Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCouncil Information Memorandum 07-07-19884 B CITY O" PUMOUTR CITY COUNCIL INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM July 8, 1988 RECYCLING CASH DRAWING July 7: No Winner Next Week: $900 Cash Award UPCOMING MEETINGS AND EVENTS..... 1. NEXT COUNCIL MEETING -- Monday, July 11, 7 :30 p.m. Special City Council meeting. 2. MEETING CALENDARS -- Meetings calendars for July and August are attached. M -2 FOR YOUR INFORMATION.... 1. 1987 HENNEPIN COUNTY CHIEFS OF POLICE ASSOCIATION SAFETY AWARD - Attached is a memorandum announcing the winners of the 1987 Hennepin County Chiefs of Police Association safety award. Awards are given in two categories: for departments driving under 300,000 miles per year; and for departments driving more than 300,000 miles per year. Golden Valley is the 1987 safety award recipient for communities with less than 300,000 miles. The City of Plymouth is receiving the award for 1987 accident experience for communities driving more than 300,000 miles. This award is yet another example of the high level of safety consciousness among Plymouth employees generally and Plymouth Police Officers specifically. (I -1) 2. MINUTES: a. Planning Commission, June 22, 1988 (I -2a) 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH. MINNESOTA 55447, TELEPHONE (612) 559 -2800 CITY COUNCIL INFORMATIONAL NENORANDUN July 8, 1988 Page 2 3. CORRESPONDENCE: a. Thank you note for floral arrangement and expression of sympathy from family of Loring M. Staples, Jr. (I -3a) b. Letter to Chief Carlquist from Etta E. Stromberg, Manager of Administrative & Security Services, at Control Data Corporation, thanking Investigator Nesbitt and Youth Service Officer Nia Wronski for presentation on Personal Safety. (I -3b) c. Letter to Rhonda Farran from Mayor Schneider concerning Town Meeting Resident Feedback form. (I -3c) d. Letter from Mayor Schneider to James Edwards of Coldwell Bank, in thanks for flag distribution in honor of 1988 Flag Day Celebration. (I -3d) e. Customer Comment Card regarding exceptional service from Myra Wicklacz, Planning & Community Development and Richard Toy, Assessing. (I -3e) f. Letter from Mayor Schneider, to Gloria Nordquist, 1304 West Medicine Lake Drive, concerning June 21 letter regarding Dundee Nursery property. (I -3f) g. Letter from Mayor Schneider, to Tim & Cindy Harrer, 10710 - 15th Avenue North, concerning May 30 letter regarding debris. (I -3g) h. Letter from Mayor Schneider, to Terrie & Kevin Christian, 9910 South Shore Drive, concerning Resident Feedback form. (I -3h) 1. Letter from Peter Enck, Chairman of Basset Creek Water Management Commission, to James Willis, regarding contributions during 1989 as part of the Bassett Creek Flood Control project. (I -31) J. Letter from Don Omodt, Hennepin County Sheriff, to Mayor Schneider, concerning Lockup Inspection Report. (I -3j) k. Letter to John W. Arkell, President of Arkell Development Corporation, from James Willis, concerning request for tax increment financing and housing revenue bonds for a senior citizen housing project in Plymouth. (I -3k) I. Memo from Helen LaFave, Communications Coordinator, to Frank Boyles, concerning Channel 37 character - generated text. (I -31) CITY COUNCIL INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM July 8, 1988 Page 3 m. Customer Comment Card regarding exceptional service from Scott McLellan, Building Division. (I -3m) James G. Willis City Manager M -a \G M Q c ct OQ Lr) N C� cz u x z < U d z x w�" U c oM o z ar\ U GGM° w �O U M Mme./ 0 C .� v:zc r-� - o U �2"•� N N AMU P4 z�Z z 'z W 0-� E-4 OU F C C.� x ct ON N N a H H U U A Gs, ^ M^ N M H O C W °° W U Q U C U V O U iv oM O >+ W L G r 7 n ra ^ Q 1� H p4 U N �� NN W u[� n U a °U Cam/. £ U fC W. VH] 0. I i {L M N Cz F.NO oNo GjW3 ^Go M N M N I i � -a1 J rz r N N. N W - ' N � i W � F-� " ti N N �" ^_� (�' M u°z �°z cr Mg ^V� w U z .o v �yr1n x x > w as J O ul� U N M r- z .4 z a xz Ho. H z u a n U w z N a1 w oM U r,_„r N M � c P4 . z 6C7 A � � U Lr v] O U PU U w H > U W coa A N oPw r..� °oU 0� r� oUOU M �, UoU M N v M E{ ^ U Z P+ H^ U U 1.4 [U ;4 CwFC E-0oM.PP- E-+C E- 0 r 11 The Hennepin Counq Chiefs of Police Association Traffic Advisory Council The winners of the 1987 Safety Award are the Golden Valley Police Department and the Plymouth Police Department. Honorable mention goes to South Lake Minnetonka Public Safety Department, Deephaven Police Department, St. Bonifacius and Minne- trista Public Safety Department and the Wayzata Police Department. The awards were in two classifications. One award was for departments with the total number of squad miles driven under 300,000 miles and the other award for departments with over 300,000 miles driven. Under 300,000 Miles Driven Over 300,000 Miles Driven Plymouth # Accidents Miles Repair Costs Frequency Rate Severity Rate Golden Valley 0 259,000 0 0 0 South Lake Minnetonka 0 193,000 0 0 0 Deephaven 0 108,000 0 0 0 St. Boni - Minnetrista 0 103,000 0 0 0 Wayzata 0 79,000 0 0 0 West Hennepin 1 106,000 $1,160.00 1.89 2,188.68 Robbinsdale 2 140,000 1,700.00 2.85 2,428.57 Richfield 3 250,000 4,000.00 2.4 3,200.00 Orono 4 240,000 2,000.00 3.33 1,666.66 Airport 5 175,000 5,525.00 5.71 6,314.29 Over 300,000 Miles Driven Plymouth 1 473,000 800.00 .42 338.27 Edina 1 325,000 609.00 .62 374.77 St. Louis Park 2 340,000 2,726.00 1.17 1,427.06 Minnetonka 2 435,000 6,000.00 .92 2,758.62 Hennepin County 5 525,000 7,500.00 1.90 2,857.14 Bloomington 16 705,000 12,566.00 4.54 3,564.82 The formula used to determine the Frequency Rate and the Severity Rate is: Frequency Rate - # of accidents divided by miles driven then multiplied by 200,000. Severity Rate - total repair costs divided by miles driven then multiplied by 200,000. CITY OF PLYMOUTH PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES JUNE 22, 1988 The Regular Meeting of the Plymouth Planning Commission was called to order at 7:30 P.M. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Pauba Commissioners Wire, Stulberg, Zylla, Plufka, Marofsky, and Tierney. MEMBERS ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Community Development Coordinator Chuck Dillerud City Engineer Chet Harrison, Planning Secretary Tammy Ward MINUTE MOTION was made by Commissioner Wire, seconded by Commissioner Plufka to approve the June 8, 1988 Minutes as submitted. VOTE 6 Ayes. Commissioner Zylla abstained. PUBLIC HEARINGS Chairman Pauba introduced the request by Hans Hagen, Hans Hagen Homes. Coordinator Dillerud provided an overview of the June 15, 1988 Staff Report. Commissioner Marofsky inquired whether the 30 ft. setbacks included the lots on Harbor Lane. Coordinator Dillerud indicated that was correct and the side yard variances were also included on Harbor Lane. Commissioner Tierney inquired why the lots on Harbor Lane were not included i n the need to delineate the open space area from private lots. Coordinator Dillerud advised that these lots were deeper and the open space would not be as close to the homes, therefore, they should not create a trespass problem. (137) z -ate,. MOTION TO APPROVE VOTE - MOTION CARRIED HANS HAGEN, HANS HAGEN HOMES. REZONING, PUD PRELIMINARY PLAN /PLAT, & CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (87124) z -aa Page 138 Planning Commission Minutes June 22, 1988 Chairman Pauba introduced Mr. Hans Hagen, 2353 No. Rice Street, St. Paul, MN and Mr. Sherm Goldberg, 12115 48th Avenue North. Mr. Hans Hagen commented on some of staff's concerns. With regard to the buffering, Mr. Hagen stated that he feels the existing natural buffering is sufficient, and did not see a need to cut down the trees, erect a fence when a buffer already exists. Mr. Hagen addressed the need to delineate those yards that abut the open space area. Mr. Hagen did not feel a need for this, and added that they have other developments similar to this project and the open space area has never been a problem before. Commissioner Plufka inquired if there were any covenants prohibiting a homeowner from erecting a fence if he so chooses. Mr. Hagen advised that there were none, and the homeowner had the right to erect a fence. Mr. Hagen stated that the request for setbacks was a major issue and the development hinges v the setbacks. Mr. Hagen stated that the varied setbacks allowed for a more interesting street appearance for the homes. He added that the front yard setbacks were critical for two reasons: 1) the narrowness of Glacier Lane and, 2) to vary appearance. He stated that the side yard setbacks are far more critical. The request for the 5 ft. side yard setback with a minimum of 15 ft. between the houses was needed to make the project work. Mr. Hagen stated that some of the houses exceeded the 20% lot coverage. Commissioner Plufka indicated advised Mr. Hagen that only ground coverage is considered, not the total square footage of the house. Mr. Hagen requested that compliance with the Engineer's Report be removed from the Resolution conditions. He stated that they were unable to comply with all of the listed conditions. Chairman Pauba advised Mr. Hagen that the Commissioners could not alter the Engineers Report and that this item should be taken up the City Council or staff. Commissioner Plufka added that this item is a "boiler plate" and the City Council is aware that the Planning Commission does not get involved in this area. Commissioner Marofsky inquired if Mr. Hagen was asking for variances for the lots on Harbor Lane. as Page 139 Planning Commission Minutes June 22, 1988 Mr. Hagen advised him that they were not, only for the 12 lots that are 60 ft. in width, plus the lots with extra wide easements would be included. Chairman Pauba opened the Public Hearing. Max Wilhelm, 508 Kingsview Lane inquired what effect this development would have on the intersection of Harbor Lane and Gleason Lake Drive, adding that this is a very bad intersection. He also wanted to know if Kingsview Lane would remain a dead end street. Engineer Harrison advised Mr. Wilhelm that at this time there were no plans for a traffic signal at this location. Engineer Harrison added that Fernbrook Lane or 4th Avenue to County Road 6 is the only planned connection, and that is a long ways off. Commissioner Stulberg added that the current Thoroughfare Guide Plan does call for this, however, it could be changed. Skip Rosen, 425 Harbor Lane was concerned about the drainage and where the water would go. Sherm Goldberg advised that there will be storm sewer on Glacier Lane and 4th Avenue North that will pick up the drainage. Mr. Rosen asked if the houses on Harbor Lane would be greater than the 35 ft. setback. Chairman Pauba advised Mr. Rosen that 35 ft. is the standard setback for single family lots in the R -2 Zone. Mr. Rosen also expressed concern for the added traffic on Harbor Lane, and inquired about the proposed change in Harbor Lane with the road no longer being straight, but now having a bend. Coordinator Dillerud advised Mr. Rosen that Harbor Lane would now square off with a stop sign. Mr. Rosen stated that he agreed with Mr. Wilhelm that there should be an exit from the rear of the development. He also did not understand the rezoning. Commissioner Marofsky explained the guiding and that there now was a need to match the zoning with the guiding. Thelma Shepperd, 415 Harbor Lane, inquired about water drainage, the easement on her property and r -0? 01- Page 140 Planning Commission Minutes June 22, 1988 what would happen to all of the trees. Ms. Shepperd stated that there was a legal description published in the Plymouth Post that was the legal for her lot. She wanted to know if they were going to be grading on her property and added that a surveyor for the City had been out on her property. Sherm Goldberg advised Ms. Shepperd that the drainage would run north to the cul -de -sac, and down Glacier Lane. Ms. Shepperd also expressed her concern for the added traffic on Harbor Lane. Mike Monson, 305 Harbor lane inquired if Harbor Lane would be widened and how the curb and gutter would be assessed. Mr. Monson stated that he felt that the developer should pay for it, as it is the developer who is creating the need for the change in the road. Engineer Harrison advised Mr. Monson that a developer is only required to put in storm sewer and utilities for his lots which abut the roadway. Mr. Monson inquired if a traffic study had been completed . Engineer Harrison advised that one had not been done. Sherm Goldberg mentioned that a traffic study had been done approximately three years ago. Engineer Harrison stated that if they decided to upgrade Harbor Lane and felt that the impact might be greater, a traffic study may be done at that time. Mr. Monson stated that the developer should pay for a traffic study that would prove whether the improvements to Harbor Lane were the