The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCity Council Packet 06-06-2005 SpecialAgenda City of Plymouth Special City Council Meeting Monday, June 6, 2005 7:00 PM City Hall Lunchroom 1. Call to Order 2. Discuss Co. Rd. 101 3. Set future Study Sessions 4. Adj ourn 2 DATE: June 1, 2005 for City Council Study Meeting June 6, 2005 TO: Laurie Ahrens, City Manager through Doran Cote, Director of Public Works FROM: Daniel K. Campbell, Sr. Engineering Technician and Ronald S. Quanbeck, City Engineer SUBJECT: COUNTY ROAD 101 RECONSTRUCTION CITY PROJECT NO. 5102 Background: Hennepin County is proposing to reconstruct County Road 101 between 12th Avenue and County Road 24. The County is requesting City approval of the layout before they proceed with the final design. They also would like authorization from the City Council to proceed with property acquisition in accordance with County policy which includes a 50% cost share by the City. City staff have been working with Hennepin County to develop the layout and feel it is time for City Council review and input. A presentation on the project will be made by Hennepin County staff at the June 6, 2005 City Council study meeting. An information sheet on the project and project layout'are attached. Layout: The layout provides the guide for the final design of the roadway. It identifies impacts to properties in a general way. The County may make minor changes to the layout, but significant changes would be brought back to the City Council. The project extends from 12th Avenue to approximately 30th Place, where the previous County Road 101 project ended. The layout provides for two lanes in each direction with turn lanes at major intersections. Concrete medians are planned for the area between 13th Avenue and Merrimac Lane. The remaining median areas would be delineated with paint as a means to minimize the impacts to adjacent residents. Trails are provided on both sides of the roadway. County Road 101 would generally follow the existing right-of-way, but deviates from south of 191h Avenue to south of 24th Avenue to provide adequate curve radii and sight distance. Several retaining walls are proposed to minimize impacts to adjacent properties and the lakes and ponds. The traffic signals at 14th Avenue and County Road 6 would also be reconstructed. No other traffic signals are currently proposed, but the other intersections will be reviewed to determine if warrants for a traffic signal are met. 0:\Engineuing\PR0JECTS\2000 - 2009\5102\Memos\CC Cty 101 Medoc SUBJECT: COUNTY ROAD 101 RECONSTRUCTION Page 2 Access: Access to County Road 101 would be limited at several locations to improve operation and safety. Access throughout the corridor would remain the same except as noted below. South of County Road 6 access remains the same except 3 single family residences north of 12th Avenue would be limited to right-in/right-out access only. A median extending north from County Road 6 would allow only right-in/right-out access for the south driveway of Rick's Market. Full access would remain at the north driveway that also corresponds to the access for Oakwood Elementary School. The first driveway north of County Road 6 on the west side, a dentist office, would be eliminated. That property would be accessed from its other driveway on Merrimac Lane. The layout proposes to realign 19th Avenue and 25th/26th Avenues to eliminate the offset intersections and improve sight distances. The realigmnents improve safety by reducing driver conflicts and allowing construction of left turn lanes at both locations. Nineteenth Avenue east of County Road 101, 25th Avenue, and 26th Avenue are designated minor collectors in the City's Transportation Plan. The City's Trail Plan also identifies a proposed on road bike route on 25th Avenue. Traffic signals are not proposed for the intersections at this time. However, the intersections would need to be realigned if traffic signals were to be installed at some point in time. The realigned intersections would be stronger candidates for a future signal than if they are left offset. These realignments will impact adjacent properties. The layout identifies elimination of 4 side street access points, Merrimac Lane west of County Road 101,24 th Avenue east of County Road 101, Queensland Lane west of County Road 101, and 26th Avenue east of County Road 101. Cul de sac turnarounds meeting City standards would be constructed at each of these locations. In addition, access for a private drive serving 4 houses on the east side of County Road 101 south of 24th Avenue would be eliminated. The drive would be rerouted to 24th Avenue. Property Acquisition: The layout provides a general idea how properties are impacted. However the specific impacts won't be known until well into the design process. Hennepin County would like authorization from the City Council to proceed with property acquisition. County Policy requires that the City share the cost of property acquisition 50/50 with the County. The actual acquisition would occur after the design has reached a point that the specific areas can be identified and described. Efforts will be made to minimize the easements needed. For example, these efforts include a number of retaining walls to minimize impacts on private property as well as to lessen environmental impacts. Despite efforts to reduce the amount of land needed for this project, there would still be significant impacts to some properties including total acquisition. Property Owner Involvement: A series of information meetings for the public have been held. The meetings are described below and summaries of comments received at the meetings are attached. WEngineeringTROJECTS\2000 - 2009\5102\Memos\CC Cty 101 Memo.doc SUBJECT: COUNTY ROAD 101 RECONSTRUCTION Page 3 At the first public meeting held on January 27, 2005, the County presented a preliminary layout depicting the difference between a four -lane roadway with medians, a four -lane divided roadway with a two-way left turn lane, and a four -lane undivided roadway. A presentation was also given on the purpose and justification for the improvement, current and projected traffic volumes, proposed schedule and estimated project cost. Comments were received both verbally and in writing. Based on public comments received and input from Plymouth Engineering staff, County staff prepared a second layout. The second layout has a combination of a four -lane divided roadway with turn lanes between 14th Avenue and Merrimac Lane, and a four -lane undivided roadway with turn lanes from Merrimac Lane to 30th Avenue. Access was also eliminated at five locations along with the realignment of two intersections. Separate meetings were held on April 4, 2005 and April 21, 2005 with the four property owners who have the private drive that currently accesses County Road 101 south of 24th Avenue to discuss alternatives to provide safer access to County Road 101. A private drive to 24th Avenue, parallel to County Road 101, was the preferred option. On April 28, 2005 a separate meeting was also held with property owners who would be directly affected by the realignment of 25th/26th Avenue intersections. The property acquisition process was explained and attempts will be made by the County to lessen the impacts to the property on the west side of County Road 101 at 26th Avenue. The next meetings were held with businesses/property owners between 14th Avenue and Merrimac Lane on May 11, 2005 and residential properties between Merrimac Lane and 30th Avenue on May 12, 2005. Comments from the business property owners revolved around change in access and impacts to their property. A meeting arranged by Mayor Johnson, Councilmember Slavik and County Commissoner Steele was held on May 31, 2005. Notes from that meeting are also attached. Funding: County Road 101 is in both Hennepin County's and the City's Capital Improvements Programs (CIPS). A significant portion of the project cost is from Federal funding the County has already secured. The City's CIP which was approved last Fall was based on the 2004-2008 Hennepin County CIP. The table below shows the estimated City cost of the project at various stages of project development. This does not include work on City utilities in the right-of-way which will likely be needed. Applicable pages from the three CIPS are attached. 210,000 of this is Right -of -Way 0:\EngineeringTROJECTS\2000 - 2009\5102\Memos\CC Cty 101 Memo:doc City 2006 City 2007 Total City Cost Total Project Cost Desi & R/W Construction CIP 420,000 210,000 630,000 8,371,000City 2004-2008 County 420,000 208,000 628,000 8,369,000 CIP 2005-2009 County 210,000 960,000* 1,170,000 10,399,000 CIP 210,000 of this is Right -of -Way 0:\EngineeringTROJECTS\2000 - 2009\5102\Memos\CC Cty 101 Memo:doc SUBJECT: COUNTY ROAD 101 RECONSTRUCTION Page 4 Hennepin County typically provides 1% of the project cost for landscaping and prefers that the City administer a separate landscaping project. Depending on the level of landscaping required this will also likely increase the City's total cost. The City's share of construction and landscaping would be from Municipal State Aid funds. Utility work would be from the Sewer Fund, the Water Fund, or the Water Resource Fund depending on the work done. Relationship to County Road 24: Hennepin County is also proposing to reconstruct County Road 24 from Olive Lane to Jewell Lane. While the projects are geographically close Hennepin County believes County Road 24 is less controversial and would like the projects to proceed on separate parallel tracks. If the design and approval process allow they may be combined into one construction contract, but if County Road 101 is delayed they could proceed with County Road 24 separately. The City Council was previously provided with an information sheet and layout for this project as well. Schedule: Both County and City CIPS provide funding in 2006 for design and right-of-way and in 2007 for construction. The current schedule has bid letting for County Road 101 in