Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCouncil Information Memorandum 12-03-1987G ITY G PVMOUT+ CITY COUNCIL INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM December 3, 1987 UPCOMING MEETINGS AND EVENTS..... 1. COUNCIL/STAFF DINNER MEETING -- Monday, December 7, 5:00 p.m. Council/staff dinner meeting in the City Council conference room. Subject - Donahue sewer system evaluation recommendations. 2. COUNCIL MEETING -- Monday, December 7, 7:30 p.m. Regular City Council meeting in the City Council Chambers. 3. BOARD OF ZONING --Tuesday, December 8, 7:30 p.m. The Board of Zoning Adjustments and Appeals will meet in the City Council Chambers. Agenda attached. (M-3) 4. PLANNING COMMISSION -- Wednesday, December 9, 7:30 p.m. The Tanning Commission will meet in the City Council Chambers. Agenda attached. (M-4) 5. PARK & RECREATION ADVISORY COMMISSION -- Thursday, December 10, 7:30 p.m. The Park and Recreation Advisory Commission will meet in the City Council Chambers. Agenda attached. (M-5) 6. EMPLOYEE HOLIDAY PARTY -- Saturday, December 5. The Plymouth Employee Holiday Party at the Scanticon Conference Center. Social hour - 6:30 p.m., Dinner - 7:15 p.m. 7. COUNCIL PHOTOS -- Monday, December 14. Council photos will be taken on Monday, December 14 at 6:45 p.m. The Communications Coordinator would like to take photos of: 1) the current Council; 2) the new Council; 3) individual photos of the Mayor and current Council - members; and 4) Councilmember-elect Ricker. Photos of newly elected or re-elected Councilmembers will be printed in the January/February issue of Plymouth on Parade. The other photos will be kept on file for future use. Please contact Judy McMillin if you will not be present. 8. DECEMBER CALENDAR -- The December meeting calendar is attached. M-8 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447, TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800 CITY COUNCIL INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM December 3, 1987 Page two FOR YOUR INFORMATION..... 1. FINAL RESIDENTIAL SURVEY INSTRUMENT - Attached for Council infor- mation is the final residential survey instrument containing the Council's input from the November 23 meeting. We expect that pre- testing of the instrument will begin the week of December 7. If the Council has concerns about the final instrument, I would like to know by December 7 in order that I can communicate that information to Decision Resources on December 8. (I-1) 2. HENNEPIN COUNTY TRANSFER SITE - DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT RECEIVEDWORKSHEET -- Hennepin County has supplied us with a draft copy of the Environmental Assessment Worksheet on the Plymouth Transfer Site which they submitted to the Metropolitan Council on November 23. A copy is attached for the Council's review. (I-2) 3. MINUTES: a. Housing & Redevelopment Authority, November 19, 1987 (I -3a) b. Park and Recreation Advisory Commission, November 12, 1987 (I -3b) 4. PARKING ON T.H. 55 NEAR FERNBROOK LANE -- Police patrol monitoring of this area from November 19 through November 24 for parking violations resulted in the issuance of one citation. This area was being checked by the police following a complaint about trucks periodically parking along the road shoulder to visit nearby restaurants. A copy of the Police Department's report is attached. (I-4) 5. METRO MONITOR ARTICLE: DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES -- Attached is an article from the December issue of the Metro Monitor dealing with development impact fees. (I-5) 6. NEW FIRE INSPECTOR -- On January 4, 1988 the new Fire Prevention Inspector position will be filled by Kevin Leuer. Kevin was selected from five outstanding candidates after completion of an extensive assessment center process for the position. For background purposes, Kevin has been a member of the Plymouth Fire Department since August 1981. Since Joining the Fire Department, Kevin has continued to upgrade his firefighter training and education by attending numerous fire suppression and instruction courses and seminars. In January 1985, he was appointed to the position of Lieutenant, and for the past three years has been actively involved as a Fire Instructor for the department. 7. CORRESPONDENCE: a. Letter to Mark Andrew, Hennepin County Chair, from City Manager, on the completion of the County Road 9 improvement project. (1-7a) CITY COUNCIL INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM December 3, 1987 Page three b. Letter mailed to District 284 art departments from Helen LaFave, on the contest for Wayzata art students to create an advertisement for the Plymouth Recycling Program. (I -7b) c. Letter mailed to Human Services agencies informing them of City funding amounts for 1988 and reporting procedures to City Council. (I-70 d. Letter mailed to property owners adjacent to tax forfeit parcel (located between Creekwood Hills and Yvonne's Lakeview Additions) to determine interest in adding portion of parcel to their property. (I -7d) e. Letters from Mayor Schneider congratulating Matt Lichty and Jeff Teschendorf on becoming Eagle Scouts. (I -7e) f. Letter to Dr. Carroll Vomhof, District 281 Community Education, from Eric Blank, advising of building scheduling concerns with the school district. (I -7f) g. Letter of appreciation from Plymouth resident to Plymouth Police Officers Mike Buske and Luke Way for their response to a medical emergency. (I -7g) James G. Willis City Manager JGW:jm attachments AGENDA Board of Zoning Adjustments and Appeals Tuesday, December 8, 1987 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 4. NEW BUSINESS WHERE: Plymouth City Center Council Chambers 3400 Plymouth Blvd. Plymouth, Minnesota 7:30 P.M. November 10, 1987 A. Gerald Rogers. Variance from the minimum front yard setback for property located at 10 Magnolia Lane North. (12-01-87). B. Mrs. E. Wells Spencer. Variance from the minimum front yard setback for property located at 1220 Ferndale Road. (12-02-87). C. Nick Boosalis. Variance from the maximum size of freestanding signs for property located at 11040 State Highway 55. (12-03-87). D. Douglas Morrissette. Variance from the minimum front yard setback for property located at 1910 Kilmer Lane North. (12-04-87). 5. OTHER BUSINESS 6. ADJOURNMENT PLANNING COM11ISSIOH MEETING AGENDA WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 9, 1957 WHERE: Plymouth City Center 3400 Plvmouth Boulevard Plymouth, MH 55447 CONSENT AGENDA All items listed with an asterisk (*) are considered to be routine by the Plannin,; i Commission and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Commissioner, citizen or petitioner so requests, in which event the item will be removed from the consent agenda and considered in normal sequence on the agenda. PUBLIC FORUM 7:15 P.M. 1. CALL TO ORDER 7:30 P.M. 2. ROLL CALL 3.* CONSENT AGENDA 4.* APPROVAL OF MINUTES November 24, 1987 5. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Robert Worthington, Opus Corporation. Revised Site Plan and Conditional Use Permit for an office/warehouse east of Niagara Lane and north of 28th Avenue North (87119) B. Midwest Brick and Supply Company. Revised Site Plan, Amended Conditional Use Permit, and Variances for the use and new occupancy of an office/warehouse located at 5205 County Road 18 (87118) C. Thomas Bisanz, Northland Land Company. Revised Planned Unit Development Pre- liminary Plan, Conditional Use Permit, Planned Unit Development Final Plan and Final Plat for "Mallard Pointe" a multi -family residential development located at the northwest corner of Niagara Lane and 18th Avenue North in the Parkers Lake North MPUD (87110) D. David Peterson. Hew Lyn, Inc./FGC Corp. Revised Planned Unit Development Concept Plan, Preliminary Plan/Plat, Rezoning, and Conditional Use Permit for residential and commercial development on 96 acres located at the southwest corner of County Road 10 and Nathan Lane (87109) 6. NEW BUSINESS - NONE 7. OLD BUSINESS A. Kenneth Streeter, Streeter Investment Co. Revised Planned Unit Development Preliminary Plan/Plat, Site Plan and Variance for a commercial development in "Downtown Plymouth", the southeast corner of 34th Avenue and Plymouth Blvd. (87068) 8. OTHER BUSINESS - NONE 9. ADJOURNMENT 10:00 P.M. Regular Meeting of the Park and Recreation Advisory Commission December 10, 1987, 7:30 p.m. Council Chambers AGENDA 1. Call to Order 2. Approval of Minutes 3. Visitor Presentations (Non -agenda Items) a. Athletic Associations b. Staff C. Others 4. Report on Past Council Action a. St. Mary's Neighborhood Park/Plymouth Creek Soccer Field b. Lions Park Play Equipment 5. Unfinished Business a. Parkers Lake Update b. Neighborhood Park Projects Update C. Park Usage and Cost Study Report (sent out last month) d. Plymouth Creek Site Planning e. f. 6. New Business a. New Plats b. 1987 Annual Report C. d. 7. Commission Presentation 8. Staff Communication 9. Adjournment Next Meeting - January 14, 1988 IIS czI i w «G OQ fm Qom -b NI Q � W H U N H W Cz C7 t M 0 a � «s W 0a � U 0 z U a1 -o a M: U C4 m o c� N 1f1 N J� ¢ M =)O •• O CA I� U V) 2:2: a _ '� r N dV)M U) a C4 N N z O H z U A H U 0 0 /7 N N ti oo 7` N Nl r✓ N �/� V J 0 � N� •O N O i z V cp N Ol N N DECISION RESOURCES, LTD. 3128 Dean Court Minneapolis, Minnesota 55414 PLYMOUTH CITY SURVEY Track/Issues/Demos Hello, I'm _________ of Decision Resources, Ltd., a nationwide polling firm. We're talking with people in Plymouth today and would like to ask you a several questions on a confidential basis. (DO NOT PAUSE) A. Are you registered to vote in Plymouth? 1. Approximately how long have you lived in Plymouth? Yes (CONTINUE) .......... I No (THANK & TERMINATE)..2 LESS THAN ONE YEAR ...... 1 1 - 2 YEARS.............2 3 - 5 YEARS.............3 6 - 10 YEARS ............ 4 11 - 20 YEARS ........... 5 OVER TWENTY YEARS ....... 6 DON'T KNOW/REFUSED......? 2. In what city and/or state was your immediate prior residence located? ------------------------------------------------------------------- 3. As things now stand, how long in LESS THAN ONE YEAR ...... 1 the future do you expect to live 1 - 2 YEARS.............2 in Plymouth? 3 - 5 YEARS.............3 6 - 10 YEARS ............ 4 OVER TEN YEARS .......... 5 DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ...... 6 Could you please tell me how many people in each of the following age groups live in your household. Let's start oldest to youngest. 4. First, persons over 55? 5. Other adults? 6. High school aged (grades 10-12)? 7. Junior high aged children (grades 7-9)? 8. Elementary school aged (grades K-8)? 9. Pre-schoolers? 1 10. How would you rate the quality of EXCELLENT.... ,1 life in Plymouth -- excellent, GOOD......... .2 good, only fair, or poor? ONLY FAIR...............3 POOR....................4 DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ...... 5 11. Over the next five years, do you DECLINE.................1 expect the quality of life in REMAIN ABOUT THE SAME 2 Plymouth to decline, remain about ... IMPROVE.................3 the same, or improve? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ...... 4 12. .What do you like MOST about living in Plymouth? 13. What do you like LEAST about living in Plymouth? 14. How much pride do you take in the GREAT DEAL......... City of Plymouth as a place to QUITE A LOT.............2 live -- a great deal, quite a SOME............ ,3 lot, some, or very little? VERY LITTLE.............4 DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ...... 5 15. If you had the chance, would you YES ................. .i like to move away from your NO......................2 neighborhood in Plymouth? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ...... 3 IF "YES" IN QUESTION #15, ASK: 16. Where would you like to move? IN PLYMOUTH.............1 BACK TO CITY ............ 2 ANOTHER SUBURB .......... 3 FURTHER FROM MPLS....... 4 OUT OF MINNESOTA ........ 5 DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ...... 6 17. If you were moving to another city, what factors would be most important to you in selecting your new place of residence? 18. If it were needed to maintain FAVOR...................I city services at their current OPPOSE..................2 level, would you favor or oppose DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ...... 3 an increase in city property taxes? 3 1 Y 19. Do you consider property taxes in EXCESSIVELY HIGH ........ 1 Plymouth to be excessively high, RELATIVELY HIGH ......... 2 relatively high, about average, ABOUT AVERAGE ........... 3 or comparatively low? COMPARATIVELY LOW ....... 4 DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ...... 5 As you may know, property taxes are divided between the City of Plymouth, Hennepin County, and your local public school district. 20. For each dollar of property taxes UNDER TEN PERCENT# ...... 1 you pay, about what percentage do 10% TO 20% ..............2 you think goes to city govern- 21% TO 30% ..............3 ment? 31'% TO 40% ..............4 41% TO 50% ..............5 51% TO 60'/ ...............6 61% TO 70% ..............7 OVER SEVENTY PERCENT .... B DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ...... 9 21. Overall, would you rate park and EXCELLENT...............1 recreation facilities in Plymouth GOOD....................2 as excellent, good, only fair, or ONLY FAIR...............3 poor? POOR....................4 DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ...... 5 I would like to read you a short list of government services, and have you tell me, for each one, whether you are generally satis- fied or dissatisfied with that service.... SATIS DSSAT BOTH/ D.K./ NEITH REF. 22. Park Maintenance 1 2 3 4 23. Snow Plowing 1 2 3 4 24. Police 1 2 3 4 25. Fire Protection 1 2 3 4 26. City Street Maintenance 1 2 3 4 27. County Road and Highway Maintenance 1 2 3 4 28. Animal Control 1 2 3 4 IF "DISSATISFIED" IN QUESTIONS #21-28, ASK FOR EACH ONE: 29. Why are you dissatisfied with 3 Let's talk about Plymouth City Government for a few minutes. When many people think about their local government, they think of the elected officials who represent them.... 30. How much do you feel you know GREAT DEAL..............1 about the work of the Mayor and FAIR AMOUNT.............2 City Council -- a great deal, VERY LITTLE.............3 a fair amount, or very little? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ...... 4 31. From what you know, do you approve STRONGLY APPROVE ........ I or disapprove of the job the Mayor SOMEWHAT APPROVE ........ 2 and City Council are doing? (WAIT SOMEWHAT DISAPPROVE ..... 3 FOR RESPONSE) And do you feel STRONGLY DISAPPROVE ..... 4 strongly that way? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ...... 5 32. Offhand, do you recall the name SCHNEIDER NAMED ......... I of the Mayor? (IF "YES," ASK:) OTHER NAMED.............2 What is his name? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ...... 3 COTHER: ------------------- Do you recall the names of any current members of the Plymouth City Council? (IF "YES," ASK:) Which council members do you recall? MENTIONED 33. David Crain 1 34. Maria Vasiliou 1 35. Bob Zitur 1 36. Jerry Sisk 1 37. Other C 38. How much first-hand contact have you had with the Plymouth City staff -- quite a lot, some, or very little? NOT MENTIONED 2 2 2 2 2 QUITE A LOT.............I SOME....................2 VERY LITTLE.............3 DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ...... 4 39. From what you have seen or heard, EXCELLENT...............I how would you rate the job per- GOOD....................2 formance of the Plymouth City ONLY FAIR...............3 staff -- excellent, good, only POOR....................4 fair, or poor? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ...... 5 40. During the past twelve months, YES.....................I have you contacted anyone working NO......................2 for the City of Plymouth to ob- DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ...... 3 tain information, to get service, or make a complaint? IF "YES," ASK: 91 41. What was the nature of your most recent inquiry, that is, what information or service did you need? ------------------------------------------------------- 42. Which department or official did you contact first about this inquiry? ------------------------------------------------------- 43. In general, were you satis- SATISFIED...............I fied or dissatisfied with DISSATISFIED ............ 2 the way your inquiry was DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ...... 3 handled? IF "DISSATISFIED" IN QUESTION 043, ASK: 44. Why were you dissatisfied? -------------------------------------------------- The Plymouth park system is composed of trails, larger city parks, community playfields, and smaller neighborhood parks. Of these four types of facilities, which do members of your household use? USE NONUSE D.K./REF 45. Trails 1 2 3 46. Larger city parks 1 2 3 47. Community playfields 1 2 3 48. Smaller neighborhood parks 1 2 3 49. Do you feel that the current mix YES.....................1 of recreational opportunities NO......................2 sufficiently meets the needs of DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ...... 3 the members of your household? IF "NO" IN QUESTION #49, ASK: 50. What additional recreational opportunities would you like to see the City of Plymouth offer residents? 5 51. What is the location of your principal retail shopping area? ------------------------------------------------------------ 52. How important to you is it that VERY IMPORTANT .......... 1 the City of Plymouth develop a SOMEWHAT IMPORTANT ...... 2 central retail shopping area in NOT AT ALL IMPORTANT .... 3 the city -- very important, DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ...... 4 somewhat important, or not at all important? 53. Should the development of conven- YES.....................1 ience outlets in Plymouth, such NO......................2 as gas stations and food stores, DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ...... 3 be made a top priority? 54. Do you feel that residents have ADEQUATE................1 an adequate opportunity for in- INADEQUATE..............2 put into the zoning and land use DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ...... 3 decision-making process in Plymouth? 55. Do you feel the City of Plymouth TOO TOUGH...............I is too tough, about right, or not ABOUT RIGHT.............2 tough enough in enforcing the NOT TOUGH ENOUGH ........ 3 City Code on such nuisances as DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ...... 4 animal control, garbage disposal, junk cars, and noise? IF "TOO TOUGH" OR "NOT TOUGH ENOUGH," ASK: 56. Why do you feel that way? ------------------------------------------------------- 57. In the past, have you had City YES.....................I Inspectors come to your resi- NO......................2 dence? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ...... 3 IF "YES" IN QUESTION #57, ASK: 58. What was the purpose of their visit(s)? 59. How would you rate their VERY HELPFUL ............ I helpfulness -- very helpful, SOMEWHAT HELPFUL ........ 2 somewhat helpful, or not at NOT AT ALL HELPFUL ...... 3 all helpful? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ...... 4 6 63. Other than voting, do you feel YES.....................I that if you wanted to, you could NO......................2 have a say about the way the City DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ...... 3 of Plymouth runs things? There has been a substantial amount of commercial and industrial development in Plymouth. 64. Do you feel that the pace of TOO RAPID...............I commercial and industrial devel- ABOUT RIGHT.............2 opment in the city has been too NOT FAST ENOUGH ......... 3 rapid, about right, or not fast DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ...... 4 enough? 65. Does the development across the WELL-PLANNED ............ I city seem well-planned for the DISCONNECTED ............ 2 future of Plymouth or a series BOTH (VOL.) .............3 of disconnected projects? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ...... 4 66. Do the more recent commercial and BLEND...................I industrial developments aesthet- DO NOT BLEND ............ 2 ically blend with the natural DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ...... 3 landscape, or not? 67. Do you currently separate recy- YES.....................1 clables from the rest of your NO......................2 garbage? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ...... 3 IF "YES" IN QUESTION #67, ASK: Which of the following materials do you recycle? YES 68. Glass? 1 69. Newspaper and cardboard? 1 70. Metal and aluminum? I 7 NO D. K. REF. 2 3 4 2 3 4 2 3 4 60. In general, do you feel that the YES.....................1 City enforces its codes fairly NO......................2 and consistently? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ...... 3 61. How would you rate the general EXCELLENT...............1 appearance of your neighborhood GOOD....................2 -- excellent, good, only fair, ONLY FAIR...............3 or poor? PO0R....................4 DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ...... 5 62. Do you feel your municipal water COMPARATIVELY HIGH ...... I and sewer charges are compara- ABOUT RIGHT.............2 tively high, about right, or COMPARATIVELY LOW ....... 3 comparatively low for the Metro- DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ...... 4 politan Area? 63. Other than voting, do you feel YES.....................I that if you wanted to, you could NO......................2 have a say about the way the City DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ...... 3 of Plymouth runs things? There has been a substantial amount of commercial and industrial development in Plymouth. 64. Do you feel that the pace of TOO RAPID...............I commercial and industrial devel- ABOUT RIGHT.............2 opment in the city has been too NOT FAST ENOUGH ......... 3 rapid, about right, or not fast DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ...... 4 enough? 65. Does the development across the WELL-PLANNED ............ I city seem well-planned for the DISCONNECTED ............ 2 future of Plymouth or a series BOTH (VOL.) .............3 of disconnected projects? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ...... 4 66. Do the more recent commercial and BLEND...................I industrial developments aesthet- DO NOT BLEND ............ 2 ically blend with the natural DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ...... 3 landscape, or not? 67. Do you currently separate recy- YES.....................1 clables from the rest of your NO......................2 garbage? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ...... 3 IF "YES" IN QUESTION #67, ASK: Which of the following materials do you recycle? YES 68. Glass? 1 69. Newspaper and cardboard? 1 70. Metal and aluminum? I 7 NO D. K. REF. 2 3 4 2 3 4 2 3 4 71. Do you use the drop-off center for recycling, participate in the curb- side pick-up recycling program, or use some other program? IF "NO" IN QUESTION #71, ASK: DROP-OFF CENTER ......... I CURBSIDE PICK-UP ........ 2 OTHER PROGRAM ........... 3 DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ...... 4 COther: -----------------------I The City offers a twice monthly curbside collection of recyclable materials, such as newspaper, glass, and metal. 72. Could you tell me why don't you participate in this program? --------------------------------------------- 73. Are there ways the curbside recycling program could be changed or enhanced so that you would participate? (IF "YES," ASK:) What are they? As you may know, several refuse haulers serve Plymouth. This arrangement has permitted citizens to choose their own haulers and contract directly with them. But, it has also created sig- nificant overlap between the haulers and increased noise and congestion on city streets. 74. Of the following three proposals, which do you most favor: A. The City contracts with one hauler to serve the entire city. B. The City contracts with a group of haulers, each serving one area of Plymouth exclusively. C. The present system. PROPOSAL A ..............1 PROPOSAL B ..............2 PROPOSAL C ..............3 DON'T CARE (VOL.) ....... 4 DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ...... 5 Hennepin County will soon require all residents to separate recyclable from their trash. The City of Plymouth is currently reviewing alternatives to comply with the county requirement. One approach would be to contract for the separation procedure to be undertaken for all citizens in the city.... 8 75. Would you favor or oppose re- FAVOR...................1 placing the curbside recycling OPPOSE..................2 pick-up program with a system DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ...... 3 in which the City contracted with haulers to collect all refuse, and the collectors later separated recyclable materials from other trash? Another approach would be to offer incentive to residents to do their own separation.... 76. Would you favor or oppose the FAVOR...................1 city arranging to base garbage OPPOSE..................2 collection fees upon the amount DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ...... 3 of refuse a household sets out, so that households which recy- cled would be charged less? 77. Are there safety hazards in the City of Plymouth which particularly concern you? (IF "YES," ASK:) What are they? ------------------------------------------------------------ On another topic.... In the past, the City has considered building a community center containing recreational facilities and meeting areas. 78. Do you support or oppose the STRONGLY FAVOR .......... 1 building of a community center SOMEWHAT FAVOR .......... 2 in Plymouth? (WAIT FOR RE- SOMEWHAT OPPOSE ......... 3 SPONSE) Do you feel strongly STRONGLY OPPOSE ......... 4 that way? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ...... 5 I would like to read you a list of facilities that could be included in the community center. For each one, please tell me if you would strongly favor, somewhat favor, somewhat oppose, or strongly oppose its inclusion in the complex. ST FAV FAVOR OPPOS ST OPP DK/RF 79. A senior citizen center? 1 2 3 4 5 80. A county library? 1 2 3 4 5 81. An indoor swimming pool? 1 2 3 4 5 82. An indoor ice skating rink? 1 2 3 4 5 83. A multipurpose gym- nasium? 1 2 3 4 5 6 ----------------------------------------------- 67. If the proposed community center QUITE A LOT MORE ........ 1 contained the features you SOMEWHAT MORE LIKELY .... 2 favored, how much more likely NOT AT ALL LIKELY ....... 3 would you be to support its DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ...... 4 construction -- quite a lot more likely, somewhat more likely, or not at all? To build a community center will require passage of a bond ref- erendum. Taxpayers would be asked to pay for the construction of the facility and to share in the cost of operating the center. User fees would also underwrite its operation. 88. How much would you be willing to pay in additional property taxes to support the construction and partial operation of a Plymouth Community Center. (START WITH A RANDOMLY SELECTED CHOICE FROM #1 - #8) Let's say, would you be willing to pay 5----- per year? (MOVE TO NEXT CHOICE UP OR DOWN DEPENDING ON ANSWER.... REPEAT THE PROCESS.) NOTHING.................1 $25 .....................2 $50 .....................3 575 .....................4 $100 ....................5 $125 ....................6 $150 ....................7 $175 ....................8 $200 ....................9 DON'T KNOW/REFUSED..... 10 89. Are you aware of ST FAV FAVOR OPPOS ST OPP DK/RF 84. An exercise room? 1 2 3 4 5 85. A meeting and crafts NONE ............... .1 household own an automobile? ONE.....................2 room? 1 2 3 4 5 86. Are there any other facilities you would like to see in the community center? (IF "YES," ASK:) What are they? ----------------------------------------------- 67. If the proposed community center QUITE A LOT MORE ........ 1 contained the features you SOMEWHAT MORE LIKELY .... 2 favored, how much more likely NOT AT ALL LIKELY ....... 3 would you be to support its DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ...... 4 construction -- quite a lot more likely, somewhat more likely, or not at all? To build a community center will require passage of a bond ref- erendum. Taxpayers would be asked to pay for the construction of the facility and to share in the cost of operating the center. User fees would also underwrite its operation. 88. How much would you be willing to pay in additional property taxes to support the construction and partial operation of a Plymouth Community Center. (START WITH A RANDOMLY SELECTED CHOICE FROM #1 - #8) Let's say, would you be willing to pay 5----- per year? (MOVE TO NEXT CHOICE UP OR DOWN DEPENDING ON ANSWER.... REPEAT THE PROCESS.) NOTHING.................1 $25 .....................2 $50 .....................3 575 .....................4 $100 ....................5 $125 ....................6 $150 ....................7 $175 ....................8 $200 ....................9 DON'T KNOW/REFUSED..... 10 89. Are you aware of the Neighborhood UNAWARE.................I Watch Program? (IF "YES," ASK:) AWARE/NOT MEMBER ........ 2 Are you a member? AWARE/MEMBER ............ 3 DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ...... 4 90. Do you or any members of your NONE ............... .1 household own an automobile? ONE.....................2 (IF "YES," ASK:) How many auto- TWO .................. mobiles are owned by members of ..3 THREE ................ this household? .4 FOUR OR MORE ............ 5 DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ...... 6 91. Do you feel that the availability YES.....................1 of public transportation is ade- NO ................... .2 quate for the needs of you and DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ...... 3 your household? IF "NO" IN QUESTION #91, ASK: 10 92. What additional services would you like to see offered? 93. Do you currently use the Park and DON'T USE/NO ............ 1 Ride Service? (IF "NO," ASK:) DON'T USE/YES ........... 2 If parking lots were closer to USE CURRENTLY ........... 3 your home, would you be more DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ...... 4 likely to use the service? 94. How would you rate the City's EXCELLENT...............1 overall performance in communi- GOOD....................2 cating key local issues to resi- ONLY FAIR...............3 dents in its publications and on POOR....................4 cable television -- excellent, DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ...... 5 good, only fair, or poor? 95. What is you primary source of information concerning city government in Plymouth -- news- papers, radio, television, city publications, neighbors, or something else? NEWSPAPERS..............I RADIO...................2 TELEVISION..............3 CITY PUBLICATIONS ....... 4 NEIGHBORS...............5 SOMETHING ELSE .......... 6 DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ...... 7 IF SPECIFIC MEDIA IN QUESTION #95, ASK: 96. Could you tell me which (newspaper/radio station/tele- vision station/city publication)? IF "SOMETHING ELSE," IN QUESTION #95, ASK: 97. What is that other source? ------------------------------------------------------- 98. Do you recall receiving the bi- YES.....................I monthly city publication, NO......................2 "Plymouth on Parade"? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ...... 3 IF "YES" IN QUESTION #98, ASK: 99. Do you or any members of YES.....................I your household read NO......................2 "Plymouth on Parade"? DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ...... 3 IF "YES" IN QUESTION #99, ASK: 100. What types of information do you seek and what kinds of articles do you read in "Plymouth on Parade"? 11 Currently "Plymouth on Parade" contains both current news about City government and policies AND information about City recreational programs. Some people feel it would be better if Plymouth residents were sent two different publications: one covering city government and policies; the second, recreational programs. Others feel that one publication is all that is needed. How about you --- 101. Should the City continue to mail CONTINUE CURRENT ONE .... I the current "Plymouth on Parade", TWO PUBLICATIONS ........ 2 or should there be two publica- DOESN'T MATTER .......... 3 tions, or doesn't it matter to DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ...... 4 you? 102. Does this household subscribe to YES ............. .1 cable television? NO......................2 DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ...... 3 IF "YES" IN QUESTION #102, ASK: 103. Do any members of this YES ............... . .1 household watch the Plymouth NO.....................2 City Council Meetings broad- DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ...... 3 casts? Over the last year, the City has produced cable television programs on the topics of solid waste recycling, the City budget, meet your Mayor and Council, introductions to City Council meetings, Plymouth Metrolink, snowplowing, and similar topics. 104. Are there any other specific topics or issues you would like to see covered in city -produced cable television programs? Now, just a few more questions for statistical purposes.... 105. Do you own or rent your present residence? 106. What is your age, please? (READ CATEGORIES) OWN.....................1 RENT....................2 REFUSED.................3 18-24 ...................1 25-34 ...................2 35-44 ...................3 45-54 ...................4 55-64 ...................5 65 AND OVER.............6 REFUSED.................7 107. What is the occupation of the head of this household? 12 108. What is your present marital SINGLE..................I status, please? Are you pre- MARRIED.................2 sently single, married, divorced DIVORCED................3 or widowed? WIDOWED.................4 REFUSED.................5 IF "MARRIED" IN QUESTION #108, ASK: 109. Do both spouses work outside YES.....................1 the home? NO......................2 DON'T KNOW/REFUSED ...... 3 110. How many full-time or part-time employed members of this household work in the City of Plymouth? 111. How many full-time # part-time employed members of this household work outside the City? IF MORE THAN ZERO IN QUESTION 4111, ASK: 112. In what cities do they work: 113. Can you tell me approximately what is the level of income for all members of your household before any taxes? Is the total annual income: (READ CHOICES #1-#7) BELOW $10,000..........01 $10,001-$20,000........02 $20,001-$30,000........03 $30,001-$40,000........04 $40,001-$50,000........05 $50,001-$60,000........06 360,001-$70,000........07 OVER $70,000...........08 DON'T KNOW.............09 REFUSED................10 113. Sex (BY OBSERVATION: DO NOT ASK) MALE....................1 FEMALE..................2 Thank you very much for your time. LIST PHONE NUMBER ----------------------------- INTERVIEWER ------------------------------ DATE ------------------------------------- 13 L)PND ENE <u November 24, 1987 Mr. Fred Moore, City Engineer City of Plymouth 3400 Plymouth Boulevard Plymouth, MN 55447 Dear Mr. Moore: Enclosed for your information is a copy of a Draft Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) which was submitted yesterday to the Metropolitan Council for their use in identifying issues for inclusion in the Scoping Document for a Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS) on the Plymouth Transfer Station. As you may know, the Metropolitan Council has determined that a Supplemental EIS will be required on the Plymouth Transfer Station. Thus, we are expecting Metropolitan Council to do a more rigorous analysis than is implied by the term EAW. Attached, as part of the draft EAW, is the Hydrogeologic Study of the transfer station that was performed in response to concerns expressed by the City of Plymouth. Should you have concerns either about the hydrogeologic study or other issues that you feel should be incorporated into the Supplemental EIS, I invite you to directly contact staff of the Metropolitan Council and myself. Yours truly, Warren K. Porter Solid Waste Division Manager WKP:tma MOORE Enclosure cc: Luther Nelson Don Krebs HENNEPIN COUNTY an equal opportunity employer a DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET (EAW) 1. Project Name Hennepin County Transfer Station - Plymouth Site 2. Proposer Hennepin County Department of Environment and Energy Contact Person Warren Porter Address 822 South 3rd Street, Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55415 Phone (612) 345-6848 3. RGU Metropolitan Council Contact Person Wayne Nelson Address 300 Metro Square Building - 7th and Robert Street St. Paul, MN 55101 Phone (612) 291-6406 4. Project Location: a. NE 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Section 27, Township 118N, Range 22W, in the City of Plymouth, Hennepin County. b. Attachments: 4a. County Map 4b. U.S.G.S. Map 4c. Air Photo/Plat Map 4d. Site Plan 4e. Land Use Map 4f. Zoning Map 5. Describe the proposed project (what will be done and how long it will take). Hennepin County intends to construct a solid waste transfer station and recycling facility on this site which will be one of four transfer stations in the County to serve resource recovery plants currently under construction. The Plymouth transfer station's primary function will be to transfer 400-700 tons per day (TPD) of solid waste from packer trucks to enclosed trailer trucks which will haul the solid waste to the resource recovery facilities. As a convenience to citizens and cities, and to aid in achieving the 1990 recycling goals the project will also include citizen drop-off facilities for yard waste, recyclables, and special household wastes. A municipal recycling unit will be provided for the cities or contracted haulers of -2 - recyclable materials. Source separated recyclables will be transported and sold to available markets. Yard wastes will be hauled to County compost failities. Special wastes will be hauled to recycling or permitted disposal facilities as appropriate for the specific materials. It is anticipated that the entire site will be disturbed during construction of the facility buildings and roadways. Construction of this transfer station and recycling facility should begin in February 1989 and last approximately 10 months. The project will be in operation in late 1989 and will operate as long as the resource recovery facilities are operable, at least 25-30 years. 