTILITY 8 PERS
221857.
6.9
ENTERPRISE ZONE
-86°_.
-.8
VACANT LAN^,
-343.
-.2
RAILROAD
0
0
MINERAL
0
0
DISABLED HMSTD
-5.
.........
-.0
TOTAL
......
74948.
.1
PROPERTY TAX IMPACTS BY PROPERTY TYPE (100D'S>
ASSESSED VALUE
CHANGE PCT CHG
- 1919416. -88.0
-870526. -87.8
- 41276. -87.8
-602518. -8£.7
- 2837791. -87.1
- 441821. -87.4
- 252615. -87.9
- 75803. -87.1
- 370790. -88.2
- 1205219. -88.4
- 1041035. -86.2
- 35913. £ ?.E
•78156. 8 .S
-6C231. -87.8
115'5. - E ; . 5
-2969. -82.6
-98:7596. -8 7.6
GROSS TAX BJRDEN
................
CHANGE PCT CMG
........ .......
-149. ..1
1193. 1.2
50. .9
-1931. -2.7
-1998. -.5
-1818. -2.7
-2179. -5.7
-497. -4.0
-5933. -10.6
- 18210. -10.0
12716. 9.9
-28.:. •5.1
244. 2.1
-227. •2.6
-6.43. -28.5
157. 32.8
- 1950E. -1.4
NET TAX BJRDEN
..............
CHANGE PCT CHG
-974. -.9
1567. 2.0
43. 1.0
8626. 14.0
-20. .0
-1818. -2.7
-2815. -7.4
-497. -4.0
2638. 5.6
- 12559. -7.1
12712. 9.9
-80;. -17.0
243. 2.1
-227. -2.6
-643. -2£.5
76. 34.5
5544. .6
' HO.'SE EE SEA
i 1 i t T i l l
EFFECTIVE TAX Rl.'_
...................
BASELINE ALTERNA.111 v:
.82
J-
1.42
1.51
1.63
1.6.°
1.90
2.1
1.11
1.N
3.69
3.5:
4.50
4.1f
2.51
2.3;
3.01
3.15
5.54
4.03
4. .
4.15
3.47
5.14
5.26
5.38
5.2:
8.76
6.25
.31
.41
1.81 1.82
MARKET VALUE
('111TAX
STD CREDIT
"S1
nC CREDIT
( =)NET TAX
EFFECTIVE RATE
HOMESTEAD PARCEL REPORT: NON -AG HOMESTEADS (EXCLUDING PROPERTY TAX REFUNDS)
(1/3 BELOW AVG VALUE)
..........................
BASELINE ALTERNAT PCT CHNG
........ ........
27800.
LEVIES
0000'S)
S81. 2.8
305.
ASSESSED VALUES 00001S)
0
0
260.
267. 2.8
.94
.95
TAX
TAX FISC
DISP F1SC C;S:
..........
COUNTY CITY
..........
/TOWN
..........
SCHOOL
SPECIAL
..........
TOTAL INCREMENT
..........
INCREMENT CONTRIBUTN
DISTRI6::7k
BASELINE:
442840.
268358.
605616.
7719.
.........
1324564.
23285.
.......... ..........
169461.
..........
0
ALTERNATIVE:
..........
471296.
..........
194070.
..........
628862.
8491.
..........
1302719.
25627.
24402.
0
CHANGE:
26456.
- 74318.
23246.
772.
.......... .........
- 21845.
2342.
.......... ..........
- 145059.
..........
0
PCT. CHANGE:
6.4
-27.7
3.8
10.0
-1.6
10.1
-85.6
0
+ ♦ + +
+ ♦ +
TOTAL MILL
RATE
BASELINE:
119.6
ALTERNATIVE:
.949 +
+ + + + + +
TAX
CREDITS (1000'S)
HSTO CRED
HSTD CRED
NSTD CRED
TAC CRED
TAC CRED TAC CRED
MISC.
AG
........
NON -AG
........
TOTAL
........
AG
NON-AG TOTAL
AG CREDT
MISC. AG BUSINESS
TOTAL
BASELINE:
57267.
207061.
264328.
........
445.
........ ........
10249. 10693.
........
98759.
........ ........
523. 14905.
........
389208.
ALTERNATIVE:
............
58822.
........
208372.
........
267193.
........
450.
........
7031. 7480.
87301.
0 2183.
364158.
CHANGE:
1555.
1311.
2865.
5.
........ ........
-3218. -3213.
........
- 11458.
........ ........
-523. - 12722.
........
- 25050.
