Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCouncil Information Memorandum 01-21-1988CITY OF PLYNOUTR CITY COUNCIL INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM January 21, 1988 UPCOMING MEETINGS AND EVENTS..... 1. COUNCIL/STAFF DINNER MEETING -- Monday, January 25, 5:30 p.m. The City Council will meet in the City Council conference to discuss the results of the 1987 residential survey with Dr. Bill Morris and Diane Traxler of Decisions Resources, Inc. 2. COUNCIL MEETING -- Monday, January 25, 7:30 p.m. Special City Council meeting in the City Council chambers. 4. ANNUAL LEGISLATIVE DINNER MEETING OF THE MUNICIPAL LEGISLATIVE COMMISSIOP- Tuesday, January 26. Annual MLC leg I slat ived nner meeting at the Decathalon Club in Bloomington. Social hour 6:00 p.m. with dinner following. 5. PLANNING COMMISSION -- Wednesday, January 27, 7:30 p.m. The Planning Commission will meet in the City Council chambers. Agenda attached. (M-5) 6. HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY -- Thursday, January 28, 6:30 p.m. The Housingan edeve opment Authority will meet in the City Council chambers. Agenda attached. (M-6) 7. NW HENNEPIN HUMAN SERVICE COUNCIL -- ANNUAL DINNER MEETING -- ednes ay,anuary 27. The Northwest Hennepin Human ervices Council will hold their annual dinner meeting at the Sheraton - Northwest in Brooklyn Park. A copy of the invitation received earlier this week is attached. Please contact Laurie by Monday, January 25 if you plan to attend. (M-7) 8. FEBRUARY & MARCH MEETING CALENDARS -- Meeting calendars for February and March are attached. M-8 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447, TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800 CITY COUNCIL INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM January 21, 1988 Page two FOR YOUR INFORMATION.... 1. FERNBROOK LANE & HIGHWAY 101 TRAILS - CHANGE ORDER -- In December, the City Council approved a change order for the construction project on the trails along Highway 101 and Fernbrook Lane. As part of this approval, the City Council requested additional information from the consultant on the need, timing and cost of the change orders. Attached is a letter from the consultant giving further details on this change order. (I-1) 2. TRAFFIC COUNTS - 34TH AVENUE/HERITAGE ESTATES ADDITION -- Attached is a copy of Fred Moore's report on the results of traffic count studies for two locations on 34th Avenue between Xenium Lane and County Road 61. The traffic counts were undertaken in December after County Road 9 was reopened to through traffic. (I-2) 3. PUBLIC SAFETY STATISTICS FOR 1987 -- The Public Safety Director has prepared the attached memo highlighting activities and statistics that were generated within the police and fire divisions during 1987. The Department's 1987 annual report will be published in the March edition of Plymouth on Parade. (I-3) 4. 1988 PAYABLE TAX AND MILL RATE COMPARISON -- Attached is a series of charts and tables prepared by the City Assessor's office. These charts are based on the 1988 mill rates which have Just been released through Hennepin County. All the data on the accompanying charts are based on these new rates for taxes payable in 1988. The charts reflect: 1) mill rate comparisons from 1984; 2) city taxes on typical Plymouth homes by school district; 3) the distribution of the tax dollar; and 4) a comparison between the 1987 and 1988 taxes, Our mill rate increased .57 to 16.618. Overall, taxes are higher due to increased mill rates for each of the school districts. The Wayzata District increased nearly 7.5 mills, and Osseo, by Just over 6 mills. Scott Hovet also advises that the City's contribution to the fiscal disparities pool has increased slightly from 30.2% to 30.9%. (I-4) 5. COMMISSION/ COMMITTEE APPLICANT -- An application for appointment from RicEaR Kunz, 12005 - 372 -Avenue No., is attached. (I-5) 6. 1988 AMM LEGISLATIVE POLICY ADDENDUM -- Attached is a final copy of the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities policy addendum for 1988 as adopted by its membership on December 3, 1987. This in conjunction with policies adopted in 1986 for the 1987-88 biennium constitute the entire AMM Legislative Policy for 1988. (I-6) 7. RECYCLING BROCHURE -- The brochure promoting Plymouth's recycling program is attached. Distribution of the brochure and the blue recycling boxes to Plymouth homes is scheduled to begin next week. CITY COUNCIL INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM • January 21, 1988 Page three 8. DRUG AWARENESS BOOKLET -- The First National Bank of Wayzata together with numerous local businesses, has made available the attached drug information booklet entitled, "Say 'NO' To Drugs." 9. CORRESPONDENCE: a. Letter to Mayor and Council from Fred Lips concerning his continued interest in serving on a City commission or board. (I -9a) b. Letter of appreciation from Governor Perpich to Dick Carlquist for serving as Chairman of the State Narcotics Enforcement Coordinating Committee. (I -9b) c. Letter of appreciation from Jan Constenuis, 2775 Upland Court, for assistance provided by Police Officer Craig Lindman. (1-9c) d. Note of appreciation from the Bill Riche family for assistance provided by Plymouth Police Department. (I -9d) James G. Willis City Manager JGW : Jm attachment PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 27, 1988 n -S WHERE: Plymouth City Center 3400 Plymouth Boulevard Plymouth, MN 55447 CONSENT AGENDA All items listed with an asterisk (*) are considered to be routine by the Planning Commission and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Commissioner, citizen or petitioner so requests, in which event the item will be removed from the consent agenda and considered in normal sequence on the agenda. 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL 3.* CONSENT AGENDA 4.* APPROVAL OF MINUTES 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS 7:30 P.M. January 13, 1988 A. Plymouth Historical Society. Site Plan and Conditional Use Permit to construct a storage building at 3605 Fernbrook Lane. (87101) B. Richard Brokke, Powell Lincoln Mercury. Site Plan and Conditional Use Permit Amendment for parking lot and vehicle storage expansion at 3901 Vinewood Lane (87127). C. Pat Goff, Goff Homes. Preliminary Plat and Rezoning for "Fernbrook Manor" east of 45th Avenue North and Fernbrook Lane. (87128) D. Beverly Kottas, President, H.I. Enterprises, Inc. Land Use Guide Plan Amendment for property at the southeast corner of Fernbrook and Harbor Lanes. 6. NEW BUSINESS A. 1501 Partnership. Site Plan and Variance to construct an office building at the northeast corner of County Road 9 and Berkshire Lane. (87132) 7. OLD BUSINESS A. Patrick Hagen, Prime Development Corporation. Continued consideration of th Rezoning and Preliminary Plat for commercial property northwest of Highway 55 and Quaker Lane. (87123) 8. OTHER BUSINESS - 9. ADJOURNMENT 10:30 P.M. A G E N D A PLYMOUTH HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ANNUAL MEETING 3anuary 28, 1988 6:30 P.M. I . Roll Call II. Approval of Minutes for December 17, 1987 Meeting III. Nomination and Appointment of Officers IV. Year End Status Report on the Section 8 Program V. Year End Status Report on the Housing Rehabilitation Program VI. Year End Status Report on the Senior Citizen Housing Site VII. Year End Status Report on the Child Care Subsidy Program VIII. Year End Status Report on the Union City Mission IX. Year End Status Report on the Plymouth House Doctor Program X. Year End Status Report on the Home Energy Check -Up Program XI. Status Report on the Community Development Block Grant (CDGB) Program for Year XIV XII. Other Business XIII. Adjournment k •- Please return this card with your check. y Meal Choice: c , 7 Chicken Kiev Amount enclosed Roast Beef __��_._________ _ Number of people Names: --.- Address: S , Make check payable to: , Northwest Hennepin Human Services Council 7323 58th Avenue North Crystal, Minnesota 55428 You are cordially invited to attend Northwest Hennepin Human Service Council's Annual Meeting Date: January 27th, 1988 Where: Sheraton Northwest - Interstate 94 and U.S-169, Brooklyn Park, MN Time: Cocktail Hour/Cash Bar 5.45 - 6:30 Dinner 6:30 - 7:30 Annual Meeting 7:30 - 8:00 Entertainment/ Program 8:00 - 9:30 and Social Time R.S.V.P. by January 21. Cost: $13.25 per person. We Look Forward to Seeing You? I ' N v I ►�.♦i..� I Ci �- � - UJ .�.. N Q1 N N I I f i N N 1 f (A Q N N h7 I t ' ! W I I F --I cn � rn N I �r I C7 W W/ w W �G ON ^-�- V I H ! H - U w~ P,4 �Ho N N o oaH' r� �," N a� �� la -I M V o'er' f � O W n U� M � O w Q U N 7 1 x U U HP� �.c uo i � • ISI 'b I;W'i as i�' o .f�Ln U ; 2 n Z o En �D z p I H O 4-4 Q. U P4 � 0 W I U P4 H pq! i H z z I , H r C) xi L) -:4 C) rM4 • N o a ; x o • • o fI I PQ n U I V7 a r-4 H- W z p o' rs+ U fll i U XoVOU; ori L� aww Na' CD Qi oUOUI aoo N VOU' N II a: �rf-+l �a ••a dnw! o�l-a M �r•N �D U H U W C 7 ' ! I I i �� J.� cn CIO� 00 u1 I _ w U) x w CIO P H V C2 �D V] FQ Pa 71 G N C31 .�-i U U W U Z H PL4 a p. -i H M� �� oa ••o a ••o i I (s r p.., n U Q-, n U cn C7 � H CQ Ct V) 00 O u1 N C3� W f� U ¢oma o •• o ON •a x a x � 00�- - 00�. ,., � 00 N �--• H U � wP-4 Q W t� O � la -1 � W U • U � yy . H i� N QI M G 0 � W oN •• V O U N U O U Cd n n co N U d U r] U Ems+ U w 0 H¢C 000 nE- oU of - N N CT « N W 00 all N G:. 00 Ar SEN ENGINEERS ■ ARCHITECTS ! PLANNERS December 16, 1987 RE: PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA STATE TRUNK HIGHWAY 101 AND FERNBROOK LANE TRAILS CITY PROJECT NO. 724 SEH FILE: 87131^1111�1�',r P� Q, c", f Mr. Fred Moore, Director of Public Works c. City of Plymouth 3400 Plymouth Boulevard Plymouth, MN 55447 As directed, we are addressing the need, timing and cost of several change order items for the above referenced project. T.H. 101 - Retaining Wall During the predesign study of the project several alternate trail routes were analyzed. The least costly alignment did not require a retaining"'Vu did require permanent and temporary easements. The most expensive alignment did require a small and smaller easements. Due to cost considerations the plans were prepared without the wall in anticipation of acquiring the necessary easements. Preliminary contact with the property owner indicated that he was receptive to granting the easements. Easement negotiations proceeded during the advertising for construction bids. After the receipt of bids and a ward of contract the negotiations with the property owner were stalemated on the southern part of the property, but negotiations continued for easements on the northerly segment. A retaining wall was designed south of the owner's driveway and the plan given to the contractor for a cost quotation. Change Order No. 1 was prepared to include the retaining wall along STH 101, a small landscape wall along Fernbrook Lane and 16 concrete pedestrian ramps on existing trails throughout the city. The change order also included a subtraction of about 4700 sq. ft. of bituminous trail along Fernbrook Lane that was to be installed by two adjacent developers. When easement negotiations with the property owner stalled on the northern part of the parcel, Change Order No. 2 was prepared to construct an additional segment of the retaining wall. The change order was prepared on September 21st and was returned by the contractor on October 2nd. NTNG �`.'. � ...__� -- �-.