HomeMy WebLinkAboutCouncil Information Memorandum 03-19-1987CITY OF
PLYMOUTFF
CITY COUNCIL INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM
March 19, 1987
UPCOMING MEETINGS AND EVENTS.....
1. SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING -- Monday, March 23, 7:30 p.m. Special City
Council meeting in City Council chambers.
2. PLANNING COMMISSION -- Wednesday, March 25, 7:30 p.m. The Planning
Commission will meet in the City Council chambers. Agenda
attached. (M-2)
3. TWINWEST CHAMBER "COFFEE BREAK" -- The TwinWest Chamber "State of
theCity" coffee break for Plymouth is scheduled for Thursday, March
26 from 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. in the City Council conference room.
A copy of the agenda is attached. (M-3)
4. STATE OF THE REGION - 1987 -- Wednesday, March 25, 2:00 p.m. The
Metropolitan Council will be hosting a "State of the Region" meeting
at the Minneapolis -St. Paul Airport Hilton, 3700 East 80th St.,
Bloomington.
5. APRIL CALENDAR -- The April calendar of meetings and events is
attached. M-5)
FOR YOUR INFORMATION.....
1. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS -- Metropolitan Council Chair, Steve
Keefe, has confirmed approval of three amendments to the City's
Comprehensive Plan. The first is the annual Capital Improvement
Plan update. The second approval is for a change in the City's
sewer plan to redirect sewer flows. The final amendment revises the
staged growth plan. The latter two amendments are required for the
Bass Lake Heights development on Pineview and County Road 47.
Copies of the approving letter are attached for information. (I-1)
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD. PLYMOUTH, MiNNESO?f, 55447. TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800
CITY COUNCIL INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM
March 19, 1987
Page two
2. PHASE II OF HOUSING NEEDS REPORT -- In accordance with earlier
Council approval, the attached Housing Need Survey is being
distributed to 3,000 Plymouth area households. The data from the
completed surveys will be used to prepare a report for HRA and City
Council consideration on the issue of the Downtown Plymouth Senior
Citizens' Housing site.
3. EMPLOYEE LUNCHEONS -- In an earlier information memo, I advised the
Council of the excellent safety record of City employees in 1986.
Losses from vehicular accidents and personal injury accidents were
very low. To show our appreciation we have scheduled a special
luncheon for all employees on Tuesday, March 24. Police officers
working "mid" and "dog" watch will also be provided with a free
dinner. Copies of the invitation memos are attached. (I-3)
4. MINUTES:
a. Planning Commission, March 11, 1987. (I -4a)
b. Municipal Legislative Commission Operating Committee Meeting,
March 11, 1987. (I -4b)
c. Plymouth Safety Committee, March 11, 1987. (I -4c)
5. CITY ATTORNEY BILLING FOR FEBRUARY -- The February summary statement
from the City Attorney's office is attached for Council review.
(I-5)
6. WEST HENNEPIN HUMAN SERVICES PLANNING BOARD -- Attached is a
newsletter from the WHHS Planning Board providing an update on the
Board's programs and services. (I-6)
7. "STATE OF THE CITIES, 1987" -- The League of Minnesota Cities has
issued the attached "State of the Cities" report for the purpose of
informing the public and state policy makers on major financial
challenges facing Minnesota's cities. The League plans to annually
publish this report to provide an on-going assessment of trends in
federal and state financial assistance to cities, their
expenditures, and the cost of federal and state mandates. A cover
letter from LMC President, James Miller is also included. (I-7)
8. CORRESPONDENCE:
a. Letter from Thomas Sweeney, to Mayor Schneider, submitting his
resignation as the City's representative to the West Hennepin
Human Service Planning Board. (I -8a)
b. Letter to Dean R. Johnson Construction Company, from Joe Ryan,
Building Official, responding to a Public Service Customer
Service comment card submitted on the hiring of additional
building inspectors. (I -8b)
CITY COUNCIL INFORNATIONAL NEMORANDUM
March 19, 1987
Page three
c. Letter from Mr. William Morkrid, President, Ferndale North
Homeowner's Association, expressing concern about North Ferndale
Road. Mayor Schneider's response is attached. (I-80
d. Letter from Mayor Schneider, to the League of Minnesota Cities,
endorsing Edina City Manager, Kenneth Rosland for receipt of the
1987 C.C. Ludwig Award. (I -8d)
e. Letter from Maxine Theusch, to Mayor Schneider, thanking the
Mayor for recognizing the Girl Scouts at the March 2 Council
meeting. A copy of the Mayor's response is also attached.
(I -8e)
f. Letter from Eric Stetz, 16820 - 30th Avenue North, to Mayor
Schneider, regarding the need for a traffic light at County Road
6 and Dunkirk Lane. A copy of the Mayor's response is also
attached. (I -8f)
g. Copy of letter sent to Homeowner Association Presidents on the
Plymouth Fire Station No. 3 referendum. (I -8g)
h. Letter to D. J. KJos, 3905 Orleans Lane, from Frank Boyles,
in response to Mr. Kjos' resident feedback form suggesting that
Plymouth Metrolink internal circulator service be expanded to
the area north of Medicine Lake. (I -8h)
i. Letter from Richard Weaver, 7732 Drew Avenue No., Brooklyn Park,
to Virgil Schneider, submitting a complaint on the discontin-
uance of universal service by Cable TV Northwest. The Mayor's
response to Mr. Weaver is also attached. (I -8i)
James. G. Willis
City Manager
JGW:Jm
attach
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA
WEDNESDAY, MARCH 25, 1987
WHERE: Plymouth City Center
3400 Plymouth Boulevard
Plymouth, MN 55447
CONSENT AGENDA
All items listed with an asterisk (*) are considered to be routine by the Planning
Commission and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of
these items unless a Commissioner, citizen or petitioner so requests, in which event
the item will be removed from the consent agenda and considered in normal sequence on
the agenda.
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. ROLL CALL
3.* APPROVAL OF MINUTES
4. PUBLIC HEARINGS
7:30 P.M.
Planning Commission Minutes, March 11, 1987
A. James C. Olson, Bonestroo, Rosene and Anderlik and Associates for the City of
Plymouth. Rezoning, Preliminary Plat, Conditional Use Permit, Site Plan and
Variances for property west of Zachary Lane in the vicinity of and including
Zachary Lane Park; north of County Road 9 for construction of an approximate
15,000 sq. ft. municipal water treatment plant. (87013)
B. City of Plymouth. Land Use Guide Plan Amendment and Rezoning from the LA -2
and R-2 designations to the LA -1 and R -1A designations for property north and
south of 34th Avenue, east of Xenium Lane.
C. City of Plymouth. Rezoning property west of Vicksburg Lane at 22nd and 24th
Avenues North from R-2 (low density multiple residence) District to R -1A (low
density single family residential) District. (86130)
D. City of Plymouth. Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan Staged Growth Element
to allow for approximately 30 acres northeast of I-494 and the Soo Line
Railroad to be served with sanitary sewer. (87014)
5. NEW BUSINESS
A. Henry B. Hayden, Metroquip. Site Plan Amendment and Variances for expansion
of the Metroquip building at 2340 Fernbrook Lane. (87002)
6. OTHER BUSINESS
7. ADJOURNMENT 9:30 P.M.
�_l
TWINWEST CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
COFFEE BREAK
March 26, 1987
"State of the City of Plymouth"
7:45
a.m.
- 8:15 a.m. --
Coffee/Juice/Rolls
8:15
a.m.
- 8:20 a.m. --
Introductions: Dave Olson, dames G. Willis
8:20
a.m.
- 8:45 a.m. --
I. State of the City - Virgil Schneider
II. Development trends in Plymouth
III. Community-based residential facilities
IV. Downtown Plymouth
V. Fire Station III
8:45
a.m.
- 9:00 a.m. --
Questions and Answers
9:00
a.m.
--
Adjourn
FB:dma
cd
YA
cz�—
w
a
w
c°
N
z
CN
z
M
O
w
r --r
N
M
�U o
M O
'z
W
W
P4
�1
N uo
O�
.--�V)UoU
0 cn
N � MV
N
z
H
z U
k
z
z
a UO
c7 a
z w
cz
H
z
730
00
�"
w z
O W H
SOF
O•• O
CC t- U
�D O
N NO�rNe.l
a
Cii
F..� •Z
U H
(n
{Yi O
C!)
W
N N
1.4
U
a W
0 W ��
W
�
w
'O
o � � ,;, o"o
d
c7
z O
U
a
U ,'�
z
�O
H •
U�
0 a�
C
mor
a NN
O x
UO U
HgU
O
0
,,
NW
OUOU
rquS
00000
.G
v oo N
U
Lr)
a
1\ H
H R+
6 I, H
M ��N.1
C7 U•
U
Q
H A
z O
�:Z)
H U
n
z z
U U
OU
w�a
OH O
H ow+u
O j
�zwc7
-4.
u
PW4'
�O
FX4
P4u
IF
UOU
M1 �r N N
G
oocz
N f•1
N o" N C>
S
U
1n r a0 .-• ON
N N
O
04 �O Metropolitan Council
i 300 Metro Square Building
Seventh and Robert Streets
WO St. Paul, Minnesota 55101
°*T r F Telephone (612) 291-6359
March 16, 1987
Al Cottingham, Associate Planner
City of Plymouth
3400 Plymouth Blvd.
Plymouth, MN 55447
RE: City of Plymouth Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Annual Capital Improvement Program Update
Metropolitan Council Referral File No. 13398-4
Dear Mr. Cottingham:
At its meeting on March 12, 1987, the Metropolitan Council considered the City
of Plymouth's Comprehenve Plan Amendment to the Annual Capital Improvement,
Program Update. This consideration was based on the following report from the
Consent List which was adopted by the Council:
The Plymouth CIP includes a 111987-1991 CIT Street Map" which shows planned
interchanges at Hwy 55 and Hwy 101; Highway 55 and County Road 24; and I-
494 and 49th Ave. These interchanges are not included in the five year
program, nor does Mn/DOT have any plans to construct them. The city may
intend these accesses for the far distant future; if and when the city
decides to build the interchanges, they must follow the Council's
guidelines and criteria for metropolitan highway interchanges. Approval of
this CIP does not mean approval of the interchange locations. In other
respects the amendment is in conformity with metropolitan system plans
consistent with other chapters of the Metropolitan Development Guide and
compatible with the plans of adjacent communities.
The Council approved this staff report as its comments on the plan amendment.
Attached is a copy of a letter from the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission
commenting on the plan amendment.
Sincerely,
,5tc�— l
Steve Keefe
Chair
SK:11
cc: James Willis, Manager, City of Plymouth
R.A. Odde, Metropolitan Waste Control Commission
Paul Baltzersen, Metropolitan Council Staff
An Equal Opportunity Employer
March 16, 1987
Al Cottingham, Associate Planner
City of Plymouth
31400 Plymouth Blvd.
Plymouth, Mn 55447
RE: City of Plymouth Comprehensive
Update Waste Control Element
Metropolitan Council Referral
Dear Mr. Cottingham:
'rN CIT"'
Plan Amendment
File No. 13398-6
Metropolitan Council
300 Metro Square Building
Seventh and Robert Streets
St. Paul, Minnesota 55101
Telephone (612) 291-6359
At its meeting on March 12, 1987, the Metropolitan Council considered the City
of Plymouth's Comprehensive Plan amendment to update the Waste Control
Element. This consideration was based on the following report frpm the
Consent List which was adopted by the Council:
The City is proposing a change in its sewer plan to direct sewer flow from
district NC -10 to the east to district BL -2. The 107 acres area to be
served is within the Council's proposed year 2000 Metropolitan Urban
Service Area and consistent with land needed to accommodate forecasted
development. The parcel is (with the exception of 20 acres redesignated in
another plan amendment - MC Referral File No. 13398-7) in an area shown in
the Plymouth plan for post 1990 development. To be consistent, the city
should amend its land use plan to change the staging for this area. The
amendment is in conformity with metropolitan system plans consistent with
other chapters of the Metropolitan Development Guide and compatible with
the plans of adjacent communities.
The Council approved this staff report as its comments on the plan amendment.
Attached is a copy of a letter from the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission
commenting on the plan amendment.
Sincerely,
Steve Keefe
Chair
SK:ll
cc: James Willis, Manager, City of Plymouth
R.A. Odde, Metropolitan Waste Control Commission
Paul Baltzersen, Metropolitan Council Staff
An Equal Opportunity Employer
March 16, 1987
Al Cottingham, Associate Planner
City of Plymouth
3400 Plymouth Blvd.
Plymouth, MN 55447
RE: City of Plymouth Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Staged Development Plan
Metropolitan Council Referral File No. 13398-7
Dear Mr. Cottingham:
Metropolitan Council
300 Metro Square Building
Seventh and Robert Streets
St. Paul, Minnesota 55101
Telephone (612) 291-6359
a:� — t
"LUCIVFD
MAR 19 1sa,7
rrtipirmogH
At its meeting on March 12, 1987, the Metropolitan Council considered the City
of Plymouth's Comprehensive Plan Amendment to the Staged Development Plan.
This consideration was based on the following report from the Consent List
which was adopted by the Council:
The City of Plymouth has proposed a change in staging of its urban service
area to permit a 36 unit residential subdivision on a 20 acre parcel in the
northcentral portion of the city near Pineview Road and County Road 47.
The parcel is within the year 2000 Metropolitan Urban Service Area and is
consistent with additional area Plymouth will need to accommodate
forecasted growth. The amendment is in conformity with metropolitan system
plans consistent with other chapters of the Metropolitan Development Guide
and compatible with the plans of adjacent communities.
The Council approved this staff report as its comments on the plan amendment.
Attached is a copy of a letter from the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission
commenting on the plan amendment.
Sincerely,
S�
Steve Keefe
Chair
SK: 11
cc: James Willis, Manager, City of Plymouth
R.A. Odde, Metropolitan Waste Control Commission
Paul Baltzersen, Metropolitan Council Staff
An Equal Opportunity Employer
PLEASE CHECK ALL THE BOXES BELO.W..WHICH APPLY TO YOU:
C J I am under 55 and have not completed the survey. Please remove my
name from your mailing list.
C J I am 55 years or older and would like to participate in a group
discussion concerning the housing needs of persona living in the
Plymouth area.
C J I am interested in any new quality housing options for persons over
age 55 in the Plymouth area and would like more information as it
becomes available.
NAME: -------------------------------------------------------------------
STREET ADDRESS: ---- ------------------------------------------------------
CITY. STATE AND ZIP CODE: ------------------------------------------------
PHONE (ONLY IF OVER 55):-------------------------------------------------
-- - - r - I ...v .. -
Housing Needs Survey
April, 1987
THE FOLLOWING SURVEY IS DESIGNED TO COLLECT THE OPINIONS OF ADULTS OVER THE
AGE OF SS CONCERNING THE NEED FOR RENTAL HOUSING IN PLYMOUTH AND THE
SURROUNDING COMMUNITIES. IF YOU ARE UNU.E_R,,.THE_ AGE_..OF ..55, PLEASE FILL OUT THE
ENCLOSED YELLOW FORM AND RETURN IT IN THE POSTAGE -PAID ENVELOPE. IF YOU ARE
SS OR OVER, PLEASE FILL OUT BOTH THE SURVEY AND THE YELLOW FORM AND RETURN
THEM IN THE POSTAGE PAID ENVELOPE TO DUALITY DECISIONS, INC. BY APRIL 20,
1987. THANK YOU FOR YOUR HELP IN MEETING THE HOUSING NEEDS OF OLDER ADULTS IN
THIS AREA.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hous i ng 11lescls
1. Do you favor the construction of rental housing which is designed
especially for adults over age 55 in Plymouth?
(1) YES
(2)_____NO
2. If you were to consider moving from your present home, how soon would you
relocate?
(1) ----- Within a year from now (3) -----
Three to five years from now
(2) ----- One to two years from now (4) More than 5 years from now
(5)_____Haven't considered moving
3. If you should have to relocate your home due to a change in your marital
status or health status, to which type of housing do you think you would
move?
