The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCity Council Packet 08-23-2005 SpecialAgenda City of Plymouth Special City Council Meeting Tuesday, August 23, 2005 Immediately following the Regular Council Meeting) Meeting Room 3 Plymouth Creek Center, lower level 1. Call to Order 2. Discuss layout for reconstruction of County Road 101 between 12th Avenue and 30th Place North (5102) 3. Discuss proposed 2006 budget and tax levies 4. Consider process and appointment to Planning Commission Res2005-335) 5. Adjourn DATE: August 8, 2005 for the Special City Council Meeting of August 23, 2005 TO: Laurie Ahrens, City Manager through Doran Cote, Director of Public Works FROM: Daniel K. Campbell, Sr. Engineering Technician SUBJECT: LAYOUT APPROVAL FOR COUNTY ROAD 101 BETWEEN 12T" AVENUE AND 30TH PLACE NORTH CITY OF PLYMOUTH PROJECT NO. 5102 ACTION REQUESTED: Discuss the layout plan for the construction of County Road 101 between 12th Avenue and 301h Place North. BACKGROUND: City staff has been working with Hennepin County staff on the improvement of County Road 101 between 12th Ave. and 30th Place N. for some time. This improvement is part of the County's 2007 - 2008 Construction Program and they are presenting the layout to the City for approval before proceeding with the final design of the project. Hennepin County is also requesting authorization to proceed with right-of-way acquisition in accordance with County policy, which specifies that the costs be split with the City on a 50% / 50% basis. The City has also included this proposed project in its Capital Improvement Program for construction in the year 2007. Attached is a memo dated June 1, 2005 for City Council Study Meeting of June 6, 2005, providing background on the project. The draft layout presented to the City Council at the June 6, 2005 Study Meeting, Layout No. 2, eliminates access for several side streets to improve safety and reflects the acquisition of two homes to accommodate the 24th Avenue cul-de-sac and the intersection realignment at 26th Avenue. During discussions, it was indicated that the City Council does not wish to acquire properties in total and that they desire to review the County's policy on cost-sharing for right-of- way acquisition. The County has agreed to further discuss this policy. During discussions a question was raised about the need for a northbound right turn lane at County Road 6. Hennepin County has indicated that their traffic modeling has projected that the addition of two left turn and two through lanes and elimination of the split -phase signal timing will significantly reduce the northbound right -turn lane queue length. An alternative that included a northbound right turn lane was presented to Herb's Service Center since it dramatically impacts their parking. Due to their objection to the alternative, the layout presented for approval does not include a northbound right turn lane at County Road 6, however, attached is an alternative layout for this approach to the intersection. 0:\Engineering\PROJECTS\2000 - 2009\5102\Memos\CC_Prelim_LayOut_5102_8_23.doe SUBJECT: LAYOUT APPROVAL FOR COUNTY ROAD 101 BETWEEN 12TH AVENUE AND 30TH PLACE NORTH Page 2 As requested by the City Council, staff held additional neighborhood meetings with the affected residents and businesses. Alternative cul-de-sac designs were presented to the residents nearest to the improvements. Several of these alternative designs would require the total acquisition of additional homes. The alternatives and the County's record of meeting are attached to this report. Also attached are email correspondence regarding the proposed improvements and the alternatives presented. The County's preferred layout, as presented in Layout No. 4, depicts aligning the Queensland Lane cul-de-sac such that the property at 2505 Queensland Lane would be acquired. Similarly, the 26th Avenue cul-de-sac is aligned such that the property at 17735 - 26th Avenue would be acquired. The two additional properties result in four properties totally acquired. Based on these meetings, additional retaining walls have also been included to reduce impacts to adjacent properties. After the design is complete, the final. construction plans will be presented to the City Council for approval. In addition a cooperative cost sharing and maintenance responsibility agreement will also require City Council approval. BUDGET IMPACT: Approval of a layout would authorize Hennepin County to begin right-of- way acquisition in accordance with County policy, which includes a 50/50 cost share between the City and the County. Several City Councilmembers have expressed an interest in further discussing cost sharing with Hennepin County. The City's Capital Improvements Program identifies $420,000 in 2006 as the City's share for design and right-of-way acquisition and 210,000 in 2007 for construction. However, a more recent cost estimate from Hennepin County has the City's share of the total project costs at $4,168,657. This is described in the attached July 29, 2005 memorandum. attachments: June 1, 2005 memorandum Layout No. 4 Alternative cul-de-sac designs Meeting records and correspondence July 29, 2005 memorandum August 16, 2005 memorandum 0:\Engineering\PR0JECTS\2000 - 2009\5102\Mems\CC_Prelim_LayOut_5102_8_23.doc 2 MEMO CITY OF PLYMOUTH 3400 Plymouth Boulevard Plymouth, MN 55447 DATE: June 1, 2005 for City Council Study Meeting June 6, 2005 TO: Laurie Ahrens, City Manager through Doran Cote, Director of Public Works FROM: Daniel K. Campbell, Sr. Engineering Technician and Ronald S. Quanbeck, City Engineer SUBJECT: COUNTY ROAD 101 RECONSTRUCTION CITY PROJECT NO. 5102 Background: Hennepin County is proposing to reconstruct County Road 101 between 12th Avenue and County Road 24. The County is requesting City approval of the layout before they proceed with the final design. They also would like authorization from the City Council to proceed with property acquisition in accordance with County policy which includes a 50% cost share by the City. City staff have been working with Hennepin County to develop the layout and feel it is time for City Council review and input. A presentation on the project will be made by Hennepin County staff at the June 6, 2005 City Council study meeting. An information sheet on the project and project layout'are attached. Layout: The layout provides the guide for the final design of the roadway. It identifies impacts to properties in a general way. The County may make minor changes to the layout, but significant changes would be brought back to the City Council. The project extends from 12th Avenue to approximately 30th Place, where the previous County Road 101 project ended. The layout provides for two lanes in each direction with turn lanes at major intersections. Concrete medians are planned for the area between 13th Avenue and Merrimac Lane. The remaining median areas would be delineated with paint as a means to minimize the impacts to adjacent residents. Trails are provided on both sides of the roadway. County Road 101 would generally follow the existing right-of-way, but deviates from south of 191h Avenue to south of 24th Avenue to provide adequate curve radii and sight distance. Several retaining walls are proposed to minimize impacts to adjacent properties and the lakes and ponds. The traffic signals at 14th Avenue and County Road 6 would also be reconstructed. No other traffic signals are currently proposed, but the other intersections will be reviewed to determine if warrants for a traffic signal are met. 0:\Enginming\PR0JECTS\2000 - 2009\5102\Memos\CC Cty 101 Memo. do SUBJECT: COUNTY ROAD 101 RECONSTRUCTION Page 2 Access: Access to County Road 101 would be limited at several locations to improve operation and safety. Access throughout the corridor would remain the same except as noted below. South of County Road 6 access remains the same except 3 single family residences north of 121h Avenue would be limited to right-in/right-out access only. A median extending north from County Road 6 would allow only right-in/right-out access for the south driveway of Rick's Market. Full access would remain at the north driveway that also corresponds to the access for Oakwood Elementary School. The first driveway north of County Road 6 on the west side, a dentist office, would be eliminated. That property would be accessed from its other driveway on Merrimac Lane. The layout proposes to realign 19th Avenue and 25th/26th Avenues to eliminate the offset intersections and improve sight distances. The realignments improve safety by reducing driver conflicts and allowing construction of left turn lanes at both locations. Nineteenth Avenue east of County Road 101, 25"' Avenue, and 26th Avenue are designated minor collectors in the City's Transportation Plan. The City's Trail Plan also identifies a proposed on road bike route on 25th Avenue. Traffic signals are not proposed for the intersections at this time. However, the intersections would need to be realigned if traffic signals were to be installed at some point in time. The realigned intersections would be stronger candidates for a future signal than if they are left offset. These realignments will impact adjacent properties. The layout identifies elimination of 4 side street access points, Merrimac Lane west of County Road 101, 24th Avenue east of County Road 101, Queensland Lane west of County Road 101, and 261h Avenue east of County Road 101. Cul de sac turnarounds meeting City standards would be constructed at each of these locations. In addition, access for a private drive serving 4 houses on the east side of County Road 101 south of 24th Avenue would be eliminated. The drive would be rerouted to 24th Avenue. Property Acquisition: The layout provides a general idea how properties are impacted. However the specific impacts won't be known until well into the design process. Hennepin County would like authorization from the City Council to proceed with property acquisition. County Policy requires that the City share the cost of property acquisition 50/50 with the County. The actual acquisition would occur after the design has reached a point that the specific areas can be identified and described. Efforts will be made to minimize the easements needed. For example, these efforts include a number of retaining walls to minimize impacts on private property as well as to lessen environmental impacts. Despite efforts to reduce the amount of land needed for this project, there would still be significant impacts to some properties including total acquisition. Property Owner Involvement: A series of information meetings for the public have been held. The meetings are described below and summaries of comments received at the meetings are attached. 0:\EngineeringTROJECI'S\2000 - 2009\5102\Memos\CC Cty 101 Memo.do SUBJECT: COUNTY ROAD 101 RECONSTRUCTION Page 3 At the first public meeting held on January 27, 2005, the County presented a preliminary layout depicting the difference between a four -lane roadway with medians, a four -lane divided roadway with a two-way left turn lane, and a four -lane undivided roadway. A presentation was also given on the purpose and justification for the improvement, current and projected traffic volumes, proposed schedule and estimated project cost. Comments were received both verbally and in writing. Based on public comments received and input from Plymouth Engineering staff, County staff prepared a second layout. The second layout has a combination of a four -lane divided roadway with turn lanes between 14`h Avenue and Merrimac Lane, and a four -lane undivided roadway with turn lanes from Merrimac Lane to 30th Avenue. Access was also eliminated at five locations along with the realignment of two intersections. Separate meetings were held on April 4, 2005 and April 21, 2005 with the four property owners who have the private drive that currently accesses County Road 101 south of 24th Avenue to discuss alternatives to provide safer access to County Road 101. A private drive to 24th Avenue, parallel to County Road 101, was the preferred option. On April 28, 2005 a separate meeting was also held with property owners who would be directly affected by the realignment of 25th/26th Avenue intersections. The property acquisition process was explained and attempts will be made by the County to lessen the impacts to the property on the west side of County Road 101 at 26th Avenue. The next meetings were held with businesses/property owners between 14th Avenue and Merrimac Lane on May 11, 2005 and residential properties between Merrimac Lane and 301h Avenue on May 12, 2005. Comments from the business property owners revolved around change in access and impacts to their property. A meeting arranged by Mayor Johnson, Councilmember Slavik and County Commissoner Steele was held on May 31, 2005. Notes from that meeting are also attached. Funding: County Road 101 is in both Hennepin County's and the City's Capital Improvements Programs (CIPs). A significant portion of the project cost is from Federal funding the County has already secured. The City's CIP which was approved last Fall was based on the 2004-2008 Hennepin County CIP. The table below shows the estimated City cost of the project at various stages of project development. This does not include work on City utilities in the right-of-way which will likely be needed. Applicable pages from the three CIPs are attached. 210,000 of this is Right -of -Way 0iEnginmring\PR0JECTS\2000 - 2009\5102\Mano9\CC Cty 101 Memo.doc City 2006 City 2007 Total City Cost Total Project Cost Desi & R/W Construction City CIP 420,000 210,000 630,000 8,371,000 2004-2008 County 420,000 208,000 628,000 8,369,000 CIP 2005-2009 County 210,000 960,000* 1,170,000 10,399,000 CII' 210,000 of this is Right -of -Way 0iEnginmring\PR0JECTS\2000 - 2009\5102\Mano9\CC Cty 101 Memo.doc SUBJECT: COUNTY ROAD 101 RECONSTRUCTION Page 4 Hennepin County typically provides 1% of the project cost for landscaping and prefers that the City administer a separate landscaping project. Depending on the level of landscaping required this will also likely increase the City's total cost. The City's share of construction and landscaping would be from Municipal State Aid funds. Utility work would be from the Sewer Fund, the Water Fund, or the Water Resource Fund depending on the work done. Relationship to County Road 24: Hennepin County is also proposing to reconstruct County Road 24 from Olive Lane to Jewell Lane. While the projects are geographically close Hennepin County believes County Road 24 is less controversial and would like the projects to proceed on separate parallel tracks. If the design and approval process allow they may be combined into one construction contract, but if County Road 101 is delayed they could proceed with County Road 24 separately. The City Council was previously provided with an information sheet and layout for this project as well. Schedule: Both County and City CIPs provide funding in 2006 for design and right-of-way and in 2007 for construction. The current schedule has bid letting for County Road 101 in late 2007 with construction beginning in 2008 and ending in 2009. Staff Recommendation: We recommend that the City Council provide comments to Hennepin County that would allow completion of a layout acceptable to the City or identify the additional information needed to complete the layout. Approval of the layout will be scheduled for a future City Council meeting. Attachments: Information Sheet Layout Summaries of comments received at information meetings Selected pages from CIPs 0.