6. Reason for EAW preparation: Supplemental EIS Scoping MEQB Rule # 4410.2100 and 4410.3000 7. Estimated construction cost $8,500,000 8. Total project area (acres) 14 or length (miles) Not Applicable (N/A) 9. Number of residential units N/A or commercial, industrial, or institutional square footage Industrial 71,360 ft2; Office 3,960 ft2 10. Number of proposed parking spaces 11 11. List all known local, state and federal permits/approvals/funding required: Refer to Attachment 11 12. Is the proposed project inconsistent with any: a. Adopted land use ordinances? X No Yes b. Adopted comprehensive land use plans? X No Yes C. Local, state or federal resource management plans? X No Yes The proposed project appears to be consistent with all zoning ordinances and land use plans. A potential conflict may occur in that the local zoning ordinance does not specifically address solid waste transfer stations as allowable, not allowable, or as a conditional use. It is the responsibility of the City of Plymouth to determine if the proposed project is consistent with local zoning requirements, and if a conditional use permit is needed. .7-- C71-. - 3 - The site is currently vacant land in a zoned industrial area. The zoning classification is I -l. The Plymouth Land Use Guide Plan specifies the area as "planned industrial," iP. A transfer station at this site should be compatible with existing zoning ordinance and the land use plan. Refer to the land use map and zoning map, Attachments 4e and 4f, respectively. 13. Describe current and recent past land use and development on and near the site. The site is located in an industrial area and is presently urban vacant land which the owner is subdividing as commercial/industrial lots. Five residences formerly occupied the southern part of the site along C.S.A.H. 6; however, these homes have been removed. The site is bordered by streets and highways on all sides. Surrounding land uses are light industrial, manufacturing, warehouses and offices. The site is in a large industrial park which is zoned as an industrial district (I-1) and the Plymouth Guide Plan specifies the site and surrounding area as planned industrial (iP). Immediately west of I-494 and south of C.S.A.H. 6 is the north end of a narrow strip along the west side of I-494 that is planned for high density residential (LA4) land use; however, the northern part of this area will be used for the southwest ramp of the proposed diamond interchange on 1-494 and C.S.A.H. 6. Refer to the land use map, Attachment 4e and the zoning map, Attachment 4F. 14. Approximately what percent of the site is in each of the following categories? (Percentages should total 100% before and after construction) Before After Before After Forest/Wooded 0 % 0 % Urban vacant 100 % 0 % Brush 0 % 0 % Wetland (types 3-8) 0 % 0 % Grassland 0 % 0 % Impervious Surface 0 % 37 % Cropland 0 % 0 % Buildings 0 % 12 % Landscape/Grass --F% ^57% 15. Show the type and location of soils on the site map. Give the SCS soil classification types, if known. Soils on site are: Cut and fill (Cu), Glencoe silty clay loam (Gc), Hand loam (Ha), Hayden loam (HbB), and Esterville sandy loam (EtB). See site plan, Attachment 4d. 4 - 16. Does the site contain peat soils, steep slopes, sinkholes, shallow limestone formations, abandoned wells, or any geologic hazards? Expla'n: No X Yes Abandoned wells are on the site. Minnesota Department of health have records that three wells on-site and one on an adjacent parcel have been abandoned according to state rules. The abandoned wells are listed below by street address with their date of abandonment, company that did the work, and location: 13710 County Road 6 10-1-84 by E.H. Renner & Sons, Inc. 55 feet north of south line, 103 feet west of east line 13810 County Road 6 9-11-86 by Robert E. Stodola Well Company No location on record with Minnesota Department of Health; location shown as approximate on site plan, Attachment 4d 13814 County Road 6 10-1-84 by E.H. Renner & Sons, Inc. 90 feet north of south line, 35 feet west of east line 13820 County Road 6 10-1-84 by E.H. Renner & Sons, Inc. 90 feet north of south line, 30 feet west of east line Refer to Attachment 4d for location Homes were also located at 13500 County Road 6 and 13720 County Road 6; however, the Minnesota Department of Health as no records of wells on these properties. Refer also to Attachment 16b, Hydrogeologic Study 17. What is the approximate depth (in feet) to: a. Groundwater - 27 feet minimum, 76 feet average b. Bedrock - 114 feet minimum, 165 feet average Taken from wells logs in the site vicinity. Refer also to Attachment 16b, Hydrogeologic Study. 18. Does any part of the project area involve: a. Shoreland zoning district? X No Yes b. Delineated 100 -year flood plain? X No Yes C. State or federally designated river land use district? X No Yes 19. Describe any physical alteration (e.g., excavation, fill, stream diversion) of any drainage system, lake, stream, and/or wetland. Estimate quantity of material to be dredged and indicate where spoils will be deposited. No drainage system, lake, stream or wetland will be altered. 20. Will the project require an appropriate of ground or surface water? Explain (indicate quantity and source): X No — Yes All water requirements for the transfer station can be met by the existing municipal system. 21. Will the project affect: a. Surface water quality (on or off the site)? X No Yes b. Groundwater quality (on or off the site)? X No Yes C. Groundwater levels in any wells (on or off the site)? X No Yes Explain both during and after construction including any discharges expected. Construction of the transfer station is not expected to affect water quality on or off the site. Surface water runoff during construction can be contained by stabilizing slopes and constructing temporary detention basins per the best practices available. After construction, stormwater runoff will be contained and discharged through storm drains. Solid waste transfer is essentially a "dry process," so water usage and wastewater discharge are minimal. All wastewater will be discharged to the municipal system. No impacts to groundwater or surface water are anticipated. 22. What type of wastewater treatment will be used? X municipal individual (on-site) other Describe type of treatment system and amount treated in gallons/day. Show location of nonmunicipal systems on a site map and the results of percolation test if warranted. Indicate if pretreatment measures will be used. Transfer station operation is essentially a "dry process" with minimal water usage and wastewater generation. Water will be used for employee drinking and sanitary facilities. Approximately 450 gallons per day of wastewater from each transfer station will be discharged into the municipal systems from employee sanitary use. It is anticipated that the sewer extensions will connect the facilities to the existing systems. -6- 23. Describe and indicate on a site map the provisions to control erosion and stormwater run-off. Indicate size and location of any retention basins, and discharge point(s). A site map is included as Attachment 4d. At this time, detailed information on the site grading plans has not been developed. However, it is anticipated that all surface water runoff will be contained on- site an discharged to storm sewers. 24. Will the project generate: a. Air pollution? b. Dust? c. Noise? d. Odors? No X Yes No X Yes No X Yes No X Yes Explain both during and after construction, identify distances to noise sensitive land uses, and quantity and type of air pollutants. Transfer stations are used only for the transfer of raw solid waste from short haul collection vehicles to larger transfer trailers. Since no processing of waste occurs, these facilities do not generate air pollutants other than some dust from waste handling and emissions from traffic in and out of the facility. Traffic emissions are not expected to be significant considering the traffic volume increases estimated in question 29. No data is presently available to estimate traffic emissions. Dust may result during construction; however, this can be minimized by the use of standard construction practices. Some noise will be generated by trucks and equipment at the facility, however, all operations will occur inside buildings which will keep noise levels to a minimum. The nearest residences are approximately 1,400 feet to the west across I-494. Transfer stations are "through -put" facilities and are not used for storage of refuse; this minimizes the generation of objectionable odors. The potential for odor will be further reduced by enclosing all portions of the faility in which refuse is handled and by covering all refuse vehicles which enter or leave the facility. No known complaints have been filed concerning odors associated with the existing north and south Minneapolis transfer stations. 25. Describe the type and amount of solid waste and/or hazardous waste that will be generated and the method and location of disposal: Solid and hazardous waste will not be generated by the facility; however, 400-700 TPD of municipal solid waste (MSW) will be collected at the facility and transported to resource recovery facilities and recycling centers. Known resource recovery facilities are being - 7 - constructed in Minneapolis and Elk River. Recycling centers have not been identified. Recyclable materials and household special waste will be provided separate drop-off and transfer areas. These materials are a part of the total 400-700 TPD range. Specific quantities have not been determined. 26. Will the project involve: a. Fish or wildlife habitat? X No Yes b. A rare, endangered, threatened or special concern species? (animals and/or plants) X No Yes C. Movement of any resident or migratory animals? X No Yes Explain (identify species and describe impact): Refer to letter from the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Attachment 26. 27. Do any historical, archaeological or architectural resources exist on or near the project site? X No Yes Explain (show resources on a site map and describe impact): Refer to letter from the Minnesota Historical Society, Attachment 27. 28. Will the project cause the impairment or destruction of: a. Designated park or recreation areas? X No _ Yes b. Prime or unique farmlands? X No Yes C. Ecologically sensitive areas? X No Yes d. Scenic views and vistas? X No — Yes e. Other unique resources (specify)? X No Yes 29. What roads will receive increased traffic? (For each road indicate the current average daily traffic (ADT) and increase in ADT contributed by the project.) The main access routes to the site are C.A.S.H. 6 and I-494. Average daily traffic (ADT) for these routes were 8,300 and 39,500 vehicle trips per day, respectively for the year 1984, the most recent data available. Indirect access to the site will be from Water Tower Circle and Annapolis Lane, however, no traffic volumes are available for these streets. A preliminary site plan is included (Figure 4d); however, it is anticipated this will be modified to show site access off Annapolis Lane rather than Water Tower Circle. The project would generate at - E - maximum "through -put" capacity an estimated 140 packer truck vehicle trips, 44 transfer trailer vehicle trips, 20 employee vehicle trips or 204 vehicle trips per day. The project could potentially increase traffic on C.S.A.H. 6 by 2.6 percent and on I-494 by 0.5 percent if all project generated traffic used both these roadways. An unknown number of trucks hauling source separated recyclables and citizen automotile traffic would be generated. The former would be a relatively low percentage of the total. For example, if 16 percent (112 TPD) of the total solid waste expected at the transfer station is recycled through source separation programs and hauled to the transfer station in trucks carrying 3 tons per truck, 37 trucks per day would haul recyclables to the transfer station. Since the 112 TPD is part of the 700 TPD of MSW delivered to the transfer station 22 less packer trucks would use the facility. Therefore, 15 truck trips would be added due to recycling drop-off for a total of 219 vehicle trips per day. Citizen traffic volumes are not available. Citizen traffic would be primarily automobiles, automobiles with trailers and pickup trucks. It is anticipated that citizens would -primarily use the drop-off failities on Saturdays or late in the day during the week, which would be low traffic volume periods for packer trucks and transfer trailers. 30. Are adequate energy sources and utilities now available to service the project? If not, what additional utilities will be required? No X Yes Refer to site plan, Attachment 4d. Summary of Issues Potential issues include abandoned wells on-site, possible air pollution and noise from vehicle trafic, increased traffic, dust and noise during construction and odor during operations. The Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement the (SEIS) will discuss alternatives and mitigative measures. CERTIFICATION BY RESPONSIBLE GOVERNMENTAL UNIT I hereby certify that the information contained in this document is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that copies of the completed EAW have been made available to all points on the official EQB distribution list. Signature Date Title HENNEPIN COUNTY TRANSFER STATION - PLYMOUTH SITE '- N 1 -- Plymouth project location Attachment 4a HENNEPIN COUNTY TRANSFER STATION - PLYMOUTH SITE ;. iZ 9 71elf � db �_~\ ; - 969 - .. � • 2 _ _`� \ i W' _. (\ ._ �� _ . 211 s_`�4 kK��2� - - - < 2- 1961- ( - Village ��� _ i, •�. � _ - - - .:mss i � �� 1 ���\'r�. '�Tr'��\ � �� ` RR �4-/ t! �; " •_ v r�iiiocbf G .,3NOUSTR•I ARK _Gael94 s 4 ■ ■ 49. _ E :ji- CC — o` ,. • _l s I��i •i �y ��:,. �-h : Lir , •-� , I'28 - : 'rJ�--�.� 491 �1 27 ` �•L - , custrlal Fark ,. Pit - Q r -pater \`.i, `Gravel P,! (°1 �•_ •1 y-. Il Tank• 96" VA -i, site •" at _ -^ I v,/ E l4_ am-Hei is • :` `' = a � moo;` .;r� � ,• - �� "_� :'• - - 9?6 � -''�1'6. \`iii - y. %• 'n ��\ - 4 ?;y "ti' X30 • o ''� `,� �, r t. �' _ _ • ��/.� • .•,' t- orkhouse �: :�_-` ' �/, �I _ amo .�\�-� (��� ,-� ✓ I' i f✓ '' •�I: �� ®tee. •II• , . d, . �! . g � `• j •,�_• l{\\ .yJ.^ 936 ...... ., •cU _ �'�.r .. •• `I StMwTof the Lake sch - L ''�•• �•1 •.Saroet Hilt •� i�'- �' �� RIOCifMONT -� s ►-�--x-�--'�------_-- 9611 - ----- _�� ----:- 'r� .--.c-. • I, . •,• •yi'• r. U.S.G.S. map showing project site Attachment 4b HENNEPIN COUNTY TRANSFER STATION PLYMOUTH SITE ?dA 7 �, J-� •i Diol Z Air Photo/Plat Map showing project site Attachment 4c qp ImioiI I C' C t V. L L C s - L i c" i• c .J O � c L • • � : i o � C • • • � : e a i � I I . ° a � • • i •r N cn ; •i-� V ' C ZQJ ' • i' S�ti Y � Y �t..� •� i� ijy� 'I t t •ON .�bM��� 81b1g�yalNr %ice yt. ioil I� I C' C t V. L L C s - L i c" i• c .J O � c L • • � : i o � C • • • � : e a i � I I . ° a � • • i •r N cn ; •i-� V ' C ZQJ ' • i' S�ti Y � Y �t..� •� i� ijy� 'I t t •ON .�bM��� 81b1g�yalNr HENNEPIN COUNTY TRANSFER STATION - PLYMOUTH SITE 1 �-�•—.. _ tri-=i�� ��. _-� a .__� _:-..... K C D 1p twnw M 71W: _ • — �- • .', f \� - / _0.+ -,.r -z Jj - t • �._ a tom--" � - .-� - -73 _ �t r _ '„_ : _. • � � �.: _ .- I .�}+,�'. �'t;+tea J • . ..� «- .,� t w • t r•*Z+r+ LAW ' Source: Plymouth Comprehensive Plan Plymouth project area land use map Attachment 4e HENNEPIN COUNTY TRANSFER STATION - PLYMOUTH SITE R R MPUD' 37LP C m MPUDF- 7 -.2sac--. Va AL W. 6 83-1 RPLJD 7 1:7=. Isite 81- �-A 77 pq 1 .3 57 B-2 A N� JA , 1 4 '9 At % F 7` ,.; r-------- R-2 M PUD,' s =mra qL RPUD� R-2 4b 84 -4 1 RpLjV, '78 -2 Soureq: Plymouth Zoning - - B -I RPUD R - 2 :78-6 84-5 I'd s -R -1A --4 —7ZrAo, R R MPUD' 37LP C m MPUDF- 7 -.2sac--. Va AL W. 6 83-1 RPLJD 7 1:7=. Isite 81- �-A 77 pq 1 .3 57 B-2 A N� JA , 1 4 '9 At Plymouth project area zoning map Attachment 4f % F 7` ,.; 7w s =mra qL J R-2 J Soureq: Plymouth Zoning Ordinance, Plymouth project area zoning map Attachment 4f % 7w s =mra qL �Aw R-2 FRD I'd Plymouth project area zoning map Attachment 4f Environmental Assessment Workshee�, Attachment 16b HYDROGEOLOGIC STUDY PLYMOUTH SOLID WASTE TRANSFER FACILITY PLYMOUTH, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA INTRODUCTION Hennepin County, Minnesota is implementing a plan to construct four solid waste waste transfer facilities within its jurisdictional boundary to facilitate the transfer, of solid waste from individual collection (packer) trucks to bulk (semi truck and trailer) carriers. Three of the four proposed facilities have been sited and environmental assessments have been completed. This study has been prepared to provide data necessary to complete the Environmental Assessment Worksheet for the fourth facility which is scheduled to be constructed in the City of Plymouth (the City), Minnesota. Additionally, this study is intended to address several questions, raised by the City, regarding the potential impact of this facility on the City's potable water well field proximate to this site. This transfer station, as the others, will include facilities for the drop-off and transfer of municipal and residential solid waste, municipal and residential source -separated recyclable materials, and yard wastes. The transfer station will also include a "Special Waste" collection unit. This unit will provide a designated location where citizens may drop-off household quantities of potentially hazardous waste used at their homes. The special wastes will then be transported and disposed at a permitted facility, or recycled. These materials include such items as wood stains, wood preservatives, paints, varnishes, household cleaning compounds, - 1 - C a V O L G > G C _ C L rh C T L C C (, N T N 41 Ni +� A A C C P t c io G C C a C C >+ C •o C V 3 u t CC CL C T ul 1 R L L N w N ++ 41 O VI V. N C C C 6: d C C C C C C C A O A O �o -.- 7 A L +•� 3 v T o u u tv, Gu C O L Lcu > C (, N T N 41 Ni +� A A C E t c io -� 3tA 3 3 a O w •o is >, � +o+ 3 u CL ul L L ++ 41 > OV .0 CL O Q A O A O �o -.- 7 A L +•� 3 v T o u u tv, Gu Er v •u Z � n Y �.- u c u u o n o O O 1 O w a O N �a O U eo O �0 3 TS E 6u i P. • r T L U {/1 N A •r n 6J n A N y U 5- L a% C L 01 eC T L C 6J s- W p o C U U. tv G — u T U a> O aJ S T G>4+ v G C n> O C E a Z d N C i0 ++ �••' L i r- L L C C E Z Zcr ` W Z Z = W } S � O 0 d a C r- i G C Z n— >� G c c c u p i: n a m �n v c c u c c C✓+a W — a' I= s c c > c r p �C •� �c x �; o� c LA � ✓ •r V C C >� H F cu;i `" CL c w 3 +� 3 i c o v N 6J C' a' ni L L Q f+ C •r E 'r �••� + 6! 