HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Packet 08-23-2005CITY OF PLYMOUTH
AGENDA
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING
AUGUST 23,2005,7:00 PM
Black Box Theater, Plymouth Creek Center)
1. CALL TO ORDER AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
2. ROLL CALL
3. PLYMOUTH FORUM Individuals may address the Council about any item not contained
on the regular agenda. A maximum of 15 minutes is allotted for the Forum. If the full 15
minutes are not needed for the Forum, the City Council will continue with the agenda. The
City Council will take no official action on items discussed at the Forum, with the exception of
referral to staff or Commission for future report.
4. PRESENTATIONS AND PUBLIC INFORMATION ANNOUNCEMENTS
4.01 Recognition of Firefighter Retirees (Fire Chief Rick Kline)
4.02 Oaths of Office to Firefighters (City Clerk Sandy Paulson)
5. APPROVE AGENDA—Councilmembers may add items to the agenda including items
contained in the Council Information Memorandum for discussion purposes or staff direction
only. The Council will not normally take official action on items added to the agenda.
6. CONSENT AGENDA—These items are considered to be routine and will be enacted by one
motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Councilmember or citizen
so requests, in which event the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed
elsewhere on the agenda.
6.01 Approve proposed City Council Minutes
6.02 Approve disbursements (Res2005-321)
6.03 Approve Easement Agreement for property located at 34th Avenue and Plymouth
Boulevard. United States Postal Service. (2004147 – Res2005-322)
6.04 (This item was removed from the Consent Agenda and placed under General Business
as item No. 8.2)
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING
August 23, 2005
Page 2
6.05 Approve Site Plan Amendment for Liberty Property Trust for a parking area expansion
for property located at 4600 and 4700 Nathan Lane North. Edward Farr Architects.
2005096 — Res2005-323)
6.06 Approve Change Order No. 4, Central and Zachary Water Treatment Plant Expansion
2032 — Res2005-324)
6.07 Approve payment No. 3 and final for 2005 Temporary Overlay Project (5114 —
Res2005-325)
6.08 Approve dispositions of tax forfeited parcels (Res2005-326, Res2005-327, Res2005-
328, Res2005-329)
6.09 Approval of Change Order No. 3 for the Public Safety Building expansion (Res2005-
330)
6.10 Approve Change Order to 2005/2006 Tree Removal & Hauling Contract (Res2005-
331)
7. PUBLIC HEARINGS
8. GENERAL BUSINESS
8_1 Consider award of bid for construction of Transit Station 73 (3125 — Res2005-332)
Tabled from August 9) additional material
8.2 Approve Rezoning, Site Plan, Conditional Use Permit, and Variances to allow a
12,678 -square foot office/retail building and a 4,200 -square foot auto -service building
for property located at the southwest corner of Old Rockford Road and Peony Lane.
Acacia Real Estate Partners LLC. (2005066 — Ord2005-20, Res205-333, Res2005-
334) (This item was previously item No. 6.04)
9. REPORTS AND STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS
10. ADJOURNMENT (TO A SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING)
Proposed Minutes
Regular Council Meeting
August 9, 2005
Mayor Johnson called a Regular Meeting of the Plymouth City Council to order at 7:00 p.m. in
the Black Box Theater, Plymouth Creek Center, 14800 34th Avenue North, on August 9, 2005.
COUNCIL PRESENT: Mayor Johnson, Councilmembers Hewitt, Slavik, Bildsoe, Willis, and
Black.
ABSENT: Councilmember Stein.
STAFF PRESENT: Fire Chief Kline, Finance Director Hahn, Police Chief Goldstein, City
Attorney Knutson, Park and Recreation Director Blank, Community Development Director
Hurlburt, Public Works Director Cote, Public Services Manager Qvale, and City Clerk Paulson.
Plymouth Forum
Liz Connelly, 2820 Zanzibar Lane, President of Wayzata Athletic Boosters, discussed their
sports booster club and encouraged the Council and residents to attend the school's athletic
games.
Presentations and Public Information Announcements
There were no presentations or public information announcements).
Approval of Agenda
Councilmember Hewitt requested to add an update of the Vicksburg Lane/Shenandoah Lane/
25th
Avenue signalization project as item No. 8.5 under General Business.
Councilmember Bildsoe requested to add a tour request of Interfaith Outreach and Community
Partners as item No. 8.6 under General Business.
Motion was made by Councilmember Bildsoe and seconded by Councilmember Black, to
approve the amended agenda. With all members voting in favor, the motion carried.
Consent Agenda
Motion was made by Councilmember Black and seconded by Councilmember Bildsoe, to adopt
the Consent Agenda that included the followingitems: ems:
6.01) Minutes of the Regular Council Meeting of July 26.
Proposed Council Minutes
Regular Meeting of August 9, 2005
Page 2 of 10
6.02) Resolution Approving Disbursements for the Period Ending July 29, 2005 (Res2005-
292).
6.03) Resolution Approving a Comprehensive Plan Amendment for Quest Development, Inc.
for Property located at 9805 Highway 5 (2005042 — Res2005-293), Ordinance Amending
Chapter 21 of the City Code to Classify Certain Land located at 985 Highway 55 (2005042 —
Ord2005-18), Resolution Approving Findings of Fact for the Rezoning of Property located at
9805 Highway 55 (2005042 — Res2005-294), and a Resolution Approving a Site Plan,
Conditional Use Permits, and Variance for Quest Development, Inc. for 51 Apartment -Style
Units in Two Structures on Property located at 9805 Highway 55 (2005042 — Res2005-295).
6.04) Resolution Approving a Conditional Use Permit Amendment for Quantum Development
for the Property located at 12325 State Highway 55 (20050787 — Res2005-296).
6.05) Resolution Approving a Site Plan Amendment to Construct a Parking Lot at Greenwood
Playfield at the Property located at 18005 Medina Road North (2005087 — Res2005-297).
6.06) Resolution Approving a Conditional Use Permit to allow a Day Care at 100 Nathan Lane
North (2005088 — Res2005-298).
6.07) Resolution Authorizing Execution of Agreement with the Minnesota Department of
Public Safety for Underage Alcohol Compliance Check Funding (Res2005-299).
6.08) Resolution Approving Request for Payment No. 3 and Final for Bass Lake Playfield
Drainageway Project (3131 — Res2005-300) and a Resolution Approving Change Order No. 1 for
Bass Lake Playfield Drainage Way Project (3131 — Res2005-301).
6.09) Resolution Approving Request for Amendment to Cleaning Service Contract for City
Facilities (Res2005-302).
6.10) Resolution Requesting Payment No. 3 and final for 2004 Street Mill and Overlay
Improvements Projects Part 2 (4115 — Res2005-303).
6.11) Resolution Approving Change Order No. 1 for Highway 55/Vicksburg Lane (4134 —
Res2005-304).
6.12 Resolution Awarding Bid for 47th Avenue West of Underwood Lane Street and Utility
Improvements (4141 — Res2005-305).
6.13) Resolution Receiving Petition and Ordering Preparation of Preliminary Report for
Watermain Extension to 10600 and 10610 South Shore Drive (5125 — Res2005-306).
6.14) Resolution amending and Restating Resolution No. 98-390 (Res2005-307).
6.15) Resolution Approving Release of Financial Guarantee for Plymouth Marketplace (20040
Proposed Council Minutes
Regular Meeting of August 9, 2005
Page 3 of 10
Res2005-308).
6.16) Resolution Approving Release of Financial Guarantee for Cascades (2002058 — Res2005-
309)
6.17) Resolution Approving Agreement with the Union Pacific Railroad for a Trail Crossing
Over Railroad Tracks in Plymouth (Res2005-310).
6.18) Resolution Adopting Fees for the Plymouth Creek Center and Millennium Garden for the
Year 2007 (Res2005-311).
6.19) Resolution Amending Resolution No. 2004-517, establishing 2005 Regular Council
Meeting Dates (Res2005-312).
6.20) Resolution Approving Winter Trails Activity Permit (Res2005-313).
Motion carried to approve the Consent Agenda.
Public Hearings
7.1) Vacation for Part of Lahti Lane in Tranquil Vista
Public Works Director Cote reported on the petitioned request of Jon and Angela Marquette, 445
Vinewood Lane, for the Vacation of all of Birch Park and part of Vinewood Lane (platted as
Lahti Lane) adjacent to Lots 1-3.
Mayor Johnson opened the public hearing for testimony.
Jon Marquette, 445 Vinewood Lane, stated he is the petitioner, and he requested that the Council
approve the request.
There being no one else wishing to address the Council, Mayor Johnson declared the public
hearing closed.
Motion was made by Councilmember Slavik, and seconded by Councilmember Bildsoe, to adopt
a Resolution Authorizing the Vacation of Part of Lahti Lane as Platted in Tranquil Vista
Res2005-314) and a Resolution Setting Conditions to be met prior to filing of Resolution No.
2005-314, Vacating Part of Lahti Lane as Platted in Tranquil Vista (Res2005-315). With all
members voting in favor, the motion carried.
General Business
8.1) Reguiding, Rezoning, Preliminary Plat, Site Plan, and Variance for "Taryn Hills"
Lundgren Bros. Construction, Inc. — 2005045)
Proposed Council Minutes
Regular Meeting of August 9, 2005
Page 4 of 10
Community Development Director Hurlburt illustrated the proposed development that lies east
of Vicksburg Lane, west of the Lake Camelot Estates development, and on the north and south
sides of County Road 47. She explained the site consists of 237.6 acres that would be
redeveloped into 219 single-family detached homes and 356 townhomes. In addition, eight acres
of the site would be commercial (for a future commercial development by a different developer),
and 26.2 acres would be dedicated to the Northwest Greenway. She highlighted issues that were
discussed at the Planning Commission, i.e. transition for the commercial area, access for parcels
abutting the plat, planned traffic improvements in the area, and landscaping plan. She stated
concerns were also expressed regarding the proposed density of the site. She stated the proposed
3.38 dwelling units per acre are on the lower end of what the Comprehensive Plan specifies for
this area. The Comprehensive Plan specifies 499 to 969 dwelling units for the residential portion
of the plat. The proposal includes 575 dwelling units, and therefore it would be consistent with
the Comprehensive Plan that was adopted for this area in 200. The lowest density areas for this
plat would be the single-family neighborhood located north of County Road 47, near the Lake
Camelot Estates subdivision. The density would be 1.4 dwelling units per acre in that portion of
the plat. By comparison, the density for the single-family portion of the Lake Camelot Estates
subdivision is approximately 2.3 dwelling units per acre.
She discussed the proposed improvements to be made to County Road 47. She stated the two-
lane section of County Road 47 would be constructed to its planned vertical and horizontal
alignments. The total cost of this improvement would be $945,000 with the applicant paying the
entire cost with the exception of $200,000, which the applicant is requesting the City to pay for.
She stated the County doesn't have any plans for improving this roadway, and they have
discussed switching this road with another road in the City that would better fit their road
system. The City could utilize some of its municipal state aid funds for this improvement as well
as possible tax increment financing proceeds from the CommonBond project and County
tumback" funds.
Councilmember Willis stated that he is concerned about the high-density level for the townhome
area south of County Road 47. He stated he would prefer to see townhomes that have more of
the single-family type structure.
Community Development Director Hurlburt cautioned that if 75 units are removed, they could be
less than the minimum density.
Mark Anderson, representing Lundgren Brothers, stated they desire to keep the lower density on
the north side of County Road 47. He stated they need to maintain the proposed density level,
and he noted that this development is on the low end of the range for density. He then spoke of
the need to reconstruct County Road 47, and due to their costs to accomplish this, the density
levels need to be at a certain level.
Councilmember Willis suggested removing some of the attached townhome units and making
them single-family homes instead.
Councilmember Black stated she isn't concerned about the proposed density, as it is well within
Proposed Council Minutes
Regular Meeting of August 9, 2005
Page 5 of 10
the guiding of the property.
Councilmember Hewitt stated she is concerned that no funds are being allocated for future repair
of Vicksburg Lane and other infrastructure improvements. She stressed that the Council needs to
discuss how they intend to fund roads in the future.
Mayor Johnson agreed with Councilmember Hewitt but stated that the developer is making a
very substantial contribution towards the County Road 47 improvements as well as the
dedication of large amount of right-of-way. She stated it concerns her that the City is being
asked to contribute $200,000 towards a road that isn't even the City's.
Jim Grube, Director of Hennepin County's Transportation Department and the County Engineer,
agreed that this is a very large issue as County Road 47 is a County road, it's a major collector
route, and it's not a State Aid highway. He stated that this road isn't a priority for the County, as
it only consists of four miles, out of 560 miles of roadway in the County. He stated if the
Council feels this is the right development for this area, it should be approved. The City and
County could then discuss options on how to work out the improvements to County Road 47. He
suggested that a meeting be held prior to August 23, which is the date that County Road 101 is
going to be discussed.
Park and Recreation Director Blank illustrated the neighborhood parks that would be on both
sides of County Road 47.
Councilmember Slavik stated she agrees with Councilmember Willis on the density concerns.
She realizes that the levels are within the range, but she still feels it's too dense. She doesn't feel
that this development would provide a good community feel for Plymouth, and she noted the lots
are very small in the single-family area. She would prefer to reduce the number of townhome
units and have three units per acre. She stated she is also concerned about funding $200,000 for
improvements that need to be made to County Road 47.
Mayor Johnson stated she would support the project with the proposed density levels. She stated
the applicant has reduced the units from 700 to 575 from the original plan and they have
included the affordable CommonBond project in the development. She noted the applicant also
had to take into consideration the trees and the wetland on the north side of the property.
Councilmember Willis stated that the City doesn't have the resources to assist the applicant for
the reconstruction of County Road 47. In addition, regarding the density issue, he would support
the applicant reducing the density by 24 units.
Councilmember Bildsoe thanked the applicant for the changes that they made to the project. He
stated the issue isn't about density but the style of housing that is going into the development.
He stated he agrees with Councilmembers Willis and Slavik that this isn't something that he
would choose for Plymouth in this large of a fashion; however, the unique characteristics of the
property are the driving force for the density levels south of County Road 47. He agreed that the
City shouldn't be contributing $200,000 to reconstruct a County road.
Proposed Council Minutes
Regular Meeting of August 9, 2005
Page 6 of 10
Steve Gardner, 10717 10th Avenue North, thanked the City for the trees that would be saved with
this development. He stated he is concerned that the applicant would scrape off the majority of
the black dirt, leave just a little black dirt over the compacted clay, and then lay sod. He noted
that there are a lot of wetlands on this property, and when concrete surrounds them, they won't
be as nice as they used to be. He requested that the park dedication fees from this development
be used to purchase forest areas in Northwest Plymouth, prior to those areas being developed.
Judy Luedke, 17910 County Road 47, stated people move to Plymouth based upon the location
of the City with its close proximity to the Twin Cities, not for the trees. She stated it would be
foolish for the Council to not allow this property to develop. She discussed a Minnesota Growth
Corridor article that was in a recent edition of the Star Tribune, and how the corridors in and near
the Twin Cities are getting congested. She stated this contributes to why the price of land is so
high, and why it costs so much to construct a home. She explained that due to the cost of land,
the density with this development is going to have to be higher. She stated that she has been
paying taxes in Plymouth for over 30 years, and she hasn't seen any road improvements to the
Northwest Plymouth area. She requested the Council's support of this project.
Mr. Anderson explained there are certain aspects of the project that they have made
commitments on that they don't want to change, and one of those items is the CommonBond
project. He stated on the north side of County Road 47, they have struggled with the density
question, but they feel very strongly that the density needs to remain low there. He indicated that
if the Council desires to reduce the units by 24, they could certainly do that. He stated regarding
the City's contribution of $200,000 for the reconstruction of County Road 47, based on the
conversations that they had with staff and some of the Councilmembers, there is a need for
realignment of that road. It became apparent that those improvements would be necessary at this
time. He stated he feels this is a "shared type" of situation; therefore, the County should be
participating. He agrees with Mr. Grube that this isn't something that needs to have an answer
this evening, but rather he would like to participate in future discussions with the City and the
County.
Motion was made by Councilmember Black and seconded by Councilmember Bildsoe, to adopt
a Resolution Approving a Land Use Guide Plan Amendment for Lundgren Bros. Construction,
Inc. for "Taryn Hills" for Property located east of Vicksburg Lane, North and South of County
Road 47 (2005045 — Res2005-316).
Councilmember Hewitt stated the reguiding of this property does impact transportation and how
to repair roadways. She stated it's not only County Road 47 that would be impacted by this
development but Vicksburg Lane as well. She stated she would support the motion, and she
appreciates the contribution from the applicant, but the Council still needs to discuss how they
are going to fund roads in the future.
Councilmember Black compared the Vicksburg Lane and County Road 47 intersection to the
Northwest Boulevard and Schmidt Lake Road intersection in her ward where many of the traffic
problems were greatly reduced after the installation of the traffic signal.
Councilmember Willis stated he would support the motion if the Council would accept Mr.
Proposed Council Minutes
Regular Meeting of August 9, 2005
Page 7 of 10
Anderson's offer to reduce the townhome units by 24 units.
Mayor Johnson stated she is satisfied with the proposed density units, and she's unsure what the
City would achieve by decreasing the townhomes by 24 units. She noted that in order to
accommodate this change, the prices of homes in this development would increase and make
them less affordable.
Councilmember Slavik stated 24 units do make a difference. She reiterated that she feels this
development is too dense. She also stated that she is concerned with the number and longevity
of townhomes being constructed in Plymouth.
Mayor Johnson stated the removal of 24 units isn't going to very noticeable, as it would be in the
middle of the development, rather than located at a main intersection. She stated that the
removal of 24 units isn't going to be noticeable to anyone.
Councilmember Black agreed with Mayor Johnson.
Councilmember Hewitt stated that she feels this is a good project; therefore, she would be
supporting the motion.
Community Development Director Hurlburt commented that if the reguiding isn't approved, it
might be close to the minimum density under the Comprehensive Plan.
Councilmember Bildsoe stated he supports the density that is proposed.
Councilmember Slavik stated that she would support the applicant's plan, as it is within the
City's guiding. She noted that the lots are small in the LA -1 area, and due to the number of
wetlands on the property, the buildable area has been reduced.
There being no further discussion and with all members voting in favor but Willis, the motion
carried.
The Council took a 10 -minute break.
Motion was made by Councilmember Willis, and seconded by Councilmember Hewitt, to adopt
an Ordinance Amending Chapter 21 of the City Code to classify Certain Land located in "Taryn
Hills" East of Vicksburg Lane, North and South of County Road 47 (2005045 — Ord2005-19,
Resolution Approving Findings of Fact for the Rezoning of Property located East of Vicksburg
Lane, North and South of County Road 47 (,2005045 — Res2005-317), Resolution Approving a
Site Plan for Lundgren Bros. Construction, Inc. for 306 Colonial Manner Townhome Units
within the "Taryn Hills" Development for Property located Southeast of County Road 47 and
Vicksburg Lane (205045 — Res2005-319) and a Resolution Approving a Preliminary Plat and
Variance for Lundgren Bros. Construction Inc. for "Taryn Hills" for Pronerty located East of
Vicksburg Lane North and South of County Road 47 (2005045 — Res2005-318).
A friendly amendment was made to the main motion by Councilmembers Willis and Hewitt to
Proposed Council Minutes
Regular Meeting of August 9, 2005
Page 8 of 10
amend the following conditions in the Resolution approving the Preliminary Plat and Variance to
read:
8. The applicant shall provide additional trail connections for access to the private trail that
would be looped around the wetland within the single-family area north of County Road 47.
22. The applicant shall replace some of the summit ash and marshall's ash shown on the
landscape plan with other tree species such as white oak.
29. The developer shall reconstruct County road 47 from Vicksburg Lane to 0.5 miles east of
Vicksburg Lane. The developer is also responsible for 25 percent of the cost of a future traffic
signal and turn lanes at the County Road 47/Cheshire Lane intersection and 100 percent of the
cost of an additional eastbound left -turn lane to provide dual left -turn lanes, and an exclusive
northbound left -turn lane at the County Road 47/County Road 61 intersection.
The Council voted on the amended main motion and with all members voting in favor but Willis,
the motion carried.
8.1.1) Request of Lundgren Bros. Construction, Inc. for Partial Funding for the
Reconstruction of a portion of County Road 47
Public Works Director Cote stated that staff would try to schedule a meeting with the County
prior to the August 23 Study Session. He stated that the Council would be notified of this
meeting. Mayor Johnson and Councilmembers Hewitt and Bildsoe stated that they would be
interested in attending this meeting.
8.2) Award Bid for Construction of Transit Station 73 (3125)
Public Services Manager Qvale reported on the bids that were received for the Plymouth
Metrolink Station 73 Transit Facility. She noted that the low bid, submitted by Stahl
Construction in the amount of $4,360,000 is 18% or $679,000 higher than the engineer's
estimate of $3,681,000. She stated she has been in conversation with the Metropolitan Council
and the State for additional funding to cover the $679,000. She stated if the Council didn't
accept the low bid and decided to withdraw from the funding agreements with the Metropolitan
Council and the State for their funding in the amount of $3,679,768, those funds would be
reallocated to other capital transit projects in the region.
Mayor Johnson asked how long the City has to review the bids and to rebid the project if that
would be the case. Public Services Manager Qvale replied the City has 30 days to review the
bids, and she wouldn't recommend rebidding the project, as material costs would increase.
Councilmember Bildsoe stated that he wouldn't support this item this evening based on how the
bids came in.
Councilmember Slavik stated it would cost the City approximately $17,000 per parking space at
this new facility. She stated there would be non -Plymouth vehicles traveling on City roads and
parking at this transit station. She asked what the City gains in revenue for maintaining the
roadways.
Proposed Council Minutes
Regular Meeting of August 9, 2005
Page 9 of 10
Councilmember Willis stated that this is an expensive project as material costs have increased.
He stated the City is unsure who would be using the facility, other than people who are going to
become more transit dependent than vehicle dependent. He stated the City should take
advantage of the funding from the Metropolitan Council and State and especially if the City is
able to obtain additional funding from them.
Councilmember Hewitt stated that she supports this item as the number of transit riders is
projected to double.
Public Services Manager Qvale noted that according to the City survey, 80% of the people who
use the transit system are Plymouth residents.
Councilmember Black stated she would be supportive of staff contacting the State and
Metropolitan Council for additional funding. She stated this development would be an asset for
possible redevelopment in this area.
Councilmember Bildsoe stated this issue shouldn't focus on whether the City has a transit
system. He stated he feels this is an item that is a convenience for the riders and method for
people to use the system. The City has a bus system and infrastructure, and the proposed facility
is basically a convenience.
Councilmember Slavik stated she hasn't been a big proponent of this project. She stated
approximately 65 cars currently park in the lot, and the City is constructing a facility that would
accommodate 283 spaces at a cost of $4.8 million. She stated that she isn't willing to take that
gamble with taxpayers' dollars, as the subsidies are quite expensive.
Motion was made by Councilmember Willis and seconded by Councilmember Black, to table
this item until August 23 during which time staff should contact other agencies to seek additional
funding for this project.
Sylvia Gustafson, 17555 28th Avenue North, Chair of the Plymouth Advisory Committee on
Transit, spoke of the need for this transit facility as well as the need to maintain the current
system.
There being no further discussion and with all members voting in favor, the motion carried.
8.3) Draft Minnesota Department of Transportation Metro District Transportation
System Plan for 2008-2030
Community Development Director Hurlburt discussed comments that were assembled by staff
on the Minnesota Department of Transportation's Metro District Transportation System Plan for
2008-2030. The Council added a few comments regarding funding for transit, and they
requested that these comments/correspondence be addressed to the Lieutenant Governor with
copies to the City's legislative delegation and County Commissioners.
Proposed Council Minutes
Regular Meeting of August 9, 2005
Page 10 of 10
8.4) Youth Appointment to the Human Rights Commission
Motion was made by Councilmember Bildsoe and seconded by Councilmember Slavik, to
appoint Natalie Novak to the Human Rights Commission (Res2005-320). With all members
voting in favor, the motion carried.
8.5) Traffic Signal at Vicksburg Lane/251h Avenue/Shenandoah Lane
Councilmember Hewitt noted that the design for this project became more extensive than
originally expected after increasing from a $232,000 to a $700,000 project with the addition of
road widening for left turn lanes, trail relocations, and retaining walls. Therefore, she asked
when this project would begin since she is concerned about traffic problems if this project were
delayed until next year and Lowe's opens. Public Works Director Cote replied stated that staff
suggests to proceed as planned, but allow the contractor a later completion date to late summer
2006. He stated it would take approximately four months for the signal work alone, and staff has
reservations that if all the work that is necessary begins this year, it won't be completed before
winter.
8.6) Tour with Interfaith Outreach and Community Partners
Councilmember Bildsoe reported that Interfaith Outreach and Community Partners asked him if
the Council would be interested in a tour of their facilities. The Planning Commission and
Housing and Redevelopment Authority members would also be invited.
The Council stated that they would be interested in a tour, and they requested the City Manager
to send an email to the Council containing possible date(s) for a tour.
Reports and Staff Recommendations
There were no Reports and Staff Recommendations).
Adiournment
Mayor Johnson declared the meeting adjourned at approximately 11:00 p.m.
Sandra R. Paulson, City Clerk
Agenda Number: 6,aCQ
TO: Laurie Ahrens, City Manager
FROM: Dale Halm, Director of Finance & Information Technology
SUBJECT: Disbursements
DATE: August 15, 2005 for the City Council Meeting August 23, 2005
1. PROPOSED MOTION: To adopt the attached resolution approving the disbursements for
the period ending August 12, 2005.
2. DISCUSSION: Shown be;,,.ow is a listing of disbursements for the various funds for the
period ending August 12, 2005.
Anchor Bank
General & Special Revenue 585,315.69
Construction & .Debt Service 210,081.21
Enterprise & Internal Service 1,833,855.76
Housing & Redevelopment Authority 314,000.44
GRAND TOTAL FOR ALL FUNDS 2.943.253.10
3. RECOMMENDATION: [ hereby recommend approval of the attached listing of
disbursements and recommend same for payment.
ON, i
Dale E. Hahn
Invoice Expense Distribution for Period E-ided 8/12/05
FUND 101 General Fund 345,939.18
201 Recreation Fu,id 25,152.67
202 Parker's Lake Cemetery Maint 0.00
203 Transit System Fund 198,014.64
204 Community Development Fund 0.00
205 Diasaster Don ation Manage Grant 2,345.00
207 Economic Development Fund 0.00
220 Comm Dev Block Grant Fund 13,864.20
250 HRA Section E Fund 313,840.14
251 HRA General f=und 160.30
302 GeneralObligation Refunding D/S 0.00
401 General Capital Projects Fund 35,855.53
402 Minnesota State Aid Fund 0.00
404 Building & Eqr, ipment Rev. Fund 2,243.38
406 Park Replacerient Fund 0.00
407 Infrasturcture [Replacement Fund 0.00
408 Project Administration Fund 200.00
409 City & Community Parks 0.00
410 Neighborhood Parks 0.00
411 Capital Improvement Fund 0.00
413 Community Park Acquisition 0.00
414 Neighborhood Park Acq/Dev 0.00
415 2003 Street Reconstruction 0.00
416 2004 Street Reconstruction 0.00
421 Utility Trunk Fund 3,900.00
422 Unfinanced Imp Construction 15,401.93
425 Shenandoah Mousing Imp. Area 0.00
426 Shenandoah administration 0.00
428 Activity Center/Fieldhouse 0.00
430 Public Safety Expansion 116,288.13
431 HRA Senior Apt. Constr Fund 36,092.14
440 Utility Trunk System Expansion 0.00
470 TIF # 7-1 (Const) 0.00
471 TIF # 7-2 O.S. (Const) 0.00
472 TIF # 7-3 P.O. 3. (Const) 0.00
473 TIF #74 P.T.F (Const) 20.02
474 TIF Dev. Exp. Bonds 95 (Const) 0.00
475 TIF # 7-5 Rottlund (Const) 20.02
476 TIF #7-6 Continental (Const) 20.02
478 TIF #7-7 Stonecreek ('Const) 20.02
479 TIF #7-8 Shops @ Plymouth Creek 20.02
501 Water Fund 990,888.11
502 Sewer Fund 501,641.26
503 Solid Waste Management Fund 4,052.84
504 Recreation Fai;ility Fund 10,854.28
505 Water Resources Fund 82,994.27
506 Activity Center Fund 0.00
507 Field House Fund 56.47
601 Central ServiG;s Fund 12,893.74
602 Central Equipment Fund 92,498.06
603 Risk Management Fund 16,626.94
604 Design Engineering Fund 0.00
605 Employee Benefits Fund 16,025.42
606 Information Technology Fund 40,900.77
607 Public Facilities Fund 64,423.60
720 Senior Housing Bond Trustee 0.00
730 1-494 Corridor Commission 0.00
Total Invoice Expense Distribution: 2,943,253.10
Check Register
Date: 8/15/2005
Time: 11:05:30 AM
COUNCIL REPORT - CHECK REGISTER
7/30/2005 Through 8/12/2005
Page 1 of 24
Vendor Name/
Aug05 Section 8 Rent
Invoice Amount Check # Check AmountInvoiceDescription
3rd Lair Skate Park
308.00 74939 308.00
8.13.05 Skateboarding demo 250.00 75107 250.00
ACME
43.I4 75110 43.14
Ref PUD amend signage fee 365.00 75103 365.00
AIM Electronics
30.96 74940 30.96
Daktronics 1600 console 432.00 75104 432.00
ARI Mechanical Service
1,106.00 74856 1,106.00
IC repr Munters unit 231.00 74936 231.00
Abdullahi, Hawa
5.91 74941 621.10
Aug05 Utility Reimbursement 51.00 74884 51.00
Accurint - Account # 1034558
609.03
Jul05 background search 5.50 75106 5.50
Adam's Pest Control, Inc.
Jul05 PC Pest Control 74.55 74937 74.55
Adam's Pest Control, Inc.
Jul-Sep05 IC Pest control 98.02 75108 98.02
Advanced Drainage Systems
Various plastic pipe $1,620.37 74938 $1,620.37
Ahmed, Habon
Aug05 Utility Reimbursement $57.00 74883 $57.00
Akerman, Dmitriy
Aug05 Section 8 Rent $1,200.00 74872 $1,200.00
Akerman, Efim
Aug05 Section 8 Rent $1,046.00 74873 $1,046.00
Alpha Investments & Consulting
Aug05 Section 8 Rent 777.00 74855 777.00
Altura Communication Solutions
PW to CC bad fiber cables 308.00 74939 308.00
American Fastener
Evelet studs -12 43.I4 75110 43.14
Ameripride
7.11.05 PC towel service 30.96 74940 30.96
Amsave LLS
Aug05 Section 8 Rent 1,106.00 74856 1,106.00
Anchor Paper
1.1116 paper by pound 5.91 74941 621.10
500sheets /Transit 6.16
Green bar,ivory,micro perf,le 609.03
Ancom Communication
http://cityintemal/asplasp_reports/finances cc_check.asp?sFromDate=7%2F30%2F2005 &sToDate=8%2F... 8/15/2005
Check Register Page 2 of 24
Equip/lbr enhancing 80OMHZ 58,310.00 75111 $8,310.00
Anderson, Charles & Helen
Aug05 Section 8 Rent $515.00 74867 $515.00
Anderson, Karen
849.00 74866 849.00
Upland&Transitional planting 3,765.13 75172 3,765.13
Anderson, Nancy
30.93 74947 30.93
8.4 19Mileage to MAVA seminar 7.70 75212 42.70
8.4.5 MAVA seminar registr fee 35.00
75177 4.00
Anderson, Warren Leroy
MN DL ID 8.00 75092 8.00
Angeno's/ J. Cousineau's
Park and Rec Refund 60.00 75209 60.00
Arrow Terminal LLC
Fuses butt splice/wire 100' 158.73 74942 158.73
Artistic Moments
7.28.05 Canvas Painting I00.00 75010 220.00
7.28.05 Printmaking 120.00
Astleford International
Unit 5901 bracket 97.26 74943 170.23
Unit 247 brake pad 72.97
Asunma, Ilene
Park and Rec Refund 70.00 74944 70.00
At the Lake Apartments
Aug05 Section 8 Rent 26,205.00 74859 26,205.00
At the Lake Apartments
Aug05 HAP 1,438.00 75112 1,438.00
Auto Electric Specialists
Stator,rectifier,bearing,regul 143.48 75113 337.63
Rotor,bearing 50.77
Rotor,stator, bearings,rectifie 143.38
Auto Glass Specialists Inc.
Unit 265 rpr windshield 148.81 74945 347.52
Unit 576 repair windshield 198.71
Bachman's Inc
Aug05 PC Plant lease 144.03 75114 144.03
Barton Sand & Gravel Co.
7.18/7.29 340.26tn CL 5 Rcycl 2,530.31 74946 2,530.31
Bass Lake Hills Townhomes
Aug05 Section 8 Rent $10,056.00 74860 $10,056.00
Beaman, Charles
Aug05 Section 8 Rent 849.00 74866 849.00
BearCom
Falcon phone charger 30.93 74947 30.93
Beckstrom, Kersten
Repair McGruff costume 4.00 75177 4.00
Begin Oaks Golf
6.16/8.25 Jr Golf League 8,434.00 75115 8,434.00
Bohn, Gary
http://cityintemal/asp/asp_reports/finance/ cc_check.asp?sFromDate=7%2F30%2F2005 &sToDate=B%2F... 8/15/2005
Check Register Page 3 of 24
Water quality landscaping gran $400.00 75149 $400.00
Bolton & Menk Inc
Proj4142 6.30.05 $13,920.50 74948 $13,920.50
Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik
800.00 75003 $800.00
Caswell International Corp
Prcj5107 May05 Well 6 emerg 1,084.00 75116 31,224.05
Prcj2032 May05 Vcksburg pump 28,037.11
Aug05 Section 8 Rent 1,262.00 74901 $1,262.00
Prcj3108 May05 General 609.00
74895 575.00
Prcj3132 May05 Well 14/15 1,493.94
Boyer Trucks
15,722.50 75120 15,722.50
Pulley ass 137.36 74949 58,814.84
Man, exh/std 122.55
75176 60.00
Return Exh man 105.95)
Step asy/cable 191.73
75121 40.00
Relay 26.15
Gsk,man/hex nut/cap/tur/manifo 224.00
Unit 282 Sterling chassis 58,219.00
Boyer Trucks
Relay 15.35 75117 15.35
Buranen, Maynard
Aug05 Section 8 Rent 1,211.00 74903 1,211.00
Bye, Nancy
Real Estate broker license 180.00 75037 180.00
C & R Technology
Rpr ice directors phone 90.00 75064 208.44
CC voice jack,mov switch brd 118.44
C & R Technology
Rpr 50prs underground cable th 1,100.00 75248 1,100.00
CDW Government Inc
Hawking 4pt/simple 512mb
Simple 512mb
CDW Government Inc
Docking station
CSM Financial
75.61 74950 $159.74
84.13
303.52 75119 303.52
Ref minor subdiv applic $300.00 74951 $300.00
Campbell Knutson Prof Assoc
800.00 75003 $800.00
Caswell International Corp
Jun05 Attorney services 32,794.15 74952 32,794.15
Capital Property Management
Aug05 Section 8 Rent 1,262.00 74901 $1,262.00
Aug05 Section 8 Rent 575.00 74895 575.00
Carefree Services Inc
3 '05 Summer str sweeping 15,722.50 75120 15,722.50
Carlson Companies
Park and Rec Refund 60.00 75176 60.00
Carlson, Cynthia
Park and Rec Refund 40.00 75121 40.00
Castaways, The
8.11.05 Concert performance 800.00 75003 $800.00
Caswell International Corp
Repair/freight 41.23 74953 $725.01
4 Target holders,motor turning 683.78
Chapchay, Laura
Aug05 Section 8 Rent 1,262.00 74901 $1,262.00
http://cityinternal/asp/asp_reports/finance/ ,-c_check.asp?sFromDate=7%2F3 0%2F2005&sToDate=8%2F... 8/15/2005
Check Register Page 4 of 24
Chernith, Vitaly
Aug05 Section 8 Rent 1,231.00 74933 1,231.00
City of Maple Grove
Jun05 Dog Impounds 1,196.95 74956 1,196.95
City of Wayzata
Unit 282 sales tax/fee's 3,816.74 74957 3,816.74
City of Woodbury
Elzy/5.10/5.I I Ford Training 100.00 74958 100.00
Coffee Mill Inc
IC Concession coffee resupply 120.55 74959 120.55
Commercial Asphalt Co.
7.18/7.2705 41A wear 6.013 19,423.43 74960 19,423.43
Commercial Furniture Services
4 Keys laptop file cabinet 25.56 74961 25.56
Constructive Ideas
Proj3134 Jul05 PS/CC expans 4,698.75 75122 20,938.75
Proj5108 Ju104/final cost&bidd 16,240.00
Continental Sign
70 New city decal logos 172.65 74962 172.65
Coolen Brothers Tree Service
6.27.05 Tree removal 5,026.80 74963 21,821.85
7.12.05 "free removal 11,555.25
7.21.05 Tree removal 5,239.80
Creekside Apt Home LLC
R199913480 8.10.99 ref erosion 3,000.00 75123 3,000.00
Cub Foods /3550 Vicksburg
Jul05 Food Charges 1,519.96 75124 1,519.96
D P C Industries Inc/PO 200129
6000lbs Chlorine @.2474 1,503.40 74964 1,503.40
DJB Futures Inc
Aug05 Section 8 Rent 496.00 74869 496.00
DSS Commercial Inc
Ju105 Metrolink maint sery 1,710.39 75125 2,351.52
Ju105 Messiah lawn maint 138.45
Jul05 Cheshire shelter maint 364.23
Ju105 Plym Cov lawn maint 138.45
Dalbec Roofing Inc
7.7.05 PS roof repairs 508.92 74965 508.92
Dalco
Towels/toilet tissue 1,589.30 75126 1,589.30
Data Recognition Corporation
Ju105 UB postage 2,807.71 75127 2,807.71
Davies Water Equipment Co
201 ft 6"push on class 52 ducti $2,740.12 75128 $2,740.12
Davis Sun Turf
Front fork $105.73 75129 $105.73
Day -Timers, Inc.
06 Pocket calendar refill $33.01 74966 $33.01
http://cityintemal/asp/asp_reports/finance/rc_check.asp?sFromDate=7°/o2F3 0%2F2005&sToDate=8%2F... 8/15/2005
Check Register Page 5 of 24
Denning, Kathy
Water Quality landscape grant $200.00 75173 $200.00
Designwrite Studios
Jul-Aug05 Plymouth Newsletter $667.08 75131 $1,353.75
Jut-Aug05 Envir Extra $686.67
Dirt Devils Services
15,732.50 75137 15,732.50
Elan Financial Services
44th/Goldenrod rpr sod on city 1,800.00 75132 1,800.00
Document Technology Solutions
Electrical Installation & Mnt
7.22/8.21 Adm/Fin SharpBC320 257.63 75133 257.63
Dorland, Chuck
Signal relamp Vicksburg & 55 97.50
14530 Gleason Lk Dr refund per 27.50 74955 27.50
Dundee Nursery&Landscaping Co.