late 2007 with construction beginning in 2008 and ending in 2009. Staff Recommendation: We recommend that the City Council provide comments to Hennepin County that would allow completion of a layout acceptable to the City or identify the additional information needed to complete the layout. Approval of the layout will be scheduled for a future City Council meeting. Attachments: Information Sheet Layout Summaries of comments received at information meetings Selected pages from CIPS O:\EngineeringTROJECTS\2000 -2009\5102\Memos\CC Cty 101 Memo.doc HENNEPIN Hennepin 110 , COUNTY PROJECT INFORMATION May 12, 2005 CSAH 101 — S. of CSAH 6 to S. of CSAH 24 Hennepin County Project 9516 SP 27-701-13 Hennepin County Transportation Department and the City of Plymouth are collaborating in the development of a proposal to reconstruct 1.4 miles of County State Aid Highway (CSAR) 101 from south of CSAR 6 to south of CSAH 24 as a multi -lane roadway. If you have questions, a county and city contact appears at the end of this document. Purpose & Justification The purpose of the project is to improve the condition of the pavement, improve safety, and to increase capacity. The corridor has multiple deficiencies: pavement structure and surfacing, horizontal curvature, vertical curvature, drainage flow with unwanted ponding, and limited traffic capacity for future volume projections. Background Information Hennepin County received jurisdiction of MnDOT Trunk Highway 101 on January 30, 1989, which changed the roadway designation to CSAH 101 The reconstruction project is funded in the Department's 2007 element of the approved Capital Improvement Program. The department is serving as the lead agency in the development of the roadway reconstruction project. The design will be coordinated with city staff, the business community, property owners and affected utility companies. The corridor consists of a mix of businesses, rental units, and single-family dwellings. Pavement History The county has placed overlays and seal coated, widened a shoulder at 25th Avenue North, and reconstructed the roadway between 30th Avenue North and MN TH 55. CSAR 6 from Olive Lane North to Shenandoah Lane North is scheduled for mill and overlay in summer 2005, which crosses CSAR 101. Existing Roadway Section The existinroadway is a two-lane facility with minimal gravel shoulders and drainage ditches north of 19t Avenue North. There are multiple side streets with entrances staggered across CSAH 101. The roadway curve north of Merrimac Lane North and 24th Avenue North is deficient in both horizontal and vertical curvature with minimal sight lines for intersecting side streets. Proposed Roadway Section Preliminary layout #1, shown at the January 27, 2005 public informational meeting, displayed CSAH 101 using the existing roadway alignment and three different typical roadway cross sections, 74' wide 4 -lane divided roadway with raised medians, 66' wide 4 -lane divided roadway with a 2 -way left turn lane, and 52' wide 4 -lane undivided roadway. The various widths were compared side-by-side to reflect their differences. Preliminary layout #2, shown at the May 11 12, 2005 public informational meeting, has been updated to represent the result of comments and concerns from the January 2005 meeting, discussions with city staff, applicable engineering design standards, and comments received from meeting one-on-one with impacted property owners. Layout #2 depicts a roadway cross section that is a combination of the three sections shown on Layout #1 with each having a particular purpose for the segment. See the following listing for a summary of roadway sections along CSAR 101 from MN TH 12 to MN TH 55. MN TH 12 to 13`h Avenue North 52' wide 4 -lane undivided (existing) 13`h Avenue North to Merrimac Lane North 74' wide 4 -lane divided with raised center medians (proposed) Merrimac Lane North to 24th Avenue North 52' wide undivided (proposed) 24`h Avenue North to 30`h Avenue North 66' wide divided with painted center medians (proposed) 30`h Avenue North to CSAH 24 74' wide 4 -lane divided with raised center medians (existing) CSAH 24 to MN TH 55 74' wide 4 -lane divided with raised center medians (existing) Right and/or left turn lanes require additional width to improve capacity and safety where traffic - turning volumes are high. Roadway Classification and Traffic Volumes CSAH 101 is classified as a minor arterial road. Minor arterial roads provide service for trips of moderate length and mobility. They connect to urban principal arterial roads and city streets. Arterials generally have higher design standards than other roads, often with multiple lanes and some degree of access control. Arterials serve to provide more mobility than access. A presentation explaining the road classification system was provided at the May 12, 2005 public informational meeting and can be repeated upon request. CSAH 101 average daily traffic (ADT) in 2004 was 15,000 vehicles with a projected 2025 volume of 22,800. The corridor growth is contributed to low-level background growth due to area wide development and travel patterns. Little additional growth is expected due to local development / redevelopment. It is anticipated the traffic will experience a growth rate of 2%, which is a typical growth rate for the countywide area. Roads with an ADT of 15,000 vehicles, as stated in the State Aid Rules, will generally require four through lanes to accommodate traffic. Ouerational Analvsis / Traffic Simulation The county has contracted with URS Consulting Inc. to assist with the determination of the necessary number of through lanes. Despite State Aid Rules dictating the need for four through lanes, the county felt it was prudent to review the traffic volume condition on CSAH 101. The simulation was provided for the existing roadway 2 -Lane configuration, a proposed 3 -lane with center dual left turn lane, a proposed 52' wide 4 -lane undivided, a proposed 4 -lane divided, and a 4 -lane with center dual left turn lane each using peak. hour volumes for 2005 and 2025. The existing roadway 2 -lane configuration with 2025 traffic volumes resulted in saturation of the signalized intersections and a steady stream of traffic; along CSAH 101, such that entering side street traffic had unacceptable delays. The 3 -lane section results were similar to the 2 -lane configuration. All three 4 -lane configurations provided similar performance with an acceptable traffic level of service at the signalized intersections and opportunities for side street traffic to enter CSAH 101. The result was in agreement with State Aid Rules: four lanes are necessary to accommodate 2025 traffic volumes. The simulation highlights were shown at the May 12, 2005 public informational meeting and can be repeated upon request. Traffic Signals There are two existing signalized intersections on the project and both are owned and operated by the county. The CSAR 101 at 14th Ave. N. traffic. signal was constructed in 1993 and the CSAR 101 at CSAH 6 traffic signal was part of the roadway turn -back from MnDOT in 1989. Both traffic signals will be replaced with the project. A new third traffic signal at CSAH 101 and 25th /26 th Avenues North has been discussed. The offset cross street alignments are being joined at CSAH 101 with the project to accommodate a possible future traffic signal installation. Signal warrants will be reviewed has part of the project. A city trail is also planned to cross at or near this intersection. Access Control and SPacin2 The CSAH 101 project corridor area includes offset intersections of side streets. Such offset intersections are products of adjacent housing developments and their associated offset road alignments. These offset alignments and intersections contradict the roadway classification function of a minor arterial road by providing multiple uncontrolled access points. Therefore, the project proposal realigns side streets at two locations and eliminates four side street connections by placing cul-de-sacs. The loss of access will divert traffic to adjacent access points. For example, closing Merrimac Lane North, west of CSAH 101, will direct traffic to 19th Avenue North; closing Queensland Lane North will direct traffic to 26th Avenue North, west of CSAH 101; closing 24th Avenue North, east of CSAH 101, will direct traffic to 25th Avenue North; and closing 26th Avenue North, east of CSAH 101, will direct traffic to 25th Avenue North and/or 28th Avenue North. The streets being closed from CSAH 101 are short in length and will divert a small amount of traffic. The closures will provide access control and improved access spacing, thus reducing conflict points, which will reduce the opportunity for crashes. There will be properties that experience a slight increase in traffic past their homes. In addition to the side street closures, 19`h Avenue North at CSAH 101 and 25`h Avenue North / 26`h Avenue North at CSAH 101 will be realigned and designed with lane configurations capable of handling the insubstantially increased traffic volumes with a 40' curb—to-curb width accommodating three lanes at the intersections, two out and one in from CSAH 101. Currently, the south sight line for 19`h Avenue North is very limited because of a wood retaining wall. The 19`h Avenue North intersection will be moved to the east to provide minimum sight distance to the south. Also, there are residents on Queensland Avenue North and on 28`h Avenue North west junction requesting closure of their streets. Documented closure requests include residents at 17910 & 18005 28`h Ave. N., and 2510 Queensland Lane. The realignments and closure points will be analyzed in an attempt to reduce impacts. The closures and side street realignments currently require two total property acquisitions. County access spacing guidelines call for `/4 mile spacing for full access and 660 foot spacing for partial access. The proposal with the side street closures improves the spacing but falls short of the guideline. The county supports the described