20'1 10 > L > N v+ 3 + Vf C •r 6.7 Z �••� 6: u C C E c c .•+ o >,u n 2 oc cl a w c i r- im o y c v+ m a C O c c c o— r - a Q L a i c o C C L L v >., r C C C r o u ••- w s o a; Z v o Z u v pesticides, motor oil, batteries, and tires. This unit is intended to provide the local residents with an environmentally safe method to dispose of these potentially hazardous materials in a safe, controlled manner conforming to Federal and State requirements, and to keep these materials out of landfills and groundwater. The presence of this unit should significantly reduce the volume of materials currently poured on the ground, mixed into normal solid wastes, or poured down sewer systems. The solid waste transfer operations will consist of off-loading municipal and residential solid waste from individual packer trucks to a central collection and bulking area. The solid waste will be compacted and collected by mechanical (front-end loaders, etc.) means, then loaded into semitrailers for transport to the solid waste resource recovery facilities. Source -separated recycling programs are being developed by the cities in Hennepin County to reduce the volume of solid waste requiring disposal by segregating specific materials which can be effectively recycled. Residential, municipal and industrial waste generators will be required to segregate such materials as paper, glass, metal and plastics so that consolidation of similar recyclable materials can be effected. These programs are expected to reduce the County's waste disposal volume by 16%. FACILITY LOCATION The transfer facility is to be located on a site encompassing approximately 14 acres. This site is bounded on the east by Annapolis Lane, on the north by Water Tower Circle, on the west by Interstate 494 and on the south by C.S.A.H. 6 (see Figure 1). The legal description for this location is NE 1/4 SW 1/4 Section 27, Township 118N, Range 22W, Hennepin County, - 2 - OSSEO, MINN. ,�� '.I. „��.. i•� �.� x'11 F ;... SW/4 ANOKA IS' OUADRANOLE r i1 I+i, o I '�;. i• 1 t�'L ! 1 { N4500—W9322.5/7.5.N., 4 �4r V 1967 / PHOTOREVISED 1972 �' �' • •^�� 1 CI - T AMS 7374 111 SW—SERIES V874 :,; `0 it i•�,11 Yet �• \ •'•�?' ,•, el 6� I ,•`•�' /'+.."11� �j I r I '� 1 I ^ � � J (v••f }, �` u nl iacinn i• :I I n � 22 1.. �x�(ti 23 0 .� •.r ii —_•e� �• `,- •�-i�� asii- >w ,.I�,.•J. I �.:.....,I �- •I� �. �� ''1",,`, �. 'pt, d. • ; ', t, T., v Q ik>r �:q• rli >1_• 1�� art 1. Z, r /' J i�:;�.i,;,l` •\ r0..1 �+ INNA LISA. jt 1'- 1. �!,.��,L/ �j•�.R' •�:'��'•` N LISTF i`AhK A vcl.. 1y ,'�71+�•� t[ 10, TRANSFER STATION SITE1snow (,trl.. (77 .: PIi atEr�\ r� •y� '' Gra,(�I 1.i i \. :� uv ' j t ��"P'rr7„ `' `�-•, •-�—. l • � _ : � /' ^• T 3 •,.f ( � :�''i� r0 - �.. h- \ , I$ �_ it I /' b yea'•.r r1' oil U�i.,I'rl ,t ``!� �r.\ •• r (i: 1 ` t :,. Er J tit) ����y��.12-i _..._ ,. i 1 .� - l.. �i ,N I y .,• i; :�F• Wi ta n• ,•u :, d •�::. --;�., _ D 916 •.:�;• \..' \,•,�.4. , 1 I d Pit'ovkhoust �Jo`-_�!il.:�: `yjj ,. r`s�� j • C' 1 •cJ�JcA io : �:": ,�r-S� �—� I; L 1 _ #i . ; �' ... ; •'A W. i�..; • t 35 . ' �''• iY` �: • _=� �'_. • . r•1 956 �'. 'lC l • � h�...� 1 r�... ,r.-+! .I .sLT.t!lif blleeLoh HOPKINS, MINN. 1 SCaLE 0:24c)c)c) 1 Mite 1000 0 loco 2000 3000 4000 soon 6000 7000 rEET 44093—H4 -TF -024 1 5 0 1 KILOMETER 1967 _ _ - PHOTOREVISED 1972 AND 1 01 CONTOUR INTERVAL 10 FEET DMA 7373 IV NW—SERIES V872 I NATIONAL GEODETIC VERTICAL DATUM OF 1929 SITE LOCATION ro PLYMOUTH TRANSFER STATION shoot 1 HDR Inlrogtructure.Inc. A Centeno Company Minnesota. The latitude and longitude for the center of this site are 44059'52" and 93027117", respectively. This places the site in the southwest corner of the Minneapolis Industrial Park. The only significant environmental features near this site are the City's municipal well field and eight private water wells. The wells within this field are primarily northwest of the site. One well, used during peak water demand periods, is located east of the facility. The site is approximately 3 miles southeast of the estimated center of the City well field (see Figures 2, 3, and 4). The closest well to the site is approximately 1/4 -mile east of the site. GEOLOGY The site is located in the Central Lowland Province of the Western Lakes Section. This area exhibits a young glaciated topography including moraines, lakes and lake plains. The last glaciation of the area was the Wisconsin glaciation of the Pleistocene Epoch in which two major ice lobes entered the area. These were the Superior lobe entering from the northeast and the Des Moines lobe attended by the Grantsberg sublobe from the southwest. This as well as three previous glacial events reworked much of the bedrock geology producing erosional effects on the till, outwash, and lake deposits from the glaciers. This action produced the complex Quaternary deposits and various soils occurring in this area. The geologic lithology for this area is presented in Figures 5 and 6.(1,2) - 3 - OSSEO, MINN. SW/f, AMOKA 19' OUADRANOLE' �) ) •` I; o II, i!'i • 4t.. N4500—W9322.5/7.5 . f i .`'3101 ., i .1'I, �i.,•1 .• � 1 / .�;• t.i iG,' s• I rt> V 1967 + ..�1 •- ---r /. _ _: I ''�`- T-- i �� lj �, PHOTOREVISED 1972 I' .o �! 1`4 _ -�/ \ •` , , AMS 7374 III SW -SERIES V872 ;,� /`), I �I� it ' �1n,•,�� I .� /� �' hliq%iml Val It' ,1 , IW 4 l,• 23 to .4'1p `I) O . 'f IL 0, ( • .:.?;, -ice ",� �, •'IIS- � � � _� 'SII L: L; ',.yt• 4` '.he'A �._� �'j•. q. 8 5 t `� 1 11iI1NN A�7 LIS 1' 1. f T r•� �,fl �j.11' y'.r• �..;...I 1t N PA UST t� L7 +, • -t �:: 1 'rte I - -• •I 1 nt vc{' .l� I�s• %f T. r`: .,, ; i �,�� ,b 1 • t �l/1 ij ,� I VI f� 1 : SS) '�: i 1 j - If o �Is 1, 7 _ '-�'1 ; Fila �� r, 1���j -�• �]] 2� tflR `.00,1J �i.• I.J{ 1 I' ! rl •,{. 1 p{I if Graf ,l ^1 �••....` n• ro `� ` L+ J," -y / O. f: ♦ �`eF; +fC�N� . ` .�.. y.e •' J7TE ARZA T.I_. •ti C1..1 1 l �� i „-7 •; - `, Sybstq� .' j;.,i ERN :1��'i I: (� �i"•� `�y`i u�' .M.i y.�,�j- .._ : iii _� ��. . •.i/ Ir 1 . _ 1' Ifi 'a• tiy. ", •�• moi' SL4 I1 ;-+5---+-"-� _.._• .�'�!•;�!. �.: ... _ a�^•1; "441 ,' �tl ,.i~ 9S0 .+T 'C. .�D 1 -� /0 976 `. .:��� .1 • '��'-.'- !' .1• fworkharse !�, `f; p �_ rL�.. �: ,F.i',�,•'. •�i.� �� : i .� , 4rot, • '.:, ,• f• :r1' 'n : '�: j 1^r f �� 14 i p- -; --...:.-:- 'I �,; � 7 ( ;�1: f: .,;sl -', ` L�,;LJ • rJ� �`. t.- .- j,/•-�` �.y�:� ;•'ice:• .(•�, ,,' . It 33 I Q 956 -� • I ., -e-•s :.�:j `1 �.• 1 'i� • ,-• L- Vii.' TT` �' 1 .rl,' �; � 1 (' -1•l r. '% .j:• i OO aT' = e. Stw 4il%f eb! I.6k, HOPKINS, MINN. I SCALE 01:24UW t M.1 44093—H4 -TF -024 1000 0 1000 2000 3000 sono 5wo 6000 RMFEET 1967 0 1 KILOMETEP PHOTOREVISED 1972 AND 1980 CONTOUR INTERVAL 10 FEET DMA 7373 IV NW -SERIES V872 NATIONAL GEODETIC VERTICAL DATUM OF 1929 CITY WELL FIELD ghost NOR Inlrestruelur0•Ine. ■ — CRY WELL 2 A CCrNerrs Cornpsny OSSEO MINN.s Y Sw/4 ANOKA tS OUADRANOLE /1� it. 1' r` o 11i (' �� �.` ( 44. ,� , r�.q.• r it N4500 W9322.5/7.5 r ,• . , ��( '. ', r �., '•' ,, t t I I II Q iii \ J I ` 1967 ,• II. • „- 1 — r PHOTOREVISED 1972 AMS 7374 111 SW—SERIES V87207 • i° 21 22 23 . ! Ila •1' �, ,.'` ,•' 1 '� 2-. 31 ) �i a ntr j•'{...j• •.ii'j-�'`' {T,t •1 3-, r • r I " • �l.1 t• U.r ! 1 4�• l . _ ! Y! N A LIS ,�\': -% j,7•a t$ r' I�• s ;�•'. O 5 ,. R tlSr J�hK A • : '�� vcI w �• . ? !:. I; i I' �, ! :— -• I ..:1 �I -�. 26' M / ;;dust, SIR14 `...•/ �• 7 r �`,.",l� �., ; - .., .� I_.,tr% +_- j • � pil /•• _ s �q�, Yat ���.> `' �•Cre I r,�i�, .i• ;:'•� Sye:<•' 'r ERN ,� �!kn?3ir �•• :;-; • '':: --?<— •- l ^ ,_ 'a � ,\NEST �*��"aSl �1 i �4e"� `�L`.S'�9''1`r� b 976 t' 1 .• '\ 4 •930 • _ �. •�. - ', i �r, �'r , • �" a1� •• �1Vwkhouse !� ���II • ' ''N: �!' � ; I ' ' pit - �- p r �•' so is .�'.' ,. I i:� cidiA. . 1 �;j'I•� •�' S •1'-1-?: _ !� r (�\i '� � I, ,tl .�•)j•���'��r•� 1! �{ •��yJ �I - F. .•!135 . 33 (� � `.� �:�_ _—• '•, �/'J� `' � 1,;-�:';. ,� ';� •�;!� %;�.. +, ..-:('i' .• ` .'. f:% - ( ::��•��• •I�.•. I.S.. .,,'.•.IX. 1,,••I ! •__ ? r .,,. ( rtt' s..e. .r. ���.. .{ .StA,l,t bi ttl! lar HOPKINS, MINN.# SCALE 1:240u0 I o 1 MILE 1000 0 1000 2070 3000 4000 5000 6000 7WO FEET 44093—H4-TF-024 1 c 0 I KILOMETER 1967 �— PHOTOREVISED 1972 AND 1980 CONTOUR INTERVAL 10 FEET DMA 7373 IV Nw_SERIES v872 NATIONAL GEODETIC VERTICAL DATUM OF 1929 � Orat• LOCATION OF WELLS FOR APPENDIX A meet 3 NOR Infrastructure. Inc. ACenterriCompany CITY WELL & PRIVATE WELL OSSEO, MINN. SW/4 ANOKA IT OUADRANOLE N4500—W9322.5/7.5 ,.� S� 1) '� I DRAWDOWN/ 10'\ 1 ' �., .•„- 1967 PHOTOREVISED 1972 AMS 7374 111 Sw—SERIES V872 ;,� p� 1 `If` Il •056' ! Mi .-P41111 j.' `�' ,' r'y' . . 1 :' rr 1 f \•W (7J” /'tel ; �� �� h` .-P lnit 1' :I1I 1 1 .'•• p: r r�. \ DRAWDOWN • 20' . ► 1 t 1" x 23 O '/�J)' ,1•'j 1. f _ 1l yrs , \ •,'� —.� i1! DRAWDOWN — 30' to I , 1 :I I . nsr 1 • '.1', I, C t ��++I!—;J •tonerf �+•'R 'INN A LIS it i' I•T r''� Y �I+r 'l�',l, •�o' 2'I _•� j 3`/ , j n 'A 1 N USTI PARIS r. i \�1 'i (? 1:•S vcl • ,' � It 1 !.• • o 9 11 �• ii I Vl i w A f � 10 m 26 12$r .1 14d' '�. - ' (•-• I I 1 •, � • C 4id'o'sii I R` A `c, 1 �. ' . / .-^ • j..!t BtNr �\ n• '� � •,'Grad 1,I ��\, �\ iN aA\�jir, a'i ':ati�' •�;: '1-� ,`,_ •. . x_•� ti �; •J/ ,' ��i; _ 3 ; •1%% `r_•�{i�n� ,�IJ�1' to �•� � '' i:''�T•_��j�'i v...�,. b ,:n r- �� ! 916•• � . � S.t • _ �. O! 1 _ a7 `- f_ � Ir J�.�i 'r, •t� •,�\ • i ;'L• i •- khoase . pi'f • -.�.. `•� ]...;.�;�•.i �,..��• •:•1�= Y'-�: ,y, Jj T. ji•UI �1•,• i�,' q• i1•'i.p •1 ; �� , A`'o ��_.� , •; ; .r,•. _ fes' I 't cc • •`;,: •/•' � is i rn - ; : ; r '... -0: i tv Ps.;.. xx -f N'.3 s ill: � a � • � • I ;l ;u• — I S� ` Ili ��1�� •'✓•i �..' �•(�A• �' �.�• `.. .� t r • y �i-=, ;,i 1 its + �? .�1�.lik. j � I::....:t•. ,� t iii -�� - \. l)., • , �•. . • �% _ .. ...... • X. •• ` ~�'Ct �i• �.li1-� •L• , i! • • HOPKINS, MINN. SCALE 1.240W ' 1 = o 1 MI(! 1000 0 1OCY' 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 r E E T 44093—H4-TF-024 I KILOMFTER 1967 PHOTOREVISED 1972 AND 1980 CONTOUR INTERVAL 10 FEET OMA 7373 IV NW—SERIES V872 NATIONAL GEODETIC VERTICAL DATUM OF 1929 ,/ D•t• CONE OF INFLUENCE, FROM CITY WELLS Shoot 4 HCR iefts Company Inc. FROM BAL REPORT— 1985 A Crnle/l• Cdnneny STRATIGRAPHY - GENERAL NDA Infrestructure,Inc. A Centerre Company 17 fit• Shoot 5 lit Z + picay�L E s a �$ P i IL 5 e6 55 ;f�go "r�3.r=ts. 483 fi=xi� �� vE gt - tS 8a�6i�.iib �iSB T . 2 7 g f 0 e €Y ajd 3 E� ��E� �tl�B 3�=4 3� ; a ?$ ii 5 SSE 4� i• =a �S DL {,( 2S a i fiq" a Ef 8� �p .y(, a5 at 6!E a 0 a6 6 �p 1{ �2 Oc li ty T IS J F a >a i 6 E4 Y 5 ■ . 4 t i Iwo ■Rl1 ■1 •�■■V lw■�tw�p ■q+Y^t�l ■NQS.) ■ro�wy STRATIGRAPHY - GENERAL NDA Infrestructure,Inc. A Centerre Company 17 fit• Shoot 5 ✓✓ NDR (nf►ostructum, Inc. A Centerra Company SYMBOLS LIMESTONE AtP ROMMA'E EPA SYSIEM GP%r 10PMATION CDLUMNMAUML'M 1 MYD"W' LOCK IIfYrH{` UMTS 6O."."d T (FEET I Z jGAANOK Q _-_- SHALE • CI.•.I • Z -i Ml..rrN p (EW vALL(r 3107 Foodildowk • C..p....•.k r a—....sr r.•r•.••.•1r Adaal.d Iron 0:9 Au•IW (19691 p CEDAR VALLEY- MA000KETA - DUBUQUE - GALENA it O51°10� AQUIFER YL(w 230 DECORAH- Q PLAT TEVILLE- GLENWOOO tJ > OLENR000 CONFINING BEO N O - 0 0 sr PETER ST. PETER AQUIFER _U O O04AKOPU W 360PRAIRIE du CME Q oNEorA JORDAN AQUIFER 110 JORDAN tr LArRErS( 3 ST LAWRENCE 00 CONFINING BED rRANCOrT1A FR..r#CONIA- 1310 Z - IRON TON - Q -' r GALESVILLE CDIRONTON AQUIFER 45 VaALESvILLE EAU CLAIRE EAU CLAIRE '.'_FF i- _=(+ too --•_. CONFINING BED MT. SIMON- - - = - - - rT slum HINCKLEY 1R.KKLEv _ FOND do LAC AQUIFER a 1 MNO b LAC ItUNr+11IAlr - NOT AN d i soLOR cwRCN _ _ AND __ wi Aw PHI - RMffy ` woo ♦ v Aao _ , �octcO3 "('•"O1'S - AQUIFER Rous ✓✓ NDR (nf►ostructum, Inc. A Centerra Company SYMBOLS STRATIGRAPHY - BEDROCK FROM KANIVETSKY-1979 Dote Shoot G LIMESTONE NDOLOMITE 6O."."d T M•I, SANDSTONE N.. r• .•.r n.. _-_- SHALE • CI.•.I • 0.m.. -i Ml..rrN Foodildowk • C..p....•.k r a—....sr r.•r•.••.•1r Adaal.d Iron 0:9 Au•IW (19691 STRATIGRAPHY - BEDROCK FROM KANIVETSKY-1979 Dote Shoot G SOILS -- The general soil classification in the site area is described in the Hennepin County Soil Survey (3) as being the Esterville-Dickman- Dakota association. This association is characterized by level to hilly, moderately coarse and medium textured soils underlain by sands and gravels. Specific soils from this association and their general characteristics present at the site are: Cut and Fill (Ca) -- This soil is of most recent origin resulting from current cultural activities in the industrial park. The composition is a mixture of loamy and clayey soils from the surrounding area. The drainage and hydraulic conductivity is directly related to the amount of compaction. This soil is found on the north side of the site and covers approximately 20% of the site area.(3) Esterville Sandy Loam (EtB) -- This soil is characterized by 2-6% slopes in the site area. The soil is well drained and retains little soil moisture. Soils are generally 12-24 inches deep and underlain by stratified sands and gravel. Such conditions result in rapid infiltration of precipitation to the Quaternary deposits below the soils. This soil is found on the south and southwest portions of the site and covers approximately 15% of the site area.(3) Glencoe Silty Clay Loam (Gc) -- The Glencoe soil at the site is a poorly drained soil indicative of a former drainage course leading west from the site. The soil is between 36-60 inches deep with a moderate to high organic content. Drainage and infiltration through this soil is poor with ponding being a common occurrence. This soil is found in the west central portion of the site and covers approximately 10% of the site area.(3) - 4 - Hamel Loam (Ha) -- This soil is similar to the Glencoe soil. As with the Glencoe soil, drainage and infiltration are non-existant to poor. The soil depth is somewhat deeper, ranging from 36-72 inches with depths of 36-54 inches being most common. Ponding is often significant which indicates the impermeability of the soil. This soil is found in the west and south-central portion of the site. The Hamel loam covers approximately 15% of the site area.(3) Hayden Loam (HbB) -- This soil is a well drained deep soil formed from loamy glacial till. Infiltration and drainage are good to excellent allowing recharge to alluvium aquifer. Slopes are from 2-6K for the site area. These slopes will limit infiltration due to slight increases in surface runoff. Soil depth varies from 30-60 inches and the soil is generally low in organic content. This soil is found in the central portion of the site and covers approximately 40% of the site area.(3) QUATERNARY GEOLOGY -- The Quaternary geology underlying this site is a complex mix of glacial outwash, tills and lake deposits see Figure 7. The deposition of these materials resulted in poor sorting of the materials and much layering within the alluvium. This lack of sorting has resulted in a large variation in hydraulic conductivity within the Quaternary deposits. Estimates of hydraulic conductivity range from a low of 10E-04 gallons per day per square foot (gpd/ft2) (4.72 x 10-8 cm/sec) to a high of 10E-1 gpd/ft2 (4.72 x 10-3 cm/sec). Conductivity probably falls within the range of 10E-02 to 10EO gpd/ft2 (4.72 x 10-6 cm/sec). Water wells have been installed in the alluvial aquifer which exists in these Quaternary deposits. The Quaternary deposits in this area range in - 5 - n L, OF J Jy 1 pb D ,••. � ° •II``� } u7O L\ J J J .J 4,J J J JIyD J'J �_ V� • •O. O. O •a� ° IV•y I C - n �•< � �Jfn J J J 1J1.3Ip-JJJJ+�JJJJ J � � � { °., Y O � O � cliff • ^�; �.. s• �� ` Q' J .1 _ J J d J J ]J JJ JJJ .i ,_�` . J .O p•l r, •�� ° �e� n� °t �� J J IP 4 • S O. ,�<: G c p��i �a • •e • n l lot, L .. c C• U �U O• C e plO ' • �.9 j� Y.e • n ,!'h y • e. •t'7 .fit a c 44 A a • e �7 �� F oV�•n' a n•j� •Q PQ ° 4• • _ S6t C_ r �• O O O I � e � I •� • r •• C p it p O <° ° a e < '°° _ p O � •0 ��L 6 C •� 'D �0o e 't�, � •<�< .ac � OO .0 •'00 • 0p •00 ! po'�v/Jid �6'1. OQei°0� 0, .0 `�(+.0.° �� n ° f • ., �� • ti' ° o a �•n�Qa. ._�. <I • f< „ r O `�• UO °' • .e .O. 1•p �g [L• _ F 'o • °� �p� O O `� 4`c.t-' .o •0Va . p p! z .4.i pl P. r Q —.o o• a c' < O 1 + O ,�7cp7 O� a � 10• a O.0 ' O Fye , a � � -�.� � �r•�- �'-'" T1s ♦fid .D i c _`-. I O O� ' `jd s`•r-`0'` n f' R Ana, �j •sc41 ata o, �.O OD '� S • \ d C a•°�1 � a e a °.. � a u c °• � CM 9. 11� e •• ° 4 SITE AREA ° ° ° ° — ° eO . --- s ° • e •: • 11•••• a 4.e .tu• of c e • a a• • c U• • U' � d S' f spa i � c. d < O • • b a o- a J 1L r < )1 Crv ' • ,� a •, - - -+, � ;I-' \e,� -� _ • �° °ci,t ° a'f � �`i2 •� ,o: �_ 61� :1� e � ,Q a c c °`O.a a✓1`•'tw <�8 a <1b °y! _ � � O I / { ' , e e a i. fit• i.` Q. �. • � • .. • • �° �e a� e < - p; O i. a a < 3 d r•_ n e °�• <a dla 4:4 QL 7e 4-� '�° f eJ • / j'ra - tJj•�,OJ • a Se°••• a�i�r1 \ O-ne • Ge e••IG'1 �a aNe•' • 1� •� a •..'a \ ,l n a ,Lr e • e it • � 4% �, iy 111 -e,. �i � t' e :: •� 'Os• � i._ a 'i a e ^n •: a 10 ` 6u {�1 �i� •° °q< •M1a•• r �' '�,• /•din•• • e ••••• IU• tM ° ° A•°• Iuij O `ey1 ••• -�. a a`• •T�• °••�••'b•p%� •a•0 e• °•• a°• a°+•�°Ye •• C 4`J' . •4 4.4.44 T=a a C f : •a a ° • • ° Qj 11 • ° p, • • •Ci al R7e • <�,! t 4 e ' ,� a a < e-� d e , a ° 0 a . • • • • • • 7 • ` c • °,- ° is 1a O �f' a c a 'Q E • ,. • 1r�j • • • 1 • � � �� e,r .� n a I�Q'' O n Date QUATERNARY GEOLOGY sh.a 7 HDR Infrastructure. Inc. A Centerra Company FROM KANIVETSKY-1979 N Y D R 0 0 E O L n 0 1 C U N I T S QUATERNARY GEOLOGY FROM KANIVETSITY-1979 HDR Infrastructure, Inc. A Centerrs Company Date Shaer 7A SUSTAINED YIELD RATING palions per minute (liters pn minutel MATERIAL GEOLOGir r F y M CLASSIFICATION CLASSIFICATION ?500 50 ()() 10025 255 61 <1 p1900) (1904400) (400-100) (10020) 1204) (<4) Gravel •: Includes mare sand In varying • sw•� �, amounts Outwash Sand and gravel with some silt IpSandis anyer d Clay, admixed Dr intew li—D beddrd; in alluvial plains or Locally silty or gravelly SI wide hannels made by main, E A glacial streams send and Gravel e1r;�� �I!� �•�t;1 a _� • Admixed or Interbedded, spo- �,o—:-� •s ��,ppA,Q radic silty areas a i r a T . .: Send, Sift and Gravel -^lModrratrly to well graded and L N i 'Ct al t`j al` Alluvium atllied stratified Sand and navel locally Inter. bedrk�d with silt, clay and Strstlfi•d Snnd, Silt, organic_ materiel. dennsitrd nn — rk Clay end Gravel s r r floodplains of major streams Locally Include orgmlc ma �.�r.i.''1 ter ial i• � ':t; : ... Sand ( • _�-� Locally it y • t or gravelly pl'dl Id Lake Deposits ' ' .)• t Sand• tiny and sill Wifit InCAi sand and gravel hnrs and Id any and Silt= Weekly to moderately wet _ _ _ _ _ on tike beds - bangs margins cial lak and mag m off glagf& e Iliad ••••• • Glacial Till ' I Ground moraine forming flat I I* Admixed Send, Silt, Clay, 1'.'.'.'