(1) ----- Move in with family or friends
(2) ..... Housing for older adults next door to a health facility
(3) ..... Housing for older adults but not next door to a health facility
(4)_____Genera1 rental apartment -type housing
(S) ..... Multi -family housing which is owned such as townhomes or condos
(6)_____A single family dwelling
(7)_____A health care facility
(8) -_---Other (Please explain_____________________________________)
4. Do you plan on moving out of Plymouth when you relocate your home?
(1) Yes
(2)_____No
(3) -----Uncertain
S. The
City of Plymouth resembles a
six mile square. In
thinking of the best
location for building rental apartment
type housing for
older adults, in
which part of the
City should the
housing be built?
(1) -----
Northwest
quadrant (upper
left-hand corner of
the square)
(2) -----
Northeast
quadrant (lower
left-hand corner of
the square)
(3)____
Southwest
quadrant (upper
right-hand corner of
the square)
(4) -----
Southeast
quadrant (lower
right-hand corner of
the square)
(S) -----
A central
location (near
Plymouth City Hall)
Page 1
Housing Needs Survey
April, 1987
6. One of the possible sites for this housing is located at the intersection'
of Plymouth Boulevard and 37th Avenue North, on the northeast corner of
the intersection, about two blocks north of City Hall. Please review the
following list of site characteristics and circle the answer that best
reflects your opinion.
I_.... think that the__.pro,pose_d.,_hou.sing__,_._site___is;._
AGREE DISAGREE_ UNCERTAIN_
A. Close to churches of various denominations A D U
B. Close to mayor highways A D U
C. Close to city/local transportation A D U
D. Convenient to shopping facilities A D U
E. An attractive location A D U
F. Close to community programs for older
adults A D U
G. Convenient to medical facilities A D U
H. Is easy to drive around in; light traffic A D U
I. Close to my family and friends A D U
7. If a rental apartment project for older adults were built in Plymouth
within the next two years, would you be interested in moving to the
complex?
(1) Yes, definitely interested (3)____ Uncertain, depends on future
(2) ----- Yes, somewhat interested (4) ----- No, not interested
8. Several descriptions of housing units are listed below. Understanding
that the larger units will cost more than smaller units, please select the
features of a unit which you feel could best meet your apace needs if you
would decide to leave your present dwelling.
A. LIVING AREA: (1) ----- An efficiency unit which combines the
living and the sleeping areas
(2) Combined living room -dining area
(3) ----- Living room and dining room
B. KITCHEN:
C. BEDROOMS/DEN:
(1) ----- With eating space
(2)_____Without eating space
(3) With a breakfast bar
(1)_____One bedroom
(2) One bedroom and a den
(3) Two bedrooms
(4) Three bedrooms
Page 2
Housing Needs Survey
April, 1987
D.
BATHROOM: E.
BATHING FACILITIES
(1) ----- One full bath
(1) Shower
(2)_____One full bath and 1/2 bath
(2) Tub
(3) ----- Two full baths
(3)____ -Combination
shower/tub
9. The
following list of facilities could
be included in the housing complex.
Circle
the answer which reflects your
need and desire for such a facility.
NEED THIS
NEED THIS DON'T NEED
VERY MUCH
-------------------------------------
SOMEWHAT OR
WANT THIS
A.
UNDERGROUND HEATED PARKING 1
2
3
B.
GUEST ROOMS 1
2
3
C.
COMMUNITY ROOM WITH KITCHEN 1
2
3
D.
HOBBY/WOODWORKING ROOM/SHOP 1
2
3
E.
LAUNDRY ROOM ON EACH FLOOR 1
2
3
F.
SWIMMING POOL 1
2
3
G.
EXERCISE ROOM 1
2
3
H.
WHIRLPOOL FACILITIES 1
2
3
I.
CONGREGATE DINING 1
2
3
10. The
following services can be included
in the housing complex for an extra
cost. Please review each service and
circle the answer which
represents
whether or not you would pay additional rent for such an
option. Your
answers should reflect your current desire for these services.
I LIKE THIS I LIKE THIS
I DON'T
AND WOULD
PAY BUT WOULD NOT
LIKE OR
EXTRA
PAY EXTRA
NEED THIS
A.
------------------------------------------
Security:Telephone admittance 1
2
3
B.
24 hour on-site guard 1
2
3
C.
A storage room in apartment 1
2
3
D.
A storage room outside the unit 1
2
3
E.
Washer/dryer in each unit 1
2
3
F.
Unit well -lit with extra 1
2
3
large windows
G.
Transportation to shopping 1
2
3
H.
A balcony or patio 1
2
3
Page 3
_,
Housing Needs Survey
April, 1987_
11. Would you prefer to purchase or rent the housing which you would move
to
next?
(1)
-----Rent
(2) Purchase (SKIP TO QUESTION 13)
12. What is the maximum rent which you are willing
and able to pay for
the
unit which you described in Question 8? (PLEASE
RECALL THAT IF YOU SHOULD
SELL A HOUSE TO RELOCATE, YOU WILL HAVE AN
INCREASE IN YOUR INCOME).
(1) Less than 5300/month (S)_____S600-699/month
(2)5300-399/month (6)_____5700-799/month
(3)5400-499/month (7)_____5800-899/month
(4) 5500-599/month (6) -----
More than 5900/month
13. The questions in this section give us an
idea of the things which
are
important activities in your life. Since
the City believes that
the
housing should support your lifestyle, we'd
like to know what your typical
day and week is like. Please answer this
section by circling the number
of times per week in which you usually
engage in these activities,
assuming that the weather is appropriate:
NUMBER
OF TIMES PER WEEK
A. Jogging/walking/bicycling O 1
2 3 4 5 6
7+
B. Exercise classes O 1
2 3 4 5 6
7+
C. Attendinq social club functions 0 1
2 3 4 S 6
7+
D. Playing cards/other games O 1
2 3 4 S 6
7+
E. Playing golf O 1
2 3 4 5 6
7+
F. Swimming O 1
2 3 4 5 6
7+
G. Bowling O 1
2 3 4 S 6
7+
14. Is the church which you attend located in the City of Plymouth?
(1) Yes
(2) -----No
(3) ----- I do not have a regular church
15. Is the clinic where you go for routine medical services located in the
City of Plymouth?
(1) Yes
(2)_____No
(3) I do not have a clinic which is designated for my family's routine
medical care
Page 4
- - -I - - _ _ ! _. _ - - - "
Housing Needs Survey
April, 1987
16. What are the TWO THINGS you like the best about the housing in which you
currently reside? (SELECT ONLY TWO)
(1) ---- The cost of the housing, affordability
(2) -__-The location of the housing in reference to shopping and
transportation
(3) The amenities which the housinq_ offers to me
(4)_ ---The security of the housing
(S) --_-Closeness to family and friends
(6) -__-The overall condition and age of the housing
(7) -__-Other (Please explain ----------------------------------------
17.
_------__-------------------
17. What is the ONE THING you like the least about the housing in which you
currently reside? (SELECT ONLY ONE)
(1) ---- The cost of the housing, affordability
(2)_ ---The location of the housing in reference to shopping and
transportation
(3) ---- The amenities which the housing offers to me
(4)_ ---The security of the housing
(5) ----Closeness to family and friends
(6) ---- The overall condition and age of the housing
(7) ----Other (Please explain ---------------------------------------->
18. How important to you is the location of your family and friends as a
factor you consider in selecting mousing alternatives?
(1) ..... Very important
(2)_ ----Somewhat important
(3) -----Not at all important
19. Is your name currently on the waiting list for any apartment housing?
(1) No (GO TO QUESTION 20)
(2) -----Yes
IF YES, is this housing:
(CHECK ALL THAT APPLY)
(1)__ ---located in the City of Plymouth?
(2)_____housing for adults over age 55
(3)_____regular apartment housing
20. Which type of apartment building, in terms of height, is most likely to
appeal to you?
(1)-----a low rise building of 1-2 stories
(2) -----
a mid rise building of 3-6 stories
(3)_-___a high rise building of more than 6 stories
(4) ..... building height makes no difference to me
21. How old are you?
(1) Under 55 (4) 65-69 (7) 80-84
----- ----- -----
(2) 55-59 (5) 70-74 (8) 8S-89
----- ----- -----
(3) 60-64 (6)-----75-79 (9) 90 or over
Page S
t ILy O= rlymvuLn
Housing Needs Survey
April, 1987
22. Are you female or male?
(1) Female (2) Male
23. What is your current marital status?
(1)_____Never married (3)_____Widowed
(2)Married (4) Separated
24. Are you currently employed for wages?
_7__C;2__
(5) Divorced
(1) Yes, full-time (3) ----- No. I am not employed at this time
(2) ..... Yes, part-time
25. Do you presently own your own home?
(1)_____Yes
(2) No
26. How much do you spend monthly on your current housing? Include all
mortgage payments, rent, taxes, maintenance, insurance and utilities.
(1) Less than 5300/month
(2)_____5300-399/month
(3)5400-499/month
(4) 5500-599/month
(S)_____5600-699/month
(6) 5700-799/month
(7)$800-899/month
(8) More than 5900/month
27. The
following question is asked to
make
sure that the
housing which is
planned is affordable to older adults.
Remember that
the survey is
anonymous and confidential and no
one else
will know
your answer. What
was
your estimated gross income for
1986?
(1)
50-5,000 (0-5417/mo)
(5)_____520-30,000
(51667-2499/mo)
(2)_____55-10,000
(5418-835/mo)
(6)_____$30-40,000
(52500-3333/mo)
(3)__---510-15,000
(5836-1250/mo)
(7)____-$40-50,000
(53334-4167/mo)
(4)---__$15-20,000
(51251-1666/mo)
(8) -----
Over 550,000
per year
THE NEXT QUESTIONS ARE TO GATHER OPINIONS OF THE NEED FOR A COMMUNITY CENTER
-------------------- -------------
1 28. Is there a need in Plymouth for a community center facility? I
I I
i (1) Yes (2)_____N0
1 29. Which of the following arrangements do you think gives older adults I
I the kind of community facilities they need to support senior programs?
I I
I (1) ..... Programs should be located in rooms which are set aside for i
I seniors at a general community center. I
I (2) ..... Programs can be located at the community center but I don't I
I think there need to be special rooms designated.
I (3) Seniors should have their own building for their programa. I
1 30. Should the community center offer congregate dining for senior adults?
I I
I C1) Yes (2) No 1
Page 6
"_� -3
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
3400 PLYMOUTH BLVD., PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800
MEMO
DATE: March 13, 1987
TO: All City Center, Maintenance, and Police Employees
FROM: James G. Willis, City Manager
SUBJECT THANKS FOR A SOB WELL DONE!
We have completed our review of personal injury and vehicular accident
statistics for calendar year 1986 as part of our process of rebidding
the City's automobile, general liability and worker's compensation
insurance. The records show that, thanks to your concern, 1986 was
again a good year in terms of minimum loss due to vehicular accidents
and personal injuries.
This excellent accident and injury record is only possible through
each employee's continuing concern for safety. To show our appre-
ciation for a job well done, the City will be providing a light lunch
for all City employees desiring to participate on Tuesday, March 24.
Two luncheons are scheduled; the first beginning at 11:00 a.m., and
the second at 12:00 noon. I am asking the supervisors to schedule
approximately one-half of their employees to attend each luncheon in
order that we can minimize any interruption on the City work
operations. Both luncheons will take place in the City Center lunch-
room.
Once again, congratulations on a job well done!
JGW:jm
cc: City Supervisors
Mayor & City Council
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
3400 PLYMOUTH BLVD., PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800
MEMO
DATE: March 13, 1987
TO: All Mid- and Dog -Watch Police Officers
FROM: dames G. Willis, City Manager
SUBJECT THANKS FOR A 30113 WELL DONE!
We have completed our review of personal injury and vehicular accident
statistics for calendar year 1986 as part of our process of rebidding
the City's automobile, general liability and worker's compensation
insurance. The records show that, thanks to your concern, 1986 was
again a good year in terms of minimum loss due to vehicular accidents
and personal injuries.
This excellent accident and injury record is only possible through
each employee's continuing concern for safety. To show our appre-
ciation for a job well done, the City will be providing a light lunch
for all City employees desiring to participate on Tuesday, March 24.
Two luncheons are scheduled; the first beginning at 11:00 a.m., and
the second at 12:00 noon. I am asking the supervisors to schedule
approximately one-half of their employees to attend each luncheon in
order that we can minimize any interruption on the City work
operations. Both luncheons will take place in the City Center lunch-
room
For police officers working the mid- and dog -shifts, we will order a
sufficient amount of food and put it in the refrigerator at the City
Center so you too can take have a free lunch during your normal shift
on the night of the 24th/morning of the 25th.
Once again, congratulations on a ,fob well done!
JGW:jm
cc: City Supervisors
Mayor & City Council
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
MARCH 11, 1987
The Regular Meeting of the Plymouth Planning Commission was
called to order at 7:30 P.M.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Steigerwald, Commissioners
Wire, Stulberg, Zylla, Plufka, Mellen
and Pauba
MEMBERS ABSENT: None
STAFF PRESENT: Community Development Coordinator
Sara McConn
City Engineer Sherm Goldberg
Planning Secretary Grace Wineman
*MINUTES
MOTION by Commissioner Pauba, seconded by Commissioner
Mellen to approve the February 25, 1987 Minutes as
submitted.
Vote. 6 Ayes. Commissioner Stulberg abstained. MOTION
carried.
Chairman Steigerwald introduced Cub Scout Troup 4724 in
attendance at the meeting. He explained the functions of
the Planning Commission and commended their interest in City
business.
OLD BUSINESS
Chairman Steigerwald introduced the request by David C.
Johnson. Coordinator McConn provided an overview of the
March 3, 1987 Planning Staff Report.
Chairman Steigerwald introduced Dale Simonson, Attorney,
representing the petitioner. Mr. Simonson noted the Plan-
ning Staff Report indicates that the previous problems as
discussed concerning this site, have been dealt with. He
listed the variances which have been eliminated by changes
to the plan. The parking on the southeast has been reduced
by 7 spaces; a left turn stacking lane will be installed to
facilitate flow and provides internal stacking as well. The
overall building size has been reduced. He commented this
was not an easy thing to do because of the economics involv-
ed; and, it will not reduce the construction costs for the
petitioner, but has made it possible for them to eliminate
the variances as noted. Item No. 28 in the Engineer's Memo-
randum is of concern. It is their opinion they have dealt
with the potential problem of incoming traffic by the on-
site left turn lane. An extension of the median would be
- 55 -
NOTION TO APPROVE
VOTE - NOTION CARRIED
SITE PLAN AND
VARIANCES FOR
DAVID C. JOHNSON
ONE-STORY RETAIL
BUILDING (86138)
=--'A ck.
Page 56
Planning Commission Minutes
March 11, 1987
dangerous; it is requested this condition be eliminated or
at least modified to use a Yield or Stop sign, rather than
extending the median.
Chairman Steigerwald clarified that the item in question is
28-B. He stated that the traffic problems could intensify
depending upon how busy this intersection becomes. Mr.
Simonson stated that because this is a neighborhood retail
center there will not be the traffic volume seen at larger
retail centers; and, that it is logical to assume that
customers will make the left turn once entering into the
parking lot.
Chairman Steigerwald asked Engineer Goldberg the reason for
the extension of the median. Engineer Goldberg discussed
the stacking distance from Highway 101 back to 14th Avenue,
and that during rush hours and traffic peaks, the traffic
could back up to where there will be a problem for drivers
trying to get onto Highway 101. If the median is extended
to the east, the left-hand turn to the west side of the
building would be prohibited.
Mr. Simonson stated the changes were made because the City
Council was concerned there was no internal circulation,
this plan provides the circulation required; and, the fact
that the employee parking is at the rear of the building
frees space at the front of the building for customer park-
ing and better access.
Commissioner Zylla inquired if the traffic engineer's com-
ments relate to in or out -traffic? Engineer Goldberg
answered both. The construction of a building that is too
large for the site diminishes the area for traffic
circulation. The median would reduce the turning
movements and potential traffic conflicts. Commissioner
Zylla inquired if extending the median would prevent turning
in front of the center; Engineer Goldberg answered
affirmatively. Coordinator McConn further explained the
problems in moving traffic into, through, and out of this
site. Engineer Goldberg stated a driver must make a hurried
decision when entering the site whether to turn left, or go
straight to the rear of the building.