•-r,;J,� e t, Mr. Fred Moore December 16, 1987 Page 2 Siltation Fence The initial design specified siltation fence to -be installed adjacent to environmentally sensitive areas, such as wetlands and lakes and where erosion could occur. During the trail construction several developments were under construction adjacent to the project area. It was determined that the city's contractor should install additional fence to demonstrate consistency between the developers requirements and municipal contracts. Although the method of trail construction {maintaining a grass area between trail and street} minimized soil transportation, the fence was effective as a preventative measure. Change Order No. 3 was prepared on October 7th. It included the addition of the siltation fence and lowering a shallow water service exposed during construction. For simplicity sake, Change Order No. 2 and 3 were combined. Revised Change Order No. 2 was transmitted to the Contractor on October 20th and received back on November 4th. The change order was then routed to the city on November 16th. Construction Cost The referenced additional work had the following impact on the total construction cost: Project Budget Bid Contract Amount Estimated Final Contract Amount Additions to Contract - Easements STH 101 Retaining Wall Fernbrook Lane Landscape Wall - Items not included in Contract Fernbrook Lane Siltation Fence Lower water service Concrete Pedestrian Ramps on Existing Trails ESTIMATED PROJECT TOTAL $180,000 124,000 *115,000 17,000 1,500 71200 2,400 $143,100 6,000 $149,100 * Includes reductions of $3700 for bituminous trail reduction and $2000 for reduction in common excavation Mr. Fred Moore December 16, 1987 Page 3 Hopefully there will not be any change orders on future projects but realistically there will be additional work identified during the construction process. In order to keep both you and the council advised of potential changes we will make a better attempt of communicating the need for potential revisions as they become apparent. We intend to accomplish better communication through special memorandums and more descriptive construction status reports. Sincerely, Mark Lobermeier, P.E. jms CITY OF PLYMOUTH 3400 PLYMOUTH BLVD., PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55'+47 TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800 MEMO DATE: January 21, 1988 TO: James G. Wi11i,g,, �City Manager FROM: Fred G. Moore, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: TRAFFIC COUNTS 34TH AVENUE HERITAGE ESTATES ADDITION In September of 1987 the City Council received a request from residents along 34th Avenue within the Heritage Estates Addition for the construction of the northerly extension of Xenium Lane to Northwest Boulevard. This request was being made because of additional traffic they perceived through their neighborhood as a result of the additional development in the Northwest Business Campus. When Northwest Boulevard was constructed in 1983, the City entered into an agreement with residents in the Heritage Estates Addition. This agreement stated that if traffic increased more than three times, the City would look at several options to decrease through -traffic on 34th Avenue. Traffic counts could not be made last September because of altered traffic routes because of the closure of County Road 9. Traffic counts were made in December after County Road 9 was opened again to through traffic. The traffic counts indicate that the west end of 34th Avenue has decreased 343 between 1983 and 1987. The east end has increased 160%. The consultant also reviewed the expected trips which would be generated on 34th Avenue in comparison to the number of homes within the area. It is their conclusion that the increase in traffic at the east end, which occurred between 1983 and 1987, is due almost entirely to the additional homes that have been constructed in that area. It is projected that there are about 20 through -trips during the peak traffic hour. A copy of the traffic counting information will be provided to Mark McCollough, the Attorney submitting the petition on behalf of the residents along 34th Avenue. As the Northwest Business Campus and other areas along Xenium Lane continue to develop, we will continue to monitor traffic on 34th Avenue. No additional action is necessary by the City Council. FGM:kh STRGAR-ROSCOE-FAUSCH, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS I� TRANSPORTATION ■ CIVIL ■ STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS ■ LAND SURVEYORS December 16, 1987 Mr. Fred G. Moore, P.E. Director of Public Works CITY OF PLYMOUTH 3400 Plymouth Boulevard Plymouth, Minnesota 55447 Dear Fred: File No. 0840481 RE: TRAFFIC COUNTS - 34TH AVENUE/HERITAGE ESTATES ADDITION IN PLYMOUTH As requested, 48-hour traffic counts have been completed and analyzed for two locations on 34th Avenue between Xenium Lane and C.S.A.H. 61 in Plymouth. The west end of 34th Avenue was counted between Xenium Lane and Sycamore Lane, while the east end of 34th Avenue was counted between Rosewood Lane and C.S.A.H. 61. Both count locations correspond with counts previously conducted by this firm in late May/early June of 1983. This year counts were completed Wednesday through Friday, December 9, 10 and 11 (see Attachments). For the purposes of a comparison analysis, Metro Area Adjustment Factors (developed by the Minnesota Department of Transportation) were used to represent the collected 48-hour count data as Average Annual Daily Traffic (A.A.D.T.) volumes. Below is a summarized comparison of the respective counts completed in 1983 and 1987. 1983/1987 34TH AVENUE TRAFFIC COUNT COMPARISON SUMMARY * Metro Area Adjustment Factors used by Mn/DOT to represent (factor) daily count data as Average Annual Daily Traffic. The adjustment factors are established yearly, for specific weekdays during each month of the year. 630 Twelve Oaks Center, 15500 Wayzata Blvd., Wayzata MN 55391 (612) 475-0010 1983 May,* 1987 Dec.,* 1983 to Daily 1983 Daily 1987 1987 Count Location Traffic Adj. 1983 : Traffic Adj. 1987 AADT Between Count Factor AADT : Count Factor AADT Change Xenium/Sycamore 520 .880 458 351 .973 342 34% (West End) Reduction Rosewood/CSAH 61 449 .880 395 649 .973 631 160% (East End) Increase * Metro Area Adjustment Factors used by Mn/DOT to represent (factor) daily count data as Average Annual Daily Traffic. The adjustment factors are established yearly, for specific weekdays during each month of the year. 630 Twelve Oaks Center, 15500 Wayzata Blvd., Wayzata MN 55391 (612) 475-0010 r Mr. Fred G. Moore, P.E. - 2 _Q--,) December 16, 1987 For comparison purposes, we estimated the expected traffic volumes from the residential areas served by 34th Avenue. Based on probable direction of approach, standard residential trip generation rates and an estimate of 65 homes served by 34th Avenue, we would expect about 650 trips (the total of both ins and outs) to be generated in the area. One can use this figure of 650 trips, the results from the traffic study and then solve algebraically for the through trips. The results of this computation indicate that about 160 trips are of the type that travel entirely through the area. Assuming typical peak hour and directional factors, this would indicate that about 20 through trips are being made with probably 12 to 15 of those trips being in the heaviest direction. The growth at the east end that occurred between 1983 and 1987 is due almost entirely to the additional homes that have been constructed in that area since the 1983 counts were made. If you should require any additional counts, please feel free to call. Sincerely, STRGAR-ROSCOE-FAUSCH, INC. Dennis R. Eyler Associate Charles R. Ken Traffic Engineering Specialist CRK/ DRE/ j a 1 Attachments information regarding these .4th AVENUE IN PLYMOUTH ACROSS FROM HOUSE NO. 13105 EAST/WEST JWEST END) HOUR ------- QUARTER HOUR ----- HOUR EACH * REPRESENTS 4 VEHICLES w�F DAY I5t end 3rd 4th TOTAL_ A DASH MEANS H0Uf--, VOLUME 1^ AM of 0 0 0 0 I AM 1 0 0 a� AM L =: AM vi 171 0 0 L7s — 4 AM 0 ? 0 1 Ars 1 1 7* b pm 4 1 1 10 16 16 9 AM 4 10 10 Ary - u 1 _ 1017 e;. s 1 y p ri 6 7 1.1 32 PM 14 FN 77 27 4 PM 1:� : 7 7 L 11` C �.�. 71 PM 11 Flm 0 1 C 0 TOTAi_ VOL.UNE IS = 40 t)Et-� ? L'! _ES . F'EAK HOURS: MORNING PEAK HOUR VOLUME OF 229 E4E�l I Nw PJ 6: 4`�', Ar! t : %? EVENING PEAT; HOUR VOLUME OF 37 BEGINS AT : 1 DATA COLLECTION DED -AN AT 11 AM ON WEDNESDAY " DECE:MSEE R 1 9E7 . .=,,it h AVENUE IN FLYMOU'? l -i ACROSS FROM HOUSE NO. i W 1 0 EAST/WEST (WEST END) HOUR _..... _ DUARTER HOUR -W---- HOUR OF DAY r{d "_�rd 4th TOTAL. 122 AM J 01 ? © 1 0 Q, 0 4 Arl :' 0 1 _ 5..r Af i -7 r P, Iii _. 1 2 r A M 7 i4 11 AM 6 TCTfaI_ VC7L�li•i ?_ 6.I ',IEHICLES. EACH * REPRESENTS 4 VEHICLES A MEANS HOUR VOLUME t: ------------------------------------- ="E fa}:"HOUSE MORNING PEAT'..' HOUR' VOLUME:- OF C7 BEG i t-�S (_'tiS: 3 G AN EVENING- PEAL` HOUR Vri{ UME OF 4,01 PEG I h1O Pil' 5,:00 F',,; f 1:2 %,1 -''r' 7'A COLL EC �• I!�i,: BEGt?F',1 FST 1 rtl�'! J;''., THt �F:CT;�,�: �i� r'Ei°II'•�_ 1 U� , � 9rS . " t t-, AVENUE 1 Tei F L`�h1Dl i"T•F � CROSS FROM HOUSE NO. 1 e en EAST/WEST (EAST END) T+�TAL VOLUME ? S 6_.6 VEH I CLEF . PEAF!; HOURS: MORNING PEA[!'. HOUR DLUMi. OF 5:' SEG 1 Nc— b : ti 5 At1 ( Q •l. � EVENING PEAk: HOUR VOLUME OF 69 BEGINS (-) T -1: r PM � 11 % ) DATA COLLECTION 2ECA4` l';T 11 f')M ON WEDNESDAY ir,)ECEMBER y . 1981'. OUARTER HrDUR ____. HOUR EACH * f;F_PRE �4= N -f 4 VEH T CLEC:: OF JAY 15t 2nd d 4th TOTAL P. DASH MEANS HOUR V0L.LlME 1^ AM 0 1 01 0 1 - i AM 0 C� 1 0 i _ AM 1 0 r ri, A!rl fzi 0 o' a b AM _ _ 10 1 P-* A1 1 16 1 �3 �1*-� p7 C Am ; C1-3 10 AM 1 � 0 3.4 1 P#`1 P 7 c' C7 � .� .6.:� �j ti. f 1 1f- 4 FM 1B 11 i 1E 67.1w i T+�TAL VOLUME ? S 6_.6 VEH I CLEF . PEAF!; HOURS: MORNING PEA[!'. HOUR DLUMi. OF 5:' SEG 1 Nc— b : ti 5 At1 ( Q •l. � EVENING PEAk: HOUR VOLUME OF 69 BEGINS (-) T -1: r PM � 11 % ) DATA COLLECTION 2ECA4` l';T 11 f')M ON WEDNESDAY ir,)ECEMBER y . 1981'. t ••1 C. FL � 1 �i'.7 v 4= r- `�11 �t I I C � !`� f'^j � 1 ` C� '^. {;tt ! 1,1f;EC.1. ES -3 (EAST END) HflLIF; -- ---- �UF4F�TER HOUR--__- H0UF: E ACH � REPRESENTS 'I VEH a CL E'-. Or-- Dr-, : 1 s'� �n � 'te r-�{ 4�t_h TO '% • r; MEANS HDU';' V0LUrlE 1 2? AM i. c' @ 0 6 _. A- 1111! LO 01 0- -1 t')t'i L 0 0 4 4 P., M m h AM C, q ()!i ca 1 LA a 1 CA AM 11 All 14 _ EP M AL.t.. f'. • Nl- 'i"}C 't' .� 17 TOTAL V01"Ut"!E 1 : Ub^ VEF161CLE.Z . MORNING F''EF',r : HOUR VOLUME OF EVENING PEP4," H(3U'�, '','0LUME OF '?G EDEG S t4 '12 F r `�� : Cts{ F'±*v1 ( 1 � "/. ; DnTf^ COLLECTION BEC -:AN ('!T 11 (`iii! G14 i'HURSI AY. ?ErE€"1 j :F: 10. 1987. f L 4rrm X74 CITY OF . L PORTABLE TRAFFIC RECORDER, DATA SHEET LOCATION COUNTY 11ZA)A)k COUNT BEG I NN I NGZ 83 .3Q DATA BY �� (WEST END) /55- STATION 5- STATION NO . _ 4- S 11��, �� U N STRGAR-ROSCOE, INC. ' ! cv.ait►�7.�crci�cru ■ u.owa.nvaa •?0 T.��� �►.. C+w��• 11SOIJ +r�r H�• •v..•. rv0 A...•. .......�M.. �171� �(,� ]� 171 OD�O 48 HOUR COUNT FROM START TIME _ /439 VEHICLES REMAR S S17-5- 3-4- 3:30 - 4.100 115/-7--7 IT- d- ,4,0- 3. ;v�p RECORDER TYPE: HR MR AR MACH. NO.I�P_ TAPE NO. FILE NO. • I�r�i�s�■�I�■� SKETCH Ak4VF24GE D41LY TRAFFIC U N STRGAR-ROSCOE, INC. ' ! cv.ait►�7.�crci�cru ■ u.owa.nvaa •?0 T.��� �►.. C+w��• 11SOIJ +r�r H�• •v..•. rv0 A...•. .......�M.. �171� �(,� ]� 171 OD�O 48 HOUR COUNT FROM START TIME _ /439 VEHICLES REMAR S S17-5- 3-4- 3:30 - 4.100 115/-7--7 IT- d- ,4,0- 3. ;v�p RECORDER TYPE: HR MR AR MACH. NO.I�P_ TAPE NO. FILE NO. CITY OF PLYMOUTH PORTABLE TRAFFIC RECORDER DATA SHEET !S� LOCr,T 10 N'/ /_ /2'83' COUNTY fi`7Viti) STAT 10 r N0.54 COUNT BEGINNING DATA BY (EAST END) DATE AVERAGE of COUNT } SUN WEEKDAY WEEKEND DAY MON TIDE WED iUR RI SAT 12- IAM 1- 2 1 2- 3 3- 4 /; 4- 5 d Q 5- 6 i 6- 7 7- 8 2 AVERAGESKETCH DAILY TRAFFIC�, b- '1 it ! 1 1 /1 1 7_S 1 1 1 1 1 , N 48 HOUR COUNT FROM START TIME = 8 9 VEHICLES N REMARKS 611 (9 -/0) q=45- /O fc O RECORDER TYPE: HR MR AR )� STRGAR-RCSCCE.INC. MACH t10.11%?- 9 TAPE NO. FILE NO. r` � (V�flLt1�C[Klrt(.a • 4+Ow.�rOu —�� glo w�•� fL.. G••� X1500 r•r.r M.r. y• w... . ...�.... •♦ rrt. ah 0D0 o AVERAGESKETCH DAILY TRAFFIC�, N 48 HOUR COUNT FROM START TIME = 8 9 VEHICLES N REMARKS 611 (9 -/0) q=45- /O fc O RECORDER TYPE: HR MR AR )� STRGAR-RCSCCE.INC. MACH t10.11%?- 9 TAPE NO. FILE NO. r` � (V�flLt1�C[Klrt(.a • 4+Ow.�rOu —�� glo w�•� fL.. G••� X1500 r•r.r M.r. y• w... . ...�.... •♦ rrt. ah 0D0 2:3 CITY OF PLYMOUTH 3400 PLYMOUTH BLVD., PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447 TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800 MEMO DATE: January 12. 