sole result of this project. Chairman Pauba closed the Public Hearing. MOTION by Commissioner Marofsky, seconded by MOTION TO APPROVE Commissioner Wire to approve the Preliminary Plat /Plan Planned Unit Development and Conditional Use Permit subject to the conditions listed in the June 15, 1988 Staff Report, changing the lot numbering of Conditions #12 and #14 to coincide Page 141 Planning Commission Minutes June 22, 1988 with the numbering on the plat /plan; delete Condition Condition 13 stating that provide, with the final Documents for the preservati open space. proposed preliminary 13 and adding a new the developer shall plat, Association on and maintenance of Commissioner Marofsky added that he wanted to address the variances on a lot -to -lot basis. Not all of the lots would need a variance and he did not want to set a precedent. MOTION by Commissioner Plufka, seconded by Commissioner Wire to amend Condition #10 to read a minimum 30 ft. front yard setback on Glacier Lane and 35 ft. on the balance of the project, with side yard setback of 5 ft. with minimum of 15 ft. between dwellings. Commissioner Tierney inquired if by doing this they would be modifying the Planned Unit Development. Commissioner Plufka stated that there are Planned Unit Developments with setbacks of 6 ft. like the "Zipper Z ". Commissioner Marofsky inquired if the front yard setback would include the four cul -de -sac lots on Glacier Lane. Commissioner Plufka advised that it would. Roll Call Vote. 5 ayes. Commissioners Wire and Marofsky nay. MOTION carried. MOTION by Commissioner Plufka, seconded by Commissioner Stulberg to further amend by deleting #12 regarding screening /buffering from County Road 15, since the petitioner made it clear that the existing buffering was sufficient. Commissioner Marofsky stated that if #12 was deleted, the petitioner could tear down the existing screening and leave no screening at all. Commissioner Plufka stated that the developer will not disturb the natural vegetation which is sufficient for a buffering. Roll Call Vote on the Amendment. 4 ayes. Commissioners Wire, Marofsky and Pauba nay. MOTION carried. MOTION TO AMEND VOTE - MOTION CARRIED MOTION TO FURTHER AMEND VOTE - MOTION CARRIED Page 142 Planning Commission Minutes June 22, 1988 Roll Call Vote on the Main Motion as Amended. 7 Ayes. MOTION CARRIED. Commissioner Stulberg asked that Coordinator Dillerud check on the legal description as noted in the Post newspaper to see what affects it has on Ms. Shepperd's land, and to talk with her before this item goes to City Council. Coordinator Dillerud advised that he would do so. Chairman Pauba introduced the request by Robert Wachter, Dimension Development for "Parkview Ridge ". Coordinator Dillerud provided an overview of the June 15, 1988 Staff Report. Commissioner Marofsky inquired if the setbacks were addressed at this time. Coordinator Dillerud advised that they should be addressed at this time. He further stated that the 25 ft. setbacks were for the lots that back up to the low land. Coordinator Dillerud advised that the reduction of the front yard setbacks was so that the lots would be buildable. Chairman Pauba introduced Mr. Robert Wachter, Wachter Development and the Mr. Greg Frank, of McCombs Frank and Roos, the representative for the petitioner. Mr. Frank addressed the following reasons for the need for the variances: 1) the low areas of the site and the need to continue the existing street elevation, 2) for preservation of the wooded areas. Mr. Frank stated that they did not intend to exceed the 20% ground coverage. Mr. Frank addressed Item 24E of the Engineer's Memo stating there could be compliance if the County will allow the trail easement within the road right -of -way. Commissioner Marofsky inquired about condition #15 with regard to open space. Mr. Frank pointed out the private trail system stating that this is a "walking neighborhood" and there were several tot lots. Chairman Pauba opened the Public Hearing. 1_120` VOTE - MOTION CARRIED ROBERT WACHTER, DIMENSION DEV.,RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, PRELIMINARY PLAN /PLAT, REZONING & CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (88018) Page 143 Planning Commission Minutes June 22, 1988 There was no one here to speak on this item and Chairman Pauba closed the Public Hearing. MOTION by Commissioner Wire, seconded by Commissioner Zylla to recommend approval for Residential Planned Unit Development, Preliminary Plat /Plan and Conditional Use Permit subject to the Conditions in the June 15, 1988 Staff Report, modifying #10 to read "...not to exceed..." Roll Call Vote. 6 Ayes. Commissioner Marofsky Nay MOTION carried. Commissioner Marofsky noted that he still had a problem with the open space area and did not feel that it was effective. He specifically noted that the "active" area for the single family detached lots was not appropriate. Chairman Pauba called for a recess at 9:19. The meeting resumed at 9:28. Chairman Pauba introduced the request by School District #284, for "Plymouth Creek Elementary School ". Coordinator Dillerud provided and overview of the June 17, 1988 Staff Report. Commissioner Marofsky had three questions: 1) How do you get from the school to the play field? 2) What would happen to the "church lot" if the church decides not to build? and, 3)Is there room for added parking for such functions as elections, PTA, etc...? Coordinator Dillerud advised that there was a culvert /bridge over the floodway of Plymouth Creek to get to the playground. He stated that the church use had not been addressed. With regard to the parking, he offered two suggestions. 