\Engineering\PROJECTS\2000 - 2009\5102\Mmns\CC Cty 101 Memo.doc HENNE PIN Hennepin COU JT`( PROJECT INFORMATION May 12, 2005 CSAH 101 — S. of CSAH 6 to S. of CSAH 24 Hennepin County Project 9516 SP 27-701-13 Hennepin County Transportation Department and the City of Plymouth are collaborating in the development of a proposal to reconstruct 1.4 miles of County State Aid Highway (CSAH) 101 from south of CSAH 6 to south of CSAH 24 as a multi -lane roadway. If you have questions, a county and city contact appears at the end of this document. Purpose & Justification The purpose of the project is to improve the condition of the pavement, improve safety, and to increase capacity. The corridor has multiple deficiencies: pavement structure and surfacing, horizontal curvature, vertical curvature, drainage flow with unwanted ponding, and limited traffic capacity for future volume projections. Background Information Hennepin County received jurisdiction of MnDOT Trunk Highway 101 on January 30, 1989, which changed the roadway designation to CSAH 101. The reconstruction project is funded in the Department's 2007 element of the approved Capital Improvement Program. The department is serving as the lead agency in the development of the roadway reconstruction project. The design will be coordinated with city staff, the business community, property owners and affected utility companies. The corridor consists of a mix of businesses, rental units, and single-family dwellings. Pavement History The county has placed overlays and seal coated, widened a shoulder at 25" Avenue North, and reconstructed the roadway between 30th Avenue North and MN TH 55. CSAH 6 from Olive Lane North to Shenandoah Lane North is scheduled for mill and overlay in summer 2005, which crosses CSAH 101. Existing Roadway Section The existing roadway is a two-lane facility with minimal gravel shoulders and drainage ditches north of 19t Avenue North. There are multiple side streets with entrances staggered across CSAH 101. The roadway curve north of Merrimac Lane North and 24th Avenue North is deficient in both horizontal and vertical curvature with minimal sight lines for intersecting side streets. ' Proposed Roadway Section Preliminary layout #1, shown at the January 27, 2005 public informational meeting, displayed CSAH 101 using the existing roadway alignment and three different typical roadway cross sections, 74' wide 4 -lane divided roadway with raised medians, 66' wide 4 -lane divided roadway with a 2 -way left turn lane, and 52' wide 4 -lane undivided roadway. The various widths were compared side-by-side to reflect their differences. Preliminary layout #2, shown at the May 11 12, 2005 public informational meeting, has been updated to represent the result of comments and concerns from the January 2005 meeting, discussions with city staff, applicable engineering design standards, and comments received from meeting one-on-one with impacted property owners. Layout #2 depicts a roadway cross section that is a combination of the three sections shown on Layout #1 with each having a particular purpose for the segment. See the following listing for a summary of roadway sections along CSAH 101 from MN TH 12 to MN TH 55. MN TH 12 to 13`h Avenue North 52' wide 4 -lane undivided (existing) 13`h Avenue North to Merrimac Lane North 74' wide 4 -lane divided with raised center medians (proposed) Merrimac Lane North to 24th Avenue North 52' wide undivided (proposed) 24`h Avenue North to 30`h Avenue North 66' wide divided with painted center medians (proposed) 30`h Avenue North to CSAH 24 74' wide 4 -lane divided with raised center medians (existing) CSAR 24 to MN TH 55 74' wide 4 -lane divided with raised center medians (existing) Right and/or left turn lanes require additional width to improve capacity and safety where traffic - turning volumes are high. Roadway Classification and Traffic Volumes CSAH 101 is classified as a minor arterial road. Minor arterial roads provide service for trips of moderate length and mobility. They connect to urban principal arterial roads and city streets. Arterials generally have higher design standards than other roads, often with multiple lanes and some degree of access control. Arterials serve to provide more mobility than access. A presentation explaining the road classification system was provided at the May 12, 2005 public informational meeting and can be repeated upon request. CSAH 101 average daily traffic (ADT) in 2004 was 15,000 vehicles with a projected 2025 volume of 22,800. The corridor growth is contributed to low-level background growth due to area wide development and travel patterns. Little additional growth is expected due to local development / redevelopment. It is anticipated the traffic will experience a growth rate of 2%, which is a typical growth rate for the countywide area. Roads with an ADT of 15,000 vehicles, as stated in the State Aid Rules, will generally require four through lanes to accommodate traffic. 2 Ooerational Analvsis / Traffic Simulation The county has contracted with URS Consulting Inc. to assist with the determination of the necessary number of through lanes. Despite State Aid Rules dictating the need for four through lanes, the county felt it was prudent to review the traffic volume condition on CSAH 101. The simulation was provided for the existing roadway 2 -Lane configuration, a proposed 3 -lane with center dual left turn lane, a proposed 52' wide 4 -lane undivided, a proposed 4 -lane divided, and a 4 -lane with center dual left turn lane each using peak hour volumes for 2005 and 2025. The existing roadway 2 -lane configuration with 2025 traffic volumes resulted in saturation of the signalized intersections and a steady stream of traffic along CSAH 101, such that entering side street traffic had unacceptable delays. The 3 -lane section results were similar to the 2 -lane configuration. All three 4 -lane configurations provided similar performance with an acceptable traffic level of service at the signalized intersections and opportunities for side street traffic to enter CSAH 101. The result was in agreement with State Aid Rules: four lanes are necessary to accommodate 2025 traffic volumes. The simulation highlights were shown at the May 12, 2005 public informational meeting and can be repeated upon request. Traffic Signals There are two existing signalized intersections on the project and both are owned and operated by the county. The CSAH 101 at 14` h Ave. N. traffic signal was constructed in 1993 and the CSAH 101 at CSAH 6 traffic signal was part of the roadway turn -back from MnDOT in 1989. Both traffic signals will be replaced with the project. A new third traffic signal at CSAH 101 and 25`h /26 th Avenues North has been discussed. The offset cross street alignments are being joined at CSAH 101 with the project to accommodate a possible future traffic signal installation. Signal warrants will be reviewed has part of the project. A city trail is also planned to cross at or near this intersection. Access Control and Spacine The CSAR 101 project corridor area includes offset intersections of side streets. Such offset intersections are products of adjacent housing developments and their associated offset road alignments. These offset alignments and intersections contradict the roadway classification function of a minor arterial road by providing multiple uncontrolled access points. Therefore, the project proposal realigns side streets at two locations and eliminates four side street connections by placing cul-de-sacs. The loss of access will divert traffic to adjacent access points. For example, closing Merrimac Lane North, west of CSAH 101, will direct traffic to 19`h Avenue North; closing Queensland Lane North will direct traffic to 26`h Avenue North, west of CSAH 101; closing 24`h Avenue North, east of CSAH 101, will direct traffic to 25`h Avenue North; and closing 26`h Avenue North, east of CSAH 101, will direct traffic to 25`h Avenue North and/or 281h Avenue North. The streets being closed from CSAH 101 are short in length and will divert a small amount of traffic. The closures will provide access control and improved access spacing, thus reducing conflict points, which will reduce the opportunity for crashes. There will be properties that experience a slight increase in traffic past their homes. In addition to the side street closures, 19`h Avenue North at CSAH 101 and 25`h Avenue North / 26`h Avenue North at CSAH 101 will be realigned and designed with lane configurations capable of handling the insubstantially increased traffic volumes with a 40' curb—to-curb width accommodating three lanes at the intersections, two out and one in from CSAR 101. Currently, the south sight line for 19`h Avenue North is very limited because of a wood retaining wall. The 19`h Avenue North intersection will be moved to the east to provide minimum sight distance to the south. Also, there are residents on Queensland Avenue North and on 28`h Avenue North west junction requesting closure of their streets. Documented closure requests include residents at 17910 & 18005 28`h Ave. N., and 2510 Queensland Lane. The realignments and closure points will be analyzed in an attempt to reduce impacts. The closures and side street realignments currently require two total property acquisitions. County access spacing guidelines call for 1/4 mile spacing for full access and 660 foot spacing for partial access. The proposal with the side street closures improves the spacing but falls short of the guideline. The county supports the described access control measures to reduce crashes associated with conflict point reduction and access spacing. Driveways The corridor has three existing driveways. Two of the driveways will be modified as necessary in their existing location. The remaining driveway serves four homes on a blind curve, which is a safety concern. The residents share a 20' wide driveway that serves as a frontage drive parallel to CSAH 101. Each property is connected to the east side of this frontage drive. The frontage drive is owned and maintained by the four properties. The residents are interested in closing the existing access to CSAH 101 for safety reasons. The existing sight line is substandard and will not be corrected with the proposed reconstruction. Four alternates were presented to the four frontage drive residents and two adjacent property owners. Alternate 1 provided an extended frontage driveway north over an adjacent property to 24` h Avenue North where a cul-de-sac is proposed. Alternate 2 provided an extended frontage driveway south over the Anthony Thomas Inc. townhouse development frontage drive to Merrimac Lane North cul-de-sac. Alternate 3 provided an additional north bound lane on CSAH 101 to allow for acceleration prior to merging into the through lane, which would compensate for the lack of sight distance to the south with a minor sight distance improvement for left turns to the south. Alternate 4 provided replacement of the driveway at its existing location. The neighborhood preferred alternate 1. The additional impact of alternate 1 compounded the impact of the proposed cul-de-sac on 24`h Avenue North to such a degree that second total acquisition would be necessary. The property owner affected by the possible total acquisition has been has been involved in project discussions and is waiting for a definite plan. The county supports alternate 1 to alleviate the safety concern relating to lack of sight distance at the existing driveway location. Crash History 28 crashes are on record for the project corridor between CSAH 6 and 30`h Avenue North during the three-year period 2000 —2002. The area north of Merrimac Lane North has a 2.6 three-year crash rate average per million vehicle miles, which is above the county average of 1.85. CSAH 101 at CSAH 6 and at 14`h Avenue North intersections, both signalized, experienced 44 crashes and both exceed the county average. Recommendations to mitigate the crash rate averages are to construct a 4 -lane divided center raised median section between CSAH 6 and Merrimac Lane North, add left and right turn lanes where feasible, coordinate signal timing to help minimize stops, modify minor side street access from full to right -in / right -out or close entirely, reduce / 4 consolidate driveway access to CSAH 101. The county supports the project proposal that incorporates these recommendations. Environmental Concerns The proposed road alignment and cross section are likely to impact DNR wetlands adjacent to the corridor. The wetland types are 3, 4, and 5. The wetland delineation is in process with the extent of the impact yet to be determined. The road alignment will be reevaluated to determine if wetland avoidance is feasible. The county will coordinate with city staff to meet regulatory agency requirements. Drainage The existing drainage consists primarily of roadside ditches routed to ponds and wetlands. There are properties experiencing standing water for periods of time after storm events. The project will attempt to alleviate this condition if deemed necessary work for the project or as additional work at city direction. The proposed drainage system would consist of storm water routing via concrete curb and gutter and collection in a new concrete storm sewer system. The storm water will be directed to the same locations as the existing flows and treated prior to discharge. New culverts will be provided for storm water that passes over land and under CSAH 101. The county will coordinate with city staff to meet regulatory agency requirements. Landscaping Plan Currently a landscaping plan is not proposed. However, the county cost participation does provide for funding at the level of l% of the project cost. The county prefers the city use the