Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Resolution 1990-711CITY Or PLYMDU= Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, was held on the 5t21 day of November, 1990- The following members were present: �Mayor Bergman^ Co ncilmembers Helliwell, Ricker, Vaailiou, and Zitur The following members were absent: None Councilmember Zitur introduced the following Resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION 90-711 SETTING CONDITIONS TO BE MET PRIOR TO FILING OF AND RELATED TO LOT DIVISION/CONSOLIDATION, APPROVING SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE VARIANCES FOR TERRY AND KATHLEEN LEDELL (90094) WHEREAS, the City Council has approved a lot division/consolidation for Terry and Kathleen LeDell for property located at the northeast corner of Sunset Trail and Pineview Lane; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does direct the following conditions to be met prior to recording of, and related to said lot division/consolidation: 1. Compliance with the City Engineer's Memorandum. 2. Compliance with Policy Resolution 79-80 regarding minimum floor elevations for new structures on sites adjacent to, or containing open storm water drainage facilities. 3. Payment of park dedication feta -in -lieu of dedication prior to issuance of building permit in accordance with City Policy in effect at that time. 4. No building permit is to be issued until the lot division/consolidation is filed with Hennepin County. 5. Submittal of all necessary utility easements prior to filing the lot division/consolidation with Hennepin County. 6. Approved variances are: a. Lot width of 101.38 feet at the front setback line for Parcel D versus the Ordinance standard of 110 feet. (see next page) Resolution No. 90-711 File 90094 Page Two c. Lot width of 92.17 feet at the front setback line for Parcel B versus the Ordinance standard of 110 feet Approval is based on compliance with the variance criteria of the Subdivision Ordinance. No other variances are granted or implied for any of the parcels. The motion for adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by Mayor Berclma_n , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: _Mayor Berq"n. Gounci l_memhArs Halliwell A Ricker, Vaail+oj And Z+ t ur The following voted against or abstained None Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.