Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCouncil Information Memorandum 01-30-1987ITV OF PLYMOUTH - CITY COUNCIL INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM January 30, 1987 UPCOMING MEETINGS AND EVENTS..... 1. BOARD & COMMISSION FINAL INTERVIEWS -- The Council will conduct reinterviews of Board and Commission finalists on Saturday, January 31 beginning at 8:30 a.m., and again on Monday, February 2 at 5:00 p.m. Dinner will be provided for the February 2 session. A copy of the interview schedule and interview questions is attached. (M-1) 2. REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING -- Monday, February 2, 7:30 p.m. Regular City Council meeting in the City Council Chambers. 3. SPECIAL STUDY COMMITTEE -- Wednesday, February 4, 7:00 p.m. The Special Study Committee on Community -Based Residential Facilities will meet in the City Council conference room. A copy of the meeting agenda and minutes of the Committee's January 13 meeting are attached. (M-3) 4. NORTHWEST SUBURBS LEGISLATIVE BREAKFAST MEETING -- Friday, February 20, 7:00 a.m. Local officials will meet with their State legislators at the Brooklyn Center Community Center. 5. FEBRUARY MEETING CALENDAR -- The February calendar of meetings and events is attached. (M-5) FOR YOUR INFORMATION..... 1. HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1987-1991 FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM -- We have received a copy of the recently approved 987- 991 Capital Improvement Program for Hennepin County. In transmitting this document, Vern Genzlinger, Associate County Administrator and County Engineer, notes that "this Capital Improvement Program assumes that considerable Federal aid and County property tax funds will be available for financing each project. Uncertainty of all funding sources, particularly, the Federal programs and County property tax funds, may alter or reduce this Transportation Capital Improvement Program". I believe the Council 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD. PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447. TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800 C11Y COUNCIL INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM January 30, 1987 Page two should keep this in mind as we plan for the County to execute its capital improvement plans. The only major project in Plymouth during this period beyond the County Road 9 project is the proposed 1990 and 1991 improvement to County Road 10 between I-494 and County Road 18. That project is contemplated to be under design in 1990 with actual construction in 1991. The project is currently estimated to cost approximately $9,360,000. 2. GOVERNOR'S BUDGET PROPOSAL -- You have all heard and read of the Governor's proposed budget for the next biennium. He has proposed reform of the property tax system and the various aid programs which would have dramatic impacts across the State, particularly, with respect to municipalities. I have been asked to serve on a property tax reform technical committee of the League of Minnesota Cities as a representative of the Municipal Legislative Commission. This technical committee is to thoroughly explore the Governor's proposal and its impact on all Minnesota municipalities. This committee will be meeting frequently commencing next Friday. As soon as I have any projections on the impact of the Governor's proposal, I will share them with the Council. 3. MUNICIPAL LEGISLATIVE COMMISSION 1987 LEGISLATIVE POLICY -- The MLC Board of Directors last week met and adopted a resolution directing its lobbyists for the new legislative session. The lobbyists have been directed to "concentrate their efforts on local qovernment aid, property tax relief programs such as homestead credit and budget reductions affecting cities. They shall also monitor fundinq for highways and other issues which may have significant fiscal impacts on its (MLC) membership". This direction recommits the MLC to concentrate on those fiscal matters which are of particular interest to the MLC membership. 4. TOPICS FOR PLYMOUTH ON PARADE MAYOR'S ARTICLES -- In the last few issues of Plymouth on Parade, the Mayor's article has covered topics such as Alpha Human Services, erosion control, benefits of development, 1987 Budget, and a number of other topics. Virgil is seeking Councilmember input on topics which might be appropriate for upcoming newsletters. As the Council is aware, the Plymouth on Parade is published six times annually. The next publication will be for the May/June issue. There are still four issues remaining in 1987. If you have any suggestions for topic areas for the Mayor's message, please share them with the Mayor at the February 2 Council meeting. 5. REVISION OF COMMITTEE/COMMISSION APPLICATION FORM -- At the January 26 meeting, the ity Council directed that additional wording be included in the Committee/ Commission application form to advise applicants that the Council may not interview all applicants. Attached is a proposed language revision in the application form for Council consideration. (I-5) CITY COUNCIL INFORMATIONAL MENORANDUN January 30, 1987 Page three 6. MINUTES: a. Planning Commission, January 14, 1987 (I -6a) b. Board of Zoning Adjustments and Appeals, January 13, 1987 (I -6b) c. Plymouth Safety Committee, January 14, 1987 (I -6c) d. Municipal Legislative Commission, Board of Directors and Operating Committee meetings, January 21, 1987. (I -6d) 7. DEPARTMENT REPORTS -- The following departmental reports for the month of December are attached: a. Police Department, including summary of 1986 Public Safety presentations. (I -7a) b. Fire Department (I -7b) 8. DEVELOPMENT SIGN -- On Friday, January 30, 1987 one development sign will be located on property for a current planning application. The application was submitted by Craig Scherber, Kenop North Corporation, for a Revised Preliminary Plat and Variance for the creation of 28 lots for single family detached units. The property is within the Wind Ridge at Bass Lake subdivision unit project and is located northeast of Pineview Lane and the Soo Line Railroad. 9. 1987 PAYABLE TAX AND MILL RATE COMPARISONS -- Attached is a series of charts and tables prepared by the City Assessor's office. These charts are based on the 1987 mill rates which have ,just been released through Hennepin County. All the data on the acompanying charts are based on these new rates for taxes payable in 1987. The charts reflect mill rate comparisons from 1983, city taxes on typical Plymouth homes by school district, the distribution of the tax dollar, and a comparison between the 1986 and 1987 taxes. Overall, taxes are lower due to reduced mill rates for each of the school districts and as a result of a decrease in the State's reduced assessed value calculations. Scott Hovet has also indicated that the City's contribution to the fiscal disparities pool has declined from 31.6% to 30.2%. (I-9) 10. CITIZEN RESPONSE TO 1987 HOMESTEAD DECLARATION CARDS -- Approximately 10,000 Homestead Declarations were mailed out at the end of December 1986. This annual mailing was conducted so homeowners will receive their homestead credit on their tax bills payable in 1988. Newly enacted legislation during 1986 now requires that all owners of homestead property, whether husband and wife, or all single persons, must sign and furnish their social security numbers to the Assessor's office. This new legislation was enacted for several C11Y CUUNCIL INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM January 30, 1987 Page four reasons. One primary reason is that the social security numbers will be run through a match list at the Minnesota Department of Revenue to determine if a property owner is claiming more than one homestead. The other major reason is to determine that if a property owner owns a home they also should be paying state income taxes. The State's computer will also run a match list for this purpose. The Assessing office returned over 1,000 declarations (10%) to Plymouth homeowners who did not furnish the required signatures and social security numbers. Hopefully, we will only have to go through this transition period for one year. Next year, it is proposed to have all owners' names and social security numbers printed on the declarations before they are mailed out. 11. CHELSEA WOODS UPDATE -- Attached are four reports summarizing doe Ryan's findings in the review of the first four plans submitted by the Chelsea Woods Homeowners Association. We are awaiting receipt of additional plans for review. (I-11) 12. CORRESPONDENCE: a. Letter from Myrna Marofsky, 2835 Medicine Ridge Road, to Dick Carlquist, stating concern with neighborhood crime statistics reported in January/February issue of Plymouth on Parade. A copy of Dick's response is attached. (I -12a) b. Letter from City Attorney to Fred Moore outlining the settlement terms concerning the Lonke/Carroll Eminent Domain appeal. (I -12b) c. Letter to Mr. Robert Bohls, 11245 - 36th Place No., from Blair Tremere, requesting a copy of the letter Mr. Bohls referred to at the January 12 Council meeting regarding uncompleted landscape work at the Mission Ponds development by Lundgren Brothers. (I -12c) d. Letter from Sharon Gorse to Mayor Schneider, recommending the appointment of George Torline as the City's representative to the Northwest Community Television Corporation. (I -12d) e. Letter from Mr. Larry Lieder, 4840 Union Terrace Lane, to Mayor Schneider, recognizing service he received from Arnie Rasmusson, Building Inspector. (I -12e) James G. Willis City Manager JGW:jm attach ►-k - \ SATURDAY JANUARY 31 8:30 - Council arrives Name Time - 10:15 a.m. Comm/Bd Choice(s) Marilou Thibault 8:45 a.m. - 9:00 a.m. Ping - BOZA Sandy Patterson 9:00 - 9:15 Ping Doyle Perry 9:15 - 9:30 PRAC Bruce Bauman 9:30 - 9:45 PRAC 15 MINUTE BREAK Jon Gutzman 10:00 a.m. - 10:15 a.m. Ping, PRAC, HRA Stephen Ludovissie 10:15 - 10:30 HRA Fred Clark 10:30 - 10:45 HRA 15 MINUTE BREAK Jay Naftzger 11:00 a.m. - 11:15 BOZA Robert Hallermann 11:15 - 11:30 BOZA Don Fraley 11:30 - 11:45 Mediation MONDAY FEBRUARY 2 Name Time Dennis Zylla 5:00 p.m. - 5:15 p.m. Gay Varecka 5:15 - 5:30 5:30 - 7:15 Make Final Selection Comm/Bd Choice(s) Ping ONLY Ping - PRAC MA-\ 1A- \ COMMISSION/BOARD INTERVIEW QUESTIONS SATURDAY, JANUARY 31 1. Tell me what you expect to get out of being a member. 2. In what areas do you see yourself as having the best judgment? 3. Think of a time when you had to make a decision which you knew would please some people and displease others and what did you do? 4. If you could make one change in the City, what would it be? 5. Of the 25 candidates to select from, why should we select you? APPLICANT SPECIAL STUDY COMMITTEE AGENDA WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 4, 1987 7:00 P.M. Committee Members David Davenport, Chairman Paul Steigerwald Gay Varecka Pat Neils Roger A. Deneen Anita Vogel ORGANIZATIONAL MEETING 1. Call to Order 2. Approval of January 13, 1987 Minutes 3. Update Report by Mr. Donn Wiski, Resolution, Inc. 4. Discussion 5. Confirm next meeting date 6. Other Business 7. Adjournment 8:30 P.M. CITY OF PLYMOUTH 3400 PLYMOUTH BLVD. PLYMOUTH, MN 55447 Council Conference Room Donn Wiski Resolution, Inc. �-3 SUMMARY NOTES OF THE COMMUNITY-BASED RESIDENTIAL FACILITIES SPECIAL TASK FORCE MEETING DATE: January 13, 1987 MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman David Davenport Paul Steigerwald Gay Varecka Anita Vogel MEMBERS ABSENT: Pat Neils Roger Deneen ALSO PRESENT: Community Development Director Blair Tremere Planning Consultant Donn Wiski Chairman Davenport introduced the members as well as the staff and consultant. Donn Wiski gave background regarding Resources, Inc. He stated that the committee is in- volved in a pioneering effort in this subject area and he suggested that the committee initially concentrate on identifying and evaluating "risks" to the community. He asked that initial issues and questions be identified so that he could begin developing an outline of responses. Chairman Davenport explained the Council's charge to the committee and the direction to the consultant. He commented that the Planning Commission and City Council found the Ordinance to be incomplete relative to a sound definition of institution. Chairman Davenport stated the committee should determine questions that come to mind at this time about the general subject matter; and, to undertake an inventory of all existing facilities in the City now, by type and location. Paul Steigerwald noted that the Commission had attempted to deal with the subject mat- ter in a generic sense from a land use standpoint, rather than concentrating on internal operations which are covered by State law and licensing regulations. Chairman Davenport suggested that as the committee develops information and criteria, the findings be "tested" against the recent case involving a proposed community-based residential facility. Extensive discussion ensued and a variety of questions were directed to Planning Consultant Wiski. Paul Steigerwald stated that it would be important to determine what is typical of such facilities in a physical or design sense; what is the norm, if any? Gay Varecka stated that it would be helpful to get a good definition of "correctional" versus "residential" facility, so that a clear distinction could be made. Direction was given to staff to prepare and distribute a variety of items including the Zoning Ordinance and maps; the Land Use Guide Plan Section of the Comprehensive Plan; some of the available literature from interest groups nationally; and, a copy of the report from Hennepin County regarding dispersal of facilities that may be concentrated in Minneapolis. The next meeting was scheduled for Wednesday, February 4, 1987 at 7:00 P.M. Chairman Davenport stressed the importance of all members being present because of the limited number of times the committee would meet. N N I 1 I cc IT) W U I !_� I I ct 72 t ! v C L11)� x U v ^ i �z o U •a N u o U z •a H f- H L) H H z U U a H I PQ cc I c l L) a H A U � o I I ! po H zzz -I a 04 94 II W pct 1Z W U A O �."' U Mt+ U PU c z 4U a d ;&I A A1-+oW I o� UOU CoUOU oai r.==� o a UOU U� '6^H x U i 04 04 o^� UU Z C9 O U �jU I U U LD r -n I n-3 �� r` n A.W c- N N =—b Application Received by City on: Committee(s)/Commission(s) Applied for: 1 t Ch s Vice 2nd Choice CITY OF PLYMOUTH APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO COMMISSION OR COMMITTEE Personal Information Name: Age: Home Phone: Home Address: Number of Children: Ages (of those living at home): Lived in Plymouth since: Property (other than residence) owned in Plymouth: Occupation Present employer: Work Phone: Position Title: Education Course Work Taken Beyond High School Name of Institution To/From Degree/Credits Area of Emphasis Previous Experience List other civic experience you have had including name of organizations, dates of participation, name of city, position held and accomplishments: " ►J //S// List other relevant experience Opinion Questions What do you believe you could contribute to the community if appointed to a City commission or committee? Why? How do you believe you would benefit if appointed to a committee or commission? As a commission or committee member, what issue(s) might cause conflict between civic responsibility and personal/professional interests? Date available: Available for commission/committee meetings on the following evenings (circle) Mon Tues Wed Thurs Fri Signed: Date: The Council reserves the right to develop selection procedures based on their assessment of the immediate needs of the City, number of applications received, and the qualifications of the applicants. The selection process will vary accordingly and may not include interview of all candidates. �Dct-� CITY OF PLYMOUTH PLANNING COR4ISSION MINUTES JANUARY 14, 1987 The Regular Meeting of the Plymouth Planning Commission was called to order at 7:30 P.M. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Steigerwald, Commissioners Wire, Stulberg, Magnus, Plufka, Mellen and Pauba MEMBERS ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Community Development Coordinator Sara McConn City Engineer Sherm Goldberg Community Development Director Blair Tremere Planning Secretary Grace Wineman *CONSENT AGENDA MOTION by Commissioner Pauba, seconded by Commissioner Wire MOTION TO APPROVE to adopt the Consent Agenda as submitted. VOTE. 7 Ayes. MOTION carried. VOTE - MOTION CARRIED *MINUTES MOTION by Commissioner Pauba, seconded by Commissioner Wire MOTION TO APPROVE to approve the December 17, 1986 Minutes as submitted. Vote. 6 Ayes. Commissioner Plufka abstained. MOTION VOTE - MOTION CARRIED carried. PUBLIC HEARINGS Chairman Steigerwald introduced the request by Dickman DICKMAN KNUTSON, BLH Knutson, BLH Development Company, and requested an overview DEVELOPMENT CO. of the January 5, 1987 Planning Staff Report by Coordinator AMENDMENT TO SANITARY McConn. SEWER PLAN ELEMENT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE Coordinator McConn stated that Hennepin County had required PLAN, REZONING, PUD an adjustment to the alignment and grades for County Road PRELIMINARY PLAN/PLAT 61. City staff reviewed the preliminary design and met with AND CONDITIONAL the petitioner's representatives. These were not major USE PERMIT (85126) changes and had a minimum impact on the lot layout. She stated that staff recommends approval subject to the conditions as listed in the Planning Staff Report. Chairman Steigerwald introduced Mr. Greg Frank, McCombs - Knutson Associates, Inc., representing the petitioner. Mr. Frank stated he had no questions or comments. -1- Page 2 Planning Commission Minutes January 14, 1987 Chairman Steigerwald opened the Public Hearing, as there was no one present to speak on this item, the Public Hearing was closed. MOTION by Commissioner Wire, seconded by Commissioner Plufka to recommend approval for the Amendment to the Sanitary Sewer Plan Element of the City's Comprehensive Plan, Rezon- ing, Planned Unit Development Preliminary Plan/Plat, and Conditional Use Permit for Dickman Knutson, BLH Development Company for "Bass Lake Heights 4th Addition", west of Pine - view Lane at 54th Avenue North, subject to the conditions as listed in the January 5, 1987 Planning Staff Report. ROLL CALL VOTE. 7 Ayes. MOTION carried. =— Locc." MOTION TO APPROVE VOTE - MOTION CARRIED Chairman Steigerwald introduced the request by Hew -Lynn, FEW -LYNN, INC. AND Inc. and Field Financial Corp. for a Land Use Guide Plan FIELD FINANCIAL CORP. Amendment for property northwest of County Road 9 and I- LAND USE GUIDE PLAN 494. An overview of the January 8, 1987 Planning Staff AMENDMENT (86104) Report was provided by Coordinator McConn. Chairman Steigerwald introduced Mr. Mike Gair, Gair & Associates, representing the petitioners. Mr. Gair intro- duced his associate, Laurie McRostie, and the applicants. Mr. Gair explained that initially, the owners of the property investigated the possibility of commercial/ retail uses and were informed the property was guided for office use. City staff explained the Land Use Guide Plan Amendment procedures. A feasibility study was done showing the commercial/retail/service areas such as the Holiday Store, 4 -Seasons Shopping Center and the proposed area for commercial development. Moving westerly, there is, at this time, no commercial/retail/service use for land areas on the west side of I-494 and north of County Road 9. Mr. Gair noted there is a proposal by Trammell Crow Company for the southwest corner of I-494 and County Road 9, however, this is only three acres and would be the extent of retail business available on the west side of the Interstate. Walking Neighborhoods 15 and 16 have no commercial service at this time, which convinced the applicants that the Land Use Guide Plan was a reasonable approach to pursue. Mr. Gair stated they have submitted a written response to nine questions posed by staff in the January 8, 1987 Planning Staff Report. He also clarified that the applicants should be listed as: Field Financial Corporation and Hew -Lynn Corporation. He read his comments as listed in the correspondence