funding for a separate landscape project to follow completion of the road project. Pedestrian Accommodations The corridor is designated as a bicycle route in the Hennepin County Bicycle System Plan. The System Plan calls for a continuous trail on one side of the road. The city staff supports placing a second trail on the opposite side of the road so that a trail is provided on both sides. This will allow for usage by neighborhoods on each side of the road without having crossing CSAR 101. Crosswalks meeting ADA requirements will be provided at all intersection corners. Pedestrian indications will be provided at signalized intersections with count down timers. Bus shelter relocation will be coordinated with the city bus system provider. Construction Staging The initial goal is to build half the project length during stage 1 and the other side during stage 2. This would leave one lane of travel in each direction for both stages. The details of the staging plan will be finalized during the detail design process. There are several walls and culvert crossings that will be coordinated with each stage or construct separately. Access will be provided or rerouted as necessary with signs to route traffic and pedestrians. The construction project manager will conduct weekly contractor meetings that will be open to the public. Project updates will also be posted on the county website. Public Involvement Public involvement began with the January 2005 kick-off meeting. A second set of meetings has been scheduled for May 11 & 12, 2005, one for business owners and one for property owners. There have been individual meetings with small groups to discuss impacts directly associated with their properties. It is anticipated that one-on-one meetings will continue both during the preliminary layout process and detail design plan process. Comment Summary Comments received to date are summarized as follows. Speed limit reduction, provide landscaping, improve conditions for entering CSAH 101, improve sight lines, reduce access with cul-de-sac placement, provide a trail, environmental impact, noise levels, property values, skew alignment of intersections, and loss of yards. Schedule The.preliminary design phase of the project is anticipated to be complete by mid -summer 2005. The preliminary layout will be developed based on State Aid standards, input gathered from property owners, and regulatory agencies. Neighborhood involvement will be solicited at open houses. City Council approval of the preliminary layout is anticipated summer 2005. Upon City Council approval of the preliminary layout the county will be the lead agency for detail design, right of way acquisition, and construction contract administration. Neighborhood open houses will occur during plan development and again prior to presenting the final plan to the city council for final detail plan approval. It is.anticipated that bid letting will occur fall of 2007 and construction will begin spring of 2008 and finish in fall of 2009. Roadwav and Richt of Way Funding / Cost Estimates The estimated cost for the CSAH 101 project is $11 million, including construction and right of way acquisitions. An updated estimate will be provided once the preliminary layout receives its last revision. A combination of Federal, State Aid, County and City funds will be used to finance the project. City participation for the roadway varies but is typically 10% of the project cost and right of way is fixed at 50%. No special assessments are anticipated. Contacts For more information or if you have specific questions, please call or visit the county and/or city websites: Hennepin County Transportation Department Guy Nowlan, P.E., Senior Project Manager Phone: 763-745-7655 www.co.hennepin.mn.us City of Plymouth Ron Quanbeck, P.E., City Engineer Phone: 763-509-5525 www.ci.plymouth.mn.us 414 1 2 ' x, f IVp CSAH 101 - PROJECT 9516 CSAH 24 - PROJECT 9617 COMMENT CARD CONCERNS FROM THE JANUARY 27TH MEETING LOWER SPEED LIMITS LANDSCAPING DIFFICULTY PULLING OUT SIGHT DISTANCE 0 CLOSE SIDE ROADS TO 101 TRAILS ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY 0 NOISE RECORD OF MEETING Hennepin County / City of Plymouth CSAH 101; County Project 9516 Monday - April 4th, 2005 - 6:00 p.m. DOCUMENTED BY: Guy Nowlan / Nick Peterson LOCATION OF MEETING: City of Plymouth, Bass Lake Room of City Hall SUBJECT: Neighborhood meeting to review new alternatives with cul-de-sacs at 24th Ave. No. ATTENDEES: NAME REPRESENTING PHONE Guy Nowlan Hennepin County, Trans. Dept. 763-745-7655 Nick Peterson Hennepin County, Trans. Dept. 763-745-7664 Dan Campbell City of Plymouth, Engr. Dept. 763-509-5522 Anne Hurlburt City of Plymouth, Comm. Dev. Dept. 763-509-5400 Nao Pao Xiong Resident -2300 CSAR 101 763-473-0217 Cheryl Albrecht Resident -2310 CSAR 101 763-258-0788 Raji Potential Buyer -2320 CSAH 101 N/A Steve & Brenda Hukriede Resident -2330 CSAH 101 763-475-3994 Laura Moore Resident -17825 24th N/A Kelly, Girlfriend of Dwight Zobel Resident -17830 24th 763-249-0159 Continued on reverse side _Yes _x—No) SUMMARY OF PROJECT & MEETING: Q See attached notes: D. Campbell e-mail, invitation letter. A meeting was held to inform the residents and Citv of the latest design alternatives for the intersection of 101 and 24th Ave., and the driveway shared by 2300 – 2330 CSAH 101. Most of the invited residents (invited by letter and telephone where possible- see attachment) attended the meeting, and the list of invited residents_ is listed above. The owner of 2320 could not attend because they are now in Florida, but the prospective buyer attended the meeting. Dan Campbell invited council members by email on April 1, 2005 (see attachment). The new alternatives all included a cul-de-sac for the WB approach and some realignment of the existing driveway by connecting and./or extending the existing driveway to the proposed cul-de-sac, andeg n, erally sliding the driveway 12 feet to the east. Also, retaining walls and access restrictions for 101 would be added. Continued on reverse side – x _Yes —No) SUMMARY OF COMMENTS FROM MEETING: All residents said they thought access to 101 would be safer with all design alternatives. Residents generally liked the proposal of a cul-de-sac and access change, though 17825 also said they were not pleased with the loss of land. Raji and his wife were present because they were interested in purchasing 2320, but left the meeting early because they were unhappy with the 12 -foot taking of their potential front yard. They said that this project was never disclosed to them by the owner/realtor and that they would no longer purchase the property because of this project's impact on their yard. All residents asked that the proposed driveway and cul-de-sac extents staked so that they can see how it would impact their property. The County stated that the worst case of the three alternatives would have the edge of bituminous staked. Cheryl Albrecht, 2130 Co. Rd 101, asked whether assessments would be levied against her property. Both the County and the City stated that no assessments would be required for this project unless the respective governing bodies were to change their current policies regarding assessments. Cheryl Albrecht, 2130 Co. Rd 101, asked when the right-of-way process would begin. The County noted that the acquisition process is currently schedule to begin April of 2006 and end April of 2007. Kelly, 17830 Co. Rd. 101, asked whether the pond on the north side of her property would be removed. The County noted that while the west side of the pond will be impacted due to the widening of 101 and the installation of a retaining wall, the pond will stay. Questions were posed regarding when an alternative would be selected and what level of detail would be available at that time. The County stated that July of 2005 is the desired date for final preliminary approval, at which time the alignment would be selected and have detail very similar to what is currently available on the layout sheets. ROUTE TO: file COPY TO: Hennepin County Memo Transportation Department Design Division 1600 Prairie Drive Medina MN 55340-5421 DATE: April 21, 2005 TO: Guy Nowlan Mark Stafne File FROM: Nick Peterson SUBJECT: Driveway realignment and cul de sac site meeting minutes Recycled Paper Phone: 763-745-7664 Fax: 763-478-4000 TDD: 763-478-4030 This memo serves as a summary of the site meeting held on April 21, 2005 at the intersection of 24" Avenue and CSAH 101 in Plymouth, MN. A site visit of other locations within the project followed the meeting with the residents. Attendees: Guy Nowlan, Hennepin County Nick Peterson, Hennepin County Mark Stafne, Hennepin County Steve Hukriede, Resident - City of Plymouth Bob Moore, Resident - City of Plymouth Summary: This meeting provided a chance for residents to see and discuss the County's proposed changes to their existing driveway and the impact of a cul de sac on 24th Ave. The County answered resident questions after staking the approximate location of the proposed new driveway alignment and cul de sac. As a result of the meeting and site visit: Residents Have stakes indicating the edge of the proposed future driveway in their front yards. Had questions answered regarding the proposed alignment. Hennepin County - Design Acquired information regarding the location of an existing watermain on the north end of the existing driveway, passing through the front of the Hukriede lot. Noted 2505 Queensland driveway is on front of house, not side. Noted that house east of 17830 25th Ave is for sale. Noted that 17735 26th Ave. N. driveway is split, with the western portion going down to the side of the house with significant relief while the east half goes to the front of the house, Retaining wall would be required here. Please contact me at 763-745-7664 with any questions that you have. Rev. 07/03) CADocuments and Settings\rquanbec.CITYCENTER\Local Settings\Temporary Intemet Files\OLK722\050421-Memo-24thAve-HC#141- 9516.doc RECORD OF MEETING Hennepin County / City of Plymouth CSAH 101; County Project 9516 Thursday - April 28th, 2005 - 4:00 p.m. DOCUMENTED BY: Guy Nowlan / Nick Peterson LOCATION OF MEETING: City of Plymouth, Engineering Conference Room of City Hall SUBJECT: Neighborhood meeting to review realignment of 251h and 26th Avenues ATTENDEES: NAME REPRESENTING PHONE Guy Nowlan Hennepin County, Trans. Dept. (Des) 763-745-7655 Nick Peterson Hennepin County, Trans. Dept. (Des) 763-745-7664 Sharon Dix Hennepin County, Trans. Dept (R/W) 763-745-7508 Dan Campbell City of Plymouth, Engr. Dept. 763-509-5522 John Hite Resident -17830 25th Ave. N. 763-478-0465 (h) 612-751-5181 (c) hitefam@mchsi.com Lisa Eidenschink Resident- 2580 Queensland 763-258-0788 Lori Brandt Resident- 18000 26th Ave. N. N/A Peggy Snow Resident- 17925 26th Ave. N. 763-475-3994 psnowmn@mac.com John Miller Resident- 18100 26th Ave. N. 952-258-3024 Continued on reverse side _Yes _x No) SUMMARY OF PROJECT & MEETING: 0 See attached notes: Attendee Map. A meeting was held to inform the residents of the latest desim nation for the intersection of 101 and 25th &26th Avenues Most of the invited residents (invited by telephone) attended the meeting The graphical depiction of invited residents and residents that attended is attached. The chain of communication for attendees that were not originally invited to the meeting: Snow informed Eidenschink Eidenschink informed Brandt and Miller. The owner of 17820 25th Ave did not attend This design option would make 25th and 26th Avenues line up and perpendicularly intersect CSAH 101 This option would require that land be purchased: some green space from 17925 (Snow), total acquisition of 17830 (Hite), and green space from 17820 (Radhi). Continued on reverse side — x _Yes No) SUMMARY OF COMMENTS FROM MEETING: The general group asked why the project was necessary. The City and County both explained: o functional classifications of roadways o how 25/261h are planned as minor collectors possibly necessitating future collinear alignment o how improvement to road has been planned for over ten years o that a pathway has been planned for corridor o how pathway could necessitate an intersection of the type presented. Owner of 17820 25`h Avenue North did not attend. Attendees all said that they didn't think they received any meeting notice cards for the previous Public Information Meetings. Ms. Brandt and Mr. Miller asked that we consider a skew intersection. The County explained its preference for a perpendicular intersection. Ms. Brandt and Mr. Miller asked that other alignment options be considered. The County explained that this alignment was created by selecting it from a number of other concept options because it restricted the direct effects of this portion of the project to only three properties. Mr. Hite asked what the protocol was for business owners/rental property owners when they are unable to find replacement tenants for their properties. The County briefly explained the acquisition process, but was unable to explain the rental question. The County noted that several items of the acquisition process are negotiable and that the rental portion may be; negotiable as well. Mr. Hite and others asked whether he should perform maintenance and/or improvements. The County noted that maintenance may be required by local laws. The County further noted that while improvements may be negotiable as part of the acquisition process, careful consideration is necessary prior to making any improvements to the property. Residents asked when the next meeting will be held. The County noted that it will be held on May 12, 2005 at the County's Public Works Facility in Medina, MN. ACTION ITEMS: Request additional information from R/W Division regarding how rental properties are acquired and/or reimbursed for their sales loss. ROUTE TO: file COPY TO: Guy Nowlan, Mark Stafne, File 11 Sharon Dix (R/W) RECORD OF MEETING Hennepin County Transportation Department DOCUMENTED BY: Gene Willms PROJECT: 101/9516 LOCATION OF MEETING: Oakwood Elementary School DATE: May 3, 2005 TIME: 8:00 a.m. SUBJECT: Oakwood Elementary School Property ATTENDEES: See attached list NAME REPRESENTING PHONE EMAIL Gene Willms Hennepin County 763-745-7665 gene.willms c,co.hennepin.mn.us Guy Nowlan Hennepin County 763-745-7655 guy.nowlan@co.hennepin.mn.us Dennis Grasmick Oakwood Elementary School 763-745-5710 dennis.Qrasmick(cr wayzata.kl2.mn.us Joe Matson Wayzata Public Schools 763-745-5150 joe.matson@wayzata.kl2.mn.us Continued on reverse side Yes _ X No) DETAILS OF MEETING: ® See attached notes We introduced ourselves and Guy informed Dennis and Joe of the upcoming open house project meeting scheduled for May 12 2005 at the