access control measures to reduce crashes associated with conflict point reduction and access spacing. Driveways The corridor has three existing driveways. Two of the driveways will be modified as necessary in their existing location. The remaining driveway serves four homes on a blind curve, which is a safety concern. The residents share a 20' wide driveway that serves as a frontage drive parallel to CSAH 101. Each property is connected to the east side of this frontage drive. The frontage drive is owned and maintained by the four properties. The residents are interested in closing the existing access to CSAH 101 for safety reasons. The existing sight line is substandard and will not be corrected with the proposed reconstruction. Four alternates were presented to the four frontage drive residents and two adjacent property owners. Alternate 1 provided an extended frontage driveway north over an adjacent property to 24`h Avenue North where a cul-de-sac is proposed. Alternate 2 provided an extended frontage driveway south over the Anthony Thomas Inc. townhouse development frontage drive to Merrimac Lane North cul-de-sac. Alternate 3 provided an additional north bound lane on CSAH 101 to allow for acceleration prior to merging into the through lane, which would compensate for the lack of sight distance to the south with a minor sight distance improvement for left turns to the south. Alternate 4 provided replacement of the driveway at its existing location. The neighborhood preferred alternate 1. The additional impact of alternate 1 compounded the impact of the proposed cul-de-sac on 24`h Avenue North to such a degree that second total acquisition would be necessary. The property owner affected by the possible total acquisition has been has been involved in project discussions and is waiting for a definite plan. The county supports alternate 1 to alleviate the safety concern relating to lack of sight distance at the existing driveway location. Crash History 28 crashes are on record for the project corridor between CSAH 6 and 30`h Avenue North during the three-year period 2000 —2002. The area north of Merrimac Lane North has a 2.6 three-year crash rate average per million vehicle miles, which is above the county average of 1.85. CSAH 101 at CSAH 6 and at 14`h Avenue North intersections, both signalized, experienced 44 crashes and both exceed the county average. Recommendations to mitigate the crash rate averages are to construct a 4 -lane divided center raised median section between CSAH 6 and Merrimac Lane North, add left and right turn lanes where feasible, coordinate signal timing to help minimize stops, modify minor side street access from full to right -in / right -out or close entirely, reduce / consolidate driveway access to CSAH 101. The county supports the project proposal that incorporates these recommendations. Environmental Concerns The proposed road alignment and cross section are likely to impact DNR wetlands adjacent to the corridor. The wetland types are 3, 4, and 5. The wetland delineation is in process with the extent of the impact yet to be determined. The road alignment will be reevaluated to determine if wetland avoidance is feasible. The county will coordinate with city staff to meet regulatory agency requirements. Drainage The existing drainage consists primarily of roadside ditches routed to ponds and wetlands. There are properties experiencing standing water for periods of time after storm events. The project will attempt to alleviate this condition if deemed necessary work for the project or as additional work at city direction. The proposed drainage system would consist of storm water routing via concrete curb and gutter and collection in a new concrete storm sewer system. The storm water will be directed to the same locations as the existing flows and treated prior to discharge. New culverts will be provided for storm water that passes over land and under CSAH 101. The county will coordinate with city staff to meet regulatory agency requirements. Landscaping Plan Currently a landscaping plan is not proposed. However, the county cost participation does provide for funding at the level of 1% of the project cost. The county prefers the city use the funding for a separate landscape project to follow completion of the road project. Pedestrian Accommodations The corridor is designated as a bicycle route in the Hennepin County Bicycle System Plan. The System Plan calls for a continuous trail on one side of the road. The city staff supports placing a second trail on the opposite side of the road so that a trail is provided on both sides. This will allow for usage by neighborhoods on each side of the road without having crossing CSAH 101. Crosswalks meeting ADA requirements will be provided at all intersection corners. Pedestrian indications will be provided at signalized intersections with count down timers. Bus shelter relocation will be coordinated with the city bus system provider. Construction Staging The initial goal is to build half the project length during stage 1 and the other side during stage 2. This would leave one lane of travel in each direction for both stages. The details of the staging plan will be finalized during the detail design process. There are several walls and culvert crossings that will be coordinated with each stage or construct separately. Access will be provided or rerouted as necessary with signs to route traffic and pedestrians. The construction project manager will conduct weekly contractor meetings that will be open to the public. Project updates will also be posted on the county website. Public Involvement Public involvement began with the January 2005 kick-off meeting. A second set of meetings has been scheduled for May 11 & 12, 2005, one for business owners and one for property owners. There have been individual meetings with small groups to discuss impacts directly associated with their properties. It is anticipated that one-on-one meetings will continue both during the preliminary layout process and detail design plan process. Comment Summary Comments received to date are summarized as follows. Speed limit reduction, provide landscaping, improve conditions for entering CSAH 101, improve sight lines, reduce access with cul-de-sac placement, provide a trail, environmental impact, noise levels, property values, skew alignment of intersections, and loss of yards. Schedule The.preliminary design phase of the project is anticipated to be complete by mid -summer 2005. The preliminary layout will be developed based on State Aid standards, input gathered from property owners, and regulatory agencies. Neighborhood involvement will be solicited at open houses. City Council approval of the preliminary layout is anticipated summer 2005. Upon City Council approval of the preliminary layout the county will be the lead agency for detail design, right of way acquisition, and construction contract administration. Neighborhood open houses will occur during plan development and again prior to presenting the final plan to the city council for final detail plan approval. It is.anticipated that bid letting will occur fall of 2007 and construction will begin spring of 2008 and finish in fall of 2009. Roadway and Right of Way Funding / Cost Estimates The estimated cost for the CSAH 101 project is $11 million, including construction and right of way acquisitions. An updated estimate will be provided once the preliminary layout receives its last revision. A combination of Federal, State Aid, County and City funds will be used to finance the project. City participation for the roadway varies but is typically 10% of the project cost and right of way is fixed at 50%. No special assessments are anticipated. Contacts For more information or if you have specific questions, please call or visit the county and/or city websites: Hennepin County Transportation Department Guy Nowlan, P.E., Senior Project Manager Phone: 763-745-7655 www.co.hennepin.mn.us City of Plymouth Ron Quanbeck, P.E., City Engineer Phone: 763-509-5525 www.ci.plymouth.mn.us fi 01 i r 'J. E n4 B P f Lr 4iH-• eb p a 4 e x' S r { 5 i _ Y f _ 1 i1• a 11 3^l A W N ^,a •.. '• - A :1 , fl' , ..l y t7 fk^ f E:3- . f. fi 01 i r 'J. E n4 B P f Lr 4iH-• eb p a 4 e x' S r { s_ eS 'a •fit , } i A W N ^,a •.. '• - A :1 , fl' , ..ly t7 fk^ f F'ta' f. hG4]. y ria Y IF, -.l -, `•* yq CSAH 101 - PROJECT 9516 CSAH 24 - PROJECT 9617 COMMENT CARD CONCERNS FROM THE JANUARY 27TH MEETING LOWER SPEED LIMITS LANDSCAPING DIFFICULTY PULLING OUT SIGHT DISTANCE CLOSE SIDE ROADS TO 101 TRAILS ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY NOISE RECORD OF MEETING Hennepin County / City of Plymouth CSAH 101; County Project 9516 Monday - April 4th, 2005 - 6:00 p.m. DOCUMENTED BY: Guy Nowlan / Nick Peterson LOCATION OF MEETING: City of Plymouth, Bass Lake Room of City Hall SUBJECT: Neighborhood meeting to review new alternatives with cul-de-sacs at 24th Ave. No. ATTENDEES: NAME REPRESENTING PHONE Guy Nowlan Hennepin County, Trans. Dept. 763-745-7655 Nick Peterson Hennepin County, Trans. Dept. 763-745-7664 Dan Campbell City of Plymouth, Engr. Dept. 763-509-5522 Anne Hurlburt City of Plymouth, Comm. Dev. Dept. 763-509-5400 Nao Pao Xiong Resident -2300 CSAH 101 763-473-0217 Cheryl Albrecht Resident -2310 CSAH 101 763-258-0788 Raji Potential Buyer -2320 CSAH 101 N/A Steve & Brenda Hukriede Resident -2330 CSAH 101 763-475-3994 Laura Moore Resident -17825 24th N/A Kelly, Girlfriend of Dwight Zobel Resident -17830 24th 763-249-0159 Continued on reverse side _Yes _x—No) SUMMARY OF PROJECT & MEETING: Q See attached notes: D. Campbell e-mail, invitation letter. A meeting was held to inform the residents and Citv of the latest desisn alternatives for the intersection of 101 and 24th Ave., and the driveway shared by 2300 – 2330 CSAH 1.01. Most of the invited residents (invited by letter and telephone where possible- see attachment) attended the meeting, and the list of invited residents is listed above. The owner of 2320 could not attend because they