dated January 13, 1987 which was sent to the Planning Commissioners and City staff, and is part of the public record. - LDC" Page 3 Planning Commission Minutes January 14, 1987 Mr. Gair stated they do not fication will impact other ample CL (limited business) it will not diminish the Plymouth" area. believe this proposed reclassi- areas as there appears to be designated land remaining; and, development of the "Downtown Mr. Gair stated that C.G. Rein has developed a proposed site plan for a retail service center of 22,000 sq. ft., 60% re- tail and the balance would be service -related businesses. They have polled the residents, inquiring whether retail would serve a purpose in this area. He presented a copy of a petition, signed by 39 residents in the vicinity who responded in favor of this proposal. The petition was sub- mitted to the Planning Commission and made part of the public record. Mr. Gair stated that C.G. Rein contacted Homeowner Associa- tions and offered to meet with them, only three people attended the meeting. Chairman Steigerwald inquired about the reclassification of the three westerly lots; and, whether this would diminish the size of the LA -3 area, as well as the change from CL to CN? Mr. Gair identifed the CL designation. He stated this is a planning opportunity for those Walking Neighborhoods. The petitioner has acquired options on property further west to afford planning for the entire area. Since 1980, when the property was rezoned to B-1, efforts to market these properties under the current guiding have been without suc- cess. The owner has priced the land at $2.50 per sq. ft., and, at one point, has priced it lower in an effort to "wholesale it". He stated that C.G. Rein stands ready to build a retail center on this property. They are convinced this is a good site; they will have a quality product; and, the development plan has resident support. Chairman Steigerwald inquired about the traffic study. Co- ordinator McConn and City Engineer Goldberg discussed the study. Coordinator McConn pointed out the difference in traffic levels; that the typical office traffic peaks in the morning and afternoon; and, the traffic to and from retail is ongoing throughout the day. Changing the Guide Plan designation changes the character of the traffic patterns and will increase traffic in the area by 24%. Chairman Steigerwald inquired if the 24% increase is all new traffic created solely by the retail uses? Coordinator McConn stated this could be due to different land uses and the additional number of vehicle trips. Engineer Goldberg noted that the 24% increase is a combination of the existing and proposed area development; and, can be managed if the Lo 0., Page 4 Planning Commission Minutes January 14, 1987 traffic improvements suggested by the Strgar-Roscoe Traffic Study are made. Chairman Steigerwald confirmed that this increase is deemed significant from a planning perspective. Chairman Steigerwald inquired, if the property were develop- ed with CL land uses, is there pedestrian movement and any plans to cross I-494 to the northeast side, such as bridge expansion? City Engineer Goldberg stated that no bridge expansion is proposed. Coordinator McConn referred to the public trail system, south of County Road 9. Commissioner Wire stated his concern that by approving the change of land use, this could evolve into more than a neighborhood shopping center in the future. He does not see any real reason for this redesignation. Mr. Gair stated they are proposing a neighborhood shopping area, not a com- munity shopping center. Commissioner Wire stated his con- cern is not alleviated, as it is not known as this time what plans are entertained for the balance of this property. Chairman Steigerwald inquired about the total number of acres under control by these petitioners. Mr. Gair stated there are approximately 40 acres and explained the ratio of service and retail. Commissioner Plufka inquired about compatible land use on the periphery of the subject property and questions if the petitioners would be back to request further change to the Guide Plan? David Peterson, Hew -Lyn, Inc., stated the areas remaining within the CL designation could be proposed for such uses as motel and medical offices which would enhance the proposed commerical area. Commissioner Wire commented that, considering its location, the 4 -Seasons Mall is a perfect example of a neighborhood shopping center. David Peterson noted that their plan is to develop the properties together, to provide easier access to the proposed commercial development, so the neighborhood residents won't have to cross the freeway. Mr. Gair stated that in 1983, a daycare and medical facilities were contem- plated; their proposal accents this by the addition of re- tail businesses. Commissioner Wire inquired if their demographics take into account the shopping on the east side of I-494 and the "Downtown Plymouth" area? Mr. Gair stated they developed a series of sectors to determine the number of persons in each sector. A more recent study took the major roadways into account. He gave the example of Sector 2 which is bound by a line north of County Road 9, west of I-494 where the study shows a 1986 population of 1,800 and a projected population of 2,100 in the Year 2000. __ U Gam. Page 5 Planning Commission Minutes January 14, 1987 Chairman Steigerwald inquired why they want to duplicate service on either side of the freeway? Mr. Gair stated they are talking neighborhood service area, without crossing County Road 9 and I-494. If there is redundancy, there is a market for it. C.G. Rein is firm on this point, even with other development proposals being reviewed for this area of Plymouth. Chairman Steigerwald explained the Commission's role in re- viewing changes to the Comprehensive Plan and the important Elements of that plan from an overall planning perspective. Mr. Gair stated they have not represented the Walking Neigh- borhoods any differently from what is shown on the Compre- hensive Plan. They believe there is no negative impact from this proposal; and, that it can be accommodated within the spirit of the Guide Plan. He stated they are not asking the City to compromise any principles, but it is their opinion this is a good location for retail development, and that it will enhance the area. Chairman Steigerwald opened the Public Hearing. Tom Leverenz, 14005 Rockford Road, stated that the petition- er has presented a good plan for the area; however, his per- sonal concern is that he lives on a busy roadway which carries alot of traffic Monday through Friday; and, he would not care to see it that busy on weekends. He is in opposi- tion to the proposal on this basis. Mr. Greg Begin, 5525 Xenium Lane, represents the Begin Contracting Company. They are developing the southeast corner of County Road 9 and I-494. He inquired about the original rezoning of the subject property and whether the change was requested by the owner. Mr. David Peterson stated the property had been industrially classified, and was reclassified CL and rezoned to B-1 (office limited business), at the request of the owner with endorsement by the City. Chairman Steigerwald explained that this action took place in 1980. Mr. Begin stated that they are developing their land under the appropriate guiding designation and they do not want their development to be diminished or hurt by having too much retail use in this area. He discussed the improvements to County Road 9 and the shopping center they have planned on property they own on the northeast corner. Tom Oestreich, 12250 51st Avenue North, stated he has studied this area for 5 to 6 years looking for retail space. He has purchased land in the southeast quadrant of Page 6 Planning Commission Minutes January 14, 1987 the "Cottonwood Plaza" development and is concerned that this proposal will be detrimental to his plans. He stated as a Plymouth resident, he would not like to see the advent of 50's style development of similar land uses on every corner. Commissioner Plufka stated that if it is their contention that retail businesses southeast of County Road 9 and I-494 must draw from large areas; this would seem to disagree with the marketing study and the definition of a neighborhood shopping center. The estimations of future retail develop- ment represented by the petitioner and other owners in this area, may be too much. Commissioner Wire stated the shopping areas do need to draw customers; he believes this would be a convenience for the residents and there is a reasonable need; however, all four corners may be too much. Ed Bergelman, 14018 County Road 9, stated he does not be- lieve people will walk into the shopping area from the resi- dential neighborhoods. He gave 4 -Seasons as an example; that there are many apartment complexes in this area and you never see people walking to the 4 -Seasons Shopping Center, whereas, vehicle traffic has tripled in this area. He inquired if there were any studies done on pedestrian traffic? Commissioner Plufka commented that an excess of the same type of retail and service will make it imperative for the retail to draw from a larger area; and, this is a big concern. Commissioner Magnus inquired if those who signed the petition live south of County Road 9? He wondered how convenient it will seem for those residents, who would drive to this area and have to cross traffic? He stated that "Downtown Plymouth" is not far, and it is not clear what service is being provided by this request that is not being provided elsewhere. Mr. Gair stated there are many levels of shopping and service and he does not believe the proposed development can be considered as excessive commercial retail. He stated there is enough market and enough people without conflicting or competing with other areas. Chairman Steigerwald closed the Public Hearing. MOTION by Commissioner Magnus, seconded by Commissioner NOTION TO DENY Pauba to recommend denial of the Land Use Guide Plan Amend- ment for Hew -Lynn, Inc., and Field Financial Corporation, based on the five findings listed in the January 8, 1987 Planning Staff Report. Page 7 Planning Commission Minutes January 14, 1987 Commissioner Pauba stated this plan has merit; however, the Planning Commission must consider the overall planning of the City, now and in the future. Commissioner Plufka spoke against the Motion. He stated that in terms of the Locational Criteria, this is not criti- cal. There is significant residential property at a higher density which will create more users. It does have an impact on the roadway systems, but it won't have a material effect on County Road 9. There is a clear public need, and he believes in the concept of a neighborhood shopping center that is not required to draw from 3 to 5 miles away. He does not believe this proposal has impact on other retail centers; the City Center sites are deemed community shopping center; but, there are no others in the immmediate vicin- ity. He does not believe the proposal is excessive; if the proposal were made to try to draw customers from I-494, this would be a major concern. Commissioner Stulberg concurred with Commissioner Plufka, but supports the Motion. The high density residential will lend more toward the neighborhood shopping center, but it will impact the roadway system. He sees the concern regard- ing retail on all four sides of I-494; and, the concern about 50's type strip development. There are other areas that are guided properly for this use. Commissioner Wire stated he would favor a neighborhood shop- ping center if it were different from what has been propos- ed. This proposal does not represent the right spot for retail. Roll Call Vote. 4 Ayes. Commissioners Mellen, Plufka, and Chairman Steigerwald, Nay. MOTION carried. Chairman Steigerwald stated he voted against the Motion because he feels there is a need to serve the northwest quadrant of the City with additional service/retail businesses. Chairman Steigerwald called a Recess at 9:25 P.M. Chairman Steigerwald introduced the request by Morse Proper- ties for a General Development Plan Amendment, Site Plan, and Conditional Use Permit to construct a hotel. Chairman Steigerwald requested an overview of the January 6, 1987 Planning Staff Report. Chairman Steigerwald introduced Mr. Wayne Morse. Mr. Morse had no questions or comments and stated he appreciated the courtesy and professionalism of City staff. VOTE - MOTION CARRIED RECESS HAMPTON INN HOTEL/ MORSE PROPERTIES GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT, SITE PLAN AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (86136) Z �D G-, Page 8 Planning Commission Minutes January 14, 1987 Chairman Steigerwald opened the Public Hearing, as there was no one present to speak on this item, the Public Hearing was closed. MOTION by Commissioner Wire, seconded by Commissioner MOTION TO APPROVE Stulberg to recommend approval for the General Development . Plan Amendment, Site Plan and Conditional Use Permit for Hampton Inn Hotel/Morse Properties, subject to the conditions listed in the Planning Staff Report. Roll Call Vote. 7 Ayes. MOTION carried. Chairman Steigerwald introduced the request by Zaremba Mid- west, Inc. for a Land Use Guide Plan Amendment and Planned Unit Development Concept Plan. Coordinator McConn gave an overview of the January 6, 1987 Planning Staff Report. Chairman Steigerwald introduced Linda Fisher, Attorney, representing Zaremba Midwest. Ms. Fisher introduced Mr. Norman Peters, Zaremba Midwest; Dennis Mulvey, Architect; and, Charles Ackermann, Barton-Aschman. Ms. Fisher stated she appreciated the opportunity to make a presentation be- fore the Commission. The development plans for this proper- ty were started early in 1986. She explained that Zaremba- Midwest, Inc. is a family owned, real estate development company in Lakewood, Ohio with a base in Des Plaines, IL. The company builds for long-term ownership. She stated they have centers in Illinois, Georgia, and North Carolina; and projects in Michigan, and Oklahoma. This is their first development in the Twin Cities. They were attracted to Plymouth because of its unique qualities including a steady housing market, and accessible freeways; and, to Minnesota, because of the high level of education of the residents and skilled labor. Ms. Fisher explained the Concept Plan for the approximate 41 acres noting the campus -like development with landscaping and walkways to tie the buildings together; open space for the tenants and employees; and, compatible architecture for cohesive development which includes retail and shops; 4,000 sq. ft. financial institution; 7,000 sq. ft. commercial with restaurant; and, the second phase for development of office space. She noted there is no immediate market for office use. She stated they looked at the roadway system first, so as to fit the development with the planned roadway system. She noted they have reduced the amount of retail uses to accommodate the roadway system. She believes the proposal complies with the Comprehensive Plan Locational Criteria concerning arterial and collector streets; center location for Driving and Walking Neighbor- hoods; and, the property is adjacent to low density residential. VOTE - MOTION CARRIED ZAREMEA MIDWEST, INC. LAND USE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT PLAN (86141) OL, Page 9 Planning Commission Minutes January 14, 1987 Ms. Fisher stated the Comprehensive Plan should be a general guide and should not be rigid and used for detailed planning solutions. She believes it could result in an inability to develop at all if taken as a rigid regulation. She believes City staff is taking the rigid approach with the Comprehen- sive Plan. She listed examples of and presented a map of existing CN guided areas that do not meet the Criteria, and where, in their opinion, there is a question of the strict application of the Comprehensive Plan. Commissioner Plufka asked if in some cases, the Guide Plan designation was assigned to fit an already developed site? Director Tremere stated that during the City's Planning/ Zoning reconciliation, the rezoning actions taken to match zoning and guiding may have rendered some properties to be not technically in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan. Linda Fisher stated that any development on this site would impact the public roadway system. Their information shows that if the entire 40 acres were office use, the average daily trips at A.M. and P.M. peak hours, would be greater than the proposed development. She stated the planned road- way system has adequate capacity; and, they have reduced the size of the retail area per the traffic study. They would also agree to a re -analysis of the traffic study for Phase II. She listed the roadway improvements to be accomplished. Ms. Fisher stated that the Land Use Guide Plan encourages a variety of uses and encourages compatible businesses. The proposal for a campus -type development allows people to walk to lunch, to the retail stores, and offices. The Groves office development employees will use the services within this proposed development. She stated that Zaremba is optimistic about Plymouth regard- ing the population growth; that the residents will need the facilities and can walk within the development; but, will drive to it as well. She stated all their studies reflect the need for this type of development. They have reviewed all CN and CS guided land, and based on their knowledge, this site met their need to be able to dictate the develop- ment schedule, and long-term tenants. They have reviewed the area demographics and income levels. The site chosen meets their criteria for accessibility, visibility, and proximity to office and business uses. Other sites studied had no utilities until after 1990; were not immediately available; or, had poor visibility. They were concerned about the demographics of other sites, including sites around City Center which are too small and lack visibility. Page 10 Planning Commission Minutes January 14, 1987 Ms. Fisher stated that regarding the existing guiding for the subject property, it can't be said it could not develop with office use. However, there is adequate office space available in close proximity which leads them to believe this is not the highest and best use for the property. There would be no adverse effects from their development plan; and, they request approval for the Land Use Guide Plan Amendment and Concept Plan as submitted. Commissioner Plufka inquired about their review of sites in the area around City Center? Ms. Fisher stated the sites are too small, and there are problems with access and visi- bility which would not be feasible for their development plans. She stated the demographics for a shopping center are not there yet, and the area does not meet the Zaremba criteria. Chairman Steigerwald opened the Public Hearing. Terrie Christian, 9910 South Shore Drive, stated she lives on the southeast shore of Medicine Lake which is close to this site. The area is valued highly by the residents and they believe this proposal would have a negative impact on the recreational and residential uses. She stated she moved from Minnepolis to escape shopping areas and she does not believe this proposal will be of any benefit as retail services are already available to the residents. She believes the proposed improvements to 10th Avenue North and the increased traffic with this proposal will have a nega- tive impact on the neighborhood. Pat Hagan, 11311 Highway 55, stated he would defer to Mr. Kennedy. Gerald Kennedy, 11311 Highway 55, stated he bought the Plymouth Shopping Center in 1979. He noted the property is appropriately guided for this use. He bought the adjacent Schiebe property to tie into the plans he has for renovation of the shopping center. He explained the problems and delays caused by existing leases (the leases in question will expire in February, 1987). The IGA (grocery store) wants to expand their facility. He explained the problems with the drainageway and discussions with the Department of Natural Resources to acquire the necessary permits. Mr. Kennedy stated he is not a developer, but wants to