HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Packet 07-02-1990Iz CITY OF PLYMOUTH
AGENDA
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING
JULY 2, 1990
CONSENT AGENDA
All items listed with an asterisk (*) are considered to be routine by
the city council and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no
separate discussion of these items unless a Councilmember or citizen
so requests, in which event the item will be removed from the consent
agenda and considered in normal sequence on the agenda.
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. INVOCATION
3. ROLL CALL
4. PRESENTATION
7:00 P.M.
A. It's Not Trash, It's Cash Recycling
Winner - Joseph Wittig
5. CONSENT AGENDA
6. MINUTES - Approval of Minutes of the Regular
Council meeting of June 18 and 22, 1990
7. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Vacation of Drainage Easement on Lot 9,
Block 1, Zachary Hills Addition
B. Public Improvement Hearing for County
Road 101/County Road 9 Watermain,
Project 012
8. PETITIONS, REQUESTS AND COMMUNICATIONS
A. Prudential/Northwest Business Campus.
PUD Concept Plan located at the
northeast corner of Highway 55 and I-494
89102)
B. Mutual Investment Properties. Site Plan
and Conditional Use Permit amendment for
Minn -Well Supply Co.
C. The Robert Larsen Partners. Preliminary
Plat and Variance for the Plaza 55
Shopping Center for property located at
11309 Highway 55 (90024)
D. Dennis Gonyea. Lot Division/Lot
Consolidation for Meyer/Gonyea Addition
located south of 45th Avenue, west of
Highway 169 and north of County Road 9
90032)
E. Van Eeckhout Builders. Lot Division for
property located in the Carlson Center
6th Addition, Lot 7, Block 1 (90033)
F. Hans Hagen Homes & Westar/Rome Builders.
Conditional Use Permit to undertake Land
Reclamation in the FRD District located
at the southwest quadrant of Medina Road
and County Road 24 (90036)
G. Inspirations, Inc. Conditional Use
Permit to amend the PUD in Burl Oaks for
a front yard setback for house addition
for Rodney Georgens located at 16890 5th
Avenue North (90044)
H. Goff Homes. Site Plan Amendment and
Variance for "Fernbrook Manor" located
east of Fernbrook Lane at 44th Place
North (90045)
I. Release of Site Improvement Performance
Guarantee for Coachman Trails (85022)
J. Ordinances Amending the Zoning
Ordinance:
1. Residential Facilities
2. Shoreland Private Recreation
Facilities
3. Private Streets
K. Development Contract Bond Reductions:
1. Quail Ridge of Plymouth 4th
Addition (87134)
2. Westwood Ridge 2nd Addition
85108)
L. Approve Plans and Specifications and
Advertise for Bids, Rockford Road Plaza
Improvements, Project 948
M. Receive Preliminary Engineering Report,
Storm Water Drainage Pond BC -P1, Project
016
N. Award of Contracts:
1. Well No. 13, Project 013
2. 25th Avenue Watermain, Project 908
3. Swan Lake Neighborhood Park
0. Resolution Requesting the Hennepin
County Surveyor to check Certificates of
Correction on Plats
P. Accept Work and Approve Payment No. 3
and Final for County Road 6/Fernbrook
Lane Traffic Signal, Project 250
Q. Authorize Contract with BRW Architects
for Design of Public Works Facility
R. Approval of Change Order No. 1 and 2 for
Fire Station No. 1, Project 825
9. REPORTS OF OFFICERS, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
10. ADJOURNMENT
MINUTES
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING
June 18, 1990
The regular meeting of the Plymouth City
Council was called to order by Mayor Bergman
at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the
City Center at 3400 Plymouth Boulevard on
June 18, 1990.
PRESENT: Mayor Bergman, Councilmembers
Helliwell, Ricker, Vasiliou, Zitur
ABSENT: None
STAFF PRESENT: City Manager Willis,
Assistant Manager Boyles, Community
Development Director Tremere, City Engineer
Faulkner, Park Director Blank, City Attorney
Thomson, and City Clerk Rauenhorst
PRESENTATIONS
Mayor Bergman announced that Music in
Plymouth will be held on Wednesday, June 27.
CONSENT AGENDA
MOTION was made by Councilmember Vasiliou, Consent Agenda
seconded by Councilmember Zitur, to adopt the Item 4
Consent Agenda as presented.
Motion carried on a roll call vote, five
ayes.
MINUTES
MOTION was made by Councilmember Vasiliou, Minutes
seconded by Councilmember Zitur, to approve Item *5
the minutes of June 4, 1990.
Motion carried on a roll call vote, five
ayes.
PETITIONS, REQUESTS, AND COMMUNICATIONS
Community Development Director Tremere stated Site Plan for Len
that following Council direction, staff has Busch Roses
met with Mr. Busch, the neighborhood Item 6-A
representatives, and developers with an
interest in the area on two occasions to
discuss the application of Len Busch Roses
for Site Plan Approval for construction of
greenhouses north of Medina Road and west of
Regular Council Meeting
June 18, 1990
Page 2
County Road 101 (90038). Mr. Busch proposed
the construction of additional greenhouses,
initially two and then four more on the west
side of the facility which includes a number
of existing greenhouses and his distribution
building.
The parties discussed the nature of Mr.
Busch's operation and the lighting problem
perceived by residents. Developer concerns
were expressed regarding the impact on future
residents and the means by which future
buyers would be notified of the problem.
Specific discussion was held with Mr. Busch
on the need for an approved landscape plan
and on waiving his right to an assessment
hearing.
Director Tremere presented a proposed
resolution approving the site plan for Len
Busch Roses. He noted the addition of
Condition No. 12: "Effective screening and/or
lighting schedules shall be implemented with
the new greenhouses so that no light produces
glare beyond the boundaries of the property."
City Attorney Thomson stated the issue before
the Council is whether to approve the site
plan submitted by the applicant. He asked
whether the application was for two or six
additional greenhouses.
Attorney Thomson stated that under the Zoning
Ordinance, the two additional greenhouses
would be permitted uses in the FRD District.
He explained that not all of the existing
facilities required site plan approval,
building permits, or lighting approvals from
the City when constructed. He stated the
City's authority related to the existing
greenhouses is different than the authority
related to the present Site Plan application.
He stated that the light from the existing
greenhouses could be considered under the
City Code Nuisance Ordinance. He stated that
Section 8, Subd. G, of the Zoning Ordinance
which applies to existing uses deals with
nonresidential performance standards, one of
which is glare. It is his opinion that
Section 8 does not apply to the existing
greenhouses because they are in an FRD
District, which is a residential district.
Regular Council Meeting
June 18, 1990
Page 3
Attorney Thomson said that an individual may
also attempt to seek remedy for the lighting
situation through a private action for an
Environmental Rights Act violation.
Attorney Thomson stated the Council can
impose reasonable conditions to mitigate the
external impacts of the proposed use on the
site. Various conditions have been
recommended by staff, the Amber Woods
residents, and developers.
Councilmember Ricker asked how the lighting
situation of the greenhouses would differ
from lighting from a school or park playfield
area.
Attorney Thomson stated it must be found to
be a public nuisance. This could be
determined by a number of factors including
degree of light; however, a nuisance is
difficult to define. If the Council received
complaints and pursued them under the
Nuisance Ordinance, a hearing would be held.
Councilmember Vasiliou expressed her concern
that once the use is in, it is very difficult
to later regulate. All concerns and
conditions relating to lighting should be
specifically addressed prior to Site Plan
approval. She believes the existing lighting
situation should be announced by signage for
the new developments and residents in the
area.
Councilmember Vasiliou stated it is
inconsistent to enforce strict requirements
against developers and not do the same in
this case, particularly relating to lighting
and landscaping.
Peter Pflaum, Lundgren Brothers, Wayzata,
stated the Len Busch Roses lighting situation
will negatively impact the developers'
ability to sell homes in the area.
Developers will have to disclose the
situation to potential home buyers. Mr.
Pflaum suggested that the City require
existing home owners in the area to disclose
the lighting situation when they sell their
homes as well. He stated the lighting
situation will become worse if the Site Plan
is approved for two additional greenhouses.
Regular Council Meeting
June 18, 1990
Page 4
Mr. Pflaum gave comparative examples to prove
the intensity of the light. He stated that a
lighting expert indicated the new greenhouses
will increase the existing lighting by 67%.
Mr. Pflaum stated developers are not allowed
to do anything on a site that negatively
impacts adjacent properties, and Mr. Busch
should not be not be allowed to either.
Mr. Pflaum stated that Mr. Busch has been
cooperative; his business is a large,
commercial operation driven by profit motive,
just as developers are in business. He
requested the following requirements if the
Site Plan is approved: the light from the new
greenhouses should be completely shielded,
the light from the existing greenhouses
should be shielded, berms and landscaping
should be installed to block the horizontal
glare, and the City should adopt an ordinance
which defines nuisance glare and establish
criteria for what level is unacceptable. He
suggested that a time table be established to
allow Mr. Busch to experiment with different
types of lighting screens, and recommended
that all screening be installed by September
1, 1991.
Councilmember Zitur asked if Lundgren
Brothers was aware of the lighting situation
when they purchased the property for
development. He has not received complaints
previously regarding the lighting.
Mr. Pflaum stated they were generally aware
of the lighting, but were not aware of the
intensity of the lighting or that the
neighbors considered it a nuisance.
Councilmember Vasiliou noted she had lived in
the area and that the greatest intensity is
in the immediate vicinity of the greenhouses.
She agreed with Councilmember Zitur that
complaints have not been received prior to
this Site Plan application. She suggested
that the disclosure requirement may be one of
the reasons that residents are now concerned.
Russ Waters, 18600 34th Avenue North,
President of the Amber Woods Homeowner's
Association, stated that following the
meeting with Mr. Busch, the Association
drafted their June 14 letter which
recommends the following conditions for Site
Plan approval:
Regular Council Meeting
June 18, 1990
Page 5
1. Mr. Busch will install mechanical light
screens to contain the light in the two
greenhouses to be built this year.
2. Mr. Busch will present to the council a
plan to install similar light containing
devices in the existing greenhouses. The
goal of this plan will be to have light
containing devices in place on all existing
greenhouses within 1-2 years. This plan must
be in effect and action started upon before
construction begins on the remaining four
greenhouses.
3. Mr. Busch will not turn the existing
lights on before 11:00 p.m. on any night
regardless of sky conditions. The only
exception to this will be during the period
from Christmas to about January 20.
4. Amber Woods, city staff, and developers
will meet with Mr. Busch this winter on a
typical overcast evening with snow cover, to
evaluate the effectiveness of the installed
system to contain the light. An agreeable
standard will then be determined, after which
Mr. Busch will be expected to comply with in
his existing and planned greenhouses.
Mr. Waters said that Mr. Busch needs time to
properly experiment with the screening
devices. The Association supports Mr. Busch
and trusts him to work with them to resolve
the lighting problem.
Councilmember Vasiliou asked if Mr. Waters'
comments officially represent those of the
Association.
Mr. Waters responded yes.
Bob Held, 18530 34th Avenue North, stated
that many people did not know the greenhouses
are in the limits of the City of Plymouth.
That may be a reason that lighting complaints
were not forwarded to the Council in the
past. He stated the lighting is a nuisance
and the disclosure requirement could
negatively affect existing homeowners as well
as developers. He supported the
recommendation presented by Mr. Waters.
Regular Council Meeting
June 18, 1990
Page 6
Steve Jacobitz, 3520 Urbandale Lane, stated
the recommendation of the Association shows a
spirit of compromise between Mr. Busch and
the area residents. He stated that all
parties are willing to link the Site Plan
approval for the new greenhouses to the
lighting problem with the existing
greenhouses. Mr. Jacobitz stated it is not
fair to allow expansion of the greenhouse
operation without addressing the lighting
concerns.
Curt Tvinneheim, 3420 Urbandale Lane North,
stated the light problem is serious. Mr.
Busch is a good neighbor and is willing to
compromise by accepting the recommendation of
the Amber Woods Association.
Mary Leuer, 17435 Medina Road, immediately
east of the greenhouses, stated she does not
consider the lighting objectionable or a
nuisance, but rather a protection.
Bill Pritchard, Orrin Thompson Homes, stated
he concurs with the recommendation of
Lundgren Brothers. He stated the lighting
problem is severe, and he supports the
screening concept.
Len Busch stated he is now aware there are a
number of residents who object to the
lighting used at the greenhouse. He was not
previously aware that the lighting was a
significant problem. He has anticipated some
objection as the area develops.
Mr. Busch suggested that he would screen the
two new greenhouses this summer and
experiment on materials through the winter.
He showed screening materials and estimated
it would take three years to screen all
greenhouses on the site. He stated the
required landscaping berm will not resolve
the light problem and he objected to the
landscaping requirement for the entire length
of the site.
Councilmember Vasiliou expressed concern
about the wattage comparisons cited by Peter
Pflaum, Lundgren Brothers. She stated
developers are given little tolerance to
comply with the City's requirements, and in
this situation a period of two to three years
is excessive. Once a remedy is found to the
Regular Council Meeting
June 18, 1990
Page 7
lighting problem, all greenhouses should be
screened in a timely manner.
Mr. Busch explained time was needed to
evaluate new screening systems.
Councilmember Ricker suggested that a
condition be added which would prohibit
construction of future greenhouses until a
plan for abatement of the light emitted from
the existing buildings is reviewed and
approved by the City Council.
Councilmember Vasiliou stated Mr. Busch may
decide not to build further greenhouses and
the lighting problem could continue.
Councilmember Zitur agreed that the timeline
for completion of screening should be
specific.
Mayor Bergman stated the city's zoning
ordinance needs to be modified to address
glare in all areas.
Councilmember Helliwell stated there is a
sense of cooperation between Mr. Busch and
the neighbors and the Council should proceed
with their negotiated conditions. The City
could pursue the lighting from the existing
buildings as a nuisance if necessary in the
future.
MOTION was made by Councilmember Ricker,
seconded by Councilmember Helliwell, to adopt
RESOLUTION NO. 90-355 APPROVING SITE PLAN FOR
LEN BUSCH ROSES (90038), with the addition of
Condition No. 13: "The petitioner shall
submit by September 1, 1990, a detailed
schedule and plan for abatement of the light
emitted from existing buildings by September
1, 1993 so that 'no glare is produced and no
new greenhouses shall be constructed on the
site until such plan has been approved by the
City Council."
Peter Pflaum stated a penalty should be
included in the resolution if the lighting
requirement is not met.
Mr. Jacobitz stated that in the interim
period, Mr. Busch has agreed to refrain from
turning the lights on until 11:00 p.m. or
midnight.
RESOLUTION
APPROVING SITE
PLAN FOR LEN
BUSCH ROSES
90038)
Item 6-A
Regular Council Meeting
June 18, 1990
Page 8
Councilmember Vasiliou stated it is
unreasonable to delay complete screening of
all greenhouses until 1993.
Discussion ensued regarding comments by the
City Attorney that the Council could restrict
use of lights until a plan was approved.
That is based upon willingness of Mr. Busch
to work under that constraint.
Attorney Bruce Malkerson, representing
Lundgren Brothers, asked for a number of
legal clarifications. Mr. Malkerson suggested
an additional condition that if the glare
from the existing greenhouses has not been
corrected by a certain date, then the two new
greenhouses can no longer be used.
Attorney Thomson stated that Mr. Malkerson's
proposed condition may overstep the City's
Site Plan approval authority. If a condition
of approval is not complied with, the City
could proceed with revocation of the Site
Plan approval. A result of that action may
be that the greenhouses could no longer be
used, but it is not clear at this point
whether that is legally viable. Site plan
related inpacts can be tied to site plan
approvals. However, Mr. Busch's current
operation is a conforming permitted use and
is not, as suggested, a nonconforming use.
Motion carried on a
ayes; Vasiliou nay.
Councilmember Vasiliou
is in deference to
disclosure requirements
homes.
roll call vote, four
indicated her nay vote
concerns about the
for existing and new
Mr. Busch asked if the requirement for
landscaping could be amended since it does
not affect the lighting issue.
Manager Willis stated this is a standard
which the Council considers on each Site
Plan, and is a separate issue from the
lighting. Mr. Busch can wait until the
Medina Road elevation is established to
submit a landscaping plan. Director Tremere
explained that the plan submitted could
propose a combination of improvements,
including berming. It was the consensus that
Item No. 10 should be clarified to reflect
that intent.
Regular Council Meeting
June 18, 1990
Page 9
Councilmember Ricker asked Mr. Busch to keep
the Amber Woods Homeowner's Association
updated on the progress with screening.
MOTION was made by Mayor Bergman, seconded by
Councilmember Ricker, to direct staff to
obtain ordinances used by other cities to
address glare.
Motion carried, five ayes.
MOTION was made by Councilmember Vasiliou,
seconded by Councilmember Zitur, to adopt
RESOLUTION NO. 90-356 APPROVING FINAL, PLAT
AND DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT FOR OPUS CORPORATION
FOR "BASS CREEK BUSINESS PARK" (89061) (MPUD
89-1) .
Motion carried on a roll call vote, five
ayes.
RESOLUTION 90-356
APPROVING FINAL
PLAT FOR BASS
CREEK BUSINESS
PARK (89061)
MPUD 89-1)
Item *6-B
MOTION was made by Councilmember Vasiliou, RESOLUTION 90-357
seconded by Councilmember Zitur, to adopt SETTING
RESOLUTION NO. 90-357 SETTING CONDITIONS TO CONDITIONS TO BE
BE MET PRIOR TO FILING OF AND RELATED TO MET PRIOR TO
FINAL PLAT FOR OPUS CORPORATION FOR "BASS FILING (89061)
CREEK BUSINESS PARK" (89061) (MPUD 89-1). ITEM *6-B
Motion carried on a roll call vote, five
ayes.
MOTION was made by Councilmember Vasiliou, RESOLUTION 90-358
seconded by Councilmember Zitur, to adopt ADOPTING
RESOLUTION NO. 90-358 ADOPTING ASSESSMENTS, ASSESSMENTS,
PROJECT NO. 035, SANITARY SEWER AND WATERMAIN PROJECT 035
AREA - BASS CREEK BUSINESS PARK ADDITION. ITEM *6-B
Motion carried on a roll call vote, five
ayes.
Park Director Blank stated the Park and
Recreation Advisory Commission (PRAC) has
been conducting public meetings and working
on development of Master Site Plans for Bass
Lake and Parkers Lake Playfields. He
introduced George Watson, Brauer and
Associates. Mr. Watson presented the
proposed master site plan for Parkers Lake
Playfield.
Mr. Watson stated there is parking for 325
vehicles on the site. The County Road 6
access will be right in - right out only, and
a one-way entrance to the playfield will be
Master Site Plans
for Bass Lake and
Parkers Lake
Playfields
Item 6-C
Regular Council Meeting
June 18, 1990
Page 10
added at the intersection of County Road 6
and Shenandoah. Mr. Watson described the
picnic area on the site of the former
workhouse superintendent's home. He stated
10-12 parking spaces are proposed for this
area.
Councilmember Ricker suggested that the
parking be limited to the least possible in
order to provide for additional picnic
tables.
Mayor Bergman agreed; however, he stated some
parking is necessary for handicapped
accessibility and maintenance vehicles.
In response to a question by Councilmember
Zitur, Mr. Watson stated the only lighting at
the picnic site would be for security
purposes.
Councilmember Ricker stated that PRAC has
recommended that the picnic area be available
only on a reservation basis. He objected to
a reservation policy in a public park. He
feels all use should be on a first-come,
first -serve basis. Councilmembers Ricker and
Zitur noted that the City paid $100,000 for
this site and it should be available to all
to use.
Director Blank stated that 10-15 picnic
tables are planned under the shelter on the
picnic site. He summarized the PRAC
Commissioners' discussion and recommendation.
PRAC recommended that the future group picnic
shelters proposed on the southwest side of
Parkers Lane be deleted from the long-range
plan since the former superintendent site
will serve this purpose. One commissioner
felt it was premature to delete the planned
picnic site.
Following discussion, the Council concurred
that no change should be made to the previous
southwest area plan.
Director Blank explained that currently no
group reservations are allowed for any of our
picnic areas. Staff members receive a large
number of requests for reserved sites.
PRAC Chairperson Freels stated the PRAC
commissioners walked the site and support the
Regular Council Meeting
June 18, 1990
Page 11
proposed plan. He added that the waterfall
should be removed for safety reasons.
In response to questions, Manager Willis
stated the waterfall was part of a rock
garden on the superintendent's site.
Councilmember Vasiliou asked Director Blank
to explain the lighting and scheduling
proposed for the playfield. She strongly
objected to the use of a reservation system
for picnics.
Director Blank stated two of the five fields
are proposed to be lit at this time. The
three unlit fields will be prepared for
lighting in the future if desired. He stated
the playfields are scheduled on a 16 week
season, typically Monday through Thursday
nights. The maximum number of days in a year
a field would be lit is 104.
Councilmember Vasiliou stated the scheduling
seemed reasonable to accommodate the adjacent
residential districts. She stated there is
still the problem of excessive noise after
the lights are turned off.
Councilmember Ricker stated as much of the
roadway to the former superintendent's site
should be deleted as possible to provide for
additional picnic tables.
Councilmembers Helliwell and Zitur stated
that some parking is needed for the
handicapped, elderly, and small children.
Councilmember Ricker asked if the developer
of Mallard Pointe is aware of the lighting
plans.
Mr. Watson stated the plans will be made
available to the developer.
MOTION was made by Councilmember Ricker,
seconded by Mayor Bergman, to adopt
RESOLUTION NO. 90-359 APPROVING MASTER SITE
PLAN #2 FOR PARKERS LAKE PLAYFIELD, PROJECT
NO. 022.
Motion carried on a roll call vote, five
ayes.
RESOLUTION 90-359
APPROVING MASTER
SITE PLAN FOR
PARKERS LAKE
PLAYFIELD,
PROJECT 022
Item 6-C
Regular Council Meeting
June 18, 1990
Page 12
George Watson presented the proposed Site
Plan (No. 6) for Bass Lake Playfield
recommended by PRAC. A main parking is p
roposed for 180 vehicles, with an additional
area for 38 vehicles off of Pineview. Mr.
Watson stated this is a very difficult site
due to the elevation change in the northwest
corner, the drainage issues, and the
vegetation. Mr. Watson stated that 2.6 of
the 23 total acres is proposed to remain as a
passive space.
Councilmember Helliwell stated that Northwest
Boulevard is an important access to the park.
Director Blank agreed and stated that he does
not believe the park could be opened until
the Northwest Boulevard is available. He
estimated that tennis and skating may be
available by 1991; however, full use of the
facility will not be ready until 1992.
Director Blank stated the recommended plan
proposes lighting for the parking lot, tennis
and basketball courts, hockey rink, and one
soccer field. Electrical sizing will be
included in the event lighting is expanded to
additional fields in the future.
PRAC Chairperson Freels stated the plan
attempts to save as much wooded area as
possible.
Mr. Watson stated that Plan 3 is recommended
by staff. This plan provides an additional
soccer field and changes the location for
hockey and general skating.
Director Blank stated Plan 6, recommended by
PRAC, addresses resident requests for a less
formalized soccer area in the park. He asked
who would be allowed to play soccer on the
field and how scheduling would occur. Also,
soccer fields need special soil preparation
or the City will incur high maintenance
costs.
Donald Kutz, 13005 55th Avenue North, stated
it is the consensus of the neighborhood that
Plan 6 is the preferred option. He expressed
concern that the soccer field near his
property will have an elevation difference of
eight feet from his property. The lights
Regular Council Meeting
June 18, 1990
Page 13
from the field will be at eye level with his
property elevation. He requested that
lighting not be included for the field.
Scott Glatstein, 12850 54th Avenue North,
stated he bought his home in January and saw
the sign indicating that a playfield was
proposed for the site. He is very pleased
with a park in this location; however, he
objects to the hockey rink in his rear yard.
He stated boards will stay up year around and
lights will be on for ice flooding at 4:00
a.m. Mr. Glatstein indicated his support for
Plan 6.
Dick Livermore, 12840 54th Avenue North,
stated that the residents of 54th Avenue,
55th Avenue, and Pineview Lane support Plan
6.
Norman Gartner, 12910 56th Avenue North,
spoke on behalf of his neighbor, Mr. Burk
Johnson, 5420 Sycamore Lane, in support of
Plan 6. Mr. Gartner stated the City
conducted a questionnaire in May and Plan 6
addresses the majority of desires indicated
in the survey. Mr. Gartner urged the Council
to consider Plan 6 due to the inclusion of
the open soccer area. He stated this area
would be first-come, first -serve and could be
used for unorganized groups. Mr. Garner said
that Plan 6 is a compromise developed after
input from the public, and he encouraged the
Council to proceed with the project.
Neal Lawson, 12730 54th Avenue North,
supported Plan 6. He stated that traffic to
and from the park should be carefully
considered, and the park should not operate
until Northwest Blvd. is connected from the
north to Schmidt Lake Road. Drainage and
lighting must be carefully considered so as
not to negatively impact the neighbors. Mr.
Lawson asked that resident involvement in the
park planning be allowed to continue through
the development of final plans.
Robert Gomsrud, 5415 Pineview Lane, original
owner of the property, indicated his support
for Plan 6.
Fran Otto, 5475 Rosewood Lane, requested that
the drainage flow not be increased from the
property. He favors Plan 6.
Regular Council Meeting
June 18, 1990
Page 14
MOTION was made by Councilmember Zitur, RESOLUTION 90-360
seconded by Councilmember Vasiliou, to adopt APPROVING MASTER
RESOLUTION NO. 90-360 APPROVING MASTER SITE SITE PLAN FOR
PLAN #6 FOR BASS LAKE PLAYFIELD, PROJECT NO. BASS LAKE
021. PLAYFIELD
Item 6-C
Councilmember Ricker asked staff to respond
to the resident comment regarding lighting at
4:00 a.m.
Park Superintendent Peterson stated that
crews normally start preparing ice at 5:00-
6:00 a.m.; however a minimum of lights are
used and the school rinks are scheduled
first.
Mayor Bergman noted that Plan 3 would provide
one more needed soccer field. Also a great
deal of passive space has already been
retained in the wooded area. He suggested
properly preparing the soil for soccer in the
proposed open passive area in the event that
a formal field may be considered in the
future. He stated that this site was planned
as a playfield and signed as playfield.
Maximum use should be made of the field.
Councilmember Helliwell stated she does not
support Plan 3 because the hockey rink is
closer to the homes than in Plan 6 and noise
could be a problem.
Motion carried on a roll call vote, four
ayes; Bergman nay.
MOTION was made by Councilmember Vasiliou, RESOLUTION 90-361
seconded by Councilmember Zitur, to adopt APPROVING PLANS
RESOLUTION NO. 90-361 APPROVING PLANS AND AND ORDERING
SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR ADVERTISEMENT FOR
BIDS FOR WEST MEDICINE LAKE DRIVE TRAIL CITY BIDS FOR PROJECT
PROJECT NO. 931.
HOYT DEVELOPMENT
NO. 931
89075) Item *6
Item *6-D
Motion carried on a roll call vote, five
ayes.
MOTION was made by Councilmember Vasiliou, RESOLUTION 90-362
seconded by Councilmember Zitur, to adopt SITE PERFORMANCE
RESOLUTION NO. 90-362 AUTHORIZING REDUCTION GUARANTEE
OF SITE PERFORMANCE GUARANTEE FOR HOYT REDUCTION FOR
DEVELOPMENT COMPANY (89075). HOYT DEVELOPMENT
89075) Item *6
Regular Council Meeting
June 18, 1990
Page 15
Motion carried on a
ayes.
roll call vote, five
MOTION was made by Councilmember Vasiliou,
seconded by Councilmember Zitur, to adopt
RESOLUTION NO. 90-363 AUTHORIZING RELEASE OF
SITE PERFORMANCE GUARANTEE FOR REAL ESTATE
DIVERSIFIED, INC., FOR "KINDER CARE LEARNING
CENTER" AT 4475 HIGHWAY 169 (86034).
Motion carried on a roll call vote, five
ayes.
MOTION was made by Councilmember Vasiliou,
seconded by Councilmember Zitur, to adopt
RESOLUTION NO. 90-364 AUTHORIZING RELEASE OF
SITE PERFORMANCE GUARANTEE FOR ALAN MUNLA
88121) .
Motion carried on a roll call vote, five
ayes.
MOTION was made by Councilmember Vasiliou,
seconded by Councilmember Zitur, to adopt
RESOLUTION NO. 90-365 AUTHORIZING RELEASE OF
SITE PERFORMANCE GUARANTEE FOR HOYT
DEVELOPMENT COMPANY (86127).
Motion carried on a roll call vote, five
ayes.
Manager Willis stated the City's Thoroughfare
Guide Plan contemplates the realignment of
County Road 73 southerly from Trunk Highway
55 to Sunset Trail. The realignment would
require the acquisition of several private
parcels of property. In 1988 the City
created Tax Increment Financing District 6-1,
largely in response to a proposed retail
development which was to have been located on
the north side of Highway 55, east of West
Medicine Lake Drive. The development did not
proceed.
In 1989 The Robert Larsen Partners indicated
their interest in redeveloping the Schiebe
property. Since that time the developer has
been working with staff to refine the plan,
particularly as it relates to traffic
impacts.
Manager Willis stated Hennepin County should
assist in financing this improvement. A
meeting was held with the City, developer,
RESOLUTION 90-363
SITE PERFORMANCE
GUARANTEE RELEASE
FOR KINDER CARE
LEARNING CENTER
89034)
Item *6-F-1
RESOLUTION 90-364
SITE PERFORMANCE
GUARANTEE RELEASE
FOR ALAN MUNLA
88121)
Item *6-F-2
RESOLUTION 90-365
SITE PERFORMANCE
GUARANTEE RELEASE
FOR HOYT
DEVELOPMENT CO.
86127)
Item *6-F-3
County Road 73
Realignment
Item 6-G
Regular Council Meeting
June 18, 1990
Page 16
and Hennepin County representatives to
discuss the need for this realignment,
particularly due to the upgrade of Highway 12
to I-394 and the future interchange with
County Road 73.
Manager Willis stated the developer should
bear costs attributable to his project. The
developer has indicated his willingness to
enter into a minimum assessment agreement
whereby tax increments in the amount of
approximately $500,000 would be generated by
his project to help offset the City's costs
for the project. He recommended that the
City continue to work with the County to
determine the degree to which they are
willing to participate and a timetable. Once
the County's level of participation is known,
the Council can better evaluate the City's
cost participation.
Kelly Doran, 730 2nd Avenue South, Suite 281,
stated that if the County agrees to pay the
costs of this realignment, the City may be
asked to pay for the project in the interim
period between construction and county
reimbursement. He asked if the Council would
approve of this concept.
Councilmember Vasiliou asked if anything
similar has been done in the past.
Manager Willis stated similar situations have
occurred on MnDOT projects in the City where
the City did the work and later received
reimbursement.
MOTION was made by Councilmember Zitur,
seconded by Councilmember Ricker, to direct
staff to continue to explore County Road 73
realignment from Highway 55 to Sunset Trail
with Hennepin County.
Motion carried, five ayes.
Manager Willis recommended that the Council
authorize the purchase of one fire truck with
pumper/telescoping aerial device from General
Safety Equipment Corporation in the amount of
256,441. The City would reserve the right
to purchase a second truck in accordance with
the proposal.
Regular Council Meeting
June 18, 1990
Page 17
MOTION was made by Councilmember Ricker, RESOLUTION 90-366
seconded by Councilmember Zitur, to adopt AWARDING BID FOR
RESOLUTION NO. 90-366 AWARDING BID FOR PURCHASE OF ONE
PURCHASE OF ONE FIRE TRUCK WITH FIRE TRUCK
PUMPER/TELESCOPING AERIAL DEVICE.
Councilmember Helliwell asked if the truck
which the second new truck would replace
pumps an adequate amount of water.
Manager Willis stated that that truck is not
the first truck out of the station.
Fire Chief Robinson agreed that the truck
will still be used as backup even if a new
truck is purchased.
Councilmember Ricker stated the Council is
only a month away from budget deliberations
and the issue should be considered at that
time. He suggested that since there is a
difference of opinion about the quality of
this backup truck between the Fire Department
and the Public Works Director, perhaps an
outside consultant should review the
situation and make a recommendation to the
Council.
Councilmember Vasiliou agreed that an outside
consultant would be a good idea. She has
researched companies that do this type of
analysis and will provide names to the City
Manager. She supported an outside analysis
of the Fire Department equipment, personnel,
and department.
Public Safety Director Carlquist recommended
that the Council authorize purchase of only
one truck at this time.
Motion carried on a roll call vote, five
ayes.
Public Safety Director Carlquist outlined the Gaughan Companies
Fire Code Appeal Procedure and explained that Fire Code Appeal
the Gaughan Companies, owners of Harbor Lane item 6-I
Apartments, have requested a formal appeals
hearing relating to the requirement that
additional fire horns be installed in
individual apartments in order to
appropriately alert residents of fire.
Director Carlquist stated the Gaughan
Companies refuses to mediate or comply with
Regular Council Meeting
June 18, 1990
Page 18
the order of the Fire Marshal that fire horns
be installed. This matter was before the
Council on November 20, 1989, at which time
it was agreed that Gaughan Companies
officials and the Fire Department would refer
the matter to the State Fire Marshal for a
decision. The State Fire Marshal responded
that his office no longer reviews and acts as
a final appeals board.
The Council amended the policy on processing
appeals on February 8, 1990, limiting appeals
to the State Fire Marshal only in those cases
where the appellant believes that the Fire
Department is enforcing the Minnesota Uniform
Fire code unfairly or inconsistently. The
State Fire Marshal has responded that he does
not perceive the enforcement by the City to
be either arbitrary or inconsistent and has
returned the issue to the City for resolution
at the local level.
Stan Scofield, Fire Inspector, explained the
situation in the Harbor Lane Apartment
building. He stated that equipment was
obtained to conduct decibel tests of the
hallway alarms to determine if they were
adequate to warn residents inside the
apartments of fire. The equipment was placed
in three different apartment units in
Plymouth, one of which was Harbor Lane.
Noise levels were measured over a 24 hour
period and graphed the sound levels to within
1/2 decibel. The purpose of this experiment
was to attempt to replicate the suggestion of
the State Fire Marshal to have a licensed
engineer conduct additional tests.
The purpose of running a 24 hour test was to
establish the average ambient noise level.
Fifteen decibels was then added to the
average to determine an appropriate warning
level. None of the apartments tested at
Harbor Lane measured a decibel reading of 70
decibels or more in the bedrooms when the
fire horns were set off in the hallway. A
minimum of 75 decibels is required. The fire
horns in the hallway would alert people in
the hallways of a problem; but the intent of
the fire code is to alert people inside the
units. Inspector Scofield concluded that the
Fire Department considers this situation a
significant life safety problem.
Regular Council Meeting
June 18, 1990
Page 19
Kathy Bjorkman, Gaughan Companies, stated
this is an industry issue and the Gaughan
Companies opposes Plymouth's horn
requirement. Ms. Bjorkman stated the Gaughan
Companies' interpretation of the NFPA code is
a minimum decibel requirement of 50 --not 75.
She stated the Uniform Fire Code does not
imply that these audible alarms are intended
to be heard in rear rooms or by sleeping
persons.
Ms. Bjorkman stated that many fire code
orders have been corrected at Harbor Lane
since the Gaughan Companies purchase of the
property. Hard -wired smoke detectors were
installed in each of the 313 units and in
hallways and common areas. She anticipated
an ongoing vandalism problem with the horns.
The horns will be destroyed, removed, and
falsely set off. She stated this requirement
is unreasonable and extremely costly.
Mayor Bergman asked if other apartment owners
have complied with the horn installation
requirement.
Inspector Scofield responded that other
apartment building owners have indicated they
will comply. Ten structures have already
installed the system. He estimated the
installation cost to be $50-$100 per dwelling
unit.
Councilmember Helliwell questioned the
difference between the smoke detectors and
the alarm horns.
Inspector Scofield stated a smoke detector
will warn apartment occupants of a fire in
their own unit; however, the alarm horns
would notify occupants of a fire in another
unit or another part of the building they
would otherwise be unaware of. He stated
that in apartment building fires, residents
don't leave the building because they don't
know there is a fire.
Ms. Bjorkland stated there has never been a
casualty due to fire in any of the units
managed by Gaughan Companies, and only two
significant fires, with no injuries, have
occurred at Harbor Lane Apartments.