.I Gravel and Boulders to undulating land surfaces -- ;•;•;•;•; Glacial TII! Linstratlfied and compact .J^r..;.; End moraines or stagnation er moraines forming pitted to — hilly land surfaces ;•;•;•;•; Loess Loess rr ;•�1'•;•;•' _ Deposits of windblown dust; 1. Silt and fine send very !frown -1-re thickness ex — - coeds 2 meters Peet Organic Deposits _ �t�- Partially decayed veg,,Ixtinn mainly mosses, reeds arxl at i ledges, acNmuisted In wet lends ' buried bodies of Snnd and gravel otter sporadically beneath lake deposits and within till. Ruled patterns slkow \\�� Buried Outwesh evoroximate extent and yield rafings of known burled \\\� Bodie of otttwash covered by outwesh aquifers. Material and geologic classifications \ \ lake deposits on till arr not shown. QUATERNARY GEOLOGY FROM KANIVETSITY-1979 HDR Infrastructure, Inc. A Centerrs Company Date Shaer 7A thickness from 100 feet to greater than 250 feet. A review of relevant well logs (see Figure 3 and Appendix A) shows a varying stratigraphy within a three-mile radius of the site. Some areas have a very tight clay layer within the Quaternary which is up to 70 feet thick while other areas have no clay present at all. Numerous layers of sands, gravels, cemented sands and clays have been documented throughout the area. While clay layers exist in varying degrees of thickness, their presence should not be construed as being confining layers within the hydrologic regime, rather they may be responsible for perched water tables within the general area. A detailed geologic map of the Quaternary deposits in the Minneapolis - St. Paul area was prepared by Roman Kanivetsky in 1979.(4) This map indicates that the transfer station site lies within an area where the Quaternary deposits can yield 100-500 gallons per minute (gpm). Due to the presence of numerous municipal well fields completed in the underlying bedrock aquifers, few domestic production wells exist in this alluvial aquifer. Yields indicate that the aquifer is a viable resource for domestic development should growth in this area require higher yields of potable water. BEDROCK GEOLOGY -- The bedrock geology germane to this site include the Ordovician and Cambrian deposits locally identified as the St. Peter sandstone; the Prairie du Chien group which includes the Shakopee and Oneota dolomitic limestone units separated by the New Richmond sandstone/limestone unit; and the Jordan Sandstone, see Figure 8. As discussed earlier, this area has been reworked by four glaciations. As a result, many of the units and formations shown in Figures 5 and 6 have been reformed or have been r p�. �.•,;�..' ti It, !•,.+n.rV,1' i Y ,,�'' Bi L.akn, r� i i 1 s s'y o, ♦ 1�'eke (' u r %J I + `' X39 ryom , .�,i. +• �. <k�j �� 'fid• �� .. ;1y ♦ �� 3*/ �� !�Qlc�w 00-1; teri t1f da /f. er ills i r 9°1` S •:� rye I 7�? 1 r �or �.,• �a. t< w CO- , F't • .�° ;r.Con6tan S a Nettp hnward r V;�. l Lake - i t i 5cr' ` Nnvl 1;0 r ! ; r Atbertvji a i 1. J �r 1 ' I;, t M hael'nd� ) I y _ ! tLc er r� i .. ..� j y L'sise p PI c u�; i o a e g tDR � � � �( Iain !i � ar��� �•�b ,� LHanover �� i r_ _L � f • / , % '� r r � � e � I "" 1 res - ! sr � .: C anes� •' t ^ . BurschvilleJ, �♦ S fin r SO Vl ; ! ;t M ds' ter` i' w r /, .� t Bomar k r• Rockfbrd SITE AREA +' ellwood j x06 _rre IN E l ''- ;�r M t no il• i�5arah � �'-- Ir 1 ��'• , ' , -. Lofett jl� d� r e ! fiRSB „�; I HD e go , rti Rhin- P Lyt s e a Ic \, 2 I d le Zahe idvale MOU -- �- r sl a LII .r, Sh v i S E f-- �- A I 1\ t PaGI 2Et 24 + I ha 36n ewpo Is w1a t` "�.� Gr a re tI o tK-- Jaz e ? n v - 1 for 3 f*I aul to 6 j Sh opeh►�^, r Ologne tir'•Jjnix �''I 1� ry8 ag_ �%' l) en c nt n —` ry fir'y� n H i g5'I� East,. et +fin wqn we g �afke .F 1 LAjce- <r r fi:t +, t>ro$ery� )f \. ,1 �'' ♦ 1a40 r1o%ni a :' !Pt{lI? c?110 f4 i`j�• LYdbPV p on elle Plaine `' 1 t"�!�!�) �\ �,� � � „ " ��.. � :; . T'` '`tt•.� N w Trier `St Ben Ic St Patrick yr t ii M ' w_ r lse9 �. t kr ''New atk r Jae t L 1' � ��� ♦ . • . �.LC ` �s'�Iko• .io i • EI��Sduo Unio, ill ?'. ♦ t'e.'.=�? %D.{. New P aF/ue / ♦ ebstef'', Hfze ob_ cR dal �► j�; C y+ t t 1 VtseII St Thomas ' 1 S I'' , 5 �'„±'d .I� ..• .,d�N! _� r. Can79 ✓IA/, BEDROCK GEOLOGY NOR Infroste.Inc.g FROM KANIVETSKY-1979 impatl eroded and exist only as glacial outwash, till or soil in the site area.(1,2, and 6) The St. Peter sandstone is the first major bedrock unit under the Quaternary deposits. Known depths to bedrock in the site vicinity range from 114 feet to 258 feet. The average thickness of this formation is 100 feet in the transfer site area.(2 and 5) In some areas, it is separated from the glacial drift by the Decorah -Platteville -Glenwood shales. A detailed study conducted in 1985(6) shows that this confining bed is absent in the immediate site area. With the confining bed of shale absent at this site, the St. Peter receives recharge directly from the Quaternary deposits. The St. Peter formation is a reasonably viable aquifer (10) yielding up 250 gpm of high quality (total dissolved solids (TDS) less than 500 parts per million (ppm)) water. Higher yields have been documented (1) but are not routinely encountered. Several wells have been completed in this formation near the transfer station site, see Appendix A. Wells completed in the St. Peter formation are generally privately owned. Municipal supply wells are normally completed in the higher yielding Prairie du Chien - Jordan aquifers. The Prairie du Chien group is primarily a dolomitic limestone group with secondary porosity in the form of fractures and solution channels. Characterization of the three units comprising this group is difficult and the group is generally represented in drilling logs as the Shakopee limestone in the site area.(1, 2, and 6). The Jordan sandstone lies immediately beneath the Prairie du Chien with no confining beds separating the two formations. Due to the absence of a - 7 - confining layer, the two formations function as a single hydraulic unit and will be treated as such throughout this report. Additionally, the Prairie du Chien group is presumed to be hydraulically connected to the St. Peter sandstone in the site area.(5). Hydraulic conductivity within these formations are high as evidenced by routine well yields in excess of 2000 gpm. The water is high quality for domestic uses with total dissolved solids (TDS) concentrations less than 500 ppm.(5) The Prairie du Chien - Jordan aquifer system provides over 75% of all potable water needs within the Minneapolis -St. Paul area. Seven of the City of Plymouth's wells have been completed in this aquifer system in proximity to the site. HYDROGEOLOGY The hydrogeology of the site region consists of three water tables. These are the alluvium unconfined groundwaters in the Quaternary deposits; the St. Peter aquifer which is a confined aquifer in specific areas, but not in this particular site; and the Prairie du Chien - Jordan aquifer system which is unconfined at this site. The hydraulic conductivities in these aquifers vary significantly. The hydraulic conductivity in the alluvial aquifer varies over an extreme range due to the various materials and lack of sorting associated with the glacial deposits. Ranges for the alluvial aquifer vary from 10E-4 to 10E-1 gpd/ft2 (4.72 x 10-8 cm/sec to 4.72 x 10-3 cm/sec). Without specific pumping or slug tests, the actual hydraulic conductivity in the site area cannot be determined. It is sufficient in this study to realize that the site area W:M has a fairly rapid groundwater flow and that portions of this glacier outwash area can act as a recharge area to the groundwater regime. A number of studies have been conducted in the St. Peter and Prairie du Chien - Jordan formations. Based on these studies, hydraulic conductivities have been determined in these aquifers. The St. Peter sandstone has an average conductivity of 80 gpd/ft2 (3.78 x 10-3 cm/sec), while the Prairie du Chien - Jordan aquifer average conductivity is 350 gpd/ft2 (1.65 x 10-2 cm/sec). These values, coupled with the presumed interconnection of the aquifers, indicate that any contaminants entering either of the aquifers could be rapidly dispersed. The regional groundwater flow in all three of the aquifers has been shown to be to the east (toward the Mississippi River). The development of numerous municipal well fields has altered the normal drainage during periods of pumping. Pumping in the City's well field has resulted in a gradient reversal causing groundwater to flow to the west northwest. Several studies(, 6, and 7) have shown that the site is located within the cone of depression for the City's well field. As such, releases of contaminants to the environment in this area may pose a potential threat to the bedrock acquifers. POTENTIAL OPERATION IMPACTS Several operational areas of the proposed solid waste transfer station at this site may pose potential impacts to the existing water resources. These include the potential loss of liquids form solid waste transfer, increased vehicular traffic with possible liquid loss and the "Special Waste" facility. The possible impacts from each operation are: Solid wastes are known to contain a percentage of moisture. Table 1 shows the percent composition of typical municipal wastes from areas across the country. Moisture content can vary from 20-35%. This moisture is a constituent of the waste and does not occur as free liquids. Under certain circumstances, some of this moisture can be released from the waste as leachate. The leachate consists of various organic and inorganic contaminants which may impact water quality. Leachate occurrence/generation is a concern at the actual landfill, rather than at transfer stations. Transfer stations are enclosed facilities and; therefore, are not generally affected by precipitation, although municipal waste received at the transfer station during the rainy seasons will tend to be wetter. However, municipal waste normally has sufficient absorptive capacity to eliminate any free liquids in the waste stream. The possible loss of liquids/leachate from the municipal waste at the transfer station represents a slight potential impact associated with the solid waste handling at the site. The vehicular traffic associated with this facility will include collection (packer) trucks and vehicles owned by residents using the "Special Waste" unit. The potential impacts generated from the vehicles include liquid loss from the packer trucks, accidents resulting in the loss of gasoline and/or diesel fuel and the possible loss of potentially hazardous materials through improper disposal by local residents. The liquids originating from the packer trucks refers to the accumulated precipitation which collects in the garbage cans, dumpsters, and empty trucks overnight as opposed to leachate. While a majority of this liquid that is not absorbed by the solid waste is lost during the collection process, small amounts may be present when off-loading occurs at the transfer station. The volume of dry waste should be sufficient to absorb this liquid during waste consolidation. o The "Special Waste" unit may pose a potential impact to the water resources in the vicinity if no mitigative design or operational measures are implemented. Residents only will be allowed to bring small quantities of special wastes to the transfer station for disposal. Accidental release of some of these materials could result in impacts to the existing groundwater system, however, state of Minnesota law requires a "household hazardous waste" management facility to be designed, constructed and operated according to stringent standards. MNE Ln hh E • .•d • �1 ni {I Im V �^ Y • �[ p Dj .ray w L fa r- 5`� N r �, bi a U • E Ut � cn ~ CJ r 10 Qf {n 0 U C r. N N N 00 .may w O U � N ti o .� v �O O m LA r. �-+ 0 � •� V u c� O � 2 C2 wfil.. ai m n in o, cn 'L7 .. ci j V: U fY d U C C. • C N N Q N u7Ir O n " 'O O V P t0 [� Y9 10 c U C cz �3a _ 10 N N 0 N 0 O O CL i Q a r in�« anfin w 5. 3-45 �, CONTROL AND COUNTERMEASURE ALTERNATIVES The fact that this facility is still in the predesign phase allows various control and countermeasure options to be considered. The variety of hazards associated with separate areas within the facility requires that general as well as area -specific options be considered. One option is to relocate the facility to another area. This option would not reduce the potential impact to the regional groundwater in that the entire Minneapolis -St. Paul area has similar hydrogeologic characteristics. The same potential water resource threats would exist at any site selected in this area. In addition, the required engineering protection would be incorporated in the facility regardless of location. The second option include various design features which can be added to the facility during construction to mitigate any potential hazards. This option includes: o Fencing the total site area. This feature would limit access to the facility through a controlled entry and exit point. Additionally, access would be limited to those individuals working or actively disposing of materials at the facility. This feature would help control unauthorized or improper disposal at this site. Paving and Off -Site Drainage for the facility includes the paving of all access roads into the facility and all active dumping and transfer areas. Grading to assure that surface drainage is directed to the City storm water system would help control precipitation and snow/ice melt. This feature would establish a reasonably impermeable barrier to help protect the existing water resources. Spilled materials could be contained and cleaned up through use of absorbents, vacuum units, etc. The spilled material could then be appropriately disposed of along with the "Special Waste" unit materials. o Paving and On -Site Drainage for the facility is basically the same as the previous one except that drainage would be contained on-site by grading paved surfaces to retain surface liquids within the facility, rather than direct the7 to the City storm water system. The collected runoff could then be metered to the City's sanitary system for treatment or combined with the "Special Waste" for disposal. A potential problem with this option would be possible hydraulic overloads to the sanitary system and the costs of "Special Waste" disposal. o A Solid Waste Consolidation Pit within the facility would provide a pit area where the solid waste would be consolidated, as opposed to a level tipping floor. This would allow any free liquids within the solid waste to be collected and discharged to the City sanitary system along with the facility's normal sanitary wastes. A "Special Waste" unit at the facility will need to be designed in accordance with regulations promulgated for permitting the operation of such facilities under the federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCR,A), and applicable state regulations. This will require impervious paving, containment diking and curbing within the unit, adequate controlled drainage within the containment area, segregation areas for various classes of wastes within the contained area, facility security, spill cleanup equipment and materials, detailed operational procedures and appropriate disposal methods. These design requirements will significantly mitigate any potential hazard to the water resources posed by this unit. The third option includes various operational features which can be implemented at the facility to mitigate the threat to the water resources. These include: Preparation and implementation of a detailed Emergency Contingency plan for the facility. This plan could identify areas of potential material release, procedures to be implemented in the event of a material release, notification procedures and those operating personnel authorized to commit resources and money to cleanup any such release. o Preparation and implementation of a Spill Prevention, Control and Countermeasure (SPCC) plan is somewhat similar to the contingency plan. This plan identifies areas of hazardous material storage, types of containers used for storage, volume of individual or classes of materials stored, types of devices installed to prevent/control releases of those materials, operational and maintenance procedures used to assure the integrity of the control devices and stored materials and the type and length of - 12 - training provided to the operational staff to assure proper implementation of the SPCC plan. Detailed personnel training is a requirement due to the operation of the "Special Waste" unit. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration requires, through 29 CPR Part 1910.120, that individuals working at "Special Waste" sites or facilities must have completed specific training requirements. This regulation specifies what must be included as minimum training for various levels of work. This training program, annual refresher training, and all training records will have to be maintained by the facility management. o A detailed operation and maintenance (0&M) plan will also facilitate prevention of accidental releases from this facility. An 0&M plan is routinely prepared for these types of facilities prior to operational start-up of the facility. Additionally, this plan is incorporated in the personnel training program so that all facility personnel are familiar with the proper operation and maintenance of the individual pieces of equipment as well as the overall facility. o Operation of the "Special Waste" unit during the weekend will mitigate the possible dumping or abandonment of residential wastes at the facility. The weekend operation could be for 8 hours per day on Saturday and Sunday, Saturday only, or for some other weekend time frequency. It is important to provide attendants during the weekend to facilitate use of the unit by the public. A publicity campaign should be prepared to notify the public of the hours of operation and appropriate procedures to be followed in using the facility. Signs within the facility should be explicit in providing directions and proper use information to people using the facility. o Provision of 24-hour security guard at the facility will mitigate the threat of vandalism and/or improper dumping during non -operational hours. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION In closing, the information provided in this report indicates that: o There are no other apparent sites within the planning area which are better suited for this type of facility. - 13 - o The value of the services provided by this solid waste transfer facility surpasses the environmental risks associated with the facility. o Environomental safeguards should be incorporated in the facility design and operation. The conclusion is that this transfer facility be constructed and that no significant potential environmental impacts would be presented. As a measure of protection the various and appropriate features from Control and Countermeasure Options two and three be incorporated in the design, construction and operation of the facility. Proper implementation of these options should result in the operation of this facility without increasing the threat to the environment including existing water resources. - 14 - W-7 ®.... The following documents and materials were used as referencE sources in the preparation of this report. 1. Norvitch, R. F., T. G. Ross, and A. Brietkrietz, Water ResczCaz Outlook for the Minn ano lis-Sr_Par Area, United States Geological Survey for the Metropolitan Council of the Twin Cities Area, 1973. 