are now in Florida, but the prospective buyer attended the meeting. Dan Campbell invited council members by email on April 1, 2005 (see attachment). The new alternatives all included a cul-de-sac for the WB approach and some realignment of the existing driveway by connecting and./or extending the existing driveway to the proposed cul-de-sac, andeg, nerall sliding the driveway 12 feet to the east. Also, retaining walls and access restrictions for 101 would be added. Continued on reverse side – x Yes No) SUMMARY OF COMMENTS FROM MEETING: All residents said they thought access to 101 would be safer with all design alternatives. Residents generally liked the proposal of a cul-de-sac and access change, though 17825 also said they were not pleased with the loss of land. Raji and his wife were present because they were interested in purchasing 2320, but left the meeting early because they were unhappy with the 12 -foot taking of their potential front yard. They said that this project was never disclosed to them by the owner/realtor and that they would no longer purchase the property because of this project's impact on their yard. All residents asked that the proposed driveway and cul-de-sac extents staked so that they can see how it would impact their property. The County stated that the worst case of the three alternatives would have the edge of bituminous staked. Cheryl Albrecht, 2130 Co. Rd 101, asked whether assessments would be levied against her property. Both the County and the City stated that no assessments would be required for this project unless the respective governing bodies were to change their current policies regarding assessments. Cheryl Albrecht, 2130 Co. Rd 101, asked when the right-of-way process would begin. The County noted that the acquisition process is currently schedule to begin April of 2006 and end April of 2007. Kelly, 17830 Co. Rd. 101, asked whether the pond on the north side of her property would be removed. The County noted that while the west side of the pond will be impacted due to the widening of 101 and the installation of a retaining wall, the pond will stay. Questions were posed regarding when an alternative would be selected and what level of detail would be available at that time. The County stated that July of 2005 is the desired date for final preliminary approval, at which time the alignment would be selected. and have detail very similar to what is currently available on the layout sheets. ROUTE TO: file COPY TO: Hennepin County Memo Transportation Department Design Division 1600 Prairie Drive Medina MN 55340-5421 DATE: April 21, 2005 TO: Guy Nowlan Mark Stafne File FROM: Nick Peterson SUBJECT: Driveway realignment and cul de sac site meeting minutes Recycled Paper Phone: 763-745-7664 Fax: 763-478-4000 TDD: 763-478-4030 This memo serves as a summary of the site meeting held on April 21, 2005 at the intersection of 24th Avenue and CSAH 101 in Plymouth, MN. A site visit of other locations within the project followed the meeting with the residents. Attendees: Guy Nowlan, Hennepin County Nick Peterson, Hennepin County Mark Stafne, Hennepin County Steve Hukriede, Resident - City of Plymouth Bob Moore, Resident - City of Plymouth Summary: This meeting provided a chance for residents to see and discuss the County's proposed changes to their existing driveway and the impact of a cul de sac on 24th Ave. The County answered resident questions after staking the approximate location of the proposed new driveway alignment and cul de sac. As a result of the meeting and site visit: Residents Have stakes indicating the edge of the proposed future driveway in their front yards. Had questions answered regarding the proposed alignment. Hennepin County - Design Acquired information regarding the location of an existing watermain on the north end of the existing driveway, passing through the front of the Hukriede lot. Noted 2505 Queensland driveway is on front of house, not side. Noted that house east of 17830 25th Ave is for sale. Noted that 17735 26th Ave. N. driveway is split, with the western portion going down to the side of the house with significant relief while the east half goes to the; front of the house. Retaining wall would be required here. Please contact me at 763-745-7664 with any questions that you have. Rev. 07/03) C:\Documents and Settings\rquanbec.CITYCENTER\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLK722\050421-Memo-24thAve-HC#101- 9516.doc RECORD OF MEE'T'ING Hennepin County / City of Plymouth CSAH 101; County Project 9516 Thursday - April 28th, 2005 - 4:00 p.m. DOCUMENTED BY: Guy Nowlan / Nick Peterson LOCATION OF MEETING: City of Plymouth, Engineering Conference Room of City Hall SUBJECT: Neighborhood meeting to review realignment of 251h and 26th Avenues ATTENDEES: NAME REPRESENTING PHONE Guy Nowlan Hennepin County, Trans. Dept. (Des) 763-745-7655 Nick Peterson Hennepin County, Trans. Dept. (Des) 763-745-7664 Sharon Dix Hennepin County, Trans. Dept (R/W) 763-745-7508 Dan Campbell City of Plymouth, Engr. Dept. 763-509-5522 John Hite Resident -17830 25th Ave. N. 763-478-0465 (h) 612-751-5181 (c) hitefam@mchsi.com Lisa Eidenschink Resident- 2580 Queensland 763-258-0788 Lori Brandt Resident- 18000 26th Ave. N. N/A Peggy Snow Resident- 17925 26th Ave. N. 763-475-3994 psnowmn@mac.com John Miller Resident- 18100 26th Ave. N. 952-258-3024 Continued on reverse side _Yes _x No) SUMMARY OF PROJECT & MEETING: 0 See attached notes: Attendee Map. A meetiniz was held to inform the residents of the latest desien option for the intersection of 101 and 25th &26 1h Avenues. Most of the invited residents (invited by telephone) attended the meeting The graphical depiction of invited residents and residents that attended, is attached. The chain of communication for attendees that were not originally invited to the meeting: Snow informed Eidenschink, Eidenschink informed Brandt and Miller. The owner of 17820 25th Ave. did not attend. This design option would make 25th and 26th Avenues line up and perpendicularly intersect CSAH 101. This option would require that land be purchased: some green space from 17925 Snow), total acquisition of 17830 (Hite), and green space from 17820 (Radhi). Continued on reverse side — x _Yes No) SUMMARY OF COMMENTS FROM MEETING: The general group asked why the project was necessary. The City and County both explained: o functional classifications of roadways o how 25/26 1h are planned as minor collectors possibly necessitating future collinear alignment o how improvement to road has been planned for over ten years o that a pathway has been planned for corridor o how pathway could necessitate an intersection of the type presented. Owner of 17820 25th Avenue North did not attend. Attendees all said that they didn't think they received any meeting notice cards for the previous Public Information Meetings. Ms. Brandt and Mr. Miller asked that we consider a skew intersection. The County explained its preference for a perpendicular intersection. Ms. Brandt and Mr. Miller asked that other alignment options be considered. The County explained that this alignment was created by selecting it from a number of other concept options because it restricted the direct effects of this portion of the project to only three properties. Mr. Hite asked what the protocol was for business owners/rental property owners when they are unable to find replacement tenants for their properties. The County briefly explained the acquisition process, but was unable to explain the rental question. The County noted that several items of the acquisition process are negotiable and that the rental portion may be; negotiable as well. Mr. Hite and others asked whether he should perform maintenance and/or improvements. The County noted that maintenance may be required by local laws. The County further noted that while improvements may be negotiable as part of the acquisition process, careful consideration is necessary prior to making any improvements to the property. Residents asked when the next meeting will be held. The County noted that it will be held on May 12, 2005 at the County's Public Works Facility in Medina, MN. ACTION ITEMS: Request additional information from R/W Division regarding how rental properties are acquired and/or reimbursed for their sales loss. ROUTE TO: file COPY TO: Guy Nowlan, Mark Stafne, File L- Sharon Dix (R/W) RECORD OF MEETING Hennepin County Transportation Department DOCUMENTED BY: Gene Willms PROJECT: 101/9516 LOCATION OF MEETING: Oakwood Elementary School DATE: May 3, 2005 TIME: 8:00 a.m. SUBJECT: Oakwood Elementary School Property ATTENDEES: See attached list NAME REPRESENTING PHONE EMAIL Gene Willms Hennepin County 763-745-7665 gene. willms(c,co.hennepin.mn.us Guy Nowlan Hennepin County 763-745-7655 guy.nowlan a,co.hennepin.mn.us Dennis Grasmick Oakwood Elementary School 763-745-5710 dennis.Qrasmickgwayzata.kl2.mn.us Joe Matson Wayzata Public Schools 763-745-5150 joe.matsongwayzata.k I 2.mn.us Continued on reverse side _Yes _ X No) DETAILS OF MEETING: ® See attached notes We introduced ourselves and Guy informed Dennis and Joe of the upcoming open house project meeting scheduled for May 12, 2005 at the Hennepin County Public Works facility in Medina. Also stated was the project is scheduled to begin in April of 2008. We discussed the school property and the probable impacts to the property. Attached is a bullet list of items discussed and a section for Actions to Take. ROUTE TO: Continued on reverse side Yes No) See Attached X Yes No) COPY TO: File: 101/9516, G. Nowlan. CSAH 101; County project 9516 Oakwood Elementary School Meeting Minutes 5-3-05 School Property Facts: o School constructed mid 1950's. o City of Plymouth Park & Recreation leases approximately 75% of school property. o School rumored to have been constructed on gravel pit. Items Discussed: o The trail on the south side of the property between CSAH 6 and the south parking lot/fire lane is named Saunders after a teacher. o Busses enter the school grounds from the entrance on CSAH 