Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Council Information Memorandum 07-28-1988
3 CITY C)'- PLYMOUTH- CITY COUNCIL INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM July 28, 1988 RECYCLING CASH DRAWING July 28: NO WINNER Next Week: $1,200 Cash Award! UPCOMING MEETINGS AND EVENTS..... 1. COUNCIL MEETING -- Monday, August 1, 7:30 p.m. Regular City Council meeting in Council chambers. 2. AUGUST CALENDAR -- The August meeting calendar is attached. (M -2) 3. UPCOMING MEETINGS - Due to the number of applications being reviewed by the Planning Commission, the Council has determined to switch the September 13 Budget Study Session and the September 19 regular council meetings. The attached September calendar now reflects the special council meeting on September 13 at 8 p.m. Note the change in time as the meeting cannot start until the polls close following the primary elections. The calendar also reflects the second Budget Study Session at 7:00 p.m. on Monday, September 19. (M -3) 4. YEAR END CALENDARS -- Meeting calendars for October - December are attached. M -4 5. LMC REGIONAL MEETING -- Monday, September 12. The League of Minnesota Cities has added a metro area regional meeting to its fall schedule. The meeting will be held in New Brighton at Robert Lee's Restaurant. (M -5) FOR YOUR INFORMATION.... 1. SWAN LAKE II - Councilmember Sisk provided me with a letter from Mr. lom Loucks, representing Craig Scherber, in which the developer is requesting the acceleration of the extension of public utilities. I have communicated to Mr. Loucks indicating the Planning Commission's August 24 public hearing on the proposed 1989 -93 CIP. The proposed 1989 -93 CIP continues to schedule the requested improvements in 1990 as proposed in 1989 as requested by the developer. (I -1) 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447. TELEPHONE (612) 559 -2800 CITY COUNCIL INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM July 28, 1988 Page 2 2. PUBLICITY FOR SPRINKLING RESTRICTIONS -- With the announcement of the Minneapolis watering ban earlier this week, many residents called us questioning the City's water restrictions. Because of this, we felt it necessary to again inform residents of our watering restrictions. Attached is a report from Helen LaFave on publicity actions taken during the week. (I -3) 3. STATUS OF SIGHT INTERSECTION VIOLATION AT 1025 STATE HIGHWAY 101 - On July 26 I inspected 1025 State Highway 101. Mr. Pepmiller, the property owner, has cut the hedge to an approximate 3 foot height within the 20 foot sight triangle. He has indicated to Myra Wicklacz that he will be contracting with a stump grinding firm to remove the remainder of the hedge within the sight triangle. Following that he will replant the hedge behind the sight triangle. We will be awaiting Mr. Pepmiller's invoice for the new hedge materials. 4. POPULATION ESTIMATES - The Metropolitan Council has informed us that they have completed their population estimates for the Twin City metropolitan area. Based upon their estimates, the Metropolitan Council has determined that the City's population on April 1, 1988 was 45,809. They also note that on that same date the City had an estimated 17,325 households. In 1987, they estimated that our population was 43,834. Based upon their estimates, we have grown by 1,975 persons (4.5 %) in the past year. Since 1980, Plymouth has grown from 31,615, or an increase of 14,194 persons (45 %). Also attached is a report from the Municipal Legislative Commission on metro area population projections and future increases in State representation through legislative redistricting. (I -4) 5. MINUTES: a. Planning Commission, July 13, 1988 (I -5a) b. Safety Committee, July 13, 1988 (I -5b) 6. DEPARTMENT REPORTS -- The Police Department's monthly report for June is attached. (I -6) 7. GEESE TRANSLOCATION PROJECT -- Attached is a summary report from Dr. James Cooper on the results of the Canada goose translocation project for the Twin Cities area in 1988. At the five Plymouth sites, 478 birds were captured and removed. The young geese were shipped to Minnesota sites, with a few going to South Dakota; adults went to Oklahoma, Kentucky, or Mississippi. Based on Dr. Cooper's research on Canada goose control, the populations at these sites should drop 50 percent in 1989, and be 75 percent below the 1988 level in 1990 if we continue to remove all geese. (I -7) CITY COUNCIL INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM July 28, 1988 Page 3 8. LMC AND AMM JOINT SOLID WASTE STUDY - The League and the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities is soliciting volunteers to serve on a joint committee to research and make recommendations to the Associations respective policy committees regarding solid waste issues. Attached is the notice from the League on this committee. Dick Pouliot has expressed an interest in serving on this committee. If any member of the Council has an interest in serving, please let me know. (I -8) 9. CUSTOMER COMMENT CARDS -- Staff responses to Customer Comment Cards are attached. (I-9T- 10. COUNCIL FOLLOW -UPS: a. Grading Permit - 2830 West Medicine Lake Drive -- A report from Joe Ryan on his investigation of the requirements for a grading permit at this address. (I -10a) b. West Medicine Boyles meets Medicine Lake Attached is representative September 20. Lake Club/Neighbor Meeting -- Each year, Frank with Community Club representatives and West neighbors to discuss issues of mutual concern. a letter sent to the neighbors and Club s tentatively scheduling a meeting for (I -10b) c. Ferndale North HOA's - False Alarm Ordinance -- Attached is a response to Bill Morkrid, President, Ferndale North HOA, regarding the City's new false alarm ordinance. In a July 5 letter (attached) to Jerry Sisk, Mr. Morkrid shared HOA members concerns with the new ordinance. (I -10c) d. Industrial Park Boulevard & Xenium Lane - Request for Traffic Study -- The City Engineer has forwarded the petition and letter to the Hennepin County Department of Transportation asking that a a traffic study be conducted at this intersection. A copy of his letter is attached. (I -10d) e. Timber Shores Park - Fisher Pier -- Attached is a letter responding to James Rydeen on the installation of permanent fencing out into Bass Lake. (I -10e) 11. CORRESPONDENCE: a. Letter to Delores Carpenter, 14000 - 40th Avenue North, regarding her concern about berming along Annapolis Lane and trespassing through her property. (I -lla) b. Letter from Sue Hembroff, 4220 Cottonwood Lane, addressed to Mayor Schneider, recommending the integration of recreation program for the mentally handicapped. A memorandum from Eric Blank on this issue is also attached. (I -llb) CITY COUNCIL INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM July 28, 1988 Page 4 c. Letter to Gregory Begin from the City Clerk concerning the processing of his application for an Amusement Center License. (I -llc) 12. DEVELOPMENT SIGNAGE -- On Friday, July 29, three development signs will be placed at the following locations: 1) Northeast Corner of Highway 101 and 1st Avenue North. School District 284 Wayzata is requesting approval of preliminary plat, site plan and conditional use permit. The preliminary plat is for the creation of two lots. The site plan and conditional use permit is for the proposed Gleason Lake Elementary School for one of the lots. (88036) 2) South of Highway 55 and West Medicine Lake Drive. Prime Development is requesting approval of a preliminary plat and variance. The proposal is to plat three lots and two outlots for future retail development. The variance is to allow for two buildings on one lot. With this proposal the existing shopping center is proposed to be removed. (88057) 3) Northwest of County Road 10 and Deerwood Lane. Ronald Libby is requesting approval of a land use guide plan amendment. The proposed amendment is to reclassify approximately five acres of land from LA -1 (Low Density Residential) to CN (Neighborhood Shopping Center). (88066) James G. Willis City Manager U; a f v a '_- a� —cr it cc a r` C) z _ r— U x U W O L') U U V OU x M :.z N M ^ z 60� c �l ^ o a cn P4 H L1 r O R p cn O N �o� aZ M U A O Z W . D M 6 O' O taA u1 -- - _ H W U W H W W caa ooa'� N �' o a� a1 °U O � 0 � oUOU M N L) N n H ^ 6^ H H :E; H a .. ,� ~^ U aC�7u J OaH WC9� c° U cy) to OU �cn cs: U U; 00 M 'I � M W i W ; ct i c� �I w a OM i � N � a w L M � G .-- v i cl, G -- - - - - -- w a w N 0� M O `p z N M w 00 M 'I � M W i W ; ct i c� �I N !n — Op N N OM i � a w OW a ^ C) p T- ^� ��oN -- - - - - -- w - - -- ... - -- - - ' � �0, a H p U O I W O P. 2 H ,l• ° x O�n L) N O� p� •� t�- X r--I u � _ N w P64 a w o Q O> z O cn x ••c x�U I P64 n U ! tr, x _ v: x w . � w c� Ln U L) r--� �za N N z H H a H O � H z w Pit to z U OM N !n — Op N N OM i � a OW a ^ C) p T- ^� ��oN -- - - - - -- w - - -- ... - -- - - ' �4 ol N �0, � F- �� °C v H p U O I W O P. 2 H ,l• ° 0ttoO O�n Q C 00 G N M°� �0 p� •� t�- r--I u N C> N w P64 a w o cn o 9 0 I ! _ . �J I i I 00 I N N !n — Op N N o ry ry i 00 L7. N . N N CC A ^� ��oN w N I �►-+ [� H ��H-1 �4 ol N �0, � F- �� °C v Im I W O P. E-4 O ,l• ° 0ttoO O�n Q C 00 G N aOO O �+ a to O v, �J I i I 00 I N o ry ry cz F- 7 L FC" N O'' � N eC+�• Q C 00 Er, 00 N N �J I i I 00 I N N M a f J L w w C] w C] U .r O G wM •• p = �D U W U c� a Z w U Z O Z `.'c O.:Dzcz V z�- U - cr: z a crw' H � W W PM Z 0. 5-y O •.� 0.0 C P„ < „cz r °— = C O O O V C7 V C. O C.7M� s tC U U •• .•--r � � �c W L C H C��E: v = N v EU- ^ a U CC7 x - x ct x N N � � �- � � � Nom•. ....., N �^; N Lr) Q Lr a z O u O U L) c cn z z :E: ac c E-4 L) ;w O- P4 En "Z 7- Z c z 0 Z Ir 04 C) V- - L; C41 r H ^N L) , C — n V, oc E- cr < z ^I M U c z Q 001, 0 z L) L1'1 A �-4 C) ;Z4 C) L) Lr a z O u O U L) c cn z z :E: ac c E-4 L) ;w O- P4 En "Z 7- Z c z 0 Z 04 C) V- - L; 001, 0 z L) L1'1 A �-4 C) ;Z4 C) L) rr LO 114 1, Z � 0-4 z u z z fq N rq C� Lr a z O u O U L) c cn z z :E: ac c E-4 L) ;w PL. P4 En ::L4 0 Z C) V- - L; rr LO 114 1, Z � 0-4 z u z z fq N rq C� Lr a z O u O U L) c cn ;14 aw�o E-4 L) ;w PL. P4 En is OC V- - C41 r H ^N L) , C — n V, oc E- rr LO 114 1, Z � 0-4 z u z z fq N rq C� r1r) 0 rl- T--( r14 r-4 Lr a z O u O U L) c cn ;14 aw�o E-4 L) ;w PL. P4 En r1r) 0 rl- T--( r14 r-4 f: — _ Lr. _ � f a � x M N � •• C r.. �a� U Z Z o Z - V -- U Q � c Z "; P 2] n U V: I a- r == U C U N O U O V es Q F. W gz o � E o= d U I-j H U F4 E-4� - x - League of Minnesota Cities 183 University Ave. East St. Paul, MN 55101 -2526 (612) 227 -5600 (FAX: 221.09861 , Please note that a metro area regional meeting has been added for September 12. The meeting will be held in New Brighton at Robert Lee's Restaurant. League of Minnesota Cities 1988 Regional Meetings Date City Location /Contact Person Tues., September 6 Bemidji Holiday Inn Dorothy Boe, City Clerk (218) 751 -5610 Wed., September 7 Floodwood Floodwood Community Center Mary Larva, City Clerk (218) Thurs., September 8 Hoyt Lakes Hoyt Lakes Arena Rick Bradford, Administrator (218) 225 -2344 Mon., September 12 New Brighton Robert Lee's Restaurant Pat Lindquist (612) 633 -1533 Wed., September 14 Plummer Afternoon: Plummer City Hall Evening: Plummer School Deb DuChamp, City Clerk (218) 465 -4239 Thurs., September 15 Henning Henning Community Center Wilma Morse, Clerk- Treasurer (218) 583 -2402 Mon., September 19 Tracy Tracy Servicmen's Center David Spencer, Finance Director (507) 629 -4020 Tues., September 20 Kerkhoven Kerkhoven Civic Center Mona Doering, Clerk- Treasurer (507) 264 -2581 Wed., September 21 Cold Spring Blue Heron Verena Weber, Clerk- Treasurer (612) 685 -3653 Thurs., September 22 Pine City Community Room, Munc. Bldg. Dan Kieselhorst, Clk- Treas. (612) 629 -2988 July 26, 1988 Mr. Tom Loucks President Tom Loucks & Associates, Inc. 7216 Boone Avenue North Brooklyn Park, MN 55428 Dear Mr. Loucks: CITY OF PLYM0UTFF Councilmember Jerry Sisk has provided me with a copy of your July 18 letter in which you request the extension of public utilities to the proposed Swan Lake II properties. Copies of your correspondence to Mr. Sisk will also be provided to the other members of the City Council. The Planning Commission is scheduled to hold a public hearing on the proposed 1989 -93 Capital Improvement Program on August 24. Through the Planning Department, the Commission will be made aware of your request. You may also wish to attend the public hearing to directly make your request for the amending of the current CIP. The proposed CIP for the period 1989 -93, as prepared by the City staff does not alter the current scheduling of the improvements which you request. After the Planning Commission has held its public hearing on the proposed CIP, they will subsequently make their recommendations to the City Council. I anticipate that the City Council will receive this report some time in September and act on it in October. I can keep you informed as to those dates if you are interested. Yours truly, mes G."Willis ty Manager JW:kec cc: Blair Tremere, Director of Planning & Community Development Fred Moore, Public Works Director Mayor & City Council 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447, TELEPHONE (612) 559 -2800 z — r -* - -7,(i 7216 Boone Avenue N., Brooklyn Park, Minnesota 55428 s July 18, 1988 Mr. Jerry Sisk 17015 24th Avenue North Plymouth, Minnesota 55447 Dear Mr. Sisk: (612) 535 -8937 On behalf of Craig Scherber, I would like to bring your attention to certain planning, utility and capital improvement issues that are important to the development implementation of a property recently acquired in the vicinity of County Road 9 and West Medicine Lake Drive (Northwest Boulevard). The property to be known as Swan Lake II is a 34 acre tract of land located 900 feet north of the intersection of County Road 9 and West Medicine Lake Road. The West Medicine Lake Terrace Townhouse development to the north and Swan Lake single family development to the east are presently served by sanitary sewer via North Central Subdistrict No. 9. The Swan Lake II site must be served by a trunk sewer that is presently available at the intersection of County Road 9 and West Medicine Lake Road. Staff has indicated to us that the city capital improvement plan (1988 - 1992) does not project extending the West Medicine Lake trunk sewer until 1990. In view of the fact that the staff, planning commission and council are reviewing the city's capital improvement program, it is our desire to petition for public improvements and accelerate the capital program by one year in order to implement a +/- 1800 foot infrastructure extension from County Road 9 to the north property boundary of Swan Lake II. The request is as follows: ITEM CURRENT CAPITAL AMENDED CAPITAL NO. - - -- DESCRIPTION ------------------ - - - - -- PROGRAM TIMING --------- - - - - -- PROGRAM TIMING --------- - - - - -- 1. +/- 1800 foot trunk sanitary sewer extension 1990 1989 2. +/- 1800 foot trunk watermain extension 1990 1989 Community Planning • Site Design • Economic Development • Market Research Mr. Jerry Sisk July 18, 1988 Page 2 0 3. +/- 1800 foot minor arterial extension NOT PROGRAMMED 1989 4. Park dedication and implementation of neighborhood park 1989 1989 5. Prepare an amendment to the staged development plan that will add Swan Lake II within the C.U.S.A. in 1989 6. Prepare a rezoning site plan and preliminary plat request for a 50 unit single family development We have thoroughly reviewed the comprehensive guide plan and capital improvement program and find our slightly accelerated request to be in keeping with the spirt and intent of the city's planning objectives. We need you and other members of the council to give favorable consideration so that we can move ahead with an orderly and economically viable development at the Swan Lake II site. Sincerely, TOM LOUCKS & ASSOCIATES, INC. Tom Loucks President TL:cab Attachments - - - -_ ---r -- i 7 i I Y� 3C � EE �- -� I J 8 8 r �+ SWAB SWA14 pool ♦' LAKE 1 Z - -- LAKE LEVE LO PMEtJT �ROPERT�(ES I yFNN 5plAi CrY. �h'R,�' �ESF•P ✓E PQoPose-o PAIZCEL TeMPoQHR,/ OWER HEAD i ✓ i K��— B F Fi C%lf.: h (- I e r- L o l r i' E 7 O: f C U Cr r d 1 T1 c t t 1 1 SUbJLC'i PUB1 IC'I .1 FOF. SYt I1;};L1N k1 'I'RIC'I 1Oh Becaust of the corlfuslon caused by Mlnneapolls' watering ban, 1 have taker, the following actions: Added a page Of informat7or, to the channel 37 character generator which says that Mlnneapolls' ban does not affect Plymouth. F'lyn,outh's. restl7ctlon5 remain the same.. I have eliminated all other Information except: that banidentf customer comment line: two lob opening ": water pub17c tree:. I an, showing the sprinkling restrictions much melt of tee, thaji an)' Ott'(" informat 1017 on channel 37 r► Diafted a mem. tC, CS;f., FITe I)epaltr.,er, peIsc•nn( r Called the Plymout1, SaIIoI Jr: older to n,cct tl;tJl deadline for Sunday's ed1t10", Jar, 7e `;n,7th said h( would Include a remindet. W Asked Daryl £>:landeJ to p Int a Temindcr al: v.atel b l is Mailed a news reIeC +e. e: to thr attached IIf.t (1 chose to mall I t b e c a u s e t h e s I tUa t 101 %. 