HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Resolution 1989-468CITY OF PLYMOUTH
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the
City Council of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, was held on the Zest day
of August 1989 The following members were present:
Mayor Schneider. Councilmembers Vasiliou, Ricker, Zitur and Sisk
The following members were absent: None
Councilmember Vasiliou introduced the following Resolution and
moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION 89-468
APPROVING AMENDED MIXED USE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT PLAN FOR OPUS
CORPORATION (89061)
WHEREAS, OPUS Corporation has requested approval of an amended Mixed Use
Planned Unit Development Concept Plan for the development of approximately 210
acres located at the northwest corner of County Road 18 (Highway 169) and
County Road 10; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council, by Resolution 81-339, approved an RPUD Concept Plan
for this site for Tennant Corporation; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council, by Resolution 89-105, approved an amended MPUD
Concept Plan for this site for OPUS Corporat�in: and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the request at a duly called
Public Informational Hearing and has recommended approval;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the amended Mixed
Use Planned Unit Development Concept Plan for OPUS Corporation for a
development to be known as Bass Creek Business Park consisting of
approximately 210 acres located at the northwest corner of County Road 18
(Highway 169) and County Road 10, subject to the following conditions:
1. Compliance with the City Engineer's memorandum dated August 3, 1989.
2. Staging of the development shall be in accordance with utility
availability as approved by the City Engineer.
3. The Preliminary Plat/Plan application shall address the Flood Plain and
Shoreland Management Ordinance standards.
4. "Touchdown Points" for public street access to Bass Lake Road shall be
limited to Nathan Lane and Trenton Lane.
5. The rezoning of this parcel shall reflect the relationship between CL and
IP land use as depicted by this pian amendment.
6. All public street right-of-way shall be dedicate?
(see next page)
Resolution No. 89-468
Page Two
File 89061
7. The portion of the site designated "...identified for Hennepin County Park
R^serve District..." is n2i an element of the City Park and Trail System
Plan, and therefore may not be eligible as credit for park dedication
requirements. Future platting of this portion of the site may reflect
Park Reserve District acquisition of that portion of the site.
8. All trails constructed within the development shall be constructed to City
of Plymouth trail specifications but will be private, with ownership and
perpetual maintenance the responsibility of the Property Owner
Association. No park dedication credit will be available for this trail
construction, per City policy. The developer may petition the City to
have the proposed trails included in the City Comprehensive Trail Plan.
9. The storm water drainage area l,cated in the northeast corner of the site
shall be owned privately, subject to drainage and utility easements. Lot
lines shall be extended through the area or appropriate common ownership
documents shall be drawn which place the fee ownership and responsiblity
with an owner's association. The developer has the opportunity to submit
plans and to suggest other alternatives to the City.
10. This approval is explicitly conditioned upon the compliance with
applicable requirements of the State Environmental Review Program as
follows:
a. This approval does not preclude the imposition of changes in the
project or of mitigation measures that would reduce or avoid
environmental impacts that are disclosed in the Environmental
Assessment Worksheet (EAW), comments received on the EAW, the
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), and comments received on the
EIS.
b. This approval is conditioned upon the completion of the required
Environmental Review process in accordance with State Environmental
Quality Board rules rather than on a decision that the Environmental
Impact Statement is adequate.
c. This approval does not preclude an ultimate decision by City or by any
other governmental unit to deny approval of the project pursuant to
Minnesota Statutes Section 116D.04, Subdivision 6 in the event that an
Environmental Impact Statement should reveal that the project would be
likely to cause pollution, impairment, or distruction of the
environment and that there is a "feasible and prudent" alternative to
the project.
(see next page)
Resoltion No. 89-468
Page Three
File 89061
11. Site plans or approvals for the parcels that appear to back up to County
Road 10 shall be high amenity and heavily landscaped and shall not have
dumpsters, loading docks, or the like on the rear side.
The motion for adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded
by_ Councilmember ziti,r , and upon vote being taken thereon,
the following voted in favor thereof: Mayor Schneider, ennnrilmembera
Vasiliou, Ricker, Zitur and Sisk
The following voted against or abstained Nene
Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.