429.21
24"Lemon pot,greenhouse 72.19 74967 327.25
Annuals,Fungicide,rose care,et 210.55
J Willis House plant 28.65
Ann uals/forestry 15.86
Dynamex
7-21-05 Campbell Knutson 32.81 75134 32.81
EMC
7.19/7.19.06 Hardware Maint 10,379.70 74968 16,201.07
7.19/7.19.06 Sftwr Maint 5,821.37
Earl F. Andersen, Inc.
1 Loop bike rack 378.08 74969 378.08
Earl F. Andersen, Inc.
Extension rod $702.90 75135 $702.90
Edmunds, John
Park and Rec Refund $300.00 75136 $300.00
Egan Oil
8499gl unleaded @1.6421 15,732.50 75137 15,732.50
Elan Financial Services
6.22/7.21 Verisign,GFOA conf1 5,784.96 74970 5,784.96
Electrical Installation & Mnt
Signal changes/relamp 604.10 75138 1,580.81
locate cables signal system Re 180.00
Signal relamp Vicksburg & 55 97.50
Pkrs Ik beach lower cables for 270.00
Signal relamps 13th Ave/Carlso 429.21
Element K Journals
05 Photoshop Fundamentals $89.00 74971 $89.00
Emergency Apparatus Maint.
05-25 Aerial 31 accident $5,992.03 74972 $5,992.03
Emergency Apparatus Maint.
7.27.04 Unit028 aerial 31 $758.94 75139 $758.94
Engineering Repro Systems
11 sets bond plots $70.89 74973 $70.89
Epshteyn, Igor
Aug05 Section 8 Rent $984.00 74888 $984.00
Esch Construction Supply Inc
Dry cut diamond saw blade $190.64 75141 $190.64
http://cityintemal/asplasp_reports/finance/cc_check.asp?sFromDate=7%2F30%2F2005 &sToDate=8%2F... 8/15/2005
Check Register
Evenflo
Page 6 of 24
4 Titan V,8 Triumph, 10 Chase $1,496.43 74974 $1,496.43
Evenflo
7.11.05 CC rug service 155.69 74980 $589.57
20 Chase boosters 1,000.87 75142 1,258.46
I Ellipsa stroller,2 embrace a 257.59
Garrison, Brenda
Evenson, Gerald
131.00 74865 $131.00
Aug05 Section 8 Rent 728.00 74881 728.00
Express Messenger
7.18/7.25.05 Attorney P/U 37.10 75143 37.10
Express Press
19,500 UB insert 330.70 74975 330.70
Fairchild, Sharon
Park and Rec Refund 300.00 75144 300.00
Farris, Roberta Lynn
Payroll Generated Invoice 443.54 75247 443.54
Fast Signs
Signs for PW facility entrance 173.60 74976 173.60
Fernbrook Townhomes
Aug05 Section 8 Rent 10,123.48 74877 10,123.48
File of Life Foundation Inc
1500 LIfe Benefits,1000 Every 137.93 75145 1,703.47
I500 Fridge magnets,1000 xtr 1,565.54
First Student Inc
7.15.05 Science Museum,Prkrs 326.40 74977 326.40
Flexible Pipe Tool Co.
Rubber bumper pad 52.90 74978 52.90
Forbs, Luz M
10750 Rockford Rd/dwn pymnt 12;400.00 75016 12,400.00
Four Seasons Estates
Aug05 Section 8 Rent 18,163.00 74878 18,163.00
Four Seasons Villa
Aug05 Section 8 Rent 442.00 74879 442.00
Fresco Inc
4 6' ext pole,I 3'foam pole w/ $230.57 74979 $311.51
95 11 mm rope,I caribiner $80.94
Fresco Inc
1 17" blade, 1 14 1/2" blade $47.61 75147 $47.61
G & K Service Inc
7.11.05 CC rug service 155.69 74980 $589.57
Public Works Uniform rntl 433.88
G & K Service Inc
Public Works Uniform rml 432.26 75148 $432.26
Garrison, Brenda
Aug05 Utility Reimbursement 131.00 74865 $131.00
Gartner, Denise A
Aug05 Section 8 Rent 1,322.00 74871 $1,322.00
http://cityintemallasp/asp_reports/finance/cc_check.asp?sFromDate=7%o2F30%2F2005&sToDate=8%2F... 8/15/2005
Check Register
Gastelum, Sheila
Page 7 of 24
Final disb Family Self-Suff $3,418.00 75069 $3,418.00
General Repair Service
Pressure troll,labor $533.36 74981 $533.36
Gertens Wholesale
Assorted roses/Parkers Lake ro 614.92 74982 614.92
Gezunterman, Matvey
Aug05 Section 8 Rent 582.00 74902 582.00
Grafix Shoppe
Graphics 139,140,142,143 1,200.00 74983 1,302.92
05-38 Unit 134 6.20.05 102.92
Grainger
168.59 75152 168.59
Hydraulic hose coupler/adapter 27.05 74984 3,089.42
Cr inv 4957518311 9.44)
Lamp 13W-10 46.86
Disc abrasive/shaft 46.80
Innerside truck bx 330.93
Truck box 465.60
D"Flashlight,battery 31.87
1 Examiner 1000 1,150.20
Innerside truck bx 330.93
Truck platform 6001b 318.71
Hammer/saw kit/gatorade 249.69
Power source 12V 100.22
Grainger
Nozzle sprayer 19.34 75151 2,157.61
Drain spade 105.98
1 Portable airconditioner 814.73
Step stool 54.02
Truck hand 5001b 121.92
Cable tie 18'/11.4" 440.50
Pipe wrench/wrench set/socket 247.83
Plier set/wrench set/cutter/sc 276.39
Glove/towel/sling web light 76.90
Grand View Lodge
Pregler/MNSCIA lodging 10.5/10 176.00 74985 176.00
Gray, Shaun
Aug05 Section 8 Rent 1,275.00 74922 1,275.00
Greater Mpls. Day Care Assoc.
Jun05 Child Care assist 1,407.00 74986 1,407.00
Greenberg Impl.
2 Filters 84.62 74987 75.62
Rtn I spring/purch gassttut 9.00)
Greupner, Karol J
6.7/7.6.05 Mileage reimb $19.44 75007 $28.46
Target/duct tape, airfreshner $9.02
GreyHawk Technologies Inc
11 Dual mode GPRS antenna, 11 $5,042.00 74988 $5,042.00
Grigoryants, Alla
Aug05 Section 8 Rent 971.00 74854 971.00
Grove Nursery Center Inc.
6-roses/8-primrose/5-astilbe/5 179.88 74989 179.88
Guggenberger, Suzanne R
Aug05 Section 8 Rent 513.00 74926 513.00
Hach Company
Ascorbic,EDTA,SPADNS,salt solo 168.59 75152 168.59
http://cityintemal/asplasp_reports/finance/cc_check.asp?sFromDate=7%2F30%2F2005&sToDate=8%2F... 8/15/2005
Check Register Page 8 of 24
Hageman, Kristen
7.5/7.28 122 Mileage reimb 49.41 75179 49.41
Haigh, Todd
Aug05 Section 8 Rent 439.00 74928 439.00
Hance Companies
Cr ovrchrg inv 51240 7.92) 74990 11.15
4 -Bent valve 10.46
Cut off valves 8.61
Hanson, Tory
Aug05 Utility Reimbursement 29.00 74930 29.00
Hawkins Water Treatment
43521b Hydrof,36901b C-9,400 C 4,330.93 74991 4,330.93
Hawkins Water Treatment
92261b C-9,4812lb Hydrof,500gl 7,242.29 75153 14,581.29
4462gl Sodium Hypochlorite 3,675.74
4442gl Sodium Hypochlorite 3,663.26
Healthfund of Minnesota
Payroll Generated Invoice 2.00 75154 57.52
Payroll Generated Invoice 4.00
Payroll Generated Invoice 5.00
Payroll Generated Invoice 2.00
Payroll Generated Invoice 5.00
Payroll Generated Invoice 29.52
Payroll Generated Invoice 1.00
Payroll Generated Invoice 1.00
Payroll Generated Invoice 5.00
Payroll Generated Invoice 3.00
Hedberg Aggregate
Various pond plants 478.16 74992 961.94
PVC primer,cement,pipe cutter 28.74
1 bgsand silica 11.58
1.27m coarse sand/loading 24.42
PVC primer,flexible glue 10.08
8 engrave stones, 16 line chrg 408.96
Heinen, Susan
Park and Rec Refund 40.00 75156 40.00
Hennepin County /NW #8121
Jun05 11.39m Waste Hauling 557.70 74993 557.70
Hennepin County Assessor
Jun-Ju105 Appraisal services 987.02 75157 987.02
Hennepin County Sheriff/Bookng
Jun05 Booking fee/prisoners 5,677.45 75158 5,677.45
Hennepin County Treas/Room-Brd
Jun05 Room/Board prisoners 9,275.11 75159 9,275.11
High Five
50th Anniv consulting 1,011.97 74994 1,011.97
Highway 55 Rental
Moonwalk/4 stakes/2 balls $246.64 75160 $246.64
Hintermeyer, Paul
Aug05 Section 8 Rent $870.00 74912 $870.00
Hirshfield's
48 5gl White field paint $889.49 74995 $889.49
Holiday Fleet
http://cityintemallasplasp_reports/financel, c_check.asp?sFromDate=7%2F30%2F2005&sToDate=8%2F... 8/15/2005
Check Register Page 9 of 24
6.22/7.21.05 E85 Fuel $313.56 75161 $313.56
Holt Motors Inc
Drum/Desc 389.98 74996 873.40
Filter/kit see cr 163913 616.95
Cr inv 163903 filter/kit 616.95)
74998 16,287.52
Kit/filter/kit/chamber 483.42
Home Depot
811.00 74874 811.00
6.28/7.27.05 Hardware Supplies 5,381.30 75162 5,381.30
Hopkins Parts Co.
882.00 75164 1,038.00
Ju105 Equipment Repair 149.10) 74997 2,771.84
Jul05 Equipment Repair 718.88
75165 300.00
Jul05 Equipment Repair 379.03
Jul05 Equipment Repair 5.28
JU105 Equipment Repair 111.98
Jul05 Equipment Repair 153.36
Jul05 Equipment Repair 211.29
Jul05 Equipment Repair 70.42
Jul05 Equipment Repair 19.75
Jul05 Equipment Repair 270.51
Jul05 Equipment Repair 41.17
Jul05 Equipment Repair 198.93
Jul05 Equipment Repair 110.31
Jul05 Equipment Repair 52.24
Jul05 Equipment Repair 7.32
Jul05 Equipment Repair 374.23
Ju105 Equipment Repair 110.31)
Jul05 Equipment Repair 17.76
Jul05 Equipment Repair 27.60
Jul05 Equipment Repair 17.76)
Jul05 Equipment Repair 291.20
Jul05 Equipment Repair 126.74)
Jul05 equipment Repair 114.49
Hong, James
Aug05 Section 8 Rent 913.00 74893 913.00
Housing Auth County of Cook
Aug05 Section 8 Rent 1,291.69 74886 1,291.69
Housing Auth of Maricopa Co.
Aug05 Section 8 Rent 474.69 74887 474.69
Howard R Green Company
Proj3114 6.24.05 13,903.00 74998 16,287.52
Proj4116 6.24.05 2,384.52
Hultgren, Nathan
811.00 74874 811.00
7.'05/6.30.08 Peace Officr tic 90.00 75038 90.00
Hydro Metering Technology
882.00 75164 1,038.00
12 ltron integ rtr/ert M35 gl 1,597.50 74999 4,107.82
10 1" M70B meters,10 #4 settrs 2,044.80
75165 300.00
3 1 "M70B Meter 465.52
TAPE
R Aikins/"Property RM Mgmnt" 275.00 75000 275.00
ISFSI
05 Kline Membership 75.00 75163 75.00
Iliarski, Elena & Boris
Aug05 Section 8 Rent 811.00 74874 811.00
Ind School Dist 284/CK ADDR
Jul05 Jujitsu/Gymn bldg use 882.00 75164 1,038.00
May05 Jujitsu bldg use 156.00
Independent Black Dirt Co Inc
75165 300.0010Yardsclay300.00
http://cityinternal/asp/asp reports/finance/ cc_check.asp?sFromDate=7%2F3 0%2F2005 &sToDate= 8%2F ... 8/15/2005
Check Register
Infrastructure Tech, Inc.
Page 10 of 24
I Manhole roller only $376.38 75166 $376.38
Irrigation By Design
Greenwood Elem irrig repairs $5,225.95 75001 $5,225.95
Irwin, James
Aug05 Section 8 Rent 962.00 74894 962.00
J. H. Larson Electrical Co.
16 -midget fuses 48.61 75002 1,046.06
10-120v ballast 73.96
6 -Color cap 201.02
2 -studio lamp/cvr/cable ties -1 84.35
6 -midget fuse/5-fast act fuse 54.11
10 -240V/24 -277V 120.72
12-100w mog base 463.29
JT Packard & Assoc
Liebert battery replacement 1,610.02 75167 1,610.02
Jacobson, Larry
8.5 45 Mileage LMC St Paul 18.23 75185 18.23
James, Shanika
Aug05 Utility Reimbursement 24.00 74921 24.00
Janco Inc
R4593 0 9.21.95 ref erosion dep 800.00 75168 1,800.00
R338494.1.93 ref erosion dep 1,000.00
Jerry, Alisha
Aug05 Utility Reimbursement 15.00 74853 15.00
John Deere Landscapes
Crimp clamp/coupling 3.62 75005 3.62
John Deere Landscapes
4 -Spec 10 round/deluxe vb gree 41.47 75170 194.70
2 1/2 coupling soc pvc fitting 5.42
2 1/2 pvc/coupling/adapters/bu 106.97
PVC cement/2 pvc/2 couplings 40.84
Johnson, Darin
Aug05 Section 8 Rent 956.00 74892 956.00
Johnson, Roger L
Aug05 Section 8 Rent 1,068.00 74917 1,068.00
Junkyard Lilies
8.16.05 Concert performance 450.00 75077 450.00
Jusczak, Kurt L
Aug05 Section 8 Rent 979.00 74899 979.00
K & S Engraving
3 2x6 Gear rack plates/magnets 23.47 75006 23.47
K & S Engraving
Name tags ... 4 1" circle tags 37.06 75171 37.06
Kehren, Stacy
Park and Rec Refund 9.00 75174 9.00
Kellington Construction Inc
Proj3129 #10/final IC addn 1,482.80 75175 1,482.80
Kenwood Chamber Orchestra
8.7.05 Concert performance 150.00 75008 150.00
http://cityinternal/asp/asp_reports/finance/cc_check.asp?sFromDate=7%2F30%2F2005&sToDate=8%2F... 8/15/2005
Check Register
Kharam, Gennadiy
Page 11 of 24
Aug05 Section 8 Rent $486,00 74880 $486.00
Klevorn, Virginia
Park and Rec Refund $200.00 75009 $200.00
Knoll Inc
Aug05 Section 8 Rent 6,345.00 74900 $6,345.00
Proj3134 PS furniture 610.82 75178 610.82
Koch Materials Company
795.50
Payroll Generated Invoice 13.14
890.61gl CRS -2 @ .79/gl 752.83 75146 752.83
Kogen Taiko
8.18.05 Concert performance 600.00 74954 600.00
Krainev, Vladimir
Aug05 Section 8 Rent 500.00 74934 500.00
Krey, Mark
05 Beach safety dive sunken d 245.00 75026 245.00
Krivanova, Eugena
Aug05 Section 8 Rent 825.00 74875 825.00
Kurtz, Lisa
7.16/7.21 meals/Leadership 97.84 75014 97.84
LSC Resource Inc
500 Millennium garden flyers 519.65 75180 519.65
LaFave, Helen
Atlanta airfare 3CMA conf 8.23 270.00 75155 270.00
LaPointe, Kathy
Aug05 Section 8 Rent 1,349.00 74897 1,349.00
Lacrosse Unlimited
8.1/8.5.05 Tennis Camp 2,784.00 75181 2,784.00
Laidlaw Transit Services Inc
Ju105 DAR/MetrolinkTransit 190,563.31 751,82 190,563.31
Lake Restoration Inc
May-Jul05 PC pond weed/algae 858.00 75183 2,811.00
05 Parkers bch DNR permit/ 455.00
05 Medicine bch DNR permit/ 764.00
05 Zachary pond weed/algae 282.00
May05 Parkers pond weed/algae 172.00
May-Jun05 Amphitheater algae 280.00
Lake Weed Harvesting
7.14/7.19 Parkers weed harvest 3,407.50 75102 3,407.50
Lakeview Commons
Aug05 Section 8 Rent 34,901.00 74885 34,901.00
Lametti & Sons Inc
Proj3114 #9 Lancaster LS 17,100.00 75184 17,100.00
Lancaster Village Apartments
Aug05 Section 8 Rent 6,345.00 74900 $6,345.00
Law Enforce Labor Serv./Union
Payroll Generated Invoice 129.50 75186 $1,104.64
Payroll Generated Invoice 795.50
Payroll Generated Invoice 13.14
Payroll Generated Invoice 129.50
Payroll Generated Invoice 37.00
http://cityintemallasp/asp_reports/finance/cc_check.asp?sFromDate=7%2F30%2F2005&sToDate=8%2F... 8/15/2005
Check Register
Law Enforcement Tech Group
Page 12 of 24
Desk mount tracer III $266.25 75011 $266.25
Lawn King, Inc.
Jul05 sod/pallet return $64.70 75187 $64.70
League of MN Cities Ins Trust
7.6.05 Fireworks 250.00 75012 250.00
League of Minnesota Cities
7.20 M Peterson/Safety class 15.00 75188 30.00
T Vetsch/Safety class 15.00
Lee Scheller Tapping Inc
24x6 tap in water main install 1,265.00 75013 1,265.00
Leitner, Erin
7.25/8.8 Target,Cub,Michaels 41.77 75140 41.77
Let's Get Graphic
IC 2 Exit signs/rink C 47.60 75189 47.60
Logis
Jun05 GIS/PD CAD,extrnl connec 10,161.00 75190 21,388.19
Apr05 GIS/PD CAD,xtrn] connect 10,161.00
WO/Inc 15I61 90.00
Smartnet/admin svc 511.03
WO# 15741 360.00
Advanced maint/admin svc 105.16
Loretto Auto Recondition
05-38 Unit 134 accident $3,168.16 75015 $3,168.16
Lubbesmeyer, Tobina
4 5x7 plaques/awards programs $42.60 75268 $42.60
MMKR
04 Audit
MN AFSCME Council #5
Payroll Generated Invoice
Payroll Generated Invoice
Payroll Generated Invoice
Payroll Generated Invoice
Payroll Generated Invoice
Payroll Generated Invoice
Payroll Generated Invoice
Payroll Generated Invoice
Payroll Generated Invoice
Payroll Generated Invoice
MN AFSCME Council #5
Payroll Generated Invoice
Payroll Generated Invoice
Payroll Generated Invoice
Payroll Generated Invoice
Payroll Generated Invoice
Payroll Generated Invoice
Payroll Generated Invoice
Payroll Generated Invoice
Payroll Generated Invoice
Payroll Generated Invoice
Payroll Generated Invoice
Payroll Generated Invoice
Payroll Generated Invoice
Payroll Generated Invoice
Payroll Generated Invoice
3,900.00 75192 3,900.00
12.16 75018 $351.20
168.20
12.76
16.82
12.76
9.I5
38.28
33.64
9.15
38.28
30.42
16.82
11.44
30.42
16.82
76.05
24.32
76.05
76.05
12.16
106.47
9.15
24.32
91.26
15.21
75194 2,008.72
http://cityinternal/asp/asp_reports/finance/ c_check.asp?sFromDate=7%2F30%2F2005&sToDate=8%2F... 8/15/2005
Check Register
Payroll Generated Invoice 12.16
Payroll Generated Invoice 12.16
Payroll Generated Invoice 45.63
Payroll Generated Invoice 24.32
Payroll Generated Invoice 24.92
Payroll Generated Invoice 185.02
Payroll Generated Invoice 12.16
Payroll Generated Invoice 60.84
Payroll Generated Invoice 252.30
Payroll Generated Invoice 12.76
Payroll Generated Invoice 65.67
Payroll Generated Invoice 12.16
Payroll Generated Invoice 30.42
Payroll Generated Invoice 18.82
Payroll Generated Invoice 41.64
Payroll Generated Invoice 12.16
Payroll Generated Invoice 233.87
Payroll Generated Invoice 12.16
Payroll Generated Invoice 33.64
Payroll Generated Invoice 30.42
Payroll Generated Invoice 15.21
Payroll Generated Invoice 12.16
Payroll Generated Invoice 121.68
Payroll Generated Invoice 45.63
Payroll Generated Invoice 12.16
Payroll Generated Invoice 15.21
Payroll Generated Invoice 36.48
MN Child Support Payment Ctr
Payroll Generated Invoice $455.00 75195
Payroll Generated Invoice $198.43
Payroll Generated Invoice $902.16
Page 13 of 24
1,555.59
MN Dept of Labor&Industry
05 Spec Comp fund Assessmnt $4,056.31 75019 $4,056.31
MN Dept of Public Safety/Bike
Final sales 5 Bike Lic $45.00 75196 $45.00
MN Environmental Fund
Payroll Generated Invoice 5.93 75197 $39.93
Payroll Generated Invoice 12.00
Payroll Generated Invoice 1.00
Payroll Generated Invoice 7.00
Payroll Generated Invoice 1.00
Payroll Generated Invoice 1.00
Payroll Generated Invoice 2.00
Payroll Generated Invoice 5.00
Payroll Generated Invoice 5.00
MN NCPERS Life Insurance
Aug05 Empl Life Insurance $1,602.00 75020 $1,602.00
MN Pipe & Equipment
2 16Cx24 SS Bolts clamps 1,603.36 75021 1,603.36
MN West Comm&Tech College
4 Registr/After the Crisis Hap $88.00 75022 $88.00
MN Youth Soccer Assoc.
200 Soccer guides/ I 00parent
MN/SCIA
Pregler/"Best Practices in Sex
480.00
160.00
75198
75023
480.00
160.00
MTI Distributing Inc
Gas cap -2 18.74 75024 $714.65
Cr 5 1/4x1/8 coupler 9.00)
1 Flow sensor 500.55
Solenoid/o ring 69.69
Spacer/v-belts 112.30
Fuse 1.5/3/4 22.37
MTI Distributing Inc
Golf Irrig Diagnostics $185.87 75199 $36,105.96
http://cityintemal/asp/asp_reports/finance/ec_check.asp?sFromDate=7%2F3 0%2F2005&sToDate=8%2F... 8/15/2005
Check Register Page 14 of 24
Span cplg/bshg/sxfpt/2" ell 90 23.26
Prcj512I Plym Plyfld irrigatn 1,508.58
74862 807.00
Prcj5121 Plymouth plyfld irrig 22,241.18
Prcj512I Plymouth Plyfld irrig 12,064.37
75027 465.23
1 Connector 90 deg antenna 9.21
1 Plyphsr coax lite arrstr 73.49
75204 75.00
MacQueen Equip. Inc
Drive shaft/sb srpin assy 396.89 75025 396.89
MacQueen Equip. Inc
168.00
S B drive chain #8 54.94 75200 54.94
Madison National Life
128.68 75028 128.68
Aug05 LTD,Term Life Ins 8,746.28 75201 8,746.28
Magney Construction Inc
392.52 75029 392.52
Prcj3108 #5 Vcksbrg pump 63,896.05 75202 63,896.05
Malone, Faith
80.94 75030 80.94
Aug05 Utility Reimbursement 30.00 74876 30.00
Mazo, Gregory
Aug05 Section 8 Rent $792.00 74882 $792.00
Medicine Lake Apartments LLC
Aug05 Section 8 Rent 807.00 74862 807.00
Menards / 6800 Wayzata Blvd
Canopy/green fence/fence posts 465.23 75027 465.23
Metro Erosion Inc.
Proj4129E rmvl silt fence 75.00 75204 75.00
Metro Fire
Lacrosse fire tech 2000 size 8 93.75 75205 261.75
1 Orion sensor kit 168.00
Metro Sales Inc
PW 1 copier toner 128.68 75028 128.68
Metro Water Conditioning Inc.
50# solar salt 392.52 75029 392.52
Metrocall
7.22/8.21.05 RAD pager rental 80.94 75030 80.94
Metrocall
Aug05 3 SW pager rentals 33.01 75206 56.79
Aug05 I WR pager rental 23.78
Metropolitan Council -Waste
Aug05 Wastewater Service 328,505.03 75031 328,505.03
Metropolitan Council/SAC
Ju105 Sery Avail Charge 130,630.50 75207 130,630.50
Michaud, Regina
7.14/7.30 Rainbow/Menards,bloc 36.43 75061 36.43
Michaud, Regina
8.4.05 trail ride Wild River S 190.00 75244 190.00
Mid America Business Systems
9.16.05/9.16.06 CD Minolta Rdr 585.00 75032 585.00
Midwest Coca-Cola
Parkers concession pop rsply 185.20 75208 485.75
IC Concession pop resupply 252.55
IC Concession pop resupply 48.00
http://cityintemal/asplasp_reports/finance/cc_check.asp?sFromDate=7%2F30%2F2005&sToDate=8%2F... 8/15/2005
Check Register Page 15 of 24
Miller Hanson Partners
Proj5108 Ju105 Reimbursables 4,190.90 75210 19,409.24
Proj5108 Ju105 arch+pringing 15,218.34
Minnesota Wanner Company
3/8" hose/cplg/3/4 mpt 46.91 75033 46.91
Minnetonka Senior Services
6.30.05 New Ulm/Mtn lake 527.00 75034 527.00
Mittelstaedt, Sara
7.22/8.2 Proex,Paper Petalum-- 30.83 75249 923.33
8.10.05 34 tickets Old Log Tht 892.50
Mobile Lock And Safe Co.
IC T -zone entrance function to 488.52 75036 701.52
Lancaster/4 Medeco rim cylindr 213.00
Mobile Lock And Safe Co.
19 Medeco cyl,13 rim cylinders 2,658.24 75211 3,057.36
WTP1 install cylinders,4 kedex 399.12
Mpls Public Housing Auth
Aug05 Section 8 Rent 6,872.91 74906 6,872.91
Muckala, Toni Denise
Aug05 Section 8 Rent 1,705.00 74929 1,705.00
NAPA Geniune Auto Parts Co
IC part 12.41 75150 79.05
60pc XM/gear wrench set 53.24
2 Super Pro I3.40
Natgun Corporation
Proj3108 46 Vcksbrg Reservoir 780,473.07 75213 780,473.07
National Cooperative Program
Sharp ARBC320 PD Admn copier 10,365.49 75214 20,730.98
Sharp ARBC320 PD clerical copr 10,365.49
National Waterworks Inc
6x15 clamp,l gate viv,15"lid c 822.57 75039 872.96
12x3 Pipe saver MU 50.39
Natural Shore Technologies
Proj4129E biologs/EC blanket 289.41 75215 289.41
Nelson, Delores
Park and Rec Refund 5.50 75040 5.50
Nesbitt, Robert
7.25/8.5.05 MN HSEM 2,345.00 75246 2,345.00
NetVersent Network
Proj3134 PS Security Mgmnt sys 4,653.26 75216 77,741.54
Proj3134 PS Bldg access cntrl 32,770.49
Proj3134 PS Surveillance syst 40,317.79
Nevelskiy, Vadim
Aug05 Section 8 Rent 1,254.00 74932 1,254.00
Norsan
IC Auto -flush clamp toilet un 298.20 75041 298.20
Norsan
IC 1 autoflush clamp toiliet u 148.04 75218 340.06
Tissue/clnr 192.02
North Memorial Clinic
http://cityintemallasp/asp_reports/finance/ c_check.asp?sFromDate=7%2F30%2F2005&sToDate=8%2F... 8/15/2005
Check Register Page 16 of 24
7.22 Julseth spirometry $38.00 75219 $38.00
Northern Balance & Scale
2x2 Floor scale rental $266.25 75220 $266.25
Northland Business Systems
CD Okidata drum/toner $311.26 75221 $311.26
Nyangoka, Samson
Aug05 Section 8 Rent $1,325.00 74918 $1,325.00
OPR Limited Partnership
210.65 75044 $5,396.40
6.4/7.1.05 Camelot park 55.65
Aug05 Section 8 Rent 12,932.00 74908 12,932.00
Oak Park Housing Authority
55.65
6.4/7.1.05 Dog Park 55.65
Aug05 Section 8 Rent 701.69 74909 701.69
Oakwood Apartments
55.65
6.4/7.1.05 Heather Ponds 55.65
Aug05 Section 8 Rent 674.00 74863 674.00
Odden, Ruth
55.65
6.4/7.1.05 Gateway Park 55.65
Park and Rec Refund 1.00 75222 1.00
Office Depot
75.65
6.4/7.1.05 Plym Creek plyfld 230.65
Lgl pocket -20 51.97 75042 206.57
12 Rg binders 99.68
6.4/7.1.05 Pilgrim In elem 55.65
Paper clips/note pad/Itr fldr/ 54.92
6.4/7.1.05 Parkers Ik plyflds 55.65
Office Depot
100.65
6.4/7.1.05 W Med I.k Reach 324.65
Battery/binder clips/note pads 76.69 75223 260.00
Storage files 132.17
6.4/7.1.05 Three Ponds Park 55.65
Pens/popup notes/log book 28.69
6.4/7.1.05 Swan Lake Park 75.65
Lsr labels 14.20
Classifictn folder 8.25
Olchanski, Alex
Aug05 Section 8 Rent 308.00 74852 308.00
Olshansky, Asya
Aug05 Section 8 Rent 984.00 74858 984.00
On Site Sanitation
6.4/7.1.05 Amphitheater 210.65 75044 $5,396.40
6.4/7.1.05 Camelot park 55.65
6.4/7.1.05 Circle Park 55.65
6.4/7.1.05 PC Dome 55.65
6.4/7.1.05 Bass LK plyfld 55.65
6.4/7.1.05 Dog Park 55.65
6.4/7.1.05 Elm Creek Soccer 100.65
6.4/7.1.05 Imperial Hills Park 55.65
6.4/7.1.05 Heritage Park 55.65
6.4/7.1.05 Heather Ponds 55.65
6.4/7.1.05 Green Oaks 55.65
6.4/7.1.05 Greenwood elem 55.65
6.4/7.1.05 Glenoch Park 55.65
6.4/7.1.05 Gateway Park 55.65
6.4/7.1,05 E Med Lake 55.65
6.4/7.1.05 Elm Creek plyfld 230.65
6.4/7.1.05 Providence Academy 75.65
6.4/7.1.05 Plym Creek plyfld 230.65
6.4/7.1.05 Plymouth Plyfld 100.65
6.4/7.1.05 Plymouth Plyfld 230.65
6.4/7.1.05 Plymouth Creek plyf 125.65
6.4/7.1.05 Pilgrim In elem 55.65
6.4/7.1.05 Parkers Ik plyflds 55.65
6.4/7.1.05 Parkers Ik plyflds 55.65
6.4/7.1.05 Parkers beach 2 100.65
6.4/7.1.05 W Med I.k Reach 324.65
6.4/7.1.05 W Med Lk Beach 208.65
6.4/7.1.05 W Med Lk Beach 208.65
6.4/7.1.05 West Lutheran HS 55.65
6.4/7.1.05 Three Ponds Park 55.65
6.4/7.1.05 Timber Shores 110.65
6.4/7.1.05 Swan Lake Park 75.65
http://cityintemal/asp/asp_reports/finance/(,c_check.asp?sFromDate=7%2F30%2F2005 sToDate=8%2F... 8/15/2005
Check Register Page 17 of 24
6.4/7.1.05 Sunrise park 55.65
6.4/7.1.05 So Shore Park 55.65
6.4/7.1:05 Mission Hills Park 75.65
6.4/7.1.05 Turtle Lake Park 75.65
6.4/7.1.05 Zachary Plyfld 200.65
6.4/7.1.05 Zachary Plyfld 200.65
6.4/7.1.05 Zachary Elem Sch 55.65
6.4/7.1.05 St Marys Park 55.65
6.4/7.1.05 Skate Park 120.65
6.4/7.1.05 Shiloh Park 55.65
6.4/7.1.05 Schmidt Lk Park 55.65
6.4/7.1.05 Public Works 55.65
6.4/7.1.05 Rolling Hills park 55.65
6.4/7.1.05 Ridgemount plyfld 75.65
6.4/7.1.05 Queensland 55.65
6.4/7.1.05 Parkers beach 2 100.65
6.4/7.1.05 Parkers beach 1 230.65
6.4/7.1.05 Parkers Lk bch 1 100.65
6.4/7.1.05 Oakwood Plyfld 55.65
6.4/7.1.05 Oakwood Plyfld 55.65
6.4/7.1.05 Maple Creek Park 55.65
6.4/7.1.05 Lions Park 55.65
6.4/7.1.05 LaCompte 55.65
6.4/7.1.05 Elm Creek plyfld 100.65
On Site Sanitation
5.12/5.13 PD Armstrong HS 53.25 75224 $53.25
Open Your Heart
Payroll Generated Invoice 1.00 75225 $12.00
Payroll Generated Invoice 1.00
Payroll Generated Invoice 1.00
Payroll Generated Invoice 1.00
Payroll Generated Invoice 3.00
Payroll Generated Invoice 2.00
Payroll Generated Invoice 3.00
Orbit Courier
7.19.05 Fr: MTI $5.35 75045 $5.35
Owens Services Inc.
PW wellhouse air handler unit $636.14 75226 $636.14
PAM Oil
AC oil filter $22.88 75046 $243.47
Pad kit/filter/oil filter $120.17
AC durapac oil filter $91.50
Air filter -2 $8.92
PAM Oil
Air filter/element 100.83 75227 $683.08
5 AC Batteries 375.76
AC water pump kit 71.30
Oil filters -12 65.50
2-22" winter blade 22.07
AC 18" perform blade/fuel filt 47.62
Palen, Jos F
Aug05 Section 8 Rent $3,926.00 74896 $3,926.00
Parameters
Proj3134 furniture $14,561.53 75047 $14,561.53
Park Bus Company
7.13.05 Munsinger Gardens $608.00 75048 $608.00
Park Jeep
Pan engine/gasket $119.48 75049 $119.48
Park Nicollet Clinic
5.2/6.23Empl Phys/Mro's $1,213.19 75228 $1,213.19
Park Place Apartments
Aug05 Section 8 Rent $1,336.00 74910 $1,336.00
http://cityintemallasp/asp_reports/finance/ -,c_check.asp?sFromDate=7%2F30%2F2005&sToDate=8%2F... 8/15/2005
Check Register Page 18 of' 24
Parkside Apartments
Aug05 Section 8 Rent 19,154.00 74911 19,154.00
Party America
7.8/7.12.05 Inhouse charges 75.40 75217 75.40
Pearson, Scott
168.04
Aug05 Section 8 Rent 527.00 74919 527.00
Pemberton, Robert
218.04 75232 218.04
Ref PERA premium 8.00 75063 8.00
Performance Kennels Inc
18,078.00 74913 18,078.00
140#bg K-9 dog food 34.28 75230 110.96
4 days K-9 Saber boarding 76.68
74915 22,184.00
Petrovski, Igor
Aug05 Section 8 Rent $1,025.00 74889 $1,025.00
Petty Cash
PD increase fund to $50 $10.00 75231 $10.00
Place Apartments, The
Aug05 Section 8 Rent $500.00 74927 $500.00
Plumb, Alice
Water quality landscap grant 135.90 75109 135.90
Plymouth Automotive Inc.
99 Chev Suburban tow 168.04 75050 336.08
95 Ford Explorer tow 168.04
Plymouth Automotive Inc.
96 Chevy Lumina tow 218.04 75232 218.04
Plymouth Colony Apartments
Aug05 Section 8 Rent 18,078.00 74913 18,078.00
Plymouth Ponds Apartments
Aug05 Section 8 Rent 22,184.00 74915 22,184.00
Plymouth Ponds Apartments
Aug05 HAP 1,289.00 75233 1,289.00
Plymouth Terrace Realty, LLP
Aug05 Section 8 Rent 151.00 74916 151.00
Pond & Lighting Designs Inc
Parkers fountain replaced 3,597.49 75234 3,597.49
Postmaster / Window D-12
Sep-Oct05 Plymouth News 4,300.00 75051 4,300.00
Prairie Restoration
7.13.05 Lake Camelot 424.69 75052 765.77
7.12.05 NW Blvd Wall 341.08
Prairie Restoration
7.20.05 PC spot spray/mow 662.99 75235 890.92
7.20.05 Pkvw Swale spot spray/ 227.93
Prime Time
Park and Ree Refund 575.00 75229 575.00
Printers Service Inc
3-77" ice knife sharp 51.00 75236 51.00
http://city1nterna1/asp/asp reports/finance/ c_check.asp?sFromDate=7%2F30%2F2005&sToDate=8%2F... 8/15/2005
Check Register
Professional Aquarium Mnt Inc
Page 19 of 24
Jul05 PC Aquarium maint $349-38 75053 $349.38
Protek Painting Inc
FS 3 main stair rail,skirt,han 2,970.00 75054 $4,215.91
FS 3 Cabinet door/drawer pulls 270.91
FS 3 paint wood doors 975.00
Providence Academy
68.63
R200004289 3.22.00 erosion ref 800.00 75055 $800.00
Public Risk Management Assoc
05/'06 Leitner Membership 310.00 75237 $310.00
Purcel, Mark
Park and Rec Refund $15.00 75238 $15.00
Qwest
164.90 75059 250.90
Ju105 E Med lk beach outside 68.63 75056 68.63
Qwest
Aug05 PD to Sheriff 93.99 75239 335.96
Aug05 L Olson/PD investig 102.19
Aug05 WTP's connect 139.78
75243 381.78
Qwest Communications
Case phone record info 150.00 75240 150.00
RCM Specialists, Inc
Mission Ponds twnhms patcher 1,375.00 75057 1,375.00
RSC - Metroquip Division
Scissor lift 590.75 75058 590.75
Ramy Turf Products
4r) Netless erosion binkt,stpl 192.55 75241 192.55
Randy's Sanitation Inc
Jul05 CC/MIP Rubbish Removal 862.70 75242 1,560.71
Jul05 PW/PM Rubbish Removal 698.01
Ray Allen
K-9 trial sleeves,jacket 164.90 75059 250.90
2 Dog Leads 86.00
Reed Business Information
Proj4141 7.8.05 legal notice 193.92 75060 193.92
Reed Business Information
Prcj3125 7.15.05 legal notice 381.78 75243 381.78
Rezabek, Rebekah
Park and Rec Refund 73.00 75245 73.00
Rice, Christina
Aug05 Utility Reimbursement 96.00 74868 96.00
Road Surface Technologies
Slurry seal 38 cul de sacs 27,420.00 75062 27,420.00
Robinson, Nakia
Aug05 Utility Reimbursement 70.00 74907 70.00
Rolyan
12 Buoy marker/Aquatic plant 1,256.70 75105 1,256.70
Rookies
Park and Rec Refund $60.00 75169 $60.00
http://cityintemal/asplasp_reports/finance/cc_check. asp?sFromDate=7%2F 3 0%2F2005 &sToDate=8%2F ... 8/15/2005
Check Register
Root -O -Matic
CC maint/sink line 200'
Rosenlund, Scott
235.00 75065
Page 20 of 24
235.00
Aug05 Section 8 Rent $1,267.00 74920 $1,267.00
Roto -Rooter
05 3rd qtr Berkshire big jet 150.00 75066 150.00
Roytelman, Ilya
817.94
Aug05 Section 8 Rent 611.00 74890 611.00
Ruttger's Sugar Lake Lodge
69,304.00 75071 69,304.00
Lewis/Abel lodge MIAMA 9.7/9,9 576.08 75067 576.08
Saunders, Jill & Randy
5,092.00 75259 5,092.00
11955 44th ave Refund permit 195.09 75004 195.09
Schaaf, Jean
904.00 74904 904.00
Park and Rec Refund 40.00 75250 40.00
Schaaf, Jean
Park and Rec Refund 40.00 75251 40.00
Scharber & Sons/Long Lake
Spool, bearing,circlip 63.97 75252 475.88
Hedge trimmer 230.03
2 trimmer lin,6spool,2 shldr s 181.88
Schoenfelder, Teresa
Park and Rec Refund 35.00 75253 35.00
Schommer, Dawn
Park and Rec Refund 22.00 75254 22.00
Schwaab, Inc.