1988 TO: James G. Willis - City Manaaer - Director FROM: Richard J. Carl4uist Public Safetv Dir SUBJECT PUBLIC SAFETY STATISTICS FOR 1987 The total number of police service calls increased 12% last vear. while at the same time the Fire Department calls increased aDoroximately 330. The laraest percentage increases in the Police calls related to Class I and Class II crimes. They increased respectively 23% and 150. Some of the major areas of increase were recorded in auto theft. theft. burglary. and assault. I am not sure in all cases why there were dramatic increases. For instance. auto theft increases have been experienced metro -wide. Some of the autos stolen are 4oina to "chop shops". Others are being resold outside of our state. Burolaries may be increasing simply because we are increasing more dwelling units. and therefore have more targets! Significant trends that continue to increase are found in Class III and Class IV statistics. For example. medical emergencies increased by 101 calls this past year. In the past six years. this category has almost. doubled. I have included the annual statistics for the Investigations Section, which includes Communitv Relations and Youth Services. The number of cases assigned for investiga- tion increased 160 last vear. The malor difference in Fire Department confirmed calls in 1987 over 1986 was in the cateaory "arass fires". In 1986. we had recorded only six arass fires. while in 1987 the total was 84. The other major increase in fire calls was false fire alarm responses. The difference was 115 more such responses in 1987. Private dwellings. apartments. industry, and our health care institutions all recorded increases in false fire alarm resvonses. Our entire estimated fire loss in 1987 was approximately the same as 1986. i.e.. $635,470 versus 5643,310. There were no fire deaths in 1987. The March issue of Plymouth on Parade will contain the Public Safety Annual Report. Other statistics concerning fire prevention efforts in 1987 will be covered in that issue. RJC:as 1� ✓ PLYMOUTH POLICE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT JANUARY THROUGH DECEMBER MONTH 1987 CLASS I [MURDER CSC ROBBERY ASSAULT BURGLARY THEFT AUTO THEFT ARSON 1986 0 [ 4 12 178 1 266 998 J 83 1 5_ � 1987 U l 18 L 6 231 306 1175___L 145 16 TOTALS 1986 1,846 1987 1,897 +23% CLASS II FORGERY EMBEZZEL STOLEN WEAP PROSTI SEX GAME OFFENSES LIQ. DISORDERLY COUNTERFEIT FRAUD MENT PROPERTY VANDALISM OFF. TUTION OFF.INARCILINGIFAM/CHILDID.W.I.1 LAW I CONDUCT I OTHER 1986 29 1109 1 4 I 2 I 598 15 1 0 41 11011 1 1 22 1 405 1 106 66 I 458 1987 58 1 130 1 4 23 686 7 I 0 1 25 11121 0 j 29 j 444 ( 88 f 61 1 566 1 TOTALS 1986 1,947 1987 2,233 +15% CLASS III FATAL PERSONAL PROPERTY SNOWMOBILE MEDICAL SUICIDE NATURAL ANIMAL ACCIDENT L INJURY ' DAMAGE I ACCIDENT DROWNING EMERGENCY SUICIDE 1 ATTEMPTS L DEATH 1 BITES j FIRE 1986 3 1 181 L 902_...._L 745 �_ 2__. 35 J_ 17 1 50 I 260 J 1987 1 1 183 } 966 1 0 W �_ 0 846 6 18 19 31_ 326 TOTALS 1986 2,195 1987 2,396 + 9% CLASS IV ASSIST ANIMAL FALSE LOCK OTHER WARRANT TRAFFIC FIREARM SUSPICION MISSING LOST PUBLIC IDOMESTICIDETAILIALARMSIPROWLERI OUTS IAGENCYISERVED (DETAIL_IVIOLATIONIINFORMATIONIPERSON IFOUNDINUISANCEI MISC.I 1986 [ 276 1474 ( 1162 1, 73 J 1584 ( 450 I 315 _1974, 41 1 1265 I 32 1 195_1_1499 1135 1987 L 296 1 1662 1 1485 1 71 1569 414 304 12090 I_ 70 1 1423 85 1264 1 1529 1 1327 I TOTALS 1986 11,475 CRIMINAL OFFENSES CLEARED 1986 32% 1987 12,649 +10% - 1987 31% HAZARDOUS VIOLATIONS 1986 4,753 1987 5,739 +21% TOTAL NUMBER OF INCIDENTS 1986 17,163 NONHAZARDOUS VIOLATIONS 1986 5,377 1987 5,117 - 5% 1987 19,175 +12% PLYMOUTH POLICE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT ;LASS I MURDER CSC t ROBBERY_j ASSAULT BURGLARY I THEFT AUTO THEFT I ARSON 986 0 0 1--L-­Ll-i-28 11 28 _J_--.116_ 8 2 :987 �� 0 2 1 _ 0 ( 21 E 21 { 97 j 15 �_ 1 TOTALS 1986 1987 166 157 - 5% MONTH DECEMBER 1987 ;LASS II FORGERY EMBEZZEL STOLEN WEAP PROSTI SEX GAMB OFFENSES LIQ. DISORDERLY ( COUNTERFEIT 1FRAUDI M£NT IPROPERTYIVANDALISM1OFF TUTION OFF. NARC LING FAM/CHILD D.W.I. LAW I CONDUCT j OTHER 1986 1 3 0 U 42 -- 0 0 1 6 11 1 1_ 1 �___ 36 1 2 1987 ��w 5 r.__. 1_3 _�� 0 1 1 46 j O j 0 2 I 4_.i._ TOTALS 1986 146 1987 141 - 3% "LASS III FATAL PERSONAL PROPERTY SNOWMOBILE MEDICAL SUICIDE NATURAL ANIMAL ACCIDENT INJURY DAMAGE ACCIDENT DROWNING EMERGENCY I SUICIDE L ATTEMPTS DEATH f BITES _ FIRES 1986 0 1 13 84 0 i 0- 78 ( 0 _1� 2_-_ l -�1 _ 3 23 f 1981 �__ ---_ �. _ 25 116 �-_- .. --�-.0 72 O 3 0 1- 33 J TOTALS 1986 204 1987 240 +18% LASS IV ASSIST ANIMAL FALSE LOCK OTHER WARRANT TRAFFIC FIREARM SUSPICION MISSING LOST PUBLIC IDOMESTIC IDETAIL ALARMSJPROWLER1_PUTS JAGENCYJSERVED }DETAIL IVIOLATIONJINFORMATION PERSON IFOUNDINUISANCEI MISC._� 1986 L18 l 95-j 104 3 136 42 15� _138 2 87 1 4 1 11 1 86 85 1987 [ 27 91 1 154 1 4 1 1271_48 1 15 148__] 1 96 1 2 1 11 1 117 80 j TOTALS 1986 1987 826 921 +12% HAZARDOUS VIOLATIONS 1986 335 NONHAZARDOUS VIOLATIONS 1986 345 CRIMINAL OFFENSES CLEARED 1986 27% 1987 31% 1987 341 + 2% TOTAL NUMBER OF INCIDENTS 1986 1,342 1987 348 + 1% 1987 1,459 + 9% E4 W W Q N U H a a w 0 H W E -4 a w 0 H D 0 E a w 0 z 0 H OH � (�o --4 ,� [ w 0>a,w O H H a 4-J 4) cn 4 '{ a W E >a H j H k ao 0 rA W 9 x v N U to H v E -o W Q1 0 0 E-4 a � a •+ Q 4J M a � v z Ul) > H �3 cn F m w 41 O O N N rn *- �- w a *- -7 Ln e} a r Ln Ln O N c•1 en a 0 C!1 r 4 G C) CT E � Iw m 0 4) r N M LD %D N M r b' M CT N Q N N �D Ln %D r O Ln M r V r tip N r 14 a r LA m O v Ln %D Cn Ln LA m M w 17 N O (h r r O r r LA Ln CD v M CA r et w H t} M N r Ln o 1 1 r %D CD %D r CD N M N N M aT O O O N N LA CD V q' %D CO C: r N Ln r Ln Ln N CD r r M •L} r N N M y O O r M M �4 Cn $a 81 > 4 r N CA CD r Ln CD M r O m r Ln r N O CO Cil r r CD r N r O Ln Ln r N qr �� 4 0% Co 10 40 r N { 1 r r C% r r O M v CO O CD Q M CA N Ql 1D Lil r V LA M r %D LD 6 Q N O M Ln Ln r r r M 0 M r r M CD N N LD CD w O CD (V C.7 r r r r r r r r Ln N W • o � ro m to x W s4 U r 3 dF rn rP r OF do v 4p .4 �-1 [-4 o% LA r r %D Ln CO CD o CD M (+1 M LA iA ON r r- LA n m N r r CO CD r qr r %D O r- Cfl q1 Why LA LA LD %0 %D LD wl M LD r co m LA LA %0 N %0 LD N Ch v %0 qw al r m r .- M 0 CT r r C (1� U r r r � • co W 4+ m 10 m GL m -i aux N 14 v 4) %D 3 G 1 co O C] N N qr LD O r N V r CD N r N M LD 0 N O r N M CD r- � r r %D N CD LA r m 0 N M Nm r N r N CTO f -4O m r + Ql 41 () to ro to u ►� ar m LD m • H a aua) 4 U O r 1D r Ln N r &n %D Ln M CD O N M LA 0%qw Ln r 0 %0 r M {! r fo Ln C) N CD O r r r L'Y C CO M r ew CT '' qT N N CD N � Ln M w M y H r r r N r r r N M 00 at W 4 > U Li c ►m+ z Q> -4 O N 1+ m O C4 p E to CT W Ln 4) 4.J z r ;4 m 'v 3 > L""L 41 O N m .4 4 i- N tp LA o Ln M Ln .- CT m r Co qr M Ln a LA o M aT r M t? w o m r N N tD LD N r r r M qr CD r N CV %0 LD N N M N r N a M N r r Ln M ID M O r .L y> N N l'1 N N N M N M N M i -A W r r r-1 -4 4 y m U C m d C 4) V O > to Ln N -4a 'O cr Go U41 U a C!1 & � .fid r -I � ."4 z m m m R i g m z� 40 C a It Or, u L" L N la w M m N +p 17 N M as N C= is {a en m N N 1+ is ("� CT (r O M M M CT N � 9 410 Cr m H 17 W QS r i+ 41 V- A l+ r' tr it d r t -L 0� t� ,Lai 8 �1 y a N m> ►4 6 .-4 P4 . 4 E rd -i .-1 .6t E � .-1 .4 r4 .G7 E E •i .i pq 3 .A • i r -I .i .-1 'C QJ m to �y Lei Zqqs�ppypO n°o'`oy� 0u� a R.a�' >L au >> r 341 c 10 S E t 6-4 sOH N 8 Z E [� CC) n v m to I�r O Ln m n CD Q' N r 1 r r co G O H � U 01 C as `� ❑ {' a -4v� �o w as l � �c V v~'i Wo o ix U ca U) U O :n N cD e� n n rn d n Ln a u) Ln 0p 0 W >>4 c� co a� 1 C O m ab trWm C 2� to .-I to W 40 tv .o 0 40 -.4i2 `I w b, °aQ 4) p � 44 r_c 0 C U it W m ri �+ 4 C 1 w b .A ,.r 4-) F .� E-+ z h -{ VA aJ G .4 b+ • 4 m e m o .0 y .-t o a U c 3 O O w 3 cv w w w O o a w E r -t m E ai .-3 gom b ea .0 o y W O a O aV .qtr Cn w E 0 m C)�a+ o u C w + � H z U w a Q U A Ci a E► O 0 a CD %D N e7' f) tG r 1 �2 v W -{ N r r to 2 {! 'G C W N a 1 .a to Q u 1 m > U h y 0) Ei 0 41 + .� 0 o 0 in 0 Ln 1 o Ln Ln N U o o Ln N o 0 o Ln Ln n o n 6 >, 1i 0 O r• O r- Q CV . s r OJ r r 0 0 0 o Ln N o 0 0 0 0 Ln rJZ Ln N 111 Ln Ln 0 o N Ln in Ln Ln o n o n n m Ln v `� E N a r� �, L'"L N N o � r•'f rn 0 Ln 0 Ln r-4 N r N Ln Ln N r r LD N r- Ln c"''1 U Q1 L7? Ln N r`'S n N O N H •- eel N N d' n IT cn (n r C h A ; N •r k >+ 4) C h r -f G+ 4 {I! V t1� y�V4 b t+ n m LD co �e X LA f" 1 111 N N Ln r- in a% %0 r- co fn n C� n Ln w 4 r 0 V 0 o ay a b a � � c E- of o U ♦cn a 4J !J 0 tf7 +•1 Q z tr W 41 ix a w H a° c H H r7 )d 0 .Ur V w 1 0 Ln a n m b' Ln N co r .- Ln Co co V 0) 0 41 + .� 0 o 0 in 0 Ln 1 o Ln Ln N v Ln o o Ln N o 0 o Ln Ln n o n 6 >, a r 0 0 0 o Ln N o 0 0 0 0 Ln o Ln N 111 Ln Ln 0 o N Ln in Ln Ln o n o n n m Ln v `� E N a r� �, L'"L N N o � r•'f rn 0 Ln 0 Ln r-4 N r N r N N m r r" N N c"''1 U L7? r-1 N r - a r-4 .. •. C h A ; N •r k >+ 4) C h r -f G+ 4 {I! V 9 z y�V4 b t+ n m LD co �e X a 0 z tr1 O O 0 0 0 Ln Ln 0 0 0 O 0 0 0-.16) o O Ln 0 0 n N Ln Ln Ln O LAt cn z 1 1 b H ►Z Lo r N Ln r- r r r- �' M O LD 1D CD Q1 .4 L^f a ,jL Ln a) � H y H Ln 0 0 Ln 0 0 o Ln o Ln o 0 0 f -L > n o o N o o Ln N Ln N Ln o Ln a- w r cD • N • • 1 .• LD • d' • LL'] • CD • Cn • . • 'V W C? .�,, tC4 Ln LD 41 �- D 410 E b a 4A c:. LQ o O O 0 0 Ln Ln 0 o Ln .0 ,4 ,s� Ln Ln o o Ln 1 1 n N Ln o n La Ln cel N N r- E-4 H r- M o O c: o r+ o � z 0 E� 0 a 0 0 0 o Ln o o Ln Ln o Ln o Ln Ln o 0 1 n Ln o n N o N Ln .♦ f.L z m . Iq 1 • Ln . o . N • w . v . n . C% . M . V . . N O 3 r N r N r r N � a U u V 0 ❑o W + .� 0 o 0 in 0 Ln 1 o Ln Ln N v Ln o o Ln N o 0 o Ln Ln n o n m >, r b Ln Ln r N n r- C; 0 CD N 111 r �-L N .- C M— E V `� E N a 0 Ln r- 0 o N o Ln Ln n M Ln N r Ln N U; * o 0 [+1 Ln N N o 0 _ 0 Ln 0 Ln 0 o Ln N Ln Ln cn 0° N D L7? r-1 r-4 .. •. C h A ; N •r k >+ 4) C h r -f G+ 4 Cr Nu V 9 z y�V4 b t+ n m LD co �e 0 s W cc I" r pC� m w on E. V 00 W— W H t 4 is .0 C Ln r Ln Ln n n U') t` E4 r . r c•f • . • to . I to cn H 1 w -%4 "Id 4 1 U r -I .- 4 I ,4 rd E I a �s � n I ❑ I z N N n I a E O m I 4 N r r lQ r 1 C W m .4 2 I -x W I rix v° -'.P a 1 U w •-I �4 +-4 P (n I to I � w t .4 I C [ H f ,4 rd E I m E 1 W CT+ G 1 a E O m I m 1 C W m .4 E -x i rix v° -'.P o U w •-I �4 +-4 P 1 �-+ > y r•I > rl 44 p+ 1 w C V.a c-.4 Mw d' I 54 1 1 1 W 1 U 1 z I O 1 0) O b + 4d aD .4 V { W Z U�Aaai�t� 1 to .0 1 b U 0 0 1 V to ••r 4j U U i 1:4roH10roNcn(n n l D N C C N N 1 O >+ ,�E@ H >, tr+ A A I! Cal 3 Q >+ 3 H +J U cn ! z 1 O 1 H I 4 { H EZ 1 44 o a � 1 i � f E v O a c(i i H m 1 O u a 1 w mlw 1 U .. j 0 3 t' i 00 000 E4 Ee�EEE FGA ! U 1 OL 1 O 1 w � a? 1 LnEA 1 N N [� s.� tV cV fV ['i N O 1 ❑ *� r r r r r r EI 1 rn n r r ty'1 Qn b' N r w w w U Uzz U 2Q W OCC o Q1 d' 1 1 { 1 1 1 z z z O O O H H H O:c Q E E E+ W a o�c a a a a n a) rA G4' w �• a co aE a E O a E m s a E � o E-4 w 54 n o PLYMOUTH FIRE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT TYPE OF REPORTED INCIDENTS BY TIME OF DAY MONTHLY JANUARY - DECEMBER 1987 *INCLUDED IN FALSE ALARM TOTALS JANUARY' =' DECEMBER' 1986 CONFIRMED CALLS 264 FALSE ALARMS 378 TOTAL CALLS 642 ESTIMATED LUSS $643,31U NUMBER OF 0001 0401 U801 1201 1601 2001 CONFIRMED FALSE PERMITS ESTIMATED 0400 1 0 00.1 1200 16UU �1 2000 1 2400 1 CALLS ALARMS I -TOTAL I ISSUED_.__j LOSS LPRIVATE�UWELLINGS j_ 9 �. �. 2� __�29.__�...._3U. _. �_ 1 b —(-� -62___Lr 54 { 116��^-1�_.-$328,4001 [APARTMENTS -_� _ 1 28 I 20 1 30 1 46 I 59 _ 48 � 33 198 �_ 231 1___l 7 I 16,9001 JHUTELS_HNU_MOTELS l_._5 ? 7 3 1 6 -�— 1U--� --26 .._- -- -1----130,00] [ALL UTHER RESIUENTIAL 1PUBLIC�ASSEMBLY ���.__ � —3 J__-_-----�-3 - i 4 _� 4 _�- 8 I ' I 1001 I SCHOOLS AND COLLEGES __j_._?_L 1 3 __I._, _-�_� 5 I 3 J 14 I 17 - 4001 IHEALTH CARE INSTITUTIONS 3 I 9 I 12 I 13 I 12 I 7( 7 49 J 56 J _ 17 1 25] I PENAL INSTITUTIONS - - _ - --- I --I - 2 I 1 I_ .. 3 - 1 - 4 7 1- -- `--1. 1201 [STORES_ AND OFFICES _! f 2__ 1 2 _1 8�� �- 18 _ 4_ _l$ --_._-L.-- -28 - --I _ __ 36 I 2 _J _._..__ ._ " "I LINDUSTRY,�MFG. __.�... �_-- _.8 .I _13 �.__.16._ 17 10 I 22 I 66_ I_. ---88_-] -- 8 -1- 82,900 I STORAGE _IN _STRUCTURES 1 i 1 I 1 I �_.. �_ __� I _ _ --�-- 2 I - -- 3- - --..' I SPECIAL STRUCTURES I 3 I 1 I I I 1 1. 1 I 5 I_FIRES OUTSIDE_ OF _STRUCTURES -.I _ l -___-- __.i_ _ 1 . _ �- _J... _.I__. _ I _ --- �__— I _.. a _-A A. .I ._ --_- ..'•..A I FIRES IN HIGHWAY VEHICLES 1 4 ( 13 I 13 L -- 8_ 1 19_x _ _� 58. _-� - _.15... _ .I _. _65 �_.i . - ' I 70,925] IFIRES IN UTHER VEHICLES- -1 -- --1J.-.. -.I -.-- --L- - 1 u. _._ -0- - I 8 I.FIRES.-IN.BRUSH, GRASS — _.. 1 7 32 J- 34 _I_._?� _�.__.. _ . D4..._ .__ i. - 2 - ._J. _104 j LFIRES IN RUBBISH, TER _Y� -.-- -� 1� 2500 ALL_ T ER FIRES 1---? --a --- _ _...1 _.----.. Jl 1 __..? _.11_—_---.._5 _ - 1_ _- - —1--- 5 1 ---.-._- _- _�_ .—_._ 1,-2001 IMEDICAL AID RES PONSES-____.___.__L_ ._Ll.__ . -- 3--�-- 2 I_----13-----1 _. 1 1-14 _ - --" '] 1 MALICIOUS FALSE. ALARMS* ___- _ - _ 1 -J ---- _-�- . _ - --- ] . _ _ 1 - -1 3 ----L--- 4- -1-- - "- -. l _ _ - -1 IMUTUAL AID OR ASSISTANCE _j 1 ��1 2]4�1--3—] — 1 �_ 11 _ 0 _�_ 11 1 LALL OTHER RESPONSES _ _ I 2 i 2 10 1 14 L 13 1 8 I 37 _ 12 _ I 49 I -_-_..l-__-__ ..- -1001 TOTALS 1_ $2 79 1 135 199 1 219 144 1 365 I 493 L 858 1_ 47_j b635,470.1 *INCLUDED IN FALSE ALARM TOTALS JANUARY' =' DECEMBER' 1986 CONFIRMED CALLS 264 FALSE ALARMS 378 TOTAL CALLS 642 ESTIMATED LUSS $643,31U -�� PLYMOUTH Flnc nspxxTmcmT MONTHLY REPORT mowTx oEcsMusx lya, TYPE OF xcpu*Tso /wCIosms BY TIME OF DAY *INCLUDED IN FALSE ALARMS TOTALS uscsmucx lyyo comFznmso CALLS 26 FALSE xLxnwo _23 TOTAL CALLS 49 ESTIMATED LOSS $18},7n00� numuEu or 1 0001 o*ol uuul 1201 lmol 2ool CUmpmmco FALSE PERMITS [3TlmxTEN 0800ALARMS_ L.]