Regular Council Meeting
June 18, 1990
Page 20
Roxie Siegler-Hazelden, Gaughan Companies,
stated the smoke detectors are checked in
each apartment unit every six months.
Tenants are also trained on fire evacuation
routes. She stated many residents pull
alarms falsely and disconnect their smoke
detectors. Also, when they hear an alarm,
they don't leave the building, but just
assume it's a false alarm.
Jim Sorbel, 2899 14th Terrace NW, New
Brighton, represented the Minnesota Multi
Housing Association, a nonprofit trade
association. Mr. Sorbel expressed his
concern with possible ramifications for the
industry of this interpretation of the fire
code. He does not believe there is a
distinct hazard in this situation that
warrants horn installation. Mr. Sorbel
stated enforcement of this interpretation
will have a negative impact of less
affordable rental housing in the City.
Richard Kelso, Sagamore Condominiums,
supported the Gaughan appeal. He stated the
existing system is adequate. He suggested
that if the Council supports the
interpretation of the Fire Department, it
should exclude condominiums.
Councilmember Zitur noted that many
condominium units are rented and he is
concerned with protecting all residents of
the City.
Richard Zejdlik, 4055 Goldenrod Lane,
represented Parkside Apartments. He outlined
the fire construction, prevention, and
deterrent systems installed in the building.
Mr. Zejdlik stated the City's alarm ordinance
is not fair. A single family residence gets
four false alarms at no charge. An apartment
complex also gets four false alarms
regardless of the number of dwelling units.
Attorney Thomson stated the Fire Code
requires that alarms be effectively heard
above the ambient noise level during normal
levels of occupancy. The Council must make
the determination of whether the existing
system is adequate or whether the fire horns
should be installed. The Council must make a
decision on the interpretation of the code.
The Gaughan Companies are not asking for a
variance from the requirement.
Regular Council Meeting
June 18, 1990
Page 21
Councilmember Ricker stated he would like to
see alarm horns in each apartment unit, but
that requirement may place a financial burden
on some people. He suggested that in the
future when an apartment complex is sold, the
owner be required to bring it up to
standards, including the fire horn
requirement.
Councilmember Vasiliou stated she has not
heard evidence to dissuade her from abiding
by the recommendation of the Public Safety
Director.
Attorney Thomson reminded the Council that
they are not receiving a staff
recommendation. They are hearing two
different interpretations of the Fire Code
and need to make a decision which
interpretation is correct.
Manager Willis suggested that staff could
summarize in writing the data presented by
the Fire Department and the Gaughan Companies
for Council review.
Ms. Bjorkland stated the unit used for
decibel comparison at Harbor Lane Apartments
was not a typical unit. It was near the
boiler room, testing was done in the kitchen
with residents and children present.
Director Carlquist noted that the
recommendation of the State Fire Marshal was
that outside testing be done by a licensed
engineer. Gaughan Companies does not wish to
pay for this testing. He also stated that a
limited number of fires is not a good reason
to support the Gaughan Companies appeal. As
the housing stock in Plymouth gets older,
more fires will occur.
Ms. Seigler-Hazelden stated an appropriate
ambient noise level should be determined on a
national level.
Fire Inspector Leuer expressed the concern of
the Fire Department that they are finding
many residents still in their apartment units
when firefighters arrive at fires.
Ms. Bjorkland clarified that Gaughan
Companies requested mediation of the fire
Regular Council Meeting
June 18, 1990
Page 22
horn requirement, but was refused by the Fire
Department.
Director Carlquist stated that Gaughan
Companies has refused to do additional tests
and has refused to comply with the
installation order.
MOTION was made by Councilmember Ricker,
seconded by Mayor Bergman, to defer this
appeal until a staff summary report is
received.
Motion carried, five ayes.
MOTION was made by Councilmember Vasiliou, RESOLUTION 90-367
seconded by Councilmember Zitur, to adopt INSTALLATION OF
RESOLUTION NO. 90-367 INSTALLATION OF TRAFFIC TRAFFIC SIGNAL AT
SIGNAL AT COUNTY ROAD 10 AND NATHAN LANE, C.R. 10 AND
CITY PROJECT NO. 812. NATHAN LANE
PROJECT 812
Motion carried on a roll call vote, five Item *6-J
ayes.
MOTION was made by Councilmember Vasiliou, RESOLUTION 90-368
seconded by Councilmember Zitur, to adopt RECEIVING
RESOLUTION NO. 90-368 RECEIVING PETITION AND PETITION AND
ORDERING PREPARATION OF PRELIMINARY REPORT, ORDERING REPORT,
SCHMIDT GARDENS WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENT, CITY PROJECT 034
PROJECT NO. 034. Item *6-K
Motion carried on a roll call vote, five
ayes.
MOTION was made by Councilmember Vasiliou,
seconded by Councilmember Zitur, to adopt
RESOLUTION NO. 90-369 APPROVING PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR
BIDS, 1990 SEAL COAT PROGRAM.
Motion carried on a roll call vote, five
ayes.
MOTION was made by Councilmember Vasiliou,
seconded by Councilmember Zitur, to adopt
RESOLUTION NO. 90-370 REDUCING DEVELOPMENT
BOND, HERITAGE RIDGE PLAT TWO ADDITION
89036) .
Motion carried on a roll call vote, five
ayes.
RESOLUTION 90-369
APPROVING PLANS
AND ORDERING
ADVERTISEMENT FOR
BIDS, 1990 SEAL
COAT PROGRAM
Item *6-L
RESOLUTION 90-370
REDUCING
DEVELOPMENT BOND
FOR HERITAGE
RIDGE PLAT TWO
ADDITION (89036)
Item *6-M-1
Regular Council Meeting
June 18, 1990
Page 23
MOTION was made by Councilmember Vasiliou, RESOLUTION 90-371
seconded by Councilmember Zitur, to adopt REDUCING
RESOLUTION NO. 90-371 REDUCING DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT BOND
BOND, BASS LAKE WOODS ADDITION (84075). FOR BASS LAKE
WOODS ADDITION
Motion carried on a roll call vote, five (84075)
ayes. Item *6-M-2
MOTION was made by Councilmember Vasiliou, RESOLUTION 90-372
seconded by Councilmember Zitur, to adopt REDUCING
RESOLUTION NO. 90-372 REDUCING DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT BOND
BOND, CARLSON CENTER EIGHTH ADDITION (87092). FOR CARLSON
CENTER EIGHTH
Motion carried on a roll call vote, five ADDITION (87092)
ayes. Item *6-M-3
MOTION was made by Councilmember Vasiliou, RESOLUTION 90-373
seconded by Councilmember Zitur, to adopt REDUCING
RESOLUTION NO. 90-373 REDUCING DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT BOND
BOND, DEERHAVEN THIRD ADDITION (89105). FOR DEERHAVEN
THIRD ADDITION
Motion carried on a roll call vote, five (89105)
ayes. Item *6-M-4
MOTION was made by Councilmember Vasiliou, RESOLUTION 90-374
seconded by Councilmember Zitur, to adopt REDUCING
RESOLUTION NO. 90-374 REDUCING DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT BOND
BOND, BASS LAKE CORPORATE CENTER FIRST FOR BASS LAKE
ADDITION (88146). CORPORATE CENTER
FIRST ADDITION
Motion carried on a roll call vote, five (88146)
ayes. Item *6-M-5
MOTION was made by Councilmember Vasiliou, RESOLUTION 90-375
seconded by Councilmember Zitur, to adopt DECLARING SURPLUS
RESOLUTION NO. 90-375 DECLARING PROPERTY PROPERTY AND
SURPLUS AND AUTHORIZING SALE, WEST MEDICINE AUTHORIZING SALE
LAKE DRIVE.
Item *6-N
Motion carried on a roll call vote, five
ayes.
MOTION was made by Councilmember Vasiliou, RESOLUTION 90-376
seconded by Councilmember Zitur, to adopt ORDERING HEARING
RESOLUTION NO. 90-376 ORDERING PUBLIC HEARING ON VACATION OF
ON THE PROPOSED VACATION OF DRAINAGE AND EASEMENTS IN
UTILITY EASEMENTS, LOTS 1, 2, AND 3, BLOCK 1, PLYMOUTH OFFICE
PLYMOUTH OFFICE COMMERCIAL PARK ADDITION. COMMERCIAL PARK
ADDITION
Motion carried on a roll call vote, five Item *6-0-1
ayes.
Regular Council Meeting
June 18, 1990
Page 24
MOTION was made by Councilmember Vasiliou,
seconded by Councilmember Zitur, to adopt
RESOLUTION NO. 90-377 ORDERING PUBLIC HEARING
ON THE PROPOSED VACATION OF DRAINAGE AND
UTILITY EASEMENTS, LOTS 6 AND 7, BLOCK 4,
PARKERS LAKE NORTH 3RD ADDITION.
Motion carried on a roll call vote, five
ayes.
RESOLUTION 90-377
ORDERING HEARING
ON VACATION OF
EASEMENTS IN
PARKERS LAKE
NORTH 3RD
ADDITION
Item *6-0-2
MOTION was made by Councilmember Vasiliou, RESOLUTION 90-378
seconded by Councilmember Zitur, to adopt ORDINANCE HEARING
RESOLUTION NO. 90-378 ORDERING PUBLIC HEARING ON VACATION OF
ON THE PROPOSED VACATION OF DRAINAGE AND EASEMENT IN MEYER
UTILITY EASEMENT, LOTS 1 AND 2, BLOCK 1, GONYEA ADDITION
MEYER GONYEA ADDITION. Item *6-0-3
Motion carried on a roll call vote, five
ayes.
MOTION was made by Councilmember Vasiliou,
seconded by Councilmember Zitur, to adopt
RESOLUTION NO. 90-379 DECLARING ADEQUACY OF
PETITION AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF REPORT,
STREET LIGHTING - CIMARRON PONDS ADDITION.
Motion carried on a roll call vote, five
ayes.
MOTION was made by Councilmember Vasiliou,
seconded by Councilmember Zitur, to adopt
RESOLUTION NO. 90-380 RECEIVING REPORT AND
ORDERING PROJECT - STREET LIGHTING CIMARRON
PONDS ADDITION.
Motion carried on a roll call vote, five
ayes.
RESOLUTION 90-379
ACCEPTING
PETITION AND
ORDERING REPORT,
STREET LIGHTING
CIMARRON PONDS
ADDITION
Item *6-P
RESOLUTION 90-380
RECEIVING REPORT
AND ORDERING
PROJECT, STREET
LIGHTING CIMARRON
PONDS ADDITION
Item *6-P
MOTION was made by Councilmember Vasiliou, RESOLUTION 90-381
seconded by Councilmember Zitur, to adopt CORRECTION TO
RESOLUTION NO. 90-381 AUTHORIZE THE CITY PLAT OF BASS LAKE
CLERK TO SIGN LAND SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE OF HILLS ADDITION
CORRECTION TO PLAT, BASS LAKE HILLS ADDITION. Item *6-Q
Motion carried on a roll call vote, five
ayes.
Regular Council Meeting
June 18, 1990
Page 25
RESOLUTION 90-382
MOTION was made by Councilmember Vasiliou, APPROVING NO
seconded by Councilmember Zitur, to adopt PARKING ON 7TH
RESOLUTION NO. 90-382 APPROVING NO PARKING AVENUE BETWEEN
SIGN INSTALLATION ON 7TH AVENUE BETWEEN VICKSBURG LANE
VICKSBURG LANE AND RANCHVIEW LANE. AND RANCHVIEW
Motion carried on a roll call vote, five Item *6-R
ayes.
MOTION was made by Councilmember Vasiliou, RESOLUTION
seconded by Councilmember Zitur, to adopt AWARDING BID FOR
RESOLUTION NO. 90-383 AWARDING BID FOR 1990 1990 STREET
STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT, CITY PROJECT RECONSTRUCTION
NO. 001. PROJECT
Item *6-S
Motion carried on a roll call vote, five
ayes.
MOTION was made by Councilmember Vasiliou, RESOLUTION 90-384
seconded by Councilmember Zitur, to adopt RENEWAL OF ON -
RESOLUTION NO. 90-384 APPROVING RENEWAL OF SALE NON -
ON -SALE NON -INTOXICATING LIQUOR LICENSES. INTOXICATING
LIQUOR LICENSES
Motion carried on a roll call vote, five
ayes. Item *6-T-1
MOTION was made by Councilmember Vasiliou, RESOLUTION 90-385
seconded by Councilmember Zitur, to adopt RENEWAL OF OFF -
RESOLUTION NO. 90-385 APPROVING RENEWAL OF SALE NON -
OFF -SALE NON -INTOXICATING LIQUOR LICENSES. INTOXICATING
LIQUOR LICENSES
Motion carried on a roll call vote, five Item *6-T-1
ayes.
MOTION was made by Councilmember Vasiliou, RESOLUTION 90-386
seconded by Councilmember Zitur, to adopt APPROVING
RESOLUTION NO. 90-386 APPROVING CONSUMPTION CONSUMPTION AND
AND DISPLAY LICENSES. DISPLAY LICENSES
Item *6-T-1
Motion carried on a roll call vote, five
ayes.
MOTION was made by Councilmember Vasiliou, RESOLUTION 90-387
seconded by Councilmember Zitur, to adopt APPROVING
RESOLUTION NO. 90-387 APPROVING AMUSEMENT AMUSEMENT LICENSE
LICENSE FOR MAPLE GROVE MALL ASSOCIATION. FOR MAPLE GROVE
MALL ASSN.
Motion carried on a roll call vote, five Item *6-T-2
ayes.
Regular Council Meeting
June 18, 1990
Page 26
MOTION was made by Councilmember Vasiliou,
seconded by Councilmember Zitur, to adopt
RESOLUTION NO. 90-388 SETTING PUBLIC HEARING
TO CONSIDER THE ON -SALE NON -INTOXICATING AND
WINE LIQUOR LICENSE APPLICATIONS OF JIEN
FUNG, INC.
Motion carried on a roll call vote, five
ayes.
MOTION was made by Councilmember Vasiliou,
seconded by Councilmember Zitur, to adopt
RESOLUTION NO. 90-389 APPROVING DISBURSEMENTS
FOR THE PERIOD ENDING MAY 31, 1990.
Motion carried on a roll call vote, five
ayes.
MOTION was made by Councilmember Ricker,
seconded by Councilmember Zitur, to adopt
RESOLUTION NO. 90-390 PLYMOUTH COMMUNITY
LIBRARY.
Motion carried on a roll call vote, five
ayes.
RESOLUTION 90-38$
SETTING HEARING
ON ON -SALE NON -
INTOXICATING AND
WINE APPLICATION
FOR JIEN FUNG,
INC.
Item *6-T-3
RESOLUTION 90-389
APPROVING
DISBURSEMENTS FOR
PERIOD ENDING
5-31-90
Item *6-U
RESOLUTION 90-390
PLYMOUTH
COMMUNITY LIBRARY
Item 6-V
MOTION was made by Councilmember Ricker, Status Report on
seconded by Councilmember Zitur, to accept Watershed
the status report on Watershed Planning of Planning
the Watershed Management Organizations. Item 7-B
Motion carried on a roll call vote, five
ayes.
MOTION was made by Councilmember Ricker, Project Status
seconded by Councilmember Zitur, to accept Report
the Project Status Report. Item 7-C
Motion carried on a roll call vote, five
ayes.
MOTION was made by Mayor Bergman, seconded by Negotiate with
Councilmember Vasiliou, to direct the City BRW - Public
Manager to negotiate and return to the Works Building
Council on July 2 the proposal for Expansion
architectural services for the public works Item 7-D
building expansion.
Motion carried, five ayes.
At 1:00 a.m. the meeting was adjourned until
3:00 p.m. Friday, June 22 to complete the
agenda and to meet in Executive Session with
the City Attorney regarding the claim of BWBR
Architects.
Regular Council Meeting
June 18, 1990
Page 27
City Clerk
MINUTES
ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF JUNE 18, 1990
JUNE 22, 1990
A regular meeting of the Plymouth City Council,
adjourned from the regular meeting of June 18, 1990,
was called to order by Mayor Bergman at 3:02 p.m. in
the Council Chambers of the City Center at 3400
Plymouth Boulevard on June 22, 1990.
PRESENT: Mayor Bergman, Councilmembers Helliwell,
Ricker, Vasiliou, Zitur
ABSENT: None
STAFF PRESENT: City Manager Willis, Assistant City
Manager Boyles, City Attorney Thomson, and City
Clerk Rauenhorst.
The Council discussed the proposed charge for the
Financial Task Force.
Mayor Bergman suggested the language should be
amended to reflect the desire to receive short as
well as long-range recommendations from the Task
Force.
Councilmember Ricker stated the suggestion is good,
but should be clearly defined in the Task Force
charge.
Mayor Bergman suggested that recommendations be
requested for 1992, 1995, 2000, 2005, and 2010. He
also noted that Item 5 of the charge should be
changed to 2010.
Financial Task Force
Item 7-A
MOTION was made by Councilmember Vasiliou, seconded Financial Task Force
by Councilmember Zitur, to approve the charge for Item 7-A
the Financial Task Force with the changes as noted
above, and to appoint Mayor Bergman and
Councilmember Ricker as the Council designees to the
Task Force.
Councilmember Vasiliou stated that Councilmember
Ricker will be able to provide historical
information to the Task Force from his prior
experience as Finance Director. Councilmember Zitur
agreed.
Motion carried on a roll call vote, five ayes.
The Council directed staff to schedule interviews
for the twelve applicants to the Financial Task
Force from 5:30 p.m. to 8:30 p.m. on July 5.
Candidates will be interviewed by two subcommittees
consisting of two councilmembers.
Councilmember Zitur and Ricker reported on the
League of Minnesota Cities Conference they attended
in Duluth.
Mayor Bergman reported on the recent Domestic
Violence Forum.
Councilmember Vasiliou stated that the news releases
relating to Music in Plymouth indicate that the cost
of the event is about $23,000; however, no mention
is made that the City of Plymouth is the largest
contributor to this event. The City gives almost
10,000 of the total amount, yet receives no
recognition as a contributor.
Mayor Bergman will send a letter to the Civic
League, sponsor of Music in Plymouth, requesting
that the City be recognized.
City Attorney Thomson stated the City Council will
adjourn to a closed meeting to discuss threatened
litigation by BWBR.
The meeting was adjourned to a closed session at
3:18 p.m.
City Clerk
CCR Reports
Item 7-D
Music in Plymouth
MEMO
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
DATE: June 26,1990 For City Council Meeting of July 2, 1990
TO: James G. Willis, City Manager through Fred G. Moore, Director of
Public Works
FROM: Daniel L. Faulkner, City Engineer
SUBJECT: VACATION OF A PORTION OF A DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT
WITHIN LOT 9, BLOCK 1, ZACHARY HILLS ADDITION
ACTION REQUESTED: Deny the vacation of a portion of a drainage and
utility easement within Lot 9, Block 1, Zachary Hills Addition.
BACKGROUND: The City Council has established a Public Hearing for July 2,
1990 on the petition to vacate a portion of a drainage and utility easement
within Lot 9, Block 1, Zachary Hills Addition. The vacation request is
needed so that the homeowner may construct a three season porch. The
easement to be vacated is 10 feet wide and runs parallel with and 9 feet
behind the existing home. This easement area is a part of Pond SC-P17A, and
at some time in the past, extensive fill material was placed on this lot,
thereby reducing the overall storm water capacity of the pond.
RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS: Before this vacation request can be
considered, I recommend that the storm water holding capacity of Pond SC-
P17A be recalculated in order to ensure that adequate pond capacity does
exist. After this information is received and it verifies there is adequate
pond storage, we would then recommend approval of the vacation request. If
the City Council desires to vacate the ponding easement without receiving
the pond data, attached is a resolution which would be adopted. We do not
recommend adopting this resolution until the necessary data is received.
Daniel L. Faulkner, P. E.
DLF:do
attachments: Resolution
Map
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a
the City of Plymouth, Minnesota was held on the
1990. The following members were present: _
The following members were absent:
adoption:
meeting of the City Council of
day of ,
introduced the following Resolution and moved its
RESOLUTION NO. 90 -
AUTHORIZING THE VACATION OF CERTAIN
UTILITY AND DRAINAGE EASEMENTS WITHIN
LOT 9, BLOCK 1, ZACHARY HILLS ADDITION
WHEREAS, a petition was received to vacate certain utility and drainage easements it
Lot 9, Block 1, Zachary Hills Addition, and
WHEREAS, a public hearing with respect to said vacation was scheduled for July 2, 199(
in accordance with Minnesota Statutes 412.851 as amended; and
WHEREAS, a notice of publication of said hearing was published and posted two weeks
prior to the meeting of July 2, 1990, and
WHEREAS, the Council did hold a public hearing on July 2, 1990 to inform any and all
interested parties relevant to the vacation of a portion of a utility and drainagE
easement in Lot 9, Block 1 in Zachary Hills Addition, and
WHEREAS, it was determined by the City Council that said easements were not needed for
public purposes.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH,
MINNESOTA: That the following utility and drainage easements be vacated:
That part of the northwesterly 10.00 feet of the southeasterly 100.00 feet
of Lot 9, Block 1, Zachary Hills Addition according to the plat thereof on
file and of record in the office of the County Recorder in and for Hennepin
County, MN lying southwesterly of the northeasterly 6 feet and lying
northeasterly of the southwesterly 6 feet thereof.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted
in favor thereof:
The following voted against or abstained:
Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
I
XX7:
x
i MEMO
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
DATE: June 25, 1990 For City Council Meeting of July 2, 1990
TO: James G. Willis, City Manager Through Fred G. Moore, Director of
Public Works
FROM: Daniel L. Faulkner, City Engineer
SUBJECT: PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT HEARING:
COUNTY ROAD 101/COUNTY ROAD 9 - TRUNK WATERMAIN
CITY PROJECT NO. 012
ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt attached resolutions ordering improvement
projects.
BACKGROUND: The City Council has established a public improvement hearing
for the above utility improvement project for July 2, 1990. Attached
herewith is the information handout material for the public hearing.
PRIMARY ISSUES AND ANALYSIS: Attached is a resolution for City Council
consideration at the conclusion of the public hearing. This resolution
orders the project and directs the consulting engineer to proceed with plans
and specifications for construction of the utility improvement.
Daniel L. Faulkner, P.E.
DLF:dkc:kh
attachments: Handout Material
Resolution
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a meeting of the City Council of
the City of Plymouth, Minnesota was held on the day of
1990. The following members were present: ,
The following members were absent:
adoption:
introduced the following Resolution and moved its
RESOLUTION NO. 90 -
ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND PREPARATION OF
PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
COUNTY ROAD 101/COUNTY ROAD 9/TRUNK WATERMAIN
CITY PROJECT NO. 012
WHEREAS, Resolution No. 90-350 of the City Council adopted the 4th day of June 1990
fixed a date for a public hearing with respect to the improvements to the Municipal
Water System as part of the 1990 Capital Improvements Program; and
WHEREAS, the proposed improvement includes the construction of 20 inch trunk watermain
along County Road 101 from the new water tower south of Trunk Highway 55, northerly to
the intersection of Peony Lane and County Road 9 and a 16 inch trunk watermain will to
be extended easterly from Peony Lane along the north side of County Road 9 to existing
watermain at Xene Lane and all necessary appurtenances; and
WHEREAS, ten days mailed notice of the hearing through two weekly publications of the
required notice was given and the hearing was held thereon the 2nd day of July, 1990 at
which time all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard
thereon;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH,
MINNESOTA;
1. Such improvement is hereby ordered as proposed in the Council resolution
adopted June 4, 1990.
2. Rieke, Carroll, Muller Associates, Inc. is designated as engineer for
the improvement. They shall prepare plans and specifications for the
making of such improvement.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted
in favor thereof:
The following voted against or abstained:
Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
7ACXX ** XXX
AGENDA FOR PUBLIC HEARING
COUNTY ROAD 101/COUNTY ROAD 9 - TRUNK WATERMAIN
CITY PROJECT NO. 012
July 2, 1990 - 7:00 P.M.
1. Call to Order - Mayor Bergman presiding, 7:00 p.m. at the City Council Chambers.
2. Introduce Councilmembers, Staff and Consultant - Mayor Bergman.
3. Purpose of meeting - Kim Bergman, Mayor.
a. The Council and staff, after careful consideration, have decided to consider
the installation of improvements to the area listed above.
b. Our citizens will have an opportunity to question these proposed improvements
and express their views.
4. The meeting was carefully and thoroughly announced in three ways:
a. Notices were published in the Weekly News as required by law.
b. Written notice was mailed to each property owner in the improvement area as
shown by the records of the Hennepin County Auditor's tax statement mailing
list.
C. Announcements and discussions at Council meetings.
5. The procedure for the hearing will be as follows:
a. Write name and address on blue card.
b. Pass card to person collecting them or give them to the Mayor.
C. When your name is called, come up to the microphone.
d. Please speak clearly into the microphone so that all may benefit from your
remarks.
e. No one may speak twice until all others who wish to have done so. Please
give your name and address each time you soeak.
6. Description of project:
a. Assessment policies and procedures - James G. Willis, City Manager.
b. Project description and cost - Daniel L. Faulkner, City Engineer.
7. Open Hearing.
8. Close Hearing.
9. Determination of Council.
PUBLIC HEARING INFORMATION SHEET
im
COUNTY ROAD 101/COUNTY ROAD 9 - TRUNK WATERMAIN
CITY PROJECT NO. 012
July 2, 1990 - 7:00 p.m.
I. GENERAL
The public hearing will discuss the aspects of the proposed project together with
the estimated costs thereof. This handout will help explain the costs related to
the proposed construction.
II. SCOPE
The proposed project involves the northerly extension of a 20" trunk watermain
line from the new elevated water storage tank which is located south of Highway
55 and east of County Road 101 to the intersection of County Road 9 then easterly
along County Road 9 with a 16 inch trunk watermain to existing watermain at Xene
Lane and County Road 9. Water services would be installed to service existing
residences and businesses adjacent to the proposed trunk watermain alignment.
III. COST ESTIMATE AND PROPOSED ASSESSMENTS
Estimated Proiect Cost:
Trunk Watermain $678,901
Proposed Assessment & Rates:
Water area assessment rates:
Residential Zones $1,580/Ac.
Business and Industrial Zones $2,370/Ac.
Water Lateral Rates:
Residential Zones $22.50/F.F.
Business and Industrial Zones $26.50/F.F.
Total Proposed Assessments * $1,745,938
Includes benefiting properties from Project No. 906 between County Road 24 and
the water tower.
f
N n sumnn Ou
N In Anel
N n AWU
I
N
r
I /
i
y
W
7co
W
2
W <
2 Z
UJM
d m
in z Z Z y
N N
a
ci I
1
g.
1
SENIOR CITIZENS AND DISABLED PEOPLE
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DEFERRALS
If you are at least 62 years old or disabled, you may qualify to have
special assessments deferred if they create a financial hardship for you.
WHO IS ELIGIBLE?
You are eligible if:
For Senior Citizens
The property is your homestead.
As property owner you are at least 62 years old.
You had a gross annual income of less than $14,800 for a one person
household in the year before the assessment installments for local
improvements are to be certified with the County.
If more than one person lives in the household, the income limit is:
2 Persons $16,800
3 Persons $18,800
4 Persons 520,800
For Permanent and Total Disability
You meet the criteria for senior citizens above except for age.
You are retired due to a permanent and total disability which must
include one of the following:
Certified as legally blind in both eyes.
Loss of both arms at the shoulder.
Loss of both legs so close to the hips that no effective artificial
limbs can be used.
Complete and permanent paralysis.
Total and permanent loss of mental facilities.
Any other injury which prevents the owner from working and earning
an income that exceeds the limit noted above.
NOW TO APPLY
Get an application for special assessment deferral at the Plymouth City
Center, 3400 Plymouth Blvd., or by calling the Finance Department at
550-5102. Applications are due October 15 each year.
After city staff has reviewed the initial application, applicants will be
asked to submit supplementary documentation to establish and verify the
following:
That the owner -occupant is over 62 years old.
That the property owner retired because of permanent and total
disability.
That paying the special assessment on the ordinary scneaule
constitutes a hardship.
WHAT KIND OF INTEREST IS CALCULATED ON DEFERRED SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS?
Simple interest will accrue for the term of the assessment on any principal
of the special assessment which is deferred. After the term of the
assessment expires, no more interest will accrue.
FOR MORE INFORMATION, CALL 550-5102
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
DATE: June 27, 1990 For City Council Meeting of July 2, 1990
TO: James G. Willis, City Manager
FROM: Community Development Coordinator CharleE. iru d through
Community Development Director Blair Treme
SUBJECT: PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA. AMENDED MIXED
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT PLAN FOR THE "NORTHWEST BUSINESS
CAMPUS" LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST QUADRANT OF STATE HIGHWAY 55 AND
INTERSTATE 494 (89102) (MPUD 81-1)
ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt the attached resolution providing for the
approval of an amended Mixed Planned Unit Development Concept Plan to
increase the acreage of the project and the total square footage to be
constructed, consistent with the Planning Commission recommendation.
BACKGROUND:
At its meeting June 13, 1990, the Planning Commission, by a unanimous vote,
acted to recommend approval of this proposal to amend the Concept Plan for
the "Northwest Business Campus" to increase the area of the project by 1.5
acres (reflecting the acquisition of a former exception parcel) and to
increase the overall square footage of the structures within the project by
175,000 square feet (approximately 10 percent). The Concept Plan redesign
also involves the conversion of a portion of the planned structure space
from industrial use to office warehouse, office show room, and all office.
This amendment would impact the portion of the project yet to be
constructed. Approximately one half of the project has been constructed to
date.
PRIMARY ISSUES AND ANALYSIS:
The Planning Commission recommendation specifically includes a condition
making the amended Concept Plan subject to the conditions of the current or
any required supplemental Indirect Source Permits, and directs the applicant
see next page)
File 89102
Page Two
to make application to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency for
determination of any amendments that may be necessary. The Planning
Commission also recommends a finding that no new Environmental Assessment
Worksheet is required. There was an Environmental Assessment Worksheet
prepared with the original Concept Plan, and the Planning Commission finds
that the magnitude of the changes in the area added do not result in
significant environmental impacts beyond those contemplated by the original
Environmental Assessment Worksheet. The petitioner has submitted data that
substantiate this finding.
RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS:
I hereby recommend adoption of the attached resolution providing for the
approval of an amended Mixed Planned Unit Development Concept Plan for the
Northwest Business Campus" as recommended by the Planning Commission.
Attachments:
1. Resolution Approving Amended MPUD Concept Plan
2. Planning Commission Minutes of June 13, 1990
3. Engineer's Memorandum
4. Location Map
5. Proposed Concept Plan Graphics
6. Previously Approved Concept Plan Graphics
cc/cd/89102:dl)
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a meeting of the
City Council of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, was held on the day
of , 19 The following members were present:
The following members were absent:
moved its adoption:
introduced the following Resolution and
RESOLUTION 90 -
APPROVING AMENDED MIXED USE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT PLAN FOR
PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY FOR "NORTHWEST BUSINESS CAMPUS" (89102)
WHEREAS, Prudential Insurance Company has requested approval of an Amended
Mixed Use Planned Unit Development Concept Plan for an increase in project
acreage by 1.5 acres by incorporating Parcels 22-31-0005, 0009 and 0010;
increasing developed structure area by 179,000 square feet and changing use
from industrial to office on approximately 168 acres located at the northeast
quadrant of State Highway 55 and Interstate 494; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council, by Resolution No. MPUD 81-89, approved an MPUD
Concept Plan for this site for Prudential Insurance Company; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council, by Resolution MPUD 81-281, approved the Land Use
Guide Plan Amendment, MPUD Preliminary Plan/Plat and Conditional Use Permit;
and by Resolution 81-846, approved the Final Plat and Development Contract for
the "Northwest Business Campus"; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the request at a duly called
Public Informational Hearing and has recommended approval;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the Amended Mixed
Use Planned Unit Development Concept Plan for the development of approximately
168 acres located at the northeast quadrant of State Highway 55 and Interstate
494, subject to the following conditions:
1. Compliance with the City Engineer's Memorandum.
2. Staging of the development shall be in accordance with utility
availability as approved by the City Engineer.
3. All public street right-of-way shall be dedicated.
4. Compliance with the applicable conditions of Resolutions 81-89 (MPUD
Concept Plan), 81-281 (MPUD Preliminary Plan/Plat/Conditional Use Permit),
81-846/847 (MPUD Final Plat/Setting Conditions, and the Development
Contract).
see next page)
Resolution No.
File 89102
Page Two
5. The amended MPUD Concept Plan shall be subject to the conditions of the
current or any required supplemental Indirect Source Permit (I.S.P.). The
applicant shall apply to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency for a
determination of any amendments required to the current I.S.P. resulting
from this MPUD Plan Amendment.
6. No Environmental Assessment Worksheet is required considering the small
size of the addition and magnitude of the changes; the added area was not
contemplated in the original plans; the area and development proposed do
not require a mandatory Environmental Assessment Worksheet; and the
Petitioner has submitted basic facts that substantiate the finding.
7. A revised MPUD Preliminary Plan for the entire MPUD reflecting all Council
approved changes shall be submitted and placed on file per the Zoning
Ordinance Planned Unit Development requirements.
The motion for adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded
by , and upon vote being taken thereon,
the following voted in favor thereof:
The following voted against or abstained
Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
JUNE 13, 1990
The Regular Meeting of the City of Plymouth Planning
Commission was called to order at 7:00 p.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Richard Plufka, Commissioners
Hal Pierce (arrived at 7:10), Larry
Marofsky, Michael Stulberg, Joy Tierney
arrived at 8:15), John Wire, and Dennis
Zylla.
MEMBERS ABSENT: None.
STAFF PRESENT: Coordinator Charles Dillerud, City
Engineer Dan Faulkner, and Planning
Secretary Jackie Watson.
MINUTES
T40h by Commissioner Stulberg, seconded by Commissioner
Marofsky rove the May 23, 1990 minutes
Vote. 5 Ayes, MOTION carri
MOTION by Commissioner Stulberg, seconded by saVsinner
Marofsky to approve the Consent Agenda. —
Vote. 5 Ayes, MOTION carried.
Chairman Plufka introduced the request of Prudential
Insurance Company for an Amended MPUD Concept Plan for
Northwest Business Campus" located at the Northeast
corner of Highway 55 and I-494.
Coordinator Dillerud reviewed the June 7, 1990 Staff
Report.
Chairman Plufka introduced Mr. Ron Pentz representing
Prudential Property Company and Mr. Miles Lindberg of BRW,
Inc., the engineer for the project.
Mr. Pentz stated that he was in agreement with the June 7,
1990 Staff Report. He said that he wanted to emphasize
that Item 6 of the Engineer's Memo had been discussed
previously with staff regarding the street system and that
the streets will be at the expense of Prudential, the
State or the City depending on location.
MOTION TO APPROVE
VOTE - MOTION CARRIED
MOTION TO APPROVE
VOTE - MMi
PRUDENTIAL
CO. (89102)
RIED
INSURANCE
Planning Commission Minutes
June 13, 1990
Page 87
Mr. Lindberg stated that the Indirect Source Permit will
be updated from the previous 1985 approval. He stated
that a new traffic analysis was done which reconfirmed the
past analysis. Mr. Lindberg said that the private street
in Area C was proposed so that the natural resources could
be preserved.
Chairman Plufka opened the Public Hearing.
Chairman Plufka introduced Mr. John Dumez of 2510 Rosewood
Lane.
Mr. Dumez asked if a traffic signal would be placed at the
intersection of Northwest Boulevard and Campus Drive.
City Engineer Faulkner stated that a recent traffic count
indicated that the intersection was close to warranting a
traffic signal.
Chairman Plufka closed the Public Hearing.
Discussion continueded with regard to the various changes
made to the MPUD Concept Plan from its inception in 1981
to the present proposed amendment.
MOTION by Commissioner Wire, seconded by Commissioner
Zylla to recommend approval of the Amended MPUD Concept
Plan for Prudential Insurance Company for the "Northwest
Business Campus" located at the Northeast corner of
Highway 55 and I-494 subject to the conditions listed in
the June 7, 1990 Staff Report.
MOTION to amend by Commissioner Marofsky to remove Area E
and Area F from the approval recommendation until a
diagram showing the change in the square footage of the
areas was available.
Motion failed for lack of a second.
Roll Call Vote. 6 Ayes. MOTION carried.