main- tain this neighborhood shopping area and has discussed his plans with "Prime Developers". He believes the economics are right for them to go ahead with their plans and the problems they have faced with this property have been solved. He stated they have met with staff to preliminarily discuss these plans. LP C�_, Page 11 Planning Commission Minutes January 14, 1987 They are concerned they would not he able to compete with the duplication of retail directly across from the Plymouth Shopping Center. Mr. Kennedy believes that the Land Use Guide Plan and Comprehensive Plan are an important tool for development of the City and any changes should be studied very carefully. He stated he is opposed to the Land Use Guide Plan Amendment. Tom Janssen, 11311 Highway 55, stated he has operated the IGA store for 8 years and if this proposal is approved, it will adversely affect his business and expansion plans. He stated this proposal is not a neighborhood shopping center and will have far-reaching effects on the traffic levels and roadway system; and, because there are other areas which are appropriately zoned for this type of development, many businesses in the area could suffer. Suzanne Wyatt, 10712 10th Avenue North, stated she is not thrilled about having a shopping center on this property. Ridgedale is close by, so that development of this property for shopping would be a waste. She believes there is already too much traffic on 10th Avenue North and she opposes the City's plans for improvements to that street. Chairman Steigerwald explained that this property is avail- able for development and development will occur making it necessary for the City's plans to upgrade the roadways and streets. He explained the City's Capital Improvements Program for street extensions in developing areas and improvements for existing streets. Mr. Gerald Kennedy stated that Prime Developers have exten- sive experience with retail development and have analyzed and developed plans for their site. Chairman Steigerwald stated it would not be appropriate to discuss their develop- ment plans and inquired if they have statements to make that would be in direct relationsip to the proposal under consid- eration? Commissioner Plufka verified that their statements are to emphasize that there is now adequate CN guided land in this area for development. The spokesman for Prime Developers noted that the Plymouth Shopping Center site was conspicuously not mentioned during the presentation of the chart prepared by the petitioner. Commissioner Plufka stated that in all fairness to the petitioner, the Plymouth Shopping Center site is not available for development, so would not be listed with the sites they have studied or considered for development. Page 12 Planning Commission Minutes January 14, 1987 Linda Fisher stated they would have no response regarding plans for the Plymouth Shopping Center site. The develop- ment plan as proposed is appropriate; is based on extensive study and review; and, there seems to be no reason why the two could not live together. However, they have no facts or figures to support that this evening. Mr. Norman W. Peters, 640 Pearson, Des Plaines, IL, stated they respect the requirements of the City of Plymouth, but the Land Use Guide Plan is not consistent with their plans for this site. They believe the proposal is compatible with development in the area and that this will be a beautiful project. He stated they don't want to get into who should or should not be developing new business, but it is their contention and the market shows they would not hurt other retail business in the area; and, that both the proposed development and Plymouth Shopping Center could offer ser- vices which will please the public. Chairman Steigerwald closed the Public Hearing. He asked the Planning Director to address the Comprehensive Plan Amendment. Director Tremere explained the purpose and use of the Guide Plan. The staff does not view the Plan as rigid, but there must be a sound basis on which any changes are made. The City invested substantial time and money developing the plan to guide and facilitate development throughout the City. The petitioner's attorney correctly cited the legal and practical purpose of Comprehensive Plans. They are to be guides and not inflexible regulations. However, that is not really the issue here. The proposal is to amend the plan to match a particular development need, it is not to determine how a land use class boundary, utility district boundary, staged growth area limits, or the like, could be interpreted or revised to coincide with the proper- ty lines of a site. The law expects cities to adhere to their adopted plans and to use them as guides. An amendment to the Plan should be viewed as an adoption issue, not as a matter of flexible application. There is land available under the guiding needed by this developer. The developer has chosen a site which does not match the Guide Plan classification for the type of develop- ment that meets their criteria. The City needs to carefully look at the issues, whether this development plan is compatible to the area; the impact on roadways and traffic circulation; the intent of the Comprehensive Plan; and, if additional CN land uses are needed to serve this area. Page 13 Planning Commission Minutes January 14, 1987 He explained that the City Council conducted a hearing on improvements to 10th Avenue North and deferred action pend- ing this hearing. Director Tremere noted that the residential land in this area is nearly all developed; he questioned what neighbor- hood the proposed retail uses would serve. Interpretation of neighborhood needs to be realistic so it can be determin- ed who would be served by this development. Commissioner Mellen inquired about the difference between neighborhood and regional shopping centers, and noted that the proposed development could serve employees and residents of the area. Director Tremere explained the City envisioned a community center core, such as "Downtown Plymouth", with nodes of neighborhood shopping areas throughout the com- munity. The City excluded "Regional" centers. The higher intensity retail and service/commercial areas are near free- ways. There are existing neighborhood shopping centers to serve the residents of this area. The primary staff concern is that the amendment be viewed on its merits, in consideration of area and community planning matters which are not development or site specific. Director Tremere confirmed for Commissioner Plufka that the guiding for the entire Plymouth Shopping Center site is CN (neighborhood shopping center). MOTION BY Commissioner Stulberg, seconded by Commissioner Pauba to recommend denial for the Land Use Guide Plan Amend- ment and Concept Plan based on two items listed in the Plan- ning Staff Report; that the proposed Amendment has a significant impact on the City's public road system; and, that it has not been demonstrated that the land could not develop within its current Guide Plan designation and Zoning. MOTION by Commissioner Plufka, seconded by Commissioner Wire to Amend the Motion to include all five findings in the January 6, 1987 Planning Staff Report as listed which include the two findings in the Main Motion. Roll Call Vote on Amendment. 6 Ayes. Commissioner Stulberg, Nay Roll Call Vote on Main Motion as once Amended. 7 Ayes. MOTION carried. Commissioner Wire stated that the two petitions for Land Use Guide Plan Amendments, where the applicants have based their request on the contention that they cannot develop office MOTION FOR DENIAL MOTION TO AMEND VOTE - AMENDMENT MOTION CARRIED VOTE - MAIN MOTION AS AMENDED MOTION CARRIED Page 14 Planning Commission Minutes January 14, 1987 buildings on that land which has been guided for that pur- pose because of today's market, raises the question whether there will be more and more requests for the City to consider changes to the Land Use Guide Plan and whether the City should study the ramifications of such future requests. Chairman Steigerwald stated Council could discuss this scheduled for next month. NEW BUSINESS the Planning Commission and City further at the joint meeting MOTION by Commissioner Pauba, seconded by Commissioner Wire *JOHN LAVANDER to recommend approval for the Site Plan for an office/ware- SITE PLAN house building for John Lavander, Parkers Lake Business (86126) Center, subject to the conditions as listed in the January 2, 1987 Planning Staff Report. Vote. 7 Ayes. MOTION carried. Chairman Steigerwald introduced the request by David C. Johnson and requested an overview of the January 5, 1987 Planning Staff Report by Coordinator McConn Commissioner Magnus confirmed the Commission had reviewed the original plan last year. He stated his concern regard- ing the parking layout, whether there will be sufficient parking; and, if this layout would not create a "bottleneck" for vehicles driving on and off the site. He also inquired whether the parking at the rear of the building would be used for employee parking, as it would not be convenient for customer parking. Coordinator McConn explained the site layout and direction of traffic flow around the site. Further discussion ensued regarding the entrances and the need to drive around the building. Mr. Dave Johnson introduced Irwin Kilstofte, Architect, who explained the lot layout and traffic delineator at the southern entrance from Highway 101. Commissioner Wire inquired about the lighting and building construction. Mr. Kilstofte stated the building is proposed as white stucco and brick, the lighting and landscape plans are the same as those originally proposed. Commissioner Magnus reiterated his concern regarding the parking and circulation on the site. Coordinator McConn explained that the Site Plan has ordinance required parking; however, she does not disagree that the parking in the rear is inconvenient to those customers visiting the site. She agreed with Commissioner Magnus that these parking spaces could be better used by employees. DAVID C. JOHNSON SITE PLAN AND VARIANCES (86138) Page 15 Planning Commission Minutes January 14, 1987 Commissioner Magnus stated it appears that the parking and drive-through could create blind spots for vehicle opera- tors, and unsafe conditions for pedestrians entering and leaving the building and site. Chairman Steigerwald stated the traffic flow is very dif- ferent from that which was originally submitted. He questioned its effectiveness. Commissioner Magnus agreed, stating that it appears that half the parking is at the back of the building. Chairman Steigerwald confirmed that the original plan for a two-story building had entrances on two sides with parking on both sides. Coordinator McConn stated the present Site Plan is for a one-story, expanded building, which reduces the yard area. She noted that the Planning Commission can defer their recommendation and give direction for re -design to resolve these concerns. Commissioner Stulberg stated his concern about what will happen when a customer driving on the site cannot find a parking space? Would he circle the building; or, would he need to exit the site? Engineer Goldberg stated that if cars are backed up from the "throat" of the drive, they would pull straight ahead and around the building. Commis- sioner Stulberg is concerned that the parking layout and circulation is not suitable. Chairman Steigerwald noted that the original plan and use was more compatible. This is a much more intense use of the site and he is also apprehensive about this layout. Commis- sioner Pauba agreed that movement is very tight. Mr. Kilstofte stated they are now talking about similar service -type businesses which will not entail long-term parking. Coordinator McConn stated the Planning Commission could re- quest a reduction in the building size; use more 2 -way drive aisles; look at the entrances and improving circulation on-site to perhaps solve the problem of vehicles having to exit the site. Commissioner Wire inquired about taking the divider out of the south entrance. Engineer Goldberg stated this would restrict movement and cause stacking problems. Public Works Director Fred Moore explained the traffic study for this area and noted the difficulty in circulation through this site. Page 16 Planning Commission Minutes January 14, 1987 Magnus inquired about notification of the neighboring property owners regarding this development proposal. Coordinator McConn stated notices were sent to property owners within 100 ft. of the site; and, a development sign was erected on the site. Mr. Ed Thuringer, 17391 County Road 6, stated he represents Kimberly Meadows. He is concerned about vehicles using their entrance to turn around. He is not against this project, but there are 92 children living in Kimberly Meadows and he is concerned about their safety. He noted that St. Phillips church was required to erect a 7 ft. fence, and it is his opinion a fence should be erected at this site to separate the children from the vehicle traf- fic. Mr. Thuringer was also concerned that the shrubbery shown on the landscape plan could become cover for thieves and vandals. Tammy Zylka, 17397 County Road 6, stated that the parking for this facility is right outside her back door, approximately 30 ft. to the site. She is also concerned about the safety of her children and would like to have a fence erected. She stated the traffic circulation problems will add to the safety problems. Engineer Goldberg noted that this traffic pattern and parking layout is similar to that shown on the original plan. Commissioner Mellen inquired if the trees and landscape plantings should be reduced, and a fence erected? Commis- sioner Plufka noted that reducing the number of trees and shrubs will not provide the buffering and screening which was requested by the residents and discussed when the original plan was submitted for Planning Commission con- sideration. Coordinator McConn noted the Zoning Ordinance calls for 90% opacity. MOTION by Commissioner Magnus, seconded by Commissioner NOTION FOR DEFERRAL Pauba to defer this item and direct re -design to alleviate the traffic circulation problems on this site by reducing the building footprint; providing two-way circulation with 90° parking; provide safe pedestrian ways; and, improve circulation on the north side of the building. Commissioners Plufka and Wire stated they disagree with the Motion; that this is as workable as this site will ever be. The drive aisles are of sufficient size to move the traffic through the site. They stated this application should move forward for City Council consideration. Commissioner Wire stated this is an aesthetically better plan and he does not believe the parking will be that onerous. Page 17 Planning Commission Minutes January 14, 1987 Extensive discussion ensued about whether this was the best plan for the site. Concerns were expressed about the circulation and transition. VOTE. Commissioners Magnus and Stulberg, Aye. Commis- sioners Wire, Plufka, Mellen, Pauba, and Chairman Steigerwald, Nay. MOTION fails. MOTION by Commissioner Wire, seconded by Commissioner Mellen to recommend approval for the Site Plan and Variances for David C. Johnson, subject to the conditions as listed in the January 5, 1987 Planning Staff Report with the addition of Condition No. 12, to construct in addition to the landscap- ing, a chain link fence on the east property line from where the Kimberly Meadows property line begins, north to County Road 6. VOTE. 4 Ayes. Commissioners Magnus, Stulberg, and Pauba, Nay. MOTION carried. MOTION by Commissioner Pauha, seconded by Commissioner Wire to recommend approval for the Lot Division and Site Plan for Ryan Construction Company, subject to the conditions as stated in the January 2, 1987 Planning Staff Report. VOTE. 7 Ayes. MOTION carried. OLD BUSINESS Chairman Steigerwald introduced the request by Image Homes for a Residential Concept Plan, Preliminary Plan/Plat, Re- zoning, and Conditional Use Permit for "Heritage Ridge". Reading of the January 5, 1987 staff report was waived. Chairman Steigerwald introduced Mr. Bill Ciora, 3045 Rose- wood Lane, who stated that Mr. Al Stobbe had presented several plans and has discussed the plans being considered this evening with the neighborhood representatives. The neighbors he spoke with, support this plan. He read state- ments from Carol Brownell and Jeff Burton who support the plan; and, referred to the January 6, 1987 letter from Mark McCullough which was reviewed by the Commission and is part of the Planning Staff report. Chairman Steigerwald inquired about the request that the width of the park on the north be increased from 75 ft. to 100 ft. Mr. Fran Hagen, 7415 Wayzata Blvd., stated the Parks and Recreation Department is satisfied with their pro- posal. They may be able to accommodate this increase, but feel there is sufficient buffer. Commissioner Plufka asked what Mr. Hagen's recommendation would be? Mr. Hagen stated he would leave it as it is. He noted the additional land- scaping, the plan to retain trees and natural vegetation. VOTE - M01FION FAILS MOTION TO APPROVE VOTE - MOTION CARRIED *RYAN CONSTRUCTION CO. LOT DIVISION AND SITE PLAN (86114) MOTION TO APPROVE VOTE - MOTION CARRIED IMAGE HOMES RPUD CONCEPT PLAN PRELIMINARY PLAN/PLAT REZONING AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR HERITAGE RIDGE (86087) Page 18 Planning Commission Minutes January 14, 1987 Chairman Steigerwald stated that on initial consideration of the application, it was suggested that open space be provided in the area south of Northwest Blvd., and it was hoped that it would be in a more central location. The portion used is not the best to serve the neighborhood being created and is the least valuable to the developer. However, an inordinate amount of time has been expended on reviewing this application and it should move forward for final disposition. MOTION TO APPROVE MOTION by Commissioner wire, seconded by Commissioner Stulberg to recommend approval of the Residential Planned Unit Development Concept Plan, Preliminary Plan/Plat, Rezon- ing, and Conditional Use Permit for Image Homes for "Heri- tage Ridge", subject to the conditions as listed in the January 5, 1987 Planning Staff Report. VOTE - MOTION CARRIED VOTE. 7 Ayes. MOTION carried. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 12:18 A.M. --�-- LQ b THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENTS AND APPEALS January 13, 1987 The Regular Meeting of the Board of Zoning Adjustments and Appeals was called to order at 7:30 P.M. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Marofsky, Commissioners Quass, Anderson, Mellen, Cornelius, Bigelow and Musatto STAFF PRESENT: Associate Planner Al Cottingham, Joe Ryan Building Official; and City Council Liaison ferry Sisk MINUTES MOTION was made by Commissioner Quass, seconded by MOTION TO APPROVE Commissioner Musatto to approve the November 18, 1986 MINUTES OF NOV. 18, Minutes as amended. 1986 VOTE. 6 Ayes. Commissioner Bigelow abstained. MOTION carried. MOTION was made by Commissioner Bigelow, seconded by MOTION TO APPROVE Commissioner Quass to approve the December 9, 1986 Minutes MINUTES OF DEC. 91 as amended. 