..IuSVED.. I__LOSS_ ) DWELLINGS l ^ l o __- ^__-__ 1 6,7001 LuLL OTHER _RESIDEN[TIAL |__ . _�_.--�] --- _' ] IPUBLIC ASSEMBLY | k�H0OL�.,AND..00LL.EGES-_____ n[ALT* Cxn[ INSTITUTIONS . ._ — _- .. ---_'_--__ � 2[ _ _9 ! _6 IpswxL. zwsTzTuTl0n3� � |-SlTR-E-S._Awo .VFf.I.CES__----- | ._-l-_| | |_l -_-'�- ] 3 '3_ - ['— 'c' ] | lnoVSTxy,1MFG. _ [| �|_ �| � _ � l -A 1 3 1 u- __ 1 1 3001 rTuxAuE IN uTxucTux[o -____._ __' — -------u- --^ -----~ -----^ |spcCIAL-sT*UcTunEs-- -__ �--__ [ | -. |� _o R0Es OUTSIDE OF STRUCTVmES| __ | _ ] _ _ [_ _ | | _ _] V /O___ IFl [8 IN HIGHWAY VEHICLES l _� 2 1 4_| �.- | __-}^0}01 IFI8[3 IN OTHER VEHICLES | _ | __. � � � � | _ _ �0_ _ | _ 0. 0 1___�_� � IF%nES_IwBRUSH, GRASS � _ � � � � � -o | ' -o /---»IFIRES IN RUBBISH, ______|___ | _. _� � __]_._ _�___ | ____�_ _ | o o_] [ALL OTHER 1FIRES- � [_ � l _] _� | l | _ V | ]_ _ ]_ _� � � � � l } DI.MALICIOUS FALSE ____/__l. | ___ _[ ____}_ -\ - -_-|-_' -V_' AlD Dn.AD3lSTAWC[ _ | � 18LL'0TH[n'�-ES90nSES. �__}__ _|_]__l �___�_] ____2_j_- ToTALo12 7 0 17� lw � la � 24 / *e / #gg_� *INCLUDED IN FALSE ALARMS TOTALS uscsmucx lyyo comFznmso CALLS 26 FALSE xLxnwo _23 TOTAL CALLS 49 ESTIMATED LOSS $18},7n00� MONTH OF DECEMBER �'ATIO[J I PLYMOUTH FIRE DEPARTMENT FIREFIGHTER PARTICIPATION THIS MOINTH/TO DATE w THIS TO Ll �")L OYEE NAME MONTH DATE Arbogast, Tel (283) 33 40 Bickley,Terry (295) 43 53 Dahlstrom Joe (292) 51 45 Elliott Dwan (267) 65 73 El l_ iott Scott ( 274 ) 49 53 Elliott Tom (241) NA NA Evenson Denny(234) F\,anon Tom ( 260 ) Faschin Brian (245) 33 NA NA 33 IJA NA Foley, Dan (293) 30 45 Fournier Jim (262) 14 30 C,rat7. - T,nwrt-nr-P MI) NA tt i I�lA Hebert, Barbara (290) Hebert David (289) 4 Hebert William (251) 24 53 71 32 41 64 ?;= -h Douca ( 239 ) 20 26 Johnson Brad (257) 88 83 Kuss Wes (243) 49 38 Lahti Tim (280) 51 57 Leuer, Daviel (265) 47 56 -:ndber, er Chuck (261) 43 48 Nelson John (259) j 43 56 N�ltin Jim (229) 18 M 24 33 MA 39 Phi11i Lee (253) Plack Lary, (270) S,Iminen Charles (273) NA 47 NA 55 Scharlau Chuck (263) ScharlauTon• (247) 38 35 Sh•2Idon Rick (240) 92 94 Jeff (250) 37 29 54 57 Leuer, Greg (264) STATICU I I PER= EMDLOYEE NAME THIS MaZIE , Cary Anderson Paul (284) 49 36 Arbeiter, Jim (230) 87 41 Begin Kevin (236) 30 7 STATICU I I PER= EMDLOYEE NAME THIS MaZIE TO DATE Anderson Paul (284) 49 36 Arbeiter, Jim (230) 87 41 Begin Kevin (236) 30 61 Begin, Ralph (228) 77 55 Bohlman Keith (254) 27 39 Branson Patrick (235) 33 40 Brennan Terry (269) 25 32 Burke David (288) 42 52 Franks Steven (294) 26 41 Gane Kevin ( 237 ) NA NA Huberty, Steve (271) NA NA Jaminski Mark (282) 49 29 Julseth Don (277) 54 57 Leuer, Greg (264) t 67 59 Leuer, Kevin (278) 81 54 Luth Rick (256) 37 44 LNTer, Ron (252) 54 36 Martin Jim (232) 21 1 18 Schroder Tamm-? (244) 33 29 Scofield Stan (275) , 77 70 Starr Lou (281) 42 38 Tar-bers William (258) 39 36 Wimrnergren, Shawn (256) 39 4D Total Alarms This Month 73 To Date 858 Fire Station I This Month 49 To Date 628 Fire Station II This Month 57 To Date 694 Last Year: Total Alarms This Month 49 To Date 642 1984 MILL RATE COMPARISON Payable 1984 - 1988 City of Plymouth #284/WAYZATA 1985 School 47.631 46.507 51.348 County 29.689 29.262 29.688 City 14.877 14.538 15.469 Misc. 5.318 5.181 5.878 Voc. Sch. 1.446 1.490 1.535 Total 98.961 96.978 103.918 *Includes 9.970 mills from referendum #281/ROBBINSDALE School 58.326 56.100 County 29.689 29.262 City 14.877 14.538 Misc. 5.318 5.181 Voc. Sch. 1.446 1.490 Total 109.656 106.571 *Includes 8.500 mills from referendum School 54.909 51.199 County 29.689 29.262 City 14.877 14.538 Misc. 5.318 5.181 Voc. Sch. 1.446 1.490 Total 106.239 101.670 *Includes 6.000 mills from referendum 59.450 29.688 15.469 5.878 1.535 112.020 54.345 29.688 15.469 5.878 1.535 106.915 #270/HOPKINS of -os -as SMM 1987 1988 49.883 29.356 16.048 5.459 1.421 102.167 56.932 29.356 16.048 5.459 1.421 109.216 55.783 29.356 16.048 5.459 1.421 108.067 57.380* 31.667 16.618 6.238 1.493 113.396 58.433* 31.667 16.618 6.238 1.493 114.449 61.859* 31.667 16.618 6.238 1.493 117.875 School 45.023 42.567 47.152 44.108 48.939* County 29.689 29.262 29.688 29.356 31.667 City 14.877 14.538 15.469 16.048 16.618 Misc. 5.318 5.181 5.878 5.459 6.238 Voc. Sch. 1.446 1.490 1.535 1.421 1.493 Total 96.353 93.038 99.722 96.392 104.955 *Includes 8.500 mills from referendum(s) Wtrshed Dist #3 .281 .061 .089 .133 .092 Sewer Dist #1- #2- #3- #4 Included in City Mill Rate (1.000 mills) 1988 DISTRIBUTION OF THE TAX DOLLAR CITY OF PLYMOU'T'H WAYZATA SCHOOL DISTRICT KILL RATES SCHOOL DISTRICT 57.380' 31.667 HENNEPIN COUNTY 16.616 CITY OF PLYMOUTH 6.238 MISCELLANEOUS 1.493 VOCATIONAL SCHOOL 113.396 TOTAL *INCLUDES 9.970 KILLS FROM REFERENDUM! (CITY KILL RA?E INCLUDES 1.000 KILL FOR STORMS SEVER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICTS, BUT DOES NOT INCLUDE WATERSHED DIVIDES) 01-11-98:SM?' VOCATIONAL SCHOOL MISCELLANEOUS C 1 . 3Y.) (5.5'/) DISTRICT { t s d j., -7-- .- �LA 1488 DISTRIBUTION OF THE TAX DOLLAR CITY OF PLYMOUTH ROBBINSDALE SCHOOL DISTRICT HILL RATES SCHOOL DISTRICT 58.433: 31.661 HENNEPIN COUNTY 16.618 CITY OF PLYMOUTH 6.238 MISCELLANEOUS 1'443 VOCATIONAL SCHOOL 114.419 TOTAL *INCLUDES 8.500 MILLS FROM REFERENDUM (CITY KILL DISTRICTS,NBUT DDOES ES •NOT INCLUDE 000 KILL RWATERSHED DiVIDES) STORM SEVEO�MENT 01-11-88:SMH VOCATIONAL SCHOOL MISCELLANEOUS (5.4/) HENNEPIN COUNTY (Z? .7v..) t } SCHOOL DISTRICT (51.1f) r r' 1968 DISTRIBUTION OF THE TAX DOLLAP. CITY OF PLYMOUTH OSSEO SCHOOL DISTRICT HILL RATES SCHOOL DISTRICT 61.8592 HENNEPIN COUNTY 31.661 CITY OF PLYMOUTH 16.618 MISCELLANEOUS 6.238 VOCATIOHAL SCHOOL 1.493 TOTAL 117.815 2INCLUDES 6.000 MILLS FROM REFERENDUM (CITY BILL RATE INCLUDES 1.000 HILL FOR STORM SEVER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICTS, BUT DOES HOT INCLUDE WATERSHED DIVIDES) VOCATIONAL SCHOOL MISCELLANEOUS (1. 3%) (5.3x) l SCHOOL DISTRICT (52.5'/.) 1988 DISTRIBUTION OF THE TAX DOLLAR --� CITY OF PLYMOUTH HOPKINS SCHOOL DISTRICT HILL RATES SCHOOL DISTRICT 48,939= HENNEPIN COUNTY 31.667 CITY OF PLYMOUTH 16.618 MISCELLANEOUS 6.238 VOCATIONAL SCHOOL 1.493 TOTAL 104.955 *INCLLrDES 8.500 BILLS FROM REFERENDUM (CITY KILL RATE INCLUDES 1.000 MILL FOR STORM SEVER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICTS, BUT DOES NOT INCLUDE WATERSHED DIVIDES) 01-11-88:SKX VOCATIONAL SCHOOL MISCELLANEOUS{1 .4'/.) (6.ov..) .1 I J i I ICT f f 1 CITY OF PLYMOUTH 1988 PAYABLE TAXES 1987 WAYZATA ROBBINSDALE OSSEO HOPKINS STIMATED DIST. #284 DIST. #281 DIST. 0279 DIST. 0270 MARKET MILL RATE:113.396 MILL RATE:114.449 MILL RATEtl17.875 MILL RATEi104.955 VALUE TAX TAX TAX TAX TAX TAX TAX TAX HOMESTEAD NON-HMST HOMESTEAD NON-HMST HOMESTEAD NON-HMST HOMESTEAD NON -HHS 25,000 222 794 224 ----------------- --------------------------------------------------------- 801 230 825 205 735 ----------------------------- 30,000 30,000 266 953 268 961 ------------------- 277 990 ----------------- 246 882 35,000 --------- 310 ------------------- 11111 313 ------------------ 1,122 323 ------------------- 1,155 287 1,029 40,000 355 1,270 358 1,262 369 1,320 ----------------- 328 1,175 45.000 ----------------------------- 399 1,429 403 ----------------- I -------------------------------------------- 1.442 415 ------------------- 1,485 369 1.322 50,000 50,000 443 11588 447 1,602 461 11650 ------------ ----------------- 410 1,469 55.000 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 488 1,746 492 1,763 507 1,815 451 1,616 60,000 532 10905 537 1,923 553 1,980 492 1,763 65,000 --------- $76 ------------------- 2,064 582 ------------------ 2,083 603 ------------------- 2,145 533 11910 70,000 672 2.223 685 2,243 726 2,310 ----------------- 615 2,057 75.000 --------- 825 ------------------ 2,381 839 2,403 885 2,475 757 2,204 80,000 978 2.540 ------------------ 994 2,564 --- 1,045 ----- 2,640 ------------------ 898 2,351 85,000 --------- 1,131 ------------------ 2,699 1,148 ------------------ 2,724 1,204 2,805 1,040 2,498 90,000 1,284 2,858 1,303 2,884 ------------------- 1,363 2,970 ------------------ 1,182 2,645 95.000 --------- 1,438 ------------------ 3,016 1,457 ------------------ 3,044 1,522 ------------------- 3,135 1,323 2,792 100.000 11591 31175 1,612 3,205 1,681 3,301 ----------------- 1,465 2,939 105,000 --------- 1.744 ------------------ 3,334 ------------------- 1,766 3,365 1,840 3,466 1,607 3,086 110,000 1,897 3,493 1,921 3,525 ------------------- 11999 3,631 ----------------- 1,748 3,233 115,000 --------- 2,050 ------------------ 3,651 2,075 3,685 2.158 3,796 11890 3,380 120,000 2,203 ------------------------------------------- 3,810 2,230 3,845 2,318 31961 -------------- 2032 3.526 125,000 --------- 4 2,356 ------------------ 3,969 ------------------- 2,384 4,006 2,477 4,126 2,174 3,673 130,000 2,509 4.128 2,539 4,166 ------------------ 2,636 4,291 ----------------- 2,315 3,820 135,000 --------- 2.662 ------------------ 4.286 ------------------- 2,693 4,326 2,795 4,456 2,457 3,967 140,000 2,815 4,445 2,848 4,486 ------------------ 2,954 4,621 ----------------- 2,599 4,114 2 145.000 --------- 2,968 ------------------ 4,604 ------------------- 3,002 4,647 3,113 4,786 2,740 4,261 150,000 3,121 4.763 3,157 4.807 ------------------ 3,272 4,951 ----------------- 2,882 4,408 155.000 --------- 3,275 ------------------ 4,921 ------------------- 3,311 4,967 3,432 51116 3,024 4,555 160,000 3,428 51080 3,466 5.127 ------------------ 3,591 5,281 ---------------- 3,165 4,702 165,000 3,581 5,239 3.620 5,288 3,750 5,446 3,307 4,849 ---.-_�. ------------------ ------------------- ------------------- ---------------- H 170,000 3,734 5,398 3,775 5,448 3,909 5.611 3,449 4,996 175,000 --------- 3,887 ------------------ 51556 ------------------- 3,929 5,608 4,068 5,776 3,590 5,143 160.000 41040 5.715 4,084 5,768 ------------------- 4,227 5,941 ---------------- 3,732 5.290 18S,000 -------- ------------------ 4,193 5,874 ------------------- 4,238 5,928 4,386 6.106 3,874 5,437 190,000 4,346 6,033 4.393 6.089 ------------------ 4,545 6,271 ---------------- 41015 5,584 195.000 -------- ------------------ 4,499 6.191 ------------------- 4,547 6,249 4,705 6,436 4,157 5,731 200,000 4,652 6,350 4,702 6,409 ------------------ 4,864 6,601 ---------------- 4,299 5,877 225,000 -------- I ------------------ 5.418 7.144 5,475 7,210 5,659 7,426 5,007 6,612 250,000 6,183 -------------------- 7,938 6,247 8.011 ------------------ 6,455 8,251 ---------------- 5,716 7,347 275,000 -------------------------- 6,949 8,731 7,020 8,813 7,251 91076 6,424 6,062 300,000 7,714 -------------------- 9.525 7,792 9,614 ------------------- 8,046 9.902 ---------------- 7,133 8,816 350,000 9,245 11.113 9,337 11.216 9,638 11,552 8,550 10,286 rpvO� PUMOUTR 1988 PAYABLE RESIDENTIAL TAXES AT THE LEFT ARE CALULATED WITH THE BILL RATES AS SHOWN. MILL RATES INCLUDE STORM SEWER DISTRICT BUT DO NOT INCLUDE WATERSHED DIVIDES. THE CALCULATION OF THE ASSESSED ALUES 6 CREDITS FOR THE VARIOUS PROPERTY TYPES ARE AS FOLLOWS: RESIDENTIAL: 1ST S68,000 p 174 BALANCE p 274 NON-HMST ! 