PD 1 restricted,) confidential 68.46 75255 68.46
Seelye Craftsmen Co
Radio box $160.00 75068 $160.00
Shenandoah Woods
Aug05 Section 8 Rent $15,281.00 74923 $15,281.00
Short -Elliott -Hendrickson
Proj2032 Jun05 WTP's upgrade $38,923.21 75256 $38,923,21
Shred N Go
7-6 Scheduled service $45.00 75070 $45.00
Signs Unlimited
5 Sr parking signs/1 occupancy $343.44 75257 $343.44
Silent Knight Security Group
7.7.05 4 Season well battery 125.84 75258 943.78
6.22 Rplc card reader at ATV d 817.94
Silver King Refrigeration Inc
8200419219 11.23.04 SIPA 69,304.00 75071 69,304.00
SimplexGrinnell LP
Proj3129 #7/final IC addn 5,092.00 75259 5,092.00
Sip, Michael James
Aug05 Section 8 Rent 904.00 74904 904.00
Sprint
Jul05 PD MDC $6.51 75260 $6.51
http://cityintemal/asplasp_reports/finance/:,c_check.asp?sFromDate=7%2F30%2F2005 &sToDate=8%2F... 8/15/2005
Check Register Page 21 of 24
St Louis Park HRA
Aug05 Section 8 Rent $810.68 74924 $810.68
State of Minnesota
74.90 75261 $129.95
6.5.05 Crew 42 Parks cleaning 247.85 75130 $587.70
6.5.05 Crew #1 Parks cleaning 339.85
Steinbring, Bradley
128.75)
Water quality landscp grant 200.00 75118 $200.00
Stone Creek Apts
57.20
Aug05 Section 8 Rent 9,306.00 74914 $9,306.00
Streicher's Prof.Police Equip.
Belt/trousers S magy 74.90 75261 $129.95
12 -restraints 140.45
S Larson Tie bar 26.36
Cr inv I278934 11 retraints 128.75)
Plastic restraints/str misc 16.99
Suburban Rate Authority
05 2nd 1/2 Dues $2,100.00 75263 $2,100.00
Suburban Tire Wholesale Inc
8 P225/60RI6 eagle ultra grip $460.76 75073
8 P225/60R16 Eagle ultra grip $460.76
3 P235/75R16 wrangler tire $167.00
1,088.52
Summer Creek Apts
Aug05 Section 8 Rent 4,670.00 74925 $4,670.00
Sun Newspapers/Notices
78.65
Ord 2005-14 78.65 75074 $2,028.82
04' Financial Reports 300.30
CDBG pubhrg 57.20
Proj 4141 144.79
Transit station bids 364.65
04' Financial Reports 407.55
04'- Financial Reports 278.85
Ord 2005-15 82.23
04' Financial Reports 214.50
TIF publication 100.10
Sun Newspapers/Notices
Vacation Lahti Lane 50.05 75264 $661.39
File 2005066 78.65
File 2005088 46.48
Vicksbg Crossing 185.90
Ord 2005-17 121.55
Ord 2005-16 89.38
File 2005077 89.38
Sunram Construction Inc
Proj4119E 41 BMP $54,727.59 75265 $54,727.59
Superior Ford, Inc.
Condensens/arm asy ns 307.65 75075 $468.95
Switch 38.13
Bolt Andns/nut 15.38
Element 70.53
Switch A 37.26
Supreme Building Maintenance
Ju105+6.9,6.15 cln water damag $8,179.84 75076 8,179.84
T C Field & Company
Aug-Oct05 Prop Casualty $2,370.00 75078 2,370.00
TDS Metrocom
Ju105 Parks, CC, PW, FS $2,971.17 75266 2,971.17
http://cityintemal/asplasp_reports/finance/cc check.asp?sFromDate=7%2F30%2F2005&sToDate=8%2F... 8/15/2005
Check Register
TKDA & Associates Inc
Page 22 of 24
5.29/625.05 Leak locates 220.25 75079 6,338.34
Proj4144 Jun05 6,118.09
Safety glasses 38.24
Target Commercial Interiors
6.00
Payroll Generated Invoice 5.00
PW carpet replacement 30,990.00 75080 30,990.00
Thompson, Kevin or Karen
53,00
Payroll Generated Invoice 1.00
Aug05 Section 8 Rent 859.00 74898 859.00
ThyssenKrupp Elevator
51.12
Payroll Generated Invoice 4.00
Aug05 PS Elev maintenance 1I3.34 75267 113.34
Tierney Bros. Inc.
351.45
PW 2 B&W,1 B,1 W tape 90.31 75081 90.31
Toll Company
Helium @ 32.29 82.56 75082 $340.77
Helium/oxygen/argon 179.35
Safety glasses 40.62
Safety glasses 38.24
Toshiba Business Solutions
PS 1 Drum kit/Fax machine $194.92 75072 $194.92
Toshiba Business Solutions
PS I toner $72.50 75262 $72.50
Town & Country Fence Inc.
Proj4129E cedar fencing $1,050.00 75269 $1,050.00
Traffic Marking Services Inc
05 Striping service $22,636.50 75270 $22,636.50
Tri -K Services, Inc.
Payroll Generated Invoice 6.00 75272 $96.00
Jul05 69yds Pulv topsoil 624.62 75083 624.62
TruGreen Landcare
6.00
Payroll Generated Invoice 5.00
Ju105 Lawn maintenance 4,755.57 75084 4,755.57
Trugreen Chemlawn
53,00
Payroll Generated Invoice 1.00
05 #3 42nd&Berkshire weeds 71.36 75085 569.78
05 #3 48th & Cheshire weeds 51.12
Payroll Generated Invoice 4.00
05 #3 Parkview Ridge weeds 95.85
http://cityintemal/asp/asp_reports/finance/cc_check.asp?sFromDate=7%2 F3 0%2F2005 &sToDate=8%2F... 8/15/2005
05 #3 Reserve Park weeds 351.45
Turovskaya, Irina
Aug05 Section 8 Rent 606.00 74891 606.00
Twin City Water Clinic, Inc.
Ju105 Water analysis 576.00 75271 576.00
United Rentals
5-13I marking flag $45.74 75086 $662.54
Shovel/spade/shovel/probes $167.36
Boom46-50ft $449.44
United Way of Mpls
Payroll Generated Invoice 6.00 75272 $96.00
Payroll Generated Invoice 5.00
Payroll Generated Invoice 2.00
Payroll Generated Invoice 6.00
Payroll Generated Invoice 5.00
Payroll Generated Invoice 11.00
Payroll Generated Invoice 5.00
Payroll Generated Invoice 53,00
Payroll Generated Invoice 1.00
Payroll Generated Invoice 1.00
Payroll Generated Invoice 13.00
Payroll Generated Invoice 1.00
Payroll Generated Invoice 4.00
Payroll Generated Invoice 5.00
http://cityintemal/asp/asp_reports/finance/cc_check.asp?sFromDate=7%2 F3 0%2F2005 &sToDate=8%2F... 8/15/2005
Check Register Page 23 of 24
Payroll Generated Invoice 10.00
Payroll Generated Invoice 13.00
Payroll Generated Invoice 5.00
Valley Fair
1,962.00
8.5.05 Day Camp trip 525.00 75087 $525.00
Valley Rich Co Inc
PW watermain&fire hydrant inst $9,900.00 75088 $9,900.00
Valley Rich Co Inc
CR9/01d RAT rd rpr wtr main 4,398.00 75273 $8,167.72
13th&Harbor Ln rpr wtr main 2,017.00
Cr inv 9730/Job Trucking 209.28)
11750 60th Pl/rpr water main b 1,962.00
Valspar Paint
8.30
3 -latex flt clr 154.73 75089 $154.73
Van Duong, Minh
Aug05 Section 8 Rent
Vang, True
Aug05 Section 8 Rent
1,115.00 74905 $1,115.00
948.00 74931 948.00
Verdicon Inc
15gl Kleenup,4gt SC Wimergrn $753.78 75090 $753.78
Verizon Wireless
10.27
Ju105 Ahrens,Tufte 40.19 75091 $68.87
Ju105 Utiltiy 12 Blazer 7.58
Ju105 Rescue Vehicle 11 6.67
Ju105 Aerial 21 8.30
Ju105 Rescue 11 Fax 6.13
Verizon Wireless
Jul05 Yard Waste 10.27 75274 45.43
Ju105 IT/spare 35.16
Viking Trophies
15 -plaque Th Nt lower div/plaq 374.03 75275 374.03
Vladimir, Begun
Aug05 Section 8 Rent 451.00 74861 451.00
Waste Management Services
Aug05 IC Rubbish Removal 159.20 75093 441.54
Aug05 PC Rubbish Removal 282.34
Waste Management Services
Ju105 Dropoff/Curb recycle les 3,281.06 75276 3,281.06
Watson Company
Pavilion concession food rsply 356.86 75094 356.86
Watson Company
Pavilion concession food rsply 206.88 75277 206.88
Weber, Dawn
Aug05 Utility Reimbursement 46.00 74870 46.00
Weinzierl, Mary
R51268 10.2.96 erosion ref 614.00 75203 614.00
Wellington Apartments
Aug05 Section 8 Rent 1,917.00 74935 1,917.00
Wendy's Wiggle, Jiggie&Jam
8.10.05 Concert performance 195.00 75095 195.00
http://cityintemal/asplasp_reports/finance/,,-c_check.asp?sFromDate=7%2F30%2F2005&sToDate=8%2F... 8/15/2005
Check Register
West Point Products Inc
Page 24 of 24
HP Ij4000/dj800/No: 78 tri col $476.42 75096 $476.42
Westside Wholesale Tire Inc.
42.16 75099 $203.60
Ju105 Hardware supplies 1.90
Unit 272 2 Bridgestone tires 670.95 75097 670.95
Willberg, Anders
9.57
Ju105 Hardware supplies 94.55
Aug05 Section 8 Rent 915.00 74857 915.00
Willow Creek Apartments LLC
639.00
Aug05 Section 8 Rent 37,446.00 74864 37,446.00
Wixon, Renee
Park and Rec Refund 68.00 75278 68.00
Wolf Camera
4x6 3x5 digital media 1.49 75098 14.25
Fire/2 Ihr processing 12.76
Woody's Hardware
Ju105 Hardware supplies 42.16 75099 $203.60
Ju105 Hardware supplies 1.90
Ju105 Hardware supplies 31.60
Ju105 Hardware supplies 13.13
Ju105 Hardware supplies 9.57
Ju105 Hardware supplies 94.55
Ju105 Hardware supplies 7.79
Ju105 Hardware supplies 2.90
Workplace 2000 Inc
IC graphite shelf ends 61.59 75279 $187.26
IC 2 base for 20" 125.67
Wright -Henn Elec. Co.
5,519.00
7-15-05 Street Lighting 7,548.34 75280 $7,548.34
Xcel Energy
2,011.81
Ju105 Lift station 4,571.30 75100 $4,571.30
Xcel Energy
Ju105 Wtr twrs 35.75 75281 $66,396.42
Jul05 Lift Stations 600.65
6.27/7.27 Well 15 5,519.00
Ju105 City Buildings 55,875.98
Ju105 Traffic Signals 2,011.81
6.8/7.10 Zachary plyfld 2,353.23
Xcel Energy/Mise
WTP1 3 phase cables 3,047.40 75282 $3,047.40
Xibaba
8.9.05 Concert performance $500.00 75035 $500.00
Zee Medical Service
CC Medical resupply 144.82 75101 $780.41
PS Medical resupply 168.07
PW Medical resupply 285.01
PM Medical resupply 182.51
Zep Manufacturing/PO BxCH10697
Zep 45/model 6400 sprayer 280.36 75283 $280.36
eQuality Pathways to Potential
Ju105 1C Janitorial 543.15 75284 $1,182.15
Ju105 PC Janitorial maint 639.00
TOTAL AMOUNT: $2,943,253.10
http://cityintemal/asplasp_reports/finance/,-.c_check. asp?sFromDate=7%2F3 0%2F2005&sToDate=8%2F... 8/15/2005
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
RESOLUTION NO: 2005 -
APPROVING DISBURSEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD
ENDING AUGUST 12, 2005
WHEREAS, a list of disbursements for the period ending August 12, 2005 was presented to the
City Council for approval;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA, that the payment of the list of disbursements of the
following funds is approved:
Anchor Bank
General & Special Revenue 585,315.69
Construction & :Debt Service 210,081.21
Enterprise & Internal Service 1,833,855.76
Housing & Redevelopment Authority 314,000.44
GRAND TOTAL FOR ALL FUNDS2.943.253.10
Adopted by the City Council ori August 23, 2005.
Agenda Number 6,
TO: Laurie Ahrens, City Manager ` iY
FROM: Shawn Drill, Senior Planner through Anne Hurlburt, Community
Development Director
SUBJECT: United States Postal Service. Easement agreement to allow parking
expansion on the City property east of the post office located at 3300
Plymouth Boulevard (2004147)
DATE: August 15, 2005 for City Council Meeting of August 23, 2005
1. PROPOSED MOTION:
Move to adopt the attached resolution approving an easement agreement to allow parking
expansion at the post office located at 3300 Plymouth Boulevard, pursuant to the attached
easement agreement.
Approval of the easement agreement requires a 4/7 vote of the City Council.
2. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST:
The United States Postal Service (USPS) is requesting approval of an easement agreement that
would allow them to expand their parking lot onto a portion of the abutting City -owned parcel
Outlot A, Plymouth Center ,addition) located northeast of the post office. The easement
agreement was prepared by the City Attorney's office.
3. BACKGROUND:
The Plymouth Branch Post Office at 3300 Plymouth Boulevard has been experiencing a parking
shortage for the past several years, often requiring customers to park in the street or circle the
parking lot until a parking spac,- opens up. Additionally, the drive -up mail drop area is currently
located within the parking lot, which exacerbates the site circulation, congestion, and parking
shortage problems.
File 2004147
Page 2
The City does not have review authority over the USPS, therefore, site plan approval is not
applicable or required. As own. -r of the parking expansion area, however, the City has been able
to influence the design including provision for water quality ponding.
In order to improve safety and efficiency, and reduce congestion in the public street, the USPS
proposes to expand its parking lot onto the abutting City parcel. The proposal would increase the
number of customer parking spaces from 15 to 39. Additionally, the drive -up mail drop area
would be relocated out of the parking lot, by installation of a separate drive lane dedicated to the
mail drop services. The proposal would include construction of a water quality pond east of the
expanded parking area. The pond would comply with City and Watershed requirements.
Although roughly 30 existing trees would need to be removed for the expansion, the landscape
plan shows that 21 new trees would be planted on the site.
The City of Plymouth has been working with the USPS to expand the on-site parking for several
years. The expansion has been delayed a number of times due to USPS budget cuts. However,
funding for the project was recently approved by USPS.
Due to unstable soils, the parking expansion area requires surcharging for roughly six months.
The surcharging operation would consist of compressing the sub -grade soils by temporarily
stockpiling fill to a height of roughly six feet in the expansion area. A silt fence would be
installed around the surcharge area, and erosion control measures would be implemented in
compliance with City requirements. The USPS plans to surcharge the expansion area this year
and complete the parking expansion in 2006.
4. RECOMMENDATION:
Community Development Department staff recommends approval of the attached resolution
approving the easement agreement pursuant to the conditions listed, and authorizing the Mayor
and Manager to execute the easement agreement on behalf of the City.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Location Map
2. Site Graphics
3. Easement Agreement
4. Resolution Approving Easement Agreement
Site
J.
EXISTING SITE LAYOUT
304 Ar'- SOS
o
V ^; \\ \ \ \ \ t gyp' so r.
u•._ -->-»-»-_-;_- -----__-_... 111 A / Y'. _..
F p I r
I 1 _
t
EXISTING POST
3
r OFFICE
44 r x
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE SCALE 1' - 30'-0'
eq V 'ii: EXPAND CUSTOMER PARKING
PLYMOUTH BRANCH
SITE DEMOLITION PLAN
MGR: CRO
C.Y. ARCHITECTURE, P.A. 3300 PLYMOUTH BLVD DRAWN MLDRAWNRY: J/
1 ISDOI219NORTHSECONDSTREET. SUITE 301
YINMCA US, MINNESOTA 55401-1454 PLYMOUTH, MN 55441 11IOf Q DATE:8/15/2005
PNOM"512)S!l-9677 IAL•(512)IM-2995 I100L 9Q PROJ N0: 04128-04
COPNdGHT C.Y. ARCHTECTURE, PA 2005
PROPOSED SITE LAYOUT
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE SCALE 1' - 30'-0'
CIrl u'- O3 EXPAND CUSTOMER PARKING SITE PLAN
PLYMOUTH BRANCH raa MCR: CRD
C.Y. ARCRDECTIIRE. P.A219NORTHSECONDSTREET. SUITE 501 3300 PLYMOUTH BLVD Ail' --
ORAwN Ery; JmE
a/15/2005 JSD03YINNTAPOUS. MINNESOTA 55401-1454
MIGH"212)SH-5677 FM-(412)536-2295PO2OE591PIR
PLYMOUTH, MN 55441 unm>tmo 7 f7 7nnc
DATE:
11 N.- 0412a-04
COPYRIGHT C.Y. ARCHITECTURE. PA 2005
reserved for recording information)
GRANT OF PARKING AREA EASEMENT
THIS GRANT OF EASEMENT is made on this day of , 2005, by
CITY OF PLYMOUTH, a Minnesota municipal corporation, (hereinafter referred to as the
City"), to the UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE (hereinafter referred to as the "USPS")
RECITALS
WHEREAS, the City is the fee owner of real property located in Hennepin County,
Minnesota, legally described a,, Outlot A, Plymouth Center Addition ("City Property");
WHEREAS, the USPS is the fee owner of real property located in Hennepin County,
Minnesota, which abuts the City Property and is legally described as Lot 1, Block 1, Plymouth
Center Addition ("USPS Property");
WHEREAS, the USPS desires to use a portion of the City Property for the construction,
maintenance and operation of e. parking lot to serve the USPS Post Office on the USPS Property,
which property is legally described on Exhibit A attached hereto ("Easement Area")
11558802
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the sum of One and No/ 100 Dollar ($1.00)
and other good and valuable consideration to them in hand paid by the USPS, the receipt and
sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged by City:
Easement. The City hereby grants unto the USPS, its successors and assigns,
forever, an exclusive easement in, to, over, across and through the Easement Area for purposes of
constructing, maintaining, repairing and operating a vehicular parking area, which easement shall
be for the benefit and use of the USPS Property and the USPS and its permittees. This easement
shall include the rights of the L SPS, its contractors, agents, servants, and assigns, to enter upon
the easement premises at all reasonable times to construct, reconstruct, inspect, repair, maintain,
remove the vehicular parking area over, across, on, under, and through the Easement Area.
2. Maintenance. The USPS shall be solely responsible for all costs of installation,
repair, maintenance, removal a1d insurance associated with the parking area placed in the
Easement Area.
Site Plan AnVnroyal. Construction of the USPS parking area authorized under the
terms of this Agreement and ary future modifications to or reconstructions of the USPS parking
area is subject to prior site plan approval by the City. Such approval shall not be unreasonably
withheld.
4. Warrant of Title. The City represents and warrants to the USPS that the City is
the only owner of fee simple title to the Easement Area, and that there are no owners or
mortgages, contract for deed, leases, rental agreements, occupancy agreements, or any other
encumbrances or verbal or wrilten agreements of any nature whatsoever affecting title to the
Easement Area. Subject to and in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Tort Claims Act,
28 U.S.C. 1346 § (b) and § 2671, Pts .a., the USPS expressly agrees to be responsible for claims,
loss, damage, actions, causes of action, expense, and/or liability resulting from the negligent or
11558802
wrongful act or omission by an employee of the USPS while acting within the scope of
employment under circumstances where the United States Postal Service, if a private person
would be liable in accordance with the laws in the State of Minnesota hereunder, in connection
with this Grant of Easement or the USPS' use of the Easement Area pursuant to this Grant of
Easement.
5. Termination. G,-antor and Grantee agree that this Grant of Easement shall become
null and void upon termination of the United States Post Office on the USPS Property. Upon
termination and at City's discretion, all parking area improvements located within the Easement
Area shall either be immediately removed by the USPS or shall remain and be owned by the City.
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement this
day of , 200`i.
SEAL)
115588v02
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
Judy A. Johnson, Mayor
Laurie Ahrens, City Manager
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
By:
Its:
By:
Its:
3
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
5's.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of
2005, by Judy A. Johnson and by Laurie Ahrens, respectively the Mayor
and City Manager of the City ol' Plymouth, a Minnesota corporation, on behalf of the corporation
and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council.
Notary Public
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this
2005, by and
respectively the and
States Postal Service, a
Notary Public
DRAFTED BY:
Campbell Knutson
Professional Association
317 Eagandale Office Center
1380 Corporation Center Curve
Eagan, Minnesota 55121
651) 452-5000
AMP
11558802
day of
of the United
EXHIBIT "A"
to
GRANT OF EASEMENT
An easement over, under and across that part of Outlot A, PLYMOUTH CENTER, according to
the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as beginning at the northwest
corner of said Outlot A; thence South 40 degrees 15 minutes 58 seconds East, assumed bearing,
along the westerly line of said Outlot A a distance of 150.00 feet; thence North 49 degrees 44
minutes 02 seconds East a distance of 120.00 feet; thence North 23 degrees 15 minutes 58
seconds West a distance of 114.22 feet to the north line of said Outlot A; thence southwesterly
along said north line of Outlot A a distance of 158.69 to the point of beginning.
115588v02
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
RESOLUTION 2005 -
APPROVING AN EASEMENT AGREEMENT ALLOWING THE UNITED STATES
POSTAL SERVICE TO EXPAND PARKING ONTO ADJACENT CITY -OWNED LAND
2004147)
WHEREAS, the United States Postal Service has requested approval of an easement agreement
to allow a parking lot expansion for the Plymouth Branch Post Office located at 3300 Plymouth
Boulevard, legally described as Lot 1, Block 1, Plymouth Center Addition, Hennepin County,
Minnesota; and
WHEREAS, a the parking lot expansion and related stormwater runoff treatment ponding would
occur on property that is owned by the City of Plymouth, legally described follows:
That part of Outlot A, PLYMOUTH CENTER, according to the recorded plat thereof,
Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as beginning at the northwest corner of said
Outlot A; thence South 40 degrees 15 minutes 58 seconds East, assumed bearing, along
the westerly line of said Outlot A a distance of 150.00 feet; thence North 49 degrees 44
minutes 02 seconds East a distance of 120.00 feet; thence North 23 degrees 15 minutes
58 seconds West a distance of 114.22 feet to the north line of said Outlot A; thence
southwesterly along said north line of Outlot A a distance of 158.69 to the point of
beginning.
WHEREAS, the City Attorney has prepared an easement document relating to said easement
agreement.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the easement
agreement for the USPS, and,
FURTHER, that the Mayor and City Manager be authorized to execute the easement agreement
on behalf of the City; and,
FURTHER, that the easement agreement and related improvements be carried out in accordance
with the civil plans received by the City on July 29, 2005 and landscape plan received by the
Resolution 2005-
2004147)
Page 2
City on August 15, 2005, on fi:.e with the City of Plymouth under File No. 2004147, subject to
the following conditions:
1) On Plan Sheet C6, revise; Item 10 to provide a two-inch thick Bituminous Binding Course
for the entire section.
2) Use City Detail ST -2 and R-3067 for grate for catch basins.
3) An NPDES permit is required prior to commencement of the project.
4) B618 concrete curb and gutter shall be noted for the curb to be replaced in 34"' Avenue.
5) Provide dimensions including radii and driveway widths for the curb sufficient to allow it
to be located on the site.
6) The west radii for the east driveway shall be 20 feet.
7) Move the NURP Pond out of the right-of-way.
8) Show stabilized riprap emergency overflow at HWL from the NURP pond. The height of
the berm around the pond shall be one foot higher than the emergency overflow
elevation.
9) Use City Detail ST -3 for the flared end sections. The last 12 joints on inlets and outlets
shall be tied.
10) Provide a signing and striping plan including dimensions for review. The south driveway
shall be one-way inbound and the north driveway shall be one-way outbound.
ADOPTED by the City Council on August 23, 2005.
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS
The undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed City Clerk of the City of Plymouth,
Minnesota, certifies that I compared the foregoing resolution adopted at a meeting of the
Plymouth City Council on August 23, 2005, with the original thereof on file in my office, and the
same is a correct transcription thereof.
WITNESS my hand officially as such City Clerk and the Corporate seal of the City this
day of
City Clerk
Agenda Number ,
TO: Laurie Ahrens, City Manager
rt
FROM: Joshua Doty, Planner (509-5453) through Anne Hurlburt, Community
Development Director
SUBJECT: Acacia Real Estate Partners LLC. Rezoning, Site Plan, Conditional Use
Permit, and Variances to allow an office/retail building and an auto -
service building for two properties located at the southwest corner of Old
Rockford Road and Peony Lane (2005066)
DATE: August 12, 2005 for the City Council Meeting of August 23, 2005
REVIEW DEADLINE: September 23, 2005
1. PROPOSED MOTION:
Move to adopt the attached items, as recommended by the Planning Commission:
a. an ordinance rezoning their properties located at the southwest corner of Peony Lane
and Old Rockford Road from FRD (Future Restricted Development) to C-1
Convenience Commercial) and C-3 (Highway Commercial);
b. a resolution approving findings of fact supporting the rezoning; and
C. a resolution approving a site plan, conditional use permit, and variances, except for the
north parking setback variance.
Approval of the rezoning, findings of fact for rezoning, site plan, conditional use permit, and
variances requires a 4/7 vote of the City Council.
2. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST:
The applicant is requesting the following approvals: 1) a rezoning of their properties from FRD
Future Restricted Development) to C-1 (Convenience Commercial) and C-3 (Highway
Commercial), 2) a site plan to allow a 12,678 -square foot office/retail building and a 4,200 -
square foot auto -service building, 3) a conditional use permit to allow an auto service building in
the C-3 Zoning District, and 4) six setback variances and a lot area variance. The development is
proposed on two lots that are roughly 1.6 acres together.
File 2005066
Page 2
3. PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING:
On August 3, 2005, the Planning Commission conducted the public hearing on this matter, and
subsequently voted unanimously to recommend approval of the request. The applicant was
present in support of the proposal. Additionally, three people spoke at the hearing; two stated
that they were not opposed to the development and all three people had questions or concerns.
Concerns were related to trash bins, oil from the transmission shop, setbacks of the office/retail
building, landscaping, and trails.
With respect to trash bins, and oil from the transmission shop, the applicant stated that all trash
would be stored inside the buildings and all oil would be stored in barrels and recycled.
A resident raised concern that the 14 -foot setback for the office/retail building would impact the
residential properties to the north. The homeowner also stated that the neighborhood asked the
developer if they would plant trees on the residential properties, but was told it could not be
done. Staff responded that the building placement was designed to provide the least amount of
impact to the neighborhood as possible. Staff added that the greatest impact from a commercial
development is from vehicles, such as traffic activity, car door and vehicle noise, and headlights.
Staff also responded that the City cannot require the developer to plant trees on a separate
property. The applicant stated that they are willing to work with the neighborhood to provide
some buffering on their properties.
A resident asked if construction of a trail on the north side of Old Rockford Road could be done
earlier. Staff responded that the trail would not likely be constructed until Old Rockford Road is
expanded. Staff stated that the Park and Recreation Commission discusses which trails will be
constructed each year. Staff added that residents can contact the Park and Recreation
Commission to request the trail be constructed earlier.
The Planning Commission asked if the existing berm on the north side of Old Rockford Road
would screen the office/retail building. Staff responded that the proposed building would be
significantly higher than the existing berm. After the Planning Commission hearing, staff
inspected the site and found that the berm is roughly 6 feet high across from the proposed
development and gradually slopes down (westerly) to roughly two feet. The proposed building
is 30 feet high, therefore the existing berm would not completely screen the commercial
building.
The Planning Commission also asked if the hours of operation could be restricted on the site.
Staff responded that the hours could be restricted through the conditional use permit. The
Planning Commission discussed restricting hours of operation for the transmission business from
7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. on weekdays, and from 7:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. on Saturdays with no
Sunday operation. The applicant stated that they would not have any issues with those hours
because they typically operate from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on weekdays, with minimal weekend
work. However, the applicant stated that during hot weather and after snowstorms, their
business increases. Therefore, they would prefer not to have a restriction. An amendment by the
Planning Commission to restrict the hours of operation failed.
File 2005066
Page 3
Prior to the Planning Commission hearing, staff received an email from a resident (attached),
requesting a restriction be placed to not allow neon signage on the north side of the office/retail
building. The applicant stated that they do not have an issue with the restriction. The Planning
Commission recommended to restrict neon signage from the north wall of the office/retail
building. Staff has added this restriction to the attached resolution.
A copy of the Planning Commission minutes is attached. Notice of Public Hearing at the
Planning Commission was published in the City's official newspaper and mailed to all property
owners within 750 feet. A copy of the notification area map is attached. Development signage
remains on the site.
4. CONTEXT:
A. Surrounding Land Uses
B. Natural Characteristics of Site
The site is located within the Bassett Creek Watershed District and contains no land within a
Shoreland Overlay District. There is no land within the Flood Plain Overlay District. Roughly
0.2 acres of the site contains protected wetland area. The applicant is not proposing to plat the
property. Therefore, the applicant is not subject to the wetland buffer or tree preservation
regulations.
C. Previous Actions Affecting Site
There are no approvals on record for the subject site. Two existing wood buildings occupy the
north property. The buildings were built in 1920 have been used primarily for various storage
uses. This site has been guided for commercial use since at least 1973.
Adjacent Land Use Guiding Zoning
North Plum Tree Living Area 2 Single Family Detached 2
Subdivision
Northeast Single Family Homes Living Area 1 Future Restricted
Development
East Vacant Land Commercial Convenience Commercial
South Peony Promenade Commercial Highway Commercial
Commercial
Development
West Undeveloped Commercial Highway Commercial
Wetland
B. Natural Characteristics of Site
The site is located within the Bassett Creek Watershed District and contains no land within a
Shoreland Overlay District. There is no land within the Flood Plain Overlay District. Roughly
0.2 acres of the site contains protected wetland area. The applicant is not proposing to plat the
property. Therefore, the applicant is not subject to the wetland buffer or tree preservation
regulations.
C. Previous Actions Affecting Site
There are no approvals on record for the subject site. Two existing wood buildings occupy the
north property. The buildings were built in 1920 have been used primarily for various storage
uses. This site has been guided for commercial use since at least 1973.
File 2005066
Page 4
5. LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION-MAKING:
The City has a relatively high level of discretion in approving or denying a rezoning application.
The proposed zoning for a property must be consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. If
the proposed zoning is not consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, the City must deny the
rezoning application. The Zoning Ordinance and Map are the enforcement tools used to
implement the goals and standards set by the Comprehensive Plan.
The City's discretion in approving or denying a site plan is limited to whether or not the
proposed project meets the measurable standards outlined in the Zoning Ordinance. If it meets
these measurable standards, the City must then approve the site plan.
The City's discretion in approving or denying a conditional use permit is limited to whether or
not the proposed project meets the standards listed in the Zoning Ordinance. However, this level
of discretion is affected by the fact that some of these standards are open to interpretation.
The City's discretion in approving or denying a variance is limited to whether or not the
proposed project meets the standards in the Zoning Ordinance for a variance. The City has a
higher level of discretion with a variance because the burden of proof is on the applicant to show
that they meet the standards in the ordinance.
6. ANALYSIS OF PROPOSAL:
A. Rezoning
The subject parcels are currently zoned FRD (Future Restricted Development). For properties
located inside the urban service area such as this site, the FRD district is intended to serve as a
holding zone until a landowner or developer makes application for development, at which time
the site is to be rezoned consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan.
The applicant is proposing to rezone the northwest parcel (parcel 1) to C-1, Convenience
Commercial and the southeast parcel (parcel 2) to C-3, Highway Commercial.
State law requires that the zoning map for each city be consistent with its adopted comprehensive
plan. All commercial land in the City is classified under the same guide plan classification of C,
Commercial. The Zoning Ordinance however, has numerous commercial districts. Therefore, to
determine the consistency of a particular zoning district with the Comprehensive Plan requires an
analysis of how a subject site fits the location criteria identified for the various sub -categories of
commercial development in the Commercial guiding classification.
C-1 Parcel
The Comprehensive Plan states that convenience commercial uses should be located at the
intersections of streets classified as at least collectors. The proposed C-1 parcel, parcel 1, is
File 2005066
Page 5
located at the intersection of Peony Lane, a minor arterial and Old Rockford Road, a major
collector.
The Plan also states that convenience commercial locations maybe adjacent to low density
residential neighborhoods in that they are inherently low intensity. Parcel 1 is located south of
the Plum Tree neighborhood. To provide an appropriate transition to the neighborhood, the
applicant is proposing to place the building on parcel 1 next to the street with the parking behind
the building. This would shield the neighborhood from the parking and from the building on
parcel 2.
C-3 Parcel
The Comprehensive Plan states that highway commercial uses should be located near arterial
access points and adjoining other businesses or industrial areas. The proposed C-3 parcel, parcel
2, is located near Peony Lane and Highway 55, both minor arterials. Parcel 2 is also located
adjacent to Peony Promenade, a highway commercial development and a vacant C-1 parcel
located on the east side of Peony Lane.
The Plan also states that appropriate C-3 locations are those that provide effective buffering and
careful transitions to uses of less intensity. Parcel 2 would be separated from the Plum Tree
neighborhood by the C-1 parcel, which would only allow low intensity commercial uses. Parcel
2 is separated from the nearby Rockford Glen neighborhood by Peony Lane, the C-1 parcel
across Peony Lane and a large wetland. The Comprehensive Plan identifies using 1) uses of
lesser intensity, 2) streets and 3) natural features to provide appropriate transitions between uses
of different intensity.
Traffic
Whether the adjacent street system can handle the traffic generation associated with the different
uses is also an important consideration. In this instance, the subject site had a commercial
guiding when the City developed its most recent Comprehensive Plan (adopted August 2000).
As part of that plan, the City's transportation consultant undertook traffic modeling to make sure
that the local street system could function properly with the land use guiding. Therefore, no
separate traffic study was required for this application.
The proposed development would have one access point only, and that would be to Old
Rockford Road. In order to accommodate the proposed development and maintain proper
roadway functioning, staff recommends that the applicant construct a right turn lane for
eastbound traffic entering the development. This is consistent with the Plymouth Office Plaza
development that is currently under construction west of the subject property. Staff has added a
condition to the attached resolution requiring the eastbound turn lane to the development.
The City anticipates that Old Rockford Road would be expanded from two to four lanes in the
future. As part of that expansion, the City would construct a median from Peony Lane 400 feet
west on Old Rockford Road. When this occurs, the access to the subject site would be right -in,
File 2005066
Page 6
right -out only. This means that eastbound motorists on Old Rockford Road that want to enter the
development would need to make a U-turn at the end of the 400 foot median. Staff notes that
access to the Plum Tree subdivision is nearly 1,000 feet from the Old Rockford Road/Peony
Lane intersection. Therefore, traffic flow should not be an issue. However, the City could post a
no U-turn" sign if a traffic problem does occur.
Staff supports the requested rezoning from FRD to C-1 and C-3 with the following findings:
1. The proposed zoning of C-1 and C-3 for parcels 1 and 2, respectively, meets the location
criteria in the Comprehensive Plan and is therefore consistent with the plan.
2. The site plan associated with this request supports an effective transition from lower intensity
uses. More specifically, the applicant is proposing to place the building on parcel 1 close to
Old Rockford Road, shielding the parking area and the building on parcel 2 from the Plum
Tree neighborhood.
3. The existing road system has sufficient capacity to handle the traffic that would be generated
by the proposed development.
B. Site Plan Amendment
The applicant is requesting a site plan to allow construction of a 12,678 -square foot office/retail
building and a 4,200 -square foot auto -service building on the subject site. The office/retail
building would be located on parcel 1 and would include 8,190 -square feet of multi -tenant retail
use on the main level of the building. In addition, just over half of the building's footprint (4,488
square feet) would have a second story office use. The second story office would be located on
the east half of the building. The applicant is proposing a transmission shop for the auto -service
building on parcel 2. The transmission shop would include six service bays and an
office/reception area.
The Zoning Ordinance contains specific standards for approval of a site plan and for
development of land in the C-1 and C-3 zoning districts. Staff reviewed the application with
these standards and determined that the proposed expansion would comply with the standards in
the ordinance for minimum district area, building coverage, building height, parking,
landscaping, lighting, and building materials. The applicant is requesting variances for building
setbacks, parking setbacks, and a lot area variance. The variances are discussed later in this
report. Additional information and ordinance requirements are provided in the following table:
File 2005066
Page 7
Variance Required
Addressed in Resolution
Ordinance Proposed Meets/Exceeds
Requirement Reuirements
District Area Minimum 1 acre 1.05 acres Yes
Lot Area Minimum 1 acre 1.05 acres Yes
Building Coverage 50% 18% Yes
Building Setbacks 75 -foot front setback 14 feet to front on Old Rockford Rd. * No
35 -foot front setback 10 feet to front on Peony Lane * No
15 -foot side setback 16 feet to south property line Yes
15 -foot side setback 65 feet to west property line Yes
Building Hei ht 30 feet 30 feet Yes
b
District Area Minimum 1 acre 11 acres Yes
Lot Area Minimum 1 acre 0.54 acres * No
Building Coverage 50% 18% Yes
Building Setbacks 50 -foot front setback 14 feet to front on Peony Lane * No
15 -foot side setback 61 feet to north property line Yes
15 -foot side setback 19 feet to south property line Yes
15 -foot rear setback 38 feet to west property line Yes
Building Height 45 feet 32 feet Yes
Parking 58 spaces 61 spaces proposed Yes
Landscaping 17 overstory trees 26 new overstory trees and Yes
15 understory trees
Parking 20 -foot front setback 18 feet to front on Old Rockford Rd. * No
Setbacks 20 -foot front setback 15 feet to front on Peony Lane * No
20 -foot side setback 13 feet to west property line * No
20 -foot side setback 51 feet Yes
Lighting:
Type A
Fixture height max 30 ft. 25 ft. Yes
Shielding Fully -Shielded Unknown Unknown**
Watts per Sq. Ft. 0.080 0.047 Yes
Type B
Fixture height max 30 ft. 25 ft. Yes
Shielding Fully -Shielded Fully -Shielded Unknown**
Watts per Sq. Ft. 0.080 0.047 Yes
Type C
Fixture height (max) 4 feet above building or On wall of building Yes
less
Shielding Fully -Shielded Unknown Unknown**
Watts per Sq. Ft. 0.035 Unknown Unknown**
Type D
Fixture height (max) 4 feet above building or On wall of building Yes
less
Shielding Fully -Shielded Unknown Unknown**
Watts per Sq. Ft. 0.035 Unknown Unknown**
Type E
Fixture height (max) 4 feet above building or On wall of building Yes
less
Shielding Fully -Shielded Unknown Unknown**
Watts per Sq. Ft. 0.035 Unknown Unknown**
Variance Required
Addressed in Resolution
File 2005066
Page 8
The specific standards that require additional explanation are as follows.