Hennepin County Public Works facility in Medina. Also stated was the project is scheduled to begin in April of 2008 We discussed the school property and the probable impacts to the property. Attached is a bullet list of items discussed and a section for Actions to Take. ROUTE TO: Continued on reverse side Yes No) See Attached X Yes No) COPY TO: File: 101/9516, G. Nowlan. CSAH 101; County project 9516 Oakwood Elementary School Meeting Minutes 5-3-05 School Property Facts: o School constructed mid 1950's. o City of Plymouth Park & Recreation leases approximately 75% of school property. o School rumored to have been constructed on gravel pit. Items Discussed: o The trail on the south side of the property between CSAH 6 and the south parking lot/fire lane is named Saunders after a teacher. o Busses enter the school grounds from the entrance on CSAH 101 and use the service road to line up at the west school entrance. o Early August, after soccer tournament, would be the best and preferred time to reconstruct entrance. The intent is to complete construction after summer athletic activities late July and prior to the beginning of the new school year which begins after Labor Day. One of the two entrances must be open at all times. o School is in attendance between 7:40 a.m. and 2:30 p.m. School year starts after Labor Day and this year ends June 9, 2005. Anticipate an early June school year ending in the future. o Dennis would like to discourage pedestrians, students in particular from leaving the school property and crossing either CSAH 6 or CSAH 101. There hasn't been a recent problem. o Dennis and Joe would like to see the fire lane moved to the east and the curve flattened. This would improve sight distance. Joe would like 8' in back of retaining wall. Guy said the proposed wall faces CSAH 101 and didn't have a height available. o The playfield west of the school building is used primarily for physical education purposes. There are some uses like T ball but the construction impacts would not impair their use of the playfields. o North of entrance road from CSAH 101 there are storage buildings, warming house, pad mounted transformer, softball field, hockey rink and skating rink. o Trail through woods is a city trail. o The school does not have a sprinkler system. o Civil defense siren in the center of the school property. o School property may have been a gravel pit at one time. o Wood chips dumped adjacent to wetland on NE comer of 19`h Avenue and CSAH 101. o Land exchange: The legal description of the land being obtained must be approved by a lawyer representing the school district, then taken to the school board. The school board acts on items once a month. o Discussed utility locations. o A fox frequents the area north and west of the Central Services building. Not in the project area. Drainage: o There is a storm water outlet from the parking lot to the wetland (Kreatz Lake) on the north side of 196'Ave. o Storm water in the front parking lot flows to the east onto CSAH 6 o (Water collected in the north parking lot flows to a catch basin and probably flows to wetlands.) ??? o West side of school and north of play area, flow is trough culverts under the service road / fire lane. CSAH 101; County project 9516 Oakwood Elementary School Meeting Minutes 5-3-05 Utilities: o Fiber optic along CSAH 6. o A power switch is located at the (west) entrance to school property (on the north side). o Gas from CSAH 6. o Water loop from CSAH 6 (in two places). o Power to school from CSAH 101. o Fiber optic from the east along 19`h Ave. N. to Central Services building and then across field to school. o Gas and electric come into school administration building at 19`h Ave. N. o Sanitary sewer location wasn't determined, thought to be from CSAH 6. o No sprinkler system. o Gas and electric from CSAH 101 to Central Services building. Suggested Design Info: o Move fire lane to the east allowing for eight feet between face of proposed wall and edge of bituminous. Result would be to flattened curves on each end and improved sight distance. o Provide the described parapet and rail if wall is in cut as stated.. o Provide project coordination with the school during construction. o Replace existing path on SW corner of property leading to traffic signal. School District Approval Process: o Submit plan and description of proposed project. o School Director of Business will present to school board. o Work session is likely. o Board acts once per month. o Process duration is 2 to 3 months. Contacts: o Dan Lower, playfield schedule. o Mark Peterson, Park Superintendent o Eric Blank, Director Plymouth Park and Recreation 763-509-5201 o Alan Hopeman, Wayzata School District Executive Director of Business o Joe Matson, Director, Buildings and Grounds Wayzata Public Schools o Dennis Grasmick, Principal Oakwood Elementary School o Stan Scofield, Plymouth Fire Inspector Actions Steps: o Research ownership of the civil defense siren located at the property center and how its wired. o Review history of school flashers and determine if they will be continued. What is the usage criteria? o Check city code for fire lane dimensions. o Provide a cross section on CSAH 101 to show the wall height and if wall is in cut or fill. It was stated at the meeting the wall was in cut but actually looked in fill when driving past. o Meet with Plymouth Park & Recreation Director to discuss past and future lease plan. Is mapping available? o Add Dennis and Joe to project mailing list or start an email list for those not on the mailing list. o Add bus company to utility listing. RECORD OF MEETING Hennepin County / City of Plymouth CSAH 101; County Project 9516 Wednesday - May 11th, 2005 - 1:00 p.m. DOCUMENTED BY: Guy Nowlan / Nick Peterson LOCATION OF MEETING: City of Plymouth, Council Room of City Hall SUBJECT: Public Information meeting to review layout #2 with commercial property owners ATTENDEES: NAME REPRESENTING PHONE Guy Nowlan Hennepin County, Trans. Dept. (Des) 763-745-7655 Nick Peterson Hennepin County, Trans. Dept. (Des) 763-745-7664 Doran Cote City of Plymouth, PW Dept. Dan Campbell City of Plymouth, Engr. Dept. 763-509-5522 Anne Hurlburt City of Plymouth, Comm. Dev. Dept. 763-509-5400 Ron Quanbeck City of Plymouth, Engr. Dept 763-509-5525 Rick Repasky Rick's Market 763-473-1561 Dave Johnson Oakwood Square 763-473-1525 Ronna Woolery Plymouth Colony 763-475-1679 Jan Allen Northwest Animal Hospital 763-475-2448 Fred Retzloff Wayzata School District, Trans. Dept. 763-745-5196 Continued on reverse sine ,res _x_ivo) SUMMARY OF PROJECT & MEETING: See attached notes: A meeting was held to inform the businesses located near the south end of the project about the latest proposed layout (#2) The meeting was held in the Plymouth City Council Room at Plymouth City Hall. Business owners generally agreed that something needs to be done at the intersections at the south end. and that the rest of the project should help improve safety along the corridor. Only five commercial and school properties were represented at the meeting,althoughlthough 14 were invited to attend. Continued on reverse side – x —Yes No) SUMMARY OF COMMENTS FROM MEETING: Dave Johnson (Oakwood Square on SE corner) noted that the right -in entrance off of 101 is not acceptable to him as it is currently proposed. He was concerned about the loss of parking stalls for his business and the circulation of traffic on his site because his other access to the south is so far away and difficult to navigate now. Ronna Woolery (Plymouth Colony apartment complex., next to Rick's) requested that a traffic light be considered for the Rick's/Plymouth Colony entrance. Ms. Woolery was concerned about safety and about traffic control for traffic accessing their sites. She was also concerned about the on-site dumpster, but advised that the dumpster would be fully considered during detail design. Jan Allen (Northwest Animal Hospital) did not like the closure of the road adjacent to her property Merrimac Lane) and did not like the loss of property due to widening and realignment. The property owners were interested in developing some of the existing green space on site. Fred Retzloff said he favored the project. Rick Repasky said he agreed with the idea of the project, but was concerned that his large truck delivery traffic will not be able to circulate his site. He further noted that he did not want his south entrance to be right in/right out. Mr. Repasky stated an interest in a traffic signal for his north entrance. ACTION ITEMS: The following three attendees requested enlarged layout prints of their sites: o Mr. Repasky (Rick's) o Ms. Allen (NW Animal Hospital) o Mr. Johnson (Oakwood Square) Discuss the Animal Hospital site with Doran Cote (City of Plymouth). Large truck turning movements need to be analyzed (AutoTurn) for Rick's. The south entrance of Rick's (common intersection with the apartments and school across the street) should be studied for traffic signal warrants. This action was requested by several attendees. The north entrance for Oakwood Square should be studied to determine whether the proposed turn lane can be altered to lessen the impact on parking, and lessen the impact on traffic flow. The south entrance should be designed to allow for left turns. There is a daycare behind the building, precluding the routing of any traffic behind the building. ROUTE TO: file COPY TO: Guy Nowlan, Mark Stafne, File CSAH 101 - PROJECT 9516 COMMENT CARD CONCERNS FROM THE MAY 12TH MEETING LESSEN IMPACTS AT 17925 26TH AVE. (PER 18000 26TH AVE) 17925 26T" AVE. WANTS IMPACTS TO 17925 26TH AVE LESSENED. CONCERNED ABOUT POLLUTION, DEBRIS (SALT/SAND/SOIL, ETC.), AND NOISE DURING AND AFTER CONSTRUCTION. CONCERNED ABOUT TREE REMOVAL, FOUNDATION DAMAGE, EXPOSURE TO TRAFFIC AT REALIGNED INTERSECTION ALLOWING TRAFFIC TO HIT HOUSE. 17910 28TH NEEDS TO BE STAKED. 2740 QUEENSLAND IS CONCERNED ABOUT SPEED, NOISE, AIR QUALITY. ALSO WONDERS WHY WE NEED 2 - 8' TRAILS ARE REQUIRED (ONE ON EACH SIDE). 2116 MERRIMAC DOES NOT LIKE EAST PATHWAY BEING SO HIGH AND THINKS PATHWAY SHOULD BE ON OTHER (WEST) SIDE. DOES NOT LIKE RETAINING WALL BETWEEN 19TH AND MERRIMAC. PREFERS AS MUCH SLOPE AS POSSIBLE; DUE TO AESTHETIC CONCERNS. 1794024 TH AVE. REQUESTED PLAN VIEW BE SENT BY MAIL. 1800526 TH AVE. WANTS TRAFFIC SIGNAL. ALSO WANTS SIGHT DISTANCE STUDIED AT 28TH AVE, PARTICULARLY TO THE NORTH. COMMENT CARD CONCERNS FROM THE MAY 11TH MEETING DAVE JOHNSON (OAKWOOD SQUARE ON SE CORNER) NOTED THAT THE RIGHT -IN ENTRANCE OFF OF 101 IS NOT ACCEPTABLE TO HIM AS IT IS CURRENTLY PROPOSED. HE WAS CONCERNED ABOUT THE LOSS OF PARKING STALLS FOR HIS BUSINESS AND THE CIRCULATION OF TRAFFIC ON HIS SITE BECAUSE HIS OTHER ACCESS TO THE SOUTH IS SO FAR AWAY AND DIFFICULT TO NAVIGATE NOW. RONNA WOOLERY (PLYMOUTH COLONY APARTMENT COMPLEX, NEXT TO RICK'S) REQUESTED THAT A TRAFFIC LIGHT BE CONSIDERED FOR THE RICK'S/PLYMOUTH COLONY ENTRANCE. MS. WOOLERY WAS CONCERNED ABOUT SAFETY AND ABOUT TRAFFIC CONTROL FOR TRAFFIC ACCESSING THEIR SITES. SHE WAS ALSO CONCERNED ABOUT THE ON-SITE DUMPSTER, BUT ADVISED THAT THE DUMPSTER WOULD BE FULLY CONSIDERED DURING DETAIL DESIGN. JAN ALLEN (NORTHWEST ANIMAL HOSPITAL) DID NOT LIKE THE CLOSURE OF THE ROAD ADJACENT TO HER PROPERTY (MERRIMAC LANE) AND DID NOT LIKE THE LOSS OF PROPERTY DUE TO WIDENING AND REALIGNMENT. THE PROPERTY OWNERS WERE INTERESTED IN DEVELOPING SOME OF THE EXISTING GREEN SPACE ON SITE. FRED RETZLOFF (WAYZATA SCHOOLS) SAID HE FAVORED THE PROJECT. RICK REPASKY (RICK'S MARKET) SAID HE AGREED WITH THE IDEA OF THE PROJECT, BUT WAS CONCERNED THAT HIS LARGE TRUCK DELIVERY TRAFFIC WILL NOT BE ABLE TO CIRCULATE HIS SITE. HE FURTHER NOTED THAT HE DID NOT WANT HIS SOUTH ENTRANCE TO BE RIGHT IN/RIGHT OUT. MR. REPASKY STATED AN INTEREST IN A TRAFFIC SIGNAL FOR HIS NORTH ENTRANCE. Residents in attendance: Dan Gutlovics 2625 County Road 101 Plymouth, MN 55447 Jen & David Baugh 2500 Queensland Lane N. Plymouth, MN 55447 Jossette Repke 17730 - 26th Avenue N. Plymouth, MN 55447 Issues Raised: CSAH 101 NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING May 31, 2005 5:30 pm Dave & Ellen Osmonson 17735 - 26th Avenue N. Plymouth, MN 55447 Peggy Snow 17725 - 26th Avenue N. Plymouth, MN 55447 Braden Canfield 2510 Queensland Lane N. Plymouth, MN 55447 Drainage in rear yard at 2510 Queensland Lane Cookie & Ernie Kulas 2505 Queensland Lane N. Plymouth, MN 55447 Heidi Gardner 2515 Queensland Lane N. Plymouth, MN 55447 Driveway onto CSAH 101 at 2625 County Road 101 (possibly relocate onto 26`h Avenue) Tuck under garage at 17735 — 26`h Avenue N. — accessibility Tuck under garage at 2505 Queensland Lane N. — grades Tuck under garage at 17830 — 26`h Avenue N. - grades Pond area behind 17730 — 26`h Avenue N. — plantings installed around pond Need for traffic signal at CSAH 101 and 25`h/26`h Avenue realigned intersection. Desire by some residents on west side of CSAH 101 to have houses purchased — add median, realign roadway to the west Screening via landscaping, trees and/or privacy fences Impacts from noise and air pollution. Right-of-way acquisition process Impacts to yards from proposed cul-de-sacs Need to cut down grades south of 24`h Avenue O:\Engincenng\PROIECIS\2000-2009\5102\Ltrs\101_Mtg_Attmdance 5_31.doc Project Category: Project Title: r CIP 2005-2009 Street Projects CR 101 - CR 6 to CR 24 Project Number: S-8 Total Estimated Cost (2005 dollars): $8,371,000 Year of Construction: 2005 % 2006 10% 2007 90 % 2008 % 2009 % Description: This project reconstructs County Road 101 from County Road 6 to County Road 24. Right-of-way acquisition and design is scheduled to take place in 2006, and construction to take place in 2007. Construction will result in the expansion of the current two-lane configuration to increase capacity. Funding Source(s): 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Minnesota State Aid Fund $420,000 $210,000 Hennepin County/Federal Gov. $420,000 $7,321,000 Describe project need and relationship to Council Goals, Comprehensive Plan, and other established plans: Hennepin County has included this project in its C.I.P. as described. The proposed cross section and impacts on adjacent properties are not yet available. Federal funding in the amount of $5,445,000 will be used for this project. Effect on Operating Costs: Hennepin County is responsible for County Road 101 so no additional operating costs are expected for the City from this project. aA City of Plymouth 2005-2009 Capital Improvements Program Street Projects 2006 Street Project Community Special Replacement State/Federal Administration Improvement Proiect Title Assessments Fund MSA Fund County Bontls Donations Fund Fund Total Comments S-1 Re lace