1) Share parking with the church site 2) Add the flood plain area for additional parking. Commissioner Zylla inquired if 50 ft. right -of- way was consistent with conventional platting. Engineer Harrison advised that it was. 1 -aa MOTION TO APPROVE VOTE - MOTION CARRIED SCHOOL DISTRICT #284. PRELIMINARY PLAT, SITE PLAN, REZONING & CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR PLYMOUTH CREEK ELEMENTARY (88035) r -a C' Page 144 Planning Commission Minutes June 22, 1988 Commissioner Zylla inquired whether staff had looked at the turning radius for buses. Engineer Harrison advised that streets are designed for turn around, and there is a large opening in the parking lot to provide for a 180 degree turn. Commissioner Zylla also inquired about the trail system. Engineer Harrison advised that trails were not indicated except the east /west trail across the south portion of the site. Commissioner Marofsky inquired if the bike trail around the building was also fire lane. Coordinator Dillerud advised that this doubled as bike trail and a fire lane. Chair���an Pauba introduced Mr. Stan Tikkanen, the petitioners representative. Mr. Tikkanen stated that he had no comments to add, and that they were prepared to comply. Mr. Tikkanen stated that they have an agreement with the church to share parking lots. He added that the bus loading area could also be considered for additional parking. Mr. Tikkanen stated that there were no trails other than the bike trail /fire lane. Commissioner Marofsky inquired if another access to the play fields was explored. Mr. Tikkanen advised that they had considered a bridge over Plymouth Creek. Commissioner Plufka stated that the play fields were inconvenient to get to from the school building and he felt the children would go where they wanted. He advised that he would like to see something done to protect the children from the water, i.e. a fence similar to Sunset Hills School. Chairman Pauba opened the Public Hearing. John Francis, 3730 Cottonwood Lane, stated that he is the Building Chairman for the proposed church site. Mr. Francis indicated that he had no information to add and was only present to answer Page 145 Planning Commission Minutes June 22, 1988 questions. He did state, however, that the church has every intention of building, and they are excited about having a school as a neighbor. Chairman Pauba closed the Public Hearing. MOTION by Commissioner Stulberg, seconded by Commissioner Wire to approve the Preliminary Plat, Site Plan and Conditional Use Permit subject to the 12 conditions as listed in the June 17, 1988 Staff Report. Roll Call Vote. 7 Ayes. MOTION carried. Commissioner Stulberg emphasized the need to keep the children out of the water on the site. He suggested a fence be constructed. Chairman Pauba introduced the request by Vantage Companies for "Highpointe Business Center ". Coordinator Dillerud advised that Vantage Company requested the Commission defer this item. Coordinator Dillerud added that in checking with the City Attorney's office, he advised the Commission to open the Public Hearing tonight for those who came to speak on this item. Chairman Pauba opened the Public Hearing. Marilyn Leverenz, 14005 Rockford Road. Ms. Leverenz stated that she was concerned about the traffic on County Road 9. She added that a boy had just been hit on County Road 9 & Fernbrook Lane the other day. Ms. Leverenz stated that the Public Safety issue was her main concern and inquired what was going to be done. She added that the County stated that they would not be making any changes until they heard from the City of Plymouth. Engineer Harrison advised Ms. Leverenz that a traffic signal is scheduled for County Road 9 and Fernbrook Lane this summer. Commissioner Plufka advised Ms. Leverenz to speak to the City Council regarding her concerns for County Road 9 as soon as possible, and not to wait for the development to start. MOTION TO APPROVE VOTE - MOTION CARRIED VANTAGE COMPANY. LAND USE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT & PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR "HIGHPOINTE BUSINESS CENTER" (88054) Page 146 Planning Commission Minutes June 22, 1988 Mr. David Peterson, 5240 Cottonwood Lane, stated that he had been a participant in the reguiding, but has now withdrawn his cooperation and property. He stated that he was opposed to this plan. Motion by Commissioner Plufka, seconded by Commissioner Stulberg to defer this item. Roll Call Vote. 7 Ayes. MOTION carried. A 60 day suspense date was added. Ms. Leverenz and Mr. Peterson will be renotified regarding the new consideration date for this proposal. Chairman Pauba introduced the request by Stuart Erickson, Subway Sandwich Shop. The reading of the June 17, 1988 Staff Report was waived. Chairman Pauba introduced the petitioner, Mr. Stuart Erickson, 6650 Vernon Avenue South, Edina, MN. Mr. Erickson stated that he had no additional comments. Chairman Pauba opened the Public Hearing. There was no one present to speak on this item and the Public Hearing was closed. MOTION by Commissioner Wire, seconded by Commissioner Stulberg to approve the Conditional Use Permit for Subway Sandwich Shop subject to the 9 conditions as listed in the June 17, 1988 Staff Report. Roll Call Vote. 7 Ayes. MOTION CARRIED. Chairman Pauba introduced the request by Graham Development /CSM Corporation for Bass Lake Hills ". Coordinator Dillerud provided an overview of the June 16, 1988 Staff Report. Chairman Pauba introduced Mike Gair, 2021 East Hennepin Avenue, the petitioner's representative. Mr. Gair introduced Graham Development and CSM Corporation representatives. Mr. Gair provided an overview of the project and described the overall plan. MOTION TO DEFER VOTE - MOTION CARRIED STUART ERICKSON, SUBWAY SANDWICH, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (88055) MOTION TO APPROVE VOTE - MOTION CARRIED GRAHAM DEV. /CSM CORP. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT PLAN (88060) � as Page 147 Planning Commission Minutes June 22, 1988 Mr. Gary Tushie, Tushie- Montgomery Assoc., 3300 Edinborough Way, Edina, MN., described the townhouse portion of this development. Mr. Gair explained the densities involved in this project. Chairman Pauba opened the Public Hearing. Ken' Morrison, 5715 Sycamore Lane. Mr. Morrison inquired if this proposal was a proper use of the area regardless of the existing guiding. He indicated that he did not believe that townhomes were compatible with the existing area. Mr. Morrison inquired what the current occupancy rate was in the similar Woodbury Project that CSM Corporation had developed. Mr. Gair indicated that the Valley Creek project in Woodbury, which is still being constructed, is 75% rented at this time. Mr. Morrison asked for a show of hands from the audience of those who would rent one of these townhouses. (No one raised their hands). Mr. Morrison inquired about the plans to upgrade County Road 10 and County Road 47, and who would bear the costs. Engineer Harrison advised that he was unsure the time table regarding upgrading County Road 10. Engineer Harrison advised that the cost for curb and gutter would be assessed. Mr. Morrison also