Parking Requirements
Section 21135.11 of the Zoning Ordinance specifies the parking requirements for retail and
office uses. The Ordinance requires 37 parking spaces for the amount of retail space proposed
and 17 parking spaces for the amount of office space. Therefore, 54 parking spaces are required
for the office/retail building.
The Ordinance does not have a specific category for auto service businesses. Section 21135.11,
Subd. 4. of the Ordinance states, "for uses not specifically listed above, off-street parking
requirements shall be computed by the Zoning Administrator on the same basis as required for
most similar listed uses." Staff used the requirements determined for two similar uses, Walser
Collision Center and Aero Colours. For these uses, staff specified one space per service bay plus
additional parking spaces for the square footage of office and reception space (based on the
office standard of 1 space/250 feet of office space). Using this method, 6 spaces would be
required for the 6 services bays and 4 spaces would be required for the office/reception area.
Therefore, 10 parking spaces are required for the auto service business.
This equates to 64 parking spaces required for the development. However, the Zoning
Ordinance specifies a 10 percent deduction for joint parking between adjoining uses.
Consequently, the City requires 58 parking spaces for the development. Under the plan, 61
parking spaces would be provided. Therefore, the request meets the City's parking requirements.
Staff notes that it is important to consider the possibility that uses could change within the
development over time. Staff has reviewed the permitted uses in the C-3 zoning district to
determine the potential for other uses to locate on the C-3 property. With the exception of
veterinary clinics, the uses allowed in the C-3 zoning district would need at least same amount of
parking that is required for a retail use. For a retail use to locate in the auto service building, 19
parking spaces would be required for the 4,200 -square foot building. Factoring in the same
allowances for shared parking, 6 additional parking spaces would be needed on site to convert
the building to a retail use. Staff finds that the site constraints would prohibit the ability to add
the parking needed for retail use on the C-3 site. Staff notes that the only way a retail use could
be added to the C-3 building is if the entire floor area of the C-1 building is converted from retail
use to office use.
Lands cap ing/Screening
Section 21130.03 of the Zoning Ordinance requires screening where a non-residential use abuts
property zoned for residential use, except on that side considered to be the front, as determined
administratively. The proposed development would not require screening as the only adjacent
residential use is along the front yard of Old Rockford Road. However, the applicant is
proposing to place the building on parcel 1 close to Old Rockford Road to shield the parking area
and the building on parcel 2 from the Plum Tree neighborhood. The applicant is also proposing
File 2005066
Page 9
landscaping on the north side of the building with deciduous trees and a line of coniferous trees
along the west property line.
Lighting
The City's lighting regulations (Section 21105.06 of the Zoning Ordinance) were amended on
November 23, 2004. The proposed development is located in Lighting Zone 3 (LZ -3), which is
the lighting zone assigned to commercial and industrial developments.
The lighting plan indicates five types of lights (A, B, C, D, and E) on the subject property. The
proposed lighting plan includes pole lighting in the parking lot (types A and B), and wall lighting
types C, D, and E). All proposed lighting would meet the height requirements of the ordinance.
More information is needed to verify that the proposed wall lighting meets the watts per square
footage requirement in the Ordinance. Staff has added a condition to the attached resolution
requiring the applicant to revise the lighting plan to show compliance with the watts per square
footage requirement for wall lighting. All of the lighting on the property is located within 300
feet of residential property. Therefore, staff has added a condition to the attached resolution
requiring house side shields for all fixtures.
Pedestrian Facilities
There is an existing paved City trail on the east side of the site along Peony Lane. The applicant
has indicated that they would install an internal walkway that connects the uses within this
development to the City trail along the west side of Peony Lane. The applicant has also
indicated that a walkway would be added along the north side of the site along Old Rockford
Road that would extend from the west property line to the existing trail along Peony Lane. If
these walkway improvements are made, the proposed pedestrian system would be consistent
with the City's plan for trails and sidewalks. However, the proposed site plan does not identify
the proposed walkway system for the site. Therefore, staff has added a condition to the attached
resolution requiring a walkway connection from the proposed parking lot to the exiting trail
along Peony Lane and a walkway from the west property line to the existing trail along Peony
Lane.
Wetlands
Roughly 0.2 acres of the site contains protected wetland area. A medium -quality wetland is
located along the west and southwest boundary of the site. There is also a high-quality wetland
that abuts the southeast boundary of the site. The applicant is not proposing to plat the property.
Therefore, the applicant is not subject to the wetland buffer regulations. The applicant is would
not impact the wetlands on the site and the minimum 15 -foot wetland buffer setback requirement
would be met.
File 2005066
Page 10
Design ofBuildings
Section 21115.03, Subd. 1 of the Zoning Ordinance specifies general standards for building
construction. The proposed buildings would be finished with several integrally colored rock face
block materials, EIFS sign bands and cornicework. The proposed buildings would be designed
to blend into the area with similar warm, natural colors used in the existing retail development to
the south. The natural colors would also be compatible with the residential homes in the area.
The proposed building materials would comply with Zoning Ordinance requirements for exterior
building finishes.
Drainage/Treatment of Runoff
The City requires storm drainage systems to be designed so the post -development rate of runoff
from a site does not exceed the pre -development rate of runoff. Additionally, the City requires
treatment of storm water runoff before it enters the drainage system. The applicant is proposing
to install a drainage/water quality pond with a retaining wall in the south/southwest portion of
the site. The proposed drainage system is required to comply with the City regulations
pertaining to drainage and water quality. The proposed drainage/water quality pond does not
meet the City's requirements. A roughly 3.5 -foot high retaining wall is proposed along the north
side of the pond. The City does not allow retaining walls along drainage/water quality ponds
because the City has taken over maintenance of all ponds in the city after they are constructed.
In addition, the retaining wall would restrict City access to the pond's inlets and outlets.
Therefore, the applicant must revise the plans to meet the City's requirements for drainage. Staff
has added a conditions to the attached resolution requiring compliance with the City's storm
drainage requirements.
Signage
The applicant is proposing wall signage for the development. Staff notes that specific uses have
not been identified for most of the development. Therefore, signage will be reviewed at the time
of individual sign permits.
C. Conditional Use Permit
The applicant is requesting approval of a conditional use permit to allow the operation of
Aamco Transmission", which is an auto -service building for vehicle transmissions. The auto -
service use would occupy the 4,200 -square foot building on parcel 2. With the proposed C-3
zoning for this property, a conditional use permit is required to allow an auto -service use. The
building would have 6 -service bays and a roughly 940 -square foot office/reception area. The
applicant states that Aamco's hours of operation would be 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. weekdays with
minimal to no work on weekends. The applicant states that Aamco's goal is to service 10 cars a
week from this site. The tools used for their business would not produce excessive noise and the
used transmission fluid is a non-toxic liquid.
File 2005066
Page 11
Section 21465.07, Subd. 8 of the Zoning Ordinance allows minor auto repair provided: 1) there
is no outdoor service operation of lubrication equipment, hydraulic lifts of service pits, tire
changing, drive system repair and tuning, or similar operations, and 2) there is no outside storage
of parts, equipment, or inoperable vehicles. The applicant does not propose any outdoor
operations with their business. In addition, the service doors would be kept closed to further
reduce any impact.
The Zoning Ordinance requires the City Council to review conditional use permit applications
for compliance with the seven general conditional use permit standards. A copy of the standards
is attached. Staff used these standards to review the application and found that the request meets
the applicable standards, as follows:
Comprehensive Plan: The subject site is guided C (Commercial). The Comprehensive Plan
allows commercial uses that provide vehicle services near major transportation routes, such as
the subject site. Consequently, the use of the subject site for an automobile repair transmission
business would be consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan.
Public Welfare: Approval of the conditional use permit for an automobile repair transmission
business would not be detrimental to the public health, safety, morals or comfort. The business
is a lower volume auto service use that would provide a need to the community.
Impact on Surrounding Property: The proposed use would not impact the surrounding
properties nor would it diminish and impair property values within the neighborhood.
Orderly Development: Except for the property to the east, the surrounding properties are
developed and the operation of an automobile repair transmission business would not impede
improvement of the surrounding properties.
Public Facilities: The subject site is adequately served by public facilities, including the
roadway network.
District Regulations: The proposed automobile repair transmission business would comply with
the development regulations in the C-3 Zoning district, as the use would be allowed with the
conditional use permit.
Performance Standards: The proposed use is consistent with the performance standards
outlined in Section 21015.04 of the Zoning Ordinance, with the exception of the requested
setback variances and lot area variance.
D. Variances
As previously stated, the applicant is requesting a six setback variances and a lot area variance as
follows:
File 2005066
Page 12
a 14 -foot setback is proposed from the office/retail building to the north property line where
75 feet is required
a 10 -foot setback is proposed from the office/retail building to the east easement line where
35 feet is required
a 14 -foot setback is proposed from the auto -service building to the east easement line where
50 feet is required
a 15 -foot setback is proposed from the parking lot to the east easement line where 20 feet is
required
a 13 -foot setback is proposed from the parking lot to the west property line where 20 feet is
required
a 18 -foot setback is proposed from the parking lot to the north property line where 20 feet is
required
a 0.54 -acre lot area, where 1 acre is required with the C-3 Zoning district
The applicant is requesting three building setback variances, three parking setback variances and
a lot area variance. The proposed buildings and parking lot have been positioned in a way to
provide screening and buffering to the adjacent residential neighborhood to the north. The
proposed plan shows the north office/retail building located along the north and east sides of the
site. The auto service building is located at the southeast corner of the site. The parking lot is
internal to the two buildings. Staff notes that the City's commercial zoning districts, except for
City Center districts, do not make allowances for building placement at the street corners with
internal parking. Therefore, variances are inherently required to achieve this goal. Without
variances, the parking lot would be located in front of the building. Even with landscaping, there
would be more exposure for the adjacent residential neighborhoods to vehicle lights and parking
lot lights. Staff notes that the three building setback variances are a result of building placement
toward the property lines. The east parking setback variance is requested to maintain a similar
setback as the proposed buildings. The applicant is also requesting a parking setback variance to
the west property line. Staff notes that the adjacent property to the west is an undeveloped
wetland, therefore there would be no impact to the adjacent property as a result of this variance.
The applicant is also requesting a variance to allow an 18 -foot parking setback variance from the
north property line. Staff does not support this variance because the applicant could remove one
additional parking space to meet the required setback. The applicant has enough parking on site
to remove one additional parking space. Therefore, staff has added a condition to the attached
resolution requiring the applicant meet the 20 -foot parking setback from the north property line.
The applicant is also requesting approval of a lot area variance to allow a 0.54 -acre lot, where
one acre is required with the C-3 zoning district. The subject property is an existing lot of record
that is currently vacant and considered legally non -conforming because it was created prior to
current zoning. The subject property would be non -conforming in all of the City's commercial
districts. As a lot of record, the City cannot deny reasonable use of the property. The total site
area for the development is 1.6 acres. A minimum lot area of one acre is required in the C-1 and
C-3 zoning districts. Therefore, the applicant cannot adjust the lot lines within the development
to meet both the C-1 and C-3 lot area requirements.
File 2005066
Page 13
The City Council must review the variance requests with the standards outlined in Section 21030
of the Zoning Ordinance. A copy of these standards is attached. Staff used these standards to
review the variance requests. Staff finds that six of the seven requested variances meet all the
applicable standards. Specifically:
1) The placement of the buildings and parking lot provide a transition and buffer from the
adjacent residential homes. The requested variances would allow reasonable use of the
property with a development that would enhance the site.
2) The conditions related to this parcel are not generally applicable to other properties. The
City's commercial zoning districts do not account for building placement at the street
corners. The design is a unique situation to this development and results in a hardship for
the applicant.
3) The granting of the variances would not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious
to other land or improvements in the area. The applicant is proposing a development that
would provide a transition from lower to higher intensity uses. In addition, the applicant
is proposing to design the buildings with colors and materials that would blend into the
area.
4) Granting of the variances would not impair an adequate supply of light or air to adjacent
properties, nor would it substantially increase congestion in the public streets, increase
the danger of fire, endanger the public safety, or substantially diminish or impair property
values within the neighborhood.
5) The proposed variances are the minimum action to alleviate the hardship.
7. RECOMMENDATION:
Community Development Department staff recommends approval of the following items for
Acacia Real Estate Partners LLC, to allow an office/retail building and an auto -service building
for two properties located at the southwest corner of Old Rockford Road and Peony Lane, as
recommended by the Planning Commission:
a. an ordinance rezoning their properties located at the southwest corner of Peony Lane and
Old Rockford Road from FRD (Future Restricted Development) to C-1 (Convenience
Commercial) and C-3 (Highway Commercial);
b. a resolution approving findings of fact supporting the rezoning; and
c. a resolution approving a site plan, conditional use permit, and variances, except for the
north parking setback variance.
File 2005066
Page 14
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Planning Commission Minutes
2. Applicant's Narrative
3. Email from Pam Darnell including City Staff Response
4. Conditional Use Permit Standards
5. Variance Standards
6. Location Map
7. Notification Area Map
8. Site Graphics
9. Ordinance Approving Rezoning
10. Resolution Approving Findings of Fact for Rezoning
11. Resolution Approving Site Plan, Conditional Use Permit, and Variances
Draft
Planning Commission Minutes
August 3, 2005
Page 2
6. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. ACACIA REAL ESTATE PARTNERS, LLC (2005066)
Chair Larson introduced the request by Acacia Real Estate Partners, LLC. for rezoning, site
plan, conditional use permit, and variances to allow an office/retail building and an auto -
service building for two properties located at the southwest corner of Old Rockford Road
and Peony Lane.
Planner Doty gave an overview of the July 26, 2005 staff report. Planner Doty noted an e-
mail had been received asking that neon signage not be allowed on the north side of the
north building. Planner Doty said the applicant is not aware of this request yet.
Chair Larson asked where neon signs would be placed, and if there is residential
development on the north side of Old Rockford Road.
Planner Doty said there are residential properties on the north side of Old Rockford Road,
and the neon signage issue addressed the north retail office building. He said signage
would be reviewed when sign permits are received.
Chair Larson asked about the setback variance along Rockford Road.
Planner Doty said the C-1 zoning district requires a 75 -foot setback from the north property
line and a 35 -foot setback from the east property line. He said the C-3 property requires a
50 -foot setback from the east property line and 14 feet is being requested.
Director Hurlburt asked if the site would be buildable without some variance.
Planner Doty responded that it would be very difficult.
Commissioner Anderson asked for a description of the elevations between the proposed
site compared to the berm on the home sites on the north side of Old Rockford Road. She
said hopefully the berm will offset some of the neighborhood lighting concerns.
Planner Doty said there is an existing berm placed as part of the residential development.
He noted there is a swale in the berm which could allow some light trespass. He said the
proposed building would be 30 feet tall.
Commissioner Anderson asked how much taller the building would be than the berm.
City Engineer Quanbeck added the berm is probably 3-4 feet in height. He said the first
floor elevation is 1012 which would make the elevation of the berm roughly 1015 or 1016.
As the building is 30 feet in height, it would be significantly higher.
Draft
Planning Commission Minutes
August 3, 2005
Page 3
Commissioner Clyman said he is concerned about accessibility of emergency vehicles. He
asked if such vehicles could cross over the proposed median on Old Rockford Road, if
necessary.
Planner Doty said there is another access possibility on Old Rockford Road off of State
Hwy. 55. He added the median would be constructed when Old Rockford Road is
expanded, and the project is not included in the current Capital Improvements Program.
City Engineer Quanbeck said when intersection improvements are made, the review would
be made to determine how to accommodate the need for emergency vehicle access.
Commissioner Holmes asked why there is no access from Peony Lane and what the
rationale was for the "right in, right out" access at Old Rockford Road.
Planner Doty said that no access would be allowed to Peony Lane because of the proximity
to the intersection, and because Peony Lane is an arterial roadway. He added Old Rockford
Road and Peony Lane are very different roadways which is why access is not allowed to
Peony Lane.
Commissioner Clyman said he is concerned about the area being pedestrian friendly and
asked if there would be walk signals at Old Rockford Road and Peony Lane. He asked if
the trail would continue to the west as the office development gets built up.
Planner Doty said the existing trail east of the intersection currently crosses the intersection
to connect with the trail along Peony Lane that goes to the high school. He said the
Comprehensive Plan states the trail would be on the north side of Old Rockford Road and
it is the City's desire to have a trail on both sides of Old Rockford Road.
Chair Larson introduced the applicant, Kathy Anderson, President of Architectural
Consortium. Ms. Anderson said the proposal is a very appropriate development for this
site. Ms. Anderson said the auto service business, Aamco, is an owner operated
transmission service which would have low parking needs and would not have the noise
and lube associated with auto service businesses. She said the goal is to service 10 cars per
week and the business would be clean and would recycle transmission fluid. She said
Acacia is negotiating for a swim school for one retail use; Acacia would have their own
business in the building which is appropriate for an owner -operator. Ms. Anderson said
she feels the area would be pedestrian friendly. She said the variances are requested to
keep the parking in the center, shielded by the buildings. Ms. Anderson concurred with the
neon light restriction and said the required lights for the emergency exits would be shielded
and aimed downward. Ms. Anderson displayed drawings of the proposed one and two-
story buildings with stucco, cornices and two-tone masonry detailing the four-sided
architecture. Ms. Anderson said that in a neighborhood meeting there was a request to not
sell liquor. Ms. Anderson said Acacia agrees with that request and is committed to not sell
liquor.
Draft
Planning Commission Minutes
August 3, 2005
Page 4
Commissioner Anderson asked if the current grading for the building is lower than Peony
Lane.
Chair Larson introduced Craig Moss, Vanguard Construction, Inc. Mr. Moss said the site
grading will slope to catch storm water. He said the grade will raise because of the existing
steep grade but said it would not raise more than a foot or two.
Ms. Anderson said she agrees with the terms in the resolution.
Chair Larson opened the public hearing.
Chair Larson introduced Sudz Ramarao, 18015 45`h Avenue N. Mr. Ramarao asked where
the trash bins would be located and asked about the oil, etc. from the auto shop.
Chair Larson Sham Kashyap, 18010 45`h Avenue N. Mr. Kashyap said that he will view
the site clearly from his house and said the proposed development is good and better than
the green shack there now. He said the builders are trying to do everything in their power
to work with the neighborhood. He said he is concerned about the setback requirement of
75 feet and it is now 14 feet, which would impact him. Mr. Kashyap said the north
building will shelter the parking lot, but from his view — especially from his second story —
maybe a parking lot would be better. Mr. Kashyap said the berm placed by Lundgren for
Plum Tree is not very high and suggested that City Planners setting up potential business
sites should do a better job requiring better berms. Mr. Kashyap said the neighborhood did
request that Acacia place trees on the north side of Old Rockford Road but he was told this
could not be done. Mr. Kashyap wanted to ensure there would be enough trees to provide
the shelter the neighborhood deserves.
Chair Larson introduced Blake Boston, 18020 45`h Avenue N. Mr. Boston said he is
overall not opposed to the development and it could be good for the area. Mr. Boston said
he is concerned about potentially high pedestrian traffic. He said there are many children
in the neighborhood and there will be an increase in traffic. For safety reasons he would
like to see the trail completed sooner. Mr. Boston echoed Mr. Kashyap's concern about the
variances and said the 14 -foot setback doesn't allow space for the developer to put in
landscaping and berms.
Chair Larson closed the public hearing.
Chair Larson stated the berm on the north side of Old Rockford Road has nothing to do
with this issue as that was part of the Lundgren development.
Director Hurlburt added that as a matter of principle, the City cannot require them to make
improvements on someone else's land as a condition to develop their own.
Draft
Planning Commission Minutes
August 3, 2005
Page 5
Ms. Anderson said in neighborhood discussions Acacia did offer to work with the
neighborhood regarding putting some buffering on their side and concurred that screening
is going to function better on the neighborhood side. Ms. Anderson said that all trash will
be incorporated internally to both buildings.
Director Hurlburt asked if there would be any burning of products on site.
Ms. Anderson introduced the Aamco owner, Roger Strom, 4705 Merrimac Lane N., who
explained that the fuel would be used in an EPA -approved transmission fluid burning
furnace. He stated this fuel burns as clean as kerosene. Mr. Strom said the fluid that is not
used as a heating source in the winter months would be stored inside the building in tanks,
and would be picked up by recyclers. He added there is a shortage and recyclers are always
looking for this product.
Director Hurlburt said generally the City looks at which trails will be installed, based on
recommendations by the Park and Recreation Commission. She said typically the trail
would be done when Old Rockford Road is rebuilt, rather than rebuild the trail when the
road is done. Director Hurlburt suggested contacting the Park and Recreation Department
to discuss which trails will be built in the coming year.
Director Hurlburt referenced the building setback issue and said the biggest impact from a
commercial development is from traffic activity, such as car doors and headlights. In this
case, the requested setback may allow the building to be closer to the neighborhood, but
that outcome is better for the residents as the parking is further from residents. Director
Hurlburt added that the nature of the proposed businesses is one more of a "destination
use" and is compatible with not being in a high visibility orientation. She said the
difficulty in utilizing this site lead to this result.
Commissioner Clyman asked if there are hours of operation limitations in a C-1 zoning
district.
Director Hurlburt said we can set hours of operation for uses that require a conditional use
permit. Planner Doty said the 8 a.m. — 5 p.m. hours for the auto service business are not
stated as part of the formal application.
Mr. Strom said the 8-5 hours Monday — Friday are set for meeting with the public. He said
Saturdays are half days and are used for drop off or pickup of vehicles. Mr. Strom said
certain times of year, such as snow storms or summer heat, generate more business and he
would not want to be totally restricted on the hours of operation. Their desire is to
maintain 8-5 hours, but would like some flexibility and Mr. Strom added that the
equipment being used is mostly hand tools and small air tools.
Director Hurlburt asked what the earliest time would be that the business would open.
Draft
Planning Commission Minutes
August 3, 2005
Page 6
Mr. Strom said he would be in around 7:00 a.m. and would let a mechanic start at 7:00 a.m.
and work until 6:00 or 7:00 p.m. at the latest. Mr. Strom said they would strive for 8-5
hours but 7-7 would be very acceptable.
Commissioner Clyman asked if the hours of operation limitation stay with the property if
the current owner vacates this premise.
Director Hurlburt answered affirmatively and said the conditional use permit runs with the
land, not the owner.
MOTION by Commissioner Weir, seconded by Commissioner Anderson, to approve the
request by Acacia Real Estate Partners, LLC. for rezoning, site plan, conditional use
permit, and variances except for the north parking setback variance to allow an office/retail
building and an auto -service building for two properties located at the southwest corner of
Old Rockford Road and Peony Lane.
MOTION to amend by Commissioner Clyman, seconded by Commissioner Holmes to
establish the hours of operation for the C-3 automotive building as it relates to the
Conditional Use Permit from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. on weekdays and 7 a.m. to 1 p.m. on
Saturdays.
Ms. Anderson said there are those days, such as snow days, which are critical to the
livelihood of the business and may require different hours of operation. She said this is of
concern to the owner of Aamco.
Planning Manager Senness said for a comparison to a gas station, the Zoning Ordinance
states hours of operation for Commercial zoning districts are 6 a.m. to 11 p.m., 7 days a
week unless the City approves longer hours.
Commissioner Murdock said she is inclined to leave the hours alone. She said she did not
hear neighborhood comments about hours.
Commissioner Anderson concurred with Commissioner Murdock.
Vote on MOTION to amend hours of limitation 5 Nay. Commissioner Clyman voted in
favor. MOTION to amend failed.
MOTION to amend by Chair Larson, seconded by Commissioner Murdock, restricting
neon signs on the north side of both buildings.
Commissioner Anderson said she agreed with the amendment for no neon signs on the
north side of the office retail building, but not on the transmission service building.
Draft
Planning Commission Minutes
August 3, 2005
Page 7
MOTION to amend the amendment by Chair Larson, seconded by Commissioner
Murdock, to restrict neon signs on the north side of the north building in the C-1 district.
Vote. 5 ayes. Holmes nay.
Commissioner Holmes said he does not want to limit lighting, but wants to protect
neighborhood for future uses that may occur.
Roll call vote on MAIN MOTION. 6 Ayes. MOTION approved unanimously.
B. QUANTUM DEVELOPMENT (2005077)
Chair Larson introduced the request by Quantum Development for a conditional use permit
amendment to modify existing conditions of approval for property located at 12325 State
Highway 55.
iate Planner Noelting gave an overview of the July 26, 2005 staff report.
Chair L n introduced the applicant Clint Carlson, representing Quantum D elopment.
Mr. Carlson id he believes this request would be positive to the site and e community.
Mr. Carlson sai historically this is the third school at this site. He sal his request is to
clean up some Ian age in the conditional use permit as there was re
his
control
in the original conditi al use permit. Mr. Carlson said the scho , which has lower class
sizes and touts language key building block, is being well re ved.
Chair Larson opened the
Chair Larson introduced Robert Zarri lo, 3210 W nut Grove Lane. Mr. Zarriello said he
and his wife are in support of Quantu eve ment and their request. He said he is a
school board member with Beacon AcaiWny. He said he and his wife both feel
excitement, energy and fun in this school d h ve two children attending there.
Chair Larson introduced MaryAve' Young, 145 Pbqmsula Rd. Ms. Young said she is
chairman of the board of Beacqfi Academy, which is ublic, charter school. She said
Beacon Acade/
asa
ate school feel at a publi school price with dedicated
volunteers and aonment.
Chair Larson aer school if Beacon is responsible t the Wayzata School
District.
Ms. Y>ursaid the school is responsible to the State and is bound by the o en meeting
law, p ting of minutes and schedules, etc.
Larson asked for clarification on the number of students.
a; ov acnc
ARCHITECTURAL
CONSORTIUM L.L.C.
901 North Third Street, Suite 220 612-436-4030
Minneapolis, MN 55401 Fax 612-692-9960
Acacia Real Estate Partners, LLC is seeking city approvals for rezoning from FRD to C-
1 and C-3 for their property at Peony and Old Rockford Road. The site includes two lots,
Tract A is 1.05 Acres (45,682 SF), and Tract B is .5 Acres (23,620 SF). The sites will
not be replatted, however the masterplan is designed as one cohesive plan. The sites are
guided commercial, and the proposed uses include a 4000 S.F. auto/ service building and
a mixed-use building with roughly 8000 S.F. of retail at the grade level, and 4000 S.F. of
office on the upper level. The auto/service building is located on Tract B which is to be
zoned C-3 to allow for this use. Tract A is to be zoned C-1. Limited uses are allowed in
the new C-1 zone, and should make for an appropriate development that is sensitive to
the existing residential neighbors. A wetland delineation bias been performed, and the
appropriate buffers of 15' are honored as required by the Basset Creek Watershed
District. Ponding is treated through several rain gardens, the most significant one is along
the southern wetland, as well as underground treatment/ storage. 61 parking stalls are
provided and are sufficient due to the shared cross easements amongst the various uses.
Several variances are proposed in this development. The auto/ service building is set back
15' from the east easement line instead of the required 50'. In order to keep the buildings
close to the streets, a setback variance of 12'where 35' is required is proposed along both
Peony and Old Rockford Road for the office/ retail building. The buildings are placed to
screen the parking lot from the residents. The orientation of the structures are internal to
the site and the architecture reflects a four sided quality for the retail/ office building with
storefronts predominating the facades. A combination of several integrally colored
rockface block materials and EIFS sign bands and comicework provide for an interesting
character. The colors are warm, natural tones including a limestone hue that will be
compatible with the recent retail development to the South. Tower forms are
incorporated at significant comers of the buildings, and the heights of all buildings are
within the 30' height restriction. Multiple colored awnings brighten the retail atmosphere.
Signage is controlled to designated sign band areas. Site lighting is directed internally and
is cut off at the property lines for sensitivity to the neighborhood. The landscaping blends
well with the significant amount of wetland that is preserved on site, and should appear as
a high percentage of greenery.
I-,
1
JUL 1 2 2006 1';':
d r
aT'I
rnE.swu T- nrvFI Oi tiT DEPARTMEN
Aoo J5ocnLa
ARCHITECTURAL
CONSORTIUM L.L.C.
901 North Third Street, Suite 220 612-436-4030
Minneapolis, MN 55401 Fri 612-692-9960
Acacia Real Estate Partners, LLC is seeking city approvals for a conditional use permit to
allow for an auto -service building at Peony and Old Rockford Road. The 4,200 SF
building will have 6 service bays. It is an AAMCO franchise that strictly works on
transmissions only. The owner is the operator and lives just '/z mile from the site. The
traffic generated is only 10 cars serviced per week on the average. There are 4 to 5
employees and a customer need of only 5- 6 stalls. No heavy air tools are used (not like
tools used at lube and tire operations) only hand tools. The lifts are electric and above
ground so below grade contamination is not an issue. Transmission fluid is similar to
kerosene and is recycled to heat the building. The building is placed on the site as far
from the residents as feasible. The architecture is compatible in style with the
office/retail building, and exact same materials and colors will be incorporated.
iFillIJUL1220 {',':
Pagel of 4
Josh Doty
To: r.p.darnell@comcast.net
Cc: Bob Stein; peg.larson@comcast.net; ejcyclman@comcast.net; fhweirmn@aol.com;
nancyfranke@comcast.net; slcunning@yahoo.com; kmurdock11 @aol.com; Anne Hurlburt; Barb
Senness
Subject: RE: old Rockford rd/peony development
Ms. Darnell,
My name is Josh Doty and I am the planner reviewing the Acacia application. Since the public hearing at the
Planning Commission is this evening, staff has completed our review of the application and prepared a staff report
for the Planning Commission. I attached the report to this email for your review because I believe it addresses a
number of you concerns. However, I also responded to each of your questions below. You will find my
comments in "blue". Please call me at 763-509-5453 if you have any questions.
Josh Doty, Planner
City of Plymouth
Original Message -----
From: Pam & Rob [mailto:r.p.darnell@comcast.net]
Sent: Monday, August 01, 2005 1:42 PM
To: peg.larson@comcast.net
Cc: ejcyclman@comcast.net; fhweirmn@aol.com; nancyfranke@comcast.net; slcunning@yahoo.com;
kmurdockii@aol.com; Anne Hurlburt; Bob Stein
Subject: old Rockford rd/peony development
Dear Planning Commission Members,
My name is Pam Darnell and I live at 18005 45th Ave N which is across the street from the proposed
commercial development on the south west corner of Old Rockford Rd and Peony Lane. I understand that
the developer is asking for a change in zoning from FRD to C1 and C3. I may not be able to make the
August 3rd planning commission meeting and I believe this zoning change request is on the agenda. I first
want to say that I think that this development can be a good fit in our community and provide useful
services. That being said, I do have a few concerns that I would like to raise. You probably have
addressed all of these, but as a resident I feel it is my obligation to bring them to your attention too. I have
outlined my concerns and some of my ideas below:
1. Traffic
a. The only practical entrance into the Plum Tree subdivision those of us on 45th Ave have is via
Old Rockford Rd and we don't want anything to compound the traffic problems at the light.
Josh Doty] The peak traffic on Peony Lane is due to school related traffic, which is mainly
before and after school on weekdays. This project would have a minimal increase in traffic
during these times and should not significantly worsen the existing conditions.
b. I am concerned that there will be a backup at the intersection when turning west from
northbound Peony. [Josh Doty] See response to c.l. below.
c. At the present time, during high use times of day, you may have to wait through several lights
to make that turn. I am concerned that with increased traffic, the problem will only be
compounded
i. Maybe turn arrows on the light might help
Josh Doty] There is currently a left turn lane with a green light for
northbound traffic on Peony turning left on Old Rockford Rd. A left turn arrow is
included on the signal head. Operation of the turn arrow will be reviewed to
ensure the signal operates as efficiently as possible. The design of the left turn
lane would accommodate any increased traffic from commercial development of
8/3/2005
Page 2 of 4
the site. Vehicles would also have the option of entering the development by traveling eastbound on Old
Rockford Rd. from State Highway 55.
d. If changes to the road are needed, at a future time, will the money have to come from city tax
payers?
Josh Doty] Municipal State Aid (MSA) funds, which are allocated based on the
City's designated MSA street system would likely be used for improvements. However, it is
important to note that no improvements are planned for Old Rockford Rd. or Peony Lane at
this time.
i. Can there be funds set aside by the developer to fund such a project if
needed?
Josh Doty] Future improvements to Old Rockford Rd. and Peony Lane would not
be due to the Acacia development. Therefore, the City would not require money to
be set aside by the developer.
e. According to the interim and ultimate construction plan for that intersection there are going to
be medians put in allowing cars to enter only from Old Rockford Rd in the Eastbound
direction
i. My concern with this is how cars entering from Peony and Westbound Old
Rockford Rd will enter the development. [Josh Doty] There is currently no time
frame set for adding a median on Old Rockford Rd. Therefore, vehicles entering
the development would be able to make a left turn from Old Rockford
Rd. However, once a median is constructed, eastbound cars on Old Rockford
Rd. would need to U-turn at the end of the median or use the State Highway 55 to
Old Rockford route. The median would be roughly 400 feet from the Peony
Lane/Rockford Road intersection. 45th Avenue is roughly 1,000 feet from the
Peony Lane/Old Rockford Road intersection. Therefore, most eastbound vehicles
will U-turn at the end of the median or prior to
45th Avenue.
ii. I am concerned that it will this cause a traffic problem with people doing U-
turns.[Josh Doty] see above.
iii. Will they use 45th Ave N. to turn around in?[Josh Doty] see above.
f. Could a traffic study be done now so there is baseline data for future comparison?
Josh Doty] A traffic study is not required for this site because it is already guided for
commercial use. The subject site had a commercial guiding when the City developed its
most recent Comprehensive Plan (adopted August 2000). As part of that plan, the City's
transportation consultant undertook traffic modeling to make sure that the local street system
could function properly with the land use guiding. In addition, another traffic analysis
was completed in 2002 as part of the project that improved the Old Rockford Road/Peony
Lane intersection. Commercial use was planned for this sited as part of the 2002 analysis.
1. Light
a. I am concerned by the impact the overhead lights, in the development, will have on our living
areas that face that direction.
i. I would like to see the lighting curfew changed from the LZ3 which is 12am to
something earlier like LZ1 at Spm, thus having less of an impact on our houses.
Josh Doty] The City cannot change the lighting curfew specific to this property.
The only way this could be done is for the City to change the LZ -3 curfew. This
would be a city-wide change that would affect all commercial and industrial
properties in the City. The site design to place the buildings toward the street
would help screen most of the parking lot lights. Service lighting above exit doors
is proposed on the north side of the north retail/office building. The service
door lighting is proposed at a much lower wattage than the parking lot lighting. In
addition, the new lighting regulations require house side shields for every fixture in
this development. House side shields will any block light glare to any residential
properties. House side shields were not a requirement when the SA was
approved by the City.
ii. I am aware that Plymouth has very restrictive lighting ordnances, but according
to homeowners on our street, when the SA went in, it had a big impact on their
bedrooms and that is even further away than this development. I think that the
lighting restrictions have become more restrictive since then, but it is a concern.
Josh Doty] The Peony Promenade development was approved prior to our
8/3/2005
Page 3 of 4
new lighting regulations.
b. I am also concerned about the light emitted from the Old Rockford Rd side of the C1 office
space windows
i. This light will be shinning directly into our windows
Josh Doty] The City's Zoning Ordinance does not regulate lighting within a
building. You would likely be able see interior lights if they are turned on.
However, it is not likely that any lighting glare would be produced from lighting
inside a building, similar to lighting inside neighboring residential homes.
ii. Is there anything that can be done to restrict this light emission?[Josh Doty]
see above.
c. I would like that there be no neon signage on the Old Rockford Rd side of the property [Josh
Doty] That could be added as a condition of approval if the City Council feels that it is an
appropriate condition.
2. Sale of Alcohol
a. I believe that the on and off sale of alcohol is allowed in the C3 zoning
i. I know that the current business in the C3 area is a transmission service
business, but in the future a bar or liquor store could go in.[Josh Doty] The site
would not have enough parking to support a bar or liquor store. The only possible
way this could occur is if the entire building on the C-1 site were converted to
office use.
ii. If this is the case, I don't think that it is good for the community to have that
type of business so close to a high school
iii. I would like to see the sale of alcohol restricted now and for the future on the
C3 site
Josh Doty] The City cannot restrict specific uses out of C-3 Zoning District or any
other standard Zoning Districts. The only way this could occur is if the site is
rezoned to a Planned Unit Development (PUD), where the allowable uses
are designed specific to the site.
iv. Are there any restrictions in regards to the sale of alcohol or in getting a liquor
license in close proximity to a school(day care facility)?
Josh Doty] A site needs to be 500 feet away from a school to be eligible for a
liquor license. The site is over 1,400 feet away from Kimberly Lane Elementary,
which is the closest school to the property. Therefore, the C-3 property could be
eligible for a liquor license. There are no distance requirements for a day care.
4. Height of building
a. When I reviewed the elevation drawings from Acacia, it appeared that the building on the C1
site was taller than the allowed 30 feet. Has this been addressed? [Josh Doty] Yes,
the office/retail building has been reduced to 30 feet.
5. Landscaping
a. If the developer is asking for a setback variance, how will that effect the landscaping? [Josh
Doty] The applicant has shown that they can plant the required amount of trees on the
property per the Zoning Ordinance requirements. The applicant has also exceeded the
ordinance requirements for the amount of landscaping on the site.
b. Will there be a mix of evergreens and deciduous trees and shrubs? [Josh Doty] Yes, the
ordinance requires that 25 percent of the required trees be either deciduous or coniferous
trees. The applicant is meeting this requirement.
c. Will the trees planted block light emission from the 2nd story windows?
Josh Doty] Not until the trees grow that height. The Ordinance requires 2.5 inch deciduous
trees, which are typically about 10 to 15 feet tall.
I would like to thank all of you for your time on this matter.
Sincerely,
Pam Darnell
8/3/2005
Page 4 of 4
18005 451h Ave N
Plymouth, MN 55446
763) 208-6040
r.p.darnell@comcast.net
8/3/2005
ZONING ORDINANCE
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT STANDARDS
21015.02 PROCEDURE: Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 15.99, an
application for a conditional use permit shall be approved or denied within
sixty(60) days from the date of its official and complete submission unless
extended pursuant to Statute or a time waiver is granted by the applicant. If
applicable, processing of the application through required state or federal
agencies shall extend the review and decision-making period an additional sixty
60) days unless this limitation is waived by the applicant.
Subd.5. The Planning Commission shall consider possible adverse effects
of the proposed conditional use. Its judgment shall be based upon (but not
limited to) the following factors:
1. Compliance with and effect upon the Comprehensive Plan, including
public facilities and capital improvement plans.