Retaining walls 420,000 420,000 840,000 Phase 1 of 2 S-8 CR 101 - CR 6 w CR 24 - Desi n & ROW 40,000 2,515,000 40,000 from Ma le (1— ro S - 9S-9 Street Reconstruction - District 5 & Hemlock 805,000 1,670,000 1,325,000 S-10 Street Reconstruction - District 34 500,000 825,000 935,000 Additiona15935,0001ikel S-11 Cheshire Lane - Glacier Vista to CR 47 935,000 15,000 50,000 view RR Crossin Im ovements 35,000viewLane &CamDrive - Overla 400,000400,000 385,000 55,000 440,000 fic Si als - Two Intersections 400,000 MPincvicw an Lane & CR 10 Intersection 400,000 400,000 State Brid aFunds th Shore Drive Brid a Re la«ment 100,000300,000 250,000 Phase 1 of 2 24 - 30th Avenue to CR 101 - Desi n & ROW 125,000 125,000 Total 1,305,000 3,091,000 2,300,000 900,000 0 40,000 0 15,000 7,651,000 Cheshire & CR 47, and CR 10 & Trenton Lane City of Plymouth 2005-2009 Capital Improvements Program Street Projects 2007 Street Project Community Special Replacement Stale/Federal Administration Improvement Project Assessments Fund MSA Fund Count dsBonDonations Fund Fund Total Comments Number Proiect Title 50,000 S - I Replace Retaining50,000Walls 210,000 7,321,000 7,531, Phase 2 of 2 S-8 CR 101 - CR6 to CR 24 - Construction 95,000 846000 941,000 Phase 2 of 2 S-17 CR 24 - 30th Avenue to CR 101 •Construction 710,000 Part of Fembrook project S -IS Traffic Signals - Three Intersections • 710,000 800,000 1,000,000Fed1,800,000 Scope and schedule depend on s- 19 Fernbrook Lane - 27th Ave to 34th Ave 400,000 S-2 0 Nathan Lane/10th/131h - Overlay17,500 400,000 157,500 175,000 Local Match 10% S-21 Railroad Safetyimprovements - West Med Lake Dr 1.275,000 S-22 Street Reconstruction - District 78 595,000 680,000 2,365,000 S-23 Street Reconstruction -District 76 1,140,000 1,225,000 1,735,000 2,355,000 1,832,500 9,324,500 0 0 0 0 15,247,000 w Total ON 1 27th & Fembrook, 34th & Fembrook, and Harbor Lane & Fernbrook va+a•: 1.13 11ankw Dal•: 1211403 2004-2008 TRANSPORTATION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM THRI WWI QlmV" Tbm: 07:91 AM Aa appl o by RaaObAloa 603-l2484R1 a0 oo • ba. 16, 2003 199L-- VALUES 04 THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS) 2006 PROGRAMMED EXPENDITURES PRIOR 2006 COSTS TOTAL STATE STATE COUNTY YEARS BUDGET • BEYONO • PROJECT COUNTY AIO AID FEDERAL BRIDGE ROAD OTHER ROAD PROJ PROJECT LOCATIONIOESCRIPTION APPROP A PROP 2006 BUDGET TAR MUN REO AID BONDS BONDS REVENUE PRIOR YEARS' OBLIGATIONS: 61 9112 N OF CSAM 3. TH 7 1 G.S.SIG RNI 1.000 1,000 61 9112 N OF CSAR 3 - TH 71 G.S.SIG CSERV 350 350 646 BI 9112 N OF CSAR 3 - TM 71 G.S.SIG 6.469 6,460 20 5.600 103 9239 S OF CANOLEWOOO - CSAH 301 G.S.SIG RM Goo 400 1.000 103 9239 S OF CANDLEWOOD • CSAH 301 G.S.SIG 200 100 7.691 9.1% 90 10 2046 NEW PROJECTS: 300 2006 SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS 500 500 20 160 1 9618 E OF E JCT 4 - E OF TH 2121G.S.SIG RM 1,600 1.690 640 640 1 9616 E OF E JCT 4 • E OF TH 2121G,S,SIG 11.400 11,400 19619 W OF W JCT 4 • E OF E JCT 4 /G.S,SIG RNV 690 690 109 1 9519 W OF W JCT 4 • E OF E JCT 4 /G,S,SIG 3,962 3,962 963 2.990 5 0205 AT HUTCHINSON SPUR / BR REPLACEMENT Soo 506 248 166 46 20 22 9338 MINNEHAHA PKWY (WB) - LAKE ST A G, S. SIG 5,860 10.000 15.100 5.274 566 24 9617 E OF CSAR 101 • 0.4 MITE E / G. S RNV 250 280 125 125 24 9617 E OF CSAH 101 -OA MILE E / G. S 940 940 28 0022 W OF TO N OF CP RR / PARTICIPATION 730 730 730 46 9742 46TH • LAKE ST I G.S.SIG RNV 250 250 500 125 125 10 48 9742 16TH - LAKE ST 1 G,S,SIO 100 12,842 12,942 20 70 73 0206 AT BNSF RR I BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 1,459 1.459 321 662 220 36 61 9647 GRADE SEPARATE TH 1691 PARTICIPATION 8247 8247 6247 01 0116 N OF TH 100 - N OF CSAM 101 G.S.SIG CSERV 852 652 8,107 901 011 e N OF TH 100 - N OF CSAR 101 G.S.SIG 9,006 9,0086t Ot 9316 5 OF CSAH 6 - S OF CSAR 241 G.S,SIG RNV 840 a" 420 420 101 9516 S OF CSAH 6. 5 OF CSAR 24 1 G,S,SIG 7.529 7,528 1019N 7 N OF CSAR 62 - N OF CSAR 31 G. S. SIG RAY Gm 609 1200 B00 101 9917 N OF CSAR 62 - N OF CSAH 3 / G, S, SIG CSERV 700 700 101 9917 N OF CSAH 62 • N OF CSAR 3/ G. S. SIG 6,866 6,880 1019931 N OF CSAR 5 • TH 121 G. S. Sr. RAN 1.300 1,300 100 1200 101 9931 N OF CSAH 5 - TH 12 / G, S. SIG CSERV 1,300 1.300 101 9931 N OF CSAR S - TH 121 G, S. SIG 8,776 9,776 2006 SIKEWAY DEVELOPMENT PARTICIPATION 100 100 100 2006 BKEWAY PROGRAM - DISCRETIONARY 100 too 100 2006 CONSULTANT SERVICES - MISCELLANEOUS 450 450 90 360 2006 HARDSHIP RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITION 30 30 30 2006 INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM IRS) PROJECTS 125 125 40 a3 2006 MAPLE GROVE RAY REIMBURSEMENT (CP 9635) 70 70 70 2006 MINNEAPOLIS SIGNAL PARTICIPATION 100 100 10 90 2006 MWDOT SIGNAL PARTICIPATION 60 80 20 90 2006 MISCELLANEOUS STRUCTURE REPAIRS 60 00 00 2006 RAILROAD CROSSING PARTICIPATION 25 25 25 2006 ROADSIDE ENHANCEMENT PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM 600 600 600 2006 SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT 80 80 20 60 SUB -TOTAL PRIOR YEARS OSUOATIONS 2,150 6,556 6296 17,014 20 0 5,890 + 0 0 3,958 266 16354 0 GSSG 5290 SUBTOTAL 2006 NEW PROJECTS 3,792 37.131 58.955 99.167 1,100 0 10,096 2006 TOTALS 5.942 43,700 67.252 116,895 1.200 0 15.966 3,936 266 16,354 5.936 CARRYOVER FROMLAST YEAR 0 2,356 (37262) NEW APPORTIONMENTS 1200 1,501 11,150 CARRYOVER TO NEXT YEAR 0 3,966 (42,156) PR0IAGIONAL PROJECTS 2006 PROVISIONAL PROJECTS: Than plajaets an /Rehafad In M F4691661 a4lh)aet b Qil apP1d lar Iada/01 MI6 Rn6M e. M 616339226EOFCSAR20 • E OF MEADOWBROOK I G,S,SIG AAAI ara4a 4044 aM14359229EOFCSAM20 • E OF MEADOWBROOK I G.S.SIG CSAR 9 • FAIRVIEW AVE.I GS RAW 1435 CSAM 9 •FAIRVMWAVE./G.S J40.9 61 9230 N OF BNSF RR - HILLOWAY RD I G,S,SIG RNV 619230 N OF BNSF RR • HILLOWAY RD I G,S,SIG 153 0116 FREMONT AVE - MISS. RNER / G,S.SIG 136 0016 TM 55 - 10 AVE I SIP y,.p...e.w-Vwalon Dab: t71t9g7 2D04-2008 TRANSPORTATION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM T..w D.u: olmuw T— 07:06 AM Aa SPPaa••4 OY Raaa4ullon 103.17•f64R1 an DaownOa 1{, 7007 2007 VALUES IN THOUSANDS OF OOLLARII 7 PRQGKA MMEIINDT7URES PRIOR 2007 eosnTOTAL STAYlA1liBUDGET • BEYONO • ROJlC7 COUNTY AIL BRIDGE ROAD OTNlR,• 46 9742 46TH • URE ST / G.S.SIG RAN Soo 100 100 500 12,942 40 9742 46TH - LAKE ST / G.S.SIG 30 100 100 12.142 125 103 9231 S OF CANDLEWOOD • CSAH 30 / G.S.SIG R/W 600 10 400 1.000 103 9239 S OF CAMDLEWOOD • CSAH 301 G.S.SIG 70 300 3.249 3,949 6.1" 2007 NEW PROJECTS: 2500 600 500 9 300 2007 SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS 204,049 17,091 22.64( 1,16030,195 237112 1 9616 E OF E JCT 4 - E OF TH 212 /G,S,SIG RMV 1,660 0 3,9" 1.630 1 9616 E OF E JCT 4 - E OF TH 2121G,S,SIG 11,553 0 1,400 10.000 11,400 22 9336 WNNEHAHA PKWY (m) . LAKE ST I G. S. SIG 5,660 10,000 13,660 22 9442 56TH ST • MINNEHAHA PKWY (WB)/ G. S. SIG 500 4,504 5,004 24 9617 E OF CSAR 101 • 0.4 MILE E / G. S R/W 250 250 940 24 N17 E OF CSAH 101 - 0,4 MILE E / G. 5 940 ri16 5 OF CSAR S. - S OF CSAH 241 G,S,SIG RIW 440 640 S`r 101too" 5 OF CSAR 6 • 5 OF CSAN 241 G.S.SIG 7,529 7.1121 101 9917 N OF CSAH 92 - N OF CSAH 31 G. S. SIG RIW 600 600 1700 700 101 IT N OF CSAR 62 - N OF CSAR 31 G. S. SIG CSERV 700 101 9917 N OF CSAR 62. N OF CSAR 3 I G. S. SIG 6.1166 11'11" 101 9931 N OF CSAH 5-TH 121 G. 5, SIG RIW 1,300 1 m 101 9931 N OF CSAR S - TH 1210 S SIG DES 1,300 1,300 101 9931 N OF CSAR 5-TH 121 G. 5, SIG 2007 BIKEWAY DEVELOPMENT PARTICIPATION 2007 BIKEWAY PROGRAM - DISCRETIONARY 2007 CONSULTANT SERVICES - MISCELLANEOUS 2007 WARDSHIP RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITION 2007 INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM OTS) PROJECTS 2007 MAPLE GROVE RAN REIMBURSEMENT (CP 96351 2007 MINNEAPOLIS SIGNAL PARTICIPATION 2007 MN100T SIGNAL PARTICIPATION 2001 MISCELLANEOUS STRUCTURE REPAIRS 2007 RAILROAD CROSSING PARTICIPATION 2007 ROADSIDE ENHANCEMENT PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM 2007 SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT SUB -TOTAL PRIOR YEARS- OBLIGATIONS SUB -TOTAL 2007 NEW PROJECTS 1 NOT TOTAL& 1 CARRYOVER FROM LAST YEAR NEW APPORTIONMENTS CARRYOVER TO NEXT YEAR 1 ICJO W CO UNE - W OF W JCT CSAR 4 l G.9 12 6740 CSAH 13. CSAN 144 I G.S WIN 12 6740 CSAH 13 - CSAH I"I G,5 30 9324 E OF CR 20'2. TH 1091 G.S.SIG R/AI 30 0324 E OF CR 202 - TH 1691 G.S.SIG 73 9231 N OF CEDAR LAKE RD - S OF 1.3941 G -S RAN 73 9231 N OF CEDAR LAKE RD - S OF 1,394 1 G.5 202 9929 TOREN AVE - ENSIGN AVE / G,S e 776 1,776 1.500 2.530 100 100 100100100 50450450 303030 20125125 707070 10120120 107070 707070 25 2500 6006009 40100IN 204,049 17,091 22.64( 1,16030,195 237112 66,00 4,030 34.2" 40,373 44' 5 20 20 60 10 1.555 ISO 1.260 5,000 390 646 1,376 5.065 200 10 394 300 140 S.D00 SO 24 206 6Do 6.666 100 100 50 400 30 20 105 70 10 110 10 60 70 25 600 40 20 0 3.625 0 0 0 404 1,160 0 10,512 s "5 0 0 13.058 1700 0 14,137 5.445 ^ 0 0 13.482 0 3,9" 42.158) 1,200 1,645 11,553 0 5,631 44,737) TMw P1•Y•roa an —k"" In Ob P19laa skit p b tMk aOpAs+61IoF hdaaa6 and NdYq w w M wanl abb Nd }uafa Meana waOWM. e O to 10 30 DO DO v.r i oe _tm ArrwGvtO c,r .. 2005.2009 TRANSPORTATION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM A9 Approved by ResokrdOn S 04-12-509111 on December 14, 2004 2006 VALUES W TNOUSANOS OF DOLLARS) VMk.: 1.06 Ver9ien Dew: 12/14N4 Print Ow: 12120104 Tw-: 07:03 AM MMED EXPENDITURES 1,600 PRIOR 2006 COSTS TOTAL STATE STATE YEARS SUDOET • BEYOND • PROJECT COUNTY AID AID FEDERAL BRIDOE ROAD OTHER n mune R... REVENII 9711 27TH AVE -WEST RIVER PKWY f G,S.SK: CSERV 17T 600 77r 8 ]00 517 el 376" 124 3 9741 27TH AVE • WEST RIVER PKWY I G,S,SIG 6,000 300 1,600 3 9754 E OF DUPONT - E OF 1.35W / G,S,SIG CSERV 1101' 1101 6,100• x,000 210 7 9751 E OF DUPONT - E OF 05W i G.S.SKi 1,160 2240 61 6637 N OF BREN ROAD - S OF CSAM 31 G,S,SIG R/W 530 200 730 6 700 100 100 17 4/ 5637 N OF BREN ROAD. S OF CSAR 3/ G,S.SIG 6263 317 103 9239 S OF CANDLEWOOO • CSAM 30l G,S,SIG RNV 600 400 14770 1-000 11,070 156s 107 9239 5 OF CANOLEWOOD • CSAM 301 G,S,SIG 200 too 20% NEW PROJECTS: 500 500 10 190 300 2006 SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS 1 9619 W OF W JCT 4 - E OF E JCT 4 /G,S,SIG R/W 796 7,679 726 3,679 1,121 2.560 196 1 9619 W OF W JCT 1 - E OF E JCT 4 IG,S.SIG 9713 W OF DAKOTA AV • W OF TM 1001 G,S,SIG R/W 215 21 S 2'737 4112,]x6 3 9745 W OF DAKOTA AV - W OF TH 1001 G.S,SIG 2.737 3 0004 LYNDALE AVE - OAKLAND AVFJSTREETSCAPE 1.551 1.551 369 777 ]66 3 0205 AT HUTCHINSON SPUR I OR REPLACEMENT RAN 50 So 503 25 25 40 228 180 71 5 0205 AT HUTCHNSON SPUR I OR REPLACEMENT OOS 22 9336 MINNEMIINA PKWY (WB) • LAKE ST I G. S, SIG 2,000 7.910 9,910 700 1.700 24 %17 E OF CSAH 101 - 0.1 MILE E I G, S RJW 250 2,161 250 x,161 1x6125 24 9617 E OF CSAR 101 - 0.4 MILE E I G. S 26 0022 W OF TO N OF CP RR 1 PARTICIPATION 7]0 770 730 46 9742 46TM • LAKE ST 1 G,S.SIG RJW 250 100 150 9.652 500 9,552 50 46 9742 46TH. LAKE ST I G.S.SIG 61 0010 AT HCRRA I BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 1,012 1,012 116 610 200 73 0206 AT 13NSF RR / BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 1,452 1,132 267 760 ]75 17 61 9947 GRADE SEPARATE TH 1691 PARTICIPATION 6.230 9250 9,250 61 0116 N OF TH 100 - N OF CSAM 101 G,S,SIG RIW 2,000 552 1.000 1.000 e1 0116 N OF TH 100 • N OF CSAR 101 G,S,SIG CSERV 652 9,560 9.360 61 0118 N OF TM 100 • N OF CSAH 101 G.S,SIc 210 101 9316 S OF CSAR 6 • S OF CSAH 24 I G,S,SIG RIW 20 420 940 9,559 x10 101 9516 S OF CSAH 6 • S OF CSAM 241 G,S,SIG 9,559 600 101 9917 N OF CSAR 62 • N OF CSAM 3 10, S, SIG R/d 600 600 700 101 9917 NOF CSAM 62•N OF CS/J171 G, S, SIG CSERV 700 6216 6216 101 9917 N OF CSAR 62 • N OF CSAR ] / G. S. SIG 1,700 101 9931 N OF CSAM S - TM 121 G. S. 510 RJIN 1,300 1300 1,300 1,300 101 9931 N OF CSAM 5 • TM 121G. S. SIG CSERV 11230 11250 101 9931 N OF CSAM S • TH 12 / G, S. SIG 2.500 121 9522 CONNECTION TO Cit 202 5.000 5.000 2500 25050 202 0101 109TH AVE - EW CREEK ROADKi, 5 CSERV 535 335 900 35 765 135900 202 o4W 109TH AVE • ELM CREEK ROADIG, S 2006 BIKEWAY DEVELOPMENT PARTICIPATION too 100 100 2006 BIKEWAY PROGRAM • DISCRETIONARYDISCRETIONARY100ONARY 100 100 360 2006 CONSULTANT SERVICES. MISCELLANEOUS 450 450 2006 HARDSHIP RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITION 30 30 30 e3 2004 oTTELi1GENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM (RSI PROJECTS 125 125 40 2006 MAPLE GROVE RAN REIMBURSEMENT (CP 96]5) W 60 60 120 2006 MINNEAPOLISS SIGNAL PARTICIPATION 1 170 10 130 2009 MWOOT SIGNAL PARTICIPATION 130 150 20 2006 MISCELLANEOUS STRUCTURE REPAIRS so e9 252006RAILROADCROSSWGPARTICIPATION 25 25 2006 ROADSIDE ENHANCEMENT PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM 600 800 600 2006 SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT w so 20 - SUBTOTAL PRIOR YEARS' OSUOATIONS 17,793 3,937 12,970 0 627 1.076 0 0 x,000 579 1200 0 10,762 4.897 653 10265 7,705 3UB-TOTAL 2006 NEW PROJECTS 4,113 33,494 572]0 4,807 655 12263 6.564 2006 TOTALS 21,906 39,941 70.200 130,947 12% 0 11,640 0 2,630 CARRYOVER FROM LAST YEAR 1200 1,956 11,101 NEW APPORTIONMENTS 0 1,3118 (31.930) CARRYOVER TO NEAT YEAR PRO1ASiDNAI PROJECTS 2004 PROVISIONAL PROJECTS: T06e P"I eb tee klelYded N M PA90e BYbteC1 N 9Mk epp.W for hdeni aid -01,41 Or In 00 ROUNDED TO NEARF 57 11,000 BASED ON PRIOR COUNTY BOARD RESOLUTION Vw.o0E ad1Wi M mOVCO 0121 . Version:LDa Vmlon Data: 12/1u04 2005-2009 TRANSPORTATION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Prim Data: 12120104 Time: 07:03 AM Aa Approved by Resolution 0 04-12.50SR'l on December 14, 2004 2007 VALUES IN THOUSANDS Of DOLLARS) 2007 PROGRAMMED EXPENDITURES PRIOR 2007 COSTS TOTAL STATE STATE COUNTY YEARS BUDGET • BEYOND -PROJECT COUNTY AID AID FEDERAL BRIDGE ROAD OTHER ROAD PROD PROJECT LOCATION/DESCRIPTION APPROP APPROP 2007 BUDGET TAX MUN REG AID BONDS BONDS REVENUE PRIOR YEARS' OBLIGATIONS: 3 9741 27TH AVE - WEST RIVER PKWY / G,S,SIG CSERV 772• 772• 447 3 9741 27TH AVE • WEST RIVER PKWY / G.S.SIG 6,500 1.600 6,300 1,333 22 9336 MINNEHAHA PKWY (UJB) • LAKE ST / G. S. SIG 2,000 7,910 9,910 3,324 4,000 500 103 9239 S OF GNDLEWOOD • CSAH 301 G,S,SIG RAV 600 100 300 1.000 50. SO 103 9239 S OF CANDLEWOOD - CSAH 30 / G,S,SIG 300 10,770 11.070 2007 NEW PROJECTS: 500 20 160 300 2007 SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS 500 3 9664 NEW ACCESS AT 1-35W / PARTICIPATE R/W 750 750 9664 NEW ACCESS AT 1•35W I PARTICIPATE CSERV 6095' 5095' 9864 NEW ACCESS AT I.35W /PARTICIPATE I,D00 1.000 1,000 0006 HIAWATHA AVE • W RIVER PARKWAY/STREETSCAPE 1.554 1,:54 389 777 388 10 9919 ZEALAND • W OF CSAH 156 / PARTICIPATE 280 260 250 19 013001 CSAH 24 - TH 55 TRAIL -PHASE 1 / G. S 450 450 90 360 24 9617 E OF CSAR 101 - 0.4 MILE E / G. S R/W 250 250 2.109 772 9617 E OF CSAR 101 -0A MILE E / G, S 2,461 2,481 48 9742 48TH - LAKE ST / G.S.SIG RAV 350 100 SO 300 SO 50 48 9742 46TH - LAKE ST I G.S.SIG 9.652 9,652 al 9112 N OF CSAR ] • TH 7 / G,S,SIG RAV 1,000 1,000 61 9112 N OF CSAH 3 • TH 7 / G.S.SIG CSERV 350 350 553 104 61 9112 NOF CSAR ] • TH 7 I G.S,SIG 686 6.172 5.636 at Ott$ N OF TH 100 - N OF CSAH 101 G,S,SIG R/W 2.000 2.000 01 0116 N OF TH 100 - N OF CSAH 10 1 G,S,SIG CSERV $52 852 6,126 1,434 81 011$ N OF TH 100 - N OF CSAR 10l G,S,SIG 9,560 9,560 Ot 101 9516 S OF CSM/6 •SOF CSAR 24 / G.S.SIG RAN 420 9576 S OF CSAH - S OF CSAR 24 / G.S.SIG 420 9,559 010 9,559 210 4,219 1.580 210 7506 101 9931 N OF CSAH 5 • TH 121 G, S, SIG RAN 1.300 1,300 101 9931 NOF CSAH S • TH 121G, S- SIG CSERV 1.300 1,300 1 101 9971 NOF CSAN S - TH 12 I G. S, SIG 1.000 10,250 11,250 109 9920 1-94' VINEWOOO / RECONSTRUCT 1 PARTICIPATE 320 320 320 90 202 0408 AT ELM CREEK I BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 180 120 30D 90 2007 BIKEWAY DEVELOPMENT PARTICIPATION 100 100 100 2007 BIKEWAY PROGRAM • DISCRETIONARY 100 100 100 2007 CONSULTANT SERVICES- MISCELLANEOUS 450 450 50 490 2007 HARDSHIP RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITION 30 30 30 2007 INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM (ITS) PROJECTS 125 125 20 104 2007 AMPLE GROVE R/W REIMBURSEMENT (CP 9635) 60 60 50 2007 61NNEAPOL15 SIGNAL PARTICIPATION 120 120 10 110 2007 MNIDOT SIGNAL PARTICIPATION 150 150 10 140 2007 MISCELLANEOUS STRUCTURE REPAIRS 70 70 70 2007 RAILROAD CROSSING PARTICIPATION 25 25 25 2007 ROADSIDE ENHANCEMENT PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM 600 600 am 2007 SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT 100 100 40 00 SUBTOTAL PRIOR YEARS' OBLIGATIONS 9,400 9,810 11,070 30,250 0 0 4.727 0 0 4.000 1.0$3 0 10.300 5.697 0 9.125 4,$97 SUB -TOTAL 2007 NEW PROJECTS 6.572 30.020 26.244 04,636 1.200 2007 TOTALS 17,972 39.030 37.314 95116 1,200 0 15.027 5.697 0 12.126 5.750 0 4.568 (31,WM CARRYOVER FROM LAST YEAR 1'200 2.014 11'450 NEW APPORTIONMENTS 0 0,002 (35,501) CARRYOVER TO NEXT YEAR PROVISIONAL PROJECTS 2007 PROVISIONAL PROJECTS: These Propos m imsud6d In dw Program subject 100 to their approval for ts"MI aid funding or in the 3 9226 E OF CSAR 20 - E OF MEADOWBROOK I G,S,SIG RAN 2,600 ewM staN aid funds become wallabM. 9228 E OF CSAH 20 • E OF MEADOWBROOK / G,S,SIG 88413 CSAH 9- FAIRVIeW AVE. I Q.S R/W 200 5,300 0 8435 CSAH 9' FAIRVIEW AVE. I G.S 01 9230 N OF BNSF RR - HILLOWAY RD I G,S,SIG R/W 100 61 9230 N OF BNSF RR • HILLOWAY RD / G.S. SIG 4,600 153 0116 FREMONT AVE - MISS. RIVER / G.S.SIG 6'9D0 156 0010 TH SS - 10 AVE / SIP 400 ROUNDED TO NEAREST St.D00 BASED ON PRIOR COUNTY BOARD RESOLUTION. 4 PRELIMINARY — SUBJECT TO CHANGE Preliminary Layout No. 04 CSAR 101 Hennepin Co. Project No. 9516 S.P. No. 27-701-13 Scale ' I" = 100' C., r `f 4 A 4. JAP f V4 7 7 4 :1 IL dL n I 4tk A• IF lo 4f kN 4W1 NUT7 , --I " A - . — I - 11 ., , * - , r - -- qy n.'lei 7 I At 04, 10 S4 V- 0.1 ol rf"Ck qt'AOW ..P 9a* :SAY T N It- c.:.,.1 A,! .71 E I'VW-k SFMN CP f—r. •W. -mw Imo' J VP r 4(4 f t R 1f i1n t ,'?-• .,+ v +,r, s ! pjt + +.•!r r .- - i i. 41-- t f r_ 1 y,, ' "'''' TTTTTT 4` ri I A — 4g ,.• ; .ror4m.uiriolCr'••,s+,".;.::',3f R°x%:+.*''$." . _ . w,-rA. 1} }, t. .!# A"Y9i,` I4A.• r_ - ' rf _ yam. v:IiJ 71 _ t+•>.'+ .. ii _....^ . ....t •- J.iJ''.'ii i- Ar 4 +wiz Lh'.1r'\i «.% ," Y .... rj , r'` Jei' jj .. .. . r— , — '_ +il= _ ,r ` •+:• IF jk 41% r // t• ,/ t s ZO ij 40 r ;kr t r ry pol 14 OV pxf i r / +.'/}},,/,,• . r, p'r ,; r Y3, /'T'r 0 • ... i%"r . F ."/ r oj i r ! •. `- —•.. _. .-. r ~` '"/ W'."`....* + r ___ T_.._,._--. .. mob__. _., .. v ,. L- - _. ,... .. ..._. irA. ! s•,y. r .. .. . .' A 1.. _"_-- ' `— .v --,+ Ile— bl y Af 74 J11 OE v ..'. -\moi . '• ._._.-. r• J...,. _9y' '' /.w„k.'` , — .. a.. Tr_- ._ - ' - : ir ' : y:.. r ; til r a OU r { drJrAr ICI, w'1 'l r/' l r ^' I SV^' t R'* . •i"", s7+ r M .. a +, lw f..4jNa ION f" r t mob r R Lr^ted-... '+..> I.0". { •s : - t r ! ` I`'! 'J ..,yr , r :^ f r/ II F ' F- r I jy. Ja% `' f :'ri'.'==S :.',- "} r ,5 ;w. jh r. 1!h •. y _ vM.'j 1 .; o :0 ' _ a'y' 1d'n. .e 441, j PA JAWAOt Ile AFI ' 1 ,., I` f .. t . `+ - . ' --.- ;,• `. — — -'- r:, y _ --. .. 1.Lt1„1. ' ^'i' . 1 1 k.. r ., 6 - - ,- r ,,t -- j ., t ;r• r- " . ` jf ...may • fly • , rjr T /. yjj(1t1tPPl r 1 r" , _ F tti Y' 3'' r ..yi L'I '. Y ' }• J ` Jter d • l • f^•. r AL AL t y I17 t f ter' ' ( .' ,,f -I : r ' rr . ' A" `' f? -0j r'. r ..., '4 f a+ R,. f" •ic h. • :- 1 y e W ' , h f 'M PIP.^ - 1 .,;• , 7( r IL i ''t ' ' }•' a . :' _J yi' '' w f P ../ !mow J-11 I o ;^ _ ff j• r i L•. ,'rye;. , ` 'P ,y *t„,°' ,,/'{,,.i rP. `'' q (,;,ic ,: f'k I. ' ..=P* A'„ A' 7 w+e;"fs' -; . I' '' 1 r., J }' • e. • ", ^ , +, r AL ret' °, ' '• f ' bfF Y... ' e ` _.._'. 4 - rt•+. a / zJ r i irf f ' C'K 5' J p a: '. p _ i r i :, fit. .•s ' yF7'; ..r. "-4F " r. fir, q r ; , g21;' t0 / • 1. f,P' it I 'r" yr ' JS %pC J ._` r av ' '+ 1 i r t Cl Aft RETAINING WALL vp WETLAND MITIGATIONYA# AREA JK i. :. • x . •! s ' .A %' nil,, i. '. , i I ti AL F -i II• I ryl 7 TF* C " 1 r + a • y". RT fipfr„ , '• • . , ,A< L PP I JJ _ f l AC f .. Y ,• ' r I f..' ..,:r f Nn / . a rer •. t jr; V .+ 4 ya.-, ' a .S f - •,. " r,# ,, of i ' `','r;' I 3f" , . F.• / i r y ', L' 1 'I` I%^^ Yh / j t V I t All OIL 04 I y a a i .. amt• \\`'.\\,`l . '„ .." ' _ _ ' + _ _ r - - ya el^" r \ _ A 4WW- M1, t s • 1' y y • t. IAF ' k t•' i« MITIGATIONWETLAN i ,, •{»' to v 1, r. .y, s_ — 4 - — AL r' 11 2f' } r-iY• ?}' 9, - S 11, ' f. + " .' L a: y' i{ ', ,e ''.7 e{ .- i air tV YID i' r + r 4 7' " + r .. ,i .; 3. f'`'. w y 't " off • 4' y ?i`"r • i f r _y . Nw, . .,p • 1 .•.• ,/`' 4i - I M $ A ' r • q!s., 1•_./. r'°I }'' •f' ;li'r . M1 It .' A `. • r'yp_.. yl , P.• `-. fir' .A' ' + n t y . I :`` .,> : y a ' f ' ;/ ' 4t, 4 r ' i>lV .+•- - j v '_.._• ... ar..s i; 'f( {F !,Y Ty ,{ !y_ l-A§f/'4 r " PPLLll . 47, h x it Ak f'+" MqP fir, i1"' } aP vel :, '! " - / r " . iP • r h ' +'r P ;• i 7y ' ,,5 4 F moi,. . rr.. dQPM IP. sl ld• ice.'•\\``t.^1 *I\ti\_ ITi: `^ __ __'. ,°_. _ '- a\ +, --' - -- _ LLRETAININGWALL MITIGATION AREAWETLAND r •;. ' fid,. re C;l` ' a •rAr r+ c l !'' d'^ • -. -' >i•V"'+7r. - ` _ %+ 1 i a•._ Yp' , 51. ' R , i,4 .•• 1 '. r r 114'- t'srr a. ." n 'y- / f yp ' t . a 3 , V fir, r , " 9r i• p ;['• ff,,:{ f ' f y ,. ," „fes.. ' - ,, • a fI ,/. i r ;, ,... !. . F.,'`,t . + y't ' q4r/ Y/. r . 5. 6!"• rn l `• 4 r ri r ya 7^ L , 7 qL+• '' '' ' r ye ' '} •..! k '' # Ff Fp 17: X' SS „ 7 gip} 1 %— •rte .r ' ' ,- , : ; ... „ . ,r T !s _J r;y Tom: • p p, Y '' Y+ : .\,%• ,, r df.- s` wi ' 09 e 1 r r, , p'\ •?r r. .A r eiia<'" `' ,; ''' ' ..• ".' , .s. apti a Y' r: is i i. rti; f• r ^' -''ai1 `+' 1 r. 4 "x '. J,w: f jI7.:' , f r '{ h ... , .. i'. :v } ' fir ' d' „Yr.' + +' r"` / ;, 1 1• l a' •t `'C _ ?, i4• q i. f", 'a `Y' ,1i. i tl' F 'f4 aeLl f r• r aQb- t x p ar sem• - - # I - - 3'"`,*'" .. , rte r yyc.ti ..'fl'R\X \'#'ti'ii.\k !!"' ,_.-'.-, .. I.. * 1'. y; t•.`a`` Am" , 7.•- b „•) 1. ._.,._...... _.._. ) .+ `"''`yam. •c.4.".w. ,',: L -'a'i1 WALL1 WETLAND MITIGATION rv At RETAINING N AREA f 1 i y .. r'.Y 3 .•T' +. , { i 't e,. "`i ' . M1'r' r • P w++ GG^ M w'" '» ' f + . k • it 7 F-2. f- 1 0"1 OF 4 .+f.R { i1 7Y .` f,,y' ' i -•i + v,• ti `• ' 1,.," 4, p ti --. ... ti„ I w . Y • ¢ , -,1 .. r• 1 - j' i - }. ,I 7 t 7 . i" ate. WETLAN FUTURE ON R7 r 1 ..,- -" ` r yr `" • i'1„i' - ,. Y A•+•wT ' i r '• ' { r . • z ` .a f,,. .. _ - r „1 ti't _'! !rr' 1'r r i , fir. , - 1 S •, . ''," .' ` • f t ^ ' i A ' r • r F' •• r yam+ -- s- 'i `! • - fir° , ;' $ rIFM, i 'k" s 1, s r R^' j+ It. f Joe lop n #t h. Are AR 41. Doran Cote From: psnowmn@mac.com Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2005 10:29 AM To: Penny Steele; guy.nowlan@co.hennepin.mn.us Cc: Judy Johnson; Kelli Slavik; Jim Willis; Tim Bildsoe; Doran Cote; Dan Campbell; Thea Snow Snow Subject: County Rd. 101 project Dear Ms. Steele and Mr. Nowlan, A week ago some of the neighbors in our area met at Plymouth City Hall with you (Ms. Steele), Kelli Slavik, Judy Johnson, Doran Cote and two county representatives. We greatly appreciate the time you took for us to voice some of our concerns. At that meeting I noticed that the map portion that impacts my house is different from what I had seen presented before in that there is an additional 15 ft from my house to the proposed location of 26th Ave, North. While I am really encouraged that things are moving in the right direction, you must understand my continued concern for the safety of my children both during and after construction, at what will become a much more major intersection. Also of concern to me is that at this point I am looking ahead at least 5 years before I have the option to sell the house and move. That doesn't seem quite right to me. In addition, the issue of salability of the house in the future is a question, not to mention the greatly compromised quality of life should we choose to stay. If you look at the current proposal on the map it doesn't look like anywhere near the degree of impact that there is if you measure out the 45' off the corner of the garage and picture traffic racing through that close to the house. The map must have already taken into account whatever number of feet off the current street that you can take by rights. I encourage you to come and see the site for yourself rather than judging the situation from what it looks like on the map. At this point my thought is that I would rather be bought out and not have to deal with the stress, uncertainty, and risk of what I will be left with after enduring this construction. Sincerely, Peggy Snow 17925 26th Ave. N. Plymouth, MN 55447 763) 473-1068 June 24, 2005 Ms, Kelli Slavik, Councilperson City of Plymouth Plymouth, Minnesota 55447 Dave and Ellen Osmonson 17735 - 26th Avenue North Plymouth, Minnesota 55447 dear Kelli: J U N 2 8 2005 J D / U a-,% I am writing on behalf of myself, my husband, nave and our two children Danny and Thomas. This letter is a formal. document informing you of our decision to vehemently oppose the purposed plan for County Road 101 and the impact it will have on our home, our family, our neighbor's homes, our neighbors and the overall quality of life we will have when this project begins and is completed. We love our home. We are very happy and comfortable with our land and the surrounding area. The yard is a dream come tare for our family and we thoroughly enjoy spending time in the yard and "digging in the dirt' is such a treat for myself and my youngest, Thomas that I can barely describe it. My husband loves our lawns and takes great pride in keeping them well maintained. Please don't get us. started on the trees. This is a dream of our lives, to have these stately, beautiful trees on our property and we feel great responsibility and pride in keeping them healthy and safe. The thought of them being bulldozed down lige so much trash breaks our hearts. I thinly I realize the there is only so much you can do, that Hennepin County is really the bad guy here, but this is a mistake, a very grave mista.kei Believe me, I am not delusional, I understand the concept of progress, but I truly do not believe that behind this plan, progress is the motivation. It's money. I sincerely hope that you do not believe that the people on our side are stupid. We are nott We also have resources, many resources of our own, to help us in this nightmare. We have no desire to go down that road. We simply want you to be aware that. we are not going to sit quietly while Hennepin County comes in and destroys our homes, lands and quality of life. r. „::-rr ,x :Hi'.a.....w-iit ..:...:.nR =6e,,i,Ln.;,':::..G rw:.-,+__:...aR-ra..w.'rl'n:.TkunTfi+GiYF.iC/3i' •' -. .i. My husband spoke to Guy Nowlan the other day when he called to arrange a meeting with the people who are going to have the cul-de-sacs. My husband inquired as to the procedure involved in formally opposing this plan.. Guy's suggestion was that we write a letter to our Councilperson. Not to Hennepin County, not to the Mayor of Plymouth, certainly not to the Governor or the Press, but you. So, this is our written, formai, opposition to Hennepin County's Reconstruction of C.S.A.H. 101 project, Thank you for your time and interest, anything you could suggest to assists in this matter would be greatly appreciated. Sincerely, Dave and Ellen Osmonson RECORD OF MEETING Hennepin County / City of Plymouth CSAH 101; County Project 9516 Queensland Ln & 26th Ave. N Cul -De -Sac Meeting Monday - June 27, 2005 - 5:00 p.m. DOCUMENTED BY: Guy Nowlan LOCATION OF MEETING: City of Plymouth, Administration Conference Room SUBJECT: Neighborhood meeting to review Queensland Lane and 26th Ave. N. cul-de-sac alternates. ATTENDEES: PRINT YOUR NAME Guy Nowlan Craig Twinem Ron Quanbeck Cookie & Ernie Kulas Shawn Gardner Jen & Dave Baugh Josette Repke Dave & Ellen Osmonson BACKGROUND: RESIDENTIAL or BUSINESS ADDRESS Hennepin County Hennepin County City of Plymouth 2505 Queensland Lane 2515 Queensland Lane 2500 Queensland Lane 17730 26' Ave. N 17735 26' Ave. N E-MAIL or PHONE 763-745-7655 763-745-7652 763-509-5525 763-475-2522 763-473-3027 763-476-1024 763-473-4746 763-473-1714 osmod0l@comcast.net A meeting was held to inform the residents of the latest cul-de-sac design alternates for the intersections of 101 @ 26th & 101 @ Queensland Lane and as a follow-up to the 5/31/05 meeting. Residents were invited by telephone. The invite list consisted of those residents that attended the 5/31/05 meeting at Plymouth. I asked that the invitees inform their immediate neighbors of the meeting. One resident (2625 CR 101 - Dan Gutlovics,) wasn't available to contact. His email wouldn't work and I didn't have a phone number. There are two that haven't participated in discussions concerning the closure of 26th Ave. (17720 —Harry and Diane Hosker & 17725 — Sally McCabe). There were 5 alternates for Queensland Lane and 4 alternates for 26th Ave. N. displayed. See the attachment for copies of the alternates. Alternate 1 for each location is shown on Layout 3. SUMMARY OF COMMENTS FROM MEETING: Residents reviewed their street alternates. For 26"' Ave. the preferred option was Alternate #2, to place the cul-de-sac toward property 17735 — Dave and Ellen Osmonson. They want to be bought out and 17730 — Jossette Repke stated she wanted to remain in her home. For Queensland Lane the preferred options were Alternate 4 & 5, to place the cul-de-sac toward property 2505 — Cookie and Ernie Kulas or 2500 — Dave and Jen Baugh. Both residents want the cul- de-sac placed on their property so they would be bought out. The other alternates were not as appealing for various reasons. The residents voiced their concerns, but were asked to