1 s IIUt of CT 1 t I Ca 1 af. i t was before . Experience has proven that the N.InneapoIIL Star and Tribune anc the electronic media ale jr, ale• accurate where they have W T I t t e n rt I ea.`.e" t 0 WUr k f 1 0n., CC: James G. wlllls Fred Moore CITY OF PLYMOUTH 3400 PLYMIOUTH BLVD.. PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 5544 TELEPHONE (612) 559 -280'_ MEMO DATE: duly 27, 1985 TO-. Community Service Officers and Fire Department Personnel FROM: Helen LaFave, Communications Coordinator SUBJECT OUTDOOR WATER RESTRICTIONS Changes in the Minneapolis watering restrictions have generated confusion among Plymouth residents. Many people have called in wondering whether Minneapolis' total water ban applies to Plymouth. It does not. Plymouth's outdoor water restrictions remain the same. They are: All outdoor watering is banned from noon to 9 p.m. every day. Odd -even restrictions are in effect before noon and after 9 p.m. Under the restrictions, water customers with addresses ending in an even - number may water their lawns on even - numbered days before noon or after 9 p.m. People with odd - numbered addresses may do the same on odd - numbered days. ° These restrictions will remain in effect through September. • The restrictions apply to new shrubs, sod, gardens and landscaping. • The restrictions apply to all water customers. ° Timed systems mist be adjusted to comply with restrictions. The penalty for violating the water restrictions is $100 for each day of violation. Water customers receive one warning before they are penalized. Refer residents with questions on the watering restrictions to 559 -2800, ext. 239. HL:kec cc: Dames G. Willis, City Manager Frank Boyles, Assistant City Manager Fred Moore, Public Works Director Karen Holm, Engineering Secretary Sharon Mohr, Engineering Clerk /Typist Dick Carlquist, Public Safety Director Val Krisko, Receptionist Sharon Reisinger, Receptionist Boyce Johnson, Receptionist CITY OF PLYMOUTH 3400 PLYMOUTH BLVD., PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447 TELEPHONE (612-1) 55 ° -280G MEMO DATE: duly 27, 1985 TO: Daryl Sulander, Accounting & D.P. Supervisor FROM: Helen LaFave, Communications Coordinator SUBJECT MESSAGE FOR UTILITY BILLS Changes in Minneapolis' watering restrictions has created some confusion for Plymouth residents. Our residents are wondering whether the Minneapolis restrictions apply to Plymouth. Consequently, I would like to have a printed message included on all utility bills. It should say: WATER RESTRICTIONS IN PLYMOUTH All outdoor water use is banned from noon to 9 p.m. every day. At other times, odd -even restrictions are in effect. ° These restrictions remain in effect through September 30. ° The restrictions also apply to new shrubs, sod, gardens and landscaping. • The restrictions apply to all Plymouth water customers. • Timed sprinkler systems must be adjusted to comply with the restrictions. ° Penalty for violating the water restrictions is $100 for each day of violation. Water customers receive one warning before they are penalized. Questions? Call 559 -2800, ext. 239. HL:kec cc: dames G. Willis, City Manager Frank Boyles, Assistant City Manager Fred Moore, Public Safety Director FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE FOR MORE INFORMATION: 559 -2800, ext. 230 The total water ban implemented for the City of Minneapolis has no effect on Plymouth water customers. Outdoor water restrictions in Plymouth remain the same. All outdoor water use is banned from noon to 9 p.m. every day. At other times, odd -even restrictions are in effect. Water customers with even - numbered addresses ma,' us,-, water outdoors on even - numbered days, before noon or after 9 p.m. Those customers with odd - numbered addresses may do th same on odd - numbered days. These restrictions apply to new sod and landscaping. They will remain in effect through Sept. 30. The penalty for violating the sprinkling restrictions in Plymouth is $100 for each day of violation. Water customers will receive one warning before they are penalized. Plymouth water customers with questions may call 559 -2800, ext. 239. -30- a4no PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD. PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447 TELEPHONE (612) 559 -2800 Attn: Metro Desk U Minneapolis Star Tribune 425 Portland Avenue Minneapolis, Ml4 5545S At' n: Jarnie Smith Plymouth Sailor 7401 Bush Lake Road Edina, Mil 55435 Attn: Carolyn Thompson Plymouth Post 8801 Bass Lake Road Minneapolis, 11.1 5542,. Attn: Ness Director WCCO TV - CBS (Channel 4) 90 South 11th Street Minneapolis, M -,' 55403 Attn: News Director KARE - NBC (Channel 11) 441 Boone Avenue North Minneapolis, MId 55427 Attn: News Director Associated Press 511 - 11th Ave. S., Suite 404 Minneapolis, MN 55415 Attn: Michael Krause Attn: News Director. Wayzata Weekly News UPI 240 South Minnetonka Ave. Grain Exchange Building Wayzata, MIJ 55391 P1� �n.a;�.�lis, 11 ! 55415 Attn: News Director KSTP AM 3415 University Ave. N. St. Paul, MIJ 55114 Attn: News Director KSTP FM 3415 University Ave. W. St. Paul, MN 55114 Attn: News Director WCCO AM 625 Second Ave. So. Minneapolis, MN 55402 Attn: News Director KMSP TV (Channel 9) 6975 York Ave. So. Minneapolis, MN 55435 Attn: News Director KSTP TV - ABC (Channel 5) 3415 University Ave. S. St. Paul, MN 55114 MUNICIPAL LEGISLATIVE i�� COMMISSION M E M O R A N D U M TO: MLC Board of Directors FROM: Robert G. Renner, Jr. RE: Population Projections DATE: JULY 14, 1988 (� ( 2 The Metropolitan Council's forecasts for population increases provides a glimpse of what the suburbs can expect in terms of additional political clout through redistricting. At present a House member represents approximately 30,400 people (60,800 per Senator). After the 1990 census, the average House member will represent 32,0600 people (65,200 per Senator). In the year 2000, the State demographer projects Minnesota's population to reach 4,600,397. The average House member would represent 34,300 people (68,600 per Senator). Using these projections, one can project the net gain or loss of representation after the 1990 and year 2000 census. 1980 1990 Population Population 7 County Metro Area 1,985,873 2,204,000 80 County Outstate Area 2,090,098 2,167,000 1.982* 1982 1992 1992 Reps Senators Reps Senators 2000 Population 2,310,000 2,290,400 2000 2000 Reps Senators 7 County Metro Area 65 32 68 34 67 34 80 County Outstate Area 69 35 66 33 67 33 * Reapportiorunent occurs 2 years after the census Note that the overall gain is not that startling. The reason for this is because several cities in the 7- county metro area are losing or have stagnant populations. Member Cities: Bloomington. Brooklyn Park, Burnsville, Eagan. Eden Prairie, Edina. Inver Grove Heights. Maple Grove, Maplewood. Minnetonka. Plymouth. Roseville, Shoreview. White Bear Lake. Woodbury To illustrate the growth in suburban representation, the chart below will remove from the calculations the cities of Minneapolis and St. Paul and contiguous suburbs that will lose population. 1980 Reps Senators 1st Class Cities and Contiguous Suburbs 29 15 Net Loss From 1980 -- -- Remaining Metro Area 36 18 Net Gain From 1980 -- -- 1980 Population MLC Cities 464,812 1980 Reps Senators 1990 Reps Senators 26 13 -3 -2 42 21 +6 +3 1990 Population 600,300 1990 Reps Senators 2000 Reps Senators 24 12 -5 -3 43 22 +7 +4 2000 Population 656,300 2000 Reps senators MLC Representation 15 7 18 9 19 10 Net Gain MLC +4 +3 From 1980 -- -- +3 +2 Please remember that these are raw population figures that would be applied if reapportionment were accomplished in a political vacuum. Suburban strength can be increased or decreased depending on how the legislature (or the courts) draw political boundaries. 1980 Population 1990 Por)ulation 2000 Population Minneapolis 370,951 270,230 352,000 256,000 340,000 253,000 St. Paul Richfield 37,851 37,000 37,000 St. Louis Park 42,931 22,775 42,000 22,000 43,000 22,000 Golden Valley Brooklyn Center 31,230 30,000 30,000 Fridley 30,228 30,000 30,000 Columbia Heights 20,029 20,000 7,500 20,000 7,800 St. Anthony Falcon Heights 7,981 5,291 5,300 5,300 South St. Paul 21,235 20,000 20,000 West St. Paul 18,527 17 700 17 300 TOTALS 879,259 839,500 825,420 1980 Reps Senators 1st Class Cities and Contiguous Suburbs 29 15 Net Loss From 1980 -- -- Remaining Metro Area 36 18 Net Gain From 1980 -- -- 1980 Population MLC Cities 464,812 1980 Reps Senators 1990 Reps Senators 26 13 -3 -2 42 21 +6 +3 1990 Population 600,300 1990 Reps Senators 2000 Reps Senators 24 12 -5 -3 43 22 +7 +4 2000 Population 656,300 2000 Reps senators MLC Representation 15 7 18 9 19 10 Net Gain MLC +4 +3 From 1980 -- -- +3 +2 Please remember that these are raw population figures that would be applied if reapportionment were accomplished in a political vacuum. Suburban strength can be increased or decreased depending on how the legislature (or the courts) draw political boundaries. CITY OF PLYMOUTH PLANNING COMMISSION MIN'JTLS JULY 13, 1985 The Rea_ular Meeting of the Plvmvuth Planninc Corrissior! �,_> called to order at 7:30 P.M. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Pauba, Commissicu,er�, llir (arrived at 7:45 P.N%i, Stu] hero Zylla, Plufka, Marofskv arid TiernF-, MEMBERS ABSENT None STAFF PRESENT: Community Development Coordinator Chuck Dillerud City Engineer Chet Harrison Public Works Director Fred Moore Planning Secretary Grace Wineman *MINUTES Motion by Commissioner Plufka to place Items 6 -B and 6 -C on the Consent. Agenda. Motion died for lack of second. Commissioner Zylla stated he wanted further information arid a discussion on Item 6 -C. A resident stated he would be interested in hearino discussion concerninq Item 6 -B. MOTION! by Cmmissioner Plufka, seconded by Commissioner Stulberq to approve the ;tune 22, 1988 Minutes as submitted. VOTE. 7 Ayes. MOTION carried. PUBLIC HEARINGS Chairman Pauba introduced the request. No representatives were present to speak on this item. The consensus of the Commission was to defer this report until the end of the Public Hearings, following Item 5 -I. Chairman Pauba introduced the request for extension of a canopy over the existing pump island and a variance to allow encroachment into the front yard setback. Reading of the July 6, 1988 staff report was waived. Chairman Pauba introduced Mr. Mike Eicher, Pump & Meter who stated he is confused about the development of thoroughfares in the City and that they were not aware, nor had they been told about the actual plans for the construction and improvement to thoroughfares in this area. Mr. Eicher noted that the "Holiday" gas station has a permit for virtually the same thing Amoco is requesting. Mr. Eicher stated the owner is concerned because of the contract with Amoco, and he questions if in fact the tank replacement would riot be more important than the canopy? -157- MOTION TO APPROVE VOTE - MOTION CARRIES) UNITED PROPERTIES/ LAUKKA DEVELOPMENT SIGNAGE PLAN FOR PARKERS LAKE NORTH PUD (87006) PUMP & METER SERVICE FOR LINN, INC. FOR AMOCO STATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT AND SITE PLAN (88030) Paq:- 15` Piannirio Commissi; Itinute�s duly 13, 1° They, wanL to know what impact there will be to this sit(' from the present ind future thorouqhfare plats. Coordinator Dilterud stated that the tanks can be replaced under the current permit; however, the amendment and the variance concerns the extension of the canopy. Mr. Eicher confirmed that the canopy issue has brought about . the staff concern and recommendation for denial, and he re- iterated the concern that they were unaware of the severity of the impact to this property by the City's plans for road construction. Public Works Director Fred Moore responded that the thoroughfare planning is a major issue that has a bearing on the requested variance. Highway 55 is a major arterial, South Shore Drive and 10th Avenue North are major collec- tors; access to State Highway 55 will be limited by changes to the intersection. Since 197 ?, the Thoroughfare Plan has shown projected road improvements and construction. He noted that proposed development plans by Ryan Construction and the developer of the golf course property, in that same area, has resulted in traffic studies that reflect needed improvements to the street system network. For example, improvements to the intersection of South Shore Drive and State Highway 55 would be needed by 1995, based on approved development. Work on these development plans is underway at this time. The intersection is riot in the 5 -Year Capital Improvement Program (CIP), but as development goes on, this will be reviewed. Mr. Moore explained that there are no firm design plans. There are two items affecting the existing drive from this facility that are definite; South Shore Drive will be closed with no access to Highway 55 and the frontage road will need to be closed at South Shore Drive with access from the east, back to the north. The requested variance would put the canopy to the frontage road where