101 and use the service road to line up at the west school entrance. o Early August, after soccer tournament, would be the best and preferred time to reconstruct entrance. The intent is to complete construction after summer athletic activities late July and prior to the beginning of the new school year which begins after Labor Day. One of the two entrances must be open at all times. o School is in attendance between 7:40 a.m. and 2:30 p.m. School year starts after Labor Day and this year ends June 9, 2005. Anticipate an early June school year ending in the future. o Dennis would like to discourage pedestrians, students in particular from leaving the school property and crossing either CSAH 6 or CSAH 101. There hasn't been a recent problem. o Dennis and Joe would like to see the fire lane moved to the east and the curve flattened. This would improve sight distance. Joe would like 8' in back of retaining wall. Guy said the proposed wall faces CSAH 101 and didn't have a height available. o The playfield west of the school building is used primarily for physical education purposes. There are some uses like T ball but the construction impacts would not impair their use of the playfields. o North of entrance road from CSAH 101 there are storage buildings, warming house, pad mounted transformer, softball field, hockey rink and skating rink. o Trail through woods is a city trail. o The school does not have a sprinkler system. o Civil defense siren in the center of the school property. o School property may have been a gravel pit at one time. o Wood chips dumped adjacent to wetland on NE corner of 19'h Avenue and CSAH 101. o Land exchange: The legal description of the land being obtained must be approved by a lawyer representing the school district, then taken to the school board. The school board acts on items once a month. o Discussed utility locations. o A fox frequents the area north and west of the Central Services building. Not in the project area. Drainage: o There is a storm water outlet from the parking lot to the wetland (Kreatz Lake) on the north side of 19`h Ave. o Storm water in the front parking lot flows to the east onto CSAH 6 o (Water collected in the north parking lot flows to a catch basin and probably flows to wetlands.) ??? o West side of school and north of play area, flow is trough culverts under the service road / fire lane. CSAH 101; County project 9516 Oakwood Elementary School Meeting Minutes 5-3-05 Utilities: o Fiber optic along CSAH 6. o A power switch is located at the (west) entrance to school property (on the north side). o Gas from CSAH 6. o Water loop from CSAH 6 (in two places). o Power to school from CSAH 101. o Fiber optic from the east along 19`h Ave. N. to Central Services building and then across field to school. o Gas and electric come into school administration building at 19`h Ave. N. o Sanitary sewer location wasn't determined, thought to be from CSAH 6. o No sprinkler system. o Gas and electric from CSAH 101 to Central Services building. Suggested Design Info: o Move fire lane to the east allowing for eight feet between face of proposed wall and edge of bituminous. Result would be to flattened curves on each end and improved sight distance. o Provide the described parapet and rail if wall is in cut as stated.. o Provide project coordination with the school during construction. o Replace existing path on SW corner of property leading to traffic signal. School District Approval Process: o Submit plan and description of proposed project. o School Director of Business will present to school board. o Work session is likely. o Board acts once per month. o Process duration is 2 to 3 months. Contacts: o Dan Lower, playfield schedule. o Mark Peterson, Park Superintendent o Eric Blank, Director Plymouth Park and Recreation 763-509-5201 o Alan Hopeman, Wayzata School District Executive Director of Business o Joe Matson, Director, Buildings and Grounds Wayzata Public Schools o Dennis Grasmick, Principal Oakwood Elementary School o Stan Scofield, Plymouth Fire Inspector Actions Steps: o Research ownership of the civil defense siren located at the property center and how its wired. o Review history of school flashers and determine if they will be continued. What is the usage criteria? o Check city code for fire lane dimensions. o Provide a cross section on CSAR 101 to show the wall height and if wall is in cut or fill. It was stated at the meeting the wall was in cut but actually looked in fill when driving past. o Meet with Plymouth Park & Recreation Director to discuss past and future lease plan. Is mapping available? o Add Dennis and Joe to project mailing list or start an email list for those not on the mailing list. o Add bus company to utility listing. RECORD OF MEETING Hennepin County / City of Plymouth CSAH 101; County Project 9516 Wednesday - May 11th, 2005 - 1:00 p.m. DOCUMENTED BY: Guy Nowlan / Nick Peterson LOCATION OF MEETING: City of Plymouth, Council Room of City Hall SUBJECT: Public Information meeting to review layout #2 with commercial property owners ATTENDEES: NAME REPRESENTING PHONE Guy Nowlan Hennepin County, Trans. Dept. (Des) 763-745-7655 Nick Peterson Hennepin County, Trans. Dept. (Des) 763-745-7664 Doran Cote City of Plymouth, PW Dept. Dan Campbell City of Plymouth, Eng. Dept. 763-509-5522 Anne Hurlburt City of Plymouth, Comm. Dev. Dept. 763-509-5400 Ron Quanbeck City of Plymouth, Engr. Dept 763-509-5525 Rick Repasky Rick's Market 763-473-1561 Dave Johnson Oakwood Square 763-473-1525 Ronna Woolery Plymouth Colony 763-475-1679 Jan Allen Northwest Animal Hospital 763-475-2448 Fred Retzloff Wayzata School District, Trans. Dept. 763-745-5196 Continued on reverse side _Yes _x—No) SUMMARY OF PROJECT & MEETING: See attached notes: A meeting was held to inform the businesses, located near the south end of the proiect about the latest proposed layout (#2). The meeting was held in the Plymouth City Council Room at Plymouth City Hall. Business ownerseg nerally agreed that something needs to be done at the intersections at the south end, and that the rest of the project should help improve safety along the corridor. Only five commercial and school properties were represented at the meeting, although 14 were invited to attend. Continued on reverse side _ x _Yes No) SUMMARY OF COMMENTS FROM MEETING: Dave Johnson (Oakwood Square on SE corner) noted that the right -in entrance off of 101 is not acceptable to him as it is currently proposed. He was concerned about the loss of parking stalls for his business and the circulation of traffic on his site because; his other access to the south is so far away and difficult to navigate now. Ronna Woolery (Plymouth Colony apartment complex., next to Rick's) requested that a traffic light be considered for the Rick's/Plymouth Colony entrance. Ms. Woolery was concerned about safety and about traffic control for traffic accessing their sites. She was also concerned about the on-site dumpster, but advised that the dumpster would be fully considered during detail design. Jan Allen (Northwest Animal Hospital) did not like the closure of the road adjacent to her property Merrimac Lane) and did not like the loss of property due to widening and realignment. The property owners were interested in developing some of the existing green space on site. Fred Retzloff said he favored the project. Rick Repasky said he agreed with the idea of the project, but was concerned that his large truck delivery traffic will not be able to circulate his site. He further noted that he did not want his south entrance to be right in/right out. Mr. Repasky stated an interest in a traffic signal for his north entrance. ACTION ITEMS: The following three attendees requested enlarged layout prints of their sites: o Mr. Repasky (Rick's) o Ms. Allen (NW Animal Hospital) o Mr. Johnson (Oakwood Square) Discuss the Animal Hospital site with Doran Cote (City of Plymouth). Large truck turning movements need to be analyzed (AutoTum) for Rick's. The south entrance of Rick's (common intersection with the apartments and school across the street) should be studied for traffic signal warrants. This action was requested by several attendees. The north entrance for Oakwood Square should be studied to determine whether the proposed turn lane can be altered to lessen the impact on parking, and lessen the impact on traffic flow. The south entrance should be designed to allow for left turns. There is a daycare behind the building, precluding the routing of any traffic behind the building. ROUTE TO: file COPY TO: Guy Nowlan, Mark Stafne, File CSAH 101 - PROJECT 9516 COMMENT CARD CONCERNS FROM: THE MAY 12TH MEETING LESSEN IMPACTS AT 17925 26TH AVE. (PER 18000 26TH AVE) 1792526 TH AVE. WANTS IMPACTS TO 17925 26TH AVE LESSENED. CONCERNED ABOUT POLLUTION, DEBRIS (SALT/SAND/SOIL, ETC.), AND NOISE DURING AND AFTER CONSTRUCTION. CONCERNED ABOUT TREE REMOVAL, FOUNDATION DAMAGE, EXPOSURE TO TRAFFIC AT REALIGNED INTERSECTION ALLOWING TRAFFIC TO HIT HOUSE. 17910 28TH NEEDS TO BE STAKED. 2740 QUEENSLAND IS CONCERNED ABOUT SPEED, NOISE, AIR QUALITY. ALSO WONDERS WHY WE NEED 2 - 8' TRAILS ARE REQUIRED (ONE ON EACH SIDE). 2116 MERRIMAC DOES NOT LIKE EAST PATHWAY BEING SO HIGH AND THINKS PATHWAY SHOULD BE ON OTHER (WEST) SIDE. DOES NOT LIKE RETAINING WALL BETWEEN 19TH AND MERRIMAC. PREFERS AS MUCH SLOPE AS POSSIBLE; DUE TO AESTHETIC CONCERNS. 