HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Resolution 1991-156CITY or PLYMOUTH
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the
City Council of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, was held on the 18th day of
March, 1991. The following members were present: _Mayor Bergman.
Coun:jjMgMa=" Helliwell, Ricker, Vasiliou, and Z+tur
The following members were absent: None
Couneilmember Zitur, introduced the following Resolution and
moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION 91-156
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ABATEMENT OF VIOLATION OF CITY CODE SECTION 2010.01 AT
11605 28TH AVENUE NORTH.
WHEREAS, the City passed on Ordinance under Section 2010.01, Nuisances, which
states that permitting, suffering, or maintaining any fence, wall, plantings,
landscape materials, or any other item within 20 feet of any street right-of-
way corner which interferes with or obstructs traffic visibility, would
constitute an intersection sight obstruction; and,
WHEREAS, the property at 11605 28th Avenue North is owned by a Gregory and
Karen Cole, has a hedge that borders the property and extends into the public
right-of-way and is in violation of City Code Section 2010.01; and,
WHEREAS, The Cole's have been notified by certified mail that his hedge along
Evergreen Lane and 28th Avenue North causes an intersection sight obstruction
and is violation of City Code; and,
WHEREAS, the City permitted the Cole's at least 30 days to bring the violation
into compliance with the City Code; and,
WHEREAS, after at least 30 days a reinspection of the property was conducted
and found that the violation had not been corrected.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does authorise the City to
abate the nuisance at a coat of approximately $ 275.00 for labor as estimated
by City Forester to remove the sight obstruction violation at 11605 28th
Avenue North;
FURTHER, that the property owners will be personally liable for costs and
administrative fees to remove that violation, per City Code Section 2010.01.
The motion for adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded
by Conn sili ou , and upon vote being taken thereon,
the following voted in favor thereof: _ ayor BerSmp, Council—hers
Helliwell, Ricker, Van iliou, and Zitur
The following voted against or abstained None
Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
(res/cc/cole:lr)