it would conflict with changes to the thoroughfare configuration in this area. Mr. Richard Linn, Applicant, inquired what would be left to the site for access, they need answers to protect their business. He stated that he had reviewed Plan A -2 for the frontage road between the trailer court and the station, and was told earlier this spring that this was the plan of choice. He is concerned that they have been left in the dark over this. Commissioner Zylla stated he does not disagree with the future roadway modifications that impact this property, but it seems that the staff report is too strong in its recommendation which is based upon an uncertain future date. He suggested that if the Commission consideration is for denial, that the first two bases listed in the staff report draft recommendation be deleted, as it is not fair to base their recommendation on something that may be far into the future. Paqe 159 P1anriinq CommiSsi,?n t1inuts July 13, 19S� Chairman Pauha opened the Public Hearinq, as there was nu one present to speak on this item, the Public Hearina was closed. Commissioner Marofsky stated he concurs with Commissioner Zylla and that the Commission recommendation must be based upon current use. MOTION by Commissioner Zylla, seconded by Commissioner MOTION TO DENY Marofsky to recommend denial of the Conditional Use Permit Amendment and Variance for Pump & Meter Service, Inc., deleting items 1 and 2 from the staff recommendation. Commissioner Wire asked about road alignment and plans for the frontage road. Director Moore explained the proposed cul -de -sac to the east for access to this property. The frontage road is owned by the State of Minnesota and chances would occur with additional lanes to widen Highway 55. Commissioner Wire confirmed that under almost arty future plan, the frontage road would become a grass median and there will be the need to redesign the access to the service station. Commissioner Stulberg and Commissioner I'larofsky inquired if the action to deny would take away or in any way affect the existing permit. Coordinator Dillerud stated it would riot. Commissioner Zylla confirmed that the recommendation is to not grant the variance, but would not negate the existing Conditional Use Permit. Roll Call Vote. Commissioners Wire and Stulherq, Nay. 5 VOTE - MOTION CARRIED Ayes. MOTION carried. Chairman Pauba introduced the item. Coordinator Dillerud CARLSON PROPERTIES provided an overview of the July 5, 1988 staff report and PRELIMINARY AND FINAL commented that Resolution No. 80 -648 called for the filing PLAT, SITE PLAN of covenants regarding the parking at this site. City AMENDMENT AND records do not reflect that these covenants were filed on CONDITIONAL USE the property. He suggested that a condition be added to the PERMIT (88056) recommendation by the Commission that directs confirmation on the restrictive covenants. Commissioner Marofsky inquired about the original plat show- ing a portion as part of Highway 55 and inquired if this road right -of -way had been dedicated. Coordinator Dillerud noted that the right -of -way was in place at that time and no dedication would have been made to the State of Minnesota. Paqe 160 Plannino Commission Hinutes 3uly 13, 19$5 Chairman Pauba introduced Larry Chiat, Carlson Properties, who stated he could riot shed anv lighL on the questions raised about the restrictive covenants and it may be that the survey firm and persons at Carlson Companies at tr t time would not be available now. There is acknowledgement by that State of Minnesota that their research shows acquisition of right -of -way and a channel change easement. He is not aware of the reason for this, but, there would be no reason to vacate it. He noted they would depict the channel change and create the new lot. He explained the amended site plan for additional parking; the Conditional Use Permit for placinq fill; arid, the variance to increase the impervious surface on the site. Commissioner Tierney stated she had visited the site and noted the west side of the buildinq has vacant parkinq stalls, whereas, the east side is crowded; would there not be a way to balance the parkinq such as movinq some of those: vehicles which are parked at the facility all day to the available parking? Mr. Chiat explained that the tenants who have the greatest number of employees are the closest to the planned expan- sion. There have been complaints about the overflow parkinq onto Teakwood Lane, and the Fire Marshal has spoken to the property managers and has requested that the tenants parking patterns be changed. Commissioner Marofsky inquired if there would be no replace- ment of displaced vegetation. Coordinator Dillerud stated the proposal is for six trees designated for the parking lot perimeter and there will be an effort to retain existing vegetation as stated by the petitioner. The landscaping is responsive to the minimum requirements. Chairman Pauba opened the Public Hearinq. David Onan, 2335 Rosewood Lane, stated his home is on the east side of Plymouth Creek where there is heavy foliage to the west. He is speaking for himself and his neighbors who are opposed to this parking lot expansion at the expense of the trees and natural vegetation that is the homeowners natural buffer from the industrial property. He stated that it does not seem reasonable to allow the devastation of trees to provide six additional parking spaces. Chairman Pauba closed the Public Hearing. MOTION by Commissioner Marofsky, seconded by Chairman Pauba MOTION TO APPROVE to recommend approval for the Preliminary Plat, subject to PRELIMINARY PLAT the conditions listed in the duly 5, 1988 staff report, add- ing Condition No. 8. The City Attorney shall review the Paqe 161 Planning Commission Minutes Duly 13, 1985 Final Plat for Minneapolis Industrial Park 3rd Addition to ascertain this proposal does not include dedicated right -of- way. Roll Call Vote. 6 Ayes. Commissioner Plufka Nay. Commissioner Plufka stated he does not see the necessity to remove any trees. The residential neighbors near this industrial property have put up with the development of the industrial buildings and deserve to have the natural buffer and screening they have today. MOTION by Commissioner Marofsky, seconded by Commissioner. Plufka to recommend the Site Plan and Conditional Use Permit be tabled for further review following the Commission's direction to staff to determine the petitioner's compliance with Condition No. 8. of Resolution No. 80 -64S, that "restrictive covenants be prepared, in a form approved and reviewed by the City Attorney and filed against the sites, to limit proposed uses within structures which do not provide for maximum parking as required by Ordinance," and to report their findings to the Commission. Commissioner Stulberq noted that the petitioner may question whether the Commission would grant a favorable recommenda- tion for this Site Plan if in fact the petitioner has com- plied with the condition in Resolution No. 80 -648. He called for a consensus of the Commission. Roll Call Vote. 7 Ayes. MOTION carried. Commissioner Zylla asked that the Commission be given copies of the reports from the Fire Marshal concerning the parking problems in that they would show the need for additional parking spaces for this site. Chairman Pauba introduced the request. An overview of the June 28, 1988 staff report was provided by Coordinator Dillerud. Commissioner Marofsky inquired about the category into which this particular proposed shopping area would fit, in light of the staff concerns and the number of conditions involving design. Coordinator Dillerud explained that in developing the staff report, he looked to the specific language of the PUD Ordinance and tried to address the uses as proposed. Commissioner Wire inquired about the traffic study and the concerns addressed in that study. VOTE - MOTION CARRIE,) MOTION TO TABLE UNITED PROPERTIES PUD PRELIMINARY PLAN' PLAT AND CONDITIONAL. USE PERMIT FOR "TOWNE CENTER" (88065) Paqe 162 Planning Commission Hinutes 7uly 13, 1999 Public Works Director Fred Moore explained that no traffic• studv had been done in 1994 �sith the review of the original proposal for the retail center. The traffic analysis at that time equated to a 12 - 14,000 sq. ft. shopping area and that some assumptions were made as to uses. The latest traffic analysis is based on the increased square footage of this latest proposal, and on other changes in this area that would see an increase in traffic from projections made in 1984. Chairman Pauba introduced Mr. Tom Bisanz, United Properties. Mr. Bisanz introduced his development team, Ron Erickson, KKE Architects; Dale Glowa, United's Corporate Center; and Gene Ernst, Landscape Architect. Mr. Ron Erickson, KKE Architects, offered clarification on the uses proposed and the traffic generation. He noted that this development is similar and consistent with the zoning on this property from 1983 through 1987. He noted the list of proposed uses are those also listed in the City's background information on this portion of the Planned Unit Development. Mr. Erickson stated that there is obviously something wrong with the traffic report. The plans as proposed are more refined, and sensitive to the neighborhood and surrounding areas. The purpose of the preliminary plat approval is to allow the developer to explain the development plan, and they have chosen to go beyond what is usually submitted at this stage to provide the Commission with more detail so that direction from the Commission could assist them in providing the best development plan for final consideration. Mr. Erickson showed the 1983 plan, pointing out the size, and, showed the site plan as approved in 1987. He noted that there were no dramatic changes between these proposals. He noted that the plan now proposed is a design with the neighborhood in mind; access is to 22nd Avenue North (which is very close to the original plan); two buildings are planned at 20,000 sq. ft. and 5,400 sq. ft.; the design shows buffering from the parking; the circulation to the site is easy and safe; and, the parking areas are away from the residential neighborhoods to the east. The access is planned for the rear of the buildings and they believe this is a workable solution. The building is setback with a buffer, and the service entrance would be to Vicksburg Lane. In reference to staff concern, they would consider an alternate. Mr. Erickson explained the building design and site layout. In reference to the "cattle crossing" under Vicksburg Lane, to be used for a pedestrian crossing, the petitioner is not in favor of this crossing, but has included it in the Paq( 163 Planning Commission Miiiutes July 13, 198, plans. They are concerned about saf tunnel. He showed slides of tht- ` tunnel, noting there would be handicapped, because of the steep tunnel. They propose to reduce the would terminate above the tunnel. width, no biking would be allowed. the bikers dismount and walk their area. t\ and the size of thr ft, wide. 7 ft. hiut; no access for thf-, grade change to the qrade and a bike trail Because of the narrow Their plan would make bicycles through this Mr. Erickson reiterated they would like the tunnel eliminated and that landscapinq and berming would be the better choice for that area of the site. He noted that there may be semaphores installed at this intersection. Mr. Erickson stated this proposal is an improvement over the original plan. The architecture is compatible with the neiqhborhood, using peaked roofs, dormers, brick, natural wood, and stucco. The marketplace will determine tenants, but the neighborhood aspect of the area will draw the uses and types of tenants that would most naturally be found in a shopping area like this. There are no specific tenants slated, so that issue is too early in the development plans for anv commitment. Chairman Pauba opened the Public Hearing. Mike Pflaum, Lundgren Brothers Construction Co., stated he has been involved in the residential development of this area for a number of years and believes that this plan is an attribute to the Planned Unit Development. He explained the residential development completed and underway by Lundgren Brothers. He stated he also represents the Steeplechase East Homeowner's Association and speaks for present and future homeowners regarding their concern about the use of the "cattle crossing" for a pedestrian underpass. The concept is good, but the tunnel should be twice the width and should have adequate lighting. If this is not accomplished, "it is a tragedy waiting to happen." He agreed with Mr. Erickson that a semaphore will be needed at this intersection, that the tunnel should not be used, but replaced by a more appropriate pedestrian -way. Mr. Pflaum said he had met with the petitioner regarding transition to the residential neighborhoods. The pond and entrance as planned will be a beautiful amenity to the development. There should be more significant berming and more trees between the commercial and residential areas, specifically to obscure and diminish niqhttime lighting and decrease the noise levels of the commercial area from the residences. Paqe 164 Planninn Commission tlinutes July 13, 198 Roqer Bever, 15925 26th Avenue North, stated his home abuts "Fox Run," and when the plans were made for this Planned Unit Development in 1982, the City stated there would be a "small" convenience center, riot a 26,000 sq. ft. shoppinq mall. There is more than adequate shopping for this area that has been developed or will develop in the near future such as at Hiqhways 101 and 6, and the "Downtown Plymouth" area. He believes this proposal is "overkill." He had concern with the traffic on Vicksburg Lane, the 50 mph speed limit is dangerous and should be lowered. He reiterated that as proposed, the commercial area is "too biq." Barry Winston, 16005 26th Avenue North, stated he has been attendinq Commission and Council meetings since the early 1980's and agreed with Mr. Bever that the City had always told him this would he a "small" convenience center. He stated the matter had been discussed as to the need for this shopping area and the City stated it was needed for the "walking traffic "; he does not see the need for a gas station in that case. Chairman Pauba closed the Public Hearinq. MOTION by Commissioner Plufka, seconded by Commissioner NOTION TO APPROVE Zylla to recommend approval for the MPUD Preliminary Plan/ Plat, subject to the ten conditions listed in the June 28, 1988 staff report. Commissioner Plufka asked that, not withstanding Condition No. 4, the record show a recommendation to the City Council that the plans for the "cattle crossing" be abandoned. Commissioner Plufka further stated that this plan is sub- stantially the same as those seen originally and is no more than what was contemplated with the development of this area. The plan shows no provision for any large scale tenant such as with a typical regional /area foodstore. His concerns would be for a resolution to the matter of