2. "Hydrogeologic Investigation of the Proposed Well Field Designs", Bruce A. Liesch Associates, Incorporated for the City of Plymouth, 1985. 3. "Soil Survey - Hennepin County, Minnesota", United States Department of Agriculture and the Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station, 1974. 4. "Hydrogeologic Map of Minnesota Quaternary Hydrogeology", Roman Kanivetsky, Minnesota Geological Survey; 1979. 5. "Hydrogeologic Map of Minnesota Bedrock Hydrogeology", Roman Kanivetsky and Matt Wilson, Minnesota Geological Survey, 1979. 6. ''Water Supply Expansion Alternatives Feasibility Study", Bruce A. Liesch Associates for the City of Plymouth, 1985. 7. ''Well Field Study, Plymouth, Minnesota", Bruce A. Liesch Associates for C.L.E.A.N., 1983. APPENDIX A T 1189 R 22 W. SECTI©N 27 WELL A M E K. REh�NE ANY �,�j, �.. 3760 ,-, 7700 sr Nr. 7 F E �... !..O .4t - Date ted. ` 2 �r Lund-K tin Conor" E.� ,',� 1 ;j..`..iii_ndnlph^VDI Owner of Contractor _t£. Job + 13200 State Hi�beta # rs tjai an--Chui-�,� ' /s Loam Lot Block Tfip or d# P 1 � U ZIL n: �sii of Innsew Cand with J+" lt.J_?vtat Dem of Well 1Q0 lros prime rA+ .et she Feet of Open Holy► Finished to Medium Sa*+d 1/ater I 4p Tested at 20 galkas per men. Draw down of 0 feet. 1 Screw sin 4"x 51 tr,tis John • on stainless — Sint or Gash 1 Is Number .e - PWOW Yaks Jacussi 4 .�� Sub>•eraibk 8� ,Motor Serial No C4007817Dlpymp Serial No 7L4 -S2 Drop rsPs 72 y S 'tsa_ 1 " Capacity of ;�� G.P.Y. Dees Inste W 11-12-62 TUBB PZTLESS. 11 Copper 1'�4!1 WPO a roma+ oowA OF wwnnOW P&ON Ow I fuer Sart" a fas"r#ow - slay Blue 15 25 10- Sand Gray 25 SO 25 TSn p lTg� T7 D _ Clay Brown SO 70 20 C Sand Gray 70 153 13 S h'� _ Yater Sand Gray 85 100 15/ NVELL B �-vyC� �L' .f ti E. R. RENNER & SOBS �JEII COMPANY 770 ighway No. 7 St. Louis os ')` P3� WC�� �OG��- (well) Nc' _:!.'d; -I _ IL-__': (PUMP) No CERTIFIED _ Date Starteri 10-2-61 lg Date Completed— 0%'mer or Contractor Pc,tpr K Ippr Address Job Location t' ' Lot Block Twp or city Plymouth County Henn of Mjnnes' TOTAL THICKNESS /� / /Q FORMATION r 5 e, v C�ol�` . Well: S 4o PT; chH�t OF FORMATION _ Cased with 5" j31cj Seam 1 P. Ft o al D P2 roin rl-� Trp. end SiasiFeet , ' of Open hole it ti. Finis _ ' „ t e� Clay r llo 10 feet. - 9 Tested at ^ y t Sandy Clay D55 Screen: Size N.,na Diak �; _ . Slot or Gauge Number — Pump: Make Red JRckQt 1507.1 `4cc U5.6 1. H.P 11 Type 13uh Tank Size?S1�_ Motor Serial No Pump Serial No. ETT a -1--3.06 Drop Pipe i98 { Size 11 GAILY Capacity of pump 20 G.P.M. Date Installed to t'AAl 81 11 Cemented Snnd KIND OF COLOR OF STARTED ENDED TOTAL THICKNESS REMARKS FORMATION FORMATION DEPTH DEPTH OF FORMATION _ C1ny Brown O 10 10 G� 40 O Clay Blue 10 Sandy Clay Brown o 46 -6 �' DirtX Sand- Sto' ' -� ` Cr Clay Tan 65 70 5 T41 Ila 81 11 Cemented Snnd Drown 81 85 b Hush Brown 85 101 16 a M uG C-cmented Sand Brown 101 111 10 CeTaented Gr vel Dark 111 135 24 St. Peter, Dirty Broi,m 135 177 42 � sty - - D Ps,Adft Shale �'2iite 177 185 C. 8 eTP r- ✓ % /mac Shale Red 185 191 6 .,to Fet.r I'111ite 191 ,_36 13045 n - .. ' 1/_ .- rj<7-P- 0C TJX I WELL C J X61544 / , r� v �-�-i o. . t' C:7 ` —44.9 1._ S' kip y - 6- `'FELL D � EMPLOYZE R" G 191-Z wEEx Na. J v / 11Q0l2 }R10tt AYTZRY#COtt TOTAL TnIs DAY OI IN I Z 11v OUT LACK DAY RL W -M. 11x WIN. MLWIN. E! �II?f. . wl HL MIN. uMLA-1 0-ItnXE - r MONDAY TVZSDAY / VrEDNIMAY r TEAT + / TiIDAT SATURDAY ITr1lrAL 0R�iATION to: � I Lesbz �7 tbsrthexbo L true report d hours d my �rpioTms�t oturmg .aid week, to �, r..... immo7 with the Wact sad ci tie Fair Labor Stiaiardr A1fSt Dire if v S�a.tas�C • � `FELL 1 -7.�� C V..:LL RECORD r VRI -STATE DRILLING CO. �� V" i Z (-,d7 k� Owner T;.nnssnolis ln_US:r.J. .. Dhl-' completed Location --__p.lymou"1 Vll.age Driller Ru lieneke Well Designation ` � ' "�.�` Well Type: -. X Rock Total Depth 50� feet.M Sczeen 2` DRILLER'S LOG (, Gravel Packed i 9 to _ lei . �laci�i drift n 1C �� WELL MATERIALS to._ -- '•e:eSn '.I,r s/ / s/V�S -- r Cs �. t!. _ 29 .in. diem. outer ea<_,: -i �� =o ---s-'�=c;e�-''rl•_ta c; .,ite���G 492 If. L!� in. diam. liner p:,( ' ••'L2__' to .�A✓ 5 tios ff - - _ in. diam. screcr• _ CSTL SNDS SNL to _ ` 9 ,r•r; :L,r)E end s :z 1 E Screen type to _ ' - - - - ----- • -. -- - Remarks: _ to - - -- - - - - to. to -' - - - -- - PERMANENT PUMP DATA to _ — _. -- ..-__-•-- Mig. Jaeu�-z'__ -- Model :2" to _.-- _ _ -- _ -_--_— _ Scrl:rl No. Type np—snati _ -- — to -- Mcfor. .. 44L; _.__V. TEST PUMPING DATA";^ ft. sctfincll�i�E,shatt—B in. coL p: Static water level -'__•. feel. Pumped at-�[],�g•p•m• Remark-- with emark:with _ ": 1 --fool level. ' aL-' .�� 9. - - -=' _,.,mr_ , •,� -- - - -- - - - - ,�g,f t �- •t:L�L_�. o._. _icl::o. _:i_ rsa�cLp.. _ �,.w- D—Ir Sa,rd cori►er,' -r iii t . a. .rrs•. .v: i 1� T 1189 R 22 W. SECTION 28 1 I .2744,- F v c -z .N , :23-j �• WELL 3 •4 ! 3147 CALIFORmIA ITT■[T. M.G { MINNEAPOLIS MINNESOTA JOB NAME PLYMOUTH 1`44 , STARTED 27 APRIL a t'A i PL Te LOCATION --5--&-4°A COMPLETED 2 Ju ,1; L. JOB NUMBER FORMAT 1 ON L 0 G Irv --22-2 METHOD OF DRILLING CABLE RIG RIG USED 36—L DIAMETER OF HOLE 241 -1 r, WAS OUTER CASING CEMENTED YES METHOD PUMP AMOUNT OF CEMENT 14 Ct DEPTH OF WELL,—FROM GROUND LEVEL FT. —FROM TOP OF CASING FT. STATIC F' UNDER REAMED FROM FT. TO FT. DIAMETER IN. METHOD SIZES OF GRAVEL AMOUNT C WELL SHOT AT FT. TO FT. NUMBER SIZE LBS. REMOVED C` M A T E R I A L I N S T A L L E D 1 N W E L L OPENING LENGTH DIAMETER M A T E R I A L o- FROM TO M A T E R I A L FROM TO M A T E R I A L 0 15 Sl 4 BLACK DIRT SANG GRAVELS ►,+N r4%` 2761 11 123 YELLOW CLAYp STICKY CGS 15 30 DARK HARD CLAY BLUES GL Ar23 1 rr 132 RED CLAY SAND MIX. C G f 30 42 GRAVEL,BLUE SHALE MIX G �vC� S 1 2 166 YELLOW CLAY,SAND MIX. 2 8 0, SAND GRAVEL SOME CLAY MIXED. / { 6 172 S%-. DARK SHALE SAND MIXED. GPM r rr C 8� 6 SANG GRAVEL YELLOW CLAY��D�V� 1� 2r 18 YELLOW CLAY SAND MIXED'— METHOD OF DRILLING CABLE RIG RIG USED 36—L DIAMETER OF HOLE 241 -1 r, WAS OUTER CASING CEMENTED YES METHOD PUMP AMOUNT OF CEMENT 14 Ct DEPTH OF WELL,—FROM GROUND LEVEL FT. —FROM TOP OF CASING FT. STATIC F' UNDER REAMED FROM FT. TO FT. DIAMETER IN. METHOD SIZES OF GRAVEL AMOUNT C WELL SHOT AT FT. TO FT. NUMBER SIZE LBS. REMOVED C` M A T E R I A L I N S T A L L E D 1 N W E L L P U M P I N G T E S T HRS PUMPED OPENING LENGTH DIAMETER M A T E R I A L SCREEN YIE D ' DRAWOOWN­ .,-. DRIVE CASING 246' " 24" 3/811 LINER CASING 2761 11 2011 3/811 GPM 1 rr P U M P I N G T E S T HRS PUMPED WATER LEVEL YIE D DRAWOOWN­ .,-. FROMTO ,: r �- BELOW SURFACE ;. GPM 1 rr 1 n GPM' i—GPM� GPM r rr r 11 TIME TO CLEAR NRS MIN. SPECIFIC CAPACITY GPM/FT OF DO. DATE, 5 Ju,4E ,19_7.L_ DRILLER S/GORDY HOLLEN NVELL E �r Lull H NVELL F iQy- 61 YG ft y VV Ull�� ! ` I % rebs certify" ba`fiir tmo.r� :-tree, eswply witl thr Wsst asd Hour Dirioi= Daft ; F W EXX INDLNG. C� / 1f—Yc —,L— W>CSK No, WELL G sort of ►ogre of my empaor=mwt d u rias said week, to r the Fair Libor Scaadards Act of 191L it L%S rKtaa.vrfoo., rr.f..r�n .nK�.� �., Y Y in •. i�.it�•ii�lii • • itaii:s.si , WEEK ENDING. Eta'ORE NOON A S II�G� 1LZ"l SACH OT A.L D DAY Of MLtt: NR 1N OUT MIN. HL MIN -RL. MIN. O`RTIII[ is. lilt(. !� MIN. ,fM is IN L >SJtKDAY ,f x M011 DAY • MIN101V�WNOMIMMEM=- TLrZXD A Y KLDN=mAY PRO I ROMMMIMEMO - TWURSDAY MOMMUMMMIMMOMME FRIDAY /(J SATURDAY TOTA WELL G sort of ►ogre of my empaor=mwt d u rias said week, to r the Fair Libor Scaadards Act of 191L it L%S rKtaa.vrfoo., rr.f..r�n .nK�.� �., Y Y in EMPLOYEE�7�%� , WEEK ENDING. Eta'ORE NOON A S II�G� 1LZ"l SACH OT A.L D DAY Of MLtt: NR 1N OUT MIN. HL MIN -RL. MIN. O`RTIII[ is. lilt(. !� MIN. ,fM is IN L >SJtKDAY ,f x M011 DAY TLrZXD A Y KLDN=mAY TWURSDAY FRIDAY /(J SATURDAY TOTA � I IOXMATtOt+ FOR �Miit:L % v I lereby o.rtfy that the abwa L a tr'a Hart 1 lwt+ d my aetpwytns� I duri" How a"'sm ai tie Fair Labor Standards Aci of 193L said week, to ae.r+piy wity tha W+�+ aid Date i NVELL H M -C EMPLOYEE WEEK ENDING 19�3,�WEEK No._ t T Ml lLTO NOON ATTX"OON 1{YI?71NG MACH DAY .. OtTT I N DAY Of WXR1 IN RicL; L1 O IMUR (/ HR MIN. HL 1 Tw i HR KiN. HR 111N. HR I YIN. HL MIN *J*ID A Y i MONDAY It S r Tt*=A Y WEt NX3DAY I Q ` THIJRZDAY GTS i TRiDAY 1 SSATL4DAY 1 . TOTAL CMIKER INTORMATION FOR timEK T- bervby certify that the above is a true rwp f t d bourn o! my employment during said week Co compfy with the Ware an Di.i:va # the Fair labor Standards Act d 19 �. -n (moic r G i WELL I CON TO DATE i PERMIT NUM I�EFRESS L.Jr,, J / / TELEPHONE CITY / < FEET SIZE OF WELL /r INCHES WATER LEVEL WELL DEPTH / FINISHED IN y SCREEN TYPE AND SIZE REMARKS: a�T L A rlvL IVIIIVIVLS)V /A LLQ WELL 2 _07 FIELD REPORT D WELL,,= Nome of Job, VILLAGE 'OF PLYMOUTH, MIIINESOTA Date started Address HALF MILE SOUTH OF HIWAY 55 ON NIAGARA LANEDate compleI d 2/2^6/i_' • PLYMOUTH. MN �'cMarS No. of days 10G'OF WELL 37 Y S. OF JORDAN REMOVED FROM SLOUGHt?10. ONE 5# SHOT DYNAMITE USED. Method'of drilling cage -F Tse Rig'used ��L Diom..of drill hole in. • :{las outer casing cemented Yes •Method PRESSURE Amount cement bepth of well -from ground level'' ft. -from top of cosing 394 ft. Static 99'°" f; MATERIAL LEFT -]-W WELL Opening From To' Material 0 7Q CLAY L•pY • 79 80 FINE SAND 80 140 ' CLAY L H i 0 •1 HARDPAN SANDq CLAY SAIt1 155 258m CLAY CL � V 37 Y S. OF JORDAN REMOVED FROM SLOUGHt?10. ONE 5# SHOT DYNAMITE USED. Method'of drilling cage -F Tse Rig'used ��L Diom..of drill hole in. • :{las outer casing cemented Yes •Method PRESSURE Amount cement bepth of well -from ground level'' ft. -from top of cosing 394 ft. Static 99'°" f; MATERIAL LEFT -]-W WELL Opening Material From ToT_ 258 267 CLAY, SANDROCK ST.P T R 207• 270 ST.PETER SANDSTONE S 270 81 SHAKOPEE LIMESTONE OPoc GRAY .i81 409 JORDAN SANDSTO�IE G b?,/_' Outer cosing 24" 205,911 37 Y S. OF JORDAN REMOVED FROM SLOUGHt?10. ONE 5# SHOT DYNAMITE USED. Method'of drilling cage -F Tse Rig'used ��L Diom..of drill hole in. • :{las outer casing cemented Yes •Method PRESSURE Amount cement bepth of well -from ground level'' ft. -from top of cosing 394 ft. Static 99'°" f; MATERIAL LEFT -]-W WELL - Underreomed from - ft.to ft. Diameter in. Method Size -sizes -of gravel Amount Well shot at 20 ft. to ft. depth. Number 1 Size_5 lb. Material removed 4= yc. WELL FILLED IN TO 394' AFTER PUMPING. ENGINEER SAID TO LCAVE SAND IN THERE. WELL TEST y, le., 1' 4;) =� Hours Pumped From To 'A 1 Hns. TOTAL_— •''Time to clear_ Dot e 2/26/70 Yield Water Level - gal. per mini. ft. below surface 5�Qco 1 Driller A Drawdown Remarks 'feet 771 CIHALEY CQLDURL"40 SAND ecIiISct ppci F A JJ 1 .•. RD/&1T 8 ft T1� - Opening Length - feet Diameter -inches Material Loci Screen =.c. a " ? ° Inner casing 2011- 28013' .375 Outer cosing 24" 205,911 .375 3'' -NGS - Underreomed from - ft.to ft. Diameter in. Method Size -sizes -of gravel Amount Well shot at 20 ft. to ft. depth. Number 1 Size_5 lb. Material removed 4= yc. WELL FILLED IN TO 394' AFTER PUMPING. ENGINEER SAID TO LCAVE SAND IN THERE. WELL TEST y, le., 1' 4;) =� Hours Pumped From To 'A 1 Hns. TOTAL_— •''Time to clear_ Dot e 2/26/70 Yield Water Level - gal. per mini. ft. below surface 5�Qco 1 Driller A Drawdown Remarks 'feet 771 CIHALEY CQLDURL"40 SAND ecIiISct ppci F A JJ 1 .•. RD/&1T 8 ft T1� - Ems 2, pDMwrta roc yV,c 4t ✓ 4�1cir`r t7o h. 6 Z, WELL 4 A❑ l--- 70 Dnr•t :T.71 �, MVAT�x1dr[xM clay Gr"el n�- MR ItEEE RECORD dervevrs�. A1t 2 2 C' I 3ASI J.tt..d O -&S co Q , •r' t rw .rom Ste c. u• I1t1.C1..01 V(J///� V ✓/' lAA:1? 07 trC: /� ZZ �� Netim stios lam► rT0^[r':"TW+ytf•'S�epUv J L.. to h. &rptn Drt.. tdtwt 7•. z r SC1Qt1 Or trP• bol. 1 17 Ms.Gs�ft. ft. ft. k-9�7..—S"UjTIC V• i..cn i•� .v Aderva tldLLbor e �r302.. Lane711 tr e• .et I>f recti to fe.b.e Lear•.tm N • Ln. Pipmout 34 XL=. s1'ter i+n. psspind W F s of oiagara h. a.^trr nn. ►tapiat .. a al s .. R - 4.tm sw .f ••11 l.e.um• vtu. DdT7v tarp 1. t+d� Au of Cmpl•ua • ' Ems 2, pDMwrta roc yV,c 4t ✓ 4�1cir`r t7o h. 6J—)O x CLAY CALOR t'cT5 0S 6 Z, 13J1. teol A❑ l--- 70 Dnr•t 100 DW clay Gr"el CISUc mCT: A.o.•i A. is �� ]o i3C].11w rod 3ASI J.tt..d ..rat +❑ rAwt.I e... 110 I 1 �; V(J///� V ✓/' S D/� e. ist /� ZZ �� N 6J—)O x CLAY CALOR t'cT5 0S 6 Z, ' ` C— Tp Irripmu— .30 Air Csod3 tlmt.{ 3❑ T.. t W. U d❑ S 7" TO 13. I—t source o: pos-- �Q,..�,......... clay Gr"el CISUc mCT: A.o.•i A. is G G'TAcc Rea D1AM. Ti r.atrd❑I Y•16.61L Coat dl nett m _ x. ❑ NDS,SNS A/ H T /� ZZ �� N stios lam► W17 -L —, COWL --7;D. I❑pit L.. sdapur '-❑ Du.—t efft.t 30 At 1.••t 1:" s& -- W.11 dzo vice d! �tn ❑11c ta. 7d. IF As.% e—t :❑ bm tmlu 3❑ Drptb: frac o ft. tc 276 h . has CO tt' I❑ D—tic A�PvDlte S.Mir 0 77:t j I.do• //00 ' ` C— Tp Irripmu— .30 Air Csod3 tlmt.{ 3❑ T.. t W. U d❑ nOs TO 13. I—t source o: pos-- �Q,..�,......... CISUc mCT: A.o.•i A. is G 110 D1AM. Ti r.atrd❑I Y•16.61L Coat dl nett m _ x. ❑ �l.ca GI.. ❑ 1101 /� ZZ 1 Z4 1.. to ft. dsptn tl.idat J. tis . t.—M . Yetb Y•1 disinfected upm etasp lr ti m' T•s ❑ ' `v, 11 1 J L.. to h. &rptn Drt.. tdtwt 7•. z r SC1Qt1 Or trP• bol. 1 17 Ms.Gs�ft. ft. ft. k-9�7..—S"UjTIC Q h�b.lw ptt. ' Mssaf.etunr's Same M.d.l ■weer V Vol" s1'ter i+n. psspind W F h. a.^trr nn. ►tapiat W17 -L —, COWL --7;D. I❑pit L.. sdapur '-❑ Du.—t efft.t 30 At 1.••t 1:" s& -- W.11 dzo vice d! �tn ❑11c ta. 7d. IF As.% e—t :❑ bm tmlu 3❑ Drptb: frac o ft. tc 276 h . has CO tt' 13. I—t source o: pos-- �Q,..�,......... Coat dl nett m _ x. ❑ �! Y•1 disinfected upm etasp lr ti m' T•s ❑ ' `v, � l ►tllf Date laa tsllmd I.% futaLI d Q ' Mssaf.etunr's Same M.d.l ■weer V Vol" l,.Atb of dr'up. pip- h. Csp—St, t M.vrisl .f drop pip- TTy.: 1❑Std.atnible 30:.S. TVrti— ametvr attnt ' `30 I❑ ,lat .p Cmtri rwr.i •t_; -' 16. vAffi wiL: C[F:'MC: ^!'S 137f'I fI :J.': X Z` i? r TLIs •ell teem drilyd mdrr q ;wUdictim sed this report Is ere f2e best of 4 aswlydee and Mli. f. ��� ' �.tt. La earu.r dv.n..• APe L.c.w•• t MG. 1LvAT1Os, 5xcm O► DATA. Add—.. 11 � q J atdm.e Avtnoti t•d Mpn•.s satin Lea Reath f1.r1 d rn..r"'IA KI.. TIY■Td Ktitf( ,. �.._.. «'ELL 5 •NAIIIWILL919901� -"nA.Or 1 0023 ire, ilgivilL_. •-^�u� 'AI R-2— Zi !x rt lar ftmorurl SAM City K In go ti '� •� � rr+.r _ wrr.w rr 1� rl ■r laver . W� ftt for? "wriK • , i M U k 1066--.4 mow. { ; "—\ ----- is 16— 40r.r.. qDW_ r '] I ug- IoAb..-....0% a .r-. t .o,mo ... 4c3cm..... 1 w.\�•f6 td. TII O. wiMri i� I.IJr m >Q tr ..I 4040 10 CL11T i?9�£S 9 40 C AApw_ u.../ S.. itwt Wm 40 40,o,f rte__... dbr*- SAW CULT AN 60 90 to ^!S .O 2". ..■. •r/ ft �a• — sat�JT CUIT IfT 1?3 1t0 —.- r _-_ .... ..,w --- --` �E'�iuTEs SRATEL RAY MN 135 186 • r \7 • t -- ��- - - r.+... w • , r, //����CC YXOSTO E e �/ !��/O� 1 +}4 G06 r. A C 10 .TL__- 1 ` LSC_. L3.7 SKICEY ST PETER RU: S I;FT 233 224400soft '- .._... w .., • irt MlWWR_ LFA w _r • S70KS I X 260 ZE2 It _d �_ �, . fr.rr . •la s%( � LWE A 264 2SS Or.. .171 L ft.— %.-O UMM l I QrfT hard 2=7 290 • '. •, �..\• •. ` -'---- •CST-- - {{ `` �-y SkAKME ■ SMAL` AX 275 39J! 01 la w[wOCwrai rr SwAxOM 1 S/IOST'utE Tkl( M 307 " '"` o.. ow. C... JWJ OPEL i SJUIOSOVE r I" 310ILK LL•.JILTasL _._ J"y _ MA ..� w r • S.S. A SAM LlG9T 323 225 •-- • _ ___ __. 1 ver _r �.+. .! ^rte •.r r.�.� J0#"z Ks. is a7Zsw mm t1 rm 327 130 .. _ .,. T� E RL a ~ t' d= 395 . '".. -,ism= -- -- TE - --4W 406o.. JOID" tPtK hard 445 415 _.r �•WU \l\q +1.71 R'fw \(„Il.r w.� 118/zz�Z� Age 1JCg • � r -r, n 'IN -) \..r\ .1 w PCs - 0 dr pisot r.rrrw.. IT" lo.� J011 Ir\rl lOw.+•000rl 10.r dater to 10 ■all•■ILLI COWMACIO. 1 Cl•ITr=&TIM f.■Y� .r t•�r rr rr Y.rr_.. r/ .r �.r. • w _ w . -92 MM SM T1K 02 -J's InWrM TW W AMA L -IK SU ■•*- 1� vu �..1w __. WELL `'FELL 7 Static W L. 105' BELOW ELEV. 969.47 PumPnq WL. 163' AT 2300 G.P.M. Drilling Dott OCTOBER 29, 1982 Drillt► E.H. RENNER 8 SONS, INC. Original Casing Elev 969.47 9C WELL LOG DEPTH IN FEET I8" CASING Pitless Elev. CLAY, BLUE I 90 100 -SAND 8 GRAVEL, HARD 105 SAND 8 GRAVEL SAND a GRAVEL, HARD 271'-18"CASING 175 180 ROCKS 185 SANDSTONE 8 GRAVEL 19B SHALE, WHITE SHALE, RED 213 245 SHALE 8 SANDSTONE, GRAY I SHAKOPEE LIMESTONE 383 JORDAN SANDSTONE 445 SHALE 8 SANDSTONE 45 I& PUMP DATA Momfocturer Installation Date Instal ler Capocity G PM at Motor H.P R.P W... Volts Phase Pitless Unit r- Column Couplinq Bottom of Pitless Unit Column Casino 200' OF 24" -OUTER Bowls Motor 553 CU. YDS. REMOVED PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA PROJECT NC. BONESTR00, ROSENE, ANOERLIK S ASSOC., INC. RECORD PLAN wELU 6 PUMP N0 7 FILE CONSULTING ENSIVI ERS ST- PAul" MHN. IVELL G j WELL ORILLING FOR FOUR GENERATIONS 6300 Industry Are. V. W., Anoka, Minn. 55303, (612) 42) WELL LOG MAP CODE 612— SGA Data Started 6 1980 Date Completed 20 August Owner or Contractor City of Plymouth Addnm 13800 H!sy # 55 Plynouth, 1K. Job Location Well No. 6. Project No. 012 Fernbroo}? & 22nd Plymouth Hennapi:L Lot Block City County State of I' Minn; g� Wall: 3 Cable Tool Rotary S Driven Griller: Geo. i oos 24" x 2001 10" Cased with IA" inch T PE _T&C 2501 10 -*Ft. Total Depth of Well 417 Ft. from c,: Feet of Open Hole 1571 2 -Finished in Jordan Static Water Level 105 Tested at 2500 gallons per min. Drawn down of 145 feet. Al Screen: ncne rrl✓� Size -dia. -ft. Make Slot or Guage Pump: Make NP Volts Phase Type Tank Motor Serial No. Pump Serial No. Drop Pipe ' Size Capacity of pump G.P.M. Date Installed Pitless Adapter: Make Offset ft. Material Size Kind of Color of Started Ended Total Thickness Formation For"+rtion Depth Depth of Ra.rwks Formation F=i1 Yellow 0 6 6 Peat Treem Black 6 10 4 Muck all 10 25 15 sa-rdy Light 25 30 Soft Sardt Clay Grey 30 60 30 ni,tyr'' a Brnyrn 60 75 1 Cemented Sand & Stone Brown 75 160 85 heavy gravel at 160 ft i"' °qnri 160 200 40 stcnes & sandstone whit St. Peter White 200 230 30 sand in rock Shakopee Tan 245 260 15 firm & clean 200nleam " Tan 290 295 5 Pink 300 D17 17 Shakopee Pink 318 370 52 Jordan White 377 407 30 soft bail eot- time vVI- an 4ul 41/ lu Urill DOST t SYATEE OF DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES BOX tet- , 500 LAFAYETTE ROAD • ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA • 55155-40 DNR INFORMATION (612) 296 -615 7 JA_ l� August 31, 1987 Prr,� ski' t _E.IVE D_p Mr. Jeffrey Turner HrR Techserv, Inc. 5401 Gamble Drive Minneapolis, Minnesota 55416-1518 Dear Mr. Turner: As per your request of 21 August, 1987, the Minnesota Natural Heritage Program has reviewed the site of the proposed solid waste transfer station in Plymouth (1\11/2, S 1/4, Section 27, Township 118N, Range 22h) for occurrences of rare plant and animal species or other significant natural features. A search of our database indicates that there are no known occurrences of such rare species or natural features at the project site. Although an on-site survey of the biological resources of the project area has not been conducted, the area's history of disturbance and the site's soils (described by the Soil Conservation Service as "cut and fill land") make it unlikely that rare species or natural features would be found there. An invoice for work canpleted will be forthcoming. You are being charged our minimum fee for computer and map search and staff scientist review. Billings are done quarterly in June, September, DeceTrber and March. DO: ran Sincer ely, DAVID OL, Natural Heritage Program AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER Attachment 26 FOUNDED IN 1849 September 25, 1987 MINNESOTA HISTORICAL SOCI E_ Mr. Jeffrey Turner HDR Techserv, Inc. 300 Parkdale 1 Building 5401 Gamble Drive Minneapolis, Minnesota 55416-1518 Dear Mr. Turner: For; �nefrin¢ .H ,tori Cen;e- 5' Pau.. %1% 55 1 ] • !6' _ - Re: Construct solid waste transfer station; NE/4 of SW/4 S27, T118, R22; Plymouth, Hennepin County MHS Referral File Number: FF -339 Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on the above project. It has been reviewed pursuant to responsibilities given the State Historic Preservation Officer by the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 and the Procedures of the National Advisory Council of Historic Preservation (36CFR800). This review reveals the location of no known sites of historic, architectural, cultural, archaeological, or engineering significance within the area of the proposed project. There are no sites in the project area which are on the National Register or eligible for inclusion on the National Register, and therefore, none which may be affected by your proposal. Again, thank you for your participation in this important effort to preserve Minnesota's heritage. Sincerely, Dennis A. Gimmestad Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer DAG:dmb Attachment 27 Jolz •��� j .