1986 VOTE. 7 Ayes. MOTION carried. NEW BUSINESS: Chairman Marofsky introduced the Board Members and reviewed the variance criteria as contained in the Zoning Ordinance. The request submitted by William Williams, Jr. was WILLIAM J. WILLIAMS introduced for a variance from the minimum building side 1325 PEONY LANE yard setback for property located at 1325 Peony Lane North, NORTH. VARIANCE FROM per the January 2, 1987 staff report. MINIMUM BUILDING SIDE YARD SETBACK Mr. Williams was not present; this item was set aside until later in the meeting by the Chairman. The request submitted by Richard Hanson was introduced. It RICHARD HANSON 320 is for a variance from the Shoreland Management setback for SYCAMORE LANE. property located at 320 Sycamore Lane North, per the January VARIANCE FROM 2, 1987 staff report. SHORELAND MANAGEMENT SETBACK Mr. Hanson reviewed his request stating he would be willing to move the house forward on the lot as suggested by staff; however, he would rather have it at the proposed location which would put it less than 25 feet from the front property line. He noted that the neighbor to the northeast had seen the proposed layout and felt the home should not be moved forward as it would have an impact on their property. Page two Board of Zoning Minutes January 13, 198& The Board discussed the possibility of moving the home to a 25 foot front yard setback rather than the 35 foot setback and the impact that Sycamore Lane would have on the home. They discussed the difference between this lot and the two homes on the cul-de-sac to the southwest that were approved to have a 25 foot setback. A 25 foot setback for this home would have a larger impact than on the homes to the southwest. Commissioner Anderson inquired about the Department of Natural Resources letter and the need for the deck on the rear of the home. Mr. Hanson responded that both he and his wife are artists and would use the deck for painting pictures of the wildlife and the out-of-doors. They would leave the lakeshore alone and not remove any vegetation. Chairman Marofsky stated that if this deck were ever to be enlarged or enclosed, Mr. Hanson would need to receive a variance in order to do so. Mr. Hanson noted that this home is being constructed with a three season porch and he did not believe they would be enclosing this deck in the future. MOTION was made by Commissioner Mellen, seconded by MOTION TO APPROVE Commissioner Bigelow to approve the request for a variance from the minimum Shoreland Management setback for property located at 320 Sycamore Lane North for Richard Hanson for the reasons stated in the draft resolution with the addition of condition no. 3 to read as follows: The vegetation shall not be significantly reduced along the shoreline and shall comply with the Shoreland Management Regulations. The Board discussed how this third condition would be enforced by City staff since they do not have the policing powers to be sure that people do not cut down shoreline vegetation. They discussed what measures could be taken by the City. MOTION TO AMEND MAIN MOTION MOTION was made by Commissioner Mellen, seconded by Commissioner Bigelow to amend the main motion by deletion of the third condition. VOTE - MOTION TO AMEND CARRIED VOTE. 7 Ayes. MOTION carried. VOTE - MOTION CARRIED VOTE on the main MOTION 5 - 2. Chairman Marofsky and Commissioner Anderson voted Nay. MOTION carried. Page three Board of Zoning Minutes January 13, 1987 OLD BUSINESS: The request submitted by Louis Cosentino was introduced. It is for a variance from the minimum building side yard setback for property located at 2435 Holly Lane North, per the January 2, 1987 staff report. Chairman Marofsky reviewed the application for the Board, noting that additional information was submitted at the City Council meeting and that the City Council referred this matter back to the Board for review and findings. Mr. Cosentino noted he reviewed the staff report and felt that he could not move the garage doors any closer together due to the interior chimney location and the impact on the parking arrangements of the vehicles. He felt his request was the smallest size for the addition that he could live with, due to the interior constraints of his garage. Chairman Marofsky reviewed the letter that was submitted as part of the revised material referencing other lots in the area for which Mr. Cosentino thought variances had been approved. He informed Mr. Cosentino that these other lots were within subdivisions that were approved under the previous Ordinance for Subdivision Unit Project. The Ordinance then allowed for lesser setbacks in SUP developments. His lot is not within a SUP development. Commissioner Quass stated his concern of the cars sliding down the driveway, even with the emergency brake on as this does not seem possible. Mr. Cosentino responded the driveway is difficult to keep totally clean of snow and ice; there is a letter from a neighbor stating they have seen the car slide down the drive into the street. Commissioner Quass felt this drive was not unique to this area since there are other lots with as steep a drive as this one. Chairman Marofsky stated that Mr. Cosentino could build a 13 foot wide detached garage alongside his existing garage that would meet the Ordinance standards of six feet from the house and six feet from the side lot line. Commissioner Quass stated the topography is not unique to this drive, which has approximately a 1 to 10 slope. There are other drives in this neighborhood and other neighborhoods that have the same slope or a greater slope. Chairman Marofsky agreed with Commissioner Quass; however, he noted that this home does not have a flat surface at the top of the drive in which to park a vehicle. -= L.Q. b LOUIS COSENTINO 2435 HOLLY LME. VARIANCE FROM MINIMUM BUILDING SIDE YARD SETBACK Page four Board of Zoning Minutes January 13, '1987 Chairman Marofsky inquired about the additional depth to this garage and what it would be used for. Mr. Cosentino responded the area would be used for the storage of bikes and lawn equipment, also it would give a better exterior appearance to the home if continued for the full depth of the house. Chairman Marofsky explained to the Board that the home to the south is approximately 22 feet from the lot line and that they could expand the house to within 15 feet of the lot line without a variance. This would then leave approximately 28 feet between the homes. Commissioner Anderson inquired as to the possibility of locating a parking pad along the existing garage. Mr. Cosentino stated the vehicle would probably end up in the neighbor's yard because they would over -shoot the parking pad. Commissioner Anderson inquired about moving the existing wall and shifting the ten foot garage door to the north two feet and thus meeting the Ordinance setback requirments. Mr. Cosentino responded that the cars would not fit in the garage if this was done. The Board discussed the possibility of removing the wall and shifting the ten foot garage door two feet closer to the north, since the floor plan of the garage labeled as Exhibit A, does show approximately six feet between the car parked in the proposed garage addition and the car parked on the south side of the existing garage. The Board concluded that four feet between vehicles was adequate space for entering and exiting cars. Commissioner Quass stated that this would be the only home in the neighborhood with a three car garage; that the petitioner does have reasonable use of the property and that he currently has a two car garage. Chairman Marofsky inquired of staff as to how other subdivisions in the area were platted. Associate Planner Cottingham answered approximately 50 percent of the surrounding developments were developed as Subdivision Unit Projects and 50 percent were developed under the R -1A guidelines. Commissioner Mellen noted that there are other drives in the area with the same slope and have a two car garage; if this variance is granted, it would set a precedent for at least this neighborhood and possibly other areas of the City. —I. - U Ic Page five Board of Zoning Minutes January 13, 1987 Commissioner Quass stated it was his opinion that the Ordinance has not created the problem, and that there are other solutions to solve this problem that do meet the Ordinance requirements. MOTION was made by Commissioner Quass, seconded by MOTION TO DENY Commissioner Anderson to deny the request for a variance from the minimum building side yard setback for property located at 2435 Holly Lane North for Louis Cosentino for the reasons stated in the draft resolution. Commissioner Quass noted that the driveway slope is not unique to this property and a three car garage would be new to this neighborhood since most of the homes have two car garages. Chairman Marofsky noted that even if a detached garage were built alongside the existing garage, and may make the neighborhood unattractive, their decision should not be based soley upon whether the addition would look attractive to the neighborhood or not. Mr. Cosentino stated that the City has granted variances with the lot sizes and front yard setbacks for his subdivision and did not understand why this variance for a side yard setback could not be granted. Chairman Marofsky noted that this Board did not grant those variances; they were considered by the Planning Commission and City Council at the time this property was platted; each request is considered on it's own merit. VOTE. 7 Ayes. MOTION carried. Chairman Marofsky reviewed the right of appeals procedure for Mr. Cosentino; they have 20 days in which to submit an appeal in writing to the City. Chairman Marofsky inquired if Mr. Williams had arrived. Associate Planner Cottingham responded that he was notified to be at this meeting and that he was not in attendance as of yet. MOTION was made by Commissioner Mellen, seconded by Commissioner Anderson to table the request submitted by Williams Williams, Jr. until the February 10, 1987 meeting. VOTE. 7 Ayes. MOTION carried. VOTE - NOTION CARRIED Page six Board of Zoning Minutes January 13, 1987 Council Member Sisk thanked Commissioners Cornelius and Musatto on behalf of the City Council for the time spent serving on the Board. ADJOURNMENT Meeting adjourned at 9:12 P.M. CITY OF PLYMOUTH Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a Regular meeting of the Board of Zoning Adustments and Appeals of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, was held on the 13th day of January . 1987. The following members were present:Chairman Marofsky, Commissioners Quass, Anderson, Mellen, Cornelius, Bigelow and Musatto The following members were absent: None Commissioner Quass introduced the following Resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. B 87-02 DENYING VARIANCE REQUEST FOR LAKE COUNTRY BUILDERS, INC. FOR M/M COSENTINO, 2435 HOLLY LANE (12-01-86) WHEREAS, Louis Cosentino has requested approval of a 2 ft. encroachment into the Ordinance side yard setback of 15 feet to construct 12 x 32 foot, addition for a third car attached garage; and, WHEREAS, the Board of Zoning Adjustments and Appeals has reviewed said request; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENTS AND APPEALS OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does deny the request for Louis Cosentino, for a 2 ft. variance to allow a 13 ft. side yard setback for property located at 2435 Holly Lane for the following reasons: 1. The variance criteria have been met. 2. Structure could be constructed within Ordinance requirements. 3. Approval would create an undesirable precedent. The motion for adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by Commissioner Anderson , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Chairman Marofsky, Commissioners Quass, Anderson, Mellen. Cornelius. Biaelow and Musatto _The following voted against or abstained: None Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. ---7—_ �0 b CITY OF PLYMOUTH Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a Regular meeting of the Board of Zoning Adustments and Appeals of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, was held on the 13th day of January . 1987. The following members were present: Chairman Marofsky, Commissioners Quass, Anderson, Mellen, Cornelius, Bigelow and Musatto The following members were absent: None Commissioner Mellen introduced the following Resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. B 87-01 APPROVING VARIANCE REQUEST FOR RICHARD HANSON, 320 SYCAMORE LANE (1-2-87) WHEREAS, Richard Hanson has requested approval of a 25 ft. encroachment into the Shoreland Management setback of 75 feet in order to construct a new home; and, WHEREAS, the Board of Zoning Adjustments and Appeals has reviewed said request; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENTS AND APPEALS OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the request for Richard Hanson, for a 25 ft. variance to allow a 50 ft. Shoreland Management setback for property located at 320 Sycamore Lane for the following reasons: 1. The variance criteria have been met. 2. No other variances are granted or implied by this action. The motion for adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by Commissioner Bigelow , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Commissioners Mellen, Bigelow, Quass, Cornelius, and Musatto The following voted against or abstained: Chairman Marofsky and Commissioner Anderson Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. =— _0 MINUTES PLYMOUTH SAFETY COMMITTEE January 14, 1987 PRESENT: Steve Herwig, Gary Smith, Russ Elzy, John Wenner, Tim Ole, John Sweeney, Mark Peterson, John Ward, Lyle Robinson, Frank Boyles ALSO PRESENT: Dave Volker, Employee Benefit Administration; Ron Garritt, CNA Insurance Companies; Mike Buske, John Stirratt, Dave Johnson I. REVIEW OF PERSONAL INJURY/VEHICULAR ACCIDENTS The committee reviewed six vehicular accidents. Four accidents were determined to be non -preventable, and one preventable. The vehicular accident involving Jon Eccles was deferred to the February meeting for additional information. Four personal injury accidents were reviewed and recommendations will be made accordingly. A personal injury accident involving Dave Johnson and Bob Hebzynski was deferred to the February meeting so both parties could be present to provide a more comprehensive view of the accident to the committee. The following items and/or recommendations were discussed durina_ accident review by the Committee: 1) John Ward recommended the committee consider revising the Accident Review Guidelines relating to Safety Committee accident determination for personal injury accidents. John's concern was that the present system is too rigid in determining personal injury accidents to be either preventable/non-preventable, and eliminating employees from attending the annual Safety Award luncheon. He stated the present system does not allow the committee to recognize such allowances as the severity of an accident, an employee's accident track record, less mitigating factors and/or parties to accident, etc., and may discourage employees from reporting minor personal injury accidents. The committee discussed the possibility of establishing some form of a point system for rating personal injury accidents. A subcommittee consisting of John Ward, John Wenner, John Sweeney, and Frank Boyles was established to study such revisions to the guidelines. 2) The committee recommended the Public Safety Department investigate allowing police officers to administer preliminary breath tests (PBT) from the back seat of the squads using an extended breath tube. Dave Volker recommended checking with the manufacturer to determine if the test would be considered valid with the use of the extended tube. PLYMOUTH SAFETY COMMITTEE _ LQ C January 14, 1987 Page two 3) Gary Smith reported the snow fence which prevents access to the culvert at Maple Creek park was in need of repair. 4) John Ward stated concern with the storage of high pressure oxygen tanks in the Police garage. John indicated he would discuss with Public Safety staff that internal procedures be established concerning the storage and use of the tanks. The meeting adjourned at 11:05 a.m. FORTIETH MLC OPERATING COMMITTEE MEETING Wednesday, January 21, 1987 3:00 - 5:00 p.m. Decathlon Club, Bloomington MINUTES The Fortieth MLC Operating Committee Meeting was called to order by Jim Willis, the MLC Vice Chair. Members Present: Jim Andre, Roseville; Linda Barton, Burnsville; Tom Hedges, Eagan; Dick Henneberger, Brooklyn Park; Carl Jullie, Eden Prairie; Jim Lacina, Woodbury; John Pidgeon, Bloomington; Doug Reeder, Maple Grove; Ken Rosland, Edina; Mark Sather, White Bear Lake; and Jim Willis, Plymouth. Also Present: Charlie Darth, Brooklyn Park; Mayor Daniel Guider, Jr., Woodbury; Larry Lee, Bloomington; D.J. Leary from Media Services, Inc.; and Bob Renner, Jr. and Deb Luebke from Messerli & Kramer. The minutes from the 39th MLC Operating Committee Meeting were approved and passed. The Treasurer's Report that the report should from November 30, 1986 was passed as amended. was presented by Mark Sather. Sather noted be amended by changing the fund balance date to December 31, 1986. The Treasurer's Report Larry Lee, Assistant City Manager from Bloomington, reported on the status of the MLC computer and the expenditure of funds that would be required to update the data base. After some discussion the Operating Committee decided to recommend to the Board of Directors to approve action to proceed with the computer update for the amount of $15,000 to be allocated for the purposes of upgrading MLC's computer data base, with an additional $5,000 to be allocated for tabulation time. Barton made a motion to this effect which was seconded by Hedges and was unanimously passed. After reviewing all three auditing proposals, the Operating Committee decided to recommend to the MLC Board of Directors that the MLC retain Voto, Reardon, Tautges & Co., Ltd. as the auditing firm to do MLC's 1986 audit for a fee not to exceed $1,000. This motion was made by Henneberger and seconded by Barton and passed unanimously. Renner presented the MLC Resolution regarding the 1987 Legislative Policy to the Operating Committee whicli was identical to the 1986 Legislative policy. After some discussion the Operating Committee decided to include an amendment to the last paragraph of the Resolution to read as follows: "THEREFORE, be it resolved that the Municipal Legislative Commission direct its lobbyists to concentrate their efforts on Local Government Aid, property tax relief programs such as homestead U MLC Operating Committee Meeting Minutes January 21, 1987 Page 2 credit, budget reductions affecting cities, consideration of additional funding for highways and other issues which may have fiscal impact on its membership." The amendment was adopted. Hedges made the motion which was seconded by Jullie to recommend the MLC Resolution as amended to the Board of Directors for adoption. A handout was distributed and Renner discussed S.F. 39 regarding the regulation of development and management of state mandates on political subdivisions. Renner also handed out materials and gave an update on current legislative issues of interest to the MLC. The possibility of introducing a MLC property tax proposal in response to Governor's Perpich's proposal was discussed. It was decided that it was premature for the MLC to respond to this issue until the Governor's Office, the House and the Senate have submitted their proposals. Renner distributed and discussed the City of Minneapolis Property Tax Reform Proposal. He commented that Minneapolis hasn't significantly altered their position on local government aids and property tax from last year. A handout regarding the Coalition of Outstate Cities Legislative Program/Laufenburger Remarks was distributed and briefly discussed. Renner .reported that the Coalition has taken a wait-and-see attitude and hasn't planned to initiate a full-blown property tax reform proposal. Jullie gave a report on the meeting held with the Municipal Caucus and the Association of Northern Mayors regarding highway funding and property tax reform. Renner gave a report on the meeting the League of Minnesota Cities held with the other local government groups, stating that at this time these groups appear to be very united, with no divisive issues creating any controversy between them. The League hasn't taken a position on any issues and will wait and see before making a specific proposal. Renner asked the MLC Operating Committee for direction on the MLC Update and the Operating Committee instructed Renner to continue to focus the Update toward the MLC Legislative Delegation. The MLC Directory was distributed to the Operating Committee with instructions to contact Deb Luebke at 893-6650 with any corrections if necessary. Renner also explained that a separate MLC Directory would be released and hand -delivered to the MLC Legislative Delegation in the next couple of wee:cs. A handout regarding the MACI Election Polling results was distributed. D.J. Leary reported that