the "cattle crossing ", and no access to Vicksburg Lane or at least approval for an exit only. Commissioner Marofsky concurred, stating that the scope of this proposal is essentially the same as seen with previous plans. He sees some problem with building design, and that the site design should not attract traffic from Vicksburg Lane, but should emphasize the access from 22nd Avenue North. Commissioner Plufka said he believes it is better to have the commercial face to Vicksburg Lane. Paor 165 Planning_ Commission Hinut(-s July 13, 1955 Commissioner Marofsky stated that e),,eii thouq" it would bC addressed later, there should be some limitation regardino signage, and specifically "no signaqe on Vicksburq Lane." He had concern with the uses as proposed and questions a convenience store at 23,000 sq. ft. He suggested approved uses be based on size and inquired if there would be some greater use that would require a Conditional Use Permit? He noted that the listed tenant -types include a real estate office, liquor store, hardware store, electrical appliances, computers and office supplies; he suggested these are not neighborhood uses and this should be addressed up front. MOTION by Commissioner Marofsky, seconded by Commissioner MOTION TO AMEND Wire to Amend the Motion by addinq the followinq condition: There shall be no signaqe allowed on Vicksburq Lane. Mr. Tom Risanz inquired if the signaqe could be left for review with the final plans and, if at this time, they could address some other specifics with the Commission? Commissioner Plufka explained that they have the option to come back with a final plan including signage, and convince this body there should be signaqe on Vicksburg Lane. Mr. Tom Risanz stated that he agrees with Mike Pflaum's com- merits regarding the "cattle crossinq ". He stated they have met with the Parks and Recreation Director concerning alter- natives to the tunnel, their preference would he for an above -grade pedestrian -way. Mr. Risanz believes the proposed uses are compatible with a neighborhood shopping area; they have accommodated the resi- dents by the use of berminq and landscaping for screening and buffering. Their plan shows 3 - 4 ft. undulatinq berms. Mr. Risanz stated that identification signage is needed and they would want the flexibility to come back with a defini- tive plan. They have not spent time on a signaqe plan and would provide details with final site plans. Commissioner Marofsky explained he is merely providing direction; however, the developer must understand there is no guarantee that signage on Vicksburg Lane will be approved. The signage should not be designed to attract vehicles from the high traffic area, to do so would make this commercial development much more than a "small" retail neighborhood center. Roll Call Vote on Amendment. 2 Ayes. Commissioners VOTE ON AMENDMENT Stulberg, Zvlla, Plufka, Tierney, and Chairman Pauba, Nay. MOTION FAILED MOTION failed. Paae 16r, Planninq Commission llinutes Jul v 131 19CL, MOTI011 by Commissioner 111arofsk%, seconded h\ Commissioner MOTION TO AMER) Wire to Amend the Motion to add Use foltowina condition: Provide substantial screening and bermino of the huildings from Vicksburq Lane. Commissioner Stulberg stated he concurs with Commissioner Marofsky, but it may be best to list these concerns and give direction to the petitioner without makinq them conditions of approval at this stage. Commissioner Wire stated there is no other way to handle this except by Motion. Mr. Tom Bisanz suggested they would take notes, and provide the options as discussed and directed; however, they would prefer these not be made conditions of approval. Commissioner Plufka agreed with Commissioner Wire that specific direction must be the consensus of the Commission; it would not be reasonable to assume that alterations to a proposal would be done based on the statements of one person. Roll Call Vote. 2 Ayes. Commissioners Stulherg, Zylla, VOTE - MOTION FAILED Plufka, Tierney and Chairman Pauba, Nay. MOTION failed. Motion by Commissioner Wire to amend the Main Motion adding a condition to limit business -types to only permitted uses and allowing no B -2 conditional uses. the Motion died for lack of second. Motion by Commissioner Marofsky to amend the Main Motion adding_ a condition that the Final Plan shall be based only upon the present proposed uses; uses other than those pro- posed would require a Conditional Use Permit. Motion dies for lack of second. MOTION by Commissioner Zylla, seconded by Commissioner MOTION TO AMEND Plufka to amend the Main Motion by adding Condition No. 11. The Final Plan will be re- evaluated concerning access to Vicksburg Lane and will include possible alternatives for service vehicles. Commissioner Marofsky stated this may be contrary to what is outlined in the Engineer's Memorandum. Roll Call Vote. 6 Ayes. Commissioner Wire, Nay. VOTE - MOTION CARRIED Commissioner Wire stated that he disagreed with the idea for a service road off Vicksburg Lane. Mr. Ron Erickson stated that in today's market, all conven- ience stores dispense fuel and there would be no other type of convenience store. Roll Call Vote on Main Motion as once Amended. 7 Ayes. VOTE - MAIN MOTION MOTION carried. MOTION CARHED Paqe 167 Planning Commission Minutes July 13, 195' Commissioner Wire stated he is concerned about the park-inn, on -site; the size of the buildiriq: warts assurance there would be no substandard parking; arid, would propose that there be a specific lightinq treatment for this site to reduce glare and prevent spill into the residential areas. Commissioner Stulberq stated his concerns are that there be more than adequate screening to Vicksburg Lane; that there be review of the signaqe plan; arid, that attention be given to the uses and hours of operation as this a critical issue. Chairman Pauba called a Recess at 9:55 P.M. Chairman Pauba called the meeting to order at 10:00 P.M. Chairman Pauba introduced the request by Peter Rohman for a Home Occupation Conditional Use Permit. An overview of the June 2S, 1983 staff report was provided by Coordinator Dillerud. Coordinator Dillerud noted that the request is in response to a Notice of Violation and upon visitinq the site, Mr. Rohman's statement that the site is screened from County Road 6 is true, however, there is staff concern about sight visibility_ during the winter months, and if landscaping would die out there would be no replacement. Chairman Pauba introduced Mr. Peter Rohman, 19200 County Road 6. who stated that the petitions submitted by his neighbors may be overstated. He has operated his business for seven years, five of which he operated from his home in Orono, Minnesota and had no problems with City regulations. He stated his is a small operation with limited equipment that includes two mower tractors, two flat bed pick -up trucks, trailers, and some hand mowers. He has two full -time employees who bring one vehicle which is parked in his yard. This is a seasonal operation and he employs two more people in the summer months who are usually college students. His property consists of two acres and is heavily wooded which screens the equipment. He works normal business hours and no work is done on his property. There is no noise from the business and he does not intend to expand the business. He stated that the equipment is stored off -site in the winter with the exception of the pick -up trucks and snow- plows. He explained that the neighbors noted concern about the wood pile on the property. This is for personal use in the home, however, there have been occasion when he has sold it. If that is a problem, he won't bring in any more for resale. He stated the site is maintained and always neat. RECESS PETER ROHMAN PROLAWNS ASSOCIATES CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (88071) Paqe 165 Plannina Commission 1'1inutes 3uly 13, 1955 Commissioner Stulberq stated he would like to see the slides taken by staff; these were shown to the Commission. Commissioner Marofsky confirmed that only one \,ehicle was brought to the site and that the employees do carpool. Chairman Pauba opened the Public Hearing, noting that the petiton submitted by the residents is part of the public record. Rick Burger, 1435 Shadyview Lane, lives across County Road 6 and has been in residence since April this _year. He was bothered by the commercial traffic from Highway 12 and the loading an off- loadinq on near his former home. He moved to get away from this type of operation and was very surprised to get a notice that the City would consider approving a business operation from a home in this area. He talked with his neighbors and they decided to start a petition to submit to the City stating their concerns. He noted this is not a personal thing, he has nothing against Mr. Rohman, but does consider this type of business as inappropriate for a residential neighborhood. The activity level and noise is bothersome; there is equipment parked in the woods and the site is disorganized and unat- tractive. The site is not completely screened from County Road 6 and would be unsightly in winter. He stated that Mr. Rohman had been loading and unloading equipemnt on Ranier Lane which was disturbing. He believes the site activity is at a much higher level than explained by the petitioner. He is interested in the restrictions that can be imposed on this business; and, requests that the equip- ment be moved to a commercial area. Chairman Pauba explained the conditions of approval for a Conditional Use Permit, and that any changes to the Home Occupation would require a re- hearing and re- evaluation by the Commission and City Council. Dave Mellen, 135 Troy Lane, stated that this business is operating now and no on has stopped it, even though Mr. Rohman has no permit. This type of business has no place in a residential neighborhood. There are safety factors with the equipment being "attractive nuisances" to children play- ing in the park nearby. He believes the appearance of the property detracts from the property values for the other homes in the neighborhood. W. E. Salovich, 1750 Troy Lane, has lived in his home since 1960 and opposes the granting of this Conditional Use Permit. This area is a beautiful part of Plymouth and hav- ing_ a business here would affect the residential character of the area. Page 169 P Ian ninc; Commission t1eetin�:, July 13. 19,SS Ms. Lois Kemp, 1SO25 17th Avenue North, lives iri "Imperial Hills " and stated concern about the area around High�%ays 101 and 6. She does not believe this business fits the defini- tion of a Home Occupation and that with the machinery, tools, and chemicals used for the business, it would not he appropriate in a residential neighborhood. Pete Wahtera, 1450 Ranier Lane, stated he did riot want to speak against someone's livlihood, but is concerned that the City staff has recommended approval of this permit. He believes the petitioner should be fined for being in viola- tion of the City's regulations or at least the operation should have been closed down. He noted that he was a City Councilman in the east and he is concerned that granting a permit for this type of business would set a dangerous precedent. He asked the Commisson to recommend denial of the request. Alan Noble, 15210 County Road 6, has lived in his home for 19 years and showed on slides that a drive was cut at the end of Mr. Rohman's property, allegedly without a permit, and that the equipment is driven on -site. He can see the equipment and chemical tanks from his driveway and is espec- ially concerned about the chemicals because of the mam- private wells in this area. He stated that the brush and wood piles are extensive and that Mr. Rohman is selling the wood. He had reported this to the City's police department and nothing was done. Relative to the City's Ordinance, this business does change the character of the neighborhood, has employees other than family members, and is a hazard to public safety. He requested the Commission to deny the request. Gary Reagen, 1410 Ranier Lane, stated that this area is clearly designated as residential zoning as shown on the City's Zoning Map. The gentleman is operating without a permit and a complaint must have been lodged to bring about this application. He stated concern regarding the staff recommendation for approval; that the information is mis- leading; and, he does not believe the Commission can make a Judgment based on this information. Harry Hunt, 18000 County Road 6, stated he would oppose a business of this type in a residential neighborhood. Chairman Pauba closed the Public Hearing. MOTION by Commissioner Stulberg, seconded by Chairman Pauba NOTION TO DENY to recommend denial of the Conditional Use Permit for a Home Occupation based on the following: The proposal as submit- ted does not meet the Ordinance criteria or standards for issuing a Conditional Use Permit for a Home Occupation. Commissioner Plufka read the Ordinance, noting that this business fails those standards. Paae 170 Planninq Commission, Minutes Jul} 13, 195 Roll Call Vote. 7 Aves. MOTIOti carried. Chairman Pauba introduced the request, readinq of the June 2S, 1985 staff report was waived. Chairman Pauba introduced Mr. Leyse who explained his application to add a third stall onto his garage. He did riot believe this would set a precedent, as various neighbors have three car qaraqes, but they do not have a uniquely shaped lot such as he owns. The cul -de -sac curve shortens the lot depth at the qaraqe. He stated that if the recommendation is for denial, he would appreciate the time to bring in pictures and slides of his property for reconsideration of his application. He noted that the Notice sent to property owners was incor- rect in that it stated 35 ft., rather than 30 ft. He explained that the staff report was not available to him until Friday after 3:00 P.M., and that he, was asked to respond to that report on that same Friday. The information given to him relative to the Variance Criteria was from a different section of the Ordinance, and he would like to respond to the criteria established for his variance request. He stated that he meets the criteria established for hardship and uniqueness, and that the proposal will not set a precedent. Mr. Leyse is unaware of any neiohbor that would be opposed to his variance request. Commissioner Plufka inquired if the qaraqe addition would follow the existing roof line. Mr. Levse stated it would drop down to some degree and the same shingles, brick and siding will be used to blend in with the existing structure. Commissioner Tierney inquired if the addition could be recessed. Mr. Levse stated that perhaps could be accomplished, but would ncessitate the removal of existing landscaping and trees which would be very expensive. Commissioner Plufka noted that "hardship" is not part of the consideration of a Conditional Use Permit. Mr. Leyse reiterated that he did not receive the appropriate variance criteria to address with his narrative. Chairman Pauba opened the