HomeMy WebLinkAboutCouncil Information Memorandum 06-21-1991ate,
CITY OF
PLYMOUTFF
CITY COUNCIL INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM
June 21, 1991
UPCOMING MEETINGS AND EVENTS....
1. CITY COUNCIL MEETING SCHEDULE FOR JUNE & JULY:
JUNE 24 5:00 P.M. EXECUTIVE SESSION
City Council Conf. Room
To discuss: 1) Condemnation
action on the library site;
and 2) the League of
Plymouth Voters litigation.
This session will be closed
to the public.
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447, TELEPHONE (612) 550-5000
6:30
P.M.
COUNCIL STUDY MEETING
------------------------------------------------------
City Council Chambers
JULY
1
7:00
P.M.
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING
City Council Chambers
------------------------------------------------------
JULY
8
7:00
P.M.
COUNCIL STUDY SESSION
------------------------------------------------------
City Council Conf. Room
JULY
15
7:00
P.M.
COUNCIL STUDY SESSION
------------------------------------------------------
City Council Conf. Room
JULY
22
6:30
P.M.
PLYMOUTH FORUM
City Council Chambers
7:00
P.M.
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING
------------------------------------------------------
City Council Chambers
JULY
29
7:00
P.M.
COUNCIL STUDY SESSION
City Council Conf. Room
2. PLANNING
COMMISSION
--
June
26, 7:00 P.M. The Planning
Commission
will
meet in
the City Council Chambers.
Agenda
attached.
(M-2)
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447, TELEPHONE (612) 550-5000
CITY COUNCIL INFORMATIONAL ISMO
June 21, 1991
Page 2
3. CITY PICNIC -- Wednesday, July 17. The Employee City
Picnic will be held at French Regional Park from 4:30 -
9:30 p.m Food will be served from 6 to 7 p.m.
Participants are asked to bring a dessert to share.
There is a parking fee of $3.25. Please let Laurie know
by June 29 if you and vour familv r)lan to attend.
4. MEETING CALENDARS -- City Center and Council calendars
for June and July are attached. (M-4)
FOR YOUR INFORMATION.....
1. COUNCIL STUDY SESSION AGENDA -- Last Monday evening the
Council reviewed and approved agenda topics for three
separate Council study meetings to be held on June 24,
July 8, and July 29. The revised meeting schedule is
attached for your information. Each of these study
meetings will be noted on the official City Council
meeting calendar. (I-1)
2. LEAGUE OF PLYMOUTH VOTERS v CITY OF PLYMOUTH --Attached
is a letter from Barbara Hatch. Murane, Conlin, White,
Brandt & Hoffman, to GAB Business Services, providing a
copy of Judge Duffy's Order and Memorandum. (I-2)
3. PROPOSED PLYMOUTH COMMUNITY LIBRARY -- Commissioner Jude
has sent to us a revised project schedule for the
proposed Plymouth Library, dated June 14. There are two
changes on this schedule from the previous schedule of
June 4. The first is the site acquisition phase being
completed by the end of August, and a soil exploration
report being completed by the end of October. (I-3)
4. EXTENSION OF SERVICE HOURS - MINNETONKA BUILDING
INSPECTIONS AND ASSESSING OFFICES -- In the last clipping
service packet, there was a brief article (attached)
dealing with Minnetonka extending its service hours for
building inspections and assessing services.
Councilmember Vasiliou asked that we look into this and
respond to the Council with respect to whether or not
Plymouth could do something similar.
Building Inspections - Minnetonka has a larger inspection
staff and compares with Plymouth () as follows: four
building inspectors (4); two plumbing inspectors (2); one
heating inspector (0); and two electrical inspectors (0).
Minnetonka is an older community with less new
residential construction but probably more residential
remodeling and repair. Their expanded service program is
directed at the residents and not at contractors.
CITY COUNCIL INFORMATIONAL MEMO
June 21, 1991
Page 3
The extended service does not involved public service
counter or telephone service. One inspector is assigned
to the one evening during the week and another is
assigned to the Saturday morning. No overtime is paid
because the hours for extended service are in lieu of
weekday hours.
Our inspection services are largely directed to
contractors involved with new construction - both
residential and non-residential - during the normal work
week. We have not had significant requests for extended
hours from commercial contractors, though it is possible
some would avail themselves of the service if offered.
We do have inspection activities with homeowners doing
their own work and they too might avail themselves of the
extended service for those inspections where their
presence is required.
Minnetonka staff reports a low usage - perhaps due to
unawareness. Inspectors there have initiated some
pending inspections, in lieu of requested and scheduled
inspections; there apparently has been some objections
raised by citizens who were contacted on weekends for
those inspections.
Blair Tremere and Joe Ryan have advised that we could
provide extended service in a similar manner with
additional temporary personnel. Otherwise, the absence
of an inspector during normal business hours would create
a problem since the inspectors' schedules are now full
and it is not expected a significant number of
contractors would opt to have weekday inspections
scheduled for an evening or weekend. The temporary
inspector would be hired to specifically provide the
extended service to residents or would, if feasible,
substitute for a full-time inspector who would be
reassigned.
The inspection division budget does not currently have
funds for this additional service; funds for a temporary
plumbing inspector were cut earlier this year, as were
some of the temporary help and overtime funds.
We could return to the Council with an estimate of costs
if the Council desires to experiment with an extended
service program. I would also ask Blair and Joe to
advise me about supervision and office support concerns
or needs related to the extended service.
CITY COUNCIL INFORMATIONAL MEMO
June 21, 1991
Page 4
Assessing - Minnetonka apparently operates with four
professional persons on its staff, although it has six
budgeted. Plymouth has four.
In Minnetonka, during the summer months, they are
experimenting with having the Assessing staff come into
the office two days a week at 10 a.m. and work until 6:30
p.m. The extra hours at the end of the day, 4:30 - 6:30,
are used to make residential appraisals. I am told that
the Minnetonka appraisers have been receiving some
resistance because of interrupting persons at the "dinner
hour." We periodically schedule appointments for either
before or after work to take care of work schedules of
individual citizens. Scott tells me that they have been
having good results in gaining access to homes in the
quartile areas, partially because they leave a notice on
the door inviting the homeowners to call back to make
arrangements for the appraiser to gain access to the
property.
It would be helpful for the Council to provide us
guidance with their thoughts on this matter. If there is
a desire to extend our service hours on a seasonal basis,
we will develop a plan to assist you in achieving that
objective. We need to first determine what services the
City Council would like to see provided, days and hours
of extended service, in order to provide you with
relevant data as to impacts upon performance standards
and the budget.
5. NOISE WALLS ON STATE HIGHWAY 169 -- On Friday, June 21,
Dan Faulkner and Frank Boyles met with Maryann Wysocki,
one of her neighbors, and MnDOT representatives including
Jim Povich, Jim Hanson, and Scott McBride. This meeting
had been directed by the Council after Ms. Wysocki
requested that the City Council consider installing noise
walls adjacent to State Highway 169. The Council found
that since the Highway is under the State's jurisdiction,
that the noise wall responsibility is theirs. A letter
was subsequently sent to the Commissioner of the
Minnesota Department of Transportation, requesting that
they follow up with Ms. Wysocki.
Jim Povich provided an explanation of the Minnesota
Department of Transportation's position. A 1978 law
prohibits the department from constructing noise barriers
for roadway segments which exceed state noise standards
unless the roadway is new construction or reconstruction.
He indicated that there is simply not a sufficient amount
of money to install walls in all areas qualifying. He
indicated that there are some 194 miles in the
metropolitan area which qualify for noise wall
construction. The total price tag for this installation
is $1,000,000 per mile, or $200,000,000 in total. The
CITY COUNCIL INFORMATIONAL MEMO
June 21, 1991
Page 5
approval of noise walls in one area would require that
MnDOT be responsible for installing the walls in all
other areas that are eligible. The state standard is
65 DBA. June readings for this segment reveal a level of
66.5 DBA. Given the fact that there are some highway
segments in the metropolitan area which are 75 DBA (twice
the noise level of 65 DBA), it is not likely that this
segment would be high priority for construction. Since
State Highway 169 is not scheduled for improvement
through 1997, it is not likely that noise walls will be
added.
Ms. Wysocki indicated that she appreciated the
information as it helped her to better understand what
the prospects were for obtaining a noise wall. She will
be contacting her neighbors to determine their level of
support, including possible funding support to determine
whether it would be appropriate to request general or
special legislation on this subject. She is also
considering reviewing MnDOT files to determine who has
called complaining about noise walls to see if those
individuals might wish to become involved in this
process. If sufficient support is shown, her intent is
to contact legislators to determine whether they would be
interested in supporting such legislation. Frank Boyles
advised Ms. Wysocki that the City would be glad to
provide whatever assistance is appropriate in this
effort.
5. LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES CONFERENCE -- Last week I
attended the annual meeting of the League of Minnesota
Cities (LMC) in Rochester. At this same meeting I
completed my three-year term as a member of the League's
Board of Directors. That has been an interesting
experience and I appreciate having the opportunity to
serve. Two sessions were particularly informative.
The first was a presentation by former Colorado Governor
Richard Lamm on the need for policy leaders to
"reconceptualize much of what government does and how it
does it." His main thesis revolves around the point that
our economic system is not, and will likely not in the
future, grow at the rate that it did in the period of the
1950's through 1970's. As a result, the revenues
available to government to provide expanding social and
other services will not continue to expand to meet social
needs. As a result, policy leaders are going to be
required to come to grips with extremely difficult public
decisions on how to reallocate scare public resources.
Targeting of public benefits will need to be much more
carefully targeted to achieve the best expenditure of the
public dollar. I am attaching a copy of his paper which
I recommend you read.
CITY COUNCIL INFORMATIONAL ISMO
June 21, 1991
Page 6
The second presentation was from Dr. Andrea Molberg on
building productive relationships. Her presentation was
last on the program schedule and the most
enthusiastically received at the conference. She is the
type of resource person who, in my view, would be
excellent in working to develop improved working
relationships within the Council. A copy of her handouts
is attached. Without the narration that she provided,
they only give you the briefest of a sketch of her talk.
(I-5)
6. UPDATES -- The following project updates have been
prepared and mailed to Plymouth residents adjacent to
these projects:
- Reconstruction Update
- Parkers Lake Playfield Update
- Bass Lake Playfield Update
(I-6)
7. VICKSBURG/COUNTY ROAD 6 CLOSING PUBLICITY -- Publicity
scheduled for the first week of July include:
- Construction Update mailing
Article appearing in Plymouth News
- Notice running on cable TV
News release mailing
At this time, the closing is tentatively scheduled for
July 15.
8. COUNTY ROAD 10 -- The County Road 10 improvement project
from I-494 to Nathan Lane is expected to begin in
October, according to the most recent word from Hennepin
County. An article outlining the type of work to be done
will be printed in the July Plymouth News. The first
construction update will be mailed in late August to
residents along the project.
9. DEVELOPMENT SIGNAGE -- On Friday, June 14, a development
sign was installed at:
Southeast corner of County Road 6 and Vicksburg
Lane -- Hennepin County is requesting an approval of a
Site Plan and Conditional Use Permit for a new 68 bed,
36,437 square foot Hennepin County Womens Correctional
Facility, and addition of a parking lot to the site.
10. DEPARTMENT REPORTS -- The Police and Fire monthly
activity reports for May are attached. (I-10)
CITY COUNCIL INFORMATIONAL M1240
June 21, 1991
Page 7
11. GOOSE REMOVAL PROGRAM -- The following is an update from
Dick Carlquist on the goose removal program:
"June 21 - Goose removal to start!!!
Preliminary counts:
Parkers Lake 84
Medicine Lake 96
Bass Lake 36
Schmidt Lake 76
In conjunction with our philosophy with "Dial -a -Ride"
the geese will be picked up at their doorstep and
luxuriously transported to a destination (not
entirely of their choosing!)."
12. RIDERSHIP STATS -- The May ridership statistics for the
Plymouth Metrolink and Dial -A -Ride transit systems are
attached. (I-12)
13. OPT -OUT REVENUE - Attached is a schedule of local transit
funds for opt -out communities which the RTB believes will
be the final available for calendar year 1991 barring any
audit changes or a special session of the legislature.
The funding available has been revised over earlier
projections to reflect tax figures submitted by the
respective county auditors and the January and May cuts
to HACA.
Also attached is a summary showing the 1990 local
property tax available versus the 1990 RTB contract
amount; the 1991 local property tax available versus the
1991 RTB contract amount; and the 1990 local property tax
available versus 1991 local property tax available. (I-
13)
14. MINUTES
a. Planning Commission, May 22, 1991. (I -14a)
b. Notes from the (Council) Meeting. (I- 14b)
C. Bassett Creek Water Management Commission, May 16,
1991. (I -14c)
d. Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission, May 7,
1991. (I -14d)
15. WATERSHED COMMISSIONS - 1992 CITY CONTRIBUTIONS --
Attached are copies of 1992 budgets received from the
Shingle Creek Watershed Management Commission and Elm
Creek Watershed Commission. The City's share for Shingle
Creek is $16,672.50, and Elm Creek, $2,280. (I-15)
CITY COUNCIL INFORMATIONAL MBMO
June 21, 1991
Page 8
16. NEW JERSEY BILL - REIMBURSEMENT FOR SERVICES --
Councilmember Helliwell asked that the attached article
given to her on March 16, 1990 by Bill Jackson be
included with this week's information memo. (I-16)
17. DISTRICT 281 - MIELKE FIELD -- Super Valu Stores has
formally withdrawn their offer to School District 281 for
the Mielke field site in Crystal. Attached is an article
appearing in a recent Post publication. Super Valu's
decision to withdraw, came after the School Board took no
action on the offer at its June 3 meeting. (I-17)
18. CUSTOMER SERVICE LINE -- Documentation on calls received
on the Customer Service Line is attached. (I-18)
a. Mark Jones has been hired as a Maintenance Worker in
the Parks Department. Mark worked for Plymouth last
summer as a temporary Maintenance Worker. Most of his
previous experience is with Hendrickson Enterprises
which runs seven Midas Muffler shops in the metro
area. He managed one shop and was responsible for
building and grounds maintenance on all seven.
He replaces Andy Jordan who is transferring to the
Sewer and Water Division of Public Works.
b. Marjorie Vigoren will fill the new position of Solid
Waste Coordinator. She will work 30 hours a week in
the Public Works Engineering Division. Marjorie is
currently the Recycling Coordinator for the West
Hennepin Recycling Commission, a position she will
retain while she works for us.
Both Mark and Marjorie are starting June 24.
a. Letter to City Council from John Coyne, 5515 Sycamore
Lane, concerning the alignment of Northwest Boulevard
from 45th Avenue to 56th Avenue. (I -20a)
b. Letter from Rodney Sando, Commission, Minnesota DNR,
to Mr. David Barstad, 12915 54th Avenue North,
concerning the review process for the Northwest
Boulevard project. (I -20b)
c. Letter from Kenneth Gallus, St. Therese Home, Inc., to
Blair Tremere, explaining their proposal for a bingo
hall in the Schiebe's Shopping Center. (I -20c)
CITY COUNCIL INFORMATIONAL ISMO
June 21, 1991
Page 9
d. Copy of letter sent to Plymouth businesses and
employers from Frank Boyles, regarding the Travel
Demand Management Program. Also attached are letters
from Mayor Bergman to Richard Harrison, Scanticon
Hotel, and John Norlander, Radisson Hotels, requesting
their participation in the program by offering a
weekend and/or dinner for two at the hotels. (I -20d)
e. Letter to Hennepin County Auditor from Laurie
Rauenhorst, requesting approval to conduct an election
by mail. (I -20e)
f. Letter of welcome to Plymouth/Wayzata Soccer Club
Tournament Participants from Mayor Bergman. (I -20f)
g. Letter from Susan Nelson, West Suburban Mediation
Center, on the City's appointment of Paul Wirtz to the
Center's Board of Directors. (I -20g)
h. Letter of appreciation to Mayne Woo, Plymouth Lions,
from Eric Blank, for the Club's $300 donation to the
Park and Recreation Department. (I -20h)
21. PRIVATE STREET TASK FORCE -- A copy of the Private Street
Task Force Charge is attached for the Council's review.
(I-21)
James G. Willis
City Manager
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA
WEDNESDAY, JUNE 26, 1991
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
WHERE: Plymouth City Center
3400 Plymouth Boulevard
Plymouth, MN 55447
CONSENT AGENDA
All items listed with an asterisk (*) are considered to be routine by the
Planning Commission and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no
separate discussion of these items unless a Commissioner, citizen or
petitioner so requests, in which event the item will be removed from the
consent agenda and considered in normal sequence on the agenda.
PUBLIC FORUM 6:45 P.M.
1. CALL TO ORDER 7:00 P.M.
2. ROLL CALL
3.* CONSENT AGENDA
4.* APPROVAL OF MINUTES 6/12/91
5. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Len Busch Roses. Site Plan Approval for construction of a
Landscape Screening Berm located north of Medina Road west of
County Road 101 (90038)
B. Hennepin County. Amended Master Plan and Conditional Use Permit
and Site Plan for a new women's facility and a new parking lot;
and, a Variance for more than one principal structure on a parcel
at the Hennepin County Adult Corrections Facility at the southeast
corner of County Road 6 and Vicksburg Lane (90103)
C. Bruce Biederman. Conditional Use Permit for a Home Occupation for
small engine repair at 4115 Fernbrook Lane North (91011)
D. Mark McAlister. Conditional Use Permit for a Home Occupation to
repair for resale telephone equipment at 1870 Troy Lane North
(91040)
6. OLD BUSINESS
A. Comprehensive Plan Update
B. Planned Unit Development Standards
7. OTHER BUSINESS
A. Information Packet Contents
B. City Tour
8. ADJOURNMENT
c►m JUN 21 '91
COUNCIL CALENDAR: JUNE 24 - JULY 7
June -July 1991
June 24
5:00pm **EXECUTIVE SESSION (Closed)
6:30pm COUNCIL STUDY MEETING
1" MONDAY
'_j July 1
7:30am METRO COUNCIL BREAKFAST MTG - Days
Inn, Br. Ctr.
7:9ppm''REG.COUNCIL MEETING
June 25 TUESDAY
7:30am METRO COUNCIL BREAKFAST MTG - T.
Wrights, Wayzata
MUSIC IN PLYMOUTH
July 2
June 26
7:00pm PLANNING COMMISSION
IWEDN.ESDAY
F
July 3
June 27
ITHURSDAYJ
CITY OFFICES CLOSED
July 4
June 28
FRIDAY ,-
July 5
June 29
SATURDAY
>>
July 6
June 30
SUNDAY
j
July 7
*Revised Meeting/Event **New Meeting/Event
M T W T F S S
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31
CiM JUN a, 9' 6/20/1991
June
M
T
W
T
F
S S
1 2
3
4
5
6
7
8 9
10
11
12
13
14
15 16
17
18
19
20
21
22 23
24
25
26
27
28
29 30
*Revised Meeting/Event **New Meeting/Event
M T W T F S S
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31
CiM JUN a, 9' 6/20/1991
M -i{
COUNCIL CALENDAR: JULY 8 - 21
July 1991
July 8
MONDAY;
;' July 15
6:30pm COUNCIL STUDY MEETING
July 9
TUESDAY
< July 16
7:00pm BOARD OF ZONING
July 10
WEDNESDAY
July 17
6:45pm PLAN. FORUMEMPLOYEE
PICNIC - French Regional Park
7:00pm PLANNING COMMISSION
►i�
- 4:30 pm
July 11
ITHURSDAY
July 18
7:00pm PRAC
July 12
FRIDAY
,,
July 19
July 13
ISATURDAYJ
July 20
July 14
SUNDAY
I July 21
July
M T W T F S S
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31
*Revised Meeting/Event **New Meeting/Event
rmuyust
M T W T F S S
1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31
1 `g 6/20/1991
COUNCIL CALENDAR: JULY 22 - AUG 4
July -August 1991
July 22
6:30pm PLYMOUTH FORUM
i.VQNDAY`_j
7:00pm COUNCIL STUDY MEETING
July 29
7:00pm REG. COUNCIL MEETING
12
July 23
IUESDAYJ
15
July 30
July 24
7:00pm PLANNING COMMISSION
IWEDNESD6,Yj
19
July 31
July 25
6:30pm SPECIAL OLYMPICS PICNIC -
Park
ITHURSDAYI
Parkers Lake
23
August 1
July 26
FRIDAY
August 2
July 27
ISATURD8yj
30
August 3
July 28
SUNDAY
August 4
July
M T W T F S S
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
*Revised Meeting/Event **New Meeting/Event
August
M T W T F S S
1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31
cjM JUN a"91 6/19/1991
Q
O
Q
1_` —L\
C' �V. 3
a
a�
W
on
y
0.�
N
r
CD
N
fT N N
LL 4
H N
3 co) O- N (D
r
co
r
N
N
o
Ncn(DN c9i
CD t2 N N
N N
x
a
0
en
N
CO
r
N `O
C7
z
�Ez
zz
a0
v�!D10N
N Holl
CO gu
LL r�o�Nco
Lo
T o r
T
N
p
N cn t0 N (�
003
r����
r N co
Q
C:
Z
to �2 N N
a2
Ln N 0)
r g N
CD
LA
r
r
N
w
�z ~
W ZW
Z
Wz�ztl
%1pa�.,
* zp�
I((
* 0U�.
A
IV;
OBcn UU
��$
H
CIO
T o r
T o
N h
I
1
1
co
N
O
N
M
C' �V. 3
a
a�
W
on
y
0.�
a
c
a
u
CCC)N
r
LL
N
LA
N
r
r
CO
N
04)
U W U
.- OD �2 N N
S
Oa
r V
N
A3
N
U 0
H
It
N
E
CV
N
p
CD
Ln
r
r
N
zz
Ei
Zo
o.
N�
w
o
°
>az
Ez
j
�jJ
I L�ijL
o NO
o�'
N
N `1f�
C)
U
z �wr
Un
wd
iVz
'
�zw
EA
C) w
°
gV
a�
n
oEn
LA
0.
e
N ,.
r
t- '
C O `°
r
C-4
r
a
0
z
Z)
U)
M -)A
0
M O r N M
LL
^ N N
LL
N 0) to N
CCD
.- OD �2 N N
S
r V
N
A3
N
S
H
It
N
p
tD — N N
CV
N
V)
a ;: �D N
N
r00^�R
LL
^ N N
tD T NN
9
IANCN
7
H
It
N
r
cl)�n- N
N(7)tD Cl)
C,
rn
a
w
6/18/91
CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSIONS
DATE TIME SUBJECT
6/24 6:30 - 7:00 p.m. Special Assessments for 25th
Avenue North, Project 025
7:00 - 9:00 p.m. Northwest Boulevard Alternate
Alignment AD vs. AE
9:00 - 10:00 P.M. Schmidt Lake Road Alignment
west of I-494
-----------------------------------------------------------------
7/8 6:30 - 8:00 p.m. Short and long range fiscal
implications of the proposed
senior citizen housing
project. (Joint meeting with
HRA)
8:00 - 8:30 p.m. 1991 Street Reconstruction
Program proposed special
assessments and 1992 Street
Reconstruction Marketing Plan.
8:30 - 9:00 p.m. Discuss a proposed charge,
composition and recruitment
for a proposed water quality
commission.
9:00 - 10:00 P.M. Review 1991-1995 Capital
Improvement Plan.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
7/29 7:00 - 8:00 p.m.
8:00 - 8:15 P.M.
8:15 - 9:15 p.m.
9:15 - 10:00 P.M.
Meet with representative of
Ethical Practices Board
regarding implementation of
the Elections and Ethics
Reform Act of 1990.
Discuss policy on the
appointment/reappointment of
members of boards and
commissions.
Review proposed Uniform
Consulting Agreement for
Professional Engineering
Services.
Review method of selecting
consulting engineers for
consideration for various
public projects.
cim 3'6' Z1' ,
MURNANE, CONLIN, WHITE, BRANDT & HOFFMAN
THOMAS M. CONLIN
ROBERT W. MURNANE
ROBERT T. WHITE
JOHN E. BRANDT
JOHN R. HOFFMAN
JOHN D. HIRTE
STEVEN I. KIRSCH
LAWRENCE R. KING
ANDREW T. SHERN
MICHAEL S. RYAN
SUSAN D. HALL
GAB Business Services,
9531 West 78th Street,
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
1800 MERITOR TOWER
444 CEDAR STREET
SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101
TELEPHONE (612) 227-9411
TELECOPIER (612) 223-5199
June 17, 1991
Inc.
Suite 320
Attention: Mr. Doug Gronli
Re: League of Plymouth Voters, et al v City of Plymouth
Your Insured: City of Plymouth
GAB File No. 56509-00624
Our File No. 35488
Dear Mr. Gronli:
JAMES F BALDWIN
C. TODD KOEBELE
BARBARA R. HATCH
MICHAEL P. TTERNEY
M. SUSAN BURNS
JOHN R. SHOEMAKER
STEPHEN J. RONDESTVEDT
DANIEL A. HAWS
WILLIAM L. MORAN
CYNTHIA E. CORNELIUS
T'HERESE M. PAUTZ
MICHELE D. SEEHAFER
THOMAS A. GILLIGAN, JR.
PAUL D. PETERSON
STEPHEN E. OT TO
PATRICK M. RYAN
DAVID C. ANASTASI
DANIEL J. TRUDEAU
LAURIE W. MEYER
PATRICIA A. MATTHEWS••
JOEL D. HEDBERG
• ALSO ADMITTED IN-ISCONSIN
•• ALSO ADMITTED 11
OKLAHOMA AND SEMME\ICD
E. WILLARD MURNANE
119(71-19,6)
CHARLES R. MURNANE
1191319821
We are pleased to enclose with this correspondence a copy of Judge
Duffy's Order and Memorandum regarding our motions for summary
judgment in the above -captioned matter. By way of this Order,
Judge Duffy has ruled that Minn. Stat. §205.07 does not violate
Article 1 Section 2 of the Minnesota Constitution, and therefore
has granted our motion for summary judgment on this issue. In
light of the 1991 amendment to Minn. Stat. §205.07 Judge Duffy has
found that the equal protection challenge to this statute, as well
as the constitutional challenges to Minn. Stat. §205.10 are moot.
Judge Duffy has further denied plaintiffs' claims for attorneys'
fees.
With the recent amendments
anticipate that plaintiffs'
review of this decision. We
counsel will continue to purl
to prohibit the mail -in ball
the City of Plymouth. We wi
iii `this regard.
BRH:las
Enclosure
to Minn. Stat. §205.07 we do not
counsel will seek further appellate
anticipate, however, that plaintiffs'
ue their request for injunctive relief
Dt election currently contemplated by
L1 continue to keep you fully advised
Very truly yours,
Barbara R. Hatch
bcc: Mr. Robert Weisbrod (w/enclosure)
Mr. Bob Pemberton (w/enclosure)
Mr. James G. Willis (w/enclosure)
Mr. Thomas Grundhoefer (w/enclosure)
"J,
CIM JAN - l
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
DISTRICT COURT
23 j„ � F:FGLM�H JUDICIAL DISTRICT
League of Plymouth Voters, ':,-I--;; ':%;i;;
a non-profit corporation, File No. MC 91-3190
and Patty Johnston,
Plaintiffs,
VS. ORDER
City of Plymouth, a municipal
corporation,
Defendant.
The above -captioned matter came on for hearing before
the Honorable David M. Duffy in the Hennepin County
Government Center, Courtroom 1355, Minneapolis, Minnesota on
April 22, 1991 on the party's cross-motions for Summary
Judgment.
Mark C. McCullough, Esq., and David A. Anderson, Esq.,
appeared for and on behalf of Plaintiffs. Lawrence R. King,
Esq., and Barbara Hatch, Esq., appeared for and on behalf of
Defendant.