Chairman Plufka introduced the request of Mutual
Investment Company for an Amended Conditional Use Permit
and Site Plan for Minn -Well Supply Company for enlarged
outside storage located at 15400 28th Avenue Nortl-1--__
Chairman Plufka waived the revi a June 7, 1990
Staff Report.
Chairma <a introduced Mr. Bill Reavley representing
Mte'oetitioner.
MOTION TO AMEND
MOTION FAILED FOR LACK
OF SECOND
VOTE - MOTION CARRIED
MUTUAL INVEST
COMPA 3)
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
ENGINEER'S MEMO
to
PLANNING COMMISSION AND COUNCIL MEMBERS
DATE: June 6, 1990
FILE NO.: 89102
PETITIONER: Mr. Ron Pentz, Prudential Property Company, 3030 Norwest Center, 90
South 7th Street, Minneapolis, MN 55402
CONCEPT PLAN: AMENDED CONCEPT PLAN FOR NORTHWEST BUSINESS CAMPUS AREA C AND D
LOCATION: West of Campus Drive, north of Highway 55, east of 494 in the southwest
1/4 of Section 22.
This memo was prepated in response to the request for conceptual approval for the above
referenced project. Documents in support of the request were submitted by B.R.W. on May
4, 1990.
1) Our assessment records indicate that that portion of the Ed Hines property added
to Area C has not been assessed for watermain area charges.
2) The City will require utility and drainage easements ten feet in width adjoining
all streets and six feet in width adjoining the site and rear lot lines.
3) The City will require ten foot utility and drainage easements on each side of a
public utility where these utilities are proposed to be installed.
4) A revised Preliminary Plat shall be submitted for Areas C and D to include:
o Proposed Street Location
o Watermain
o Sanitary Sewer
o Storm Sewer and Ponds
o Preliminary Grading Plan
5) The preliminary drainage plan shall show how the pond in Area C proposed to be
moved north will still function properly.
6) To provide an adequate street system for the revised General Development Plan:
o Add a left turn lane on the southbound CR 61 approach to TH 55
o Add a left turn lane and right turn lane to the northbound CR 61 approach
to TH 55
o Add a left turn lane to the eastbound TH 55 approach to CR 61
o Reconstruct the traffic signal at TH 55 and CR 61 to accommodate these
roadway improvements.
ENGINEERING MEMO - CONCEPT PLAN
Page Two
7) The developer will be responsible for the construction of the necessary
watermain, sanitary sewer, storm sewer, and streets to serve the site.
8) The City will require final plan and profile of proposed sanitary sewer,
watermain, streets, and storm sewers, plus an erosion control plan in accordance
with our Engineering Guidelines.
9) A storm water drainage map with runoff calculations and pipe capacity, along
with pond calculations, shall be furnished to the City prior to final approval
of the storm sewer system.
10) Drainage easements for ponding purposes shall be placed over all of the pond
within Area C to the 100 year elevation.
11) This amended Concept Plan would require the vacation of Old Annapolis Lane and
the existing ponding easement within Northwest Business Campus 7th Addition
Outlot A.
12) The interior right-of-ways shall be 60 feet wide.
13) The southern drive from Area C to Annapolis Circle shall be removed due to the
proximity to the curve.
SUBMITTED BY:
Daniel L. Faulkner, P.E.
City Engineer
1:
sc
lo
A 'HOTEVCONFERENCE CENTER
A B - OFFICE
C - OFFICE/OFFICE RESEARCH
D - COMMERCIAL COMBIN[ATION
E - OFFICE/BANK
F - OFFICE
ui (, - CFFI E WAREHOUSE/MANUFACTURING
H OFFICE WAREHOUSE/MANUFACTURING
OFFICE WAREHOUSE/MANUFACTURING
Tm
7L.LNORTH
1 p s0 100 200 400
1, ®R ---
y i711- ir j
1990
NORTHW PROPOSED
BUSINESS GENERAL
CAMPUS DEVELOPMENT PLAN
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
SRF1990 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Rv-Ka=e-F&um\ NORTHWEST BUSINESS CAMPUS TRAFFIC STUDY
Prudential
NOVEMBER 3,1989
4
w
A/-'OFFICE/OFFICE RESE:R C'
B - OFFICE
C - HOTE-6-MOT-E-L OFFICE
ii D - COMMERCIAL COMBINATION
W7, - E - OFFICE/ OFFICE - BANK
F - OFFICE
G - SERVICE; -'-STATION
K7
H INDUSTRIAL
mot
Nortkulest) cRusiness Campus
PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE CO.
V,,'4AMS KNI11".404 -N-
GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN
3-1-82
MM
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
DATE: June 27, 1990 For City Council Meeting of July 2, 1990
TO: James G. Willis, City Manager
FROM: Community Development Coordinator ChaD6:j.illerud through
Community Development Director Blair Tremere
SUBJECT: MUTUAL INVESTMENT PROPERTIES. AMENDED CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND
SITE PLAN FOR ENLARGED OUTDOOR STORAGE AT "MINN-WELL SUPPLY
COMPANY" LOCATED AT 15400 28TH AVENUE NORTH (90023)
ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt the attached resolution providing for the
approval of an amended Site Plan and Conditional Use Permit to permit
the addition of 3,150 square feet of outdoor storage to the existing
outdoor storage at this location, consistent with the recommendation of
the Planning Commission.
BACKGROUND:
At its meeting June 13, 1990, the Planning Commission, on a vote of 5-1,
acted to recommend approval of this proposal to enlarge an existing outdoor
storage area by extending the existing screen fence 30 feet easterly and
providing new paved surface. The enlarged storage area would be fenced in
the same manner as the existing storage area is.
The dissenting Commissioner indicated that he did not feel that the
screening of the existing outdoor storage was adequate. He commented that
to extend the storage area would be to compound what he viewed as an
existing problem.
Other Commissioners did not concur with this.
see next page)
File 90023
Page Two
RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS:
I hereby recommend adoption of the attached resolution providing for the
approval of an amended Site Plan and Conditional Use Permit for "Minn -Well
Supply Company" to enlarge the outdoor storage area, as recommended by the
Planning Commission.
Attachments:
1. Resolution Approving Amended
2. Planning Commission Minutes
3. Engineer's Memorandum
4. Location Map
5. Site Plan Graphics
cc/cd/90023:dl)
Site Plan and Conditional Use Permit
of June 13, 1990
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a meeting of the
City Council of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, was held on the day
of , 19 The following members were present:
The following members were absent:
moved its adoption:
introduced the following Resolution and
RESOLUTION 90 -
APPROVING AMENDED CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND SITE PLAN FOR MUTUAL INVESTMENT
PROPERTIES FOR ENLARGED OUTSIDE STORAGE AT "MINN-WELL SUPPLY COMPANY" (90023)
WHEREAS, Mutual Investment Properties has requested approval for an Amended
Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan for enlarged outside storage (3,150
square feet) at Minn -Well Supply Company for property located 15400 28th
Avenue North; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed said request at a duly called
Public Hearing and recommends approval;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the request by
Mutual Investment Properties has requested approval for an Amended Conditional
Use Permit and Site Plan for enlarged outside storage at Minn -Well Supply
Company for property located 15400 28th Avenue North subject to the following
conditions:
1. Compliance with the City Engineer's Memorandum.
2. Submission of required financial guarantee and Site Performance Agreement
for completion of site improvements.
3. Any subsequent phases or expansions are subject to required reviews and
approvals per Ordinance provisions.
4. Compliance with the Ordinance regarding the location of fire lanes.
5. An 82 x 11 inch "As Built" Fire Protection Plan shall be submitted prior
to the release or reduction of any site improvement bonds per City Policy.
see next page)
Resolution No. ~
File 90023
Page Two
6. Compliance with applicable conditions of Resolution 87-722 approving the
initial Site Plan and Conditional Use Permit.
The motion for adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded
by , and upon vote being taken thereon,
the following voted in favor thereof:
The following voted against or abstained
Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
Planning Commission Minutes
June 13, 1990
Page 87
Lindberg stated that the Indirect Source Permit will
be pdated from the previous 1985 approval. He stated
that new traffic analysis was done which reconfirmed the
past a lysis. Mr. Lindberg said that the private street
in Area was proposed so that the natural resources could
be presery
Chairman Plufk opened the Public Hearing.
Chairman Plufka in oduced Mr. John Dumez of 2510 Rosewood
Lane.
Mr. Dumez asked if a tratKic signal would be placed at the
intersection of Northwest RWlevard and Campus Drive.
City Engineer Faulkner stated t t a recent traffic count
indicated that the intersection w close to warranting a
traffic signal.
Chairman Plufka closed the Public HeariZtq.
Discussion continueded with regard to the vious changes
made to the MPUD Concept Plan from its incep 'on in 1981
to the present proposed amendment.
MOTION by Commissioner Wire, seconded by Commis ioner
Zylla to recommend approval of the Amended MPUD Con pt
Plan for Prudential Insurance Company for the "Northwe
Business Campus" located at the Northeast corner o
Highway 55 and 1-494 subject to the conditions listed in
the June 7, 1990 Staff Report.
MOTION to amend by Commissioner Marofsky to remove Area E
and Area F from the approval recommendation until a
diagram showing the change in the square footage of the
areas was available.
Motion failed for lack of a second.
Roll Call Vote. 6 Ayes. MOTION carried.
Chairman Plufka introduced the request of Mutual
Investment Company for an Amended Conditional Use Permit
and Site Plan for Minn -Well Supply Company for enlarged
outside storage located at 15400 28th Avenue North.
Chairman Plufka waived the review of the June 7, 1990
Staff Report.
Chairman Plufka introduced Mr. Bill Reavley representing
the petitioner.
MOT,LON TO AMEND
MOTION FAILEUIT LACK
OF SECOND
VOTE - MOTION CARR
MUTUAL INVESTMENT
COMPANY (90023)
Planning Commission Minutes
June 13, 1990
Page 88
Mr. Reavley stated that he was in agreement with the June
7, 1990 Staff Report.
Commissioner Marofsky stated that the pipe stored at the
rear of the property was visible above the fence.
Mr. Reavley stated that this is not a normal condition and
that the increase in storage area size would greatly
reduce the height of the stacked pipe.
Commissioner Marofsky stated that even though the storage
of materials is below the fence top it is still visible
from 28th Avenue North, and unless a higher fence and
lower stacks were maintained they would be visible. He
said that the Ordinance requires that all storage areas
must be screened.
Coordinator Dillerud stated that because the area slopes
from south to north it will continue to be somewhat
visible from 28th Street.
Chairman Plufka opened the Public Hearing.
Chairman Plufka closed the Public Hearing as there was no
one in attendance to speak on the issue.
MOTION by Commissioner Stulberg, seconded by Commissioner
Pierce to recommend approval of the petition by Mutual
Investment Company for an Amended Conditional Use Permit
and Site Plan for Minn -Well Supply Company for enlarged
outside storage located at 15400 28th Avenue North subject
to the Conditions listed in the June 7, 1990 Staff Report.
Roll Call Vote. 5 Ayes, Commissioner Marofsky, Nay.
MOTION carried on a 5-1 vote.
Commissioner Marofsky stated that he voted Nay because the
site does not meet screening requirements from the street
and adjacent property, and there is no assurance that it
will be screened in the future.
Commissioner Stulberg stated that the petition is a
Conditional Use Permit which will be reviewed annually for
compliance with the Ordinance.
Chairman Plufka introduced the request of Robert Larsen
Partners for a Preliminary Plat, General Development Plan
and Variance to allow more than one principal struc
a lot located at the southeast quadrant o ay 55 and
Cottonwood Lane.
Coordinato erud reviewed the "June 1, 1990 Staff
MOTION TO APPROVE
VOTE - MOTION CARRIED
ROBERT TNERS
City of Plymouth
E N G I N E E R' S M E M 0
to
Planning Commission & City Council
DATE: June 6, 1990
FILE NO.: 90023
PETITIONER: Mr. Tim O'Conner, Mutual Investment Properties, 15400 -28th Avenue
North, Suite 2, Plymouth, MN 55447
SITE PLAN: PALLETIZED PIPE STORAGE AREA - MUTUAL INVESTMENT COMPANY
LOCATION: North of 28th Avenue, east of Vicksburg Lane in the southwest 1/4 of
Section 21.
ASSESSMENT RECORDS:
N/A Yes No
1. X Watermain area assessments have been levied based on proposed use.
2. X Sanitary sewer area assessments have been levied based on proposed
use.
3. X SAC and REC charges will be payable at the time building permits are
issued.
Area charges are subject to change periodically as they are reviewed
annually on January 1. The rate assessed would be that in effect at
the time of Site Plan approval: These are in addition to the
assessments shown in No. 1 and No. 2.
4. Area assessments estimated - None.
5. Other additional assessments estimated: None.
LEGAL/EASEMENTS/PERMITS:
N/A Yes No
6. _ X _ Property is one parcel -
The approval of the site plan as proposed requires that a lot
consolidation be approved by the City Council and the necessary
resolution should be processed at the same time as the site plan
approval.
N/A Yes No
7. X _ Complies with standard utility/drainage easements -
The current City ordinance requires utility and drainage easements
ten feet (10') in width adjoining all streets and six feet (6') in
width adjoining side and rear lot lines. (If easements are required
it is necessary for the owner to submit separate easement documents
executed and in recordable form prior to the issuance of any
building permits.)
X _ Complies with ponding requirements -
The City will require the dedication of drainage easements for
ponding purposes on all property lying below the established 100
year high water elevation and conformance with the City's
comprehensive storm water requirements.
9. X All standard utility easements required for construction are
provided -
The following easements will be required for construction of
utilities.
N/A Yes No
10. X All existing unnecessary easements and rights-of-way have been
vacated -
It will be necessary to vacate the obsolete easements/right-of-way
to facilitate the development. It should be noted that this
vacation is not an automatic process in conjunction with the
platting process. It is entirely dependent upon the City receiving
a petition for the vacation from the property owner; therefore, it
is their responsibility to submit a petition as well as legal
descriptions of easements proposed to be vacated.
11. XX The Owner's Duplicate Certificate of Title has been submitted to the
City with this application -
It will be necessary for the property owner to provide the City
Attorney with the Owner's Duplicate Certificate of Title in order
that he may file the required easements referred to above.
2-
UTILITIES AND TRAFFIC:
N/A Yes No
12. _ _ XX All necessary permits for this project have been obtained -
The following permits must be obtained by the developer:
DNR
MN DOT
Hennepin County
MPCA
State Health Department
XX Bassett Creek
Minnehaha Creek
Elm Creek
Shingle Creek
Army Corps of Engineers
Other
The developer must comply with the conditions within any permit.
13. _ _ X Complies with Storm Drainage Plan -
The site plan will be submitted to the City's consulting engineer
for review to see if it is in conformance with the City's
Comprehensive Storm Drainage Plan. All of their recommendations
shall be incorporated in a revised plan. The grading and drainage
plan shall also indicate proposed methods of erosion control,
including the placement of silt fence in strategic locations.
Additionally, the following revisions will be necessary: An
additional catchbasin shall be constructed over the existing storm
sewer pipe that crosses through therrooposed Palletized pipe storage
area to accent the storm water from the storage area.
N/A Yes No
14. XX Necessary fire hydrants provided -
The City of Plymouth requires that all parts of a building such as
the one proposed be within 300 feet of a fire hydrant. It will be
necessary to locate hydrants in such a manner that the site plan
complies with this section of the City Ordinance.
15. XX Size and type of material proposed in utility systems has been
provided
The utility plan shall be revised to indicate the size and type of
material required in the proposed sanitary sewer, watermain services
and storm sewer.
16. XX _ Post indicator valve - fire department connection
It will be necessary to locate the post indicator valve in such a
manner that it will not render any of the existing fire hydrants
inoperable.
3-
N/A Yes No
14
17. X Hydrant valves provided -
All new fire hydrants shall be valved with 6" gate valves per City
Engineering Guidelines Detail Plate No. W-2. This plate should be
referenced on the site plan.
18. X Sanitary sewer clean -outs provided -
It will be necessary to provide clean -outs on the proposed internal
sanitary sewer system at a maximum of 100 foot intervals.
19. X Acceleration/deceleration lanes provided -
Acceleration/deceleration lanes are required at the intersection of
and
N/A Yes No
20. X _ All existing street right-of-ways are required width -
Additional right-of-way will be required on
21. X _ _ Complies with site drainage requirements -
The City will not permit drainage onto a City street from a private
parking lot; therefore, the site plan shall be revised accordingly.
4-
0 -
NI A Yes No
22. _ _ X Curb and gutter provided -
The City requires B-612 concrete curb and gutter at all entrances
and where drainage must be controlled, Curb Stone may be used where
it is not necessary to control drainage. For traffic control either
B-612 or curb stone is required around the bituminous surfaced
parking lot. The site plan shall be revised to indicate compliance
with this requirement. B-612 concrete curb will be required around
the pelletized storage area to control drainage.
23. X _ Complies with parking lot standards -
The City will require that all traveled areas within the parking
lot, as well as the proposed entrances, shall be constructed to a
7 -ton standard City design with six inches of Class 5 100% crushed
limestone and three inches of 2341 wear or five and one-half inches
of 2331 base and two inches of 2341 wear. All parking areas may be
constructed to a standard 5 -ton design consisting of four inches of
Class 5 1006 crushed base and two inch bituminous mat. The site
plan shall be revised to indicate compliance with these
requirements.
STANDARDS:
N/A Yes No
24. X It will be necessary to contact Bob Fasching, the City's utility
foreman,
24 hours in advance of making any proposed utility connections to
the City's sanitary sewer and water systems. The developer shall
also be responsible for contacting Jim Kolstad of the Public Works
Department for an excavating permit prior to any digging within the
City's right-of-way. All connections to the water system shall be
via wet tap.
25. _ X The City will require reproducible mylar prints of sanitary sewer,
water service and storm sewer As-Builts for the site prior to
occupancy permits being granted.
26. X The site plan complies with the City of Plymouth's current
Engineering Standards Manual. Note Items 12. 13, 22, 26, 27A, 27B.
27C. and 27D.
5-
SPECIAL CONDITIONS REOUIRED: 14
27. A. A detail of the catchbasin structure shall be noted on the Site Plan.
B. The B-612 curb and gutter detail shall be shown on the Site Plan.
C. The Site Plan shall note at a minimum spot elevations for the proposed
palletized storage area.
D. No encroachment into the ponding easement area will be allowed. It appears
that a retaining wall will be necessary to avoid the necessary ponding area.
Submitted by:
Daniel L. Faulkner, P. E.
City Engineer
IMS\ 1(l i I\-
s
I
f Norte :..
570. D ,
777
7
y
fC1 D F#te. filar L r.,x n
OLA
ON WkIt,
r V
PRQ
PHASE
iL
r ft
mai`i.,f ...
T;
k c ., F t t `^' 7i4FQ/ ad ' : "31 if
1 a t a .x: -
I "".k i. E.• ra. y., t •n "''..
tint. .... , .?,
a , } +' "
L i. .. • t,z <, J } , . _ y ..` a+•: _
t;' ' .+
a tt't. -,
a• ,. m t _ a» .
t "'?`: yp aS
a __'
J p " j>yj- _ i '_; `
t ' ., .. r. ja`. z •
i. +TK'i' ,
tyw,
t, ,.,..as,F1
aa, i+ '^• ° .,T .' \ `"""' y t[r+w : •31' >+-r+ t- a = a
It .s
f _ _ ...
na 3 r {LE.r.t x C
T`
ate
t ` C
Q 11 Y1 , 5a' ,.+c,. y '
sy ;
rr
c 2 + ,.<
r
Y •
k't .,.t-' .
JO q -
w
ECtfON y
f }•^'
elm
y
l `Y r1l•
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
DATE: June 27, 1990 For City Council Meeting of July 2, 1990
TO: James G. Willis, City Manager
FROM: Community Development Coordinator Charls illerud through
Community Development Director Blair Trem
SUBJECT: ROBERT LARSEN PARTNERS. PRELIMINARY PLAT/GENERAL DEVELOPMENT
PLAN AND VARIANCE FOR THE EXISTING PLYMOUTH SHOPPING CENTER IN
THE SOUTHEAST QUADRANT OF HIGHWAY 55 AND COTTONWOOD LANE (90024)
ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt the attached resolution providing for the
approval of a Preliminary Plat and General Development Plan, including a
variance to permit two structures on a single parcel, as recommended by
the Planning Commission.
BACKGROUND:
At its meeting June 13, 1990, the Planning Commission, on a vote of 5-1,
acted to recommend approval of this Preliminary Plat, General Development
Plan, and variance for the redevelopment and expansion of the existing
Plymouth shopping center on the existing site of 18.7 acres. The General
Development Plan proposes an addition to the existing shopping center
structure of 8,127 square feet (to the existing 33,440 square feet) and
27,010 square feet of new construction in three structures. The variance is
to permit the location of a second structure on the proposed lot which would
contain the existing shopping center structure. The purpose for the
variance is the existence of a sanitary sewer that would be covered by any
addition on the east end of the existing shopping center.
The dissenting Commissioner indicated his vote was based on the proposed
alignment of County Road 73 that would result from the Preliminary Plat
proposed. He indicated that the intersection of the proposed South Service
Road to Highway 55 with the proposed realignment of County Road 73 should be
closer to existing Highway 55 to avoid conflicts with grades, existing
structures, and wetland areas.
see next page)
File 90024 .
Page Two
PRIMARY ISSUES AND ANALYSIS:
The design of this site has been the subject of prior applications over the
past three years. There has been substantial public discussions on the
subject of the road alignments as they relate to the Plymouth Transportation
Plan.
Amendments were made to the Transportation Plan (Thoroughfare Section) late
in 1989 as a function of the overall updated Plymouth Transportation Plan
effort by the City Council. These modifications were recommended by the
Engineering Consultants based on their review of traffic movement needs in
this area and the physical constraints that would influence the location of
the corridors to accommodate these traffic needs. The Preliminary Plat and
General Development Plan proposed is responsive to the amended Thoroughfare
Guide Plan for this area of the Community, as amended in 1989.
RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS:
I hereby recommend adoption of the attached resolution providing for the
approval of a Preliminary Plan/General Development Plan and Zoning Ordinance
variance for the "Plymouth Shopping Center", as recommended by the Planning
Commission.
Attachments:
1. Resolution Approving Preliminary Plat/General Development Plan and
Zoning Variances
2. Planning Commission Minutes of June 13, 1990
3. Engineer's Memorandum
4. Location Map
5. Site Graphics
6. Thoroughfare Guide Plan Graphic
cc/cd/90024:dl)
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a meeting of the
City Council of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, was held on the day
of , 19 The following members were present:
The following members were absent:
introduced the following Resolution and
moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION 90 -
APPROVING PRELIMINARY PLAT AND GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR ROBERT LARSEN
PARTNERS FOR "PLAZA 55 SHOPPING CENTER" (90024)
WHEREAS, Robert Larsen Partners has requested approval for a Preliminary Plat
and General Development Plan for Plaza 55 Shopping Center, a plat for 2 lots
and 1 outlot on 18.7 acres and a General Development Plan for an 8,127 square
foot addition to the existing 33,440 square foot shopping center and 27,010
square feet of new construction in three structures located at the southeast
quadrant of Highway 55 and Cottonwood Lane; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed said request at a duly called
Public Hearing and recommends approval;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA, that it hereby does approve the request by Robert Larsen
Partners for a Preliminary Plat and General Development Plan for Plaza 55
Shopping Center for a plat for 2 lots and 1 outlot on 18.7 acres and a General
Development Plan for an 8,127 square foot addition to the existing 33,440
square foot shopping center and 27,010 square feet of new construction in
three structures located at the southeast quadrant of Highway 55 and
Cottonwood Lane, subject to the following conditions:
1. Compliance with the City Engineer's Memorandum.
2. Removal of all dead or dying trees from the property at the owner's
expense.
3. Payment of park dedication fees -in -lieu of dedication prior to permit
issuance in accordance with the Dedication Policy in effect at the time
of building permit issuance.
4. Compliance with Policy Resolution 79-80 regarding minimum floor
elevations for new structures in subdivisions adjacent to, or containing
any open storm water drainage facility.
5. No building permits shall be issued until the Final Plat is filed and
recorded with Hennepin County.
see next page)
if
Resolutions No.
File 90024
Page Two
6. Incorporation of tree protection provisions in the Final Plat and
Development Contract approval.
7. Final Plat design documents shall demonstrate measures to minimize
wetland encroachment related to construction of the Highway 55 South
Service Drive intersection with County Road 73.
8. The Final Plat and Site Plan(s) shall demonstrate elimination of all
encroachment on State or Federal wetlands not related to public street
construction consistent with #7 above.
9. The initial Site Plan shall' demonstrate efforts to retain existing
forestry resources on site including compliance with City Council
Resolution 89-439 regarding preservation of trees.
10. Property owners within 500 feet shall be notified of Site Plan
applications for new buildings that are scheduled to be considered by the
Planning Commission with current mailing lists and labels provided by the
developer
The motion for adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded
by , and upon vote being taken thereon,
the following voted in favor thereof:
The following voted against or abstained
Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
Planning Commission Minutes
June 13, 1990
Page 88
11- Reavley stated that he was in agreement with the June
1,\
ofe
Report.
CMarofsky stated that the pipe stored at the
rroperty was visible above the fence.
Mated thatthis is not a normal condition and
tcr se in storage area size would greatly
reigh of the stacked pipe.
Commissioner Marofsk tated that even though the storage
of materials is below\
requi
top it is still visible
from 28th Avenue Nortess a higher fence and
lower stacks were maiy would be visible. He
said that the Ordinanthat all storage areas
must be screened.
Coordinator Dillerud stated that b ause the area slopes
from south to north it will cont i a to be somewhat
visible from 28th Street.
Chairman Plufka opened the Public Hearing.
Chairman Plufka closed the Public Hearing as theme was no
one in attendance to speak on the issue.
MOTION by Commissioner Stulberg, seconded by Commissi er
Pierce to recommend approval of the petition by Mutu
Investment Company for an Amended Conditional Use Permit
and Site Plan for Minn -Well Supply Company for enlarged
outside storage located at 15400 28th Avenue North subject
to the Conditions listed in the June 7, 1990 Staff Report.
Roll Call Vote. 5 Ayes, Commissioner Marofsky, Nay.
MOTION carried on a 5-1 vote.
Commissioner Marofsky stated that he voted Nay because the
site does not meet screening requirements from the street
and adjacent property, and there is no assurance that it
will be screened in the future.
Commissioner Stulberg stated that the petition is a
Conditional Use Permit which will be reviewed annually for
compliance with the Ordinance.
Chairman Plufka introduced the request of Robert Larsen
Partners for a Preliminary Plat, General Development Plan
and Variance to allow more than one principal structure on
a lot located at the southeast quadrant of Highway 55 and
Cottonwood Lane.
Coordinator Dillerud reviewed the `June 1, 1990 Staff
Report.
MOTION TO APPROVE
VOTENk MOTION CARRIED
ROBERT LARSEN PARTNERS
90024)
Planning Commission Minutes
June 13, 1990
Page 89
Chairman Plufka introduced Mr. Kelly Doran representing
the petitioner.
Mr. Doran stated that he was in agreement with the June 1,
1990 Staff Report. He said that there is currently no
storm water retention on the property; he is willing to
discuss the cul-de-sac at Cottonwood Lane; the developer
will not fill the wetland area; and, they will try to
change the slope on the southeast corner of the property.
Chairman Plufka opened the Public Hearing.
Chairman Plufka introduced Mr. Gary Brown and Ms. Denise
Gilmore jointly of 11410 5th Avenue North.
Ms. Gilmore and Mr. Brown stated that their concerns were
for the loss of wildlife and trees. They stated a natural
noise barrier was created by the existing trees.
Chairman Plufka introduced Mr. Bruce Forsman of 515
Cottonwood Lane North.
Mr. Forsman stated he did not see the need for a larger
shopping center, and was concerned that the change in
County Road 73 would cause more runoff into the wetlands,
and be damaging.
Chairman Plufka introduced Ms. Peggy Murphy of 309 North
Zachary Lane.
Ms. Murphy stated that the new County Road 73 and the
proposed building would destroy the wildlife area and that
there was no need for additional commercial property in
the area.
Commissioner Marofsky left the table at 8:40 p.m.
Chairman Plufka introduce Mr. Harvey Schiebe of 1215
Goldenrod Lane.
Mr. Schiebe stated that he was against the closing of West
Medicine Lake Road and that it should be kept open to the
south only. He also said that he felt most of the trees
on the south edge of the property were worthless and that
replacement with evergreens would enhance the area.
Chairman Plufka introduced Mr. Bruce Thompson of 11018 Old
County Road 15.
Mr. Thompson stated that he felt this proposal was forcing
the County Road 73 development and that the expense of
this road was an expense imposed on taxpayers for private
interest. He said that the frontage road will encroach on
the wetland area and the storm water storage area is now
Planning Commission Minutes
June 13, 1990
Page 90
overflowing. He questioned how shopping center traffic
will be handled until County Road 73 is complete.
Chairman Plufka explained that the construction of County
Road 73 is part of the Thoroughfare Guide Plan adopted by
the City and was not driven by private interests.
Chairman Plufka introduced Mrs. Marilyn Thompson of 11018
Old County Road 15.
Mrs. Thompson stated that a letter received for the Corps
of Engineers in January show a building design which
differs from the current plan. She said she was concerned
about some dirt that was piled on the southern edge of the
site.
Mr. Doran explained that a new application would be
submitted that would depict the design of the proposed
building.
Chairman Plufka introduced Ms. Marion Bauer of 11010
County Road 15.
Ms. Bauer stated that she was concerned about the dirt
piled on the site. She also said that she had lived in
the area for 43 years and was in favor of the shopping
center because it was convenient, and within walking
distance.
Chairman Plufka introduced Mr. Bob Courtney of 800
Cottonwood Lane.
Mr. Courtney stated that he would prefer the west side of
the site be buffered by a privacy fence.
Chairman Plufka reintroduced Mr. Bruce Thompson.
Mr. Thompson stated he would like to know the staging
plans for the development.
Mr. Doran stated that all development would be done at one
time with the exception of the building along County Road
73. This building will depend on the completion of County
Road 73. Mr. Doran also stated that the developer was not
unhappy with the current road structure and did not ask
for the development of County Road 73.
Chairman Plufka closed the Public Hearing.
Commissioner Wire asked if the developer had a map of the
Corps of Engineers wetland that was defined by types of
vegetation. He asked what type of fence would be used for
the holding pond area.
Planning Commission Minutes
June 13, 1990
Page 91
Mr. Doran stated that the definition of the wetland area
would be determined with the submission of the Site Plan.
He said that the Ordinance was clear as to type of
screening required for the area and that the developer
would abide by the requirements.
MOTION by Commissioner Zylla, seconded by Commissioner MOTION TO APPROVE
Pierce to recommend approval of the petition by Robert
Larsen Partners for a Preliminary Plat, General
Development Plan and Variance to allow more than one
principal structure on a lot located at the southeast
quadrant of Highway 55 and Cottonwood Lane subject to the
conditions listed in the June 1, 1990 Staff Report.
MOTION to amend by Commissioner Wire, seconded by MOTION TO AMEND
Commissioner Pierce to add a condition stating that the
alignment of County Road 73 be altered to the northeast so
that there would be no impact on the wetlands and so that
the intersection would be closer to the existing
intersection of County Road 73 and State Highway 55.
Commissioner Pierce stated that the current plan for
County Road 73 may not be the best place for the roadway
or the service drive.
Commissioner Zylla stated that he felt conditions No. 7
and 8 covered the amendment proposed by Commissioner Wire.
Roll Call Vote. 2 Ayes. Commissioners Zylla, Tierney, VOTE - MOTION FAILED
Stulberg and Chairman Plufka, Nay. MOTION to amend failed
on a vote of 2-4.
MOTION to amend by Commissioner Stulberg that a cul-de-sac MOTION TO AMEND
be constructed by the petitioner on the extension of
Cottonwood Lane.
MOTION failed for lack of a second. MOTION FAILED FOR LACK
OF A SECOND
MOTION by Commissioner Stulberg, seconded by Commissioner MOTION TO APPROVE
Pierce that residents within 300 feet of the development
and those present this evening be notified when the Site
Plan request comes before the Planning Commission.
Roll Call Vote. 6 Ayes. MOTION carried.
MOTION to amend by Chairman Plufka, seconded by MOTION TO AMEND
Commissioner Wire that the motion to notify neighbors when
the Site Plan comes before the Planning Commission be
changed to include property owners within 500 feet.
Roll Call Vote. 6 Ayes. MOTION carried. VOTE - MOTION CARRIED
Planning Commission Minutes
June 13, 1990
Page 92
Roll Call Vote on Main Motion. 5 Ayes. Commissioner VOTE - MOTION CARRIED
Wire, Nay. MOTION carried on a vote of 5-1.
Commissioner Wire stated that his Nay vote was because of
his objection to the alignment of County Road 73 and was
not intended to be a disapproval of the petition.
Chairman Plufka called a recess at 9:25 p.m.
Chairman Plufka reconvened the meeting at 9:32 p.m.
Chairman Plufka introduced the request of Hans Hagen HANS HAGEN HO S/
Hames/Westar-Rome Partners for a Conditional Use Permit to WESTAR-ROME ARTNERS
undertake land reclamation activities in the FRD Zone (90036)
located at the southwest quadrant of Medina Road and
County Road 24.
Coordinator Dillerud reviewed the June 7, 1990 Staff
Report.
Commissioner Stulberg stepped down from the table.
Chairman Plufka introduced Mr. Richard Bloom representin
the petitioners.
Mr. Bloom stated that he was in agreement with the J e 7,
1990 Staff Report. He said most of the fill w ld be
placed on the southern site and that some roug grading
would be done to the new County Road 24 c ridor, if
approved.
Chairman Plufka opened the Public Hearing
Chairman Plufka introduced Mr. Mich Halbach of 3185
Kimberly Lane.
Mr. Halbach stated his concern were whether the fill
could be seen from the road an whether the dust would be
controlled.
Mr. Bloom stated that t valley area would be filled
first, the fill woul be seeded immediately after
stockpiling. The fil would be removed in 1-2 months.
Chairman Plufka in oduced Mr. Steve Leuer of 17435 Medina
Road.
Mr. Leuer st ed that his concern was the road access to
the site.
Mr. Blo stated that the County has directed that access
to th site be only from Medina Road and not from County
Roa 24.
airman Plufka closed the Public Hearing.
City of Plymouth
E N G I N E E R' S M E M 0
to
Planning Commission & City Council
DATE: June 6, 1990
FILE NO.: 90024
PETITIONER: Mr. Kelly Doran, Robert Larson Partners, 732 Avenue South, #281,
Minneapolis, MN 55402
PRELIMINARY PLAT: PLAZA 55
LOCATION: South of State Highway 55, east of Cottonwood Lane in the
northeast 1/4 of Section 35
ASSESSMENT RECORDS:
N/A Yes No
1. _ X Watermain area assessments have been levied based on proposed use.
2. X Sanitary sewer area assessments have been levied based on proposed
use.
3. _ X SAC and REC charges will be payable at the time building permits are
issued.
Area charges are subject to change periodically as they are reviewed
annually on January 1. The rate assessed would be that in effect at
the time of final plat approval. These are in addition to the
assessments shown in No. 1 and No. 2.
4. Area assessments: None.
5. Other additional assessments estimated: The developer will be
responsible for one-half the cost of constructing the new frontage
road abutting their property.
LEGAL/EASEMENTS/PERMITS:
N/A Yes No
6. X Complies with standard utility/drainage easements -
The City will require utility and drainage easements ten feet (10')
in width adjoining all streets and six feet (6') in width adjoining
side and rear lot lines.
N/A Yes No
7. _ _ X All standard utility easements required for construction are provided
The City will require twenty foot (20') utility and drainage
easements for proposed utilities along the lot lines where these
utilities are proposed to be installed. This item has been reviewed
with the final plat and final construction plans. A 20 foot drainage
and utility easement shall be provided over the existing sanitary
sewer, and for the proposed storm sewer from Pond BC -P32 to Highway
8. _ _ X Complies with ponding requirements -
The City will require the dedication of drainage easements for
ponding purposes on all property lying below the established 100 year
high water elevation and conformance with the City's comprehensive
storm water drainage plan. Drainage easement for ponding purposes
shall be provided for Pond BC -P32 to an elevation of 895.30. and for
9. X All existing unnecessary easements and rights-of-way have been
vacated
It will be necessary to vacate the obsolete easements/right-of-way to
facilitate the development. This is not an automatic process in
conjunction with the platting process. It is the owner's
responsibility to submit a petition as well as legal descriptions of
easements proposed to be vacated. A portion of the old frontage road
W
10. X The Owner's Duplicate Certificate of Title has been submitted to the
City with this application - If it is subsequently determined that
the subject property is abstract property, then this requirement does
not apply.