PCT. CHANGE:
2.7
.6
1.1
1.1
-31.4 -30.0
-11.6
-100.0 -85.4
-6.4
MARKET VALUE
('111TAX
STD CREDIT
"S1
nC CREDIT
( =)NET TAX
EFFECTIVE RATE
HOMESTEAD PARCEL REPORT: NON -AG HOMESTEADS (EXCLUDING PROPERTY TAX REFUNDS)
(1/3 BELOW AVG VALUE)
..........................
BASELINE ALTERNAT PCT CHNG
........ ........
27800.
........
28200. 1.4
565.
S81. 2.8
305.
314.
0
0
260.
267. 2.8
.94
.95
(AVERAGE VALUE)
..........................
BASELINE ALTERNAT PCT CHNG
........ ........ ........
41600. 42100. 1.2
846. 867. 2.5
457. 468.
0 0
389. 399. 2.5
.94 .95
(1/3 ABOVE AVG VALUE)
..........................
BASELINE ALTERNAT PCT CHNG
........ ........ ........
55300. 55900. 1.1
1124. 1151. 2.4
607. 622.
0 0
517. 530. 2.4
.94 .95
(COMPARATIVE VALUE)
..........................
BASELINE ALTERNAT PCT CHIC•
........ ........
61800.
........
64000. 3.6
1256.
1318. 4.9
679.
712.
0
0
578.
606. 4.9
.94
.95
M.cTfC A: 1 F R C F F f T 1 1/) 1 0 L'
ES';f.:... FAr /L.E 1S__. Qi:c:k' 11.
V5.
ALTERNATIVE. PRCJECTEC PA E>. RE't:SE: DIS AF.'Y A. :.
MARKET VALUE
PROPERTY CLASS CHANGE PCT CH:
AG HOMESTEAD
13766.
1.3
AG NON -HMSTD
4921.
1.1
TIMBERLAND
0
0
SEAS•REC•RES'AL
1154.
1.1
RESIDENTIAL HS
296°182.
7.2
RES NON-YS
229329.
5.0
APARTMENTS
18553.
4.2
SUBSIDIZED APTS
27285.
3.9
C/I UNDER 60 K
7118.
.8
C/I OVER 60 K
863573.
5.9
UTILITY 8 PERS
78? -:.
5.2
ENTERPRISE ZONE
4-.
4.7
VACANT LAND
5823E.
5.E
RAILROAD
0
C
MINERAL
0
0
DISABLED HMSTD
11.
.0
TOTAL
......... ......
443E15E.
6.3
PRO E:'Y TAY IK =ACTS E` DR YER'Y TYPE
ASSESSED VALUE
CHANGE PCT CHG
-143946. •87.3
•70711. •87.1
•274. •87.5
-20197. -86.9
•687221:.. •86.9
-1119943. •86.9
-1300377. -87.3
- 132712. -87.1
•231185. •88.1
•5499146. -E7.2
522 >E5. Eti.
-1E=. E�.7
3466°.x. 8c.1
312:9. -87.8
C 0
•2523. -82.6
1(293914. •E7.1
GR^SS TAX BJRDEk
................
CHANGE PCT CHG
1491. 8.3
907. 9.9
2. 5.9
-17C. -6.6
86040. 9.4
14231. 9.4
8427. 4.8
1308. 7.2
-106. -.3
56479. 7.7
8:�'. 11.
9. 33._
83:7. 17.9
33. E
0 0
16:. 43.8
185407. 8.5
NET TAX BURGER
CHANGE PCT CHG
1353. 14.5
868. 12.6
1. 4.0
122. 5.4
61719. 10.6
14231. 9.4
8427. 4.8
1308. 7.2
4097. 15.2
61893. 8.5
82K. 1, .7
9. 33.3
83'7. 17.9
33. .8
0 0
83. 46.9
170741. 9.3
♦ ♦ i 4 4 4
BASELINE:
ALTERNATIVE:
CHANGE:
PCT. CHANGE:
F
' 8E
LEVIES
(1000'S)
..........
1.C.
1.52
1.7:
1.44
1.4'
2.10
2.14
1.41
TAY
3.30
COUNTY
CITY /TOWN
SCHOOL
SPECIAL
TOTAL
INCREMENT
BASELINE:
493241.
365439.
890854.
102255.
1851789.
123541.
ALTERNATIVE:
526353.
..........
342237.
. ... •.....
991773.
110338.
197C'701.
141014.
CHANGE:
33112.
•23202.
.•........
100919.
..........
8083.
..........
118912.
.........
17473.
