HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Resolution 1989-355CITY OF PLYMOUTH
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City
Council of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, was held on theifthday of yj,jy ,
198_ The following members were present: Mayor Schneider. Councilmembers
Vaciliou Ricker Zitur and Sisk
The following members were absent: xonP
rouncilmemher Ricker introduced the following Resolution and
moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO. 88-355
RESOLUTION APPROVING ABATEMENT OF VIOLATION TO CITY CODE SECTION 2010 AT 15430
GLEASON LAKE DRIVE.
WHEREAS, City Ordinance Section 2010, Nuisances, states that permitting,
suffering or maintaining any fence wall plantings, landscape materials or any
other item over three feet in height above the street curb level within 20
feet of any street right-of-way corner so as to interfere or obstruct traffic
visibility constitutes an intersection sight obstruction and;
WHEREAS, the property at 15430 Gleason Lake Drive owned by Mr. Don Hauge has
evergreen trees that border the property and are in violation of the City Code
Section 2010; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Hauge has been notified by certified mail that his evergreen
trees along Gleason Lake Road cause an intersection sight obstruction and is
in violation of the City Code; and,
WHEREAS, the City gave Mr. Hauge 30 days to correct the violation; and,
WHEREAS, after 30 days a reinspection of the property was conducted and found
that the violation had not been corrected; and,
NOW THEREFORE BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED, THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA, directs the abatement of the nuisance by the owner in two
weeks by trimming the trees to the proper height from the ground to allow
clear visibility to the east on Gleason Lake Drive. If the abatement is not
completed within two weeks the Cit Forester is authorized to abate the
violation at a cost of approximately 100 for labor to remove the violation at
15430 Gleason Lake Drive and that Mr. Hauge, the property owner, will be
personally liable for cost and administrative fees to remove the violation,
per City Code Section 2010.
The motion for adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by
Mayor Schneider , and upon vote being taken thereon, the
following voted in favor thereof: Mayor Schneider. Cnttnrj1mt-mhPrn Zi it
The following voted against or abstain
Whereupon the Resolution was declared
duly passed and adopted.