2. The establishment, maintenance or operation of the conditional use will
promote and enhance the general public welfare and will not be
detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, morals, or comfort.
3. The conditional use will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of
other property in the immediate vicinity for the purpose already
permitted, nor substantially diminish and impair property values within
the neighborhood.
4. The establishment of the conditional use will not impede the normal and
orderly development and improvement of surrounding property for uses
permitted in the district.
5. Adequate public facilities and services are available or can be reasonably
provided to accommodate the use which is proposed.
6. The conditional use shall, in all other respects, conform to the applicable
regulations of the district in which it is located.
7. The conditional use complies with the general and specific performance
standards as specified by this Section and this Chapter.
Section 21015 -Plymouth Zoning Ordinance
fonns/cupsta)
ZONING ORDINANCE
VARIANCE STANDARDS
The Board and Zoning Administrator shall not approve any variance application
major or minor) unless they find failure to grant the variance will result in undue
hardship on the applicant, and, as may be applicable, all of the following criteria
have been met:
That because of the particular physical surroundings, shape, or
topographical conditions of the specific parcel of land involved, a
particular hardship to the owner would result, as distinguished from a
mere inconvenience, if the strict letter of the regulations were to be
carried out.
2. That the conditions upon which a petition for a variation is based are
unique to the parcel of land for which the variance is sought and are not
applicable, generally, to other property within the same zoning
classification.
3. That the purpose of the variation is not based exclusively upon a desire
to increase the value or income potential of the parcel of land.
4. That the alleged difficulty or hardship is caused by this Chapter and has
not been created by any persons having an interest in the parcel of land
and is not a self-created hardship.
5. That the granting of the variation will not be detrimental to the public
welfare or injurious to other land or improvements in the neighborhood
in which the parcel of land is located.
6. That the proposed variation will not impair an adequate supply of light
and air to adjacent property, or substantially increase the congestion of
the public streets, or increase the danger of fire, or endanger the public
safety, or substantially diminish or impair property values within the
neighborhood.
7. That the requested variance is the minimum action required to eliminate
the hardship.
Section 21030 -Plymouth Zoning Ordinance
formsNariance Standards.doc)
Location Map - 2005066
Acacia Real Estate Partners LLC
Plymouth Acacia
Southwest Corner of Old Rockford Road
and Peony Lane
Request for a Rezoning and Site Plan
N
9r,246 W E
City of
Plymouth, Minnesota S
Legend
C, Comercial
FFM CC, City Center
CO, Commercial Office
IP, Planned Industiral
0 LA -1, Living Area 1
LA -2, Living Area 2
LA -3, Living Area E
LA -4, Living Area 4
LAR, Living Area Rural
P -I, Public/Semi-Public/Institutional
0.1 0.05 0 0.1 0.2 0.3
Miles
o q ` b m
tly A,
202.8] ]sou7 112 11212 125
za401
2820731A11N
ffi
1` 309 98
N
ao M
y
8 co
mr.5
O`t'' '/ / •,qr " : 17'11'+ N ac 90
rj
iLIEL7S V o mZE
y /' I__ ri(i( *
114.571pLgyaqL4
N4°21731
Gj to
oz
f
y // ?
4 m '4• .F ' ,
V97
4iE8 62.73 H0.7
7a'wdrw 'g
faso 7AS7Y 1 f00TE 11.fl 7 80.]5 7a.
7
it
AV400M am
sz+4 — tfz n m
44.. ",EJ
1^3016
7p6p
F 75.27 922]5 .i
m 57.06 "vii T
2695
7-1?
6
eONS ;QAC 9 2 .+> a N R S oa>r sye N 96
At
4 Ca
uZ890L 9B7s
6318 "
L5 142 Inv
7 80'MCt'E ' + ; • u.
N m. v o orb'
94
782 ;0968 `
r1#
y
4'
f
4 '
il / ! '
0q : 0y _y 'A'..
ONa !27 zr 11
S60°07'04"E N
42\2\ 41.331 : 1615 569117-E
N
L
m 2015a
a 97
A BS
9896 16].01 A Lbw
95ZL 6LN 101.]8
AL W a N v ( VZ om 512.,
LZ.CS. q1 a°' IV
76.5
g584ZW o
ttl /
u
65 sp ' m i 66 J9` } Nbs, 59.'!154.05 -•
Y
00
Y
CTl
Z9Z
lA 80.4 78.d
L9L
L
60.
142 38 `? 3B
J
7 ]5.3] '
Q % o, - . MERRIMACkmso
aFS360]
h + ,
y 4B 12 `317255 m / P v f9f. 90.2
why
v
J
1
42 -
42 N-m sy>._` ___ .------ _
O
m 42 +
5
v 708 .Z 243 75
2 2 Z` O i 42 .FV ZZv m a
o
44 30.211
y `a
iC' ,
29 a Y 'S
BEgtc\
a ^
dP• '
21Yof
N
r y2 y
X56 _
99.01
ol
I L 40.47
7 2 9L L Oi
s
j 4eaa
8'B04; - m
16628 3449
VZ 542 238
y 6 `
m •
n O V
iz---------, \ \ \ \
RMER yFORO R
J a
k
oar
Q
PIACI aT Fora
AE DRECTED er
M., r
WSaW
REMOVE
s , E)OSTWG ., eulLnures •• ,•
IREMGVESLAB
z
v REIT •, ' ,/.--;_--_ - I I b O' Z
arj
3; C W N 7
REM i fOQ za8''TR w V y f Q
Ee
z I n ..O J J
uTItjTYTREE uj
U.
1 •
SY
n `
r// /`mom pTR -_-----
0 ILREMZTREELn
ml
r
1 I F
TDP 0E D
PUCE
0
99].JS N — _..
l1
i
W SDE R r,n
nEr+tEriN iE o) - - BVl'7
NOT-. JUL 1 3 »r ewx
ocCXED er..we
CONTRACTOR TO DETERMINE AND VERIFY THE EIGSTENCEI - OE9CirED .1 1
OF ANY UTRITY LINES NOT SHOMN ON PLAN AND ioF Satz .<
COORDINATE REMOVAL OR ADAPTATION TO NEW STE Nv 999.9D 5 '
rsnr9
PLAN W—E DR I9,0.90 EAw ft 9rEET
C1
fk.aROCI'C. tiCsgy No pR0
s 9
PROPOS
C 0Cq T/CN
SITE RAN
I . 20-1
i .— ()LD CP
ARCHITECTURAL
CONSORTIUM L. LC.
s 229 8,2s38J999
Nmcwdb. YN S5101 Fm 812892-9868
PLYMOUTH -
ACACIA
PLYMOUTH, MN
X
SITE PLAN
SCALER" = 20'-0"
20 10 0 20 40 60 IF JUL I z 2005
SCALE fN FEET 3— —A—L.0G
Architectural Consortium_ L.L.C. 2005
NOTES
ALL WATER MAIN AND SERVICE UNES SHALL HAVE 7.5• MIN. BURY.
SILT FENCE SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO ANY SURFACES BEING DISTURBED
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSCILE FOR DOCUMENTATION AND
ADHERANCE M ALL NPDES PERMIT REQUIREMENTS
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONFORM TO CITY DETAILS, SPECIFICATIONS AND PERMITS
ALL CONCRETE AND BITUMINOUS SHALL BE SAW CUT FULL DEPTH
AT CONSTRUCTION LIMITS PRIOR TO REMOVAL
TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL IN CONFORMANCE TO THE LATEST VERSION OF THE
MMUTCD SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR ALL WORK LOCATED INSIDE PUBLIC R/WS /
STRIP EXISTING TOPSOIL PRIOR M EMBANKMENT CONSTRUCTION.
CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY EXISTING UTILITY LOGRONS AND ELEVATIONS. /
ALL STORM SEWER INLETS SHALL HAVE INLET PROlEC710H DEVICES
INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED AT ALL TIMES DURING CONSTRUCTION
ALL PAVED AREAS SHALL BE SWEPT CLEAR A MINIMUM OF ONE TIME PER WEEK /
OR MORE IF CONDITIONS WARRENT.
STOP SIGN LOCATION SHALL BE 10' FROM ROADWAY EDGE AND 2' FROM
DRIVEWAY EDGE THE BOTTOM OF SIGN SHALL BE SIX FEET FROM THE GROUND.
STOP SIGN SHALL BE A 30W SIZED SIGN HAVING A HIGH INTENSITY REFLECRVE
FACE SIGN SHALL BE MOUNTED ON A SIX FOOT NO. 3 AND A EIGHT FOOT
REMOVE TREES AS NECESSARY
COORDINATE ALL UTUIY WORK WITH APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANIES
SITE SOIL CORREC71ON TO BE DONE PER BRAUN INTERTECH SOLS REPORT
ALL WETLANDS DOST ON THE SITE WILL BE PROTECTED PER SWPPP BMP -S
FINISHED CONTOURS ARE 940WM FOR GENERAL DRAINAGE PATTERNS AND FOR
GRADING OF SITE
CHECK ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR SIDEWALK LOCATIONS AND
rFORANYCONCRETEPADWORK.
x 91,.30 SPOT ELEV ALL CURB RADII ARE TO BACK OF CURB
X Yll.m SPOT ELEV. ON BITUMINOUS CURB RADII ARE 5' TYPICAL
x sll.m TOP OF CURB ELEV. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED
x LBA1— CURB GUTTER ELEV.
PApUS ,n- RAMIS7
J•RMOs ,n 4—I/
S1iE ]/: PER R 1
I
3r
6612 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER
ALN
1 1/2. ONNNOUS W[ARING COURSE (NVWE]30]SB) (23-)
BmI.— TICK CMT (m37)
3 . Bllu S NorrATAReD COURSE (ImIW3IO]39) (x3eo)
6• AGGP[GlE MSE RILED CL 3 (]111)
B• SLBGRADE PR[PAPATON (2111) (IFICIDDRK)
PARKING LOT PAVEMENT SECTION
w2 cONpnTE
H• AGGREMIE (
11PR1- 1 RACED 21 3 (2111) Ie• SUBGRME PAPAION 11) (FILIDEMK)
CONCRETE SIDEWALK
1pR \
w \
INV 100
Aoi-
8 n -oRPI(M ;
PIACE aT FOH¢
AS DtMMM BY NENONEDI
I
I CONSHFNCIION
ANS
SAWw% TAO Ex. BT.
STIRFK'L BEFMC PAVNc
PNOtDE INIET mile XN
ACJE aT FdWCE N0.
J,
ORAllili-\.
TAIL Bet/ % 54'-12'RCP PLUS \-
IY RCP FES'
E ,
azzs q(ptMAQ (fit/`
J/
RAV /
RIPRAR. p/Ep(;LTJOY-
R
OVFRFLow-
1 - CMRtteCCE70_•E
OUTSIDE DROP N - OUTSIDEI 1i' IId
A°'O IAWEXSANITARY
4INV• 100BK
4 4CY CL 3
G
RIPRAP
p AS DIREDIED
e• M,E
BY
Ex. IAN uR ____
NOP 009.5)
auT
90 ]
DRO
E'-B'PN: w 6.8'PA-_, r
VERIFY N FIELD]
a=a
D
ELEV.
DROPPED CURB DETAIL
S9s00 WATOI E PRORLiId
K 101 .00
1 TC 10210
1— 3
pp Tc ,on—io
N W
d Tc lan.90 —
0"lotto±
Oo Tc ,mzw _
210
TWT TD 1012.50
1 I
CURB HEIGHT AT PmBUILDING0.0
D. 1 - rW TFL „S e•
1 o No 111OWAIIf • r C
ROOF DWANACC
H6i fiE IMSJ'U-i0
010.30
YMUNT _
R o-
uN
sIS o
T FOYE G
b•' f •
p AS DIREDIED
e• M,E
BY
Z r
1END
1701-1•-41' Cam
e',a•
Y f m00 ( SAWOIT EX. BT MAN. ML
a=a
D
S9s00 WATOI E PRORLiId
AND REBIBt[ WI
e• m-3 AcG BAS[ AND Y
BT. WEAR COURSE
O LTi
S
7-e ceoo . h
Ft I HAND EOL BST LO.E CWTEWITH
I t ML'AD1N AND DEPIH. NFP] TER wmHaL- =_
J a ,yl LptE yEC110N DEPTNs ANO wTE
EMTIEt11W
As
ROD'!m. REMOVAL I 0 BBEmMYADI111EFIELDBYteNOR
mI.
TIIAFFI0 CONIROLOR
wnH IYUTEL
CDKWRTOO HNOO®CHC.
RAn aY,Fdc/
ory _ - '
I 4= 111a
DRAWN BY: JL
dECKED BT. JAR
Ex. SAH w
OEmwo BT .L
TOP Oe1 S 1 - ® JOB N0. 15]01)
IINTLDE
IN 970.90 EAN
SREET
C2
5 CZC
P MALE T FOYE G
b•' f •
p AS DIREDIED
e• M,E
BY
Z r
e',a•
Yf m00 ( SAWOIT EX. BT MAN. ML
r. rI. W V. DANDREBIBt[ WI
e• m-3 AcG BAS[ AND Y
BT. WEAR COURSE
O LTi
S
O
I
An9wEPROWOE1RLG
wAawNGs Ix11eI1B NRSWATION H
i O ..O J Z
VALK )-
R nU. Q IL
c
0
Lu
rcavo w V Je• Cv a V N
GB
COMKCT ro Ex.
O}J Q
I a T-1C B.A0(
BD) Q Qmaa ' 1 ON F2W—W— N 4.
ASI' 1Y HDOE'
EX ETDANDe•xe• m_
1-_ I I HON6f ro 0l J
i 1•x9. 1EL 1D•DP WN
rezW
WATT ON FIFLT)
e•!t>C WET TM
d
S ' r }.ATE VK]F f WlE VALY[
lB'-Hi Ca00
7-e ceoo . h
Ft I HAND EOL BST LO.E CWTEWITH
I t ML'AD1N AND DEPIH. NFP] TER wmHaL- =_
J a ,yl LptE yEC110N DEPTNs ANO wTE
EMTIEt11W
As
ROD'!m. REMOVAL I 0 BBEmMYADI111EFIELDBYteNOR
mI.
TIIAFFI0 CONIROLOR
wnH IYUTEL
CDKWRTOO HNOO®CHC.
RAn aY,Fdc/
ory _ - '
I 4= 111a
DRAWN BY: JL
dECKED BT. JAR
Ex. SAH w
OEmwo BT .L
TOP Oe1 S 1 - ® JOB N0. 15]01)
IINTLDE
IN 970.90 EAN
SREET
C2
aqqo
R,
aoTOBE
B
s
ONE
c
3=
F
BTH
gSa`
m€ o
Sage
W
k
ci
r a-
Ln o
r- .2 J_
yG J Q
Certo t. W
ZLLLu
Z Q Jv
f.) j Q V
V
aNy
J
L
1 5DM 1
N16ULTDL' rlc
11'16n 1— ned.29W1. 11s
Pm ('real +e°-waa
Lam.....
OAAMN BW
Lm
n1ELNEO BY: JAP
OESlONED BY: L
JOB M0. 13.101]
91EEi
C3
NEENAH CASTING NQ R-3067 WITH TYPE DR, DL,
OR TYPE V GRATE OR APPROVED EQUAL)
M[NtMLp RIPRAP REQUIRED
TG°
V' \I w.Jat RfN 1 B 6 ID
Ai ILL iPLNOES 2M LEpiW,TG
SNILL lE rL/lED p M LPA
YrrrE a aura i. B m ' B612 v M an m sttr p Incur
If4TEi: p ID
eB1 nmfmme rNs nr uia
IpIVP/d ®rtxmc I x Is . m - ""S rc Ius nu r rtn p Incnl
RMAOfm O
L
mN0.'
OsmmLsr6 rmmlriAtp SECTION B -B w m sw ry r .L tP•m vIo
Alm ouoe r LBt¢ss uTw ams r
uPv artTu mAo[ Lnc rmc B
a ma n"mrol my Lawiuurc imv rAar.avm ' IawY°u ms
TW6R01IDE% G pPl
mySToT
pN1rT
dyuI0[srnr. pp
v" SAND BEDDING Tr iB r
A1mA6A
r TMLmSB1 6 IY 6 1Q7Ai Ao-.sslmmrrei)
oli6.
r A — — A p
Am 9•lL m•e.I vinl zBRRc ` 1",® rr. anlm4 "u'r ms t--- — — — _ a ` I Bele
nvn°r race Rn pcnuttLr Irrx• M uSip4 xa ANY
r mct N¢n THE lM¢n Ra Rws
mnac aulL rE manER
r Ir
ar BOM M PPSM AIR n61nL a
SES V MRrw BEIV I
THE YCd 6• fdtJElE `6Rarm SURMOUNTABLE
OC1L11
vv m 1-vr s• rH Ir v slRslus BAv s L[n •yy,.. —]y
La1°
ttn aw To LE m.° AT BAm6
6LM ASIC nVER PPE W 6M rpmm riADr-
SQ LRY PIAtt M6 B11R-3
N TE .. .. . USE M F®T DIAMETER
ROCK BEDDING Tr m r p ®IUTW]L. CA7C11 BASIN MAMI LE WHEN
L.P MAIRIIL 6 umTARL DEPTH EXCEEDS 4.3 FEET.
SEE PLATE N6 ST -1 OR ST -6 SECTION A -A (tmmnL rw
Lo
P161ID Q Pl mn'm MRES
rol sNnow ¢ima TB LURB CUT DETAIL
srLu:llrc ww L
Bn avlz[o- AVM By, REv12Eo- A n[vls[n STAN ARD DETAILS nz=iimSTANDAR DETAILS -Bs STANDARD DETAILS s -Ls STANDARD DETAILS 3-u '
NITARY SEVER AND PVC VATERNAIN BE DING ir rl. Ma wPRBv. CATCH BASIN (MAX DEPTH 4.5'> y RIPRAP DETAIL FOR FLARED END SECTIONS 0., amu•, sy STANDARD CURB DETAILS nrr rL, Ma
CITY OF PLYMOUTH ss -e CITY OF PLYMOUTH CITY OF PLYMOUTH LITsr-a CITY OF PLYMOUTH sTRi-I
IRmrsmr Q ESS Lf MfRICO f LMM m
mMCEMFD PP][ Inrs
v o Mmc w.L aTs, r-nis, NDTs Mn BIDDING
rwTvuL srxmvs REA1im
cInLL HE As111 nso i1'rE :TABLE:: r1aL BrB a Mmrn alarm imrs
usmc Avn a snsas v mcs
c- a-vr ns•m rnaLLTmr
OMTIDRL sulmrm sRAaE nmom Asasrne Imes
urs Ta : ouBLn ,
I
vm s osmBSl r wusllaxr,
aExrAap srr a ury " ` , Ir AsamloR. NE Lm¢n
4 O
Ausnfnr mcs m Mnm NnsTH
6 MPR .mI11L n610E MIX 6 1-r
RHri 101AiELY mmEll M GfiHr•
s ,
rvr Imr m.LLT.r
O L swi amiui sAn'viVOc aa' auTmuL srAvwn
Rw v¢v mw>r w raw w Mm MRM L rFET AR1VE M W
Slap VAIFA IrVR.
tS - • .: •..:-..
L a1 wlrun f @Are urATTH
VAN
eery
m7- njy
a[ r S f II °t)I 0'-rl
sonars: slur rAQrAsr smml °LLL a nw
NLELLER CENTURION StE vPw ]mvn nri v
@ T
21vi If• OG M
ACIDAttLT na/ mi a[rNI
vTlx sruniess)rna att utt VALVE Buri
t 3 RL ins arLFd t¢ImR
s '_ h 1--- m V Wtt VALv[ %ESL
MBOBp RAL Tpa(St 6' f91
A YmQ TYPC m
a Ir OPM 0O[wII Tn[LESS 1•
rn EKN r a iH atATTH
my--U . mrL.
TNw Ir An nEBrsex vrp
IMTOBAL a1w NYUV+IP
sw Iwo IE9L
i.. :r: pSLLATm TRN2 VPE tt VALVE
TO Nrm nasi o
MuaID
srmc Lnc
r• ILOa( ILnR mm! d
1_
RDu SEE..Y=l •SECTtnM A A -
L IGTtt VN.Ki AS[ Haman VRi Au Hlmrnri _ •. I
L IlQ MYmMRi 9YLL X YR1.PV T M IA[l1tY.
Y Y' SlffC r
tN T
Lf
rn® Mrt ECSCi1 RL ATmI SWLL BL IInNTNN SwRN
2Y
f .v l IIBSdI aIDpm InY ILfO a ELa®p LSL-Q-BALI tt
CMICR° a
er r •• s
s su ars r -BOLTS. wrs wm ®mc swu BE ASIM r»s
TYPE HIt srADlrtf sTrst_ B B
SCCTI N H -B A
STANDARD DETAILS STANDARD ETAILS STANDARD DETAILS STAN ARD DETAILS j
PLYMOUTH ACACIA
STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP)
EROSION CONTROL DETAILS
GENERAL FRO-9tw Au^Tt
INSDEc— ND bi_T MQ
1. TM Pvmittr(.) (N. Ope ) mu.l rwtlnMY Fmrt N.
wclYn Yla mm ewy s.. (1) dap d.F9 «tIw cenelruetlr ab MUF aq hwn ally
2 M b.Drlkn. IIImaF O.on a cmwr brrir9 wn.Wclbn mu.l W rrertled in -VgW
th. r.a.M moat b.-WriU U. 5'APPP F e:cvMw .iN RECORD RETENTM.
Reode at sew F.prllr ob mdnlrrw «IMI, Mm V. -
n Dab W lin. of Ic.Prtlm. c mdg .I Feprl)
IradIDlc
lui19 yr llm. ealbn. b rllw acllm.
e Cera -V tea (FmrdF9 dotba bn.4 d PMty mmM.bV9
a DHomme
allvunll
Nuw); 01 rnFlall ...nb grevtr Um 1/1 Fdi (a5 Ylmw)
F 14i nose r
I. Dowmmlolbn of mm9. come b N. SYPPP.
m. pert. of Ne c.ablctim Mw haw -,M- IV,Wl ndN6atla4 but aura rands. m alter
Perla f U Mta in.p«tlm. of Ue ebmlzed may M rabraed 1. eco r mm1n. Mv.
aura nm bw .r«rded bu to Irazr Qvrnd randtlra OIe taeniae Feprlbn. rd
It_mot Imo e°ne• 1a .ed. m noon aca.a m u. We a aI. 11 n..ailqo.ebudbn, allllmea bol
a, .
d er 6atn.
rall
II vedmnula
nll
Pa Rmlpaei e.Wqp :ed1wli: l:ea err crop.n rd
1. rwctba B T.. P -t..(.) mr.l beach .. ob eerply MN N. I-,
Feria% Yt mvinlrmw
brani.
nrl.
Iecn mus rmabed ra«ed, v .gpanrted anal Nw Drab rwnNn=
hM
v
dl.mt r«mm 1/] el N. hdght or tti Inca that r«ob. -tl b. made MNF 1. nae.rafe .rr. a M m m m. 8Ye avWDau me
b. T.npvvY W p.m..l eedmrpend. mu.i W OacW ue .came.! tons.., ..
Ne dMi. of fns WYnrl ctW hmrWN tub. a DaYn r«d w 1/1 N. elavp. wk.na paFage rd
rano.d muel n. ml.petw W.. 11 Moa of a.m..y v I. m w eYd ce.dYw mm
c Surfoc. 01.4 FWdnq b.- dI.- and o.w ..IM, n orad W _,w Iv
sMtlov el Win.l beFB ii -.1w by rmiv.. Us P.mNr(.) mu.l r.now Y ,Mae W
41
aWitl wtdrelwrN
stet .
h.rbn..9 tM VF eget, «L IIII. rallol d
W almllmllr moat tore p«..IU. rose IT) dap m acowY uN.M Dr.dudM by I.qd
rgdat.% a ph"' or ,v"""' Ue P.miltr Mm ur m rewrml. erbt. b ebbF
II premrd.d remail and .Iml6allr mut tore Pam .1NF .awl (1) mindv dap d
wNedtlw W rrMK19 mYtwpktlee P-11. 1Mv to«cmOrclip .m'abYIN. stW IaN.d
d CanebucBen Mb .alae nil I«ally. mut b. ilmrbd e. b W off -Yb atoned -g
ml. pa..e .rf«aa Tremed Winn m.Y a tone.., has m aH-tole p.W .rMu4 MNF
2A saes of ossa..% v 11 W . It, .- a Marie lF.a
V. TI. P. Wbilt(e) ae nmm.bl. b Ue mrmlm bW ma-tw .I tIII— m0 7zp. M. .want ma.egemrt BYPa m rY oe m .mlm Pr tbn and Winn carted 1 iv
dv.lbn m Ne ca. -CUs .era It ins Y. . Pvmllte{a) o __enable bb raN. It.m hw wwmal carbo- awr as el Ne m. Nat naw nm Orr IFdIY almNxMale
It. rxgrgone almYlxdb. rd a .-al T.mFatlm tem Orr WnItW la N. IIPO• (r
PMT X - IERWkATON a CO AM).
1. II .-Mit .rapt N. cm.wclim M, e"-Mle d
of a hru.cY mMclrt la mIYn6. off-Yt. illy«b (a m• Arplyr, 1I F If b cab Wsada, Fb ebrm roan by N. nal mM ad/. pw a mistY hmad b ora of pupk abwU).
S. N FRwtlm am. man M b.md to rte that no .ebnnl Fan .9m•9 mnewclNan MI.nW I. reomF9 N. innlMlr vw and Uwe van m• protrbW Fan cenp«lion bre to cmeNuclbn
w(ar..l bIIw9 oma 1M Fflbalbn arae
POIELTION PRE"EN". YANAGEIpIT .G Rm
Toe Pompe{.) Mm F plr U. Imbr g pdbtl. ;N w mmaganrt IMIN-I r Ue M.
1. Sdb Wan. CMIrtM .ean.rl, .what W crab mNF94 FeaW9 dMM4
IOmid matcampy ntll PPCA dbmq rru obaItbbrYWaN. awls moat W tl6pmtl of -WYm
2 Nerdw. Mb- OE ge«IF4 pa rd rY hm.dw. aM.Wcw must b. _.'y alm.1
M. -Ii __y crtaFmml, 1. p.wnt mNa I.ma a .N. d6dwga RwhbW - le
I- as moat w pro lded to vewrl obdmh ib -Ip and dlmmd of hax.e.a .ate man
p-
21.
YP'CA rgialbna
E.tam aMF9 01 wase ab cur mnebvcllr .akdr oral w IF.IIed le v ceded vm er Ue Ml.
Rum" muel a --rd rwb pvprtY dlmoW IT No .qF. d.JraFq 6 meW . M4
DENATOON. AID BASM ON -IN.
1. Owa: a baton -9 (• Pooped d6Magee. brae/stile ort. w baFege) rWIM 1. th.
llm aetMly uvt mar new laDb . Winrl lefr dYmvq. rat. must w d.aa9.. b 1Iarbvprrmn.t rdYnrtallm Paton . ue p 9th Y , 1/ Ne vols coal
M aWep.d 1. 1 Winrtallr D1aI prb ie .t.F9 Ne rn«. volt. It vel b«tM MN int
mveprNb BNP, rm Ud ) I, dm eel adwaYyrpINW q rat. v dem.u.vnImda..a ins P..nllter. moat rare net d6moq. pane o odaMmMy volaNed w t .erbnWware111. ,Maga un D. d 6 ave nalurd r«l Apra s aorto D mlle MbetFq aboNroglM .deMpallm m Adquvb .eamrtalbn .bd o reeub.d
mw.q l. Nal cmbFa r« mh edb42, retr de _ .11_ v bo.F b, - «11NOr mu.l b. db .d F a mmnr that bre not
nu(.mn c i N-1 .o.'.n F -t I. t. v m tlo.Ym. pmblfM a Fwdellm N
wlbnM cwbn9 slgnllM.t od..w Yap«t la Ue rMlmd
AYflDYENTS TO S%PPP
Ue Pemllttw(aJ man amnv IM S%PPP m n.wa.y to Fm.N atldlbnd rou:em.t4
w oddlka.d a modlfled BYPR drlpud b cmrl pral:an. lemtle.d . adber
1. Thr b v mora F a.Y.. cmawctlr, molly....d ca rwur v comm -INV.
Nal M1m v egnllkmt allyl r tM dladiaw ai pdbtmta [o arrix oto v u. th. .of..
2 Ni.
rolOa.
lf«tl. h deinMnliq a M.-ty mFWlm'YYgeNe d6Nugellopmulontct,
P
ler. v br.o.d wlo v Nhat 1M IN iNI o IIMMr rote WIRY atmtldd
1 rn.c=p1. -1 .ah!.Ninq Ne qr.d m'eli.m .l nrhW1'nq P-1. F .tam torr d6moP.
b r1N cmaD..11r «tMIY• v N. S%PPP b ort alWt.l nU 1M tomo and mndtlr. of
6 D. . q. th. mY IFI. an1 rmll eoru9. Y efbctM. u. ItPan my del.mF. Not Ne pmJrt'..tmn .oto
dadwgm mar cares haw rornml. "tMiud I. cm u b nm-mldvn.t of my
mpbml. rola walty ale If YMCA mmr cum htaUYwllr, Ne YPG rN n fy tlu
P.mltte{a) F .dtF9. F d.Y.Im 1 Mppl .td DIP achy pm .
MprgeNob SYPPP enrdmrb l by the 5APPP modlkella.. le adbar Ne brtle.d iNk.tdwbl.Ill Frvmetlr sante, by Nr INPCA, .kh t u' e.ad.d. r FYbbrd Pomo oppkollr. IfYPCA'. t. I m1111ca0on rsylrs a remana nY.. N r.geild rINF 1M eprl6.d tin.henemn.Oblr a p.mlt -at -
N. STAB6 u1
Ise Pompe{.) mret roue .. W.. bn .f N. Yla Ue P-..(.) mut abnll a N...
of T.mFotlm rINF b d am Md e1mNBlb11 I. mmpl.la th cony/mol. (Proal.)
he. waned cmbM vert a of U. me 1 naw rot .d.gre Ii.M .tmllxaHr. FFd
etmllxpi.n cm b. r F ova of Ne fa" ow
1. Nnos 1-, al the It. haw Dor r .*W. rd m W bimmretb. ebbed by o wit.
W v t.u. ar. Mth a e.Yly of 10 Prot aw u. rli. Prrriw. rnece a«, a
N. __MM male nrwry to vert aV bN.a Wren .ea1.. cmatlr. orb
a N bdnape ONd.a o..Wcted to Bail .m. team N. It. ons cm.WCU. b
mnpeta mret a .trollied b vada,. roots.;
D. N ternpavy ..Valk. W abutted rale Iaewltlr W eWn.t cmbd
Brt Yre9emri Rma (wm r Yl leeJ mal b..r.rmwd m Pon vl Ne aIle
Md .1m11mlbnmue1Mp.mltMWb) W dor wt m rM.rt Fan olwiaen and teen
e pavy .edF..tatbn Dmina tMt ve to W -WI m y.mm..l wt. edify
gemrt ba.ina Seeinrl mu.l W ObmiW b pnwnt It Fen b q -w
Deck inb Ne De.F, crwimr aM eaYlape rep
1d1o aIFYb Nh e bminb Wwt.a TI. acral al prmr.t bwFe must b..ithlrt tnWn b
sato. am«n%
z Fr rMbrlla am.lmalbn eRri Ilnd .tmRxelkn nm b.r aml..rd .NI.. lanparay
pmtrlbn h tlo.rr vadlrl prF Vi. - fa FdhHtl ON nae brI competeddU. reMee.. nee bot UmsNnee to N. heneowl.. Adatlrm% th P.rmltw mandbbVNaYPGTemrr. faa Mrl' b Ne hoeowl. to Flom Ne .-1 .1 N.
nW Ia. m0 D.eflb el, IFd aImIWYm.I
RECORD RETENTION
U. SYPPP, m aamee to It. W Fm«tbne rd mainlrrm rr.b mu.l be kept It Ne Mt.
O.Fq cm.wctlr by 1M P.mltir aha hw vp.dlend crbd IT Nat Daum of Ne Yta Th.
5%PPP mr M kml F MIM N..- ofnc. al F In m -Mb _...
N e.r.(a) mrt tem N. 5%PPP, dr0 .1. Ne -.2 .-d '_b ... Iv Nrr (])
yrs ettr arbmntFq of N. NOT m wNud F PMT N -NATION -AM lob
Owe sat _ ry reveres en..rD Mttd If Ne NOT.
1. MY al.. _Ne reybed Id Ne veJ.l;
N P -__rd maFl
aces --
t.OIatplmw bor inp.n.rtM. Fdublq IN
fight ./ «ri o.b«l4 wwwrta ob otter IN -QQ requi.nrb re9adbt9 P.petW
N r.wbed cabblbne b d.Y. If 1M I.npsvy rd p.m.rt I. .m. mmaganml apl.n4
l .ANION O' COVERAGE
1.._Nle{.) a g to I.mF.t. cawape .d. Ne -It o _ret Wal! N.11w1.p-
MM.) T.mFelbn (NOT) WIL to u. 11Pf Cargllrm nu N. Pomo b 7"" wb o
NOT . Iltmla.lpn 1I
Umet
d eY•U. NOT
bl
dYaaw wd. uY Damp
WIL
1 M pW-jt'MW') mmt Walt a NOT n -y (b) Ni'. arty In. a mer. of OIe
bleairq o.dtlra haw b. oral.
a Fhd Stmibvllr tem Dor am1..e0 . m polime or ue tole b akdl Ne P.mlllr
d .1--11
Y
FWd'n9 1M mN.d al m tenp.'ry .atom smut mo..n .rcdr m Yt frca
e 11IPamxnlurme / (
PF
rovbdnrd
Ire b 1.. pr. or.iz«Om aybYlwi ur)
I meet. tr) teOOOOaverdareItwN.w mnrW «aatlFq b Pon 1.8.5 PPCAP.mn Xn MIN RIof NueweMteelnrot b. Ba1ndIYmNIz.b v11
c. Fa redtlrli=bactlm eNY• I——M. t prat«tlr and d .atllnt
p__ Yn W FaN it. teas bar Crn.p.ted r th.
WrAedbmWbtheh. -n.. W+, Ne P.mlttr ...t d6hbute iM
A'e 'n.mrerr Im Mwt' la Ne harem to Flan tl.e h...na If Ne -
NW Ie - brelll. al. IYW .Imllxetlr.
9TE PFdFl FH
PNAY - A. uNAnNO
PHASE 11 - U., MSTAWl10N
PRAY 11 - BMINNG COM5111UCIIM
PRAY I - M.. O m.
1. TIe auerW W alma Yl tarn I-. W U. crbMa MwM Netm Ma Yt Iso ca indcaled
del i. At dem Ii, l perF.n.4 mrelbnrl I- Mede
W aced Toa Yl lance ail d« a.'w « u. cm.Wctlr IYnit. Iv Phar 1 of Us c.rh..0m prxa4
1 Priv to mare .etlinq Ne emlrocta Nrm rmetr«t o I«Y cmelrvctla a lrmu (see detm) b mirinla
bored dmoMllr to aq N. gapmed .Ile
1 Te pontl. Mm be o..wcb I MI mrd --
IT...,
tlFrted to u.a to «t « sedmrl bmina 6arNq
h.r wtobllMb IModlrwnaelfatmlyr! W Nd I-, Cw10idvp.Mted led to Nlol 9meee an.
e. N .
WNPDES p
m1. moat haw Nmpvay ..Mm c.hd IrOon
w 5p b NM yr rendF diW II u. siai. 9 1. 1•adtlkNmd afwFm iwl.
sled .ilhir Ue vmd
a an
40PE (11edmlm lime m ar em randy
Sbm. b.r },1 )dap men sour the aw b not rO.My
tUl l0 11 1A dap baYp eased)
Flatt. Um lot at dap
t. Mm per Mi.w atlrtlm tom w)ranl p "m y T W more .re N..e.ipn
hal pr«lkw In F tYror vo vrrI mlpe1..1 rmnrE
6. Nal cm W .Ilv.k b. dm. al tti 6«Oon .l u. C 1,,
1. Stln.rl W be raneW soar Yt Ira b 1/3 Na.
It N rod sed ob bnelr Mb mrlvrn Mb 1M Ing NN/DOT .pealltc.11re « medfled bYaa.
1178
Tanpwy SW (tyq 150 O b/«) ] IT]816
istiN(TT.. t dbc -MI) !!1
c..rd %ecanrl 25ri
9. 11pr we g ran wi_ IM cwiD«t. Mm almib. vo (M. Damrrl
vegelaUn that ab 'a wtwah.d by uI.Ily ar.wc- ro Ud WN not b..araee
lel b ,.odor., III - Ind_
110.
Rep,
StmelzatlyVIII
d Mm be
caul
pebilw Speclnh YrDateSNuclllca1. 1513 end
meap.nl w «mdaatten odb0ond pwnPeNlmlNan alae, bin'a fine P- IE
12 N abm wt. Hsh Mm Naw FM pmlrlbn PmMded MmM wy lmmF9 NM F.tm.tlr. wet
D b« Mom ;NI vn .y •'rR•• IN,. -b pmt«t Ne puNk rd ii, I. _-Y Fan M1vm.
hiA pmtrtlr Mm be F N I m delalal o ee ;ruled F Ybot Sprlecdla. 1511 t Dnlrtlr
Mm W "-1 1. m Hole aI— Ue Preyed v« am Iv lfcw Flele F.ud.1My tlo.nehaan el Na
pmJrt mo FM pmirtlm Mm De Nabrtbl to ue "),I if Uo Is net a r«ac Bb It. Iv uta
13. T.npvvr .e -1 M.iu Mm W ravuird -YM... are b mr. t11m 10 evr b.FFq b . ao Ue
incl .... Mm be Wed 1. --t Ne .eV IN. to U. atom avlr -"g .b. BYP'a a rlr
of - m be r-- la eN = «wnp1M U TopsvY seanrt bots. Mm Fdrbecild la
Ne v.w If a Jeed Bb Ito don ort IMAIv ub
PN. tl - uTA]TY .-TION
1. Th. -dacuteMMVnwNirmr`na W,Niq rraWtIr Neareo. (ar ldr I. FMe'lop qm).
2 TM :l:Tta Mm F.lai the u NNI« F o moat oat Imlta U. nru Fane h abh o.Mtlw
emh«le M. .F Im .mltbnd ..Yat _.
11 ,.
Macaw r.
Iit. Midtalms
wrf
1. o .edeted
o..nlgit. II Ue _11v.m an -p.b N.y Mm be -1 F «corbFce rlth W
mvapr.. m6 Iv D.mmrl -telbk
Sae Mwdd W pmt«W by It Nast o lair of lamvvy m onv sew IIIYfD.CL hdudinq
b.N N. F.tdmllr m vndl and Iar9. snort
PHASE 11 BOtDND COM51R110110N
1. The ower .N nm. Ue pmad 11. IFr rd Breda Prb li d4*9 m «dr I.I.
hneV cvnbd Mm W F p«a to ael m r.dinrt o.bd and to _cllr IF.Il. .1 Ire4
k Dade v Ramsay W Rwllr bq. Mace De mn.bred It le Me rapmebNtY of U.
uYdr to v..rl .carnet Ummat Fan NW lot
2 Eawr mi Mwtld
atb. I trout 16. eYw Wooed m1 rd almIt. rluF 11 Icva Sm honbunumwllonMete .Rood me I«ally r ob Ywdd b....ema.e by
IT I.Na
PR • T Fa"°wTde
Tele "*t a.Wb vl opproainalwy 1.59 aa.. comm _-
tof ®
saki% uteity b.tmetla.e.
b.-99 bit c..wc re Ib. and IT I Ne Oly
mf
d
bIMIP_ tan. T .ave . rate N be g died b, t.-Itt.