It will be necessary for the property owner to provide the City
Attorney with the Owner's Duplicate Certificate of Title in order
that he may file the required easements referred to above.
11. _ _ X All necessary permits for this project have been obtained -
The following permits must be obtained by the developer:
X DNR
X MnDOT
X Hennepin County
MPCA
State Health Department
X Bassett Creek
Minnehaha Creek
Elm Creek
Shingle Creek
X Army Corps of Engineers
Other
The developer must comply
2with
the conditions within any permit.
TRANSPORTATION:
N/A Yes No
12. X Conforms with the City's grid system for street names -
The names of the proposed streets in the plat must conform to the
City grid system for street names. The following changes will be
necessary.
13. _ X Conforms with the City's adopted Thoroughfare Guide Plan -
The following revisions must be made to conform with the City's
adopted Thoroughfare Guide Plan.
14. X _ Acceleration/deceleration lanes provided -
Acceleration/deceleration lanes are required at the intersection of
and
15. X All existing street rights-of-way are required width -
Additional right-of-way will be required on As shown on the
Preliminary Plan,
N/A Yes No
16. _ X Conforms with City standards requiring the developer to construct
utilities necessary to serve this plat -
In accordance with City standards, the developer shall be responsible
for constructing the necessary sanitary sewer, water, storm sewer and
streets needed to serve this plat. A registered professional
engineer must prepare the plans and profiles of the proposed sanitary
sewer, watermain, storm sewer facilities and streets to serve the
development.
3 -
N/A Yes No
17. X _ Preliminary utility plans submitted comply with all City requirements
The developer has submitted the required preliminary plans for the
proposed sanitary sewer, watermain and storm sewer facilities.
X Per developer's request a preliminary report and plan will be
prepared by the City -
If it is their desire to have the City construct these facilities as
part of its Capital Improvements Program, a petition must be
submitted to the City. The cutoff date for petitions is October 1,
of the year preceding construction.
The developer shall petition the City to construct the frontage road
and County Road 73 and waive their rights to an assessment hearing
for the project that will be assessed in the future.
19. _ _ X Conforms with City policy regarding minimum basement elevations -
Minimum basement elevations must be established for the following
lots.
The minimum basement elevations for the building adjacent to Pond BC
P32 shall be 897.30 and two feet above the 100 year high water
elevation for the pond purposed to be constructed south of the
existing building.
N/A Yes No
20. _ X The preliminary plans conform to the City's adopted Comprehensive
Water Distribution Plan -
The following revisions will be required:
21. X The preliminary plans conform to the City's adopted Comprehensive
Sanitary Sewer Plan -
The following revisions will be required:
4 -
PRELIMINARY GRADING DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL:
N/A Yes No
22. X It will be necessary to contact Bob Fasching, the City's utility
foreman, 24 hours in advance of making any proposed utility
connections to the City's sanitary sewer and water systems. The
developer shall also be responsible for contacting Jim Kolstad of the
Public Works Department for an excavating permit prior to any digging
within the City right-of-way. All water connections shall be via
wet tan.
23. _ _ X Complies with Storm Drainage Plan -
The grading, drainage and erosion control plan has been submitted to
the City's Consulting Engineer for review to see if it is in
conformance with the City's Comprehensive Storm Drainage Plan. All
of their recommendations shall be incorporated in a revised plan.
The grading and drainage plan shall also indicate proposed methods of
erosion control, including the placement of silt fence in strategic
locations. Additionally, the following revisions will be necessary:
Shall comply with all agency permits.
24. A. Until the new frontage road and County Road 73 are constructed, the existing
access to Highway 55 will remain open to traffic with the following conditions:
o Existing driveway access opposite West Medicine Lake Drive to the frontage
road shall be closed.
o Existing right in/right out access point east of West Medicine Lake Drive
from the frontage road to Highway 55 shall be closed.
o Temporary accesses may be provided at the west side of the property from
the existing frontage road and from proposed Lot 2 to the existing
frontage road via a temporary paved drive.
B. Before any occupancy of the proposed building the frontage road shall be
reconstructed from Cottonwood Lane to the west line of Lot 2.
C. All slopes greater than 3 to 1 along proposed County Road 73 shall be either
engineered slopes or retaining walls.
D. Storm sewer calculations, along with pond calculations, shall be submitted with
the final grading plan.
E. Profile sheets shall be provided for the intersection of the new frontage road
and Cottonwood Lane along with the construction details of retaining walls if
necessary. The maximum grade for a local street is 7% with a 3% maximum
intersection grade to provide a "landing."
5 -
F. Comments on the site utilities and paving will be made when a Site Pian
application is submitted.
Submitted by: `ele
Daniel L. Faulkner, P.E.
City Engineer
6 .! •1 I I I 631,L%, C, 14, 'Fm Iq
A !!L
Sl MMMMI
F
ro
LA.
V \ \
22' res
wn6199fI2 ..+., ,.., ,„ew . n f
AM
is of i 63g £ :'s F• ; g:szi .ss € e £= x `:£ .£:ell r$re;i:Eh.
Ybii?sF °=Sail°±¢!'s Fj:"sss*'S=ltla6dgjFf;?
ga.
t:gzg9cY= 's
g:,'
g9}
iYj>r€Eiz'si"E° ssi''cs':4x
ggg°$gg$8o888$8`q'A8$88e$88i"•$r£££i$F8 8 g$S$8$888zIg4$8$$g4£fr2$$?£££8£86$88 £$088 $$$£8=
I
SRFShprat—F.wch, la.
u,.se.. u, I
THOROUGHFARE GUIDE PLAN
rp City of Plymouth, Minnesota
FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION NOTICE TO USERS
RYCApd Arterials Mayr Collectors 1. The Cly Council may authorize
amendments to this Pian/map. A
Intermedate Arterials Minor Cosectors record of amendments is
maintained W the Community
Minor Arterials O Exs%ig Interchanges Deveapment Department.
Planned Interchanges 2. Refer to Comprehensive Plan
for exploinotion of thoroughfare
guide plan.
I
SRFShprat—F.wch, la.
u,.se.. u, I
MEMO *
0 ID
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
DATE: June 27, 1990 For City Council Meeting of July 2, 1990
TO: James G. Willis, City Manager
FROM: Community Development Coordinator Charl cdE ill rud through
Community Development Director Blair Tremere —
SUBJECT: MEYER/GONYEA LAND DEVELOPMENT COMPANY. DIVISION/CONSOLIDATION OF
PLATTED PROPERTY, AND AMENDED GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN LOCATED AT
THE SOUTH SIDE OF 45TH AVENUE NORTH BETWEEN NATHAN LANE AND STATE
HIGHWAY 169 WEST SERVICE DRIVE (90032)
ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt the attached resolutions providing for the
Division/Consolidation of Platted Property and amended General
Development Plan; approval of a division/consolidation; and, the Setting
of Conditions Prior to Recording of the Resolution, as recommended by
the Planning Commission.
BACKGROUND:
At its meeting June 13, 1990 the Planning Commission, by unanimous vote,
acted to recommend approval of this proposal to divide property lines
involving three lots of the "Meyer/Gonyea Addition".
PRIMARY ISSUES AND ANALYSIS:
Two basic property line adjustments are proposed: one would move the
property line between Lots 1 and 2, 44 feet westerly; and the second would
move the property line separating Lots 2 and 3, 100 feet northerly.
The change in the General Development substitutes a future 33,650 square
foot post office facility for a proposed office building of 76,000 square
feet, and reduces the square footage of another proposed office building on
the reconfigured Lot 1 from 83,000 square feet to 75,300 square feet to
better match the reduced size of the parcel.
see next page)
File 90032
Page Two
RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS: I
I hereby recommend adoption of the attached resolutions providing for the
approval of a Lot Consolidation/Division and Setting Conditions Prior to
Recording, as recommended by the Planning Commission.
Attachments:
1. Resolution Approving Lot Division/Consolidation
2. Resolution Setting Conditions Prior to Recording of the Consolidation/
Division Resolution
3. Resolution Approving Amended General Development Plan
4. Planning Commission Minutes of June 13, 1990
5. Engineer's Memo
6. Location Map
7. Site Graphics
cc/cd/90032:dl)
IML
IF
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a meeting of the
City Council of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, was held on the day
of , 19 The following members were present:
The following members were absent:
moved its adoption:
introduced the following Resolution and
RESOLUTION 90 -
APPROVING LOT DIVISION/CONSOLICATION AND AMENDED GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR
MEYER/GONYEA LAND DEVELOPMENT COMPANY (90032)
WHEREAS, Meyer/Gonyea Land Development Company has requested approval for a
lot division/consolidation and amended General Development Plan for the
modification of property lines located at the south side of 45th Avenue North
between Nathan Lane and the State Highway 169 west service drive;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the lot
division/consolidation and amended General Development Plan for property
located at the south side of 45th Avenue North between Nathan Lane and the
State Highway 169 west service drive;
EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS
Lot 1, Block 1, Meyer Gonyea Addition
Lot 2, Block 1, Meyer Gonyea Addition
Lot 3, Block 1, Meyer Gonyea Addition
To be divided and consolidated as follows:
PARCEL A
The north 494.72 feet of the east 44.00 feet of Lot 1, Block 1 and north
494.72 feet of Lot 2, Block 1, MEYER GONYEA ADDITION, according to the
plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder
in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota.
PARM R
That part of Lots 1 and 3, Block 1, MEYER GONYEA ADDITION lying west of a
line drawn parallel with an distant 44.00 feet west of the west line of
Lot 2, said Block 1 and its southerly extension and lying north of the
north line of Lot 5 said Block 1 and its easterly extension, according to
the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County
Recorder in an for Hennepin County, Minnesota.
see next page)
jpw
P6
File 90032
Page Two
PARM C
The part of Lot 2 and the west 44.00 feet of Lot 1 lying south of the
north 494.72 feet thereof and Lot 3 except that part thereof lying
westerly of a line drawn parallel with and distant 44.00 feet west of the
west line of said Lot 2 and its southerly extension and lying north of
the easterly extension of the north line of Lot 5. All in Block 1, MEYER
GONYEA ADDITION, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in
the office of the County Recorder in an for Hennepin County, Minnesota.
FURTHER, that the City Manager be authorized to make the necessary special
assessment corrections based upon City Policy when the division/consolidation
is approved by Hennepin County.
The motion for adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded
by , and upon vote being taken thereon,
the following voted in favor thereof:
The following voted against or abstained
Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
H
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a meeting of the
City Council of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, was held on the day
of , 19 The following members were present:
The following members were absent:
moved its adoption:
introduced the following Resolution and
RESOLUTION 90 -
SETTING CONDITIONS TO BE MET PRIOR TO FILING OF AND RELATED TO LOT
DIVISION/CONSOLIDATION FOR MEYER/GONYEA LAND DEVELOPMENT COMPANY (90032)
WHEREAS, the City Council has approved a Lot Division/Consolidation for
Meyer/Gonyea Land Development Company amending property lines of lots 1, 2 and
3 located at the south side of 45th Avenue North between Nathan Lane and the
State Highway 169 west service drive;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does direct the following
conditions to be met prior to recording of, and related to said lot
division/consolidation:
1. Compliance with the City Engineer's Memorandum.
2. No yard setback variances are granted or implied.
3. Compliance with Policy Resolution 79-80 regarding minimum floor elevations
for new structures on sites adjacent to, or containing open storm water
drainage facilities.
4. Payment of park dedication fees -in -lieu of dedication prior to issuance
of building permit in accordance with City Policy in effect at the time
of building permit issuance.
5. No building permits shall be issued until the resolution approving the
division/consolidation is filed with Hennepin County.
6. Submittal of all necessary utility easements and relocation of easements
as required by the City Engineer prior to filing of the
division/consolidation with Hennepin County.
The motion for adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded
by , and upon vote being taken thereon,
the following voted in favor thereof:
The following voted against or abstained
Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
F1-3
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a meeting of the
City Council of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, was held on the day
of , 19 The following members were present:
The following members were absent:
moved its adoption:
introduced the following Resolution and
RESOLUTION 90 -
APPROVING AMENDED DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR MEYER/GONYEA LAND DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
90032)
WHEREAS, Meyer/Gonyea Land Development Company has requested approval for an
Amended General Development Plan for lots 1, 2 and 3, Meyer/Gonyea Addition
located at the south side of 45th Avenue North between Nathan Lane and the
State Highway 169 west service drive; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed said request and recommends
approval;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA, that it hereby does approve the request by Meyer/Gonyea
Land Development Company for an Amended General Development Plan for property
located at the south side of 45th Avenue North between Nathan Lane and the
State Highway 169 west service drive;
1. Compliance with the City Engineer's Memorandum.
2. Payment of park dedication fees -in -lieu of dedication in accordance with
the Dedication Policy in effect at the time issuance of guilding permits.
3. Compliance with Policy Resolution 79-80 regarding minimum floor
elevations for new structures in subdivisions adjacent to, or containing
any open storm water drainage facility.
The motion for adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded
by , and upon vote being taken thereon,
the following voted in favor thereof:
The following voted against or abstained
Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
Planning Commission Minutes
June 13, 1990
Aw, Page 94
Edgerton stated that it depends on the lot elevation.
He id that Table 13 on page 53 identified the low
pressu areas of the City.
Chairman Plu opened the Public Hearing.
Chairman Plufka clo d the Public Hearing as there was no
one present to speak o the issue.
MOTION by Chairman Plufka, seconded by Commissioner
Stulberg to recommend approval the Comprehensive Plan
Water System Element.
Roll Call Vote. 6 Ayes. MOTION carried.
Chairman Plufka opened the Public Hearing for endments
to the Zoning Ordinance regarding Flood Plain Regu ions,
Residential Facilities, Shoreland Private Recrea ' n
Facilities, Planned Unit Development Attributes, Privat
Streets, and Temporary Real Estate and Other Signs.
MOTION by Commissioner Stulberg, seconded by Commissioner
Pierce to continue the Public Hearing until the June 26,
1990 Planning Commission meeting.
Roll Call Vote. 6 Ayes. MOTION carried.
MOTION TO APPROVE
VOTE - MOTION CARRIED
TO CONTINUE
VOTE - MOTION CARJ ED
Meyer/Gonyea Land Development Company, Division/ Consoli- MEYER/GONYEA LAND
dation of Platted Property and Amended General Development DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
Plan located at the south side of 45th Avenue North (90032)
between Nathan Lane and the State Highway 169 West Service
Drive.
Vote. 5 Ayes. MOTION carried.
Van Eeckhout Builders, Division of Platted Property and
Zoning Variance for lot width at 255 and 257 Berkshire
Lane.
Vote. 5 Ayes. MOTION carried.
Olfisco, Inc., Variance for Side Yard Setback at 15
Xenium Lane North (A-261).
Vote. 5 Ayes. MOTION carried.
Chairman Plufka introduced t equest by Goff Homes for a
Site Plan Amendment an olicy Resolution Variance for
Fernbrook Manor" te delete the use of B612 curb and
gutter located st of Fernbrook Lane at 44th Place North.
Chair Plufka introduced Mr. Pat Goff representing the
itioner.
VOTE - MOTION CARRIED
VAN EECKHOUT BUI
90033) /
E - MOTION CARRIED
OLFISCO, INC. (A-261)
VOTE - MOTION CARRIED
GOFF HOMES (90045)
r
City of Plymouth
E N G I N E E R' S M E M 0
to
Planning Commission & City Council
DATE: June 6, 1990
FILE NO.: 90032
PETITIONER: Michael J. Gair, McCombs -Frank -Roos Associates, Inc., 15050 -23rd
Avenue North, Plymouth, MN 55447
LOT DIVISION/CONSOLIDATION:LOTS 1, 2, AND 3, BLOCK 1 MEYER GONYEA ADDITION
LOCATION: South of 45th Avenue, west of Highway 169, east of Nathan Lane in
the northeastern 1/4 of Section 13.
N/A Yes No
1. _ X _ Watermain area assessments have been levied based on proposed use.
2. _ X _ Sanitary sewer area assessments have been levied based on proposed
use.
3. _ X SAC and REC charges will be payable at the time building permits are
issued.
Area charges are subject to change periodically as they are reviewed
annually on January 1. The rate assessed would be that in effect at
the time of Lot Division/Consolidation approval:
4. Area assessments: None.
5. Other additional assessments estimated: None.
6. _ _ X Complies with standard utility/drainage easements -
The current City ordinance requires utility and drainage easements
ten feet (10') in width adjoining all streets and six feet (6') in
width adjoining side and rear lot lines. (If easements are required,
it is necessary for the owner to submit separate easement documents
executed and in recordable form prior to the issuance of any building
permits.) 6 foot drainage and utility easements will be required
alone the new property lines.
40
N/A Yes No
7. X _ Complies with ponding requirements -
The City will require the dedication of drainage easements for
ponding purposes on all property lying below the established 100 year
high water elevation and conformance with the City's Comprehensive
Storm Drainage Plan.
8. _ _ X Conforms with City policy regarding minimum basement elevations -
Minimum basement elevations must be established for the following
lots: A minimum basement elevation for Parcel B shall be 902.0 and
897.0 for Parcel C.
9. X _ All standard utility easements required for construction
The following easements will be required for construction of
utilities
10. X All existing unnecessary easements and rights-of-way have been
vacated -
It will be necessary to vacate the obsolete easements/right-of-way to
facilitate the development. This vacation is not an automatic
process in conjunction with the platting process. It is entirely
dependent upon the City receiving a petition for the vacation from
the property owner; therefore, it is their responsibility to submit a
petition as well as legal descriptions of easements proposed to be
vacated. Existing drainage and utility easement over the south
WX 2«01"1uv VK•3W9147=4V-V I I P M-2-9 IM II elp •aaaY
with a —•- -easement provided in order t• vacate this easement,
X The Owner's Duplicate Certificate of Title has been submitted to the
City with this application -
It will be necessary for the property owner to provide the City
Attorney with the Owner's Duplicate Certificate of Title in order
that he may file the required easements referred to above.
12. _ X All existing street rights-of-way are required width -
Additional right-of-way will be required on
13. A. When Parcel A and B are developed, the drainage will have to be to the south
since there is no storm sewer to the north to handle the drainage.
2
B. A drainage and utility easement will be required over Parcel C for the required
storm sewer from Parcel A.
C. The general development plan shows encroachment of parking lots from Parcel B
and C into Pond NB -P5. This pond was constructed to store the required amount
of storm water. No filling will be permitted below an elevation of 895.0.
D. County Road 18 shall be changed to State Highway 169.
Submitted by:
Daniel L. Faulkner, P. E.
City Engineer
3
n
IQ oil is 4.1i
tzt ry 'YI 0111 IIrSiH .w woe) ...:_.. .
r .............
t
d -
My
1
Opp
N
r w we _
y
1
Soo
iq 0.10 I
aM. MA7
i
1 1
w
1 •
4
ApP2ovcu
i
F ever
go nyea
SIR'-'• '+=aa.Fsa•i ." 1 r.•.
Poo
n .,d u. -.wiww a yr
ad dn.
4
MEMO — c
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
DATE: June 27, 1990 For City Council Meeting of July 2, 1990
TO: James G. Willis, City Manager
FROM: Community Development Coordinator Charle E. lerud through
Community Development Director Blair Tremer
SUBJECT: VAN EECKHOUT BUILDERS. DIVISION OF PLATTED PROPERTY AND ZONING
ORDINANCE VARIANCE AT 255/257 BERKSHIRE LANE (90033)
ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt the attached resolutions providing for the
division of platted property; setting conditions prior to recording; and
a Zoning Ordinance variance to allow the sale of individual units of a
duplex structure, as recommended by the Planning Commission.
BACKGROUND:
At its meeting June 13, 1990, the Planning Commission, on a unanimous vote,
acted to recommend approval of this proposal to divide an existing platted
parcel containing a duplex structure into two separate parcels, each
containing half of the duplex structure. The resulting lot sizes (9,429
square feet and 9,871 square feet) meet or exceed the Zoning Ordinance
standard for duplex lots, per unit, in the R-2 Zoning District in which this
site is located.
The Zoning Ordinance variance is to permit the width of one of these lots at
the front setback to be 48 feet versus the Ordinance standard of 50 feet.
The other lot is 52 feet in width at the front setback line.
see next page)
File 90033
Page Two
RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS:
I hereby recommend adoption of the attached resolutions providing for the
division of platted property and the setting conditions with a Zoning
Ordinance variance for property located at 255/257 Berkshire Lane, as
recommended by the Planning Commission.
Attachments:
1. Resolution for the Division of Platted Property
2. Resolution Setting Conditions Prior to Recording and Approving a Zoning
Ordinance Variance
3. Planning Commission Minutes of June 13, 1990
4. Engineer's Memorandum
5. Location Map
6. Site Graphics
cc/cd/90033:dl)
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a meeting of the
City Council of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, was held on the day
of , 19 The following members were present:
The following members were absent:
introduced the following Resolution and
moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION 90 -
APPROVING LOT DIVISION FOR VAN EECKHOUT BUILDERS (90033)
WHEREAS, Van Eeckhout Builders has requested approval for a lot division and
Zoning Ordinance Variances for the modification of property lines located at
255 and 257 Berkshire Lane;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the lot division
and Zoning Ordinance Variances for Van Eeckhout Builders for property located
at 255 and 257 Berkshire Lane;
EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Lot 7, Block 1, CARLSON CENTER SIXTH ADDITION, according to the recorded
plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
To be divided and consolidated as follows:
PARCEL A
That part of Lot 7, Block 1, CARLSON CENTER SIXTH ADDITION, according to
the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota which lies westerly
and northerly of the following described line: Commencing at the
northwest corner of said Lot 7; thence on an assumed bearing of South to
the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence South 37
degrees 30 minutes 30 seconds West a distance of 56.60 feet; thence North
52 degrees 29 minutes 30 seconds West a distance of 2.00 feet; thence
South 37 degrees 30 minutes 30 seconds West a distance of 128.40 feet to
the south line of said Lot 7 and said line there terminating.
PARCEL B
That part of Lot 7, Block 1, CARLSON CENTER SIXTH ADDITION, according to
the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota which lies easterly
and southerly of the following described line: Commencing at the
see next page)
Resoluton No.
File 90033
Page Two
northwest corner of said Lot 7; thence on an assumed bearing of South to
the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence South 37
degrees 30 minutes 30 seconds West a distance of 56.60 feet; thence North
52 degrees 29 minutes 30 seconds West a distance of 2.00 feet; thence
South 37 degrees 30 minutes 30 seconds West a distance of 128.40 feet to
the south line of said Lot 7 and said line there terminating.
FURTHER, that the City Manager be authorized to make the necessary special
assessment corrections based upon City Policy when the division/consolidation
is approved by Hennepin County.
The motion for adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded
by , and upon vote being taken thereon,
the following voted in favor thereof:
The following voted against or abstained
Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a meeting of the
City Council of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, was held on the day
of , 19 The following members were present:
The following members were absent:
introduced the following Resolution and
moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION 90 -
SETTING CONDITIONS TO BE MET PRIOR TO FILING OF AND RELATED TO LOT DIVISION
AND APPROVING A ZONING ORDINANCE VARIANCE FOR VAN EECKHOUT BUILDERS (90033)
WHEREAS, the City Council has approved a Lot Division for Van Eeckhout
Builders located at 255 and 257 Berkshire Lane;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does direct the following
conditions to be met prior to recording of, and related to said lot
division/consolidation:
1. Compliance with Policy Resolution 79-80 regarding minimum floor elevations
for new structures on sites adjacent to, or containing open storm water
drainage facilities.
2. A variance from the Zoning Ordinance is approved for lot width at the
front setback of "Tract B" of 48 feet versus the Ordinance standard of 50
feet based on compliance with the variance standards of the Zoning
Ordinance. No other variances are approved or implied.
The motion for adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded
by , and upon vote being taken thereon,
the following voted in favor thereof:
The following voted against or abstained
Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
Planning Commission Minutes
June 13, 1990
Page 94
Edgerton stated that it depends on the lot elevation.
He aid that Table 13 on page 53 identified the low
press a areas of the City.
Chairman Nfka opened the Public Hearing.
Chairman Plufka losed the Public Hearing as there was no
one present to sp on the issue.
MOTION by Chairman Nfka, seconded by Commissioner
Stulberg to recommend app val of the Comprehensive Plan
Water System Element.
Roll Call Vote. 6 Ayes. MOTIONmarried.
Chairman Plufka opened the Public Hea.'ng for Amendments
to the Zoning Ordinance regarding Flood in Regulations,
Residential Facilities, Shoreland Priv a Recreation
Facilities, Planned Unit Development Attr-& t Private
Streets, and Temporary Real Estate and Other Sign
MOTION by Commissioner Stulberg, seconded by Commissi er
Pierce to continue the Public Hearing until the June 2
1990 Planning Commission meeting.
Roll Call Vote. 6 Ayes. MOTION carried.
MOTION TO APPROVE
VOTE - MOTION CARRIED
MOTION TO CONTINUE
E - MOTION CARRIED
Meyer/Gonyea Land Development Company, Division/ Consoli- MEYER NYEA LAND
dation of Platted Property and Amended General Development DEVELOP T COMPANY
Plan located at the south side of 45th Avenue North (90032)
between Nathan Lane and the State Highway 169 West Service
Drive.
Vote. 5 Ayes. MOTION carried.
Van Eeckhout Builders, Division of Platted Property and
Zoning Variance for lot width at 255 and 257 Berkshire
Lane.
Vote. 5 Ayes. MOTION carried.
Olfisco, Inc., Variance for Side Yard Setback at 1915
Xenium Lane North (A-261).
Vote. 5 Ayes. MOTION carried.
Chairman Plufka introduced the request by Go es for a
Site Plan Amendment and Policy Res n Variance for
Fernbrook Manor" to delete use of B612 curb and
gutter located east o rook Lane at 44th Place North.
Chairm ka introduced Mr. Pat Goff representing the
aettr'loner.
VOTE - MOTION CARRI
VAN EECKHOUT BUILDERS
90033)
VOTE - MOTION CARRIED
OLFISCO, INC. (A-
E - MOTION CARRIED
GOFF HOMES (90045)
City of Plymouth
E N G I N E E R' S M E M 0
to
Planning Commission & City Council
DATE: June 6, 1990
FILE NO.: 90033
PETITIONER: Mr. Eugene C. Bangasser, Van Eeckhout Building Corporation, 1935
West Wayzata Boulevard, Long Lake, MN 55356
LOT DIVISION/CONSOLIDATION: LOT 7, BLOCK 1, CARLSON CENTER 6TH ADDITION
LOCATION: South of Berkshire Lane in the southwest 1/4 of Section 34.
N/A Yes No
1. — X —
2. X
3.
4
5
WAR
Watermain area assessments have been levied based on proposed use.
Sanitary sewer area assessments have been levied based on proposed
use.
SAC and REC charges will be payable at the time building permits are
issued.
Area charges are subject to change periodically as they are reviewed
annually on January 1. The rate assessed would be that in effect at
the time of Lot Division/Consolidation approval:
Area assessments: None
Other additional assessments estimated: None
v :v
6. X _ Complies with standard utility/drainage easements
The current City ordinance requires utility and drainage easements
ten feet (10') in width adjoining all streets and six feet (6') in
width adjoining side and rear lot lines. (If easements are required,
it is necessary for the owner to submit separate easement documents
executed and in recordable form prior to the issuance of any building
permits.)
N/A Yes No
7. X Complies with ponding requirements -
The City will require the dedication of drainage easements for
ponding purposes on all property lying below the established 100 year
high water elevation and conformance with the City's Comprehensive
Storm Drainage Plan.
g, X _ _ Conforms with City policy regarding minimum basement elevations -
Minimum basement elevations must be established for the following
lots: The home is existing.
9. _ X All standard utility easements required for construction
The following easements will be required for construction of
utilities
10. X All existing unnecessary easements and rights-of-way have been
vacated -
It will be necessary to vacate the obsolete easements/right-of-way to
facilitate the development. This vacation is not an automatic
process in conjunction with the platting process. It is entirely
dependent upon the City receiving a petition for the vacation from
the property owner; therefore, it is their responsibility to submit a
petition as well as legal descriptions of easements proposed to be
vacated.
I
11. X The Owner's Duplicate Certificate of Title has been submitted to the
City with this application -
It will be necessary for the property owner to provide the City
Attorney with the Owner's Duplicate Certificate of Title in order
that he may file the required easements referred to above.
12. _ X All existing street rights-of-way are required width -
Additional right-of-way will be required on
13. A. This division is for dividing a double existing home along the common wall
line. Drainage and utility easements therefore are not required.
Submitted by:
Daniel L. Faulkner, P. E.
City Engineer
2
Alb
n_mklwi
C*111-WWWWAT15 um, blu KV Z y < QW33
Prepared for*
VAM 1BUJIL' TION
Proposed Property Oivisiw
EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
Lot 7, Block 1, CARLSON CENTER SIXTH
ADDITION, according to the recorded
plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
Area - 19,00 square feet
PROPOSED PARCEL AREAS:
Pioposed Tract A - 9429 square feet
Proposed Tract B - 9871 square feet
11
oc
TRACA\
N4 \
IN,
eq
4E AS BUILT ELEVATIONS:
NS2 S Top of foundation - 1000.0
9St.3a Basement floor elev. - 992.3
G..
PROPOSED TRACT A -
That part of Lot 7, Block 1, CARLSON CENTER SIXTH ADDITION, according to the recorded plat
thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota which lies westerly and northerly of the following described
line: Commencing at the northwest corner of said Lot 7; thence on an assumed bearing of South
52 degrees 19 minutes 43 seconds East along the north line of said Lot 7 a distance of 52.09 feet
to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence South 37 degrees 30 minutes 30
seconds West a distance of 56.60 feet; thence North 52 degrees 29 minutes 30 seconds West a
distance of 2.00 feet; thence South 37 degrees 30 minutes 30 seconds West a distance of 128.40
feet to the south line of said Lot 7 and said line there terminating.
PROPOSED TRACT B:
That part of Lot 7, Block 1, CARLSON CENTER SIXTH ADDITION, according to the recorded plat
thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota which lies easterly and southerly of the following described
line: Commencing at the northwest corner of said Lot 7; thence on an assumed bearing of South
52 degrees 19 minutes 43 seconds East along the north line of said Lot 7 a distance of 52.09 feet
to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence South 37 degrees 30 minutes 30
seconds West a distance of 56.60 feet;thence North 52 degrees 29 minutes 30 seconds West a
distance of 2.00 feet; thence South 37 degrees 30 minutes 30 seconds West a distance of 128.40
feet to the south line of said Lot 7 and said line there terminating,
GENERAL NOTES:
o Denotes iron monument Proposed top of foundation elev.
X. Denotes cross chiseled in concrete Proposed basement floor elev.
X931.3 Denotes existing spot elevation
Proposed garage fl oor elev.
9e-7 Denotes proposed spot elevation
Denotes surface drainage BENCHMARK.
Dashed contour lines denote proposed features APR ?4 00
Solid contour lines denote existing features CITY OF PLYMOUTH
AMMUNi1Y OEYELOPMEXT OETt.
I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was
SC'A'LE
ALL -METRO LAND prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I"= 3
I an a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the laws of
SURVEYORS the State of Minnesota.
8001
2340 Daniels Street f - /
Ig 4
Long Lake, Minnesota 55356 JJ
FILE NO.
475-1433 DATE &AMS REG. NUMBER 11025
MEMO
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
DATE: June 27, 1990 For City Council Meeting of July 2, 1990
TO: James G. Willis, City Manager
FROM: Community Development Coordinator Charles 6jfxl'ferud through
Community Development Director Blair Tremere
SUBJECT: HANS HAGEN HOMES/WESTAR-ROME PARTNERS. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
FOR LAND RECLAMATION AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF COUNTY ROAD 24
AND MEDINA ROAD (90036)
ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt the attached resolution approving a Conditional
Use Permit to allow the stockpiling of fill materials for future use in
the grading of a residential subdivision, as recommended by the Planning
Commission.
BACKGROUND:
At its meeting June 13, 1990 the Planning Commission, on a unanimous vote,
acted to recommend approval of a Conditional Use Permit to allow the
stockpiling of approximately 100,000 cubic yards of fill material on a 6.8
acre reclamation site at the corner of Medina Road and County Road 24.
Material to be stockpiled in excess of the requirement for the immediate 6.8
acre site would be distributed over the remaining 60 acres of a residential
subdivision for which a Preliminary Plat has been applied for. No
encroachment on wetland areas will result from this proposed filling
activity, and adequate erosion control measures are specified by the plan
and the City Engineer.
RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS:
I hereby recommend adoption of the attached resolution providing for the
approval of a Conditional Use Permit for land reclamation activities at the
corner of Medina Road and County Road 24, as recommended by the Planning
Commission.
Attachments:
1. Resolution Approving Conditional Use Permit for Land Reclamation
2. Planning Commission Minutes of June 13, 1990
3. Location Map
4. Site Graphics
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a meeting of the 1
City Council of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, was held on the day
of , 19 The following members were present:
The following members were absent:
introduced the following Resolution and
moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION 90 -
APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR HANS HAGEN HOMES/WESTAR/ROME PARTNERS FOR
LAND RECLAMATION (90036)
WHEREAS, Hans Hagen Homes/Westar/Rome Partners has requested approval for a
Conditional Use Permit for land reclamation and stock piling of earth fill
material on property located at the southwest quadrant of Medina Road and
County Road 24; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed said request at a duly called
Public Hearing and recommends approval;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the request by
Hans Hagen Homes/Westar/Rome Partners for a Conditional Use Permit for land
reclamation and stock piling of earth fill material on property located at the
southwest quadrant of Medina Road and County Road 24; subject to the following
conditions:
1. Compliance with the City Engineer's Memorandum.
2. Any subsequent phases or expansions are subject to required reviews and
approvals per Ordinance provisions.
3. Concurrence with the recommendations and requirements of the Hennepin
County Department of Public Works with respect to access to County Road 24
and signage with respect to "Trucks Hauling".
4. No filling activities shall be undertaken until approval by the City
Council of the specific alignment of the relocated Medina Road and County
Road 24.
5. A complete Grading Permit application shall be submitted, all required
financial guarantees shall be submitted, and all fees shall be paid prior
to issuance of the permit.
6. The work shall be continuously managed so to comply with all applicable
air quality, noise, and erosion control standards.
The motion for adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded
by , and upon vote being taken thereon,
the following voted in favor thereof:
The following voted against or abstained
Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
Planning Commission Minutes
June 13, 1990
Page 92
Call Vote on Main Motion. 5 Ayes. Commissioneron VOTE - MOTION CARRIED
Wire, a carried on a vote of 5-1.
Commissioner Wire state is Nay vote was because of
his objection to the alignment o t Road 73 and was
not intended to be a disapproval of the pe
Chairman Plufka called a recess at 9:25 p.m.
Chairman Plufka reconvened the meeting at 9:32 p.m.
Chairman Plufka introduced the request of Hans Hagen HANS HAGEN HOMES/
Homes/Westar-Rome Partners for a Conditional Use Permit to WESTAR-ROME PARTNERS
undertake land reclamation activities in the FRD Zone 90036)
located at the southwest quadrant of Medina Road and
County Road 24.
Coordinator Dillerud reviewed the June 7, 1990 Staff
Report.
Commissioner Stulberg stepped down from the table.
Chairman Plufka introduced Mr. Richard Bloom representing
the petitioners.
Mr. Bloom stated that he was in agreement with the June 7,
1990 Staff Report. He said most of the fill would be
placed on the southern site and that some rough grading
would be done to the new County Road 24 corridor, if
approved.
Chairman Plufka opened the Public Hearing.
Chairman Plufka introduced Mr. Michael Halbach of 3185
Kimberly Lane.
Mr. Halbach stated his concerns were whether the fill
could be seen from the road and whether the dust would be
controlled.
Mr. Bloom stated that the valley area would be filled
first, the fill would be seeded immediately after
stockpiling. The fill would be removed in 1-2 months.
Chairman Plufka introduced Mr. Steve Leuer of 17435 Medina
Road.
Mr. Leuer stated that his concern was the road access to
the site.
Mr. Bloom stated that the County has directed that access
to the site be only from Medina Road and not from County
Road 24.