There was further discussion regarding the length of medians
in other retail centers. Commissioner Mellen noted that
this site is not dissimilar from a small shopping area in
Wayzata (on Highway 12) and noted that if a partition/median
is installed, it may become very confusing for the
motorist/customer. Engineer Goldberg commented that that
particular shopping area also has a poor site design.
Page 57
Planning Commission Minutes
March 11, 1987
It was mentioned that the speed limit at this site is 40
mph. Discussion ensued about the proposed improvements to
Highway 101 which will move the curbline 7 ft. to the east.
The petitioner has complied with the required dedication for
right-of-way.
Chairman Steigerwald inquired if there would be three lanes
of traffic along Highway 101? Engineer Goldberg stated
there will be a left lane, through lane, and right -turn
lane. These improvements will be accomplished soon; a
portion will be installed at the time of constructing
Building A on this site.
Mr. Simonson noted that the shared entrance with the service
station will be used by more customers; but some provision
must be made for site access at 14th Avenue.
Commissioner Pauba noted this is not a small retail building
and the site problems have necessitated spending the great
amount of time it has taken to review this project to make
sure all alternatives have been considered to reduce the
problems of parking, and traffic circulation.
Commissioner Zylla stated in reviewing the Site Plan, he
sees only one way to make a left turn out of the whole
block onto a public road at the most southerly edge of the
site. Mr. Simonson stated this is to provide a safety
factor because of the traffic levels. Commissioner Zylla
confirmed that the County has mandated no left turn onto
County Road 6. Coordinator McConn explained that the median
cut on County Road 6 will probably be closed in the future.
Commissioner Pauba confirmed the elimination of the vari-
ances and that the building size has been reduced. Commis-
sioner Stulberg inquired why they had not considered "flip-
flopping" the building? Mr. Simonson stated that visibility
for the lease space is essential. The traffic is concen-
trated on Highway 101 and County Road 6 for the retail and
for the service station. If the building were flip-flopped,
it would present only the backside of the building; the only
visibility would be to the northbound traffic. This also
presents a psychological barrier which would be a serious
problem in leasing the tenant space. He stated he has
managed other shopping centers and have seen these problems
and had to deal with the loss of visibility. He noted that
they have studied all of the alternatives and have consider-
ed every possible change. The plan presented tonight is the
optimum plan and solves the problems reviewed previously.
Page 58
Planning Commission Minutes
March 11, 1987
Mr. Simonson is concerned that even though they have provid-
ed the internal circulation as directed by City Council,
there seems to be additional concerns expressed tonight that
have not surfaced in previous discussions. Coordinator
McConn stated an earlier plan was for a smaller building
which provided more space on the site for parking and traf-
fic circulation; however, the concern regarding traffic
entering, circulating, and leaving the site has been a point
of discussion since the City began reviewing plans for this
site. Chairman Steigerwald concurred.
Coordinator McConn confirmed for Commissioner Zylla that the
reason for not shifting the building to the east is because
of the required 75 ft. setback from the commercial site to a
residential area.
Chairman Steigerwald noted that the Planning Commission had
recommended the installation of a chain link fence, and
asked if the City Council has considered this in their re-
view? Coordinator McConn stated the Council has not discus-
sed the fence. Chairman Steigerwald noted this recommenda-
tion was not brought forward in the staff report. Coordina-
tor McConn stated this was an oversight and would be cor-
rected before the the application is sent on to the City
Council.
Mr. Simonson stated they have no
regarding the fence, except that
be, that residents in the are
installed.
strong feelings either way
it can be ugly, and it may
will request a gate be
Commissioner Wire inquired if the 12 -ft. drive aisle were
widened, would this give an adequate release to the traffic
pressure point? Mr. Simonson stated that a previous plan
showed a 24 -ft. drive aisle, but there was difficulty with
including the median, and the City Council felt there was no
internal circulation, so the' drive aisle was narrowed to
provide this circulation. There was further discussion re-
garding the site layout and the stacking problems.
Commissioner Zylla inquired if the petitioner's development
team had their own traffic study done. Steve Krause stated
they had no trip studies done.
MOTION by Commissioner Stulberg, seconded by Commissioner
Plufka to recommend approval of the Site Plan and Variances,
subject to the conditions as stated in the March 3, 1987
staff report, adding the condition as recommended previously
by the Planning Commission to construct a chain link fence;
to change the Engineer's Memorandum by the elimination of
Item 28-B requiring the extension of the median; and 28-C
should be clarified regarding the installation of Stop
signs.
MOTION TO APPROVE
-7'- 4o.
Page 59
Planning Commission Minutes
March 11, 1987
Commissioner Stulberg stated that short of flip-flopping the
building, further reducing its size, or tearing down a
building and re -designing the entire development, this Site
Plan is the best for this particular site. If the traffic
problems become so bad it drives customers from the site,
the center will fail on its own. He does not believe that
extending the median will be effective.
Commissioner Pauba concurs with the Motion; that the regular
customers will learn to navigate through the center; and,
that the petitioner has done the best with what he has to
work with.
Commissioner Zylla stated he cannot support the Motion. He
does not believe it is the Commission's role to design the
building; and, he moved to amend the Motion to direct the
applicant to work with City staff to design a median of
adequate length to improve the site circulation and minimize
the traffic conflicts. MOTION died for lack of second.
Commissioner Plufka stated he supports the Motion and be-
lieves this plan best suits the site.
Vote. 6 Ayes. Commissioner Zylla, Nay. MOTION carried. VOTE - NOTION CARRIED
OTHER BUSINESS
Chairman Steigerwald introduced the continued discussion of STREAMLINING
potential measures that could be taken to Streamline the
Development Process. The Planning Commission reviewed the
February 27, 1987 Memorandum from Associate Planner Al
Cottingham. Chairman Steigerwald clarified that the Site
Plan for AT&T Communications was initially submitted with
variances. The variances were eliminated and the revised
Site Plan would have met the criteria for administrative
approval.
Chairman Steigerwald inquired if any of the Planning Commis-
sion members would have requested to review in full detail,
any of the Site Plans listed in the staff memorandum.
Because no one identified any specific project on which they
would have sought detailed review, Chairman Steigerwald
inquired if the Commission could recommend a 6 -month trial
period for administrative review and approval of Site Plans
for certain non-residential and multi -residential
developments.
MOTION by Chairman Steigerwald, seconded by Commissioner NOTION TO APPROVE
Plufka to recommend to the City Council that a 6 -month trial SIX-MONTH TRIAL
for a procedure which would involve the administrative re- FOR ADMINISTRATIVE
view and approval of Site Plans for certain non-residential SITE PLAN APPROVAL
Page 60
Planning Commission Minutes
March 11, 1987
and multi -residential developments, within the described
parameters of the March 5, 1987 Memorandum to the Planning
Commission.
VOTE. 6 Ayes. Commissioner Zylla abstained. MOTION
carried.
The Planning Commission discussed the anticipated changes to
the Tables of Residential and Non -Residential Allowable Uses
as listed in the March 5, 1987 Memorandum.
Commissioner Wire expressed concern with allowing
mortuaries, funeral homes, and monument sales in the B-1
Zoning District as a permitted use. Commissioner Wire
stated that the B-1 District is located adjacent to
residential areas and his concern is related to the business
hours of this type of use. He stated the control through
the Conditional Use Permit process should be maintained.
Commissioner Wire expressed similar concern with personal
service and repair establishments being allowed as a permit-
ted use in the B-1 Zoning District.
Commissioner Mellen commented that these types of land uses
do not have a high volume of customers, and he did not
appreciate the time delay involved with the Conditional Use
Permit process.
Coordinator McConn confirmed that a final decision would not
need to be made for purposes of directing a Public Hearing.
The Public Hearing could be scheduled and subsequent to
input from the staff, public, and Planning Commission
discussion, a final determination could be made.
Coordinator McConn requested that in addition to the items
listed in the staff memorandum, the Planning Commission
consider allowing printing establishments in the I-1
District as an accessory use. Most often, this type of
business is found to be supportive of the other uses allowed
in the I-1 District. The Commission concurred that this
could be considered at the public hearing.
S-40�"
VOTE - NOTION CARRIED
MOTION by Commissioner Plufka, seconded by Commissioner NOTION TO SCHEDULE
Mellen, to direct staff to proceed in scheduling the neces- PUBLIC HEARINGS
sary Public Hearings to consider the draft changes to Tables
of Residential and Non -Residential Allowable Uses.
ADUOUR?WNT
The meeting adjourned at 8:45 P.M.
FORTY-SECOND MLC OPERATING COMMITTEE
Wednesday, March 11, 1987
9:00 - 11:00 a.m.
Messerli & Kramer Board Room
MINUTES
T-�y b
MEETING
The Forty-second MLC Operating Committee Meeting was called`to•-order by
Jim Willis, the MLC Vice Chair.
Members Present: Jim Andre, Roseville; Tom Hedges, Eagan;
Dick Henneberger, Brooklyn Park; John Pidgeon, Bloomington; Ken Rosland,
Edina; Mark Sather, White Bear Lake; and Jim Willis, Plymouth.
Also Present: Tim Flaherty from the Coalition of Outstate Cities;
Leslie Anderson, Burnsville; Charlie Darth, Brooklyn Park; Larry Lee,
Bloomington; D.J. Leary from Media Services, Inc.; and Bob Renner, Jr.
and Deb Luebke from Messerli & Kramer.
Members Absent: Linda Barton, Burnsville; Michael Black, Shoreview;
Ken Haider, Maplewood; Carl Jullie, Eden Prairie; Jim Lacina, Woodbury;
Jim Miller, Minnetonka; Doug Reeder, Maple Grove; and Bob Schaefer,
Inver Grove Heights
The minutes from the 41st MLC Operating Committee Meeting were approved
and passed.
The Treasurer's Report was presented by Mark Sather and was approved.
Tim Flaherty met with the MLC Operating Committee and explained the
Coalition of Outstate Cities' 1987 Property Tax Proposal. The components
of this proposal included a $46 million tax base equalization formula, a
$25 million commercial property tax credit, a $9 million distressed area
industrial credit, and a $25 million shift in property tax due to
lowering the amount of agricultural land values by 25%.
Renner discussed the Governor's Property Tax Proposal and distributed
some position statements issued from the Department of Revenue. Renner
recommended to the MLC Operating Committee that the MLC take a position
on the Governor's proposal, stating that while the MLC may not be opposed
to certain portions of the proposal, the Commission could not support the
proposal in aggregate. Leary also recommended to the Operating Committee
that the MLC develop their positions on the current issues for the 1987
Legislative Session. Motions were made and passed by the MLC Operating
Committee that the following policies be recommended to the MLC Board of
Directors:
1) Henneberger made a motion to recommend to the MLC Board of Directors
that the MLC oppose the Governor's 1987 Property Tax Proposal. This
motion was seconded by Hedges and was passed. 2) Henneberger made a
motion to recommend to the Board that the MLC oppose any legislation
which would extend the sales tax and motor vehicle excise tax to local
42nd MLC Operating Committee Meeting
March 11, 1987
Page 2
Z -Ab
units of government. This motion was seconded and passed. 3) Rosland
made a motion, which was seconded by Hedges and passed to recommend to
the MLC Board that the MLC support legislation which would expand
Minnesota's present sales tax base item(s). 4) Henneberger made a motion
that a recommendation be made to the Board that the MLC support
legislation which would impose the 6% sales tax on the wholesale price of
gasoline. The funds raised from this tax would be dedicated to the trunk
highway fund or would be used to replace the lost revenue due to the
transfer of the motor vehicle excise tax from the general fund to the
trunk highway fund. This motion was seconded by Pidgeon and was passed.
5) Willis made a motion to recommend to the Board that the MLC oppose
any changes in the appropriation and/or amount of homestead credit
dollars going to local units of government. This motion was seconded by
Rosland and was passed. 6) Rosland made a motion which was seconded by
Henneberger that a recommendation be made that the MLC support legisla-
tion which retains the appropriation for local government aid (LGA) at
its current level. Should LGA payments be reduced, the reduction should
be proportional. 7) Andre made a motion which was seconded by Pidgeon
that the MLC oppose all four property tax reform components proposed by
the Coalition of Outstate Cities.
It was reported that the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities would
be voting on their position regarding fiscal disparities on March 12.
Larry Lee, Assistant City Manager from Bloomington, reported that the
Bloomington had just received the auditor's information for the MLC com-
puter and that that portion of the program would be up and running next
week. However, Lee also reported that the programming would take up more
manhours than originally estimated and that Bloomington's computer wasn't
entirely compatible and neither was Messerli & Kramer's. The City of
Plymouth has a Burroughs computer which would be more compatible so it
was decided that Lee, the computer programmer from Bloomington, Willis,
Dale Hahn (Plymouth's computer programmer), Renner and Messerli & Kramer's
computer manager would meet next week to determine how to proceed with
MLC's computer project. Once the computer system is functional the
Operating Committee requested that a computer run be completed on the cost
of homestead credit if $50 were deducted from the current figures.
The Leaguc of Minnesota C.`LLiras (LMC) Technical Committee met on March 9
and will recommend that the LMC Board of Directors oppose the Governor's
Property Tax Proposal. The Committee felt that while portions of the
Governor's proposal were acceptable, it was unacceptable in aggregate.
It was decided to call a special meeting of the MLC Board of Directors
to vote on the MLC policy statements which were developed in the 42nd
MLC Operating Committee Meeting. This special meeting was scheduled
for Wednesday, March 25 at 5:00-6:00 p.m. at the Edina City Hall Council
Chambers. The special MLC Board Meeting is to be preceded by a MLC
Operating Committee Meeting scheduled at 4:00 - 5:00 p.m. on Wednesday,
March 25 at the Edina City Hall Council Chambers.
The Forty-second MLC Operating Committee Meeting was adjourned at
11:30 a.m.
-7--4A (Z.,
MINUTES
PLYMOUTH SAFETY COMMITTEE
March 11, 1987
PRESENT: Gary Smith, John Wenner, Lyle Robinson, Mark Peterson, Russ
Elzy, Tim Oie, John Ward, Steve Herwig, John Sweeney, Frank
Boyles
ALSO PRESENT: Dave Volker, Employee Benefit Administration; Ron Garritt,
CNA Insurance Companies; Bobbi Leitner, Judy McMillin
I. OLD BUSINESS
A. APPROVAL OF FEBRUARY MEETING MINUTES
The February 4 meeting minutes were approved as submitted.
B. REPORT ON SAFETY ACTIVITIES
1. Traffic Warning Device Policy status -- Frank Boyles advised he
had met with Scott Sayer of Warning Light Inc. to review the
policy for additions. Frank reviewed with committee members the
revisions recommended by Mr. Sayer. Frank indicated that he
expects to receive a report from the County for the April meet-
ing, and anticipates the policy should then be ready for
finalization at the May meeting.
John Wenner asked what traffic warning procedures/steps
employees should be following prior to the policy's implemen-
tation. Frank Boyles indicated that for work being done on
streets which are 35 mph and less, employees should follow the
procedures/equipment listed on the traffic warning device
matrix. For streets over 35 mph, the Appendix B recommended
procedures and equipment should be used.
2. Respirator Program status -- Frank advised that Mark Peterson,
Tom Vetsch and Bob Fasching had submitted inventory records
which identified the City's existing respirator stock and types
of respirators needed to be purchased, the type of jobs requir-
ing respirators, the type of respirator required for a specific
job, the frequency and duration of a job, and the employees
performing the job. Frank indicated the next step will be to
contract with a Respirator professional who will: 1) supply
respirator use and maintenance training required to first-line
supervisors and employees; 2) evaluate the condition of current
respirators and recommend replacement/refurbishing; and 3)
conduct face -seal testing to employees using respirators and
determine if beards/facial features pose problems for certain
employees.