ItIf
W
tppmd
d th. irlo m wlaling vllmb The o" It, rr g roto Iv N6 Dla)rt Ia 1
surd the- b I«out to U. oath of 1M PM)rt It.. TFY b v« N not d.M fNW
1 m«bl role . Ynpobed .etr, ilre vmrtY oro. 1. be nm M.. Iv m
pend maFlrmce on. Ne NOT naa bar 6wal I. be NPOES p.mli. R.i. I.
tam rare" cdmNIt_ fv 1, tort If Ne 1-)r .tom and alum r.. W..9 ofIno10 -yr atom. Tho aIle Ia 1 'we worn It.
lee -nat. aged. anm ben tiff of . nappia 1 diW into th
It N. stab. Tse bW.M numD.a Mm Eenotll ars mplgl ., .No
Mm dm W nall6ed rose regi by Iwo
A9rcy P-11 Cent«t Phre Nvnbr
PCA NPDEs Bnen Cow (551.1%.11136
MR Prmit Oenrd Wet. Petr feet. 651.198.6589
stab Nty OMc. 800.4110198
EC Superdr TBD
qty of PlynwN shore NININl 163.508.5511
zC
V G
z r' _
z W u1
0 IM. O
FAQ
n'o A a
It FtoW d
U) z a CL
ani a d
o} a vii
a3Q =
SNC
aNy
J
CL
PJDM
dl4i wMl 112
T•enaitea. IDI 66011
rem.: lei
r.a: (161)MI) -574
ma..®
T
C4
INLET PROTECTION
Rmre,
oSPECIFtCATIONS, 1 . C'ILL• 11pn1 MJCL M CITU® Ifl6 Lor.
BILI ImI61d1 awl ]r d Mmmvtt vEM lau art >ax
R MMELTdI YD1 HC CLAttO®N TYPE A®Dr m 1DL
t dM ML POrrs DIID M OmBO AT M COVIImL ss T M rnDCE
S v6r IDmr PG xd D.9n [DOIR OKSERVArdI Ca11BR [msDDI Ila
S V
TYPC V61 BC K Da1GTED XDlml
TTR A • DIET IIUIECT01 m DE YRIII9 AmDm IAC D6Ca
OMR KNaRL VDII Iml 106r ]r A 10aON V t DD M 4001r IMO m
RDr twR >0• ADwD M dS YL TAasa WrMZ
IIII4 I[DWd1 RKLLQMTdI RTi wVT ORM CSTAtl51r6dvorAaVOratDDirs GT Or alT rpr[ d M IRLLl fS Md4 M rUOS LM. AM MOI 161 R1G
INLET PROTECTION ROCK ENTRANCE TO CONSTRUCTION SITE
r°m m Drrl'
uwrr"
Emt v m Alm umvur6nxo
rYPE D. DrLT rKUrtCTOt vDi c uTDJII9 d Sir D6Ea vrtloD t>n
DETAILS
SILT FENCE DETAIL
s v® POrrs wr Dc am w m 4 rm wMR o< vmE KESII a
m asPdT M rAroc v vDx Icd a ua m SlPfdf M rADDr sera
Imre wr Dc am w m. r¢r NAR.
INLET PROTECTION
STD. 2'%O' STORM STRUCTURE
O
rlTy pl, In w v, Orr M_ In
TTR O DO.CT PODIECTId V61 < UTR®d itIQT DLliS VIDI OO KwCt
57-zz
arf Q MOL1L RGC a. 4pOY[ fIIT Ifl6 M'IOf lUT a EF— R/JAin
nvc-ID CITY DF PLYMOUTH DVG-s
D k^ o
ST-za
un dla rvewmm0oim°Lwr —U-- aITRnmoaa°rnarn wvc
5« APPROVED PRODUCTS FOR INLET PROTECTIOWAPPROVED
a
TYPE A
mA0 aMDt - VUOm. LLC -199 ilra DmvE, aWas6 IDI
STIrAR CaMR Rff:RT - 1952 F]PWIpI1AL - SEATTLE. VO
VaE IOSI OFVY 10L W
3 3V O
E06SIDI Can6a aOSm - IDTCAL fAfJtCIE PDS - STAGY, KM PST OETAL d
11TER rArOC eY• wx KIJ
saT sAoc - Av RlvwaacTlrAL - 61R9aD. vA r. =. ` vD® a•m ruxsru
3W€ STOUR CiM110 - SEDDdf OLY- IDSS ERv0 0ODM. -SUTTEE,
INSERT TO BE USED SHALL BE P VIRGO i0 HEVErTIiRD - N.PINE LIRBNATRI RUT. - OMM CITY. d C imm9w RDRD DRAIN' STYLE, DR APPROVED EQUAL
UTILIZED W THE E%IS711G R ADVAY CAS7IM4
TYPE B
gqpgS
6AIm1'DIS - 6AlmI PRO ICTS - fAWC CRT, d C KaUON S I nl O'ILL' 19ooI FSS O''
TYPE C
Dr
DUVFA DAM - 6AKm1 FO®lCTS - DiWE nn, d I' TD t vAxo mot TO BE USED IN CONJUNCTION 111THOA NEENA
DL, OR TYPECPS7INcNOORDINDdAdwoeAlaDMniR-vD. LLC T9v nns m.-aw®¢. PPPROVEDEEOUA
S1T SCIEEIi - ALPDC SIaDNAIq WT. -(ADV[ CITY, d d a fMS /dAGt• lmt tr11A9® aCl K MI/IDr G-1 aJ, IUIO[C
TYPE D
OSR]Ir6LKVAArdI PAOIfd wY t I® aDUI M RDD' TD VdlDIMIId10.TYG aDt DIm M nur.
K APPRDVT r M dtaC.L Z
vR STANDARD DETAILS co DnA STANDARD DETAILS aEVIUDsn 6uvv aY STAN'
ac}IZEo xcvuca v
By
H
ujOF- In O U)
H Q
J
Oy0 J W
H W C
1-
Q
ZLLZLL Q
VJ Q d
u
IL3a
aQ
x
Na y
O
QNNI
J
2
CDDSIIWIC Q1CHIt, PIL
I.mrIM. Do emu
P— ITDDI TCO -MA
CM) 754-4
eam...om
DBACM
CHECKED BY. JAR
DE4CRE0 BY: 1
JDB N0. 1DI01>
91EFi
C5
INLET PROTECTION ROCK ENTRANCE TO CONSTRUCTION SITE
DETAILS
SILT FENCE DETAIL
INLET PROTECTION
STD. 2'%O' STORM STRUCTURE
Ds
rlTy pl, In w v, Orr M_ In
CITY OF PLYMOUTH 57-zz CITY OF PLYMOUTH nvc-ID CITY DF PLYMOUTH DVG-s CITY OF PLYMOUTH ST-za
CC
za 6o , 6, kD06 00
C', p e 0e - n fagr'
0 0
0 ,
o 02 o + t b
D6 a ,5 0, UC Ico a6 '06 D6
C 2 6.3 6e, 'o, Da ee 0.0 ' •
eo oo
DO
DD .l ]D J.S ,. O:S R2 O,T DC '0: ''OA , 0. 0 00
t 'dl •Z rel 0 0. ox `
ABO
p `
0.80 'OG '0 1 0.t 0 0.0 '0.0
0 / -x 0 ',0 0 '07 lam{ l J ( /O f=0 'OJ
2 0
0
00
000
1J / ° `LLS 0 -
OO
C0
C 0 'sTS B hklR a 'o005fF/ F
t 'xJ 'J, ', 'VI - \`O \ 00 00
0.2 p 1z o /) &0c1 w o V.
0 5 z.5 ,
a9-.06 5
6.
6
E05•D
V
0 "0dOA'0. 03 0 6 e
E.
03 '0 2 '12 , 1.3 '10 0 I 0.1/
Co!
A ] '
2 6 / tr 2 '„ T 'p 0.T 'O6 / 5 0I
OJ 5 O 11 ] x ,J 0 .B O.t ,60
e2 6
f'
2 , 2 1C 11
06o 1 3 t
6
i 0E
0t 0 5 0 2 +2 5 ... t .5 .E J %9 %11! • T 0 / S
S , 1a x
rfi t ']1'. -IT 11 t
0, Ot 0 ,.0 '1.2 '1.3 /'t:3 '23'J.f Qfi '5:9 1, x5 2 14 i0. , 0 \
0. x C 6 D-7 - nOmow._ '3.,
0-0_ nJ 0i 6 T e SEs e - S 'I t
00 o.o0 00 5 _ 1 n \ '0 ,r .5 .aP 's tb.o s2 6 25 Ex ,
pR a `
3
4' f
0 dd g T
o
0.
o'Co
7'
a 0 o o
0.
0 00 ' .\ \\, .'o3p .a
l J r l ) j r1 U O
a.fi 0a iee
a DVC Co 06
O odt a>ye a 5-
4,2n0
ox D6
mss- 'a 'a0 00 Co o '.0 'o\ 'oE . e 00 0.0 o.D Do 00 00 0., ep oz. o.z oa On
v --0.0 0 00 '0\'0, o., 'aD 0 0.0 0.0 00 00 0.1 02 0s. D3 0, 00
x_
01- Cl 0.1 0, 0. I 0. 00 00
ILLUMINATION DISTRIBUTION SITE PLAN
SCALE:,'=x0'-0'
LUMINAL ESCHEDULE
r -
O[
twnnvx
ut.Vr
raw,ea,runw
o,[5 ,ro
GENERAL NOTES
1 7gT.°`EL L
H. E_EVATI- FOe
ATI
sHuOLo
CE d5 E l-..
3 Ll lIG CRD NAICE R P. M',VTH
C
KEY PLAN
4 E%TERIOR ELEVATION u
I
I -
r-—T--i-i--
J
3 E%TERIOR ELEVATION
l I I
2 E%TERIOR ELEVATION uiia• . _
Architectural
IUUNSUK 1 IUM L.L.C.
9011bT 11N Svael Suit Z1U b1P<.0
Ilimaap k rM 55101 —fi,]E9 -9
PLYMOUTH -
ACACIA
PLYMOUTH, MN
RETAIL / OFFICE
EXTERIOR
ELEVATIONS
SCALEI/8" = T-0
A3.1
L.L.C.
Architectural Consortium, L.L.C. 2005
ARCHITECTURAL
CONSORTIUM L.L.C.
T.O. ROOF
EL. 172'-
901—TIN a—s-a220 611J]W030
km—o1 Fea fi12 2-9960
I T10 FMAPETIL
EL 126'-0
4 T E N A T 5 I N A 6 E TENA 516NA6E
80.0. SOFR7
Et 120-0
T.0 STMITRONT
EL 112-0
Mark Wn/1551/[ DateELIOO-0
4 E%TERIOR ELEVATION
PLYMOUTH -
ACACIA
1 E%TERIOR ELEVATION E%TERIOR ELEVATION
PLYMOUTH, MN
j EXTERIOR
KEY PLAN L r ELEVATIONS
j SCALE:U8,._1'-0„
i—a
s
E7cTERIOR ELEVATION
A3.2
Architectural Consortium, L.L.C. 2005
Page 1 of 3
Sandy Paulson
From: Laurie Ahrens
Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2005 5:59 PM
To: Sandy Paulson
Subject: FW: Aug 23rd city council meeting
Original Message -----
From: Sandy Hewitt
Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2005 8:25 AM
To: Laurie Ahrens
Cc: Anne Hurlburt; Josh Doty
Subject: FW: Aug 23rd city council meeting
Please add this to 6.04 for tonight's meeting. I apologize for not forwarding this earlier.
Sandy Hewitt
Original Message -----
From: Pam & Rob Imailto:r.p.damell@comcast.net]
Sent: Toe 8/16/2005 12:30 PM
To: Judy Johnson; Sandy Hewitt
Cc:
Subject: Aug 23rd city council meeting
Dear Mayor and Council Member Hewitt,
My name is Pam Darnell and I live at 18005 45th Ave. N. I am writing with my concerns and
questions that were not alleviated after the planning commission meeting that discussed the
proposed rezoning of the Southwest corner of Old Rockford Rd and Peony Lane. I would first
like to say that I think the proposed development is can be a good fit for our neighborhood and
can provide useful services to our community. I do feel that there are a few items that are still of
concern and I would like to ask that you provide insight on making this sight the best possible fit
for our community.
1. Setback variance
a. The planning commission recommended to approve the 14 foot setback variance from
Old Rockford Rd
i. I am concerned that there is not enough room for the planning
commission's required sidewalk, right turn lane and landscaping in that 14
feet.
ii. Even though the planning commission recommended not approving the
setback variance for the parking, it only required them to take out one
parking space. Will you please consider the impact having parking spaces at
the entry into the development will have on incoming traffic? I think it will
affect traffic on Old Rockford Rd.
iii. I think that approving the setback variance, on this site, from Old
Rockford road thus allowing the parking to be shielded by the buildings is a
good thing for residents living in close proximity, but please envision how
that will effect that intersection in function and appearance if approving this
setback variances sets a precedence for the South East corner development
8/23/2005
Page 2 of 3
to be placed closer to the road also.
2. Right in/Right out entrance
a. The planning commission did not think that there would be a traffic problem with
cars doing a U-turn to get into the development while traveling westbound on Old
Rockford Rd. I disagree completely. Please envision how this will impact traffic on
Old Rockford Rd and where these people will be turning around. Even if a `No U-
turn" sign is put in place, people will most likely still do it or use 45th Ave N as a
place to tum around.
b. Josh Doty stated that he didn't think the U-turn entry would affect the entrance into
the Plum Tree subdivision 1000' feet from the intersection. It may or may not cause
a problem there. I think the problem will be in a backup of traffic at the intersection
of Old Rockford Rd and Peony Lane.
3. Hours of operation
a. I would like to see a limitation on hours of service put in place as a part of the
conditional use permit for entire site (C3 and Cl) since it is so close to residential
areas.
b. The proposed owner of the transmission business stated that their hours of operation
would be 8-5 M -F and 8-12 on Sat with no business conducted on Sundays. The
planning commission wanted to restrict business from 7-7 Mon -Fri and 7-1 on Sat
due to the close proximity to residential areas which I thought was reasonable. The
proposed owner said that in peak times (snow and heat) they would need to stay open
later and thought it would cause undue hardship on their business by limiting their
hours of operation. I think if the 3 additional hours per day the planning commission
offered are not adequate, it is even more of a concern on how late his business will
operate. As a resident that lives directly across the street, I certainly do not want him
operating into the night.
4. Conditional use permit
a. Please look at the probability that inoperable vehicles will be in the parking lot if they
have a goal of 10 cars/week being serviced and 6 service bays. It seems that there
will be times that inoperable cars, possibly leaking transmission fluid, will be parked
outside while waiting for service.
b. If the conditional use permit for an auto service station is approved, I believe it is
transferable to future uses.
i. If the proposed AMMACO goes out of business can a Jiffy Lube type
business go in there?
ii. I am concerned about that type of business being allowed in the future
because typically they have long hours and generate a lot of noise with air
hammers and other like tools. I would like to see the council restrict this
type of business from operating in the future. I don't think that would be a
good fit in such close proximity to residential areas.
c. Can it be stated in the conditional use permit that all service on cars must be
conducted with the service bay doors down? I think that would cut down on noise.
4. Fumes/Spills of transmission fluid
a. I am concerned about fumes from the on-site burning of the transmission fluid. I
researched the furnaces that they use and I admire their industry for being
environmentally friendly for taking the safer route of burning vs. transporting the
transmission fluid to a disposal site and generating their own heat with the burning of
the used fluid. In reviewing the Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) for transmission
fluid, it states in an accidental release of the fluid stay up wind and notify people
down wind. I may be unjustifiably concerned, so could you please verify the
resident's safety in close proximity to this burning process?
8/23/2005
Page 3 of 3
b. Will nearby resident's air be impaired by the smell of the fumes?
c. Please verify their process on preventing the transmission fluid from entering the
storm water and natural areas in the event of a spill either from a holding tank or from
a leaking car
I hope I have given you adequate time to review my concerns prior to the City Council meeting
where this agenda item will be discussed and decided upon. I can only imagine how hard it must
be to devote adequate time to all the decisions facing the council. So, thank you for your time in
reviewing my concerns. I believe that the council does a great job at keeping the resident's best
interest in mind when making decisions for the city!
Sincerely,
Pam Darnell
8/23/2005
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. 2005 -
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 21 (ZONING ORDINANCE) OF THE CITY
CODE TO CLASSIFY CERTAIN LAND LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF
PEONY LANE AND OLD ROCFORD ROAD (2005066)
THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH ORDAINS:
Section 1. Amendment of City Code. Chapter 21 of the City Code of the City of
Plymouth, Minnesota, is hereby amended by changing the classification on the City of Plymouth
Zoning Map from FRD (Future Restricted Development) to C-1 (Convenience Commercial) and
C-3 (Highway Commercial) with respect to two properties located at the southwest corner of
Peony Lane and Old Rockford Road, presently legally described as follows:
Parcel 1
Tract A, Registered Lane Survey No. 1091, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
Torrens Property
Torrens Certificate No. 1070327
Parcel 2
That part of Tract B, Registered Land Survey No. 1091, Hennepin County, lying North of a line
drawn from most Southerly corner of Tract A, Registered Land Survey No. 1091, to a point on
the line of said Tract B, distant 219.41 feet South from the Northeast corner of said Tract A,
Hennepin County, Minnesota.
Torrens Property.
Torrens Certificate No. 1072744
Section 2. Effective Date. This amendment shall take effect immediately upon its passage.
Ordinance 2005-
2005066
Page 2
ADOPTED by the City Council on August 23, 2005.
Judy A. Johnson, Mayor
ATTEST:
Sandra R. Paulson, City Clerk
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
RESOLUTION 2005 -
APPROVING FINDINGS OF FACT FOR THE REZONING OF PROPERTY LOCATED AT
THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF PEONY LANE AND OLD ROCFORD ROAD (2005066)
WHEREAS, Acacia Real Estate Partners LLC, has requested reclassification of the zoning from
FRD (Future Restricted Development) to C-1 (Convenience Commercial) and C-3 (Highway
Commercial) with respect to two properties located at the southwest corner of Peony Lane and
Old Rockford Road, presently legally described as follows:
Parcel 1
Tract A, Registered Lane Survey No. 1091, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
Torrens Property
Torrens Certificate No. 1070327
Parcel 2
That part of Tract B, Registered Land Survey No. 1091, Hennepin County, lying North of a line
drawn from most Southerly corner of Tract A, Registered Land Survey No. 1091, to a point on
the line of said Tract B, distant 219.41 feet South from the Northeast corner of said Tract A,
Hennepin County, Minnesota.
Torrens Property.
Torrens Certificate No. 1072744
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed said request at a duly called Public Hearing
and recommends approval; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has adopted an ordinance rezoning the affected parcels from FRD
Future Restricted Development) to C-1 (Convenience Commercial) and C-3 (Highway
Commercial).
Resolution 2005-
2005066)
Page 2
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the request for
reclassification of the zoning from FRD (Future Restricted Development) to C-1 (Convenience
Commercial) and C-3 (Highway Commercial) with respect to two properties located at the
southwest corner of Peony Lane and Old Rockford Road, based on the following findings:
The proposed zoning of C-1 and C-3 for parcels 1 and 2, respectively, meets the location
criteria in the Comprehensive Plan and is therefore consistent with the plan.
2. The site plan associated with this request supports an effective transition from lower intensity
uses. More specifically, the applicant is proposing to place the building on parcel 1 close to
Old Rockford Road, shielding the parking area and the building on parcel 2 from the Plum
Tree neighborhood.
The existing road system has sufficient capacity to handle the traffic that would be generated
by the proposed development.
ADOPTED by the City Council on August 23, 2005.
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS.
The undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed City Clerk of the City of Plymouth,
Minnesota, certifies that I compared the foregoing resolution adopted at a meeting of the
Plymouth City Council on August 23, 2005 with the original thereof on file in my office, and the
same is a correct transcription thereof.
WITNESS my hand officially as such City Clerk and the Corporate seal of the City this
day of
City Clerk
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
RESOLUTION 2005 -
APPROVING SITE PLAN, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND VARIANCES TO ALLOW
AN OFFICE/RETAIL BUILDING AND AN AUTO -SERVICE BUILDING FOR TWO
PROPERTIES LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF OLD ROCKFORD ROAD
AND PEONY LANE (2005066)
WHEREAS, Acacia Real Estate Partners LLC, has requested approval of a site plan, conditional
use permit, and variances to allow a 12,678 -square foot office/retail building and a 4,200 -square
foot auto -service building located at the southwest corner of Old Rockford Road and Peony
Lane, for properties legally described as:
Parcel 1
Tract A, Registered Lane Survey No. 1091, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
Torrens Property
Torrens Certificate No. 1070327
Parcel 2
That part of Tract B, Registered Land Survey No. 1091, Hennepin County, lying North of a line
drawn from most Southerly corner of Tract A, Registered Land Survey No. 1091, to a point on
the line of said Tract B, distant 219.41 feet South from the Northeast corner of said Tract A,
Hennepin County, Minnesota.
Torrens Property.
Torrens Certificate No. 1072744
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed said request at a duly called public hearing
and recommends approval.
Resolution 2005 -
File No. 2005066
Page 2
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the request by Acacia
Real Estate Partners LLC, for a site plan, conditional use permit, and variances to allow a
12,678 -square foot office/retail building and a 4,200 -square foot auto -service building, subject to
the following conditions:
1. A site plan, conditional use permit, and variances are approved to allow construction of a
12,678 -square foot office/retail building and a 4,200 -square foot auto -service building on two
properties, in accordance with the application materials received by the City on May 27,
2005, and revised plans received by the City on July 12, 2005, July 13, 2005, and July 26,
2005 except as amended by this resolution.
2. The following variances are approved: 1) a 14 -foot setback from the office/retail building to
the north property line where 75 feet is required, 2) a 10 -foot setback from the office/retail
building to the east easement line where 35 feet is required, 3) a 14 -foot setback from the
auto -service building to the east easement line where 50 feet is required, 4) a 15 -foot setback
from the parking lot to the east easement line where 20 feet is required, 5) a 13 -foot setback
from the parking lot to the west property line where 20 feet is required, and 6) a 0.54 -acre lot
area, where 1 acre is required with the C-3 Zoning district, based on the findings that:
a) the placement of the buildings and parking lot provide a transition and buffer from the
adjacent residential homes. The requested variances would allow reasonable use of the
property with a development that would enhance the site.
b) The conditions related to this parcel are not generally applicable to other properties. The
City's commercial zoning districts do not account for building placement at the street
corners. The design is a unique situation to this development and results in a hardship for
the applicant.
c) The granting of the variances would not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious
to other land or improvements in the area. The applicant is proposing a development that
would provide a transition from lower to higher intensity uses. In addition, the applicant
is proposing to design the buildings with colors and materials that would blend into the
area.
d) Granting of the variances would not impair an adequate supply of light or air to adjacent
properties, nor would it substantially increase congestion in the public streets, increase
the danger of fire, endanger the public safety, or substantially diminish or impair property
values within the neighborhood.
e) The proposed variances are the minimum action to alleviate the hardship.
3. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the plans shall be revised to show compliance with the
20 -foot parking setback to the north property line.
Resolution 2005 -
File No. 2005066
Page 3
4. Prior to issuance of a building permit, a site improvement performance agreement and
financial guarantee shall be submitted pursuant to Section 21045.10 of the Zoning Ordinance.
5. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the plans shall be revised to identify a right turn lane
for eastbound traffic entering the development. The developer shall also be responsible for
constructing the turn lane.
6. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the plans shall be revised to show a walkway
connection from the proposed parking lot to the exiting trail along Peony Lane and a
walkway (north of the building on parcel 1) from the west property line to the existing trail
along Peony Lane.
7. Prior to issuance of a building permit, a revised lighting plan shall be submitted in
compliance with Section 21105.06 of the Zoning Ordinance. Specifically, the revised plan
shall identify compliance with the watts per square footage requirement for wall lighting, the
shielding for each type of light fixture, and house side shields for all fixtures within 300 feet
of a residential property line.
8. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit revised elevation plans that
identify all exterior materials on the plans to be reviewed for compliance with Section
21115.03. Subd. 1. of the Zoning Ordinance.
9. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall revise the site plan show the
location of compact parking signs on the site. The locations shall be reviewed and approved
by the City.
10. Neon signage shall not be located on the north side of the north office/retail building in the
C-1 zoning district.
11. All trash shall be enclosed pursuant to Ordinance requirements.
12. All rooftop equipment shall be screened or painted to match.
13. Future improvements to Old Rockford Road will require a center concrete median to be
constructed on Old Rockford Road from Peony Lane westerly approximately 400 feet. This
will ultimately impact the access to the subject site with a right -in, right -out only. No
driveways shall be allowed on Peony Lane.
Resolution 2005 -
File No. 2005066
Page 4
14. Engineering conditions:
a. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the plans shall be revised to include the following:
1. A 10 -foot utility and drainage easement on Old Rockford Road and Peony Lane and a
6 -foot drainage easement along the west property lines.
2. A drainage and utility easement for the pond high water level and for maintenance
access to the pond. The drainage and utility easement shall also include the high
water level of the wetland at 1007.2.
3. Install B612 curb and gutter for the parking lot.
4. The watermain shall be connected to stub at the intersection of Old Rockford Road
and Peony Lane. The existing water service on Peony Lane shall also be used to
provide a looped system. The southerly -proposed watermain wet tap on Peony Lane
is not allowed.
5. The watermain shall be stubbed to the west plat boundary.
6. Shallow storm sewer and pipe shall have granular material placed to a depth of 48
inches. Use City Detail ST -2 on plans.
7. No retaining walls shall be allowed in the drainage and utility easement for the pond.
6. The north side of the pond must have a 10 -foot bench at the normal water level.
Include City Detail ST -3 on the plans.
7. A 15 -foot wide pond access route must be provided with a grade that shall not exceed
15 percent. The access route shall be located to gain access to the pond outlet
structure as well as for future pond cleaning.
8. A skimmer structure shall be added for the pond outlet and shall be relocated as far as
possible to the southeast portion of the pond.
9. Relocate all storm sewer that discharges into the pond to discharge to the westerly
portion of the pond to avoid short-circuiting of the storm water.
10. Remove detail of Dropped Curb on page C 2.
11. Green areas must drain at a minimum grade of 13/4 percent. Drain tile is required if
the minimum grade cannot be met. Percent of grade shall be identified on the grading
plan.
12. Correct curb height note for the southerly building.
13. Show a 20 -foot radius for the driveway. Refer to City Detail STRT-14 and include the
detail on the plans.
14. The sanitary sewer must have at least 7 feet of cover.
15. Show location of catch basin inlet protection on grading plan.
16. Submit a description on the grading plan of how increased volumes of runoff due to
the proposed development would be minimized by limiting impervious cover and
encouraging infiltration of storm water where soil conditions are appropriate.
17. Submit a description on the grading plan of how alternative landscape techniques and
materials will reduce rates and volumes of runoff.
Resolution 2005 -
File No. 2005066
Page 5
18. Identify on the grading plan all reasonable steps to avoid water quality impact and
mitigate with appropriate best management practices (BMPs) to prevent water quality
in receiving waters from falling below established standards.
b. Prior to issuance of a building permit, cross easements for the driveway and parking lot
must be provided.
c. Prior to issuance of a building permit, all appropriate permits shall be obtained from the
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Minnesota Department of Health, Bassett Creek
Water Management Commission, and NPDES.
d. Prior to issuance of a building permit, a right-of-way permit shall be obtained from the
Engineering Department.
e. Prior to the financial guarantee being released, the City requires reproducible mylar prints
of sanitary sewer, water service, storm sewer and pond As-Builts for the site.
15. Fire Conditions:
a. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the plans shall be revised to include the following:
1. Identify location of fire apparatus access road signage. Fire apparatus access
roads shall be designed to minimum fire lane construction requirements.
2. Identify turning radii from all directions through the entire drive aisle. Provide
proof that all Plymouth Fire Department apparatus will be able to make the
required turns.
3. Identify fire hydrants in locations approved by the City Fire Inspector.
4. Submit fire flow calculations flowing the remote two hydrants simultaneously.
Each hydrant shall be capable of flowing a minimum of 1,500 GPM at 20 PSI
residual pressure.
b. The entire fire watermain system must be looped due to low water pressure in the area.
c. All buildings shall be protected by a City approved NFPA 13 Automatic Fire sprinkler
system.
d. A building fire sprinkler system and fire alarm system shall be monitored by an approved
UL central station with a UL certificate on the system. The PIV and all system control
valves with the system flow switches shall be monitored by the UL central station.
e. An approved solenoid device is required to be connected between the building domestic
water supply and the building fire sprinkler system.
f. An approved City of Plymouth Fire Department lockbox must be installed in an approved
location near the main entry door for each building.
g. An 8 1/2 inch x 11 inch "As -Built" Fire Protection Plan shall be submitted prior to the
release or reduction of any site improvement bonds, per City Policy.
h. Fire Lane signage must be installed in locations as identified by the Fire Inspector.
i. The locations of post -indicator valves and fire department connections shall be approved
by the Fire Inspector.
Resolution 2005 -
File No. 2005066
Page 6
16. The minimum floor elevation shall be 1012.0.
17. The existing sanitary manhole shall be field verified for an outside drop for the sanitary sewer
service. The applicant shall install an outside drop if one does not exist.
18. Written permission is required from the property owner to the west for work across the
property line.
19. Standard Conditions:
a. The applicant shall remove any diseased or hazardous trees.
b. All signage shall comply with the Section 21155 of the Zoning Ordinance.
c. Building permits are required prior to the commencement of any construction related to
the project.
d. Any subsequent phases or expansions are subject to required reviews and approvals per
Ordinance provisions.
e. The permit is subject to all applicable codes, regulations and ordinances, and violation
thereof shall be grounds for revocation.
f. This approval shall expire one year after the date of approval, unless the property owner
or applicant has substantially started construction of the project, or unless the landowner
or applicant has received prior approval from the City to extend the expiration date for up
to one additional year, as regulated under Sections 21045.09, 21015.07, and 21030.06 of
the Zoning Ordinance.
ADOPTED by the City Council on August 23, 2005.
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS.
The undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed City Clerk of the City of Plymouth,
Minnesota, certifies that I compared the foregoing resolution adopted at a meeting of the
Plymouth City Council on August 23, 2005 with the original thereof on file in my office, and the
same is a correct transcription thereof.
WITNESS my hand officially as such City Clerk and the Corporate seal of the City this
day of
City Clerk
Number , Agenda 0g
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
TO: Laurie Ahrens, City Manager A
1"
FROM: Shawn Drill, Sr. Planner through Anne Hurlburt, Community Development
Director
SUBJECT: Edward Farr Architects. Site plan amendment to allow parking
expansion at 4600 Nathan Lane and 4700 Nathan Lane (2005096)
DATE: August 18, 2005 for the City Council meeting of August 23, 2005
REVIEW PERIOD DEADLINE: November 25, 2005
COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING: CO (Commercial Office)
ZONING: B -C (Business Campus)
1. PROPOSED MOTION:
Move to adopt the attached resolution approving a site plan amendment to allow a parking
expansion at two abutting properties located at 4600 Nathan Lane and 4700 Nathan Lane, as
recommended by the Planning Commission.
Approval of site plan amendment requires a 4/7 vote of the City Council.
2. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST:
The applicant is requesting approval of a site plan amendment to allow a parking expansion at
two abutting properties located at 4600 Nathan Lane and 4700 Nathan Lane. Both properties are
owned by Liberty Property Trust. The parking expansion would involve installation of a new
joint parking area that would be constructed in the west portion of the properties. The new
parking area would result in a net increase of 125 parking spaces, increasing the overall parking
count for the two properties from 1,062 to 1,187.
File 2005096
Page 2
3. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING:
On August 17, 2005, the Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of
the site plan amendment on their consent agenda. A copy of the Planning Commission minutes
is attached. Notice of the Planning Commission's public meeting was mailed to all property
owners within 200 feet. The notification area map is attached.
4. CONTEXT:
A. Surrounding Land Uses
B. Natural Characteristics of Site
The properties are located in the Shingle Creek and Bassett Creek Drainage Districts. No
portions of the properties lie with the floodplain or shoreland overlay district. The properties
contain four wetlands. The wetlands would not be affected by the proposed parking expansion.
C. Previous Actions Affecting Site
The 4600 Nathan Lane site contains an 84,600 square foot office/technical building constructed
in 2001, with ev3 as the tenant. The 4700 Nathan Lane site contains a 120,000 square foot
office/technical building constructed in 1980, with ATK as the tenant.
5. LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION-MAKING:
The City's discretion in approving or denying a site plan amendment is limited to whether or not
the proposed project complies with the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance requirements.
If it meets these standards, the City must approve the site plan amendment.
Adjacent
Land Use Guiding Zoning
North Church; Public/Institutional; Public/Institutional;
Gas/Convenience & C (Commercial) C-3 (Highway
vacant land Commercial
West (across Apartments; LA -3 (Living Area 3); RMF -4 (Multi -Family 4);
Nathan Lane S.F. Res. LA -1 (Living Area 1) RSF-2 (Single -Family 2)
East (across New Hope — S.F.
Hwy. 169) Res. & Apartments
South Apartments LA-4(Living Area 4 RMF-4(Multi-Family 4)
S.F. Res. = Single -Family Residential
B. Natural Characteristics of Site
The properties are located in the Shingle Creek and Bassett Creek Drainage Districts. No
portions of the properties lie with the floodplain or shoreland overlay district. The properties
contain four wetlands. The wetlands would not be affected by the proposed parking expansion.
C. Previous Actions Affecting Site
The 4600 Nathan Lane site contains an 84,600 square foot office/technical building constructed
in 2001, with ev3 as the tenant. The 4700 Nathan Lane site contains a 120,000 square foot
office/technical building constructed in 1980, with ATK as the tenant.
5. LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION-MAKING:
The City's discretion in approving or denying a site plan amendment is limited to whether or not
the proposed project complies with the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance requirements.
If it meets these standards, the City must approve the site plan amendment.
File 2005096
Page 3
6. ANALYSIS OF REQUEST:
This request is for a site plan amendment to allow a parking expansion for two abutting
properties located at 4600 Nathan Lane and 4700 Nathan Lane. The new parking area would be
located in the western portion of the properties. The new parking area would cross over the
common lot line that separates the two properties, and would connect the existing parking areas
on each property via an internal drive aisle system (refer to attached site graphics). There would
not be any new access points directly to Nathan Lane. The Zoning Ordinance states that joint
parking areas on abutting properties are not required to meet the parking setback from the
common lot line separating the properties. The property owner would record a cross-
access/parking easement for the new parking area. The attached resolution addresses this matter.
Based on the square footage and uses, the City requires at least 338 spaces for the 4600 Nathan
Lane site and at least 480 spaces for the 4700 Nathan Lane site, for a minimum overall total
parking count of 818 spaces. There are currently 357 parking spaces on the 4600 Nathan Lane
site and 705 parking spaces on the 4700 Nathan Lane site, for a current overall total parking
count of 1,062 spaces. Under the plan, the new joint parking area would result in a net increase
of 125 spaces, for an overall total parking count of 1,187 spaces for the properties. Therefore,
the current and proposed parking count would exceed the City's minimum requirement.
The property owner has requested the additional parking to accommodate the needs of their
tenants. In particular, ev3 located in the 4600 Nathan Lane building has been growing rapidly
and needs additional parking spaces.
The Zoning Ordinance contains specific standards for approval of a site plan amendment and for
development in the B -C zoning district. The Planning Commission and staff used these
standards to review the proposal. The specific standards that apply are as indicated on the
following table.
Standards:forAhi ' C District
Required Proposed Complies?
Parking Setback min.: 20 ft. 20 ft. Yes
Drive Aisle Setback min.: 10 ft. 38.5 ft. Yes
Parking to Building min.: 10 ft. 160 ft. Yes
Parking Spaces (overall): 818 1,187 Yes
Lighting:
Fixture height max. 30 ft. 20 ft. Yes
Shielding Fully Shielded Fully -Shielded Yes
Watts per Sq. Ft. max. 0.080 0.060 Yes
File 2005096
Page 4
Ponding
A new water-quality/retention pond would be provided east of the expanded parking area. The
proposed pond would treat storm water runoff prior to its discharge into the drainage system.
The proposed pond would comply with City regulations pertaining to water quality.
Landscaping/Screening
Roughly 50 existing trees would need to be removed from the properties to allow for the new
parking area and related storm water ponding. Even with the removal of these trees, the
properties would exceed the minimum number of required trees based on the square footage of
the buildings. Nine of the trees to be removed would be transplanted on the properties.
Additionally, the landscape plan includes 26 new trees within and around the perimeter of the
proposed parking area. The proposal would exceed the City's landscaping requirements.
The proposed parking area would be located over 300 feet from the nearest residences—which
are located to the west. Nathan Lane and the subject properties are not visible from the
residential area due to several existing mature trees on the west side of Nathan Lane. The plan
includes a berm ranging from two to four feet in height between the proposed parking area and
Nathan Lane. A hedgerow would be planted on the berm. The proposal would exceed the City's
screening requirements.
7. RECOMMENDATION:
Community Development Department staff recommends approval of the site plan amendment for
Edward Farr Architects to allow a parking expansion at two abutting properties located at 4600
Nathan Lane and 4700 Nathan Lane, as recommended by the Planning Commission.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Planning Commission Minutes
2. Applicant's Narrative
3. Location Map
4. Notification Area Map
5. Site Graphics
6. Resolution Approving Site Plan Amendment
Draft
Planning Commission Minutes
August 17, 2005
Page 2
C. EDWARD FARR ARCHITECTS (2005096)
MOTION by Commissioner Murdock, seconded by Commissioner Clyman, to approve
the request by Edward Farr Architects for a site plan amendment to allow a parking
expansion at 4600 Nathan Lane and 4700 Nathan Lane. Vote. 6 Ayes. MOTION
approved unanimously.
7710 Golden
Triangle Drive
Eden Prairie
Minnesota 55344
Tel: 952 943-9660
Fax: 952 943-9665
www.edfarrarch.com
Mr. Shawn Drill
City of Plymouth, MN
3400 Plymouth Blvd.
Plymouth, MN 55447
Re: Narrative Attachment for Site Plan Amendment Submittal
4600 and 4700 Nathan Lane N parking lot expansion
EFA # 05.032
Dear Mr. Drill,
Liberty Property Trust owns both 4600 and 4700 Nathan Lane North and would like to
expand the parking area for the 4600 Nathan Lane North property by crossing the shared
property line with new surface parking. The new parking area will connect the parking
system for both properties and utilize existing curbcuts. The new parking area will
maintain the 20' parking setback of the 4600 Nathan Lane property and continue the
radial parking layout which parallels Nathan Lane. Berming and landscaping (planting)
will be installed to screen the expanded parking from Nathan Lane. Lighting for the
expansion area will match the current type and layout of the 4600 Nathan Lane property.