he had spoken witl-i the Capitol press corps and informed them that the MLC hasn't yet taken a position for the 1987 Legislative Session. MLC Operating Committee Meeting Minutes January 21, 1987 Page 3 The next MLC Operating Committee Meeting was scheduled for Wednesday, February 13 at 9:00 a.m. at the Messerli & Kramer Board Room in Bloomington. The Fortieth MLC Operating Committee Meeting was adjourned at 5:00 p.m. FOURTEENTH MLC BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING Wednesday, January 21, 1987 5:00 - 6:00 p.m. Decathlon Club, Bloomington MINUTES The Fourteenth MLC Board of Directors Meeting was called to order by Minnetonka Mayor Larry Donlin, the MLC Chair. Members Present: Jim Andre, Roseville; Linda Barton, Burnsville; Mayor Bea Blomquist, ^__�-�;; r" Crain, ^?j�Moutii Council Member; Mayor Larry Donlin, Minnetonka; Mayor Daniel Guider, Jr., Woodbury; Tom Hedges, Eagan; Dick Henneberger, Brooklyn Park; Carl Jullie, Eden Prairie; Mayor Jim Krautkremer, Brooklyn Park; Jim Lacina, Woodbury; Mayor Daniel McElroy, Burnsville; Jim Miller, Minnetonka; Mayor Gary Peterson, Eden Prairie; John Pidgeon, Bloomington; Doug Reeder, Maple Grove; Ken Rosland, Edina; Mayor William Saed, Inver Grove Heiglits; Mark Sather, White Bear Lake; Charlotte Wasiluk, Maplewood Council Member; and Jim Willis, Plymouth. Also Present: Charlie Darth, Brooklyn Park; Larry Lee, Bloomington; D.J. Leary from Media Services, Inc.; and Ross Kramer, Bob Renner, Jr. and Deb Luebke from Messerli & Kramer. The minutes from the 13th MLC Board of Directors Meeting were approved and passed. The Treasurer's Report was presented by Mark Sather. Sather noted that the report should be amended by changing the fund balance date from November 30, 1986 to December 31, 1986. The Treasurer's Report was passed as amended. Larry Lee, Assistant City Manager from Bloomington, reported on the status of the MLC computer and the expenditure of funds that would be involved to update the data base. The Operating Committee made the recommendation that the Board of Directors approve funds for the amount Of $15,000 to be allocated for the purposes of upgrading MLC's computer data base and that $5,000 be allocated for tabulation time. A motion was made and seconded to adopt the Operating Committee's recommendation which was unanimously passed. The Operating Committee recommended to the MLC Board of Directors that the MLC retain Voto, Reardon, Tautges & Co., Ltd. as the auditing firm to do MLC's 1986 audit for a fee not to exceed $1,000. This motion was passed unanimously. The Operating Committee recommended to the the Board of Directors to adopt the MLC Resolution that outlined the MLC's 1987 Legislative Policy, which continued to focus on local government aids (LGA) and state property tax programs affecting MLC cities and to also focus on legislation involving additional funding for highways. A discussion ensued and the last paragraph of the Resolution was amended as follows: MLC Board of Directors Meeting Minutes January 21, 1987 Page 2 "THEREFORE, be it resolved that the Municipal Legislative Commission direct its lobbyists to concentrate their efforts on Local Government Aid, property tax relief programs such as homestead credit and budget reductions affecting cities. They shall also monitor funding for Highways and other issues which may have significant fiscal impact on its membership." The amendment was adopted. The MLC Resolution regarding the MLC's 1987 Legislative Policy was passed unanimously. A legislative bill was distributed and Renner discussed S.F. 39 regarding the regulation and management of state mandates on political subdivisions. Renner also handed out materials and gave an update on current legislative issues of interest to the MLC. The possibility of introducing a MLC property tax proposal in response to Governor's Perpich's proposal was discussed. It was decided to wait and see what was introduced and how other organizations respond and how the situation develops before introducing a MLC proposal. Renner distributed and discussed the City of Minneapolis Property Tax Reform Proposal. He commented that Minneapolis hasn't significantly altered their position on local government aids and property tax from last year. A handout regarding the Coalition of Outstate Cities .Legislative Program/Laufenburger Remarks was distributed and briefly discussed. Renner reported that the Coalition has taken a wait-and-see attitude and hasn't planned to initiate a full-blown property tax reform proposal. Jullie gave a report on the meeting held with the Municipal Caucus and the Association of Northern Mayors regarding highway funding and property tax reform. As was indicated by the amendment to the 1987 MLC Resolution, highway funding is an issue that the MLC wants to address, but in the immediate future this involves simply monitoring tine situation, rather than issuing any policy statements. Miller gave a report on the meeting the League of Minnesota Cities held with the other local government groups, stating that at this time these groups appear to be very united, with no divisive issues creating any controversy between them. The MLC Directory was distributed to the Board of Directors with instructions to contact Deb Luebke at 893-6650 with any corrections if necessary. Renner also explained that a separate MLC Directory would be released and hand -delivered to the MLC Legislative Delegation in the next couple of weeks. D.J. Leary reported that he had spoken with the Capitol press corps and informed them that the MLC hasn't taken a position on any issues for this Legislative Session yet. MLC Board of Directors Meeting Minutes January 21, 1987 Page 3 � -UQS A handout regarding the MAOI Election Polling Results was distributed. The next b1LC Board of Directors Meeting was scheduled for Wednesday, April 29 at 5:00 p.m. at the Decathlon Club in Bloomington. The Fourteenth MLC Board of Directors Meeting was adjourned at 6:00 p.m. PLYMOUTH POLICE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT CLASS I I MURDER I RAPE I ROBBERY I ASSAULT I BURGLARY THEFT I AUTO THEFT I ARSON 1 19851_ 0 1 0 1 1 1 15 1 11 1 59 1 3 1 0 1 19861 0 1 0 1 1 1 11 1 28 1 116 1 8 1 2 1 TOTALS 1985 89 1986 166 +86.5% CLASS II MONTH DECEMBER - 1986 Z- `1 Cl,� 1986 146 +10.6% CLASS III FATAL PERSONAL PROPERTY SNOWMOBILE MEDICAL SUICIDE NATURAL ANIMAL i ACCIDENT I INJURY I DAMAGE I ACCIDENT 1 DROWNING I EMERGENCY 1 SUICIDE 1 ATTEMPTS I DEATH 1 BITES I FIRE 1 19851 0 1 15 1 103 1 0 1 0 1 56 1 2 I 2 1 0 1 4 14 1 19861 0 1 13 1 84 I 0 1 0 1 78 1 0 I 2 1 1 1 3 1 23 TOTALS 1985 196 1986 204 + 4.1% CLASS IV ASSIST ANIMAL FALSE LOCK OTHER WARRANT TRAFFIC FIREARM SUSPICION MISSING LOST PUBLIC 1D0MESTICIDETAILIALARMSIPROWLERIOUTS 1AGENCYISERVED (DETAIL IVIOLATIONIINFORMATIONIPERSON IFOUNDINUISANCEI MISC. 1 19851 29 1 72 1 97 1 3 1 124 1 32 1 29 1 185 1 1 1 61 1 2 1 10 1 64 1 97 1 19861 18 1 95 1 104 1 3 1 136 1 42 1 15 1 138 1 2 1 87 1 4 1 11 1 86 1 85 1 TOTALS 1985 806 CRIMINAL OFFENSES CLEARED 1985 27.8% 1986 826 +2.5% 1986 26.9% HAZARDOUS VIOLATIONS 1985 214 1986 335 +56.5% TOTAL NUMBER OF INCIDENTS 1985 1,223 NONHAZARDOUS VIOLATIONS 1985 433 1986 345 -20.3% 1986 1,342 +9.7% FORGERY EMBEZZEL STOLEN WEAP PROSTI SEX GAMB OFFENSES LIQ DISORDERLY I COUNTERFEITIFRAUDI MENT 1PROPERTYIVANDALISMIOFF ITUTIONIOFFINARCILINGIFAM/CHILDID.W.I.1 LAW I CONDUCT I OTHER 1 19851 3 1 6 1 0 1 2 1 27 1 0 1 0 1 2 1 9 1 0 1 0 1 43 1 12 1 5 1 23 1 19861 1 1 3 1 0 1 0 1 42 1 0 1 0 1 6 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 36 1 12 1 5 1 28 1 TOTALS 1985 132 1986 146 +10.6% CLASS III FATAL PERSONAL PROPERTY SNOWMOBILE MEDICAL SUICIDE NATURAL ANIMAL i ACCIDENT I INJURY I DAMAGE I ACCIDENT 1 DROWNING I EMERGENCY 1 SUICIDE 1 ATTEMPTS I DEATH 1 BITES I FIRE 1 19851 0 1 15 1 103 1 0 1 0 1 56 1 2 I 2 1 0 1 4 14 1 19861 0 1 13 1 84 I 0 1 0 1 78 1 0 I 2 1 1 1 3 1 23 TOTALS 1985 196 1986 204 + 4.1% CLASS IV ASSIST ANIMAL FALSE LOCK OTHER WARRANT TRAFFIC FIREARM SUSPICION MISSING LOST PUBLIC 1D0MESTICIDETAILIALARMSIPROWLERIOUTS 1AGENCYISERVED (DETAIL IVIOLATIONIINFORMATIONIPERSON IFOUNDINUISANCEI MISC. 1 19851 29 1 72 1 97 1 3 1 124 1 32 1 29 1 185 1 1 1 61 1 2 1 10 1 64 1 97 1 19861 18 1 95 1 104 1 3 1 136 1 42 1 15 1 138 1 2 1 87 1 4 1 11 1 86 1 85 1 TOTALS 1985 806 CRIMINAL OFFENSES CLEARED 1985 27.8% 1986 826 +2.5% 1986 26.9% HAZARDOUS VIOLATIONS 1985 214 1986 335 +56.5% TOTAL NUMBER OF INCIDENTS 1985 1,223 NONHAZARDOUS VIOLATIONS 1985 433 1986 345 -20.3% 1986 1,342 +9.7% CLASS I MURDER RAPE I ROBBER 1985 0 0 1 6 1986 I 0 4 I 12 TOTALS 1985 1,498 1986 1,546 CLASS II PLYMOUTH POLICE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT ASSAULT BURGLARY THEFT AUTO THEFT ARSON 140 255 1016 74 I 7 178 I 266 I 998 I 83 I 5 +3.2% ,� I MONTH JANUARY - DECEMBER 1986 FORGERY EMBEZZEL STOLEN WEAR PROSTI SEX GAMB OFFENSES LIQ. DISORDERLY i COUNTERFEIT iFRAUDI MENT I PROPERTY I VANDALISM I OFF ITUTIONIOFFINARCILINGIFAM/CHILD ID.W.I.1LAW I CONDUCT OTHER 1985 1 14 1170 1 0 I 7 �_ 447 1 2 1 0 1 251 98 1 0 1 9 1 416 1 48 1 38 I 348 I 1986 I 29 1 109 4 1 2 I 598 1 5 1 0 1 411101 1 1 1 22 1 405 1106 1 66 458 I TOTALS 1985 1,622 1986 1,947 +20.0% CLASS III FATAL I ACCIDENT 1985 1 3 I 1986 I 3 I TOTALS 1985 1986 CLASS IV PERSONAL PROPERTY INJURY I DAMAGE 163 1 735 181 1 902 1,878 2,195 +16.9% SNOWMOBILE MEDICAL SUICIDE NATURAL ANIMAL ACCIDENT I DROWNING I EMERGENCY I SUICIDE I ATTEMPTS I DEATH I BITES I FIRESI 0 1 0 1 681 I 3 11 I 18 1 29 1 235 0 1 0 1 745 I 2 I 35 i 17 50 I 260 ASSIST ANIMAL FALSE LOCK OTHER WARRANT TRAFFIC FIREARM SUSPICION MISSING LOST PUBLIC IDOMESTICIDETAILIALARMSIPROWLERI OUTS IAGENCYISERVED (DETAIL IVIOLATION IINFORMATION IPERSON I FOUND INUISANCE I MISC.1 1985 I 211 1 1433 1094 76 1 1296 L 388 1 337 ( 1496 38 1219 I 20 1208 1 1181 I 1613 _ 1986 i 276 1 1474 1162 1 73 1584 I 450 I 315 i 1974 41 I 1265 I 32 1195 i 1499 I 1135 I TOTALS 1985 10,610 CRIMINAL OFFENSES CLEARED 1985 31.9% 1986 11,475 + 8.2% 1986 32.0% HAZARDOUS VIOLATIONS 1985 4,596 1986 4,753 + 3.4% TOTAL NUMBER OF INCIDENTS 1985 15,608 NONHAZARDOUS VIOLATIONS 1985 6,391 1986 5,377 -15.9% 1986 17,163 +10.0% 2 Z O M: L • L • • • L C i N L N • • N • • N • N • • • L •r W L L L i i L L i L L L L WL! L L17 E L i L iLt7LLr) L LLLLLLLLLL iLLN LLL I- r N • N 1-4 r -t N -4 r--1 LO 1-1 )--1 M )--I M '-1 r1 1-4 .-. — • C N N r W Y Y E W Z t6 tC Ln U a 4-3 o Q Z l0 M L L W F- C)LnWOOLOLANMkoANOn L Nr-.ONctLD LO QNMr4La ONt-I-4 mN O •4r -t n ri r-1 M N La t 1 t F- F - Z Z W W a� a a •r N •r L W Y W O C •--� C �-•• F- N 4 p N N 3 N •� 4-3 (Z W� {.J Y Y Y 4-3N -J W4) 4-) {.J Y U •r •r •r IT IS•r tT IT•r •r r \ U r- r \ •r •r N ,-- -0.0 IT > •r r > •r IT •r > L` IT IT ► IT Q) IT L L IT c LL N (A L Cr L C r- L r- C t/) 'V L LL -0-0 L N N L O LL N a) b ML Ip ICL ICL Ia (v •r IC LL •r •r tC a) d IC L O Z Z m S S U 2 0 m= 2 Z tY m O= of m Z Z m 3 N L N N 00 O L 1p O1 U O O rt r C -W 4- = IC I N 1 4- LL L c I L N W O r Q 4-.) W O L U • O = r-- -0 U LU t6 Z LU tC > O O— L r Z 4-. r U L Q U LU O L L 00 ¢ c 0 +- D •r L L U ITL L 00 in O O >> = Z IT 4-) U L Z r- L t6 O W p Q L •r LD U W O V Lm E F- 11 N d Q cli (Ii F -- -O C) E IT i*-.) >) r- d r S •r •r L • N r L ¢ >) L 4J d N }J •r -0 O L S L r- •r IT y- tT L ++ U S•r Or S•r N U•r NI --!C = (A O L IC IT 4-J IC •r S 4-.) S 4-J C O +J C 41 C!3 U O L c= LM L S 4-3 O C = IT (6 U= •r C I Ln -04-J 0 0\ 4> c /C O •r t9 O C m Ln O M. to >- C= L U L= {-J b 4-.) V Q. 4-) U •r U a LU N Y tC O 41 N O O p N m N d LU tC cn c O L In c w< U C E N L E N IC N S c N L L d O C (V U CJ (V >) E L +-) >, C (V >) L O C >)-C IU A M L ix LU L X: L L r- L = IC r- = L IC = = N b = LU 0) •r = CD CL >- co tndQULs- CLInI3.3U CD 3cUJX:F-w r\ N n 1 1 I 1 � Ln N +3 C U r- O O L U O C OF- uF- d3 U c LUN 3c -i N r L1J O Wr i W 41 r- N r V) = LU >> }) N r 0 L N L Y O L W m GJ +-% •r W td O +•� O +� m 0 p d' N L O L- u U L d N IC 4- = d c 0 r r- LL •r >> -0 O C In 0 dJ L r to W L IC r N N U L IN C O N 3 t Lp U tC U .-r •r M L IT LU E M L i M IT M N L ?• 00 t = •r L r Y L L- CL CL N •r = _ > •r = _ = C = •r 'o = d' Ql d X r• _ •r C = = 1= O N O O L= L i O O= L O •r o ¢ •- t O (v O O L m O O ¢ Lm 7)L) F- Lndl- UmF-f- O Z > IY Q � m '7 Q W U- C) m LL W O LL LL. Ln J L/7 Q 2 J W -::r q*l La LD^r-r-1MM^0000 F- F- W NtTLTMLn Q N N N N N N O Z F- ct to '•-t .--t r-+ r t N 1 Q I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I F- O Q I I 1 1 I I I O .-4 r" r -t • -t --1 )•-t E O N N N N N N N F- -�0. tD 00 C71 ri S U CC Q f S F - Z O X: C L C L L C •r .J= ••r L •t •r L •tt tt • •Lt •L L VISLL W E L E L E W L L L L L f Ln C Ln s Ln Ln L Ln O Ln Ln L L Ln Ln C Ln LO L Ln LC) Ln �--� Ln • Ln • • Ln n LC) ^ • 1�- ^ n rl_ n n r- -4 —4 r, r+ -Ct r+ ri N . • r1 • • N V) V) N (A W W Y Y Y Y U Z Z 10 t0 10 f0 p • D Z N Z CV N N N W L W F— NLnC)CDmmN Ln t F--411-r4N-4rA -4 Wt LO H OOOOOOOOtnOOO OOtn U) CD Q ri r♦ Ln W M O N tD Ln •--1 Tt .-4 et -4 N N Ln r+ r+ r1 V) • r.1 L • Op .0 00 M 1 1 Ln I 1 N F— F— Z Z n W W •4 CL CL r +-) N N Y C +J L C1 V) •r fu •r d •r W W C Y4-) E Y W V)�-0 N V f t •-• �-••� ^ L C •r C O a •"" N +) O F- F- N 3 O •r Z M F- WYYY 7 4-3 i-) 4-J 4-) W 4-J a)+.14J --- Z NY 4.1Y Y }1Y }) 4-)}1 U V) •r V) Q•r •r •r •r U •r r •r •r C)\ C •r •r V) V) •r •r •r •r •r •--� C > cr- C.C.0 A•r » C QICL0 »-0.0 LL- L 10 L r0 O N O a) LL a) •r a) a) c t0 a) M a) LL 10 L a) m O O O 0 3 2 3 U Z Z Z Z O Z CC Z Z N M S Z 3 M 3 Z S Z Z Z N L a ^ r La tD t U a O tD +) Ln m L ct t0 O 00 00 O t0 r1 L a) I Ln I 1 V +) 10 L 41 >1 W W >1 (A L V C +•) W U (0 U U M r rr M >) r N ID C C U •r N p Z Z M 0— —m O N —0 O Z L +.) 4) Q Q O p O a) r •r Q +) C N a) p p ()tr r- ter r -4-J 4-) p V) N a) a) u Z Z U U O O .0 V •r O O b t0 Z •r 1n -0 3 c W W C N O O U Ln 0 0 O D U W p R) •r a) F- F- a) -a C (v c7 C t > > F- r- N Y LL F- H W -C U L) i-) i� U V •C F— a) U Q) r (n C ¢ Q m Ln Ln O L C N (A N W W W Q r CC 04-) 10 +) >. V) m t0 N +) +-) V1 O O m C C S'V 3 -0 a) •r () -0 O -0 >f >-, O N N L L O •r •r O V) a) c O S'o E O N O O +) +) O CU H O +) V t) +.) E E fu O a) •r •r U c z U a) O •r •r 0 •r C L V) Ln N L cn L +.) 3 •r > Ci 3 C C LN d C •r U O a) a) d. a) m C C c Q) L w L C c C 0 S 3 E Y r- ; Ci = a N aJ 3 U C Iy L. >, W 3 — (V E '- 0 0-a •O >> Q L L Cl O Q >) a) O L C C) U U r C) O L N E L CC L O a) r F- •r O a) = a) M L L •r a •r M E O •r L •r L O 0.— •ra- a- CD 0_:2c(DM LSHtnYSF-CO CDC70007 N .4 .0 N 00 1 1 1 i N N Z O O 4-3 F— F- 4 -F- >, fa O G) uj 0 •fir C) ) y >1 4 W N >> 1 •r •r >> >> a) > >> N >> r C) C V •r 4-) Ln W 4-) a) i-) >I +) i-) %1 >f 4-) 4-) +) W }) •r C •r a) L O W Of O (- a) }) O L6 4) +) 00 a) Q) CC a 21 •r 4-1 4-) O 4- Q' CL- 4- 1v 4- (1)4- U a) O U 4- 4- CL 4- m 4-) a) O U (0 CL 10 U m 4- t0 O 4- 4- O b to M r 4) (L) L a) Ln V) N 10 N m L0 a N N NJ•r M- V) a) N W NNW U \ V) Ln V N U v10 a "o"a •� a) C) >1 C Y 4- Y r- J L a) r- L- C) L L L a) a) cm- )r,C -VO-0 3 V C •r ¢ 1.0 CL •r r- •r C Y •r O O O O O Y Y O •r •r C O •r L m O O a) m L •• F— 00 O t O c O •r L O L 0 0 0 •r •r L L t O F—M ccF—JN0o U S O 071 F— Un- UF— OOUF— pF—F—OD M UUF— J U F— r+CL ) -� CL' CC f W J Q F- •r CC CC CC O Q CL O U. O ¢ LL - d LnN W O .- 4 I� M r1 Q N F- W -I*- Ln to tD r•-1 .14, Ln tD 071 O Q F- M Ct 00 r+ r1 r -I r, M F- CC Z F- •-i r•1 M M f-- 00 00 •-•1 . •f -4 •-•i N N N N N M F- 4 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 O O Q 1 I i I 1 I I i I I 1 I I I I I 1 O pM MCV) MMMMM F— LL f p-01 pct Cr¢ 11cr etcPetRd, mr ct �-4-¢ 4*1R F— tD O C1� Q S F - Z O X: c C L L L L LC 1 - L -C C • 1 .— •r•r N NLL L•r • 1 LL ••r•r N • 1 L E E L Ln Ln L L E L 1 L L E E L L i LN I- LLnLnLLn L 1 f LnLnL LL 1 rr Ln O • . • Ln 1 •-•, • • Ln O 1 F- C M N r-1 •4 N M NV M N r♦ 1 1 1 1 1 N 1 n n��i�i� �� N 1 r • 1 N N N N N N Y N 1 10 N( N Y Y Y YY Y r L 1 }J L 1 L W r r r r r r 1 t J L 1 L 1 L U tC 10 10 b w 4-3 1 L N 1 Z A.J 4.J }J +J +J }J O 1 U Ln 1 Ln Q Ln 1 Z N 1 Il - O N N N d N N 1 Q tD O O O w N tD • 1 Z I� 1 Z M Ln Ln -4 -1 O1 1 N L .--1 1 W I 00 F -Nu') OLnMOLOLn LnOLn O 1 1 1 F- -4 r-4 O r♦ -4 00 Ln O Ln to Il_ M I 1 F- 1 1 1 Q Ln r•4 .•4 N --4 ra Y L Z 1 W 1 W •r N N L 1 CL I CL > C1 Y 0- 1 N I N C •r V (A 1 1 16 r a) 1 L 1 L = r m L 1 f 1 E >> r >J L CD- +J ►-� 1 •r F- 1 F - (U (U O LU CL •r +J F- 1 J]C 4J 1 r •r r r\ r •r 1 N }J 1 (T 4- (7f (7f (T r L 1 C •r 1 '� O � '� L •r N 1 O .Q 1 ��•r U •r •r fp L () I N CL' Ln CC m CL Z I N 3 4J 1 CC 4-J •r 4-J •r }J .-J 4.J •r 4-1 +J •r 1 }J +.J •r •FJ •r +J \ 1 L }J Y N iJ Y i•J 4..1 {-) Y {-J 4.J Y I L {.J 4J Y 4-) Y -W N 1 U •r N L •r N •r •r •r N •r •r (n I U •r •r N •r N •r L 1 �L c (UL C L LL C.0L C LL CL c -C (U 1 LL N O ITN 0000 00 N O 1 LL N N O N co 0) 1 LL O L O CJ L. w w (U L O (U L 1 LL W w L w L (U O 1 O Z 3 CC Z 3 Z Z Z 3 Z Z 3 1 O Z Z 3 Z 3 Z CC 1 . 1 1 1 1 N 1 Ln ra 1 .•••� 1 M Ln f L 1 01 r+ I N 1 M L 1 1 c 1 1 1 M --o 1 1 O L 1 L L 1 (U U U 1 U U L L L N C U I L Z 1 Z L r +J +J M N Z 1 m QI C Q 1 Q U r_ -i 0 1 G >J•r N Z 1 Z U L r r v r Z 1 10 c E L L 1 L V L L O O O L 1 C C L •r O F- 1 F- c L Ln 0 0 0 0 r O F- t L 10 10 L M F- 1 F- RS aJ •r •r L L O L F- 1 = r (U (v (T m Q 1 Q N L •r N N C C U U O V Q 1 r L (U J r c 1 L <U 2 7 r>> Ln N L Ln 1 U 10 L r 10 1 (U L O r '7 7 V N 1 L 7 F- N d E I r y.J (T 2 •r 3 Ln 4-.J "0 O O c 2LL O (U 0 0 1 4-) -0 tTc-0 N 1 O J O >> +J +J 0 .r •C O O I N C Q C (v C N 1 L L ty +J 0 0 3> O U 3 1 •r 10 U •r L M (U CL U (U +J C (U O o C L O Ln C 1 CL E X: c c 1 N U N L N E E N U 3 0) 1 = •r L>- L- O (U IC E c >> >-, (U L Y .0 CD (U 1 O 4.J +J 10 •r +J N 1 = L W L O O r r L •r M O L 1 CC Cl -4 3 (U L 0) O i LD CL- Cl- Q7LnCl. a-CDCCIOU C7 I Q CD-4ZJIL) MCO 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � N 1 1 4-J 1 00 1 Cil N 1 1 1 1 1 >> 1 1 1 1 1 N (U d 4J N 1 L L N I Ln N U U Z 1 N V N U Z I Z lU C r •r O 1 E &j L 4.J O 1 O N m N 10 1 0-4 >>•r 0- >> O O >> F- I r 3 G. 3 I 4-J }J N }J CL CL -IJ Q 1 t r Q Q (U N (U (U (U >> F- 1 O 'C lU F- 1 F - (U 4- = Cr-' 4- (U 0J 4- >> +J >> Z 1 L O >> 2 >> O Z 1 Z N 10 17 b L L 10 }J N +J L 1 CL O +J 41 O L 1 L LN >> N +J 4J N O 4- N N I L (U >> (v L N 1 N L r U 4- 10 4- L 1 O L 4- {.J 4- L L I L Q lU M C (U 4- 4- (U 10 Ln 10 CL' 1 r O m •r b O = I CC r C W r O O r (n N CL 1 r L Ln C N .a CL 1 a- -0 U -r (T U V "a I U C L O L }J 1 •-'� r >> E L >> (U (U >> (U r (U L 1 (y M(U E (U (714- 1 CL •r V•r a Urr V -V --.-v O I CL >.- -v Y•r N 1 O L •r L E •r O O •r •r L •r O 1 tD O O (U •r O •r (U L F - UmULmCCCCm mum F- I 00 F -I-) CcUCOZF- I N • 1 Cn L 1 J F - g 1 L ^7 I O 1 Z 1 F- CL 1 O CC 1 O I 7 O I I 1 Z V) 1 N 1 O L M Ln O I-- m Q I F- L 00 ct -ct Ln Ln tD Q 1 F- r~ r-1 r•4 Ln tO tO M r♦ -4 N N N F- 1 Z F- tO -4 N N N N Q I I 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 O I O Q I ( 1 1 1 I 1 O 1 ►-� O Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln LO Ln Ln Ln F- 1 m 0 to tD WD tD tD tD tD F- 1 N C, N 1 . 1 L• L • L- L L- 1 • N 1 N O N t W L 1 W L L 1 W O L O L- t t f t L 1 L .L -C F- N 1 rr F- •-t M 1 1 F- r+ it' rt Ln rt 1 1 t 1 t I t 1 t N I N 1 Y W1 W Y 1 W r U • 1 U r 1 U b N Z N 1 Z to 1 Z 4-) L Q L 1 Q +) N 1 Q t p t 1 p L 1 D LO Z 1 Z CT 5 1 Z Ln W O LC) 1 W O 1 W F- -C I F- O L2) N LO C> 1 F-L[) OONO r, Q 1 1 4 •-t LC1 'Cf 1 Q M N e•-t -4 N 1 F- Z W 1 Z I W G. 1 W I d Cn 1 d t N 1 Ln I WI W 1 W 1 r r f 1 1 O O ^ t ^ 1 ^ In 3 � 1 tZ' y 1 +> 1 +-) 4-) to +3 W y 1 W 4-) -he 1 W 4.+d-3Ln-le +) U •r 1 U •r •r 1 U •r •r \ •r •r �--� i ►-� > LL. N 1 LL N C 1 LL_ N (A L C N L.L. a) 1 LL_ d rt 1 LL. O O to to O OZ 1 C) 1 C) CIO 1 i 1 t t I O I O m j Lf) 1 ^ M I Lo 1 L 1 1 1 1 1 1 • 1 1 t� W LA 1 • 4 W 1U U 1 U N U 1 ^v Z Z 1 O •r Z 1 � .0 Q D I N D I i(\J•r Q Z Z I Q r Z 1 t1J W W f O W I U O F- F- 1 00 F- 1 r i F- I -u-C F- 1 4- O L U) Q 4 Q 1 c U Q t rw O-D p 1 0V) i OOt N S 1 U t -)- O V 4-)- t QJ LN N C -c 41 I Q) r / U U to tU cn 1 LT to I N •r -0 W E r O O r i r N 1 0 0 RJ 3 tY 1 CC C 1 00- 3 i-) O •p 1 = 4-)-o t = 3 b tU N W O C 1 O N- 1 O Y a) (v >> U CC •r 1 = 0 0 1 = t0 L L b� c9 3 1 C'3 3 o` t CD C) :z LD 3 Z t t 1 1 1 � rt I LLQ 1 1 1 I t t 1 1 t 1 1 N 1 Ln 1 Z Z 1 Z 1 O IO O �r I r t Q I t Q I O Q LF- L- !- 4-) Z 1 4--)Z 1 to O Z two W 1 to WI N U >> W 3 Ln 1 3 C N 1 tU c 4.J Ln W 1 O W 1 r N O O W 1 'U.