HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Resolution 1990-071CITY OF PLYMOUTH
. Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of
the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, was held on the 5t -h— day of February , 19
The following members were present: Helliwell, Zitur, asiliou, Ric erTc Bergman
fiWe Tolllowing members were eb`sent: one
Councilmember Rickerintroduced the following Resolution and moved its
adoption:
�
RESOLUTION NO. 90-71
IMPOSING PENALTY FOR LIQUOR LAW VIOLATION
AGAINST BASS LAKE INC.
WHEREAS, the Plymouth City Code provides that any liquor license issued by the City may
be denied, suspended, or revoked by the Council for any violation pertaining to the
activity of the license held, and
WHEREAS, Plymouth City Code Section 1005.23 provides that no license may be suspended
or revoked until after a hearing is held; and
WHEREAS, a liquor law violation relating to sale of liquor to a minor occurred at Bass
Lake, Inc., 11540 County Road 10, on July 21, 1989, and
WHEREAS, this liquor law violation is the first offense at this location, and
WHEREAS, a hearing was held on January 22, 1990, and continued to February 5, 1990, to
determine whether the license should be suspended or revoked.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA,
that a $500 penalty is hereby imposed against Bass Lake Inc. The penalty is stayed on
the following conditions:
1. That the licensee have no liquor law violations during the next 12 months, and
2. That a check in the amount of $500 payable to the City of Plymouth be received
by the City Clerk within 30 days of the passage of this resolution and
deposited in City of Plymouth Account 205-000-503.00-093-000 to be used for
drug education purposes, and
3. That Bass Lake Inc., immediately initiate a written, aggressive identifiction
carding program shared with its clerks including disciplinary action for clerk
failure to card customers. The written program is to be submitted to the City
Clerk within 30 days of passage of this resolution for City Council review.
The motion for adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by
Councilmember Vasiliou , and upon vote being taken thereon, she
following -voted in favor t_hereoF Helliwell, Zitur, Vasiliou, Ricker, Bergman
. The -following voted against orabstained: one `
Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passed d an adopted.