PLYMOUTH SAFETY COMMITTEE
March 11, 1987
Page two
'7_-4.\Q
3. Oxygen Storage - Police garage -- A memorandum from Sgt. Dennis
Paulson on the storage and refilling of high pressure oxygen
tanks in the police garage was reviewed by the committee. The
memorandum reports that all police officers have been instructed
in the refilling operation as part of their FTO program. In
addition, a spare tank system has been instituted in which the
CSO's maintain two filled spare tanks. With this system, police
officers will not be required to refill their portable tanks,
but only switch tanks. The CSO's have been trained in the
operation of the equipment, with overall responsibility of the
program being assigned to Rick Herman. Stan Scofield, Fire
Inspector, completed a fire/safety inspection of the tank
storage location, and approved the location.
4. Snow Fence in Maple Creek Park -- The committee reviewed the
memorandum from Tom Vetsch reporting on the snow fence at Maple
Creek Park. The fence was initially installed to act as a
barrier for children who may want to get close to the area where
the water enters the manhole. However, due to high water
levels, the existing fence was under water - the basis for the
concern. Prior to the ice going out, Park Maintenance personnel
had installed another fence on the ice. During the summer
months, a chain link fence will be installed which will protect
the area throughout the year.
II. NEW BUSINESS
A. Review of Personal Injury /Vehicular Accidents -- The committee
reviewed three vehicular accidents involving City employees, deter-
mining two accidents to be non -preventable and one accident
preventable. A memorandum will be prepared to the City Manager with
respect to each accident and recommendations made to supervisors
accordingly. A fourth vehicular accident involving an unoccupied
City squad car and a Hennepin County Jail Transport truck was also
reviewed.
B. Report from Safety Committee Subcommittee -- Frank Boyles reported
that a Subcommittee of the Safety Committee had met on February 24
to discuss alternatives to the present system of reviewing personal
Injury accidents. Committee members had previously stated concern
that the present review system is too rigid in determining personal
Injury accidents to be preventable or non -preventable and therefore
eliminating employees from attending the annual Safety Award
luncheon. He stated the Subcommittee considered several alter-
natives to the present review system including: 1) the disbanding
of the Safety Committee altogether on the basis that it is no longer
able to make the "hard decisions"; 2) having the Safety Committee
rule only on the preventability/non-preventability of accidents and
allowing the City Manager or supervisor determining employee
luncheon attendance, discipline or retraining; 3) allowing all
employees to attend the luncheon regardless of whether or not the
PLYMOUTH SAFETY COMMITTEE
March 11, 1987
Page three
=- J_�
employee was involved in a preventable accident; and 4) establishinq
a point system to rate severity of accidents. The Subcommittee
agreed that although many alternatives are available, they would all
be difficult to administer since they are not as as simple and
straight -forward as the existing review system. The Subcommittee
concluded that the most appropriate step is for the Safety Committee
to continue with the existing personal injury review system.
Safety Committee members further discussed the Subcommittee's
recommendation. Dave Volker reminded committee members that an
effective safety program should raise the safety consciousness of
employees. He believes the present system accomplishes this
objective.
Frank Boyles reiterated the Subcommittee's recommendation stating
that members should reflect upon the purpose of the safety program
and his or her role on the Safety Committee. Such reflection will
help Safety Committee members to remember that the prevention of
accidents can only be effectively accomplished by the recognition of
accidents which are preventable. This recognition will sometimes
deprive an employee of attendance at the Safety luncheon. While
this may be undesirable, it is far more preferable than failing to
recognize preventable accidents, which in turn, leads to future
similar accidents and ultimately serious personal injury or property
damage.
Committee members accepted the recommendation contained in the
Subcommittee's report to continue with the existing personal injury
review system.
C. Revised Invitation Memo -- Committee members approved the revised
invitation memo sent to employees involved in personal injury/
vehicular accidents.
D. Other Business
Gary Smith presented a warning label taken from the new Public Works
uniforms advising that the uniforms are not flame resistant. Dave
Volker stated that uniforms worn by Public Works personnel should
not contain any flammable material. Frank Boyles advised that
appropriate steps would be taken to remedy the situation.
Ron Garratt reported he would have a presentation and short film
for the April meeting on a Loss Control Recognition Program.
Committee members were asked to review the personnel protective
equipment checklist for revisions before the April meeting.
ru rr'ivu i n JAr t I T C;UMM1 I I tt �_
March 11, 1987
LA
Page four
Frank reviewed the City's 1986 Annual OSHA Occupational Injuries and
Illnesses Survey. Compared with 1985 OSHA survey results, the
number of injuries to City employees involving lost workdays,
workdays with restricted activity, and injuries without lost
workdays were substantially less in 1986.
Frank reported that Mark Peterson is in the process of preparing
training materials for use by temporary employees.
Frank reviewed a memo from Sgt. Larry Rogers indicating that
appropriate City personnel will be notified in the future about
known hazards on City property which could affect City employees.
The committee discussed the use of the Vehicle Repair Reportinq
form. Members were advised that each City vehicle should have a
vehicle repair reporting book assigned to it. Frank will ask
City supervisors to discuss and explain the reporting procedures to
new employees.
The meeting adjourned at 10:00 a.m.
LeFEVERE LEFLER KENNEDYp O' BRIEN
a Professional Association
2000 First Bank Place West
5�7
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402
Telephone: (612) 333-0543
{/'
Page 1
March 11, 1987
C L I E N T S U M M A R Y
66 Dale Hahn
MATTER #
MATTER NAME FEES DISB
TOTAL
A5242699
Project 853 Vicksburg Lane
2.64
$2.64
*110
General
6,281.25 528.22
$6,809.47
111
Prosecution - Court Time
- -
6,137.25 55.22
$6,192.47
111A
Prosecution-office Time
3,885.00 40.56
$3,925.56
1024
Codification
205.28
$205.28
1883
Robert Middlemist 6th Addition
667.50 30.90
$698.40
3036
Project 404 Eminent Domain
93.75
$93.75
3281
Project 455
206.25
$206.25
3360
Project 426 Carlson Center
337.50
$337.50
3756
Mendota, Inc
2,197.50 33.50
$2,231.00
3845
Neutgens, K. M.
37.50
$37.50
3846
Johnson Inverse Condemnation
52.50
$52.50
4037
Swan Lake
202.50
$202.50
4040
Hazardous Building
112.50 42.00
$154.50
�S
Page
2
4078
Nelson Arbitration
37.50
$37.50
4263
Project 544 - Fernbrook Lane N
168.75
$168.75
4265
Cavanaugh Hazardous Buildings
375.00
21.50
$396.50
4339
Project 609 Stroman v. City
56.25
$56.25
4398
Moles --Zoning Violation
210.00
$210.00
4502
Simonson Appeal
2,937.50
75.71
$3,013.21
4560
12510 28th Ave N -- Unsanitary
Conditions
15.00
5.60
$20.60
4646
Project #804
300.00
$300.00
4701
Project 655 - Easement Acquisition
795.00
92.92
$887.92
4753
Belgarde v. City
615.00
14.40
$629.40
4770
Foster Land Acquistion-Project
431
570.00
18.80
$588.80
4774
City Plat - Project 431
146.25
$146.25
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL: $26,437.25 $1,167.25
$27,604.50
*Credit (Retainer) (281.25)
$26,156.00 $1,167.25
$27,323.25
February, 1987
wait htneeple humon itnrkat pkanlaq bowd
4100 wamm eveave myth,
wait
theeple 920-5555
YAlan
161VICt/
UPDATE ON WEST
.it. louli park, wlanatot - 55416
HENNEPIN
HUMAN SERVICES PLANNING BOARD
MISSION AND PLANNING \ `Y
Vo
Our mission and long term planning have been a recent focus oT-- 4est
Hennepin Human Services Planning Board. Beginning at our Board re-
treat and at two follow-up board meetings, we went through a process
of re -defining our Mission Statement. The process was facilitated by
Dale Nelson of Unisys Corporation and the result was the following
new Mission Statement:
West :lennepin Human Services Planning Board is dedicated
to the empowerment of people and the development of human
services to improve the quality of life of our community.
To fulfill this mission, we:
* provide education, awareness, and linkage among
governmental units, consumers, and providers;
* provide a participatory planning process which
determines needs and priorities;
* advocate and coalesce around issues;
* influence providers and funders to adequately
assist people in need; and
* develop, implement, and improve services.
We are currently re -doing our goals and objectives and will be parti-
cipating in a local long range planning process as well as a joint
process with the other two human services councils.
ENERGY AND EMERGENCY SERVICES
We continue to deliver energy assistance at eight outreach sites uti-
lizing 31 volunteers. Our third annual community resource guide that
we give to Energy Assistance recipients was published. We have been
impressed with the increasing complexity and long term economic diffi-
culties of our clients. Even families with two incomes are not able
to make ends meet.
The three human services councils jointly sponsor an Energy Issues
Task Force that focuses on energy-related services_ They will be
sponsoring a forum to educate municipal staff and other groups on
services available. Out of this task force also came the idea of ap-
plying for "House Doctor" funds. West Hennepin Human Services Plan-
ning Board successfully sought funding from Minnegasco and the Dept.
of Energy and Economic Development for this we atherization program.
The first project is in Plymouth, St. Louis Park and Tonka Bay and
the second project will be in Medina, Robbinsdale and Maple Grove.
West Hennepin Human Services staffs community energy councils for
these projects and Energy Outfitters does the actual weatherization.
1986 was a record year for the number of clients using emergency food,
shelter, clothing and transportation through West Hennepin Human Ser-
vices Planning Board. 4,182 clients were served utilizing Hennepin
County funds. Additional clients were served utilizing FEMA, United
Way and C.A.S.H. funds. The program is delivered through cooperative
arrangements with Interchurch Community Association, Westonka Chris-
tian Services, St. Louis Park Emergency Program, Interfaith Outreach,
Jobs for Families, area police departments and battered women's shel-
ters.
In an effort to improve service delivery, we sought and received fund-
ing from the Minneapolis Foundation to provide training and coordina-
tion of advocates for the programs; re -printing of a directory for
emergency services clients; parenting and nutrition education pro-
grams; and speakers training on emergency needs.
COMMUNITY NEEDS RESEARCH
This year we have four different areas of focus on community needs re-
search. Our main project is our annual CSSA citizen participation
process. We are participating in the joint human services councils
survey. In addition we will be sponsoring a number of focus groups
(the first one in February is on Emergency Services which has been
our number one priority for the last five years) and a client survey.
This is a process utilizing a variety of information gathering mecha-
nisms and the final report is released in August.
This year we are also doing a similar (though modified) process around
economic assistance issues. We have gathered demographic, service usage,
key informant and other data and will be making a series of recommend-
ations.
We have periodically looked at Community Health issues and needs. This
year, we have done a brief summary of West Hennepin Area Community
Health needs and issues.
Jointly with the other two human services councils, we developed the
Housing Resources and Coordination Projects. Partially funded by
C.A.S.H., the project organized a community advisory committee, re-
viewed and analyzed previous housing studies in regard to Suburban
Hennepin housing needs, published two newsletters, developed and dis-
tributed housing resources files for Community Agencies, produced and
published "Home Sweet Home" (2,000 copies) and are currently in the
process of releasing a final report which will be distributed to 300
key people and organizations.
=-(40
LEGISLATION
At this time of the year, West Hennepin Human Services Planning
Board puts alot of its focus on supporting key human services
legislation. Our Board has passed a legislative agenda with 16
items for support. Areas of legislation include employment, child
care, health care, mental health services, services for the mentally
retarded, food programs and energy assistance. Staff have provided
leadership in organizing coalitions to look at welfare reform
legislation and health insurance for the working poor.
In addition, we have been active participants in the Food First
Coalition, the Child Care Works Coalition, and the Jobs Now Coalition.
Our relationship to Jobs Now has been especially strong because
WHHS is their fiscal and administrative agent and the WHHS Director
is past chair of the Coalition and currently their legislative chair.
In the current session, both Board and staff members will be active
in advocating for the items on our legislative agenda.
SOME OTHER PROJECTS
A top priority for West Hennepin Human Services Planning Board
has been the need for a youth crisis housing program. For a number
of years, we have unsuccessfully tried to get County and United
Way funds to do this. This year we worked with the Bridge and
sought private funding. We were successful and received funding from
Cargill and the Carolyn Foundation. The Bridge West will open
in the very near future using a host home concept to provide
shelter for youth in crisis.
Another priority area for us is the need for chemical abuse
prevention programs. We did a survey and developed recommendations
for program development in this area. In addition, we successfully
advocated with the Hennepin County Board to establish a special
County Board appointed task force to look at chemical abuse pre-
vention. The resolution sponsored by Commissioner Sivanich estab-
lishing this task force was passed in February.
We publish a resource guide and manual for people who are unemployed
and underemployed called "Basic Tools." We received a grant from
General Mills to do a feasibility study of whether we could market
this on a national basis. In response to the study, we are pur-
suing avenues for broadening the publication and distribution of
this guide.
We are currently in the process of revising and reprinting our"Direc-
tory of Human Services for West Hennepin Residents," a small directory
which has had a distribution of 80-100,000 for each edition. Its
purpose is to provide area residents with information about access
points to the service system. We hope to have this new edition
available this spring.
West Hennepin Human Services Planning Board and the Mental Health
Association have sponsored two conferences (called "A Delicate Balance:
Cost, Equity, Choice and Quality") on the impact of health care
financing on mental health and chemical dependency care. We are in the
process of developing "A Delicate Balance III" conference which
will be aimed at employers and their role in health care financing.
There is also a working group that came out of the last conference
that has looked at ways of impacting these issues.
Three coordination committees that we provide staff assistance to are:
* Providers West, a coordinating group of providers
that has met for about 10 years. Their current ef-
fort has been to focus on service needs and issues
in selected cities in the West Hennepin area.
* West Hennepin Youth Services Providers, a coordinating
group which focuses on information sharing and
education on key youth service delivery issues.
* Suburban Mental health AFtercare Providers, a coor-
dinating group which is jointly staffed with North-
west Hennepin Human Services Council. Their current
focus is on mental health legislation and the County
budget process.
LL1 league of minnesota cities
March 16, 1987
MEMORANDUM
T0: Mayor Managersrks
a
FROM. Jame F. Miller, LMC President
SUBJECT: "State of the Cities, 1987"
For the first time, the League has prepared a "State of the
Cities" report (enclosed) to provide state policy makers with an
assessment of recent trends in federal and state aid to
Minnesota cities as well as information about cities' spending
and tax levels.
The report finds that Minnesota cities face major financial
challenges this year. Federal aid has dropped dramatically: $80
million in federal general revenue sharing will be lost by our
cities over the next two years. The state's current budget
difficulties hold the prospect for further declines in state
assistance as well. The main findings of the report include:
Since 1978, federal aid in real dollars to Minnesota
cities has been cut in half.
State -funded property tax relief for cities has decreased
by 7% in constant dollars over the 1980-85 period.
* Although city spending has declined in real dollars by
2.4% over the 1980-85 period, net city property taxes
have increased over 18% and other local revenues (special
assessments, user fees, etc.) have risen by over 16%.
Total city employment has dropped 24% since 1980, more
than three times the rate of decrease of any other local
governmental unit in the state.
Declining aid has already forced many cities to raise property
taxes and trim budgets by reducing services and employment. As
the federal government continues to withdraw its assistance to
cities, the League will utilize this report to argue that it is
critical to maintain adequate state funding for property tax
relief. I urge you to CONTACT YOUR STATE LEGISLATORS with this
information and cite your particular city's financial situation.