- 1 O •r t&-- d' O d 1 04--$ d t L r 4-) to t1 O 1 O rt t +-) to t0 N t 1 t U 1 t0 •r U L 1 L 1 d+� �r O 1 O- 1 c t6 1 -0 W 1 r N W C •• Ut 1 Ut 1 cU 0'V O M 1 ► Q1 O) 1 —0-- L t7) N W d•r I d •r O •• 1 Cl- t N O O L m O tU 1 O tL L F- 1 C: O U N O L tv i F-Z •• 1 F-ZO c%1 I W HNF-MCL Uj r 1 O 1 m J 1 F- C7 1 f d 1 N = I W LLJ Y 7 I Q I F- N J 1 C7 t d O 1 O 1 W •7 O 1 Q O t V) LL. 1 LL 1 LL- 1 i N 1 Lo 1 N 2 J I S J 1 S J F- W O Q I F- W Lo r� Q 1 F- W t\ N l0 O Q Z F- . I F- 1 Z F- N N F- 1 Z F- Lo • 4 N N N F- O Q I O I O Q I 1 O t O Q I 1 1 1 1 O t0 r%_ F- 1 m O 00 00 F- 1 i I= On ON 4m m m F- L C L C L C L C C C L •r r L •r t •r •r •r WE In E E L L L L E E E f to r\ Ln U) L L L L �--� • O • O • O • Ln O O F- .--� M r♦ M r -I M N r-1 r4 14 •-•I ct M M N N N N (A W Y Y Y Y Y U r r r r r Z R'f rt) ICS IO IO Q 4-) 4-) 4-) 4-3 4-) 4-J i-) 4-) 4•) 4-J 4J Z C V N N N N W .�..�� H LL F - LnLnNmOOLnOOOOO C) Ln Q MNr4 r4MNOw0D00-4 Lnr\ ICS 0 N C Y Y •r o 4-) i-) 4J 4-) 4-) 4J Y 4--) 4-J i-) 4-) 4•) 4-J 4J N fO •r •r •r •r •r •r C 0) aL� L LL 0.- N N (A N N N L n C) C) O C) aJ C) V) 3\ Z Z Z Z Z Z F-LnLn LO C)CDa 0LnLOLnOONO.--4Q 00 E o ICS ea N IO E to to Q' 4-) 4-) U 4) 4) 4-> •r •r •r •r 4J •r •r W 4) 4-) C 4J �3 4J Y Y Y Y 4•) Y Y U •r •r C) •r •r •r N N N N •r N N ►•-� •D L L� L L L C C C G L C G LL- N N O L N N N co O 00 00 LL- C) C) rp m a) a) a) L L L L C) L L- C) O Z Z J m Z Z =:W 3 3 3 Z 3 3 O O Y N >> ov ou oa)nG O N Q O Ln r- o 0) r L O L O L RS a) C U N d S U N O U C CJ L Ln r N C N r L N 16 L fl7 r 4-) N m a) r t.) f F- a O S O O L U O S O C O O U O C) E o •r -0 O O C"0 3 41 Ln U L •r r- > 4J 0 3 0 •r L- c C a) L) O L C L C) O C N C ILS a) N r- r• M M U (A 3 C) •r L r - O C) C L L CLr O L. C Y C) "a (a a) = L =-- O X •r r- •r O M L ICS C) L cm 0L/)C'3U W 01C9mcnOCD= -i Ln C7) CT G C •C •C •r •r L rt) Cr W m 0 v O T qtj- -4 1 H Z W a N W V) N Z O H Q Z W Lr) W z CL LY W m O L) 0 z 0 LL - G G c C L c •r • • •r N •r • •r •r W L E L L L E L L L L L L E L E L Ln E i L L -a-CL L L -C L L L L N •-• O Ln Ln Ln • O I M rl .-4 r4 ct r4 q*- r4 q*- M rl M 0 N W Y Y U r r Z to eo Q to u 4-+ b a 4J �- 4) H'• 4J 4 4J 4-3 4J U.j C 3 a) a) N (L) a) N r a) r 4- 4- 4- 4- -4- 4 -4- F-LnLn LO C)CDa 0LnLOLnOONO.--4Q 00 E o ICS ea N IO E to to 41 L O L O LN LN Ln Ln Ln N C) 4•) U 4•) O a) •r 4- /a L rC .0 C C c c C C LL- (A V) C L/) L/) C (A LA N O N N •r N C r U N N C .0 () a) r- r- 3 3 3 3 3 3 U O W O L O O O O 4) 00 O L L O LTrr r-4-rr a •r L>> 3 L •r r r- r r C) r- r O L U o o b u C) IC ICS m ICS L ICS b F--UCnF-H JLnZSSSSF--SS C) Cr W m 0 v O T qtj- -4 1 H Z W a N W V) N Z O H Q Z W Lr) W z CL LY W m O L) 0 z 0 LL - G G c C L c •r • • •r N •r • •r •r W L E L L L E L L L L L L E L E L Ln E i L L -a-CL L L -C L L L L N •-• O Ln Ln Ln • O I M rl .-4 r4 ct r4 q*- r4 q*- M rl M 1 1 F -- Z W Cl Ln W f H .-4 M 1 1 W U Z Q Z W f -- H Q O N W m W O z z O LL N 1 • N S MtC ONr-000�0 MMC) OO -J I S .-4 NMM c-gd-m m m CD CD J 1- W )•4 .4 .-4 N N N N N N N N M M M Q 1 1 W ct !t ct Ln Ln tO .-4 .4 .-4 ri F- O Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 Q r 4 rt .--1 •-4 r4 P4 r4 . •--I .-4 • 4 rl r4 •-4 r♦ .-4 r 4 .-+ O X: im r4 .-4 —1-4 rt .-4 r+ r•4 e-4 —4 rt •-4 .-4 r4 H 1 2: M rl rl -4 r4 r• .-4 )-4 .-4 r4 P4 rl ••4 r4 .•4 r4 .•4 r4 .•4 � 0 N W Y Y U r r Z to eo Q 4-) 4-+ O O O O •r Z N N U.j (n3 3 Q 33\ •r 1- F-LnLn LO C)CDa 0LnLOLnOONO.--4Q 00 Q tO N r4 W M N 1-4 1-1 Ln N tO N •-4 O)--1 Z N tO \ 4-) I" •-4 1 1 F -- Z W Cl Ln W f H .-4 M 1 1 W U Z Q Z W f -- H Q O N W m W O z z O LL N 1 • N S MtC ONr-000�0 MMC) OO -J I S .-4 NMM c-gd-m m m CD CD J 1- W )•4 .4 .-4 N N N N N N N N M M M Q 1 1 W ct !t ct Ln Ln tO .-4 .4 .-4 ri F- O Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 Q r 4 rt .--1 •-4 r4 P4 r4 . •--I .-4 • 4 rl r4 •-4 r♦ .-4 r 4 .-+ O X: im r4 .-4 —1-4 rt .-4 r+ r•4 e-4 —4 rt •-4 .-4 r4 H 1 2: M rl rl -4 r4 r• .-4 )-4 .-4 r4 P4 rl ••4 r4 .•4 r4 .•4 r4 .•4 � C C •r •r O •r •r ICS Y Y N Y Y E C N N L (I) N-0 m c c a)ccc E O O O O •r (n3 3 Q 33\ •r z 41 41 4-) 4-) 4-) 4) 4) •r 4J 4) a 4J C \ 4-) W 4•J 4J Y 4-) 4.J Y 4-) 4-) 4-3 ,C }) 4) •r 4J b C L 4-) U •r •r •r •r •r .r.- •r •r N •r •r r •r E O a) •r ► -0 M >.0L >LLLT C LL`rL'o N -W -0 LL- (A V) C L/) L/) C (A LA N O N N •r N C r U N LL- O a) (a a) (v LC (v C) C) L (V C) L a) •r (U () a) C) Z Z= Z Z= Z Z Z 3 Z Z C1 Z J Z m Z N (V N N 4-) (A a) — IC1 4J C) L C) C L r M O O E 4-) C) •r Y U O L C •r a) tO (A Lf) a F-- otS ICS L N u u v O OWN Cd U 4-)^ O L r- m N O N tO L N N O r• M- r (V LL- r >)— 4J (V r 4- 0 E L O C O m to VN O L C O W O O•r Q) o r- O r—O O O W L 4-) - N E L O O C) L u U N C U S •r u O L O N u U c i LnY a) Nm LN L M -a C: Ln m m L U U U 4-) Ur•r NU NJ 3 0 3 M O LN LN LN •r L- -0 4J 41 N 3 L O C L O S a• O O C O C •r 4•) •r O 4) O Q) v O o IO O 16 > U= > L O 3 o c o 4i c 3 u u u o CL L •r O L 4.) O C O •r o C) M C V) •r N L S U r- E U N E N Y; C; N •r C) L 7 O L-0 >> L E >) C) Q Y L x C"o C) L a) L L i=-- O r •r L r L 1- M O ICS O C L> 0 0 CM co CL CL co -Cc a LDM.COXON►-4CDu UN E 16 L L O L O CL 4-) N >> O O >) >> _ 4-3 (A 4.J 4-3 C L •r 4) 4..) d CV Y (v •r O m 4-) a) () u = r 4- u 4- L •r C >) 4- 4 -- -m m L a) ICS = 4-j O C) a) 41 m LC a) LA u L N u m Z > N O N N N O 16 4-) 4-) U a) u a) O 4- O Cl m to r M\ r CN O >> L C M r- r- .0 0 - Iv 3 >> rt -0 m a Q cn ra m Q 4- ep C L C r• W Ln C C O r U o a) O O •r a) O O r- O )-+ N E CT N RS 0) 41 Err• (A (A L r- C) •r L O a L •r L L 4) O N •r •r •r L L Q •r r• ICS O L O () L O a) C) L O L L L a) C) O L O 7 O u U LL- a. CY O 7 U U U a. CL F-- LU H LN W m X: W O Z 1 1 F -- Z W Cl Ln W f H .-4 M 1 1 W U Z Q Z W f -- H Q O N W m W O z z O LL N 1 • N S MtC ONr-000�0 MMC) OO -J I S .-4 NMM c-gd-m m m CD CD J 1- W )•4 .4 .-4 N N N N N N N N M M M Q 1 1 W ct !t ct Ln Ln tO .-4 .4 .-4 ri F- O Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 Q r 4 rt .--1 •-4 r4 P4 r4 . •--I .-4 • 4 rl r4 •-4 r♦ .-4 r 4 .-+ O X: im r4 .-4 —1-4 rt .-4 r+ r•4 e-4 —4 rt •-4 .-4 r4 H 1 2: M rl rl -4 r4 r• .-4 )-4 .-4 r4 P4 rl ••4 r4 .•4 r4 .•4 r4 .•4 � C C C 1 •r •r •r • 1 W L E L E L E L 1 1 1 1 1 N 1 N L • 1 L L L N L 1 O W Y L 1 U r Z R) Ln 1 1 ^ • 00 Q 41 UJ HOOLO C)LnOqd- 1 1 1 1 QMU*)t0U)rtC)ri F• 1 H �' W I W W CL 1 n- d N I N N 1 W 1 W W C 1 tp 1 E 1 •p 1 � C 1 In r 1 v J 1 CC 4J 4-3 •r 4-) 4-) \ 1 Y L W 4J4-3Y 4-�4)00 1 (, •r •r N •r •r •r 0) 1 O ► L L CLL > Y 1 00 LL N N O N N C V 4Q� 1 N ri LL- CJ y L CJ (v m a) N 1 N lD OZZ3 ZZSCC ct 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 W 1 W W U 1 U U N Z 1 z Z Q Q (D L L p 1 p p r 4-3 4J L Z 1 Z Z L LO Ln O W 1 W W L U �• � r- F- 1 h-- F- OF- •r S u O O N 1 •r O O 4� 1 r L L N 1 L• O U D •r 1 •� a (n (n E 1 •r 1 4-) >) 41 01 4-) 1 N 4-) C C G 1 m C m M O N N 1 W 0 J J 4-) 4� I to U E E 4-) 0 0 1 N Ln 41 •r •r O U V 1 kO CL eo • L L OV) !n CO I Cn Cr O >1 L L A 1 1 1 1 Q� f0 d •r •r r O O 1 1 1 1/ ) 1 N cm CL 0- G- U U N 1 Z O 1 1 Z O Z O Q 1 Q Q F- 0 y.) Z 1 Z Z L C W 1 W W NI cn N d L E W 1 W W M }) r CL 1 d U N O / 4-) S W N 1 C � 1 � O 1 41 C- N N N a V 4-) O O w COD 1 L eo L L rt7 O 1 � CL 4 Q Ina `FC m C r U W O to to U to 1 ►-• O O O •r 4-) CL 3 L X X— C O W 1 O M L) N O O to O m 1 LL- cr- H J In (n to G- In F- f 1 N W W I J to m U I Q J X:p W 1 O F- U 1 H O W CC 1 LM 1 I 1 Z Q �n 1 O W S ONLOCO J to f- W a* .--4 00 Z F- 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 H 1 >< LLJ C S O Q N N N (V N N N O I Z -4 f p -4 -4 r + . 1 r4 -4 •--4 ►- I (n O `76,� 1986 Year End OFFICER TOPICS NUMBER Nesbitt Child Safety 12 Child Safety (Assist) 2 Neighborhood Watch 7 Police & Society 6 Sexual Child Abuse 8 Bicycle Safety 4 Tours 3 Tours (Assist) 5 Police Careers 2 Bank Security 2 School Patrol 5 Emergency Response 1 Halloween Safety (Assist) 10 Theft 1 Theft (Assist) 1 Residential Security 4 Retail Security 1 Community Helpers 2 Juvenile Problems 1 Explorers 1 Personal Protection 2 Police Safety 1 Crime Watch 1 Say No To Drugs 1 TOTALS 63 Talks 18 Assists WRONSKI Halloween Safety 10 Bicycle Safety 8 Bicycle Safety (Assist) 1 Child Safety 2 Baby Sitting Safety 1 Tours 6 Sexual Child Abuse 1 Sexual Child Abuse (Assist) 5 Community Helpers (Assist) 2 School Patrol (Assist) 2 Personal Safety (Assist) 1 TOTALS Talks 13 Assists CARLQUIST Town Meeting 4 Crime Funds 1 TOTALS 5 Talks OFFICER TOPICS NUMBER ROGERS Criminal Justice 2 Theft 1 TOTAL 3 Talks SABA Child Safety 2 Tour (Assist) 1 2 Talks 1 Assist RIDGLEY Police & Society (Assist) 4 Sexual Assault 1 Police Careers 2 Child Safety (Assist) 1 Juveniles/Law 3 TOTALS —T- Talks 5 Assists HANVIK Drug Education 18 Police & Society (Assist) 2 Checks 1 Santa Anonymous 1 TOTALS 20 Talks 2 Assists UHLIG Bike Safety 1 Child Safety (Assist) 1 Juvenile Problems 1 Tours 1 Runaways 6 TOTALS 9 Talks 1 Assist BARG Tour 8 Bike Safety (Assist) 2 TOTALS 8 Talks 2 Assists PHILLIPS Tour 1 Bike Safety (Assist) 3 TOTALS 1 Talks 3 Assists LAURENCE Tour 1 TOTALS —T Talk BECKER Tour 2 Tour (Assist) 4 Bike Safety (Assist) 1 TOTALS 2 Talks 5 Assists PATROL OFFICER TOPICS NUMBER LINDMAN Tour (Assist) 5 Role of Police 1 1 Talk 5 Assists Nelson Tour (Assist) 1 Jail & Bail 1 1 Talk 1 Assist BEVINS Tour 1 1 Talk DIGATONO Tour (Assist) 1 --T Assist ANDERSON Child Safety (Assist) 2 1 Assists NOTE: THIS RECORD DOES NOT INCLUDE THE PRESENTATIONS GIVEN BY PATROL OFFICERS TO THE EXPLORER POST. FOREMAN, J.LARSON, HERMAN, WARD, AND BEVINS ARE KN WN TO HAVE PARTICIPATED IN THEIR TRAINING. =- --10, MAJOR PRESENTATIONS 1986 Neighborhood Watch//Security • 12 Child Safety/Abuse 25 Tours 20 Bank Security 2 Halloween Safety 10 Bicycle Safety 13 Police & Society 14 Drug Education 19 Juvenile Problems 11 PLYMOUTH FIRE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT TYPE OF REPORTED INCIDENTS BY TIME OF DAY MONTH DECEMBER - 1986 0001 0401 0801 1201 1601 2001 CONFIRMED FALSE PERMITS ESTIMATED 0400 1 OR00 1 1200 1 1600 1 2000 1 2400 I CALLS I ALARMS I TOTAL I ISSUED I LOSS I PRIVATE DWELLINGS I 2_ I I I 2 I 5 1 2 I 9 I 2 I 11 1 - 1 $13,900 APARTMENTS. 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 3 I R I 1 1 8 I 9 I 17 I -- 1 -- I HOTELS AND MOTELS I ( I 1 I I I I 0 I 1 I 1 ALL OTHER RESIDENTIAL I I I i I I I 0 I 0 1 0 PUBLIC ASSEMBLY 1 I I 1 I I I 0 1 0 I 0 SCHOOLS AND COLLEGES I I I I 1 ( I 0 1 0 I 0 HEALTH CARE INSTITUTIONS I I I I I I I 0 1 0 1 0 PENAL INSTITUTIONS I I I I 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 I 2 STORES AND OFFICES I I I 2 I I ( I 1 I 1 I 2 INDUSTRY, MFG. I i 1 1 I 2 I 1 I, 1 1 0 I 5 I 5 STORAGE IN STRUCTURES I I 1 1 I 1 1 I I 2 I 0 I 2 I __ I 1,100 SPECIAL STRUCTURES I I I I I I I 0 I 0 I 0 FIRES OUTSIDE OF STRUCTURES 1 I I I I I I 0 I 0 I 0 FIRES IN HIGHWAY VEHICLES I I 2 I 2 I I I 1 I 2 I 3 1 5 1 -- I 3,700 1 FIRES IN OTHER VEHICLES I I i I I I I 0 i 0 I 0 FIRES IN BRUSH, CRASS I I I I 1 I I I 1 I 0 I 1 FIRES IN RUBBISH, DUMPSTERS I I i I I I I 0 I 0 I 0( ALL OTHER FIRES I I I I I 1 I 0 1 0 1 0 MEDICAL AID RESPONSES I I I I I i I 0 I 0 1 0 "MALICIOUS FALSE ALARMS I I I I I I I O I 0 1 O MUTUAL AID OR ASSISTANCE 1 I I 1 I I I 0 I 0 I 0 ALL OTHER RESPONSES I I I 1 1 2 1 I I 2 I 1 I 3 TOTALS 1 3 1 5 1 9 1 12 1 15 1 5 1 26 1 23 1 49 1 -- 1 $18,700 1 "INCLUDED IN FALSE ALARMS TOTALS DECEMBER 1985 CONFIRMED CALLS 13 FALSE ALARMS 23 TOTAL CALLS 36 ESTIMATED LOSS $29,50(1 PLYMOUTH FIRE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT TYPE OF REPORTED INCIDENTS BY TIME OF DAY MONTHLY JANUARY - DECEMBER 1986 *INCLUDED IN FALSE ALARM TOTALS JANUARY - DECEMBER 1985 CONFIRMED CALLS 265 FALSE ALARMS 293 TOTAL CALLS 558 ESTIMATED LUSS $364,525 0001 0400 1 0401 0800 0801 1 1200 i 1201 1600 1 1601 2000 2001 2400 CONFIRMED 1 CALLS FALSE ALARMS N­UnER OF PERMITS TOTAL I ISSUED ( ESTIMATED LOSS 1 PRIVATE DWELLINGS 1 5 7 1 20 1 25 1 35 18 1 71 1 39 1 110 - - I $496,9001 APARTMENTS I 25 I 33 I 30 1 44 1 50 1 39 1 34 187 1 221 1 l 4,5001 AND MOTELS I 2 I 1 1 1 2 4 1 1 1 0 I 10 1 10 _HOTELS ALL OTHER RESIDENTIAL 1 I i 2 1 1 1 0 1 3 1 3 PUBLIC ASSEMBLY 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 3( 1 1 7 2 1 9 SCHOOLS AND COLLEGES 1 1 3 1 4 1 5 1 i 1 1 5 1 9 1 14 i - 1 2001 HEALTH CARE INSTITUTIONS 1 1 3 1 8 1 10 1 5 4 5 26 31 1 1 1 1,1501 PENAL INSTITUTIONS 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 -- 1 1001 AND OFFICES 2 2 1 11 1 4 8 1 2 4 1 25 1 29 1 -- - -1 _STORES INDUSTRY, MFG STORAGE IN STRUCTURES 1 1 7 1 1 1 21 1 16 1 2 12 1 5 1 14 5 1 47 0 61 - - 5 I 42,750 47,701 SPECIAL STRUCTURES 1 1 1 � 2 0 2 -1 FIRES OUTSIDE OF STRUCTURES 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 -- I - -1 FIRES IN HIGHWAY VEHICLES 1 4 7 12 1 12 8 4 33 14 47 1 - - 1 48,010 IN OTHER VEHICLES I I 1 1 1 1 1 0 l -- 1,0001 _FIRES IN BRUSH, GRASS I 1 1 2 1 1 1 8 15 I 3 1 27 1 3 30 _FIRES IN RUBBISH, DUMPSTERS I 1 1 1 1 1 4 I I 6 0 I 6 _FIRES ALL OTHER FIRES 1 I 1 3 6 10 0 10 1 -- 1 1,0001 MEDICAL AID RESPONSES I l 1 1 4 1 7 1 0 7 *MALICIOUS FALSE ALARMS ( I I 0 0 I 0 MUTUAL AID OR ASSISTANCE 1 1 1 1 l 2 0 2 -- -� ALL OTHER RESPONSES TOTALS t 2 1 47 1 5 1 73 1 8 1 120 1 8 1 146 1 8 1 162 1 8 194 1 29 264 10 1 378 39 642 2 1 $643,3101 *INCLUDED IN FALSE ALARM TOTALS JANUARY - DECEMBER 1985 CONFIRMED CALLS 265 FALSE ALARMS 293 TOTAL CALLS 558 ESTIMATED LUSS $364,525 CITY OF PLYMOUTH 3400 PLYMOUTH BLVD., PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447 TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800 MEMO DATE: January 23, 1987 TO: James G. Willis, City Manager FROM: Scott L. Hovet, City Assessor and Staff 3VA SUBJECT 1987 Payable Tax and Mill Bates Comparisons The 1987 mill rates have just been released by Hennepin County. Based on these new rates for payable tax year 1987 we have updated our comparison charts. (see attached) Some of these include the 1983-1987 mill rate comparison sheet, city taxes on typical Plymouth homes, distribution of the tax dollar, and a comparison between 1986 + 1987 taxes. To summarize, tax year 1987 is a good year for most taxpayers. The total mill rate for each school district is down between 1% and 3.5%, and the dollars out of pocket for most residential homesteads have decreased between 2% and 6%. This decrease is due to the state's reduced assessed value calculations, plus the fact market values remained at approximately the same level for both 1985 and 1986. Another interesting note is our contribution percentage to the Fiscal Disparities pool from commercial and industrial properties went down from 31.6% to 30.2%. cc: Dale Hahn Frank Boyles #270/HOPKINS School 45.475 MILL RATE COMPARISON 47.152 44.108* County 28.451 Payable 1983 - 1987 29.688 29.356 city 13.134 City of Plymouth 15.469 16.048 Misc. 5.106 #284/WAYZATA 5.181 5.878 5.459 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 School 42.982 47.631 46.507 51.348 49.883* County 28.451 29.689 29.262 29.688 29.356 City 13.134 14.877 14.538 15.469 16.048 Misc. 5.106 5.318 5.181 5.878 5.459 Voc. Sch. 1.119 1.446 1.490 1.535 1.421 Total 90.792 98.961 96.978 103.918 102.167 *Includes 6.370 mills from referendum #281/ROBBINSDALE School 52.901 58.326 56.100 59.450 56.932* County 28.451 29.689 29.262 29.688 29.356 City 13.134 14.877 14.538 15.469 16.048 Misc. 5.106 5.318 5.181 5.878 5.459 Voc. Sch. 1.119 1.446 1.490 1.535 1.421 Total 100.711 109.656 106.571 112.020 109.216 *Includes 8.500 mills from referendum #279/OSSEO School 46.035 54.909 51.199 54.345 55.783* County 28.451 29.689 29.262 29.688 29.356 City 13.134 14.877 14.538 15.469 16.048 Misc. 5.106 5.318 5.181 5.878 5.459 Voc. Sch. 1.119 1.446 1.490 1.535 1.421 Total 93.845 106.239 101.670 106.915 108.067 *Includes 6.000 mills from referendum #270/HOPKINS School 45.475 45.023 42.567 47.152 44.108* County 28.451 29.689 29.262 29.688 29.356 city 13.134 14.877 14.538 15.469 16.048 Misc. 5.106 5.318 5.181 5.878 5.459 Voc. Sch. 1.119 1.446 1.490 1.535 1.421 Total 93.285 96.353 93.038 99.722 96.392 *Includes 8.500 mill from referendum(s) Wtrshed Dist #3 .086 .281 .061 .089 .133 Sewer Dist #1- #2- #3- #4 Included in City Mill Rate (1.000 mills) CITY OF PL_YMCK)TH 10137 D..'..YARI r• T'AWPI4 19;16 WAYZAC'I'F, O:SSEO HOPIC): Nts CST T.MAIE'. I:) f)):ST. 4204 DIST. #213] DIS.1. 4:279 D3:5T. 4270 MARI<rll 'i[l...l., RATE::: 1.02.11,7 M]:LA_ RAPE: 1.09. 2 1. 6 HILL RATF'::10£3.067 MILLRATE:: 9.6.392 Vr.d_UhC TAX TAY TAX TAX TAX TAX TAX TAX •:Dfff,: SI I::: AD NON -1 )MST I-l0MI:S'l EAE) NON-HMST Hr)MESTE..AD NON-•HMST' HOMESTEAD NUN -HMS an, (wo all '1.:i 226 756 200 675 30,000 25tl 050 271 917 26B 900 239 810 zi , UO(i 296 1,001. 317 1,07() 31.:]1 1059 279 945 40,000 338 1..144 362 1,223 3513 1,210 319 1,080 -15,000 3B1 1,287 407 1.376 403 1,362 359 1,215 `x0,000 423 1,430 452 1,529 447 1,513 399 1,349 55,000 465 1.573 497 1,682 492 1,664 439 1.484 60,000 508 1,%16 543 1,035 53'7 1,[:)16 479 1,619 e'.5, 000 530 3_135- 1359 500 1 , 9flFJ 582 1.967 519 1,754 _._.._._.._......._........ 70,000 ......._..' - --- f,46 2.002 701 2,141. 716 2.118 610 1,889 7!1, 000 709 P. , 144, 8134 2,294 C167 2.269 745 2,024 00,000 9:32 2,289 1,03% ,2.A-116 LOSE:) 2,421 890 21159 ITIS , 000 1,075 2 . 4i3i? 1 . 109 21.5179 1. , 170 2.572 1.015 2,294 _-'70,000 1,219 2.575 1.,342 c^^:..752 1.,32]. 2,723 1,150 2,429 95,000 1,}362 z?,7113 3.,495 2,905 1,472 2,075 11284 ------------------- 2,564 100,000 1,50.', 2,661 1,640 'x3,050 1,623 3,026 I,419 2.699 105,000 1,6AF.1 3,004 1.,801 3,211 1.,775 3,177 1.554 2,834 110,000 1,791 3,147 1.,954 3,364 1.926 3,328 1,689 2,969 115.000 1,934 3,290 2,107 3,517 2,077 3,480 1,824 3,104 ].20, 000 2.,07'7 3,493 2,260 3,670 2,229 3,631 1,959 3.239 1.25,000 2,220 3,571, 21413 s' Bea 2,380 3.702 2.094 3,374 11710,000 2,x63 3,719 2,566 3,9'75 2,531 3,934 2,229 3,509 1:=15 . OU O P 1506 3,862 2, 7113 Z4,128 2,682 4,085 2 .364 3, 644 1.40.000 ^_.649 4,00:1 2,071 AIZF..13. 2.1334 4,23 e, 2.499 3.7719 14:1,000 2.792 4.140 3, 0rr^_4 4,434 2,985 4,808 2,634 3.914 1:10,000 2,935 4,291 3,177 4,5F37 3,134, 4,539 2,769 4,0413 155.000 3.078 4,434 3.330 A, 74 3,288 4,690 2,904 4,163 ........... 160.000 3,221 4,57'7 3,483 4,893 3,439 41841 3,039 4,318 1.!.,5,000 3,364 4,720 3,6:)6 5.046 3,590 4,993 3,174 4,453 170,000 -------------........ 3,507 4,863 ----------------------------------------- 3,709 5,199 3,742 5,144 3.309 4,58(3 175,000 3,650 5,006 3,942 51352 3,893 5,295 3,444 4,723 1.90, 000 ].. 3,793 5,149 4.095 5,504 4,044 5,447 3,579 4,858 ].1:35,000 3,9:3.6 5,292 4,247 :x,657 4,195 5.598 3,714 4,993 I,'U,000 1. 4,079 5.435 4,400 5,133.0 4,347 5,749 3,849 5,128 19:1,000_...... 4,222 5,578 4,553 5,9$13 4,491.7 5,900 3,983 5,263 .... ... _......_.._..--.._.._..»----------._.._...._-- 200,000 4,345 5,721 -- 4,706 ___ - 6,116 4,649 6.052 4.118 5,398 225.000 5,080 6,4__17 5,471. 6.001 ._______-- 5.406 _---...__.__:_.______.__ 61000 4,793 .__-_--..---------_._- 6,073 _..._._._..._..._.._..._.._.__..._._._..---._..__.______......___._._._.__...._ 2:.>O,000 5,796 7,152 6,23`'.1 7,645 6,162 7,565 5,460 6,747 275,000 6.511 7,867 7,000 8.410 6.919 8,321 6,143 7,4212 ._.._......._... _. __ .. 300,000 _ _ 7,226 _ $.1,582 7,764 1 9,174 7,675 9,078 $.,,817 B.097 350,000 13,656 40,012 9,293 .10,703 9,1813 3.0,591 0,167 9,4.16 T -'a1 � CITY OF PIYMOUTF+ 1987 1987 PAYABLE RESIDENTIAL TAXES AT THE LEFT ARE CAL.UL_ATED WITH THE MILL RATES AS SHOWN. MILL RATES INCLUDE STORM SEWED: DISTRICT BUT DO NOT INCLUDE WATERSHED DIVIDES. THE CALCULATION OF THE ASSESSED )AL.UES S CREDITS FOR THE VARIOUS PROPERTY TYPES ARE AS FOLLOWS: RESIDENTIAL: IST $63,000 Q 18% BALANCE Q 28% NON-HMST Q 28% HOMESTEAD CREDIT. 54% OF GROSS TAX ON IST $68,000 OF EMV NOT TO EXCEED $700. COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL.: IST $60,000 Q 20% BALANCE 0 43% LAND (VACANT): (? 