��.i i .�^ 1 ,may-•-.� Attachment 27 MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA NOVEMBER 19, 1987 A Regular Meeting of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Plymouth, was called to order by Chairman Neils on the 19th day of November, 1987 at 6:38 p.m. at the City Council Chambers in the City of Plymouth, Minnesota. The following members of the Authority were present: Chairman Neils, Commissioners Gutzman, Ludovissie, and Crain who arrived at 6:44 p.m. Also present were City Manager Willis, Planning Director Tremere, Housing Specialist Dale and City Clerk Brandt. Commissioner Hillstrom was absent. MINUTES MOTION was made by Commissioner Ludovissie, seconded by Commissioner Gutzman, to approve the minutes of the October 13 public hearing/special meetino as presented. Motion carried, three ayes. ELDERLY HOUSING SITE Manager Willis introduced Michael Grossman from Ehlers and Associates. Michael Grossman, stated three development proposals were received, i.e. from North idge, tuart Corporation, and ASP Construction Co., Inc. One proposal, from ASP Construction Co., was based on the City's owning and operatinq the project. Mr. Grossman did not believe the City was favorable to ownership nor did the proposal meet the intent of the Request for Proposal. He summarized the two remaining proposals as to the anticipated costs each developer believed would be needed to develop the site. It was his opinion that both developers needed to provide more cost figures. Mr. Grossman provided a "Recap of Developer Proposals" that showed Stuart Corporation's total costs would be about $600,000 less than that of the North Ridge proposal. However, the Stuart Corporation proposal failed to show operating costs during the start-up phase. Discussion followed on the amount of subsidy the developers expected and that even though these are initial proposals, they are a long way from firm, realistic numbers. The possible use of additional Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds, and how long the City would have use of those funds were also discussed. Chairman Neils stated a lot of City time and money have gone into research on this project over the past several years. He asked whether the Commissioners were willing to consider either doing the project or acknowledging that it is unfeasible and return the CDBG money for the site back to HUD. The property could then be developed for market rate rental elderly housing with some lower cost housing. REGULAR HRA MEETING November 19, 1987 Page Two Commissioner Gutzman asked if the Authority has levied the full amount allowed for housing authorities. Chairman Neils answered that the HRA doesn't levy the full amount. The Council has levied an amount for support of HRA activities. Discussion continued on whether the Council would approve subsidy payments to the developer, how many of the units would have to be subsidized, market value of the property, and if the City could purchase the land and sell it to a developer for predominately market rate senior housing. Director Tremere asked if the Commissioners would want to meet with the prospective developers. Chairman Neils answered that he didn't believe the HRA or Council would be interested. Both the proposals require a local subsidy that is too high. MOTION was made by Commissioner Gutzman, seconded by Commissioner Ludovissie, to adopt HRA RESOLUTION NO. 87-06 RECOMMENDING RESECTION OF ALL PROPOSALS FOR ELDERLY HOUSING DEVELOPMENT due to the substantial and excessive local financial commitment requirements. Motion carried on a Roll Call vote, four ayes. MOTION was made by Commissioner Gutzman, seconded by Chairman Neils, to recommend that staff be directed to determine options of site disposition and assemble and prepare options and evaluations of how market rate housinq might be developed with some support by the City but without CDBG program constraints. Motion carried, four ayes. The meeting adjourned at 7:50 p.m. Secretary Minutes of the Park and Recreation Advisory Commission Meeting November 12, 1987 Page 38 Present: Chair Edwards, Commissioners Reed, Anderson, and LaTour; staff Blank and Pederson Absent: Commissioners Beach and Rosen 1. CALL TO ORDER Chair Edwards called the November meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Conference Room. 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A motion was made by Commissioner Reed and seconded by Commissioner Anderson to approve the minutes of the October meeting as presented. The motion carried with all ayes. 3. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS a. Athletic Associations. Representatives of the Plymouth -Wayzata Soccer Club were present. Their presentation is covered under Item 6.c. b. Staff. Mary Patterson stated that beach attendance figures from this past summer were 11,378 at Parkers Lake, 10,694 at East Medicine Lake and 6,347 at West Medicine Lake. Attendance has been steadily increasing since 1985, although attendance at Medicine Lake was down in 1987. She attributes this to an early algae bloom which resulted in several reports of swimmers itch at these beaches. Mary stated that she, Rick Busch and Mary Tilley spent a planning day in October discussing new program policies and procedures and preparing a planning calendar. She announced that three programs are coming up this winter sponsored by the Metropolitan Regional Arts Council; a presentation of "Family" by the Illusion Theatre, a "Hometown Holiday Concert" by the St. Paul Chamber Orchestra, and a World Tree Puppet Theatre performance. These programs will be held at Wayzata Senior High School. We're also sponsoring a joint program with the Plymouth Historical Society; "An Old Fashioned Christmas" will be held at Plymouth Creek Park on Sunday, December 13, from 2-5 p.m. Horse drawn sleigh rides will be given as part of the afternoon's activities. c. Others. Ben Broman, 4050 Glacier Lane, was present to suggest a name for Amhurst Park. He would like to recommend that the park be named "Hugo G. Broman Park" after his father, who originally owned the land the park sits on. 4. REPORT CN PAST COUNCIL ACTION a. Reject Bids on Parkers Lake Pavilion. Council rejected the bids on Parkers Lake Pavilion as recommnended by staff and PRAC. b. Trail and Sidewalk Standards. Council accepted the standards for trails and sidewalks as recommended by staff and PRAC. PRAC Minutes November 12, 1987 Page 39 5. UNFINISHED BUSINESS. a. Lions Park Play Equipment. Director Blank stated that the Lions Park play equipment, as recommended by staff, will include all the pieces that residents wanted, as well as the pre-school piece having a flat deck rather than a rounded surface. The pieces selected include: - one BigToy PS-12AB - one BigToy PR -37 - one Miracle Cyclone Slide 132-3 - one backhoe digger - one springed animal. A MDTICN WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER LATOUR AND SECONDED BY CICWISSIONER REED TO ACCEPT DIRDCIOR BLANK'S RECCFMENDATICN OF THE LIONS PARK PLAY EQUIPMENT. The motion carried with all ayes. b. Parkers Lake Pavilion. (The building architect, Del Erickson, failed to appear at this meeting.) Director Blank reviewed the staff report he sent to PRAC and discussed the following issues: 1) What are the needs of the community at this time with regard to !park and recreation facilities? 2) What is the the quality of the pavilion that the community expects, deserves and the Commission feels is necessary? 3) What is the Commission willing to pay for this quality and quantity and what effect will this project have on other projects that are currently included in the five year CIP? Director Blank feels it is the City's need at this time to: - first, acquire undeveloped park land as necessary - second, develop neighborhood park sites on an on-going basis to keep up with current development trends, and - third, at this time, he believes it is important to develop indoor recreation space for recreational programs. He believes that attendance at Parkers Lake Park could reach anywhere from 40,000 to 50,000 by 1989. Based on those figures, he feels that the pavilion should be of the best quality possible. Chair Edwards indicated her concern about the top floor as proposed now not having much usable space. Director Blank stated that the top floor allows for direct access from the trail and road, contains the lifeguard room, mechanical/electrical room, and storage space. All of these areas are important to the building's function. Director Blank then listed items that could be eliminated from the pavilion in order to reduce costs. The Commission reviewed these items and made changes as follows: PRAC Minutes November 12, 1987 Page 40 1) $ 3,500 from general conditions 2) $19,000 from site work 3) $ 6,000 from concrete 4) $14,500 from masonry 5) $ 4,000 from carpentry 6) $ 4,000 from moisture protection/insulation 7) $13,000 from doors and windows 8) $ 3,500 from finishes 9) $ 9,000 from specialties 10) $14,200 from electrical 11) $ 1,800 from mechanical Director Blank indicated that building a picnic shelter will not add or subtract from the total cost of the pavilion, but one must be built in order to meet the terms of the grant we received. A WTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER LATOUR AND SBCONDED BY CCtT':ISSIONER REED TO RDC)OWEZ THAT COUNCIL ACCEPT THE CHANGES PROPOSED TO REDUCE THE COST OF THE PARKERS LAKE PAVILION WITH THE EXCEPTION OF ITEMS 9A AND 15D AS STATED IN DEL ERICKSON'S MEMORANDUM TO DIREC'T'OR BLANK. PRAC FURTHER REOM12,DS THAT THE OVERALL ORIGINAL QUALITY OF THE PAVILION SHOULD BE MAINTAINED. The motion carried with all ayes. It was the general consensus of those members present that a special meeting should be held within the next two weeks to go over these proposed changes with those members that were not present at this meeting. c. Neighborhood Parks Update. Director Blank stated that the neighborhood park projects are completed, and that the hill at the 34th Avenue entrance to Heritage Park has been lowered as requested by the residents. d. 1987 Trail Projects Update. Director Blank stated that the trails are completed at: - Highway 101 from 19th to 26th Avenue - Fernbrook Lane from 46th Avenue to County Road 6 - Zachary Lane from 48th Avenue south to Zachary Elementary School - County Road 9 from Zachary Lane to County Road 61. e. Timing of 1988 Construction Projects. Director Blank indicated that it is necessary to formally recommend to Council that we proceed with hiring a consultant to design the St. Marys neighborhood park in order to begin the process in time to have it constructed during the summer of 1988. We also need to begin work on the Plymouth Creek soccer field. A MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER ANDERSON AND SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER REED TO APPROVE DIRECTOR BLANK'S RECCn13,IDATION TO HIRE A OCNSULTANT TO BEGIN DESIGNING THE ST. MARY'S NEIGHBORHOOD PARK, AND TO HAVE STAFF COMPLETE A FEASIBILITY STUDY OF THE PLYMOUTH CREEK SOCCER FIELD. The motion carried with all ayes. PRAC Minutes November 12, 1987 Page 41 6. NEW BUSINESS a. Review Park Usage and Cost Study Report. Director Blank informed the Commission that he had prepared a park usage and cost study report for the City Manager as part of the City Manager's 1988 Goals and Objectives. This report was then forwarded to the City Council and after their review, it was requested that it be forwarded to PRAC for their review. Director Blank indicated that the City Council wants PRAC to examine possible cost saving measures and revenue enhancing measures in early 1988. Any number of possible alternatives, such as additional user fees for youth athletic associations, could be considered. Director Blank stated that Council has suggested that PRAC hold some public information meetings in early 1988 to introduce this idea to the residents. This item will continue to be on future agendas. b. New Plats. There were no new plats. c. Request from Plymouth -Wayzata Soccer Club. Janet Bogan, secretary of the Plymouth -Wayzata Soccer Club was present at the meeting to request that Plymouth Park and Recreation take over running the house league soccer group, since they wish to devote all their time to the traveling teams. She stated that there are approximately 1,100 soccer players, and 270 of those children are on traveling teams. She suggests that we combine the summer soccer program with our fall soccer program and run it from early August through mid-October. Director Blank stated that August tends to be a big vacation month for families with children, and it's the same time that we generally start field renovations. Rick Busch indicated that the younger age groups could possibly play on the hockey rink areas. John Ferris, treasurer of the club, was present and discussed the financial aspect of the program. He stated that they charge $20 per player and they provide t -shirts and trophies, as well as paying someone to do the scheduling. He feels that we could charge the same and provide the same things they have been providing. Director Blank stated that another option to consider other than Park and Recreation offering the program would be to suggest that the in-house parents start their own soccer association. He indicated that he, Rick Busch, Greg Finn and Mary Patterson would meet with the Soccer Association to further review this item and make some recommendations to PRAC at their December meeting. 7. OOMMISSION PRESENTATION None. 8. STAFF COMM NICATION There were no communications by staff. 9. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 10:45 p.m. PLYMOUTH DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY 3400 PLYMOUTH BLVD., PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447 TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800 DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: 1. The violations Manager. November 25, 1987 Director Carlquist D. Paulson PARKING ON T.H. 55 NEAR FERNBROOK LANE area car was requested to check for the parking outlined in the November 13th memo from the City 2. Five days were selected for extra attention, they are as follows: Thursday 11/19 Friday 11/20 Saturday 11/21 Monday 11/23 Tuesday 11/24 3. During this period, one violation was observed (tuesday, 11/24). This violation was handled with a citation. 4. The officers have been advised to watch for future violations during their normal patrol activities. The violations appear to be very sporadic. o s 6 V w .0 `Q• L� �' U C L' V c.J, 'i, S C C J ..^_ �� v a j' o f" L. w, .cc m .. U o cn Cq U �= u c oU c pq� c L p > p c y �E V c >• E•r-t� i s Q v ci tj .._ >_ �. O � •�c.°. d .y C v, � � G O ._ H V V y V o A _ 3. c cc�w c v v K ° y.0 c U v> t'l UL ^> c75 flA L C ca Cw r� �L �I O ic^ VO 5 U v G U ciaUima�iUroEc"4i--uac V.) O. may' 0 V C^ v• v G Sec pox ou�a�8.�`�' '�"�CI.F�- c0000?c00 c°o>u � 0Da WI cc c > " y o v 0 'm x's 0.u�N`UU��"���� �'"' �+0 c� a E 5 Ex > O c 0 may , •►�.. 04.E oOD000cc� a>�••� >0c,op30 ��� 03 c�,y O 0� � C3 `a03�s�hns�oc0 CA �0 Ev" ��°caNiop�Fa1 0 y •r O p�jti av pyo.^Ec°c :Z, b4 to w'ao:�00C° ° -.aoo auic > cc Ny u = z c-- c o �.>,or� >,2° 0 cN 0s c E"� 3°° x a� U° o y ti a�,uh0 o:cc3�°c s" °'._ 5 >w co �c c u om co o f ox o u °' � L E 0 u.o�' a� n pn L m v_ � o o �_� �_ c.�...fn •L7 `j w �..... O, y y OL) 3 C 'J ,O V C c C G V c L° c° cCa a> �" cd .� y L M y• R •a ;., H H C c`� 0 >O 00 O .cam•, O 6I ._ y y U cd �n O U �. p U or �._ E.ca N.., c ca E-0 c c y c °ons a� E = L a> o � �_ cd y u a 5 �_ y c E av v� >,-- 0.0 0 0 � � �'� 2, > c ° c•a� o� E E�z°'a:? �'� ° � > o - ° � ° � cy`°•y � ° aci•� ° � ` •cc 4) 6. .> c =yo °c>,._, a y.fl w0 ° c n 0 a O O cd c c CE. a cd E U 7> U U U Tc h> U V U 4 U 'fl dQ.� ��+� �.�.:'w O y� ~' E ON� p C'O >�� ,D .aL v p� cVC o.•vi >, �y V �•t TE 0 O 4% ev _ o oo•-, L o -- �C IC Vi c ttS 6 (n V r i •v '� w `.i, °. v, 0 s,ccU��E�c co�,>,tU o�ycycccnO°a'T `NE E c. �-c�a - oEc ca LY �n .G is '� '" a� x •� a� •o o O U p• o c _ o u a>�s yric°w coda oq° toocaca`°o v po yccucya v o ao o v 003 yx�e00 o �° �.� y c c �, ys m� o c E o x h o c:. c. c c ao a> c v 4 0= y o C ¢ -0 c Cts co E U •— > C' `c c }- � c y oo« m ._ a —L c ca coc a0n - 3e c� _ 0c E 3 0 cob a�. a� t•6' c a� o °L2> o �v �.E� u c c `° >'�'- aci ccE� `'� EU ao `°U o c �`° ai `' 1° ;? y c c v �• u c o v E U s .8.o v E x O h _ c H h L 0q D y h cC ec t o _ 4 L C V a v > LO �, 3 O C `... C O C �' 00 " aro c ° L 4.' O �•� cco :v ° w0 .� .x 'A L • 7 .D 3 •C `° @ " o " V U > c t^ �Lc� 0 c �, 000 c. L'E c �+ �o v yw. U v c c �' v o onv `° is a'i ` ��o+ ao� a V�sp c �_ h :.+ •Z7 h C >> N O V C CJ .L.+ .y+ N �... ° Uo4�0sca��3�aconXZ2=>�GLo�°- yo:'x cccuc xvU'a� �''�v _ mooaxiova o �Uoa: Eoow uvo�_ ccu•o.. 5 aci ea i x �_ c c^ Cl ov o > •v o `c c E E c�' E- �o ° a n� acv u c a� o uU uU3u vm00Z0 cL o•vc Eu.'`°-�n =y°' cEi'_'E� =0 3 u `5 ° u > os �U: o �' ? co`as� = �aao `�°'? ao3 0� v 0 ooL o c cc co v 0D `" r�+v L ° y° c °' �3 0 �•4c�von co �Lro ° w a�ho 0u ed� s� EoU vaso .oc h �o Y'- ao � •• = L c7 .y � - c •n o o � u >, c �- u — v 4� � � .. w ;; oL c Co a� •� �. >, � E • v •� ao �aoa���u�>n cco>y` cynicaero' AL3 a ° ° v fl a o o >,° a> U N : U¢ ►v ...,�, o = c^>;0co3Lb -to.. E.2 c v c E �+oDZ ° E ys c a-tu 5 o'2 � � � � � 3 v"u c•c o m o N3 ° U E E-.� >, �.oE� W 4> �' C'j �c ccaoo`4°h >�03 x s o nc i v �x� 0 > c0 y c '� v ,Z' •�.� Ivo `= c a.E v ys m y v > a� ao m_ >:N.0 a� _%p c •.c o y E CIO -0 U ��w-0- �.a� c .� �' °•E `E 0 v c o•S a E a� ° m u u °x'o >,� °'o �� `0 0 0o.r n ° o u O �, .,�; V > o R� aS cs cc >? " o °��ecLy`° cEEccucyU` o�c-y� a' 4) ,�' �EUcac'�,v��o3��LU EO "" R n.,D H N .3 RL Q U '9 E %i ►.� E •t7 •L7 U .0 y U ._ 0-- �_ •`' 03 � Q. o� O m " +.a c co m-14�4 $'>`0. 