Based upon the arguments at hearing, all the files,
records, affidavits and proceedings herein, and being fully
advised in the premises, the Court makes the following
Order.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
1) Plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment on the
issue of whether Minn. Stat. §205.07 violates
Article I, Section 2 of the Minnesota Constitution
is denied. Defendant's cross-motion for summary
judgment on this issue is granted.
2) The parties cross-motions for summary judgment on
the issue of whether Minn. Stat. §205.07 violates
the equal protection clause of the United States
Constitution are dismissed as moot.
3) The parties cross-motions for summary judgment on
the issue of whether Minn. Stat. §205.10 violates
the Minnesota Constitution and the United States
Constitution are dismissed as moot.
4) The claim set forth in Count II of Plaintiffs'
Complaint is dismissed as moot.
5) Plaintiffs' claim for attorneys' fees, costs and
disbursements, as set forth in Count VI of
Plaintiffs' Complaint, is denied.
6) Judgment is hereby entered in favor of Defendant
on Plaintiffs' claims against it and Plaintiffs'
Complaint is hereby dismissed with prejudice.
7) Let the attached memorandum be incorporated as if
set forth in full herein.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Dated.
David M. Duffy
Judge of District Court
c►M A' 21
-2-
MEMORANDUM
Leaque of Plymouth Voters et al -vs- City of Plymouth
Court File No: MC 91-3190
FACTS
Defendant, the City of Plymouth ("Plymouth" or "the
City") is a Plan B statutory City operating under Minn.
Stat. Ch. 412. Under Plan B, the City has four
councilmembers and one mayor. The councilmembers are
elected for four year terms and the mayor a two year term.
The voters are granted the right to elect councilmembers and
the mayor under Minn. Stat. §412.02. In 1974, the City
adopted Ordinance 74-1 which established an odd year
municipal election schedule and staggered the terms of two
of the four councilmembers.
Plymouth currently has a population of 50,800 and is
the seventh largest municipality in the state. It has
33,316 registered voters, of which 7,254 voted in the last
municipal general election in November 1989.
Prior to December i7, 1990, the regular municipal
general election to fill two of the councilmember's offices
and the mayor's office was scheduled for November 5, 1991.
On December 17, 1990, at a regular council meeting, the City
Council, by a 3-2 vote, adopted Ordinance 90-41. Ordinance
90-41 repeals Ordinance 74-1, changes the municipal general
election schedule to even -numbered years, and extends the
terms of office of the mayor and the councilmembers for one
year in order to carry out a transition to the even -numbered
year plan. The reasons given by the City for changing to an
GIM Jury z 1 1
-3-
=. Q_
even -numbered year election schedule were 1) a cost savings
of approximately $22,400 as a result of merging the City
elections with existing state and federal elections; and 2)
the greater voter turnout associated with the state and
federal elections occurring in even -numbered years.
Minn. Stat. §205.07 regulates the timing of elections
in statutory cities. That statute reads, in part:
subdivision 1. Date. The municipal general election
in each statutory city shall be held on the first
Tuesday after the first Monday in November in every
even -numbered year: except that the governing body of a
statutory city may, by ordinance passed at a regular
meeting before September 1 of any year, elect to hold
the election on the first Tuesday after the first
Monday in November in each odd numbered year. When a
city changes its elections from one year to another,
and does not provide for the expiration of terms by
ordinance, the term of an incumbent expiring at a time
when no municipal election is held in the months
immediately prior to expiration is extended until the
date for taking office following the next scheduled
municipal election. To provide an orderly transition
to the odd or even year election plan, the governing
body of the city may adopt supplementary ordinances
regulating initial elections and officers to be chosen
at the elections and shortening or lengthening the
terms of incumbents and those elected at the initial
election so as to conform as soon as possible to the
regular schedule provided in section 412.02,
subdivision 1.
In response to the council's actions, residents of
Plymouth formed the League of Plymouth Voters, ("the
League") a Minnesota non-profit corporation. The mission
statement of the League is "to obtain and preserve a
representative local government for the electorate of the
City of Plymouth." The League was incorporated on January
8, 1991.
-4-
Clt�
111N 21�'��
The League decided to proceed with a petition drive.
The League circulated a petition which read "We, the
undersigned registered voters of Plymouth, pursuant to Minn.
Stat. §205.10, hereby petition and demand that a special
election be held within sixty (60)_days after submission of
this petition to determine whether or not the length of City
Council members' terms will be decided by the City Council
members themselves, or by the voters of the City of
Plymouth." By February 4, 1991, the League had obtained
signatures from 3,582 registered voters; more than 50% of
the voters in the last municipal election held in November
.:.
Minn. Stat. §205.10 provides, in part, that:
Special elections may be held in a statutory or home
rule charter city on a question on which the voters are
authorized by law or charter to pass judgment. A
special election may be ordered by the governing body
of the city on its own motion or, on a question that
has not been submitted to the voters in an election
within the previous six months, upon a petition signed
by a number of voters equal to 20 percent of the votes
cast at the last municipal general election....
Minn. Stat. §205.10, subd. 1.
The League's petition was presented to the City Council
at its regular meeting on February 4, 1991. At a regular
City Council meeting on March 4, 1991, the Council refused
to take action on the petition for a special election.
In this action, Plaintiffs (the League and Patty
Johnston, a resident of Plymouth) challenge the
constitutionality of Minn. Stat. §§205.07 and 205.10. The
C►M JV,
-5-
parties' cross-motions for summary judgment were heard on
April 22, 1991.
On May 28, 1991, Governor Carlson signed into law a
bill which amends §205.07 by adding the following
subdivision:
Subd. 3. An ordinance changing the year of the
municipal election is effective 240 days after passage and
publication or at a later date fixed in the ordinance.
Within 180 days after passage and publication of the
ordinance, a petition requesting a referendum on the
ordinance may be filed with the city clerk. The petition
shall be signed by eligible voters equal in number to ten
percent of the total number of votes cast in thb city at the
last municipal general election. If the requisite petition
is filed within the prescribed period, the ordinance shall
not become effective until it is approved by a majority of
the voters voting on the question at a general or special
election held at least 60 days after submission of the
petition. If the petition is filed, the governing body may
reconsider its action in adopting the ordinance.
The effective date of the amended statute is May 29,
1991 and applies "to all ordinances passed within 180 days
prior to the day following final enactment." Chapter No.
227, H.F. No. 478, Sec. 28. The amended statute therefore
applies to Plymouth Ordinance 90-41.
ANALYSIS
Summary judgment is appropriate where there are no
genuine issues of material fact in dispute and one party is
entitled to judgment as a matter of law. The
constitutionality of legislation is a proper issue for
summary judgment where the decision does not depend upon
the finding of a genuine issue of material fact. Hodason v.
Flakne, 463 F.Supp. 67 (D. Minn. 1978). The present
j
litigation involves no genuine issues of material fact and
is ripe for determination by summary judgment.
Plaintiffs contend that Minn. Stat. §205.07, violates
Article I, Section 2 of the Minnesota Constitution, which
provides that "No member of this state shall be
disenfranchised or deprived of any of the rights or
privileges secured to any citizens thereof, unless by the
law of the land or the judgment of his peers."
In Jordan v. Bailey, 37 Minn. 174, 33 N.W.-778 (1887),
the Minnesota Supreme Court reviewed a statute which, among
other things, extended the term of office of two Minneapolis
municipal court judges. The court upheld the validity of
the statute, noting that the legislature has broad power to
enact legislation regarding the dates for holding elections.
In particular, the court stated:
[i]t can hardly be questioned that where the
constitution provides generally that the legislature
may make provision for the election of certain
officers, leaving it to carry out such provisions by
appropriate enactments, it is fairly within the
authority of the legislature, in the exercise of its
general powers, to make reasonable changes by amendment
to existing laws, in respect to the times for holding
such elections and mode of filling temporary vacancies.
From this it follows, we think, that it is fairly
within the scope of such legislation to permit
incumbents to hold over during an interval except in so
far as the constitution limits the exercise of such
power, as where it expressly declares that certain
officers shall not hold beyond a certain time.
Jordan, 37 Minn. at 177.
-7-
= Q-,
Plaintiffs cite State v. Berg, 132 Minn. 426, 157 N.W.
652 (1916) and State v. Windom, 131 Minn. 401, 155 N.W. 629
(1915) for the proposition that legislative acts which
extend the terms of office of elected officials violate
Article I, Section 2 of the Minnesota constitution. These
cases, however, are inapposite to the issues presented in
this litigation. In both Berg and Windom the legislative
act in question attempted to extend a term of office which
was set by the constitution. In both cases, the
constitutional provision found to have been violated was the
provision setting forth the term for the particular office
in question. Neither case involved a challenge under
Article I, Section 2.
The Minnesota Supreme Court's holding in Jordan v.
Bailey, supra, is directly on point. It does not violate
Art. I, Sect. 2 of the Minnesota Constitution for the
legislature to allow a city's governing body to change the
date of a municipal election and to extend an incumbent's
term of office in order to accommodate such a change.
Plaintiffs, in their motion for summary judgment,
argued that the legislation establishing a procedure for
changing election years violates the equal protection clause
of the United States Constitution.
Plaintiffs' equal protection argument was premised upon
the prior legislative scheme which distinguished between
statutory cites and home rule charter cities in permitting
the governing body of a city to change election years.
-8-
= ZZ -1
Prior to the amendment of Minn. Stat. §205.07, residents of
a statutory city were not given an opportunity to call for a
popular vote on the issue when the governing body passed an
ordinance changing the date of an election. Residents of
home rule charter cities, on the other hand, could initiate
such a vote through a petition drive. See, Minn. Stat.
§205.20, subd. 4.
As amended, however, Minn. Stat. §205.07 does grant the
residents of Plymouth the right to a popular vote on
Ordinance 90-41. The League's petition was signed by
eligible voters greater in number than ten percent of the
votes cast in the last municipal general election and was
filed within 180 after passage of Ordinance 90-41.
Therefore, the City is required to submit Ordinance 90-41
for voter approval. This development renders Plaintiffs'
equal protection challenge to Minn. Stat. §205.07 moot.
See, e.g., Peterson v. Humphrey, 381 N.W.2d 472, 475 (Minn.
App. 1986) (If, pending a decision on a constitutional
challenge to a statute, the legislature repeals the statute
retroactively, the action will be dismissed as presenting a
moot question) .
The Court notes that under §205.07, subd. 3, Ordinance
90-41 "shall not become effective until it is approved by a
majority of the voters voting on the question." Unless and
until that occurs, Ordinance 74-1 remains in effect.
Therefore, until Ordinance 90-41 becomes effective, the
-9-
parties shall proceed with preparations for the regularly
scheduled election to be held November 5, 1991.
Plaintiffs have also raised challenges to Minn. Stat.
§205.10 under both the Minnesota and United States
Constitutions. Plaintiffs' challenges to §205.10 were based
upon the fact that the statute, as interpreted by the
Plymouth City Council, permits special elections on city
ordinances only where specifically provided for by statute.
Based upon this interpretation, the City Council initially
took no action on the League's petition because no statute
specifically authorized a special election on an ordinance
changing the date of a municipal election in a statutory
city.
Under the recently enacted amendments to 5205.07,
however, Plaintiffs are entitled to a referendum on
Ordinance 90-74. Therefore, Plaintiffs' constitutional
challenges to 5205.10 are moot. See, Peterson v. Humphrey,
supra.
Count II of Plaintiffs' Complaint alleges "[t]hat to
the extent Minnesota Statute §205.07 authorizes the City
Council to extend the terms of office of councilmembers and
mayor, without allowing the voters to vote on the extension,
it is invalid and in conflict with Minnesota Statute
§412.02." Plaintiffs' claim in this regard is, again, based
upon the fact that the residents of Plymouth were not
initially allowed a referendum on Ordinance 90-74. The
recent amendment to Minn. Stat. §205.07 renders this claim
-10-
=CQL
moot as well. Although Count II was not addressed in the
parties' cross-motions for summary judgment, resolution of
this issue does not depend upon factual determinations, but
is rather a pure question of law. Therefore, the court may
properly decide this issue sua sponte.
Count VI of Plaintiffs' sets forth a request for
attorneys' fees and costs incurred in bringing this action.
This is also a pure question of law and may be disposed of
by the court sua sponte. The court concludes that
Plaintiffs are not a "prevailing party" in this action and
are, therefore, not entitled to costs or disbursements
incurred up to the date of this order. See, Minn. Stat.
§549.04. Nor are Plaintiffs' entitled to attorneys' fees
incurred up to the date of this order.
CONCLUSION
In sum, the court concludes that Minn. Stat. §205.07
does not violate Article I, Section 2 of the Minnesota
Constitution. The court therefore grants Defendant's motion
for summary judgment on this issue. The remainder of the
issues raised by the parties' cross-motions for summary
judgment are moot and will not be decided by the court. The
claim set forth in Count II of Plaintiffs' Complaint is
likewise moot and is dismissed by the court sua sponte.
Finally, the claim for attorneys' fees, costs and
disbursements set forth in Count VI of Plaintiffs' Complaint
is denied.
now
Based upon the foregoing, Defendant is entitled to
judgment on Plaintiffs' claims against it. Plaintiffs'
Complaint is hereby dismissed with prejudice.
D.M.D.
-12-
GiN Juti 21 19.1
TEL No. 1L,.n 1Y•,'=11 10:04 N0.CII CI1 F•.Ci1
Ay -.Spa
• �3
DATE: June 14, 1991
TO: Robert Rohlf, Director, Hennepin County
Libraries
FROM: James Taplin, Property Management
SUBJECT: Plymouth Community ty Library
Per your request, I enclose a revised Plymouth Community Library Project
Development Schedule for your review and use in land negotiations with the
City of Plymouth.
The Schedule is initially dependent upon the successful selection of a
design consultant and execution of the contract with the consultant within
the five month period indicated.
Acquisition of the site should be complete by August 1991, to.allow site
exploration studies prerequisite to beginning the design process.
The Schematic Design period of three months assumes library programming
complete and available to the consultant at the outset.
Due to the scheduled winter start of construction, the construction
contract period may extend into spring 1994, to complete site development
especially lawns and landscaping.
JT:mw
Enclosure: Schedule
cc: Commissioner Tad Jude
Gerald Weiszhaar
William L. Schroeder
Post -it" brand fax transmittal memo 7671
N of pages ► �
To �
Isom
Dept.one
N
— C
Fax U
F 55d
ax N
GIM aA 21 'l1
/cL nu-1uo ionouVi r.u�
A.
'
y
�
°
cc
\` " -- — --------------- �-1
B
8
"
�
C> �
�
ivuu,kjxA 'boo
l �^
otfvmv 06
� '___--'_-----
-_--- --
M3lA3U 08
x
r�
-- -------------'—'-------
-------
'-----------
w
/
)
- . _---------_'
�
T-- ' ------
y
�
°
cc
\` " -- — --------------- �-1
B
8
"
�
C> �
�
ivuu,kjxA 'boo
l �^
otfvmv 06
� '___--'_-----
-_--- --
M3lA3U 08
_ --_____----'
-- -------------'—'-------
-------
'-----------
w
/
y
�
°
cc
\` " -- — --------------- �-1
B
8
"
�
C> �
�
ivuu,kjxA 'boo
l �^
4
MNAC CUPPING SERVICE
MINNETONKA
SAILOR
Hennepin Co.
N1 AY 2 9 1991
AI4Aa service hours expanded
Beginning May 29 and naming through Labor Day, Min-
netonka's building, electrical and plumbing/heating inspectors
will be available to conduct inspections until 8 p.m. on
Wednesdays and during certain Saturday morning hours. The ex-
panded hours have been scheduled to accommodate residents
who cannot schedule inspections during regular business hours.
Inspections can be scheduled by calling the Community Develop-
ment Department at 939.8200, ext. 270 or 271.
Also, property appraisers will be available for appointments
through 6:30 p.m. on Mondays and Tuesdays throughout the sum-
mer. The Assessing Division will review various Minnetonka
neighborhoods this summer, and property appraisers need to see
each house. Property appraisers may be reached through the x
Assessing Division at 939.8200, east. 220.
CIM 11M,1. 21 991
Q
"Brave New World of Public Policy'
Auditorium
12:30-2:00 p.m., Thursday
THE21-ST CENTURY SERIES
AN ANucAN ISSUES FORUM
fF 7FUND
Y FUND
URY FUND
NTURY FUND
CENTURY FUND
Sr CENTURY FUND
THE BRAVE NEW WORLD OF PUBLIC POLICY
PREPARED BY
RicHARD D. LAMM
MARCH 1990
UNIVERSITY of DENVER
'3
Cli�i►1 4 Z l
This publication is a joint project of the Custerfor Public Policy and
Contemporary issues, University of Denver, and The 21st Century Fund.
For each additional copy, please submit $250 playable to:
TrJE CINM FOR PUBLIC POL CY AND CONTEMPORARY ISBm
University of Denver
2301 South Gaylord
Denver, CO 80208
Phone: 303/871-2468
Copyright 1990, The Center fior Public Policy and Contemporary issues,
University of Denver.
All rights reserved.
�t�n JUN 2l g0
Policy is formed by preconceptions and by long implanted
biases. When information is relayed to policy makers, they
respond in terms of what is already inside their heads and
consequently make policy less to fit the facts than to fit the
baggage that has accumulated since childhood.
—Barbara Tuchman, Practicing History
The roaring current of change... overturns institutions, shifts
our values and shrivels our roots. Change is the process by
which the future invades our lives, and it is important to look
at it closely, not merely from the grand perspectives of history,
but also from the vantage point of the living breathing
individuals who experience it.
—Alvin Toff er, Future Shock
=
CIM JUN 21 '9]
A tib vxwvts tNtw rvuKLu ur rutsLtl: rul-ILT
There is a story that John Stuart Mill woke up one
morning and had this overwhelming feeling that the
"answer to the question of the ages" had come to him in
the middle of the night. But he forgot what it was. He then
placed a quill and paper next to his bed, and a few
mornings later he awoke with a similar feeling, yet this
time he found on the paper in his own handwriting "?tank
in different terms."
We are sailing into a new world of public policy; a world
as strange and new as Columbus discovered. It is a world
where infinite government demands have run straight into
finite resources. Most of our institutional memories and
political culture come out of the 1960s and 1970s when
America had the industrial world's highest rate of
productivity growth and was doubling its wealth every 30
to 40 years. Government had a substantial yearly growth
dividend it could spend. Now we have the lowest rate of
productivity growth in the industrial world and it now
takes approximately 130 years to double our national
wealth.l We go into debt to maintain current levels of
government. Being in government today is like sleeping
with a blanket that is too short: we do not have the
resources to cover all our needs.
A nation that is the world's largest debtor nation with a
massive federal debt cannot merely duplicate the solutions
that worked when it was a creditor nation with little
1.2
1.0
0.6
0.6
a
0.4
0.2
0.0
U.S Federal Governmental Finances
Real Per Capita Taxes
1800-1992
,e mo W do 70 x tee W -o -70 -o
Source: Wm. Craig Stubblebine Van Tobel, Professor of
Economics, Claremont McKenna College.
federal debt. The health care of a society which dies in old
age of chronic illnesses is vastly different from that of a
society which died at an average of 47 after a short episode
of infectious disease. Geometric demand for municipal
services cannot be met by arithmetically growing tax
resources.
It is my belief that an old world of public policy is dying
and a new world of public policy is being born. The
essence of this new world is that the economy of 1990s
=.S—
cannot support the dreams of the 1960s. The next major
challenge of government will be the "revolution of lower
expectations" as we find our dreams exceed our resources.
Net Public Sector Investment as a Percent of GNP
Average Annual Rate
6
4
I
s
o..reo
Source: Peter Peterson and Neil Howe. On Borrouxd Tmu (San
Francisco: institute for Contemporary Studies Press, 1988), p. 66.
Public policy cannot count on historic revenue growth
and thus cannot chase geometric curves of public
spending. I suggest that this world of ever growing public
needs and shrinking resources will require us to
neconceptualize much of what government does and how it
does it. It will cause us to define what is absolutely
fundamental in many of our basic institutions.
This is not a matter of conservative or liberal. It is not a
matter of "won't." It is a matter of "can't." It is not a
philosophic difference between parties, but a resource
limitation imposed by an economy increasingly under
international attack and not growing fast enough to sustain
programs already undertaken, let alone new needs? It is
not a matter of the heart. It is a matter of the wallet.
The challenge of the 1990s will be how to meet new public
needs with evermore limited resources. I suggest that it
will be politically difficult but conceptually possible. The
United States has enough tax money to meet our critical
needs if it is properly focused. We must, however,"Think in
different terms." I suggest that the inadequacies in one part
of the government be funded out of the excesses in other
parts of the system.
New needs can be met by reallocating existing resources.
This is not another argument against "waste in
government." Waste cannot be justified but will not yield
that much new money. We need more than new
efficiencies, we need new imagination. Paradigms must
shift. The much more restrained resources of the future will
require us to reconceptualize much of what we do in
government. It will require us to decide what is
fundamental and what is superfluous: what is truly
necessary?
CIM JUN 21 '91
RICHARD D. LAMM
_2
Focus SMMING
Spending on the elderly is one area where considerable
funds could be refocused. The elderly are 12 percent of
Annual Real Rate of Return on OAST Social Security
Contributions by Generation and Income Level
1970-2025
10
Im Im r nu am
VWFEWN urr.y•
Source: Peter Peterson and Neil Howe. On Borrowed Tarr (San
Francisco: Institute for Contemporary Studies, 1968), p. 276.
America and get 57 percent of all federal entitlements.
"Retirees" get 65 percent of all federal entitlements. Studies
show that they have the highest amount of discretionary
income. America still thinks of the elderly as poor but as a
class they are doing quite well. A child in America is seven
times more likely to be poor than someone 65.3
Now it is true that the poorest people in America are
"elderly widows" — but the richest people in America are
"elderly widows."
Ken Dychtwald states that between 500,000 and 600,000
millionaires get a social security check every month, and
that half the millionaires in the country are over 65.4 Our
society does have the option of transferring money now
going to rich elderly to poor kids. It could be done through
taxing all Social Security and Medicare benefits or even by
"means testing" Social Security. Social Security and
Medicare are tremendous transfer payments from one
generation to an older generation. Contrary to public myth,
people are not "getting their money back" in these
programs. The average person retiring today receives back
five times more than they and their employer paid into the
system (plus interest).5 Our system taxes all workers to
raise a pot of money, then takes that money and transfers
an average of $12,000 to each elderly family. The actuarial
benefits of Medicare are often 20 to 25 times what a retiree
has contributed. This is appropriate for many of the
elderly; but questionable for those elderly who have
considerable resources.
Many retirees today are beneficiaries of federal policy that
pays them back ten to twelve years after retiring more in
federal benefits than they ever paid in federal taxes (social
security and federal income taxes) plus interest. They are
"tax free citizens" having been returned in benefits more
than they ever paid in total federal taxes plus interest.6
Such a system cannot survive the new demographics
where we live long and have few children It is also unfair
to our children.
Public policy today amends Medicare to give heart
transplants to the elderly, but 600,000 American women
gave birth last year with either little or no prenatal care.7
That is not a correct distribution of limited resources. We
have the highest life expectancy at age 80 of any country in
the world but we are 20th in infant mortality. That is not
fair. Poverty in America wears diapers, not a hearing aid.
The new world of public policy will not allow us to be
indiscriminately generous. We will not be able to continue
to give benefits to everyone just because they turned 65.
Public policy should transfer money from the rich to the
poor, rather than from the young to the old. There is
enough money to run a just and fair public policy but not
enough to fund all our past dreams, or blindly fund all our
past systems. Priorities will have to be made. Choices will
be forced upon us if we refusg to do them voluntarily. We
do no justice to the future if we assume that the status quo
can continue. We cannot continue to socialize the expenses
of our elderly and privatize the expenses of our kids. We
must 'Think in different tens."
Government will have to re -think both ends and means.
We need to develop a sense of "compassionate austerity"
where we honor compassionate Qoals but, perhaps, change
Persona Living in Poverty by Age -Group
1986
"to"
CU XMW
now"
W MHLI o
uA.-
C" =111i0a
r6
Lalion►
6b17
as mlukma
Source: Peter Peterson and Neil Howe. On Borrowed Tarr (San
Francisco: Institute for Contemporary Studies, 1988), p. 100; citing
Current Popukhon Reports (Series P-60, and Technical Paper 57,
Census).
the means whereby we accomplish them. Take
transportation of the handicapped. The handicapped
advocacy groups push for a "barrier free society" and
demand a wheelchair lift on every bus in America. Studies
show, however, that government can transport three times
as many handicapped by vans for a fraction of what it costs
to put a wheelchair lift on every bus. The future will have
enough money to meet compassionate ends, but we must
be tougher on how we meet those ends. It doesn't make
sense to put a wheelchair lift on every bus in America
when we can meet the needs of the handicapped by a
much cheaper alternative. We can't afford to govern by
slogan.
Another area of focus is clearly the area of existing
governmental subsidies. Too often our government
subsidies do not go to those who need them the most. This
can be seen, for example, in the area of agricultural
subsidies. The General Accounting Office states that almost
30 percent of all farm subsidies go to the largest one
percent of all producers. Meanwhile, 80 percent of all
farmers with sales of less than $100,000 a year, exactly
those farms experiencing the greatest economic stress,
receive less than a third of the government payments.
There is nothing more poignant than the sale of a
foreclosed farmer, as their personal goods are carried out
by the sheriff and the farm lobbies publicize these stories
dramatically to justify the existing system of subsidies. Yet
most farm benefits, according to one study:
Soto farmers who don't need help. Under the current program, for many
ons dollar of government subsidies that goes to a struggling fanner,
some four dollars go to his more prosperous neighbor--tvho happens to
be his eampetitor.
They go on to say, "It is a cruel irony. While distributing
substantial subsidies to large farmers who are doing quite
well, less than a quarter of the income and price support
payments go to financially stressed farms. It is, writer
Jonathan Rauch says, 'among the most brutal, inefficient
welfare programs in government—amounting to welfare,
in many cases, for the wealthy. -8
A world of limited tax resources always has the option of
better focusing existing programs.
REDUCE SUPERFLUOUS AND REDUNDANT INaTITUrIONs
America has spent too much in some areas and not
enough in others. I suggest we are spending far too much
of our evermore limited resources on excess; on
superfluous and redundant institutions. We as a nation
have too many law schools, too many medical schools. We
have too many hospitals and within those hospitals too
many intensive care units and too much duplicative
technology. We train too many lawyers, too many doctors,
too many medical specialists, too many accountants — this
list is long. In a world that desperately needs scientists,
technicians, good teachers, engineers, production
specialists — people and places which can create new
wealth, we continue to train lawyers, accountants, and real
estate salesmen, and fund unnecessary and un -needed
military bases, hospitals, etc.
How much money has gone from our generation to build
new hospitals or to expand new wings of those hospitals?
Experts tell us that clearly there are too many hospital beds
in America — the estimates run from 200,000 to 400,000
excess beds -9 Fifty percent of the hospital beds in Colorado
are empty.10 Our roads are deteriorating, our teachers are
�-s 3—
underpaid, we have over 500,000 medically indigent — but
50 percent of the hospital beds are empty.
The Rand Corporation found — albeit before DRGs —
that 25 penxnt of the people in a hospital bed didn't need
to be there — they were there for the convenience of their
doctor or insurance policy.
Now, capital is the stored flexibility we have to build a
better world for our kids. Politicians can print money but
they can't print capital. We only have it once — and if we
spend it on redundant wheelchair lifts and empty hospital
beds — instead of robots and new factories and new
teaching techniques — we cheat our children.