40% AGR I CULTURAL. (FARM.) : IST $65,000 Q 14% BALANCE Q 18% NON-HMST Q 113% AG CREDIT (HOMESTEAD): 36% OF GROSS TAX ON IST 320 ACRES, EXCLUDING HOUSE. GARAGE, AND IST ACRE. '6% OF BALANCE_.. NO CREDIT LIMIT. AG CREDIT (NON -HOMESTEAD): 26% OF GROSS TAX ON ENTIRE PROPERTY, EXCLUDING HOUSE, GARAGE, d 1ST ACRE:. NO CREDIT LIMIT. (CALCULATE AG CREDIT BEFORE 1UMESTEAD CREDIT I5 CALCULATED.) BLIND/DISABLED: IST $32,500 Q 5 % 2ND $32,500 Q I0% BALANCE Q 28% ]./14/87 SMM/Ami" 1987 DISTRIBUTION OF THE TAX DOLLAR CITY OF PLYMOUTH WAYZATA SCHOOL DISTRICT MILL RATES SCHOOL DISTRICT (WAYZATA) 49.883* HENNEPIN COUNTY 29.356 CITY OF PLYMOUTH 16.048 MISCELLANEOUS 5.459 VOCATIONAL SCHOOL 1.421 TOTAL 1022.167 *INCLUDES 6.370 MILLS FROM REFERENDUM (CITY MILL RATE INCLUDES 1.000 MILL FOR STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICTS, BUT DOES NOT INCLUDE WATERSHED DIVIDES) 1-6-87:SMM/RMA VOCATIONAL SCHOOL MISCELLANEOUS av' 1 a 3,% 1987 DISTRIBUTION OF THE TAX DOLLAR CITY OF PLYMOUTH ROBBINSDALE SCHOOL DISTRICT MILL RATES SCHOOL DISTRICT (ROBBINSDALE) 56.932* HENNEPIN COUNTY 29.356 CITY OF PLYMOUTH 16.048 MISCELLANEOUS 5.459 VOCATIONAL SCHOOL 1.421 TOTAL 109.216 *INCLUDES 8.500 MILLS FROM REFERENDUM (CITY MILL RATE INCLUDES 1.000 MILL FOR STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICTS, BUT DOES NOT INCLUDE WATERSHED DIVIDES) 1-6-87:SMM/RMA ('h MISCELLANEOUS VOCATIONAL SCHOOL 1 1987 DISTRIBUTION OF THE TAX DOLLAR CITY OF PLYMOUTH OSSEO SCHOOL DISTRICT MILL RATES SCHOOL DISTRICT (OSSEO) 55.783* HENNEPIN COUNTY 29.356 CITY OF PLYMOUTH 16.048 MISCELLANEOUS 5.459 VOCATIONAL SCHOOL 1.421 TOTAL 108.067 *INCLUDES 6.000 MILLS FROM REFERENDUM (CITY MILL RATE INCLUDES 1.000 MILL FOR STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICTS, BUT DOES NOT INCLUDE WATERSHED DIVIDES) 1-6-87:SMM/RMA f2? VOCATIONAL SCHOOL MISCELLANEOUS f51.t��1 1987 DISTRIBUTION OF THE TAX DOLLAR CITY OF PLYMOUTH HOPKINS SCHOOL DISTRICT MILL RATES SCHOOL DISTRICT (HOPKINS) 44.108* HENNEPIN COUNTY 29.356 CITY OF PLYMOUTH 16.048 MISCELLANEOUS 5.459 VOCATIONAL SCHOOL 1.421 TOTAL 96.392 *INC_LUDES 8.500 MILLS FROM REFERENDUM (CITY MILL RATE INCLUDES 1.000 MILL FOR STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICTS, BUT DOES NOT INCLUDE WATERSHED DIVIDES) 1-6-87:SMM/RMA MISCELLANEOUS VOCATIONAL SCHOOL * Includes Storm Sewer District #1 SCHOOL DISTRICT 284 (Wayzata) City Taxes on Typical Plymouth Homes Example I City Net Portion Assessed/ Valuation Payable City Increase/ Payable Market Taxes Portion Decrease 1982-83 $ 90,300 $ 1,204.34 $ 174.27 1983-84 90,300 1,318.33 198.14 +$ 23.87 1984-85 92,100 1,307.99 196.07 - 2.07 1985-86 92,100 1,343.96 199.98 + 3.91 1986-87 92,100 1,278.77 200.89 + .91 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Example II City Net Portion Assessed/ Valuation Payable City * Increase/ Payable Market Taxes Portion Decrease 1982-83 $ 102,500 $ 1,514.48 $ 219.15 1983-84 102,500 1,680.53 252.58 +$ 33.43 1984-85 104,600 1,671.65 250.58 - 2.00 1985-86 104,600 1,720.67 256.04 + 5.46 1986-87 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 104,600 1,636.35 257.07 + 1.03 Example III City Net Portion Assessed/ Valuation Payable City Increase/ Payable Market Taxes Portion Decrease 1982-83 $ 131,200 $ 2,244.09 $ 324.72 1983-84 131,200 2,532.59 380.65 +$ 55.93 1984-85 133,800 2,521.18 377.92 - 2.73 1985-86 133,800 2,600.64 386.98 + 9.06 1986-87 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 133,800 2,471.67 388.30 + 1.32 Example IV City Net Portion Assessed/ Valuation Payable City * Increase/ Payable Market Taxes Portion Decrease 1982-83 $ 157,500 $ 2,912.68 $ 421.46 1983-84 157,500 3,313.39 498.00 +$ 76.54 1984-85 160,700 3,303.79 495.24 - 2.76 1985-86 160,700 3,411.31 507.60 + 12.36 1986-87 160,700 3,241.19 509.10 + 1.59 * Includes Storm Sewer District #1 * Includes Storm Sewer District #1 SCHOOL DISTRICT 281 (Robbinsdale) City Taxes on Typical Plymouth Homes Example I City Net Portion Assessed/ Valuation Payable City Increase/ Payable Market Taxes Portion Decrease 1982-83 $ 90,300 $ 1,406.92 $ 183.46 1983-84 90,300 1,531.06 207.76 +$ 24.30 1984-85 92,100 1,501.67 204.83 - 2.93 1985-86 92,100 1,503.32 207.61 + 2.78 1986-87 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 92,100 1,406.56 206.62 - .99 Example II City Net Portion Assessed/ Valuation Payable City * Increase/ Payable Market Taxes Portion Decrease 1982-83 $ 102,500 $ 1,750.95 $ 228.32 1983-84 102,500 1,932.40 262.23 +$ 33.91 1984-85 104,600 1,901.31 259.34 - 2.89 1985-86 104,600 1,909.39 263.69 + 4.35 1986-87 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 104,600 1,788.81 262.78 - .91 Example III City Net Portion Assessed/ Valuation Payable City * Increase/ Payable Market Taxes Portion Decrease 1982-83 $ 131,200 $ 2,560.26 $ 333.86 1983-84 131,200 2,876.54 390.34 +$ 56.48 1984-85 133,800 2,834.87 386.68 - 3.66 1985-86 133,800 2,857.98 394.69 + 8.01 1986-87 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 133,800 2,681.76 393.95 - .74 Example IV City Net Portion Assessed/ Valuation Payable City * Increase/ Payable Market Taxes Portion Decrease 1982-83 $ 157,500 3,301.90 430.57 1983-84 157,500 3,741.72 507.75 +$ 77.18 1984-85 160,700 3,694.90 503.98 - 3.77 1985-86 160,700 3,731.85 515.37 + 11.39 1986-87 160,700 3,504.38 514.79 - .58 * Includes Storm Sewer District #1 * Includes Storm Sewer District #1 SCHOOL DISTRICT 279 (Osseo) City Taxes on Typical Plymouth Homes Example I City Net Portion Assessed/ Valuation Payable City * Increase/ Payable Market Taxes Portion Decrease 1982-83 90,300 1,266.69 177.34 1983-84 90,300 1,463.09 204.83 +$ 27.49 1984-85 92,100 1,402.70 200.59 - 4.24 1985-86 92,100 1,402.91 203.00 + 2.41 1986-87 92,100 1,384.40 205.58 + 2.58 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Example II City Net Portion Assessed/ Valuation Payable City * Increase/ Payable Market Taxes Portion Decrease 1982-83 102,500 1,587.26 222.22 1983-84 102,500 1,851.93 259.27 +$ 37.05 1984-85 104,600 1,783.98 255.11 - 4.16 1985-86 104,600 1,790.48 259.08 + 3.97 1986-87 104,600 1,762.63 261.75 + 2.67 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Example III City Net Portion Assessed/ Valuation Payable City Increase/ Payable Market Taxes Portion Decrease 1982-83 131,200 2,341.40 327.80 1983-84 131,200 2,766.65 387.33 +$59.53 1984-85 133,800 2,674.61 382.47 - 4.86 1985-86 133,800 2,695.83 390.09 + 7.62 1986-87 133,800 2,646.19 392.96 + 2.87 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Example IV City Net Portion Assessed/ Valuation Payable City * Increase/ Payable Market Taxes Portion Decrease 1982-83 157,500 3,032.48 424.55 1983-84 157,500 3,604.87 504.68 +$ 80.13 1984-85 160,700 3,495.09 499.80 - 4.88 1985-86 160,700 3,529.88 510.77 + 10.97 1986-87 160,700 3,460.15 513.83 + 3.06 * Includes Storm Sewer District #1 * Includes Storm Sewer District #1 SCHOOL DISTRICT 270 (Hopkins) City Taxes on Typical Plymouth Homes Example I City Net Portion Assessed/ Valuation Payable City * Increase/ Payable Market Taxes Portion Decrease 1982-83 $ 90,300 $ 1,255.25 $ 176.74 1983-84 90,300 1,266.46 195.54 +$ 18.80 1984-85 92,100 1,242.40 194.19 - 1.35 1985-86 92,100 1,278.63 198.32 + 4.13 1986-87 92,100 1,206.48 200.88 + 2.56 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Example II City Net Portion Assessed/ Valuation Payable City * Increase/ Payable Market Taxes Portion Decrease 1982-83 $ 102,500 $ 1,573.91 $ 221.61 1983-84 102,500 1,619.11 249.99 +$ 28.38 1984-85 104,600 1,591.29 248.72 - 1.27 1985-86 104,600 1,640.12 254.38 + 5.66 1986-87 104,600 1,543.85 257.05 + 2.67 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Example III City Net Portion Assessed/ Valuation Payable City Increase/ Payable Market Taxes Portion Decrease 1982-83 $ 131,200 $ 2,323.55 $ 327.16 1983-84 131,200 2,448.71 378.08 +$ 50.92 1984-85 133,800 2,406.30 376.10 - 1.98 1985-86 133,800 2,484.57 385.36 + 9.26 1986-87 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 133,800 2,331.95 388.27 + 2.91 Example IV City Net Portion Assessed/ Valuation Payable City * Increase/ Payable Market Taxes Portion Decrease 1982-83 $ 157,500 $ 3,010.50 $ 423.88 1983-84 157,500 3,208.94 495.46 +$ 71.58 1984-85 160,700 3,157.12 493.46 - 2.00 1985-86 160,700 3,262.50 506.01 + 12.55 1986-87 160,700 3,057.98 509.15 + 3.14 * Includes Storm Sewer District #1 CITY of PLHUM MARE 1986 VS 1967 PHNE M rA�s BY 9CBD01. nLsnLr�r CITY OF PLffiM *1986 MARKET VALUES li K1r INMUSED OVER 1985 MA= VALUES ESCIIJDING QOARTIIE AND/OR MARKET ADJUSIMENPS* 1-1587 FIGS INCUME STM SEER DISTRICTS, BUr DD WT INCLUDE WATEMM DIVIDES SKV je #284/WAYZATA #281/RDBBINSMTF #279/OSSED #270/HDPKINS 1986 1987 1986 1987 1986 1987 Increase 1986 1987 *Estimated* Mills: 97.538 95.797 102.520 100.716 100.915 102.067 or 91.222 87.892 Market Values Referendum: +6.380 +6.370 Decrease +8.500 +8.500 Decrease +6.000 +6.000 Decrease +8.500 +8.500 Decrease 1985 5 1986 Total Mills 103.918 102.167 $ 2 112.020 109.216 $ % 106.915 108.067 $ % 99.722 96.392 $ % $25,000 $ 215 $ 211 -$4 -2% $ 231 $ 226 -$5 -$2 $ 221 $ 224 +$3 +1 $ 206 $ 200 -$6 -3% 50,000 430 423 7 2 463 452 11 2 442 447 +5 +1 412 399 13 3 75,000 828 789 39 5 947 884 63 7 872 867 -5 -1 783 745 38 5 100,000 1,582 1,505 77 5 1,759 1,648 111 6 1,647 1,623 -24 -1 1,507 1,419 88 6 125,000 2,335 2,220 115 5 2,572 2,413 159 6 2,422 2,380 -42 -2 2,229 2,094 135 6 150,000 3,088 2,935 153 5 3,384 3,177 207 6 3,198 3,136 -62 -2 2,952 2,769 183 6 175,000 3,842 3,650 192 5 4,196 3,942 254 6 3,973 3,893 -80 -2 3,676 3,444 232 6 2D0,000 4,595 4,365 230 5 5,008 4,706 302 6 4,748 4,649 -99 -2 4,398 4,118 280 6 225,000 5,349 5,080 269 5 5,820 5,471 349 6 5,523 5,406 -117 -2 5,121 4,793 328 6 250,000 6,102 5,796 306 5 6,632 6,235 397 6 6,298 6,162 -136 -2 5,844 5,468 376 6 275,000 6,855 6,511 344 5 7,444 7,000 444 6 7,073 6,919 -154 -2 6,567 6,143 424 6 300,000 7,609 7,226 383 5 8,257 7,764 493 6 7,848 7,675 -173 -2 7,290 6,817 473 6 Commercial Example: 100,000 ("OC11) 3,572 3,577 +$5 - 3,761 3,744 -$17 - 3,642 3,717 +$75 +2% 3,475 3,440 -$35 -1% 100,000 ("C") 4,518 4,524 +$6 - 4,756 4,735 -$21 - 4,606 4,701 +$95 +2% 4,395 4,350 -$45 -1% 9MICEMI& BEAD TAgLS CALCU AM) AS FO IM: Comm AL rATCM AS PCELM: Payable 1986 Payable 1987 Payable 1986 Payable 1987 1st $64,000 @ 18% 1st $65,000 @ 18% "OC' 1st $60,000 @ 28% 1st $60,000 @ 28% = Assessed Assessed = Assessed Assessed Balance @ 29% Value Balance @ 28% Value % Balance @ 43% Value Balance @ 43% Value % "C" Total Market Value @ 43% Total Market Value @ 43% Homestead Credit: 54% of gross tax 54% of gross on 1st Fiscal Disparities on 1st $68,000 of $68,000 of market market value to value to mwdmm of Area Wide Mill Rate 107.553 112.238 mmd= of $700 $700 % Contributed 31.6507 30.1578 *1986 MARKET VALUES li K1r INMUSED OVER 1985 MA= VALUES ESCIIJDING QOARTIIE AND/OR MARKET ADJUSIMENPS* 1-1587 FIGS INCUME STM SEER DISTRICTS, BUr DD WT INCLUDE WATEMM DIVIDES SKV je P20pwr TAX AAYANB 1977 1967 CITY Cr PLUM #184 iUZATA SM= DlgrR3 T Payable Market Property Mill Market Property Mill Year Value Taxes Rate Value Taxes Rate 1977 $30,100 $684 100.006 $65,200 $1,456 93.487 1978 31,800 601 99.077 68,300 1,459 95.638 1979 38,400 577 96.351 76,900 1,425 92.487 1980 46,800 449 91.514 92,700 1,258 85.609 1981 53,800 368 87.547 105,800 1,421 82.358 1982 55,300 414 92.687 106,800 1,568 88.501 1983 58,900 456 93.285 112,600 1,771 90.79.:. 1984 58,900 469 96.353 115,400 2,064 98.961 1985 60,000 461 93.038 117,700 2,053 96.978 1986 64,900 540 99.722 118,200 2,131 103.918 1987 64,900 518 96.392 118,200 2,025 102.167 #281 #279 ffiIlCnUB 9CH M DISIBICT CG= 9CWM DISTR= Payable Market Property Mill Market Property Mill Year Value Taxes Rate Value Taxes Rate 1977 $48,900 $1,196 98.296 $84,300 $2,807 102.069 1978 51,400 1,157 97.854 91,200 2,712 100.598 1979 58,000 1,123 94.830 101,900 2,529 93.258 1980 70,000 865 88.232 117,700 2,062 86.104 1981 80,100 949 87.370 134,100 1,991 80.040 1982 81,100 1,110 98.600 135,100 2,344 90.819 1983 84,600 1,246 100.711 143,600 2,667 93.845 1984 84,600 1,344 109.656 144,500 3,191 106.239 1985 86,200 1,313 106.571 147,300 3,086 101.670 1986 86,500 1,321 112.020 148,000 3,136 106.915 1987 86,500 1,235 109.216 148,000 3,076 108.067 Mill rates include/school district referendum where applicable and sewer districts, but do not include watershed divides. The properties used in this study are 4 actual houses of various market values (ore from each of the 4 school districts within the city). For puporses of comparability, all subject houses are classified residential home— stead, are maintained in average condition and have not been improved with any additions. All estimated market values were increased during the years for inflation, quartile and/or market adjustments. 1/22/87 S"M/ je FISCAL DISPARITIES COMMERCIAL & INDUSTRIAL PROPERTIES (Property Types "C" & "I", Class "40) PAYABLE 1987 PROPERTY TAX Contributed (of assessed value) to F. Disp. Balance (of assessed value) Total Tax Bill Area Wide (A.W.) Mill Rate (F. Disp.) Wayzata School District (S.D.) Mill Rate = 30.1578% (of tax) = 69.8422% (of tax) = 100.0000 = 112.238 (7 County Metro Area) = 102.167 30.1578% of Commercial/Industrial property tax bills goes into the Fiscal Disparities pool, calculated in the examples below: EXAMPLE (A) (Assessed method) 1986 Market Value = $100,000 x 43% $43,000 = Total 1987 payable "assessed value" $43,000 x .301578 = $12,968 x (A.W.) .112238 = $1,455.49 (contributed)** $43,000 x .698422 = $30,032 x (S.D.) .102167 = $3,068.29 Total 1987 Tax Bill **Amount contributed in 1986 on $100,000 Was EXAMPLE (B) (Factor Method) .112238 (A.W.) x .301578 = .0338485 .102167 (S.D.) x .698422 = .0713557 .1052042 .1052042 x 43% = .0452378 (F. Disp. FACTOR) OR: = $4,523.78 = $1,463.80** $100,000 x .0452378 Total 1987 Tax Bill = $4,523.78 Note: Each Fiscal Disparities "Factor" and payable tax will differ depending on the school district in which it is located as follows: Wayzata Factor = .0452378 Robbinsdale Factor = .0473548 Osseo Factor = .0470097 Hopkins Factor = .0435034 1-07-87 SMM SMM FISCAL DISPARITIES COMMERCIAL & INDUSTRIAL PROPERTIES (Property Types "CC" & "II", Class 1140) PAYABLE 1987 PROPERTY TAR Contributed (of assessed value) to F. Disp. Balance Total Tax Bill Area Wide (A.W.) Mill Rate (F. Disp.) Wayzata School District (S.D.) Mill Rate = 30.1578% (of tax) = 69.8422% (of tax) = 100.0000 112.238 (7 County Metro Area) = 102.167 30.1578% of Commercial/Industrial property tax bills goes into the Fiscal Disparities pool, calculated in the examples below: EXAMPLE (A) (Assessed method) 1986 Market Value = $100,000 1st -60,000* @ 28% _ $16,800 Balance $ 40,000* @ 43% = 17,200 $34,000 = Total 1987 payable "assessed value" $34,000 x .301578 = $10,254 x (A.W.) .112238 $34,000 x .698422 = $23,746 x (S.D.) .102167 Total 1987 Tax Bill **Amount contributed in 1986 on $100,000 was EXAMPLE (B) (Factor method) .112238 (A.W.) x .301578 = .0338485 .102167 (S.D.) x .698422 = .0713557 .1052042 .1.052042 x 6/10* _ .0631225 x 28% .1052042 x 4/10* _ .0420817 x 43% (variable) OR: Total 1987 Tax Bill _ $1,150.85 (contributed)** _ $2,426.09 _ $3,576.94 $1,157.38** _ .0176743 (1st $60,000) _ .0180951 (Balance) _ .0357694 (F. Disp. FACTOR) $100,000 x .0357694 _ $3,576.94 *The multiplying x 6/10 & 4/10 is a variable. The multiplying fraction will change depending on the market value and the "1st" & "Balance" parts. (ie: $60,000 - 100,000 EMV = 6/10 & $40,000 - 100,000 = 4/10) Note: Each Fiscal Disparities "Factor" and payable tax will differ depending on the school district in which it is located as follows: Wayzata Factor = .0357694 Robbinsdale Factor = .0374433 Osseo Factor = .0371705 Hopkins Factor = .0343981 1n P O_v v tryD In "! D. 0ChAp 1b N m r 1f0 T�W N IN NP v N L o • tl ai V • • C V L V V . cc, A_ • U � 4� F O tl O O L � . N tl� N A O i[ Y y Z p r rr U A N 00-� m> •� T y w tl 4 4 4 O: J~ O..rO al CG E .�. (� ••+ >..•+ 7 . 1+ A [[++ O O .r 6 to ++ m ••� � u v W •wl U tl tl v� O8 -v. � U O o C r 6114 A U C 4 -. L �• A dL ff 4 7p ++ ■ � L 1+ to U m O G C A i O d O. C M d > �7 t.JJ.L [-• A >. >• yy O 4 LL A O NL a G C � 4 A•O O m 4 G vC aC+ rvaC+yC7+ y 0— 4 yo u p L L 4 ••OO 1 1 m O y e ag4i uO n 'IV qu ,OytG 6..�..UL)Uuuf U 9 F C G. (•.C.�=-A a ` '�.1 O� Vtun>U=Z qI u i U Or r.. P� O rtn P 0 o r� ID v 0000 �+•n .-t P N � n • .r to 0 0 y D O O d u ■■ I : v Y 8 ►. C tl V V • M 4 W y tl O .+ ••pp ••+ O qqe • � 5 t 4 alar m � Cp9� r O �+ tl•ON m r 6 ••1 .•r• � C : �� TOo ° � ° H •41 u a ..tl• a� .•� K to .F.• • w Y A �• �• 5 c d -� > UD•• -t iuuuu F-• e cR Y c u 0 0 0 0 0-0 E:Ekkk 0° "T-- CA n min �n .n n.n •nnr.. wl .n rn�rn N r ry n ry N N r r N r N N r r 1nNtJ1NYl 1lt�N N�N1l1 JIN N - N N N N N N N N N N N t V- N .••t OtrbO �n8O �+vlor�D' o.»oommP U c LU� v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v 1 v v v O .•+ .•+ N .•. N �f f v tntn�nr_tn pC>CC• ZZZZZZZ m o ID Orn lnO tnNNr In nw1N r NtD r ONti h 41 �.++, +++++++•1 r Ou1v PSD�p tD ID PPv�p rtON�+T �Om v y N mP N rvv 4 r r r tl tl tl m i .r .•t .-:,Ig tDO7 v to J.9 r .7P .7a!"! mID C ti v IDOtll to r.1N�mmtiwt of ✓f ftD T�OPP tno vv vP �D mn�D (G � a e G G G G O O O i v vNtnv vvvv v �D to 1n {n �n �D �n v v p Nin vto �p y1 y1 �p [W u N.nv In yti Q4p A p� 1 1 1 1 1 1 > u L L L L N • •••t N AI N N • .. A Y 1.. V. r •O we O.•�•••tN� TRAIT Tbr OP O.•+N nv10 • I 1>..0 �+ Ym rP�m •.+ r r r n r rr r tr tr trrr r o m m o m o C �� A.•�.+ L N r r n NCI NNN NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN N 4 U.•+••� fnr .'t O/Dm C I+1 P r O m r ID v .r r to v N V1 m y Vf N ~ r O .•1 �D tr O r tD O P n r u r P r w m to P r .•n r tf1 � O %D %D r v AI tD O r v v O v In O to O I v.•• 1 .• .•• 1. ti v I f m r N ti N P m' O Ln N.• P V N N m P O %v N O O N o r V 1 ti t/ 1 r N 1 D p O 7 O .D v m V1 1ft P .-� tD r v O m nt Ol P .r Vf Vt v �D r r fD IO N �D Vf .r �n U1 P V1 ..r m In P 1n �O O P�4��j+ tD R i NNN .M .^� N .••• .•..N .n N .•v N N .•n N N ••+ N ti .••� N N �f ti •r M .r N .••� 2 i D h7 t�� a O F „ O A Y Y r Q a tl a> J p� C C w to C 4 • .°.. > .4+ •py re O 4 �Cvd. •p 'U Oi OLd .r C > O gg D uO >• Oli Ulm m m u u g cg U V i .g �` >� >� i i i o a¢¢N h Ln 'n to 3 i City of Minneapolis County CountyRevenue 4.854 .........................10.235 County Social Services.................14.539 County Capital Improvement Fund........ .064 County Reserve Bonds & Interest........ .144 County Medical Center .................. 1.406 Metropolitan Health Plan ............... .040 Total County 26.428 Miscellaneous Levies Metro Council.. .. .407 Metro Council Right -of -Way Loan Fund... .077 Metro Council Bonds & Interest......... .041 Metro Council Solid Waste Bonds & Int.. .029 Park Museum.......... .350 Metro Mosquito Control ................. .600 Metro Transit Commission ............... 3.023 Metro Transit Commission Bonds & Int... .327 Total Miscellaneous Levies 4.854 CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS MILL RATE TABLE City (Minneapolis) Tax Payable in 1987 Municipal Building Commission.......... .616 Firemen's Relief ....................... 2.987 Police Pension.... .................. 3.752 General Fund...........................12.056 Total Rate: 115.816 Permanent Improvement .................. .204 Estimate & Taxation .................... .017 Total Rate: 115.949 Library General ........................ 2.340 (with Watershed No. 3) Municipal Pension & Retirement......... 2.149 Police Personnel Expansion ............. 1.001 Bond Redemption Principal & Interest... 4.780 Park Rehabilitation & Improvement...... .215 Park & Recreation ...................... 3.084 Dutch Elm Disease Control .............. .764 Tree Preservation & Reforestation...... 1.050 Lake Pollution Control Fund............ .051 Total City of Minneapolis 35.066 Special School District No. 1 General...............................38.691 Bonds & Interest ...................... 2.446 Capital Outlay ........................ 2.898 Transportation ........................ 4.221 Community Service ..................... 