Public Hearing, as there was no one present to speak on the item, the Public Hearing was closed. MOTION by Commissioner Plufka, seconded by Commissioner Stulberg to recommend approval for the Residential Planned Unit Development Plan and Conditional Use Permit Amendment for Harold Leyse, based on the Conditional Use Permit criteria of the Ordinance, that the proposal would set no adverse precedent because of the unique situation of this lot with the cul -de -sac curve and wooded area on the lot. VOTE - MOTION CARRIE_i HAROLD K. LEYSE RPUD PLAIT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT (88076) NOTION TO APPROVE Page 171 Planning Commissinn Minutes July 13, 195 Roll Call Vote. 6 Aves. Chairman Pauh,, Nay. Chairman Pauha stated he is uncomfortahle with this actior within a Planned Unit Development, as the PUD criteria needs special consideration. Chairman Pauba introduced the request, reading of the July 7, 1988 staff report was waived. Chairman Pauba introduced Mr. William Munsinger, who explained that he operates a gymnastic school in New Hope that has a Conditional Use Permit. His students are from 2 years to adults and they now want to open a satellite to serve additional students. They require certain ceiling clearance and have certain area for equipment so that they are limited as to a buildinq they can use. They have many students from the Plymouth area. They have been in business for 15 years in an industrial area in New Hooe. As their activities take place during off -hours they do not conflict with the parking and /or traffic in the area during business hours. They also operate on Saturday morning. They plan to occupy approximately 4,000 sq. ft. in Plymouth; New Hope would remain their main facility. Chairman Pauba opened the Public Hearing. Mr. Andy Schaefer, 330 2nd Ave. So., has been working with Mr. Munsinger to find space available in this area for the gymnastic school. He noted other qym -type operations in Plymouth and surrounding communities. VOTE - MOTION CARRIE' WILLIAM MUNSINGER CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (88078) MOTION by Commissioner Plufka, seconded by Commissioner Wire MOTION TO APPROVE to recommend approval for the Conditional Use Permit for William Munsinger, subject to the conditions listed in the July 7, 1988 staff report and adding that the hours of operation be from 8:00 A.M. to 10:00 P.M. Commissioner Plufka stated that the Ordinance would not recognize the unique needs of such a business and this site is next to a retail area. Roll Call Vote. 6 Ayes. Commissioner Marofsky, Nay. Commissioner Marofsky stated that the proposal does not meet the strict Ordinance requirements to operate in the Industrial District of the City. Chairman Pauba introduced the request and reading of the July 6, 1988 staff report was waived. Chairman Pauba introduced Mr. Michael Pflaum, Lundgren Brothers Construction Co., who explained the setbacks as proposed are needed so that the monument signs are visible when approaching the Fox Run and Steeplechase developments. VOTE - MOTION CARRIED LUNDGREN BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION CO. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT FOR VICKSBURG WEST MONUMENT SIGNS (88080) Page. 172 Planning Commission Minutes July 13, 1995 Chairman Pauba opened the Public Hearinq, as there was no one present to speak on this iterr;, the Public Hearing was closed. MOTION by Commissioner Zylla, seconded by Commissioner MOTION TO APPROVE Plufka to recommend approval of the Conditional Use Permit Amendment for Vicksburg West Planned Unit Development for Lundgren Brothers Construction Company, subject to the conditions as listed in the July 6, 1985 staff report. Roll Call Vote. 7 Ayes. MOTION carried. Chairman Pauba re- introduced the first item on the agenda. Reading of the July S, 1988 staff report was waived. Chairman Pauba introduced Mr. Tom Bisanz, United Properties, who introduced Mr. Gene Ernst, landscape architect, to explain the proposal. Mr Ernst showed exhibits and explained that the project size, and therefore the scale of signage, is an important issue. Commissioner Plufka confirmed the proposal for six signs, one on each side. Mr. Ernst explained they are deleting the project monument as initially proposed. He showed the location of the signage and explained the siqns proposed for the medians. They believe that with the excess right -of -way required by the City, it is only fair that they use a portion of this for signage. They propose landscaping including trees, shrubs, and flowers and their plan will show the vehicle sight distances to indicate there will be no sight obstruction. He asked that the record show their request is for 96 sq. ft. signage for "Sign E - Commercial Signage" and 96 sq. ft. signage for "Sign D - Industrial Signage. It was confirmed there would be two Subdivision Signs for Mallard Pointe. Commissioner Plufka inquired whether the commercial signage would be the same configuration as the industrial sign (Sign E). Mr. Ernst stated he could not answer those questions at this time. Commissioner Plufka stated he would like some indication of the extent and design for the commercial signage, or that it be removed from the plans. Mr. Ernst explained it was the intent to exclude commercial signage for discussion at this time, and to provide details with final development plans. Commissioner Zylla inquired if the petitioner was in agreement with the conditions of approval other than the issue with Condition No. 6, that no signage should be located in the street right -of -way or median areas. VOTE - NOTION CARRIED UNITED PROPERTIES LAUKKA DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT AND VARIANCE FOR SIGNAGE FOR PARKERS LAKE NORTH (87006) Paqe 173 Planninq Commission Hinutes July 13, 1985 Mr. Ernst stated that they are in agreement, with the following exceptions: 1. Condition No. 4., with the exception of the Subdiv- ision Monuments within the street right -of -way in the medians. 2. Clarification of Condition No. 5., that, at this time they are asking only for approval of the size for the commercial signage. 3. Condition No. 9 of the staff recommendation. Chairman Pauba opened the Public Hearing, as there was no one present to speak on this item, the Public Hearing was closed. MOTION by Commissioner Stulberg, seconded by Commissioner MOTION TO APPROVE Wire to recommend approval for the Amendment to the Planned Unit Development Preliminary Plan /Plat and Final Plan and Conditional Use Permit for Parkers Lake North for a Master Sign Plan, subject to the conditions listed in the July 8, 1988 staff report, with an addition to Condition No. 1., that "Sign A - Project Monument, is not part of the approved plan." MOTION by Commissioner Wire, seconded by Commissioner Plufka NOTION TO AMEND to Amend the Main Motion by deleting Condition No. 6. Commissioner Marofsky stated that he could not support the Motion. He personally has had difficulty seeing at points where median signage exists and believes that visual obstruction would be a problem. Coordinator Dillerud asked that Public Works Director Moore discuss the engineering concerns regarding median signage. Public Works Director Moore stated that there would be concern with sight lines and visual obstruction; and, the issue of safety. It was the developer's desire to have the large medians, City staff did not require them. Neither staff nor the Commission may grant a variance for the use of that right -of -way. The application will proceed to the City Council who would consider and act upon such a request. The Chair recognized Larry Laukka, Laukka Development Company. He stated that the issue of the medians is "old history." The signage plan is an important issue and is integral to these developments. The developers' direction to the consultant preparing the sign plan was that the overall appearance of that signage be crisp and clean, and provide continuity throughout to enhance these developments. Page 174 Planning Commissioni 11inutes July 13, 195 Roll Call Vote on Amendment. 4 Ayes. Commissioner Stulberq, Tierney, and Marofsky, Nay. MOTI0H carried. MOTION by Commissioner Plufka, seconded by Chairman Pauha to Amend the Main Motion by adding the following to "nekN" Condition No. 6.: No approval is hereby granted for size, location, or design for the signage labeled " Commercial Signage", depicted for a location within Outlot K, of Parkers Lake North MPUD. Commissioner Marofsky stated he has a problem with no pro- posal for the commercial signage and could not vote for this Master Plan without reviewing a detailed commercial signage plan. Roll Call Vote on Amendment. 6 Ayes. Commissioner Marofsky, Nay. MOTION by Commissioner Plufka, seconded by Commissioner Zylla to Amend the Main Motion by changing Condition No. 9 to read: No approval is granted or implied, other than basic design, of signs labeled "tertiary." Siqn size, location, and amount shall be addressed with site specific final plans. Roll Call Vote on Amendment. 7 Ayes. MOTION carried. Roll Call Vote on Main Motion as three times Amended. 6 Ayes. Commissioner Marofsky, Nay. MOTION carried. NEW BUSINESS Chairman Pauba introduced the request. Readinq of the July 8, 1988 staff report was waived. Chairman Pauba requested that Coordinator Dillerud provide an overview of the July 13, 1988 Memorandum distributed to the Commission. Coordinator Dillerud explained the omission concerning the service station signage. Chairman Pauba inquired about the fact there are no comemnts regarding the parking variance. Coordinator Dillerud stated that this was not overlooked, it was not reviewed for this report. Chairman Pauba introduced Mr. the petitioner. Mr. Simonson explained the proposal. Dale Simonson, representing showed slides of the site and Chairman Marofsky listed size and type of signage for the shopping center and the service station, and inquired if the petitioner is aware they could be waiving signage to which they are entitled by action on this request. Coordinator Dillerud explained that the service station has a separate sign plan. VOTE - AMENDMENT 1. MOTION CARRIED MOTION TO AMEN) VOTE - AMENDMENT 2. MOTION CARRIED MOTION TO AMEN) VOTE - AMENDMENT 3. VOTE - MAIN MOTION AS THREE TIMES AMENDED DAVID C. JOHNSON SITE PLAN AMENDMENT AND VARIANCE FOR MASTER SIGN PLAN "OAKWOOD SQUARE" (86138) Paaf- 175 Planning Commission Hinutes July 13, 19S Commissioner Wire inquired why the building desiori is dictating the size: of the signage. Discussion ensued regarding the need for specific signage for the service station and shoppinq center. Commissioner Wire stated that the variance could be reduced, since the use of the larger UNOCAL "orange ball" would pro- vide adequate identity. MOTION by Commissioner Stulherq, seconded by Commissioner MOTION TO DENY Wire to recommend denial of the Site Plan Amendment and SITE PLAN AMENDMENT Variance for the Master Sign Plan for the Oakwood Shopping FOR SIGN PLAN FOR Center, as stated in the draft recommendation. OAKWOOD SHOPPING CTR. MOTION by Commissioner Stulberg, seconded by Commissioner Wire to recommend denial of the Site Plan Amendment and Variance for the Master Sign Plan for the Oakwood Square UNOCAL Service Station. The Commission noted that durinq the early stages of development, the staff, Planning Commission, and Citv Council stated concerns regarding the site and buildinq design that could have shortcomings that would result in future requests for variances from the Ordinance standards. Mr. Dale Simonson asked for the opportunity to speak regard- ing the need for a price sign for the gas station. He stated that all service stations are allowed this signaqe and it seems unfair to deny this station what all other stations in the metro area have. He noted that the shopping center is a complicated issue. The roofline and the pitch that were design features to make this center compatible with the residential nature of the area affects the wall area for signaqe. Mr. Simonson introduced Mr. Steve Krause, architect, to explain the unique needs of the shopping center. Mr. Krause stated that compatibility with the neighborhood was the goal of this architecture. The tenants were not known during the earlier development phases, however, they now have firm commitments for some tenant space. The neighbors, who were disgruntled by the redevelopment of this corner, have had nothing but positive reaction to the shopping center. He believes they are being penalized on this sign issue. Mr. Simonson explained that the problem is two -fold, the roofline that provides less wall area, and the fact that there are two more tenants than anticipated. He stated that this is no fault of either the City or the developer. He MOTION TO DENY SITE PLAN AMENDMENT FOR SIGN PLAN FOR SERVICE STATION Pane 176 Planninq Commissio<< Minutes July 13, 19,S noted that the Ordinance, by nature, is inflexihle. Hf� aqreed that the original submission needed to be cut back, however, they request the use of the square footage allowed for a normal parapet wall. Further discussion ensued. SUBSTITUTE MOTION by Commissioner Marofsky, seconded by Com- missioner Plufka to approve the Service Station Signage for a single Pylon Sign with price sign; and, two signs, not to exceed 96 sq. ft. Roll Call Vote. 4 Ayes. Commissioners Wire, Stulberg, and Zylla, Nay. MOTION carried. SUBSTITUTE MOTION by Commissioner Plufka, seconded by Com- missioner Zvlla to amend the Main Motion to allow a 346 sq. ft. total for signage; and, to allow one pylon sign with no individual tenant siqns for the Oakwood Shopping Center. Roll Call Vote. 2 Aves. Commissioners Wire, Stulberg, Tierney, Marofsky, and Chairman Pauba, Nay. MOTION failed. Roll Call Vote on Main Motion. 