We have far more military bases than we need for the
defense of our country11 We keep funding them because
we don't have the political courage to shut them down; but
the money now wasted is desperately needed elsewhere in
our society. We fund an expensive system of veteran's
hospitals which delivers to veterans health care for
principally non -service connected disabilities in a very
expensive setting. With over 35 percent of the hospital
beds in America empty, one wonders if we even need a
system of VA hospitals. Let's integrate the VA system into
the existing hospital system} and use the funds saved to
retool our industries.
Higher educational institutions throughout America have
a capacity that exceeds the wildest projections of future
students.12 America is spending considerable money
supporting a number of institutions of higher education
that are simply not needed for our educational needs. They
are being kept alive because no one has the political will to
shut them down, but their contribution to America is
actually a negative one. The "opportunity costs" of the
dollars now going into surplus and redundant institutions
are much greater elsewhere in America. America has too
much quantity in higher education and insufficient
quaiity13
Related to the surplus of higher education institutions is
our system in public education of subsidizing all students,
whether they need it or not. A UCLA study, for instance,
found in 1967 that over one third of entering freshmen at
state universities came from families earning more than
$60,000 annually (which put them above the 87th
percentile of US. families). Taxpayers thus subsidize many
students in amounts ranging from $6,749 to $8,813 who
Come from families that could well afford to pay for their
children's colleges.14 There are hundreds of millions of
dollars in new money available in tightening down this
system. But it requires us to "Think in different turns."
I do not claim these steps will be easy. They won't.
Politicians will lose their seats over these proposals.
America has a political constituency for "yes," but not for
"no;" for budgeting by addition but not subtraction. I do
claim, however, that it is imperative that we start. A society
with as low a productivity rate as we have had for twenty
years doesn't have any options but to reprioritize existing
spending and try hard to make the pie grow larger in the
future.
INCREASE EMCIENCY
Government can dramatically increase the efficiency of
government by better providing incentives and
disincentives of employees. Most government spending at
all levels is to pay employees and despite the fact that we
have many hard working and dedicated public employees,
the system neither rewards excellence nor allows us
adequately to get rid of mediocrity.
Almost 40 percent of this nation's income is spent by
government and one great source of new funds and new
energy would be to reform the civil service system. One
generation's reforms become another generation's
problems and this is clearly seen in the the civil service
system. Most public employees are enmeshed in a system
that neither rewards good work nor punishes poor
performance. Additionally, too many public employees
simply give up on the system and too many of the them are
unaccountable to elected officials or even their own
superiors. It is my experience that the size of the public
work force could clearly be reduced and perhaps
dramatically reduced if 1.) one gave managers the
flexibility and ability to discipline and, in some cases,
ultimately terminate a non-performing employee, or 2.) we
developed a good system of rewarding high -performing
employees.
Government seldom says "thank you" to its high
performers. Recognition is important in managing people.
Napoleon once said, 1 can make men die for little pieces of
ribbon." Fortunately, we don't have to go that length in
government today but clearly the ability to dispense
rewards or awards is necessary. Likewise, the ability to
discipline without a blizzard of paperwork would
dramatically improve management. Constance Horner,
formerly director of the Office of Personnel Management of
the Federal Government has observed:
[Flederal managers have little discretion to use pay to reward and
retain good employees. As a rule superior performance goes
unrewarded with better pay. Nor does promotion come more
swiftly to workers who show superior commitment and talent.
Status on the basis of seniority is the dominant ethos of the civil
service administration.15
She goes on to say,
[Mlanagers can't decide how many people to hire, for what jobs,
at what salary levels ... it would be much better if senior
managers could get their appropriated budgets and decide how
many people to hire at what pay level to get the job done.16
Paperwork in the federal government consumes endless
hours to administer a system that has more than 700
occupations, 18 grades and 10 steps a grade. Again,
Constance Horner observes:
[T]here are 74 pages of rules on how much to pay a secretary.
Taking disciplinary action means coping with protracted and
complex appeal procedures, including agency appeals, union
negotiated arbitration, EEOC determinations, and the federal
courts. Thele is ceasekas disputation 17
It isn't that government hasn't tried to loosen up their civil
service systems. They have. But with a growing tax base,
they had other, less controversial, options. We can avoid
the painful task of taking on our own employee
organizations who generally resist reform. But the new
world of public policy must get its new money out of our
old inefficiencies. And this is clearly one of them
INSTITUTIONAL REFORM
New resources can be found in increasing the efficiency
and effectiveness of existing institutions. America is
wasting too marry resources on inefficient and ineffective
institutions. Our legal system adds too many costs to our
goods and services and our health care system is
stunningly inefficient. To become again a competitive
nation we shall have to examine all our institutions. We
must reduce the "transactional costs" of everything we do
in America.
Government is going to have to play a role in reducing
the "transactional costs" on American society. We cannot
continue to allow our institutions to impose such large
transactional costs on American goods and services. We are
in the midst of a new world of international competition.
To use an Olympic metaphor, I suggest that all the world's
nations are lined up at the starting line in a race for the
world's wealth. The race is to see who will win the
economic gold medal and have the world's strongest
economy. One runner has a Japanese flag on his back, one a
German flag, and one of the runners has an American flag
on his back. On the back of the American runner we are
heaping among the highest wages in the industrialized
world, the highest health care costs in the industrialized
world, the highest insurance rates in the industrialized
world, the highest litigation costs in the industrialized
world, the highest rate of alcohol and drug abuse among
its workers, and the highest number of functional
illiterates. This cannot continue. We must look to increasing
the efficiency and effectiveness of all our institutions.
HEALTH CARE
No one,spends more money on health care than America,
yet American males are 15th in world life expectancy and
American females are eighth in world life expectancy We
are 20th in infant mortality. Twenty six nations have better
cardiovascular health With 12 percent of our GNP going to
health care with such modest results, this is clearly an area
that needs close scrutiny and increased efficiency 18
Health cane in America is growing over two times the rate
of inflation. When 1 was in high school our nation spent on
health care 45 percent of what we spent on education.
Today we spend twice as much. Doctors are our highest
paid professionals and teachers are our lowest paid
professionals. In most American communities new and
L itif!'r,i 21 ' 1
often superfluous hospitals sit cheek to jowl to old and
inadequate schools. We are investing our limited resources
in the wrong places. Health care is an emotional magnet
Health Insurance
Rate of Uncovered Population by Age -Group
1985
20
L%tdw ZS 25 to" 43 to N Ory 65
AV Gmup
Source: Peter Peterson and Neil Howe. On Bormwed Tune (San
Francisco: Institute for Contemporary Studies, 1988), p. 203.
that pulls resources into the system that are desperately
needed elsewhere. We will not remain a competitive nation
by overtreating our sick and undereduating our children.
Now, no trees grow to the sky and no segment of our
budget an continue to grow at twice the rate of inflation.
The hard choices in health are are not behind us — they
are ahead of us. Health are is a fiscal black hole into which
we can pour unlimited resources.
This is a very complicated area. It is fraught with ethical
dilemmas.
One area where we over -expend health care dollars is the
area of death and dying. We spend W billion a year on
people in the last six months of their lives while we are not
giving pregnant women prenatal are and not vaccinating
our children.
We are simply not rich enough as a society for each one of
us to take $100,000 or $200,000 of our kid's limited
resources as we are on our way out the door.
We talk about the "right to die" as if we have a right to
refuse. My research in this area has discovered the amazing
fact that worldwide — the death rate is one per person. We
must recognize that often the best thing to do in many
instances — is to do nothing. "They also serve who only
stand and wait."
Shakespeare said it so well: "We all owe God a death."
We must better recognize that many of the machines and
procedures we have invented don't cure but merely
prolong dying. Too often the legal system and medical
education force us to use these machines when other, much
more cost effective procedures in the area of basic health
care are going unmet. In a strange way "invention has
become the mother of necessity" for many of our Faustian
machines. "Can do" has become "must do" — even if it
:Z - s- 5 -
means using resources that could buy far more health
elsewhere in the system. Money desperately needed at the
start of life is being wasted at the end of life.
The essence of the dilemma of health care, however, is
that we have invented more health care than we as a
society can afford. No matter how "efficient" we get, no
matter if we adopt the Canadian or the English system, we
will soon find that infinite medical needs have run into
finite resources.
We must have the maturity to recognize that we can't give
"presidential health care" (as Victor Fuchs put it) to all
Americans. We can do a lot with 11/2 billion dollars a day,
but we can't do everything for everybody.
This will require hard choices. Oregon serves as an
example of "thinking in different terns." In 1986, the Oregon
Legislature decided to stop funding transplants (except
kidneys) and transfer the money, instead, to maternal and
child health. They decided that basic health care for many
would buy more health for Oregon than high technology
medicine for a few. America can't pay for everything that
medical science has invented. We shall painfully but
inevitably have to establish priorities. We can fund prenatal
pre for pregnant women out of the money we now spend
less efficiently in other parts of the health care system.19
Medicare and Medicaid have averaged 19 percent growth
a year since their inception Clearly we cannot continue to
fund them at historical rates. They cost the federal and
Federal Benefit Outlays per Elderly Person
Fiscal Years 19W - 86
10000
sm
6000
4000
2000
aso "71 caw tsst
Neal YOU
Source: Peter Peterson and Neil Howe. On Borrmed Tune (San
Francisco: Institute for Contemporary Studies, 1988), p. 154.
state government $132 billion in 1988 and Medicare is one
recession away from bankruptcy. Priorities are going to
have to be set.
If we only brought our percentage spent on health care (12
percent) down to the Canadian percentage (9 percent) we
would free up $100 billion 20
We painfully must start to maximize the health of our
society and not rnaximize the health are delivered to every
individual. We are going too many things expensively at
the margin while other — more cost effective — strategies
rw ..... ? w T 1
RM
go unfunded. A world of limited resources asks "How do
we buy the most health for America with our restricted
funds?" When we start to ask that question we will find
(as other countries have found) that we can give more
people better health for less money.
LEGAL SYSTEM
That brings us to the legal system. There has been an
explosive growth in the number of lawyers and amount of
litigation in America. With five percent of the world's
population we have two thirds of the world's lawyers and
by far most of the world's litigation.21 The legal system is
imposing staggering transactional costs on American
business and industry; costs of insurance and lawyers
directly, but also the indirect costs of lost productivity of
American management.
The full costs of the legal system in medicine are
staggering. Every time an American goes to the doctor he
or she is over -tested, over -X-rayed, over -diagnosed, over
tabbed, not for medical reasons but for defensive medicine
reasons. Lawyers have both costs and benefits to our
society, but the costs are becoming very heavy.
Our society has many options to reduce the costs of
litigation and reduce the costs of dispute resolution. We
don't need more judges, we need systems that generate
fewer lawsuits. We don't need more new courtrooms, we
need more streamlined procedures.
When a plane crashes in Japan, the whole matter is
cleared up in about three weeks; in the United States it
goes on for years and makes lawyers rich. Clearly, we do
not have an efficient system for resolving our disputes.
It is not the legal system, per se, but the over -expanded
role it plays in both the public and private sector. It works
synergistically with other inefficient systems. Resources for
the Future, for instance, estimates that 60 percent of all
money being spent on Superfund-related activities is going
to the law firms and consultants who represent
"potentially responsible parties," and to feasibility studies
and other non -clean up activities. Clearly, the law should
not shoulder all this blame, but it contributes to the absurd
misappropriation of our limited funds. It also stifles our
entrepreneurship.
A survey by the Conference Board found that "47 percent
of U.S. manufacturers withdrew products from markets for
liability reasons. In addition, 39 percent decided against
introducing some new products and 25 percent
discontinued some form of new product research." This in
a nation which has been steadily losing market share in
virtually everything to our international competitors -22
Simply put, it is my opinion that excess is the enemy of
any institution. One of the big challenges of government is
to de -lawyer society. There are a number of things that we
can do; study alternate dispute resolution, reduce the
number of class action suits, adopt comparative
negligence, cure the abuse in the discovery system,
simplify jury instructions, limit pain and suffering awards,
give some additional protection to product liability, reduce
punitive damages, and require losing parties to pay legal
fees if the suit is deemed not legally justified.
I would go further. I wonder why we need a jury trial in
a civil case. We are the only country in the world that has a
Ratio of Tort Costs to Gross Domestic Product
Includes personal
9
liability, property
damage, product
liability,
a
malp ce
v 2
E
(1986 )
•
a
•
c
•
•
•
• c
e
ac
-40
Source. "F.owmw Trends," Busiam Wads 11/6/89, p. 34; citing
Tillinghast.
jury trial in a civil case. F. Lee Bailey has stated, "Every
Democratic nation, including our model, Great Britain, has
given up the right to a jury trial on most civil lawsuits.
Were we to imitate them we might see substantial reform,
yet we continue to expend tremendous amounts of effort
and money in preserving a procedural nicety which no
longer insures a fair and independent accounting. Juries,
for instance, are helpless to decide in cases which call for
expert witnesses and technical explanations. Often, the jury
selection process, because it calls for time commitments
away from one's work, discriminates against the most
qualified candidates "b
He goes on to say, "Lawyers are not the ones to remedy
the serious problems which plague our legal system; it is
simply too lucrative in its present disarray. Partners in
major law firms earn at least one or two million dollars,
and for relatively little work"24
We must become better problem solvers and less
adversarial. Finding an equitable solution should be more
important than winning. Senator Everett Dirksen once said
it so well: n he oil can is mightier than the sword."
Ultimately it is not companies that compete but nations
that compete. Countries with inefficient institutions add
overhead to goods and services that make them
uncompetitive. These systems have to be improved for
reasons of international competitiveness and because it is a
new source of funds for the future.
SUNCAARY
In summary, we are rapidly careening into a brave new
world of public policy — but, like von Clausewitz' general,
we are fighting the last wars.
�; , n gip,_!
We still think in terms of creating social justice by
spending the yearly growth dividend produced by a
phenomenally productive economy — yet the halcyon
days of the 1960s and 1970s are over and we face a new
international marketplace, as the world's largest debtor
nation and with the industrial world's lowest rate of
productivity growth. We must start to turn our attention
from dividing a growing pie to making that pie grow. But
we must also think creatively about distributing the
existing pie.
A just society can no longer be created by merely
spending new money. There is some new money, but not
much and that is heavily mortgaged. The challenge of this
Brave New World of public policy is to reexamine some of
our historic assumptions, to reallocate some of our existing
resources to meet new needs — to fund our new
inadequacies out of our old excesses.
The new world of public policy will be:
• A world of trade-offs.
• A world where budgeting not by addition, but by
substitution and even subtraction.
• A world where every dollar is examined for its
"opportunity cost."
• A world of "cost- benefit ratios."
• A world where "need" alone is insufficient justification
for new spending.
• A world where every societal risk can not be protected
against.
• A world of two-tiered system where government will
provide certain basic services and those with money can
buy enrichment of those services. The fight of the
compassionate will be to raise that level of basic service to
as high a level as possible.
• A world asks not only "what do we need?" but also
"what can we afford?"
• A world that will have to substitute imagination for
resources. We will stop asking "how much more money
does our existing system need"?, and more "how can we
redesign our existing systems to use existing funds more
efficiently?" A world where new imagination and
creativity are often a substitute for new funds.
• A world that is counter -intuitive, where we can have
better health care by dosing hospitals, better justice by
• b t h' her education b
training fewer lawyers, et es ig y
fewer(but better) colleges; better government by spending
• A world that is counter -intuitive, where we can have
better health care by closing hospitals, better justice by
training fewer lawyers; better higher education by
fewer(but better) colleges; better government by spending
less money to elect politicians to office.
• A world were "rights and privileges" are better balanced
by "duties and responsibilities." A world which truly asks
-what you can do for your country."25
One of the secrets of modern day societies is to maximize
capital where it can do the most good and where it is most
needed. The Japanese almost totally stopped shipbuilding
and transferred those resources and workers to other
higher value added industries. They have factories that
they assume will be obsolete every few years and they tear
them down and build new or different wealth creating
entities. One key to survival in the new international
marketplace is the flexibility and speed of transferring
workers and both public and private capital from one use
to a higher use. The future belongs to the efficient and the
flexible. If a society does not produce enough new wealth
to meet new needs, it muht, however politically painful,
reprioritize.
What is ultimately at stake here is not merely our
standard of living but our entire economic and political
system. No great nation is forever. Nations rise and nations
fall. Sometimes it is necessary to call on citizens to
discipline, to sacrifice, to take less, to stop thinking only of
rights and privileges and to start thinking of duties and
responsibilities. No nation can forever distribute the spoils
of a wealthy continent and past glory. At some point in
every nation's history it becomes reality time. We have to
start asking "what we can do for our country." That time is
now. We must rebuild our nation or stand in the judgment
of history that we let our nation's greatness slip.
To do that, we must start to " bink in different terms."
Rickard D. Lamar is director of the Center for Public
Polio and Contemporary Issues, University of Denver. He
is also holds of the Leo Block Chair and an instructor in
the Public Affairs Program.
cal JJ�
ENDNOTES
1 Congressman Jim R. Jones states "...at the 1950s growth rate,
real national income per worker doubles in only 25 years. At the
1980s growth rate, it takes 175 years." The Geywational journal,
Vol. II, No. 1, 4/30/89, p. 41; citing McCracken, Paul. The Wall
Street journal, 1/16/89.
2 The growth rate of public spending during the last two-thirds
of the 20th century cannot be maintained. In current dollars,
federal, state and local expenditures have grown from $10 billion
in 1929 to $1.5 trillion in 1987. Even allowing for population
growth and inflation, per capita expenditures have risen 1,000
percent. The federal government has been borrowing
approximately 15 cents out of every dollar it spends just to meet
current demands. Public needs are rising faster than our
anticipated economy can support.
State and local governments face the same political reality as the
federal government. Since Proposition 13 and the "tax revolt" of
the late 1970s, tax revenues have declined as a percentage of state
personal income. The difference has been made up with non -tax
revenues such as user fees, lotteries and special assessments.
However, unlike sales or income taxes, revenue from lotteries and
user fees does not necessarily increase as personal income
increases.
These revenue sources have very limited growth potential. For
the most part, they are simply tax substitution revenues. Services
that were previously supported with tax revenues are put on a fee
basis. In some cases lottery revenues have declined as the novelty
wore off. These measures bought us time but did not solve the
problem of inadequate revenues.
The conflict between arithmetically increasing revenues and
geometrically increasing expenditures is complicated by a change
in the composition of government spending. The change is most
apparent at the federal level. In the past two decades federal
investment in transportation, education and public health has
declined while direct payments to individuals have ballooned.
Long-term investment in economic infrastructure and in human
capital by the federal government has declined below 1977 levels.
At the same time the proportion of federal aid to state and local
governments earmarked for direct payments to individuals has
grown from 33 percent in 1975 to 52 percent in 1988.
This is not meant to demean direct payments to individuals. We
have to maintain a social safety net, and these payments have
broader social benefits. Medicaid improves the long term health
and productivity of children and adults. Income maintenance
programs help people through difficult times. But, when we
reduce public health, environmental and educational programs
while funding for income maintenance programs continues to rise
dramatically, we have to ask whether we can do better. We have
to start to ask harder questions.
The Cato Institute does raise an important point on current
federal subsidies to state and local governments:
"Yet transferring funds from a government drowning in red ink
to governments that collectively run a surplus — roughly $55
billion in 1987 and $40 billion in 1988 — makes no sense even if
the projects are good. The per capita debt of the federal
government is nearly three times that of local jurisdictions. Even
more important, intergovernmental aid causes jurisdictions to
undertake projects that they would not undertake if they had to
foot the bills."
Cato Policy Report, Nov./Dec.1989, Vol. M, No. 6, p.1.
3 Senator Patrick Moynihan. "Why America Needs a Family
Policy," The Generational Journal, Vol.1 No. 2, 7/15/88, p. 94.
=
4 Dychtwald, Ken. Age Wave (Los Angeles: Jeremy P. Tarcher,
Inc., 1989), p. 67.
5 Pete Peterson and Neil Howe. On Borrowed Time (San Francisco:
Institute for Contemporary Studies, 1988), p. 269.
The Council on Competitiveness, in their publication
"Reclaiming the American Dream," stated, in recommending
percentage of social security benefits taxed increase from 50 to 85
percent, "[E)conomists estimate that, for an average beneficiary
over his or her lifetime, 85 percent of Social Security benefits
represent income transfer from the government and only 15
percent represent what was actually contributed by the
beneficiary. Thus, for most beneficiaries, taxing up to 85 percent
of benefits still avoids double taxation."
6 Pete Peterson and Neil Howe, op tit, p. 269.
7 Children's Defense Fund
8 National Issues Forum. "The Farm Crisis: Who's in Trouble,
How to Respond," p.19
9 Statistics provided by Larry Wall, Colorado Hospital
Association.
10 Note:
' About 30 percent of our nation's acute care hospitals are located
in the 50 largest SMAS. Those hospitals, representing 30 percent
of the U.S. total, contain about 45 percent of all the country s
acute inpatient beds. (These percentages were about the same in
1987 as they were in 1982.)
• In 1982 those 50 largest SMAS, with 30 percent of the hospitals,
and 45 percent of the beds, received approximately 50 percent of
the Part A Medicare dollars. (Increasing the number of SMAs to
the top 75 or 100 would naturally further increase the percentage
of Part A Medicare dollars and still not include any rural
hospitals or sole provider community hospitals.)
• Sixty percent of the 50 largest metropolitan areas are operating
under 70 percent of bed capacity.
• The average urban acute care hospital operates with fixed costs
of approximately 40 percent to 50 percent. (The lower the
occupancy level, the higher percentage of fixed cost.)
• Efforts to close beds within existing hospitals has an
insignificant affect on overall costs because the fixed costs of
operating the institution remains. The only meaningful cost
reduction occurs by closing whole hospitals.
• If the number of Medicare participating acute care hospitals in
each of these multi hospital metropolitan areas could be reduced
to such an extent that the remaining hospitals would increase
their average occupancy to 80-85 percent, the ongoing cost of
delivering acute inpatient care in those communities could be
reduced dramatically. (Projections are being developed.)
11 Congress has been adding not subtracting to the defense
budget. The democratic Congresses added a number of weapons
systems to the Pentagon budget. "We spent $1.5 billion for a plane
the Pentagon doesn't need, trying to keep Grumman alive —
wouldn't we be better off to take one tenth of that money to help
retrain the workers?" asks Lawrence Korb of Brookings. (cited in
Rocky Mountain News, 12/3/89, p. 7.) Rudolph G. Pennce, former
director of the Congressional Budget Office states, "We've been
cutting defense spending over the past few years, but we've been
doing so without really changing defense policy in any
fundamental sense. A large part of the savings have come from
just stretching out the purchase of weapons, and that"'s been very
inefficient and has raised unit costs (of individual weapons).
...we engage in a lot of procurement delays as opposed to
cancellations, and we really need cancellations." (cited in The
Washington Post National Weekly Edition, 12/ 4 -10/89, p. 8.)
12 In most and perhaps all states in the United States, higher
education is tetter understood as an economic development issue
rather than an educational issue. Clearly in public higher
education, many programs and institutions exist not because they
make educational sense but because no one has the political
courage to close them. There has only been one public college
closed in recent American history; that by then -Governor William
J. Janklow in South Dakotas, but throughout the rest of the United
States institutions that are not in the total educational scheme are
kept alive because they mean jobs to local citizens. Taking on
these issues, while politically difficult, is an additional resource of
flexibility revenue for the future.
It will not be easy. In the past three years, Colorado,
Connecticut, Mississippi, Missouri, Oklahoma and Texas have
defeated plans to merge or close public education institutions.
If the marketplace is any kind of determinant of a need for
higher education, clearly a large number of private college
closings have shown that the demand cannot sustain all of the
higher education that we built up in the United States in the
halcyon days of the baby boom in the 1960s. The Chronicle of
Higher Education (June 24, 1987) points out that, "during 1986,
when no public colleges were closed or merged, at least seven
private colleges and universities, not including proprietory
schools, closed and four others merged with other institutions.
But when the existence of higher education institutions depends
not on the market, but on political power, a vastly different story
emerges.-
"You
merges""You can never underestimate the emotion, power, and influence
of local groups that protest closure," laments Mark Sullivan, who
wrote his doctors thesis for Harvard University on the attempted
closing of the University of Connecticut's Torrington Campus,
and is now Vice President for Administrative Affairs at Southern
Connecticut State University.
The Chronicle for Higher Education quotes Chester E. Finn, Jr.,
former U.S. Assistant Secretary of Education for Educational
Research and Improvement: "my hypothesis is that, in most
states, if they are allowed to speak privately, knowledgeable
persons will tell you the names of public institutions that have
virtually no reason to exist other than that influential persons will
not let them die... Even if they fail to attract a sufficient number
of interested customers, they are nevertheless maintained in
perpetuity by their legislators.
"But these redundant and superfluous institutions are clearly a
source of re -prioritized dollars."
13 The Chronicle of Higher Education, 6/24/87, p.1.
14 Donald E. Fouts. 'Tuition Policy and Minority Access," a paper
presented at the Futures Project Opening Conference, 5/ 4 - 7/88,
Chicago, Il., p.1.
15 Horner, Constance. "Beyond Mr. Cradgrind," Policy Review, p.
34
16 [bid.
17 Ibid.
18 Dorothy Rice, Dorothy. "Do We Get Full Value for our Health
Dollar?", Hospitals, 3/20/88.
19 But let's look at what California did at the same time.
California voted to pay for transplants, then one week later voted
to remove 270,000 low income people from Medical. They
decided, in essence, to pay for high technology medicine for a few
at the expense of basic health care for the many.
Which state, then, best asked itself "how do we take limited
resources and buy the most health for the most people?" Which
state tried to maximize limited resources? I suggest it clearly was
Oregon.
Every state has large numbers of medically indigent people
unserved. They are real people with real problems. Oregon
attempted to weigh these people's basic health needs against
other programs for which the state paid. They recognized that
the money they paid for transplants for a few people could buy
more health care elsewhere, providing basic low technology
services to people not at that time covered.
20 Chrysler figures.
21 Dr. Eugene Grant. "A Conversation with Grant," Quality,
March 1984, p. 15.
22 Priest, George. "How to Control Liability Costs," Fortune,
5/24/89, p. 323.
23 F. Lee Bailey. 'The Defense Never Rests," Imprimis, Vol. 16
No. 8, August 1987, p. 2.
24 Ibid.
25Mr. King, City Manager of Palm Springs, in a stimulating
speech to the 42nd Annual Kansas City Management Conference
on April 26,1989 asked:
"Are we dealing with thetaxpayer or the ratepayer? The
importance of the distinction costes home when we reflect on the
type of dinner or cocktails or for dinner or both. There are two
ways you can structure this get-together tonight. One will be to
agree beforehand that you all will pay precisely for what you
consume. The other is, and this will probably be your choice, to
split the bill evenly after you have your drinks and your dinner.
What are the consequences of this? They are fairly obvious when
we think about it. If the latter approach is chosen, I would mon:
likely have more than one drink; I would definitely have the
lobster or the steak instead of the chicken. And so would you, and
so will you, and so do we."
He further argued that government was going to have to move
from supply management to demand management:
"...government at all levels is not properly managing the demand
for governmental services, for products, for natural resources and
consequently, we are over consuming them." He summed up his
concept of "demand manageatent.-
• Understanding the difference between treatment and
prevention.
• Promoting full coat pricing.
• Differentiating between the nate-payer and the taxpayer.
• Using the price system wherever possible.
• Treating pollution as an tmcaptured resource.
• Understanding the law of diminishing returns.
• Implementing the privitization of costs.
• Promoting that a barrel of oil saved is the same as a barrel of oil
produced.
Dealing with the "God is dead" mentality.
• Protecting the poor without subsidizing the rich.
Using technology to make life better and less expensive versus
longer and more expensive.
