HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Packet 11-25-1991 SpecialAGENDA FOR 1992 PROPOSED BUDGETS PUBLIC HEARING
November 25, 1991
7:00 P.M.
1. Purpose of Meeting
To provide the public an opportunity to hear a presentation
of the proposed 1992 City Budgets. Citizens will have an
opportunity to address the Council concerning their views on
the proposed budgets. The Council plans to adopt the 1992
budgets and property tax levy on December 10.
2. The Meeting Was Carefully and Thoroughly Announced as
Follows:
a. Mailed notice to all property taxpayers from Hennepin
County (Truth in Taxation statement)
b. Notice published in the Minneapolis Star Tribune,
November 21
C. Discussions at previous City Council meetings.
3. Review of 1992 Proposed Budgets
James G. Willis, City Manager
Dale Hahn, Finance Director
4. The Procedure for the Hearing Will Be as Follows for Those
Who Wish to Speak:
a. Write name and address on blue card.
b. Pass card to person collecting them, who will give them
to the Mayor.
C. When your name is called, come up to the microphone.
d. Please speak clearly into the microphone so that all may
benefit from your remarks.
e. No one may speak twice until all others who wish to speak
have done so. Please aive your name and address each
time you speak.
5. Open Public Hearing
6. Continue Public Hearing to December 10.
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
DATE: November 25, 1991
TO: Mayor & City Council
FROM: James G. Willis, City
ManageSUBJECT: 1992 BUDGETS
The City Council has scheduled a public hearing this evening on my proposed
budgets for 1992. This public hearing is being held in accordance with long-
standing Council policies, as well as under the requirements of the "Truth in
Taxation" legislation. The City Council will not adopt a budget this evening,
but will reconvene on Tuesday, December 10 for the purposes of finalizing its
budget review and adoption of the 1992 budgets and the setting of the 1991,
payable 1992, property tax levy.
The budgets which are being considered this evening have previously been
provided to the City Council. We have conducted one study meeting on my
proposed budgets, and additional public study meetings are scheduled for
November 26, December 3, and possibly December 9.
The Council's review of these budgets is ongoing and modification of the
proposed budgets can be expected.
The City operates with several separate budgets, however, the General Fund
budget is the one which is primarily supported through property taxes. The
following are the other city budgets:
1. Recreation Fund
2. Forestry Fund
3. Water Fund
4. Sewer Fund
5. Solid Waste
6. Central Equipment Fund
7. Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) Fund
The City's budgets which are being considered by the City Council would be
financed with property tax levies in the gross amount of $10,598,145. This
represents an increase of $280,057 or a 2.64 percent increase over the gross
10,318,088 tax levy of 1991.
1992 BUDGETS
November 25, 1991
Page 2
The gross property tax levies are reduced by the "Homestead and Agricultural
Credit Aid" (HACA) and the fiscal disparities tax. In 1991, the City's gross
property tax levy of $10,318,088 was reduced by $1,440,077 of HACA and
793,523 of fiscal disparities tax. In 1992 it is projected that the HACA
will decrease to $1,413,712 and fiscal disparities to $701,040. The net
property tax increase will be $398,905 or 4.93 percent and the net tax
capacity rate is estimated at 14.68 percent as compared to 13.83 percent in
1991.
The City Assessor has calculated that the City's tax capacity value for taxes
payable in 1992 will be approximately $57,794,000 as compared to $58,462,583
for taxes collectable in 1991. The decrease in tax capacity value is
essentially the result of changes in the manner in which tax capacity is
calculated for three property classes, decreases in some commercial and
industrial values and increasing fiscal disparities contributions.
Homeowners will benefit most from changes in the tax classification rates for
home values over $115,000. The following is an example of the change on a
140,000 homestead property:
First $68,000 of value at 1%
680
Next $42,000 of value at 2%
840
Over $110,000 of value at 3%
900
Total for $140,000 Home = $2,420
First $72,000 of value at 1%
720
Next $43,000 of value at 2%
8630
Over $115,000 of value at 2.5%
625
Total for $140,000 Home = $2.205
The foregoing example indicates that a $140,000 home would have a $215
REDUCTION in tax capacity. Since more than half of our single family homes
are valued in excess of $110,000, the assessor estimates that we will lose
approximately $1,750,000 in tax capacity as a result of this change.
The other changes involve commercial /industrial property where the
classification rates for 1992 will be 4.75 percent as compared to 4.95 percent
in 1991, and apartments from 4 percent to 3.8 percent in 1992.
Finally, the City's contribution to the Fiscal Disparity pool will be
increasing from approximately $12,525,000 tax capacity to nearly $13,700,000
of tax capacity value.
So what does this mean to the taxpayer? Given the fact that the tax capacity
value overall is down, one would expect that individual taxpayers would have
to pay more taxes in order to generate the same amount of revenue. In
reality, the growth of tax value because of new growth, as well as reductions
in the tax classification rates noted above, will result in a TAX DECREASE for
1992 BUDGETS
November 25, 1991
Page 3
most residential taxpayers in their 1992 city property taxes. Exceptions to
this are likely for homestead properties in the lower value ranges and
commercial /industrial property.
1991 1991 1992 1992
Actual Actual Tax Projected Projected Tax
Levy Capacity Rate Levy Capacity Rate
GENERAL PURPOSE LEVIES
General Fund 7,809,914 13.36 7,824,900 13.54
Infrastructure 930,804 1.59 930,818 1.61
Forestry 228,500 39 213,500 .37
Storm Sewer Tax Districts 300,034 51 300,034 .52
Total General Purpose $9,269,252 15.85 9,269,252 16.04
SPECIAL LEVIES
Tax abatements and
cancellations 0 0 200,483 35
1980 Park Bonds 73,636 1) 13 363,000 63
1980 Storm Sewer Bonds 44,000 08 44,000 08
1987 Fire Station Bonds 254,000 43 254,000 44
City Special Assessments 330,200 57 110,000 18
HRA 347,000 59 357,410 62
Total Special Levies $1,048,836 1.80 1,328,893 2.30
TOTAL ALL LEVIES $10,318.088 17.65 $10,598,145
LESS: HOMESTEAD &
AG CREDIT AID
HACA) 1,440,077 2) 2.46 1,413,712 3) 2.45
FISCAL DISPARITY
TAX 793,523 4) 1.36 701,040 4) 1.21
NET CITY TAX & RATE $ 8,084.488 13.83 $ 8,483,393 14.68
TAX CAPACITY VALUE ,$58,462,583 $57.794,000
When all special levy programs are included, I project our "net tax capacity
rate" to be 14.68 percent as compared to 13.83 percent in 1991.