1 r3,:; university avenue east;, st. paui, rninneeota _5)51 01 [0 1 21 227-000
Ia-
�# THE{r_r
RN lki
= OF THE
c I
I -E
1987
rA-
TABLE OF CONTENTS
00=- 7
Page
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...............................................................1
CITY REVENUE & EXPENDITURE TRENDS
Summary........................................................................2
FEDERAL & STATE AID TO MINNESOTA CITIES
Federal Aid Plummets..............................................................3
StateAid Drops...................................................................4
MINNESOTA CITIES RELY MORE ON PROPERTY TAX.....................................5
Increased Regressivity of State Tax System..............................................6
REDUCED PROPERTY TAX BASE GROWTH OF MINNESOTA CITIES .........................7
CITY SPENDING HAS NOT INCREASED..................................................8
FACTORS INFLUENCING CITY SPENDING & TAXING
Spending Factors..................................................................9
Property Tax Factors.............................................................10
Homestead Credit Insignificant......................................................10
CITY EMPLOYMENT DROPS..........................................................11
Costs of Pay Equity/Comparable Worth Mandate........................................12
City Services Provided More Efficiently...............................................12
GOVERNOR'S PROPERTY TAX PROPOSAL..............................................13
Cuts in Property Tax Relief Proposed.................................................13
LEAGUE RECOMMENDATIONS ON PROPERTY TAX REFORM .............................14
LEAGUE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR ENHANCING CITY GOVERNMENT
EFFICIENCY...................................................................14
MORE DETAIL ON REDUCTIONS IN FEDERAL GRANTS
& AIDS TO CITIES
Loss of General Revenue Sharing....................................................15
Other Cutbacks Affecting Housing & Development.......................................15
Reagan Administration's 1988 Budget Proposals.........................................16
Medicare and Other Personnel Costs Increases...........................................16
Rising Costs of Federal Mandates....................................................16
Impact of 1986 Federal Tax Reform Act..............................................17
CHARTS AND TABLES
1. Combined Federal & State Aid to Minnesota Cities in
1978 Dollars, 1978-1985 ............................................................2
2. Federal Aid to Minnesota Cities in 1978 Dollars,
1978-1987...... .
3.
State Aid to Minnesota Cities in 1980 Dollars,
1980-1985.......................................................................4
4.
Local Government Aid Received By Cities in Constant
1979 Dollars, 1979-1986 ............................................................4
5.
Revenue of Minnesota Cities by Source, 1977-1985 .......................................5
6.
Trends in Revenue ,& Spending of Minnesota Cities in
Constant 1980 Dollars, 1980 -1985 ....................................................6
7.
Trends in Minnesota Cities' Property Tax Bases,
1976-1987.......................................................................7
8.
City Expenditures in Constant 1974 Dollars,
1974-1985.......................................................................8
9.
Factors Contributing to Spending Increases for All
Cities, 1986-1987 .................................................................9
10.
Factors Contributing to Levy Increases for all Cities,
1986-1987......................................................................10
11.
Employment Trends Among Minnesota's State and Local
Governments, 1980-1985..........................................................11
12.
Minnesota's State and Local Government Public
Employees by Governmental Unit, 1985 ...............................................11
13.
Full -Time Employment Per 10,000 Population, Minnesota
vs. U.S. Average, 1985.............................................................12
14.
Potential City Property Tax Increases Under Governor's
Plan, 1988-1989 .................................................................13
�!7
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Minnesota's cities are facing major financial challenges this year as they struggle to maintain essential
services while coping with large cuts in federal aid and the threat of similar reductions in state aid. Many
cities are being forced to raise property taxes and trim their budgets by reducing services and employment.
Such adversity comes at a time when cities are attempting to diversify their economic bases and attract new
businesses.
At the state level, declines in Minnesota's farming and mining sectors have restricted growth in the
revenues needed to fund both state and local government service obligations. At the federal level, extreme-
ly large and growing deficits have caused outright abandonment of important federal assistance programs,
such as the general revenue sharing program which would have provided $80 million to Minnesota's cities
over the biennium.
At the same time, mandates and similar restrictions imposed by both federal and state governments have
raised the costs of providing services and operating government at the local level. Mandates such as com-
parable worth, fair labor standards, and wastewater treatment have adversely affected cities just as federal
tax reform has imposed restrictions and increased costs on cities' revenue -raising abilities.
As the federal government continues to withdraw its assistance to cities, it is critical that adequate state
funding for property tax relief be maintained. Governor Perpich's recommendations for property tax
reform would essentially eliminate direct state -funded property tax relief for cities. With the precipitous
decline in federal aid, this plan will force cities to reduce services and increase property taxes even more
than they have in the past.
The League of Minnesota Cities will annually issue this report, the "State of the Cities" report, to pro-
vide the public and state policy makers with an on-going assessment of trends in federal and state financial
assistance to Minnesota cities, their expenditures, and the cost of federal and state mandates.
The main findings of this report include:
* Federal aid to Minnesota cities has declined by 38% in real dollars over the 1978-85 period. With elimi-
nation of general revenue sharing in 1987, the League projects that federal aid will have declined by 98%
over the 1978-87 period.
* State -funded property tax relief for Minnesota cities has also decreased, although not as substantially as
federal aid. In real dollars, state aid to cities declined 7% over the 1980-1985 period.
* Although expenditures by Minnesota cities in real dollars have declined by 2.4% since 1980, net city
property taxes have climbed by over 18% in real terms and other city own -source revenues (special
assessments, user fees, etc.) have increased by over 16%. Such local tax increases have been necessitated
by declines in federal and state aid.
* Less federal and state assistance have required Minnesota cities to rely more on the property tax. This
trend tends to make the state -local revenue system less progressive, that is, less related to ability to pay.
Cities increased reliance on property taxes has unfortunately come at a time when the taxable property
wealth of many cities has been declining.
* City employment in Minnesota has dropped a dramatic 24% since 1980, more than three times the rate
of decrease of any other local governmental unit in the state. Per capita employment for city services in
Minnesota is generally 30-50% below the national employment average for such services.
CITY REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE TRENDS
SUMMARY
The decade of the 1980s have been marked by serious economic problems surfacing at both the federal
and state levels. A severe recession in 1981-82, an escalating federal deficit, and a number of budget crises
at the state level have all converged on Minnesota's state and local governments and decreased the financial
resources available for the delivery of government services.
The result for Minnesota's cities has been economic stress. During the 1980s, the level of federal and
state aid provided to our cities diminished relative to what was available in the decades of the 1960s and
1970s, when the national and state economies were relatively healthy.
As federal and state assistance has waned, cities have been forced to rely more on their own local sources
of revenue. The dominant source for such revenue has been the property tax. Unfortunately as cities have
been forced to rely more on property taxes, the taxable property wealth of many of Minnesota cities has
been declining. The effect of these economic forces has been to severely constrain the revenue options of
most cities, mounting pressure on them to reduce services.
For the future, if adequate funding for state property tax relief programs is not maintained, pressures on
cities to further reduce services will intensify and for the many cities which have already cut services,
property tax levels will escalate even more rapidly than they have in the past. Governor Perpich's 1987
property tax proposal holds just such gloomy prospects for Minnesota's citiesand their taxpaying residents.
FEDERAL AND STATE AID TO MINNESOTA CITIES DECLINES
Revenues received by Minnesota's cities from the federal and state governments have dropped significant-
ly since 1978. The most precipitous decline occurred between 1978 and 1982. Since 1982, federal and state
aid has increased somewhat but, with the elimination of federal general revenue sharing in 1987, such aid
will resume its steep decline. In real dollar terms, combined federal and state aid to cities dropped from
a level of $465 million in 1978 to $395 million in 1985, representing over a 15% decline.
500
450
IN
MILLIONS
OF
1978
DOLLARS 40C
35C
30C
CHART 1
COMBINED FEDERAL 6 STATE AID TO MINNESOTA CITIES
IN 1978 DOLLARS
1978-1985
1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985
SOURCE: MINNESOTA STATE AUDITOR FOR FEDERAL 6 STATE AID.
U.S. DEPT. OF COMMERCE FOR STATE 6 LOCAL IMPLICIT PRICE
DEFLATOR.
-2-
Intergovernmental revenues have played an important role in local government finance. Minnesota cities
are quite uneven in their capacities to raise local revenues. Federal and state aid have acted t3 equalize
these disparate tax capacities, making basic and essential services affordable for many communities. In
addition, federal and state aid have attempted to compensate for spillover effects which occur when the
benefits of services provided by the local community "spillover" to individuals outside that community.
Declines in such intergovernmental aid are resulting in widening the gap between the haves and have-nots
of our communities, making a basic level of city services less and less affordable for many communities.
Federal Aid Plummets. At the federal level, cuts in federal general revenue sharing coupled with reduc-
tions in other federal assistance programs have caused total federal aid to Minnesota cities to decline by
over 38% in real dollars during the period 1978 to 1985. Federal aid totalled $171 million in 1978, but by
1985 it had dropped to $105 million in constant dollar terms. With the elimination of federal general
revenue sharing, we project that federal aid in 1987 will be roughly half what it was in 1978. (See section
on Federal Grants and Aid for more detailed discussion of federal cutbacks.)
CHART 2
FEDERAL AID TO MINNESOTA CITIES
IN 1978 DOLLARS
1978-1987
200
111
IN
MILLIONS
OF
1978
DOLLARS
10C
5C
1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987
SOURCE: MINNESOTA STATE AUDITOR FOR 1978-85 FEDERAL AID.
LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES ESTIMATES FOR 1986-87 AID.
U.S. DEPT. OF COMMERCE FOR STATE 4 LOCAL IMPLICIT
PRICE DEFLATOR.
In 1978, federal aid represented over 15% of total revenues for Minnesota cities, but by 1985 that share
had dropped to less than 10%. Whereas federal aid in 1978 used to contribute $3 for every $4 raised in
property taxes by Minnesota cities, by 1985 federal aid provided only $1.50 for every $4 raised in city
property taxes.
-3-
State Aid Drops. State financial assistance to cities through the local government aid (LGA) and other
property tax relief programs (predominantly the homestead credit) has also declined somewhat in recent
years, although not nearly as significantly as federal aid. Minnesota has struggled to maintain its financial
commitment to cities, but fiscal problems, revenue volatility, and other economic difficulties have impeded
the state's ability to do so. In real dollars, state property tax relief funding to cities declined from $377
million in 1980 to $350 million in 1985, a 7% decline. Whereas state aid in 1980 used to contribute $1.50
for every $1 raised in property taxes by Minnesota cities, by 1985 state aid provided only $1 for every $1
raised in city property taxes.
IN
MILLIONS
OF
1980
DOLLARS
CHART 3
STATE AID TO MINNESOTA CITIES
IN 1980 DOLLARS
1980-1985
400
1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985
SOURCE: MINNESOTA STATE AUDITOR FOR STATE AID.
D.S. DEPT. OF COMMERCE FOR STATE i LOCAL IMPLICIT
PRICE DEFLATOR.
Local government aid (LGA) represents the largest portion of state aid to cities. It provides nearly 70%
of the total property tax relief for cities. The LGA program is funded through an annual appropriation
and therefore fluctuates from year to year depending upon the state's fiscal situation and other funding
commitments. Large cuts in LGA occurred in 1982-83 as a result of the state's budget crisis. After adjust-
ing for inflation, funding for LGA in 1986 stood at nearly the same level it was in 1980.
CHART 4
LOCAL GOVERNMENT AID RECEIVED BY CITIES
IN CONSTANT 1979 DOLLARS
1979-1986
250
20C
IN
MILLIONS 15C
OF
1979
DOLLARS
100
50
1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986
SOURCE: MINNESOTA REVENUE DEPARTMENT FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENT AID.
U.S. DEPT. OF COMMERCE FOR STATE 6 LOCAL IMPLICIT
PRICE DEFLATOR.
-4-
MINNESOTA CITIES RELY MORE ON PROPERTY TAX AND OWN -SOURCE REVENUE
As federal and state aid has declined and program costs have risen, cities have been forced to rely more
on their own sources of revenue, predominantly the property tax, to fund city operations. For many
cities, increased reliance on their own local revenues has made them hard pressed to provide some program
services. This trend toward increased dependence on cities' own -source revenue began in 1980, but has
intensified in recent years as federal and state aid has decreased. As of 1985, cities relied on their own
sources of revenue for nearly two-thirds of their funds.
CHART 5
REVENUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES
BY SOURCE
1977-1985
65
(61.95)
OWN -SOURCE REVENUE* ,.. •.
PERCENT .' ........r'
SHARE 55
OF
TOTAL
REVENUE
50
45 1 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE**
(38.15)
35
1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985
SOURCE: MINNESOTA STATE AUDITOR.
R OWN -SOURCE REVENUES INCLUDE ALL LOCAL TAXES, LICENCES,
SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS, FINES, CHARGES, INTEREST AND
MISCELLANEOUS REVENUES.
RR INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUES INCLUDE FEDERAL, STATE. AND
LOCAL GRANTS.
E62
=_ 7
During the 1980 - 1985 period, net city property taxes (after all property tax credits are subtracted)
climbed over 18% in real dollar terms, from $231 million in 1980 to $274 million by 1985. Similarly,
other own -source revenue from --for example, special assessments, local sales taxes and user fees-- increased
over 16% in constant dollars during the same period, from $575 million in 1980 to $670 million in 1985.
The rise in city property and other taxes was largely caused by declining federal and state aid. It was not
due to increased city spending, since city expenditures over the same period declined by 2.4% in constant
dollars.
CHART 6
TRENDS IN
REVENUE 6 SPENDING OF MINNESOTA CITIES
IN CONSTANT1980 DOLLARS
1980-1985
20
+18.41
affiEfflamfle +16.51
15
10
5
PERCENT
FEDERAL STATE CITY
CHANGE 0
AID AID SPENDING
IN
NET OTHER
CONSTANT
PROPERTY OWN -
IN
1980 -5
TAKES SOURCE -2.41
DOLLARS
REVENUES I=
-101 -7.11
-15
-201 p1-19.
SOURCE: MINNESOTA STATE AUDITOR FOR CITY REVENUE, SPENDING AND
FEDERAL AND STATE AID.
U.S. DEPT. OF COMMERCE FOR STATE 6 LOCAL IMPLICIT PRICE
DEFLATOR.
Results from the League of Minnesota Cities "1986-87 City Budget Survey" indicate that the disparity
between city property tax and spending continues today. The survey indicates that for 1987, city property
taxes are rising 7.9% while city spending is rising at half that rate, 3.9%.
Increased Regressivity of State's Tax System. In recent years, the shift toward increased reliance on the
property tax coupled with reductions in the state's income tax have made our state -local revenue system
less progressive --that is, less related to ability to pay than it was previously. The decade of the 1970s was
marked with bold policy initiatives that increased Minnesota's reliance on income and sales taxes so that
local property taxes could be reduced. With the declines in federal and state aids in the 1980s, this set of
policies, the "Minnesota Miracle", is being gradually reversed.
M
z-7
REDUCED PROPERTY TAX BASE GROWTH FOR MINNESOTA CITIES
Beginning in 1983, the growth in the tax bases of Minnesota cities leveled off dramatically. Starting in
1983, the rate of growth in assessed values for cities slowed to about one-third the growth rate experienced
in the prior seven years. This, coupled with restricted growth in state and federal assistance has placed
financial pressure on many cities. Neither their tax bases nor state or federal aid have kept pace with the
rising costs of the services they deliver.
This pattern of slowed growth has been prevalent among both metro and non -metro cities. Between
1977 and 1983, the assessed values for metro -area cities grew at an average annual rate of 10.7 percent.
This growth rate dropped to 4 percent for the 1983-1987 period.
For non -metro cities, a similar trend has been apparent. Assessed values for non -metro cities grew at
average annual rate of 8.7 percent for the 1976-83 period and then dropped dramatically to a 2.1 percent
average annual growth rate from 1983 to 1987. The sharp drop in the value of agricultural land has also
intensified pressures on non -metro cities property tax base.
Between 1983 and 1984, 561 —or two out of every three— of Minnesota's 855 cities experienced declines
in their property tax bases. Cities experiencing the largest declines were predominantly smaller cities with
assessed values of less than $3 million. Between 1984 and 1985, conditions improved somewhat. Some
382 cities, or just about one out of every two of the state's cities, had declines in their property tax bases.
AVERAGE
ANNUAL
PERCENT
INCREASE
15
10
CHART 7
TRENDS IN MINNESOTA CITIES' PROPERTY TAR BASES
1976-1987
1976-83 1983-87
SOURCE: MINNESOTA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES RESEARCH DEPARTMENT.