A new stormwater retention pond will be constructed on site also to handle the drainage
requirements of the new impervious surface as well as some existing surface that will
now drain into the new parking area.
Sincerely,
Marc Williamson
Edward Farr Architects
Jul— r"'6j; ill
Oorj oqP
NOTIFICATION AREA MAP
u u U
vre zzrr 9 +b.
m a S 48J845) f53) 1'
9
et.m
5
4B ) a
er
52) e6`A 49iN AVEsw
rF4 _
0
je
eoaz im a (471
o gerr^k(10) a
1541x71
8 4B ; e
at
r e T R o --,A- o" !) ao .ys ° % (g7)
1 1410
522 " (49) A' s ^ a'+ 171. .
2Jve
a
a 8 (437) -
a e
04ra5
48TH PLN' ` 2 ,o c , 2 g (a1
a a f31J m
72)
4 12-118-22-42
7) Bv
dJ
B
PA(alli1uee
1f1-(71,
a
2 2
i +'4,
p r 1 (2213
24)
eflw q12 a 82i g 88 (78)
14)
7 1
W
n (28)
a j A ill L
R.SezK r46
1.fe4 ,]']f ,z• 19
80)
8B) ----- 47TH PLN 3Gfls
1 _ w 5 ae.m re5e v e Ser m
j4 +y
i
871¢2a
lBel
a5 3 l BJ 35) a ,o -fl 72)
471 si tKW r 1-0 rj 6M1''f Q+b '+b r7 a "+bb 130j f +b°er
G ry Y BBl " b.a _ , ab IoA •p ,q ,4 )
eas, srg82) C O n
a(
Sx J7Casto4s ( ) a
Nr r]s f9
B) •: "
24)
7)-' y
g) cifia
et es pp\6 ,SB t04 gsyt•sL"a'
0 (33)
38)
23)tA 0 ' A1 9 ®b, (/9)
2 as w4+,rv+
mw
II iK
8ya , eI.N v a(7/1 14N
3
27)
J J 121
28)(
i
o
13)
i. ,„# 4 NePE ' .' e2•.•Y ykYR. Sg4S Nal1'R+ i:fit
o-t4e
n
PLYMOUTH (vqa
e AN
Me° A o.3#'t"twrsAq. / 12-11 B 22 43 H
S
ZCY PARK 11
OP 6RAMERC ' Y .1 .. I, t
12-118-22-41
3)
12-118-22-44
7)
06
WIN
U
zzflm Nea SSerE wYJTo1Y SM Jz4.5e w ]M.el zea W5T5°ez — •
y
a WTecCa ]xflf--
Y k AIONrQONERY
r Y Q') .ti.A' 8 (151 W 3N0 AOON
u u U
00
l t
12-118-22-41
3)
12-118-22-44
7)
06
WIN
U
zzflm Nea SSerE wYJTo1Y SM Jz4.5e w ]M.el zea W5T5°ez — •
y
a WTecCa ]xflf--
Y k AIONrQONERY
r Y Q') .ti.A' 8 (151 W 3N0 AOON
PLAN SET PEND/NG C/TYAPPROVAL
m ^ X29 gmg 1A -A €off m
F«
Za
9m4 _oma Rg O
x NCmiFOp .lAnn u xy eyZ z
A€ m$ =4 Flo n
n i poi ing 's" g2o =254 sic Z
HSaA. os uyg o
a Tm
is.
m„m o m m F S O
Aio oFu fA4
LAS n ln z gmonO
Yy - U '
FF
y
N d
m ^ X29 gmg 1A -A €off m
F«
Za
9m4 _oma Rg O
x NCmiFOp .lAnn u xy eyZ z
A€ m$ =4 Flo n
n i poi ing 's" g2o =254 sic Z
HSaA. os uyg o
a Tm
is.
m„m o m m F S O
Aio oFu fA4
LAS n ln z gmonO
Yy - a X- P
o Nn
Zr
5i:i, Zo
i Nil
mp
l
I
I
I
I
fig+
ovcn fg .g n
p u$ m y6"i m `ctP $ m
g Up Ne mm
up
g o z
N
cm"
G
R
PLAN SET PENDING CITYAPPROVAL
e D
n_
yto X'
8
p z A r czg
6i
g D79C
A Z0 Nn
y Dt
fro
p
zo
v
m
r
I
A\
Ux
7 €
Sa
ion
Rzo
g n-
s ak5-
T
F
z
N0mmvCrm
iS
aQ
s
2 7
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
RESOLUTION 2005 -
APPROVING A SITE PLAN AMENDMENT FOR EDWARD FARR ARCHITECTS, TO
ALLOW PARKING EXPANSION AT 4600 NATHAN LANE AND 4700 NATHAN LANE
2005096)
WHEREAS, Edward Farr Architects has requested approval of a site plan amendment to allow
parking expansion at 4600 Nathan Lane and 4700 Nathan Lane; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered the request at a public meeting.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the request by Edward
Farr Architects for a site plan amendment to allow parking expansion at 4600 Nathan Lane and
4700 Nathan Lane, subject to the following conditions:
1. The site plan amendment is hereby approved in accordance with the plans received by the
City on July 28, 2005 and with the lighting cut -sheets and plan received by the City on
August 5, 2005, except as may be amended by this resolution.
2. Prior to commencement of the project, the applicant must obtain a grading permit from the
Building Division.
3. Prior to issuance of the grading permit, the applicant shall submit the required Financial
Guarantee and Site Performance Improvement Agreement.
4. Prior to issuance of the grading permit, the applicant shall provide proof of recording of a
private cross access/parking easement.
Resolution 2005-
2005096)
Page 2
5. Prior to issuance of the grading permit, the applicant shall provide the City with the
following easements:
a. a utility and drainage easement ten feet on each side of the storm sewer pipe for the
NURP pond outlet.
b. a 15 -foot wide access easement for maintenance of the NURP pond. Such easement must
include access to both the pond inlet and outlet.
c. a utility and drainage easement for the NURP pond to the 100 -year high water level.
6. Prior to issuance of the grading permit, the applicant shall provide revised plans indicating
the following:
a. type of storm sewer pipe.
b. B612 curb and gutter.
c. compliance with water resources plan policies.
d. a maintenance access route to the NURP pond at a grade acceptable to the City.
e. detail and elevations of water quality pond outlet control structure.
f. rip rap location and elevation of water quality pond overflow.
g. Parking count table on the site plan.
h. detail and locations of handicap and compact parking signage.
7. Prior to issuance of the grading permit, the applicant shall obtain the necessary permits from
the applicable watershed management commission(s), and shall obtain the necessary NPDES
permit.
8. Standard Conditions:
a. This approval shall expire one year after the date of approval, unless the property owner
or applicant has substantially started construction of the project, or unless the
landowner or applicant has received prior approval from the City to extend the
expiration date for up to one additional year, as regulated under Sections 21045.09 of
the Zoning Ordinance.
b. The applicant shall comply with the Ordinance regarding the location of fire lanes and
fire lane signage.
c. The applicant shall submit reproducible mylar prints of storm sewer and pond "As-
Builts" prior to the release or reduction of any site improvement financial guarantee.
ADOPTED by the City Council on August 23, 2005.
Resolution 2005-
2005096)
Page 3
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS.
The undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed City Clerk of the City of Plymouth,
Minnesota, certifies that I compared the foregoing resolution adopted at a meeting of the
Plymouth City Council on August 23, 2005 with the original thereof on file in my office, and the
same is a correct transcription thereof.
WITNESS my hand officially as such City Clerk and the Corporate seal of the City this
day of
City Clerk
DATE: August 11, 2005 for the City Council Meeting of August 23, 2005
TO: Laurie Ahrens, City Manager through
Doran Cote, Director of Public Works
FROM: Daniel K. Campbelingineering Technician
SUBJECT: APPROVE CHANGE ORDER NO. 4
CENTRAL AND ZACHARY WATER TREATMENT PLANTS
EXPANSION AND UPGRADE PROJECT
CITY PROJECT NO. 2032
ACTION REQUESTED: Make a motion to adopt the attached resolution approving Change Order
No. 4 for the above project.
BACKGROUND: Attached is Change Order No. 4 which includes nine individual change order
items. A spreadsheet has been attached which details each of these items. The City's consulting
engineer, Short, Elliott, Hendrickson, Inc. (SEH) has reviewed each of the attached change order items
submitted from Knutson Construction Services. The change order includes additions and deductions to
the contract amount. The net cost increase to the contract from these nine change order items would be
an addition of $16,170.00.
BUDGET IMPACT: The previously revised contract amount of $19,540,016.60 will be increased to
19,556,186.60 with the addition of Change Order No. 4. Contingencies for this project were
estimated at $338,402 or 1.5% of the total construction and engineering costs. With the previous
change orders and Change Order No. 4, 37% of the total estimated contingencies will be accounted for.
Funding for Change Order No. 4, in the amount of $16,170.00, will be from the Utility Trunk Fund.
RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS: I recommend that the City Council adopt the
attached resolution approving Change Order No. 4 to Knutson Construction Services for the Central
and Zachary Water Treatment Plants Expansion and upgrade project, City Project No. 2032, in the
amount of $16,170.00.
attachments: Change Order No. 4
Map
Spreadsheet
Letter
Resolution
0:\Engineering\PROJECTS\2000 - 2009\2032\Memos\CC_ChgOrd_4.doe
CHANGE ORDER NO.4
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
DATE: July 19, 2005
PROJECT: Central and Zachary Water Treatment Plants Expansion and Upgrade
City Project No. 2032)
CONTRACTOR: Knutson Construction Services
CHANGE ORDER NO.: 4
DESCRIPTION OF WORK:
This change order provides for 9 change order items as summarized on the attached
document. These items are added to or deducted from the contract:
Original Contract Amount $19,429,909.60
Previous Change Orders $110,107.00
THIS CHANGE ORDER NO.4 - ADD $16,170.00
TIME CHANGE 0
REVISED CONTRACT AMOUNT $19,556,186.60
Approved by: (CONTRACTOR)
Knutson Construction Services
Recommended for approval by:
City Engineer, City of Plymouth
00
Recommended for approval by:
Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc.
By:_
Approved by: City of Plymouth, Minnesota
By
Mayor
By
City Manager
Date:
Distribution:
1 - City Engineer
2 - Contractor
1 - Consulting Engineer
X:\P"Mlytnu\030300\7-ca\71-gent\Change Orders\Plymuuth Change Order 4.doc
CENTRAL/ZACHARY
WATER TREATMENT PLANTS
CityProject No. 2032
016YjQOOFZQQ)W wZWUllZmWZX ZKYNV=mQWF NZ KZUZQ xa W NQV mUZ N Nt=/IdQQ U,UK 3 wozx3J owm(3oa3a°wz>zoF w az m wmOZJU'm QZW > K Q llJWZEaa U OZZOZ <aKd<Wd'Z UZ 30001/1 Yf1 U'llRYZ WKW WFNKQQxll 1J1JOwK>QJ J.xr UwiomQN>X3>J f/KOaO Z QYW Ox 'U W00Um QN X`I>a WNKOd 02 Y 2OLLWOUILQN>X3>
JHtY/
l¢ OR ozm Yq x flo> NQN>2$>JI-Nll Od OZ OZ xEowoo>woa o- azw,aw—x
3Y
g$
J
60TH AVE. N 9) I 8
INI b
hs _ *
60TH AVE.
25TH AVE.
is20THAVE. f
15TH AVE.
d
AVE10TH
5TH AVE.w
RIDGEMOUNTAVE.
4
000000000000006888oa00000-nr
Location
RIDGEMOl1NTAVE.
8S°So8°oo°S000
1
S xZR2>ovoz0,_m
OzDz DmcFX$4,C?
Change Order No. 4
Plymouth Central and Zachary Water Treatment Plants Expansion and Upgrade
City Project No. 2032 / SEH No. A-PLYM00303.01
Change Order
Change Item # Amount or
RFP # / PCO#) Description Time Adjustment Reason fur Contract ChanSe
Provided one ultrasonic level transmitter (07-LIT/LE-2) for Sodium Permanganate day tank at
1. (RFP 33, PCO 64) Central. Installed ultrasonic level transmitters (01-LIT/L.E-20, 05-LIT/L-E-2, and 06-LIT/LE-0) 6,735.00 These items were not shown on the electrical drawings and were not included in the bid price. for Sodium Hypochlorite day tank, Orthophosphate day tank, and Fluoride system bulk tank at
Central.
Connected dedicated receptacle for sodium permanganate feed pump to panel LV 1 circuit 38
2. (RFP 34, PCO 65) instead of circuit 34 at Central plant. Dedicated receptacles for the Fluoride and sodium 160.00 This item was not shown on the electrical drawings and was not included in the bid price.
hypochlorite feed pumps shall remain on panel LVI circuit 34.
3. (PCO 67) Added electrical work for drinking water fountains at Zachary plant. 555.00 These items were not shown on the electrical drawings and were not included in the bid price.
4. (PCO 48) Provided heating piping, wiring, and controls for new unit heater Z-UH-13 at Zachary plant. 325.00 Unit heater Z-UH-13 was added during construction and required the described installation work. This work was not included in
the original bid price.
S. (PCO 61) Replaced standard caulking in chemical rooms at Central plant with fire caulking. 1,350.00 Change required by city building inspector, This work was not included in the original bid price.
6. (RFP 35, PC068) Added a circuit from panel LV2, space 28, for the glycol fill pump located in Mezzanine C201 1,195.00 This item was not shown on the electrical drawings and was not included in the bid price. at Central plant.
RFP 10 - l) Conduit and junction boxes were added to provide for door contacts for external
doors in rooms ZI14 and Zl 17.
7. (RFP I0, 15, & 25 r
2) Provisions for a card reader and door binge electric lock were added for room Z205A. These changes resulted from a pre-hardware door meeting with the City, Engineer, Contractor, and the door budwm supplier to
PCO 33) 3) Fre pull stations were changed to card readers. 5,325.00 accommodate the security system. A separate meeting with the City's IT Department also required changes to certain door
4) Conduit and junction box (to provide for door contacts, by others) were added for the hardware. This work was not included in the orginal bid price.
external door in room Z220A.
RFP 15 - Item l: Central and Zachary Water Treatment Plant Reference: Specification Section
08710, Part 2.04 Loeksets and Latches, Item B. Cylinders. Provide credit to owner for deletion
of all cylinders from door hardware contractors scope of work. Owner to supply. Contractor to
install. Item 2: Central Water Treatment
Plant Only Reference: Specification Section 08710, Part 2.04 Locksets and Latches, Item D.
Hazardous Locations. Provide credit to owner for deletion of knurling at hazardous locations
noted.
RFP 25 • See RFP 025 in Change Order 4 document for description
8. (PCO 70)
Six-inch propeller meter (CM-SW-1) as shown on Central plant drawings will be replaced with
1,725.00 City staff prefer a magnetic meter tike the other magnetic meters in the plant in order to maintain and provide parts for one type of
6-inch mangeuc meter that is identical to other magnetic meters provided for this project. meter.
9. (RFP 32, PCO 60) Contractor will provide a credit to change 100 gallon water heater at Zachary to 75 gallon water 1,200.00) A 75 gallon water heater will meet the demands of the plant and easily fit into the storage room. heater.
Total Contract Change Order Amount $16,170.00
i
SEH
July 29, 2005
Mr. Dan Campbell
City of Plymouth
3400 Plymouth Blvd.
Plymouth, MN 55447
Dear Dan:
RE: City of Plymouth, Minnesota
Central and Zachary Water Treatment
Plants Expansion and Upgrade
City Project No. 2032
SEH No. A-PLYMO0303.01
Please find enclosed proposed Ch znge Order No. 4 for the construction of the Central and Zachary Water
Treatment Plants. Change Order No. 4 includes nine (9) individual change order items. We have
reviewed each of the attached change order proposals from Knutson Construction Services (KCS).
Modifications and/or clarification were required from KCS before we forwarded the change order to the
City for approval. The change order includes additions and a deduction to the contract amount.
The net cost increase from Change Order No. 4 will be an addition of $16,170.00 to the original contract
amount. We originally estimated a change order contingency of 1.5 percent of the total construction cost
or $338,402.40 as part of the totzl project budget. If approved, the total change order amount to date
would account for approximately 37 percent of the change order budget for this project. The attached
change order and spreadsheet summarizes each change order item, the cost addition or deduct to the
contract amount, and the reason for the change.
If this proposed change order is acceptable, please sign three copies of each change order and return them
to my attention. We will forward the change order to the Contractor for their signatures. A signed copy
of the change order will be returned to the City.
Please contact me at 651.490.2071 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Greg F. Johnson, PE
Project Manager
GFJ
Enclosures
c: Doran Cote, City of Plymouth
Brian Young, City of Plymouth
Sue Mason, SEH
John Lee, SEH
x:\pt\plymo\030300\7-cu\71-genl\change ordersVetter to thin cmnphe 11 for change order no. 4.doc
Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc., 3535 Vadnais Center Drive, St. Paul, MN 55110-5196
SEH is an equal opportunity employer I www.sehinc.com 1 651.490.2000 1 800.325.2055 1 651.490.2150 fax
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
RESOLUTION NO. 2005 -
APPROVING CHANGE ORDER NO.4
CENTRAL AND ZACHARY WATER TREATMENT PLANTS
EXPANSION AND UPGRADE
CITY PROJECT NO. 2032
WHEREAS, Change Order No. 4 has been prepared providing for the following:
Nine items of additions and deductions to the contract amount.
WHEREAS, Change Order Na. 4 for Central and Zachary Water Treatment Plants Expansion
and Upgrade, City Project No. 2032, is recommended for approval;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA: That Change Order No. 4 for Knutson Construction
Services, For Central and Zachary Water Treatment Plants Expansion and Upgrade, City
Project No. 2032, by adding $16,170.00 is approved:
Original Contract Amount
Previous Change Orders
THIS CHANGE ORDER NO.4
REVISED CONTRACT AMOUNT
19,429,909.60
Add 110,107.00
Add 16,170.00
19,556,186.60
FURTHER BE IT RESOLVED: Additional funding in the amount of $16,170.00 will be
needed from the Utility Trunk Fund.
Adopted by the City Council on August 23, 2005.
0:\Engineering\PR0JECTS\2000 - 2009\2032\Reso1\Chng0rd_4_2032_Res.doc
DATE: August 12, 2005 for the City Council Meeting of August 23, 2005
TO: Laurie Ahrens, City Manager through
Doran Cote, P.E., Director of Public Works
FROM: Ross A. Beckwith, P.E., Assistant City Engineer
SUBJECT: PAYMENT NO. 3 AND FINAL
2005 TEMPORARY OVERLAY PROJECT
CITY PROJECT NO. 5114
ACTION REQUESTED: Make a motion to adopt the attached resolution approving
Payment No. 3 and Final to Northwest Asphalt, Inc. for the 2005 Temporary Overlay
Project, City Project No. 5114.
BACKGROUND: The 2005 Temporary Overlay Project involved a bituminous overlay
applied to streets that are in poor condition and are not scheduled for reconstruction for at
least the next five years. Overlaying these streets should provide a minimum of five
years of life before they need to be included in a reconstruction project. Approximately
six miles of streets were included in this project, and the actual street segments overlaid
are listed below and shown on the attached map.
169 Frontage Road @ 45`h We. 6` Avenue @ Pineview Lane
8`' Avenue @ Queensland Lane 18` Avenue @ Niagara Lane
30` Avenue @ Olive Lane 32° Avenue @ Ranchview Lane
37` Avenue @ Plymouth Blvd. 44Avenue @ Trenton Lane
45` Avenue@ Nathan Lane 46` Avenue @ Harbor Lane
51 S` Avenue @ Nathan 54th Avenue @ 169 Frontage Road
55 th Avenue @ Ximines Lane Gleason Lake Drive
Ithaca Lane @ 43r Ave. Ithaca Lane @ 47` Ave.
Kin sview Lane @ 43d Av,-. Kirkwood Lane @ 12` Ave.
Lanewood Lane @ 43d Ave. Magnolia Lane @ Sunset Trail
Minnesota Lane 42n Av,-. Niagara Lane @ 44` Ave.
Olive Lane @ 8` Ave. Olive Lane @ 19` Ave.
Polaris Lane @ 44` Ave. Quinwood Lane @ 45` Ave.
Rosewood Lane @ 45` AvE;. Shenandoah @ 22° Ave.
0:\Engineering\PROJECTS\2000 - 2009\51 l4Wemos\FinalPymtMemo_5114.doc
SUBJECT: PAYMENT NO. 3 AND FINAL
2005 TEMPORARY OVERLAY PROJECT
CITY PROJECT NO. 5114
Page 2
The work on this project has been completed and certified as meeting project
specifications by the City's Engineering staff. This project was completed in July of
2005. The original contract amount for this project was $424,823.23. On June 14, 2005
City Council approved Change Order No. 1 for a revised contract amount of $467,896.73
to take advantage of the law bid prices and add additional street segments. The final
contract cost is $479,626.69 or 2.5% above the revised contract amount due to increased
quantities resulting from additional pavement thickness needed along 18th Avenue.
BUDGET IMPACT: Based on the final contract cost, the final project cost including
engineering, administration, and legal is estimated at $489,219.22.
RECOMMENDATIONS .AND CONCLUSIONS: I hereby recommend that the City
Council accept the project and approve Payment No. 3 and Final in the amount of
35,130.34 to Northwest Asphalt, Inc. for the 2005 Temporary Overlay Project.
attachments: Map
Pay Request
Resolution
0:\Engineering\PR0JECTS\2000 - 2009\5114\Memos\FinalPymtMemo_5114.doc
60TH AVE.
55TH AVE.
50TH AVE.
45TH AVE.
40TH AVE
35TH AVE
30TH AVE
25TH AVE
20TH AVE
15TH AVE
10TH AVE
5TH AVE
2005 'Temporary Overlays Map
gg yg
w
OK W 3 zQ N
iuu
yy G w 3 Q Y W N q W 6 UQay O W
F W O W W H Oq q W 3 Q O+W 2 FWP1 Q W P
FO.
yygNgN0
K >>
WW....]]]]
NQQ.] .] F CUOO 4 7 UN gWO8
aWO
fL l+.] O 8
1.1
pw a YU WW8 8N3NU Fy EN F
iUUG 60y pZ
NWN
NMRW.] N QN FYfjgLW 1lWG rz{
iW(
4
wZN
3N] O W-
IWHfgl
xpO QUy'ZBW
j+
S13W OS yO1 0 g j .O] pp [1S S O rW O—tgy
WN
O.]
PrWa[4l'
yq.
a m¢
qJ
4W
pN0
pey'yQ W „yaW U r]{.
q] .qU7
aS yQN
j
j iWzq pW+'rGayH' CPmya1 NN zyQpU
y7"
p
WV'
ZWIWI»W>yQ 3"j aQYW.
ypd
W>N
wE
p pR'>
Ww
K[F N aµO'asWa ,a ya
3 .
4NNiG >
F NIKOh04Rz ZU q1 VH RHIN 0.0$S X I+I U7WWG 4N?IC IS7>
UUrNi1 Z0.0xE.]Yh'+S [f G.W WO U 4 N%3M!, h Q7.E SCF m
rbYOiVn l
mt
0 uO1V r01 rOiNM GOTH
AVE 55TH
AVE 50TH
AVE 45TH
AVE. 40TH
AVE. 35TH
AVE. 30TH
AVE. 25TH
AVE. 20TH
AVE. 15TH
AVE. 10TH
AVE. 5TH
AVE. RIDGEMOVH
N
PNPainPNNNNNN Fi1NNNYYYYYYYAaYwwwwWwwwwWNNs iuuta.>us"i[".UYNYYrF+NYNrY000000000 Om m Omb JPNdwNFObmJPUJiAWtJ
YobmJPNAWN+
OmmJPNAwNYOmmJ JP nAW NI+O OmJPNAwN+OnmJPNAWN+O OmJPtn ow0000R<
00000000000200000000Onow000,`o<00000g0000000 oom00000 O<ooN00000OZooX0000m000 00000000000g0000.o MWE
7
onQ,M.
IiC" H 4NnO"7CHx EG tl2
H
C poN0
Nfl
7NW'"ZwnW'S"0b S£ 070 pPa{S OOH O" XpC19 8
K4 PN1 cpH5MH2L1M 3N ln9m e yCNbaN1l'
J ty
Btq MPN )B5
ON
BBC b tl 0£
l7
Z 7
0 OZ
I%
n £ S
S Vl m
n N M
re -
2005 Temporary Overlays w
Engineering
City
of Department Plymouth,
Minnesota August 2005
REQUEST FOR PAYMENT
DATE: August 5, 2005
PLACE: Plymouth, MN
PROJECT: 2005 Temporary Overlgy Project
PROJECT NO.: 5114 FT:,E NO.:
CONTRACTOR: Northwest Asphalt Comoany, Inc.
FOR PERIOD
FROM: 7/1/05 TO: 8/5/05.
SPECIFIED CONTRACT
COMPLETION
DATE: July 29, 2005
ADDRESS: 1451 Stagecoach Road
Shakopee, MN 55379
REQUEST FOR PAYMENT NO.: 3 & Final
SUMMARY:
1. Original Contract Amount 424,823.23
2. Change Order - ADDITION $ 43,073.50
3. Change Order - DEDUCT TON $ 0.00
4. Revised Contract Amount 467,896.73
5. Value Completed to Date 479,626.69
6. Material on Hand 0.00
7. Amount Earned 479,626.69
8. Less Retainage 0 % 0.00
9. Less Liquidated Damages 0.00
10. Sub -Total 479,626.69
11. Less Amount Paid Previously 444,496.35
12. AMOUNT DUE THIS REQUEST FOR PAYMENT NO.: 3 & Final 35,130.34
Approved By: (ENGINEER)
By:
OWNER APPROVAL:
By:
By:
Approved B)
By:
2005 Temporary Overlay Project
City of Plymouth, Minnesota
City Project No. 5114
Estimate No. 3 & Final - 8/5/05
NO. ITEM UNIT UNIT
PRICE
Qty. Completed
This Period
Value Complete
This Period
Qty. Completed
To Date
Value Complete
To Date
Est. Bid
Qty.
Complete
1 MOBILIZATION L.S. 11,500.00 1.0 11,500.00 1 100%
2 TRAFFIC CONTROL L.S. 2,100.00 1.0 2,100.00 1 100%
3 EDGE MILL BITUMNINOUS SURFACE (1") S.Y. 1.00 15,994.0 15,994.00 15,600 103%
4 EDGE MILL BITUMINOUS SURFACE (1.5") S.Y. 1.00 114 114.00 6,528.0 6,528.00 6,651 98%
5 MILL BITUMINOUS SURFACE (1.5") S.Y. 1.25 17,649.0 22,061.25 13,856 127%
A RITUMINnIIS PATCHING MIXTURE TON 150.00 13.6 1,950.00 50 26%
7 TYPE LVWE4 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (1.5") S.Y. 3.37 46,649.0 157,207.13 46,686 100%
8 TYPE LVWE4 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (2") S.Y. 4.70 614 2,885.80 9,530.0 44,791.00 3,314 288%
9 TYPE MVWE4 WEAR COURSE MIXTURE (1.5") S.Y. 3.32 51,667.0 171,534.44 58,333 89%
10 TYPE LVWE4 LEVELING COURSE MIXTURE TON 52.00 168 8,736.00 357.0 18,564.00 160 223%
11 TYPE MVWE4 LEVELING COURSE MIXTURE TON 52.00 59.0 3,068.00 160 37%
12 TACK COAT GAL. 1.25 5,465.0 6,831.25 5417 101%
13 ADJUST GATE VALVE BOX EACH 50.00 77.0 3,850.00 77 100%
14 ADJUST CASTING EACH 150.00 75.0 11,250.00 73 103%
15 PVMT MESSAGE (RIGHT ARROW) - PAINT EACH 35.00 1.0 35.00 1 100%
16 24" STOP LINE WHITE -PAINT LIN. FT. 3.00 45.0 135.00 50 90%
17 4" DOUBLE SOLID LINE YELLOW - PAINT LIN. FT. 0.14 7,167.0 1,003.38 8100 88%
18 4" SOLID LINE WHITE - PAINT LIN. FT. 0.06 9,289.0 557.34 10100 92%
19 4" BROKEN LINE WHITE - PAINT LIN. FT. 0.14 180.0 25.20 300 60%
20 ZEBRA CROSSWALK WHITE -PAINT S.F. 1.55 414.0 641.70 306 135%
Total Is 11,735.80 $ 479,626.69 _ 103%
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
RESOLUTION NO. 2005 -
REQUEST FOR PAYMENT NO. 3 AND FINAL
2005 TEMPORARY OVERLAY PROJECT
CITY PROJECT NO. 5114
WHEREAS, the City of Plymouth as owner and Northwest Asphalt, Inc. as contractor,
have entered into an agreement for 2005 Temporary Overlay Project, City Project No.
5114, said agreement was approved by the City Council on May 24, 2005; and
WHEREAS, the Engineer has certified his acceptance of the work and his approval of the
final request for payment.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA:
1. That the original contract amount was $424,823.23, the revised contract as
per Change Order No.I was $467,896.73 and the value of the work to date
is $479,626.69 and is herewith approved. This project exceeds the revised
contract amount by 2.5% due to an increase in estimated quantities.
2. That the work performed by the contractor for the 2005 Street
Reconstruction Project and certified to the Council by the engineer as
acceptable, being the; same, is hereby released from the contract except as
to the conditions of the performance bond, any and all legal rights of the
owner, required guarantees and correction of faulty work after final
payment.
3. Request for Payment No. 3 and Final in the amount of $35,130.34 to
Northwest Asphalt, Inc. for the 2005 Temporary Overlay Project is hereby
approved and the Cil -.y Finance Director is hereby authorized and directed
to pay the same forthwith.
4. Final funding will be from: Street Replacement Fund $489,219.22
Adopted by the City Council on August 23, 2005.
0:\Engineering\PROJECTS\2000 - 2009\5114\Resol\FinalPyintRes_5114.doc
DATE: August 12, 2005 for the City Council Meeting of August 23, 2005
TO: Laurie Ahrens, City Manager through
Doran Cote, P.E., Director of Public Works
FROM: Stephen Deuth, Sr. Engineering Technician
SUBJECT: TAX FORFEIT PARCELS
ACTION REQUESTED: Make a motion to adopt the attached resolutions approving
conveyance, public sale and private sale of certain tax forfeited parcels in the City of Plymouth.
BACKGROUND: On July 5, 2005, the City of Plymouth received a list from Hennepin County
of non -conservation classification parcels which have gone into tax forfeiture status as a result of
nonpayment of taxes or special assessments. They ask that the City determine whether the
properties should be:
A. Sold at public auction;
B. Sold privately to the adjacent property owner; or
C. Conveyed to the City for a public purpose.
A parcel may be conveyed to the City if there is a specific public purpose, such as street right-of-
way, park right-of-way, or any City utility easement.
The Council can determine that each parcel either be: 1) Sold at public auction; 2) Sold privately
to the adjacent property owner; or 3) Conveyed to the City for a public purpose. If no action is
taken by the Council at this meeting, the parcels will be deemed to be approved for public sale.
This list of tax forfeit parcels and the recommendation on each is as follows. A land analysis and
map are also attached for each parcel.
PARCEL 1) 07-118-22-32-0017 - Tract B, RLS 133
Guiding: P -I (Public/Semi-Public/Institutional)
Zoning: FRD (Future Restricted Development)
Size: Roughly 3,000 square feet, .06 acres
O:\Engineering\GENERAL\MEMOS\STEVED\CC_g_23_05_Ta ForfeitedPucels.doc
SUBJECT: TAX FORFEIT PARCELS
Page 2 of 3
This parcel is situated in-between the new Elm Creek golf course clubhouse and a single-
family home on the northeast side of State Highway 55 just north of the Canadian Pacific
railroad bridge crossing. The parcel was previously used as part of the access into the old
clubhouse and parking lot area to the golf course.
This is not a buildable lot and most likely should be combined with the adjacent parcels.
PARCEL 2) 17-118-22-43-0011 - Outlot L, Sugar Hills
Guiding: NO CURRENT GUIDING
Zoning: NO CURRENT ZONING
Size: Roughly 56 square feet, .001 acres
This parcel is located in the northwest corner of Rockford Road and Dunkirk Lane adjacent
to the Plymouth Presbyterian Church. It is an existing outlot in the Sugar Hills
development that was never deeded to the City and lies in the right-of-way. Adjacent
properties are zoned RSF-2 (Single Family Detached 2) and RSF-4 (Single and Two
Family) and guided LA -2 (Living Area 2).
This is not a buildable lot and should be designated as road right-of-way.
PARCEL 3) 24-118-22-23-0026 - Lot 1, Block 1, Wood Creek
Guiding: LA -1 (Living Area 1)
Zoning: RSF-1 (Single Family Detached 1)
Size: Roughly 18,400 square feet, .42 acres
This parcel is a platted lot located on the corner of Medicine Lake Boulevard and 34th
Avenue. It lies in the Medicine Lake Shoreland Overlay District.
To the east is a vacant lot owned by Lundgren Brothers Construction (Lot 2, Block 1,
Wood Creek) and to the north is City of Plymouth owned property (Lift Station # 2).
This is a buildable lot for most likely a single-family home in the RSF-1 zoning district,
either by itself, or combined with the vacant lot to the east.
Staff has determined that it could also be added onto the adjacent City of Plymouth lift
station property to the north, and used for expansion of the adjacent storm water treatment
pond.
PARCEL 4) 36-118-22-14-0005 - Part of Lot 5, Plymouth Gardens
PARCEL 5) 36-118-22-14-0006 - Part of Lot 6, Plymouth Gardens
PARCEL 6) 36-118-22-14-0007 - Part of Lot 6, Plymouth Gardens
Guiding: CO (Commercial Office)
Zoning: B -C (Business Campus)
O:\Engineering\GENERAL\MEMOS\STEVED\CC_8_23_05_Ta FodeitedParcels.doc
SUBJECT: TAX FORFEIT PARCELS
Page 3 of 3
Size: 0005, roughly 25,420 square feet, .59 acres
0006, roughly 20,200 square feet, .46 acres
0007, roughly 4,000 square feet, .09 acres
Total of three parcels: roughly 49,620 square feet, 1.14 acres
These parcels are located along the west side of St. Hwy. 169 south of 8th Avenue and
north of 605 Waterford. They are the previous Westum Roofing Building property that
was destroyed by a fire in 1999.
Individually, the parcels would be undersized lots in the B -C zoning district and most
likely are not buildable. However, if combined, they could create a buildable lot in the B-
C zoning district roughly 1.14 acres in size with a parcel 150 feet in width by 330 feet in
length.
BUDGET IMPACT: There is an economic benefit to the City, as well as other governmental
units, of getting parcels back on the tax rolls. However, this is also an ideal opportunity for the
City to acquire needed drainage, parkland and right-of-way areas.
RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS: Resolutions are attached which would
accomplish the public sale, private sale or conveyance of these parcels as recommended below by
staff:
PARCEL 1) - 07-118-22-32-0017
Recommend private sale to adjacent property owner and combination with the
property.
PARCEL 2) - 17-118-22-43-0011
Recommend conveyance to City of Plymouth for public use as right-of-way for
Dunkirk Lane.
PARCEL 3) - 24-118-22-23-0026
Recommend conveyance to City of Plymouth for public use as a drainage and
water quality pond area.
PARCEL 4) - 36-118-22-14-0005
Recommend the public sale of this parcel and combination with Parcels 5 and 6.
PARCEL 5) - 36-118-22-14-0006
Recommend the public sale of this parcel and combination with. Parcels 4 and 6.
PARCEL 6) - 36-118-22-14-0007
Recommend the public sale of this parcel and combination with Parcels 4 and 5.
attachments: Hennepin County Request Letter
Tax Forfeit Land Analysis
Aerial Maps of Parcels
Resolutions
O:\Engineering\GENERAUMEMOS\STEVED\CC_g_23_05_Ta ForfeitedPucels.doc
Hennepin County Taxpayer Services Department
A-600 Hennepin County Government Center
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55487-0060
July 1, 2005 BY CERTIFIED MAIL, RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
SANDY PAULSON CITY CLERK ;
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
3400 PLYMOUTH BLVD
PLYMOUTH MN 55447 JUL 5 2
RE: Conservation/Non-Conservation Classification List # 1335 C/NC
The lands as described on Conservation/Non-Conservation Classification List # 1335 C/NC, wer'e*'ieQas either
conservation lands or non -conservation lands, as is appropriate, by the County Auditor's Administrative Review Board.
Enclosed is a copy of County Auditor's Directive No. 2005-18 providing for the classification of the lands, under
authority granted in accordance to Minnesota Statute 282.135 by the Board of Hennepin County Commissioners.
As required under M.S. 282.01, the department requests that your city officials review Conservation/Non-Conservation
List # 1335 C/NC. When municipal review has been completed, the department will require a certified copy of a
municipal resolution that resolves and approves parcels for public auction, for auction to adjacent owners, or requests
public use conveyance or nonpublic sale to your city. See enclosed Exhibit A, an outline for suggested points that
should be covered in your municipal resolution.
Please be advised that the sale of the lands shall be deemed to be approved pursuant to M.S. 282.01, Subd. 1
if the city council fails to respond to this classification notice within sixty (60) days of receipt of certified mail.
The deadline for responding will be September 07, 2005.
Please contact Terry Schuhler, Property Tax Services unit leader, at (612)596-6527(voice mail), should you need
further assistance or clarification.
Sincerely,
Patrick H. O'Connor, Director
Taxpayer Services Department
effrey L. Strand, Supervisor
Tax -Forfeit and Property Revenue Section
PHO:JLS:tIs
Enclosures
An Equal Opportunity Employer Recycled Paper
DATE: 7/7/2005
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
ASSESSING DIVISION
TAX FORFEIT LAND ANALYSIS
PID #: 07-118-22-32-0017
TOPOGRAPHY: Low
ELEVATION: 970
IST DELINQUENT YEAR: 1999
AREA SIZE: .069 Acres
AREA DIMENSIONS: 33 x 89
MARKET VALUE: 2,200
DELINQUENT TAXES BEFORE FORFEITURE: 22.10
UNPAID SPECIALS BEFORE FORFEITURE: 0
REMARKS:
Parcel is classified vacant land residential and is zoned FRD. It is located in the 284/0
school district and sewer district 3. Legal description: RLS 0133 Tract Band is a Torrens
property. Usage: drainage ditch
SEE MAP ATTACHED
DATE: 7/7/2005
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
ASSESSING DIVISION
TAX FORFEIT LAND ANALYSIS
PID 4: 17-118-22-43-0011
TOPOGRAPHY: Flat
ELEVATION: 1002
1ST DELINQUENT YEAR: 2001
AREA SIZE: .0012 Acres
AREA DIMENSIONS: NA
MARKET VALUE: 100
DELINQUENT TAXES BEFORE FORFEITURE: 1.10
UNPAID SPECIALS BEFORE FORFEITURE: 0
REMARKS:
Parcel is classified vacant land residential. It is located in the 284/3 school district and
sewer district 2. Legal description: Outlot 1 Sugar Hills Addition. It was never deeded to
the city and sits in the road right away.