1) General Fund Contributed $295,864 in 1991 for General Debt Service; this
sum is available under levy limits for the 1992 budget.
2) The City's 1991 HACA payment is being reduced by approximately $360,000
from $1,440,077.
3) Current 1992 HACA estimate provided by Minnesota Department of Revenue.
1992 BUDGETS
November 25, 1991
Page 4
4) The amounts shown for Fiscal Disparity Tax represent the City's share of
the Fiscal Disparities pool as provided us by the Department of Revenue.
PERSONNEL
The single largest cost of local government is for personnel. In 1992 I
received requests from the various departments for 11 additional persons. In
analyzing those requests, I have included only one new position in the 1992
proposed budget: a park maintenance worker. At the current time, the City
has a total of 169 employees and my proposed budget would increase that to
170.
GENERAL FUND BUDGET — $10,900,500
1991
Adopted
Budgets
Description Revenues
Property Tax $ 7,514,050
Penalties & Interest 80,000
License Fees 68,100
Permits 1,128,000
Fines & Forfeitures 429,900
Use of Money & Property 303,100
Intergovernmental Revenues 59,500
Current Services 441,300
Transfers Received 499,600
Other 100,000
TOTAL $10.623,550
Expenditures
1991 1992
Estimated Projected
Revenues Revenues
7,154,050 $ 7,824,900
0 0
77,900 79,900
1,120,500 1,107,300
429,900 435,000
274,000 274,000
62,400 74,200
394,400 410,200
499,600
80,000
615,000
80,000
A comparison of the adopted 1991 budget with the proposed 1992 budget for
General Fund operation indicates an overall expenditures increase of $276,950
or 2.6 percent. This increase essentially is a reflection of inflation.
RECREATION FUND BUDGET — $608,200
The Recreation Fund is operated as a proprietary activity. Recreation program
user fees are projected to reach $453,500 in 1992 as compared to $434,000 this
year. Property taxes in 1992 are projected at $152,700, or 25.11 percent of
the budget. The data below illustrates the revenue and expenditure history
for 1990, 1991 and projected 1992.
1992 BUDGETS
November 25, 1991
Page 5
Actual Estimated Projected
1990 1991 1992
Revenue $553,543 $571,630 $608,200
Expenditure 545,589 571,630 608,200
Rev. over <under> Exp. 7,954 0 0
Fund balance 1/1 20,099 28,053 28,053
Fund balance 12/31 $ 28,053 $ 28,053 $ 28,053
FORESTRY FUND BUDGET - $224,300
The Forestry Fund was originally developed as a special levy activity when the
state authorized such levies for shade trees disease control. Since 1983
there has been no state subsidy to support shade trees disease control
programs. This activity no longer justifies classification of a separate
fund. I plan to move this activity to the General Fund for accounting
purposes in 1992. This will not change either the fiscal accountability nor
the administrative nature of the program.
In 1991, we increased the diseased tree hauling fee from $35 to $45 per load.
In 1992 I recommend an increase to $50 per load. This will enable us to
stretch our own funds further and also encourage homeowners to find
alternative disposal sources. The burning permit we obtain from the Pollution
Control Agency (PCA) was renewed this year with some difficulty. The permit
has now expired. Our site does not meet their standards for setback from
adjacent streets - 1,000 feet. If we are not able to obtain a new permit to
burn the diseased trees, we will have to stop accepting trees for disposal, or
haul the trees to other approved disposal sites. My budget assumes on site
burning disposal.
WATER FUND - $2,454,500
During the past two years, Wells 12 and 13 and the new 3 million gallon
elevated reservoir were brought on -line to assist us in meeting our expanding
water demand. The average daily demand for water during the hottest days has
exceeded 18 million gallons. The following are comparative data for our water
production showing our production capacity, maximum daily usage and average
daily usage for the past three years:
Production
Capacity-
Maximum
Daily Usage
Average
Daily Usage
1988 23.11 mgd. 17.48 mg. 8.09 mg.
1989 23.11 mgd. 18.63 mg. 7.70 mg.
1990 25.70 mgd. 18.63 mg. 6.52 mg.
1991 25.70 mgd. 15.77 mg. Not available
1992 BUDGETS
November 25, 1991
Page 6
The 1992 Water Fund budget does not contemplate a change in water rates. Our
rates were last adjusted in 1987. Our primary expenditures are demand driven:
those involving energy to pump water and the chemicals to treat that water
prior to its being pumped into the distribution system.
SEWER FUND - $4,051,400
The largest element of expense in this budget is the cost of sewage treatment
by the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission (MWCC). The costs are projected
to increase 9.5 percent from $2,693,500 to $2,948,600 in 1992. These charges
constitute nearly 73 percent of the total expenditures for the Sewer Fund.
Sewer rates were last increased in 1990 and at that time were projected to be
adequate through 1991. The proposed 1992 budget includes a 5% increase in the
sewer usage volume rate effective January 1, 1992. Even with the proposed
rate increase the 1992 budget will require a $216,300 contribution from
retained earnings.
We can continue to anticipate increases in our sewer charges from the MWCC.
Their costs continue to increase far more rapidly than inflation, and this
trend is not expected to change. In fact, the charges could increase
dramatically, up to 40 percent, if the MWCC is required to meet lower
phosphorus standards currently being considered by the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA). This standard, if adopted, is estimated to result in
about $273 million in MWCC capital costs, plus an additional $36 million in
annual operating expenses.
SOLID WASTE FUND - $549,600
This was a new accounting activity in 1991. Operating as a utility, the Solid
Waste Program relies upon a $1.00 per month charge to all homeowners for
recycling. These charges are projected to generate $175,800 in 1992, or
32 percent of the budget. The balance of the funding, $373,800, comes from
Hennepin County.