1794024 TH AVE. REQUESTED PLAN VIEW BE SENT BY MAIL. 18005 26TH AVE. WANTS TRAFFIC SIGNAL. ALSO WANTS SIGHT DISTANCE STUDIED AT 28TH AVE, PARTICULARLY TO THE NORTH. COMMENT CARD CONCERNS FROM THE MAY 11TH MEETING DAVE JOHNSON (OAKWOOD SQUARE ON SE CORNER) NOTED THAT THE RIGHT -IN ENTRANCE OFF OF 101 IS NOT ACCEPTABLE TO HIM AS IT IS CURRENTLY PROPOSED. HE WAS CONCERNED ABOUT THE LOSS OF PARKING STALLS FOR HIS BUSINESS AND THE CIRCULATION OF TRAFFIC ON HIS SITE BECAUSE HIS OTHER ACCESS TO THE SOUTH IS SO FAR AWAY AND DIFFICULT TO NAVIGATE NOW. RONNA WOOLERY (PLYMOUTH COLONY APARTMENT COMPLEX, NEXT TO RICK'S) REQUESTED THAT A TRAFFIC LIGHT BE CONSIDERED FOR THE RICK'S/PLYMOUTH COLONY ENTRANCE. MS. WOOLERY WAS CONCERNED ABOUT SAFETY AND ABOUT TRAFFIC CONTROL FOR TRAFFIC ACCESSING THEIR SITES. SHE WAS ALSO CONCERNED ABOUT THE ON-SITE DUMPSTER, BUT ADVISED THAT THE DUMPSTER WOULD BE FULLY CONSIDERED DURING DETAIL DESIGN. JAN ALLEN (NORTHWEST ANIMAL HOSPITAL) DID NOT LIKE THE CLOSURE OF THE ROAD ADJACENT TO HER PROPERTY (MERRIMAC LANE) AND DID NOT LIKE THE LOSS OF PROPERTY DUE TO WIDENING AND REALIGNMENT. THE PROPERTY OWNERS WERE INTERESTED IN DEVELOPING SOME OF THE EXISTING GREEN SPACE; ON SITE. FRED RETZLOFF (WAYZATA SCHOOLS) SAID HE FAVORED THE PROJECT. RICK REPASKY (RICK'S MARKET) SAID HE AGREED WITH THE IDEA OF THE PROJECT, BUT WAS CONCERNED THAT HIS LARGE TRUCK DELIVERY TRAFFIC WILL NOT BE ABLE TO CIRCULATE HIS SITE. HE FURTHER NOTED THAT HE DID NOT WANT HIS SOUTH ENTRANCE TO BE RIGHT IN/RIGHT OUT. MR. REPASKY STATED AN INTEREST IN A TRAFFIC SIGNAL FOR HIS NORTH ENTRANCE. Residents in attendance: Dan Gutlovics 2625 County Road 101 Plymouth, MN 55447 Jen & David Baugh 2500 Queensland Lane N. Plymouth, MN 55447 Jossette Repke 17730 - 26th Avenue N. Plymouth, MN 55447 Issues Raised: CSAH 101 NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING May 31, 2005 5:30 pm Dave & Ellen Osmonson 17735 - 26th Avenue N. Plymouth, MN 55447 Peggy Snow 17725 - 26th Avenue N. Plymouth, MN 55447 Braden Canfield 2510 Queensland Lane N. Plymouth, MN 55447 Cookie & Ernie Kulas 2505 Queensland Lane N. Plymouth, MN 55447 Heidi Gardner 2515 Queensland Lane N. Plymouth, MN 55447 Drainage in rear yard at 2510 Queensland Lane Driveway onto CSAH 101 at 2625 County Road 101 (possibly relocate onto 26th Avenue) Tuck under garage at 17735 — 26th Avenue N. — accessibility Tuck under garage at 2505 Queensland Lane N. — grades Tuck under garage at 17830 — 26th Avenue N. - grades Pond area behind 17730 — 26th Avenue N. — plantings installed around pond Need for traffic signal at CSAH 101 and 25th/26th Avenue realigned intersection. Desire by some residents on west side of CSAH 101 to have houses purchased— add median, realign roadway to the west Screening via landscaping, trees and/or privacy fences Impacts from noise and air pollution. Right-of-way acquisition process Impacts to yards from proposed cul-de-sacs Need to cut down grades south of 24th Avenue O:\Engineering\PROJECTS\2000-2009\5102\Ltrs\101_Mtg_Attenda ce_5_Jl.doc r CIP 2005 - 2009 Project Category: Street Projects Project Title: CR 101 - CR 6 to CR 24 Project Number: S-8 Total Estimated Cost (2005 dollars): $8,371,000 Year of Construction: 2005 % 2006 10% 2007 90 % 2008 % 2009 % Description: This project reconstructs County Road 101 from County Road 6 to County Road 24. Right-of-way acquisition and design is scheduled to take place in 2006, and construction to take place in 2007. Construction will result in the expansion of the current two-lane configuration to increase capacity. Funding Source(s): 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Minnesota State Aid Fund $420,000 $210,000 Hennepin County/Federal Gov. $420,000 $7,321,000 Describe project need and relationship to Council Goals, Comprehensive Plan, and other established plans: Hennepin County has included this project in its C.I.P. as described. The proposed cross section and impacts on adjacent properties are not yet available. Federal funding in the amount of $5,445,000 will be used for this project. Effect on Operating Costs: Hennepin County is responsible for County Road 101 so no additional operating costs are expected for the City from this project. dF M W t; City of Plymouth 2005-2009 Capital Improvements Program Street Projects 2006 Street Project Community Special Replacement State/Federal Administration Improvement Project Number Proiect Title Assessments Fund MSA Fund County Bnntls Donations Fund Fund Total Comments S-1 Re lace Retaining Walls 96,000 96,000 840,000 Phase I of 2 S-8 CR 101 - CR 6 to CR 24 - Design & ROW 420,000 420,000 40,000 2,515,000 40,000 from Maple Grove S-9 Street Reconstruction - District 5 & Hemlock 805,000 1,670,000 1,325,000 S- 10 Street Reconstruction - District 34 500,000 825,000 935,000 Additional $935,000 likely paid by developer S-11 Cheshire Lane - Glacier Vista to CR 47 935,000 15,000 50,000 S- 12 Pineview RR Crossing Improvements 35,000 400,000 S-13 Pineview Lane & Campus Drive - Overlay 400,000 440,000 S- 14 Traffic Signals - Two Intersections • 385,000 55,000 400,000 S- 15 Nathan Lane & CR 10 Intersection 400,000 300,000 400,000 State Bride Funds S - 16 South Shore Drive Bridge Replacement 100,000 250,000 Phase 1 of 2 S- 17 CR 24 - 30th Avenue to CR 101 - Design & ROW 125,000 125,000 Total 1,305,000 3,091,000 2,300,000 900,000 0 40,000 0 15,000 7,651,000 Cheshire & CR 47, and CR 10 & Trenton Lane W O City of Plymouth 2005-2009 Capital Improvements Program Street Projects 2007 Street Project Community Project Special Replacement State/Federal Administration Improvement Number Proiect Title Assessments Fund VISA Fund Count Bds Donations Fund Fundon Total Comments S- I Replace Retaining Walls 50,000 50,000 7,531,000 Phase 2 of 2 S-. 8 CR 101 - CR6 to CR 24 - Construction 210,000 7,321,000 941,000 Phase 2 of 2 S-17 CR 24 - 30th Avenue to CR 101 - Construction 95,000 846,000 710,000 Pan of Fernbrook project S- 18 Traffic Signals - Three Intersections ' 710,000 800,000 1,000,000 1,800,000 ScoDc and schedule de nd on Fed funding S- 19 Fernbrook Lane - 27th Ave to 34th Ave 400,000 S-20 Nathan Lane/ IOth/13th - Overlay 400,000 175,000 Local Match 10% S-21 Railroad Safety Improvements - West Med Lake Dr 17,500 157,500 1,275,000 S-22 Street Reconstruction - District 78 595,000 680,000 2,365,000 S-23 Street Reconstruction - District 76 1,140,000 1,225,000 Total 1,735,000 2,355,000 1,832,500 9,324,500 0 0 0 0 15,247,000 27th & Fernbrook, 34th & Fernbrook, and Harbor Lane & Fernbrook U t Vani n: 1.13 1l.ralon Data: 121tfg7 2004-2008 TRANSPORTATION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM -Prkd Data; OV011104 Tim.: 07:05 AM As approv d by Msok b- 803.1I.664R1 on D4rrwmbw 16, 2003 VALUES W THOUSM03 OF DOLLARS) 2006 PROGRAMMED EXPENDITURES PRIOR 2006 COSTS TOTAL STATE STATE COUNTY YEARS BUDGET •BEYOND PROJECT COUNTY AID AID FEDERAL BRIDGE ROAD OTHER ROAD PROJ PROJECT LOCATIONIOESCRIPTION APPROP APPROP 2006 BUDGET TAX MUN REO AID BONDS BONDS REVENUE PRIOR YEARS' OBLIGATIONS: 61 9112 N OF CSAR 3 • TH 71 G S,SIG RAN 1.000 1,000 61 9112 N OF CSAH 3 - TH 7 / G,S,SIG CSERV 350 350 61 9112 N OF CSAH 3 - TH 7 / G,S.SIG SAW 6,466 20 S,600 648 103 9239 S OF CANDLEWOOD - CSAH 301 G,S,SIG RW 600 400 1,000 103 9239 S OF CANDLEWOOO - CSAH 30 / G,S.SIG 200 100 7,698 6.198 90 10 2006 NEW PROJECTS: 2006 SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS 500 500 20 ISO 300 1 9618 E OF E JCT 4 - E OF TH 2121G,S,SIG RW 1,660 1,680 640 540 1 9615 E OF E JCT 4 - E OF TH 212 /G,S,SIG 11,400 11.400 1 9619 W OF W JCT 4 - E OF E JCT 4 /G,S,SIG RAN ago 890 1 9619 W OF W JCT 4 - E OF E JCT 4 /G,S,SIG 3,982 3,982 963 2,590 109 5 0205 AT HUTCHINSON SPUR/BR REPLACEMENT 50S 506 248 186 48 28 22 9338 MINNEHAHA PKWY (WB) - LAKE ST / G. S. SIG 3,860 10.000 15,860 5.274 586 24 9617 E OF CSAR 101 - 0.4 MILE E / G. S RAN 250 250 125 125 24 9617 E OF CSAH 101 -0.a MILE E / G. S 940 940 28 0022 W OF TO N OF CP FIR / PARTICIPATION 730 730 730 48 9742 46TH - LAKE ST I G,S,SIG RAN 250 250 500 125 125 48 9742 46TH - LAKE ST 1 G,S,SIG 100 12,542 12,942 20 70 10 73 0205 AT BNSF RR / BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 1,459 1,459 321 882 220 36 81 9547 GRADE SEPARATE TH 1691 PARTICIPATION 8.247 11.247 6,247 61 0118 N OF TH 100 - N OF CSAR 10 / G,S,SIG CSERV 852 652 81 0115 N OF TH 100 - N OF CSAR 101 G,S,SIG 9,006 11.008 6,107 901 O7 9316 5 OF CSAH 6 - S OF CSAR 241 G,S,SIG RAN 640 640 420 420 101 9516 S OF CSAR 6 - S OF CSAH 24 1 G,S,SIG 7,529 11,529 101 9917 N OF CSAR 62 - N OF CSAR 31 G. S. SIG RAN 600 600 1200 600 101 9917 N OF CSAR 62 - N OF CSAR 3 / G, S. SIG CSERV 700 700 101 9917 N OF CSAR 52 • N OF CSAR 3 / G. S, SIG 6,566 X5,566 101 9931 N OF CSAR 5 - TH 12 I G. S. SIG RAN 1,300 1,300 100 1.200 101 9931 N OF CSAH 5 - TH 12 / G, S, SIG CSERV 1,300 1,300 101 9931 N OF CSAH 5 - TH 12 / G, S, SIG 8,775 8,778 2006 BIKEWAY DEVELOPMENT PARTICIPATION 100 100 100 2006 BIKEWAY PROGRAM - DISCRETIONARY 100 100 100 2006 CONSULTANT SERVICES - MISCELLANEOUS 450 450 90 360 2006 HARDSHIP RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITION 30 30 30 2006 INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM (ITS) PROJECTS 123 125 40 85 2006 MAPLE GROVE RAN REIMBURSEMENT (CP 9635) 70 70 70 2006 MINNEAPOLIS SIGNAL PARTICIPATION 100 100 10 90 2006 MNIDOT SIGNAL PARTICIPATION 50 80 20 60 2006 MISCELLANEOUS STRUCTURE REPAIRS 50 60 60 2006 RAILROAD CROSSING PARTICIPATION 25 25 25 2006 ROADSIDE ENHANCEMENT PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM 800 600 600 2006 SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT 80 50 20 80 SUB-TOTAL PRIOR YEARS' OBLIGATIONS 2,150 6,565 8296 17,014 20 0 5,890 0 0 0 656 SUB-TOTAL 2006 NEW PROJECTS 3,792 37.134 58.955 99.551 1,150 0 10,096 3,958 266 16,354 5.250 2006 TOTALS 5,942 43,700 57.253 116,895 1200 0 15,956 3,958 266 16,354 5.935 CARRYOVER FROM LAST YEAR 0 2,335 (37,2827 NEW APPORTIONMENTS 1.200 1,608 11,110 CARRYOVER TO NEXT YEAR 0 3,956 (42,155) 2006 PROVISIONAL PROJECTS: PROVISIONAL PROJECTS TMsa projects an included In the program subject 3 9228 E OF CSAH 20. E OF MEADOWBROOK I G,5,SIC RAN 100 to Ihair approval lw 1 daral aid lwwkq w in Sr 3 9225 E OF CSAR 20 • E OF MEADOWBROOK / G.S,SIG 2,800 avwa state aid halls b o * available. 6 8435 CSAH 9 - FAIRVIEW AVE.I G,S RAN 200 8 6435 CSAH 9. FAIRVIEW AVE.I G.S 5.300 fit 9230 N OF BNSF RR - HILLOWAY RD I G,S.SIG RAN 100 81 9230 NOF BNSF RR • HILLOWAY RD I G,S,SIG 4.600 153 0116 FREMONT AVE - MISS. RIVER I G,S.SIG 6.900 156 0018 TH 55 - 10 AVE I SIP 400 U Va,alaa: to V.