Chairman Plufka closed the Public Hearing.
Planning Commission Minutes
June 13, 1990
Page 93
MOTION by Commissioner Wire, seconded by Commissioner
Tierney to recommend approval of the petition by Hans
Hagen Homes/Westar-Rome Partners for a Conditional Use
Permit to undertake land reclamation activities in the FRD
Zone located at the southwest quadrant of Medina Road and
County Road 24 subject to the conditions listed in the
June 7, 1990 Staff Report with emphasis on Condition No.
4.
Roll Call Vote. 5 Ayes. MOTION carried.
Commissioner Stulberg returned to the table.
MOTION TO APPROVE
VOTE - MOTION CARRIED
Chairman Plufka introduced the request of Inspirations, INSPIRATIONS, INC.
Inc. for an Amended RPUD Preliminary Plan for "Burl Oaks" (90044)
for a change in the structure setback located at 16890 5th /
Avenue North.
Chairman Plufka waived the review of the June 6, 1990
Staff Report.
Chairman Plufka introduced Mr. Craig Degendorfer
representing the petitioner.
Mr. Degendorfer stated that he was in agreement with the
June 6, 1990 Staff Report. He distributed a survey of the
property to the Commissioners.
Chairman Plufka opened the Public Hearing.
Chairman Plufka closed the Public Hearing as th a was no
one present to speak on the issue.
MOTION by Commissioner Wire, seconded y Commissioner MOTION TO APPROVE
Stulberg to recommend approval of the request by
Inspirations, Inc. for an Amended UD Preliminary Plan
for "Burl Oaks" for a change i he
the
setback
located at 16890 5th Avenu North subject to the
conditions listed in the June , 1990 Staff Report.
Roll Call Vote. 6 Ayes. AOTION carried. VOTE - MOTION CARRIED
Chairman Plufka i roduced the Amendment to the COMP. PLAN - WATER
Comprehensive Plan• Updated Water System Element. SYSTEM ELEMENT
water
introduced Mr. Dan Edgerton, representing
sene, Anderlik & Associates, consulting
the City.
Wire asked Mr. Edgerton is there would still
pressure problem in thehigher elevations of
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
ENGINEER'S MEMO
to
PLANNING COMMISSION AND COUNCIL MEMBERS
DATE: June 6, 1990
FILE NO.: 90036
PETITIONER: Mr. Richard Bloom, Land Concept Corporation, 14600 Woodruff Road,
Wayzata, MN 55391
CONCEPT PLAN: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUEST FOR STOCK PILING FILL MATERIAL TO BE USED
AT A LATER DATE IN THE SEVEN PONDS ADDITION
The developers of the Seven Ponds 2nd Addition have submitted an application for a
Grading Permit which requires a Conditional Use Permit for the stock piling of fill
material from off site. The Conditional Use Permit, if approved by the City Council,
shall include the following conditions:
1. The fill must be placed in a location not to interfere with the construction
of proposed. Median Road and County Road 24.
2. Silt fence and/or other erosion control methods must be in place at all times.
3. The stock pile shall be seeded and mulched immediately after stock piling has
been complete.
4. Slopes shall not exceed a 3 to 1.
5. Shall comply with Bassett Creek and Minnehaha Creek requirements.
6. Hennepin County will not allow County Road 24 to be used as an access road to
the site. All trucks must use Medina Road.
7. The developer shall have in place truck hauling signs as required by Hennepin
County at all times during the hauling operation.
8. If the stock pile should interfere with the construction of Medina Road, the
developer agrees to immediately relocate the stock pile to a different area
within the Seven Ponds Addition and comply with all of the above requirements.
9. The contractor hauling the fill material shall use "dust control" on Medina
Road as necessary.
10. The contractor shall have a street sweeper available to clean County Road 24
and Highway 55 as necessary.
Submitted by:
Daniel L. Faulkner, P.E.
City Engineer
sIM'`I I 7 It i !1:
A
J
z s
177
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
DATE: June 27, 1990 For City Council Meeting of July 2, 1990
TO: James G. Willis, City Manager
FROM: Community Development Coordinator Cha rDillerud through
Community Development Director Blair Tre Pe
SUBJECT: INSPIRATIONS, INC. RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
PRELIMINARY PLAN/CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT FOR "BURL OAKS"
AT 16890 5TH AVENUE NORTH (90044) (RPUD 78-1)
ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt the attached resolution providing for amendment
to the "Burl Oaks" RPUD Preliminary Plan/Conditional Use Permit to allow
adjustment to the setback of a single lot to permit the construction of
a home addition, as recommended by the Planning Commission.
The approval or amendment of a RPUD Preliminary Plan and Conditional Use
Permit requires a 4/5 vote of the City Council.
BACKGROUND:
At its meeting June 13, 1990 the Planning Commission, by a unanimous vote,
acted to recommend approval of this request to amend the RPUD plan for the
Burl Oaks" RPUD to allow modification of the street setback on a single lot
to permit the construction of a family room addition to a home 29 feet from
the property line adjacent to a public street, rather than the 35 feet
specified in the current PUD plan. The individual lot for which the PUD
plan amendment is requested is a "double front" lot with public streets both
in the rear and in the front. The requested setback amendment would be to
the street that is the rear of the lot (9th Avenue North). The house fronts
on 5th Avenue North.
see next page)
Page Two
File 90044
RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS:
I hereby recommend adoption of the attached resolution providing for the
approval of an Amended RPUD Preliminary Plan and Conditional Use Permit for
Burl Oaks" regarding the street setback of a single lot, as recommended by
the Planning Commission.
Attachments:
1. Resolution Approving Amended RPUD
Permit
Preliminary Plan and Conditional Use
2. Planning Commission Minutes of June 13, 1990
3. Location Map
4. Site Graphics
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a meeting of the
City Council of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, was held on the day
of , 19 The following members were present:
The following members were absent:
moved its adoption:
introduced the following Resolution and
RESOLUTION 90 -
APPROVING RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PLAN CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
AMENDMENT FOR INSPIRATIONS, INC. FOR "BURL OAKS" (90044)
WHEREAS, Inspirations, Inc. has requested approval of a Planned Unit
Development Plan Conditional Use Permit amendment for property located at
16890 5th Avenue North to allow for reduced setbacks from 35 feet to 29 feet
to the street right-of-way line of 9th Avenue North to permit an addition to
the home; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed said request at a duly called
Public Hearing and recommends approval;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the request by
Inspirations, Inc. for a Planned Unit Development Plan Conditional Use Permit
amendment for "Burl Oaks" to allow reduced setbacks for property located at
16890 5th Avenue North, subject to the following findings and conditions:
1. No other amendments or variances are granted or implied.
2. All applicable requirements of the City and State Building Codes shall be
implemented and enforced; no Code requirements are waived by this
approval.
3. The granting of the permit is responsive to criteria of the Zoning
Ordinance for Conditional Use Permits and PUD Plans.
4. The applicable Conditions of Resolutions 78-152, and 78-275, and the
Development Contract for "Burl Oaks" shall be complied with.
The motion for adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded
by , and upon vote being taken thereon,
the following voted in favor thereof:
The following voted against or abstained
Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
Planning Commission Minutes
June 13, 1990
Page 93
MKIO by Commissioner Wire, seconded by Commissioner
Tierney ecommend approval of the petition by Hans
Hagen Homes/Wes - ome Partners for a Conditional Use
Permit to undertake a clamation activities in the FRD
Zone located at the southwes ant of Medina Road and
County Road 24 subject to the con i listed in the
June 7, 1990 Staff Report with emphasis on 'tion No.
4.
Roll Call Vote. 5 Ayes. MOTION carried.
Commissioner Stulberg returned to the table.
Chairman Plufka introduced the request of Inspirations,
Inc. for an Amended RPUD Preliminary Plan for "Burl Oaks"
for a change in the structure setback located at 16890 5th
Avenue North.
Chairman Plufka waived the review of the June 6, 1990
Staff Report.
Chairman Plufka introduced Mr. Craig Degendorfer
representing the petitioner.
Mr. Degendorfer stated that he was in agreement with the
June 6, 1990 Staff Report. He distributed a survey of the
property to the Commissioners.
Chairman Plufka opened the Public Hearing.
Chairman Plufka closed the Public Hearing as there was no
one present to speak on the issue.
MOTION by Commissioner Wire, seconded by Commissioner
Stulberg to recommend approval of the request by
Inspirations, Inc. for an Amended RPUD Preliminary Plan
for "Burl Oaks" for a change in the structure setback
located at 16890 5th Avenue North subject to the
conditions listed in the June 6, 1990 Staff Report.
Roll Call Vote. 6 Ayes. MOTION carried.
Chairman Plufka introduced the Amendment to the
Comprehensive Plan: Updated Water System Element.
Chairman Plufka introduced Mr. Dan Edgerton, repre g
Bonestro, Rosene, Anderlik & Associat consulting
engineers for the City.
Commissioner
res!`ure Mr. Edgerton is there would still
be a wa roblem in the higher elevations of
itv.
MOTION TO APPROVE
ION CARRIED
INSPIRATIONS, INC.
90044)
MOTION TO APPROVE
VOTE - MOTION CARRIED
COMP. PLAN -
SYSTELd--a-EMI
0(14) (
45) 2 (
52)
67) (66) 72) (71) (Z) (65) (61 (42) (.8)
15)
4) (17 1., I
6)
5)
r"n t9) se
5) (
26) aa. C (20)
29)
P
22)
RA) (n)
26)4 QW 4 (25)
4 (32) (24) (21) (20) (18) (17) (10) (
6)
06)
ot
46) 4
33)
47) (30) (
34)
42)
41) '4b
CA (35) j4W
27) (4)
4
47
40)
lop
25) (34)
L ---------------------------- .............
40)
4o
14
3
50
IST AVER
c•
To (20"
d cm, s
Y, 977.8 C LAP, ES -
4x
981.2
91a . z --
0
DQ
00
4 976.7,
8
SA- 9 0'x
Wy .
1V
977.0K ExisTJlsti , USE
OZip 97,
979.3 / 976.8 x 977.0,
979.3
0
I
4
Jdh
r 978.7 '1
l
S
z/
14
x985
01
O 6
O -x982.2 \h1.l04
x 979.5
o Denotes Iron Monument I
x950 Denotes Existing Elevation
950) Denotes Proposed ElevationD "U 1 D
Direction of Drainage w-•
Proposed Top of Foundation Elevation =
Proposed Garage Floor Elevation =
Proposed Lowest Floor Elevation =
MAY 9 1990
C1 I^y C} i L Y U 1 ti t
CQMt+iilRJY 0E.jE Q?MENT DEPT.
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of a survey
of the boundaries of:
Lot 1, Block 2, BURL OAKS, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
And of the location of all buildings, if any, thereon, and all visible
encroachments, if any, from or on said land. As surveyed by me this 24th
day of March, 1981.
5-7-90 AS-gUtLT SUZVEY
SATHRE-BERGOUIST, INC.
935 EAST WAYZATA BLVD. • WAYZATA, NIN. 55391
TELEPHONE 612-476-0848
QEv. 4-3-6i DE EAStn`Ea T (zE:v.EG4=
Land Surveyor, Minn. Reg. No. 7725
SCALE
I'=40 PZEPA2ED F02
BOOK PAGE
2 59
F n-EE NO. INSPIRATIONS9ANC.
rya/ ,,,-
MEMO 7 —
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
DATE: June 27, 1990 For City Council Meeting of July 2, 1990
TO: James G. Willis, City Manager
FROM: Community Development Coordinator Charlei" llerud through
Community Development Director Blair Trem
SUBJECT: GOFF HOMES, INC. SITE PLAN AMENDMENT AND VARIANCE FROM CITY
COUNCIL CURBING POLICY FOR "FERNBROOK MANNER" LOCATED EAST OF
FERNBROOK LANE AT 44TH PLACE NORTH (90045)
ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt the attached resolution providing for the
denial of the Site Plan amendment and variance to City Council Policy
Resolution 79-73 regarding curb and gutter in residential developments,
as recommended by the Planning Commission.
BACKGROUND:
At its meeting June 13, 1990, on a vote of 4-2, the Planning Commission
adopted action recommending denial of the request to amend a previously
approved Site Plan and approve a waiver from City Council Resolution 79-73
to delete concrete curb and gutter for all non-public roadways and parking
areas (internal drives) within the project.
PRIMARY ISSUES AND ANALYSIS:
The dissenting Commissioners provided two reasons for their dissenting
votes:
1. A continued requirement for curb and gutter for that portion of the
development that fronts on 44th Place North was reasonable, but
elimination of the curb and gutter for the balance of the project would
be appropriate.
2. The focus of this particular project to provide more moderately priced
homeownership is unduly compromised by requirement for expensive curb
see next page)
File 90045
Page Two
and gutter, and therefore the elimination of the curb and gutter would
be in the best interest of the City of Plymouth.
This multiple dwelling project was approved in 1988 with a plan showing
standard B-612 concrete curb and gutter would be provided for all driving
and parking areas. A portion of the project has been constructed with, the
public street receiving concrete curb and gutter, but the private drive
areas and parking areas have been paved, with no curb and gutter provided.
The Site Improvement Performance Agreement and related financial guarantee
include the requirement concrete curb and gutter throughout the project.
The purpose of curb and gutter ,around driving and parking areas is
functional in nature and is not an aesthetic treatment. The developer was
presumptive in not installing the curb and gutter --per approved plans --and
was not led to believe the requirement could or would be waived after the
fact. We expect the site to be developed per approved plans.
RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS:
I hereby recommend adoption of the attached resolution providing for the
denial of the application to amend the Site Plan for the "Fernbrook Manner"
project and for a waiver to the City Council Policy Resolution 79-73
regarding concrete curb and gutter within multifamily residential projects.
Consistent with prior Council direction in such cases, I have also included
a resolution for approval of the requested actions.
Attachments:
1. Resolution Denying Site Plan Amendment and Policy Resolution Variance
2. Resolution Approving Site Plan Amendment and Policy Resolution Variance
3. Planning Commission Minutes of June 13, 1990
4. Petitioner's Letter of June 13, 1990
5. Engineer's Memorandum
6. Location Map
7. Site Graphics
cc/cd/90045:dl)
I
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a meeting of the
City Council of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, was held on the day
of , 19 The following members were present:
The following members were absent:
moved its adoption:
introduced the following Resolution and
RESOLUTION 90 -
DENYING SITE PLAN AMENDMENT AND VARIANCE FROM RESOLUTION 79-73 FOR GOFF HOMES
FOR "FERNBROOK MANOR" LOCATED EAST OF FERNBROOK LANE AT 44TH PLACE NORTH
90045)
WHEREAS, Goff Homes has requested approval for a Site Plan Amendment and
Variance from Resolution 79-73 to eliminate B-612 curb and gutter from
Fernbrook Manor located east of Fernbrook Lane at 44th Place North; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed said request at a duly called
Public Hearing and recommends approval;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does deny the request by Goff
Homes for a Site Plan Amendment for Fernbrook Manor located east of Fernbrook
Lane at 44th Place North, based on the following reasons:
1. The purpose of Resolution 79-73 is not met in a permanent and effective
alternate manner as required.
2. The site and conditions of the development are not unique with respect to
the need for permanent delineation provided by concrete curb and gutter.
The motion for adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded
by , and upon vote being taken thereon,
the following voted in favor thereof:
The following voted against or abstained
Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
t
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a meeting of the
City Council of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, was held on the day
of , 19 The following members were present:
The following members were absent:
moved its adoption:
introduced the following Resolution and
RESOLUTION 90 -
APPROVING SITE PLAN AMENDMENT AND VARIANCE FROM RESOLUTION 79-73 FOR GOFF
HOMES FOR "FERNBROOK MANOR" LOCATED EAST OF FERNBROOK LANE AT 44TH PLACE NORTH
90045)
WHEREAS, Goff Homes has requested approval for a Site Plan Amendment and
Variance from Resolution 79-73 for elimination of B-612 curb and gutter from
Fernbrook Manor located east of Fernbrook Lane at 44th Place North; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed said request at a duly called
Public Hearing and recommends approval;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the request by
Goff Homes for a Site Plan Amendment for Fernbrook Manor located east of
Fernbrook Lane at 44th Place North, subject to the following conditions:
1. Any subsequent phases or expansions are subject to required reviews and
approvals per Ordinance provisions.
2. Compliance with the applicable terms and conditions of Resolution 88-385
approving the original Site Plan and Conditional Use Permit.
The motion for adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded
by , and upon vote being taken thereon,
the following voted in favor thereof:
The following voted against or abstained
Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
Planning Commission Minutes
June 13, 1990
Page 94
Edgerton stated that it depends on the lot elevation.
He aid that Table 13 on page 53 identified the low
pre\
peak
s of the City.
Chafka opened the Public Hearing.
Chaka closed the Public Hearing as there was no
oneo speak on the issue.
MOThai n Plufka, seconded by Commissioner MOTION TO APPROVE
Sturecomme approval of the Comprehensive Plan
WatElement.'
Roll Call Vote. 6 Ayes.OTION carried. VOTE - MOTION CARRIED
Chairman Plufka opened the P lic Hearing for Amendments
to the Zoning Ordinance regardi Flood Plain Regulations,
Residential Facilities, Shorel d Private Recreation
Facilities, Planned Unit Developme Attributes, Private
Streets, and Temporary Real Estate an Other Signs.
MOTION by Commissioner Stulberg, seconde y Commissioner MOTION TO CONTINUE
Pierce to continue the Public Hearing unti the June 26,
1990 Planning Commission meeting.
Roll Call Vote. 6 Ayes. MOTION carried. VOTE - MOTION CARRIED
Meyer/Gonyea Land Development Company, Division/ Con li- MEYER/GONYEA LAND
dation of Platted Property and Amended General Developm t DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
Plan located at the south side of 45th Avenue Nor t 90032)
between Nathan Lane and the State Highway 169 West Service
Drive.
Vote. 5 Ayes. MOTION carried. TE - MOTION CARRIED
Van Eeckhout Builders, Division of Platted Property and VAN CKHOUT BUILDERS
Zoning Variance for lot width at 255 and 257 Berkshire 90033
Lane.
Vote. 5 Ayes. MOTION carried. VOTE - MOTIO\
CARRIEDOlfisco, Inc., Variance for Side Yard Setback at 1915 OLFISCO, INC
Xenium Lane North (A-261).
Vote. 5 Ayes. MOTION carried. VOTE - MOTION CARRIED
Chairman Plufka introduced the request by Goff Homes for a GOFF HOMES (90045)
Site Plan Amendment and Policy Resolution Variance for
Fernbrook Manor" to delete the use of 8612 curb and
gutter located east of Fernbrook Lane at 44th Place North.
Chairman Plufka introduced Mr. Pat Goff representing the
petitioner.
Planning Commission Minutes
June 13, 1990
Page 95
Mr. Goff distributed a handout to the Commissioners. He
explained that his reason for eliminating the use of B612
curb and gutter was because the development had a smaller
density and he felt the residential atmosphere would be
enhanced without the B612 curb and gutter. He described
other townhouse developments that did not have 8612 curb
and gutter.
Discussion addressed the topics of where to define streets
versus private driveways; should the B612 curb and gutter
be used partially in the development; and the protection
of fire hydrants and landscaping with B612 curb and
gutter.
MOTION by Commissioner Wire to recommend approval of the
request by Goff Homes for a Site Plan Amendment and Policy
Resolution Variance for "Fernbrook Manor" to delete the
use of B612 curb and gutter located east of Fernbrook Lane
at 44th Place North striking all conditions listed in the
June 6, 1990 Staff Report and adding a condition that
states that "with the exception of entry driveways off
44th Place North, and from the edge of a parking lot to
the edge of driveway, all B612 curb and gutter be
eliminated."
MOTION failed for lack of a second.
MOTION TO APPROVE
MOTION FAILED FOR LACK
OF A SECOND
MOTION by Commissioner Zylla, seconded by Commissioner MOTION TO DENY
Stulberg to recommend denial of the request by Goff Homes
for a Site Plan Amendment and Policy Resolution Variance
for "Fernbrook Manor" to delete the use of 8612 curb and
gutter located east of Fernbrook Lane at 44th Place North.
Roll Call Vote. 4 Ayes. Commissioners Wire and Tierney,
Nay. MOTION to Deny carried on a vote of 4-2.
Commissioner Zylla stated that the requirement to use 8612
curb and gutter was a part of the original approved plan
and that the development would not look finished without
the curb and gutter.
Commissioner Wire stated he agreed with Commissioner Zylla
in part but felt that the curb and gutter are not
necessary in the rear area of the buildings.
The Commissioners were reminded of the Public Hearing to
be held on June 19, 1990 at 7:00 p.m. regarding the
Realignment of County Road 9 and County Road 24.
The meeting adjourned at 10:35 p.m.
VOTE - MOTION CARRIED
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
ENGINEER'S MEMO
to
PLANNING COMMISSION AND COUNCIL MEMBERS
DATE: June 8, 1990
FILE NO.: 90045
PETITIONER: Mr. Pat Goff, Goff Homes, 865 Aspen Circle, Little Canada, MN 55109
SITE PLAN: SITE PLAN AMENDMENT FOR FERNBROOK MANNER - REQUEST TO ELIMINATE CONCRETE
CURB AND GUTTER
LOCATION: East of Fernbrook Lane, north and south of 44th Avenue in the southwest
1/4 of Section 10.
Mr. Pat Goff of Goff Homes has submitted an application to the City requesting an
amendment to the approved Site Plan removing the condition that concrete curb and gutter
be installed as an off-site improvement.
I recommend that the approved plans not to be changed for the installation of concrete
curb and gutter or curb stone for the following:
o To positively delineate public parking in driving areas.
o To protect the landscaped areas, building, and utilities, and fixtures such as
light standards and fire hydrants.
o To control surface drainage for positive flow, erosion prevention, and
protection of site landscaping and critical slopes which is not otherwise
achieved.
SUBMITTED BY:
Daniel L. Faulkner, P.E. "
City Engineer
GOFF HOMES,INC.
865 ASPEN CIRCLE
LITTLE CANADA, MINNESCTA 55109
612)482-0767
FAX 482-0876
June 13, 1990
Honorable Chairman
City of Plymouth
3400 Plymouth Boulevard
Plymouth, Minnesota 55447
Dear Honorable Chairman:
jook
We would like to submit the follow ng as reasons to grant a
variance to delete thy- curbing on the private property of
this developwie;nt.
1. Snow removal and snow storage areas. Most of our
development's associations will hir•a snow removal companies
that gust use ::ick. -up trucks to push snow without the
capacity to lift: the snow over the curbing.
2. There are'not any light standards or buildings or fire
hydrantz. that are that close or not adequately marked that
could b1 damaged by a snow plow on a pick-up truck.
3. Our surface drainage has always been designed to run
down the center of our driveways without the need of curbs.
With sodded yards there are no erosion problems.
4. Originally we propo ,c_d a 100' shorter cul de sac and the
buildings were not as spread out. The City Council demanded
we spread out the buildings to be more harmonious with the
single- family neighborhoods in the area. To keep this theme,
of space between buildings and more of a single• family
f:.,vor• wi h our smaller buildings, curbing is too
commercial or apartment complex" looking on private
property.
S. Our development is only 102 units ..n an original 20 acre
site. This is only 5 units per acre average, hardly more
density then a aingle family neighborhood. Curbing would
take the low density residential feeling out of the
development.
6. To date we have four other developments of the,n,= same
bt.ii ldin•js with no curlbin-,-. on
privarr pcop,::rty.
0
7. 0 -,er its -i with more density and notldevelopmeiinPlymouth
curbs arm:
Cardinal Ridge - Nathan Lane
Westridge Manor Homes - Lartch Lane
Prominade Homes - Vicksburg Lane
Timberton - Vicksburg Lane
Tyrell Townhomes - 45th Avenue N.
Carlson Companies Annex Building - Hwy 6 and 55
S. We have a quiet country setting with spacious setbacks.
We wish to leave it that way without commercial curbing.
Respecttully Submitted,
Patrick W. Gof-,'
L CA ,ION MmI90045
J
a
h T
x' - y- - , -moi 1"'•. . 1
Lt
CA •' I I
I I' / , 1 `/ \ \ I- N e _ oma
YN a oa9 `1 II , 1
I
IL
1 I *' G .cNY a •II i t O ) OfNO II' 1 I 1S
o
1 •p i-' y v 0 M b ..
f' • L
1 ti( w 0 ` 9 1 h 0
ii ; , -all • ' • '-:
MEMO
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
DATE: June 28, 1990 For City Council Meeting of July 2, 1990
TO: James G. Willis, City Manager
FROM: Community Development Coordinator Charl s llerud through
Community Development Director Blair Treme
SUBJECT: SCHUETT INVESTMENT COMPANY. RELEASE OF SITE IMPROVEMENT
PERFORMANCE AGREEMENT AND FINANCIAL GUARANTEE FOR "COACHMAN
TRAILS" AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF OLIVE LANE AND 14TH AVENUE
NORTH (85022)
ACTION REQUESTED: Adoptthe attached resolution providing for the
release of the Site Improvement Performance Agreement and remaining
financial guarantee for the "Coachman Trails" apartment project.
PRIMARY ISSUES AND ANALYSIS:
Planning staff has inspected the site and found that site improvements have
been completed according to the approved Site Plan. Landscaping materials
installed since the 1989 site inspection have completed winter
survivability, and an "as -built" utility plan has been submitted.
RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS:
I recommend adoption of the attached resolution authorizing release of the
financial guarantee in the Site Improvement Performance Agreement for
Schuett Investment Company for property located at 14th Avenue and Olive
Lane (Coachman Trails Apartments).
Attachments:
1. Draft Resolution
2. Location Map
3. Resolution 85-398
cc/cd/85022:dl)
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a meeting of
City Council of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, was held on the
of , 19 The following members were present:
The following members were absent:
the
day
introduced the following Resolution and
moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION 90 -
AUTHORIZING RELEASE OF SITE PERFORMANCE GUARANTEE FOR SCHUETT INVESTMENT
COMPANY FOR "COACHMAN TRAILS" (85022)
WHEREAS, a Site Plan for Schuett Investment Company was approved under City
Council Resolution 85-398; and,
WHEREAS, the developer submitted the required Site Performance Guarantee in
the form of a cash deposit in the amount of $196,500; and,
WHEREAS, Resolution 88-13 reduced the cash deposit to $102,250; and,
WHEREAS, Resolution 88-794 reduced the cash deposit to $63,750; and,
WHEREAS, Resolution 89-146 reduced the cash deposit to $40,000; and,
WHEREAS, upon notice from the developer, City staff has inspected said site
and recommends release of the financial guarantee;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does authorize the release of
the cash deposit in the amount of $40,000, which was submitted to guarantee
site improvements for Schuett Investment Company for "Coachman Trails".
The motion for adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded
by , and upon vote being taken thereon,
the following voted in favor thereof:
The following voted against or abstained
Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
of ton a lid Al
P' oil
4
9_
li( I
I AW
CITY OF PLYMOUTII
11torsuant to due cal l and notice thereof, a rAQtJ,)r meeting of the City Ccxw(ci 1 of
the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, was held on the ard_ day of 19
The following memt)ers were present: HI nr DAypnpnrt ruiinr i lmnmhor
14pi1t. Srhnrlirir+r ,rnrt V,aeilinte
The following members were absent: tower -_
i R to ! * • r• *
Cniinrilmnmhnr• Srhnrirjpr introduced the following Resolution and move(I its
adoption:
RESOLUTION NO. 85- 393
APPROVING SITE PLAN AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR SCHUETT INVESTMENT COMPANY (85022)
WHEREAS, Schuett Investment Company has requested approva! for a Sit(- Plan and Con-
ditional Use Permit for the construction of two multi -family building,; witrr o total
of 153 units to be located west of 14th Avenue North and Olive Lane on l.ot 1 arnct ',
Block 1 of Schiehe's Oakwood Addition to be platted as "Coachman Trails"; and,
WHEREAS, the. Planning Commission has reviewed said rt,quest .it a doily ral Ird Publ it
Hearing and recommends approval;
NOW, THERFFORF , BL 11 III-lif-BY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL 01 fill CITY 01 1'l.l't•tUtITH,
MINNESOTA, that. it should and hereby does approve the request for .'irhuett Invr ;tmrnt
Company for a Site Pl,)n and Conditional Use Permit for the construction of two multi-
family huildir,gs with ,, total of 153 units to be located west of 1411t A,.vmw North
and Olive Lane, suhjrct to the following conditions:
1. Compliance with City I nyii)ver's Memorandum
Submission of rrcluired fin,incial guarantee and Site Performance lgrtrrinvio for
completion of site- improvements.
3. Any signage shall be in compliance with the Ordinance.
4. Any subsequent phases or expansions are subject to required review; ir-A approv-
als per Ordinance provisions.
S. All waste arid. waste containers shall be stored within the structure and nu out -
sid-! storage is permitted.
G. No Conditional Use Permit or Bullding Permit to be Issued UM. iI t.he• I inal f'l'it
is filed and recorded with Hennepin County.
7. Appropridtc legal documents regarding shared access and cirCulalion :ysir•ni ,,_,
approved by the City Attorney, shall be filed with the Final Plat..
A. Approval of a Variance from the requirement of fire lanes subject to the• siruc-
tures being sprinklered, in accordance with the Fire Chief's reconrnendation.
PLEASE' SEE PACE: TWO
s" j.Y ,.•.,
rl
rage. two
a iicrsolut ion No. 85- 398
9. The pool and tennis crnrrt hours shall be restricted to no tenant. or (jM'*'t Irsc
after 10:30 P.M., or prior to 7:00 A.M..; and, no lights stial l he insta l lf•rt at
the pool or tennis courts.
10. No access to the pond shall be provided and no paths, docks, or sign,rye pointing
out the pond shall be constructed; there shall be no advertising puhlished for-
this orthisdevelopmentthatwouldalludetotheuseofthepond.
11. Additional plantings including pine trees and evergreens shall he t,l,>ct•d )long
the south lot line and along Outlot A north to the pond at a rate of 15 ft. nn
center. Additional plantings to be approved by staff, as to locatiotl, may not
necessarily be 15 ft. on center for all plantings. The 102 additional evergrce n
plantings shall be a minimum 8 ft. in height.
12. Adequate devices shall be installed to prevent direct run-off from this property
into the pond and this drainage shall be treated to remove the acc.umul.1t. ion of
sediment.
13. Approve a vari,ince of ', ft. for a maximum 40 ft. height. of the 3 -star` hlri 1;1i .
The motion for adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by
Councilmember Crain , and upon vote being taken thereon, thr
following voted in favor thereof: Mayor Davenport, Councilmembers Crain,
Neils. Schneider and Vasiliou
The following voted against or abstained: none —
Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
s
t
MEMO
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
DATE: June 28, 1990 For City Council Meeting of July 2, 1990
TO: James G. Willis, City Manager
FROM: Community Development Coordinator Char es Di lerud through
Community Development Director Blair Tre
SUBJECT: ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT AMENDMENTS
ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt the attached three Ordinances which provide for
amendments to the text of the Plymouth Zoning Ordinance regarding
miscellaneous topics, as recommended by the Planning Commission.
A 4/5 vote of the City Council is required for any amendment to the
Zoning Ordinance.
BACKGROUND:
At its meeting June 26, 1990, the Planning Commission took action
recommending approval of three amendments to the Zoning Ordinance text
presented by staff. A Public Hearing was held June 13, 1990, and continued
until June 26, 1990.
The amendments recommended for approval, and the Planning Commission voting
on each, were as follows:
1. To the R -1A District standards to permit residential facilities existing
as of November 1989 - the unanimous vote to approve.
2. To permit shoreland private recreation facilities in the FRD and all
residential zones - 3-2-1 (Commissioner Tierney and Chairman Plufka
opposed, Commissioner Marofsky abstained).
3. Deleting specification for private streets from the Planned Unit
Development section - unanimous to approve.
see next page)
Zoning Ordinance Amendments
Page Two
PRIMARY ISSUES AND ANALYSIS:
No members of the public spoke at the Public Hearings concerning the Zoning
Ordinance text amendments that were under consideration.
The item regarding residential facilities is a "housekeeping" measure
similar to the one approved earlier this year for the Adult Corrections
Facility.
The other items are in response to Council directives. The one regarding
private streets is a "first step" that clarifies the Zoning Ordinance and
leaves the rest of the issue to non -zoning considerations, i.e., the
Subdivision Code, Engineering Standards and Policies. We anticipate
completing those facets in the near future.
RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS:
I hereby recommend adoption of the attached Ordinances to amend the text of
the Plymouth Zoning Ordinance, as recommended by the Planning Commission.
Attachments:
1. Ordinance to Amend the Zoning Ordinance Regarding Residential Facilities
2. Ordinance to Amend the Zoning Ordinance Regarding Shoreland Private
Recreation Facilities
3. Ordinance to Amend the Zoning Ordinance Regarding Private Streets
4. Staff Report to the Planning Commission Regarding Residential Facilities
5. Staff Report to the Planning Commission Regarding Shoreland Private
Recreation Facilities
6. Staff Report to the Planning Commission Regarding Private Streets
7. Excerpt of Planning Commission Minutes of June 26, 1990
cc/cd/zo:dl)
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
ORDINANCE NO. 90 -
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING PORTIONS OF THE ORDINANCE 80-9 ADOPTED JUNE 16, 1980, AS
AMENDED, AND KNOWN AS THE PLYMOUTH ZONING ORDINANCE, RELATIVE TO RESIDENTIAL
FACILITIES.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Section 7, Subdivision C. is hereby amended as follows:
Add a new item to Section 7, Subdivision C which would read as
follows:
FRD R -1A R -IB R-2 R-3 R-4
49. -- C -- -- -- -- -Nursing Home, Residential
Facility, Residential
Shelter and similar
properly licensed and
sanctioned treatment
facilities in operation
as of November 20, 1989.
Section 2. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect upon its
passage and publication.
Adopted by the City Council this 2nd day of July 1990.
ayor
ATTEST
City Cler
Struel Material - indicates deleted text
Underscore - indicates new text
cc/jw/7-2.1)
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
ORDINANCE NO. 90 -
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING PORTIONS OF THE ORDINANCE 80-9 ADOPTED JUNE 16, 1980, AS
AMENDED, AND KNOWN AS THE PLYMOUTH ZONING ORDINANCE, RELATIVE TO SHORELAND
PRIVATE RECREATION FACILITIES.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Section 7, Subdivision C is hereby amended as follows:
FRD R -1A R -IB R-2 R-3 R-4
35A. P P P P P P Private recreational
structures and buildings
open on all sides on
undeveloped lakeshore
parcels as otherwise
regulated by this
Section 2. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect upon its
passage and publication.
Adopted by the City Council this 2nd day of July 1990.
Mayor
ATTEST
ty Cle
Struck Material - indicates deleted text
Underscore - indicates new text
cc/jw/7-2.3)
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
ORDINANCE NO. 90'
1980 AS
PORTIONS OF THE
ORDINANCE
NCE
AN ORDINANCE
AMENDING
RELATIVE
PTED JTOEPRIVATE
AAMENDED, AND KNOWN AS THE PLYMOUTH ZONING ORDINANCE
STREETS.
ITY OF PLYMOUTH
DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
s•
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE C
4. h is hereby
amended as follow
Section I. Section 9,
Subdivision B,
ets,
Utilities,
Services and Public
Facilities:
s thath, Stre require
ueness of each
proposal for a P.U.D. utilities and
services may e
The uniq ecifications
and standards
specifications
and difncatdionsofromrthessnces governing
their
subject to minor ordina
Cit Council may
therefore waive or modef not
e
established
in This any
other City
is found that they The
construction
specifications
or standards
where it
e5 and
services shall be
andinterestsofthe
resident; or of the entire City.
r
required in the unlit the City
Engineer
plans and
profiles of all
streets
and approved by plan
r
the
reviewed,
modified
ifnecessary,approval of the P•ublicpwater and
Building
Official p ro ects shall be served by P laced
City Council. All P.U:D• P . electrical
shall be p
sewer systems.
All utilities including
underground.
a- P J
PLYMOUTH ZONING ORDINANCE
Section 4, Subdivision B
yard setback or height regulations of the district in which it is located.
Non -Conforming Use of Land -- Any use of a lot which does not conform to
the applicable use regulations of the district in which it is located.
Non -Conforming Use of Structures -- A use of a structure which does not conform
to the applicable use regulations of the district in which it is located.
Nursery School -- A non-residential facility exclusively providing activities
of an educational or enriching nature for six or more children of up to the
age of six and licensed by the State of Minnesota.