transmit an email or letter so there wouldn't be any confusion on their position. Landscape on side slopes if the wall at Queensland Lane is eliminated. Noise, drainage, property values, driveway grades, and etc. ACTION ITEMS: Residents were asked to transmit their comments and conclusions to Henn. Co. Henn. Co. and City are to review alternates, comments, and letters and formulate an engineering decision on where the cul-de-sacs should be placed. The residents are to be notified prior to Layout #3 council consideration. ROUTE TO: COPY TO: Guy Nowlan, Craig Twinem, Nick Peterson, Mark File: 101/9516/RW Stafne 11 Doran Cote, Ron Quanbeck, Dan Campbell Doran Cote From: psnowmn@mac.com Sent: Friday, July 01, 2005 8:02 AM To: guy.nowlan@co.hennepin.mn.us Cc: Penny Steele; Judy Johnson; Kelli Slavik; Jim Willis; Tim Bildsoe; Doran Cote; Dan Campbell; psnowmn@mac.com Subject: Co. 101 X 26th Ave. N. Plymouth Mr. Nowlan, Thank you for meeting with us again this week concerning the various options for cul-de-sacs in our area. I felt, as the rest of the neighbors seemed to, that the best of the presented options for those cul-de-sacs was to guide them to the south in each case (Queensland and 26th Ave. N. on the east side) in place of the houses that are currently there. That option was the best both from the neighbors needs perspective, and from the perspective of how difficult it would be in terms of engineering if those particular houses were left to stand. If this option is chosen, I would like to request that the option of moving 26th on the west side a little farther north is explored. Thanks for giving us the opportunity for input. Sincerely, Peggy Snow Doran Cote From: Kelli Slavik Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2005 4:02 PM To: guy.nowlan@co.hennepin.mn.us; james.grube@co.hennepin.mn.us Cc: Doran Cote Subject: FW: 101 Proposed Upgrade Original Message ----- From: Gustafson, Sylvia,'1NCS [mailto:sylviagustafson@att.com] Sent: Tue 6/28/2005 2:18 PM To: Kelli Slavik; Tim Bildsoe Cc: Subject: 101 Proposed Upgrade 17555 - 28th Avenue North Plymouth, MN 55447 Ms. Slavik and Mr. Bildsoe: The purpose of this email is to express my concern and disappointment with the City of Plymouth in the lack of notification, for homeowners impacted, of meetings that are scheduled for the Hennepin County planned upgrade of County Road 101. The homeowners in my neighborhood are directly impacted by these proposed changes but we have not been notified of scheduled meetings to discuss our concerns. I was apprised, after the fact, of meetings that have been held by a homeowner who lives on 28th Avenue (west side of 101). He said, he had been notified of the meetings by letters sent by the City of Plymouth. I am extremely concerned the impact for our homes with the proposed changes to closing 26th Avenue. The residents of Shiloh Addition use 26th Avenue extensively and, believe me, they do not follow the 30 mile an hour speed limit rule. The neighbors have complained often, to the police department, about the speed on 26th Avenue. Now, Hennepin County is proposing to move this traffic via 28th Avenue so I will have to deal with this excessive speed from the front of my house versus just walking on 26th Avenue. To further aggravate the situation, the City of Plymouth elected not to notify me of any 7/19/2005 L1GLL11" a- - --- meetings so I could share my concerns prior to the development of this plan. Proposed plan taken from Hennepin County website: Access Control and Spacing CSAH 101 project corridor area has historically experienced offset side street alignments of side streets through platting of adjacent housing developments. These alignments contradict the roadway classification function of a minor arterial road by providing multiple uncontrolled access points. Therefore, the project proposal realigns side streets at two locations and eliminates four side street connections by placing cul-de- sacs. The loss of access will divert traffic to adjacent access points. For example, closing Merrimac Lane North west junction will direct traffic to 19th Avenue North, closing Queensland Lane North will direct traffic to 26th Avenue North west junction; closing 24th Avenue North east junction will direct traffic to 25th Avenue North; and closing 26th Avenue North east junction will direct traffic to 25th Avenue North and/or 28th Avenue North. The streets being closed from CSAH 101 are short in length and will divert a small amount of traffic. The closures will provide access control and improved access spacing, thus reducing conflict points, which will reduce the opportunity for crashes. There will be properties that experience a slight increase in traffic past their homes. In response to the side street closures, 19th Avenue North at CSAH 101 and 25th Avenue North / 26th Avenue North at CSAH 101 are being realigned and designed with lane configurations to accommodate the increased traffic volumes, 40' curb -to -curb width accommodating three lanes at the intersection, two out and one in from CSAH 101. The 19th Avenue North intersection is also being moved to the east to provide minimum sight distance to the south. There is a wood retaining wall blocking the sight line. There are residents on Queensland Avenue North and on 28th Avenue North west junction requesting closure of their streets. The realignments and closure points will be analyzed in an attempt to reduce impacts. The closures currently require one total property acquisition. County access spacing guidelines call for 1/4 mile spacing for full access and 660 foot spacing for partial access. The proposal with the side street closures improves the spacing but falls short of the guideline. The county supports the described access control measures to reduce crashes associated with conflict point reduction and access spacing. I have two requests: 7/19/2005 1. Why were the residents of Candlelight Terrace not notified of these meetings with the 101 project manager and Hennepin County engineers? 2. What does the City of Plymouth plan to do with the currect excessive speeding on 26th Avenue so the problem is not simply moved to 28th Avenue? Thank you for your time in addressing my concerns. Sylvia Gustafson 763-473-8307 (home) 612-376-6692 (office) 7/19/2005 Guy, Regarding the cul-de-sac at Queensland and the available options, I am still in favor of the original plan that would leave 2505 and 2500 in place, with the retaining wall that runs between Queensland and 24th Ave, preferably topped with a wood partition vs. the fencing material. I was wondering if there is enough space to the east of 2505 to put a new garage at grade, possibly at an angle so that the tuck under garage is not an issue? My second preference would be to have the cul-de-sac moved North towards 2500 and my third preference would be to move the cul-de-sac South towards 2505. I do not like the options of moving the cul-de-sac to the West towards 2510 and 2515, primarily because I believe it is awkward and not as functional. In the event that the decision is to remove 2505 and to create a slope VS. a retaining wall, I would like to strongly lobby for either a burm or a fence between Queensland and 24th Ave. The removal of 2505 removes our only noise and sight barrier of 101. I am also interested in knowing about the triangular piece of land that is between 17900 24th Ave and my property. Would that property be purchased in whole by the County/City? Thank you for your help. Shawn Gardner 2515 Queensland Ln N, Plymouth sgardner@venturebankonline.com 763-398-5816 Daytime Phone 763-473-3027 Home Phone 763-398-3323 Fax Dear Mr. Nowlan, I attended the last meeting held on June 21, 2005. Our address is 2750 Queensland Lane North. Our concerns as home owners are as follows. Our biggest concerns are safety, privacy, noise and of course losing any value we may lose. We currently have beautiful trees along our property on 101 that give us privacy and they help eliminate some of the noise from the already busy highway. Without the trees the noise will increase and we no longer have the privacy as we once had once the project is completed. Having a young child and with the increased traffic, safety is a big issue. If we attempted to try and sell our property it would be a lost cause for no one will purchase not knowing the out come of this project and how it will affect the market value. According to the map it doesn't look like we will be affected as much as some of our neighbors. It looks as if we will be losing a significant part of our backyard, including our shed and more trees in which we love. If you can shed any light on this situation that would be greatly appreciated. A concerned homeowner. Sincerely, Clotine Ramos I live at 17725 26th Avenue North, the 2nd house in on 26th Avenue North on the south side of the road. I was able to attend the very first public meeting on the Highway 101 project, but have been unable to attend the subsequent meetings. My neighbor across the street discussed with me the various cul-de-sac options for 26th Avenue North and suggested that if I have an opinion, one way or the other, that sending an e-mail was the best mechanism for doing that. I personally am not opposed to having 26th Avenue North become a cul-de-sac. I am somewhat tired of people racing down the street, only to have to stop at the stop sign at the intersection with Highway 101. As far as the 3 cul-de-sac options for 26th Avenue North, I most prefer option 2, with option #3 being next and option #4 being the least desirable of the 3 options. My biggest concern regarding the project is the number of trees and other plants that will be lost along the east side of Highway 101 and with the change in 25th Avenue North. Currently, the trees and plants along the east side of Highway 101, from 25th Avenue North northward, provide homes along that stretch with sight and sound barriers. The trees and plants absorb much of the sounds of the traffic along Highway 101 with the exception of the larger trucks - dump trucks, semi -trailers, etc. They also serve to block much of the lights from the headlights of vehicles turning onto Highway 101 from the various cross streets, like 25th Avenue North. With the removal of these trees and plants, we will be exposed to the full bore of sights and sounds of the increased traffic along Highway 101. And with the widening of Highway 101, the traffic level along it will be much greater than it is today. I would like to request that the planting of various types of trees and shrubs along the east side of Highway 101, to replace the trees and shrubs we will be losing when the existing ones are removed to widen Highway 101, be a part of the project. I do understand that it is not economically feasible to replace the existing trees and shrubs with comparably sized trees and shrubs, but it is only fair to provide homeowners along Highway 101 with some vegetation that will at some point in the not -so -distant future, provide us with the same level of sight and sound barriers that the current trees and shrubs provide. I also understand that the house at 17830 25th Avenue North will be removed in order to alter the 25th Avenue North intersection with Highway 101. I imagine the destruction of this home and alteration of the intersection will result in the removal of trees and shrubs that provide sight and sound barriers. Without that house on the corner, all vehicles headed north on Highway 101, turning right onto 25th Avenue North from dusk till dawn, will have their headlights shining right into my home and the home at 17735 26th Avenue North. Again, I would like to request that trees and shrubs be planted along the north side of the new 25th Avenue North intersection to prevent this from happening. We currently do not have to deal with the distraction of headlights shining in to our homes from the vehicles turning right onto 25th Avenue North. This is another barrier we should not have to lose. Thanks for your time. Sally J. McCabe Regis IT Department 952-918-4237 sally.mccabe@regiscorp.com MEMO CITY OF PLYMOUTH 3400 Plymouth Boulevard Plymouth, MN 55447 DATE: July 29, 2005 TO: Laurie Ahrens, City Manager FROM:q"Ie el P.E., Director of Public Works SUBJECT: COUNTY ROAD 101 RECONSTRUCTION CITY PROJECT NO. 5102 As we discussed, Dan Campbell and I met with Hennepin County yesterday afternoon to discuss their newest layout for the above referenced project. Layout No. 4 (attached) differs from the layout presented to the City Council at the June 6, 2005 study session in the following general areas: The Xcel Energy transmission lines will be located behind the proposed sidewalk on the east side of County Road 101. Retaining walls were added north of 26th Avenue to reduce encroachment into adjacent properties. Black vinyl -coated chain link fence is proposed where walls exceed four feet in height. The County prefers to locate the proposed Queensland Lane cul-de-sac entirely on 2505 Queensland Lane (Kulas). This results in a total taking but eliminates the need for a retaining wall. The property owners have indicated their desire to be acquired in total. Similarly, the County prefers to locate the proposed 26th Avenue cul-de-sac entirely on 17735 - 26th Avenue (Osmonson). This results in a total taking, but access to this property would have been significantly impacted by the project regardless of the cul-de-sac location. The property owners have indicated their desire to be acquired in total. A northbound right turn lane at County Road 6 is not included due to impacts to parking in the Oakwood Square Shopping Center. Staff will be meeting with Herb's Service Station representatives again to discuss the possibility of adding the lane if desired. 0:\Engineering\GENERAL\MEM0S\D0RAN\2005\CR101 Recon_Laune_7 29.doc SUBJECT: COUNTY ROAD 101 RECONSTRUCTION Page 2 Hennepin County also provided the City with a new preliminary cost estimate (copy attached). With the additional retaining walls and property acquisition, the City's share now stands at 4,168,657 which is significantly higher than was anticipated and well above the $620,000 programmed in the CIP. Staff will be evaluating the impacts this new estimate will have on our ability to fund this and other projects programmed in the CIP. I have attached additional neighborhood meeting notes and minutes for your reference. The Mayor has suggested that the City Council discuss this project at the August 23, 2004 Study Session. Please advise me if this date is acceptable or if another date should be selected. attachments O:\Engineering\GENERAL\MEMOS\DORAN\1005\CR101_Recon Laurie 7_29.doc Preliminary Cost Estimate County State Aid Highway 101 County Project 9516 7/26/2005 Item Total Cost Federal Hennepin Plymouth Roadway Construction Cost (1) 9,000,000 3,529,412 4,376,471 1,094,118 CIP Concrete Walls (50% Sharing) (2) 1,750,000 686,275 531,863 531,863 CIP Concrete Walls (3) 2,000,000 784,314 1,215,686 CSAH 101/9516 18% Design & Contract administration 292,676 8.0 million 292,676 R/W Cost (4) 4,500,000 2,250,000 2,250,000 Landscaping (5) (6) 127,500 127,500 Total Cost 17,670,176 5,000,000 8,501,520 4,168,657 Notes 1) Assumes a general 80% Hennepin and 20% Plymouth cost split for preliminary estimate only. Actual City cost to be determined by Hennepin Cost Participation Policy during detail design phase. 