-7-
=_7
CITY SPENDING HAS NOT INCREASED
As of 1985 (the latest available data), city spending in real (1974) dollars stood at a level of $791 mil-
lion, a level that was about the same as it was in 1977, when city spending totalled $786 million. Except
for the 1980-1982 period when state property tax relief funding was reduced, city expenditures have been
relatively stable over the eleven -year period, 1977-1985.
Increases in city expenditures are frequently, but improperly, compared to rises in the Consumer Price
Index (CPI). Over half of city expenditures are related to personnel costs. The CPI does not reflect such
costs. A special price index, the state and local Implicit Price Deflator (IPD), is designed specifically to
reflect local government spending categories and provides the proper weight to personnel costs.
For example, in 1985, the CPI rose only 3.5% while the state and local IPD rose 5.4%.
The dominance of salary and wage costs in city spending makes the imposition of pay equity/comparable
worth requirements troublesome for some cities. Based on a League survey, cities estimated that on average
pay equity would increase their payroll costs by 4.5%, which is equivalent to $30 million statewide.
1000
800
CONSTANT
1974 600
DOLLARS
IN
MILLIONS
40C
20C
CHART 8
CITY EXPENDITURES
IN CONSTANT 1974 DOLLARS
1974-1985
1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985
SOURCE: MINNESOTA STATE AUDITOR FOR CITY EXPENDITURES.
U.S. DEPT. OF COMMERCE FOR STATE 6 LOCAL IMPLICIT
PRICE DEFLATOR.
I VII
=-7
FACTORS INFLUENCING CITY SPENDING AND TAXING
Results from a city budget survey conducted in November 1986 by the League of Minnesota Cities
research staff shed some light on the most important factors influencing 1987 city spending and taxing
trends.
Spending Factors. The expansion of services or initiation of new programs was found to not be an
important factor behind city spending increases; only 8% of the cities surveyed cited this factor. Overall,
cities most frequently designated two factors as contributing to their 1987 spending increases:
1. 58% identified the increased costs of delivering the same services as one of the top three factors causing
spending increases; and
2. 56% cited the rising costs of liability insurance (the cities surveyed showed an increase of 163% in
liability insurance costs over the 1984-96 period).
60
PERCENT 40
OF
CITIES
SELECTING
FACTOR
20
0
CHART 9
FACTORS* CONTRIBUTING TO SPENDING INCREASES
FOR ALL CITIES, 1986-1987
SAME SERVICES COSTS EXPANSION
• SELECTED BY CITIES AS ONE OF TOP THREE FACTORS.
SOURCE: LMC CITY BUDGET SURVEY, JANUARY, 1987.
Property Tax Factors. Cities most frequently cited the loss of federal general revenue sharing as the
cause of their property taxes increasing in 1987. More than two out of every three cities surveyed desig-
nated this factor. One out of every three cities also identified an insufficient amount of LGA to cover costs
as one of the top three reasons for their property tax increases.
Homestead Credit Insignificant. A very small portion (less than 3%) of the cities surveyed indicated that
higher homestead credit amounts influenced their property tax levels. This finding is contrary to an in-
creasingly popular, but not well-founded, assertion that the homestead credit mechanism greatly influences
local spending and taxing decisions and works against local "accountability."
This accountability argument suggests that state financial assistance to local governments, particularly
through the homestead credit, causes local spending and taxes to be higher. Firm evidence of such a causal
relationships does not exist, however. On the taxing side, the argument suggests that local governments
make decisions to increase spending knowing that their taxpayers will not have to bear the full cost of that
spending increase.
These survey results indicate that the homestead credit is quite insignificant to cities' decisions to raise
taxes. On the contrary, the loss of a massive amount of federal aid and insufficient state aid are driving city
taxes far higher than necessitated by city spending increases.
PERCENT
OF
CITIES
SELECTING
FACTOR
CHART 10
FACTORS* CONTRIBUTING TO LEVY INCREASES FOR ALL CITIES
1986-1987
75
FEDERAL SUFFICIENT HOMESTEAD
REVENUE TO COVER CREDIT FROM
SHARING RISING COSTS LEVY RISE
* SELECTED BY CITIES AS ONE OF TOP THREE FACTORS.
SOURCE: LMC CITY BUDGET SURVEY, JANUARY, 1987.
-10-
CITY EMPLOYMENT DROPS
Reflecting the severe budget restraints put on Minnesota cities by the drop in federal and state assistance
and poor growth in property values, the number of city employees in Minnesota declined by nearly one-
quarter (24%) over the 1980-1985 period. This was by far the largest employment decline of any state or
local governmental unit in Minnesota.
CHART I1
EMPLOYMENT TRENDS AMONG MINNESOTA'S
STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS,
1980-1985
Employees of the state and of school districts make up nearly two-thirds of all public employees in
Minnesota. City employees comprise only 16% of all Minnesota public employees.
CHART 12
MINNESOTA'S STATE AND LOCAL GOVERMENT PUBLIC EMPLOYEES
BY GOVERNMENTAL UNIT, 1985
SPEC. DISTS. (
TOWNSHIPS (4.11
CITIES (15.951)
COUNTIES (1
DISTS (33.121)
(29.051)
SOURCE: U.S. BUREAU OF THE CENSUS, "PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT IN 1985."
-11-
15
+11.51
10
+10.21
PERCENT
5
CHANGE
+2.71
+2.41
IN
MINN MINN
NUMBER
0
CITIES SCHOOLS
OF
U.S.
MINN MINN
MINN
EMPLOYEES
AVER
STATE COUNTIES
TOWNS
-5
GOV'T
-10
-7.71
-is-
-20_
-24.21
-25
SOURCE:
U.S.
BUREAU OF THE CENSUS,
"PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT IN 1980," AND
"PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT IN 1985."
Employees of the state and of school districts make up nearly two-thirds of all public employees in
Minnesota. City employees comprise only 16% of all Minnesota public employees.
CHART 12
MINNESOTA'S STATE AND LOCAL GOVERMENT PUBLIC EMPLOYEES
BY GOVERNMENTAL UNIT, 1985
SPEC. DISTS. (
TOWNSHIPS (4.11
CITIES (15.951)
COUNTIES (1
DISTS (33.121)
(29.051)
SOURCE: U.S. BUREAU OF THE CENSUS, "PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT IN 1985."
-11-
=-"7
Cosis of Pay Equitv/C,'uniparable Worth Alandatc�. The League's 1986-87 City Budget Survey revealed
that a large number of Minnesota's cities, particularly larger cities, are experiencing sizable increases in their
payroll costs as a result of implementation of the state's comparable worth law. On average cities respond-
ing to the Survey estimated their payroll costs would rise by 4.5%, which is equivalent to approximately
$30 to $35 million in increased costs statewide per year for Minnesota cities. Some 96% of Survey cities
with populations over 10,000 indicated that pay equity would increase their payroll costs, while only
29% of cities will populations under 10,000 indicated that pay equity would raise their payroll costs.
City .Services Provided /More Efficiently. Minnesota's cities tend to provide services more efficiently than
the average for all American cities. Per capita, full-time employment in Minnesota for city services such as
police and fire protection, sewage and sanitation services, water supply and housing and urban renewal are
well below the national average.
Per capita employment for all service functions of Minnesota's state and local government units (includ-
ing schools, counties, cities andtownships) is about 7% below the national average. However, for police
protection, Minnesota public employment is 29% below the national average; for fire protection, our state
is 54% below the national average; for housing and urban renewal, we are 56% below average; for sewage
and sanitation, 29% below average. These services --police and fire, housing and urban renewal, and sewage
and sanitation— constitute over one-half of all city spending.
TABLE 13
FULL-TIME EMPLOYMENT PER 10,000 POPULATION
Minnesota vs. US Average
1985
Function, US Average
All NIN state & local
employment ......................442.6
MN poi is e protection .................25.5
MN fire protection ...................9.7
MN housing/urban renewal .............3.9
MN se:vage & sanitation ...............8.7
% Below
Minnesota US Average
411.8 7%
18.2 29%
4.5 54%
1.7 56%
6.2 29%
Source: J.S. Bureau of the Census, "Public Employment in 1985," August, 1986.
-12-
GOVERNOR'S PROPERTY TAX PROPOSAL
z7
Governor Perpich has recommended a major property tax reform measure which proposes to consolidate
all property tax relief programs (local government aid and property tax credits) into one Education Credit
available solely to reduce school property taxes. The overall effect of this proposal is to eliminate direct
property tax relief for cities. With the precipitous decline in federal aid, such a proposal will force cities to
reduce services and increase property taxes even more than they have in the past.
Furthermore, the Governor's recommendation to redirect all property tax relief toward schools and away
from other units of local government will lead to more inequity and less stability in our property tax
system. Such an approach to property tax reform is a prescription for widening the gap between the haves
and have-nots of our communities.
Cities differ greatly in their needs and in their abilities to rely on local taxes to meet those needs. The
Governor's proposal to eliminate LGA and replace it with an Education Credit would hurt the most econo-
mically disadvantaged communities. For 19 Minnesota cities, the loss of LGA will mean less than a one mill
increase in local property taxes. But for 11 cities, losing LGA would mean an increase of over 100 mills.
The proposed Education Credit formula will worsen tax base disparities. Unlike the objectives of the
current LGA program, the proposed Education Credit is not designed to recognize differing needs of cities
or to equalize tax base disparities. Its future allocation formula would be based on per capita and sales tax
point of origin factors. Cities with smaller populations and lower -than -average commercial/retail sales
activity would clearly suffer.
Given the inequitable distribution of funds that could occur under the new Education Credit formula,
the local discretion authority for allocating the credit will likely lead to unfair and unhealthy competition
among cities. Localities gaining under the formula would be able to attract more residents and businesses
while those losing would find themselves in a downward spiral, denied the necessary resources to keep or
attract residents and businesses.
Cuts in Property Tax Relief Proposed. The Governor is proposing approximately $246 million in reduc-
tions in all property tax relief programs over the biennium. This includes:
-- a $126 million cut in the property tax refund and renters credit program,
- a $110 million reduction in projected funding for property tax credits, and
-- a nearly $10 million cut in LGA. The Governor's proposed $5 million cut in 1987 LGA is an amount
which cities have already budgeted and levied for.
If current property tax escalation trends continue, city levies will be rising by approximately $72 million
over the biennium. (Estimate based on city levy increases projected by the Revenue Department for
1987). Under the Governor's proposal to freeze total spending for property tax relief, this full $72 million
would be shifted to property taxpayers.
Add to that the $51 million in increased costs which would be shifted to cities under the Governor's
budget (see table below), and the total effect on city taxpayers would bean increase of over $123 million
in property taxes over the next two years.
TABLE 14
Potential City Property Tax Increases Under Governor's Plan
1988-89 (in millions)
Sales tax imposed on city purchases ..........................$29.2
Motor vehicle excise tax imposed on cities ..................... 3.8
2% gross insurance premium tax ............................ 5.0
Non -transfer of motor vehicle excise tax ....................... 13.0
Subtotal..................................... 51.0
Potential rise in city levies
(under current law) ..................................... 71.8
TOTAL................................................$122.8
- 13 -
0007-7
LEAGUE RECOMMENDATIONS ON PROPERTY TAX REFORM
In the face of an unprecedented loss of federal aid and gradually declining state aid, the League recom-
mends that the state maintain a commitment to providing property tax relief for city services. The Local
Government Aid program, which recognizes differing city needs and differing capacities to fund those
needs, should be continued rather than abandoned as the Governor has recommended.
The state has a legitimate and necessary role to play in helping cities' finance their service needs. These
services include police, fire, rescue services, street maintenance, and maintenance of sewer and sanitation
facilities which affect public health. Such "local" services are not strictly local. They are not strictly
property -related, nor are they discretionary. They are essential services which no community can do
without.
Furthermore, the costs of providing city services are increased by both state and federal government
mandates --comparable worth, clean water standards, wastewater treatment, personnel mandates, just to
name a few. The essential nature of most city services, the spillover effects of service provisions, state
program mandates and the wide disparities in cities' tax bases and service needs warrant continuation
of the state's active support role for city services.
The League supports simplification efforts, such as reducing the number of property classifications to 10
or less. In reducing the number of classifications, the relative relationships that currently exist among the
major classes of properties should be preserved, so that large shifts in property tax burdens among the
major classes are avoided. The impact of classification and credit changes must be thoroughly analyzed,
not just for their impact statewide, but for their effect upon individual communities.
LEAGUE RECOMMENDATIONS TO ENHANCE CITY GOVERNMENT EFFICIENCY
In addition to implementing the League's property tax recommendations, the state could greatly assist
cities facing this period of fiscal stress by providing increased financial assistance for what in many cities is
the single largest capital project, constructing or upgrading sewer treatment facilities. Further, legislation
increasing the efficiencies of cities as governmental entities or providing the tools at the local level to cope
with declining federal and state assistance is needed.
According to some estimates, there is over $1.1 billion in necessary repairs and new construction of
wastewater treatment facilities required in Minnesota if the state is to comply with the clean water stan-
dards specified in federal law. Congress, over two Presidential vetos, recently reaffirmed its commitment to
assisting local governments meet those federal standards by reauthorizing the Clean Water Act. Unfor-
tunately, the amount of federal assistance falls short of meeting the needs of local communities, as well as
beginning a transition from a grant program to a loan program.
Complicating matters is the fact that many of the cities needing new or renovated facilities are the
smallest and least financially capable of proceeding without additional assistance. The Governor's budget
provides increased state financial assistance for wastewater treatment, and the League supports this effort.
The ability of cities to manage their employees effectively, use special assessments to finance services and
improvements, promote economic development through capital seed funds and economic development
authorities, conduct governmental business without undue threat of litigation or liability, are also signifi-
cant parts of the League's legislative proposals for 1987. While they cannot fully relieve the pressures
recently placed on city governments, they would certainly help local officials respond to continuing needs
of the residents of our state's communities.
-14-
1
REDUCTION IN FEDERAL GRANTS AND AID TO CITIES
LOSS OF FEDERAL GENERAL REVENUE SHARING (GRS)
Elimination this year of the only direct federal aid program to Minnesota Cities, the federal General
Revenue Sharing (GRS) program, has reduced city revenues by $40 million per year, representing ap-
proximately 7-8% of the property taxes levied by cities. Losing those funds is a severe blow to services and
programs in many cities.
The permanent elimination of GRS will mean that local tax sources will be under pressure to absorb
much of the revenue loss at a time when the fiscal capacity of many cities has been declining. Inevitably,
the quality and level of city services are likely to decline if other revenues (particularly state aid) are not
available to help make up for the loss.
Great disparities exist among cities in their capacities to replace lost GRS funds. While the loss of GRS
constitutes about a 12.5% cut in revenues in St. Cloud, the loss of those federal dollars represents only
a 2.5% reduction in Eden Prairie. Many Twin Cities metropolitan cities used GRS for one-time capital
improvements. Nevertheless, the loss of those funds was no less serious for them -since the long-term debt
for replacement of basic facilities (i.e., fire equipment, police vehicles, public buildings, etc.) will ultimately
result in higher local costs and in delays in capital spending for other needed projects.
For cities in areas with steeply declining land values, the loss of GRS comes at a bad time. Local services
and governmental operations could be severely curtailed. For some agricultural areas as well as for many
rural cities with populations of 2,500 or less, GRS has represented the difference between delivering ade-
quate public safety services and doing with less.
In 1985, cities answered a League survey requesting information on what would be lost if GRS had been
eliminated in that year. Cities indicated an inability to fund public safety services with local tax dollars as
well as difficulty in meeting the increased costs of complying with federal mandates for which GRS pay-
ments had been used. Many cities applied GRS funds to the actual operations of police and fire depart-
ments, including personnel costs.
OTHER FEDERAL CUTBACKS AFFECTING HOUSING AND DEVELOPMENT
Early in 1986, cities faced the prospect of losing at least 5.9% of federal funding for housing and dev-
elopment programs. It was estimated that such program reductions would be necessitated by the new
Gramm -Rudman -Hollings legislation. The federal programs subject to funding roll -backs included: waste-
water treatment construction grant funds, transit operating and capital assistance, highway and community
development block grants, and urban development action grants (UDAGs).