SEE MAP ATTACHED
DATE: 7/7/2005
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
ASSESSING DIVISION
TAX FORFEIT LAND ANALYSIS
PID #: 24-118-22-23-0026
TOPOGRAPHY: Flat
ELEVATION: 890
IST DELINQUENT YEAR: 2001
AREA SIZE: .423 Acres
AREA DIMENSIONS: 150 x 98 +/-
MARKET VALUE: 50,000
DELINQUENT TAXES BEFORE FORFEITURE: 377.27
UNPAID SPECIALS BEFORE FORFEITURE: 71.31 Delinquent Utilities
REMARKS: Legal Description: Lot 1 Block 1 Wood Creek. Original owner: Lundgren
Brothers. Located in the 281/7 School District and Storm Sewer #1. It is zoned RSF-1
and had a limited market value of 33,300. A corner lot classified as vacant residential
land.
SEE MAP ATTACHED
DATE: 7/7/2005
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
ASSESSING DIVISION
TAX FORFEIT LAND ANALYSIS
PID #: 36-118-22-14-0005
TOPOGRAPHY: Flat
ELEVATION: 910
1ST DELINQUENT YEAR: 2001
AREA SIZE: .0583
AREA DIMENSIONS: 74 x 495
MARKET VALUE: 106,800
DELINQUENT TAXES BEFORE FORFEITURE: 2,740.62
UNPAID SPECIALS BEFORE FORFEITURE: 168.00
REMARKS: Classified as Vacant Industrial Land. At one time a building existed on the
site and the black top of the parking area remains. The parcel is located in the 270/7
school district and storm sewer # 1. It is classified as B -C and has a long legal. Address:
701 State Hwy 169.
SEE MAP ATTACHED
rip CITY OF PLYMOUTH
ASSESSING DIVISION
TAX FORFEIT LAND ANALYSIS
DATE: 7/7/2005
PID #: 36-118-22-14-0006
TOPOGRAPHY: Flat
ELEVATION: 910
IST DELINQUENT YEAR: 2001
AREA SIZE: .1634 Acres
AREA DIMENSIONS: 74 x 258 +/-
MARKET VALUE: 100,000
DELINQUENT TAXES BEFORE FORFEITURE: 3,020.10
UNPAID SPECIALS BEFORE FORFEITURE: 168.00
REMARKS: Classified as Vacant Industrial Land. Address: 701 State Hwy 169.
Zoning: B -C. Parcel is located in the 270/7 school district and sewer district # 1.
SEE MAP ATTACHED
DATE: 7/7/2005
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
ASSESSING DIVISION
TAX FORFEIT LAND ANALYSIS
PID 9: 36-118-22-14-0007
TOPOGRAPHY: Flat
ELEVATION: 910
IST DELINQUENT YEAR: 2001
AREA SIZE: .0915 Acres
AREA DIMENSIONS: 60 x 70
MARKET VALUE: 16,800
DELINQUENT TAXES BEFORE FORFEITURE: 564.58
UNPAID SPECIALS BEFORE FORFEITURE: 0
REMARKS: Located in School District 270/7 and Sewer District # 1. Classified as
Vacant Industrial Land and zoned B -C. Long legal and adjacent to two before -mentioned
tax forfeit properties.
SEE MAP ATTACHED
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
RESOLUTION NO. 2005 -
AUTHORIZING THE PRIVATE SALE OF
TRACT B, RLS 133
PARCEL 07-118-22-32-0017
TO ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER
WHEREAS, Hennepin County has provided the City with a list of non -conservation properties which
have become tax forfeit as a result of nonpayment of property taxes and/or special assessments; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with the City Council's Tax Forfeit Land Policy, each parcel has been
reviewed; and
WHEREAS, parcel 07-118-22-32-0017 does not serve a public purpose; and
WHEREAS, the property is a vacant section of land which lies between the new Elm Creek Golf
Course clubhouse to the west and a single-family home to the east ; and
WHEREAS, the City Council is desirous of returning tax forfeit parcels to private ownership whenever
possible;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA THAT IT HEREBY:
1. Declares Parcel 07-118-22-32-0017 to be unbuildable from a zoning and city code
perspective; and
2. Authorizes the private sale of said parcel to the adjacent property owner in accordance
with Hennepin County procedures and;
3. Requires that this parcel be combined with the acquiring adjacent parcel providing there
are no taxing district issues that would hinder the process of a combination.
0:\Engineering\RESOL\2005WUTH_Ta Forfei[_07_32_0017_Res.doc
Page 2
BE IT FURTHUR RESOLVED that the City Council affirms the non -conservation classification status
by the Board of County Commissioners, and certifies that the parcel does not need to be withheld from
sale pursuant to applicable state laws. The Council certifies that it does no know of any wells located
on the property.
Adopted by the City Council on August 23, 2005.
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS.
The undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed City Clerk of the City of Plymouth,
Minnesota, certifies that I compared the foregoing resolution adopted at a meeting of the Plymouth
City Council on , with the original thereof on file in my office, and the same is a
correct transcription thereof.
WITNESS my hand officially as such City Clerk and the Corporate seal of the City this
day of
City Clerk
0:\Engineering\RES0L\2005W UTH_TaxForfeit_07_32_0017_Res.doc
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
RESOLUTION NO. 2005 -
AUTHORIZING THE CONVEYANCE OF
OUTLOT L, SUGAR HILLS
PARCEL 17-118-22-43-0011
TO THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH FOR PUBLIC USE
WHEREAS, Hennepin County has provided the City with a list of non -conservation properties which
have become tax forfeit as a result of nonpayment of property taxes and/or special assessments; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with the City Council's Tax Forfeit Land Policy, each parcel has been
reviewed; and
WHEREAS, said parcel, Outlot L, Sugar Hills was never conveyed from the developer to the City for
road right-of-way; and
WHEREAS, parcel 17-118-22-43-0011 is unbuildable from a zoning and city code perspective; and
WHEREAS, parcel 17-118-22-43-0011 serves a public purpose as road right-of-way ; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA THAT IT HEREBY:
1. Approves the classification made by the Board of County Commissioners of parcel 17-
118-22-43-0011 as non -conservation land, and
2. Declares said parcel to be unbuildable from a zoning and city code perspective, and
3. Requests conveyance to the City of Plymouth for the public use as road right-of-way.
The Council certifies that is does no know of any wells located on the property.
0: \Engineering\RESOL\2005\AUTH_TaxForfeit_ I7_43_0011_Res.doc
Page 2
Adopted by the City Council on August 23, 2005.
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS.
The undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed City Clerk of the City of Plymouth,
Minnesota, certifies that I compared the foregoing resolution adopted at a meeting of the Plymouth
City Council on , with the original thereof on file in my office, and the same is a
correct transcription thereof.
WITNESS my hand officially as such City Clerk and the Corporate seal of the City this
day of
City Clerk
O: \Engineering\RESOL\2005\AUTH_TaxForfeit_l7_43_001 I_Res.dm
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
RESOLUTION NO. 2005 -
AUTHORIZING THE CONVEYANCE OF
LOT 1, BLOCK 1, WOOD CREEK
PARCEL 24-118-22-23-0026
TO THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH FOR PUBLIC USE
WHEREAS, Hennepin County has provided the City with a list of non -conservation properties which
have become tax forfeit as a result of nonpayment of property taxes and/or special assessments; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with the City Council's Tax Forfeit Land Policy, each parcel has been
reviewed; and
WHEREAS, parcel 24-118-22-23-0026 is a buildable single family lot, however will best serve a
public use as a water quality and drainage area; and
WHEREAS, the City owned parcel to the north of said Lot 1, has an existing pond that is scheduled in
the City's CIP for expansion to accommodate drainage in the area; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA THAT IT HEREBY:
1. Approves the classification made by the Board of County Commissioners of parcel 24-
118-22-23-0026 as non -conservation land, and
2. Requests conveyance to the City of Plymouth for the public use as a water quality and
drainage facility.
The Council certifies that is does no know of any wells located on the property.
Adopted by the City Council on August 23, 2005.
O:\Engineering\RESOL\2005\AUTH_TaxForfeit_24_23_0026_Res. m
Page 2
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS.
The undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed City Clerk of the City of Plymouth,
Minnesota, certifies that I compared the foregoing resolution adopted at a meeting of the Plymouth
City Council on , with the original thereof on file in my office, and the same is a
correct transcription thereof.
WITNESS my hand officially as such City Clerk and the Corporate seal of the City this
day of
City Clerk
0 \Engineering\RES0L\2005\AUTH_TaxForfeit_24_27_0026_Res.doe
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
RESOLUTION NO. 2005 -
AUTHORIZING THE PUBLIC SALE OF
LOTS 5 AND 6, PLYMOUTH GARDENS
PARCELS - 36-118-22-14-0005,
36-118-22-14-0006 AND 36-118-22-14-0007
WHEREAS, Hennepin County has provided the City with a list of non -conservation properties which
have become tax forfeit as a result of nonpayment of property taxes and/or special assessments; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with the City Council's Tax Forfeit Land Policy, each parcel has been
reviewed; and
WHEREAS, parcels 36-118-22-14-0005, 0006 and 0007 do not serve a public purpose; and
WHEREAS, the City Council is desirous of returning tax forfeit parcels to private ownership whenever
possible; and
WHEREAS, each parcel is not buildable on its own, but as a combined parcel it would meet City
standards; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA THAT IT HEREBY:
1. Approves the public sale of parcels 36-118-22-14-0005, 36-118-22-14-0006 and 36-
118-22-14-0007 and;
2. Requires that these parcels be combined providing there are no taxing district issues that
would hinder the process of a combination.
0:\Engineering\RES0L\2005\RUTH_TaxForfei[_36_I4_0005_0006_0007_Res. doc
Page 2
BE IT FURTHUR RESOLVED that the City Council affirms the non -conservation classification status
by the Board of County Commissioners, and certifies that the parcel does not need to be withheld from
sale pursuant to applicable state laws. The Council certifies that it does no know of any wells located
on the property.
Adopted by the City Council on August 23, 2005.
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS.
The undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed City Clerk of the City of Plymouth,
Minnesota, certifies that I compared the foregoing resolution adopted at a meeting of the Plymouth
City Council on , with the original thereof on file in my office, and the same is a
correct transcription thereof
WITNESS my hand officially as such City Clerk and the Corporate seal of the City this
day of
City Clerk
O:\Engineering\RESOL\2005WUTH_Ta Forfeit_36_14_0005_0006_0007_Res.doc
Agenda Number:
TO: Laurie Ahrens, City Manager
THROUGH: Mike Goldstein, Chief of Police
FROM: Scott Webb, Lieutenant
SUBJECT: Change Order —Public Safety/ CityHall Project
DATE: August 16, 2005 for the August 23, 2005 City Council Meeting
1. ACTION REQUESTED: The City Council adopt the resolution approving Change Order
number 3 for the Public Safety/City Hall Expansion and Remodel Project.
2. BACKGROUND: City Staff have been working with the architectural firm of the Boarman
Kroos Vogel Group (BKV), owner's representative, Bill Wolters of Constructive Ideas and
the general contracting firm. of Maertens-Brenny on the expansion and remodel of the Public
Safety Building and City Hull. Phase 1 of the project included the construction of the
addition to the Public Safety building and enclosed garage. A remodel of the existing Public
Safety Building followed this. The last phase of construction will be the new common entry
for Public Safety and City Hall. This new space will include a large meeting room (dividable
in two) and a new reception desk. The public hallways in the upper level of City Hall will
also be redecorated. The project should be completed in January of 2006.
3. DISCUSSION: The City has received Change Order number three from our owner's
representative, Bill Wolters from Constructive Ideas Inc. The change order will modify the
contract between the City of Plymouth and Maertens-Brenny Construction Company. The
details of the changes are as follows:
Items for Change Order No. 3
No. Description PR # or COR No. Requested by: Amount
1 Ceiling mounted fire devices at City Hall Lobby PR -17 Architect 673.00
2 Revisions to coiling shutter at opening C1 02D PR -24 Architect 3,180.00
3 Delete interior signage from General Contract PR -26 Owner 1,671.00
4[Add electrical outlets for additional TV brackets PR -37 Owner 2,425.00
5 Reduce transom height to match lowered ceiling PR -38 Architect 536.00
6 Delete cast metal letters from General Contract PR -40 Owner 5,325.00
7 Add final design of project monument sign PR -43 Owner 17,474.00
8 Move fire standpipe in stairwell PR -44 Mechanical
engineer
1,158.00
Items for Change Order Nc. 3
No. Description PR # or COR No. Requested by: Amount
9 Add striping of floor by evidence lockers PR -45 City Building
Inspectors
403.00
10 Modify transfer switch from 3 pole to 4 pole PR -46 Electrical engineer 5,087.00
11 Add heat detector at elevator pit PR -48 Architect (Elevator
Insp.)
753.00
12 Add receptacles for water coolers and lights PR -49 Electrical engineer 436.00
13 Add demo of corridor clgs. At exist Police PR -51 Architect 1,157.00
14 Correct mildew and rust four at existing const PR -52 Owner 2,534.00
15 Revise disconnect at transfo,mer PR -53 Electrical engineer no change
16 Add painting of existing sally:)ort area walls PR -58 Architect 672.00
17 Add flow switch to fire protection system PR -60 Electrical engineer 2,861.00
18 Change paint colors on walls PR -61 Owner 4,163.00
19 ISplit and rotate lights at evidence lockers CCD -1 Electrical engineer 1,352.00
20 Move horn/strobe at Evidence room - C009 CCD -2 Owner 505.00
21 Delete painting of Mech/elect rooms C168, C169 COR -24 Architect 500.00
22 Add 5 miscellaneous items COR-25Arch/Inspectors 3,209.00
23 Delete aluminum door C150A COR -26 Architect 1,700.00
24 Misc. hardware revisions and additional electric
strikes
COR -27 Owner 2,684.00
25 Provide door frame & hardware shown as existing COR -28 Architect 639.00
26 Add three (3) camera locations in garage for Police
security
COR -29 Owner 1,297.00
27 Add overtime work for const of curbs on Saturday COR -35 Owner 1,666.00
28 Demo recessed mat & fill w/ conc. At existing
building
COR -36 Architect 713.00
Total Change Order No. 3 46,381.00
4. BUDGET IMPACT: The original contract amount awarded to Maertens-Brenny
Construction Company was $8,469,150. Change Order number 1 increased this amount by
48,164 to $8,517,314. Change Order 1 was approved by the City Council on 2/22/05.
Change Order 2 increased the contract to Maertens-Brenny Construction by $22,509, to
8,539,823. Change Order 2 was approved by the City Council on 3/29/05. Change Order 3
will increase the contract by $46,381 to 8,586,204. The project budget including the
contingency fund still remains strong with $367,000 remaining in contingency.
5. RECOMMENDATION: We recommend the City Council adopt the resolution authorizing
the approval of Change Order number three to the contract between the City of Plymouth and
Maertens-Brenny Construction Company.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Explanation of Items for Change Order #3
2. Draft Resolution
Plymouth Public Safety Addition and Remodel
Plymouth, Minnesota
Explanation of Items for Change Order No. 3
1. Proposal Request No. 17. The Architect has relocated a few fire alarm devices which were
mounted on the wood paneled "fin" walls of the new City Hall Lobby exterior wall. It is
believe the ceiling location will give better coverage. Cost impact to the project — Add
673.00.
2. Proposal Request No. 24. Revisions were necessary to the framing of the coiling door at the
Police Lobby, room C1021). Cost impact to the project —Add $3,180.00
3. Proposal Request No. 26. The interior signage originally scheduled to be provided by the
General Contractor was deleted and the signs were purchased as part of the furniture package.
Cost impact to the project — Saving of $1,671.00.
4. Proposal Request No. 37. Additional TV bracket locations were identified as being needed
and electrical outlets were provided for these locations. Cost impact to the project — Add
2,425.
5. Proposal Request No. 38. A. ceiling was lowered at the connection of the new construction
and the existing building. This was needed to get a mechanical duct thru above the new
ceiling. Lowering of the ceiling necessitated remodeling a transom window which was on
site. Cost impact to the project —Add $536.00.
6. Proposal Request No. 40. T'he cast letters originally included under the general contract have
been eliminated from the project. Project identification to be provided by the final design of
the project boulevard monument sign. Cost impact to the project — Saving of $5,325.00.
7. Proposal Request No. 43. This represents the cost difference between the original allowance
included in the contract and the final cost for the project monument sign. When the project
was bid an allowance was included in the contract of $25,000 help cover the cost of a
boulevard sign whose design had not been finalized. Over the past year various schemes were
reviewed with a final design. being chosen and sent to the contractor for pricing. The final
sign design includes a stone wall construction which will tie together the stone retaining walls
installed on the north side o F the project site, and the stone walls which will be installed on the
south side of the project as part of the City Hall Lobby expansion. This sign, which will be
built on the corner of Plymouth Boulevard and 34th Avenue will be the element which will tie
the overall site design together. Cost impact to the project — Add $17,474.00.
8. Proposal Request No. 44. The direction of travel on the new stair in the police area was
changed prior to construction to meet a code requirement for a barrier gate to the lower level
in the event of a fire. The fire standpipe had already been installed prior to the change and as
a result had to be moved to the other side of the stairwell. Cost impact to the project — Add
1,158.00.
9. Proposal Request No. 45. Painted highlighting had to be added to the floor outside of the
evidence lockers in the police garage as a result of a code interpretation by City Inspectors. It
was necessary because the lockers are built with a flat floor along a sloping corridor from the
evidence area to the main garage floor. There was a concern that there should be some form
of warning provided because of the floor differential. Cost impact to the project — Add
403.00.
10. Proposal Request No. 46. rhe transfer switch at the emergency generator had to be changed
from a 3 pole to a 4 pole. Cc)st impact to the project — Add $5,087.00.
11. Proposal Request No. 48. lluring the final inspection of the new elevator the State Inspector
required a heat -tape be installed at the elevator pit to prevent possible freeze up. Cost impact
to the project — Add $753.00.
12. Proposal Request No. 49. Two electrical receptacles were added for water coolers in
corridor C 106. Existing light fixtures were removed and cover plated added to the receptacle
boxes. Cost impact to the project — Add $436.00.
13. Proposal Request No. 51. The corridor ceilings on the I" and 2 n floor of the existing Police
Station had to be removed, but were not noted for removal on the drawings. Cost impact to
the project — Add $1,157.00.
14. Proposal Request No. 52. When the demolition of the existing Police facility was taking
place, mildew and rust were discovered at the Northeast corner of the 2"d floor. This had been
caused by a previously leaking window. The window leak had been taken care of some time
in the past, but the interior damage wasn't apparent until the vinyl wall covering was removed
during our project. This change removed and repaired mildewed gypsum board and rusted
corner beads. Cost impact to the project — Add $2,534.00.
15. Proposal Request No. 53. This clarified the wiring between the existing 1600 Amp Service
switchboard and the secondary 75 KVA transformer. Cost impact to the project — No Change.
16. Proposal Request No. 58. Painting of the walls at the existing Sallyport were added to the
project. This was because of doors and frames that had been removed and the resulting
openings were patched in with concrete block. Painting the walls gave a finished appearance
to the area. Cost impact to the project — Add $672.00.
17. Proposal Request No. 60. A flow switch was added to the relocated Siamese connection for
the fire protection system of City Hall. Cost impact to the project— Add $2,861.00.
18. Proposal Request No. 61. During the construction of the remodeling portion of the project,
and after the occupancy of the new Police facility and decision was made to change the colors
specified for certain corridors in both the new and remodeled portions of the project. The
walls were repainted with accent colors used throughout other areas of the project. Cost
impact to the project — Add $4,163.00.
19. Constructive Change Directive (CCD) No. 1. In the evidence lockers at the Police garage,
the light fixtures were split md rotated to allow the security wire screening to extend from the
floor to ceiling. This was necessary to insure security of the evidence stored in the lockers.
Cost impact to the project — Add $1,352.00.
20. Constructive Change Directive (CCD) No. 2. During the installation of the evidence
shelving a fire alarm horn strobe was relocated from it's designed location to allow the
installation of an additional 5 lineal feet of shelving. Cost impact to the project — Add
505.00.
21. Change Order Request (COR) No. 24. The interior painting of mechanical rooms Nos. C168
and C169 was deleted from the project. Cost impact to the project —Savings of $500.00.
22. Change Order Request (COR) No. 25. During the course of construction a request was
received from the contractor for an increase to his contract to cover 4 miscellaneous electrical
items. A description and breakdown of the items are as follow:
1. 2 additional 2 x 4 parabolic light fixtures were added and rewiring of fixtures was done to
match the Architectural and Electrical drawings. Cost -- $556.00.
2. A separate circuit was added to the Elevator Equipment Room for power and lighting at
the request of the State Elevator Inspector. Cost -- $309.00.
3. Power had to be added to a basement water cooler that was not shown on the electrical
drawings. Cost — $263.00.
4. Vandal proof covers were added over twelve (12) manual pull stations at the Fire
Marshall's request. Cost -- $1,898.00.
The costs listed for the individual items is exclusive of the cost for Bond and Overhead and
Profit for the General Contractor. Total cost impact to the project — Add $3,209.00.
23. Change Order Request (COR) No. 26. A credit was taken for a doubled up door opening.
An aluminum door was scheduled in an opening that had been provided in hollow metal.
Cost impact to the project — Savings of $1,700.00.
24. Change Order Request (COR) No. 27. During the correction of the door and frame shop
drawings, the hardware schedule, and the security review of the building minor miscellaneous
changes were made. Some door frame heads were changed from 2" to 4" to match masonry
coursing and 3 additional electric strike locations were noted requiring changes to either new
or existing frames. Cost impact to the project — Add $2,684.00.
25. Change Order Request (COR) No. 28. A door opening scheduled as "existing" on the door
schedule did not exist and had to be provided. Also, and "offset" pull was added to the
aluminum door at the west side of the Police breakroom. Cost impact to the project — Add
639.00.
26. Change Order Request (COR) No. 29. Three additional camera locations were required for
the Police security system in the new garage. Rough -in for conduit and electrical boxes were
provided under this contract Cost impact to the project —Add $1,297.00.
27. Change Order Request (COR) No. 35. In light of the exceedingly wet spring encountered
33 days with rain within 45 calendar days), and the problems encountered with Xcel Energy
construction crews who were not available when needed because they were often responding
to storm caused power outages throughout the city, overtime was authorized for the contractor
to install curbs to allow a schedule to be met for the "Music in Plymouth" event. Cost impact
to the project — Add $1,666.00.
28. Change Order Request (COR) No. 36. An existing recessed entry mat and frame had to be
removed and the area filled with concrete. Cost impact to the project — Add $713.00.
Total of all twenty-eight (28) it --ms included in Change Order No. 3: $46,381.00
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
RESOLUTION NO. 05 -
RESOLUTION APPROVING CHANGE ORDER NUMBER THREE
ON THE PLYMOUTH PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING
EXPA1ISION AND REMODELING PROJECT
WHEREAS, the original contract for the public safety building expansion and remodeling
project was awarded to Maertens-Brenny Construction Company in the amount of $8,469,150;
and
WHEREAS, change order number one, adopted by the Council on 2/22/05, modified that
contract due to structural and mechanical changes that are needed in the project by increasing the
contract by $48,164 to $8,517,314; and
WHEREAS, change order number two, adopted by the Council on 3/29/05, modified that
contract due to structural and mechanical changes that are needed in the project by increasing the
contract by $22,509 to $8,539,823; and
WHEREAS, we have r..ow received our third change order for various changes listed in
detail within the cover agenda item; and
WHEREAS, Change Order Number Three will increase the contract amount by $46,381;
and
WHEREAS, the City's owner's representative, Bill Wolters, has recommended approval
of Change Order Number Three; and
WHEREAS, City and Police Department Staff has reviewed and also recommends
approval of Change Order number three on the Plymouth Public Safety Building Expansion and
Remodeling Project.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, the City Council adopt the resolution approving Change Order
Number Three on the Plymouth Public Safety Building Expansion and Remodeling Project to
increase the contract amount by $46,381.
Adopted by the City Council on
Agenda Number:
TO: Laurie Ahrens, City Manager through Eric Blank, Park & Rec Director
FROM: Paul Buck, City Forester
SUBJECT: Change order to 2005/2006 Tree Removal & Hauling Contract
DATE: August 16, 2005 for Council Meeting of August 23, 2005
1. ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt a change order to the 2005/2006 Tree Removal & Hauling
Contract to address a requested change in Forced Tree removal calculations.
2. BACKGROUND: The 2005/2006 Tree Removal & Hauling contract contained many
major changes, all in an effort to solicit/entice competitive bidding. The following major
changes were noted in the cover letter:
Splitting the City into tNvo (2) separate bidding units (each side containing slightly
different numbers),
Hauling became a straight price rather than an hourly rate,
Stump grinding was removed and
The contract was reduced from three (3) to two (2) years.
We did receive four bids (4) of which two (2) had calculation flaws. We accepted the
Coolen's bid, which was 63% cheaper than the other legal bid.
Many smaller changes were not highlighted/noted on the cover letter, including a minor
change in the Forced Removal formula. The Coolen Brothers did not note this change until
the first two (2) force cuts were removed. The formula was originally instituted to more fairly
compensate contractors for removals occurring on private property. The previous formula
was Force Removal Price = A + [A x (B + C + D + E)] whereas the new formula was Force
Removal Price = A x (B + C + D + E). This change resulted in not automatically doubling the
bid price. Over the last few years, bid prices have crept up closer to market value and
therefore we didn't want to gouge the occasional non-compliant property owner.
A. Base price (DBH) as determined by Bid.
B. Force removal factor:
Completion within 7 days of notification B 1.0
Not finished within 7 days B 2
C. Yard position factor:
Front Yard C 0.0
Side Yard C 0.25
Back Yard C 0.5
G
Undeveloped Land C = 0.7
D. Structure Factor:
Permanent structures within drip line of tree D = 2.25
House, Garage, Deck, Fence, etc.)
No structures within drip line D = 0.0
E. Utilities Factor:
Overhead utilities within drip line E =.2
No Overhead wires within drip line E = 0
3. ALTERNATIVES: The contract could be continued as signed, but the Coolen Brothers
claim they did not see the change and their bid would have been higher to compensate for the
change. The contract could be terminated, but that would leave us without adequate tree
removal options.
4. DISCUSSION: Given little choice this late in the season, we need to come to an adequate
compromise. In an effort to give additional price relief for the occasional extremely difficult
tree, we can revert to the previous formula. To our knowledge, cases like this occur only once
every two or three years.
5. BUDGET IMPACT: The impact will be felt by the occasional resident that does not
comply with timely removal of their private condemned trees. The removal costs are charged
against the property owner plus a $100 administrative fee.
6. RECOMMENDATION: Upon complaint by the contractor and review by Roger
Knutson, City attorney, it is recommended that we issue a change order to the original
contract to address this situation. The force cut removal formula should revert back to the
previous contract language, Force Removal Price = A + [A x (B + C + D + E), and the
contract will be reviewed at the end of the first year. Payment of force cuts will not be
retroactive, but rather all force cuts issued after approval by the City Council shall be eligible
for the increased payment.
Attachment
RESOLUTION NO. 2005 - **
APPROVING CHANGE ORDER TO 2005 - 2006 PUBLIC TREE AND STUMP REMOVAL
CONTRACT
WHEREAS, the Forestry Division enacted the 2005 - 2006 Tree & Stump Removal on City
owned lands; and
WHEREAS, there were many changes from previous years contracts and
WHEREAS, Coolen Brothers Tree Service did not note the change in the Force Cut Removal
formula
AND, WHEREAS, in an attempt to be fair and equitable, the previous formula A +
A*(B+C+D+E)] should be used to calculate the price of Force Cut removals.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA, that it should, and hereby does, accept the change order to
revert the Force Cut removal formula to past contracts for fiscal years 2005 - 2006. Further, that
funds are authorized from account no. 101-1330-7533.
Adopted by the City Council or.. August 23, 2005
DATE: August 15, 2005 for the City Council Meeting of August 23, 2005
TO: Laurie Ahrens, City Manager through
i
FROM: Pat J. Qvale, Public Services ManagerA
s'
SUBJECT: AWARD CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
PLYMOUTH METROLINK STATION 73 TRANSIT FACILITY
CITY PROJECT NO. 3125
ACTION REQUESTED: Make a motion to adopt the attached resolution. awarding the
contract for the construction of the above project.
BACKGROUND: On August 9, 2005, the City Council delayed action on the bid award for
Plymouth Metrolink Station 73 Transit facility. Due to the increase in the construction cost,
Council directed staff to continue discussions with the State of Minnesota and the Metropolitan
Council regarding additional funding for the project. A copy of the August 9, 2005, staff report
is enclosed.
PROJECT STATUS: Bids were publicly opened for the Construction of the Plymouth
Metrolink Station 73 Transit facility on Thursday, August 4, 2005. Stahl Construction is the low
bidder at $4,360,000. The low bidder was 18% or $679,000 higher than the engineer's estimate
of $3,681,000.
Staff met with the State of Minnesota and the Metropolitan Council to ask for additional
funding. Both funding partners have verbally committed the following additional funds.
The State of Minnesota $300,000
The Metropolitan Council $250,000
This will cover $550,000 of the $679,000 bid construction cost that was over the engineer's
estimate. The remaining $169,000 could be added to the City's cost from the transit reserve
funds. Transit reserve funds are dedicated funds for transit facilities and transit operations. The
transit fund balance as of July 30, 2005 is $1.8 million. A portion of this fund is targeted for
operations. Funding this project plus operations will retain approximately $1.0 million in transit
reserve funds for on-going operation shortfalls.
0:\EnginceringTROJECTS\2000 - 2009\3125\Memos\CC_Awud_Bid _ 3125_08_16_05.doc
AWARD CONTRACT
PLYMOUTH METROLINK STATION 73 CITY PROJECT 3125
Page 2
The State of Minnesota and the Metropolitan Council are committed to making this project a
reality. The ability to contribute additional funding in the current economic environment speaks
to their commitment. Both entities emphasize that we have a project ready and acknowleges it is
a benefit to the City of Plymouth and the region.
BUDGET IMPACT: Based on the low bid received of $4,360,000, the total project cost, which
includes final design, administration, and contingencies, is estimated to be $4,810,000. The
current available funding for this project is:
Available Funding Sources Amount
Mn/DOT State Bonds 2,800,000
Regional Transit Capital Bonds 1,429,768
Transit Reserve Funds 580,232
Total Project 4,810,000
No design options were included in the current bid. Changes to the current design. would require
design changes and likely require the project to be rebid.
COMMENTS: City staff in addition to the Metropolitan Council staff provided the following
comments.
0 Transit needs to be one of the several tools in our toolkit to maintain mobility in the
region.
Transit adds highway capacity without the expense of building highways lanes.
A highway lane can carry about 2000 cars in an hour before falling into congestion.
Transit carrying 2000 people in one hour is the equivalent of building one highway lane
80% of op out transit riders ride during the peak.
The Metropolitan Council regional goal is a 50% increase in the transit system by 2020.
0 Plymouth taxpayers contribute more than $1.2 million for regional transit capital in 2005.
This project allows Plymouth taxpayers to directly benefit from their regional funding
contributions as Eden Prairie and Maple Grove have.
Plymouth Metrolink serves 1,800 passenger per day, with 1,200 going to and from the downtown
area. A recent license plate survey indicated 85% of Plymouth Metrolink riders are Plymouth
residents.
The proposed facility will not only serve as a park and ride but a transfer hub. Currently,
Plymouth Metrolink riders use the Plymouth Road Transit Center, which is operated by Metro
Transit. By consolidating the park and ride with a transfer hub, Plymouth will be able to keep
Plymouth Metrolink riders on the Metrolink system. This will maximize the fare revenues that
stay in Plymouth. A portion of the fares from Plymouth riders currently go to Metro Transit to
support the Plymouth Road Transit Center.
0:\Engineering\PR0JECTS\2000 - 2009\3125\Me s\CC_Award—Bid _3125_08_l6_05.doc
AWARD CONTRACT
PLYMOUTH METROLINK STATION 73 CITY PROJECT 3125
Page 3
RECOMMENDATIONS: The City Council adopt the attached resolution awarding the
contract for City Project No. 3125, Project to the lowest responsible bidder, Stahl Construction,
in the amount of $4,360,000.
attachment: City Council Report August 9, 2005
Resolution
0AEngineeringTROJECTS\2000 - 2009\3125WsTC_Award_Bid_3125_08_16_05.doc
DATE: August 2, 2005 for the City Council Meeting of August 9, 2005
TO: Laurie Ahrens, City Manager through
FROM: Pat J. Qvale, public Services Manager
SUBJECT: AWARD CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
PLYMOUTH METROLINK STATION 73 TRANSIT FACILITY
CITY PROJECT NO. 3125
ACTION REQUESTED: Make a motion to adopt the attached resolution awarding the
contract for the construction of the above project.
BACKGROUND: The project is a dedicated busway and transit station facility for timed
transfer service between Plymouth Metrolink shuttle and express bus transit services. In
addition, the site will incluc.e a fully enclosed passenger waiting area, structured parking
for 283 vehicles and a bus circulation and layover area. The site is located at the southeast
quadrant of the intersection of Trunk Highway 55 and County Road 73.
Bids were publicly opened for the construction of the Plymouth Metrolink Station 73
Transit Facility on Thursdav, August 4, 2005. A total of nine bids were received at the
following prices.
Contractor Total Base Bid
Shaw -Lundquist Associates 4,785,000
Lund Martin Construction 4,399,800
Knutscn Construction 4,844,000
Merimic Construction 4,607,757
R.ochon Corporation 4,389,000
Stahl Construction 4,360,000
Graham Penn -Co Construction 4,770,000
Arkay Construction 4,409,000
CM Construction 4,792,000
Engineer's Estimate 3,681,000
0:\Engineering\PR0JECTS\2000 - 2009\3125\Me s\CC_Award_Bid_3125_08_09_05. doc
AWARD CONTRACT
PLYMOUTH METROLINK STATION 73 CITY PROJECT 3125
Page Two
The low bidder was 18%1 or $679,000 higher than the engineer's estimate of $3,681,000.
A detailed review of the engineer's estimate cost to the low bid for the construction
materials is currently underway. Staff concludes that seven responsible bids ranging from
4,360,000 to $4,844,000 indicates current market conditions. The bids were checked for
accuracy, and the low bidde - is Stahl. Construction. The City's consulting engineer, LSA
Design, Inc. reviewed the in:'ormation submitted by Stahl Construction to comply with the
bidder qualification criteria policy and finds the information acceptable. Staff believes
that they are capable of constructing the project in accordance with the approved plan and
specification.
BUDGET IMPACT: Based on the low bid received of $4,360,000, the total project cost,
which includes design, administration, legal and contingencies, is estimated to be
4,81.0,000. The available funding for this project is:
Available Funding Sources Amount
Mn/L1OT State Bonds 2,500,000
Regional Transit Capital Bonds 1,179,768
Transit Reserve Funds 1 $1,130,232
Total Project 4,810,000
The City of Plymouth is c;ligible for the annual allocation of 2006 National Transit
Database funds. This is the annual federal allocation based on Plymouth Metrolink
ridership. Discussions are currently underway with the Metropolitan Council to add the
2006 allocation to this project. The estimated additional funding is $230,000. This would
reduce the transit reserve funds contribution to approximately $900,000. The current
balance of the transit reserve fund is $1.8 million. In addition, staff will submit an
additional funding request to the State of Minnesota.
RECOMMENDATIONS: The following two options are being presented.
A. The City Council adopt the attached resolution awarding the contract for City
Project No. 3125, Project to the lowest responsible bidder, Stahl Construction, in
the amount of $4,36C,000.
B. The City Council adopt an alternative resolution to cancel the project and withdraw
from the funding agreements with the State of Minnesota and the Metropolitan
Council in the amoturt of $3,679,768. This funding will be reallocated to other
capital transit projects in the region.
attachment: Resolution
0:\EngineeringTROJECTS\2000 - 2009\3125\Mems\CC_Awwd_Bid_3125_08_09_05.doc
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
RESOLUTION NO. 2005 -
AWARD CONTRACT
PLYMOUTH ME'CROLINK STATION 73 TRANSIT FACILITY
CITY PROJECT NO. 3125
WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for Plymouth Metrolink Station 73 Transit
Facility, City Project No. 3125, bids were received, opened and tabulated according to law, and
the following bids were received complying with the advertisement:
Contractor Total Base Bid
Mn%DOT State Bonds 2,800,000
Shaw -Lundquist Associates 4,785,000
Lund Martin Construction 4,399,800
Knutson Construction 4,844,000
Merimac Construction 4,607,757
Rochozi Corporation 4,389,000
Stahl Construction 4,360,000
Grahani Perm -Co Construction 4,770,000
Arkay Construction 4,409,000
CM Ccnstruction 4,792,000
Engineer's Estimate 3,681,000
WHEREAS, it appears that Stahl Construction is the lowest responsible bidder complying with
the minimum specifications; and
WHEREAS, the City staff recommends awarding the project to Stahl Construction;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA, that the appropriate City Officials are hereby authorized and
directed to enter into the contract for the Base Bid with Stahl Construction in the name of the
City of Plymouth for the Plymouth Metrolink Station 73 Transit facility, City Project No. 3125,
according to the plans and specifications therefore approved by the City Council and on file in
the office of the City Engineer in the amount of $4,360,000.
FURTHERMORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED:
1. That the funding for this, project shall be as follows:
Available Funding Sources Amount
Mn%DOT State Bonds 2,800,000
Regional Transit Capital Bonds 1,429,768
Transit Reserve Funds 580,232
Total Project 4,810,000
Adopted by the City Council on August 23, 2005.
0A\Engineering\PR0JECTS\2000 - 2009\3125\Resol\CC Res _AwardContract_3125.doc
CGTL /IVE •-
v
OF
PA RKWO RSI MF
H16'H
I
3 0 13 CS
90ADWAy
I
PA v E M E -NT
Pl.A N VIEW
i
I VZ ccC
TURN-IRO ND
I ''RCA
I
I
I
r
I
I
I
I
I
I
THREE -DECK RAMI'
6
S
14- g
3 10[
12- 1
rZ
Nls.
290)-5rAL&_5 - 94 SQ=FJ7,%STALl-
7) HANW CAS P S TIA I= f- -5
S u STALL S D Wpi& ol- r
SEQUcAirm L PA&KhV iF
T R EA C H L Ro e s Z- wR y T7/I FF/c
o' Bus R0fl DwA V lol KEs
THS EFFEC.T"I V C 1 -?A M P
17-60T-P&/IVT i8o 'x 2S 0/
02+S7, 000 Q• FT, - 161 S- r --TIS ; At:C
C Ue"(1 S ConISoDE/ABL.
A RVY M vv1 Al w'.
r- G' - (50) STXLL
i a
AfnpvL ES
I I
i 4-o' x 150
I 12- 0' N/614
I
I
49 0 00 Sq, F7'
1
I
I RA v P
o I ARES
4V6• / z0' t,'N4LK
AoromATcD PAIQIom
8o",,I_o'= 181906/306 =k1 sq.
EVEgy STlgt-L HANDICAP
300) S714LL5 +(33) oN 5L1kFt4CE
6-VC'H!CLE-S 11r9/our PER Ir11N417"
PEKFCP,MANCF jaNDLD
Amx. 4-o' rc 5cARD il-1 t v-5
V#/CLCS DRIVE CNLy 01 1 SURFACE
Vo c'NE 14 T'Hg STORAGE SpAcE-
5/m F/_ C SA F6 f Se C uX E
9#sSIM. ' .3- 1Vj411V 7T 1V1q A10E
S'A FE l®i C, oic,
tia, (2Z/05