284 HOMESTEAD CREDIT: 544 OF GROSS TAX ON IST $68,000 OF EMV NOT TO EXCEED S700. COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL: 1ST $60,ODO @ 284 BALANCE @ 434 LAND (VACANT): @ 404 AGRICULTURAL (FARM): IST $66,000 @ 144 BALANCE @ 184 NDN-HMST @ 184 AG CREDIT (HOMESTEAD): 364 OF GROSS TAX ON IST 320 kCRES, EXCLUDING HOUSE, GARAGE, AND IST ACRE. i4 OF BALANCE. NO CREDIT LIMIT. AG CREDIT (NON -HOMESTEAD): 264 OF GROSS TAX ON ENTIRE PROPERTY, EXCLUDING HOUSE, GARAGE, 6 IST ACRE. NO CREDIT LIMIT. (CALCULATE AG CREDIT BEFORE )MESTEAD CREDIT IS CALCULATED.) BLIND/DISABLED: 1ST S34.000 0 5 4 2ND $34,000 @ 17% BALANCE @ 274 1/15/86 SMM/BL * Includes 1.00 mill for Storm Sewer District SCHOOL DISTRICT 284 (Wayzata) City Taxes on Typical Plymouth Homes Example I City Net Portion Assessed/ Valuation Payable City * Increase/ Payable Market Taxes Portion Decrease 1983-84 909300 19318.33 198.14 +$ 23.87 1984-85 929100 19307.99 196.07 - 2.07 1985-86 929100 19343.96 199.98 + 3.91 1986-87 929100 17278.77 200.89 + .91 1987-88 989500 19544.67 227.07 + 26.18 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Example II City Net Portion Assessed/ Valuation Payable City * Increase/ Payable Market Taxes Portion Decrease 1983-84 1029500 19680.53 252.58 +$ 33.43 1984-85 1049600 19671.65 250.58 - 2.00 1985-86 1049600 19720.67 256.04 + 5.46 1986-87 1049600 19636.35 257.07 + 1.03 1987-88 1099800 19890.65 277.93 + 20.86 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Example III City Net Portion Assessed/ Valuation Payable City Increase/ Payable Market Taxes Portion Decrease 1983-84 1319200 29532.59 380.65 +$ 55.93 1984-85 1339800 29521.18 377.92 - 2.73 1985-86 1339800 29600.64 386.98 + 9.06 1986-87 1339800 29471.67 388.30 + 1.32 1987-88 1439200 29913.25 428.25 + 39.95 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Example IV City Net Portion Assessed/ Valuation Payable City * Increase/ Payable Market Taxes Portion Decrease 1983-84 1579500 39313.39 498.00 +$ 76.54 1984-85 160,700 39303.79 495.24 - 2.76 1985-86 160,700 31411.31 507.60 + 12.36 1986-87 1609700 3,241.19 509.10 + 1.59 1987-88 1719900 39791.96 557.42 + 48.23 * Includes 1.00 mill for Storm Sewer District * Includes 1.00 mill for Storm Sewer District SCHOOL DISTRICT 281 (Robbinsdale) City Taxes on Typical Plymouth Homes Example I City Net Portion Assessed/ Valuation Payable City * Increase/ Payable Market Taxes Portion Decrease 1983-84 909300 19531.06 207.76 +$ 24.30 1984-85 929100 19501.67 204.83 - 2.93 1985-86 929100 11503.32 207.61 + 2.78 1986-87 929100 19406.56 206.62 - .99 1987-88 989500 19565.52 227.00 + 20.38 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Example II City Net Portion Assessed/ Valuation Payable City * Increase/ Payable Market Taxes Portion Decrease 1983-84 102,500 19932.40 262.23 +$ 33.91 1984-85 1049600 19901.31 259.34 - 2.89 1985-86 1049600 19909.39 263.69 + 4.35 1986-87 1049600 19788.81 262.78 - .91 1987-88 1099800 19914.70 277.63 + 14.85 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Example III City Net Portion Assessed/ Valuation Payable City * Increase/ Payable Market Taxes Portion Decrease 1983-84 1319200 29876.54 390.34 +$ 56.48 1984-85 1339800 29834.87 386.68 - 3.66 1985-86 133,800 29857.98 394.69 + 8.01 1986-87 133,800 29681.76 393.95 - .74 1987-88 1439200 29946.80 427.29 + 33.34 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Example IV City Net Portion Assessed/ Valuation Payable City * Increase/ Paxable Market Taxes Portion Decrease 1983-84 1579500 39741.72 507.75 +$ 77.18 1984-85 160,700 39694.90 503.98 - 3.77 1985-86 1609700 31731.85 515.37 + 11.39 1986-87 1609700 39504.38 514.79- .58 1987-88 1719900 39833.67 555.88 + 41.09 * Includes 1.00 mill for Storm Sewer District * Includes 1.00 mill for Storm Sewer District SCHOOL DISTRICT 279 (Osseo) City Taxes on Typical Plymouth Homes Example I City Net Portion Assessed/ Valuation Payable City * Increase/ Payable Market Taxes Portion Decrease 1983-84 90,300 19463.09 204.83 +$ 27.49 1984-85 92,100 19402.70 200.59 - 4.24 1985-86 929100 19402.91 203.00 + 2.41 1986-87 92,100 19384.40 205.58 + 2.58 1987-88 989500 19633.34 230.30 + 24.72 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Example II City Net Portion Assessed/ Valuation Payable City Increase/ Payable Market Taxes Portion Decrease 1983-84 1029500 19851.93 259.27 +$ 37.05 1984-85 1049600 11783.98 255.11 - 4.16 1985-86 1049600 19790.48 259.08 + 3.97 1986-87 104,600 1,762.63 261.75 + 2.67 1987-88 1099800 1,992.97 281.01 + 19.26 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Example III City Net Portion Assessed/ Valuation Payable City * Increase/ Payable Market Taxes Portion Decrease 1983-84 131,200 21766.65 387.33 +$59.53 1984-85 1339800 29674.61 382.47 - 4.86 1985-86 133,800 29695.83 390.09 + 7.62 1986-87 1339800 29646.19 392.96 + 2.87 1987-88 1439200 39055.97 430.89 + 37.93 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Example IV City Net Portion Assessed/ Valuation Payable City * Increase/ Payable Market Taxes Portion Decrease 1983-84 1579500 39604.87 504.68 +$ 80.13 1984-85 160,700 39495.09 499.80 - 4.88 1985-86 1609700 39529.88 510.77 + 10.97 1986-87 1609700 39460.15 513.83 + 3.06 1987-88 171,900 39969.38 559.68 + 45.85 * Includes 1.00 mill for Storm Sewer District * Includes 1.00 mill for Storm Sewer District SCHOOL DISTRICT 270 (Hopkins) City Taxes on Typical Plymouth Homes Example I City Net Portion Assessed/ Valuation Payable City * Increase/ Payable Market Taxes Portion Decrease 1983-84 90,300 19266.46 195.54 +$ 18.80 1984-85 92,100 19242.40 194.19 - 1.35 1985-86 929100 19278.63 198.32 + 4.13 1986-87 929100 11206.48 200.88 + 2.56 1987-88 989500 1,422.41 224.74 + 23.86 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Example II City Net Portion Assessed/ Valuation Payable City * Increase/ Payable Market Taxes Portion Decrease 1983-84 102,500 19619.11 249.99 +$ 28.38 1984-85 1049600 19591.29 248.72 - 1.27 1985-86 1049600 19640.12 254.38 + 5.66 1986-87 1049600 19543.85 257.05 + 2.67 1987-88 109,800 19742.63 275.34 + 18.29 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Example III City Net Portion Assessed/ Valuation Payable City * Increase/ Payable Market Taxes Portion Decrease 1983-84 131,200 29448.71 378.08 +$ 50.92 1984-85 1339800 29406.30 376.10 - 1.98 1985-86 1339800 29484.57 385.36 + 9.26 1986--87 133,800 29331.95 388.27 + 2.91 1987-88 143,000 29689.12 424.88 + 36.61 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Example IV City Net Portion Assessed/ Valuation Payable City * Increase/ Payable Market Taxes Portion Decrease 1983-84 157,500 39208.94 495.46 +$ 71.58 1984-85 1609700 39157.12 493.46 - 2.00 1985-86 160,700 39262.50 506.01 + 12.55 1986-87 160,700 39057.98 509.15 + 3.14 1987-88 1719900 39502.41 553.38 + 44.23 * Includes 1.00 mill for Storm Sewer District PFCPERTY TAX CO4*R1 SON PAYPaE I.9T7 THRa«s 1968 CITY OF PL`?CJTH IM R84 H PKINS SCHn DISTRICT WYIATA SDICXL DISTRICT Payable Market Property Mill Market Property Mill Year Value Taxes Rate Valve Taxes Rate 1977 S30,100 S 684 100.006 S 65,200 S 1,456 93.487 1978 31,800 601 99.077 68,300 1,459 95.638 1979 38,400 577 96.351 76,900 1,425 92.487 1980 46,800 449 91.514 92,700 1,258 85.609 1981 53,800 388 87.547 105,800 1,421 82,358 1982 55,300 414 92.687 106,800 1,566 88.501 1983 58,900 456 93.285 112,600 1,771 90.792 1984 58,900 469 96.353 115,400 2,054 98.%1 1985 60,000 461 93.038 117,700 2,053 96.978 1986 64,900 540 99.722 118,200 2,131 103.918 1987 72,400 675 96.392 118,500 2,034 102.167 1988 76,300 793 104.955 127,100 2,439 113.396 rm /279 R;1$IRDV-E 30 -[XL DISTRICT i>551m S[}iM DISTRICT Payable Market Property Mill Market Property Mill Year Value Taxes Rate Value Taxes Rate 1977 548,900 51,196 98.296 S 84,300 52,807 102.059 1978 51,400 1,157 97.854 91,200 2,712 100.598 1979 58,000 1,123 94.830 101,900 2,529 93.258 1980 70,000 855 88.232 117,700 2,052 85.104 1981 80,100 949 87.370 134,100 1,991 80.040 1982 81,100 1,110 98.600 135,100 2,344 90.819 1983 84,600 1,246 100.711 143,600 2.667 93.845 1984 84,600 1.344 109.656 144,500 3.191 106.239 1985 85,200 1,313 106.571 147,300 3,085 101.670 1986 86.500 1,321 112.020 148,000 3.136 106.915 1987 86,900 1.248 109.216 148,000 3,076 108.057 1998 92,900 1,392 114.449 1591500 3,575 117.873 Rill rates include/school district referendum Where applicable and suer districts, but do not include watershed divides. The properties used in this study are 4 actual houses of various market values (one from each of the 4 school districts within the city). For purposes of comparability, all subject houses are classified residential homestead, are maintained in average condition and have not been iaproved with any additions. All estimated market values Were increased during the years for inflation. quartile and/or market adjustments. 1/13/88 SPTV je ------------ FISCAL DISPARITIES COMMERCIAL & INDUSTRIAL PROPERTIES (Property Types "C" b "I", Class "4C") PAYABLE 1988 PROPERTY TAX % Contributed (of assessed value) to F. Disp. Balance (of assessed value) Total Tax Bill Area Wide (A.W.) Mill Rate (F. Disp.) Wayzata School District (S.D.) Mill Rate = 30.9891% (of tax) = 69.0109% (of tax) = 100.0000 = 118.812 (7 County Metro Area) = 113.396 30.9891% of Commercial/Industrial property tax bills goes into the Fiscal Disparities pool, calculated in the examples below: EXAMPLE (A) (Assessed method) 1987 Market Value = $100,000 x 43% $43,000 = Total 1988 payable "assessed value" $43,000 x .309891 = $13,325 x (A.W.) .118812 $43,000 x .690109 =,$29,675 x (S.D.) .113396 Total 1988 Tax Bill **Amount contributed in 1987 on $100,000 Was EXAMPLE (B) (Factor Method) .118812 (A.W.) x .309891 = .0368188 .113396 (S.D.) x .690109 = .0782556 .1150744 .1150744 x 43% = .0494820 (F. Disp. FACTOR) Note: 1-13-88 SMM = $1,583.17 (contributed)** = $3,365.03 = $4,948.20 = $1,455.49** OR: $1009000 x .0494820 Total 1988 Tax Bill = $41,948.20 Each Fiscal Disparities "Factor" and payable tax will differ depending on the school district in which it is located as follows: Wayzata Factor = .0494820 Robbinsdale Factor = .0497944 Osseo Factor = .0508111 Hopkins Factor = .0469771 FISCAL DISPARITIES COMMERCIAL & INDUSTRIAL PROPERTIES (Property Types "CC" & "II", Class "4C") PAYABLE 1988 PROPERTY TAX % Contributed (of assessed value) to F. Disp. Balance Total Tax Bill Area Wide (A.W.) Mill Rate (F. Disp.) Wayzata School District (S.D.) Mill Rate = 30.9891% (of tax) = 69.0109% (of tax) = 100.0000 118.812 (7 County Metro Area) = 113.396 30.9891% of Commercial/Industrial property tax bills goes into the Fiscal Disparities pool, calculated in the examples below: EXAMPLE (A) (Assessed method) 1987 Market Value = $100,000 1st -609000* @ 28% = $16,800 Balance $ 40,000* @ 43% = 179200 $34,000 = Total 1988 payable "assessed value" $34,000 x .309891 = $10,536 x (A.W.) .118812 $34,000 x .690109 = $23,464 x (S.D.) .113396 Total 1988 Tax Bill **Amount contributed in 1987 on $100,000 was EXAMPLE (B) (Factor method) .118812 (A.W.) x .309891 = .0368188 .113396 (S.D.) x .690109 = .0782556 .I 1 UV / `'fi'''t .1150744 x 6/10* = .0690446 x 28% .1150744 x 4/10* = .0460298 x 43% (variable) OR: = $1,251.80 (contributed)** = $2,660.72 _ $39912,52 $1,150.85** = .0193324 (1st $60,000) = .0197928 (Balance) = .0391252 (F. Disp. FACTOR) $100,000 x .0391252 Total 1988 Tax Bill = $3,912.52 *The multiplying x 6/10 & 4/10 is a variable. The multiplying fraction will change depending on the market value and the "1st" & "Balance" parts. (ie: $60,000 - 100,000 EMV = 6/10 & $40,000 - 100,000 = 4/10) Note: Each Fiscal Disparities "Factor" and payable tax will differ depending on the school district in which it is located as follows: Wayzata Factor = .0391252 Robbinsdale Factor = .0393723 Osseo Factor = .0401762 Hopkins Factor = .0371446 s Applicat*on Received t)v Cj-Ly on: Comm iLtee (s) (Commis 1st Choice ion(°) Applied for. Position Title: pwAIPA— cve�, (U'--'.. it�,) • 2nd Choice CITY OF PLYMOUTH APPLICATION FOR APE?OINTMENT TO COWISSION OR COWITTEE Personal Information Name: 1CS/�'V Age: Home Phone: Home Address:�Q(� 01) � Number of Children: F-, Ages (of those living at home)VL Lived in Plymouth since: ITB? 7 Property (other than residence) owned in Plymouth: Occupation ` Present employer: "»Z �L;4�C'VuS twc, Work Phone: 5 Position Title: pwAIPA— cve�, (U'--'.. J Education Course Work Taken Beyond High School Name of Institution To/From Degree/Credits Area of Emphasis l� -6 �►h'V �['� Lc�S ILlf Z j%M (l4 KS t t~j--8s A A qaf rl l flV? t � Uri.K"ttq Previous Experience List other civic experience you have had including name of organizations, dates of participation, name of city, position held and accomplishments: lopot- Alt ► l % k - w � at Lif OLher relevant experience Opinion Questions What do you believe you could contribute to the community if appointed to a Cit\ - commission or committee? Why? Vit Q 'V N78 r !kx+,- &mv I How do you believe you would benefit if appointed to a committee or commission? As a commission or committee member, what issue(s) miqht cause conflict between civic responsibility and personal /professional interests? "Alf- Would your employer object to your involvement on a commission or board? If yes, explain. Date available: F4V � S Available for commission/committee meetinq_s on the following evenings (circle) Mon Tues Wed Signed: urs Fri Date:__J;WJy The selection process will vary according to the number of applicants and openings and may not include interviews with all candidates. as ociation of metropolitan municipalities A D D E N D U M T 0 P O L I C I E S A N D L E G I S L A T I V E P R O P O S A L S i • • ADOPTED BY THE ASSOCIATION MEMBERSHIP ON DECEMBER 3, 1987 183 university avenue east, st. paul, minnesota 55101 (612) 227-5600 rN f J` association of metropolitan municipalifiee January 11, 1988 Dear AMM Member City Official: Attached are the policy additions and ch 1988 Legislative package as adopted by t December 3, 1987. Except where changed policy adopted last year for the 1987-88 biennium is still in affect for 1988 and are in addendum to those of last year. anges for the AMM he membership or replaced, all Legislative actions this year The policies are separated into five sections representing the five standing committees; Section I Municipal Revenue and Taxation, Section II General Legislation, Section III Housing and Economic Development, Section IV Metropolitan Area Issues, and Section V Transportation. As indicated above, this Addendum in conjunction with policies adopted in 1986 for the 1987-88 biennium constitute the entire AMM Legislative Policy for 1988. Various committees and the Board of Directors will be meeting prior to and during the 1988 session and may adopt interim policy on an as needed basis in reaction to developing issues. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact either Vern Peterson or Roger Peterson at the AMM office (227-4008). Respectfully, AMM Board of Directors 183 university avenue east. st. ''-,Hdi► _�: , -'� ; 2 -- /-5600 I MUNICIPAL REVENUES I -A LEVY LIMITS A-1 3% LEVY LIMIT REPEAL The Association of Metropolitan Municipalities has consistently opposed the levy limit laws in that they apply uniform statewide restrictions to cities and are too inflexible to accommodate inflation, uncertanties in state and federal financial aids, and the diverse problems and circumstances faced by cities throughout the state. Such laws are inconsistent with principles of local self-government and accountability. Neither do they recognize changing local conditions as to either expenditure needs or revenue sources. Levy limits may ultimately work against the interests of local taxpayers because the law creates an incentive for cities to take maximum advantage of the opportunity to make general or special levies. For example, the arbitrary decision in 1981 to create a new levy limit base effectively penalized those cities that were successful in holding down their property tax levies in 1981. This was done again in 1987. History has now provided cities with numerous lessons teaching that cities which choose to levy less than the maximum allowed in a given year risk being later tied to unrealistic or artifically low new limits for future budget years. Therefore, THE AMM REMAINS STRONGLY OPPOSED IN PRINCIPLE TO SUCH LIMITATIONS AND RECOMMENDS THAT THE MINNESOTA LEGISLATURE REPEAL LEVY LIMIT LAWS FOR CITIES. A-2 LEVY LIMIT INDEX The 1985 Legislature reversed the annual levy limit base increase index from the greater of the Implicit Price Deflator or 5% to the lessor of these. In 1987 this was changed to 3%. For many years cities argued that the levy base increase should not be a flat percentage but be indexed to reflect cost of doing business. This is especially true since labor costs are 60 to 65 percent of the total municipal cost, yet because of the state PELRA laws control of wages and wage increases often is determined by outside arbitration. Also, during those years, of flat percent increase, many adjustments and gimmicks were needed to keep up but since the adoption of the Implicit Price Deflator as an index, this has not been the case and property tax increases have been reasonable. THE AMM URGES THE LEGISLATURE TO RESTORE THE ANNUAL LEVY BASE INCREASE TO THE IMPLICIT PRICE DEFLATOR, SINCE THIS IS THE ONLY INDEX OF ACTUAL NEED. - 1 - I -B LEVY LIMIT MODIFICATIONS Although the AMM is strongly opposed to Levy Limitations as currently legislated, the organization is aware that there is significant legislative initiative to maintain the responsibility for local property tax levels. However, local government must continue and be allowed to provide for services that people demand and that state and federal law require. Therefore, if repeal is not adopted, the Association supports amendments to the present levy limit law to provide further relief from current inequities. B-1 REALISTIC LEVY BASE The 1983 legislature restored the pre 1982 levy base formula of local government aids plus levy limit on which annual growth is calculated without regard to actual levy. This method provides that cities may levy less than the limit without losing the ability to regain the underlevy in future years. The legislature also provided growth based on an index rather than a flat percentage and growth increase for the greater of population or households and some base growth for commercial and industrial activity. All of these growth factors are necessary as a minimum to allow cities the ability to at least stay even with service provisions for the varying population needs. THE AMM SUPPORTS CONTINUED USE OF THE CURRENT LEVY BASE ADJUSTMENT FACTORS AS A MINIMUM FOR FUTURE LEVY YEARS IF THE LEGISLATURE FINDS IT PHILOSOPHICALLY NECESSARY TO CONTINUE LEVY LIMITS FOR CITIES . I -F GENERAL FISCAL IMPACT POLICIES F-4 FUNDING SHIFTS (REPLACEMENT) Minnesota's population and property market value are evenly distributed between the seven -county area and outstate. For example, in 1986 2,102,441 persons resided in the metropolitan area compared with 2,111,572 non -metro. Payable 1986 market property valuation is also comparable $6291319241,000 metro vs. $61,052,901,000 non -metro. Although per capita market valuation is the same (1% difference), a high discrepancy exists in the collection and redistribution of state tax dollars. This disparity is especially noticeable in the amount of property taxes the average metro home pays vs. average non -metro (1987 Citizens' League Property Tax Survey --$1,021.71 metro vs. $460.04 non -metro; metro cities above 2,500 population vs. non -metro cities above 10,000 population). Minnesota House of Representatives Research Department annually prepares Major State Aids and Taxes: A comparative Analysis. The latest 1986 update (based on 1985 data) -2- discloses 64 percent (213) of all major state tax is collected in the metro area; yet, only 46 percent of government aid flows back to the metro region. The trend will be more lopsided in the future under new school aid and property tax aids approved by the State Legislature. In addition, the Greater Minnesota Corporation (used to fund primarily outstate economic development projects) received a windfall because of the state's current budget surplus; and, as a result, will direct more money outstate. State tax and aid policies may jeopardize the future economic growth of the metro area to the detriment of the whole state: STATISTICS COMPILED BY THE HOUSE RESEARCH DEPARTMENT SHOW THAT 64% OF THE STATE REVENUE IS RAISED IN THE METRO AREA WHILE ONLY 46% OF THE STATE AIDS AND CREDITS ARE ALLOCATED TO THE METRO AREA. WHILE SOME IMBALANCE IS ACCEPTABLE AND UNDERSTANDABLE, THE AMM REQUESTS THE LEGISLATURE TO OPENLY STUDY WHETHER THERE IS AN IMBALANCE AND HOW THIS REDISTRIBUTION OF RESOURCES MAY EFFECT THE ECONOMIC GROWTH AND VITALITY OF THE METRO AREA AND THUS THE ENTIRE STATE. F-5 OPPOSE SALES TAX FOR CITY PURCHASES The 1987 legislature faced with a significant budget shortfall and increased spending desires for education considered extending sales tax to all local government purchases as a method to increase state revenue. The final decision eliminated sales tax for general purpose but did retain the 6% motor vehicle excise tax for all city vehicles. Although this admittedly helps the state coffers it does so by creating an additional local government expenditure that can only be paid for through the property tax which is considered the most regressive of the three major tax areas. In essence the state is imposing a property tax to fund state services that properly should be funded by a more progressive income tax. This is bad public policy and therefore: THE AMM OPPOSES THE IMPOSITION OF SALES TAX ON GENERAL GOVERNMENT PURCHASES. ADDITIONALLY, THE AMM REQUESTS THE LEGISLATURE TO REPEAL THE 1987 LAW REQUIRING MOTOR VEHICLE EXCISE TAX FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENT VEHICLE PURCHASES. BOTH OF THESE TAXES ARE IN REALITY A STATE IMPOSED PROPERTY TAX TO FUND STATE PROGRAMS THAT SHOULD BE PAID FOR BY MORE PROGRESSIVE TAX SOURCES. F-6 STATE REVENUE STABILITY The AMM urges adoption of fiscal and revenue policies that will stabilize state revenues and thereby lead to more predictable funding levels for local governments. Inevitably, the stability of revenues flowing to local governments is dependent on the stability of revenues flowing to the state. A reserve should be -3- built up during years of economic prosperity and used only to protect the state budget from unexpected economic downturns, not for tax reductions or expenditure increases. Such a budget reserve is necessary given the relatively volatile tax bases on which the state currently relies (particularly the income and sales tax) and the potential for error in revenue and economic forecasting. THE AMM SUPPORTS ESTABLISHMENT OF A PERMANENT BUDGET RESERVE EQUAL TO A MINIMUM OF FIVE PERCENT OF TOTAL STATE OUTLAYS. AS SOON AS POSSIBLE THE RESERVE SHOULD BE BUILT UP TO A MORE ADEQUATE LEVEL IN EXCESS OF FIVE PERCENT OF OUTLAYS. I -G FISCAL DISPARITIES G-5 TIF DISTRICT FD CONTRIBUTION Present Tax Increment Finance (TIF)/Fiscal Disparity (FD) law requires that a City or HRA make a one time election to make the TIF district FD contribution from the district itself or from the "city as a whole". The vast majority of districts are created with the City or HRA electing to make the FD contribution from the City as a whole which increases the City's mill rate resulting in an additional tax burden. If, by year two or three of the TIF district, it is clear the district could make the FD contribution and still meet debt service payment the City could reduce taxes if the FD election could be reversed. For high tax cities this may be preferable to an early retirement of the TIF District. THE AMM URGES THE LEGISLATURE TO AMEND CURRENT TIF/FD LAW BY ALLOWING A ONE TIME OPPORTUNITY FOR A CITY OR HRA WITH A FD CONTRIBUTION FROM THE "CITY AS A WHOLE" TO PLACE THE FD CONTRIBUTION BACK IN THE TIF DISTRICT. -4- II. GENERAL LEGISLATION II -L-2 POST - COLLEGE REQUIREMENTS Current POST rules require at least a two year degree in law enforcement to be eligible to become a peace officer. This is somewhat restrictive in that it does not allow for College degreed persons to make a career change without returning to school for significant added course work. The current applicants tend to lack maturity that may be desireable to blend in to police departments. THE AMM ENCOURAGES THE POST BOARD TO CONSIDER ALLOWING PERSONS WITH COLLEGE DEGREES TO BECOME PEACE OFFICERS WITH SOME ADDITIONAL LAW RELATED COURSE WORK THAT CAN BE ATTAINED THROUGH PRE EMPLOYMENT PART-TIME EFFORT OR DURING THE FIRST YEAR OF FULL TIME PEACE OFFICER EMPLOYMENT. THIS DOES NOT EFFECT THE SKILLS COURSE REQUIREMENTS. II -R STATE AGENCY RULE MAKING Legislation is needed to assure that municipalities are informed of proposed rules when they are initiated by State Agencies to assure a more meaningful appraisal of their impact upon local government. State agencies now are required to only publish notice of proposed rules in the State Register which is not in general circulation and which is available to local governments only by subscription, whereas, State law mandates that local governments publish notice of a variety of activities in legal newspapers and mail notices to potentially affected parties. State agencies are not required to notify local governments when rules are proposed that have direct impact upon and directly involve the local governments. The current law also allows the agencies to decide that proposed rules are "non -controversial" and thereby negate the requirements for a Public Hearing. The decision that a proposed rule is "non -controversial" may be overridden only if 25 persons file a notice with the agency that a Public Hearing is desired. The law requires agencies to make a finding as to the cost the proposed rules would have for other units of government; this process does not require the solicitation of input from the other units of government, but, rather, is left to the agency itself. The cost threshold for "non -controversial" is an overall dollar amount that does not consider that the cost could be very significant for some units. THE AMM REQUESTS LEGISLATION THAT WOULD REQUIRE DIRECT NOTIFICATION FOR PROPOSED AGENCY RULES IF THERE IS IMPACT OF ANY FINANCIAL NATURE REGARDLESS OF THE AMOUNT. ALSO, THAT AGENCIES BE REQUIRED TO ESTABLISH AN OPEN PROCESS TO SEEK INPUT FROM AFFECTED GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES PRIOR TO DECLARING A PROPOSED RULE -5- "NON -CONTROVERSIAL" THUS BYPASSING FORMAL PUBIC HEARING. II -S GEESE PROLIFERATION The Geese population has been growing significantly in the Metropolitan Area over the past several years and without enhanced control methods will continue at an accelerated rate. The geese return to their birthplace annually to summer and reproduce. They are becoming a health and safety hazard around area parks and waterways. The DNR, some cities, and the University of Minnesota have been, on a spot basis,involved in various control activities. However, due to safety reasons and funding, these activities are less than adequate. THE AMM REQUESTS THE LEGISLATURE TO INITIATE AN INDEPTH STUDY INVOLVING THE DNR AND U OF M TO DEVELOP A GEESE CONTROL PROGRAM AND TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE FUNDING TO IMPLEMENT THAT CONTROL PROGRAM. II -T DATA PRACTICES - LIQUOR LICENSE The definition of 'licensing agency' in Minn. State 13.41 is not clear as to the inclusion of cities, therefore, it is unclear whether all or part of the information on license issuance is public. This can be a real problem when issuing liquor licenses, since part of the data concerns sensitative business and personal finances. THE AMM ENCOURAGES THE LEGISLATURE TO CLARIFY THAT POLITICAL SUBDIVISIONS OF THE STATE INCLUDING CITIES ARE LICENSING AGENCIES IN MINN. STATUTES 13.41 AND THAT FINANCIAL DATA OF A PERSON OR BUSINESS SUBMITTED IN CONJUNCTION WITH AN APPLICATION FOR A LIQUOR LICENSE OR OBTAINED AS A RESULT OF AN INVESTIGATION OF THE APPLICANT OR LICENSEE SHALL BE CLASSIFIED AS PRIVATE. II -U CONCURRENT DETACHMENT AND ANNEXATION The statute authorizing concurrent detachment and annexation was modified in 1985 to allow petitions from landowners for detachment from one city and annexation to another. If the receiving community concurs, the municipal Board may hold a hearing at which time the petitioner must prove the case and the loosing city may object or concur. The real question is, should a landowner have the right to initiate the process since generally this will only be done for economic gain and to circumvent existing comprehensive plans and zoning. It is not enough to say that the process is protected by statutory criteria because in most cases a strong case can be made either way by a quick witted attorney. This law change merely provided opportunity for mischief. THE AMM SUGGESTS THAT THE STATUTES AUTHORIZING CONCURRENT M DETACHMENT AND ANNEXATION BE REVIEWED TO DETERMINE THE APPROPRIATENESS OF INDIVIDUALS PETITIONING THE MUNICIPAL BOARD TO INITIATE THE PROCESS. AT A MINIMUM EITHER AFFECTED CITY SHOULD BE GIVEN VETO POWER. -7- HOUSING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT III -A. HOUSING Affordable housing is a metropolitan problem of major proportions according to data compiled by the Metropolitan Council and the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency. There are strong indications that under existing conditions, the need for housing for the lower income segment will not be met. The Federal and State Governments appear to be reducing their financial commitments for housing for low and moderate income persons and this will intensify the housing shortage problem for those unable to purchase or rent at market rates. Local units of government do not have the financial capability to assume the shortfall in Federal and State provided subsidies. The housing problem for persons unable to afford market rate housing can only be solved if all levels of government and the private sector work together and if each contributes a fair share to the solution. Each level of government should contribute to help solve the problem and each level's contributions should be of the kind it is best suited to make. The Federal and State Levels should continue to provide the direct subsidies for low and moderate income persons. The Federal and State Governments also have the responsibility to provide a tax climate in which the private sector can produce rental units that are affordable to low and moderate income households. The State should also grant local units of government the authority and flexibility to conduct the kind of housing programs that best meets their diverse needs. The Metropolitan Council should continue to place high priority on housing planning for the Metropolitan Area and provide specific guidance to the public and private sectors so that both can make rational decisions relative to future housing needs. The council should continue to be aggressive in seeking innovative ways to create housing opportunities for low income persons. Local units of Government also have a strong role to play. Land use controls constitute a small portion of the total cost of housing but local units should not set requirements which go beyond what is necessary for the protection of health, safety and welfare. Local units should also work with the private sector to make the best use of existing tools (revenue bonds, tax increment financing, etc.) to produce housing which is more affordable. Decision makers at all levels of government of their actions, policies, and decisions substantial impact on housing costs. M must become more cognizant which have an indirect but A -Z. EXAMINE LOCAL REQUIREMENTS Local requirements, if excessive, could increase the cost of producing housing. COMMUNITIES SHOULD EXAMINE THEIR LOCAL REQUIREMENTS (LAND USE REGULATIONS, SUBDIVISION ORDINANCES, ETC.) TO ASSURE THAT THESE REQUIREMENTS DO NOT GO BEYOND WHAT IS NECESSARY FOR THE PROTECTION OF HEALTH, SAFETY, AND WELFARE, AND INHIBIT THE CONSTRUCTION OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING. MODIFICATIONS SHOULD BE MADE WHEN APPROPRIATE. A-2. PRACTICES WHICH INCREASE HOUSING COSTS Decision makers at various levels of government must become more cognizant of actions they take which have an indirect but substantial impact on housing costs. These actions in themselves may be worthwhile and beneficial, but when implemented result in increased housing costs. Examples of this type of action would include such things as the sewer availability charge, restricted growth policies, building and energy codes, environmental rules, etc. ALL LEVELS OF GOVERNMENT SHOULD EXAMINE THEIR PRACTICES AND POLICIES TO DETERMINE POSSIBLE HIDDEN IMPACTS ON HOUSING COSTS OF SAID PRACTICES AND POLICIES NOT DIRECTLY RELATED TO HOUSING. CHANGES SHOULD BE MADE AS NECESSARY INCLUDING REINSTATEMENT OF THE DEED AND MORTGAGE TRANSFER TAX EXEMPTION FOR PUBLIC AGENCIES. A-3. MANDATORY STANDARDS AND ALTERNATIVE HOUSING Mandatory, uniform standards for housing style, type and location are not appropriate because of the great diversity among cities and differences within cities relative to state of development, topography, lot and dwelling sizes, the mix of housing values and costs, and the level of municipal services which are provided. Land use regulations is one of the tools city officials need to protect the health, safety, welfare, and interests of the city's residents. THE LEGISLATURE SHOULD NOT PASS LEGISLATION WHICH SETS MANDATORY ZONING AND SUBDIVISION STANDARDS OR WHICH REMOVES ADDITIONAL LAND USE REGULATION AUTHORITY FROM LOCAL UNITS OF GOVERNMENT. CITIES SHOULD RETAIN THE AUTHORITY TO REGULATE THE LOCATION, SIZE, AMOUNT, AND TYPE OF HOUSING INCLUDING MANUFACTURED AND ACCESSORY HOUSING, WITHIN THEIR BOUNDARIES. A-4. FINANCING STATE AND REGIONAL HOUSING POLICIES Property taxes provide the major revenue source for most cities in the Metropolitan Area and the Minnesota Property Tax System is one of the most complex systems in the nation. Unfortunately, the Legislature often times adds to the complexity of this system by changing it to benefit certain persons as a means to implement or. finance social policy. THE AMM OPPOSES THE USE OF THE PROPERTY TAX SYSTEM TO FINANCE OR IMPLEMENT STATE OR REGIONAL HOUSING POLICIES OR GOALS. STATE AND/OR REGIONAL HOUSING POLICIES AND GOALS SHOULD BE IMPLEMENTED AND FINANCED BY NON -PROPERTY TAX SOURCES. A-5. FEDERAL AND STATE HOUSING FUNDING The Federal and State levels of government have a broader and more diverse tax base than local units of government and should provide the necessary funding to fulfill their housing policy commitments to lower income persons. FEDERAL AND STATE FUNDING FOR HOUSING SHOULD BE PROVIDED TO IMPLEMENT THE HOUSING POLICIES OF THOSE LEVELS AND MATCH THE NEEDS OF THOSE PERSONS REQUIRING ASSISTED HOUSING INCLUDING ASSISTANCE FOR RENOVATING AND REHABILITATING SUBSTANDARD HOUSING UNITS. ADDITIONALLY, THE STATE SHOULD ESTABLISH A STATE HOUSING TAX CREDIT FOR THE PRODUCTION OF LOW INCOME HOUSING UNITS SIMILAR TO THE FEDERAL 4 AND 9% HOUSING CREDITS. ALSO SINCE THERE IS A LIKELY LOSS OF MANY LOW INCOME HOUSING UNITS DUE TO THE 1986 FEDERAL TAX CODE CHANGES AND OWNERS OPT OUT OF FEDERAL SECTION 8 CONTRACTS AS A RESULT; THE LEGISLATURE SHOULD CONSIDER PROVIDING INCENTIVES SO THAT THE OWNERS WILL NOT OPT OUT. THE AMM ALSO ENCOURAGES THE LEGISLATURE TO EXPLORE OTHER FUNDING SOURCES FOR THE PRODUCTION OF LOW COST HOUSING AND TO DETERMINE IF THERE IS A NEED TO MODIFY THE DATES FOR THE USE OF THE UNIFIED BOND POOL AND THE PERCENTAGE OF USE FOR LOW INCOME HOUSING ACTIVITY. A -b. AUTHORITY AND RESPONSIBILITY FOR LOCAL HOUSING PROGRAMS There is a great diversity among the cities in the metropolitan area. Some cities need more housing for low and moderate income persons while other cities need more housing for middle and upper income persons. Cities should have the authority to promote whichever kind of housing is within the public purpose and best interest of the city. State and federal agencies should cooperate with cities in developing workable programs to meet the diverse needs of cities. Cities need to have more control over the cost of housing being developed if they are to meet the intent of the Metropolitan Land Planning Act. -10- CITIES SHOULD BE GRANTED SUFFICIENT AUTHORITY AND FLEXIBILITY BY THE LEGISLATURE TO CONDUCT HOUSING PROGRAMS THAT MEET THE DIFFERING NEEDS OF DIVERSE CITIES AND THAT ENABLE CITIES TO COMPLY WITH THE METROPOLITAN LAND PLANNING ACT WHICH DIRECTS CITIES TO PROVIDE OPPORTUNITY FOR LOW AND MODERATE COST HOUSING. CITIES SHOULD BE ALLOWED, TO REQUIRE LOWER COST HOUSING IN PROPOSED DEVELOPMENTS AND TO REQUIRE THE DEDICATION OF LAND OR CASH FOR LOW AND MODERATE INCOME HOUSING AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO THE REQUIRED DEDICATION FOR PARKS. ALSO, CITIES SHOULD HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO DEVELOP HOUSING FOR MIDDLE AND ri UPPER INCOME PERSONS IF THAT IS NEEDED TO ACHIEVE A BALANCED HOUSING STOCK. THE AMM SUPPORTS LEGISLATIVE ACTION TO REMOVE THE 1989 SUNSET ON THE INTEREST RATE REDUCTION PROGRAM AND TO REMOVE RESTRICTIONS ON PAYBACK PROVISIONS. THE AMM ALSO BELIEVES THAT LOW INCOME HOUSING PROJECTS RECEIVING LOCAL FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE SHOULD HAVE THE SAME PROPERTY TAX ASSESSMENT RATES AS SIMILAR PROJECTS RECEIVING STATE OR FEDERAL FINANCIAL SUPPORT. THE AMM ALSO SUPPORTS LEGISLATION TO ALLOW PUBLIC AGENCIES TO INVEST REVENUE BOND PROCEEDS IN THE SAME INSTRUMENTS THAT ARE ALLOWED FOR OTHER LOCAL GOVERNMENT INVESTMENTS. A-7. RENTAL HOUSING IN THE METROPOLITAN AREA Rental housing plays an important role in the Twin cities housing market. Approximately 35 percent of the housing units in the Twin Cities region are rental units. Traditionally, rental units have provided an affordable housing option for singles, young adults, young married, students, the elderly, and low and moderate income households. Rental housing units serve a market much more diverse than that served by owner occupied units. Yet over the past several years a number of problems have developed in the rental market, including: 1. A reduction in the rate of new rental units being produced. 2. Lack of mobility for households to move from rental to ownership status. 3. Conversion of rental units to condominiums and increased operating costs. 