Our 1992 program for solid waste and recycling include:
Weekly curbside collection of recyclables; glass, cans, paper, cardboard,
and plastics
Recycling drop off center
Grass /leaf disposal
Tree /brush disposal
One -day collection events
Assistance in developing programs in apartment complexes and businesses
Promotion and education through flyers, newsletter inserts, and displays
1992 BUDGETS
November 25, 1991
Page 7
ENTRAL EQUIPMENT FUND - $1.4
The Central Equipment Fund owns and maintains all motorized and related
equipment in the City. The various city operating divisions are charged for
equipment they use from the Equipment Center. In 1991, the total Equipment
Center adopted budget amounted to $1,478,400, while in 1992 it is projected to
be $1,428,300. Capital outlay for furniture and equipment is projected at
690,400.
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES - $1,114,210 Combined
We have divided the Housing and Redevelopment Budget into three components for
budget purposes in 1992; 1) Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) programs;
2) Section 8; and 3) Senior Housing. The first category includes those
expenditures related to contracts between the City and the federal government
HUD) because of our participation in the Community Development Block Grant
CDBG) program. The Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) serves in an
advisory capacity to the Council regarding those activities. The second deals
with the Section 8 Housing Program activities which is the direct
responsibility of the HRA through their contract with HUD. The third deals
with the proposed Senior Housing Program. We separate this activity in order
that the Council may keep this program under close budgetary review. Local
property taxes are the sole source of revenue for our proposed senior program.
The CDBG program revenue for rehabilitation grants, scattered site housing,
daycare, and program planning and administration are expected to increase from
174,500 in 1991 to $202,000 in 1992.
A property tax levy of $23,400 is required to assist in funding of this
activity in 1992 as compared to $27,300 in 1991. The special levy amount is
applied to personnel and overhead expenses the City incurs in the
administration of the programs.
The revenues and expenditures directly related to the HRA Section 8 Rent
Subsidy Program are expected to amount to $550,800 in 1992 as compared to
427,100 in 1991. No property tax levy will be required to assist the
Section 8 program.
My budget also proposes to levy $334,010 to support the City Council's and
HRA's proposed Senior Citizen Housing Program. This levy is authorized for
HRA purposes outside of levy limits. The purpose of this levy is to enable
the HRA to move forward with the planning and subsequent construction of a
senior housing project. In 1991 the Council levied $319,700 for this program.
Major expenses for this program in 1991 include the acquisition of the senior
housing site at a cost of about $237,000, and $15,000 for concept planning.
If the Senior Housing Program is ultimately authorized, property tax levies
will continue to be required in future years to assist in keeping rents
affordable" for seniors residing within the proposed building.
JW:kec
Your Proposed Property Tax for 1992
THIS IS NOT A BILL - DO NOT PAY
The amounts shown below are being proposed by your county, city /town and school district.
Property ID: 11- 118 -22
PLYMv.,iM MN 55442-6411 Market Value for 1991 taxes: 140,000 HMSTD
Market Value for 1992 taxes: 140,000 HMSTD
The market values have already been finalized.
If you have any questions concerning them,
please contact your assessor.
Your county board of commissioners, your city council or township electorsandyourschoolboardwillholdmeetingssoontodecideontheamountofpropertytaxestocollectin1992topayforservicestheyprovide. The
county board and city council or township electors will also discuss theirproposedbudgetfor1992andtheschoolboardwilldiscussitsbudgetfor
the current school year.
The first column of figures below shows the 1991 property tax you paid toyourcounty, city or town, school district and special taxing districts.
The second column of figures below shows the total amounts of property tax
your county, city or town, and school district will collect from you in 1992
if they approve the property tax amounts they are now considering. Any
upcoming referendums, legal judgments, natural disasters and specialassessmentscouldresultinincreasingtheseamounts.
The amounts shown below for special taxing districts - such as watershed
districts - are the totals for all special taxing districts in which your
property is located. No meeting is required for these districts.
Your county commissioners, city council or township electors and schoolboardmembersinviteyoutoattendtheirmeetingsatthetimesandplacesshownbelowtoexpressyouropinionsontheproposedpropertytaxamounts
for 1992. If you cannot attend the meetings, you may send your comments to
the addresses listed below in the left column.
Property
Tax
You paid
For 1991
Property
Tax
Proposed
For 1992
Increase
or
Decrease
Over 1991
Percent
Increase
or
Decrease
Budget Hearing
Dates, Times
and locations
County of Hennepin 728.75 759.90 31.15 4.3% NOV 19, 1991 7:00 PM
COMMISSIONER BD ROOM
HENNEPIf
COUNTYHENNEIN A24CO GOVERNMENT CTR
GOVERNMENT CTR MPLS MN 55487
MINNEAPOLIS MN 55487
348 -3011
City of PLYMOUTH 1349.56 t336.87 12.69 3.6% PLYMOUTHICITY CENTER
CITY OF PLYMOUTH 3400 PLYMOUTH BLVD
3400 PLYMOUTH BLVD PLYMOUTH MN 55447
PLYMOUTH MN 55447
550 -5000
School District 281 1,369.38 1,334.06 35.32 2.6% DEC 02 , 1991
ADMINISTRATION
ADMINISTRATION BLDG 4148 WINNETKA AVE N
4148 WINNETKA AVE N NEW HOPE MN 55427
NEW HOPE MN 55427
533 -2781
Special Taxing Dist No meeting required
Fiscal Disparity No meeting required
Tax Increment
Other Districts 175.03 130.34 44.69 25.5% No meeting require
otals: 2,622. 2 2, 61. 7 6 .55 2.