• Helping to host and manage cocktail parties which allocate the
costs correctly.
Cim JUN L ' i i
1991 LMC Conference S
"Building Productive Relationships"
Theatre
ANDREA MOLBERG, PH.D. 9:00 a.m. - 12:00 noon, Friday
Licensed Consulting Psychologist
.,
BUILDING PRODUCTIVE RELATIONSHIPS:
Personal and Professional
C,'X1 JUN 21 '� i
P.O. Box 5901, Rochester, Minnesota 55903
(507) 365-8043
Gim JUN 21 '91 r
FINISHED FILES ARE THE RE—
SULT OF YEARS OF SCIENTIF—
IC STUDY COMBINED WITH THE
EXPERIENCE OF MANY YEARS.
= s -
cim Jul:%
FOUR FRAMES OF REFERENCE
Level 4: We are learning & friendly - Others are learning & friendly
There are few, if any, absolutely right or wrong answers.
No human has yet found the "right" way for all things.
We're all constantly learning, growing, and trying our best.
We try to listen to each other's points of view so we can grow,
develop, and change together - even if it's in different directions.
Ask open questions, Listen, Discuss, then Te7'1
Foster interdependence
Level 3: We are right & friendly - Others are right and friendly
Other people have points of view, too. They may be right, but
I'll do it my way and they can do it their way. If they work
for me or are in a relationship with me, they must do it my way.
Tell, Act independently
Level 2: We are right & friendly - Others are wrong & misquided
I have the truth and other people will find it out when they
have the benefit of my superior background, experience, and
decision making ability.
Tell, Ask patronizing questions, Ask loaded questions
Level 1: We are right & friendly - Others are wrong & hostile
I have the truth and those who disagree with me are stupid.
I'll get angry, yell, and even hit until people agree with me.
Ye11, Throw, Withdraw
C06 JUN a i
RELATIONSHIP PRINCIPLES
What makes a relationship attractive to us? Why do we enjoy relating
to some people and dislike interacting with others?
Using a wide variety of research approaches, social psychologists have
repeatedly found four major relationship principles:
1. Reciprocal Liking
2. Similarity
3. Familiarity
4. Proximity
Relationship principles that appear often but not consistently
include:
5. Attractiveness
6. Competence
7. Complementariness
Good, positive relationships are pleasant and rewarding for those
involved.
GIM JUN 1
STRATEGIES FOR ENHANCING RELATIONSHIPS:
"Friendship Factors"
1. Make relationships a priority.
When you consider a relationship (or group) important, you
give it what it needs -- time, attention, and energy. Good
relationships require a serious investment.
2. Be open.
openness leads to openness, so don't hide behind a role or a
wall. Let others get to know you.
3. Spread compliments.
Instead of being quick to criticize and judge, be quick to
offer praise. Make an effort to catch someone doing
something right.
4. Demonstrate carina-
-
Giving compliments enhances relationships, but actions do
speak louder than words. Do things that show you care.
Take the first step.
5. Show respect and acceptance.
Another way to show liking is to accept people as they are.
Avoid criticizing differences. Try to see their side, then
they will be more willing to see yours.
See Alan McGinnis' The Friendship Factor, Augsburg Publishing, 1979.
ci,lo Juf� 2-1 ,
HOW BUILDING DEPTH OR STRENGTH
INTO RELATIONSHIPS WORKS
Feel good most of the time
about each other. Feel good when
interacting with each other.
which increases good
feelings and decreases
loneliness)
1. What two people do together:
The more physically & mentally active,
the better.
2. When the two do these things only with
each other, not with others, that is more
strength -building.
3. You do something to please the other,
regardless of what the other is doing.
4. Talk non -critically - laugh a lot.
5. Always search for ways to find alternative
solutions (including the ability to handle
anger and upsets).
WAYS TO BUILD STRENGTH
which develops
Confidence. i n self and in the
relationship. This creates more
willingness to commit one's self
to working at the relationship.
You feel you can make friends
and enjoy being with people.
RELATIONAL STRENGTH - THE ABILITY TO HANDLE
THE RELATIONSHIP SUCCESSFULLY WHEN STRESS
AND PROBLEMS ARISE.
Adapted from Edward Ford & Robert Zorn's Why RP IonPIv?. 147;
which builds
61M JUIN 21
BUILDING COOPERATION -- DEVELOPING HUMAN RELATIONS
Check your common courtesies to others., i.e., do you greet
people in the morning, say hello in the halls, say thank you,
especially with lower status people?
Keep a calendar of birthdays, etc., and recognize people on
significant dates through comments or sending cards or notes.
Try "management by walking around," i.e., frequently get out in
the work area and see what is going on.
Do not allow yourself to become so busy or self-centered that you
fail to notice the needs and concerns of others.
Look for small opportunities to build acquaintances with
team members (coffee, lunch, etc.).
Praise co-workers' performance. Tell them and others that you
are proud to be part of such a team.
Participate in social or recreational activities with your team.
Get to know them outside the workplace.
Smile more!
Apologize to those you hurt, ignore, or "step on"
unintentionally.
Pay more attention to people ... even in small ways.
Improve your eye contact.
Be aware of when co-workers are hurting in their personal life --
death, illness,etc.--and express your interest and concern in
words, by a visit, or with a gift/flowers.
Try to be less judgmental and evaluative.
When appropriate, make your interactions more informal. (Choose
an informal setting, word choice, body posture, etc.)
Temper your directives to others with statements that acknowledge
that you hear and understand their comments.
Make attempts to learn about others by asking them about their
personal lives.
Learn to be less abrasive by confronting issues instead of
people.
;its J�I� ; `
BUILDING COOPERATION -- DEVELOPING HUMAN RELATIONS
continued
Make sure you are not giving off signals of manipulation or
somehow creating a climate of mistrust around you. Especially,
don't use information to your advantage.
Ask if you can help when you see a colleague "in a bind" on a
project or assignment.
Be willing to take the ideas of your team to the next higher
level and support them enthusiastically. Give credit where
credit is due.
Meet with subordinates to show them how their contributions
support the goals of the organization.
Take time to listen to the joys and concerns of your subordinates
in one-to-one conversations.
"Go to bat" for your team (or a team member) when a good idea has
been rejected or overlooked.
Be supportive of others' efforts to try new ideas and test new
talents.
Avoid correcting minor faults or problems until relationships are
stronger.
Get your team together regularly.
Listen without interrupting. Summarize the other's view before
Presenting your own.
Show respect for each team member as a competent individual.
Encourage quiet members to contribute, and support them when they
do.
Recognize and encourage members' efforts to improve teamwork.
Make others feel important.
See PDI's Improving Managerial Effectiveness, 1984, and Vanpak
Software Strategies, Inc.'s Participative Management Skills, 1983.
•-`' t,
-=.s
STRATEGIES FOR ENHANCING RELATIONSHIPS:
"Seven Steps to Cohesiveness'
To develop team relationships, Bormann and Bormann suggest the following:
1 Identify your group. Do things with your team as a whole. Give
your group a name or slogan (e.g., "The Number Crunchers",
"Going -for -Blue Birds"). Why do you think teams have uniforms,
mascots, and colors?
2 Build a group tradition. Do things together, and then reminisce
about things you did in the past as a team. Bring up ;in" jokes and
old stories.
3. Stress team work. Encourage the attitude of "I don't care if I
star as long as we win." Focus on the group succeeding rather than on
which team member gets the credit. Point out that team members need
each other. Show solidarity. Look for opportunities to agree.
4 Get the group to recognize good work. Praise important
contributions. Reward team playing efforts.
5 Set clear, attainablegoals. When there is a clear target, team
members start heading in the same direction. Specific goals help you
know where you're going, how far you've come, and when you can
celebrate.
6. Give GROUP rewards. Give the entire team a common reward (e.g.,
lunch) for reaching its goal. To build a team you don't need to
eliminate individual incentives, just be sure to provide group
incentives, too.
7 Treat people like people, not machines. Be sensitive to team
members' changing needs. Resistance occurs when people's needs and
desires are ignored.
See Bormann and Bormann's Small Group Communication, Burgess Publishing,
1972.
Crim JA 2 l
AVOID TRIGGERING DEFENSIVENESS
One of the major barriers to communication is defensiveness. When people
are defensive, they are too busy protecting themselves to listen or
understand.
In his classic article, Jack Gibb described the behaviors and styles which
trigger defensiveness and those more likely to create a supportive,
non -defensive climate:
Defensive Arousing
1. Evaluation
2. Control
3. Strategy
4. Neutrality
5. Superiority
6. Certainty
S
Defensive Reducing
1. Description
2. Problem Oriented
(3, 5c,..,., . , '--x
3. -Spey-.1
4. Empathy
5. Equality
6. Provisionalism
Remember that it is easier to avoid defensiveness than it is to reduce it.
Communicate with care.
CIM x1v L '
LP
Reconstruction Update
A bulletin from the City of Plymouth, June 21, 1991, Number 1
Street reconstruction will begin soon in your area. To keep you up-to-date on the progress, the City will periodically
send you Updates. We hope that this information minimizes the inconvenience caused by this project
Phase I of the 1991 Street Reconstruction Program includes Districts 4 and 11 and District 7. Each Update will report
on progress by district
Types of Work
The work done on each street will vary according to its condition. However, most streets will be either totally
reconstructed or receive less extensive overlay improvements. Included in the project is repair and replacement of
storm sewer pipe as needed.
Total reconstruction consists of:
• Remove all existing bituminous;
• Remove and replace poor subgrade materials;
• Install drain tile where necessary;
• Repair poor concrete curb and gutter to improve drainage; and
• Complete new, final bituminous surface.
The overlay improvements streets consist of.
• Mill 1-1/2 inches of the existing bituminous;
• Fill cracks;
• Repair bituminous which has broken up;
• Repair concrete curb and gutter to improve drainage; and
• Resurface with bituminous overlay.
Areas of Work
Districts 4 and 11: Area south of Co. Rd. 9, east of Zachary Ln., north of 36th Ave., and west of Quaker Ln.
Construction in this area is scheduled to begin Tues., June 25. Work will begin on the Trenton Ln. cul-de-sac south
of 39th.
Streets scheduled for overlay improvement are:
• Yorktown Ln., north of 39th Ave.
• 38th Place, north and south of 39th Ave.
• Union Terrace Way, west of Union Terrace Ln.
• 37th Place cul-de-sac, east of Union Terrace Ln.
• Union Terrace Crt. cul-de-sac, west of Union Terrace Ln.
• Wellington Court cul-de-sac, east of Wellington Ln.
yE" Juli
• 36th Place cul-de-sac, east of Wellington Ln.
• 38th Ave. N. from Union Terrace Ln. to five lots west of Wellington Ln.
Streets that are scheduled for total reconstruction:
• 39th Ave. N. from Yorktown Ln. to Saratoga Ln.
• Trenton Ln., cul-de-sac, south of 39th.
• Wellington Ln. from 36th Ave. to 38th Ave. N.
• Union Terrace Ln. from 36th Ave. N. to 39th Ave. N.
• Trenton Ln. and Saratoga Ln., north of 36th Ave. N.
• Ximinies Ln. from Old Rockford Rd. to approximately two lots south of 41 st Ave.
• Revere Ln. from Old Rockford Rd., to two lots south of Old Rockford Rd.
District 7:
Area east of Co. Rd. 101, north of the Plymouth south municipal limits, and south of Luce Line Trail, and west of
Gleason Lake. The contractor is tentatively scheduled to begin in this area July 8.
The following streets will be totally reconstructed:
• All of Inland Ln. except the south cul-de-sac.
• Holly Ln. from approximately 2nd Ave. to Inland Ln.
• A portion of Kimberly Ln. from 1 st Ave. to Kimberly Ln. cul-de-sac, and 1 st Ave. from approximately Jewel Ln.
to the Inland Ln. cul-de-sac.
All other streets within the Kingswood Farms subdivision which make up District 7 will be receiving a bituminous
overlay.
Completion
All major work except sodding and clean-up in these three areas is scheduled to be finished before school starts.
Contractor
The contractor for this project is C.S. McCrossan, Inc. The contractor is responsible for proper traffic control, signage
and overall project safety.
Driveway Access
Work of this magnitude is bound to cause some inconvenience. It is likely you may not be able to reach your driveway
at various times throughout construction. If your driveway will be inaccessible, the contractor will notify you in
advance.
Funding
The City will fund 70% of this project Benefiting property owners will be assessed the remaining 30%.
CIM JUti L ! 1 � 1
Caution
Because of construction activity and increased truck traffic, travel with caution. Please keep children way from the
construction area. Heavy equipment will be operated in the area and crews will be working with hot bituminous at
various times. Bituminous may be driven on within an hour after being laid. For your child's safety, please keep
him/her from walking on it until after it has cooled (four to eight hours, depending on weather conditions.)
The City, Short Elliot Hendrickson, and the contractor will try to minimize inconvenience during this project. We
appreciate your cooperation to help make this a safe and successful project
For More Information
If you have problems during construction, please contact
Todd Blank, Project Engineer
Dave Haugen, Resident Project Representative
490-2017
Sue Mason, Project Manager
Short Elliot Hendrickson, Inc.
490-2018
City Representatives
Dan Campbell or Dan Faulkner
City of Plymouth
550-5070
Stewart Krummen
C.S. McCrossan, Inc.
425-4167
Thanks for your patience!
%iii JUN G i
Parkers Lake Playfield
Update
A bulletin from the City of Plymouth, June 17, 1991, Number 1
The Plymouth City Council recently awarded the bid for construction of the Parkers Lake Playfield, Niagara Ln. and
Co. Rd. 6, to Shingobee Builders. The Council also approved construction of a second playfield, Bass Lake Playfield,
at 54th and Pineview Ln.
Because the Parkers Lake Playfield project is a large project that will affect your neighborhood, the City will
periodically send you Updates. Construction of the playfield is dependent upon many factors, including weather.
Therefore, the Updates will give you the best information we have at the time they are issued.
As soon as we have abetter idea of when construction will begin, we will send out another Update. That may be as
early as next week.
Overall Project
The Parkers Lake Playfield will include:
• Two soccer fields;
• Three baseball/softball fields;
• Four tennis courts;
• Two tot lots;
• Picnic grounds with picnic shelter; and
• Shelter building.
Tentative Timetable
Construction at Parkers Lake Playfield will likely start sometime in July. The contractor has 365 days to finish the
playfield. Substantial completion is expected by late November 1991. The playgrounds and tennis courts are
expected to be finished by Oct. 1991. Grass areas should be ready for use by the spring of 1993.
Construction Phases
• The first phase of construction will include site cleanup.
• Next crews will begin grading. They will strip off top soil and stock pile it on the site.
• Next they will "sculpt" the playfield surface to specified elevations. Then they will re -spread the top soil over the
sculpted surface.
• Finally, crews will build the shelter buildings, parking lot, tennis courts, playgrounds and trails.
GII : 41 I
Funding
The combined cost of the Parkers Lake and Bass lake Playfields is $2.8 million. Funding will come from the Public '
Improvement Revolving Fund, a reserve fund for major capital expenditures.
Caution
Children may find the construction site tempting. Please warn them to stay away from it. Heavy equipment and
uninstalled playground equipment will be on the site. In addition, crews will be trenching and working with hot
bituminous. Help us prevent accidents by keeping children and pets away from the construction sites at all times.
More Information
If you have any questions about this project, call Parks and Recreation Director Eric Blank at 550-5131.
Thanks for your patience!
I'i
M �
iii"; x 2 i
Bass Lake Playfield
Update
A bulletin from the City of Plymouth, June 17, 1991, Number 1
The Plymouth City Council recently awarded the bid for construction of the Bass Lake Playfield, 54th and Pineview
Ln., to Shingobee Builders. The Council also approved construction of a second playfield, Parkers Lake Playfield,
at Niagara Ln. and Co. Rd. 6
Because the Bass Lake Playfield project is a large project that will affect your neighborhood, the City will periodically
send you Updates. Construction of the playfield is dependent upon many factors, including weather. Therefore, the
Updates will give you the best information we have at the time they are issued.
As soon as we have a better idea of when construction will begin, we will send out another Update. That may be as
early as next week.
Overall Project
The Bass Lake Playfield will include:
• Soccer field;
• Hockey rink;
• Baseball field;
• Softball/baseball field;
• Four tennis courts;
• Tot lot;
• Picnic area;
• Shelter building;
• Basketball court; and
• Parking for 200 cars.
Tentative Timetable
Construction at Bass Lake Playfield will start in late June or early July. The contractor has 365 days to finish the
playfield. Substantial completion is expected by late November 1991. The playgrounds and tennis courts are
expected to be finished by Oct. 1991. Grass areas should be ready for use by the spring of 1993.
Construction Phases
The first phase of construction will include site cleanup.
Next crews will begin grading. They will strip off top soil and stock pile it on the site.
wP` ('1''\ �.•.-i'1 r. t -..r �,_�� I - . -J',ace to sp
Giro JUN. e 1 'S'I
• Finally, crews will build the shelter buildings, parking lot, tennis courts, playgrounds and trails.
Funding
The combined cost of the Bass lake and Parkers Lake Playfields is $2.8 million. Funding will come from the Public
Improvement Revolving Fund, a reserve fund for major capital expenditures.
Caution
Children may find the construction site tempting. Please warn them to stay away from it Heavy equipment and
uninstalled playground equipment will be on the site. In addition, crews will be trenching and working with hot
bituminous. Help us prevent accidents by keeping children and pets away from the construction sites at all times.
More Information
If you have any questions about this project, call Parks and Recreation Director Eric Blank at 550-5131.
.,
Thanks for your patience!
nim jUN 21 '9l
A
90
91
90
91
90
91
PLYMOUTH POLICE DEPARTMENT
MONTHLY REPORT
MONTH JAN -MAY 1991
MURDER
CSC
ROBBERY
ASSAULT
BURGLARY
THEFT
AUTO THEFT
ARSON
0
11
1
131
148
434
58
8
0
12
4
1 148
1 149
1 442
1 44
1 4
90
91
TOTALS 1990 791
1991 803 27.
CLASS II
1990
1991
FORGERY
COUNTERFEIT
FRAUD
HAR
COMM
STOLEN
PROPERTY
VANDALISM
SEX
OFF.
NARC
OFFENSES
FAM/CHILD
D.W.I.
LIO
LAW
DISORDERLY
CONDUCT
OTHER.
14
39
112
0
265
5
45
19
164
48
18
172
9
51
172
7
1 177
1 13
1 51
1 27
1 162
1 44
1 13
139
TOTALS 1990 901
1991 865 -47
CLASS III
FATAL
ACCIDENT
PERSONAL
INJURY
PROPERTY
DAMAGE
SNOWMOBILE
ACCIDENT
DROWNING
MEDICAL
EMERGENCY
SUICIDE
SUICIDE
ATTEMPTS
NATURAL
DEATH
ANIMAL
BITES
FIRE
0
57
343
0
0
419
0
12
13
26
144
0
58
1 373
1 0
1 0
1 428
3
1 7
1 19
1 28
105
TOTALS 1990 1014
1991 1021 1%
CLASS IV
DOMESTIC
ANIMAL
DETAIL
FALSE
ALARMS
LOCK
OUTS
ASSIST
OTHER
AGENCY
WARRANT
SERVED
TRAFFIC
DETAIL
SUSPICION
INFORMATION
MISSING
PERSON
LOST
FOUND
PUBLIC
NUISANCE
MISC
150
612
614
710
235
206
633
922
15
94
572
1064
130
630
601
755
255
194
567
794
16
78
526
998
TOTALS 1990 5938
1991 5544 -7%
HAZARDOUS VIOLATIONS 1990 1804 1991 1875 4%
NONHAZARDOUS VIOLATIONS 1990 2032 1991 2141 5%
CRIMINAL OFFENSES CLEARED 1990
26%
1991
18%
TOTAL NUMBER OF INCIDENTS 1990
8644
1991
8233 -57
odm JUN 21 'U 1
90
91
90
91
90
91
90
91
PLYMOUTH POLICE DEPARTMENT
MONTHLY REPORT
MONTH MAY 1991
CLASS I
MURDER
CSC
ROBBERY
ASSAULT
BURGLARY
THEFT
AUTO THEFT
ARSON
0
2
0
23
53
103
7
1
0
1 5
0
1 38
30
1 94
1 8
1 1
TOTALS 1990 189
1991 176 -7i
CLASS II
1990
1991
A
FORGERY
COUNTERFEIT
FRAUD
HAR
COMM
STOLEN
PROPERTY
VANDALISM
SEX
OFF,
NARC
OFFENSES
FAM/CHILD
D.W I
LID
LAW
DISORDERLY
CONDUCT
OTHER
2
8
24
0
75
1
7
5
36
15
5
34
4
13
28
5
41
1 3
10
3
46
13
2
32
TOTALS 1990 212
1991 200 -62
CLASS III
FATAL
ACCIDENT
PERSONAL
INJURY
PROPERTY
DAMAGE
SNOWMOBILE
ACCIDENT
DROWNING
MEDICAL
EMERGENCY
SUICIDE
SUICIDE
ATTEMPTS
NATURAL
DEATH
ANIMAL
BITES
FIRE
0
15
74
0
0
101
0
3
2
6
24
0
14
73
0
0
106
0
3
2
9
19
TOTALS 1990 225
1991 226
CLASS IV
TOTALS 1990 1326
1991 1321 -
HAZARDOUS VIOLATIONS 1990 453 1991 483 72
NONHAZARDOUS VIOLATIONS 1990 479 1991 535 122
CRIMINAL OFFENSES CLEARED 1990
242
1991
222
ASSIST
1952
1991
1923 -12
DOMESTIC
ANIMAL
DETAIL
FALSE
ALARMS
LOCK
OUTS
OTHER
AGENCY
WARRANT
SERVED
TRAFFIC
DETAIL
SUSPICION
INFORMATION
MISSING
PERSON
LOST
FOUND
PUBLIC
NUISANCE
MISC.
26
147
120
163
39
40
151
212
6
31
139
252
26
177
135
143
60
43
126
201
5
16
152
237
TOTALS 1990 1326
1991 1321 -
HAZARDOUS VIOLATIONS 1990 453 1991 483 72
NONHAZARDOUS VIOLATIONS 1990 479 1991 535 122
CRIMINAL OFFENSES CLEARED 1990
242
1991
222
TOTAL NUMBER OF INCIDENTS 1990
1952
1991
1923 -12
E
z
W
z
E
A
w
E
a
O
a
w
a
w
0
W
a
E
Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0
W O O V}V)V}O O V}NO O V?V)O V}V}V?V}V?V}V} II O
E OM HH 00 H II tD
N H V} V} N 1--1 Ln
M V} V} V? M II r
H LO N V)-
V)
}to O II
w
wa n
Q (n eir.-41--10.--1 00CDN�' 00000000000 II 00
E Q r-
aHw II
w�x 11
ca cn II
aaH ii
z II
MO.-IOM1--4wC>tDt-N1-40w1-4 m0rINwrn 11 d'
tD N N -4 N N 1--I 11 N
E
p II
E II
fJ) NM1--IONOOt-OOtf1NOOd�0000.--IOd' II 0)
W N O .-I .••I N II 0)
LO
a II
a 11
W � II
Q 1-1 r- O O 1--I M 1--I O tD N O 1--1 O e1- T-1 01 O 1--i 1--I 00 On II Ln
Lo N II N
w II
O U II
n
U I I
1 --IO
CD -<P 1-4OOCAMOd tD01--I000OM01--10HtD II
tD
0 0
cV d II
O
0o -
II
1-4
.-1 N
II
-40
I -1D00 - -<r M0111M0001--I'-INOOON1-4 11
%D
00
1--1 M '-I 1-"1 11
a)
N co
HH
1--1 O
OOOOOOtD1--I O t!"100000 t- OM001--1 Md' 11
tD
0 0
I N N 11
00
tD N
II
0 1--1
it
1--I O
re) 1-iONONOON01-•IOO1--4NN II
tD
O O
ItDCN00N
1-1 11
M
a acn w w w
to w z EA -1 w E-4 *4 V) U O z
c� UPOW UaUUw acnazo
z cnH>lwcnHw toaaH14W WWWP4
H 4EaazEU •aEaxUU) W W > W
a wzm9HxHc9EUE H OC4QHaHw
a Ewzo Ewr&4w w>x IX w 0 I
w OMWUWHLwz a c7 - A
XInzHIn aEo ZP44>4 x HA
AE cnvOw4U) Hcno43-cnaQHa
Cw-1cnaUaxHcnEa-1Cw7�cCx7xawCx1�QEx-1
�Eaal-1oE wcn HHHEaaov�a0
P=M=aZOMOWPxowx9CE9
Z a O E a U W W E Z E a D Z Z Z Z 1W D�
a4x0acnxacnHWWO""- -l" zz
Ln M
N
OmN1-4O
mr-r-LnO
m 1-4 .-i M N
ter
1-4 Ln CN wr O
01N01N0
m .-I
N
V1 -
a cn
�1 •• to
oU�a°
in - 0
>+ X U E-4
�wvi�"
Ora�10LO
t-3 u
CIM JUN 21 '91
Z \C)
GIM JUN �- 1 I
I
n
o 0 o O tl
o
W
00 0 o It
o
E-4
r -i O —4 O it
N
Ul H Ln II
H En
II
V?
E M
II
fn O
II
W a
II
W
O U)
'A N d N N
E p
-1 it
N
(�Hw
II
��m
n
n
zwcn
II
.�
aaH
II
rn
z
II
0)
r i
m Ul t- N 1-4 M .--1 t0
H N
�
�
E
O
E
••
O1 �' Ln N M N r•1 11
kD
N n
�r
Etwl�
z
w
E
0
O 1-1 N —1 Ln II
00
II
N
a
II
II
O
O U
II
04
II
W a
U
II
D W
a
w
a�
wEH
O
d' tD N M 11
a1
II
I
H
co �
II
a z
.-I N
II
r -I O
MO r-'1 N t1') r-1 11
O
II
I
N
N o0
II
a
4
r-1 r.i
II
O
Im
oLnT--iso
Dk
mrnM1.0N
O
(n
r -I N
M
r -I O
q co M -4 M II
O
V).