2) Walls to reduce R/W acquisition considered part of RW acquisition. 50% Hennepin and 50% Plymouth) walls @ $90 per sf, includes chain link fence) 3) Walls to reduce wetland / pond impacts considered 100% Hennepin. 4) R/W cost estimate updated 7/21/05. (50% Hennepin and 50% Plymouth) Includes total acquisition of 17825 24th Ave., 2505 Queensland Lane, 17830 25th Ave., and 17735 26th Ave. 5) Hennepin landscaping limited to 1 % of the roadway construction cost for tree replacement only. 6) Hennepin Roadside Enhancement Partnership Program ( REPP) will fund qualifing streetscape / landscape elements. Level of contribution is subject to the limitations of the program and requires a request letter. See cost participation policy for details and limitations. Cost per Mile Comparison (2005 dollars) Project Bid Date Const. Cost Length Cost per Mile CSAH 10/8727 Mar -05 9.4 million 1.8 miles 5.2 million CSAH 101/9918 Mar -05 17.3 million 2.1 miles 8.2 million CSAH 81/0117 19.1 million 1.8 miles 10.6 million CSAH 101/9516 13.0 million 1.6 miles 8.0 million pre lest_0 7_26_05. xls W City of Plymouth 2005-2009 Capital Improvements Program Street Projects 2006 Street Project Community Special Replacement State/Federal Administration Improvement Project Number Proiect Title Assessments Fund MSA Fund County Bonds Donations Fund Fund Total Comments S - 1 Re lace Retainin Walls 96,000 96,000 840,000 Phase l of 2 S-8 CR 101 - CR 6 to CR 24 - Design & ROW 420,000 420,000 40,000 2,515,000 40,000 from Maple Grove S-9 Street Reconstruction - District 5 & Hemlock 805,000 1,670,000 1,325,000 S- 10 Street Reconstruction - District 34 500,000 825,000 935,000 Additional $935,000 likely paid by developer S- 1 I Cheshire Lane - Glacier Vista to CR 47 935,000 15,000 50,000 S - 12 Pineview RR Crossing Improvements 35,000 400,000 S- 13 Pineview Lane & Campus Drive - Overlay 400,000 440,000 S-14 Traffic Signals - Two Intersections' 385,000 55,000 400,000 S. 15 Nathan Lane & CR 10 Intersection 100,000 400,000 300,000 400,000 State Brid a Funds S- 16 South Shore Drive Bride Replacement 125,000 125,000 250,000 Phase 1 of 2 S-17 CR 24 - 30th Avenue to CR 101 - Design & ROW Total 1,305,000 3,091,000 2,300,000 900,000 0 40,000 0 15,000 7,651,000 Cheshire & CR 47, and CR 10 & Trenton Lane w tT City of Plymouth 2005-2009 Capital Improvements Program Street Projects 2007 Street Project Community Special Replacement State/Federal Administration Improvement Project Number Proiect Title Assessments Fund MSA Fund County Bonds Donations Fund Fund Total Comments S-1 Re lace Retaining Walls 50,000 210,000 7,321,000 50,000 7,531,000 Phase 2 of 2 S-8 CR 101 - CR6 to CR 24 - Construction 941,000 Phase 2 of 2 S-17 CR 24 - 30th Avenue to CR 101 - Construction 95,000 846,000 710,000 Pan of Fernbrookproject S-19 sTrafficSignals -Three Intersections ' TrafficS rth 710,000 800,000 1,000,000 1,800,000 Scopeand schedule depend on Fed funding S-19 Fe Lane - Ave 34th Ave 400,000 S-20 Nathan LanellOth/13th - Overlay400,000 17,500 157 175,000 Local Match 10% S-21 Railroad Safe improvements - West Med Lake Dr 500 1,275,000 S-22 Street Reconstruction - District 78 595,000 680,000 2,365,000 S-23 Street Reconstruction - District 76 1,140,000 1,225,000 Total 1,735,000 2,355,000 1,832,500 9,324,500 0 0 0 0 15,247,000 27th & Fembrook, 34th & Fembrook, and Harbor Lane & Fembrook RECORD OF MEETING Hennepin County / City of Plymouth CSAH 101; County Project 9516 Queensland Ln & 26th Ave. N Cul -De -Sac Meeting Monday - June 27, 2005 - 5:00 p.m. DOCUMENTED BY: Guy Nowlan LOCATION OF MEETING: City of Plymouth, Administration Conference Room SUBJECT: Neighborhood meeting to review Queensland Lane and 26th Ave. N. cul-de-sac alternates. ATTENDEES: NAME Guy Nowlan Craig Twinem Ron Quanbeck Jen & Dave Baugh Cookie & Ernie Kulas Braden Canfield Shawn Gardner Josette Repke Dave & Ellen Osmonson RESIDENTIAL or BUSINESS ADDRESS Hennepin County Hennepin County City of Plymouth 2500 Queensland Lane 2505 Queensland Lane 2510 Queensland lane 2515 Queensland Lane 1773026 1h Ave. N 1773526 1h Ave. N Harry & Diane Hosker (Absent) 1772026 1h Ave. N Sally McCabe (Absent) 1772526 1h Ave. N BACKGROUND: E-MAIL or PHONE 763-745-7655 763-745-7653 763-509-5525 763-476-1024 763-475-2522 763-537-4797 763-473-3027 763-473-4746 763-473-1714 osmod4l na,comcast.net 763-473-4795 763- - A meeting was held to inform the residents of the latest cul-de-sac design alternates for the intersections of 141 @ 26th & 101 @ Queensland Lane and as a follow-up to the 5/31/05 meeting. Residents were invited by telephone. The invite list consisted of those residents that attended the 5/31/05 meeting at Plymouth. I asked that the invitees inform their immediate neighbors of the meeting. One resident (2625 CR 101 - Dan Gutlovics,) wasn't available to contact. His email wouldn't work and I didn't have a phone number. There are two that haven't participated in discussions concerning the closure of 26th Ave. (17720 — Harry and Diane Hosker & 17725 — Sally McCabe). There were 5 alternates for Queensland Lane and 4 alternates for 26th Ave. N. displayed. See the attachment for copies of the alternates. Alternate 1 for each location is shown on Layout 3. SUMMARY OF COMMENTS FROM MEETING: Residents reviewed their street alternates. For 26'x' Ave. the preferred option was Alternate #2, to place the cul-de-sac toward property 17735 — Dave and Ellen Osmonson. They want to be bought out and 17730 — Jossette Repke stated she wanted to remain in her home. For Queensland Lane the preferred options were Alternate 4 & 5, to place the cul-de-sac toward property 2505 — Cookie and Ernie Kulas or 2500 — Dave and Jen Baugh. Both residents want the cul- de-sac placed on their property so they would be bought out. The other alternates were not as appealing for various reasons. The residents voiced their concerns, but were asked to transmit an email or letter so there wouldn't be any confusion on their position. Landscape on side slopes if the wall at Queensland Lane is eliminated. Noise, drainage, property values, driveway grades, and etc. Braden provided a plan view of a drainage problem he would like corrected as part of the project. A picture of the English Dry Stack wall was displayed. X -sections were available for viewing (24"' thru 26") ACTION ITEMS: Residents were asked to transmit their comments and conclusions to Henn. Co. Henn. Co. and City are to review alternates, comments, and letters and formulate an engineering decision on where the cul-de-sacs should be placed. The residents are to be notified prior to Layout #3 council consideration. ROUTE TO: COPY TO: Guy Nowlan, Craig Twinem, Nick Peterson, Mark File: 101/9516/RW Stafne Doran Cote, Ron Quanbeck, Dan Campbell CSAH 101- PROJECT 9516 PUBLIC RESPONSE CUL-DE-SAC MEETING JUNE 279 2005 July 28, 2005 Queensland Ave. N Cul-de-sac Responses Jen & Dave Baugh 2500 Queensland Lane 763-476-1024 Cookie & Ernie Kulas 2505 Queensland Lane 763-475-2522 Braden Canfield 2510 Queensland Lane 763-537-4797 Shawn Gardner 2515 Queensland Lane 763-473-3027 Prefers Queensland Alternate #4 or #5. No project at all. Prefers Queensland Alternate #4, with buy out. No preference stated, no property impacts, but wants drainage addressed. Prefers Queensland Alternate #1, then Alternate #5, and last Alternate #4. 26th Ave. N Cul-de-sac Responses Josette Repke 17730 26th Ave. N 763-473-4746 Dave & Ellen Osmonson 17735 26th Ave. N 763-473-1714 Harry & Diane Hosker (Absent) 17720 26th Ave. N 763-473-4795 Sally McCabe (Absent) 1772526 1h Ave. N 763- - Peggy Snow 17925 26th Ave. N (West leg) 763-473-1068 Doesn't want to be bought out. Prefers 26th Ave. N Alternate #2. No project at all. Prefers 26th Ave. N Alternate #2, with buy out. Prefers 26th Ave. N Alternate #2. No contact, no property impacts. Not on cul-de-sac. Prefers 26th Ave. N Alternate #2, with the additional buy out of property 17820 25th Ave. N. to reduce impacts to her property. CSAH 101 - PROJECT 9516 PUBLIC CONCERNS FROM THE JUNE 21s'2005 MEETING Support the plan. 17825 24"h Ave. N. (Laura & Bob Moore) 2330 Co Rd 101 N. (Brenda Hukriede) Totally against project. Expect legal action. 17735 26`h Ave. N. (Dave & Ellen Osmonson) Buy out request. 17825 24°i Ave. N. (Laura & Bob Moore) 2505 Queensland (Cookie & Ernie Kulas) 2500 Queensland (Jen & Dave Baugh) 1791028 1h Ave. N. (Matthew Howe) Add a right turn and left turn lane at Merrimac Lane. Block headlights from shining across Kreatz Lake to our homes. 2112 Merrimac Lane N. (Forrest Harstad) Add right turn lane or widen radius at Merrimac Lane. Add climbing vines to Kreatz Lake side of wall. 2116 Merrimac Lane N. (Alf & Rolly Heitkamp) Add right turn lane or widen radius at Merrimac Lane. 2234 Merrimac Lane N. (Paul Puleo) Concerned about losing property and trees. Which trees are lost? 1350 Co Rd 101 N. (Amy Brusegaard) Requests the berm be replaced or a wall be installed. 2830 Ranier Lane N. (Donn Warhol) 2840 Ranier La. (Andrew Aarstad) Concerned with tree lose, hill they sit on and sound improvements. Wants to discuss these concerns with someone. 2745 Olive Ln. (Jerry Johnson) Requesting a signal at 25`h Ave. N with the project. There is already a problem turning left onto CSAH 101. The cul-de-sacs will make this worse. 2330 Co Rd 101 N. (Brenda Hukriede) Expand pond in yard 2725 Olive La. (Larry Trout) Drainage problems exist in back yard now. How does the project affect drainage? 2710 Queensland Lane N (Darla Dahlager) Requests that a wall be installed to reduce sloping into back yard. 2720 Queensland lane N (Jacob Peterson) Concerned for safety, privacy, noise and property values. 2750 Queensland Lane (Clotine Ramos) Concerned with the type of fence installed along her frontage and construction vibration. Wants to be involved with fence selection. 2310 Co Rd 101 N. (Cheryl Albrecht) MEMO CITY OF PLYMOUTH 3400 Plymouth Boulevard Plymouth, Plymouth, MN 55447 DATE: August 16, 2005 TO: Laurie Ahrens, City Manager and Mike Kohn, Financial Analyst FROM: c a ote, P.E., Director of Public Works SUBJECT: CSAH 101 RECONSTRUCTION CITY PROJECT NO. 5102 Mayor Johnson recently requested a comparison of the City's share of project costs on the CSAR 101 Reconstruction Project from CSAH 24 to TH 55 (City Project No. 9005) and the proposed cost share on the County's CSAH 101 Reconstruction Project from 12"' Avenue to CSAH 24. (City Project No. 5102). Based on information available in our file, below please find a cost sharing comparison, costs have been rounded for comparison purposes): Not included in County's 7/26/05 estimate (attactiecl). Please note that costs reflected above do not include $235,000 other City incurred costs (fencing, landscaping, consulting services, in-house engineering). attachment O:\Fnglneering\PROJECTS\2000-2009\5102\Memos\Laurie_Compar_101_55 8_11.<loc City Pra.ject No. 9005 City Proiect No, 5102 Item Total City Share o Total City Share Roadway Construction 5,900,000 1,235,000 21 9,000,000 1,100,000 12 Retaining Walls 150,000 70,000 47 3,750,000 530,000 14 Right -of -Way 2,400,000 860,000 36 4,500,000 2,250,000 50 Engineering/Admin. 1,070,000 243,000 23 1,620,000 300,000 19 Total: 9,520,000 2,408,000 25 18,870,000 4,180,000 22 Not included in County's 7/26/05 estimate (attactiecl). Please note that costs reflected above do not include $235,000 other City incurred costs (fencing, landscaping, consulting services, in-house engineering). attachment O:\Fnglneering\PROJECTS\2000-2009\5102\Memos\Laurie_Compar_101_55 8_11.<loc Preliminary Cost Estimate County State Aid Highway 101 County Project 9516 7/26/2005 item Total Cost Federal Hennepin Plymouth Length Cost per Mile CSAH 10/8727 Mar -05 9.4 million 1.8 miles Roadway Construction Cost (1) 9,000,000 3,529,412 4,376,471 1,094,118 CIP Concrete Wails (50% Sharing) (2) 1,750,000 686,275 531,863 531,863 CIP Concrete Walls (3) 2,000,000 784,314 1,215,686 18% Design & Contract administration 292,676 292,676 RNV Cost (4) 4,500,000 2,250,000 2,250,000 Landscaping (5) (6) 127,500 127,500 Total Cost $17,670,176 $5,000,000 $8,501,520 $4,168,657 Notes 1) Assumes a general 80% Hennepin and/20% Plymouth cost split for preliminary estimate only. Actual City cost to be determined by Hdnnepin Cost Participation Policy during detail design phase. 2) Walls to reduce RAN acquisition considered part of RW acquisition. 50% Hennepin and 50% Plymouth) wails Gro $90 per sf, includes chain link fence) 3) Walls to reduce wetland / pond impacts considered 100% Hennepin. 4) RAN cost estimate updated 7/21/05, (50% Hennepin and 50% Plymouth) Includes total acquisition of 17825 24th Ave., 2505 Queensland Lane, 17830 25th Ave., and 17735 26th Ave. 5) Hennepin landscaping limited to 1 % of the roadway construction cost for tree replacement only. 6) Hennepin Roadside Enhancement Partnership Program ( REPP) will fund qualifing streetscape / landscape elements. Level of contribution Is subject to the limitations of the program and requires a request letter. See cost participation policy for details and limitations. Cost per Mile Comparison (2005 dollars) Project Bid Date Const. Cost Length Cost per Mile CSAH 10/8727 Mar -05 9.4 million 1.8 miles 5.2 million CSAH 101/9918 Mar -05 17.3 million 2.1 miles 8.2 million CSAH 81/0117 19.1 million 1.8 miles 10.6 million CSAH 101/9516 13.0 million 1,6 miles 8.0 million prelest_07 26_05.xls Agenda Number: TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Laurie Ahrens, City Managerl SUBJECT: Consider appointment to Planning Commission DATE: August 11, 2005, for Special Council Meeting of August 23, 2005 The City Council should consider the process for making an appointment to the Planning Commission to fill a vacancy. attached are copies of the applications that we have on file, as well as rosters of the City's various advisory commissions. The Council could appoint an applicant from the list provided, move a commissioner to the Planning Commission from another commission, consider other appointees, or solicit for more applications and schedule interviews.