1992 PROPOSED CITY BUDGETS
November 1, 1991
Page 7
Table 1
SCHOOL
rity Taxes
DISTRICT 281 (Robbinsdale)
on Typical Plymouth Homes
EXAMPLE I
City
Net Portion
Assessed /
Payable
Market
Valuation
Payable
Taxes
City*
Portion
Increase/
Decrease
1989 -90 103,400 1,483.10 226.04
1990 -91 105,900 1,558.46 216.78 9.26
1991 -92 Est. 105,900 1,623.82 221.96 5.18
rXAMPTY TT
1989 -90 117,500 1,924.28 293.28
1990 -91 120,300 1,982.22 275.73 17.55
1991 -92 Est. 120,300 1,989.70 271.97 3.76
F.XAMPT.F. TTT
1989 -90 150,400 2,953.69 450.17
1990 -91 154,000 3,077.91 428.14 22.03
1991 -92 Est. 154,000 2,967.71 405.66 22.48
EXAMPLE IV
1989 -90 180,500 3,895.49 593.72
1990 -91 184,800 4,079.31 567.43 26.29
1991 -92 Est. 184,800 3,862.09 527.91 39.52
PLYMOUTH RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY
VALUE DISTRIBUTION 1991
lmll
VALUES # OF HOMES PERCENT
0 50,000 1,204 7.91
50,000 60,000 457 3.01
60,000 70,000 1,039 6.83
70,000 80,000 1,403 9.22
80,000 90,000 1,263 8.29
90,000 100,000 1,425 9.36
100,000 150,000 5,269 34.63
150,000 200,000 2,080 13.67
200,000 250,000 749 4.92
250,000 300,000 254 1.67
300,000 350,000 31 20
350,000 400,000 26 17
400,000 450,000 8 05
450,000 500,000 5 03
500,000 + 7 04
TOTAL 15,220 100.00
Your property tax dollar
5 = >: 1'1:LF.RAtltT:. 'slt'l 1•OTl: .4
TOM *011 I'S UCAL UOIDIER
B 704282-1-
4
s+
C
School District 50 Hennepin County 2U Misc. City
Districts 15t
7t
r
Q
J
O
r
U.
Q
cc
0
N 1 1 1
O+ 4) 3 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 :.
FC a 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 I I I 1 r
t 1 I
1 I I
cv m m I I 1 f 1 I 1
O+ w 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 00000001, O O O O 0 0 1 0 1
o m C 1 O 1 0 1 O O O O O O O 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
1 On m 1 Q• 1 Ct 1 d O Ili M t0 ll to V 1 C I 0 0 0 to O d d I M 1
C tU I d 1 d 1 ri . to N rl .-1 tD Q• I Ot 1 O tD O ) N M Ot 1 t` I
b a 1 N I N I r-I d 1 t- I d 0 t` N ri d 1 0 1
co 1 0 1 I 1
I
an rA M 1 r1 I
11
r1 't? d) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
W o v 5 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 i 0 I . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
O Ot E C I to I to I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
z 1 JJ CD 1 O 1 0 1 d 0 tD N tD lU M 0 1 ON 1 O O O N O O O I to 1
W m I V I d 1 rt ei U C ri ri tD CO 1 V. 1 O tD O M O M CD 1 0 1
W a 1 to I to 1 r1 d 1 r- I to O r- M r-1 d I N I
to -1 M
1 rL
7 O N
O ON ri O m 1 1 1 1 I 1 I
E >i Ot Ot m 7 1 00 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 00 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
ar, o m c I too I trl I 0000000 0 1 0 1 0 000000 1 0 1
rl 11 m 1 O to I to 1 d M O N M ao M O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
6L a I 1 11 1 I I
t2 m m I V' d I c+0 1 r1 .-1 to N N .-1 tD r. I O 1 O N N M O M O I w 1
44 Z) W a a 1 to d 1 O+ 1 0 1 tD I to ri r- M rl d I N I
O to >4 r-1 1 r 1 1 1 to .-1 M t .
tea W w 4 b m I 1 1 I 1 I 1
U 6. 0 0 7 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
0+41 c 1 tno 1 to f 00000000 1 0 1 0000000 1 o 1
1-404m 00 0 1 vMa0NM01no 4 1 0000000 1 0 1111
V m 1 d' O I d' 1 r1 to N N ri tD r` 1 CO 1 O N N 17 O M W 1 CO 1
W 2 a 1 H 0 1 0 1 v 1 t D 1 t o r4 r- M -4 d I N I
z to I to 1 1 1 to H M I I
W 1 1 1
C7 n t I 1 ri 1
rn b 0 1 wto 1 0 1 OdotoOMOto 1 t- I tDHtomtotoO 1 ri I
o% 7 C 1 to to 1 0 1 O N M W W W H M I N 1 r- t- O 0 M a0 H 1 ID I
H 11 m 1 o% t[1 1 N 1 to ON v v V' w N t0 1 M 1 r- CO r1 t0 to N O 1 M 1
m t M V 1 0 I H to r-1 N ri V' N 1 0 1 tT to N d N M ri 1 0 1
a l H CD 1 Ot 1 to I t- 1 N O t- N ri tD 1 0 1
CD I CD 1 1 I
1
to H M 1 14 1
1
t0
1
W 1 +f C p
w 1 m 1+ f U
U : a7 1 O Pu 4J - Id Ic rd 11
W I ri C m 0 0 • td m $4 4 b
H O m0 d A CAi > W m to 4)
z
J
1 ca
I 'O
t9
1
U -rl -1 E C b'
1 m H -4 m m• 4
W
W
W ••1 -•a
rd .54 E
W I oc to UW m $4 U rl W 41 -4 U 14
1 m 1t 0 AJ m -1 0 IT C m m m
z 1 41 —1 aw m JJ rt rt m r1 m W C C 4) .0 a to
W I C V m m R1 to IT r-I to 1 -4 > 4Z U E+
C9 1 m -4 to M E W M $a CO z b A u E
1 It rt W to 1 o ro I1 m m W 4 E C C m ItOtIT11 $4 C
t 7 m
W I
W I
1) t7t N W t7+ $4
7 -r1 • w 0 b 1) C
U
H
4 7 b to
1 rl 41 —1 ra V r W
U I U0. H 6u 1 4 U m 0 a a 0 0 0 mwXV)OA04 a
a m i H 1 a00
00 Ec0 z
00000000
000000 0 0 O 1
000000-1
0000000
OWI
1 t4 E+
1
U I rl N M d to tD d to E
H`
Il, 1 r1 M d tD 9 Ot 01 H
1 O O H I r4 H r r4 H rl N N is W 1 M M M M M M M
E+ I d d d d d d d d d d a 1 d d d d d d d
T
Qi
J
O
r
U.