1.212 Total Special School District No. 1 49.468 watershed District No. 3 .133 i Date: January 30, 1987 CITY OF Mr. Tom Barker PLYMOUTH+ President Chelsea Woods Townhouse Association NON-STRUCTURAL PLAN REVIEW REPORT Project Title: Chelsea Woods Townhouses Site Address: 1623 Black Oaks Place North _Plan Number: 001 Plans Specifications The enclosed documents have been reviewed for compliance with the requirements of the 1970/1973 Uniform Building Code. The project data listed above is based on plan submittal information provided to our office by representatives of the Chelsea Wood Homeowners Association. For our reference we have numbered each set of the plans. Plans are identified as "As -built Drawings" Yes No Plans bear indication of City Approval? Yes No Plans consist of 2 sheets. The attached pages represent the results of our review. Any questions regarding the contents of this review should be directed to doe Ryan at 559-2800 ext. 222 Sincerely, doe Ryan Building Official Attachment: Plan Review Comments Enclosure: Plans/Specifications cc: 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447, TELEPHONE (612) 559.2800 PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS Occupancy Group: I (Attached Single Family Dwelling) Type of Construction: VN (wood frame) Location on Property: 0 feet on Common Wall(s) side of dwelling units. Number of Stories: i Square Footage of Floor Area: Basement 1020 First Floor 1020 Second Floor Number of Bedrooms: 2 Number of Bathrooms: 1/2 Bath �1-3/4 Bath Full Bath 1 GFarage: El Attached x I 1 Detached Foundation: 0 Slab -On -Grade 0 Crawl Space ® Full Basement Fireplace Shown: ® Yes No Optional Masonry Factory Built Unable to Fire Rating of Dwelling Unit Separation Wall: 1 Hour 2 Hour I Y, Determine No separation wall detail shown on plans Stairways Designed to Code: UNABLE ® YES NO TO DETERMINE N/A Smoke Detectors Designed to Code: 0 0 Stairways Designed to Code: ® 0 No stairway section shown on plan Handrails Designed to Code: 0 No handrail detail shown on plans Guardrails Designed to Code: 5 No guardrail detail shown on plans Bedroom Egress/Rescue Windows Designed to Code: 0 Manufacture's window specifications unknown Garage/Dwelling Separation Wall I -VI Designed to Code: U Light & Ventilation Designed � a a a to Code: Fireplace Designed to Code: F� n qx IFManufacture's installation manual not provided withans Date: January 30, 1987 Mr. Tom Barker President Chelsea Woods Townhouse Association NON-STRUCTURAL PLAN REVIEW REPORT Project Title: Chelsea Woods Townhouses Site Address: 1770 Archer Court North Plan Number: 003 Plans Specifications The enclosed documents have been reviewed for compliance with the requirements of the 1970/1973 Uniform Building Code. The project data listed above is based on plan submittal information provided to our office by representatives of the Chelsea Wood Homeowners Association. For our reference we have numbered each set of the plans. Plans are identified as "As -built Drawings" Yes U No Plans bear indication of City Approval? Yes No Plans consist of 4 sheets. The attached pages represent the results of our review. Any questions regarding the contents of this review should be directed to doe Ryan at 559-2800 ext. 222 Sincerely, C1cx.. . doe Rya nV Building Official Attachment: Plan Review Comments Enclosure: Plans/Specifications cc: 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD. PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447, TELEPHONE (612) 559.2800 PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS Occupancy Group: I (Attached Single Family Dwelling) Type of Construction: VN (wood frame) Location on Property: 0 feet on Common Wall(s) side of dwelling units. Number of Stories: Square Footage of Floor Area: Basement First Floor 670 Second Floor 1035 Number of Bedrooms: 2 Number of Bathrooms: 1/2 Bath 3/4 Bath ; Full Bath 1 Garage: Attached Detached Foundation: 0 Slab -On -Grade Crawl Space 0 Full Basement Fireplace Shown: 0 Yes No = Optional = Masonry � Factory Built �11 Unable to Fire Rating of Dwelling Unit Separation Wall: 1 Hour U 2 Hour Il.� Determine No separation wall detail shown on plans UNABLE YES NO TO DETERMINE N/A Smoke Detectors Designed to Code: 0 ^ 0 Not shown on plans Stairways Designed to Code: Insufficient stairway section details shown on plans Handrails Designed to Code: 0 l7! 0 No handrail detail shown on plans Guardrails Designed to Code: I = =1 Insufficient guardrail detail information shown on plans Bedroom Egress/Rescue Windows Designed to Code: Manufacture's window specifications unknown Garage/Dwelling Separation Wall © a Designed to Code: Steel beam in garage not protected with approved materials Light & Ventilation Designed � ❑ to Code: Fireplace Designed to Code: n n �I 17 manufacture's installation manual not provided with plans a„ Date: January 30, 1987 CITY OF Mr. Tom Barker PLYMOUTH+ President Chelsea Woods Townhouse Association NON-STRUCTURAL PLAN REVIEW REPORT Project Title: Chelsea Woods Townhouses Site Address: 1716 Comstock Lane North Plan Number: 004 ^ Plans u Specifications The enclosed documents have been reviewed for compliance with the requirements of the 1970/1973 Uniform Building Code. The project data listed above is based on pian submittal information provided to our office by representatives of the Chelsea Wood Homeowners Association. For our reference we have numbered each set of the plans. Plans are identified as "As -built Drawings" Yes No Plans bear indication of City Approval? �—� Yes X No Plans consist of 9 sheets. The attached pages represent the results of our review. Any questions regarding the contents of this review should be directed to doe Ryan at 559-2800 ext. 222 Sincerely, Joe Ryan Building Official Attachment: Plan Review Comments Enclosure: Plans/Specifications cc: 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD. PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447. TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800 Occupancy Group: I Type of Construction: Location on Property: PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS (Attached Single Family Dwelling) VN (wood frame) 0 feet on Common Wall(s) side of dwelling units. Number of Stories: 3 Square Footage of Floor Area: Basement First Floor 644 Second Floor gi0 3 Third Floor 624 Number of Bedrooms: Number of Bathrooms: 1/2 Bath 3/4 Bath 1 Full Bath 1 Garage: ® Attached Detached Foundation: El Slab -On -Grade 0 Crawl Space Full Basement Fireplace Shown: � Yes = No = Optional = Masonry CE Factory Built Unable to Fire Rating of Dwelling Unit Separation Wall 1 Hour 2 Hour u Determine UNABLE YES NO TO DETERMINE N/A Smoke Detectors Designed to Code: 0 X I0 tiot shown on plans Stairways Designed to Code: a o Handrails Designed to Code: E No handrail detail shown on plans Guardrails Designed to Code: t ni Insufficient grardrail detail information shown on plans Bedroom Egress/Rescue Windows Q Designed to Code: Ffl Manufacture's window specifications unknown Garage/Dwelling Separation Wall a Q Designed to Code: Insufficient detail information shown on plans Light & Ventilation Designed � ❑ to Code: Fireplace Designed to Code: F-1 n17manufacture's qpans installation manual not pr Red with Date: January 30, 1987 CITY OF Mr. Tom Barker PLYMOUTH President Chelsea Woods Townhouse Association NON-STRUCTURAL PLAN REVIEW REPORT Project Title: Chelsea Woods Townhouses Site Address: 1636 Comstock Lane North _Plan Number: 002 Plans Specifications The enclosed documents have been reviewed for compliance with the requirements of the 1970/1973 Uniform Building Code. The project data listed above is based on plan submittal information provided to our office by representatives of the Chelsea Wood Homeowners Association. For our reference we have numbered each set of the plans. Plans are identified as "As -built Drawings" Yes L— X No Plans bear indication of City Approval? U Yes No Plans consist of 6 sheets. The attached pages represent the results of our review. Any questions regarding the contents of this review should be directed to doe Ryan at 559-2800 ext. 222 Sincerely, doe Ryan Building Official Attachment: Plan Review Comments Enclosure: Plans/Specifications cc: 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447, TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800 PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS Occupancy Group: I (Attached Single Family Dwelling) Type of Construction: VN (wood frame) Location on Property: 0 feet on Common Wall(s) side of dwelling units. Number of Stories: 2 Square Footage of Floor Area: Basement First Floor 667 Second Floor 1014 Number of Bedrooms: 3 Number of Bathrooms: 1/2 Bath 3/4 Bath i Full Bath i Garage: ® Attached F-1 Detached Foundation: E-1 Slab -On -Grade F7" Crawl Space E-1 Full Basement Fireplace Shown: ® Yes = No = Optional fI Masonry ® Factory Built Unable to Fire Rating of Dwelling Unit Separation Wall: 1 Hour 2 Hour �� Determine UNABLE YES NO TO DETERMINE N/A Smoke Detectors Designed to Code: 0 Not shown on plans Stairways Designed to Code: a a o Insufficient stairway sections shown on plan Handrails Designed to Code: t "� No handrail detail shown on plans Guardrails Designed to Code: 0 y�� U Insufficient guardrail detail information show on plans Bedroom Egress/Rescue Windows a Designed to Code: Manufacture's window specificiations unknown Garage/Dwelling Separation Wall a Y Designed to Code: Insufficient detail information show on plans Light & Ventilation Designed ED � ❑ to Code: Fireplace Designed to Code: n n 17 I-1 As per attached specifications and if installed per manufacture's installatinn mann 1 Myrna M arofs�y 2835 Medicine Ridge Road plymouk Minnesota 55441 (612) 544-9685 City of Plymouth 3400 Plymouth Boulevard Plymouth, Minnesota 55447 Attention: Police Chief Richard Carlquist Dear Sir, January 12, 1987 I received the Plymouth on Parade issue for January and February and noted the "Crime Map" located on page 22. I am concerned about the Area 3 statistics, since that is where my family resides. Could you please explain why these figures are so much higher than the other areas of Plymouth. In many cases they are 3 and 4 times the other areas. Please inform me if there is anything our neighborhood can do regarding this crime problem. What is the Police Department doing to alleviate this situation. I look forward to your answer. Sincerely, U My aZaro7 fsky cc. Mayor Virgil Schneider -T-_ \aC4.. M.T January 23, 1987 CITY OF PLYMOUTR Ms. Myrna Marofski 2835 Medicine Ridge Road Plymouth, Minnesota 55441 Dear Ms. Marofski Thank you for your letter concerning the PLYMOUTH ON PARADE crime map and how it relates to your particular area. I am sorry that I took so long in responding to your letter sent on January 12th: but. I wanted to make sure that the Crime Prevention Officer had a chance to research your concern. Area ##3 reported in the PLYMOUTH ON PARADE crime map is one of the most densely populated areas of Plymouth. We estimate that there are 10.500 people living in this area. That would equate to approximately 25% of the entire population of the City of Plymouth. One of the reasons for the high density is the 11 major apartment complexes. We have a number of large parking lots associated with the apartment complexes, as well as some of the businesses located in that area. This attracts a lot of "car prowlers" who are usually juveniles involved in thefts from vehicles. Many of these juveniles do not live in Plymouth. Area ##3 is bordered by major roadways. such as County Road 18. Highway 55, County Road 9, and Highway I494. The Police Department response to the large number of thefts. as well as other crimes in Area ##3, has been to direct as much as possible the free time of police officers to patrol identified areas where criminal activity is taking place. In addition. we have used a number of unmarked vehicles and set up a portable radio -alarm system that we use to apprehend persons in the act of committing a crime. Also, we have made a number of arrests. For Instance, one 17 -year-old male has been arrested for committing 12 burglaries in Area ##3. Over $25,000 in property was recovered. There are some options that you can do in your own neighborhood. In many of the PLYMOUTH ON PARADE issues. we mention Neighborhood Watch in one form or another. I have enclosed a booklet with this particular letter for your review. In short. neighbors helping protect neighbors is the most effective way that we can use our police resources. Notifying us when suspicious activity takes Place has been our most successful strategy to date. We have recently formed some new Neighborhood Watches in Area ##3. 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD. PL Y?,10JTH, MINNESOTA 55-'-'7. TELEPHO�4E '612) 559-2800 Ms. Mvrna Marofski January 23, 1987 Page Two The latest one was at 30th and Pilgrim lane. The At The Lake Apartments will be holding security meetings in February with our Crime Prevention Officer. If you should have any further comment or need, please do not hesitate to contact Crime Prevention Officer Robert Nesbitt at your convenience. His phone number is 559-2800, extension 368. Again, thank you for taking the time to write. We hope that we can be of service to you. Sincerely, Richard J. C rlquist Director of Public Safety cc: James G. Willis - City Manager Mayor Virgil Schneider Robert Nesbitt. CPO LeRwere Lcf ler M r . Fred Moore Kenned, Director of Public Works O'Brien & City of Plymouth I)rawz I ;: David J. Kennedy Plymouth, M N 55447 John B. Dean N 1:1111111 \l_; Charles L. LeFevere Appeal - Lonke/Carroll Herbert P. Lefler III 2000 First Bank Place West January 26, 1987 Minneapolis Minnesota 55402 Telephone (612) 333-0543 Telecopier (612) 333-0540 M r . Fred Moore Clayton L. LeFevere Director of Public Works Herbert P. Lefler City of Plymouth J. O'Brien E. rawz Johnhn E. Drawzy 3400 Plymouth Boulevard David J. Kennedy Plymouth, M N 55447 John B. Dean Glenn E. Purdue Richard J. Schieffer Re: City of Plymouth Project No. 404 - Eminent Domain Charles L. LeFevere Appeal - Lonke/Carroll Herbert P. Lefler III James J. Thomson, Jr. Thomas R. Galt Dear Fred: Dayle Nolan Brian F. Rice As we discussed last week, the above -referenced matter John G. l S.Clu Lorraine S. Clugg has been settled between the cit and Mr. Lonke and Mr. y James M.Strommen Carroll. Terms of the settlement are as set out below: Ronald H. Batty William P. Jordan Kurt J. Erickson ( a) Payment of 3/4 of Commissioner's award, i.e. , William R.Skallerud $22,500, payment already made. Rodney D. Anderson Corrine A. Heine David D. Beaudoin (b) Payment of interest in the amount of $4,234.12. Paul E. Rasmussen Stever, M. Tallen ( c) Credit of interest payment of $8,968.24 to the principal on Special Assessment Levy No. 9713 for the property involved in this proceeding, the credit to be made before 1987 interest is calculated. (d) Payment of witness fees in the amount of $4,475. These are the terms which you and I had previously discussed and agreed to as the terms of settlement of this matter on behalf of the City of Plymouth. Also as I indicated to you, Mr. Lonke and Mr. Carroll do not want complete payment of the settlement in cash. Rather, they would prefer the money to be paid to them by the city in the following manner: (a) A check in the amount of $2,903.04 payable to Dane Carroll, John Lonke, and Harold Sheff, their attorney. - gab Mr. Fred Moore January 26, 1987 Page 2 (b) The remaining balance of $5,806.08 to be credited to the payment of principal of Special Assessment Levy No. 9713 and credited at the same time as the interest which was referred in the previous paragraph. I have sent the payment voucher to Dale Hahn requesting the $2,903.04 check. I will also be preparing the documents of settlement and dismissal for signature by the parties. Should you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me. Yours very truly, LeFEVERE, LEFLER, KENNEDY, O'BRIEN & DRAWZ H' er P. Lefler III HPL/sp I January 27, 1987 Mr. Robert Bohls 11245 36th Place North Plymouth, MN 55441 Dear Mr. Bohls: NIP ° CITY OF PLYMOUTH+ =- k a C_ , At the January 12, 1987 City Council meeting, you requested that a Performance Guaran- tee held by the City for work by Lundgren Brothers at the Mission Ponds development be retained and not released. You stated that essentially there were concerns about the landscaping and particularly whether the approved berm had been developed as approved. You told the City Council that you had a letter from Lundgren Brothers stating that the work had not been completed. You indicated that a copy of that letter would be pro- vided to the City. I am hereby asking you for a copy of that letter so that we can complete our research and administration of this matter. I have had a member of my staff re -check the site and the files on this project and we need your information to complete that work. Once we have it, we will be able to develop a report which we will share with you as it is returned to the Council for further consideration. Please direct the letter to my attention and please let me know if you have any further questions regarding this matter. Sincerely J Blair Tremere, Director Community Development Director BT / gw cc: File A-338 City Manager dames Willis 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447, TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800 1-19-87 Dear Uirgii: this letter is written in regards to the upcoming appointment of a City of Plymouth representative to the North West Community Television Corporation's Board Of Directors. As a second term elected C.T.C. board member, and City Of Plymouth, video staff employee, I am very concerned that we have a representative who will do his homework before each monthly meeting, and also consider what's best for Plymouth when decisions concerning cities are voted on. I feel this position calls for Someone who believes in the use of video as a powerful communications tool, and is dedicated to the city's growth in that field. I would like to recommend someone that I believe would do an eHcellant Job as the City of Plymouth's representative to the C.T.C. board. This person Is well informed about C.T.C. history and current policies. He has been involved In video communications for over three years. He Is a current resident of Plymouth, and Is Involved in video production for the city. His name is George Torline. I have had the priveiedge of working with George In the field of Community Television programming for almost two years. During that time I have developed a -iad respect for his knowledge In video production, and his commitment to Plymouth's progress in the field of Uideo Communications. George has helped Plymouth's city channel to become the best, and most, programed government channel, In the N.W. Community Television Corporation's access area. I have found Nim to be eHtremely competent In dealing with people and situations, and his ability to analize a situation before acting on it makes me believe he would do an eHcelent job of representing the city. I feel that George's appointment as The City Of Plymouth's representative to the C.T.C. Board of Directors could be a benefit to the city. I also believe that this eHperience could be valuable for George. If you will be part of the process to determine who will represent the city of Plymouth on The C. T. C. Board Of Directors, I hope you will consider George Torline for that position. Sincerely, Sharon Gorse N.W.C.T.C.Board of Directors City Of Plymouth Uideo Staff JAN 291987 ciffWaymoaH .Semi e!� ��y� su � roti s5�yy7 O -et r 19572 /& y0 J /O 7�2 /� C/vw �f �o w G2 � �j .� i di CES •/- �� /��-�4� Q r R�-�..� ��..,�c.�c � y !�?�C , �r ✓7//�� �G SS/7� NSs �-j ��Lp GCS /--7 C Cariec ( !c_ /hac��rir JJi Qrr� i Z /iv e c �C G� c yl rr� /yl Susi c o---�f o1 /c.e— i�epClcrece -7-A is /3 GL /�ta�/or GyC�«o l�5�i�^c..,1 6LS he.v2►- Co.,,ts �ac/C Co�ieGl /�ils7��c�� w'� o to,?e, s cctr l� . r n i � � �Tyy �-t,1- 7' �- � (,t S 7`-L,.. 't�1 D u. r Com. ce�,Js i 9 � ✓ f' C.(, S � � ✓ c c.¢, GL... aL i� tt-,�Swi e.- O �C �- Q Gc�S / iB-rt.3'. �D ,,c� / 7L d {� � � Gc� GZ S 7�G'/ Pmt ��y Cl�..� ✓!/ 7'�..Z � / o / -T� / r"Z��-��/%L� yOGv !it/1D K �� C'J� ��7�.•C✓FS/-1 K - ��IC.S/�� �cSS January 29, 1987 Mr. Larry Lieder 4840 Union Terrace Lane N. Plymouth, MN 55441 Dear Mr. Lieder: CITY OF PLYM0UTR Thank you for your very kind letter addressed to Mayor Schneider regarding the excellent service you received from Arnie Rasmusson. Your letter is certainly a day brightener and one which we appreciated receivinq. I have shared your letter directly with Arnie as well as others in our City family. It is particularly nice to have a citizen comment favorably on any public employee's activities and I am particularly pleased with your taking the time to comment on Arnie's service. Thank you again for writing. Yours truly, AesG. illisy Manager JGW:dma cc: Mayor and City Council Joe Ryan, Building Official Arnie Rasmusson, Building Inspector 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447, TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800