3 03 E o U) Nine L N (1' C o �r o I M ■ `pyV � � O M U CL o s 6 V w .0 `Q• L� �' U C L' V c.J, 'i, S C C J ..^_ �� v a j' o f" L. w, .cc m .. U o cn Cq U �= u c oU c pq� c L p > p c y �E V c >• E•r-t� i s Q v ci tj .._ >_ �. O � •�c.°. d .y C v, � � G O ._ H V V y V o A _ 3. c cc�w c v v K ° y.0 c U v> t'l UL ^> c75 flA L C ca Cw r� �L �I O ic^ VO 5 U v G U ciaUima�iUroEc"4i--uac V.) O. may' 0 V C^ v• v G Sec pox ou�a�8.�`�' '�"�CI.F�- c0000?c00 c°o>u � 0Da WI cc c > " y o v 0 'm x's 0.u�N`UU��"���� �'"' �+0 c� a E 5 Ex > O c 0 may , •►�.. 04.E oOD000cc� a>�••� >0c,op30 ��� 03 c�,y O 0� � C3 `a03�s�hns�oc0 CA �0 Ev" ��°caNiop�Fa1 0 y •r O p�jti av pyo.^Ec°c :Z, b4 to w'ao:�00C° ° -.aoo auic > cc Ny u = z c-- c o �.>,or� >,2° 0 cN 0s c E"� 3°° x a� U° o y ti a�,uh0 o:cc3�°c s" °'._ 5 >w co �c c u om co o f ox o u °' � L E 0 u.o�' a� n pn L m v_ � o o �_� �_ c.�...fn •L7 `j w �..... O, y y OL) 3 C 'J ,O V C c C G V c L° c° cCa a> �" cd .� y L M y• R •a ;., H H C c`� 0 >O 00 O .cam•, O 6I ._ y y U cd �n O U �. p U or �._ E.ca N.., c ca E-0 c c y c °ons a� E = L a> o � �_ cd y u a 5 �_ y c E av v� >,-- 0.0 0 0 � � �'� 2, > c ° c•a� o� E E�z°'a:? �'� ° � > o - ° � ° � cy`°•y � ° aci•� ° � ` •cc 4) 6. .> c =yo °c>,._, a y.fl w0 ° c n 0 a O O cd c c CE. a cd E U 7> U U U Tc h> U V U 4 U 'fl dQ.� ��+� �.�.:'w O y� ~' E ON� p C'O >�� ,D .aL v p� cVC o.•vi >, �y V �•t TE 0 O 4% ev _ o oo•-, L o -- �C IC Vi c ttS 6 (n V r i •v '� w `.i, °. v, 0 s,ccU��E�c co�,>,tU o�ycycccnO°a'T `NE E c. �-c�a - oEc ca LY �n .G is '� '" a� x •� a� •o o O U p• o c _ o u a>�s yric°w coda oq° toocaca`°o v po yccucya v o ao o v 003 yx�e00 o �° �.� y c c �, ys m� o c E o x h o c:. c. c c ao a> c v 4 0= y o C ¢ -0 c Cts co E U •— > C' `c c }- � c y oo« m ._ a —L c ca coc a0n - 3e c� _ 0c E 3 0 cob a�. a� t•6' c a� o °L2> o �v �.E� u c c `° >'�'- aci ccE� `'� EU ao `°U o c �`° ai `' 1° ;? y c c v �• u c o v E U s .8.o v E x O h _ c H h L 0q D y h cC ec t o _ 4 L C V a v > LO �, 3 O C `... C O C �' 00 " aro c ° L 4.' O �•� cco :v ° w0 .� .x 'A L • 7 .D 3 •C `° @ " o " V U > c t^ �Lc� 0 c �, 000 c. L'E c �+ �o v yw. U v c c �' v o onv `° is a'i ` ��o+ ao� a V�sp c �_ h :.+ •Z7 h C >> N O V C CJ .L.+ .y+ N �... ° Uo4�0sca��3�aconXZ2=>�GLo�°- yo:'x cccuc xvU'a� �''�v _ mooaxiova o �Uoa: Eoow uvo�_ ccu•o.. 5 aci ea i x �_ c c^ Cl ov o > •v o `c c E E c�' E- �o ° a n� acv u c a� o uU uU3u vm00Z0 cL o•vc Eu.'`°-�n =y°' cEi'_'E� =0 3 u `5 ° u > os �U: o �' ? co`as� = �aao `�°'? ao3 0� v 0 ooL o c cc co v 0D `" r�+v L ° y° c °' �3 0 �•4c�von co �Lro ° w a�ho 0u ed� s� EoU vaso .oc h �o Y'- ao � •• = L c7 .y � - c •n o o � u >, c �- u — v 4� � � .. w ;; oL c Co a� •� �. >, � E • v •� ao �aoa���u�>n cco>y` cynicaero' AL3 a ° ° v fl a o o >,° a> U N : U¢ ►v ...,�, o = c^>;0co3Lb -to.. E.2 c v c E �+oDZ ° E ys c a-tu 5 o'2 � � � � � 3 v"u c•c o m o N3 ° U E E-.� >, �.oE� W 4> �' C'j �c ccaoo`4°h >�03 x s o nc i v �x� 0 > c0 y c '� v ,Z' •�.� Ivo `= c a.E v ys m y v > a� ao m_ >:N.0 a� _%p c •.c o y E CIO -0 U ��w-0- �.a� c .� �' °•E `E 0 v c o•S a E a� ° m u u °x'o >,� °'o �� `0 0 0o.r n ° o u O �, .,�; V > o R� aS cs cc >? " o °��ecLy`° cEEccucyU` o�c-y� a' 4) ,�' �EUcac'�,v��o3��LU EO "" R n.,D H N .3 RL Q U '9 E %i ►.� E •t7 •L7 U .0 y U ._ 0-- �_ •`' 03 � Q. o� O m " +.a c co m-14�4 $'>`0. 3 03 E f CITY OF November 25, 1987 PLYMOUTR Mr. Mark Andrew, Chair Hennepin County Board of Commissioners 2400 Government Center Minnepolis, MN 55487 Dear Commissioner Andrew: Thanks a million! County Road 9 from County Road 18 to I-494 is now opened. The new roadway is a tremendous new transportation asset to our community as well as the County. The roadway is already receiving rave comments from many citizens who have long looked forward to its completion. So often in local government thanks are not expressed when due. In this case, we cannot let this opportunity pass to express our very sincere appreciation on behalf of the residents of Plymouth for the completion of this new roadway. It is appreciated. Thanks to you and the many fine County employees who made it possible. Yours truly, aCmes G. Willis ty Manager OW:kec cc: Mayor and City Council 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447, TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800 SUBJECT: CONTEST TO CREATE AN ADVERTISEMENT FOR PLYMOUTH RECYCLING PROGRAM Dear Jerry: As we discussed, the City of Plymouth is interested in tapping the talents of Wayzata High School art students. The City will award $100 to the student submitting an advertisement which city staff and officials select to run in local newspapers. I have enclosed the contest guidelines as well as a brochure which pictures the City's new recycling containers. If you have any questions, call me at 559-2800. 1 am looking forward to reviewing the creative entries your students are sure to submit. Sincerely, Helen LaFave Communications Coordinator enclosure CC: Frank Boyles, Assistant City Manager Dick Pouliot, Recycling Coordinator 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447, TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800 r�+r - AY� CITY O� November 24, Jerry Trushunski PUMOUTR Art Department Wayzata High School 305 Vicksburg Lane Plymouth, MN 55447 SUBJECT: CONTEST TO CREATE AN ADVERTISEMENT FOR PLYMOUTH RECYCLING PROGRAM Dear Jerry: As we discussed, the City of Plymouth is interested in tapping the talents of Wayzata High School art students. The City will award $100 to the student submitting an advertisement which city staff and officials select to run in local newspapers. I have enclosed the contest guidelines as well as a brochure which pictures the City's new recycling containers. If you have any questions, call me at 559-2800. 1 am looking forward to reviewing the creative entries your students are sure to submit. Sincerely, Helen LaFave Communications Coordinator enclosure CC: Frank Boyles, Assistant City Manager Dick Pouliot, Recycling Coordinator 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447, TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800 CONTEST TO DEVELOP AN ADVERTISEMENT TO PROMOTE PLYMOUTH'S CURBSIDE RECYCLING PROGRAM PURPOSE: Beginning in February, the City of Plymouth will make changes in its curbside recycling program to make recycling more convenient for Plymouth residents. By making recycling more convenient, we hope to increase recycling participation_ The City would like students to design advertisements to publicize these changes in local newspapers. Entries may publicize: 1) the curbside recycling program in general; or 2) the weekly cash drawing; or 3) combine information on both ENTRIES All entries become the property of the City of Plymouth. Students may submit as many entries as they want. ENTRIES REQUIREMENTS Entries must be: - done in black ink on white paper - proportioned so that it may be reduced to 6 3/16 inches wide by five inches deep. DEADLINE All entries must be received by Helen LaFave at the City of Plymouth, 3400 Plymouth Blvd., no later than Friday, December 18. AWARD The student submitting the winning entry will win $100. In addition, she or he will see their work printed in local newspapers. BACKGROUND INFORMATION A_ Plymouth Curbside Recycling - Newspaper, cardboard, glass and metal/aluminum may be recycled - Recycling collections are every Thursday for all areas served by the recycling program - Plastic blue recycling containers make storing recyclable materials convenient for homeowners between weekly collection days - For information on recycling call 559-2800 B_ Weekly $100 Cash Drawing - To be eligible, residents must have their recyclables at the curb by 8 a.m. on Thursday. - How the drawing works: 1) an address is drawn each week and kept confidential; 2) on Thursday a city staff person will check the address to see if recyclables are at the curb; 3) if they are, the household wins $100; 4) if not, the money is added to the next week's prize. SUGGESTIONS 1_ A major component of the recycling program is the blue recycling box. The artist may want to develop a "treasure chest theme" based on the blue box and saving valuable natural resources through recycling_ 2. Weekly citywide Thursday collections make recycling in Plymouth easy to remember. The artist may want to emphasize this aspect of recycling in Plymouth. 3_ The artist may want to emphasize that the "That's Not Trash, It's Cash" drawing makes recycling in Plymouth fun --and profitable. 4. All entries must be accompanied by the submitter's name and telephone number. QUESTIONS: Call Helen LaFave at 559-2800_ November 25, 1957 moi-, Ms. Marcy Shapiro P�%I�`fV^� �•-` Executive Director ! t West Hennepin Human Services Planning Board 4100 Vernon Avenue So. St. Louis Park, MN 55416 SUBJECT: 1988 FUNDING FROM THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH Dear Ms. Shapiro: The Plymouth City Council has finalized the level of funding to be authorized to social service agencies for calendar year 1988. The 1988 funding for your organization is $3,162. The City Council recognizes that the funding amounts may not be identical to that which was initially requested. Their purpose was to balance Citv support for agencies providing a broad range of services for the benefit of all community residents, young and old, of various social and economic means. The Council has asked to receive quarterly reports from each human service agency identifying specifically the number of Plymouth residents and business persons receiving assistance from your program as well as the type of assistance received. Your quarterly reports should be forwarded to my attention. To obtain your funds, an invoice should be directed to Jan Wendland in the Plymouth City Finance office, 3400 Plymouth Blvd., Plymouth, MN 55447. If you have any questions about the funding or reporting requirements, please give me a call. Sincerel Frank Boyles Assistant City Manager FB:Jm cc: Mayor & City Council James G. Willis, City Manager Dale Hahn, Finance Director 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447, TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800 x u-. C N ` ; Q qj v.• N v, 8 CC N G G � N r ?s�Y; _ Zug t. �Y CITY OF November 17, 1987 PLYMOUTR Mr. dames Fischer 4825 Oakview Lane North Plymouth, MN 55442 SUBJECT: TAX FORFEIT PROPERTY Dear Mr. Fischer: Hennepin County has advised the City of a parcel in your area which has gone into tax forfeiture for nonpayment of property taxes and special assessments. The parcel is approximately 16-1/2 feet wide by 1,300 feet long, running immediately behind your property and dividing the Evonne's Lakeview Addition from Creekwood Hills. The City would like to divide the parcel in half longitudely with the exception of road right-of-way areas and to add the portion immediately adjacent to your parcel to your lot. Attached is a sketch showing how this could occur. This action could be accomplished at little cost to you, i.e., $1.00 with Hennepin County completing the necessary recordkeeping and consolidation. The impact to you from a property tax perspective would be negligible. To determine your perspective on this issue, I am attaching an opinion sheet for you to fill out and return to me indicating whether or not you would be interested in pursuing this proposal. If you have any questions relating to property valuation and taxation, please feel free to contact our Assessing Division at 559-2800. Other questions may be directed to me at the same phone. Please return your completed opinion card no later than Friday, December 4. Sincerely, Dick Pouliot Project Coordinator DP:kec cc: Assessing Mayor and City Council 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447, TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800 TAX FORFEIT PARCEL OPINION SHEET FROM: Mr. James Fischer 4825 Oakview Lane North Plymouth, MN 55442 TO: Dick Pouliot City of Plymouth Check One I am interested in having the portion of parcel identifica- tion number 11-118-22-32-0082 adjacent to my property I am not made part of my lot at a cost not to exceed $1.00. I recognize that if I am not interested, owners of other parcels adjoining the property will be asked if they desire to incorporate it as part of their lot. Signed r _ .. i CA` � CT �_ �:I - r•� ., i•+^ •, ., .I '-�1 � ,. I„ "V..yJ• Vr 1 55 Y e"� L r rte, •�. }' •1 `n .-. I v n - w rn16 •-� � `� .; 71. I: i3. `-0' I;/) S' � 81. S3' �� � � oti, / •eL`�S'. cf , 1 �. (�j OAKV �� `- � r 1 n 149.5 �.1S.ot•oIs �A. 0 I�.l � N• o R'1S V 18 90' pll� A. 18• R.� �. o )AK V I E w . b 50, 9t. _ I'�a °. �• 154. 83' N _ 120 7U. 83 107.9 g ,o rn� - _. 6p a> Lo C> CIDCn - w C' t 36.5 �" r., 84. 6S'�' oo' 1S\ w-< J `� . N - _ -<65.06' 74.94' -� rn Cb CID CD 109_99140 150, 120.0491_ 52• 16[.5 coti Z - tS4•nl 136. 5' T .i . 106 m Z o �,-_`I -k6_ oy W E 'I $ • 11.38 `" `f „ 130' So �' v �S_o $ 136.5 ' o o �� 4 b NORWOOD t� r0 .I Cn LA. N. Ln n K. 9� a ip ...� `n W A [ .� q\ �� JJ, I O C} 130' 9 36, r\-)' ', 4 O v� °° i�w o99�y"�_ v �-1 146 3 _ 4 N -• d6 / ((I cn tp _ 140' - Q V V 16 a, 150 - - oo `'08 6 "v' vc.i - .l (� 7 66 fib' e w w v, , �. 125.85 \ qq c 48.44 A 3>• ice' w m 0 r\j Cn._ ~ / 0 6\�53 �� 46. 68' m caw A 67s- 137. 2' c 7 (� �� +. 3 6� j CD ' \� ;K a f..� pow � .: q of „ 1 �\ CID ILA \8 140. 54 91 , 58. Sj v rn ��ti♦ q� 103.13 a'" c„ ot- 4 ^. `o NOL (A p I; r{ _ ✓go LA Lo d / - \' p• vrn 109.99 s.. a q � y 1 y ��. (J, v U4 CP r - W syyn "W ,OwO .v �f ,'v 1. N 1104 � O 00J _ W D V N V N .,..� .-•. v tn 19 C) to CID 140 Sc 50 • 110 140-3 50' 120' 1 60. 50' ►+0'09' SS'r 3.180 - 38 2. 32 • / - --- _ �o 155.06 5 195.03 so- 03. 1 0 80. 81 9 13x.02' 70.37. 225.25 1 14o. 1 1 So' SU -TA�)< FoPFE �T- LA &�D '1i MZZ- 3 Z- 00 8 2 Pc c P. I. D. -- NAME ADD KESS �%�N, sTgTc, ztP 6-ZZ' 32' 001 J -3-ames Fischer 825 Oakjiew La. t�. Plymo�jh, MK ss 442 COZ-9 Lee R0.inev _kol k n n ylk am 12530 484-1 Ave tJ I o Ave- KJ " 003 at s� 250 o-�S 1\ je S Mss ' MN 6032 Fra of �1 12-500 48{-1) � N fly 55,44 41 M� D03 Crag 1Z4O 46 -Vh N " 34 De-nnis Williams124 20 48 A M 0038 r d er k r ue.r 4825 MQ -Q poli C, 0039 nold 4B Zo McA. ncAI CIL Lc, Nla `r DOS P-18 l Uo N ► ` 059 i s ck o 4-8-15 6 N ' 0W Bruce. Kxik.K6sun 4BGSAJorWood Lx,, N ` 0 (o I Zane J-0 46-10 IBJ o r d K) " 00(0 O D 2)ru.cP- '�)ar -' 0 48-I5-MCILSno is LC.- N 48 8 o M ar. n olio. W-11 1 3 2-S 401 A-1, N ` 00-7 Randall Say -�- ve, N __ 0-7 Sohn d 4635 Da.`cv►ew Lc, M December 1, 1987 Matt Lichty 14525 - 7th Avenue North Plymouth, MN Dear Matt: r CITY OF PUMOUTR Congratulations on becoming an Eagle Scout. As you know, this is the highest honor in Scouting. Accept this honor with pride. It will be with you the rest of your life. I am sure you feel "this is the end." Quite the contrary. This accomplishment marks the beginning. By becoming an Eagle Scout, you have proven you are dependable, trustworthy and are an achiever. While these qualities are the mark of an Eagle Scout, they are also what it takes to become a leader in your school, church, community and nation. Accept the challenge to lead. It is your responsibility and duty. My son became an Eagle Scout on November 15, 1987. Consequently, I am familiar with the commitment you, your parents and Scout Master made to achieve this. Accept my personal congratulations and the City of Plymouth's congratulations to you. Congratulations! Sincerely, Vi gil Schneider Mayor VS:kec 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447, TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800 December 1, 1987 Jeff Teschendorf 515 Ranchview Lane North Plymouth, MN Dear teff: N CITY O� PLYMOUTR Congratulations on becoming an Eagle Scout. As you know, this is the highest honor in Scouting. Accept this honor with pride. It will be with you the rest of your life. I am sure you feel "this is the end." Quite the contrary. This accomplishment marks the beginning. By becoming an Eagle Scout, you have proven you are dependable, trustworthy and are an achiever. While these qualities are the mark of an Eagle Scout, they are also what it takes to become a leader in your school, church, community and. nation. Accept the challenge to lead. It is your responsibility and duty. My son became an Eagle Scout on November 15, 1987. Consequently, I am familiar with the commitment you, your parents and Scout Master made to achieve this. Accept my personal congratulations and the City of Plymouth's congratulations to you. Congratulations! Sincerely, Vi gil Schneider Mayor VS:kec 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447, TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800 E . � Y November 25, 1987 CITY OF Dr. Carroll Vomhof PUMOu i �t District 281 Community Education 4139 Regent Avenue N Robbinsdale, M 55422 Dear Carroll: It has now been seven days since I contacted your secretary and left a message that I would appreciate it if you could call me at your convenience to discuss a matter of mutual concern. Having not received a call to date, I'm putting my concern down on paper. During the last two weeks, we have run into two unfortunate situations which have caused a considerable amount of inconvenience for our public, and at the same time, damaged the reputation of School District 281 and Plymouth Park and Recreation Department. The first incident took place on Saturday morning, November 10. Due to illness of a District employee who was scheduled to open the building for a program that morning, we discovered that there was no back-up plan for anyone else to open the building in order for the program to continue. I would ask that some type of contingency program be put in place, so that this does not occur again at this location, or any other location where the public is expecting to enjoy a program using District 281 facilities. The second incident took place on Monday, November 16. We were contacted by your department at approximately 1:45 in the afternoon and told that we would not be able to hold a Jazzercise class at Plymouth Junior High that evening. This necessitated us having to contact approximately 100 individuals prior to class commencing that night at 7:00 p.m. It was our understanding that the cooks at Plymouth Junior High failed to follow District policies and secure a permit for the use of the cafeteria on that evening. We are to be given eight days notice when a permit we have in hand has been cancelled, so that we can make the appropriate arrangements with our clientele. I would ask that once again, all of 281 District employees be informed it is their responsibility to secure permits for facilities, so that these embarrassing situations do not continue to occur. I look forward to hearing your reply to my concerns in the near future. Sincerely, Eric J. Blank, Director Parks and Recreation EJB/np cc: James G. Willis Donna Jean Carter Pat Hoyt Neils 3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD. PLYMOUTH. MINNESOTA 55447. TELEPHONE (612) 559-2800 4- 4-j Sz, 4-j NOTE TO MAYOR & COUNCIL: City Council Agenda Item - 6-H., Revisions to Engineering Guidelines, Street Standards, and the December 7 Council/staff dinner meeting agenda will be delivered on Friday, December 4.