In addition, the Administration acted early in 1986 to rescind and defer funding of Community Develop-
ment Block Grant (CDBG) projects, thereby delaying the receipt and the certainty of funding for many
local community development activities. Although Congress and the courts later acted to secure the release
of some of these federal funds and to restore funding recissions, cities had to make unanticipated budget
adjustments to compensate for the expected losses.
In the meantime, Congress, in an attempt to reduce the ballooning federal budget deficit, proposed
reductions in appropriations for housing and development programs. At the time it was feared that Minne-
sota and its localities would lose as much as $1 billion in federal funds by this action. Compared to other
states, Minnesota's potential losses ranked 14th highest in the nation.
On top of the proposed reductions of 10% for CDBGs in 1986, cities with such projects experienced a
Gramm-Rudman cutback of 16% in anticipated grant funds. In wastewater treatment construction grants,
highway funding, transit assistance and UDAGs, Minnesota cities were cut by 4.5% in 1986.
When the federal budget was proposed for fiscal year 1987, CDBG funding was again to be reduced by
2.5%. Rental housing rehabilitation, housing development grants, UDAGs, and Economic Development
-15-
=_7
Administration funds were all to be cut by 12.5%. Federal highway aid and transit funds were to be cut by
10%, while funding for low-income housing was to be frozen at the previous year's level.
By the time cities had set their levies for this year (1987), Congress had not yet finalized its budget
figures. It appears, however, that the rate of program cutbacks is at least slowing. For the CDBG program,
funding is holding at about the same level as the previous year. For the Economic Development Admin-
istration, Congress restored the funding level that existed before the Gramm-Rudman cuts. UDAGs,
however, were cut significantly while rental rehabilitation and housing development grant (HODAGs)
funding was increased.
Reagan Administration's Fiscal Year 1988 Budget Proposals. President Reagan's proposed 1988 budget
continues the Administration's efforts to defer and otherwise halt grant and aid programs of benefit to
cities. Such threats as well as the delay in receipt of project funds makes local planning and cash flow
projections very problematic for many cities.
According to estimates prepared by Minnesota Finance Commissioner Jay Kiedrowski, cities and coun-
ties would lose about $57 million for sewage treatment and economic and rural development programs
under President Reagan's budget plan. Minnesota would also lose $11 million in mass transit funding under
the Administration's proposal to require local governments to pay a larger share of transportation costs.
Most community and economic development grants to local governments would be phased out, costing
Minnesota cities and counties $4 million. Sewage treatment grants would be reduced by $5 million.
Some of the proposed budget cuts adversely affecting cities include: an 8% reduction in Section 312
rehabilitation loans and Section 108 loan guarantee programs, termination of HODAGs, and severe cuts in
rental rehabilitation funds. Housing assistance in the Administration's proposed budget would be limited to
the voucher program, with no new loan authority for the construction of housing for the elderly or handi-
capped. Rental rehabilitation grants would also be deferred, and $50 million in current appropriations
would be rescinded.
MEDICARE AND OTHER PERSONNEL COST INCREASES
In earlier Congressional action, all employees hired by cities after March 31, 1986 were required to
participate in Medicare. Both cities, as employers and their newly -hired employees were required to pay a
1.45% contribution rate on their wages. The proposed 1988 budget includes a provision which would
require all current city employees who do not participate in Social Security to contribute to Medicare.
The increased costs of covering all current municipal workers under Medicare could cost cities as much as
$ 5 million per year. The major impact of these proposed changes in Medicare and Social Security will be
on cities with paid police and firefighters. In collective bargaining negotiations, cities are likely to face
higher wage demands to compensate for the higher withholding required on employees' wages and salaries.
As a result of the 1987 budget reconciliation legislation, cities will have to speed up payment of Medicare
and Social Security payments to the federal government. Loss of investment income and possible cash
flow problems have already been cited.
Cost of application of the federal Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) pay regulations regarding overtime
compensation and related scheduling changes is more difficult to estimate. Based on available full-time
municipal employee counts per state, estimates suggest that local governments in Minnesota would likely
have approximately $22 million in increased costs per year resulting from compliance with FLSA require-
ments. In addition, accounting and record-keeping changes of complying with federal FLSA standards
continue to cause problems for cities. Redoing computerized or manual payrolls, changing pay periods,
rescheduling police and firefighter schedules have all been difficult for cities to accomplish.
RISING COSTS OF FEDERAL MANDATES
A new tax increase has been recommended by President Reagan in the proposed 1988 budget --that is,
the elimination of the tax -exemption for state and local government vehicles from the federal gas tax.
-16-
=--I
Such proposals typify proposed Congressional and executive actions that plague cities with increased
costs and no federal funding to cover them. Mandates, in recent years, have frequently resulted from
agency regulations. Complying with such regulations raise cities' administrative costs. The cost, for in-
stance, of reprogramming computerized payroll systems, of redoing accounting methods to conform with
new requirements, or of completing an ever-increasing number of federal forms.
Smaller cities are ill-equipped and poorly staffed to deal with these administrative requirements. Part-
time city officials are already struggling just to keep ahead of current payroll and financing reporting
requirements.
IMPACT OF 1986 FEDERAL TAX REFORM ACT
The 1986 Federal Tax Reform Act significantly interferes with the ability and authority of Minnesota's
cities to raise revenue by issuing tax-exempt municipal bonds. Tax-exempt bonds have been the primary
tool available to cities to finance vital economic development projects which have allowed many cities to
grow and expand their tax bases. The new tax law is making it more expensive for cities to borrow money
and, in the process, can make city services more costly. Cities will find it far more difficult and costly to
foster the construction of low-income housing and the rebuilding of blighted areas.
Cities in Minnesota, like other levels of government, periodically issue bonds (i.e., borrow money from
the public) to help finance major public projects such as roads, fire and police stations or sewage treatment
plants. In 1984, Minnesota's cities issued over $1 billion worth of bonds. In exchange for borrowing
money from the public, cities make a commitment to pay interest over the life of the bonds. Issuing
municipal bonds is much like a,family obtaining a mortgage in order to finance the purchase of a home. In
many bond issues, the city pledges its full faith and credit, meaning that the city promises it will increase
local taxes to guarantee payment of the interest due on the bonds.
Being able to issue tax-exempt bonds has saved money for cities since the interest rate they must pay on
tax-exempt bonds is likely to be lower than for taxable bonds. The 1986 tax bill severely restricts what
cities can finance with tax-exempt bonds, and will force many projects to be financed by taxable bonds.
Such restrictions increase the costs of issuing those bonds and thus increase local taxpayers property tax
burdens. For example, the cost of building a sewage treatment plant could increase as much as 50% if it
had to be financed with taxable rather than tax-exempt bonds. The new tax bill also subjects some of the
interest on bonds to federal income tax, a move which could force cities to increase the rate of interest
payable on their bonds in order to attract investors.
Moreover, the tax bill imposes a new state -by -state volume cap curtailing cities' ability to issue private
purpose bonds as well as some general obligation and revenue bonds. The 1986 volume cap of the greater
of $75 per capita or $250 million will drop in 1988 to the lower of $50 per capita or $150 million. For
Minnesota, the cap is extremely stringent; in the first year, the cap mandates a reduction in bonding auth-
ority, from over $1 billion to $315 million. The new cap applies to:
* private use of the proceeds of general obligation or revenue bonds in excess of $15 million;
* tax increment bonds;
* small issue industrial development bonds;
* multi -family, low-income rental housing bonds;
* single-family mortgage revenue bonds; and
* publicly -owned and operated municipal and water facilities which may fail the new public purpose
definition requiring that the purpose of a project be at least 90% governmental (rather than 75% as under
current provisions).
-17-
Changes in the definition of public purpose bonds will discourage and in many cases prevent the creation
of public-private partnerships to provide local services. The new law severely limits the availability of
bond authority for privately -operated wastewater, hazardous and solid waste facilities.
The federal tax code revisions further the erosion of the federal role in providing housing opportunities
for low and moderate income persons. In addition to the direct housing funding cutbacks mentioned
earlier, the new tax law will affect cities' abilities to leverage private investment into housing and economic
development. The law subjects multifamily rental housing bonds to the new volume cap. In addition, it
imposes new compliance and tenant eligibility requirements. The new law also removes incentives for funds
to be invested in low-income housing construction.
-18-
modec corporation
Honorable Vergil Schneider
Mayor
City of Plymouth
Your Honor,
=�- gco"..
'• C
arch 13, 1987
It is with regret that I must submit my resignation as the representative of the
City of Plymouth, to the West Hennepin Human Services Planning Board. I have served
in this capacity for approximately two years. My leaving is for personal and business
reasons, and because I don't feel that I have been able to devote the time and atten-
tion that the Board deserves.
i`
I sincerely hope that the City of Plymouth continues its support of the WHHSPB
and takes advantage of the services the Board has to offer. If I can be of service
to the City or the Board please feel free to call; Home 476-2500, Office 541-0056.
Sincerely,
Thomas P. Sweeney
Copy: Marcy Shapiro, WHHSPB
2859 Louisiana Avenue N • New Hope, MN 55427 9 (612) 541-0056 • Telex: 291131 Pakon UD
March 10, 1987
Bill
Dean R. Johnson Construction Compan_
3650 Annapolis Lane North
Plymouth, Mn 55441
Dear Bill:
CITY OF
PLYNOUTR
Thank you for submitting a Public Service Counter Customer Comment Card. In
your crd
you make reference of not being able to obtain an inspection within a 24 hour time
frame, and that an additional inspector should be added to the Building Inspection
Division.
As a result of the mild winter, we have experienced an increase in the amount of
construction activity this year, which at times, has surpassed our ability to
provided requested inspections within a 24 hour time frame.
We are currently in the process of working with members of our Development Council to
establish methods on improving our service of performing inspections. Our Division
makes every attempt to provide inspections within 24 hours of the scheduled request.
It is my hope that the results of our meetings will provide for the best prublic
service available to our customers with the compliment of staff provided. Please
contact me if -you have any questions or if I may be of any further assistance.
Sincerely,
Joe Ryan
Building Official
cc: Frank Boyles, Assistant City Manager
File
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447. TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800
-::z-. 8b
�bgi
M W41"
F *' CITY .OF PLYMOUTH
t r
x PUBLIC SERVICE COUNTERStCtISTOIFJt COIOENT CARD ;�i
.'�' r S '.. .:Y4 x.,:__' -' .A , .ka ._ ' ':+r«�►+:aF i+^$ix.�'! ++'p:�..'^" �'wy.+'
We value your opinion about thel service y K wive at the Public Service
" Counters! Please complete .this''card and .dropit,in:the Customer Comment Box---_:-
at the main receptionist's counter:`"� '.
-L)EA� JoNNs�,�
Date of visit Z `'1 TimeCotAS
., :..
1. With which department(s) did -Y64 deal?x°" 01; �.i
'.T". }
2. Name of City Employee (if you.-recall)`j ,e
c -SDN -r- I XOC-
3.
. Did you have an appointment.for a.'weetn9? Yes No X
_
prom$,Y
K. Was`£service pts es No �s'a
k-
KitD LAE
��I.o &L 5 In c k1-5
Your name would be appreciated; however; if
anonymous, we still value your observations.
:'iai11C
( L. L --
Address 3 �ONN.Po�� sL
City
Phone
4
HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION
March 10, 1987
Mr. Virgil Schneider
Mayor, City of Plymouth
3400 Plymouth Blvd.
Plymouth, Mn. 55447
Dear Mr. Schneider:
As president of the Ferndale North HomeoT-aner's Association,
I would like to recuest your help in the following utter.
Our homeowner's association is becoming increasingly con-
cerned about the danger to bicyclists snd pedestrians on
North Ferndale Road. I feel we share this concern with
other residents of North Ferndale.
I am aware of a variety of Mans that have been proposed
to you regarding North Ferndale Road. ry request, I hope,
will be less complex. Our homeowner's association requests
that North Ferndale be regarded as a residential street and
have an enforced speed limit of 35 YPH. At this time North
Ferndale is posted at 40 rTH which is not enforced. Paving
the shoulder and clearly marking the center and side lines
of the road is also part of our remuest.
I hope you will give our ideas serious consideration. Thank
you for your attention to our concerns.
sincerely,
,* UTY)
William (Bill) Morkrid
President, Ferndale North,
Homeowner's Association
1110 N. Ferndale Rd.
Plymouth, En. 55447
W - 475-4580
H - 473-3399
r...: jr
March 13, 1987
CITY OF
PLYMOUTR
Mr. William Morkrid
President
Ferndale North Homeowner's Association
1110 N. Ferndale Road
Plymouth, MN 55447
Dear Mr. Morkrid:
Thank you for your March 10,
Ferndale Road. I have referred
Moore and Public Safety Director
have asked them to share their
Council as well.
Yours truly,
44
I % t1t*
Virgil Schneider
Mayor
VS: fm
=-� & C....
1987 letter expressing concern about North
your letter to Public Works Director Fred
Dick Carlquist for review and response. I
responses to you with myself and the City
cc: Dick Carlquist, Public Safety Director
Fred Moore, Public Works Director
S/F 3/20
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH. MINNESOTA 55447, TELEPHONE (612) 559.2800
=.- %$:�L
March 10, 1987
League of Minnesota Cities
% Kenneth E. Rosland, City
City of Edina
4801 W. 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
CITY OF
PLYMOUTR
Manager
Dear C.C. Ludwig Award Committee:
As a "part-time" local official myself, I have learned to appreciate the
special effort required to do an acceptable ,fob as a "part-time" local
official, while at the same time, balancing one's professional .and family
life. It takes a special individual with high energy and great commitment
to successfully balance all three. In many cases, the pressure becomes too
much and after one or two terms, retirement from public life follows.
This is clearly not true with C. Wayne Courtney. Wayne's public activities
span more than two decades. His contributions have been many and diverse
including Park Board member, Metropolitan Waste Control Commission Official,
Cable Commission Chair, Athletic Board member, Little League Coach, not to
mention, Councilmember, and Mayor of the City of Edina.
I become all the more appreciative of Wayne's public career when I realize
that Wayne had already begun his illustrious career in public service when I
was a high school student attending Edina High School along with his son.
Since then, I have had the good fortune to observe Wayne in action through
his contributions to the League of Minnesota Cities and Association of
Metropolitan Municipalities. Through his participation on both bodies, he
has made an impact on both the metropolitan as well as a state level.
Wayne is truly the embodiment of dedication in public life. I would
heartily encourage your consideration of Wayne Courtney for receipt of the
1987 C.C. Ludwig Award.
Sincerely,
qVi r gil Schneider
Mayor
VS:dma
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447, TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800
Z 8c1.
M
EDINA
Virgil Schneider, Mayor
City of Plymouth
3400 Plymouth Blvd.
Plymouth, Minnesota 55447
Dear Mayor Schneider:
At its last meeting, the Edina City Council unanimously voted to
nominate our Mayor, C. Wayne Courtney, for the C. C. Ludwig Award. I
am sure you are familiar with this award, which is made to individuals
who have made outstanding contributions through their involvement in
municipal government.
Over the past couple of years, we have made this nomination, but Mayor
Wayne Courtney was not the individual selected. We still feel so strongly
that Wayne Courtney is deserving of this award. We ask you once again to
write a letter on his behalf. Wayne is, as you know, in the twilight of
his career that expands some 50 plus years in working in the area of
either teaching or municipal government. He truly has given his all to
the betterment of this total Twin City area and State as a place to
live, work and play. He has participated to the fullest in the League
activities, County activities, State activities and obviously our own
local acitvities. I cannot stress too strongly how I feel about what
this man has given.
The Edina City Council and I would certainly appreciate your support of
Mr. Courtney's nomination. We hope that you might write a letter of
recommendation for this award and send it to me by Monday, March 16, 1987.
This will be included with other supplemental material to support Wayne
Courtney's nomination for the C. C. Ludwig Award. Enclosed is a brief
summary of some of Wayne's accomplishments and contributions to the State
and to our City.
Thank you again for your help and support.