Q N d m I 1 I 1 I I I
m Q) 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 I
i a, m
0 m
a s 1 1 1 I 1 1 1
1 I I 1 t I
I I
I 1
rn it :3 1 00 1 o 1 00 1 0 1 000 i 0 i 000000
m a) C 1 00 t o 1 00 1 0 1 000 1 0 1 000000
i U+ a) 1 00 1 0 1 00 1 0 1 u1 O I C t d llD O O H m
C a) I O to I to I a 0 I d 1 N H O 1 d I d d to N d d
ro a 1 rI 1 ch 1 n 1 r 1 H to H I t- 1 H H
d I d I
1
N I N 1
1
1
1 1
I
1I
61 ON +) 7 1 O O 1 0 1 00 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
O ON E C 1 00 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
Z H V a) I O m 1 m 1 0 0 1 0 1 O d 1 d 1 c tD O O O ao
W m> I 1 - I I - I t I
W m 1 to d 1 ON 1 d 0 1 d 1 O N 1 N I d d to N d d
h7 a 1 N I N I 1` 1 t` I to H 1 tD 1 H H
a d 1 d I N I N 1 I 1
s I 1 I
5 O N
O m
E >+ m ON m Z 1 00 1 0 1 00 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
H m m C 1 0 0 1 0 I O O 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
1-4 H 4 a) 1 O m I m I H O 1 H I O to I to i r) O to O O O
a
a) a) I tD O C d
w O W a s 1 N I N 1 0 1 0 1 to I to I m H
0 U) >, d I d 1
I
r) I M I
I
I I
1
tea j w 1 I I 1
U w m 0 I o 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 t o l 0 0 0 0 0 0
m++ C 1 00 1 0 1 00 1 0 1 00 1 0 1 000000
a H 040 1 Om 1 m 1 HO 1 H 1 0L 1 to I rl0tn00co
O > I 1 - I I , I ,
ti a) I to d' I m 1 rf 0 1 t`l 1 O m I m 1 d tD O N d d
a 1 N 1 N 1 0 1 0 1 to I to 1 rn .-t
W
C7 1 I 1
ON to z 1 e+1 %0 1 ON I tD O 1 w 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 r1 O N O r1 O
m 7 C 1 N CD 1 0 1 tD N 1 CD 1 CO O 1 CO I w (In fn O H Co
V a) 1 d' CO 1 m 1 O W I %D I m In I d 1 0 tD N d V' In
i 1 1 i oamiO+ V i V i to 1; 0% Co ao c ON H M
a l N 1 m 1 0 1 0 1 d 1 to I t''1 H H
d I d 1 M 1 M I I 1
I I t
I 1 1
m m y m
to
10 1 b b H 1 o. w a 4 1 m>
1 m C
a
a
W
1 141
I m
o
H
e+
a 1 m• 4 I s>; m U' H a 1 -: tv -
m a) H w l m w 1 C z vi mw 0m
i v w o o1 ° tT m z twa
m -AIziCromIC+
i o a 1 V z 4J m m z 1 $4 w $4bM mr
U M m m wH
W
1 a) -4
I C b D)
0 I m C
1 $4
RC 1
H I
a C a)
Ia -•1 0 o
a
a
O
1 4J
I C C m
1 a) O+ W a) MW
a
1 -4 C
t w p w
I C td
1 O m
6v
O
z 1
rz 1
41 ro C7ch
w w v
1
1 -4"4 c0a
H+
U 4 -4
w a) i m z z o 1 () o a, 0 0i14Nziccvii "4 4
Z 1 U H w H H a i a i. ) H W i 4 N a In a H
s 1 1 a o h It 000 a w 1 00000000
o 0
14
0
00
0 0
c
W 1 0 0 0 E-4 al 0 0 0 0 0 0
w 0 1 a
Z 1 H N H W 1 O H H 1 H r1 n H N r d to r CO
H 1 to to i# t/) 1 D tD z I r- h 0 4c x 1 w w w w w w
W 1 d d K Z I d d H I d d to 0, U 1 It d d d d Iq
r
O
O
TOM
F
U.
Q N 't7 m I 1
1 0
1
1
1
1
1
0 1
I
I O 110
n
tlQtm71II1IH
a m 1 1 1 I I 1 I IIt4
O> 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 II
a s 1 i i i i i i ii
1 t t 1 ii 1i
CV m
7%$40,0000101
m 1 1 1 1
0 000000000 l
1
0 1
1
0 1 0
1
1 0
II
1
7%4)c 1 0000101 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 o n
1 iT m I w tD O O I N I O O N co O O O O I O I O 1 0 1 to 11
C m 1 .-1 N CD N 1 0 I O t•] C h O O to 11 1 to 1 1 0 1 (3 11
td a 1 rt I` I` I • 1 V M W N M O N CO I• t 1 Cl) O 1 O II
N 1 d i N I O 1 1 1 II
1 1 O II
1
W
1 'C3 m
a
1
1 0 0 0 0
I
t O
1
1
I
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O I
1
O I
1
0 1 0
I
1 0
II
11
O E C 1 0 0 O O t 0 I O 0 0 0 0 O 1 0 1 O 1 0 1 to II
z 1 +> m I tD t0 O I d I O N m O
1 II
W m>
w m
I --
I rt M c0 O
I -
I d
I
I to D O -1 0 D 1 ON 1
I°
0 1 0 1 N 11
to r I tT 1 r1 %D %D th aD d 1 1 OD I CO t O• It
a N 1 N 1 N I V 1 t I O 11
I
O N I 1 1 1 II
E >t cy%
1-4
0) 7 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 4
i o m C 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 O 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 O 1 0 I to tl
4 i -a m 1 in %o tD O 1 0 1 O N OD " O - t0 ; O O C it
o. a
et m m
1 - - -
1 .i C - CO O
I -
1 H
1
1
11
to %D 0 •-1 0 tD 1 O, 1
1
O 1 O
It
1 O
H
H
w ZD w a s 1 .1tn 0 1 d' 1 4 0 %DM0 d' I ON 1 0 1 0 1 N 11,
0 y >t N .-t 1 •0 i N 1 cr I 1 1 ri 1 N
1 -
11
II
I O H
4j z0
Ub,
r-4 00 1 0000 1 0 1 0000000000 i o i 0 1 0 1 0 11