PCT. CHANGE:
6.7
-6.3
11.3
7.9
6.4
14.1
♦ ♦ i 4 4 4
BASELINE:
ALTERNATIVE:
CHANGE:
PCT. CHANGE:
EFFECTIVE
..................
F
' 8E
ALTER07.71.
,'. •
..........
1.C.
1.52
1.7:
EFFECTIVE
..................
TA) F.1 ".
BASELINE
........
ALTER07.71.
.91
..........
1.C.
1.52
1.7:
1.44
1.4'
2.10
2.14
1.41
1.4E
3.30
3.4'
3.95
3.S
2.61
2.6;
2.87
3.21
4.9E
5.1`
4.6`
4.5-
NON-AG
........
TOTAL
4.61
5.14
5.13
5.17
0
0
.29
.43
2.58
2.65
ASSESSED VALUES 00001S)
TAX FISC DISP FISC D:S
INCREMENT CONTRIBUTN DISTRIE
1032207. 1761676. 1761E -;.
141316. 251373. 2094E =:.
.......... .......... ..........
•890891. •1510303. 332 -
•86.3 •85.7 1'."
HOMESTEAD PARCEL REPORT: NON -AG HOMESTEADS (EXCLUDING PROPERTY TAX REFUNDS)
(1/3 BELOW AVG VALUE)
..........................
BASELINE ALTERNAT PCT CHNG
........ ........ ........
MARKET VALUE 53000. 56000. 5.7
TOSS TAX 1048. 1181. 12.7
:STD CREDIT 566. 638.
( =)TAC CREDIT 0 0
(m)NET TAX 482. 543. 12.7
EFFECTIVE RATE .91 .97
(AVERAGE VALUE)
..........................
BASELINE ALTERNAT PCT CHNG
........ ........ ........
79200. 83600. 5.6
1696. 1813. 6.9
700. 725.
0 0
996. 1088. 9.2
1.26 1.30
(1/3 ABOVE AVG VALUE)
..........................
BASELINE ALTERNAT PCT CHNG
........ ........ ........
105300. 111100. 5.5
2516. 2567. 2.0
700. 725.
0 0
1816. 1842. 1.4
1.72 1.66
(COMPARATIVE VALUE)
..........................
BASELINE ALTERNAT PCT CHk,
........ ........ ........
61800. 64000. 3.6
1222. 1350. 10.4
660. 725.
0 0
562. 625. 11.1
.91 .98
TOTAL MILL
RATE
BASELINE: 116.3
ALTERNATIVE: .972
. •
.. • . .
TAX
CREDITS (1000'S)
HSTD CRED
-----------------------------------------
HSTD CRED
HSTD CRED
TAC CRED
TAC CRED TAC CRED
MISC.
AG
........
NON-AG
........
TOTAL
AG
NON -AG TOTAL
AG CREDT
MISC. AG
BUSINESS
TOTAL
4315.
336678.
........
340993.
........
0
........ ........
0
........
0 6424.
........
541.
........
9634.
........
357593.
4530.
3610.
.......
365606.
0
0
0 6635.
0
17.
372258.
215.
24399.
.. .. .. ..
24613.
.. ......
0
........ ........
0
........
0 211.
........
-541.
........
•9617.
......--
14665.
5.0
7.2
7.2
0
0
0 3.3
-100.0
-99.8
4.1
HOMESTEAD PARCEL REPORT: NON -AG HOMESTEADS (EXCLUDING PROPERTY TAX REFUNDS)
(1/3 BELOW AVG VALUE)
..........................
BASELINE ALTERNAT PCT CHNG
........ ........ ........
MARKET VALUE 53000. 56000. 5.7
TOSS TAX 1048. 1181. 12.7
:STD CREDIT 566. 638.
( =)TAC CREDIT 0 0
(m)NET TAX 482. 543. 12.7
EFFECTIVE RATE .91 .97
(AVERAGE VALUE)
..........................
BASELINE ALTERNAT PCT CHNG
........ ........ ........
79200. 83600. 5.6
1696. 1813. 6.9
700. 725.
0 0
996. 1088. 9.2
1.26 1.30
(1/3 ABOVE AVG VALUE)
..........................
BASELINE ALTERNAT PCT CHNG
........ ........ ........
105300. 111100. 5.5
2516. 2567. 2.0
700. 725.
0 0
1816. 1842. 1.4
1.72 1.66
(COMPARATIVE VALUE)
..........................
BASELINE ALTERNAT PCT CHk,
........ ........ ........
61800. 64000. 3.6
1222. 1350. 10.4
660. 725.
0 0
562. 625. 11.1
.91 .98