- Dab: 12116,03 2004-2008 TRANSPORTATION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 'Pr.,I Dm: 01105104 Ti- 07:06 AM As aPPrO by Rasoldbn 303.12.69487 0 Da bw 16, 2002 VALUES W THOUSANDS OF DOLLARSI 2007 PROGRAMMED EILPEND RES PRIOR 2007 COSTS TOTAL STATE STATE COUNTY YEARS BUDGET • BEYOND • PROJECT COUNTY AID AID FEDERAL BRIDGE ROAD OTHER ROAD PROJ PROJECT LOCATION/DESCRIPTION APPROP APPROP 2007 BUDGET TAX MUN REO AID BONDS BONDS REVENUE PRIOR YEARS' OBLIGATIONS: 44 9742 46TH - LAKE ST / G,S.SIG RNV S00 500467010 9742 46TH - LAKE 5T / G,S,SIG 100 100 12.742 12,942 20 103 9239 5 OF CANDLEWOOD - CSAH 301 G,S,SIG RAN 600 400 1.000 394 103 9239 5 OF CANDLEWOOD - CSAH 301 G,S,SIG 300 3.949 3,949 8,196 3.555 2007 NEW PROJECTS: 500 500 20 130 300 2007 SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS 1 9618 E OF E JCT 4 - E OF TH 212 /G,S,SIG RNV 1,630 1.680 140 1 9616 E OF E JCT 4 - E OF TH 2121G.S,51G 1,400 10,000 11,400 1.260 22 9338 MINNEHAHA PKWY (WB). LAKE 5T I G. S. SIG 5,860 10,000 15,860 5,000 5,000 22 9642 56TH ST - MINNEHAHA PKWY (WB) I G, S. SIG 500 4,504 5,004 60 390 50 24 9517 E OF CSAR 101 - 0.4 MILE E I G. s RAN 250 250 94 24 9617 E OF CSAR 101 - OA MILE E I G, 5 940 940 446 101 9516 5 OF CSAR 6 - 5 OF CSAR 241 G,S.SIG RAM 540 840 5,445 204 S`r 101 9516 5 OF CSAR 6 - 5 OF CSAR 24 / G.s,51G 7,529 7,529 1,675 101 AM9917NOFCSAR62 - N OF CSAR ] 1 G, S. SIG R 400 400 1700 500 101 9917 N OF CSAR 62 - N OF CSAR ] 1 G. 5, SIG CSERV 700 700 200 6,666 101 9917 N OF CSAR 62 - N OF CSAR ] 1 G. S. SIG 6.066 6.066 1019931 N OF CSAR 5-TH 121 G. S. SIG RAM 1,300 1.300 101 9931 N OF CSAR 5 - TH 121 G. 5, SIG DES 1,300 1.3oo 101 9931 N OFCSAH 5 - TH 12 I G. 5, SIG 9,778 I;nB 2007 BIKEWAY DEVELOPMENT PARTICIPATION 100 100 100 2007 BIKEWAY PROGRAM - DISCRETIONARY 100 100 100 2007 CONSULTANT SERVICES - MISCELLANEOUS 450 450 50 400 2007 HARDSHIP RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITION 30 30 30 2007 INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM (ITS) PROJECTS 125 125 20 105 2007 MAPLE GROVE RAM REIMBURSEMENT (CP 9535) 70 70 70 2007 MINNEAPOLIS SIGNAL PARTICIPATION 120 120 10 110 2007 MNIDOT SIGNAL PARTICIPATION 70 70 10 50 2007 MISCELLANEOUS STRUCTURE REPAIRS 70 70 70 2007 RAILROAD CROSSING PARTICIPATION 25 25 25 2007 ROADSIDE ENHANCEMENT PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM SOO 500 600 2007 SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT 100 100 40 60 SUB -TOTAL PRIOR YEARS'OBLIGATIONS 1.500 4.049 17,091 22,640 20 0 3,625 0 0 0 10512 5,445 0 0 404 0 13,056 SUB -TOTAL 2007 NEW PROJECTS 12,530 30,195 23 262 66,007 1,160 2007 TOTALS 14,030 3424.4 40,373 6:e,647 1,200 0 14,137 5,445 0 0 13,462 CARRYOVER FROM LAST YEAR 0 3.956 (42,158) NEW APPORTIONMENTS 1200 1,665 11,554 CARRYOVER TO NEXT YEAR 0 5,631 (44,737) PROVISIONAL PROJECTS 2007 PROVISIONAL PROJECTS: aa plgacb an ilcludad in the program wb)act 1 9620 W CO LINE - W OF W JCT CSAH 41 G.s 11,600 hair approval fw lad -I aid fording w in ObEmslabaidladsbaconba-ibbla. 1z 8740 CSAR 1J - CSAR 1441 G.5 RNV 900 i2 1740 CSAR 13-CSAH 1441 G. 10,100 30 9324 E OF CR 202 - TH 1691 G,S,SIG RAV S00 30 9324 E OF CR 202 - TH 1691 G.s,SIG 7200 73 9231 N OF CEDAR LAKE RD - 5 OF 43941 O,S RNV S00 73 9231 N OF CEDAR LAKE RD - S OF L]941 G,5 4•900 202 9925 TI DEN AVE - ENSIGN AVE I G,S 5'100 f r.,.a imxms.m ArrnOvcn cir .. 2005.2009 TRANSPORTATION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM As Approved try Reeo11J0on 6 04-12-509111 on December 14, 2004 2006 VALUES IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS) V.nion: 1.06 V.n1an Oat.: 12/14104 Print Deb: 12/20104 Ttrne: 07:03 AM 2006 PROGRAMMED EXPENDITURES PRIOR 2006 COSTS TOTAL STATE STATE COUNTY YEARS BUDGET • BEYOND -PROJECT COUNTY AID AID FEDERAL BRIDGE ROAD OTHER ROAD PROJ PROJECT LOCATION/DESCRIPTION APPROP APPROP 2006 BUDGET TAX MUN REO AID BONDS BONGS REVENUE PRIOR YEARS' OBLIGATIONS: 3 9741 27TH AVE - WEST RIVER PKWY / G,S.SIG CSERV 17T 600 772' 517 83 376 124 3 9741 27TH AVE . WEST RIVER PKWY / G,S,SIG 6,000 500 1.300 5,300 3 9754 E OF DUPONT - E OF I.35W / G,S,SIG CSERV 1101• 1101" 2'000 240 3 9754 E OF DUPONT - E OF 1-35W / G,S,SIG 4,160 2240 6,400' 61 6637 N OF BREN ROAD • S OF CSAR 3 / G,S,SIG RAN 550 200 750 100 100 317 41 5637 N OF BREN ROAD - S OF CSAH 31 G,S,SIG 6.283 317 6,600 103 9239 S OF CANDLEWOOD • CSAH 30 / G,S,SIG RAN 600 400 1,000 SS 1S 103 9239 S OF CANOLEWOOD. CSAR 301 G,S,SIG 200 100 10.770 11,070 2006 NEW PROJECTS:300 500 500 10 190 2006 SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS 1 9619 W OF W JCT 4 - E OF E JCT 4 /G,S,SIG RAN 796 796 3,879 1,121 2.560 193 1 9619 W OF W JCT 4 - E OF E JCT 4IG,S.SIG 3.379 3 9745 W OF DAKOTA AV . W OF TH 1001 G,S,SIG RAN 215 215 2,]26 411 3 9745 W OF DAKOTA AV . W OF TH 1001 G,S,SIG 2,737 2,737 3 0004 LYNDALE AVE- OAKLAND AVFJSTREETSCAPE 1,554 1,554 389 777 385 5 0205 AT HUTCHINSON SPUR I SR REPLACEMENT RAN SO 50 25 25 238 180 77 40 S 0205 AT HUTCHINSON SPUR I BR REPLACEMENT 303 505 22 9338 MINNEF~ PKWY (WS) . LAKE ST 1 G. S, SIG 2,000 7,910 9,9110 1.700 300 24 9617 E OF CSAM 101 - 0.4 MILE E I G, S RAN 250 2:50 125 125 24 9517 E OF CSAR 101 -0.4 MILE E I G, S 2X81 2,431 25 0023 W OF TO N OF CP RR I PARTICIPATION 730 730 730 4e 9742 46TH •LAKE ST I G.S.SIG RAW 250 100 150 500 50 50 46 9742 46TH - LAKE ST / G,S,SIG 9,652 9,652 81 0010 AT HCRRA / BRIDGE REPLACEMENT , 1,012 1,012 146 640 200 26 73 0206 AT BNSF RR /BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 1,452 1,452 267 780 375 47 5/ 9347 GRADE SEPARATE TH 1691 PARTICIPATION e2S0 51!50 8,250 51 0118 NOF TH 100 - NOF CSAR 101 G,S,SIG RAW 2.000 2,000 1,000 1,000 61 0118 N OF TH 100. N OF CSAH 101 G,S,SIG CSERV $52 352 81 0118 N OF TH 100. N OF CSAH 101 G,S,VG 9.560 9,560 101 101 9518 S OF CSAH 6 •SOF CSA11 24 I G,S,SKS RAW 9518 S OF CSAH 6 - S OF CSAH 241 G,S,SIG 420 420 9,559 540 9,559 210 210 101 9917 N OF CSAR 62 - N OF CSAH 3l G, S. SIG RAW 600 800 600 101 9917 N OF CSAR 62 • N OF CSAR 3 / G, S. SIG CSERV 700 700 101 9917 N OF CSAR 62 - N OF CSAR 31 G. S. SIG 6.248 5248 101 9931 NOF CSAR S - TH 121 G. S. SIG RMI 1.300 1,300 1,300 101 9931 N OF CSAH S -TH 12I G. S. SIG CSERV 1,300 1,300 11.250 101 9931 N OF CSAH 5 . TH 121G. S. SIG 11.250 121 9522 CONNECTION TO CR 202 5,000 5,000 2,500 2,500 202 0404 109TH AVE •ELM CREEK ROADIG, S CSERV 335 335 35 250 50 7gg 135 202 0404 109TH AVE . ELM CREEK ROADIG, S BOO 900 2006 BIKEWAY DEVELOPMENT PARTICIPATION 100 100 100 2008 BIKEWAY PROGRAM . DISCRETIONARY 110 100 100 2008 CONSULTANT SERVICES - MISCELLANEOUS 450 450 90 360 2006 HARDSHIP RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITION 30 30 30 2006 INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM (ITS) PROJECTS 125 125 40 85 2008 MAPLE GROVE RAW REIMBURSEMENT (CP 9635) 60 60 60 2005 MINNEAPOLIS SIGNAL PARTICIPATION 130 130 10 120 2005 MNIDOT SIGNAL PARTICIPATION 150 150 20 130 2005 MISCELLANEOUS STRUCTURE REPAIRS 60 90 60 2006 RAILROAD CROSSING PARTICIPATION 25 25 25 2005 ROADSIDE ENHANCEMENT PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM 600 800 600 2006 SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT 60 80 20 60 SUB -TOTAL PRIOR YEARS' OBLJOATIONS 17,793 3,957 12,970 34.120 0 1.200 0 1,078 0 0 2,000 879 0 10.762 4,897 555 10.265 7,705 SUB -TOTAL 2006 NEW PROJECTS 4,113 35,484 57,230 96,527 2006 TOTALS 21,906 39,441 70,200 130,947 1,200 0 11,840 4,697 BSS 12.265 8,384 0 2,630 (11,191) CARRYOVER FROM LAST YEAR 1200 1,958 11,101 NEW APPORTIONMENTS 0 4,see (31,930) CARRYOVER TO NEXT YEAR PROVISIONAL PROJECTS 2004 PROVISIONAL PROJECTS: Three V* --ft era Snck d d I. Un Program --ejectItotheirappy1fmfederalaidAndingorIntM ROUNDED TO NEAREST $1,000 BASED ON PRIOR COUNTY BOARD RESOLUTION V x cn a:tff 2003 An gpvE min PRIOR 2007 COSTS TOTAL STATE STATE COUNTY YEARS BUDGET BEYOND • PROJECT COUNTY AID AID FEDERAL BRIDGE ROAD OTHER ROP 2007 BUDGET TAX MUN REG AID_ BONDS BONDS REVENLROADPROJPROJECTLOCATIOWDESCRIPTION V -Il 1.08 APP Venlon Oat.: 1211u04 2005-2009 TRANSPORTATION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Print Date: 12120/04 3 Time: 07:03 AM As Approved by Resolution 0 0412-509Ri on December 14, 2004 100 3 2007 450 8,500 VALUES IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS) 22 9338 MINNEKAKA PKWY (WB) - LAKE ST / G. S. SIG PRIOR 2007 COSTS TOTAL STATE STATE COUNTY YEARS BUDGET BEYOND • PROJECT COUNTY AID AID FEDERAL BRIDGE ROAD OTHER ROP 2007 BUDGET TAX MUN REG AID_ BONDS BONDS REVENLROADPROJPROJECTLOCATIOWDESCRIPTION 1,000 APPROP APP 320 PRIOR YEARS' OBLIGATIONS: 202 0408 AT ELM CREEK I BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 180 120 3 9741 27TH AVE - WEST RIVER PKWY / G.S,SIG CSERV 772• 100 3 9741 27TH AVE - WEST RIVER PKWY / G.S.SIG 450 8,500 1.800 22 9338 MINNEKAKA PKWY (WB) - LAKE ST / G. S. SIG 2007 INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM (RS) PROJECTS 2,000 7,910 103 9239 S OF CANDLEWOOD - CSAH 301 G,S,SIG R(W 800 100 103 9239 S OF CANDLEWOOD - CSAH 30 / G,S.SIG 150 300 2007 MISCELLANEOUS STRUCTURE REPAIRS 2007 NEW PROJECTS: 3_12 2007 RAILROAD CROSSING PARTICIPATION 2500 2007 SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS 6 500 3 9854 NEW ACCESS AT 1.35W / PARTICIPATE R/W 750 11,070 3 9864 NEW ACCESS AT 1.35W I PARTICIPATE CSERV 6095• 39,830 3 9864 NEW ACCESS AT 1.35W / PARTICIPATE 0 1,000 3 0006 HIAWATHA AVE - W RIVER PARKWAY/STREETSCAPE 1,200 1,554 to 9919 ZEALAND - W OF CSAH 156 / PARTICIPATE 1,200 0 280 19 013001 CSAH 24 - TH 55 TRAIL -PHASE 1 / G. S 0 4,588 450 24 9617 E OF CSAH 101 - 0.4 MILE E / G. S R(W 250 9617 E OF CSAH 101 -0.4 MILE E / G, S 35,501) 2,481 45 9742 48TH - LAKE ST / G.S.SIG R(W 350 100 48 9742 46TH - LAKE ST / G,S.SIG 61 9112 N OF CSAH 3 - TH 7 / G,S,SIG R(W 1,000 81 9112 N OF CSAH 3 - TH 71 G,S.SIG CSERV 350 61 9112 N OF CSAR 3 - TH 71 G.S,SIG 688 81 0118 N OF TH 100 - N OF CSAH 10 / G,S.SIG R(W 2,000 81 0116 N OF TH 100 - N OF CSAH 101 G,S,SIG CSERV 852 81 0118 N OF TH 100 - N OF CSAH 101 G.S,SIG 9,560 0,11 9518S OF CSAR 8 - S OF CSAH 24 / G.S,SIG RIW 420 420 9.5599516SOFCSAH8 - S OF CSAH 24 / G.S,SIG 101 9931 N OF CSAH 5 - TH 12/G, S, SIG R(W 1,300 101 9931 N OF CSAH 5 - TH 12 1 G, S. SIG CSERV 1,300 300 10,770 50 9.852 6,172 101 9931 NOF CSAH 5 - TH 12 / G, S, SIG 1,000 10,250 109 9920 1-94 - VINEWOOD / RECONSTRUCT 1 PARTICIPATE 320 202 0408 AT ELM CREEK I BRIDGE REPLACEMENT 180 120 2007 BIKEWAY DEVELOPMENT PARTICIPATION 100 50 2007 BIKEWAY PROGRAM - DISCRETIONARY 100 2007 CONSULTANT SERVICES - MISCELLANEOUS 450 2007 HARDSHIP RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITION 30 389 2007 INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM (RS) PROJECTS 125 388 2007 MAPLE GROVE R(W REIMBURSEMENT (CP 9635) 80 105 2007 MINNEAPOLIS SIGNAL PARTICIPATION 120 360 2007 MN/DOT SIGNAL PARTICIPATION 150 2,109 2007 MISCELLANEOUS STRUCTURE REPAIRS 70 3_12 2007 RAILROAD CROSSING PARTICIPATION 2500 140 2007 ROADSIDE ENHANCEMENT PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM 6 2007 SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT 100 SUB -TOTAL PRIOR YEARS' OBLIGATIONS 9,400 9,810 11,070 SUB -TOTAL 2007 NEW PROJECTS 8.572 30.020 26.244 2007 TOTALS 17,972 39,830 37.314 CARRYOVER FROM LAST YEAR NEW APPORTIONMENTS CARRYOVER TO NEXT YEAR 8.300 0,910 1,000 11,070 500 750 5095 1,000 1.554 454 251 2,48' 50 9,55 1.DO 35 6.85 2,00 85 9,56 84 9,5; 1,3( 1,3( 11,2! 