Nursing Home -- A State -licensed facility or that part of .a facility which
provided nursing care pursuant to Minnesota Statute Chapter 144A.01. (Ord.
89-38)
Obstruction -- Any dam, wall, wharf, embankment, levee, dike, pile, abutment,
projection, excavation, channel rectification, culvert, building, wire,
fence, stockpile, refuse, fill, structure, or matter in, along, across, or
projecting into any channel, watercourse, or regulatory flood hazard area
which may impede, retard, or change the direction of the flow of water,
either in itself or by catching or collecting debris carried by such water,
or that is placed where the flow of water might carry the same downstream
to the damage of life or property.
Occupancy -- The purpose for which a building is used or intended to be used.
The term shall also include the building or room housing such use. Change
of occupancy is not intended to include change of tenants or proprietors.
Open Space -- Any open area not covered by structures owned by a person or
persons including but not limited to the following uses: required or
established yard areas, parking areas, sidewalks, schoolwalks, trails,
recreation areas, water bodies, shorelands, watercourses, wetlands,
groundwater recharge areas, floodplain, floodway, flood fringe, erodible
slopes, woodland and soils with severe limitations for development.
Open Space, Common -- A parcel or parcels of land or an area of water not
required for storage of the "Regional Flood" or a combination of such land
and water area within the site designated for private open space for the
sole benefit, use, and enjoyment of present and future lot or home owners
within a development.
Open Space, Private -- Any open space owned by a person or persons.
Open Space, Public -- Any open space publicly owned.
Ordinary High Water Mark -- A mark delineating the highest water level which
has been maintained for a sufficient period of time to leave evidence upon
the landscape. The Ordinary High Water Mark is commonly that point where
the natural vegetation changes from predominantly aquatic to predominantly
terrestrial. For water courses, the Ordinary High Water Mark shall be the
elevation of the top of the bank of the channel. For reservoirs and
flowages, the Ordinary High Water Mark shall be the operating elevation of
the normal summer pool. The Ordinary High Water Mark of public waters in
PLYMOUTH ZONING ORDINANCE
Section 4, Subdivision B
dwelling or other use as allowed under this Ordinance.
Public Waters -- Waters which are defined in Minnesota Statutes 1980, Section
105.37, Subdivision 14; For Purposes of the Shoreland Overlay District as
provided in this Ordinance, this includes lakes, ponds, and flowages of
more than 10 acres and streams, creeks, and water courses having a total
drainage area of 2 square miles or more. This does not include a body of
water created by a private user, where there was no previous shoreland, as
defined by the Department of Natural Resources, for a designated private
use authorized by the Department of natural Resources. The official
determination of the size and physical limits of drainage areas of streams,
creeks, and water courses shall be made by the Department of Natural
Resources. The official size of lakes, ponds, or flowages shall be the
areas listed in the Division of Waters, Soils and Minerals Bulletin 25, an
Inventory of Minnesota Lakes, or in the event that lakes, ponds, or
flowages are not listed therein, official determination of size and
physical limits shall be made by the Commissioner of the Department of
Natural Resources pursuant to State statutes. (Amended Ord. No. 82-33)
Reach -- A hydraulic engineering term to describe a longitudinal segment of a
stream or river influenced by a natural or man-made obstruction. In an
urban area, the segment of a stream or river between two consecutive bridge
crossings would most typically constitute a reach.
Recreation Vehicle -- For purposes of this Ordinance, the term shall
include the meaning of "recreational camping vehicle" as defined in
Minnesota Statutes 327.14, Subd. 7; and travel trailers, pickup coaches,
motor homes and camping trailers, "manufactured homes" as defined in this
Section, which are less than 40 feet in body length, converted buses, and
converted vans which can be and are used as temporary dwellings for travel,
recreational, and vacation purposes. (Amended Ord. 82-26)
Regional Flood -- A flood which is representative of large floods known to have
occurred generally in Minnesota and reasonably characteristic of what can
be expected to occur on an average frequency in the magnitude of the 100
year recurrence interval.
Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation -- A point not less than one foot above
the water surface profile associated with the regional flood plus any
increases in flood heights attributable to encroachments on the flood
plain. It is the elevation to which uses regulated by this Ordinance are
required to be elevated or flood proofed.
Residential Facility -- a dwelling where a State -licensed residential program,
public or private, which for gain or otherwise, regularly provides a 24-
hour -per -day substitute for care, food, lodging, training, education,
supervision, habilitation, rehabilitation, or treatment for one or more
persons, as defined by the State Human Services Licensing Act, outside a
person's own home, except in the case of persons with mental retardation
where the program may be in,the person's home. (Ord. 89-38)
Residential Shelter -- A supervised facility providing short-term housing,
food, and protection for transient individuals. The term does not include
Residential Facilities, Community Correctional Facilities, Day Care
facilities, Hotels, Motels, or Nursing Homes. (Ord. 89-38)
4-13
DRAFT AMENDMENT NO. 3
HEARING DATE: June 26. 1990
DESCRIPTION:
Provide for certain structures, now viewed as accessory, as principal
structures, when located on undeveloped lakeshore parcels.
SECTIONS INVOLVED: Section 7, Subdivision C.
EXPLANATION/PURPOSE:
The City Council at its May 21, 1990 meeting in conjunction with a continued
review of a Board of Zoning Adjustments and Appeals matter directed staff to
investigate Ordinance standards and,to prepare a Zoning Ordinance amendment
which would allow for secondary or accessory structures on lakeshore lots
without primary structures. The Council made it clear that the direction did
not include garages or boathouses; the Council focus has been on open -sided
shelters which the petitioner in the particular case has called a "picnic
shelter."
The Zoning Ordinance now provides for private recreational facilities
including those for golf, tennis and swimming that are located on the premises
of clubs, schools and places of worship as conditional in all residential
zoning districts.
The Ordinance also provides for private recreational facilities such as
swimming pools, -tennis courts, etc. other than on the premises of clubs,
schools or places of worship as accessory in all residential zoning districts.
Accessory uses, by legal definition, require a principal use or structure and
therefore are not allowed alone.
The Council direction is to provide for a certain limited use in the form of
an open -sided building which could provide shelter for persons enjoying the
amenities of an undeveloped lakeshore parcel.
The key consideration is that the Ordinance amendment deals with undeveloped
lakeshore parcels since developed lakeshore parcels are eligible for accessory
uses.
The City Council emphasized that the action does not include garages and
boathouses which are now provided by the Ordinance as accessory uses in all
districts.
Shoreland Management regulations would still apply relative to setback of any
structures located on lakeshore property.
Page Two
Draft Amendment 3
CONCLUSIONS/RECOMMENDATIONS:
The Draft Ordinance is responsive to the City Council direction by allowing
for the secondary structure, other than a garage or boathouse.
FRD R -1A R -1B R-2 R-3 R-4
35A. P P P P P P Private recreational
structures and buildings
open on all sides on
undeveloped lakeshore
parcels as otherwise
regulated by this
ordinance.
Underscore - indicates new text
Attachments
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING
MAY 21, 1990
PAGE: 173
MOTION made by Councilmember Zitur, seconded
by Councilmember Vasiliou to direct the staff
to investigate ordinance standards and
prepare a Zoning Ordinance amendment which
would allow for secondary or accessory
structures on lakeshore lots without primary
structures.
Motion to amend made by Councilmember Ricker
to include garages within the purview of the
ordinance.
Motion died for lack of a second.
Councilmember Zitur stated the motion did not
include garages or boat houses.
Motion carried on a Roll Call vote: Four
ayes. Councilmember Ricker voted nay.
MOTION was made by Councilmember Zitur,
seconded by Councilmember Vasiliou to table
this appeal pending the results of the staff
response to the Council direction.
Motion carried on a roll call vote. Four
waves. Councilmember Ricker voted nay.
Coun ' member Vasiliou asked Ryan Ryan Construction
represe atives why the sign plan before the Co., PUD Final
Council i the right plan. She stated that Sign Plan,
others had p pared plans and have asked for Rockford Road
revisions to t plan shortly thereafter. Plaza
Item 7-B
Bill McHale, Ryan Co truction Company, 900
2nd Avenue, Minneapoli stated that the sign
plan is based upon the' experience with
similar facilities. Tar g , Greatland has
erected the type of sign ptosed in the
past.
Councilmember Vasiliou questioned whjether the
sign calculation addresses the end'ot the
building as she has seen a numbeof
wraparound signs. Director Tremere sta d
that the ordinance allows for 5 percent o
the wall supporting the sign.
Mr. McHale stated they understand the
conditions of the approving resolution and
they have control over the signs throughout
the development per the plan.
PLYMOUTH ZONING ORDINANCE
DISTRICTS
FRD R-lA R -1B R-2 R-3 R-4
10. P C -- -- -- --
11. C C C C C C
P P P P P
C C C C C
C C C C C
15. C C C C C C
16. -- C C C C C
17. -- -- -- C C C
18. C C C C C C
7-5
Section 7, Subdivision C
UES
Agriculture, the keeping of one or
more horses, nurseries,
greenhouses for growing only,
landscape gardening and tree
farms, including
sale of products grown on
premises.
Parks and recreational areas
owned or operated by public
bodies, other than the City of
Plymouth
Golf courses (except club houses,
miniature courses and driving tees
operated for commercial purposes)
Private recreational facilities,
including those for golf, tennis,
and swimming, located on the
premises of clubs, schools, and
Places of Worship. (Amended Ord.
89-02)
Nursery, elementary and secondary,
public and private schools.
Amended Ord. 89-02)
Place of Worship, as specifically
regulated in this Ordinance.
Amended Ord. 89-02)
Day Care Facility operated in a
Place of Worship or in public or
private schools, as regulated in
Section 9. (Amended Ord. 89-02 &
Ord. 89-38)
Day Care Facility serving up to 16
persons operated on the premises
of an allowed Multiple Family
Dwelling or Dwellings, as
regulated in Section 9. (Amend.
Ord. 89-38)
Municipal, administrative and
service buildings or uses, public
libraries, museums, post offices
and the like except incompatible
activity of an industrial
character; and Adult Corrections
PLYMOUTH ZONING ORDINANCE
DISTRICTS
FRD R-lA R-lB R-2 R-3 R-4
34. A A A A A A
r A A A A A A
36. A A A A A A
37. A A A A A A
38. A A A A A A
39. A A A A A A
40. P
41. P -- -- -- -- --
42. A A A A A A
43. A A A A A A
44. P P P P -- --
7-7
Section 7, Subdivision C
USES
Living quarters of persons
employed on the premises, other
than Places of Worship. (Amended
Ord. 89-02)
Private recreational facilities
such as swimming pools, tennis
courts, etc. other than on the
premises of clubs, schools, or
Places of Worship. (Amended
Ord. 89-02)
Private garage, carport,
boathouse, dock or pier (Ord.
87-16) (See Section 6, Subd. B)
Signs as herein regulated
Fences as herein regulated
Parking as herein regulated
Transient merchants regulated in
Section 10 (Amended Ord. 86-07)
Transient produce merchant as
regulated in Section 10 (Amended
Ord. 86-07)
Administrative offices, meeting
rooms, classrooms, and food
preparation and service areas in a
Place of Worship, the uses of
which are incident and directly
related to the primary use.
Amended Ord. 89-02)
Secondary uses customarily
incident to the permitted or
conditional uses allowed in the
district, unless otherwise
regulated by this Ordinance.
Amended Ord. 89-02)
Day Care Facility serving 12 or
fewer persons in a Single Family
Detached Dwelling.
DRAFT AMENDMENT NO. 5
HEARING DATE: June 26, 1990
DESCRIPTION:
Amend the Zoning Ordinance so as to not allow for private streets.
SECTIONS INVOLVED: Section 9, Subdivision B, 4. h.
EXPLANATION/PURPOSE:
The City Council on April 17, 1990 acted to direct staff and the Planning
Commission to develop the appropriate amendments to the Zoning Ordinance and
Subdivision Code which would not allow for private streets.
The City Council has deliberated this subject for some time and has concluded
that the City Codes and Ordinances should not provide specifically for private
streets as a matter of right. There are several cases in the City where
private streets have been allowed and the City has come to regret it in the
sense that the residents along those streets have voiced concerns about having
to maintain the private roads and streets without City assistance even though
they pay taxes.
Also, private roads and streets have been shown to deteriorate and are
difficult to maintain without full replacement which can be a very expensive
proposition for a single development.
The Zoning Ordinance in the Planned Unit Development provision has provided
for standards other than those applicable to conventional subdivisions with
respect to streets.
Design flexibility can still be provided following this amendment; the basic
standards for streets however would remain where they predominately are in
most communities, in the Subdivision Code and in the design manuals adopted by
the City Council and enforced by the Engineering Department.
The proposed amendment eliminates the "double standard" which suggests that
private streets are acceptable as an alternative.
CONCLUSIONS/RECOMMENDATIONS:
The amendment is responsive to the City Council direction to amend the Zoning
Ordinance to not allow for private streets.
I have reviewed this with the Public Works Director and with the City Attorney
and we recommend the following:
Amend Section 9, Subdivision B, 4. h, by deleting the last sentence of
the text ("The following table shall be used as a guide and shall be the
minimum street standards for all streets, public or private, within a
P.U.D.:"), and delete the table, "P.U.D. Street Design Standards" in its
entirety.
Attachments
pc/bt/6-26.5:jw)
PLYMOUTH ZONING ORDINANCE
predetermined reasonable standard.
under the ownership of one of the
appropriate:
Section 9, Subdivision B
These common areas may be placed
following, depending which is more
1) Dedicated to public where a neighborhood wide use would be
anticipated.
2) Owner control when property not subdivided.
3) Property Owner's Association, provided all of the following
conditions are met:
a) The Property Owner's Association must be established prior to
any sale.
b) Membership must be mandatory for each owner, and any
successive buyer.
c) The open space restrictions must be permanent, not for a
given period of years.
d) The Association must be responsible for liability insurance,
local taxes, and the maintenance of residential and other
facilities.
e) Landowners must pay their pro rata share of the cost and the
assessment levied by the Association that can become a lien
on the property in accordance with Minnesota Statutes.
f) The Association must be able to adjust the assessment to meet
changed needs.
g. Covenants, Easements and Restrictions:
The final plan shall identify and contain such proposed covenants,
easements and other provisions relating to the bulk, location and
density of such residential dwellings, non-residential uses and public
facilities as are necessary for the welfare of the Planned Unit
Development and are consistent with the best interest of the entire
City. All or any of the covenants, easements and other provisions, if
as part of the final plan may be modified as deemed necessary by the
City Council when the final plat is approved, for the preservation of
the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of all City
residents.
h. Streets, Utilities, Services and Public Facilities:
The uniqueness of each proposal for a P.U.D. requires that
specifications and standards for streets, utilities and services may be
subject to minor modifications from the specifications and standards
established in this and other City ordinances governing their
construction. The City'Council may therefore waive or modify the
specifications or standards where it is found that they are not
required in the interests of the residents or of the entire City. The
9-12
PLYMOUTH ZONING ORDINANCE
Section 9, Subdivision B
plans and profiles of all streets, utilities and services shall be
reviewed, modified if necessary, and approved by the City Engineer and
Building Official prior to the final approval of the P.U.D. plan by the
City Council. All P.U.D. projects shall be served by public water and
sewer system- All utilities including electrical shall be placed
underground.tThe following table shall be used as a guide and shall be
the minimum street standards for all streets, public or private, within
a P.U.D.:
P.U.D. Street Design Standards
Street Description
Residential Non -Residential
Traffic (ADT)* Less Than 400 400-1,000 Over 1,000
Pavement Width**
in feet
No Parking 20' 26' 44' 44'
Parking One Side 26' 32' 44' 44'
Presumed or Actual
Right of Way Width 40'-44' 44'-50' 60'-66' 60'-10'
Sidewalks*** None ONE OR BOTH SIDES
Street Slope**** 0.5%-10% 0.5%-10% 0.5%-8% 0.5%-8%
Anticipated Speed 20 25 30 30
Axle Load Design***** 7 ton 7 ton 9 ton 9 ton
ADT (Average Daily Traffic) is used as a measure of the number of
vehicles using a road during an average 24-hour period.
Values shown are minimum. Conditions may require variations in pavement
widths.
Lack of specific requirements may make sidewalks on one or both sides of
higher volume residential and of non-residential streets unnecessary.
Values shown are a range. Topographic conditions may require
variations.
As defined in the Minnesota Highway Department Road Design Manual.
i. Transition Design:
1) The City Council has determined that specific standards and
guidelines are necessary and desired with respect to the
transition of Residential Planned Unit Developments particularly
where such development contains housing types other than single
family detached dwellings, and abuts existing or future
residential development containing single family detached
dwellings.
M93
Planning Commission Minutes
June 26, 1990
Chairman Plufka introduced a continuation of the Public
Hearing that was opened at the June 13, 1990, Planning
Commission Meeting concerning six Zoning Ordinance Text
Amendments that were proposed by staff: 1 - Flood Plain
Regulations; 2 - Residential Facilities; 3 - Shoreland
Private Recreation Facilities; 4 - Planned Unit Development
Attributes; 5 - Private Streets; and, 6 - Temporary Real
Estate and Other Signs.
Chairman Plufka announced each of the Text Amendments under
consideration and asked if any member of the public desired
to address the Planning Commission at the Public Hearing
concerning these amendments. No members of the public
requested to be heard.
Chairman Plufka closed the Public Hearing.
Commissioner Tierney inquired as to whether the proposed
Text Amendment No. 3 - Shoreland Private Recreation
Facilities - related to a recent Board of Zoning Adjustments
and Appeals' petition involving a picnic shelter adjacent to
Palmer Lou Lake.
Coordinator Dillerud indicated that the Council direction to
consider Zoning Ordinance Amendment regarding Private
Shoreland Recreation Facilities resulted from the City
Council deliberation of that Zoning Ordinance variance
action.
MOTION by Commissioner Wire, seconded by Commissioner MOTION TO APPROVE - TEXT
Tierney, to recommend approval of the Zoning Ordinance Text AMENDMENT NO. 2
Amendment No. 2 concerning Residential Facilities.
Roll Call Vote. 6 Ayes. MOTION carried. VOTE - MOTION CARRIED
MOTION by Commissioner Wire, seconded by Commissioner Zylla, MOTION TO APPROVE - TEXT
to recommend approval of the Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment AMENDMENT NO. 3
No. 3 concerning Shoreland Private Recreation Facilities.
Roll Call Vote. 3 Ayes. Commissioner Tierney and Chairman VOTE - MOTION CARRIED
Plufka Nay. Commissioner Marofsky abstained. MOTION
carried.
MOTION by Commissioner Wire, seconded by Commissioner MOTION TO APPROVE - TEXT
Marofsky, to recommend approval of Zoning Ordinance Text AMENDMENT NO. 5
Amendment No. 5 concerning Private Streets.
Roll Call Vote. 6 Ayes. MOTION carried. VOTE - MOTION CARRIED
Planning Commission Minutes
June 26, 1990
Chairman Plufka then continued the Public Hearing concerning
Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment Nos. 1 - Flood Plain
Regulations; 4 - Planned Unit Development Attributes; and,
6 - Temporary Real Estate and Other Signs until the meeting
of July 11, 1990.
MEMO
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
3400 PLYMOUTH
BOULEVARD,
PLYMOUTH,
MINNESOTA 55447
2 1990
DATE: June 27, 1990 for Council Meeting of July ,
TO:
James G. Willis, City Manager,
through Fred G. Moore, Director of
Public Works
FROM: John R. Sweeney,
Assistant Engineer
SUBJECT: BOND REDUCTIONS
We have received requests from the developers for
he
ACTION REQUESTED: completed work in their
developments.
bond reduction to
reflect comp
made inspections of
the work
are:
that the attache
City has ted. These developments
resolutions be adopted. (87134)
1. Quail Ridge of Plymouth 4th Addition
85108)
2. Westwood Ridge 2nd Addition
jo n R. Sweeney
JRS:kh
attachments:
Resolut10
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a
the City of Plymouth, Minnesota was held on the
1990. The following members were present:
The following members were absent:
adoption:
7tCXX
meeting of the City Council of
day of ,
XXX
introduced the following Resolution and moved its
RESOLUTION NO. 90 -
REDUCING DEVELOPMENT BOND
WESTWOOD RIDGE 2ND ADDITION (85108)
WHEREAS, in accordance with the development contract dated March 2, 1987, Graham
Development Company and Commercial Excavating, Inc., developer of Westwood Ridge 2nd
Addition (85108), has agreed to install certain improvements for said development; and
WHEREAS, the developer has completed a portion of the street, utility and site grading
as noted below; and
WHEREAS, the developer has requested a reduction of the development bond to reflect the
completed work;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH,
MINNESOTA; that the bonding requirements are reduced as follows:
Street Construction
Sanitary Sewer
Watermain
Storm Sewer
Boulevard and Drainage Swale Sod
Pond or Ditch Construction
Street Signs
Site Grading and Drainage Improvements
See Grading permit No. 8996)
Park and Trail Improvements
Design, Administration, Inspection, As-Builts
TOTAL
z44s 4IN0111 Zvi
99,790 0-
45,047 0-
37,480 0-
23,963 0-
6,000 2,200
0- 0-
600 0-
0- 0-
0- 0-
25,546 264
238,426 $ 2,464
That the letter of credit required for the above items be reduced as detailed above
from $41,719 to $2,464 to reflect the completed work.
Resolution No. 90 -
Page Two
FURTHER BE IT RESOLVED that the bonding requirements for the following items per
Section 8.1 of the approved development contract be reduced as follows:
ITEM ORIGINAL AMOUNT NEW AMOUNT
Maintenance of Erosion
and Sediment Control Plan
Street Sweeping and Storm
Sewer Cleaning
Cash: $-0- $-0-
Letter of Credit: $-0- $-0-
FURTHER BE IT RESOLVED that the sanitary sewer, watermain, storm sewer, street
construction, and concrete curb and gutter is accepted for continual maintenance as of
July 2, 1990 subject to the One Year Guarantee by the Developer.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted
in favor thereof:
The following voted against or abstained:
Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
X)YX XX'n axx
t MEMO
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
DATE: June 26, 1990 For City Council Meeting of July 2, 1990
fig, L
TO: James G. Willis, City Manager Through Fred G. Moore, Director of
Public Works
FROM: Daniel L. Faulkner, City Engineer
SUBJECT: APPROVE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ADVERTISE FOR BIDS
ROCKFORD ROAD PLAZA
STREET, UTILITIES AND SIGNAL SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS
CITY PROJECT NO. 948
ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt the attached resolution.
BACKGROUND: At the February 26, 1990 City Council meeting, plans and
specifications for City Project No. 948 were ordered. These plans included
the improvement of Vinewood Lane within the Rockford Road Plaza Development
from County Road No. 9 north and east to Northwest Boulevard. Northwest
Boulevard will also be improved by widening with concrete curb and gutter
from County Road No. 9 to approximately 45th Avenue North. Additional turn
lanes will be provided on County Road No. 9 along with widening of the
southbound 494 exit ramp. Traffic signals will also be installed at County
Road No. 9 and Vinewood Lane along with revisions to the present signal
systems at the exit and entrance ramps from Highway 494. Final plans and
specifications for City Project No. 948 have now been completed and we are
requesting approval and ordering the advertisement for bids.
RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS: I recommend that the City Council adopt
the attached resolution which approves the final plans and specifications
and orders advertisement for bids with bids to be received Thursday, August
2, 1990.
Daniel L. Faulkner, P.E.
DLF:dkc:kh
attachments: Resolution
Map
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a meeting of the City
Council of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota was held on the day of
1990. The following members were present:
The following members were absent:
XXX XXX XXX
introduced the following Resolution and moved
its adoption
RESOLUTION NO. 90 -
APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS
ROCKFORD ROAD PLAZA
STREET, UTILITIES, AND SIGNAL SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS
CITY PROJECT NO. 948
WHEREAS, pursuant to a resolution passed by the Council on February 26, 1990
the City's Consulting Engineer, Strgar-Roscoe-Fausch, Inc., has prepared plans
and specifications for the improvement of Rockford Road Plaza street,
utilities, and signal system improvements by the installation of watermain,
sanitary sewer, storm sewer and street improvements and has presented such
plans and specifications to the Council for approval;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA;
1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which is attached hereto and
made a part hereof, are hereby approved.
2. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official
paper and in The Construction Bulletin an advertisement for bids upon
the making of such improvement under such approved plans and
specifications. The advertisement shall be published once, shall
specify the work to be done, shall state that bids will be received
by the City Clerk until 10:00 a.m. on Thursday, August 2, 1990, at
which time they will be publicly opened in the Council Chambers of
the Plymouth City Center Building at 3400 Plymouth Boulevard,
Plymouth, Minnesota, by the City Manager and that no bids will be
considered unless sealed and filed with the City Clerk and
accompanied by a cash deposit, cashier's check, bid bond or certified
check payable to the City Clerk for five percent of the amount of
such bid.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following
voted in favor thereof: ,
The following voted against or abstained:
Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
XXX *** XXX
OUTLOT A
AVENUE
r-A —I
e.
IOUTL
OU EU
SUSTRGAR-ROSCOE-FAUSCK INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
TRANSPORTATION : CTVIL- STRUCTURAL ENCNEERS
IAN'DSURVEYORS PARKNG
Suite 150, One Carlson Parkway North
Minneapolis, Minnesota 5-1"7
61 2) 475-001
4-
POND
tROCKFORD ROAD PLAZA/
Ir
rr
tl ED
UTLOT D
c
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
VINEWOOD LANE/
C.S.A.H. 9 AREA
CITY PROJECT NO. 948
LEGEND
EXISTING ROAD
PROPOSED ROAD
EXISTING STORM SEWER
PROPOSED STORM SEWER
PROPOSED CURB BY OTHERS
FIGURE 2
PROPOSED STREET & STORM
SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
COMMISSION NO. 0891258
r
L
o
d
i
1
1
1
1
1
1
VINE OD LANE C'
ix o
U W
Z
z 0
W X cr
w W a
a
i) J
ir Z
cr W
W3
a
W N
N
cr O N
o N cr
N O C
Z a 0
x
W a a
l
i----- TH. 494 \\\
i
cri
W
w
E,
12
In
N
000
0
z
0
0
u
aoerO
zz
u
W
O
99
IL.
r
F
I I
144THAVE. z
I
j =-1- W
3
3 0
W
0
o
cn
a cr
IrN
coir oa
W
0
U)
cr
G
0 W WII
Z O F- OO
c f= to a N n. a
00
n
w
O
x
W
cr
d w a a
C W
I
4-4-
w
z
V
WY
J
O
0
rpz
Ow I
Qw
w C4
N
p ppO
w o
z
ow
o`n
w uu
MEMO
CITY OF PLYMOUTH *b,''`
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
DATE: June 27, 1990 For City Council Meeting of July 2, 1990
TO: James G. Willis, City Manager Through Fred G. Moore, Director of
Public Works
FROM: Daniel L. Faulkner, City Engineer
SUBJECT: STORM WATER DRAINAGE POND NO. BC -P1
CITY PROJECT NO. 016
ACTION REQUESTED: Approve the attached resolution accepting the
Preliminary Engineering Report and refer the report to the Special
Assessment Committee.
BACKGROUND: The City Council has authorized the preparation of a
Preliminary Engineering Report for Storm Sewer Drainage Pond No. BC -P1 and
its outlet as part of the 1990 Capital Improvements Program. James M.
Montgomery, Inc. has completed the report for approval. Two alternatives
have been considered. Alternate A includes construction of a temporary open
channel between County Road 101 and Medina Road at a total cost of $95,200.
Alternate B includes installation of a storm sewer through this area at a
total cost of $124,100. Neither alternate includes the acquiring of
easements. Since the open channel would require a much greater easement, it
may be the more costly alternative. The engineer recommends the
construction of Alternate B.
As part of this study, the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the Bassett Creek Water Management Commission,
and some affected property owners have given comments concerning the
contributing area of Pond BC -P1.
RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS: It is recommended that the City Council
accept the Preliminary Engineering Report and refer the report to the
Special Assessment Committee for their consideration.
Daniel L. Faulkner, P.E.
DLF:dkc:kh
attachments: Resolution
Report
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a meeting of the City
Council of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota was held on the day of
1990. The following members were present: ,
The following members were absent:
7C ACX fiCiC 7rC CX
introduced the following Resolution and moved
its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO. 90 -
RECEIVING PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING REPORT AND
REFERRING REPORT TO THE SPECIAL ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE
STORM WATER DRAINAGE POND NO. BC -P1
CITY PROJECT NO. 016
WHEREAS, the City of Plymouth as part of the 1990 Capital Improvements Program
is proposing drainage improvements to Pond BC-Pl by providing an outlet and
down stream drainage facilities; and
WHEREAS, James M. Montgomery, Inc. was designated as the consulting engineer
for the project, and a Preliminary Engineering Report was ordered as part of
the 1990 Capital Improvements Program; and
WHEREAS, the report for the improvements of Storm Water Drainage Pond No. BC -
P1 has been prepared and is being received by the Council on July 2, 1990;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA:
1. The Special Assessment Committee shall consider the report
and proposed assessments prior to ordering a public
hearing.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following
voted in favor thereof:
The following voted against or abstained:
Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
LXX X)YX 7CXX
MEMO
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
DATE: June 26, 1990 For City Council Meeting of July 2, 1990,
TO: James G. Willis, City Manager Through Fred G. Moore, Director of
Public Works
FROM: Daniel L. Faulkner, City Engineer
SUBJECT: AWARD OF CONTRACT
WELL NO. 13
CITY PROJECT NO. 013
ACTION REQUESTED: On Tuesday, June 26, 1990 bids were received for the
drilling of Well No. 13. Attached is a letter from the consulting
engineer recommending that the contract be awarded to the low bidder,
E.H. Renner & Sons for Well No. 13 in the amount of $132,180.
BACKGROUND: Due to uncertain subsurface conditions in this area, the bid
included an alternate for a test well. The test well alternate bid is
15,400 and the main production well bid is $116,780. We are recommending
an award which includes the test well. The total bid of $132,180 is 2%
below the engineer's estimate.
RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS: Attached is a resolution for City Council
adoption which approved the award of the Well No. 13 Contract to E.H. Renner
Sons in the amount of $132,180.
Daniel L. Faulkner, P.E.
DLF:dkc:kh
attachments: Resolution
Letter
Map
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a
the City of Plymouth, Minnesota was held on the
1990. The following members were present:
The following members were absent:
adoption:
meeting of the City Council of
day of ,
introduced the following Resolution and moved its
RESOLUTION NO. 90 -
RESOLUTION AWARDING BID
TEST AND PRODUCTION WELL NO 13
CITY PROJECT NO. 013
WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the drilling of Test and Production
Well No. 13, and all necessary appurtenances, bids were received, opened and tabulated
according to law, and the following bids were received complying with the
advertisement:
E.H. Renner & Sons $ 132,180.00
Layne Minnesota 133,562.20
Bergerson-Caswell 137,470.00
Keys Well Drilling 147,505.00
WHEREAS, it appears that E.H. Renner & Sons is the lowest responsible bidder, complying
with the minimum specifications.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH,
MINNESOTA:
1. The Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter
into the attached contract with E.H. Renner & Sons in the name of the
City of Plymouth for the drilling of Test and Production Well No. 13,
according to the plans and specifications therefore approved by the
City Council and on file in the office of the City Clerk in the amount
of the low bid of $132,180.
2. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith
to all bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the
deposits of the successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall be
retained until a contract has been signed.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted
in favor thereof:
The following voted against or abstained:
Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
ACX iC 'C YX
I
7 CXX
r
rr
AdEr
ASEH
ENCJNEERS • ARCHMECTS ptMfNEitS
June 27, 1990
City of Plymouth
3400 Plymouth Blvd.
Plymouth, MN 55447
353$VAQNAK,, CENMR DWi; ST RfAUi. MINNE507A 5St 7Q 672 490-2o00
RE: PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA
WELL NO. 13
CITY PROJECT NO. 013
SEH FILE NO: 90187
Attn: Dan Faulkner, City Engineer
On Tuesday, June 26, four bids were received for the construction
of Production Well No. 13 with an alternate bid for an associated
test well. The combined bids ranged from a low of $132,180 to a
high of $147,505. The Engineer's Estimate for the project was
135,000. The combined low bid was submitted by E.H. Renner &
Sons of Elk Riven.
The bids have been reviewed by our office for mathematical
errors. A complete tabulation of all bids is attached for your
preview.
Because of the inconsistencies experienced in the past with the
geological formations in this area, we would recommend that the
alternate bid for the test well be included as part of the award.
In our previous experience with E.H. Renner & Sons, we have found
them to be a reputable contractor with the capabilities of
completing this project in accordance with the specifications.
Please call if you have any questions.
SDC/cih
Enclosure
SNORT ELLtO7,
NENORICKSON 1NC.
ST PAUL,
MINNESOTA
Sincerely,
Steve Campbell, P.E.
CHIPPFWA FALLS,
WIS',70WN
nF,, 20 90 08:45 Alf PO^
JUN -28-1990 08:50 FROM SEH INC. TO PLYMOUTH P.03
A 6K • 1
H 1
A to
V7FAI 1
4 1
M
w
M
y H OOthO
z w
1.1
zx3 o
wotr
x
e•ac.a y
A
E
N
4
o la o Q o Q O O Q Q Q
Q O O O O O O O O O O
O O O O O O O Q Q Q Q
4 O O O O O O O O O O
QI IA rsS b !' w ri 10 N •-t
w e+f rs N w
p Q p Q Q Q O O p Q Q
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o v
o
vo+
cora
O
r0.
cOv o 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
O u; O O O b b b O O b
m N r4
rt M .d w
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
00 w 1-t rl w 0 w 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 o Q p p p
o Q o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
O b O o o O p p O h O
p o o Ie, 0 0 0 o Q n Q
440 c0v 1rr +°Di N
p o 0 o a o 0 0 0 0 0
O O O p Q Q O IIT O O O
a 0 o o
I4
o
0 0 o Q o 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 4 QO O O O o 0
0 0 0 0 0
CA M 0 0 a H 0 v to N N
w m rl w w
0 0 0 0 0 o C p O O O
0 o n to o v o 0 0 0 0
a ev o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a
1
Aff A O w O .
d
40'
f
0 O
QI N N
a
la l i (0d N N ti
N w
z
lO-
1 b1 Lt/ Ou b. yi :1 U O co
d
a a a •a v a ci x a a
Wo x
ax o
a a .
o E
TW +
d
U Q hNt
t9 H N R7 C7
al c a x
In
to z x x
U ,
er~!
t W a H a
O 1:
cx E-1
U G O W A
N a roi N z x o c ca
at to fn
H Q Q 0U' W iA Vl Ak E
f ?M fti fT r .t .t N
N 0 .
t r
O N th N O b w O w b
w N N e'y in In b O t0 A
O O O O O O O O O O O
n n C% N N n [.
N N N N N N N N N N N
QO
O
O
O
M
w
0
0
In
N
p
b
N
r,
0
H
N
0
Iri
w
r{
JUN -28-1990 08:50 FROM SEH INC.
t ai
10
p O O O O O O O O I O r
0 ou o o O O o tri 1 h n
Q Ln h N p a O 0 0
O N t- to O .-1 4 O rl t ttl a
a1 O N "A
1 ! 0
rl t e! N
1 +•I N
O O o O O O O O
O N at N O O b O
O O
1 N
O O O O C O O O O 1 0
O O O o 4 O O O 0.11 0
O 0 0 O t7 O O 0 wool
0 o O O >n o o O 1 z`
Iry a i "% trl
1rtN
0 0 o O v 0 0 0
0 o d O O O O O
0 O O O O
N IOtf 0
O O O O O O O O Q I O N
o O n 0 O o o a tr t N
0 o a+ o o a o o M s to
0.4 in
N
m In
1 (7
I rl a
O O W!O O O C Q
O M •moi O OO O
o .t to m0
O O o 0 0 0 0 o O+ O s
0 o v o v o Q o o l o a
OO o 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
0 0 0 w v a v o 0 1 m r
L0
to M W' r4 a I ": 1
to 1 N It
1 rl p
O O O O O O O O
Q Q O O O O O O
O O t7 OO O O 0
o N N 9-10 0 0 0
Ln 0 Ln
a1 to co«mt rt V-4
W N r1
tz ayZnWCpOO N d!