H
O O
1-4 II
M
E
t.0 N
II
�
O -4
I
I
O
GQ
1-1 O
r-1 M r-1 II
W)
Ui O
co l0 -W O
00
II
0)Ngr r- CN
E
O O
z
u
o
n
H
H O z
z FwFatt�
D
c�7 0E -40W U W U U W acnaZO
wwa
••
w
z LOH>4wcnHw xDDHacnzwwwa
U�
cn ••
w
1-+ 0P44ZEU ZE-4W Ufl:.7WW>W
�WE
a en
•• �
a WZM0HaHC7EUE HnHaHw
w
44 E
.,.��
O
a
a EWz0 ErX4PW nDcn�xa ,woc�ll'
W O 0 W U W H W Z a W(9Im
Ucn�O
w
.'c U) EO ZE-444 x Ho
(nHw
r -a
tx
of mv)U) Hcno
4>
o 0
4z
maw
OH,,.� muF
w
ww`;'acnUH Wlwwm=
�C7xDI�E��E
ua�
O
Ez� Uax cnE-40
IEG4a0U o
�E-i�4%�-+OE WW-
a
"HwHxoma40H4
Hxmxx�zoco
�
?mZ�E-4P
D+
aa0PMUW WEZPaDZZZZ�WDO
4
O 0m
9
E
P44W004WZP4M►"itl W0HHHH zz�
E
U4, E w
GIM JUN �- 1 I
I
PLYMOUTH PUBLIC SAFETY
ALARM REPORT
POLICE
FALSE ALARMS
PERMITS
1490
97
22
1991
105
31
CHANGE
+8.2 %
+40.9 %
FIRE
FALSE ALARMS
PERMITS
1440
31
12
1491
46
21
CHANGE
48.4 %
75 %
zoo
MAY 1991
MONTH
cad Juts 21 z -j ,
PLYMOUTH METROLINK SOUTHWEST
DAILY RIDERSHIP BY SERVICE TYPE
MAY 1991
COMMITTER REVERSE COMMUTER TOTAL SYSTEM
WEEK OF:
05/01 - 05/03
960
209
1169
05/06 - 05/10
1555
305
1860
05/13 - 05/17
1364
317
1681
05/20 - 05/24
1447
287
1734
05/28- 05/31
1233
m
1541
TOTAL:
6559
1387
7946
DAILY AVERAGE
RIDERSHIP 298 63 361
YEAR TO DATE
AVERAGE 328 63 391
METROLINK SOUTHWEST \`
DAILY RIDERSHIP AVERAGES BY MONTH
FOR CALENDAR YEARS 1984-1991
COMMUTER/
REVERSE COMMUTER
MONTH: 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991
January
330
307
351
429
433
496
427
432
February
310
292
350
394
426
461
420
404
March
307
311
338
397
418
467
417
377
April
301
295
354
365
408
405
364
381
May
295
298
332
350
392
388
367
361
June
276
314
349
358
409
362
372
July
277
297
328
345
361
356
360
August
266
292
328
345
377
376
352
September
275
322
354
348
396
383
407
October
276
312
384
365
430
441
398
November
271
311
396
398
437
433
389
December
---------
265
320
412
391
409
398
352
YEAR LONG
-------------------------------------------------------
AVERAGE
287
306
356
374
408
414
373
391
* Effective April 1, 1990 Plymouth Metrolink providers changed from
Medicine Lake Lines to Metropolitan Transit Commission. The
passenger numbers for Medicine Lake Lines for the period 1984 - 1989
do not reflect transfers, while the 1990 Medicine Lake Lines figures
includes transfers. Metropolitan Transit Commission figures reflect
all fares whether cash or convenience.
DAILY AVERAGE
RIDERSHIP
YEAR TO DATE
AVERAGE
= -� 0;,
PLYMOUTH METROLINK NORTHEAST
DAILY RIDERSHIP
MAY 1991
WEEK OF•
05/01
- 05/03
927
05/06-
05/10
1525
05/13
- 05/17
1595
05/20
- 05/24
1525
05/28
- 05/31
1186
June
TOTAL:
6758
307
314
DAILY RIDERSHIP AVERAGES BY MONTH
MONTH: 1990 1991
January
---
331
February
---
318
March
---
297
April
---
318
May
---
307
June
243
July
263
August
284
September
266
October
294
November
301
December
-------------------
278
-----
YEAR LONG
AVERAGE: 276 314
LI
--------------------
PLr'MOUTH DIAL -A -RIDE
--------------------
1990 MONTHLY COST SUMMARY
-------- Less Revenue ---------
Cash Coupons Value of Equals Subsidy/ Recoyry Total Rides! Service Milesi Miles!
Total Cost Fares SubsittedTransfrs TOTAL Deficit Passenger Pass. Ratio Hours Hour Miles Hour Pass.
----------- --------------------------------------
Jan-90 16538.38 2138.50 238.00 2376.50 14161.88 1,197 $6.45 14.41 606.75 2.7 17,235 21.36 7.84
Feb -90 15200.75 2161.50 173.00 2334.50 -12866.25 2,167 $5.94 15.4% 741.50 2.9 14,931 20.14 6.89
Mar -90 16107.67 2163.00 214.00 2377.00 -13730.87 2,190 $6.27 14.81 785.75 2.6 16,059 20.44 7.33
Apr -9U 15226.38 175:.75 278.i�i- 20:3.75 -13192.63 1,818 $7.26 13.41 725.75 2.5 15,073 20.77 8.29
Mav-90 16072.00 1618.00 400.00 20318.00 -14054.00 1.834 $7.66 12.6% 784.00 2.3 15,119 19.28 8.24
Jun -Jun -9016B81.75. 1905.6"i 342.00 :247.80 -14633.95 2,OB5 $7.02 13.31 623.50 2.5 15,819 19.21 7.59
Jul -go 17061.13 1821.5;, 258.00 2079.50 -14981.63 1,864 $8.04 12.21 832.25 2.2 154924 19.13 8.54
Aug -90 1837,.13 2116.20 242.00 2353.20 -16014.93 2,136 $7.50 12.81 896.25 2.4 16,325 18.21 7.64
Sep -90 1612.25 174.25 304.00 133.00 2177.25 -13946.00 1,963 $7.10 13.5% 786.50 2.5 14,991 19.06 7.64
Oct -90 1B601.70 1819.75 394.00 91.00 2304.75 -16296.95 2,142 $7.61 12.4% 907.40 2.4 16,414 1B.09 7.66
Nov -90 17384.00 184!!.25 302.0,:! 59.0ii 2201.25 -15182.75 1,963 $7.73 12.71 848.00 2.3 15,457 1B.23 7.67
Dec -90 180*04.13 2105.7. 2761.00 43.00 2424.70 -15579.43 2,144 $7.27 13.51 B78.25 2.4 15,679 17.85 7.31
Jan -91 18086.17 2135.65 354.00 114.00 2603.65 -15482.48 2,288 $6.17 14.41 882.25 2.6 17,321 19.63 7.57
Feb -91 16400.00 1777.00 366.00 .66.00 2209.00 -14191.00 1,985 $7.15 13.5% 800.00 2.5 14,948 18.69 7.53
Mar -91 17245.63 1927.75 358.00 79.00 2364.75-14BBO.BB 2,125 $7.00 13.71 841.25 2.5 15,241 18.12 7.17
Apr -91 17763.25 2028.05 449.00 61.00 2538.05 -15225.20 2,319 $6.57 14.3% 666.50 2.7 16,057 1B.53 6.92
hw ?l 17184.13 1966.55 523.00 92.00 2581.55 -14602.56 2,406 $6.07 15.01 638.25 2.9 16,057 19.16 6.67
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ---------------------
Accusulated
Totals 288253.60 33021.20 5471.00 738.00 39230.20 249023.40 35,626 $6.99 13.6% 14,044.15 2.5 268.650 19.13 7.54
CIM JUN 21 �j I
.�� ` C,;Ll
04 0Uh z 1 Z3
FLtYM%,11ir.
IF iF-
S!F-A SURINARY - l UIR OF
NY,
394£t
------
Ner'.-.:?=r
SBres ------
-------
N,Sdes --------
{ zr v
Lerd=_
: } }
Wider
.t
Se8.i or i
We
Ft i'
'tfYs
6i._
Re:vds
Iransf.
Lifter
6.•v'r
'"i'v'ci
Rep 1r
Btt,Uett
Lrt.t'trr..
1i;fAt.
Ilk' ies.
---------------
Fmirr
--------
{15i{t}i9}
`--
N
--'-------------
41.`=Ut
0.1,101
-------------------------------
1.Ut
3.90
0.1w
U.(i(i
---------
Q
}
----------------------------
A
4
{1
It
22:`=
=f2.'_:
0`s1Ulill i
1I
14.UQ
v.(!v
i`s.(W
2.00
0.00
iJ,OU
`s
!
3Q
Q
U
3U
2P
12% 1,t
411J0'1NI
i1
21.(ia
(1,(i(!
i.Us
10. Oki
0.{i4
0 O
3
2
31
(:
n
st
219
---------------
11.{f(i
--------
veone0?Y
--------
---
---
---------------
%$. "o
---------------
0' 1(i
-------------------------------
2$. U(i
-------------------------------
1 .. 0111
0. 00
01 Oct
---------
a
---------
3
----------------------------
105
-----------------------------
('f
0
11.1.r
W
---------------
--------------U.fU2i41
i6. `(;
kill, i 15 2 1
iU
ib.:=(tU.Ov,;.00f
t. 00
4.1 K,
Y.iti!
$
3
41
{]
U
41
is
ii. ir,
{t�•ii!lffi
i1
l .`.ti
(t.(<{!
4.tt(t
k;. 0-1.i
U,U(i
i.4'11
1
1
I!
fJ
U
22
1L4:;
1�,
(11!fL`'ir9Is
ti
YU.(iU
F(i.(tU
q. Oki
1.U':i
UI Ilk,
U. (i
J
}
:.1
!
:_}
224
---------------
--------
iD.uz=_'si=t.
---
---------------
1(t.:(i
------------------------------
ib.;%4
F{t.U!Ui.v(t
---------
-----------------------------
44
6C
_.
1.:i0
(.{i i
,{:Q
3':
b
`s{i
{iSt4_
.,
SC J'•%
'Z.0-Jfj
14
4
3i
'd
:!
,..
Z:h
1i..fv
(t.=J?i: •!f
!i
iC. ,?7
14. .':i
12.(i.tiif
{i. Silt
1
41r
(S
11
tib!
124
3[.e:V
s!s
4.(N.
(i.{i(t1.f':!
,.
}:
lf.
i;t
bb".
:h.,•.(t
St:<t':4'4f
.. �.
Jt ?i(%
5f.{1S:•
L'.
Li.SK!
Si.{fit
.Vt
.
h
4S
S
4ii
4{i
o ei',i
ai.t':1ci�'i
, _
'.!..
'1.i�{:
(•.fJ{!
(t.t}{''
ii.UU
b
}
..,
It
Ut
1b
1f(`•
3't.2:s
?t. t?Sr
Sir;Rt
St. all
)}
}
'31
{!
.!
:i
Y
F(G. 1.
r.i•lty:,
4t •.1.
•11r .••I
�tf. :iii
,\, ii(f
(t•:i:!
ff•(!v
=
r
.
{f
•,i
S(f .:
b`.=d
�b•'�
{Ltl itf 'S
.(1(.i
;`.(i.QU)
J. v(i
:.{i{!
S?. (i{!
( t
i
b:
2 12
0`sts3. fi
1i
i..
{:.1Ji;
1}.U(i
0.Wi
U. Oki
(>.
$
..
(;
(t
3f
1.i
11.2t!
t(i.(iii
U.U(i
0.011)
U.U(i
0.0,;
r
(
U
1
U
'.QU
iiteBi{a
i(ii,Sri
`sU!.4ri
11,-IiU
13.U(i
r:,(i(t
`s.fJ(
i
! i
U
U!
i ,
?$.i.•
({t Mi
.lii}., Y}
A t
i{
� f t
4.,.1i
rf.O'i
rJ.rJ(:
:.I1{t
U.(t(t
,.. 5.!:i
i�
i
44
(t
4'1
P:'
}i,lv
9. 0(It
'IN. OV
0.Cili
!,.(!U
4
1£t
{i
t)
lr
}1.6
kt;iP.V,"4I
!;
is
'si.(i;
}i.U(i
.U='+
rJ.<i(1
3.
r
:+
04 0Uh z 1 Z3
Z \Z),
c►Mi JUfi z 1 Z, 1
PlYROU 111
fRANS11
111 L-A-1?iDE
0410, S1.t341 ARA - RDWIR OF
Ray,
19911
LiiSr i{C'.YlvfY-
-------
KSA-Cast
flares --------
-------
Roel--------
1.asd
Car -IS
HI 11
Under
?!::
Srr:iu 5
CC
Ja1eS
FE•:Vd
iiaC,54,
Later
6
�ait' St:vie
i?i!yii.,
,iiir:rt}
%h}!Tr.
1U, (AL
(41 es
ikis;i5
9"Alki
30. EK!
L6.Oki
5.0Ei
ti, 00
..Uo
1?
5
-----------------------------
33^.
t!
t%
!?6
670
;tt.0ti
0`5AN14
10
35.
5'i
t}.Ei0
1.t:t%
:.oil
0. Oki
41.0#1!
11
:�b
0
fi
36.
22:
12.1"s
0`.ti";Ii'i
11
11.00
0.010
11.0f%
0 U(.1
0.Ei0
0. Oki
:i
0
23
fA
O
18
2211,
11..<0
0if 0414 }
12
1;4.00
111.00
8. s't+
t . 00
0. Oki
0.00
4
2
: `.
fi
:i
`.t
21
1
3tiu�=.131'•1
E+4. J
'sv.0%i
1t#. •Ei
}Ei.M,
U.00
0#.00
)a
f
94
E!
t1
44
69's
36. t5
051}0i *:
4;.1%.
0.,If
11.0011
4.0101
0. t;%
0.016
;ti
1
41
Ei
42
236
?!.i`s
iJ5:.,141
1--
0.0ii
3.16.011!
'1.4!01
0.Si
.tib.
`s
34
%d
A
2V*t
12.25
0,/10141
i''.:sii
Ei.tii'
14.01!
kiIOki
0. Oki
V, Oki
A
}.:gr.
--------
---
i.,:i!
--------------••
•,4..0
:k#,titi
-------------------------------
`s. Oki
0.0ti
ti.4i1
?
---------
sit
ii#`�
----------------------------
0
O
1t!'I
--------------
7 t°
----------------------------
---------------
--------
aaturdi':
---
---------------
45. i
:1.010
-------------------------------
ii.;Xf
010
41.01
0.Oill
---------
}
i1
4i
4
32
313
8.CRI
Ci.iili
0. till;
i
t
c'<
.Et
il?
11.`10
%J:''..''il
0.tt1's
0.0%,
`s
}
L1S
t
0
.ta
103
11.50
Et.iio *i
!b•
;i...
14. 00
:%. V'!
t1, 00
ti. iiU
1
L
.;t
0
0
S
141
li.iJ
R..r.d,
i~::...
+;
28. ^i
4.: %
0111
0.011
N.
i
Ei`•`. ;si
Fi:
4b.?i!
%i.Jf!
4.,.
..fit=
ii,i%t!
t1.f#�.t
i
a
44
0
44
126
3. 2`i
4i�•. 141'4;
11
ic. i
111,0
4,01:
0, 0.t
0.00
01(K.,
i
16
0
U
tv
1','i
01`,•`341'1:
11
1i .1i;i
11,1!%f
4,00
c#,t3Ci
0.010
0.011
4
---------
%!
-----------------------------
---------------
--------------
--------
--------
---
---
---------------
4'41 "it
41.0!%
---------------
Y1i.ti0
-a-----------------------------
21.0#t1
-------------------------------
1.110
01.001
01.,:11
lc
---------
4
iI'll ;
-----------------------------
ii
.!
13
T11
---------------
3T.2`.<
011 ill 4 }
11!
4' ",,i01.00
1.4"11
1.00
0.00
1.011!
6
41
C•
41
25::
31.010-
26.E{`?
z.0ti
10.0.!
Q. Oki
0.00
8.00
5,
s
4;
j!
41
ZU
32.1+1.,
Oil lti4i
1i
30.0{1
13.siti
0. VII
0,(i;}
0.0t!
---------
J..!
-----------------------------
0
is
;tti
244
---------------
--------
wed tie S",By
--------
---
---
---------------
64.5%%
---------------
30!.1!0
------------------------------
s.01i
-------------------------------
1.titi
0.00
W.Oo
16
---------
1
-----------------------------
l
---------------
76.2s
05116'41
iE!
`s .`a!
t?. !t
.. i
�.vi!
0.00
1.100
4
1
°":
1i
`, 3
167
32.Oi
Js 1ct41
ri
:f. %!
1<.0u
}tl,s!i
0.,it!
O,jsL
0.03E
N
l�+
:
!�t
1d4
1
05? is=?'+;
T:
1's.s!0
0.0101
31.Oki
1.00
0.f1fr
0tits
4
s
U
:t?
1`s1
11.00
c►Mi JUfi z 1 Z, 1
CIM JUN 21 ' -b1
4' {
L3AL-A'R3a
33A'A SU iMP'. I - Rllit4ii{ OF
!4sy!
1490
--------
-------
--------
Card's
81
Bader
kL'
j�'Cti::rt
3)at
Wte
bares
Via; es
Recvt
3rarssf.
later
6
Lan: :-sl:+R
Reye:r
bt de,t
i.M Or
IU UAL
J'.
f4'.+UT�
43.ns,
0.tio
s)sl
1.00
0.00
3.On
3:4
Sub
3
3(Ic
10
Jc.i`s
ES131tY}
ti+
44.`O
n.i+;
.us
i f11
{;n
n tsi!
4
E!
f;
4`s
a 6
; .ntl
n`si311f}
t3
t;�.`s{!
s.!...
4.{!%
{;,r-;
{:.i1[1
..:,L•
I
`s
;
n
s�
's
iEs'z
3.`sii
ii`„'1i 1if1
f'2
$-5('
}+.'. fu
i.0"'
iJ,nu
fJ.(iu
0.(!s:
6
n
26
E1
n
26
14%
---------------
i2.a`s
--------
brSr6in.+1+J
---
---11------------
-------------------------------
13.0.+
U.(!;<
L.'1t'
---------
Si
--------------------------
i(I
'.:
f!
i3'
}6114
0.('.
u.uu
U.ok!
n,nu
.
(
a.`50
S iir •-,
E!
ir.0't+
fJ.i}n
tf.nn
J
2
3..
1.63
163
8. 5'j
3. JE.
Q0
C. Jti
4
..,
(`
sc
Lii
3:..Ls
Ei.VU
5
3
i6
(!
26
!22
}a.t:+
43
_
?a..,
t!..iii
?.#i+.:
0. Oki
4.0
U.v#.i
2
')3
234
3[. i`s
tx.it0
1.Ail
#f.1+o
0. Oki
s
i+
q'{
f4!
SS��•
Ji1.f.•
ii'`{3
t'
44.`ss,+
j.{;,;
r#.
{i.E!v
I.ESE
4
4
4:
tl
4--"
i `s
(6(10
n,#t;!
U. Oki
:!
u. us,
3.:(
3
..
:i4
{tirs66i
Vo•..
J:.('.+
ai.(}+l
:.u(!
(t. i){'
l,ii:i
n
C.
3is'
n
i3.
(`'Yi
a
4f, ...
,
s.{I
�.
44si2
}'f;
s2. nu
tit ;ati'fi
r'i
ii..:!
Ei.(#'S+
3:.EI%;
4.i!(I
(+.(+E;
:,u'V
6
4
3`s
;l
J`s
t::$
ii.25
n5/L2=41,
1a
36..
0 E+
34.L;s
ff.Un
0.01.1
0100
4
3
LJE
3t.C+(
ke6nC,s eq
18 !fJ
i0.E+u
;2.n
3.V)
0.00
2.(!u
15
i&?
n
n
}n!
655
36.2`s
(IItIl.:IV1
2. 11 v!
}.(+J
0.0v
.✓
3
's
°;
(+
s`s
las
3 s
EIS?2.;PI
s3
t....
1C.t:
3i.Eln
E1.4E!
EI.E}'!
(>.il(l
4
(+
(4
('
.4
214
v`s1231'ti
Ii
ai.c:
U.E►{!
121. oc?
U.00
LS.'JE!
u.;(!
i
Z
..
u
u
72
2s4
3:.2�
3htir-va':
$`s.
[s.E+u
25.00.,
i.00
0.00
0.00
4
5
3:13
n
u
3(;3
163
a6. ti)
. 24rYi
1n
..'1S
E.fJ#+
3.uf:
t. Oki
sl,rs
.. iE>
t;
4
a:,
(!
n
32.
tib
i:..ilfJ
E1:•':.'
i;
I:..,
n.'Of u
s2.11y
U. ..
0. W!
u.«(
4
3
;.v
v
EI
`•.fta
E`
G
iv
ti`s
ia.nti
CIM JUN 21 ' -b1
GIM JUPj 2 I
JIAL'�S-R
iL�
OW;r, SURTARY - 1ORM,,
OF
Ka'y,
MU
Last Re evier
-------
#{tr•.-.ast,
�areb --------
-------
RIdes --------
CaTC
Cards
all, t
Under
*0
Se"iv I
"u2,te
`^''.?
to ec
Sales
Reivd
transi.
Later
6
Cats' Stiot
Rp.quir
StMertt
Calor.,
iiitAL
Riles
ftur=
--------
Pr -.r, ..:
---
---------------
6-.:111
4%.ts{i
-------------------------------
2 .tF:%
2.iFii
0. 00
1.(31}
---------
16
6
-----------------------------
86
U
U
NB
---------------
a-,. 12-11
ft}
31.54
u.t}U
2.1311
1.UU
MA
U.UU
:,
i
Ji
-----------------------------
U
ti
.t
} ;i
---------------
a,;j:
--------
Sat trday
---
---------------
31.51%
'tt i
-------------------------------
i. Jt%
C. U
U.Utt
4. 010
---------
Of 41
it;
4s ti;
t}.t>{i
4,1%1}
1.Uts
U.Uti
1. Oct
`,•
i
4I
{s
C
4U
ill
}2.2`1
ct�stl:'
3
c:
1t.ci
U.
t.Ui
U{i
{
i
!
t
(}
y
tit
..tc.
4.4a
{}.ti{
t%,Uti
{I,UU
2
}
2v
-----------------------------
ti
Of
19
!24
---------------
11.UU
--------
ittFc.u�
---
---------------
-------------------
2.{itE
------------
ti.Ott
1.411
---------
}ti
`
V6
t}
U
If
WN
36.5U
U:71s
ii!
4:,;.:(:
,.1311
..s}tl
..i'ti
{}. UtF
42
ti
t}
42
13i
}1.25
41+.ik
1's.i}F
Q,IOki,
i.iiU
t.t}•',:
U
U
3t"
Uii
'sb
2111
2`s
U.1F{F
i:.tiU
ch
1
:1F
{F
tt
it1
51Fit!e5'.d'r
Li.:%'t+
:'u.UU
.i%t)
i.tiU
4.1%11
6.t�ti
}:.
i
1U}+.
11
t}
's4"
:`.S
3^.`siJ
4. ail
4t.{1:i
{F. tN,i
0.1Fij
l:
R
.t}
t}
:1
19?
1t.t{{
1F.i :j'3
{%.00
G. tit,
4
if
U
it
tib
lt.{%U
34
1!.u'5ie:
j86
e,
8b
Nib36.54
t°.i; i'4'i
t{+
ri „ri
u,tt%
L.t}t%
i.ts4
1F,i{t
j,t%iF
44
1:
44
Zb's
11.1:
}b.:';
{1.131•
}{;,1311
U. tU
U.Utt
0.00
26
tt
:<
26
U:ui.i%'i
..,
ts,ttti
tt.!%ti
S.4�a
t%.
-.%1V
3
tt
is
a1
i4 F
}1.1}t•
:1F.1Ftl
2. 00
V1. i0
L.tsti
+
B
1111:'
l:
.
}UU
tt}o
St%. 2 t
GIM JUPj 2 I
PLVAGttN RAMS i !
DIAL-K-RIbE
WA sumq N+ - EItVii. OP Itia'y, ,144;1
-------- ------- Rides -------
Card Girds Mi under No Sensor
"udt8 ^.te^e.fe5 Ja!fs Rer'vd irinf. Letrr c an Sihow Regulr S2iidertt !hldii+ IWAL Asi:e=_. How r5
ifdii+tS !'fbt.5`. x$4.5:1 5 -.Ki '12.tK+ 0.W 41.0(1 SOI 1 240 L1 0 24;114 1`5$45 5
FORGSaiH TRANSIT
iota!
1t:2a1 2 idz@k, N;Vs 22o Or 1ir4 PK de;l
iota; 4 Meekesio rc'r's 1.14, or Yo Per •sa'r
24' i s
:;tai te:-:i<ryL,• �:f� Hi:t:f 2.�
iota, ro2!es pee FisE:F:',-Fer :^.b
CIM JUN 21
ZN3
SCHEDULE OF OPT -OUT COMMUNITIES
1990 8, 1991 *AVAILABLE LOCAL TRANSIT FUNDS
i 1991
DISTRICT I **HACA LTOTALA
$177,684 $41,477 $219,161
$113,725 $22,279 $136,004
$291,409 $63,755 $355,164
$317,451
-
1990
--�
$199,949
DISTRICT
HACA
TOTAL
CARVER:
$103,641
$18,982
$122,623
CHANHASSEN
$129,902
$50,299
$180,201 /
CHASKA
$88,789
$432
$89,220 1
TOTAL
$218,690
$50,731
$269,421 /
DAKOTA:
1
/
APPLE VALLEY
$272,503
$165,619
$438,122 \
BURNSVILLE
$658,472
$236,532
$895,004 /
EAGAN
$607,560
$232,575
$840,135 \
ROSEMOUNT
$84,770
$32,487
$117,257 /
TOTAL
$1,623,306
$667,212
$2,290,518 \
HENNEPIN:
\
EDEN PRAIRIE
$1,087,890
$256,123
$1,344,014 /
MAPLE GROVE
$443,145
$190,452
$633,596 \
PLYMOUTH
$930,641
$320,431
$1,251,072 /
CHANHASSEN
$1,292
$1,292
TOTAL
$2,462,968
$767,006
$3,229,974 /
SCOTT:
/
PRIOR LAKE
$156,367
$66,758
$223,125 \
SAVAGE
$124,411
$52,721
$177,131 /
SHAKOPEE
$244,852
$63,012
$307,864 \
TOTAL
$525,630
$182,491
$708,121 /
GRAND TOTAL
$4,830,593
$1,667,440
$6,498,033 /
i 1991
DISTRICT I **HACA LTOTALA
$177,684 $41,477 $219,161
$113,725 $22,279 $136,004
$291,409 $63,755 $355,164
$317,451
$118,229
$435,680
$731,565
$199,949
$931,514
$799,385
$158,610
$957,995
$103,641
$18,982
$122,623
$1,952,042 $495,770 $2,447,813
$1,087,236 $156,672 $1,243,908
$494,578 $130,963 $625,541
$1,045,543 $339,044 $1,384.587
$2,624,670 $626,679 $3,251,349
$121,882
$51,468
$173,350
$98,412
$32,928
$131,341
$159,698
S36,056
$195,754
$379,992
5120,452
$500,444
$5,248,113 $1,306,657 $6,554,770
* 90% of operating levy net of feathering _
** '91 HA CA reflects legislative cuts ($2,635,294 allocated to all cities in taxing district)
SOUTHWEST METRO
$1,614,727
\
$1,596,386
MN VALLEY TRANSIT
$2,690,774
/
$2,752,503
MAPLE GROVE
$633,596
\
$625,541
PLYMOUTH
$1,251,072
/
$1,384,587
S HAKO P.EE
$307,864
\
$195,754
TOTAL
$6,498,033
/
$6,554,770
SOURCE: Dept of Revenue
County Auditors
CIM JUN 21 t� .i
Z�3
Replacement (Opt -out) Service
1991 RTB Contract Vs 1991 Local Progerty Tax Available (90%)
1990
1990
Funds
Percent
RTB Subsidy
Tax Levv
Remaining
Allocated
SW Metro
$993,856
$1,614,727
$620,871
61.55%
MN Valley
$155,555
$2,690,774
$2,535,219
5.78%
Maple Grove
$318,363
$633,596
$315,233
50.25%
($55,714)
X726 300
$1 251,072
$524 772
5R ns?/
_Plymouth
Shakopee
$218,499
$307,864
$89,365
70.97%
Total
$2,412,573
$6,498,033
$4,085,460
37.13%
1991 RTB Contract Vs 1991 Local Progerty Tax Available (90%)
1990 Vs.1991 Local Property Tax Available (90%)
1991
1991
Funds
Percent
RTB Contract
Tax Levy
Remaining
Allocated
SW Metro
$1,614,727
SW Metro
$960,250
$1,596,386
$636,136
60.15%
MN Valley
$2,902,843
$2,752,503
($150,340)
105.46%
Maple Grove
$681,255
$625,541
($55,714)
108.91%
Plymouth
$956,312
$1,384,587
$4218
r.9 A7w -
Shakopee
$235,330
$195,754
($39,576)
120.22%
Total
$5,735,990
$6,554,771
$818,781
87.51%
1990 Vs.1991 Local Property Tax Available (90%)
CIM JUN
1990
1991
Amount
Percent
Tax Levy
Tax Levv
Tax Increase
Variance
SW Metro
$1,614,727
$1,596,386
($18,341)
-1.14%
MN Valley
$2,690,774
$2,752,503
$61,729
2.29%
Maple Grove
$633,596
$625,541
($8,055)
-1.27%
87
$133,515
10.67%
_P
Shakopee
$307,864
$195,754
($112,110)
-36.42%
Total
$6,498,033
$6,554,771
$56,738
0.87%
CIM JUN
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
MAY 22, 1991
The Regular Meeting of the City of Plymouth Planning
Commission was called to order at 7:00 p.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Plufka, Commissioners Hal
Pierce, Joy Tierney, Michael Stulberg,
and John Wire.