3: 1 1 1 4 1 1 1 1 30. 64. 96, 1.353 8,126 447 3.324 4,000 568 50. 4,560 50 20 160 300 1,000 400 389 777 388 250 105 90 360 2,109 110 3_12 50 140 50 583 103 2007 PROVISIONAL PROJECTS: 3 9228 E OF CSAH 20 - E OF MEADOWSROOK / G,S,SIC R7W 100 3 9228 E OF CSAH 20 - E OF MEADOWBROOK / G,S,SIG 2.800 8 8435 CSAH 9 - FAIRVIEW AVE. / G.S R/W 200 5 8435 CSAH 0 - FAIRVIEW AVE. / G,S 5,300 61 9230 N OF BNSF RR - HILLOWAY RD / G,S.SIG RIW 100 81 9230 N OF BNSF RR - HILLOWAY RD / G.S,SIG 4,800 153 0116 FREMONT AVE - MISS. RIVER / G,S.SIG 6.900 156 0018 TH 55 - 10 AVE I SIP 400 ROUNDED TO NEAREST $1.000 BASED ON PRIOR COUNTY BOARD RESOLUTION. 4 8,126 1,434 219 210 4,249 4,560 750 100 1,000 2007 PROVISIONAL PROJECTS: 3 9228 E OF CSAH 20 - E OF MEADOWSROOK / G,S,SIC R7W 100 3 9228 E OF CSAH 20 - E OF MEADOWBROOK / G,S,SIG 2.800 8 8435 CSAH 9 - FAIRVIEW AVE. / G.S R/W 200 5 8435 CSAH 0 - FAIRVIEW AVE. / G,S 5,300 61 9230 N OF BNSF RR - HILLOWAY RD / G,S.SIG RIW 100 81 9230 N OF BNSF RR - HILLOWAY RD / G.S,SIG 4,800 153 0116 FREMONT AVE - MISS. RIVER / G,S.SIG 6.900 156 0018 TH 55 - 10 AVE I SIP 400 ROUNDED TO NEAREST $1.000 BASED ON PRIOR COUNTY BOARD RESOLUTION. 4 ea. pro)ects au Included In the program sub). their approval for lederel aid funding or in the ant tat. aid fund. becorne available. 320 90 90 100 100 50 400 30 20 105 80 10 110 10 140 70 25 000 40 60 0 0 4.727 0 0 4,000 1,063 1,200 0 10,300 5,697 0 8.125 4,597 1,200 0 15.027 5.697 0 12.126 5.780 0 4,588 31.930) 1.200 2.014 11.450 0 8,502 35,501) ea. pro)ects au Included In the program sub). their approval for lederel aid funding or in the ant tat. aid fund. becorne available. Agenda Number: 3 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Laurie Ahrens, City Manager SUBJECT: Set Future Study Sessions DATE: June 2, 2005, for City Council meeting of June 6, 2005 1. ACTION REQUESTED: Review the pending study session topics list and amend the topics if desired. 2. BACKGROUND: Attached is the list of pending study session topics, as well as calendars to assist in scheduling. Mayor Johnson has asked the Council to set a study session to discuss possible reimbursement to two property owners for flooding damages that occurred in June 2003. We have provided background information on this flooding situation, as requested by the Council. After reviewing the information, the Council may wish to consider whether to establish a study session. Pending Study Session Topics at least 3 Council members have approved the following study items on the list) Other requests for study session topics: Update with City Manager — quarterly (next mtg. Aug.) Campaign sign enforcement Discuss possible reimbursement for flooding site (Johnson) OFFICIAL CITY MEETINGS June 2005 Sunday I Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday 1 2 3 4 May 2005 Jii12005 S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 S M T W T F S 1 2 6:00 PM SPECIAL PLANNINGCOMMISSION 7:00 PM HUMAN RIGHTS MEETING: COMMISSION - 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 COMPREHENSIVE Medicine Lake 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 PLAN UPDATE- Lunchroom Room 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 29 30 31 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 7:00 PMPLANNING 31 COMMISSION, Council Chambers 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 6:45 PM YOUTH ADVISORY 7:00 PM SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING: COUNCIL, Council BUDGET PRIORITIES; Chambers Lunch Room 7:00 PM SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING: DISCUSS CO. RD. 101, Lunchroom 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 5.w PM SPwwL COUNca MEETING: REVIEW AUDI REPORT,CONSIDERZONING AMENDMENTS TO uLow 7:00 PM PLANNING 4:30 PM ANNUAL PARK TOUR, depart from City Hall RELIGIOUS INSTITUTIONS IN COMMISSION, INDUSTRIAL DISTRICTS, Lu_hrm COUIICiI Chambers 7:W PM REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING. CauncII Ch -- Eley Day 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 TH) wm 26 27 28 29 30 7:00 PM 7:00 PM REGULAR PLANNING COUNCIL COMMISSION, MEETING, Council Council Chambers Chambers modified on 6/3/200:1 OFFICIAL CITY MEETINGS July 2005 Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Jun 2005 Aug 2005 1 2 S M T W T F S S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 14 15 16 17 1S 19 20 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 26 27 28 29 30 28 29 30 31 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 CITY OFFICES 5:15 PM MUSIC CLOSED IN PLYMOUTH, Hilde INDEPENDENCE DAY Performance Center 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 6:45 PM YOUTH ADVISORYCOUNCIL, Plymouth Creek Cerner 7:00 PM REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING, Black Box Theater, 7:00 PM ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMMITTEE EOC), Plymouth Creek Center 7:00 PM PARK & RECREATION ADVISORY COMMISSION(PRAC), Conference Room A, Plymouth Creek Center Plymouth Creek Center 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 7:00 PM PLANNING COMMISSION, Black Box Theater, 7:00 PM HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (HRA), Plymouth Town Square Plymouth Creek Center 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 11:45 AM PLYMOUTH BUSINESS COUNCIL, Sharebn Minneapolis Wast 1sso1 Ridpedele Ddw, Minnetonka 7:00 PM PLYMOUTH ADVISORYCOMMITTEEON TRANSIT (PACT), Plymouth Creek Center 7:00 PM REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING, Black Box Theater. Plymouth Creek Canter 31 modified on 6/3/2005 OFFICIAL CITY MEETINGS August 2005 Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday 1 2 3 4 5 6 5:30 PM 7:00 PM NATIONAL NIGHT PLANNING OUT COMMISSION, Black Box Theater, Plymouth Creek Center 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 8:45 PM YOUTH ADVISORY COUNCIL, Plymouth Creek Center 7:00 PM REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING, Black Box Theater, 700 PM ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMMITTEE EQC), Plymouth Creek Center 7:00 PM PARK & RECREATIONADVISORY COMMISSION(PRAC), Conference Room A, Plymouth Creek Center Plymouth Creek Center 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 7:00 PM PLANNING COMMISSION, Black Box Theater, 7:00 PM HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (HRA), Plymouth ToWrt Square Plymouth Creek Center 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 6:45 PM YOUTH ADVISORY COUNCIL, Plymouth Creek Center 700P REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING, Bleck Box Theater, Plymouth Creek Center 7:00 PM PLYMOUTHADVISORY COMMITTEE ON TRANSIT (PACT), Plymouth Creek Center SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING (IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING REGULAR MEETING) BUDGET STUDY SESSION, Black Box Theater, PCC 28 29 30 31 Jul 2005 Sep 2005 S M T W T F S S M T W T F S 1 2 1 2 3 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 modified on 6/3/2005 OFFICIAL CITY MEETINGS September 2005 Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Aug 2005 00 2905 S M T W T F S S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 1 7:00 PM HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION, 2 3 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Plymouth Creek Center 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 28 29 30 31 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6:45 PM YOUTH ADVISORYCOUNCIL, Plymouth Creek Center 7:00 PM SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING: BUDGETSTUDY SESSION; Conf. Rm. 2, Plymouth Creek Center Iowerleoel 7:00 PM PLANNING COMMISSION, Black Box Theater, Plymouth Creek Center 7:00 PM PARK & RECREATION AoVISORY commissioN (PHnc) Cl—'.., Ply.—Creek Cuter (Mm meeting only) 7:00 PM SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING: LABOR DAY - City Offices Closed BUDGET STUDY SESSION IF NEEDED); Cord. Rm. 2, Plymouth Creek Center I— bwl 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 7:00 PM REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING, Black 7:00 PM ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMMITTEE EOC), Plymouth Creek Center 7:00 PM HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (HRA), Plymouth Town Square 9:00 AM -3:30 PM PLYMOUTH CLEAN-UP DAY, Public Works Box Theater, Maintenance Plymouth Creek Facility Center 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 6:45 PM YOUTH ADVISORY COUNCIL, Plymouth Creek Center 7:00 PM PLANNING COMMISSION, Autumn Art Fair and Plymouthy on Parade Black Box Theater, Plymouth Creek Center 25 26 27 28 29 30 11:45 AM PLYMOUTH BUSINESS COUNCIL, Sheraton Minneapolis West 12201 Ridgedale DrW Minnetonka 7:00 PM PLYMOUTHADVISORY COMMITTEE ON TRANSIT (PACT), Plymouth Creek Center 7:00 PM REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING, Blade Box Theater, Plymouth Creek Center modified on 6/3/2005