4. The supply of existing rental units, which is predominately efficiency and one bedroom units, does not adequately address the needs of families seeking rental units. ALL LEVELS OF GOVERNMENT SHOULD BECOME INVOLVED TO SUCCESSFULLY ADDRESS THE PROBLEMS IN THE RENTAL HOUSING MARKET. IN PARTICULAR, THE STATE AND FEDERAL GOVERNMENTS HAVE CRUCIAL ROLES IN PROVIDING AN OVERALL INVESTMENT CLIMATE IN WHICH THE PRIVATE SECTOR CAN PRODUCE AN ADEQUATE SUPPLY OF RENTAL UNITS. POSSIBLE ACTIONS INCLUDE: - 11 - -- MODIFYING FEDERAL AND STATE TAX POLICIES TO IMPROVE THE PRODUCTION AND MAINTENANCE OF AFFORDABLE RENTAL HOUSING. INCREASING THE LEVEL OF FUNDING ASSISTANCE AIMED AT GIVING LOW AND MODERATE INCOME FAMILIES ACCESS TO DECENT HOUSING. CONTINUING PROGRAMS WHICH USE TAX EXEMPT BONDING TO CREATE BELOW MARKET RATE FUNDS FOR RENTAL HOUSING. CONTINUING PROGRAMS WHICH ALLOW REHABILITATION AND WEATHERIZATION PROGRAMS TO BE UTILIZED ON RENTAL UNITS. - GRANTING LOCAL UNITS MORE AUTHORITY TO REGULATE THE CONVERSION OF RENTAL UNITS TO CONDOMINIUMS. A-8. ASSESSMENT RATES FOR RENTAL PROPERTY The Multi -housing association and other groups have been advocating lower assessment rates for rental housing relative to the rates for other types of property. A number of Legislators have also been examining this matter with a particular focus on the difference in rates between rental housing and owner occupied housing which results in higher property taxes for rental housing. The AMM is very concerned about the affordability or rental housing for lower income persons and does not oppose a thoughtful study of this issue. THE AMM BELIEVES ANY LEGISLATIVE PROPOSAL WHICH WOULD REDUCE THE TAXES FOR RENTAL PROPERTY RELATIVE TO OTHER CLASSES OF PROPERTY SHOULD CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING CONCEPTS: A CLEAR DIRECT LINKAGE BETWEEN THE REDUCTION OF TAXES AND THE AFFORDABILITY OF THE UNIT WITH RESPECT TO NEW CONSTRUCTION; A CLEAR DIRECT LINKAGE TO LOWER RENTS IF APPLIED TO EXISTING HOUSING; FULL DISCLOSURE OF REVENUE IMPLICATIONS FOR LOCAL UNITS OF GOVERNMENT. -12- III --E ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Cities have an interest in the maintenance of and appropriate enhancements to the economic base of their respective, communities. It is the community's economic base which provides; a.) The tax base and other sources from which the City generates the revenue to support its operation; b.} the employment of some or a substantial number of residents and, c.) the means by which the populous is housed. All Metropolitan communities address economic development when its translated to physical development through their local land use regulations with the individual communities striving for "orderly development". As a group however, Metropolitan communities differ as to development needs and view points, with each community's needs subject to a number of variables. A municipality's ability to both regulate and promote economic development is based on authority established by other organizations and regulations. It is this ability that is of general interest to all Metropolitan communities. The Association of Metropolitan Municipalities is the principal policy action group acting on behalf of its member cities. As such it is appropriate that AMM present the policy issues and concerns to those organizations that set the rules. Because of divergent economies, differing needs and diverging viewpoints between Metropolitan Minnesota and Greater Minnesota there is a need to ensure the means of economic development available to AMM member cities are appropriate to their needs and that economic development efforts of others are complementary to and not at the expense of member cities. As noted economic development for local governments is not just a matter of more tax base for the community but entails tools to promote, regulate and service the development. Promotional means include Housing and Redevelopment Authorities, Economic Development Authorities, Port Authorities, tax increment financing, revenue and general obligation bonds, condemnation and the Star Cities Program. Regulation includes its comprehensive planning and land use functions. Servicing include water, sewer, streets and other municipal services. TRANSPORTATION AS A KEY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ELEMENT Transportation, not only streets and highway but mass transit, rail and air are all key elements in the economic development picture of a community. -13- While infrastructive issues sucli as water and sewer are to some degree issues for one or two governmental entities, transportation systems involves the entire garnet from the local municipality through the federal government. Additionally it is more than just an infrastructive issue. Concerns as to where highways were to be planned was a significant issue raised in the formation of the Metropolitan Council and a rationale for passing the Fiscal Disparities Act in 1973• The issue has come to the forefront in the last few years as major highways and interstate links have aged, existing routes have volumes exceeding capacity and federal and state funding has not kept pace with needs. This has been further highlighted by using a previous highway funding source the sales tax/MVET to help balance the State general fund. This has resulted in cuts and delays in projects throughout the state. With economically depressed areas demanding more funding to improve their economic attractiveness to businesses and economically successful areas needing funding to keep pace with expansion, the issue of funding could become very divisive between Metro and Greater Minnesota. A balanced and an efficient, well maintained transportation system, including the before mentioned components; is a necessity so as not to retard economic development. BUSINESS FACTORS IN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT While governmental entities can provide inducements, services and infrastructure there are a number of other factors that influence a business' economic development decisions. Factors such as in place resources and costs, human resources (availability that matches the needs), regulations and attendent costs, governmental costs such as taxes, services etc. While only some of these are under the control or influence of the governmental sector in the state and therefore the mission of AMM, these entities should make efforts-to ensure that state and local governments are competitive. GENERAL ISSUES IN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Apart from direct business factors other items influence locational and expansional considerations including "Quality of Life" factors such as the educational systems, arts, theater and professional sports teams. In addition governmental concerns ralate to housing, environmental impacts and economic security among others. Also the perceptions about the Metropolitan and outstate areas which relate directly to the focus of economic development activities and financed by the State. Some perceptions need to be explored as to their accuracy as they may negatively impact Metropolitan communities. a . ) The perception that the Metropolitan area is heavily dependent on the commodities and markets of greater Minnesota and as such it is appropriate that the Metropolitan area finance State supported economic development tools for Greater Minnesota. b.) The perception on the part of some political leaders that the net flow of state tax funds is from out -state Minnesota to the Metropolitan area and that there should be an equalization of such fund flows. c.) A perception by some leaders in the private sector that since the State pays substantial portions of local governments costs through state collected taxes that the State should therefore exert greater control of local spending. (While somewhat true for the funding of urban. counties and school districts a majority of municipal funds are locally raised.) d.) The percept on that municipalities generally in the state are "bloated" with staff and that through stringent state measures and governmental restructuring more efficient services and lower taxes can be achieved. THE AMM, AS THE PRINICIPAL POLICY ACTION GROUP FOR METROPOLITAN AREA CITIES, PLEDGE: ITS BEST EFFORTS TOE .1. PRESERVE EXISTING TOOLS OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND LAND USE CONTROL. OF HIGH PRIORITY ARE SUCH TOOLS AS TAX INCREMENT FINANCING, HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, AND PORT AUTHORITY. 2. EXTEND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT/PORT AUTHORITY POWERS TO ALL CITIES THAT WANT SUCH AUTHORITY. 3. PROVIDE CITIES THE AUTHORITY TO ISSUE GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS TO ASSIST THEIR RESIDENTS/PROPERTY OWNERS WHO EXPERIENCE UNINSURED PROPERTY DAMAGE AS A RESULT OF A FEDERALLY DECLARED DISASTER IN THAT DESIGNATED AREA. u. EDUCATE ITS MEMBERS DURING 1988 REGARDING OTHER ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT TOOLS AND HOW AND IF, THEY COULD BE USED BY METROPOLITAN AREA CITIES. TOOLS TO BE CONSIDERED INCLUDE: A. STATE FINANCED QUASI - PUBLIC AGENCIES AND FUNDS SUCH AS THE GREATER MINNESOTA CORPORATION, IRRRB, URAP AND RALF. B. IMPACT/DEVELOPMENT DEDICATION FEE. C. PRIVATE TRANSPORTATION CORPORATIONS AND ROAD UTILITY DISTRICTS. IF IT IS DETERMINED THAT THESE TOOLS ARE NOT AVAILABLE BECAUSE OF STATUTORY LIMITATIONS, DETERMINE IF THERE IS SUFFICIENT INTEREST TO PURSUE REMOVAL OF THOSE LIMITATIONS DURING THE 1989 LEGISLATION SESSION. -15- 5. TO DEVELOP A STRATEGY BASED ON FACTUAL INFORMATION DURING 1988 TO REFUTE/DISPELL THOSE PERCEPTIONS DESCRIBED IN THE POLICY BACKGROUND SECTION WHICH MAY HAVE AN ADVERSE IMPACT ON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT TOOLS AVAILABLE TO METROPOLITAN AREA CITIES. -i6-- METF�OFJLITAN AREA ISSUES & CONCERNS IV -0 SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT IN THE METROPOLITAN AREA. The solid waste management system in place in the 7 -county area is a three -tiered system: cities control and regulate collection; counties are responsible for 'siting' new landfills, developing abatement plans, devcloping processing facilities and regulating existing landfills; and the Metropolitan Council provides grants and has regional planning and coordinating responsibilities. The system was intended to foster and encourage abatement, recycling and resource recovery for as much of the waste stream as possible and then to assure environmentally sound disposal for the remaining solid waste. Maximum cooperation and coordination among and between the various levels and units of government and the private sector are needed if the system is to work as intended. 0-1 CONSOLIDATION OF SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT RESPONSIBILITIES The responsibilities for managing solid waste in the Metropolitan Area are sharer by the Metropolitan Council, Counties and Cities and Towns. The AMM believes that if the area is to reach its mandate of no more landfilling of unprocessed solid waste by 1990, the responsibilities for source separation abatement and recycling related activities must be more effectively coordinated at the county level. THE AMM RECOMMENDS THAT THE COUNTIES ASSUME THE RESPONSIBILITIES FOR ALL SOURCE SEPARATION, ABATEMENT, AND RECYCLING RELATED ACTIVITIES AND PROJECTS WHEN A CITY DOES NOT SUBSTANTIALLY MEET THE COUNTY ESTABLISHED GOALS. THE MUNICIPALITIES NOT MEETING THE GOALS WOULD RETAIN AUTHORITY TO REGULATE THE COLLECTION OF SOLID WASTE TO PROTECT THE HEALTH, SAFETY AND WELFARE OF THEIR RESIDENTS. 0-2 ALTERNATIVES TO LANDFILLS All levels and units of government and the private sector should participate and cooperate in planning amd managing the solid waste stream to assure a cost efficient and environmentally sound solid waste management system. Landfilling should only be us.ed as a last resort and then only for "processed" solid waste or for those materials which can not be recycled, reused, or disposed of in a more acceptable manner. THE AMM ENDORSES ABATEMENT, RECYCLING AND RESOURCE RECOVERY ACTIVITIES AND PROGRAMS TO REDUCE THE NEED FOR IN -GROUND DISPOSAL OF UNPROCESSED SOLID WASTE. THE 1987 AMENDMENTS TO THE WASTE MANAGEMENT ACT (WMA) ELIMINATED DIRECT SUBSIDIES TO CITIES FROM -17- f 1-,5 / - -- p I �- o f"X 6. c'K� roa kow mack roar lkoa I falKess Was ���reccated. I 6-�L ', 71, ns� '