indicated concern with the extreme amount of traffic, and the playground located across the major street from much of the project. He inquired if the school district was aware of the added housing, and if this would crowd the schools. Commissioner Plufka advised that the school districts look at the City Zoning to project enrollment. He added that Osseo School District should be aware of the proposal. Mr. Morrison inquired about the added water problem. Engineer Harrison advised that he was not aware of any water problems. Page 148 Planning Commission Minutes June 22, 1988 Mr. Morrison also indicated concern for the preservation and maintenance of the trees and wild life in the area. Ms. Joyce Tolve, 5640 Sycamore Lane, expressed her concern for rental units in the project. She stated that he had been in charge of rental property in Eagan. She stated that renters do not take care of the property they rent. Ms. Tolve indicated that she was a Realtor, and there was a great need for ownership Townhouses in the $100,000 - $150,000 price range. She indicated that these units were better as owner occupied than as rental as proposed. Ms. Tolve added that there already is a problem with water pressure in this area. She stated there are days that the water just drips from the faucet. Ms. Tolve stated that County Road 47 should be developed before anything else. She indicated that traffic on Pineview Lane is backed up. She added that something needs to be done also about the people who use the Prudential ballfields, as they are parked all over the streets in the area. Ms. Tolve inquired as to why the townhouses were to be rental units. Commissioner Plufka advised Ms. Tolve that the City has no control over whether the units are rented or sold. Mr. Mike Derring, 13035 56th Avenue North, indicated concern about the elevations of the roadway. He also expressed concern over the noise and sound abatement. He stated that he felt the existing buffering was good protection from I -494. Mr. Derring inquired about County Road 61. Commissioner Marofsky advised Mr. Derring that there are no plans to touch the area east of County Road 61. Mr. Derring inquired when they would be able to discuss County Road 61. Engineer Harrison advised that there would be a Public Hearing for the platting process and assessments for curb and gutter. la0- Page 149 Planning Commission Minutes June 22, 1988 Commissioner Plufka advised that County Road 61 is intended to connect with I -494 to I -694 and adjoining Plymouth property owners would be assessed for the curb and gutter. Mr. Wayne Gunderson, 5620 Sycamore Lane, stated that nothing had been mentioned about the cost of the single family houses. Coordinator Dillerud stated that the City does not get involved with the price of the homes. Mr. Gunderson stated that he did not feel that "empty nesters" would be renting these homes, but believed there will be more families with young children. He was also concerned for the safety of the children as there already exists traffic problems. Kris Wenker, 5655 Sycamore Lane, indicated concern over the construction of County Road 61. She inquired if residents would use the Bass Lake area as a short cut until County Road 61 was completed. Ms. Wenker inquired if there was an escrow for her development. Engineer Harrison advised Ms. Wenker that she would need to check with the Finance Department for this information. Ms. Wenker stated that she felt there already exists a wonderful berm that deflects noise and she would like to see this berm kept. There continued to be discussion regarding County Road 61. Commissioner Marofsky stated that the Engineering Department should be contacted regarding these plans. Norman Gartner, 12910 56th Avenue North indicated that the developers had given an, excellent presentation. Mr. Gartner indicated that he has looked at the Comprehensive Guide Plan and does not feel the project is as dense as it could be. Mr. Gartner questioned the methods of transition. Coordinator Dillerud explained transition to Mr. Gartner. Mr. Gartner inquired about the buffer. He also indicated that the open space area could not be considered park land. Page 150 Planning Commission Minutes June 22, 1988 Mr. Gartner was concerned with the County Road 61 and the assessments He was also concerned about added area. Mr. Gartner questioned the spot units per acre. He felt that spread out through the project. development of for this road. traffic to the density of 9.9 this should be Ron Labat, 5580 Quinwood Lane, was concerned that 56th Avenue would become a major thoroughfare. Mr. Labat also indicated he would like to see the developer maintain the roads during the construction phase. He expressed a need to get the promises in writing. Nancy Stevens, 5725 Rosewood Lane, expressed concern for the preservation of the trees. She inquired about the transition from single family houses to townhouses. Ms. Stevens inquired if the proposed bike path would indeed be constructed. Ms. Stevens was also concerned about the water pressure issue and stated that this needed to be addressed. Ms. Stevens was also concerned about the additional traffic in the area. She would like to see traffic routed to County Road 47 not County Road 61. She added that the average family makes 8 trips a day by vehicle, making traffic in the area very heavy. Douglas Thayer, 12955 56th Avenue North, feels the density in this area is a mistake. He stated that the area would be much like Brooklyn Park. Mr. Thayer stated that these townhouses are not "upper scale ". He indicated that he could go along with the proposal if the rent was more like $1,000. Mr. Thayer indicated that this proposal was a "crock" and that the density needed to be lowered. Chairman Pauba advised Mr. Thayer that it was not that easy, and the developer had a right to develop the property. He added that the corridor along the freeway has a high density to provide for a mix. Beth Molberg, 5565 Rosewood Lane, expressed concern for County Road 61, stating that it is routed through a wild life area. She stated that Page 151 Planning Commission Minutes June 22, 1988 the County Road 61 should not be curved so sharply and wanted to know who could make this change. Chairman Pauba advised the alignment of the street would be taken into consideration. Discussion ensued between the Commissioners and Coordinator Dillerud regarding the Land Use Guide Plan