7 Ayes. MOTION carried. Chairman Pauba introduced the request by the City of Plymouth for a Lot Division and Variance to construct a City water tower. Reading of the June 28, 1988 staff report was waived. MOTION by Commissioner Zylla, seconded by Commissioner Tierney to recommend approval of the Lot Division and Variance from the Ordinance standard for street frontaqe for the City of Plymouth to allow the construction of a water tower, subject to the conditions as listed and based on compliance with the variance critera as stated in the June 28, 1988 staff report. Vote. 7 Ayes. MOTION carried. Chairman Pauba introduced the request and reading of the July 7, 1988 staff report was waived. Commissioner Zylla inquired why this would not be consoli- dated as individual building sites, and why the City was just transferring the land to property owners. He stated concern that this property should have been appraised and sold. Coordinator Dillerud explained that since this property was donated to the City, and 6th Avenue North is a collector street, the City does not want lots with direct access to 6th Avenue North. This action puts the property back on the tax rolls without creating an access problem on a thorough- fare street. SUBSTITUTE MOTION TO APPROVE SERVICE STATION SIGNAGE VOTE - MOTION CARRIED SUBSTITUTE MOTION TO OAKWOOD SQUARE SHOP- PING CENTER SIGNAGE VOTE - MOTION FAILED VOTE - MOTION TO DENY SHOPPING CENTER SIGN PLAN MOTION CARRIED CITY OF PLYMOUTH LOT DIVISION AND VARIANCE (88063) MOTION TO APPROVE VOTE - MOTION CARRIED CITY OF PLYMOUTH LOT DIVISION/ CONSOLIDATION AND VARIANCE (88075) Page 177 Planning Commissions Minutes July 13, 199'- Haintenance and assessme�-its were discussed. MOTION] by Commissioner 'hire, seconded by Commissioner Marofsky to recommend approval for the Lot Division/ Consolidation for the Cite of Plymouth, subject to the conditions listed in the July 7, 1985 staff report. Vote. 6 Ayes. Commissioner Zylla, Nay. OLD BUSINESS Chairman Pauba introduced the request and explained that a letter received from the Berkshire Lane Corporation Vice President had been delivered to the Commission, Mayor, and Council regarding the property adjacent to that under consideration with the Vantage Company proposal. Mr. John M. Lewman, who signed the letter as Vice President, stated before the beginning of the meeting that he was no lonqer an officer of the Corporation as of 6:00 P.M. this date, and there would be no one present at this meeting to represent the Corporation. Chairman Pauba waived the reading of the July 9, 1989 staff report. Chairman Pauba introduced Mr. Kelly Doran, Vantage Company, who explained the proposal that now consists of 21 112 acres, rather than the 23 acres as previously proposed. Commissioner Marofsky inquired about percentage of office use versus industrial use. Mr. Doran stated it could be up to 70% office use. Mr. Doran stated they have no problems with the conditions and he assured the Commission that development would begin before the deadline of August 1, 1989. MOTION TO APPROVE VOTE - MOTION CARRIES VANTAGE COMPANIES LAND USE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT AND PUD CONCEPT PLAN (88054) MOTION by Commissioner Plufka, seconded by Commissioner Wire MOTION TO APPROVE to recommend approval of the Land Use Guide Plan Amendment, and the Mixed Planned Unit Development Concept Plan for Vantage Companies, subject to the conditions listed in the July 8, 1988 staff report. MOTION by Commissioner Marofsky, seconded by Chairman Pauba to amend the Main Motion by adding Condition No. 7 to the MPUD Concept Plan approval as follows: With the submittal of a PUD Final Plan /Plat, any industrial use must receive a Conditional Use Permit or such other specific use approval method as determined by the City Attorney, and that a tenant list be submitted to the City of Plymouth to further assure the "High Tech" industrial uses proposed. Mr. Doran stated he had no problem with the concept of this Motion, however, the uses within this District are fairly restrictive already. Page 175 Planning Commission Minutes July 13, 1985 Discussion ensued regarding appropriate uses and enforcement. Vote on Amendment. 1 Aye, 6 Nays. MOTION failed Vote on Main Motion 7 Ayes. MOTION carried. ADJOURNMENT 1:05 A.M. VOTE - AMENDMENT MOTION FAILED VOTE - MAIN MOTION' MOTION CARRIED MINUTES PLYMOUTH SAFETY COMMITTEE July 13, 1988 PRESENT: Gary Pouti, Eric Luetgers, Mark Peterson, Steve Herwig, Dan Campbell, Tim Ole, Darrel Anderson, Russ Elzy, Lyle Robinson, Frank Boyles ABSENT: None ALSO PRESENT: Dave Drugg, North Star Risk Services; Dave Volker, Employee Benefit Administration; Judy McMillin, Bobbi Leitner I. OLD BUSINESS A. APPROVAL OF JUNE 15 MEETING MINUTES The committee approved the June 15 minutes as submitted. B. Report on Safety Activities 1. Annual Inspection of City Facilities -- Frank Boyles reported that he has received follow up responses to the city facilities inspection report from Mark Peterson, Lyle Robinson, Dick Carlquist and Eric Blank. Frank noted that approximately 50 percent of the operation /correction recommendations have been completed. Frank will provide a written status report to the Committee at the August meeting on the remaining items to be completed. 2. Employee Safety Manual -- Frank advised that with the completion of the Employee Right -to -Know Law procedure, the manual will be printed by the August meeting. 3. Manhole Covers along Highway 55 -- Frank reported that Water and Sewer employees had completed staking all manhole covers which extend above the ground surface along Highway 55. 4. Fire Response to Fire Calls. Frank reviewed the letter from Dave Drugg about the status fire fighters responding to fire calls in their personal vehicles. According to the staff attorney for the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust, there are two issue areas involved: 1) general liability/ automobile liability; and 2) Workers' Compensation. From a general liability and automobile liability standpoint, volunteer firefighters responding to fire calls in their personal vehicles, and who may subsequently be involved in accident situations, would not be exposing the City PLYMOUTH SAFETY COMMITTEE July 13, 1988 Page 2 to "first line" liability. From a liability standpoint, firefighters are considered to be operating on an individual basis at this time and not under the direct supervision or representation of the City. Dave advised that the LMCI Trust contract provides coverage for firefighters responding in any vehicle, however, the firefighter's private automobile liability insurance is considered as the primary coverage. Dave Drugg pointed out that volunteer firefighters are not afforded any special considerations under State law and are not considered emergency vehicles unless the vehicle they are operating is equipped with appropriate warning light and siren equipment and other appropriate markings. Even then, these vehicles must proceed until it is obvious that they are given the right -of -way, and they cannot assume that they can take the right -of -way because of their response status. Lyle Robinson stated that department policy is made very clear to firefighters in that they are to obey all posted speed limits, signals, etc., whenever responding to fire calls in their personal vehicles. From a Workers' Compensation standpoint, volunteer firefighters are considered as being involved in an employee /employer relationship when they are responding to calls and would be considered covered under Workers' Compensation. 5. Herbicide Spraying -- The committee reviewed a memorandum from Tom Vetsch responding to a Safety Committee member's concern that a temporary street maintenance employee had been spraying weeds with a herbicide without appropriate training and licensing. According to Tom, the temporary employee in question had been trained in the application of herbicides and employee right -to -know matters. In addition, the employee had been wearing appropriate personnel protective equipment. Mark Peterson advised the Committee that at the present time, there are no restricted herbicides in house, and therefore, no State herbicide spraying license for individual employees is required. Mark noted that he will monitor all future purchase of herbicides to assure the City meets licensing requirements. 6. Orange Hats -- Frank stated that the florescent orange hats had been redistributed to employees. II. NEW BUSINESS A. Consent Agenda. The committee approved the consent agenda as presented. The agenda contained three personal injury accidents; two were determined non - preventable, and one preventable. B. Committee Review of Vehicular /Personal Injury Accidents. The committee reviewed three vehicular accidents and four personal Injury accidents. Two of the vehicular accidents were determined PLYMOUTH SAFETY COMMITTEE July 13, 1988 Page 3 preventable, and one accident non - preventable. All four personal injury accidents were determined non - preventable. A report on the Safety Committee's findings and recommendations will be forwarded to the City Manager. The committee's review of the above accidents resulted in the following recommendations or items for follow -up: (1) Recommendation to Public Safety Director to explore the appro- priate number of employees required for assistance in medical emergency cases (i.e. assisting paramedics in ambulance enroute to hospital). (2) Recommendation that consideration be given to a comprehensive plan for public works /park maintenance equipment /vehicle storage needs. (3) Recommendation to consider whether minimum fitness requirements for certain City positions are required. (4) Frank Boyles will follow up with Dick Carlquist on the status of speedcuffing and self - defense classes for police officers. III. OTHER BUSINESS A. Safe Driver Pins -- Eric Luetgers inquired as to the status of 1987 safe driver award pins for 1987. Frank advised he is continuing to work on the pin design and they will be ordered shortly. B. Smith & Lovelace Drywell -- Dave Volker advised he had contacted the State OSHA office with regard to the issuance of a state -wide variance to OSHA requirements for the Smith & Lovelace drywell. He was advised that each city with this type of drywell should individually send a letter for a variance. Frank stated he will meet with Dave to discuss the City's appeal to OSHA. The meeting adjourned at 9 :45 a.m. 1987 vs. 1988 CLASS I PLYMOUTH POLICE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT MONTH January - June MURDER CSC ROBBERY ASSAULT BURGLARY THEFT AUTO THEFT ARSON 0 12 4 102 146 542 70 11 0 12 3 116 124 504 1 91 1 5 TOTALS 1987 887 1988 855 -3.6% CLASS II FORGERY COUNTERFEIT FRAUD HAR COMM STOLEN PROPERTY VANDALISM SEX OFF. NARC. OFFENSES FAM /CHILD D.W.I LIO LAW DISORDERLY CONDUCT OTHEG 33 61 109 10 386 16 68 17 201 46 14 166 21 35 120 11 223 26 95 10 208 39 35 284 TOTALS 1987 1127 1988 1107 CLASS III -1.8% FATAL ACCIDENT PERSONAL INJURY PROPERTY DAMAGE SNOWMOBILE ACCIDENT DROWNING MEDICAL EMERGENCY SUICIDE SUICIDE ATTEMPTS NATURAL DEATH ANIMAL BITES FIRE 0 90 405 0 0 378 3 9 8 19 180 3 95 416 1* 0 401 3 9 10 13 165 TOTALS 1987 1092 1988 1116 2.2'/o' CLASS IV *Fatal TOTALS 1987 6240 1988 6173 -1% HAZARDOUS VIOLATIONS 1987 286 198 2770 _3.2 NONHAZARDOUS VIOLATIONS 1987 2448 1988 2805 14.6% CRIMINAL OFFENSES CLEARED 1987 31 1988 38.7°! ASSIST 9346 1988 9251 -1% ANIMAL FALSE LOCK OTHER WARRANT TRAFFIC SUSPICION MISSING LOST PUBLIC DOMESTIC DETAIL ALARMS OUTS AGENCY SERVED DETAIL INFORMATION PERSON FOUND NUISANCE MISC 161 843 622 781 221 168 1052 703 49 107 701 832 151 873 622 627 209 161 1130 784 j 28 116 768 704 TOTALS 1987 6240 1988 6173 -1% HAZARDOUS VIOLATIONS 1987 286 198 2770 _3.2 NONHAZARDOUS VIOLATIONS 1987 2448 1988 2805 14.6% CRIMINAL OFFENSES CLEARED 1987 31 1988 38.7°! TOTAL NUMBER OF INCIDENTS 1987 9346 1988 9251 -1% 1987 vs 1988 CLASSI PLYMOUTH POLICE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT MONTH June MURDER CSC ROBBERY ASSAULT BURGLARY THEFT AUTO THEFT ARSON 0 1 0 20 23 89 9 2 0 2 0 20 29 92 14 1 TOTALS 1987 144 1988 158 9.7% nl A L%Ll 11 FORGERY COUNTERFEIT FRAUD HAR, COMM STOLEN PROPERTY VANDALISM SEX OFF NARC OFFENSES FAM /CHILD DW.I. LID LAW DISORDERLY CONDUCT OTHE= 2 6 23 0 51 1 7 2 27 10 4 31 4 0 21 3 48 6 16 1 34 6 3 75 TOTALS 1987 164 1988 217 32.3% CLASS III FATAL ACCIDENT PERSONAL INJURY PROPERTY DAMAGE SNOWMOBILE ACCIDENT DROWNING MEDICAL EMERGENCY SUICIDE SUICIDE ATTEMPTS NATURAL DEATH ANIMAL BITES FIRE 0 20 70 0 0 74 0 3 0 2 28 0 17 78 0 0 64 0 2 4 4 38 TOTALS I987 197 1988 207 5% CLASS IV DOMESTIC ANIMAL DETAIL FALSE ALARMS LOCK OUTS ASSIST OTHER AGENCY WARRANT SERVED TRAFFIC DETAIL SUSPICION INFORMATION MISSING PERSON LOST FOUND PUBLIC NUISANCE MISC 28 175 112 133 53 24 212 117 8 25 229 146 23 183 139 117 54 27 188 165 9 25 181 285 TOTALS 1987 1262 CRIMINAL OFFENSES CLEARED 1987 4tJ% 1988 1396 10.6% 1988 41.6% HAZARDOUS VIOLATIONS 1987 581 1988 573 -1% TOTAL NUMBER OF INCIDENTS 1987 1767 NONHAZARDOUS MOLAMONS 1987 577 1988 564 -2% 1988 1978 11,c oC M zt N M oC C v^, oC N oC N I I N Ntn M M O, Ic Ic I— M N N `i M M N I O i W O*� O� — tn 00 "C �D lzt O N C� N N — — .-. .-. � I z ip Q Im I \D oo O N M N Q,� iz I I I I Izzzz w ��z �o 0000� zz� I I ���zzEnV)° >> P6. � xx��Zzz< < <¢¢¢wwZzz�eo w !888888wZZZZzzQQwpz3�� I I�l ►- a�l�]L�R:xxB¢ooQQQC�Q88zw�w,�� w u �raal�aaa�pv��Qwwwwwww �.zws3, i i p w !! U z C I iw wV� Ov a Q O i !z z d f z Zo C) r~ I tz > �a aw ww p Z�QQ ¢w I wZza R Z l¢ ¢Z z gyp¢,3 x z zpz I z ¢� wa'3�z_xww�azx ""�wF"w 0 ��x��svw�a U 8 � ¢�¢ wx ¢ zvOz "Rot z0�"- vx)1= 2a.- , =u ti-, ti-, oc OC t— t— I IN I I I I I I I O*� C C� C N I I c I I I I G 1 I � 00 M It N 00 tt t-- I I C C\ I�t MI'D 00 V) tr; �- I� I I~ I I i I I � I I I I � 000� pp i� �o N U aj I I � dF �F G) 'a E W I I r w V ! x a z z° I �N z¢V) �b C'e) O H 3 U 1988 CANADA GOOSE REMOVAL REPORT - -DR. JIM COOPER, DEPARTMENT OF FISHERIES AND WILDLIFE, COLLEGE OF NATURAL RESOURCES, UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA, ST. PAUL, MN 55108 (612- 624 -1223) SITE BASS LAKE CITY PLYMOUTH LOCATION DEERWOOD AND ZACHARY LAKE REMOVALORBANDING REMOVAL88 DATE PLANNED DATE DRIVEN NUMBER OF DRIVES 28 JUNE AM 28 JUNE AM 2 TOTAL YOUNG CAUGHT TOTAL ADULTS TOTAL CAPTURED 92 29 121 ESTIMATED BIRDS NOT CAPTURED 0 SITE CIMMARON PONDS -- GLEASON LAKE CITY PLYMOUTH LOCATION ZANZIBAR LANE SOUTH OF COUNTY ROAD 6- -BIRDS GO TO GLEASON DURING MOLT REMOVALORBANDING REMOVAL88 DATE PLANNED DATE DRIVEN NUMBER OF DRIVES 28 JUNE PM 28 JUNE PM 1 TOTAL YOUNG CAUGHT TOTAL ADULTS TOTAL CAPTURED 73 31 104 ESTIMATED BIRDS NOT CAPTURED 3 SITE MEDICINE LAKE -- FRENCH REGIONAL PARK CITY PLYMOUTH LOCATION SOUTH OF BASS LAKE ROAD TRAP SITE AT PARK ON SOUTH END AND AT FRENCH PARK ON NORTH -- PRIVATE HOMEOWNER 122 REMOVALORBANDING REMOVAL88 DATE PLANNED DATE DRIVEN NUMBER OF DRIVES 22 JUNE AM 22 JUNE AM 3 TOTAL YOUNG CAUGHT TOTAL ADULTS TOTAL CAPTURED 98 49 147 ESTIMATED BIRDS NOT CAPTURED 0 SITE PARKERS LAKE CITY PLYMOUTH LOCATION COUNTY ROAD 6 AND NIAGARA - -PARK ON NORTH SIDE REMOVALORBANDING REMOVAL88 DATE PLANNED DATE DRIVEN NUMBER OF DRIVES 22 JUNE PM 22 JUNE PM 1 TOTAL YOUNG CAUGHT TOTAL ADULTS TOTAL CAPTURED 43 10 53 ESTIMATED BIRDS NOT CAPTURED 0 SITE SAGAMORE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION CITY PLYMOUTH LOCATION 10700 ROCKFORD ROAD REMOVALORBANDING REMOVAL88 DATE PLANNED DATE DRIVEN NUMBER OF DRIVES 22 JUNE PM 22 JUNE PM 1 TOTAL YOUNG CAUGHT TOTAL ADULTS TOTAL CAPTURED 34 19 53 ESTIMATED BIRDS NOT CAPTURED 0 League of Minnesota Cities July 26, 1988 183 University Ave. East St. Paul, MN 55101 -2526 (612) 227 -5600 (FAX: 221.0986) TO: Mayor's, Managers and Clerks FROM: Joel J. Jamnik, Legislative Counsel RE: LMC and AMM Joint Solid Waste Study The League and the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities have begun to organize a committee to research and make recommendations to the Associations respective policy committees regarding certain solid waste issues. Most specifically, the issue of volume based collection systems and billing practices will be examined, since the issue will likely be the focus of Legislation in the 1989 session. We are thus soliciting volunteers with an interest and /or knowledge of Solid Waste Management to serve on this joint committee, which will begin meeting probably mid to late August. Please talk to me at the League if you or other city staff are interested in participating. CITY OF Pi.YMWTH s PUBIC SERVICE COUKTEPS CUSTOWR COMMEKT CARD We: value your opinion about the service you receive at the Public Service Counters! Please complete this card and drop it in the Customer Comment Box at the main receptionist's counter. Date of visit Time 1. With -which department(s) did you deal? r .2. Name of City Employee (if you recall) 3. Did you have an appointment for a meeting? Yes No 4. Was service prompt ?. Yes / No 5. Was service courteous ? - Yes No / 6.. Were your questions answered.or business concluded? Yes No 7. If no, what information do you still require? 