MEMBERS ABSENT: Commissioners Dennis Zylla and Larry
Marofsky.
STAFF PRESENT: Coordinator Charles Dillerud, City
Engineer Dan Faulkner, and Planning
Secretary Jackie Watson.
*MINUTES
MOTION by Commissioner Stulberg, seconded by Commissioner
Pierce to approve the Planning Commission Minutes of May
8, 1991.
Commissioner Tierney stated that a change in paragraph 5
on Page 77 be made to drop the last three words of the
paragraph.
Vote. 5 Ayes. MOTION carried.
Chairman Plufka introduced the request by Lundgren Bros.
Construction for a RPUD Amendment and Final Plan/Final
Plat for Churchill Farms Subdivision located at the
northeast corner of County Road 24 and Brockton Lane.
Coordinator Dillerud reviewed the May 13, 1991 Staff
Report. Coordinator Dillerud stated that Block 5, Lots 1
and 2, and Block 6, Lot 2 should be added to the two
approving resolutions as eligible for a reduced front
setback.
Chairman Plufka introduced Mr. Peter Pflaum and Mr. Mike
Pflaum, representing Lundgren Bros. Construction Company.
Peter Pflaum stated that the developers wanted to improve
upon former projects and thought the median improvements
on Zircon Lane and County Road 24 would enhance this
project. He said that the median would be maintained by
CA..
MOTION TO APPROVE
VOTE - MOTION CARRIED
LUNDGREN BROS.
CONSTRUCTION (90009)
Planning Commission Minutes
May 22, 1991
Page 84
the Homeowner's Association. He said that the flag pole
and the development logo on the plan would create an
aesthetic view at the entrance to the development.
Mike Pflaum stated that the reduction in the front yard
setbacks would increase the backyard size and allow area
for the runoff from the wetlands. He said the increase in
the backyards would also eliminate the need to destroy
some of the trees on the sites specified.
Mike Pflaum stated that it is the developer's desire to
construct the private/public trail within the right-of-way
so it will be closer to the curb and easier to maintain by
the Homeowner's Association.
Mike Pflaum indicated that some changes were desired in
special conditions B, C, F, and G of the Engineer's Memo
and these had been discussed with the City Engineer.
City Engineer Faulkner stated that there was agreement
regarding a revision to Xanthus Lane allowing a temporary
cul-de-sac.
Commissioner Stulberg asked that a tree inventory plan for
the lots requested to have a 30 foot setback be explained
later in the meeting.
Chairman Plufka opened the Public Hearing.
Chairman Plufka introduced Mr. Mark Stuhlfaut of 18615-
32nd Avenue North.
Mr. Stuhlfaut stated that he lives in Amber Woods on 32nd
Avenue North. He said this is directly across from the
proposed monument on 32nd Avenue North and he objected to
this. He said that there is a sidewalk that stops on the
west edge of his property and he would like to see it
extended to Greenwood School. Mr. Stuhlfaut stated he
does not object to the proposed monument sign and flag
pole at 24th Avenue North but he objects to the fence and
entrance plaque on 32nd Avenue North.
Chairman Plufka introduced Mr. Russ Waters of 18600 -34th
Avenue North.
Mr. Waters stated that he objected to the connection of
34th Avenue North. He said that a previous petition
during the preliminary plat stage also objected to this
connection. He stated that he objected to the fence in
this area and preferred to see the bushes remain as a
screen.
Mr. Waters said he objected to the four entrance monuments
proposed for this site when there is only one entrance
WA JUN 21 `y .l
Planning Commission Minutes
May 22, 1991
Page 85
into Amber Woods. He stated that fewer entrances into a
development aid in the deterrent of crime.
Mr. Waters stated that the streets in Amber Woods are 44
feet wide and residents were told during a previous plan
by Lundgren Bros. that the Churchill Farms streets would
be 33 feet wide. He said he was told that the street
would not be a minor collector.
Chairman Plufka closed the Public Hearing.
Chairman Plufka stated that the plan for 34th Avenue North
is the same as it was when approved by the City Council
for the Preliminary Plat.
City Engineer Faulkner stated that 34th Avenue North would
be 36 feet wide.
Coordinator Dillerud stated that 34th Avenue North was not
specifically referenced in the Preliminary Plat, and was
shown to connect with Zircon Lane as a 60 feet wide right-
of-way.
Coordinator Dillerud stated that the plan to connect
Greenwood Elementary School by the Trail System is being
met with this proposed plan using Zircon Lane and the
east/west trail approved in the U.S. Homes plat to the
north.
Mike Pflaum stated that the area which includes 34th
Avenue North is not being platted at this time. He said
the developers were required to show an 80 foot wide
right-of-way connection at 34th Avenue North by the
previous City Council approval. He stated that the
developers would like to build a smaller street in this
area.
Chairman Plufka stated that the fences proposed at 32nd
and 34th Avenue North created a true physical barrier
between the two developments.
Peter Pflaum stated that the fences are aesthetic and open
and can be seen through. He said the developer's intent
is not to create a barrier between the two developments.
Commissioner Stulberg asked for response to his previous
question regarding the number of trees that would be
preserved if the front yard setbacks were reduced from 35
feet to 30 feet for three of the homes proposed on Zircon
Lane.
Mike Pflaum stated that he could not give a specific
count. He said that the reduced setbacks would possibly
save many of the trees by moving the homes further from
the tree roots.
iPf JUN.
Planning Commission Minutes
May 22, 1991
Page 86
MOTION by Chairman Plufka, seconded by Commissioner MOTION TO APPROVE
Stulberg to recommend approval of the application by
Lundgren Bros. Construction for a RPUD Amendment and Final
Plan/Final Plat for Churchill Farms Subdivision located at
the northeast corner of County Road 24 and Brockton Lane,
subject to all conditions of the May 13, 1991 Staff
Report.
MOTION to Amend Condition No. 19 and Condition No. 6 from
the resolutions Setting Conditions to be met Prior to
Filing; and, Approving the RPUD Plan Conditional Use
Permit. deleting the word "not" and "and is prohibited"
and adding the words "as per plan submitted".
Chairman Plufka stated that he approved of the proposed
median an other improvements this project proposes. He
said that other existing medians in the City have not
caused any problems.
Roll Call Vote on Motion to Amend. 5 Ayes. MOTION VOTE - MOTION CARRIED
carried.
MOTION by Commissioner Wire to recommend removal of the MOTION TO AMEND
entrance monuments for the project at 32nd and 34th Avenue
North.
MOTION failed for lack of a second. MOTION DIED
Commissioner Wire questioned whether the monument signs
are needed between the two developments.
Commissioner Tierney asked how large the proposed signs
would be.
Peter Pflaum responded that the monument signs between the
two developments would be 4 square feet in size. Mike
Pflaum stated that he did not have a graphic drawing of
the smaller signs.
Commissioner Pierce stated that he wanted to be assured
that the monument signs would be no taller than 5 feet.
Mike Pflaum assured the Commission that the monument signs
would not be taller than 5 feet.
Commissioner Wire asked what is proposed for the sidewalk
in front of the Stuhlfaut residence.
Coordinator Dillerud stated that Mr. Stuhlfaut's home is
the only residence with the sidewalk which goes to the
Amber Woods outlot. He said this piece of sidewalk is the
terminus of the trail. He stated that the east -west trail
to the school will be completed on the U.S. Homes property
to the north when it is developed.
Roll Call Vote. 5 Ayes. MOTION carried. VOTE - MOTION CARRIED
Planning Commission Minutes
May 22, 1991
Page 87
Chairman Plufka introduced the request by Family Hope FAMILY HOPE SERVICES
Services for a Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, Site Plan, (91013)
and Rezoning from FRD to B-1 of a 0.52 acre tract located
at the southwest corner of Fernbrook Lane and 34th Avenue
North.
Chairman Plufka waived the review of the May 6, 1991 Staff
Report.
Chairman Plufka introduced Mr. Fred Peterson representing
Family Hope Services.
Mr. Peterson stated that he questioned the safety of the
public trail referred to in item 5 of the Staff Report and
asked who would be liable if any injuries occurred on the
trail. He said he would like the trail moved closer to
the curb for safety reasons. He also stated that he would
like to be able to waive the park dedication fee in return
for an easement parallel to Fernbrook Lane as requested by
the Park Department.
Coordinator Dillerud stated that the trail was constructed
by another developer and that there are similar grades on
trails throughout the City which have not created any
problems. He said that the City would not pay to move the
trail.
Commissioner Pierce asked what the slope on this trail
was.
City Engineer Faulkner stated that the slope was a little
over 5 percent but that the Park Department accepts up to
8 percent for the slope on trails.
Chairman Plufka opened the Public Hearing. There being no
one present to speak on the issue, Chairman Plufka closed
the Public Hearing.
MOTION by Commissioner Wire, seconded by Commissioner MOTION TO APPROVE
Tierney to recommend approval of the request by Family
Hope Services for a Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, Site
Plan, and Rezoning from FRD to B-1 of a 0.52 acre tract
located at the southwest corner of Fernbrook Lane and 34th
Avenue North subject to all conditions in the May 6, 1991
Staff Report.
Roll Call Vote on Main Motion. 5 Ayes. MOTION carried. VOTE - MOTION CARRIED
MOTION by Chairman Plufka, seconded by Commissioner Pierce MOTION TO AMEND
to recommend to the City Council that the City work with
the petitioner to align the trail onto the public right-
of-way.
Roll Call Vote. 5 Ayes. MOTION carried. VOTE - MOTION CARRIED
CIM JUN 21 '91
Planning Commission Minutes
May 22, 1991
Page 88
Chairman Plufka introduced the request by Tom Bishop for a TOM BISHOP (91029)
Conditional Use Permit to Amend the Planned Unit
Development to allow encroachment of an enclosed porch to
within 15.5 feet of the property line at 10690 -45th Avenue
North.
Coordinator Dillerud reviewed the May 7, 1991 Staff
Report.
Commissioner Tierney asked if there were any other sites
within this development with a setback distance such as
the petitioner has.
Coordinator Dillerud responded that there are no others.
Commissioner Stulberg asked if the petitioner's home was
closer to the trail than others within the development.
Coordinator Dillerud responded that the house is closer to
the trail than others within the development.
Commissioner Tierney asked if there is a temporary pad in
place for the addition of a porch.
Coordinator Dillerud responded that there was not a
temporary pad in place.
Chairman Plufka introduced Mr. Tom Bishop, the petitioner.
Mr. Bishop stated that the side considered by the City to
be his front yard is actually the side of his house. He
said that the porch addition would not create a problem
for the neighborhood. Mr. Bishop said that other homes in
the area are closer to the trail than the porch he
proposes but the side that faces the trail is considered
their side yard.
Chairman Plufka opened and closed the Public Hearing as
there was no one present to speak on the issue.
MOTION by Commissioner Stulberg, seconded by Chairman MOTION TO APPROVE
Plufka to recommend approval of the request by Tom Bishop
for a Conditional Use Permit to Amend the Planned Unit
Development to allow encroachment of an enclosed porch to
within 15.5 feet of the property line at 10690 -45th Avenue
North because of the reasons stated in the May 7, 1991
Staff Report.
Roll Call Vote. 5 Ayes. MOTION carried. VOTE - MOTION CARRIED
Chairman Plufka introduced the request by Ron Splett for a RON SPLETT (91025)
RPUD Plan and Conditional Use Permit Amendment for a 12 x
14 foot enclosed porch in Cimarron Ponds located at 990
Xene Lane.
GIM JUN 21
Planning Commission Minutes
May 22, 1991
Page 89
Chairman Plufka waived a review of the May 7, 1991 Staff
Report.
Chairman Plufka noted that this request should have been
listed on the agenda under the heading of Public Hearings.
Coordinator Dillerud stated that this request was
advertised as a Public Hearing.
Chairman Plufka introduced Mr. Ron Splett, the petitioner.
Mr. Splett stated that his name was listed as "Rick" on
the Staff Report and it should be "Ron".
Staff noted the correction and stated that City records
will be reviewed and corrected where necessary.
Mr. Splett stated that he was in agreement with the May 7,
1991 Staff Report.
Chairman Plufka opened and closed the Public Hearing as
there was no one present to speak on the issue.
MOTION by Commissioner Tierney, seconded by Commissioner MOTION TO APPROVE
Wire to recommend approval of the request by Ron Splett
for a RPUD Plan and Conditional Use Permit Amendment for a
12 x 14 foot enclosed porch in Cimarron Ponds located at
990 Xene Lane, subject to all conditions in the May 7,
1991 Staff Report.
Roll Call Vote. 5 Ayes. MOTION carried. VOTE - MOTION CARRIED
Chairman Plufka introduced by request by Jeff Robers for JEFF ROBERS-FOOD
Food Engineering Corporation (FEC) for a Site Plan ENGINEERING CORP.
Amendment and Variances for a building addition and (91034)
parking lot expansion for property located at 2765 Niagara
Lane North.
Chairman Plufka introduced Mr. Jeff Robers, the
petitioner.
Mr. Robers stated that this site i s unique because it is
fronted on three sides by City streets. He said that he
was not able to purchase additional land from surrounding
property owners and that he wanted to tie the proposed
expansion into the existing circular driveway. Mr. Robers
stated that it would be a hardship for the company if they
had to lose some of the existing parking at the front of
the building.
Mr. Robers introduced Mr. Ralph Burgess, President of the
company.
x411 JUN 2
Planning Commission Minutes
May 22, 1991
Page 90
Mr. Burgess stated that there is a considerable amount of
truck traffic onto the property. He said that the
existing City Code now limits the size of any addition to
the building which was not the case when he purchased and
built the existing building.
Mr. Burgess stated that the variances requested for
parking setback are requested to that the parking can be
extended on the south side of the site for office staff
parking and to provide some security during night time
hours. He said there is not o fire lane in front of the
building but that the Fire Department would like to have
one there.
Mr. Burgess stated that most traffic access onto the site
if from Highway 55 or I-494. He stated that it is
hazardous for incoming traffic to have to jog around the
west side of the building because of the parked cars in
this area.
Mr. Burgess introduced Mr. Pete Vanasse, a consultant
working on the proposed plan.
Mr. Vanasse stated that a hardship is evident and a
variance is needed to provide for safe circulation of
vehicles within the parking lot. He said that a change in
the Zoning Ordinance requirements resulted in the need for
the variances requested.
Mr. Burgess introduced Mr. Mike Peters, a consultant
working on the proposed plan.
Mr. Peters stated that if variances were allowed on the
east and south side of the site, a fire lane would be
viable.
Commissioner Stulberg asked Mr. Burgess if he considered
requesting a variance to construct a larger addition than
the one here proposed.
Mr. Burgess stated that a larger building would add to the
parking problems. He said that if he were to sell the
site in the future, a new owner would possibly have to
construct a parking ramp to be in compliance with the
Zoning Ordinance parking requirements.
Mr. Robers stated that this request for an addition to the
building will be sufficient for several years.
Commissioner Stulberg stated that he wanted to make sure
that this plan presented is what the company really needs.
Mr. Burgess responded that this request is what the
company needs.
Planning Commission Minutes �•\1���
May 22, 1991
Page 91
Commissioner Pierce asked if the hard cover requirements
for this site could be expanded.
Coordinator Dillerud stated that hard cover could be
expanded from 35 to 40 percent of the site but this would
generate the need for more parking needs because of
setback changes.
MOTION by Commissioner Stulberg, seconded by Commissioner MOTION TO APPROVE
Wire to recommend approval of the request by Jeff Robers
for Food Engineering Corporation (FEC) for a Site Plan
Amendment and Variances for a building addition and
parking lot expansion for property located at 2765 Niagara
Lane North subject to all conditions in the May 13, 1991
Staff Report.
MOTION to Amend by Commissioner Stulberg, seconded by MOTION TO AMEND
Commissioner Wire to remove Condition No. 10 in the May
13, 1991 Staff Report relating to the relocation of
landscaping from the public trail outlot.
Coordinator Dillerud stated that it is unusual to have
private landscaping on a public trail and it would
constitute a potential maintenance liability for the City.
Chairman Plufka stated that there is a difference between
private trees and a private trail.
Mr. Burgess stated that the company would like to plant
the trees closer to the trail because it would be more
aesthetic, and that the company is willing to maintain the
plantings. He said he will bring a Landscape Plan to the
City Council meeting.
Commissioner Pierce asked if a Landscape Plan is required.
Coordinator Dillerud stated that a Landscape Plan needs to
be approved before issuance of a Building Permit.
Chairman Plufka stated that if the plantings are approved
to be placed on City property they would become City
property once they are planted.
Vote on MOTION to Amend. 5 Ayes. MOTION carried. VOTE - MOTION CARRIED
MOTION to Amend by Chairman Plufka, seconded by MOTION TO AMEND
Commissioner Tierney to add the following to Condition
9a.: "be graduated from 15 feet on the east to 25 feet on
the west."
Vote. 3 Ayes, Commissioners Wire and Stulberg voted Nay. VOTE - MOTION CARRIED
MOTION carried.
�dtk`s JUN
Planning Commission Minutes
May 22, 1991
Page 92
Vote on Main MOTION as twice amended. 5 Ayes. MOTION
carried.
Chairman Plufka introduced the request by Bob's Energy
Saving Service, Inc. for a RPUD Conditional Use Permit
Amendment for a three season porch at 1175 Black Oaks
Lane.
Chairman Plufka waived the review of the April 19, 1991
Staff Report. (This item was tabled from the May 8, 1991
meeting because the petitioner did not attend the
meeting.)
Chairman Plufka introduced Mr. Bob Hunter, the petitioner.
Mr. Hunter stated that he was in agreement with the April
19, 1991 Staff Report.
MOTION by Commissioner Wire, seconded by Commissioner
Pierce to recommend approval of the request by Bob's
Energy Saving Service, Inc. for a RPUD Conditional Use
Permit Amendment for a three season porch at 1175 Black
Oaks Lane subject to all conditions in the April 19, 1991
Staff Report.
Roll Call Vote. 5 Ayes. MOTION carried.
Meeting Adjourned at 10:15 p.m.
ZAA-kC-,,-
VOTE - MOTION CARRIED
BOB'S ENERGY SAVING
SERVICE (91023)
MOTION TO APPROVE
VOTE - MOTION CARRIED
cm JUN 21 '91
z �\-kb
NOTES FROM THE MEETING
PLYMOUTH CITY COUNCIL
JUNE 17, 1991
1. The request of Martin Harstad for reconsideration of Land Use
Guide Plan Amendment and RPUD Concept Plan for "Sugar Hills"
located at the northwest corner of Vicksburg Lane and Highway
55 was referred back to the Planning Commission.
2. The Site Management Plan for Union City Mission, southwest
quadrant of East Medicine lake Blvd. and 36th Avenue North,
was accepted by the Council. The City Council previously
approved a Conditional Use Permit Amendment to allow the use
of the "Smith Lodge" building for a 19 bed transitional
housing facility. One of the conditions of that approval was
that Union City Mission submit a plan to the City to address
operational problems. Several neighborhood meetings have
been held and ongoing communication networks have been
established between the neighborhood and the Union City
Mission. The neighborhood residents and Union City Mission
personnel appear to be satisfied with the progress to date.
3. The Council renewed the Conditional Use Permit for Wayzata
School District 284 to allow a temporary classroom building
at Wayzata Senior High School, 305 Vicksburg Lane, until
September, 1992.
4. The Zoning Ordinance and City Code were amended to provide
for three year terms for members of the Board of Zoning
Adjustments and Appeals. The amendment also limits a member
to serving a maximum of two terms or six years, whichever is
greater.
5. The Council authorized construction of approximately 500 feet
of trail between Zachary Lane and the paved portion of the
Soo Line trail, constructed as part of the Wild Wings
Addition. Over 90 percent of the trail is already in place
and this will complete the segment. The project includes
construction of a floating boardwalk trail immediately east
of Zachary Lane and south of the Soo Line tracks.
6. The Final Plat and Development Contract were approved for
"Boulder Crest". The developer will create 47 single family
lots on a 30.9 acre site on the west side of County Road 101
at 34th Avenue North (east side of Amber Woods).
7. The Council revised the Cooperative Agreement between the
City and County for the construction of County Road 6 from
Fernbrook Lane to County Road 101. The contractor had
requested that Vicksburg Lane be temporarily closed to
complete the intersection improvements more quickly and
safely rather than doing the work under traffic.
cim JUN 21
Under the agreement adopted by the Council, the contractor
will be allowed to close Vicksburg Lane north of the County
Road 6 intersection for a period of 5 working days excluding
Saturday and Sunday. The contractor will then be required to
reopen the closed portion of Vicksburg Lane. A comprehensive
detour and informational signing plan will be required of the
contractor in advance of the closure. The detour routing for
southbound traffic on Vicksburg Lane would be along Highway
55 to either Niagara Lane or Fernbrook Lane for eastbound
traffic, and Dunkirk Lane for westbound traffic. The
Council also approved closing the intersection of 18th Avenue
and Vicksburg Lane during construction.
8. Stop sign installations were authorized on 44th Avenue at
Norwood Lane and on 27th Avenue at the intersection of 28th
Avenue.
9. A Recycling Source Reduction Program was implemented for the
City. The program outlines efforts to be taken.in order to
reduce the quantity of solid waste generated by all City
departments. A policy promoting the use of recycled material
in publicly funded contracts was also approved.
10. An election was scheduled for September 3, 1991, on the
question of whether Ordinance No. 90-41, "An Ordinance
Relating to Elections, Repealing Ordinance No. 74-1, and
Scheduling the Municipal Election for Even -Numbered Years,"
shall be effective. The election will be conducted by mail
ballot on September 3 and will determine whether or not a
November, 1991, election for Mayor and two Councilmembers
will be conducted.
11. The Council reviewed the Water Sprinkling Restrictions. They
decided to make no change to the existing odd -even policy but
encouraged that discretion be exercised in enforcement.
12. The composition and charge of the Private Street Task Force
was approved.
"Notes of the Meeting" is distributed to city employees after
each Council meeting. It contains items of general interest
to employees and not every action taken by the Council is
reported. staff members should not rely on these notes for
accuracy - only the official Council minutes should be used
for providing information to petitioners or the public.
Questions? Comments? Call Laurie at 5014.
GIM JUN 2I 9
I A C._...
BASSETT CREEK WATER MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
Minutes of the Meeting of May 16, 1991
Call to Order:
The Bassett Creek Water Management Commission was called to order by Chairman Peter Enck at
11:35 A.M., Thursday, May 16, 1991, at the Minneapolis Golf Club.
Roll Call:
Crystal:
Commissioner Bill Monk Engineer. Len Kremer
Golden Valley:
Commissioner Ed Silberman Recorder. Elaine Anderson
Medicine Lake:
Commissioner John O'Toole Counsel: Curt Pearson
Minneapolis:
Alternate Commissioner R. Kannankutty
Minnetonka:
Commissioner David Sonnenberg
New Hope:
Commissioner Peter Eyck
Plymouth:
Commissioner Fred Moore
Robbinsdale:
Not Represented
St. Louis Park:
Commissioner Don Rye
Approval or Correction of Minutes:
Chairman Enck requested that the April minutes reflect that he had had telephone communications with
Mr. Spychalla, Project Manager, and with Colonel Baldwin. With that addition, it was moved by Mr.
Rye and seconded by Mr. Silberman that the April 18 minutes be approved Carried unanimously.
Financial Statements:
Mr. Silberman presented the Treasurer's Report as of April 18 showing a checking account balance of
$66,913.87, an investment balance of $294,411.24, and a construction account balance of
$247,553.92 plus the $5,000.00 which is earmarked for Medicine Lake. The construction escrow
account balance had not been updated. The treasurer's report was filed for audit. Chairman Enck
requested Mr. Kannankutty to provide Mr. Silberman with the updated balance in the escrow account
monthly.
Presentation of Invoices for Payment:
1. Mr. Silberman moved appro:�al of the Earr Engineering i, -.voice for $14,714.15 for the period
covering March 31 through April 17. Seconded by Mr. Sonnenberg and carried unanimously.
2. Mr. Silberman moved approval of the invoice from Mr. Howard Lawrence, appraiser, for $8900.
Seconded by Mr. Moore and carried unanimously.
3. Mr. Silberman moved approval of the invoice from Babcock Langbein and Company for the annual
audit totaling $275.00. Seconded by Mr. Sonnenberg and carried unanimously.
Miscellaneous
Mr. Silberman presented the 1992 Budget Proposal. Discussion followed Mr. Kremer explained that
there was an increase in engineering administration as a result of the wetland bill, modification of the
1991 program for water quality because of work with Plymouth on upland storage, and the monitoring
of six stations this summer for biota which will be compared with previous monitoring. The water
quality program is part of the 5 year program which is consistent with previous plans. The total water
quality budget is $40,000. Mr. Monk asked if we approve this budget if we were approving the
Sweeney Lake Study on which he would like further discussion. Mr. Kremer replied that approving
the proposed budget is not necessarily a carte blanche approval. Mr. Enck asked if we should consider
cJt4 jw% 21 'x'
=-kLk c_.
2
dedicating an entire meeting this summer as to where we want to go on water quality. Mr. Monk asked
what the percentage of increase was. Mr. Kremer indicated it is around 7%. It was suggested that,
because of contemplated insurance coverage, Audit and Bonding be increased from the $2500 in the
proposal to $4500 making the proposed total $247,500 instead of $245,500. Total funds available are
$427,706. The date on the information form for anticipated cash and investments should be corrected
from 1/3/91 to 2/1/91. Mr. Silberman moved approval of the proposed budget ($247,500). Seconded
by Mr. Rye. The motion carried unanimously.
Assessments were then discussed. Mr. Silberman said it was not necessary to vote for the assessment
at this meeting. The possibility of maintaining a $160,000 assessment was suggested. It was asked
how much longer we will have to carry the load on the Corps project. It was stated that there will be a
lot of work to get our proper credits together. This will most likely not happen until 1993.
Mr. Moore moved that we approve an $160,000 assessment in accordance with the formula established
by the Joint Powers Agreement. Seconded by Mr. Silberman. Mr. Moore then asked if we could see
the distribution by the communities. Mr. Silberman said he would like to see the distribution also.
Moore said he would like to move the $160,000 assessment but will authorize the amounts for each
municipality next drne. The rno—"iion cawed unanimously.
Communications
Chairman:
Mr. Enck had received copies of letters to Mr. Silberman and to Mr. Chenoweth appointing them as
Commissioner and Alternate Commissioner from February 1, 1991 to February 1, 1994.
Counsel:
1. Mr. Pearson discussed a letter he had written to Colonel Baldwin regarding our request for credits
for Wirth Golf Course easements and regarding our budgeting problems. Mr. Cabe of the Corps
real estate office had written regarding the appraisal. He indicated that it was based on 168 acres
instead of their calculated 104 acres which was below the elevation of 825. Mr. Pearson and Mr.