relating to classifications and density. Scott Ottenberg, 5625 Quinwood Lane, indicated that he did not appreciate Chairman Pauba's comment about the residents not wanting anyone around them. He stated that he did no want to be packed in like sardines and wanted to see compatible houses built. He stated that they were not getting satisfactory answers regarding traffic signals, water pressure etc ... He added that he had done a quick calculation and 310 vehicles x 8 trips a day would be 3720 vehicles on the roads. Steve McNattin, 12625 58th Avenue North, stated there should be a review of the density in this area. He wanted to know timing with regard to completion County Road 61 and County Road 10. He too was concerned about the water pressure and questioned why no wells would be going. Chairman Pauba closed the Public Hearing. MOTION by Commissioner Stulberg, seconded by Commissioner Tierney to approve the Residential Planned Unit Development Concept Plan subject to the 8 conditions listed in the June 16, 1988 Staff Report. Commissioner Stulberg stated that at this time the Commission needed only to determine if the Concept Plan supports the PUD Ordinance. Commissioner Plufka stated that the high density in the northeast corner was a major concern. He suggested the density be spread out and perhaps have no single family houses in the development. He stated that it was up to the developer to provide for an adequate transition. Commissioner Stulberg stated this proposal combines 6 pieces of land (the 7th piece is owned by the City) in an area guided LA -2 and LA -3, rather than each proposal coming in as separate MOTION TO APPROVE s Page 152 Planning Commission Minutes June 22, 1988 pieces. He added that the single family houses to the south is a better transition with the existing houses. Commissioner Marofsky recommended that the developer contact the owner of the property to the south to see if they have a contemplated use that may be consistent with the single family housing. Commissioner Marofsky added his concern for the lack of efficient open area. He indicated that the park is across County Road 61 and there is no method provided for assistance in crossing County Road 61. The open area has problems as a Concept Plan. Commissioners Zylla inquired if readings and signals were provided to the developer so he does not come back in the next stage with the same plan. Commissioner Zylla also was concerned for the preservation of the natural areas and the lack of open space. He suggested that perhaps providing for more open space would bring the density down. Commissioner Plufka added that the housing units could be clustered together, eliminating the single family houses and thus would allow for more open areas. Commissioner Zylla stated that he understood that with regard to the Concept Plan it is less than what is eligible, however, inquired if the bonus point is something that has to be granted. He inquired as to the density without the points. Commissioner Zylla also questioned what is meant by "eligible for ". Is this negotiable, or is it an absolute. Commissioner Plufka advised that the Ordinance provides the project scale. The variety of housing is subject to one bonus point. He added that the criteria for granting bonus points are in the Ordinance. More discussion ensued regarding bonus points. Commissioner Tierney pointed out that this development could have 63 more units than what is proposed tonight and that the single family houses could be eliminated altogether. Page 153 Planning Commission Minutes June 22, 1988 Commissioner Marofsky advised that a condition should be added to provide for more open space for the townhouses. MOTION by Commissioner Marofsky, seconded by Commissioner Wire to amend to add a 9th condition to provide for the open space areas within the town homes to be increased in size and be suitable as active use open space. Roll Call Vote. 3 ayes. Commissioners Stulberg, Tierney, Plufka and Chairman Pauba nay. Motion by Commissioner Zylla, seconded by Commissioner Plufka to add a number 9 for the petitioner to, with the Preliminary Plat /Plan, provide attention to the preservation of natural amenities on site to the greatest extent, particularly in the areas of greatest densities. Roll Call Vote. 7 ayes. Commissioner Wire expressed his concern for the added traffic on 56th Avenue. He stated that he does not know how to resolve the problem, but feels that there is a need to think about redesign. MOTION by Commissioner Wire to add Condition #10 for the petitioner to address the added traffi.c. Due to lack of a second, the motion died. Commissioner Stulberg indicated his reason to not second the motion was that it is part of the City Ordinance to provide the petitioner with direction. He did not want the concerns listed as part of the recommendation. Commissioner Marofsky requested that copies of this discussion be included when this proposal comes back as preliminary plan /plat. Coordinator Dillerud advised that this is normally the practice. Roll Call Vote on Main Motion as once Amended. 6 Ayes. Commissioner Marofsky nay. Chairman Pauba called for a recess at 12:26. The meeting resumed at 12:35. s ac. MOTION TO AMEND VOTE - MOTION FAILS MOTION TO AMEND VOTE - MOTION CARRIED MOTION TO AMEND MOTION TO AMEND DIES FOR LACK OF A SECOND VOTE - MOTION CARRIED TO APPROVE MAIN MOTION AS ONCE AMENDED Page 154 Planning Commission Minutes June 22, 1988 Chairman Pauba introduced the request by Amoco Oil Station for the proposed canopy. The reading of the June 14, 1988 Staff Report was waived. Chairman Pauba introduced the petitioner's representative Mark Winson, 3025 Harbor. Lane. Commissioner Plufka inquired what happens to the right -of -way. Coordinator Dillerud advised that it is given back to the property owners, and this is a long process through the State. Chairman Pauba opened the Public Hearing. There was no one present to speak on this item and the Public Hearing was closed. MOTION by Commissioner Plufka, seconded by Commissioner Wire for approval of the site plan amendment, Conditional Use Permit Amendment and Variances, subject to the 2 conditions listed in the June 14, 1988 Staff Report. NEW BUSINESS: NONE OLD BUSINESS: Chairman Pauba introduced the request by Patrick Goff, Goff Homes. The reading of the June 15, 1988 Staff Report was waived. Chairman Pauba introduced the petitioner's representative, Bruce Hilger, 2106 No. St. Paul. Mr. Hilger indicated they with they would have known the cul -de -sac could have been 640 ft. rather than the 500 ft.. Chairman Pauba opened the Public Hearing. Randy Nord, 4420 Harbor Lane, reiterated the conditions that were set prior and that they had reached an agreement with Goff Homes. Mr. Hilger stated that they were still in agreement. Commissioner Marofsky inquired about the easement from the end of the cul -de -sac to the park. Mr. Hilger indicated that no direction has been indicated as of yet. 1 -o2 a_ AMOCO OIL COMPANY, SITE PLAN & CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT WITH VARIANCE FOR PROPOSED CANOPY (88074) MOTION TO APPROVE PATRICK GOFF, GOFF HOMES. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT & SITE PLAN (88019) -f aO%- Page 155 Planning Commission Minutes June 22, 1988 Commissioner Tierney inquired if the units were within the limits of the staged development. Mr. Hilger indicated they were at the limit. MOTION by Commissioner Wire, seconded by MOTION TO APPROVE Commissioner Stulberg to approve the Site Plan & Conditional Use Permit subject to the 9 conditions listed in the June 15, 1988 Staff Report. MOTION by Commissioner Marofsky, seconded by MOTION TO AMEND MAIN Commissioner Tierney to amend the Main Motion with MOTION Condition #10 requiring the developer to comply with the agreement made with the Kingsview Homeowners Association and the easement from the cul -de -sac to the park. Roll Call Vote on Motion to Amend. 7 Ayes. Motion VOTE - MOTION CARRIED Carried. Roll Call Vote on Main Motion as once Amended. 7 VOTE ON MAIN MOTION AS Ayes. MOTION carried. ONCE AMEND - MOTION CARRIED Chairman Pauba introduced the request by Wally WALLY ANDERSON, ARADCO, Anderson, ARADCO for "Emerald Green ". The reading PLANNED UNIT DEV. CONCEPT of the June 17, 1988 Staff Report was waived. PLAN & COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS (88015) Chairman Pauba introduced the petitioner's representative, Mr. Greg Frank. Mr. Frank advised that the Northwestern Bell property was not being included. Mr. Frank discussed the drainage, sanitary sewer and storm sewer pipe. MOTION by Commissioner Plufka, seconded by MOTION TO APPROVE Chairman Pauba for approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendments subject to the 3 conditions listed in the June 17, 1988 Staff Report and approval of RPUD Concept Plan subject to the 9 conditions listed in the June 17, 1988 Staff Report. Roll Call Vote. 7 Ayes. Motion Carried. VOTE - MOTION CARRIED Commissioner Wire inquired about Berkshire Lane, stating the sharper corners will not stop the flow of traffic. s -aa Page 156 Planning Commission Minutes June 22, 1988 Coordinator Dillerud advised they were trying to honor the minor collector status on the Thoroughfare Guide Plan with the staff recommendation to make the connection more direct. The meeting adjourned at 1:12 A.M. -1 -3� 4 «. ,- .•..•- �.r_.�..�w.w,fX��a...wv tKi�2: ?:` isi! �n :!; °.Z�:2:4!�?�::!`s�.fi:+iiw`` �- �..__.... C� �....•:. �. i:'"'. Sbl Nr..: ?4; i�° J?: K; u. ? !?•+.'i�L'ZCiEb'igCSSw..iS.':. 2200 Berkshire Lane ? Plymouth, Mmnesota 5544' J yD GE) CONTROL DATA CORORLATION 23 JUNE. 1988 City of F1 vmouth =400 Plvmouth Boulevard Plymouth, Minnesota 55441 Attn: Chief Carlquist Dear Chief Carlquist: I would like to extend our sincere appreciation for the presentation on Personal Safety oiven by Investigator Nesbitt and your Youth Service Officer, Ni a Wronsk:i . I'm sure that from their presentation, the employees who attended this session learned many valuable lessons, including the most important one, being responsible for themselves. Investioator Nesbitt and Officer- Wronsk:i make a wonderful. team. Their personalities compliment one another enough so the seriousness of the topic was not lost. but some of the tension was relieved. Some of the employees I spoke with after the session feel more confident already, a far cry from yesterdays hysteria. The cooperation shown through and from vour department is appreciated wholeheartedly by Control Data and the Plymouth employees. Please extend our appreciation to Investio_ator Nesbitt and Officer Wronski. Sincerely, j9ft Etta E. Strombero_ Manager Administrative & Security Services Control Data Corporation cc: T. Ruesch - Manager, Facilities Administration J. Cook:: - Manager, Human Resources jaj� a eui+ CWT. 7 -Je June 22, 1988 fib � CITY OF PLYMOUTR Rhonda Farran 13025 - 34th Avenue North Plymouth, MN 55441 SUBJECT: YOUR TOWN MEETING RESIDENT FEEDBACK FORM Dear Rhonda: Thank you for your resident feedback form from the dune 13 Town Meeting. I am sorry if you felt Councilmember Sisk and I were rude with Mr. McCullough. The Town Meeting is intended to be an informal forum where residents and Councilmembers alike can exchange information and get to know one another. If we appeared rude, we were obviously not accomplishing our objectives. Your feedback form asks "why was Xenium Lane not extended ?" There are two issues. First is the fact that an agreement was entered into by Mr. McCullough on behalf of the residents of this area. The agreement sets forth timing for extension of Xenium Lane based upon traffic volumes. Upon receipt of Mr. McCullough's petition, we undertook a traffic study. The study showed that the traffic volumes had not increased to the thresholds provided for in the agreement. If they had, the City would have initiated efforts to extend Xenium Lane. The agreement aside, extension of Xenium Lane would otherwise take place as development occurs on the parcels immediately adjacent to the proposed right -of -way. At that time, we would expect that Xenium Lane right -of -way would be dedicated as part of the platting of these parcels. I, and members of the Council, hope that Xenium Lane can be constructed as soon as possible, consistent with the need for this roadway, and as soon as sufficient funding is available as a result of development in the area. Sincerely, I W-- 4ZI-1-C V' gil Schneider Mayor VS:kec 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447, TELEPHONE (612) 559 -2800 1 -3a/ CITY OF June 22, 1988 PLYMOUTH+ Mr. James Edwards Coldwell Bank 4205 Lancaster Lane Plymouth, MN 55441 SUBJECT: 1988 FLAG DAY CELEBRATION Dear Jim: Thank you for distributing flags throughout the City. This symbol of old fashioned patriotism is refreshing in this day and age. Your efforts were well organized as I received no complaints whatsoever about distribution of the flags. Thanks again for your efforts and I hope that you will continue this program in future years. Sincerely, Vi gil Schneider Mayor VS :kec 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447, TELEPHONE (612) 559 -2800 t M JJ Y 'Mi;F Y ',M N e^�;,a;1;i;M, t� Lt t<<r' 2 + H; t$ S"! �'! f'.' y�` J! i�' a? 2tvSl Y�'.. �.' L�i�i9:" i. �2+"'....! i^ C'`:'`, IS! �i t)L' ".4i.'ii{.'S':`R`..