a Aj c 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 to n
1 W m 1 to W 1D O 1 en O N co to O '4 ; 1° I II
b y 1 rq (IN co 0 1 .-1 1 to w 0 H 0 %D 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 ri II
W RC a I .1 to 0 1 -it 1 1 w tD (n 0 d' 1 0 1 O 1° 1 N a
z N •'1 1 d i N 1
I 1 O 11V, 1
ON -4 D 10Hd M 1 v 1 t
00000 00 00 0 l
I
0 1 N 111 N 11 0
tl
U
rn a c 1 rn o %D 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 to to l 0 1 H I r-1 I qe H
41 m 1 0 C <f' 0 1 c0 1 0 d' fn O m N 1 O 1 t0 1 D 1 Ct n
U I - • . 1 . 1 1 I 1 I - n
st m 1 H O en d' 1 cn 1 O N tD O 0 tD t to 1 0 1 0 1 0 II
Iz 1 •1 r N 0 1 to I tD to to cn N N I qe 1
N H 1 d' H 1 M 1 1 1111i
I 1 rn n
4J :1 • w m X
w: m am > I V 0) x b 4jb+ 4J $4 a X 1 4 w LI aJ C C C $4 w
m c C m w O 1 41 $4 m C 0 N a m 0
0 3 4) -4 0 w E m m W
U 1) E 04 I m w m E V 'v 3 m C
A 4 0) U+ w I 4j m m to c m U 0 0 z
ON m e O Q I 1 m C+ 0 0 4) 11 41 -A W m
c4 -4 m -+ f*4 4.1 m t7 41 -•4 w .-t m . A 4.1 1%
0) H 0)$ t 1 m 7 C C 't3 A b a 7 m EOmmmmHIA47tdm11b3mA0
0 to m w w 1 m td '0 -•4 14 $4 -a H to I 1 E4
U m c a U 1 U $4 m td b 4 a w t m a
m m b- 4 1 tT m .54 h' c w -+ x 11 H 5 1 U W A
4j w c 1 O U t 4 0 $4 0 0 0 0 O
wz
I 0)
d
z
H
O
M
wptn3wUaiaca3aaE+UV aU
tD O O
vja
1 OOOOO
O O O O E+
O
s4 1
M I
0 0 r'1 N m q' to
0 0 0 0 000000 O W 0
1 0
O H N O E+ 1 H r I H .- H H ri e! E4 x I th E
O• at tT o I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O E4 I to
st V V to 41 E4 1 Ln to to to to trn to to to to O 1 to 4c
T
O
TM
U
a
cc
0
N N 1) I
0 W .-4 1
1 I 1 1 I
ri N tD N W
1 I 1
0 34 4 ) I 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 O O 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1
O) N O I 00000:01 O 1 0 1 O O 1 0 1 O O 1 0 1
ri Ot 'O I N tD t` H 00 d' 1 O 1 O 1 O tD 1 tD 1 ON n 1 tD 1
a I
w >4
a H
O
a a
O
a, to O
c IYl 1 N M O t0 ri 1 d' 1 d' I d' I r N I m I t0 4p I to 1
tC t ON t` r- d 1` I to 1 0 1 0 1 N co 1 0 1 tD to I N I
N ri .4 1 t` 1 M I M I M Cl) I r- 1 r-4 N I V' 1
1 0 w I
r1i
aU 1
N '10 1J 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1
ON 41 N 1 O ri O ri N 1 V' I O 1 0 1 ri 00 1 Ot I co M 1 ri 1
Ot O IT I 4 d' O cn 00 1 N 1 0 1 0 1 M O 1 m coI O 1 ON 1
4 CT' 'Cf I n M M 'M tD I-T 1 0 1 0 1 n ON I t0 I n Cl) 1 0 1
a co 1 Nr- tD t- d' I 00 I at 1 d 1 Ot d 1 V I tD M 1 0 I
I ON 00 00 v t` I 4b 1 O 1 O 1 t` Ot 1 r I t0 r- I q* 1
N 1-1 -4 1 t` 1 M I M 1 M M 1 t` I H (N I d' 1
4 'O 0) I
ON 41 w
W k 1
W 1
to 0 W .-4 1
W 1) O
4 M In to N
rn
ri N tD N W
1 1
H o
OD tD 00 tD to
a
N r-4
1zWO
W
O
a
x
V W N
4
7 0 ri oa 1J I
1
w
E 0 .-4 ON m ON 1
a 41 o W
r4 >4 a O 1
a I
w >4
a H
O
a a
O
a, to O
H
4-) w
4,
4 0 4 2s 4 1
U z ON 4) 4) I
0
6.
O 7 1
a V ID I
I
W
z
W
c
1 0 w I
r1i
aU 1
k t
W I
H
z
W
x
z
a
9
0
0
a
z
W
c
to M* O O
I I
1 0 1
1
1 to 1
4 M In to N I r 1
ri N tD N W
1 147%, N .-1 to t` 1 to 1
OD tD 00 tD to 1 N 1
N r-4 1 tD 1
U) 00 ON t` t`
I
I tD 1
1
I n to co ri 1 to 1
N l)' ll ll N 1 00 1
ri N tD N W I W I
d M t0 N 1 tD 1
r-4 1 N 1
0 0 0 0 0
1 t
10 1
00000 0
M M M to I OD I
O O+ ON t0 0 1 to 1
at to r- tD 1 1 1
N r-4 1 to 1
0 0
1
1 1000000
M .-4
to
Ill M 1 t. 1
I 1
O O N r .-4 1 1 I
1 tD O w 1 N 1
N N 1 tD I
M t` r- .-4 "
I I
1 0 1
M co an q d' 1 t0 I
00 .-4 N N N 1 r- I
I 1
t: d' O N 0 I N 1
t` to d' -w M 1 to I
N ri 1 In 1
1 1
d' 1 d' 1
to 1 to 1
n 1 n 1
a% 1 Ot 1
N 1 N 1
ri 1 ri 1
to 1 to t
O 1 O 1
to 1 <n I
r-4 I .-4 1
r-4 1 .-1 1
1 1
in I tth I
I 1
ON I 1 I
O, 1 0% 1
N 1 N 1
0
1 1
0 1 0o
O 1 O
0 1 1 1
M I M I
I I
ri I ri I
M 1 M I
O 1 O 1
1 ,
N 1 N 1
O 1 O 1
M 1 M I
11)
41)
U
W a
w
a
d
a
0 1 H
a
z
W
a
O
a
W
0
H
z
O
I I
4 O I .-1 I
O ON 1 4T I
t` d 1 .-4 :
1
N RT I t` I
1 to I t0 1
M M 1 tD 1
O t
I 1
0 I tD 1
N t` I Ot 1
ri N 1 M 1
d to 1 O 1
ri ri I M I
I I
00 1 0 1
Np O 1
X70'
1
1 • 1Nd' 1 W I
0 W I W 1
M M 1 W 1
1 I
00 01 001
O co i O
ri 1 0 I
M M 1 tD I
I 1
OD
In Oq tD t1
N N I v 1
I
O tD I tp • 'I
M M 1 tD 1
E-4
a
0
a
w
0
4
H
0 z
r.