'j why Pw+k If\e.x �i� �� wtas v�oT rc�c S. How could we serve you better? �,} A6 r� ,Vv\ X %*N .5 fit. .: o 'Your name would be appreciated; however, if you should prefer to remain anonymous, we still value your observations. Name Address City Phone Zip Y, Pi 4 July 25, 1988 CITY OF Mr. . Brad Crzzpa PLYMOUTR 13206 95th Street North East Elk River, MN 55330 I� Thank you for submitting a customer comment card. In your comments you express concern regarding the issuance process for permits. As you know, we initiated an automated system for processing permit applications and issuance of permits. We have continually evaluated our system and have received input about the operation of the system from contractors and from groups representing contractors. We have designed some modifications which we believe are responsive to the concerns which have been raised. Those concerns included the faster turn around time for certain classes of permits and a better means of issuing certain permits by mail which would reduce the amount of time large volume contractors would spend caning to the City Center. The basic concern was that an automated system should provide more efficient and timely issuance of those permits which do not require formal plan review and verification. For these reasons, the following modifications were developed which we feel address the concerns that have been expressed to us. 1. Same Day Permit Issuance - the Building Inspection and Finance Departments are prepared to accept and process complete applications, and to issue permits on the same day between the hours of 9:00 am and 10:00 am, Monday through Friday for all plumbing and mechanical work of one and two family dwellings. It is important that applications are complete and accurate. Applications must be made between 9:00 am and 10:00 am. 2. Permits by Mail and Invoicing - the City of Plymouth has implemented a means by which contractors who generally deal in a large volume of permits may charge the fees for such permits on a monthly basis. This program was primarily designed for those contractors who indicated a desire to operate exclusively by mail. Further information describing the invoicing requirements is available at our Public Service Counter. 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447, TELEPHONE (612) 559 -2800 Mr. Brad Grupa July 25, 1988 Page two As discussed in our recent conversation, we will be evaluating our system to see if any further modifications may be warranted. Let me assure you that our objective is to provide the best possible public service to our customers consistent with our responsibility for fulfilling our legal obligations. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me. Sincerely, I Joe Ryan Building Official JR:jk cc: File CITY Or PLYIPM H 10e value your opinion about the service you receive at the Public Service, Counters! Please complete this card and drop it in the Customer Cownent Box_ at the +gain receptionist's counter. Date of visit — – Tiwev/©.���T 1. With whict -- departments) did - you deal? 2.. -Nam of City Employee .(if you recall) 3: Did you have an appointment for a meeting? Yes -.. No j� 4. Was service prortpt? Yes N� +'j A l July 20, 1988 CITY a PLYMOUTH+ Mr. Ken Boutin 4915 Pineview Lane North Plymouth, MN 55442 Dear Mr. Boutin: Thank you for submitting a custcmer camient card. In your comments you express concern regarding the issuance process for plumbing permits. As you know, we initiated an automated system for processing permit applications and issuance of permits. We have continually evaluated our system and have received input about the operation of the system from contractors and from groups representing contractors. We have designed sane modifications which we believe are responsive to the concerns which have been raised. Those concerns included the faster turn around time for certain classes of permits and a better means of issuing certain permits by mail which would reduce the amount of time large volume contractors would spend caning to the City Center. The basic concern was that an automated system should provide more efficient and timely issuance of those permits which do not require formal plan review and verification. For these reasons, the following modifications were developed which we feel address the concerns that have been expressed to us. 1. Same Day Permit Issuance - the Building Inspection and Finance Departments are prepared to accept and process complete applications, and to issue permits on the same day between the hours of 9:00 am and 10:00 am, Monday through Friday for all plumbing and mechanical work of one and two family dwellings. It is important that applications are complete and accurate. Applications must be made between 9:00 am and 10:00 am; all applications submitted after 10:00 am will be processed by the close of business on the following business day. 2. Permits by Mail and Invoicing - the City of Plymouth has implemented a means by which contractors who generally deal in a large volume of permits may charge the fees for such permits on a monthly basis. This program was primarily designed for those contractors who indicated a desire to operate exclusively by mail. Further information describing the invoicing requirements is available at our Public Service Counter. 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447, TELEPHONE (612) 559 -2800 Mr. Ken Boutin July 20, 1988 Page two As discussed in our recent conversation, we will be constantly evaluating our system to see if other changes may be warranted. Let me assure you that our objective is to provide the best possible public service to our customers consistent with our responsibility for fulfilling our legal obligations. If you have any questions, please feel free to call mg. Sincerely, Joe Ryan Building Official JR:jk cc: File MEMO CITY OF PLYMOUTH 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447 DATE: July 25, 1988 TO: Frank Boyles, Assistant City Manager FROM: Joe Ryan, Building Official SUBJECT: GRADING PERMIT - 2830 WEST MEDICINE LAKE DRIVE Recently as you know, our office received a complaint from the property owner directly south of the above referenced site concerning fill material which had been hauled in to retain the grade around an in- ground swimming pool which was constructed on the referenced property last summer. During my involvement in investigation of this matter, I mailed a letter to the property owner informing her that the work performed was without the required issuance of a grading /filling permit by our office, and was therefore in violation of the City Code. I required the property owner to submit a grading plan prepared by a registered Engineer, outlining the existing grade conditions of the site, together with proposed contours reflecting the magnitude of the work yet to be completed. The permit application was submitted to our office on May 23, 1988. Our Engineering Department reviewed the plans and have established certain conditions which must be adhered to in order to comply with City regulations. On Thursday, June 30, 1988, I met with the property owner, her general contractor, and her real estate agent, discussing the various conditions of approval. Prior to the issuance of the grading permit the property owner was required to submit to our office a copy of a street sweeping contract as well as a letter of understanding agreeing to the conditions of permit approval. The scope of the work which is yet to be completed consists of an additional 1,500 cubic yards of fill material. The property owner's contractor stated that he has approximately 1,000 cubic yards of material readily available to commence work during the week of August 1, 1988. All parties have agreed to complete the remainder of the work no later than September 15, 1988 which would include revegetation of the site. A grading permit was issued by our office on July 22, 1988. Frank Boyles Page 2 I will continue to monitor the site during the grading process in order to ensure the anticipated schedule is being maintained. I will continue to keep the adjoining property owner informed. Please see me should you have any further questions. JR /tw cc: file Mr. Frank Cleave 1730 Forestview Lane North Plymouth, MN 55441 SUBJECT: ANNUAL NEIGHBOR /COMMUNITY CLUB MEETING Dear Mr. Cleave: Over the last few years we have made it a practice of annually meeting with the West Medicine Lake neighbors and Community Club representatives to discuss issues of mutual concern. This year, Dolly Revling has suggested that the meeting be conducted in September, before the officers of the club leave town for winter vacations. I am suggesting a meeting date of Tuesday, September 20 at 7 p.m. here at the City Center Conference Room. Please contact Judy McMillin at 559 -2800, ext. 202, to confirm your attendance by Friday, August 5. In hopes of facilitating a productive meeting, I am asking that by August 5, both neighborhood and Community Club representatives provide written issue lists for discussion. I will share the issue lists with the participants before the meeting. I will assume that there is no reason to meet if issue lists are not submitted. 11 Frank qio�l6s Assistant City Manager FB:kec cc: Dick Carlquist, Public Safety Director Mayor & City Council S.F. 8/5/88 9/20/88 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447, TELEPHONE (612) 559 -2800 Joan & Jay Nelson 1735 Forestview Lane North Plymouth, MN 55441 SUBJECT: ANNUAL NEIGHBOR /COMMUNITY CLUB MEETING Dear Mr. & Mrs. Nelson: Over the last few years we have made it a practice of annually meeting with the West Medicine Lake neighbors and Community Club representatives to discuss issues of mutual concern. This year, Dolly Revling has suggested that the meeting be conducted in September, before the officers of the club leave town for winter vacations. I am suggesting a meeting date of Tuesday, September 20 at 7 p.m. here at the City Center Conference Room. Please contact Judy McMillin at 559 -2800, ext. 202, to confirm your attendance by Friday, August 5. In hopes of facilitating a productive meeting, I am asking that by August 5, both neighborhood and Community Club representatives provide written issue lists for discussion. I will share the issue lists with the participants before the meeting. I will assume that there is no reason to meet if issue lists are not submitted. / S Frank %yles Assistant City Manager FB:kec cc: Dick Carlquist, Public Safety Director Mayor & City Council S.F. 8/5/88 9/20/88 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447, TELEPHONE (612) 559 -2800 Mr. Art Ankers West Medicine Lake Community Club 2430 Magnolia Lane Plymouth, MN 55441 SUBJECT: ANNUAL NEIGHBOR /COMMUNITY CLUB MEETING Dear Mr. Ankers: Over the last few years we have made it a practice of annually meeting with the West Medicine Lake neighbors and Community Club representatives to discuss issues of mutual concern. This year, Dolly Revling has suggested that the meeting be conducted in September, before the officers of the club leave town for winter vacations. I am suggesting a meeting date of Tuesday, September 20 at 7 p.m. here at the City Center Conference Room. Please contact Judy McMillin at 559 -2800, ext. 202, to confirm your attendance by Friday, August 5. In hopes of facilitating a productive meeting, I am asking that by August 5, both neighborhood and Community Club representatives provide written issue lists for discussion. I will share the issue lists with the participants before the meeting. I will assume that there is no reason to meet if issue lists are not submitted. Frank Wyles Assistant City Manager FB:kec cc: Dick Carlquist, Public Safety Director Mayor & City Council S.F. 8/5/88 9/20/88 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447, TELEPHONE (612) 559 -2800 Ms. Dolly Revling West Medicine Lake Community Club 1501 Crosby Road Wayzata, MN 55391 SUBJECT: ANNUAL NEIGHBOR /COMMUNITY CLUB MEETING Dear Ms. Revling: Over the last few years we have made it a practice of annually meeting with the West Medicine Lake neighbors and Community Club representatives to discuss issues of mutual concern. This year, Dolly Revling has suggested that the meeting be conducted in September, before the officers of the club leave town for winter vacations. I am suggesting a meeting date of Tuesday, September 20 at 7 p.m. here at the City Center Conference Room. Please contact Judy McMillin at 559 -2800, ext. 202, to confirm your attendance by Friday, August 5. In hopes of facilitating a productive meeting, I am asking that by August 5, both neighborhood and Community Club representatives provide written issue lists for discussion. I will share the issue lists with the participants before the meeting. I will assume that there is no reason to meet if issue lists are not submitted. i Sinc Frank BWei Assistant City Manager FB:kec cc: Dick Carlquist, Public Safety Director Mayor & City Council S.F. 8/5/88 9/20/88 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447, TELEPHONE (612) 559 -2800 Y � July 5, 1988 Mr. Jerry Sisk 17015 24th Avenue Plymouth, MN 55447 Dear Mr Sisk: This letter is a follow up to our telephone conversation of several weeks ago regarding Plymouth's new burglar and fire alarm ordinance. My concerns were directed at the burglar alarm provisions, and you suggested I discuss the matter with the membership of my homeowners association and respond to you. Since then I have collected opinions from Ferndale North residents and other Plymouth residents near the North Ferndale Road area, Residents both with alarms and without alarms are opposed_ -to the ordinance as presently written. This is not to say that they are opposed to cutting down the number of false alarms requiring a police dispatch. They are also very supportive of penalties for alarm owners who abuse the services of the police department. However, as written they and I feel the ordinance is unrealistic and punitive. In particular, we are concerned that Plymouth has enacted an ordinance that is more severe than any other city in the west suburban area including the city of Minneapolis. Homeowners with alarms have gone to considerable personal expense to protect against burglaries. This benefits the city as well because the time spent investigating a burglary is many hours more than following up on a false alarm. Alarm owners do not expect complete freedom to abuse the police services they receive, but to be expected to pay a fee for every false alarm is unrealistic. Human error does enter into burglar alarm operation. Children, cleaning help, workmen, and house sitters are the most frequent cause of alarms according to my membership. This can be cut down but not completely eliminated. I am also concerned that the mesdage being sent to homeowners is a negative one. Most Ferndale North residents are very supportive of city government and the police department and feel they cooper- ate in every way possible with the city. This ordinance creates a feeling that is negative and implies that the city is not willing to cooperate with residents. I would like to propose that in the area of burglar alarms the city return to its previous policy with the addition of yearly registration of alarms being required and a more serious penalty policy for those who go beyod their three false alarms per calendar year. Such penal- ties could include higher fees, disconnecting faulty alarms until needed repairs are made, or other penalties. I think there are ways to decrease false alarms without using the present system. This would be greatly beneficial for residents who have only one or two false alarms and allow the city to concentrate on those alarm owners who have multiple false alarms. 