�1'.e'c. �SSL'✓x. ..?:�.. ,7 �..'(,� . ���vr �;{S9y.°�#'�'1:`.�w .!53�.'�.d1.�.r... �..r`�..� < �w :: i.. -�"� . . '+ �2/ sai. i�' t•. .".i".e".a.`ua`�i,Y�iS+:xS#'�.. '- �y'�`L`�- ti"„�.a:'- 1 -31 r CITY OF June 29, 1988 PLYMOUTR Gloria Nordquist 1304 West Medicine Lake Drive Plymouth, MN 55441 SUBJECT: YOUR JUNE 21, 1988 LETTER Dear Ms. Nordquist: Thank you for your June 21 letter. In that letter you request that the Dundee Nursery property be retained as a retail zone. The nursery property has for many years been zoned future restricted development. The Dundee Nursery retail operation is at least, in part, a grandfathered non - conforming use. We are awaiting a petition from Dundee advising of his construction desires. At that time we will review the petition in light of the City ordinance requirements. I agree that Plymouth needs a county library. I and members of the City Council are working closely with the Hennepin County Library Board to make this a reality. The primary rub point appears to be the building's location. I hope that in less than five years a community library will be a reality in Plymouth. We are glad that you are able to use our Plymouth Metrolink bus system. We are proud of the system's accomplishments and hope to expand upon it as ridership justifies such action. We hope you will continue your patronage. Thank you for you kind letter. Sincerely, , Vilrgil Schneider Mayor VS:kec 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447, TELEPHONE (612) 559 -2800 CITY OF June 30, 1988 PLYMOUTR Tim & Cindy Harrer 10710 - 15th Avenue North Plymouth, MN 55441 SUBJECT: THE FIVE CONCERNS OF YOUR MAY 30, 1988 LETTER Dear Mr. & Mrs. Harrer: In your May 30, 1988 letter you point out five concerns. Attached for your Information is a copy of a Community Service Officer report on their findings. They confirm expired registrations on the trailer and boat, pallets, branches and lumber, lack of garbage cans and various miscellaneous materials. The property owner has been given until July 1 to conform with city ordinance provisions. If they do not, we will proceed to enforce the code through the courts. Your final question regarding 15th Avenue North is addressed in the attached memorandum from Fred Moore. Thank you for bringing these matters to our attention. Sincerely, i gil Schneider Mayor VS:kec attachment 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447, TELEPHONE (612) 559 -2800 PLYMOUTH POLICE DEPARTMENT MESS KEY CONTROL NUMBER OCA CONT. AGENCY NCIC IDENT (CAG) I DATE!TIME REPORT MADE �, C_! _ I / 1$ 1 8 1 0 1 0 1 1 16 ) Sp 1` i I M N 0 1� I ? ��� i 6/18/88 2016 L NBR DATE REPORTED RPp TIME RPO TRIP LOCATION GRID NBR (LGN) PLACE COMMITTED (P, 0/ 0 1 b 1 17 8 18 / 1 1 4 0 / 2 5 1 / i 10715 15th Av O L NBR HRD SQUAD OR BADGE s (SON) TIME ASIG. (TAS) TIME ARR. (TAR) TIME CLR. (TCL) F/ FM / 6 2 1 1 4 0 / 1 1 1 4 1 I I / T J - CLRD /Arrest Juv. ❑ HOME ADDRESS O 1 I LNBR ISN UOC UCS ®, 0 -1-1 , ,a LNBR ISN UOC UCS ago/ /o OFFICER ASSIGNED Phillips ASSISTED By SUPR. APPROVED DETECTIVE ASSIGNED HRD Codes P - Phone R - Radio A Alarm 1 In Person V - Visual M - Mail T - Other DFFENSE❑ OR INITIAL COMPLAINT❑ DATE 6 TIME OCCURRED A - CLRD /Arrest Adult ❑ Public Nuisance Ongoing ENTERED CJ RS By. VICTIM (IF FIRM, NAME OF FIRM 6 NAME OF PROP.) BUSINESS ADDRESS BUSINESS PHONE - GOA / UTL ❑ C - Exc. / CLRD. ❑ J - CLRD /Arrest Juv. ❑ HOME ADDRESS O HOME PHONE IF VICTIM IS D.O.B. OCCUPATION IF SCHOOL GRAUE PARENT'S NAMES A PERSON JUVENILE PERSON REPORTING OFFENSE TO POLICE BUSINESS ADDRESS BUSINESS PHONE © HOME ADDRESS HOME PHONE 10710 15th Ave 545 -9334 I- INUITIGS, UISPOSITION OR11)SS RoOPERTY 0.4,— :/_�2��11 10715 15th Ave No DESCRIPTION OF NUISANCE: 1. Red /White runabout boat and trailer lic. #P29196. Boat registration # MN4149BA. Both trailer and boat have ex- pired registrations. 2. 20' x 20' pile of pallets, branches, misc. lumber that is there. 3. Garbage is being placed in the front yard area in plastic bags. No garbage cans are available for disposal. 4. Misc. bike frames, snowmobile parts, and misc. litter, trash, etc. I became aware of the above nuiscance conditions from a letter which the jMMMM had mailed to me or Mrs. was not at home at the time of my inspections, and I will be mailing her a nuisance report which will it July a ve 1,,1988 t bate isaace con ions. According to the letter attached, e conditions have been going on for at least one year. Nothing further. Phillips /jh C'C' Pr-.4 �Lo. 1P GG . UCS DISPOSITION P Pending ❑ U - Unfounded ❑ A - CLRD /Arrest Adult ❑ A - Assist /Advised ❑ ENTERED CJ RS By. G - GOA / UTL ❑ C - Exc. / CLRD. ❑ J - CLRD /Arrest Juv. ❑ R - Ref. Oth. Agency ❑ O - Other ❑ PERSONS ARRESTED - SUSPECTS - WITNESSES R ADDITIONAL DETAILED REPORT ON CONTINUATION SHEET MEMO CITY OF PLYMOUTH 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447 DATE: June 24, 1988 TO Frank Boyles, Assistant City Manager FROM Fred G. Moore, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: MAY 30 LETTER TIM AND CINDY HARRER This is in response to Question No. 5 in the May 30, 1988, letter to Mayor Virgil Schneider from Tim and Cindy Harrer, 10710 15th Avenue. This portion of 15th Avenue has never been improved to City street standards, as was stated within the letter, it is only a gravel roadway. The present City policy is to do only the minimum work necessary on gravel roads in order that they are passable by vehicular traffic. This is done through grading and the placement of rock as necessary. To my knowledge the City of Plymouth has never received a petition from the adjoining property owners requesting the improvement of this street. If the Harrers wish to have this street improved,. I would suggest that they circulate a petition t_� n_rh�x_nei$hhers and then submit it to the �hQ��. �4nade- -aware that - tbe- full- -cost _ of improvi g t is _TheY- _ - -- street will be paid for by the adjoining property owners. FGM:kh