1
N
w
y
tl A W
DC x rt H
x
ice+
c~A
O
W
WjH•
rt W
aH
td d tD w tl + tl kC is
H O Z N .Z. O
K y a aaa
A A A A V F d E E0a
TO PLYMOUTh
T/ —^t In M^
WELL WELL
NO.2 N0.3r-------1
I _)
ENO 1.0 MG ELEVATED
RESERVOIR
CENTRAL WATER
TREATMENT PLANT
a
WELL 1 WELL WELL
N0.5 NO.4 N0.6
rd AVE. N0.
Y
Q CID O
fr
Q. m
Z
a PROPOS D RAW W
Z WATER PIPING
21 st AVE. N0.
2
12••
6 WELL WELL N0. 12—/
N0.7
PROPOSED
WELL NO. 13
4
ENGINEERS 6 ARCHITECTS R PLANNERS
O
19th AVE.
LEGEN D:
10 EXISTING WELLS
El FUTURE WELLS
OVERSIZED CASING WELLS
LOCATION MAP FILE N0.
90187
CENTRAL WELL FIELD DRG. NO.
PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 1
JI
I
MEMO
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
kJ - /, L
DATE: June 26, 1990 For City Council Meeting of July 2, 1990,,,--
TO: James G. Willis, City Manager through Fred G. Moore, Director of
Public Works
FROM: Daniel L. Faulkner, City Engineer
SUBJECT: AWARD OF BID
25TH AVENUE TRUNK WATERMAIN
CITY PROJECT NO. 908
ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt the attached resolution awarding contracts for
City Project No. 908.
BACKGROUND: Bids were received for the 25th Avenue Trunk Watermain, City
Project No. 908 on June 26, 1990. Attached is a letter from the consulting
engineer recommending that the contract be awarded to the low bidder, F. F.
Jedlicki, Inc. Included within the attached resolution is a tabulation of
all bids received. The low bid is approximately 276 below the engineer's
estimate included within the Preliminary Report.
RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS: It is recommended that the City Council
adopt the resolution awarding the contract for City Project No. 908, 25th
Avenue Trunk Watermain, to F. F. Jedlicki, Inc. in the amount of $239,486.
Daniel L. Faulkner, P. E.
DLF:dkc:do
attachment: Resolution
Letter
Map
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a
the City of Plymouth, Minnesota was held on the
1990. The following members were present: _
The following members were absent:
X )CX 7fX C
adoption:
meeting of the City Council of
day of ,
C XX
introduced the following Resolution and moved its
RESOLUTION NO. 90 -
RESOLUTION AWARDING BID
25TH AVENUE TRUNK WATERMAIN
CITY PROJECT NO. 908
WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for 25th Avenue Trunk Watermain Project,
bids were received, opened and tabulated according to law, and the following bids were
received complying with the advertisement:
COMPANY TOTAL BID
F. F. Jedlicki 239,486.00
Latour Const. 248,157.75
Glendale Cont. 253,664.00
C. W. Houle 264,795.25
Nodland Const. 282,906.60
Northdale Const. 288,710.50
Hennen Const. 296,232.00
B. & D. Underground 309,041.00
G. L. Cont. 328,927.50
WHEREAS, it appears that F. F. Jedlicki, Inc. of Eden Prairie is the lowest responsible
bidder, complying with the minimum specifications.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH,
MINNESOTA:
1. The Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter
into the attached contract with F. F. Jedlicki, Inc. of Eden Prairie,
MN in the name of the City of Plymouth for 25th Avenue Trunk
Watermain, City Project No. 908, according to the plans and
specifications therefore approved by the City Council and on file in
the office of the City Clerk in the amount of the low bid of
239,486.00.
2. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith
to all bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the
deposits of the successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall be
retained until a contract has been signed.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted
in favor thereof:
The following voted against or abstained:
Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
t 1X X 'XX 7C
I
1.
June 27, 1990
City of Plymouth
3400 Plymouth Boulevard
Plymouth, MN 55447
Attns Mr. Fred G. Moore
Res 25th Avenue
Trunk Water Main Improvements
Project No. 908
File No. 70255
Dear Fred,
On Tuesday, June 26, 1990• sealed bids were received for the above referenced
project. A total of nine (9) bids were received. The bids have been checked.
tabulated, and reviewed. Five copies of the tabulation of the five low bids
are enclosed.
The low bidder is ?. F. Jedlicki„ Inc. with a total base bid of $239,486.00.
This bid is approximately 271 lower than the Engineer's Estimate of
328,708.60. The reason for the difference between the low bid and the Engi-
neer's Estimate is that the market for construction projects has been very
competitive this year.
F. F, Jedlicki, Inc. has completed several projects in the past for our firm.
The work on these projects was satisfactorily completed.
We recommend award of the project to F. F. Jedlicki, Inc. as the low bidder in
the amount of $239,486.00.
Yours very truly,
ONESTI00, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Daniel J. Edgerton, P.E.
DJEsli
Enc I.
30
2335 West Highway 36 0 St. Paul, Minnesota 55113 a 612-636-4600
cW G, 87sezm Pk. Nth A. Cvfd +. RE, Junes R. M**N. Pe.
r AMersos P.E.
Thomas R Anderson A LA,
GuY f Ryynecr. PE
Sones t roo
00bed W aozv- P.E.
Joseph C. Ar*ft PE
whaed W roe PE
oo natd t kg%iardt RE,
Kenneth
Ma& R. Rohs, PE. B. " p.E. MAt , x'
Phfp Gravel fR PE
nn
Marvin L, Sorv1$$ PA.
Rkhaml E. dimer PE.
Jerry A. 6ourdcn, Re.
Mark MOrnso. U.
ftbtn c, Rw;& A.I.A.
Thomas E. Maus PE.
A P.=.
G
Rene C. PIumM AIJ1.
AprKs M. Rin$ ICPo,S4ne
rv,.1 1r DARik &
M C. OWN P.E.
Glenn R, Cdak. PE
Ted K. fkkl, PE,
h4"I T. RautMMM PE,
Howard sar tord,
OanrN J. 5dperton PE
PC
levy Q Pcrer R.. C«It o . P.E.
tderl Thor= G. Noyn K Rubcn R. ftfft Pk.
Re,
Mark A. $NP,
Pimp I tarmt PA, Charles A Ertekwrs
Associates Room G. sehunkht RE.
Susu+ M, Merin, CPA,
029V 0 Inskoa.
Thomas W I' MrsOr4 PE. hmaN Martina• P.E. LeoM, km
MVW1 C. 4,nm P.E. Mark 0. Watit4 PE.
Engineers & Architects
June 27, 1990
City of Plymouth
3400 Plymouth Boulevard
Plymouth, MN 55447
Attns Mr. Fred G. Moore
Res 25th Avenue
Trunk Water Main Improvements
Project No. 908
File No. 70255
Dear Fred,
On Tuesday, June 26, 1990• sealed bids were received for the above referenced
project. A total of nine (9) bids were received. The bids have been checked.
tabulated, and reviewed. Five copies of the tabulation of the five low bids
are enclosed.
The low bidder is ?. F. Jedlicki„ Inc. with a total base bid of $239,486.00.
This bid is approximately 271 lower than the Engineer's Estimate of
328,708.60. The reason for the difference between the low bid and the Engi-
neer's Estimate is that the market for construction projects has been very
competitive this year.
F. F, Jedlicki, Inc. has completed several projects in the past for our firm.
The work on these projects was satisfactorily completed.
We recommend award of the project to F. F. Jedlicki, Inc. as the low bidder in
the amount of $239,486.00.
Yours very truly,
ONESTI00, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Daniel J. Edgerton, P.E.
DJEsli
Enc I.
30
2335 West Highway 36 0 St. Paul, Minnesota 55113 a 612-636-4600
V f' — i — .' - L•J C lJ 1 L> t: U f'4 C 1 N: V k—, k— L H 1 t
vwi}
DM
CL Co
a
M V
R
y g g 8 8$$ 8
J t11 N N
M
8ggg 888
M w
88888
r% M
r
8888888
88888888,
tv
r
St8 888,$,
M
p p
Qr
N
88888,88,8
w 0-o r M
w
88888p88S
r N
8888888888
N y N N r M
8888888888
g8 8888888
8888888888
8B 888$88,8
r. w• r t+
pp p
r r wj rp'
8 p 8 8 8$$$$ S
V-
R
g g M g g$ 8 8 8 8
w r ro M v
p p p pp
r
O 8 88Q 118y O8 (8p 1 6Q Opp 8S 8
N r M N N N
H• - Vl J
A
H
YT
In
4
0
L
M
ZM
M
M
N
H V
M F
7
y, L Vl
u
a
r
a
M V
R
y g g 8 8$$ 8
J t11 N N
M
8ggg 888
M w
88888
r% M
r
8888888
88888888,
tv
r
St8 888,$,
M
p p
Qr
N
88888,88,8
w 0-o r M
w
88888p88S
r N
8888888888
N y N N r M
8888888888
g8 8888888
8888888888
8B 888$88,8
r. w• r t+
pp p
r r wj rp'
8 p 8 8 8$$$$ S
V-
R
g g M g g$ 8 8 8 8
w r ro M v
p p p pp
r
O 8 88Q 118y O8 (8p1 6Q Opp 8S 8
N r M N N N
H• - Vl J
N
W
I
u
r
a
Q
W
I
MC V
3
u ta
0
L pu
a
N
9
I - M
888888538888888gg888
88888oQ8$$g88$8$$8
888g8g8888885888888
gg8$8885* 9-g8888
0 V% b
r r CCr r $$N r
r
8$8888888$588888888,
14 4
8 8 8 8$$$ 8$$ 8 5t 9$ S S 8
r
pr
8888888S88SNq 0(78518
rf
8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8$ 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
h
N N N b r• N r r + N
w
888888888888555888
Y OD Ml ri'1 '+
a W% V% .. r
r r
r
tWI111 {{,}} fq
W w w W J J J J N N J N N G W
fA-
A
m
J I.JN—' r —'_+ LJEU 1 _7 = 1 J3L ME5 T RULJ 23. i-S(JC_ 1 Fi 1 t5
Ii
1-' . b 1
W
W
qqN
m W Yy H Wy1••'
1-' . b 1
z
w
z
a
J
a
cr
9
Q
271H AVENUEI N.
1 I 2 I 3 I 4 I 5
LOCATION PLAN
SCALE: 1° - 200'
MEMO
i_ *g_N-3
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
DATE: June 26, 1990, for City Council Meeting of July 2
TO: James G. Willis, City Manager
FROM: Eric J. Blank, Director of Parks and Recreation
SUBJECT: AWARD OF BID SWAN LAKE NEIGHBORHOOD PARK
1. ACTION REED: The attached resolution awards a bid to Ideal
Paving in the amount of $153,467 for the construction of Swan Lake
Neighborhood Park.
2. BACKGROUND: On May 7, by resolution No. 90-289, the City Council approved
a comprehensive master plan for Swan Lake Neighborhood Park. On June 4,
the City Council approved the final plans and specifications for the
construction of Swan Lake Neighborhood Park and ordered the advertisement
of bids for City Project Nu. 023. The bids for this project were opened
at 10 a.m. on Tuesday, June 26. Bids were received from four companies as
shown on the attached bid tab. The low bid was received from Ideal Paving
from Brooklyn Park. The base bid was received in the amount of $144,392.
I am recommending that the City Council also accept two add alternates.
The first add alternate, in the amount of $2,100, will widen the trail
that runs around the lake from eight to ten feet. We anticipate a lot of
bicycling, roller blading, jogging and walking traffic going in a circular
pattern around the lake. This trail will also serve as the main
maintenance trail for servicing the entire park. The added width makes it
easier for our maintenance vehicles to service the park, and it will be
easier for snow removal in the winter.
The second alternate is for $6,975 which is additional sod for the
project. Due to the wet conditions we have experienced this year, we
think it would be prudent to have available some additional sod to hold
the steep banks within the park to prevent erosion. With these two add
alternates, the total cost would be $153,467. As I reported in my May 30
memo to the City Council, the engineers last projected cost for the
project was $160,000. Including the engineering cost of $8,900, the total
cost including design and engineering is $162,367.
3. RDCCNMENDATIONS AND OONCLUSIONS: It is my recommendation that the City
Council award the bid for the development of Swan Lake Neighborhood Park
to Ideal Paving in the amount of $153,467.
Eric J. Blank, Director
Parks and Recreation
EJB/np
Attachments
I
CITY OF PLYM3M
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a meeting of the
City Council of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, was held on day of
19 The following members were
present:
The following members were absent:
introduced the following Resolution and moved its
adoption.
RESOLUTION NO. 90 -
AWARDING BID SWAN LAKE NEIGHBORHOOD PARK
PROJECT NO. 023
WHEREAS, bids were received and opened in accordance with City bid policy, and
WHEREAS, the low bid in the amount of $153,467 was received from Ideal Paving,
and
WHEREAS, the City's consulting engineer, Barton-Aschman, and the Director of
Parks and Recreation, have recommended awarding of bid to Ideal Paving,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA, that the bid for Project No. 023, Swan Lake Neighborhood
Park, is hereby awarded to Ideal Paving in the amount of $153,467.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following
voted in favor thereof:
The following voted against or abstained:
Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
c
3
C 4D LIM W N 0-+ V/ wi+ W N a-
W aD In y
aornr
O a,
N
N
V
011
p V
In
In
z
o a
In
m
O
OD
zc v m F- z a a mzzm7oma
r
m o z 7C a o ma
o
z m
x aimtool f'7 m
y
Cl*)
O O
C) c r
0
i z z o zCD
0
C a Vn c z SrcoNzI0Mii S1n0" V) 70 m
c n mozo--Invnzo
Cl
Z o n
c
o C' o
n
o z
N
c
3
Cr
r c
c z
3 m
Cl
c N
1 On
S
In O V
Lnm
O
0o O
W aD In y
aornr
O a,
N
N
V
011
p V
In
In In O
OD
N N
r Ln
In o
O O O O
0 0 0 0
Cr
r c
c z
3 m
Cl
c N
1 On
S
In O V
Lnm
O
0o O
W aD In y
aornr
O a,
N
N
V
011
p V
In
In In O In
Cr
r c
c z
3 m
Cl
c N
1 On
S
0o Lnm 0o O
W aD In y
aornr
O a, O N
011
In O
Cr
r c
c z
3 m
Cl
c N
1 On
S
Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc.
111 Third Avenue South. Suite 350
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401
USA
June 28, 1990
Mr. Eric Blank
Director, Parks and Recreation
City of Plymouth
3400 Plymouth Boulevard
Plymouth, MN 55447
Re: Swan Lake Park Bidding
Dear Mr. Blank:
Prone: (612) 332-0421
Fax: (612) 332-6180 ;
The apparent low bidder for the Swan Lake Neighborhood Park is Ideal Paving
Company, 4129 85th Avenue, Brooklyn Park, Minnesota 55443. The firm's bid of
144,392 has no apparent mathematical errors.
At our request, Ideal provided three references for park construction. These
references included the City of Coon Rapids, City of Brooklyn Park, and the
City of Brooklyn Center. Sebsequent contacts with each of these communities
indicated that Ideal had provided average or above average services for
projects constructed within the last three years.
Based upon this information, we recommend that Ideal Paving be awarded the low
bid for Swan Lake Neighborhood Park construction. We suggest that the City of
Plymouth request from the contractor a list of all subcontractors that Ideal
intends to utilize for construction as well as a schedule of construction to
be followed for Swan Lake.
Sincerely yours,
BARTON-ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC.
fa
Barry 1 Warner
Princi 1 Associate
BJW:kro
r, F. 'P r-^ 9n:27 P.N. Pot
MEMO
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
DATE: June 28, 1990 For City Council Meeting of July 2, 1990
TO: James G. Willis, City Manager
FROM: Fred G. Moore, Director of Public Works
SUBJECT: CERTIFICATES OF CORRECTION
SUBDIVISION PLATS
WIR
ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt the attached resolution requesting that the
Hennepin County Surveyor check Certificates of Corrections to
subdivision plats before they are submitted to the City for approval.
BACKGROUND: Attached is a letter received from the Hennepin County Surveyor
regarding Certificate of Correction to subdivision plats. As stated in the
letter, after subdivision plats are recorded, at times, errors are
discovered. These errors normally involve a distance or direction shown
along one of the property lines on the plat. As an example, the City
Council approved one of these at the June 18 Council meeting.
The County Surveyor is requesting that the City concur with his
recommendation that he will provide services to make sure the certificate is
proper and correct before it is submitted to the City for approval. The
land surveyors who discover the errors would first submit the certificate to
the County Surveyor for their verification. If everything is in order, it
would be then submitted to the City for approval.
RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS: I concur with the County Surveyor's
recommendation that they provide the services to verify Certificates of
Correction regarding subdivision plats.
Fred G. Moore, P.E.
FGM:kh
attachment: Resolution
Letter
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a meeting of the City
Council of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota was held on the day of
1990. The following members were present: ,
The following members were absent:
its adoption:
introduced the following Resolution and moved
RESOLUTION NO. 90 -
CERTIFICATES OF CORRECTION
SUBDIVISION PLATS
WHEREAS, errors have been found in subdivision plats that have been filed with
Hennepin County, and
WHEREAS, Certificates of Correction have been filed to correct these errors,
and
WHEREAS, the Hennepin County Surveyor has offered to verify that information
contained in a certificate is correct;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA: that the Plymouth City Council requests that the
Hennepin County Surveyor review subdivision data provided to them by the
surveyor for the subdivision, before a Certificate is submitted to the City.
FURTHER BE IT RESOLVED, that the City understands that there will not be a
charge for this service.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following
voted in favor thereof: ,
The following voted against or abstained:
Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
XXX XacX XXX
SURVEYOR
A703 Government Center
HENNEPIN
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55487-0073
LIUPhone (612) 348-3131
Crossroads To Service
June 12, 1990
James G. Willis, Manager
City of Plymouth
3400 Plymouth Blvd.
Plymouth, MN 55447
Dear Mr. Willis:
In 1851 the territorial government of Minnesota enacted legislation to permit
filing of lots and blocks for building sites in the form of subdivision plats.
Since that time over 12,000 plats, representing hundreds of thousands of lots have
been filed in our county. In any human endeavor errors and/or omissions creep into
projects and the subdivision plat is no exception.
In the 1950's the legislature provided the surveyor a means to put the public on
notice that there was an error in a plat and to state the correct data. Over the
years numerous Certificates of Correction have been filed. In 1976 the legislature
provided that the municipality as well as a surveyor had to sign the Certificate of
Correction before the County Recorder could accept the document for filing. This
action provides the municipality with notice but few agencies are able to tell if
the new data is any better than the old.
The purpose of this letter is to offer the service of this office to provide your
municipality with assurance that the data on a Certificate of Correction is in fact
correct. We could check the data provided by the surveyor by comparing the new
data against the old. If correct we would sign the certificate stating the
information has been checked. We would conduct our review before the certificate
is submitted to the municipality so that passage through your system would be as
expeditious as possible.
If this proposal is acceptable a resolution by your governing body requesting our
participation would be appropriate. This would give us authorization to do the
work as part of the County's continuing service to the municipalities and to
contact the surveyors about the change in procedure. If you have any questions
please let me know.
Sincerely yours,
42
Bernard H. Larson, County Surveyor
HENNEPIN COUNTY
an equal opportunity employer
r
MEMO
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
DATE: June 28, 1990 For City Council Meeting of July 2, 1990
TO: James G. Willis, City Manager
FROM: Fred G. Moore, Director of Public Works
SUBJECT: ACCEPT WORK AND APPROVE FINAL PAYMENT NO. 3
COUNTY ROAD 6/FERNBROOK LANE TRAFFIC SIGNAL
CITY PROJECT NO. 250
ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt the attached resolution accepting the work and
approving Final Payment No. 3 for the traffic signal installation at the
intersection of Fernbrook Lane and County Road 6.
BACKGROUND: The contractor has completed the installation of the traffic
signal at County Road 6 and Fernbrook Lane. Enclosed is a letter from the
consulting engineer certifying the completion of the work in accordance the
plans and specifications.
The final amount of the contract is the same as the original contract
amount, $53,056. There were no change orders approved with this traffic
signal construction.
RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS: It is recommended that the City Council
approve the work and authorize final payment.
c-
Fred G. Moore, P.E.
FGM:kh
attachments: Resolution
Letter
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a meeting of the City
Council of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota was held on the day of
1990. The following members were present:
The following members were absent:
CXX
its adoption:
I
introduced the following Resolution and moved
RESOLUTION NO. 90 -
REQUEST FOR PAYMENT NO. 3 AND FINAL
C.S.A.H. 6/FERNBROOK LANE - SIGNAL SYSTEM
CITY PROJECT NO. 250
WHEREAS, the City of Plymouth as owner and Ridgedale Electric, Inc. as
contractor, have entered into an agreement for C.S.A.H. 6/Fernbrook Lane,
Signal System, City Project No. 250 said agreement being dated September 25,
1989; and
WHEREAS, the Engineer has certified his acceptance of the work and his
approval of the final request for payment.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA:
1. That the original contract amount was $53,056 no change
orders were approved and the value of the work to date is
53,056 and is herewith approved.
2. That the work performed by the Contractor for C.S.A.H.
6/Fernbrook Lane, Signal System and certified to the Council
by the engineer as acceptable, being the same, is hereby
released from the contract except as to the conditions of
the performance bond, any and all legal rights of the owner,
required guarantees and correction of faulty work after
final payment.
3. Request for Payment No. 3 and Final in the amount of $7,760
to Ridgedale Electric, Inc. for C.S.A.H. 6/Fernbrook Lane,
Signal System is hereby approved and the City Finance
Director is hereby authorized and directed to pay the same
forthwith.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following
voted in favor thereof: ,
The following voted against or abstained:
Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
AXE X):X
y l
r
DATE:
PLACE:
PROJECT:
REQUEST FOR PAYMENT
June 7, 1990 FOR PERIOD:
FROM: April 1, 1990
Plymouth, Minnesota TO: May 31, 1990
C.S.A.H. 6/Fernbrook Lane
Signal System
PROJECT NO.: 250
CONTRACTOR: RIDGEDALE ELECTRIC, INC.
524 Brimhall Avenue
Long Lake, MN 55356
REQUEST FOR PAYMENT NO.: 3 (Final)
SUMMARY:
SPECIFIED CONTRACT COMPLETION
DATE: December 1, 1989
ENGINEERS FILE NO.: 0870902
BY:
DATE: APPROVED BY: RIDGEDALE ELECTRIC, INC.
CON RACTOR
BY: z---
1. Original Contract Amount 53,056.00
2. Change Order - ADDITION $ 0.00
3. Change Order - DEDUCTION $ 0.00
4. Revised Contract Amount 53,056.00 "
5. Value Completed to Date 53,056.00
6. Material on Hand 0.00
7. Amount Earned 53,056.00 v
8. Less Retainage 0% 0.00
9. Subtotal 53,056.00k-'
10. Less Amount Paid Previously 45,296.00
11. AMOUNT DUE THIS REQUEST FOR PAYMENT NO.: 3 (Final) $ 7,760.00
APPROVED BY: STRGAR-ROSCOE-FAUSCH, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEER
BY:
of
OWNER APPROVAL:
BY:
BY:
DATE: APPROVED BY: RIDGEDALE ELECTRIC, INC.
CON RACTOR
BY: z---
SRFSTRGAR-ROSCOE-FAUSCH, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
TRANSPORTATION CIVIL STRUCTURAL PARKING LAND SURVEYORS
SRF No. 0870902
June 13, 1990
Mr. Fred G. Moore, P.E.
Director of Public Works
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
3400 Plymouth Boulevard
Plymouth, Minnesota 55447
RE: TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL SYSTEM
C.S.A.H. 6 AND FERNBROOK LANE
PLYMOUTH PROJECT NO. 250
Dear Fred:
Enclosed please find three copies of the final Request for
Payment for the above referenced project. Also enclosed are
copies of the as -built drawings for the project.
The Contractor, Ridgedale Electric, Inc., has completed the
project in accordance with the plans and specifications and we
recommend final payment be made subject to the warranty
provisions of the Contract.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us.
Sincerely,
STRGAR-ROS COE-FAUSCH, INC.
JM4 C/ / l ,
Craig M. Twinem, P.E.
Senior Engineer
CMT:bba
cc: Gerald Wagoner, Ridgedale Electric, Inc.
Jerry D. Smrcka, Hennepin County Department of Public Works
Suite 150, One Carlson Parkway North, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55447
612/475-0010 FAX 612/475-2429
MEMO
CITY OF PLYMOUTH I , Q
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
DATE: June 28, 1990 For City Council Meeting of July 2, 1990
TO: James G. Willis, City Manager
FROM: Fred G. Moore, Director of Public Works
SUBJECT: ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING EXPANSION
CITY PROJECT NO. 009
ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt the attached resolution approving the
Architectural Services Agreement between BRW Architects, Inc. and the
City of Plymouth for the proposed Public Works Building Expansion
Project.
BACKGROUND: At the June 18, 1990 Council meeting the Mayor reported the
recommendations of the Architectural Selection Committee for the Public
Works Building Expansion Project. The committee recommended that BRW
Architects, Inc. be designated as the architect and that an agreement be
prepared between the architect and the City.
Attached is a proposed agreement between BRW Architects, Inc. and the City
of Plymouth. The proposed project is divided into five work tasks and the
City must authorize in writing authorization for the architect to proceed
from one task to the other task. The total maximum architectural service
fee is based upon the Feasibility Report which was previously prepared. The
maximum costs for services would not exceed $170,000.
After the architect completes the Final Needs Study and Schematic Design
Phase, if the project has been altered substantially, this agreement would
be modified. The services will be provided on an hourly basis with a
maximum not to exceed amount.
RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS: It is recommended that the City Council
adopt the attached resolution approving the Architectural Services Agreement
and authorizing the City Manager to sign the agreement on behalf of the
City.
A
Fred G. Moore, P.E.
FGM:kh
attachments: Resolution
Proposed Agreement
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a meeting of the City
Council of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota was held on the day of
1990. The following members were present:
q
The following members were absent:
introduced the following Resolution and moved
its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO. 90 -
APPROVING ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
BRW ARCHITECTS, INC.
PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING EXPANSION
CITY PROJECT NO. 009
WHEREAS, the City Council has designated BRW Architects, Inc. as the
consulting architects for the proposed Public Works Building Expansion, City
Project No. 009; and
WHEREAS, an Architectural Services Agreement is necessary between the City and
architect; and
WHEREAS, a proposed agreement has been prepared by BRW Architects, Inc.; and
WHEREAS, said agreement is acceptable to the City of Plymouth;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA: The the Architectural Services Agreement, dated June 21,
1990, between the City of Plymouth and BRW Architects, Inc. for the Public
Works Building Expansion is approved and the City Manager is authorized to
sign the agreement.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following
voted in favor thereof:
The following voted against or abstained:
Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
XX X
w
4
I
DAVID 1. SENNETT
THRESHER SQUARE MARK G.SWFN$0N
7WTHIRD SPRFEtf SOUTH DENNIS J. SUTUFF
MINNEAp01 S MN 55415 - DAVID L GRAHAM
PHONE; W) 370-9W PETER E IARVIS
FAX. 16121370-137b LXONALDW RINGROSE
R .._W A_ R. C H I T E C T S I N C.
June 21, 1990
Mr. Fred Moore
Director of Public Works
City of Plymouth
3400 Plymouth Boulevard
Plymouth, MN 55447
RE: Public Works Building Expansion
Dear Mr. Moore:
Thank you for selecting BRW Architects, Inc., to serve as Architects for the ex-
pansion of the Public Works Building in the City of Plymouth, Project No. 009.
This letter shall serve as a preliminary contract between the City of Plymouth
and BRW Architects, Inc. A formal AIA B-141 Contract will be prepared in the
near future. The scope of services for the study is defined in Section 6 of our
proposal dated May 10, 1990. (See attached).
The proposed compensation is based on the scope of work outlined in the
Feasibility Report prepared by Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & Associates. Assuming
the scope of work does not change in any substantial way, BRW Architects, Inc.,
and our consultants, will work on an hourly basis up to a fixed maximum amount
of $170,000, plus reimbursable expenses. Reimbursable expenses will be billed
at 1.0 times their cost to BRW or our consultant. Reimbursables include travel
costs, express mail, deliveries, reproduction, surveys and borings. Our
schedule of hourly rates in attached.
BRW Architects shall provide services consistent with the five-step list of
tasks outlined in the proposal. We shall not continue to the next step of tasks
without written confirmation by the City of Plymouth.
AN AFFIUATE OF THE BE.NNETT. RINGROSE. WOLSFELD 1ARVIS GARTATIORDNLP. INC. GROUP
ARCFIYM1NUEAPOLIS4 DENVER • PHOENIX •
DMCN. PLANN TRANS -
ST. PEER
BUIRGERING
0F. 28. 90 09:0'7 AM FG_
Mr. Fred Moore
June 21, 1990
Page 2
Additional services, if any must be authorized in advance by the City and will
be provided on an hourly basis.
If this proposal meets with your approval, please indicate by having James Wil-
lis sign below.
Sincerely,
BRW ARCHITECTS, INC.
9f y . Oertel, AIA
s oc to and Project Manager
Accepted by:
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
James G. Willis
City Manager
Date:
JLO/ag
cc: James G. Willis, City Manager
BRW ARCHITECTS, INC.
MaG. Swenson, AIA
Vi a President and Principal
Date: -61 fiZ
U
BRW ARCHITECTS, INC.
1990 SCHEDULE OF HOURLY RATES
Effective until March 31, 1991)
CLASSIF CATION HOURLY RATE
Principal 120.00
Principal 100.00
Vice President 77.50
Senior Associate 70.00
Associate 65.00
Senior Professional 57.50
Professional II 47.50
Professional I 40.00
Senior Technician 40.00
Technician III 35.00
Technician II 30.00
Technician I 25.00
DE. 2'. 90 09: 0 r AM F03
a
a
CL
C"
a
N
a a c
J J
fD nov
1w
z a`<
tv_
O O O rt O O O N CD tO 7r
CID
a
a rt m rt J 4 C7 0 n et " f O N X
J CD CD O n O r O et N C -t. rr 10 O
et O w O N n O J O O 0-% co et CD n? a O
CD O -+ O CA et c m et O O CD v c Cl) a CD O n
c CD G m O E; d et et CA w
w Q O' O. co E n to E CD CD a -
P) rt C CD rr n CD x CA N G 'C O
et n w to et w J rr r n 10 o
O to rt- 10 rr N D J N CD O n O
O CD CD w — r O et CD O O ? n
m et O. n O n rt a w a
O CD O CD n O C et n to rt
Ln fi N et O O c r =r O'
rr n O t< N n O w CD CD C' m
O1 m
CD x 0 N n n m 0
t:) w C a et O x et 0 s O CD
3 Cy tO —0 w CD s CD O O -C N
w O m -3 O. A t< a. Cn r" -7 m -+
N O. CD N Ct rt• O CD O N tO
w a -h O y O Q n" rt^ O
CD O N CD E w ti, O CD rr CD w
I to n s to o ct n Cr w
w rt• w a n rh Or r v to rr -• 0
et N et rt S N et CD S Cl) - Cl
a -+ N m a m=r C CA
w CD CD O w O et y 0 m n? n
O w -+, O d CD O m w O. CD CD O
m 0 0. J w a c<a=
n x Cn -3 et n n N m — i N
O O et n O i o. m O N rt- tNAOmmJOOrCO '7
n et x rt O D O. i N C
CD a = o etn
0 OS m a 3 t< C+ i t< = Ct
Ct CO ID rr et E n w —
tn m -+ O. CA O t< m J'O rt O
Cr a+ m - rC m o c -s
O C et + CA w CA N to w n m E
Ct N o Cl+ n m CA m 0
J m n W m c m O. m -4
Or d to < -+ N n D M O a
C w Cr n t< N i rt a rt
y AJC O w O momt<=r
J to O C et m_ rr J G m
O. 1w- m o mrt•. n
m rt O d m n? '0
3
CDp
O
LO n O rt• Cl) m m to -1t
N a O w O n w rt• CZ ? J
w Cn m m 0
N C O a CS et CD m rr c
o m-4 m a J n:cmCIV
et oCt 0 OW=rM
v a rt -S a a r+ m C
J J m J m w n 0 Cr
w J S s 1 v -•
t< n w rr m w Cl) 0-1 -
03 w a n atOOn
J O ct J O W N m et n L-
t< E CD CA n0
O N et N A et -1
C n n et rf rt i 7C'
rt 0 0 0 0 S a Cn i N
N CA w r rt i, d tO
rt rt CO io m a
1 m n N A L w n
C c O m C O' n
O
CL
a
a
CL
C"
0
N N
t„v W W W W N N N N N N N N N N
O 3 O O - O O A N
CD m m m m i CD -S CD O CD CD O Cl)
N < n M N m N < m -% et < < 7 ?
N et 'D m m m n m
U3 CD w o to m y m w O c
O O w
O f r m
c Q m a et y
n n n w O w c IE
n .7 w '0 n
CA - o C - CCD et -S et m CD -s
O n m et O O N et O m -5 7 -+ N
J m 'Det et n f O m
3 CD n a O et w O w n
m et
Cl) ct CD =r "ti C_X„
O -5 ct c O .Ar. CD CD
y < et < -+
et O . W ` ct A n CD ? m et tG
J i
m
J m
a w n > n
CD O w d C N y = n Cl)
J
Cl) a n e r et < -s
W t'f n CD 0 CD
ct N O J M O O n
0
et n H '* a 3 m
O a N O
i A -3 CD X
a -'' to o w et
et et "0 n O N J -1
o c m r*
CD n >
ti) et O n w
m
et N O mCDw
aCL e*
m mN
i
CL i O aCD
N
m-+ n
Cf J
CD N m
J m 06
o c n
i m
CCD N_
CD
to
n
0
o
n
m
et
N
COD
eco O O O A
w
m
m i CD i N
a c a
J i J Q m
cND 3 CD v
J et et
0
V
et =1 ct CD
m N m
CD m O
CAo
o 0ertCDoto
x -$ ti s
wpi CD 7r
n N
i
m t< CD c O
1 f 0 c a
N m to i
m 0)J
mro
C+
eot
n
et o o m
O et m
n N N n
A m r N
et V+ N
N f
eNt
w n
n i
h
1, to
c
a n
O A m
CL
A Ota
J
Q
A n t-+
o m m
c n
c et
r)
i I <
J m m
a N
i m•
A O
et N
C w
o n
c
i
m
m
n
v
s
a
N
A A A A A A A A A A A A A w w w w w
r r r to OD V O Ul A W N r O tD OD V tT Ln
N r O
n v O N -0 't7 N -0 -0 N -V C7 -n -0 ; 'a ."O
O tD U c -3 '7 c -1 -1 c -1 -s CD O O -+ -1 CD n CD
O -+ r+ Cr tD tD¢ - fD CD Cr CD CD < 0 > > CD -,A CD 'Da. a 'D 3 'D 'D a "0 fl l'r N Pw "D - N
a a w a a a CD r+ lw CD me* <
I tD O rt -z -S r+ -s -S r+ -1 -S £ O "s -1 tD O N
C n CD pr CD W CD pr c c G W rt CD
0 rt W O 0 CD r+ tD pr O
r+ n O -r n r• -+ n — to c rt to r. O r+ rt
O O c -- 0 W O O pr O O CD to -+ p rt .r.
O O W 0 > > N > > N 3 O O to O N O t7
r+ O N r+ (A r+
n H O O O -+ CD O rt r+ Cr W Ai CD -b t1 n -A W n -4 CD < t7 d -% O e + t<
n 'o r+ n > O O O N -+ O CD O
a r+ 'D (A 0 n d O. 0 n CD n < n o. O+ N n N O r+ O e'+ O £ c CD O CD C7 e'+ CL o o r+ O -s O -s n O 3 to to i
t
cw "
Do -3 rt a CD
lio
o r+ ell,n "0- O -C -
D o a o 0 o a a r+
rt a
a
O n -Z n n -s n n N tD O
D
nCDWr+ r+ r+ CD r+ r+ CD r+ n O O o. O i
tD O -ft O 's 'D CD rt rt m c Cl)
rt -s to 0 CL O d -b O a to -1 < O to
C) o o O -s o o -3 o c to o CD n rr - o a n r+ n -1 r* n c r
r+ -3 O -s c c c 0 D' 0 -+ CDt< — a o. O a -s B -S a B - 'Dto -0 CD CD fD CD tD CD B n
0 O < O < O _0 rt 'D CD ..• CD
0 fD n r+ -+ r+ rt "s rt 0
a+ O D rt to tD N CD N O W -s
O £ £ tr? r+
to 'D -1 tD £
rt CD
rt — r V tJ1 N c W0
W O Co
M O to to
C-) D' -1 tnD
CD CD m o. n
r+ CD n CD '3 n CD r.
t< CD n n n r+ CDty < n CD tD to
O CD CD rt rt to
n O £ r+ to
n n n
I CD 0 £
r+
r+ tD tD -+
U:) CD
w
D to
OL r+
a
w -%
OL
CD p,
o.