2 I appreciate your willingness to share this information with the city council. I hope to hear from you in regard to this matter. Sincerely, ho Bill Morkrid President, Ferndale North Homeowners 1110 N. Ferndale Road Plymouth, MN 55447 i CITY OF July 25, 1988 PLYMOUTF- Mr. Bill Morkrid President Ferndale North Homeowners Association 11110 North Ferndale Road Plymouth, MN 55447 SUBJECT: JULY 5, 1988 LETTER TO COUNCILMEMBER SISK Dear Mr. Morkrid: Councilmember Sisk has asked that I respond to your July 5 letter regarding tht; City's new false alarm ordinance. We appreciate the fact that you have shared the ordinance with residents of the Ferndale North area and have made the effort to respond with your concerns. Your letter indicates that you are not opposed to cutting down the number of false alarms requiring police dispatch, but you are concerned about an ordinance which is unrealistic and punitive. To respond to this concern, let me provide you with some history. In 1982, the City of Plymouth first initiated an alarm ordinance. After some five years of experience with the ordinance, we found that despite our efforts, false alarms have continued in substantial amounts through 1987. As a taxpayer, I am sure you are concerned that false fire alarms account for over 50% of our Fire Department's activity. Similarly, our Police Department responds to more than five false alarms Bai_lY. This constitutes over 7% of the total annual Police Department calls. fihese police and fire false alarms continue despite the old false alarm ordinance. Aside from the economic impact of false alarms, the tremendous volume of alarms increase wear and tear on equipment. More importantly, false alarms breed complacency. Police and fire officers who repeatedly respond to fire alarms at a location are more likely to be unfortunately surprised if they respond to the real thing at that location. False alarms also expose you and Plymouth Public Safety Officers to unnecessary hazards associated with emergency type response driving. This needless exposure can be curtailed through an effective false alarm ordinance. 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH MINNESOTA 55447, TELEPHONE (612) 559 -2800 Mr. Bill Morkrid July 25, 1988 Page 2 In developing the new ordinance which the Council has adopted, we have collected data from the League of Minnesota Cities, covering the 855 cities in Minnesota. We have also contacted municipalities throughout the nation, researching the type and effectiveness of their false alarm ordinances. The net result was the ordinance which the Council adopted effective for January 1, 1989. It would also be our preference too to retain the old fire and police alarm ordinance. But experience shows that it was not effective in achieving its objective. We are anxious to work with you to minimize the number of false alarms you experience. As you can see in the ordinance, we have attempted to define acts such as activation of a system as a result of an effort to upgrade, install, test or maintain a system, or activation by a utility company power outage, climatic conditions or other conditions which are clearly beyond the control of the alarm manufacturer, installer or owner and are not false alarms. We believe that these safeguards help to protect businesses and homeowners who otherwise exercise restraint and care in the maintenance and operation of their systems. Sincere , Frank oyles Assistant City Manager FB:kec cc: Dick Carlquist, Public Safety Director Jerry Sisk, Councilmember Mayor & City Council Mr. Dennis Hansen Hennepin County Department of Transportation 320 Washington Avenue South Hopkins, MN 55343 -8468 SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR A TRAFFIC STUDY AT THE INTERSECTION OF INDUSTRIAL PARK BOULEVARD AND XENIUM LANE (COUNTY TRUNK HIGHWAY 61) IN THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH Dear Mr. Hansen: Sincerely, A petition and letter has been received by the City of Plymouth asking that a traffic signal or traffic control be placed at the intersection stated above. Based on that request, it appears that major problems are generated during peak hours at this intersection. Please do a traffic study and evaluation of the need and warrants for a traffic signal at this location, or any other improved traffic control. Thank you for your immediate attention to this request. Sincerely, Chester J. Harrison, Jr., P.E. City Engineer CJH:kh cc: Fred G. Moore, Director of Public Works Thomas L. Ruesch, Managing Facilities and Services Control Data Corporation 2200 Berkshire Lane North Plymouth, MN 55441 David Fouts, Regional Manager Baxter Scientific Products Division 13505 Industrial Park Boulevard Plymouth, MN 55441 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447, TELEPHONE (612) 559 -2800 Armstrong ,-' Torseth Slcold and •,` Rydeen Inc. June 30, 1988 The Honorable Virgil A. Schneider Mayor of Plymouth 11520 - 54th Avenue No. Plymouth, MN 55442 Re: Timber Shores Park - Fishing Pier, etc. Dear Virgil: As per our discussion on June 24, 1988, we would like a positive response to the ongoing problems centering on the fishing pier in Timber Shores Park. As you know, it is "right under" our deck. We voiced our objections and concerns when the design was shown to us, yet the City still elected to install it. I believe the City has a responsibility to assist us (the Vale -Hoff Association, especially Rydeens, Clemens, Davies, Searls) in solving the problem. Last summer (1987) we met with you and Eric Blank. You suggested a permanent fence be extended out as far as possible, and we discussed additional landscape screening to our yard. All that happened was a sign was erected, which did not solve the problems. The pier, shore and shelter are impossible areas for the Police and Park Department to supervise. As a result, our backyard becomes part of the public area. Wes Clemens had his boat motors stolen, thus we feel rather vulnerable to anybody who is in the park. I have not put my dock out for the past several years because I couldn't keep kids from the park from using it. I like your suggestion of installing a permanent fence extending out into the water. We will be happy to discuss the issue further with you. Si cerely, James E. Rydeen, A.I.A. JER /sr cc: Jim Willis, City Manager Erick Blank, Park & Recreation Dept. July 12, 1988 Mr. James Rydeen 5605 Evergreen Lane N Plymouth, MN 55442 Dear Jim: In response to your letter dated June 30 that you sent to Mayor Schneider, Mark Peterson, Superintendent of Parks is in the process of getting quotes on the installation of permanent fencing out into Bass Lake to block off the north shore. If the bids come in with a reasonable cost, we will proceed immediately to ask the contractor to install this fence. Thank you for your assistance and patience in this matter, Jim. I hope that we can get it cleared up in the next few weeks. Sincerely, Eric Blank Director of Parks & Recreation cc Mayor Schneider EB:ds Y p tbY }y ; k? CITY OF July 25, 1988 PLYMOUTH- Dolores Carpenter 14000 - 40th Avenue North Plymouth, MN 55447 SUBJECT: YOUR CONCERN ABOUT BERMING ALONG ANNAPOLIS AND TRESPASSING THROUGH YOUR YARD Dear Ms. Carpenter: Upon receipt of your phone call in June, I asked our Community Service Officers to be in contact with you. Community Service Officer Philip Sykes spoke with you on June 29, advising you of Minnesota state laws pertaining to trespass and what you can do if individuals trespass on your property. You also asked about plans for berming along Annapolis Lane and future trail plans which might help to avoid trespass through your yard. Community Development Coordinator Chuck Dillerud investigated both subjects and provided the following information: I. Trail - A trail is scheduled to be constructed.by the City on the Zheshire Lane right -of -way between 40th Avenue North and Annapolis Lane. The schedule for trail construction, however, is dependent upon our ability to obtain 15 additional feet of right -of -way from Trammell Crow. The trail would then extend from the cul -de -sac and 40th Avenue North in a 90 degree angle directly to Annapolis Lane and the PDQ store which apparently is generating the foot traffic. The trail is also to connect to the west side of Annapolis Lane to the trail that parallels the south side of County Road 9. The construction of the trial along Annapolis Lane will be concurrent with improvements to Annapolis Lane. 2. Berming - Our investigation finds that there was no berming or fencing called for in the platting your parcel. Any berms that are in place were constructed by the developer at the time of initial construction. Our Engineering Department has not yet completed construction plans for Annapolis Lane. The plans could potentially include berming across the rear of your property. Such berming would likely result in a special assessment against your property. A second complication is the fact that there is very little right -of -way to work with in your immediate area. 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447, TELEPHONE (612) 559 -2800 Dolores Carpenter July 25, 1988 Page 2 By copy of this letter, I am asking the Engineering Department to consider your request as part of their construction plans for Annapolis Lane. Given the construction schedule uncertainties, you may wish to consider the Installation of a fence to prohibit trespass prior to completion of the roadway construction. If you decide to pursue this alternative, you should contact Building Official Joe Ryan for information necessary prior to fence construction. i Sincerel Frank yles Assistant City Manager FB:kec cc: Fred Moore, Public Works Director Blair Tremere, Director of Planning & Community Development Mayor & City Council 7/18/88 Virgil Schneider, Mayor City of Plymouth 3400 Plymouth Boulevard Plymouth, ivINT 55447 Dear Mr. Schneider: As the parent of a mentally handicapped child, I am extremely interested in the issue of integrated recreation. The schools are now realizing the importance of integration in the classrooms; I would like to see this carried out into recreational activities as well. Our son has participated in programs sponsered by West Hennepin Community Center for several years. However, these programs are segregated: our son does not have contact with non - handicapped peers. To my knowledge there is no program in operation which encourages participation from both handicapped and non - handicapped children. West Hennepin Community Center has employed an integration specialist to coordinate recreational programs for eight suburban cities, one of which is Plymouth. I urge you and the city council to budget the necessary monies for integrated recreational programs to be sponsered by WHCC and Plymouth Park and Recreation. Recreational programs are important for children such as my son in that they help develop and strengthen social skills and social ties with his peers. Thank you for your consideration of this issue. Sincerely, S,.,e Hernbrof f 4220 Cottonwood 121 Plymouth, M 55441 559 -1843 MEMO CITY OF PLYMOUTH 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447 DATE: July 27, 1988 TO: James G. Willis, City Manager C- FROM: Eric Blank, Director of Parks and Recreation SUBJECT: INTEGRATED RECREATION PROGRAMS We currently contract for the provision of some recreational programs from the West Hennepin Community Center. They have submitted a 1989 funding request to include the integration of special populations into the mainstream of our programs. Mary Patterson, Cindy Anderson, and I have met with representatives of the West Hennepin Community Center to review their proposal for this program. Although their program is one that we philosophically agree with, we have not concluded that the City of Plymouth would receive enough benefit to warrant the expenditure they have requested. At this time, we have included $1,200 in our recreation draft budget for 1989, which was the amount of their request. We are looking at other options such as providing this service ourselves, which may be more cost effective,based on the limited number of individuals that may wish to participate in this program. It was our intention to discuss this matter with you when we met to review the proposed 1989 budgets. EB /np July 27, 1988 Mr. Gregory Begin 5525 Xenium Lane Plymouth, MN 55442 Dear Mr. Begin: This letter is to confirm receipt of portions of your application for an Amusement Center License from the City of Plymouth. As I indicated, we cannot accept your application for processing until we receive the following: 1. Management Plan outlining ongoing means by which the establishment will be supervised, training provided to supervisory personnel, and methods of dealing with infringements of establishment rules. 2. License fee in the amount of $1,214.55. This amount was calculated on your application for 40 machines: 1st 7 = $1,100.00 33 @ $55 = 1,815.00 TOTAL: $2,915.00 Pro -rated for 5 months (August 1 - December 31, 1988) = $1,214.55. As you are aware, the Police Department will conduct an investigation based on your submitted application and make a recommendation to the City Council. Any approval by the Council will be contingent on approval of the necessary Conditional Use Permit, which I understand you are in the process of obtaining. If you have any questions regarding your license, please contact me. Sincerely, Laurie F. Rauenhorst City Clerk cc: Frank Boyles, Assistant City Manager Chuck Dillerud, Community Development Coordinator 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447, TELEPHONE (612) 559 -2800