4 U
c 4) O
c a U
tv 4 C
CLI H
O
H
z
O
H
a
U
a
tz
r.;
ri .-1
1
r- Ln 1 M I
ri tD 1 O 1
1 I
tD O 1 t0 I
an O I Ln 1
ri O 1 r-I 1
r-I r-I
I
M M
I
tD II
N 4T I .-1 I
M c I M 1
I 1
r to I M 1
v I to I
1
00 1 O
O O 1 O
Ln n 1 N
n 4b 1 tD 1
to O 1 tD 1
1-4 O 1 r-I I
e-1 ri
I 1
00 0
00 0
LO M 1 CO I
t- tl1
11
N
1
I
1O-
1 O 1 N 1
r-1 ri
1
N v 1 W
U) r- 1 N
V' tD 1 .i
t- N 1 M
N ri I t-
r-1 O 1 ri
z
O
1 4v a
i U W
s I". a
V C U
4u
cd a
a
a a
H
O
H
H
w
In
C O
O
4 N -4
c b m 4
04(d -40C w
U z c .+ c z
a 41 o W
li10SM4
U U U W a H
O
H
4,
1 1
d' 1 d' 1
to 1 to 1
n 1 n 1
a% 1 Ot 1
N 1 N 1
ri 1 ri 1
to 1 to t
O 1 O 1
to 1 <n I
r-4 I .-4 1
r-4 1 .-1 1
1 1
in I tth I
I 1
ON I 1 I
O, 1 0% 1
N 1 N 1
0
1 1
0 1 0o
O 1 O
0 1 1 1
M I M I
I I
ri I ri I
M 1 M I
O 1 O 1
1 ,
N 1 N 1
O 1 O 1
M 1 M I
11)
41)
U
W a
w
a
d
a
0 1 H
a
z
W
a
O
a
W
0
H
z
O
I I
4 O I .-1 I
O ON 1 4T I
t` d 1 .-4 :
1
N RT I t` I
1 to I t0 1
M M 1 tD 1
O t
I 1
0 I tD 1
N t` I Ot 1
ri N 1 M 1
d to 1 O 1
ri ri I M I
I I
00 1 0 1
Np O 1
X70'
1
1 • 1Nd' 1 W I
0 W I W 1
M M 1 W 1
1 I
00 01 001
O co i O
ri 1 0 I
M M 1 tD I
I 1
OD
In Oq tD t1
N N I v 1
I
O tD I tp • 'I
M M 1 tD 1
E-4
a
0
a
w
0
4
H
0 z
r.
4 U
c 4) O
c a U
tv4 C
CLI H
O
H
z
O
H
a
U
a
tz
r.;
ri .-1
1
r- Ln 1 M I
ri tD 1 O 1
1 I
tD O 1 t0 I
an O I Ln 1
ri O 1 r-I 1
r-I r-I
I
M M
I
tD II
N 4T I .-1 I
M c I M 1
I 1
r to I M 1
v I to I
1
00 1 O
O O 1 O
Ln n 1 N
n 4b 1 tD 1
to O 1 tD 1
1-4 O 1 r-I I
e-1 ri
I 1
00 0
00 0
LO M 1 CO I
t- tl1
11
N
1
I
1O-
1 O 1 N 1
r-1 ri
1
N v 1 W
U) r- 1 N
V' tD 1 .i
t- N 1 M
N ri I t-
r-1 O 1 ri
z
O
1 4v a
i U W
s I". a
V C U
4u
cd a
a
a a
H
O
H
r
O
r
F
LJL
a
U)
W
a
O
H
M
Q
z
w
a
x
J.1 W N
C a,
E74
a a a
w >>4
O
a
1 rn o
4-J w
1 a
U z
W
W
z
W
U
N 0) v I 1 I 1 I 1 I
ON 1.1 O 1 O O O I O I 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1
O` a) t3) 1 O O O 1 0 1 O O O O I O 1 O O O l 0 1
1-1 0) 'O 1 W 00 co I d' I r-1 ' O Cl) I 00 1 r- d' tD 1 I
a C I I _ I I
C m I r` rn t- I to 1 d M M N I N 1 M I to t
rd 1 4 Ot U) I r- 1 ri -1 M tD 1 N 1 ON N 00 1 0 1
M 1 N d' Cl) I .-1 I
M cl N
N >7 J-> 1 I I I 1 I I
Cn 4.1 N 1 1 M N I tD I d O N O I tD 1 d' O I M I
Ot 0) Ut I 00 tD I U) I U) r- M M I 00 I O co O 1 m 1
r.1 D I M r-, 00 1 M 1 M to ul I co 1 r O• tD I N I
m co 1 O r- r- 1 to I t0 M 1 r- I CO 1 to N M I N I
1 N O U) 1 co 1 N 1-1 d to I M I m r` co 1 U) 1
d' M I n I d' d' U) 1 d' i N d' M 1 1-1 1
Ul
1 •O Ol I 1 1 1 1 I 1
Ot 31 I co OO d' 1 0 1 U) O ON r` I I I N .-1 O I M 1
0 E +) I tD O rV 1 0 1 O O 00 O 1 0 1 h U) O 1 N 1
I 1- 'd 1 r .-1 tD I ON 1 1-1 M Ot co 1 N I N 00 r 1 00 1
0) 04 1 I I
W x I r 00 Ul 1 C 1 r` OD I tO 1 O v 00
W I c0 r` U) 1 N 1 1-1 .-1 O r-I 1 U) I c0 00 V' 1 •-1 1
M N 1 r- 1 N 00 11 1 1 I N M M 1 O 1
M d ri N
Lf W -1 I I I 1 1 I I
a) O I co M n I M 1 d U) O M I 1 tD O tD I (N I
a 1 1 1 Ut H I V I O N r- r` I aD I Ln O N 1 00 I
c 1 O I r` M O 1 1-4 I m r h O) I M 1 r1 M d I 1
a) r> M I I 1 I 1 I I
Cl+ I 1 V' r-1 d I O
x tD 1 r- M N I M 1 1 U) 1 N 1 N N d' 1 m 1
W O I M 1 Ln V 1 0 1 1 tD -1 1 co I
1 N
r-1 Tf 1.1 I 1 1 1 I I
Ot a1 a) 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 000:0! 1
