Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Resolution 1989-468CITY OF PLYMOUTH Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, was held on the Zest day of August 1989 The following members were present: Mayor Schneider. Councilmembers Vasiliou, Ricker, Zitur and Sisk The following members were absent: None Councilmember Vasiliou introduced the following Resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION 89-468 APPROVING AMENDED MIXED USE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT PLAN FOR OPUS CORPORATION (89061) WHEREAS, OPUS Corporation has requested approval of an amended Mixed Use Planned Unit Development Concept Plan for the development of approximately 210 acres located at the northwest corner of County Road 18 (Highway 169) and County Road 10; and, WHEREAS, the City Council, by Resolution 81-339, approved an RPUD Concept Plan for this site for Tennant Corporation; and, WHEREAS, the City Council, by Resolution 89-105, approved an amended MPUD Concept Plan for this site for OPUS Corporat�in: and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the request at a duly called Public Informational Hearing and has recommended approval; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the amended Mixed Use Planned Unit Development Concept Plan for OPUS Corporation for a development to be known as Bass Creek Business Park consisting of approximately 210 acres located at the northwest corner of County Road 18 (Highway 169) and County Road 10, subject to the following conditions: 1. Compliance with the City Engineer's memorandum dated August 3, 1989. 2. Staging of the development shall be in accordance with utility availability as approved by the City Engineer. 3. The Preliminary Plat/Plan application shall address the Flood Plain and Shoreland Management Ordinance standards. 4. "Touchdown Points" for public street access to Bass Lake Road shall be limited to Nathan Lane and Trenton Lane. 5. The rezoning of this parcel shall reflect the relationship between CL and IP land use as depicted by this pian amendment. 6. All public street right-of-way shall be dedicate? (see next page) Resolution No. 89-468 Page Two File 89061 7. The portion of the site designated "...identified for Hennepin County Park R^serve District..." is n2i an element of the City Park and Trail System Plan, and therefore may not be eligible as credit for park dedication requirements. Future platting of this portion of the site may reflect Park Reserve District acquisition of that portion of the site. 8. All trails constructed within the development shall be constructed to City of Plymouth trail specifications but will be private, with ownership and perpetual maintenance the responsibility of the Property Owner Association. No park dedication credit will be available for this trail construction, per City policy. The developer may petition the City to have the proposed trails included in the City Comprehensive Trail Plan. 9. The storm water drainage area l,cated in the northeast corner of the site shall be owned privately, subject to drainage and utility easements. Lot lines shall be extended through the area or appropriate common ownership documents shall be drawn which place the fee ownership and responsiblity with an owner's association. The developer has the opportunity to submit plans and to suggest other alternatives to the City. 10. This approval is explicitly conditioned upon the compliance with applicable requirements of the State Environmental Review Program as follows: a. This approval does not preclude the imposition of changes in the project or of mitigation measures that would reduce or avoid environmental impacts that are disclosed in the Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW), comments received on the EAW, the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), and comments received on the EIS. b. This approval is conditioned upon the completion of the required Environmental Review process in accordance with State Environmental Quality Board rules rather than on a decision that the Environmental Impact Statement is adequate. c. This approval does not preclude an ultimate decision by City or by any other governmental unit to deny approval of the project pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 116D.04, Subdivision 6 in the event that an Environmental Impact Statement should reveal that the project would be likely to cause pollution, impairment, or distruction of the environment and that there is a "feasible and prudent" alternative to the project. (see next page) Resoltion No. 89-468 Page Three File 89061 11. Site plans or approvals for the parcels that appear to back up to County Road 10 shall be high amenity and heavily landscaped and shall not have dumpsters, loading docks, or the like on the rear side. The motion for adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by_ Councilmember ziti,r , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Mayor Schneider, ennnrilmembera Vasiliou, Ricker, Zitur and Sisk The following voted against or abstained Nene Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.