Kremer had met with Mr. Lawrence and had prepared a response to questions raised by the Corps.
Overlays were prepared sketching it out. The appraisal has been redone to show what we consider
to be the proper amount of land affected by the easement and it will be in Mr. Cabe's hands
tomorrow morning. It would have been given to Mr. Spychalla today but he was not in
attendance. This does not change the methodology of the appraisal. Mr. Lawrence believes the
Commission should receive $2,100,000 of credit for this right-of-way provided to the Corps for
the project..
2. Mr. Pearson had written a letter to Mr. Jerry Fitzgerald, Assistant City Attorney, Minneapolis,
regarding removal of the Fifth Street Bridge. The Circuit Court removed the restraining order. The
question was raised as to who would be certified as the lowest responsible builder. Mr.
Kannankutty said they will be pushing ahead.
3. Mr. Pearson sent a letter was sent to the Minnesota League of Municipalities about the EPA
regulations regarding applications for stormwater permits. Mr. Jamnik representing the League
replied that the League was following this closely and considered it very important. Mr. Kremer
reported that the PCA is still looking at group permits. Mr. Kremer indicated he will continue to
follow PCA activities on the stormwater permits.
4, Mr. Pearson briefed the Commission about the need for insurance We have received a proposal
for coverage for general liabilities and errors and omissions insurance. The League of Cities
Insurance Trust proposed premium is $3591. Mr. Erick wants to defer any decision until we have
more information and said he would work with Mr. Sonnenberg and Mr. Pearson and report back
to the Commission.
c►.n% J'ujj 21'91
3
5. Mr. Pearson distributed copies of a letter we had written to the PCA turning down the Medicine
Lake grant. Mr. Kremer raised the question whether we should send a copy of the letter to Senator
Durenberger.
Corps of Engineers
Mr. Spychalla was not in attendance. Mr. Kremer passed out an information memorandum on the
various relocations still to be accomplished as part of the project. It had been discussed that the
Commission might seriously consider doing Westbrooke and Medicine Lake projects by our member
cities. It was also stated that the Penn Avenue project should be done by Minneapolis because it
involves the Minneapolis Water Department.
Medicine Lake:
Mr. Moore said that the DNR says they do not own the dam at Medicine Lake -- that it is either
Plymouth or Hennepin County. It was stated that the preliminary concept plan said it is the DNR's.
Mr. Kremer said there are old plans that show the DNR to be the owner. If it is the DNR's, they will
help on the replacement cost but would insist Plymouth maintain it in the future. Mr. Moore said he
would presume that it would be a cost-sharing project. Mr. Erick said he wotild like to see it get done.
After further discussion it was moved by Mr. Moore that the engineer prepare a proposal to do a
feasibility study to construct the Medicine Lake Structure by the City of Plymouth. Seconded by Mr.
O'Toole and carried unanimously.
Westbrooke Road:
There are final plans for this project. It is a large arch structure and a considerable amount of right of
way is involved. Golden Valley is reluctant to proceed with the plans because they have had objections
from owners. The advantage of having the work done by Golden Valley is that they could change the
design. Mr. Silberman moved that a feasibility report be prepared but that it be implicit that we want to
work with Lowell Odland in its preparation. Seconded by Mr. Kannankutty. Mr. Monk said changes
in design made him "nervous" -- he wanted to be sure there is no change in protection. Golden Valley
typically uses a 50 year protection. If it is done locally, there can be savings in easements. Getting a
hold harmless document from the City of Golden Valley was suggested. Golden Valley might say they
couldn't get the right-of-way for the Corps project. Mr. Pearson said another community could then be
directed to condemn the necessary right-of-way if Golden Valley refused. The motion carried
unanimously.
Penn Avenue - Old Box Culvert.
The old culvert has to be removed. To remove the culvert a water main needs to be relocated This has
to be done by the City of Minneapolis Water Department who will charge for the work. Mr.
Kannankutty will get in touch with the Water Department. There is need for an approximate cost
estimate. Mr. Kremer will send this plan to Mr. Kannankutty.
Engineer
1. Mr. Kremer distributed a copy of a "Consultant Review" as to requirements for consultants and
proposals for services.
2. Mr. Kremer reported that there had been flooding in Medicine Lake, in Golden Valley and at Wirth
Park. Rain had been heavy - almost 3". Mr. Kremer said we would probably be hearing from the
Park Board concerning the water stored on the course by the Highway 55 structure.
clot JON 21,51
4
Old Business:
Orrin Thompson Homes. This had been discussed under New Business at the April meeting. Mr.
Paul Pearson of McCombs, Frank Roos Associates, Inc., and Mr. Bill Pritchard of Orrin Thompson
Homes were in attendance at this meeting also. Discussion followed re the drainage plan for Phase 1.
A series of ponds are proposed. This led to discussion of diverting portions of Minnehaha Creek
runoff to Bassett Creek. Concern was expressed about phosphorus and how it could be taken out. It
would result in 35 pounds more per year than what we would already expect. Mitigation was
discussed Mr. Rye asked if mitigation would be the responsibility of the applicant. He also asked
what kind of things in the way of mitigation could we expect to happen. Mr. Enck said this issue will
have to be addressed. Mr. Kremer recommended that the Phase I drainage plan be approved. We are
considering Phase I drainage and also Phase I drainage and the concept of the diversion. They do not
have a stormwater plan for Phase I. Mr. Rye asked what about not diverting the water and leaving it in
Minnehaha Creek. Mr. Kremer said we have to address the rate of runoff as well as the volume. This
is a landlocked area. Minnehaha Watershed has indicated that landlocked arras should be analyzed for
an outlet into a ponding area. Mr. Rye asked if this would be an additional cost item as well as time.
He also asked how much difficulty it would cause the developer if we didn't authorize the diversion.
Medina doesn't have a plan for providing an outlet. The question was raised if the runoff would be
chemically treated and if there would be provision for improving water quality., The Commission could
approve diversion given a proper plan. It was suggested that if we approve the drainage plan we will
then look at how treatment could be handled. Mr. Kremer said again he would recommend Phase I
drainage but that we should be clear that the diversion plan is not approved Mr. Pearson asked if this
would require filings with the Board of Water and Soil Resources regarding a change in the watershed
boundary. Mr. Kremer said the only issue is Phase I drainage and the mitigation of encroachment into
the City's stormwater pond. These have been submitted to the DNR for permit approval but the DNA
states that a permit will not be required.
Mr. Moore questioned what we are talking about in Phase I. We are discussing the west part which
drains to Minnehaha Creek and Elm Creek. We are not altering drainage. Should we eliminate
discussing diversion and discuss drainage only. It was moved by Mr. Moore that we approve Phase I
but that we give no indication of approving diversion. Seconded by Mr. Kannankutty. Mr. Moore
than added that we also approve the concept of diversion subject to water quality and that they be
required to take care of the net increase. Mr. Sonnenberg expressed that concept approval is indefinite
and we would be pinning ourselves down without knowing all the facts. Mr. Rye said he is
philosophically opposed to diversion. Mr. Kannankutty said he agrees with Mr. Sonnenberg. Mr.
Kremer questioned if Elm Creek and Minnehaha Watershed have approved in concept. Elm Creek is
not affected
Mr. Monk asked if we could see a statement of hardship explaining why the, have to divert the `nater, a
full implication of what happens to Bassett Creek because of the diversion, and what mitigation efforts
there will be. It was recommended that we not vote until we know the above. Mr. Moore withdrew his
motion and the amended motion and Mr. Kannankutty withdrew his seconds. Mr. Enck asked that a
study be made of the absolute need to do this and that this be reduced to writing by Mr. Kremer and
sent to the Commissioners.
Adjournment
Since there was no further business, it was moved by Mr. Sonnenberg and seconded by Mr. Rye that
the meeting adjourn. Chairman Enck adjourned the meeting.
W. Peter Enck, Chairman
Donald Rye, Secretary
Elaine Anderson, Recorder
Date:
GIM JUN a 1,9
EXECUTIVE SE-RETARY
Judie Anoerson
3030 Harxr ane
Piymoutr. MN 55447
Phone 6'2 553-11144
elm creek
Watershed Management Commission
TECHNICAi_ .ADVISOR
Henneo r : -nservaton District
'2450 Wave. to Bowevard
M;nnetor,a MN 55343
Phone 6-2 544-8572
Minutes
May 7, 1991
I. The regular monthly meeting of the Elm Creek Watershed Management Com-
mission was called to order at 3:10 p.m., Tuesday, May 7, 1991, at Plymouth
City Hall, Plymouth, MN, by Chairman Fred Moore.
Those present were: Todd Tuominen, Champlin; Bob Derus,,Corcoran; Shir-
ley Slater, Dayton; Steve Peaslee, Hassan; Ken Ashfeld, Maple Grove;
Larry Elwell, Medina; Fred Moore, Plymouth; Leon Zeug, HCD; John Barten,
Hennepin Parks; Will Hartfeldt, attorney; and Judie Anderson, Executive
Secretary.
II. Peaslee moved and Ashfeld seconded a motion to approve the minutes of
the April 10, 1991 meeting. Motion carried.
III. Derus moved and Ashfeld seconded a motion to approve the Treasurer's
Report and pay the bills. Motion carried.
IV. Reports from the District Office.
A. Model Floodplain Ordinances. HCD presented a draft of the revised
ordinance for review by the Commissioners. A copy of the draft was sent to
the DNR and HCD is awaiting their comments. The Commissioners should direct
their comments to HCD.
B. Changes to Management Plan. HCD drafted a composite of the amend-
ments which have been adopted by the Commission in the years since the Plan
was approved by the Board of Water and Soil Resources. These will be trans-
mitted to BWSR following review and comment by the Commissioners.
C. Water Quality Monitoring. The 1991 program has begun on Weaver,
Fish and Jubert Lakes, the Champlin Mill Pond, and at the eight stream sites.
Stream samples collected April 18th indicated that fecal coliforms were below
the 200 colonies/100 ml guideline at all sites.
The City of Maple Grove Lake Quality Commission has initiated a
monitoring program which in 1991 includes Rice and Weaver Lakes. Weaver Lake
sampling will be coordinated with the Commission's monitoring schedule.
HCD also met with USGS staff to discuss some issues of concern re-
garding the USGS monitoring stations. The 1991 analytical program has been
corrected to include suspended solids in addition to total solids.
V. Fr000sed Rules for Metropolitan Local Water Management. Moore gave an
,ih� JUN 21,91
� LAd_
Minutes
May 7, 1991
page 2
rules. A second meeting is scheduled for May 9, after which the group will
bring its recommendations to the full Task Force.
VI. Project Reviews.
A. 86-037 Joe Raskob, Medina. No information.
B. 87-034 Shadow Creek 3rd Addition, Maple Grove. The developer has
submitted a plan for removal. The City of Maple Grove has requested addition-
al erosion and sediment control measures for restoring the stockpile area.
C. 88-017 Gerald Dykhoff, Medina. HCD will send a letter to the
owner stating that the surveyor has indicated his notes would not be useful to
the Commission in plotting existing contours onto the approved grading plan
and reminding him of the June 1 performance deadline.
D. 88-018 Steve Lessor, Jerry Westrum, Corcoran. HCD has not re-
ceived a response to their letter to the owner requesting an* as -built of the
property.
E. 90-022 Shadow Creek 5th Addition, Maple Grove. This project has
been withdrawn by the owner. Zeug will write a confirming letter to the City
of Maple Grove.
F. 90-024 Mel Harris, Maple Grove. The owner has submitted a plan
to mitigate the fill on his property. Zeug will meet with Jim Kujawa of Maple
Grove to confirm the numbers.
G. 91-004 Mitchell -Pearson Property, Plymouth. HCD has requested
additional changes to the erosion and sediment control plan.
H 91-005 Veit Contracting, Hassan. No information.
I. 91-006 Medina Road, Plymouth and Medina. HCD has recommended
minor changes to the erosion and sediment control plan. The engineer will sub-
mit a revision pending review by other involved WMO's.
J. 91-007 High Pointe Park, Champlin. HCD approved the erosion and
sediment control plan.
VII. 1992 Budget. The Commission must adopt its 1992 budget at the June 12
meeting. Letters requesting tax capacities have been mailed to assessors of
the member communities. Staff are requested to provide their anticipated
costs to Anderson by June 5.
There being no further business before the Commission, the meeting was ad-
journed at 4:00 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Judie A. Anderson
Executive Secretary
cIm JUN 21 `91
VIM
EXECUTIVE SECRETARY
Jude Anderson
3030 Harbor Lane
Plymouth. MN 55447
Phone 612/553-1144
z-\ old
CORRECTED
elm creek
Watershed Management Commission
TREASURER'S REPORT
May 31, 1991
TECHNICAL ADVISOR
431.96
3
10,568.04
Hennepin Conservation DiStriCt
Cash SunaIy
0
2,000.00
12450 Wayzata Boulevard
M nnetonKa MN 55343
Interest Bearing
Checking Account - Ridgedale
$ 7,510.04
Phone 6.2 544-8572
Interest Bearing
Checking Account - Norwest
0
6,000.00
Money Market Savings Account - Ridgedale
101,960.82
61000.00
TOTAL CASH ON BAND - April 30, 1991
$109,470.86
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bills Subaitted
1,100.00
$47,000.00
$ 8,104.61
Will Hartfeldt
S 500.00
Legal expenses
41000.00
Norwest Hank
25.00
Audit verification
4,759.27
Instruaental Research 1,672.69
Lake and streaa saaples
0
,IHSS
907.01
Adainistrative expense
0
TOTAL
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$3,104.70
$47,000.00 $11,209.31
23
EXPENSES YEAR TO DATE
thru last aonth - 33$ of year coapleted
Expenditures Budgeted Expended Eipended
Adainistrative $12,400.00 S 4,322.65 34
Legal Services 4,500.00 3,350.00 74
Technical Services
Streaa Gauge/Monitoring
Rain Gauge
Watershed Plat
Lakes Monitoring
Other
Contingency
TOTAL
Unexpended
$ 8,077.35
1,150.00
11,000.00
431.96
3
10,568.04
2,000.00
0
0
2,000.00
4,000.00
0
0
4,000.00
6, 000.00
0
0
6,000.00
6,000.00
0
0
61000.00
1,100.00
0
0
1,100.00
$47,000.00
$ 8,104.61
17
$38,895.39
i, W JUN Z 1,91,
thru this aonth - 42% of year coapleted
Expenditures
Budgeted Expended
g Expended
Unexpended
Adainistrative
$12,400.00 S 5,254.66
42
$ 7,145.34
Legal Services
4,500.00 3,850.00
86
650.00
Technical Services
Streaa Gauge/Monitoring 11,000.00 863.92
6
10,136.09
Rain Gauge
2,000.00 0
0
2,000.00
Watershed Plan
4,000.00 0
0
41000.00
Lakes Monitoring
61000.00 1,240.73
20
4,759.27
Other
6,000.00 0
0
6,000.00
Contingency
1,100.00 0
0
1,100.00
TOTAL
$47,000.00 $11,209.31
23
$35,790.69
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
INCOME RECEIVED
During May
Year to Date
Dues
$
$22,693.00
Interest
516.86
3,126.81
$ 516.86
$25,819.81
-------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------
Cash Suuary
Interest Bearing Checking Account
- Ridgedale
$ 4,445.92
Interest Bearing Checking Account
- Norwest
0
Money Market Savings Account -
Ridgedale
102,437.10
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL CASE ON HAND - May 31,
1991
$106,863.01
i, W JUN Z 1,91,
elm creek
Watershed Management Commission
EXECUTIVE SECRETARY
Jude Anderson
3030 Harbor Lane
Plymouth. MN 55447
Phone 612'553-1144
TECHNICAL ADVISOR
Hennepin Conservation District
12450 Wayzata Boulevard
M;nnetonka. MN 55343
Phone 612'544-8572
June 17, 1991
Ms. Laurie Rauenhorst
City of Plymouth
3400 Plymouth Boulevard
Plymouth, MN 55447
Dear Ms. Rauenhorst:
Enclosed for your files is a copy of the budget of the Elm Creek Watershed
Management Commission for the year 1992 as approved by the Commission at its
June 12, 1991 meeting. Your community's share is 5.8% or $2,280.
If you have any questions regarding this budget, don't hesitate to contact
this office or Chairman Fred Moore.
Regards,
Judie A. Anderson
Executive Secretary
JAA:tim
Encl.
cc: Fred Moore
CIM JUN z 1 '91
elm creek
Watershed Management Commission
EXECUTIVE SECRETARY
Judie Anderson
3030 Harbor Lane
Plymouth. MN 55447
Phone 612 553-1144
TECHNICAL ADVISOR
Hennepin Conservation District
12450 Wayzata Boulevard
Minnetonka, MN 55343
Phone 612 544-8572
June 17, 1991
To: Commissioners
Staff
Fr: Judie Anderson
Re: 1992 Budget
Below is outlined the budget for the Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission
for the year 1992 as approved by the Commission at its June 12, 1991 meeting.
Revenue
Fund Balance S 9,400
Member Assessments 39,000
Water Monitoring 2,000
Interest Income 4,700
Total Revenue $55,100
Expenditures
'90 Tax Capacity
Technical Services
'92 Budget Share
Stream Gauge Operation/Monitoring
$12,600
Lakes Monitoring
9,300
Rain Gauge
2,000
Engineering, Consulting
3,000
Report Printing
1,000
Special Projects
1,000
Contingency
2,000
Total Technical Services
30,900
Administrative
14,200
Legal Services
9,000
Contingency
1,000
Total Expenditures
$55,100
----------------------
Budget Share by Member
JAA:tim
CIM A21'91
'90 Tax Capacity
Member
'92 Budget Share
192
Overall
Community
Elm Creek Basin
Fee
%age
Amount
%age
Amount
Champlin
2,148,892
1,000
7.8
2,496
9.0
3,496
Corcoran
2,390,496
1,000
8.6
2,752
9.6
3,752
Dayton
2,102,360
1,000
7.6
2,432
8.8
3,432
Hassan
1,362,279
1,000
4.9
1,568
6.6
2,568
M Grove
16,107,315
1,000
58.0
18,560
50.2
19,560
Medina
2,530,436
1,000
9.1
2,912
10.0
3,912
Plymouth
1,121,278
1,000
4.0
1,280
5.8
2,280
TOTALS
$27,763,056
$7,000
100.0
$32,000
100.0
$39,000
JAA:tim
CIM A21'91
SHINGLE CREEK WATERSHED
MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
3030 Harbor Lane • Plymouth, MN 55447
Telephone (612) 553-1144 Fax (612) 553-9326
June 20, 1991
Ms. Laurie Rauenhorst, City Clerk
City of Plymouth
3400 Plymouth Boulevard
Plymouth, MN 55447
Dear Ms. Rauenhorst:
Enclosed is a copy of the 1992 budget adopted by the Shingle Creek Watershed
Management Commission at its June 13, 1991 meeting.
The Commissioners approved a budget assessment of $135,000, which is allocated
50% on the basis of area within the watershed and 500 on the basis of tax
capacity within the watershed. Your community's share of this budget is 12.35%
or $16,672.50.
Please use this amount in determining your city's 1992 budget. If you have any
questions, please do not hesitate to contact your representative, Fred Moore,
or Treasurer Sy Knapp, 569-3300.
Sincerely,
Ge//rald E. Butcher
Secretary
GEB:ja
Encl.
cc: Fred Moore
GIM JUN 21,91-
SHINGLE CREEK WATERSHED
MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
3030 Harbor Lane • Plymouth, MN 55447
Telephone (612) 553-1144 Fax (612) 553-9326
June 20, 1991
To: Commissioners
Staff
Fr: Sy Knapp
Re: 1992 Budget
Below is outlined the budget for the year 1992 which was approved by the
Shingle Creek Watershed Management Commission at its June 13 general meeting.
Annual Assessment
Annual Assessment to Member Communities $135,000
Appropriations
Engineering Services
Watershed Management Plan $ 13,000
Project Review 21,600
General Administration 28,000
Special Projects 30,000
Total Engineering Appropriation 92,600
Legal 13,000
Secretarial 10,880
Meeting Expense 1,500
Audit and Bonding 400
Contingencies 1,620
Reserve* 15,000
Total Other Appropriations 42,400
Total Appropriations $135,000
*The Commission's end of year fund balance is estimated as follows:
1991 - $23,000 and 1992 - $38,000.
04 JUN 2 A -
June 20, 1991
page 2
Acreage and Tax Capacity Summar
The Shingle Creek Watershed Management Organization Joint Powers Agreement
provides that the organization and planning costs will be apportioned as
follows: 50% on the basis of area within the Watershed Management Organiza-
tion and 50% on the basis of tax capacity within the organization.
The following will be each community's share in 1992:
Cost Allocation Cost Alloca. Based
Based
1990 Tax
on Tax
Acreage
Capacity
Brooklyn Center
3,720
$ 21,413,859
Brooklyn Park
7,080
28,361,167
Crystal
2,480
7,485,798
Maple Grove
5,020
8,492,325
Minneapolis
1,950
6,304,979
New Hope
2,070
11,512,628
Osseo
300
1,613,242
Plymouth
4,380
9,416,424
Robbinsdale
1,460
6,601,353
TOTALS
28,460
$101,201,775
The Shingle Creek Watershed Management Organization Joint Powers Agreement
provides that the organization and planning costs will be apportioned as
follows: 50% on the basis of area within the Watershed Management Organiza-
tion and 50% on the basis of tax capacity within the organization.
The following will be each community's share in 1992:
Cost Allocation Cost Alloca. Based
JAA:tim
GINA JUN 21,91
Based
on Area
on Tax
Capacity
Total Cost
%age
Dollars
%age
Dollars
%age
Dollars
Brooklyn Center
13.1 $
8,842.50
21.2
$ 14,310.00
17.15
$ 23,152.50
Brooklyn Park
24.9
16,807.50
28.0
18,900.00
26.45
35,707.50
Crystal
8.7
5,872.50
7.4
4,995.00
8.05
10,867.50
Maple Grove
17.6
11,880.00
8.4
5,670.00
13.00
17,550.00
Minneapolis
6.9
4,657.50
6.2
4,185.00
6.55
8,842.50
New Hope
7.3
4,927.50
11.4
7,695.00
9.35
12,622.50
Osseo
1.0
675.00
1.6
1,080.00
1.30
1,755.00
Plymouth
15.4
10,395.00
9.3
6,277.50
12.35
16,672.50
Robbinsdale
5.1
3,442.50
6.5
4,387.50
5.80
7,830.00
TOTALS
100.0 $
67,500.00
100.0
$ 67,500.00
100.00
$135,000.00
JAA:tim
GINA JUN 21,91
01
Scandal May
Spur Connecticut
Manager Licensing
Connecticut may become the third
state to license property management
companies. State Rep. Douglas Mintz
(D -Norwalk) expects to introduce a bill
soon after the state legislature convenes
February 7. The bill will require that
management funis be licdnsed and carry
bonds to protect association assets.
If the bill is passed, Connecticut will
join Florida and Hawaii as states requiring
management firm licensing. California
has a licensing proposal pending. Mintz
said that he has been working on the bill
for six months, and that he thinks a growing
scandal involving a Connecticut manage-
ment firm will make passage easy.
Tha NW rrnrn of New Raver
_YMOUTH CREEK HOMEOWNERS' ASSOCIATION
0. BOX 41633 PLYMOUTH, MN., 55447
Telephone 612-557-1758
2:—\
Inside:
Proposition 13
Faces Court Test
See Page 2
4 a New JerseyAct Requires
Reimbursemer-166Services,
_
New :'Jersey mumcipahaes'are`:DepartmentofCommunityAffairs and
required to provide community services< other ezpeits to exploe the ramifications
or to reimbtuse homeowner associations of the
thatprovidetheir ownservicesundera hSnowremoval,streetlighting,and
new `law signed by ' out -going . Gov collecttoi bi' leaves,'recyclable materials
Thomas Kean on his last day in office = and garbage are covered under the law.
-New Jersey is first in enacting ;Reimbursement will be at the level
such legislation on a state-wide basis_,;, community associations currently pay
althoughthere have been -agreements for the services or what it would cost
between homeowner associations and -municipality municipality to provide them,
individual municipalities. - The New whichever is lower. The law goes into
Jersey act could serve as- a national effect on January 1, 1991, and will be
model for similar legislation. The phased in ata rate of 20 percent a year
New Jersey CAI chapter plans a February over five years.
20 meeting with Charles Richman, The CAI New Jersey chapter was
assistant commissioner of the 'state prominent in aiding passage of the act.
(_ocrC, /
Uu1G7.p "tit.. F,vf,—J .........b ..... ..... ..._ ___r________._ __
qualified" The Mintz bill has been viewed operations, and the validity and sanctity
favorably by other Connecticut of covenants, and warranties. These cases
management firms as a step toward focus on specific questions arising from
promoting professionalism in the industry. specific situations. Taken together,
control over assessments and finance
become crucial issues, and consumer
questions multiply as unit owners strive
continued on page 5
CSM JUN z 1,91
it copyright T991 POST PUBLICATIONS&
Mielke Field offer
is withdrawn
By Bob Shipman
Super Valu Stores has
withdrawn its offer of $800,000
for Mielke Field, the District
281 football field that lies adja-
cent to the Anthony Shopping
Center in Crystal.
The action comes after a
June 3 School Board meeting in
which the board took no action
either to accept or reject Super
Valu's offer.
"It wouldn't be in good spirit
to leave (the offer) on the
table," said Super Valu assis-
tant retail development man-
ager Pat Groeper last week.
"It puts everybody in an un-
compromising situation. To
leave it sit there on the table
wasn't productive for any-
body.'
Groeper said the company is
still interested in obtaining
Mielke, adding, however, that
the seven -acre field would be
land banked until a major re-
construction of the Highway
100 and 36th Avenue intersec-
tion is complete in 1998.
During the June 3 meeting,
school board members said
they were concerned that the
cost of relocating Mielke would
exceed the $800,000 offer. Also,
there are no indications that
neighboring communities are
willing to provide a new site for
the field.
Tony Nicklow, who along
with his brother William, owns
Nicklow's Restaurant and the
adjoining shopping center, said
the current facility has been a
source of problems for nearby
businesses.
Echoing comments from
Crystal city officials, Nicklow
said Mielke provides no park-
ing or toilet facilities for
athletes. At times, he said, he
has had to hire security per-
sonnel to monitor parking
problems during events.
Nicklow added that both the
city and the school district
would benefit from the sale
through increased tax reve-
nues.
The Nicklows have an
agreement pending to sell
one-third of their ten arce
parcel to Super Valu.
For now, it seems, both
Super Valu and District 281
have plenty of time to consider
their next move.
"The development we're
looking at is years down the
road due to construction of the
major interchange going in at
36th and 100," Groeper said.
"Right now, quite frankly,
we're just keeping our options
open because that whole area
there is going to take on a
whole differant feel and look
after that interchange is put in.
No action is going to be taken
for several years out there due
to the construction."
Crystal community devel-
opment director Ann Norris
said that according to the city's
May 31 agreement with Super
Valu, the city will step in only if
Super Valu makes a -formal
request to the city.
"Since we weren't really in-
volved in that whole exchange,
we're not getting involved at
this point," Norris said.
However, Norris said, the
city stands ready to act at
Super Valu's request.
"If Super Valu tries to make
another run at the school dis-
trict and are unsuccessful, then
they will make a formal re-
quest that the city and the EDA
use their powers of eminent
domain to acquire it."
cltA o21,g1
CUSTOMER SERVICE LINE
June 11, 1991
ANONYMOUS
PROBLEM: Caller claims that
renovated the
without any building inspectors being involved. He
said there were no sprinklers, no heat detectors.
They used 2x4" studs instead of aluminum studs. They
used 1/2" plywood sheet rock instead of 5/8's. He is
concerned that it is a fire hazard.