Sincerkly,
Kenneth E. Rosland `
City Manager
KER/sw
S $d
C. WAYNE COURTNEY
Activities and Contributions to the Community:
- Morningside Park Board Member, 1962 to 1963
- Morningside City Council Member, 1962 to 1966
- Edina City Council Member, 1966 to 1980
- Board Member of the League of Minnesota Cities, 1981 to present
- Treasurer/Vice Chair of the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission, 1975 to 1983
- Board Member of the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities, 1974 to 1980
- Committee Chair of the Metropolitan Agencies (AMM), 1974 to 1980
- Chair of the Legislative Committee (AMM), 1977
- Board Member/Vice President of the Suburban League of Metropolitan
Municipalities, 1972 to 1974
- Board Member/Vice Chair/Chair/Co-Chair of the Hennepin County Criminal
Justice Council, 1972 to 1982
- Vice Chair/Chair of the Southwest Suburban Cable Commission, 1972 to present
- Chair of the Minneapolis Coaches Selection Committee, 1958 to 1964
- Member of the Minnesota Board of Control, 1969 to 1971
- Vice Chair of the Minneapolis Athletic Board, 1964 to 1968
- Council Representative of the Edina Bi -Centennial Committee, 1974 to 1976
- Coordinator/Coach of the Edina Little League, 1953 to 1974
- Chairman of the Land Use and Agriculture Preservation Committee, 1980
- Mayor of Edina, 1980 to present
- As Chair of the Southwest Cable Commission, Mayor Courtney led this group
through the development of a request for proposal, a franchising process and
monitoring construction of the system for a five -city cable TV system.
- Mayor Courtney was involved in the redevelopment of the commercial area of 50th
and France.
- He was responsible for the re-establishment of the use of volunteers within
the Edina Fire Department.
- Mayor Courtney was a strong promoter of the development of the existing park
and recreation system that exists in Edina today.
- He was instrumental in the formation of the Edina Historical Society and played
a key role in the retention and restoration of two historical buildings.
- It was Mayor Courtney's leadership in the development of a Heritage Preservation
Board that ultimately led to the development of various sites being declared
eligible for the National Register.
- While serving on the Council, Mayor Courtney supported and encouraged the
institution of low and moderate income housing and was very supportive of
further development of senior housing.
=— 4a cz\: .
-2-
- He was involved in the construction of the Pigs Eye waste disposal plant and
the centralization of waste treatment in the Metro area.
- In regard to this work with the Juvenile Justice League, Mayor Courtney was
involved in the review/approval of LEAA Block Grants that led to the
development of 911.
- Mayor Courtney's involvement with the Hennepin County League supported the
development of the Metropolitan Council.
- He received the Public Service Award in serving on the Metropolitan Waste
Control Commission.
Mayor Courtney was awarded the Certificate of Merit from the Association
of Metropolitan Municipalities.
- He received the Construction Award from the Southwest Cable Company.
- The Community of Morningside awarded Mayor Courtney the Civic Service Award.
- Mayor Courtney is in the Hall of Fame for the Minnesota High School Coaches
Association.
- tie received the Service Award from Edina Youth Baseball and the Edina Baseball
Association.
Mayor Courtney is in the Hall of Fame at Mankato State College.
- He received the Mr. Basketball Award of 1984.
�� e -p
I'L) Q r
�—..c..2—
HEARTS
c.irrenC.
CURRENT, INC.. COIORAOO SPRINGS. CO 60941
March 12, 1987
Ms. Maxine Theusch
2740 Black Oaks Lane N.
Plymouth, MN 55447
Dear Ms. Theusch:
One of the things I particularly enjoy about being Mayor is the opportunity
to publicly recognize that which is most important about our community which
in my mind, is our citizens. I have had the opportunity to recognize the
important contributions of our residents in all walks of life.
I especially enjoy recognizing our children and the contributions which they
make as I was able to do on March 2 for the Girl Scout Anniversary. I
respect and appreciate the, work which Scout Leaders and other youth
volunteers devote to providing youth learning opportunities. On behalf of
the City Council, the best of luck to you and the Girl Scouts during your
75th anniversary!
Maxine, thank you very much for your note. It brightened my day!
Sincerely,
Virgil Schneider ,7e711r Was V
Mayor
VS:dma
cc: City Councilmembers
Eric Blank, Director of Park and Recreation
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447, TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800
4i.,:::,
.�i;' .:U!..li;'1 �:1 :):i`*'117
•L,.
,r..��r a. t, a f�i
:� c�_�r ii:;i) �c:-i.,oi an'i
.:iiI ue
.;._....,,_,+.. 1;_i,,1:Ci
-_it)O_iL" lol:.
i..' _i: i, 'i' :'+JL"i0:; �,�• �Ui.i:1 � ..
J <71;1.a ''i :.lr'..
..i i,3C!)C.-d
u Z3 f; I:.uJ+J, :3<11 ..y ..2 1:3Yi.i
l:U Lac. iJ+C. u_,iil,,.ils
1:"I v£
Sdc 1 L
. ion .
•i ,.'' Z..T.'!'.. .. i 1Ci:. Sri ✓ Viii
t, l 1 .. A Ci 0 u i i t. ' . i C: i. IL \j 1 L J • 1
:i_..a• .. .....:)�: �;; JL... ..J:1:: :�...... 1),;
or _.,-.eri n , .;;;i_ii:s:� ::o.:;.
a o�u:�:",
�,: \+.J '.. .. :J :�I' vi '..�J �.IL'.. Ali :. i)l••
.l_ .. �.J..+L:' ' I)j ,)r:J
).t:":zi;�
:i;"!•.1 rc:.j:. i'1..:;:
co
-------------------------
� co RD. NO 4 7
-----------------
RD
J
S5
CO. RD NO 10
Q
..�
C/TY
Y
J
BASS
3
.LAKE I,
'
W
CO RC
i Q
J
J
� J
I
�
Z
_
Y �
Cr
Q
SCHWDT
MDOrlY
Y m
LAKE A
co
we]
9
H
MEDICINE
\LAKE
c
RD
J
S5
�
..�
C/TY
Y
CO RC
w
_
Y �
Cr
O
cr
MDOrlY
Y m
2 cn
� LAKE
¢
LRD
CO
NO.
NO.
-PARK
Q
K
rf
�pIL
O
�+J
_
�INi
EAS
RD
z
a
LAKE
CO
we]
9
H
MEDICINE
\LAKE
March 12, 1987
Mr. Eric M. Stetz
16820 - 30th Avenue N.
Plymouth, MN 55447
Dear Eric:
Thank you for your letter regarding the need for a traffic light at County
Road 6 and Dunkirk Lane. We agree that a light is needed at that
intersection.
You will pleased to know that the Hennepin County Department of
Transportation has recently agreed to install a signal light at this
intersection this year. We have not received a firm schedule from Hennepin
County on the timing of this new construction. I anticipate that it will be
completed prior to school commencing in the fall.
Thank you, Eric, for your interest in traffic safety.
Yours truly,
Virgil Schneider
Mayor
VS:dma
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447, TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800
tct
March 16, 1987
CITY OF
PLYMOUTFF
Rick Jorgenson
AMBER WOODS HOA
18615 - 34th Avenue No.
Plymouth, MN 55447
SUBJECT: PLYMOUTH FIRE STATION NO. 3 REFERENDUM
Dear Mr. Jorgenson:
The City Council has been planning for Fire Station No. 3 for several years,
as you may know. They have now selected a site on the east side of Dunkirk
Lane, immediately south of County Road 24. Two stations currently serve our
community, one in the southeast and one in the northeast. The addition of a
third station will provide for better response time to fire emergencies and
will be responsive to development patterns in our community.
A referendum is scheduled for Tuesday, April 28. I would
you would alert homeowner association members to the fact
next two weeks they will be receiving by mail a brochure
tional details about the need for and location of proposed
3. If you have questions, please feel free to contact me
Director, Richard Carlquist.
Yours truly,
James G. Willis
City Manager
OGW:jm
cc: Mayor & City Council
Richard Carlquist, Public Safety Director
appreciate it if
that within the
providing add! -
Fire Station No.
or Public Safety
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447, TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800
March 17, 1987
D. M. Kjos
3905 Orleans Lane
Plymouth, MN 55441
Dear Mr. Kjos:
Z VA
Thank you for your Resident Feedback form suggesting that Plymouth Metrolink
internal circulator service be expanded to the area north of Medicine Lake.
Plymouth Metrolink was initiated in October 1983 under the "Opt Out" statutes which
authorized communities receiving little or no transit service to develop their own
transit demonstration program. The Council elected to develop Plymouth Metrolink
serving the area south of County Road 9 and west of Medicine Lake, as that was the
area in the community receiving the least transit service. The area north of
Medicine Lake receives better service through the traditional Medicine Lake Lines
line -haul service.
Unfortunately, as you point out, Medicine Lake Lines does not presently provide
service to Ridgedale. The only alternative is to utilize Plymouth Metrolink service
from the park and ride lot.
Each year we negotiate our contract with the Regional Transit Board for costs
associated with Plymouth Metrolink. The negotiations for 1987 are completed based
upon status -quo service levels. The reason has been that Plymouth Metrolink's
continued existence depends upon ridership. In order to expand the service, we must
be able to demonstrate that an increase in ridership will occur (that does not mean
a redistribution of ridership from Medicine Lake Lines to Plymouth Metrolink).
An expansion of service to your area would be possible in 1988 provided that a means
can be found to demonstrate that added ridership would Justify the added service.
What is needed is a demonstration of interest from residents in your area. In this
regard, you could circulate a petition asking individuals who would be interested in
service to Ridgedale to sign. With this petition, we might be able to approach the
Regional Transit Board in our 1988 funding request with a recommendation that the
internal circulator service be expanded to your area.
Our objective is to provide the best transit service we possibly can. If siqnficant
added ridership can be documented, we would be delighted to further discuss a
possible service expansion for 1988.
Yours ver tru ,
Frank Boyles
Assistant City Manager
FB:jm
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447, TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800
%Ih
March 10, 1987
CITY OF
PLYMOUTH
D. M. Kfos
3905 Orleans Lane
Plymouth, MN 55441
Dear Mr. Kjos:
Thank you for your thoughtful message on the Resident Feedback form you
submitted at the March 9 Town Meeting. Both the City Council and City staff
were gratified that the meeting was so well attended.
In order to more thoroughly respond to your concerns, we have referred your
comments to the Administration for investigation. A member of that
department will provide you with additional information on this subject.
Once again, thank you for participating in the town meeting and feel free to
contact me, City Council members or the City staff at any time if we can be
of service to you.
Sincerely,
Virgil Schneider
Mayor
VS: lb
cc: Frank Boyles, Assistant City Manager
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447, TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800
PLYMOUTH TOWN MEETING FORMAT
AREA 4
March 9, 1987
I. INTRODUCTIONS - Mayor Virgil Schneider
II. STATUS REPORTS ON ISSUES OF INTEREST - City Department Heads
III. QUESTIONS FROM RESIDENTS IN ATTENDANCE
IV. CLOSING COMMENTS - Mayor Virgil Schneider
V. ADJOURN
RESIDENT FEEDBACK FORM
Please use this form if you have a question or concern which you would like
the City to investigate. If you provide your name, address and phone
number, we will advise you of our actions and findings with respect to your
concern.
NATURE OF CONCERN/ PROPERTY ADDRESS INVOLVED:
ACTION YOU DESIRE THE CITY TO TAKE:
NAME OF CONCERNED RESIDENT:
ADDRESS OF RESIDENT: 3 `f'O O,eC(�-rf,�lS Gi✓ /1�`i
PHONE NUMBER: -5-W6 — 4ct� S3
Richard Weaver
7732 Drew Avenue North
Brooklyn Park, Minnesota 55443
March 17, 1987
Mr. Virgil Schneider
11520 - 54th Ave N
Plymouth, MN 55442
Dear Commissioner Schneider,
I wish to make you aware of a complaint I have with Cable TV Northwest. But
before I get into that, you probably are not aware of how difficult it has been to
contact you. I have talked to Greg Moore on several occasions and a couple of
times I asked if I could get a list of the Commissioners. I was told that such list
was unavailable, and that addresses and phone numbers could not be given out. I
call this to your attention since I am sure that as a "public official" you would
WANT to hear from the people you are representing rather than be sheltered from
them. Finally I got your name and address through other sources and am writing
to you about a complaint I have.
BACKGROUND - We subscribed to the "Basic" tier of service for a short period to
try it out. We found we were not making enough use of it to justify
keeping it so we cancelled the service. When we cancelled the "Basic"
service, we paid the ONE TIME fee for the privilege of using the cable
to receive channels 2 through 13 ("Universal" service). The
understanding was that the $14.95 was a one time cost with NO
ADDITIONAL monthly charge.
CURRENT PROBLEM - In December, a representative from the cable company
called me to say that unless we subscribed (at approximately $14 per
month), we would be disconnected from cable because they were no
longer offering universal service. I told them I felt they could not
legally do that since a contract was formed when they received my
payment for the universal service. She told me that as of January
1987 they were de -regulated by Congress by the Cable Act of 1984.
Even though this act was apparently passed in 1984, the cable
company continued to sign customers up for universal service (and
take their money); even as recently as September! I have talked to two
cable commissioners, the Minnesota Commerce Department and the
Attorney Generals Office. There seems to be some agreement that a
valid contract may exist, but it may not be a practical matter for an
individual to try to fight the cable companys actions.
MY POSITION - I believe that the cable company is breaking contract obligations
which it has with me (and some 500 other customers). I find it hard to
believe that Congress would pass an act that would negate valid,
Preexisting contracts, since this would provide an unfair benefit to
the company at the expense of the individual. Also, since the cable
company apparently planned to terminate universal service on the
effective date of deregulation, I feel customers should
Page 2
have been told that when they inquired about purchasing universal
service. In my case, I would have thought twice, since there was an
expense on my part to wire my house to distribute the signal to
various rooms.
According to Cable TV Northwest, they say they have "expanded a service tier
known as Universal, to 51 channels" when in fact that already existed as the
"Basic" tier of service. In other words, they didn't expand the Universal tier,
they eliminated it by making It the same as the already existing "Basic" service.
At the same time Cable TV Northwest was "expanding" their Universal service,
they were in the process of realligning their station order so that "premium"
offerings would be in the channel 2 to 13 range which was available to
"Universal" customers. It seems obvious to me that they wanted to eliminate the
"Universal" subscriber so that they could carry out their plan to rearrange the
channel numbers. If they did not do away with universal subscribers, the
universal subscribers would have access to the "premium" offerings. As you
know, the change in channel numbers, which Cable TV Northwest had planned to
make in January received such negative comments that the proposed changes were
put on hold.
I am hoping that you can help me (and the other 500 universal customers whose
service was terminated). I feel that the Cable Act of 1984 If being misused for
unfair gain by Cable TV Northwest and their parent corporation Hauser
Communications. If nothing else, I believe it is imperative that the Commission
put up a fight to regain the authority that is apparently being stripped away by
the Cable Act (or by the way Cable TV Northwest is interpreting it). The Cable
Act of 1984 has a specified review by the Federal Communications Commission on
or before 1990. I feel that information needs to be forwarded to the FCC so that
the erosion of YOUR power as a Commission can be halted or reversed. If you
would like to discuss this further, I can be reached at home (561-5027) in the
evenings or at work (425-4131 X450) during the day. Thank you for your help!
Th nks again for your help,
Richard Weaver
March 18, 1987
Mr. Richard Weaver
7732 Drew Avenue No.
Brooklyn Park, MN 55443
Dear Mr. Weaver:
Thank you for your March 17, 1987 letter to Commissioner Willis and myself.
As a result of your letter, Commissioner Willis has been in contact with
Greg Moore, Executive Director of the Northwest Suburbs Cable Communication
Commission. Mr. Moore has indicated that the subject of your complaint will
be placed upon our next Commission agenda scheduled for Thursday, April 16.
Mr. Moore has asked the Commission attorney to review the subject to
determine what steps, if any, the Commission may take on this issue. I hope
that you will plan to attend the Commission meeting.
Thanks again for your letter.
Sincerely,
Virgil Schneider
Plymouth Cable Commission Representative
cc: Greg Moore, Executive Director
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447, TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800