CA W
D
t
v
o
0
o w
Q
CD
1
rI TmwwTw"_wwzww•mwwW1
w
N
rt -fi N cn Ul M Ln CJi Cl1 C71 tJ1 tJ1 t71
CD O =r
CD -r CD
C7
S tD O V O C T1 A W N r O
cD C+ - m
w f A e+ 'p W 0 m H Or- m CCD
m G N"D m CAD CD -S N A d o D 0< r fir
CD
s d 77
O A
CD W w CCD w n
3 "D CAD s
C+ w N n
w o Nv a w yo w Q a) A
3 a
a< w w r+ 0 n
t< d
CD n O
CD O N CD
c+
OC-- CO N CD N N -b
w w m N 77
C A—
N CD =- CS 7
A
N CD fl N C C CD O.
C+ w CD C CD w 1 w 77 C A O O
O 0 O CAD w b Q CD N
w C+ o w o
C-+
M O N e+
CD CD A CDO rt D ww w af9ACD-
CA N W d CL O O W W C+
r) N
w
A -
O O 7 CD O O C+ e+ O
r CD A
CD = f
rt
CS w A N O
CL O Q CD G O 3 "0 to A A S N O
O
O
to
C --h CD CL O A O m A O rt w A
C to rt co A A co A N
CD f CD N m
cr
O X CD M CD N -S
Cl) O rt
CD c CL
C+ w o a. O w O
17rCDMbAN
fl
r O 0 A O A
p p rt O w rt c+
7
N r+
c O CD
CS -1 CD O CD O O1 A o N
CD 1 e+ Cl) b -b A w N
C w C
0-4 OL r+ 3 rt CD - A
AAwiwrtONe+
O rt
0- w o
O w Nt< CD e+ O CD N N0
OID-
1 A
A
rt ?
r
w
N
N
7
a
N
rt w
C CD 7 O
CD G "
D
d
CD -` D o rt c CD O O
O
A
r+ CSC) Nr to
0
O
cu
CS CD m
r—
CD co O O N
CD O O CD A o OL O d
CD
O N A N C1 O -b CD N C
O
O Pt'O C+ A C -P. w N 3 C+
M a o 1 N
A CD CD mCD
l'+ N A C
f
7' CD
o
p N
JW CD 7 tG rt rt O CD N O C
p'
aR c O C+ O
g r
CD + CD O
1
r
CD
A
C+
o
w O
n
rt
C-+ -. a CD w
CD
or 0 O
ct CD
S
O
A A O
N A
CD
w
e+
CD :r w o w v o.
rt
tom ? o v c f O
ftc CD A r OL s
O A co A rh N
s v w w
w O A f
1 rt CD e+
O rt A C+ w D to O m
w O CD t
A
N A
w
1
rt o
CD n w fD f A O
N P+
N c't A O r
O f m CD A NCN
n e'r
CA
D A
A 0 rt
CBRW W MAI
64 L
oil a
r+• rt OQ
ri) C CD
rD
r r
C1Q• ry
c,C
1110
R
3 o
d
u:3
n
a
a
CBRW W MAI
64 L
Qui .i
i
ftt{ !r{ / i i !i 1 r1 lig i• •' • SIU
C-)
CD N O O O O O O c N O O O O O O CD 3
N A+ n c m
s
A N
o
t
IC-) C-) o m of z cn m t A z
C N O O O CD X O A? A x A O N
m N O w to CD s CD O e+ D CD 'O D
ZS w w N w q O O rt io co CD N CD i
s rt as H m a O 03asaa0
aa) a-0 0 Z
OL O CD t't A n CD c N O O• C+
3EOQ. N x rt CD CD N -i{ 7 CD e't
CD n C+ N wO O
N A n O O N 0 e+ O CD O S a 0 -3
o m a o 3 e+ ro o
O N e 1 CD -+ A w CD a c 0
O N dc+ C a O E3 C rt i I 3 f Colt N
CL a N A CD O O A O tCD 7r O
CD
CD e+ c O f< s O A CD O O
c 3a C+ rn x• v W a — x• t w o
A to w O w CD N x CD A N O
A C+ t" t 7 A A i 7 N to
c O A t't CD N O CD Cl) CD O A
O. CD
M
CD CD — O I- CSa n c CD
cr w CD f y N A O w
A CSD c+ A N O 3 et O i A
CD O A n O Z O A o
to OLOt•+ n A N to W O. c
C+ O A t -t tocrcAOnCDt•+ C+ A n
c O to CD M n to O O c CD
S N O n A ti
N A w N A ioto0
0 CQna O Cl)
p, r. r o n
CD n N A -.
N 0
CD A A 3 -1 t"F O
O
N t•+ C+ O
CD co CD -1 O C+ r
O A c CD
N w Ht to A e -t CD N
m A r+ S
N A CD CD M e+
V A tT W W CD n
N
Co N OD O O N
i- W C+ C
c CD O O O O O m A
Cl Cl OOO A
s O m CD
ONCDOn
v D n N
acDWfN
cw+
N
D w
N c O n O
Oe -t
c r -' V+ O
A CD O
A
p m
O ? CD
CD
to CD O -A
N A 3Eno N t7
pt 7 N CD CD
to N afir. tT
w y _. O
MEMO
CITY OF PLYMOUTH - 8
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
DATE: June 28, 1990 For City Council Meeting of July 2, 1990
TO: James G. Willis, City Manager
FROM Fred G. Moore, Director of Public Works
SUBJECT: CHANGE ORDER NO'S 1 AND 2
FIRE STATION NO. I
CITY PROJECT NO. 825
ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt the attached resolution approving Change Order
No's 1 and 2 which add $1,640 to the contract for the construction of
Fire Station no. 1.
BACKGROUND: The plans for Fire Station No. 1, which were prepared by
Trossen-Wright and Associates, were based upon the records which the City
had for the original Fire Station No. 1. During the excavation for the new
utility services for the new building, the contractor discovered two changed
conditions.
Although the old building had been connected to City sanitary sewer for over
25 years, the original septic tank had never been removed. In order to
comply with City Code, the old septic tank had to be removed and backfilled
and compacted properly. The cost to do this which is included in Change
Order No. 1 is $440.
Also, the City records indicated that the sanitary sewer service, which was
installed for the original building, was six inches in diameter. When they
excavated to extend the pipe for the new building, they discovered it was
only a four inch sanitary sewer service. Because of the enlarged size of
the new building, a six inch service is required. The cost to remove the
existing pipe and install a new six inch pipe is $1,200.
RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS: It is recommended that the City Council
adopt a resolution approving Change Order No. 1 and No. 2. The contract for
Fire Station No. I will increase from $726,000 to $727,640.
T
Fred G. Moore, P.E.
FGM:kh
attachments: Resolution
Change Orders
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a meeting of the City Council of
the City of Plymouth, Minnesota was held on the day of ,
1990. The following members were present:
The following members were absent:
adoption:
introduced the following Resolution and moved its
RESOLUTION NO. 90 -
APPROVING CHANGE ORDER NO'S 1 AND 2
CONSTRUCTION OF FIRE STATION NO. I
CITY PROJECT NO. 825
WHEREAS, Change Order No. 1 has been prepared providing for the following:
Remove existing septic tank
AND WHEREAS, Change Order No. 2 has been prepared providing for the following:
Replace existing four inch sewer service with new six inch service
AND WHEREAS, Change Order No's 1 and 2 for Fire Station No. I, City Project No.
825 are recommended for approval;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH,
MINNESOTA; that Change Order No's 1 and 2 for Fire Station No. I, City Project No. 825
by adding $1,640.00 is recommended for approval
Original Contract Amount $726,000.00
Previous Change Orders 0.00
THIS CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 - ADD 440.00
THIS CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 - ADD 1200.00
REVISED CONTRACT AMOUNT.......... $727,640.00
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted
in favor thereof: ,
The following voted against or abstained:
Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
ir x 4c'c4c xxx
CHANGE
ORDER
AIA DOCUMENT G701
PROJECT: Fire Station No. 1
name, address) 13205 County Road #6
Plymouth, MN 55447
TO (Contractor):
I
Palani Construction, Inc.
5661 International Parkway
Minneapolis, MN 55428
L
CHANGE ORDER NUMBER: 1
INITIATION DATE: 6-22-90
ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO: 89026
CONTRACT FOR: General Construction
I CONTRACT DATE
You are directed to make the following changes in this Contract:
Existing septic system, southeast corner of existing
facility, to be removed, backfilled and compacted. ADD
5-3-90
440.00
but \ahcl until >igned by bath the U\\ner and Architect. Signature Of the Contractor indicate!- hi. agreemenl herewith, including any adju,tment in the Contract Sum or Contract Time.
The original (Contract Sum) +X+ltDk 4ltc h 74xt1 was ...... • . • .. • • • • • • • . • • • • • • • • $ 726, 000.00
Net change by previously authorized Change Orders ................................... $ .00
The (Contract Surn) prior to this Change Order \vas .......... $ 726,000.00
The (Contract Sum) \\ill be (increased) i6xXXxedYx RVd)
bythis Change Order......................................................... $ 440.00
The new (Contract Sumi (6antanj t:X**.jM tR=3C=R including this Change Order will be ... $ 726, 440.00
The Contract Time will be (unchanged) by ( —0— ) Days.
The Date of Substantial Completion as of the date of this Change Order therefore is 9-15-90
Trossen/Wright Architects, P.A. Palani Construction. Inc.
69'EE 77 CU b.1CTOR
TSibley Street, Suite 230 5 61 International Pkwy.
Address Address
St Paul, MN 55101 Minnea oli 55428
BY
DATE 6-22-90 D;TE . Z '7 C)
AIA DOCUMENT G701 CHANGE ORDER \f" tl1-1t EDITI()x \I'•.' 1471;
THE \.MEK1C:\\ INIIITU IE Or :\KcHITECTS. 17;; SEW 1ORi\ \\T.. N \v . \Y\1,1Jim.
Authorized:
City of Plymouth
U306 Plvmouth Boulevard
Address
Plymouth, MN 55447
BY
DATE
G701 — 1978
Distribution to: j 4 J 1j
OWNER foil i/F
ARCHITECT lilf - `
CONTRACTOR
FIELD
OTHER
c; F,;,
ui77 ; l"
PROJECT: Fire Station No. 1
name, address) 13205 County Road #6
Plymouth, MN 55447
TO (Contractor):
I
Palani Construction, Inc.
5661 International Parkway
Minneapolis, MN 55428
L
CHANGE ORDER NUMBER: 1
INITIATION DATE: 6-22-90
ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO: 89026
CONTRACT FOR: General Construction
I CONTRACT DATE
You are directed to make the following changes in this Contract:
Existing septic system, southeast corner of existing
facility, to be removed, backfilled and compacted. ADD
5-3-90
440.00
but \ahcl until >igned by bath the U\\ner and Architect. Signature Of the Contractor indicate!- hi. agreemenl herewith, including any adju,tment in the Contract Sum or Contract Time.
The original (Contract Sum) +X+ltDk 4ltc h 74xt1 was ...... • . • .. • • • • • • • . • • • • • • • • $ 726, 000.00
Net change by previously authorized Change Orders ................................... $ .00
The (Contract Surn) prior to this Change Order \vas .......... $ 726,000.00
The (Contract Sum) \\ill be (increased) i6xXXxedYx RVd)
bythis Change Order......................................................... $ 440.00
The new (Contract Sumi (6antanj t:X**.jM tR=3C=R including this Change Order will be ... $ 726, 440.00
The Contract Time will be (unchanged) by ( —0— ) Days.
The Date of Substantial Completion as of the date of this Change Order therefore is 9-15-90
Trossen/Wright Architects, P.A. Palani Construction. Inc.
69'EE 77 CU b.1CTOR
TSibley Street, Suite 230 5 61 International Pkwy.
Address Address
St Paul, MN 55101 Minnea oli 55428
BY
DATE 6-22-90 D;TE . Z '7 C)
AIA DOCUMENT G701 CHANGE ORDER \f" tl1-1t EDITI()x \I'•.' 1471;
THE \.MEK1C:\\ INIIITU IE Or :\KcHITECTS. 17;; SEW 1ORi\ \\T.. N \v . \Y\1,1Jim.
Authorized:
City of Plymouth
U306 Plvmouth Boulevard
Address
Plymouth, MN 55447
BY
DATE
G701 — 1978
CHANGE
ORDER
AIA DOCUMENT G701
PROJECT: Fire Station No. 1
name, address)
13205 County Road #6
Plymouth, MN 55447
TO (Contractor):
FPalani Construction, Inc.
5661 International Pkwy.
Minneapolis, MN 55428
L
CHANGE ORDER NUMBER:
INITIATION DATE: 6-22-90
ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO: 89026
CONTRACT FOR: Mechanical Construction
J
CONTRACT DATE
You are directed to make the following changes in this Contract:
Remove existing 4" sanitary sewer pipe and install new
6" PVC pipe (approx. 23 feet) and connect to existing
8" main line, on. east side of building.
I
5-3-90
1,200.00
Not kalid until signed hq both the U,.Nner and Architect. Sk4n,ItUre of the C ntractor indicates his agreement hvremth• including any adjustment in the Contract Sum or Contract Time.
The original (Contract Sum) was .. ' - ' ' - - ' ' ' . ' ' ' . . . . . . ' ' ' . ' • $ 726,000.00
Net change by previously authorized Change Orders ................................... $ 440.00
The (Contract Sum) (>Qx x>ex>x cacCxChtl prior to this Change Order was .......... $ 726,440.00
The (Contract Sum) iEacna>Kmactx'sdx>:;>:aoaxfcsaxt) will be (increased) 1, 200.00
by this Change Order......................................................... $ 0.00
The new (Contract Sum, (fcaux=Namdat ta x %d including this Change Order will be ... $ 727 , 64-
0—) •
The Contract Time will be (anc ea clt#>tttaaax (unchanged) by 0—) Days.
The Date of Substantial Completion as of the date of this Change Order therefore is—15-90Authored:
Trossen/Wright Architects,_P.A. Palani Construction. Znc.
Co. 'T •\ TORy& Pkwy. 5
City of Plymouth
Distribution to:
940 Hbley Street,
OWNER
ARCHITECT
A.
CC ti
l ' i%` ='"
CONTRACTOR S[
J
FIELD mouth I"
OTHER
PROJECT: Fire Station No. 1
name, address)
13205 County Road #6
Plymouth, MN 55447
TO (Contractor):
FPalani Construction, Inc.
5661 International Pkwy.
Minneapolis, MN 55428
L
CHANGE ORDER NUMBER:
INITIATION DATE: 6-22-90
ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO: 89026
CONTRACT FOR: Mechanical Construction
J
CONTRACT DATE
You are directed to make the following changes in this Contract:
Remove existing 4" sanitary sewer pipe and install new
6" PVC pipe (approx. 23 feet) and connect to existing
8" main line, on. east side of building.
I
5-3-90
1,200.00
Not kalid until signed hq both the U,.Nner and Architect. Sk4n,ItUre of the C ntractor indicates his agreement hvremth• including any adjustment in the Contract Sum or Contract Time.
The original (Contract Sum) was .. ' - ' ' - - ' ' ' . ' ' ' . . . . . . ' ' ' . ' • $ 726,000.00
Net change by previously authorized Change Orders ................................... $ 440.00
The (Contract Sum) (>Qx x>ex>x cacCxChtl prior to this Change Order was .......... $ 726,440.00
The (Contract Sum) iEacna>Kmactx'sdx>:;>:aoaxfcsaxt) will be (increased) 1, 200.00
by this Change Order......................................................... $ 0.00
The new (Contract Sum, (fcaux=Namdat ta x %d including this Change Order will be ... $ 727 , 64-
0—) •
The Contract Time will be (anc ea clt#>tttaaax (unchanged) by 0—) Days.
The Date of Substantial Completion as of the date of this Change Order therefore is—15-90Authored:
Trossen/Wright Architects,_P.A. Palani Construction. Znc.
Co. 'T •\ TORy& Pkwy. 5
City of Plymouth
0\1Y4 Plymouth Boulevard
940 Hbley Street, Suite 6 onal230internati
Address
ddress
St. Paul, MN 55101
dd«•ss
Minnea oli MN 55428 Plymouth, MN 55447
i
By
6-22-90 DATE Z* - DATE
DATE
AIA DOCUMENT G701 • CHANCE ORDER • :\1'1:11 11)78 EDill() • \IA' ' ..
rlunr1' G701 —1978
THE UtERIC\N I`SIITUTE Of ARCHITECTS, 1-.1 NIAV 1'()RK \V,r N.\\'.. \\ \I11M;T0 \ 0-C
LOCATION MAP FOR JUNE 269 1990
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
P F
CITY OF
SCALE OF MILES
PLYMOUTH- S'
nnwr. w.aw
Ell.
Ell lifflmlu: 5111"gliffi,
CITY C
July 6, 1990
PLYMOUTR
Kathy Loehr
4570 Glacier Lane
Plymouth, MN 55446
Dear Mrs. Loehr:
The Engineering Division has completed the surveying of the drainage
area behind your home on Glacier Lane. As I stated in my June 29
letter, we would be comparing the drainageway as it currently exists
with the approved plans. Before any homes were built within the Kings
North Addition, the developer was required to grade the drainageway as
indicated within the plan.
The existing ground along the drainageway is approximately 1.5 feet
higher than that which was specified in the approved plan. We have also
compared the existing ground to that indicated on the survey which was
submitted by the builder when they obtained the building permit for your
house. The existing ground at the edge of the drainageway easement
closest to your house is approximately 0.5 feet higher than was
indicated on the approved plan.
We have also made a comparison of the existing drainageway compared to
that on the approved plan on the two properties immediately west of your
home. The drainageway which was to be across these properties would
flow from your property westerly along both of these lots and then empty
into the main drainageway at the corner of the Sandvold and Robert's
property. The ground elevation along this entire drainageway is
approximately two feet higher than that on the approved plan.
Unless the drainageway is regraded across all three properties, it
cannot be just graded on your property. As you are aware, there is a
storm sewer pipe also under the drainageway. The storm sewer pipe
provides for the major flow of water which is coming from Fernbrook
Lane. The drainageway,on the yards is to provide surface drainage from
the properties along the drainageway.
It appears that the best solution to establishing the proper drainage
along this lot line drainageway is for each of the three property owners
to construct small inlets to the storm sewer pipe for their individual
yard. By doing this, the entire yard area would not have to be regraded
and establish a drainage swale two feet deep as indicated on the
approved plan.
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447, TELEPHONE (612) 550-5000
Kathy Loehr
July 6, 1990
Page Two
Another variation on the inlets to the storm sewer system would be for
each property owner to establish a landscaped rocked area within the
lower area of their yard to which the water would drain. This area
would then have an outlet to the storm sewer.
Fred Moore, Director of Public Works, will be meeting with you and
Councilmembers on the evening of July 6. He will be able to show you
our drawings which were prepared and discuss possible solutions.
If you have any further questions, you may contact me at 550-5070.
Sincerely,
Daniel L. Faulkner, P.E.
City Engineer
DLF:kh
cc: Fred G. Moore, Director of Public Works
Frank Boyles, Assistant City Manager
Darrell Johnson, Senior Engineering Technician
MEMO
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
DATE: June 28, 1990
TO: Mayor & City Council
FROM: James G. Willis, City Manager
SUBJECT: ADDITIONAL CORRESPONDENCE WITH RESPECT TO THE LEONA
NEUTGENS AND MELBOURNE WROLSTAD LETTERS
Attached for Council information is additional background
information with respect to the Neutgens and Wrolstad letters
contained in last week's information memorandum.
JW:kec
attachment
MEMO
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
DATE: June 20, 1990
TO: Dan Faulkner ty Engineer
FROM: Richard J. P uliot, Project Coordinator
SUBJECT: JUNE 8, 1990 LETTER TO MARIA VASILIOU FROM LEONA NEUTGENS
I have read the letter from Mrs. Leona Neutgens to Councilmember
Vasiliou and the following comments are offered: I have been involved
with Mr. and Mrs. Neutgens from the very beginning of this project. I
have met with them prior to construction in an attempt to acquire the
right-of-way necessary for the new road construction. I met with them
both in a conference room in City Hall and at their home in the area of
construction. My approach and I am sure the approach of all City
personnel involved, was and is "Let's get the job done, let's do the
best job we know how, and lets do it in a way that is most compatible,
least disruptive to the wishes of the residents adjoining the roadway."
Mr. and Mrs. Neutgens stated from the very beginning that they wish the
City to purchase their property rather than purchase an easement.
Although most_ of the residents have settled based upon professional
independent appraisals, the Neutgens have chosen to require the City to
condemn their property and we have been unsuccessful in negotiating the
necessary easements. I have also been told by several neighbors in the
area who have settled that the Neutgens were actively campaigning and
asking them not to settle short of condemnation because they would get
more money if the City proceeded through the condemnation process. In
spite of this, k04 extended every courtesy and responded in every way
possible to their complaints.
The following comments are specifically addressed to the numbered
paragraphs:
1. The City appraisal report which was done by BCL
Appraisals or Brad, Bourkland states that the house will
be 11.78 feet closer to County Road 6 then before and
that the distance from the house to the roadway was 47
feet before the taking and approximately 34 feet after
the taking. The 34 feet remaining is not significantly
different than most residential homes. He has, however,
taken into account this closer distance, the increased
traffic, the dust, and the noise in arriving at his
appraised value of $18,600, which the Neutgens at this
time have chosen not to accept. The trees referred to
SUBJECT: JUNE 8, 1990 LETTER TO MARIA VASILIOU FROM LEONA NEUTGENS
June 20, 1990
Page Two
as having been stripped were removed by Mr. Neutgens and
set back on his own property. There was a 15 foot wide
platted roadway which the Neutgens had chosen to use as
their yard, and therefore, the apparent reduction in
size may appear greater.
2. I am not familiar with the sidewalk or the step having
fallen away from the house. Unless this was a result of
placing fill in the front yard at the Neutgen's request,
I cannot see the reason why the project would have
caused this.
3. Number three is correct, the driveway is significantly
steeper than it was before the project. The elevation
at which the house sits and the distance from the house
to the new roadway is transitioned in the most
reasonable way allowing for a level landing at the top
and was graded in such a way as to convey the runoff
water in the best possible manner. It is a situation
that is unavoidable, however, on numerous occasions the
City's consulting engineer requested guidance and
direction from Mr. Neutgens and was ignored regarding
the driveway.
4. I have discussed some of the items and complaints with
the__City Attorney's office and there would appear to be
an effort on the part of the Neutgens to exacerbate the
extent of the project's impact in order to arrive at a
larger settlement through the condemnation process.
Suffice it to say that the conditions left after the
project are less desirable than before, however, the
legal process of appointing commissioners to determine
the value of the damages is the route chosen by the
Neutgens and it would be my opinion that the
commissioners will award the Neutgens an amount of money
that will generously compensate for the damages which
have occurred.
Asking for the City to refund the taxes paid over the last 28 years,
asking the City to improve the driveway, build a retaining wall, etc.,
etc. at City expense, and to pay the full amount of the commissioner's
award because of those same damages is the same approach that they have
taken during the entire negotiating process of attempting to acquire the
right-of-way. It is extremely difficult to attempt to please the
Neutgens to say the least.
If I can be of any further assistance, please let me know.
RJP:kh
I
Mrs. Leona Neutgens
14407 County Road 6
Plymouth, Minnesota 55441
June 8, 1990
Ms. Maria Vasiliou
Plymouth City Council
1775 North Black Oaks Lane
Plymouth, Minnesota 55447
Dear Ms. Vasiliou:
Realizing the precious few free moments we all have these days, IwouldreallyappreciateyourspendingacoupleminutesofyourvaluabletimetosharethethoughtsofoneresidentoftheCityofPlymouth.
The total complexion of my neighborhood has changed from a warmatmospheretoacold, fearful one since the widening of County Road6. Half of my front yard, which formerly was a more private area, a buffer from the road, surrounded by valuable mature trees, hasbeenstrippedofthosetrees, and replaced by blacktop. Followingisabriefoutlineoftheburdenswe've experienced as a result.
I can no longer use my front door, as the sidewalk had to beremovedaspart- of all this, and the step has fallen away from thehouse. Returning home from the hospital after surgery on mandanklethiswinter, the inabilityto g Y y foot
through to my homethefrontdoorcausedmeapainfulfallsandfurthercomplications.
When it rains, the water rushes down the driveway and behind theretainingwalllikeariver, eating at the foundation of the house, and has rotted the sheet rock off the walls in places in the lowerwestendofmybasement. My son's truck was damaged when thedrivewayroad -bed, in one phase of its "re -construction", collapsedononeside. Imagine your friends and relatives reluctant to visitYourhomeforfearofhavinganaccidentinyourdriveway. Imaginehavingtoleavehomeforworkinthemorning15to20minutesearlierthanwouldotherwisebenecessaryjusttogetoutofyourowndriveway.
My driveway has been left with such a steep grademycomingandgoing, both in an automobile, and
that it inhibits
on foot. next to impossible to It isget
morning, and is .orrifying
out onto the road, especially in theintheice. The apron between the winter Wnen tr__
driveway and the road esuit is glare
isandisnotevensquare. poorly built,
When it rains, the water rushes down the driveway and behind theretainingwalllikeariver, eating at the foundation of the house, and has rotted the sheet rock off the walls in places in the lowerwestendofmybasement. My son's truck was damaged when thedrivewayroad -bed, in one phase of its "re -construction", collapsedononeside. Imagine your friends and relatives reluctant to visitYourhomeforfearofhavinganaccidentinyourdriveway. Imaginehavingtoleavehomeforworkinthemorning15to20minutesearlierthanwouldotherwisebenecessaryjusttogetoutofyourowndriveway.
City of Plymouth
Plymouth, Minnesota
Page Two
Thanks to the close proximity of the road to our house now,
strangers waltz through my front yard a few feet from my window now
at all hours of the night and day, some leaving garbage (trash,
refuse) in their wake. I've been rudely awakened from many a
night's sleep from the noise, wondering if I will find some weirdo
with a gun who has strayed a few feet from the road, or a car
parked in my living room or kitchen. The worst part is being kept
awake from the subsequent fear caused by our home's vulnerability
since the alteration of our yard. Imagine the consequences were a
car to accidentally leave the roadway.
On February 5, 1990, in fact, we found someone had attempted to
force open our basement bathroom window to gain entry to our home.
We reported the incident to the Plymouth police, but we dare not
leave the houde for any extended period of time, such as for a
vacation, etc., as a passerby need only step or drive a few feet
from the roadway to attempt any sort of vandalism or burglary.
Withthe trees gone, the noise and dirt from the road have worsened
considerably. I can not leave my windows open any more. My
ceilings, walls, and carpet are filthy from the dirt stirred up
during construction, as well as the emissions from the cars, which
used to be filtered by our trees. The ceilings will have to be re-
sprayed, the walls re -painted, and the carpets re -shampooed.
Imagine not being able to get any fresh air into your house.
Our fireplace chimney cracked from ground vibration during
construction, and is worsening since the road is now closer. There
are cracks in the walls in some spots, and my kitchen cupboards no
longer hang level, having dropped a good 1/2" or more on one end
from all the vibration.
I have used the term "imagine" in -several instances; you cannot
possibly, ever. For. my iaiit ily and I, chis is a L ea:i rxgj.lt1Zi a we
have to try to live through every day. I have been both mentally
and physically sick since the start of this infringement on our
rights. The stress it has caused me has taken a.heavy toll on my
health, and adversely affected my job performance. It is evident
when speaking with other people throughout what used to be our
neighborhood, where the strain of having their lives disrupted has
also contributed to the loss of two residents' lives.
City of Plymouth
Plymouth, Minnesota
Page Three
Our land, which we have nurtured and paid taxes on for 28 years,
has been taken away and manipulated against our will. As a result,
we have been stripped of our right and ability to lead a secure and
unencumbered existence in the peace and privacy of our home. In
all fairness, (although "fair" has had nothing whatsoever to do
with anything associated with this project), I feel that the
property taxes we have paid all these years should be given back to
us, since the City of Plymouth has acted as if the land wasn't
ours.
in silpmary, it •makes' me_ hear -sick that thi prO5ject was carried
out with complete disregard for people's feelings, and in woeful
neglect of what this country is supposed to be all about..
Sincerely,
Mrs. Leona Neut gens
612) 473-7654
MEMO
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
DATE: June 20, 1990
TO: /James G. Willis, City Manager
FROM: &"Daniel L. Faulkner, City Engineer
SUBJECT: RESPONSE TO JUNE 3, 1990 LETTER FROM MELBOURNE WROLSTAD AND
A JUNE 8, 1990 LETTER FROM MRS. LEONA NEUTGENS
I am attaching a response from Street Supervisor, Tom Vetsch, to Fred
Moore regarding the asphalt overlay work on Ranchview Lane, which Mr.
Wrolstad refers to in his June 3, 1990 letter. As Tom indicates in his
memo, the portion of Ranchview that was overlaid by our City crews is
rated No. 16 out of the total 67 areas which the City is divided into for
road evaluation purposes. The lower the number the worse the roadway.
This portion of Ranchview Lane would likely be upgraded through our
Reconstruction Program within the next three to four years. At that time,
storm drainage improvements would also be made to solve this existing
problem referred to in Mr. Wrolstad's letter.
Also enclosed is a memo from Dick Pouliot which addresses the items in
Mrs. Neutgens' June 8 letter. I believe Dick's memo addresses all items
that Mrs. Neutgens brings up.
If you have any further questions, please let me know.
DLF:kh
attachments
cc: Fred G. Moore
Dick Pouliot
Tom Vetsch
BMW,
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
DATE: June 19, 1990
TO: Fred Moore, Director of Public Works
FROM: (`.1 • Tom Vetsch, Street Supervisor
SUBJECT: ASPHALT OVERLAY WORK ON RANCHVIEW LANE
In response to Melbourne E. Wrostad's letter (340 Ranchview Lane), concerning
some overlay work that was done on Ranchview Lane, I will try to respond to
the areas that I have information on. Many concerns of his are before my time
and I do not know what was taking place at that time during the construction.
Since Pavement Management has been introduced to the City of Plymouth, the
Street Division have been trying to blend in maintenance work with
reconstruction and sealcoat work. We have to balance our work so that it is
not for a short-term basis if reconstruction is coming along, on the other
hand we don't want to make repairs in such an order that gives the residents a
sense of having a sound street.
One of the areas we analyzed extensively was the area west of Niagara and
north of Third Avenue up to Sixth Avenue.
Between Third Avenue and Sixth Avenue, the streets needing alot of work were
Orchid, Quantico and Ranchview Lanes. They had alot of alligator areas and
weak base underneath the asphalt with depressions. The streets I just
mentioned are a number "16" on our overall study plan which would mean that
these areas would not be reconstructed at least within the next couple of
years. We decided that to insure some degree of rideability and so that we
would not have to be there pothole patching monthly, the overlay work was
necessary.
Ranchview Lane was overlayed from the northern Third Avenue up to the north
driveway for Birchview Elementary. Mr. Wrostad is correct in saying that the
drainage is poor on this street. It is a very flat area and any fluctuation
with the street does and will continue to cause some water ponding. With the
overlay work that we did, our intention was not to make the road drain
properly from Third Avenue North to Sixth Avenue, although we did try to get
it to do that as much as possible. The overlay thickness ranges from 2 inches
to a skin patch in varying places. Much of the 2 inch depths were along the
edge of the roadway where the asphalt was broken off. I drove this area after
receipt of Mr. Wrostad's letter and noted that "yes" there are still some
areas that do hold water immediately after a rain and these areas are the
Fred Moore
June 19, 1990
Page Two
southwest corner of Fifth and Ranchview, the west side of Ranchview, just
south of Fifth Avenue and in front of 450 Ranchview Lane. I also looked at
the height of the street in relation to driveways and garages and from what I
observed, I do not agree that 410 Ranchview is in any different situation
since the overlay work before the overlay work. At Mr. Wrostad's residence, I
noted that his garage is also higher than the street and he has a concrete
driveway which comes in right at street level.
To understand the specific changes that have happened becauseof our work I
would have to have known exactly what the drainage problems were before we did
the work. As much as I can tell, I don't believe we changed the drainage
significantly and should not have affected properties. The results we were
after were the ones we obtained by strengthening the street until such time it
can be reconstructed.
On the last item Mr. Wrostad said that in a couple of weeks we will have two
giant potholes where the Gas Company dug and did some repairs. We know where
they were and we did not wait for the Gas Company to fill them because we
wanted to get on with our work. We simply filled those holes, compacted the
asphalt and then did the overlay work. Unfortunately, at this time they are
settled somewhat and a little water ponds in them. This is to be expected to
some degree until it has settled out.
If you would like further information, or more in depth details of our plan
and actions, I would be happy to drive over there some day with you and
discuss it as we are looking at this section of Ranchview.
TV:sm
F
Q
Melbourne E Wrolstad
ti
340 Ranchview Lane Plymouth, MN 55447 t
3 June 1990
City? Village? Township? of Plymouth
3400 Plymouth Blvd.
Plymouth, Minnesota 55447
Rim Bergman, Mayor,
Councilmember Maria Vasilou,
Councilmember Lloyd Ricker,
Councilmember Robert Zitur,
Councilmember Carole Helliwell,
Councilmember Jerry Sisk,
City Manager James G. Willis,
City Engineer,
I arrived home late last evening after being away for a week and to and
behold, I see another one of Plymouth's smart moves. The street department
has done it again with no regard to the original plans or to the residents
that have to put up with the further worstening problem of water standing
in yards and then ending up in basements etc.
I, as a resident in this location since 1961 have so far paid for 3
assessments for storm sewer, one each for sanitary sewer and water. Of the
three times I paid for the storm sewer, only the first one was done in a
way that in part did us any good. At the time of the storm sewer
installation we, the residents asked that catch basins be installed
halfway between 3rd Avenue and 6th Avenue on Ranchview Lane. We were told
at that time that -we would not have to worry as the street was designed to
take all water runoff from 3rd Avenue to the catch basins on 6th. This
indeed did work for a time. Between the time the storm sewer was put in
and the sanitary sewer was built per drawing 66-1f dated 27 March 1967 as
built, grade levels on the street were changed somewhat due to patching,
etc. However per the same drawing the road profile was to be returned so
that the runoff would again flow to 6th Avenue.
On plan project 118 drawing dated 20 May 1974, our famous engineers
decided again that water could run up hill to the catch basins. Over the
years we the residents have brought this matter up a number of times to no
avail. Each time the street department repaired the street, They would
start at the end of my driveway and keep on raising the level of the
roadway. I believe at this time if core samples were taken at various
places on the street we would most likely find over 12 inches of blacktop,
layer upon layer.
I, as well as some of the neighbors have tried to keep pace with the city
in trying to keep up yard levels to control the water. At this time the
roadway is so high that water that used to be able flow from the east side
to the west side and into the woods in now going to be left standing, or
flow into the area of 410 Ranchview. This yard can not be built up any
higher due to the fact the home there was built many years ago and sits
pretty low. This will mean that this person will have to keep a sump pump
running more often that should be required. Not only will this person have
Melbourne E Wrolstad
340 Ranchview Lane Plymouth, MN 55447
problems, but the people behind him and myself as my rear yard becomes a
holding pond that according to past engineers, was to flow up hill to the
catch basins on 3rd and Quantico.
In order to ease the water problem to my basement created by the past
experts, I had to have the area around my basement dug up and new tile put
in to ease the water coming into my basement. As stated above the problem
created by this new paving job hopefully will not hurt me but I feel sorry
now for the rest of the area.
I am hoping that this problem will not be completly ignored again as inthepastwheneveritwasbroughttotheattentionoftheformerpeople in
charge of this municipality. I do hope that this time someone will look
into it before futher damage is done to the value of the -area and/or it
becomes one big breeding ground for water needing insects.
By the way, the two holes that the gas company left and were filled in
with blacktop when the pavers did the job should be 2 giant pot holes
within the next couple of weeks also.
Repectfully submitted for health and welfare of the neigherhood.
Sincerly,
17
Melbourne E. Wrolstad