SOLUTION: The call was referred to Community Development
Director Blair Tremere.
CIM JUN 21 %1
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
DATE: June 14, 1991
TO: Blair Tremere, Director of Planning & Community
Development
FROM: Helen LaFave, Communications Coordinator
SUBJECT: CUSTOMER SERVICE LINE CALL
We received an anonymous call on the 24 -Hour Customer Service
Line on June 11. While the call was anonymous, the caller points
out several public safety items which merit investigation. The
caller claims that
without the involvement of any
building inspectors. He cites several examples to back up his
claim. He said that the renovation does not have sprinklers or
heat detectors. He also said that they used 1/2" plywood sheet
rock, rather than 5/8" and that 2x4" studs were used, rather than
aluminum studs.
I would like to discuss how to handle this call, given the fact
that it is anonymous, but also concerns some potential public
safety problems and liability to the city.
,,, Juh?W91-
=Vz
CUSTOMER SERVICE LINE
June 11, 1991
LOIS HANSEY, 1855 NIAGARA LANE, 475-1895
PROBLEM: Poison ivy is growing rampantly across the street from
Ms. Hansey's house on the Cimmeron East side of the
street. She and her husband have tried spraying it
themselves, but it hasn't done any good. Because she
and her husband are both allergic to poison ivy, they
would like to see either the City or the Cimmeron East
management eradicate the poison ivy.
SOLUTION: The City or Cimmeron East management be required to
eradicate the poison ivy. Ms. Hansey requested that a
staff person call her regarding this.
Circ JUN 21 '91
CITY OF.PLYMOUTH
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
DATE: June 14, 1991
TO: Glen Upton, Weed Inspector
FROM: Helen LaFave,`Communications Coordinator
SUBJECT: CUSTOMER SERVICE LINE CALL
I received a call from Lois Hansey, 1855 Niagara Lane, 475-1895,
on the 24 -Hour Customer Service Line on June 11 concerning poison
ivy growing rampantly across the street from their house. She
would like this investigated and either the City, or the Cimmeron
East management be required to eradicate the poison ivy. Please
investigate this matter and advise me of action taken on this by
Friday, June 21 so that I may note it in my customer service line
log. Additionally, please call Ms. Hansey and advise her of our
actions.
Thanks.
HL:kec
cc: James G. Willis, City Manager
S.F. 6/21/91
S r aye '/�
✓�rGf IC �-pS� J,
ja rIse/ ��c,�c�G�� �r J =.fir y✓�/.
�'u, �� /✓i S - �a-r SAY Q .r d Q � .S P
1 l YNdc'f e:- S'i"vvr�' /3 V.)
tlyMov
CIM JUN 21'91
June 19, 1991
COUNCIL MEMBER
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
3400 Plymouth Blvd.
Plymouth, MN 55447
Dear Council Member,
/ 7400 Boone Avenue North, Brooklyn Park, Minnesota 55428
O (612) 425-8666
FAX (612)425-1653 (800) 336-8666
!Tq 1
-4
On August 25, 1991 I wrote a letter to the City of Plymouth
and all of the council members requesting that they
carefully review the choices available on City Property 416,
106 Northwest Blvd., as far as alignment, noise, pollution,
and the impact on the wetlands. My concerns were dismissed
as trivial. They claimed that all of the issues were
carefully studied by both the City and the Hennepin
Transportation Department. As per the mayors written words,
"An Environmental Impact Statement and Norse Analysis were
not required." As you now know it was, and the city is
responsible for the actions taken along this highway.
As you can see from my photo's contained in my letter of
June 3, 1991, this destruction has had a staggering impact
on my property. As of today I have spent $ 7,000.00 on
landscaping, trying to start to renew what was destroyed.
o
S�
TO CITY OF PLYMOUTH COUNCIL MEMBER
June 19, 1991
Page 2
Because of the destruction of these trees and the way it was
done I am requesting that:
1. That trees be placed along the walking pati. from
56th Ave. to Schmidt Lake Rd.
2. That a barrier be placed to reduce noise.
3. Fencing be established for those residences that
border along the walking path.
The bridge is the key issue for the people that border
Northwest Blvd. If a bridge is absolutely needed, then it
should be incorporated in with the design of the interchange
that is possibly going to be used for Schmidt Lake Road.
This interchange would have an effect on the environment,
but combining it into one project, it might be better then
two significant encroachments. I expect a written reply to
each of my requests from the council.
Sincerel?nE.
oyne
5515 Sycamore Lane, Plymouth, MN
JEC/wgh
CC: Lloyd Ricker
Maria Vasiliou
Carole Helliwell
Bob Zitur
Jim Willis
Rick Duncan
Dave Barstad
t JUN 21 '91
STATE OF
ll�JUPJIEZ(OVZ:
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
500 LAFAYETTE ROAD, ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55155-4037
OFFICE OF THE DNR INFORMATION
COMMISSIONER (612) 296-6157
June 12, 1991
Mr. David A. Barstad
12915 54th Avenue North
Plymouth, Minnesota 55442-1721
Dear Mr. Barstad:
Thank you for your June 3, 1991 letter expressing interest in the
Department's review of the proposed Northwest Boulevard/ Schmidt
Lake Road Droiect.
The Department is guided by Minnesota Statute 103G.311 for public
hearing procedures related to permits. In addition to details on
the hearing process, the statute gives the Commissioner the
authority to waive the hearing requirement. In practice, it is the
Department's policy to utilize the public process at the local
level; a formal permit public hearing is only held if the
Department determines that there has been inadequate input from the
public at the local level.
The Department has and will continue to work with the city of
Plymouth, the city's consultant, and concerned citizens during the
review process for the Northwest Boulevard/ Schmidt Lake Road permit
application. Regional Hydrologist John Stine will contact the
residents' representatives prior to any final decision by the
Department on the city's permit application.
Please contact Regional Hydrologist John Stine at 772-7910 should
you have further questions.
You truly,
v Rodney W. Sando
Commissioner /
cc: Mayor Kim Bergman, City of Plymouth ✓
Kent Lokkesmoe, Acting Director, Waters
John Stine, Region 6 Waters
QL143 14 : �=�1 ST THERE'=;E HCiI'1E
Mr NEW HOPE
Saint Therese Home, Inc.
Care Center - Residence
8000-8008 Bass Lake Road, Minneapolis, MN 55428
(612) 537-4503 FAX. (612) 537-2054
June 11, 1991
Mr. Blair Tremere
Development Director
City of Plymouth
3400 Plymouth Blvd.
Plymouth, MN 55.497
Dear Mr. Tremere:
Jbw�
IZE�t�
(0-14-9 I VnuzI c R • —
F )( s . CC) OA61EN TS ?
Mr. John Duffy from Duffy Development Company has asked that I send you a letter stating what
we are proposing for the eastern 12,400 sq. ft. of the Schiebe's Shopping Center.
First I would like to tell you who St. Therese Home, Lnc., is. St. Therese Home, Inc, is a 302 bed
non-profit Catholic Nursing Home with 220 attached apartment units. We have approximately 550
elderly residents living on our campus, which is located at 80W Bass Lake Road in New Hope,
Minnesota. Our primary service area is the northern part of Hennepin County. Residents also
come from other parts of the Metropolitan area the State as well as other States within the U.S.
We employee over 500 part-time and full-time employees.
The Minnesota Department of Human Services has the total responsibility of determining rates for
our Nursing Home. They also determine what cost they will reimburse the Nursing Home for.
The State of Minnesota also has been suffering from cash short falls thereby, putting pressure on
the State Department to reduce expenditures. Given these constraints St. Therese became well
aware that we must raise funds from other sources to make the necessary improvements to
continue providing the quality care expected from us. One area that is available to us is Lawful
Gambling. St. Therese Home and St. Benedict's Center, a nursing home from St. Cloud,
Minnesota, opened a bingo hall in February, 1988 located in Brooklyn Park. The hall became an
immediate success. We currently have another partner, St. Gerard's Church located in Brooklyn
Park, who along with the two nursing homes operates Carousel Bingo holding 13 bingo sessions
per week. We also sell pull tabs and provide an opportunity to purchase pop, hot dogs, etc. from
our concession area If you wish to contact the City of Brooklyn Park in regards to our
relationship with them, you may contact Al Erickson at 424-8000.
"Dedicated to the Care of the Aging" Cir", JUN 21 ,g 1
A Voluntary, Non -Profit, Gift Supported Corporation
An Equal Opoortunity Employer
JU11 14 "+1 14:C-1-2 ST THERE .E HC11,1E P. ZI
Mr. Blair Tremere
June 11, 1991
Page 2.
Our proposal for the Schiebe's Shopping Center is to duplicate the bingo hall we help operate in
Brooklyn Park. The eastern 12,400 square ft. would be renovated to provide a seating capacity of
approximately 500 bingo players. We would sell pull tabs along with providing concessions for
our customers. There would be no alcohol served at the site. We anticipate to employ
approximately 75 concession sales, callers, and other various personnel. The hours of operation
will consist of normal daily retail hours with the potential of later evening operations (11:00 p.m.
to 1:00 a.m.) on designated weekends and specific holidays. The site plans to attract an average of
approximately 200 patrons each session, which is expected to enhance the commerce of the
adjacent business.
It is anticipated that the following improvements will be made to the site:
A) The location will be the eastern 12,400 sq. ft. of the center.
B) Slightly less than half the parking lot would be resurfaced and re -stripped.
C) Some improvements would be made to the pylon sign and a small amount of landscaping
would be used to dress -up a new entry way.
D) Some roofing repair is expected.
E) Inside, the former grocery store space would be fitted with new ceiling tiles, new flooring
and wall covering, and painting, where applicable.
F) A new mechanical system is anticipated.
G) The floor plan would be slightly modified to include storage rooms, adequate restroom
facility, office space and a concession area.
It is anticipated that these improvements will greatly enhance the aesthetics of the center as well 4s
improving its' financial picture.
We look forward to a discussion of these improvements at your earliest convenience.
Should you have questions, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Kenneth J. Gallus
Administrator
KJG:jk
cw JUN 21 '91
June 6, 1991
Ann Berger
Personnel Coordinator
Advance Machine
14600 - 21st Avenue North
Plymouth, MN 55441
CIN OF
PLYMOUTF+
SUBJECT: TRAVEL DEMAND MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
Dear Ms. Berger:
We need your help!
The Metropolitan Council is mandating that cities take effective
steps to reduce traffic congestion on metropolitan system roads
(I-494, Highways 55, and 169). We are required to identify the
number of automobiles our efforts will remove from the roadways
in the future. Compliance has been sought by refusing to approve
elements of the City Comprehensive Plan until our Travel Demand
Management Program objectives meet their requirements.
That's where you come in!
A Travel Demand Management (TDM) Program, intended to enlist the
help of businesses and employers as cooperative participants, is
needed to reduce the vehicle congestion on the roadway. At one
extreme, a Travel Demand Management Program will require changes
to the City's ordinances which would mandate trip reduction
measures for at least new developments in the community. Some
communities have taken this approach. Employers would be
mandated to subsidize various forms of employee mass
transportation to ensure that the number of trips within the City
is kept below target rates.
To avoid such negative incentives, the City of Plymouth is
initiating a voluntary Travel Demand Management Program.
For the program to work, we are relying upon your cooperation.
Here is what we intend to do:
1. We will contact you with a brief survey to be
administered to employees. Once completed, we will ask
that the surveys be returned to us. The surveys will
identify measures which employees believe would be most
effective in getting them to car pool, van pool,
telecommute, bike, walk, or use the public transportation
system.
cls JUN 21 '91
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH. MINNESOTA 55447. TELEPHONE (612) 550-5000
.� A-oct.
Ann Berger
June 6, 1991
Page 2
2. Once we have the results, we will confidentially share
them with you as the employer so that we can work
together to develop a plan to reduce congestion on the
roadways by using the appropriate strategies.
We must work together, in order for this to work, and to avoid
undesirable ordinance changes. So when members of our Travel
Demand Management Team contact you, please give a few minutes of
your time to learn more about this important effort. By working
together now, we can do much to alleviate severe congestion
anticipated on metropolitan area roadways at minimal cost in time
and dollars terms.
The Travel Demand Management Team members listed below contacting
you: Dave Jacobson (229-2713), Len Simich (229-2709), or Assata
Brown (292-8789) - Regional Transit Board; Steve Mahowald -
Metropolitan Transit Commission (349-7775); Judy Orchard -
Minnesota Rideshare (349-7531); and Frank Boyles (550-5013), or
Dan Faulkner (550-5071), City of Plymouth.
Thanks in advance for your cooperation.
Sincerely,
Kim M. Bergman
Mayor
KB:kec
cc: Frank Boyles, Assistant City Manager
Judy Orchard, MN Rideshare
George Sonn Jim Renier Herb Getzler
Advance Machine Honeywell Miles Homes
14600 21st Ave. N. P.O. Box 524 4700 Nathan Lane N.
Plymouth, MN 55441 Minneapolis, MN 55440 Plymouth, MN 55442
Skip Gage Sean James Anthony Beer
Carlson Companies Wagner Spray Tech Buhler-Miag Inc.
12755 Highway 55 1770 Fernbrook Lane N. 1100 Xenium Lane N.
Plymouth, MN 55441 Plymouth, MN 55442 Plymouth, MN 55441
James Ousley David Huntley Marvin Graybow
Empros Mammoth Norter Co. Greybow Daniels
2300 Berkshire Lane 13120 Co. Rd. 6 9700 13th Ave. N.
Plymouth, MN 55441 Plymouth, MN 55441 Plymouth, MN 55441
Bob Trill Richard Snyder Jerry Wellik
Miles Homes Snyder General McQuay L.S.I. Corporaticn
4700 Nathan Lane N. 13600 Industrial Pk. Blvd. 2100 Xenium Lane N.
Plymouth, MN 55442 Plymouth, MN 55441 Plymouth, MN 55441
John Hay Ardwin Link Connie Turnquist
Prudential United Hardware L.S.I. Corporation
13001 County Road 10 5005 Nathan Ln. N. 2100 Xenium Lane N.
Plymouth, MN 55442 Plymouth, MN 55442 Plymouth, MN 55441
Allan Kasdan Robert Fayfield
Log House Food Inc. Banner Engineering
700 Berkshire Lane N. 9714 10th Ave. N.
Plymouth, MN 55441 Plymouth, MN 55441
Thomas Tully William Sweeney
Schneider USA ITT Life Ins. Corp.
5905 Nathan Lane 505 N. Highway 169
Plymouth, MN 55422 Plymouth, MN 55441
Colleen Wendell Hung
James Phillips Co. Deltak Corp.
2440 Fernbrook Lane 13330 12th Ave. N.
Plymouth, MN 55447 Plymouth, MN 55441
Dr. Ron Carter Tim Gentz
Hennepin Tech Ctr. James Phillips Co.
1820 Xenium Lane N. 2440 Fernbrook Lane
Plymouth, MN 55441 Plymouth, MN 55447
012.1 o 21'91
Ann Berger
Advance Machine
14600 21st Ave. N.
Plymouth, MN 55441
Julie Schulke
Carlson Companies
12755 Highway 55
Plymouth, MN 55441
J.V. Helgeson
Empros
2300 Berkshire Lane
Plymouth, MN 55441
Raymond Kessler
Honeywell
975 Nathan Lane N.
Plymouth, MN 55441
Denise Kokales
Prudential
3033 Campus Drive
Plymouth, MN 55441
Mike Stulberg
Log House Food Inc.
700 Berkshire Lane N
Plymouth, MN 55441
Stacy Bechtel
Schneider USA
5905 Nathan Lane
Plymouth, MN 55422
Robert Wood
CBM Industries Inc.
13220 Co. Rd. 6
Plymouth, MN 55441
Edith LeJovarn
Hennepin Tech Ctr.
1820 Xenium Lane N.
Plymouth, MN 55441
Colleen Olson
Honeywell
12001 Highway 55
Plymouth, MN 55441
Lynn Johnson
Wagner Spray Tech
1770 Fernbrook Lane
Plymouth, MN 55442
Jean Shogren
Mammoth Norter Co.
13120 Co. Rd. 6
Plymouth, MN 55441
�,• aoc�
Donald Wildman
Scoville Press
14505 - 27th Ave. N.
Plymouth, MN 55441
Frank Lunetta
Buhler-Miag Inc.
N. 1100 Xenium Lane N.
Plymouth, MN 55441
Barb Ewald
Snyder General McQuay
13600 Industrial Pk. Blvd.
Plymouth, MN 55441
Dean Schwanke
United Hardware
5005 Nathan Ln. N.
Plymouth, MN 55442
Phoebe Ruona
Banner Engineering
9714 10th Ave. N.
Plymouth, MN 55441
Theo Peterson
ITT Life Ins. Corp.
505 N. Highway 169
Plymouth, MN 55441
Judy Riley
Deltak Corp.
13330 12th Ave. N.
Plymouth, MN 55441
June 13, 1991
Mr. Richard Harrison
Scanticon Hotel and
Conference Center
3131 Campus Drive
Plymouth, MN 55441
Dear Mr. Harrison:
CITU OF
PLYMOUTF+
The City of Plymouth, in conjunction with the Regional Transit
Board, is developing a Comprehensive Transportation Plan as
required by the Metropolitan Council. An important part of this
project is a transportation survey that will be distributed to
employees of major companies throughout the City of Plymouth.
The responses will provide us with a better understanding of the
travel behavior patterns within the City.
The validity and reliability of the study hinges on a strong
survey return rate. Consequently, we are developing a random
prize drawing to create additional incentive. All persons
returning completed surveys will be eligible. The City of
Plymouth and the Regional Transit Board are now soliciting a
limited number of Plymouth -based sponsors for the drawing. A
sponsor would receive direct recognition on each survey and cover
letter - an estimated 5,000 to 10,000 will be distributed. I am
hoping Scanticon Hotel and Conference Center will participate in
our effort.
We would be very appreciative if we were able to offer a weekend
for two at Scanticon and/or a dinner for two at the Scanticon
Restaurant. I will have someone contact your office early next
week to determine your interest. The City of Plymouth and the
Regional Transit Board thank you for your past civic
participation and look forward to working with you in the future.
If you have any questions, please feel free to call Frank Boyles
in our City Manager's office at 550-5013.
Sincerely,
Kim M. Bergman
Mayor
KB:kec
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD. PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447. TELEPHONE (612) 550-5000
June 13, 1991
Mr. John Norlander
President
Radisson Hotels
Carlson Companies
Carlson Parkway
Minneapolis, MN 55459
Dear Mr. Norlander:
The City of Plymouth, in conjunction with the Regional Transit
Board, is developing a Comprehensive Transportation Plan as
required by the Metropolitan Council. An important part of this
project is a transportation survey that will be distributed to
employees of major companies, including Carlsop Companies,
throughout the City of Plymouth. The responses will provide us
with a better understanding of the travel behavior patterns
within the City.
The validity and reliability of the study hinges on a strong
survey return rate. Consequently, we are developing a random
prize drawing to create additional incentive. All persons
returning completed surveys will be eligible. The City of
Plymouth and the Regional Transit Board are now soliciting a
limited number of Plymouth -based sponsors for the drawing. A
sponsor would receive direct recognition on each survey and cover
letter - an estimated 5,000 to 10,000 will be distributed. I am
hoping Radisson Hotels will participate in our effort.
We would be very appreciative if we were able to offer a weekend
for two at a Radisson Hotel and/or a dinner for two at a Radisson
Hotel restaurant. I will have someone contact your office early
next week to determine your interest. The City of Plymouth and
the Regional Transit Board thank you for your past civic
participation and look forward to working with you in the future.
If you have any questions, please feel free to call Frank Boyles
in our City Manager's office at 550-5013.
Sincerely,
Kim M. Bergman
Mayor
KB:kec
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447. TELEPHONE (612) 550-5000
June 18, 1991
Hennepin County Auditor
Government Center
300 South 6th Street
Minneapolis, MN 55487
Dear Auditor:
Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 204B.46, the City of
Plymouth hereby requests approval to conduct an election by mail
with no polling place other than the office of the City Clerk on
September 3, 1991.
Enclosed is a copy of Resolution No. 91-351 which establishes the
special election date as September 3, 1991, and designates the
ballot question. Also enclosed is a copy of Resolution No. 91-
300 adopted on June 3 which authorizes mail balloting in the City
of Plymouth.
I would appreciate your response as soon as possible in order to
have adequate time to prepare for the election. Thank you.
Sincerely,
Laurie Rauenhorst
City Clerk
cc: Dan Decowski, Elections Division
Marge Christianson, Elections Division
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD. PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447. TELEPHONE (612) 550-5000
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the
City Council of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, was held on the
3rd day of June, 1990. The following members were present:
Helliwell, Ricker, Vasiliou, Zitur, Bergman. The following
members were absent: None.
Councilmember Ricker introduced the following resolution and
moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO. 91-300
AUTHORIZING MAIL BALLOTING
WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes, Section 204B.46 allows
municipalities to submit questions to the voters at a special
election by mail balloting; and
WHEREAS, the City intends to hold a special election on the
question of whether Ordinance No. 90-41, pertaining to the
scheduling of the municipal general election, is effective; and
WHEREAS, the City Council deems it in the best interest of the
City to allow mail balloting at the special election; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Sections 204B.45
and 204B.46, the Secretary of State has adopted a rule requiring
the governing body of a municipality to authorize mail balloting
by resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Plymouth, Minnesota that mail balloting as permitted by Minnesota
Statutes, Section 204B.46 is hereby authorized in the City and
that this resolution shall remain in effect until revoked by the
City Council by a subsequent resolution.
The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly
seconded by Mayor Bergman and upon vote being taken thereon, the
following voted in favor thereof: Helliwell, Ricker, Zitur, and
Bergman. The following voted against or abstained: Vasiliou.
Whereupon the resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
CiM Jll Z i s 1
0-1- aole-,
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the
City Council of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, was held on the
17th day of June, 1991. The following members were present:
Helliwell, Ricker, Vasiliou, Zitur, Bergman. The following
members were absent: None.
Councilmember Ricker introduced the following resolution and
moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO. 91-351
ESTABLISHING SPECIAL ELECTION DATE AND BALLOT QUESTION
WHEREAS, the City Council has indicated that it intends to hold a
special election on the question of whether Ordinance No. 90-41,
is effective; and
WHEREAS, on June 3, 1991, the City Council adopted Resolution No.
91-300 Authorizing Mail Balloting in the City of Plymouth.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED that:
1. A special election is scheduled for September 3,
1991; and
2. The question for the special election shall read as
follows:
SHALL ORDINANCE NO. 90-41, "AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO
ELECTIONS, REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 74-1, AND SCHEDULING
THE MUNICIPAL ELECTION FOR EVEN -NUMBERED YEARS," BE
EFFECTIVE?
Yes
M
Be it further resolved that the City Clerk is authorized to take
the necessary and appropriate actions to conduct the election.
The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly
seconded by Councilmember Helliwell, and upon vote being taken
thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Helliwell,
Ricker, Zitur. The following voted against or abstained:
Vasiliou and Bergman. Whereupon the resolution was declared duly
passed and adopted.
� ao�
Plymouth/Wayzata Soccer Club
Tournament Players, Spectators, and visitors
Welcome!
We at the City of Plymouth take great pride in the excellence of
our community playfields. The City has invested �L substantial
amount of money in our athletic fields, as well as their annual
maintenance.
Having good fields is important but, even more important is the
contribution made by the Plymouth/Wayzata Soccer Club serving
over 400 area youth.
The effectiveness of the Plymouth/Wayzata Soccer Club is
demonstrated by the fact that this is the 14th anniversary of
this tournament involving over 700 participants in the games at
several locations throughout Plymouth.
We wish each of the participants the best of luck and hope that
whether you are a participant, parent or official, that you enjoy
your stay in Plymouth.
Sincerely,
Kim M. Bergman
Mayor
KB:kec
(gym JUN 2 1 91
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD. PLYMOUTH. MINNESOTA 55447.. TELEPHONE (612) 550-5000
0 =4:� 4:� 'Y
WEST SUBURBAN MEDIATION CENTER
32 Tenth Avenue South, Suite 214, Hopkins, MN 55343 (612) 933-0005
,lune 17, 1991
Laurie Rauenhorst
City Clerk
City of Plymouth
3400 Plymouth Boulevard
Plymouth, MN 55447
Dear Ms. Rauenhorst:
Thank you for your letter of June 12th informing us of the appointment
of Paul Wirtz to our Board of Directors and the alternate. Helen LaFave.
We have scheduled an orientation with Mr. Wirtz and look forward to
our association with him and Helen LaFave.
Thank you for your time and efforts on our behalf.
Sincerely,
Susan A. Nelson
Executive Director
"'N 3I h 21 91
June 20, 1991
Mayne Woo
Plymouth Lions
12610 25th Ave N
Plymouth, MN 55441
Dear Mayne:
CI?Y OF
PLYMOUTR
On behalf of the Park and Recreation Department, I would like to thank you for
your generous donation of $300. As you may know, this year we experienced
budget cuts, and it affected a number of our programs. Your contribution was
a wonderful surprise and will be put to good use.
Once again, our heartfelt thanks for your support. It's because of
organizations like the Lions, that Plymouth continues to be a community where
people are proud to live and work!
Sincerely,
Eric J. Blank
Director of Parks and Recreation
EJB/np
cc: City Manager
PLYMOUTH LIONS CLUB
ACTIVITIES FUND
PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55441
PAY
TO TH E
ORDER OF
1721
17-120/910
I
OLLARS
--7 memunh
P07=71n Of7ff66'T
(612)M119161 biwAme. sswl r
136M 3�M A"%w NW*. n7mmEl►.
FORS)
u'00 L? 2 ill' 1:09 100 L 2091..
000 L09 ?II
GW JUN,21 '91
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447. TELEPHONE (612) 550-5000
PRIVATE STREET TASK FORCE CHARGE
June 17, 1991
(As Adopted by City Council)
•. -
The Private Street Task Force is to independently reexamine what,
if any, responsibility the City should have in private street
maintenance and make recommendations to the Council on this
subject, including the type of responsibility the City should
have, if any, which streets qualify for city assistance,
conditions and costs of such assistance, statutory authority for
city actions, and the method for implementing task force
recommendations.
Composition
The Task Force will consist of four residents whose homes are
served by private streets, and four residents whose homes are
served by public streets. An effort will be made to achieve
geographic representation in the community. The Task Force will
receive staff support from Fred Moore, Director of Public Works,
who will be a Task Force member.
Process
The following is a proposed outline of the process the Task Force
may wish to use to accomplish their objectives:
1. Review previous reports, minutes, and correspondence from
Special Assessment Committee inquiry on this question.
Receive report from Public Works Director and/or Special
Assessment Committee members on this topic. Interview
private street interests as appropriate. Review annual city
street maintenance costs.
2. Answer the following questions:
a. Does the property owner living on a private street
have any claim on public funds for street maintenance
purposes?
b. If so, where should such funding come from?
C. Define the legal authority for such funding?
3. Tentatively identify alternatives which the City could
consider with respect to private streets.
4. Determine what data is needed to evaluate the alternatives
and how that data can be secured.
PRIVATE STREET TASK FORCE CHARGE
June 17, 1991
Page 2
5. Obtain necessary information.
6. Refine alternatives available and determine advantages/
disadvantages of each.
7. Select one or more alternatives to propose to City Council.
8. Determine action plan for implementation, identifying funding
required, if any, source, statutory authority, etc.
9. Prepare draft report to City Council.
10. Finalize report and present to City Council.
11. Implement report of recommendations as directed by Council.
Timeframe
Complete report for presentation to the City Council by December
31, 1991 in order that adequate preparations can be made if
legislative action is required. Next legislative session
scheduled to begin January 6, 1992.