Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Resolution 1989-743CITY OF PLYMOUTH Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, was held on the 20th day of November 1989. The following members were present: Sisk, Zitur, Schneider, Ricker, Vasiliou The following members were absent: None Councilor -tuber Zitur introduced the followl,y Resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 89-743 IMPOSING PENALTY FOR LIQUOR LAW VIOLATION AGAINST PLYMOUTH LIQUOR INC. WHEREAS, the Plymouth City Code provides that any liquor license issued by the City may be denied, suspended, or revoked by the Council for any violation pertaining to the activity of the license held, and WHEREAS, Plymouth City Code Section 1005.23 provides that no license may be suspended or revoked until after a hearing is held; and WHEREAS, a liquor law violation relating to the sale of liquor to minors occurred at Plymouth Liquor Inc., on August 18, 1989, and WHEREAS, this liquor law violation is the first offense at this location, and WHEREAS, a hearing was held on November 20, 1989, to determine whether the license should be suspended or revoked. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA, that a $1,000 penalty is hereby imposed against Plymouth Liquor Inc. The penalty is stayed on the following conditions: 1. That the licensee have no liquor law violations during the next 12 months, and 2. That a check in the amount of $500 payable to the City of Plymouth be received by the City Clerk within 30 days of the passage of this resolution and deposited in City of Plymouth Account 205-000-503.00-093-000 to be used for drug education purposes, and 3. That Plymouth Liquor, Inc., immediately initiate a written, aggressive identifiction carding program shared with its clerks including disciplinary action for clerk failure to card customers. The written program is to be submitted to the City Clerk within 30 a(=ys of passage of this resolution for City Council review. The motion for adoption of the foregoing Resolut#on was duly seconded by Councilmember Sisk , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Sisk, Zitur, Schneider, Ricker, Va:�Iliou The following voted against or abstained: None Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.