Ot to ON I 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 to i to 1 0 0 0 I O 1
1 a t3 I N a' N 1 00 1 O Cl) U) U) I M 1 to c0 co I .--1 I
7 1 1 I I I 1 I
a) ra I r I c0 00 I r 1 N M 00 O
Ix 1 M r- to i D 1 N 1-1 O N 1 tD i co c0 r` I M I
d N 1 r 1 M 00 'A I N 1 N Cl) M 1 0 1
M N
b +1 1 I I I 1 I I
am a) a) 1 000 I o 1 0000 1 0 1 000 1 0 1
O' V 0) I 0 0 0 1 0 1 O O O U) I U) 1 O O O 1 0 1
I a '0 1 to r- O I N 1 d' M 00 N 1 r- 1 N V' O 1 d' 1
0 7 1 t I 1 I 1 1
O co 1 C d' .-1 1 tD 1 M M N Ot I 00 I U) N r-1 1 Ot 1
r>r 1 tD CO tD 1 0 1 ON .-1 U) (N 1 c0 I ON tD r- I N I
r N 1 (30 1 M o ff 1 M I N 'q' M 1 .--1 1
M d' r1 N
0 -4 rr) I 1 1 I I I 1
M CU $4 I Lo Ln Ot 1 O) I to 0 Ot ri I to 1 d 1n r 1 tD I
Ot C 41 1 d' co co 1 11 1 r` N U) to 1 1 1 ON r W 1 M 1
r•I V 'O 1 r O• O 1 O 1 H M N r, 1 rn I tD U) 00 1 1-1 1
U LL I 1 I 1 1 1 I
FC x I M e l O I rn 1 d tD U) tD 1 N 1 Ul tD O 1. 1 1
W 1 M to qt I M I N .--I 1-1 1 ON 1 r d' N I In 1
d N •-1 1 CO 1 O ON .--1 1 0 1 N M M 1 m 1
r0
ra
N
y,1
la • 1 C
4-1 d c H 0) rn
c 04 O W 1 AL
v a, ..1 w a a
E 4 • V 4 o
a a t~ CO U 3
a, w 4
d+ ro U U w U
c c z 1 I U a) H w H
Q) -•4 ro Q H 1 c $4 a4 rn I ro 64
U to x z w I N a) Os m 4 1 0) S4 ca
c In H w l U 0) o a I c H
ro a x w 1 I U a) 4) a o 1 a
C to a) V] 1 1 N $4 $4
W i 4 (D •.1 a 1 O E •.I 4 I Q) a
U I F-4 U I w W Gu k. U 1 a) .0 1 04
z I H H I H H I c a) a) H
4 I o a l o a l 4 Q) a) O
z I H co I H m I 0) W 14 H
H 1 b I 0 1 C 4.) 4-1
w 1 W I P. I W rn V)
r
O
A
O
r
u
V)
W
a
x
H
H
D
z
w
a
0 x
4.) W N
5 ON
O W m
e -4
a a 4
w >4
0
o a
I O
N4
0 zz
x
IT.
a
W
z
w
c
N N 1J 1 1 1 11
O% $a N I O O O 1 0 1 O II
O d M 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 O II
I ON 'C 1 co N O 1 0 1 to II
U 1J E4 A
C C O z
C W I O O I M 1 o II
1 000
W I 1 rl
N 4 r-i 1 Lnn 1 ON II
II
E+ 1 O O N
0 1 U U I]
1 O 11
N I 1 11
ON 41 O 1 M O O I m 1 N II
O M M I O O O 1 0 1 O% 11
r-1 f:7' 'p 1 0 O+ O I C) 1 d' 11
f iCooui m
1 4 %D 0 1 ao 1 W II
u1
1 N II
ON 11 U I O• 00 1 Oi I d H
0 E 1j 1 d 00 1 s! I M 11
W x l Lno o 1 10 1 u
w 1 ID co 0 1q*
II1 -
1 O II
G) O ON 1 0 1 .Y 1 11 11
1 0 1 N II
m 0 I co
yC
CL
fI I C
x 10 1 D 14 1 CO 1 If1 II
1 u
I u
ON IV 4) 1 0 00 1 0 1 O II
ON m al 1 0 00 1 0 1 'n II
r+ -1 O 1 o ch o 1 rn l o u
1 1 - I - 11
N co I h In O 1 N 1 do II
a 1 r 0 1 1 N 11N
dN
O
1 1 1 I 11
0 N N I 0 0 0 1 0 1 O 11
0% 4.) b+ I 0 0 0 1 0 1 in 11
r4 W b 1 m to 0 1 ON 1 in H
i i iimiCO+ ri
1 O r- to I N I N 11
n I t0
III
1 O II
0 .-I m I 1 I II
ON b Id 1 0 %D O 1 N 1 t- II
ON 7 4j 1 d ID O I .-1 I ID 11
1-1 +) *0 I rA N 0 1 r- I in 11
a k 1 N N O 1 V I co 11
W I N c 1 In 1 0 1 In 11
1 O 11
1 14 H
m
N
1 0) RC
k E4
4 ro a O
m E~ w E4
to >I x
U 1J E4 A
C C O z
a b+ 7 a a4
C C b" ft O
W I 1 rl O
E+ 1 O O N
0 1 U U I]
MEMO
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
DATE: November 22, 1991
TO: Mayor & City Council
FROM: James G. Willis, City Manager
SUBJECT: FOLLOW UP ITEMS FROM NOVEMBER 20, 1991 BUDGET STUDY
SESSION
Attached is a list of items which the Council directed the staff
to follow up on during the November 20 budget study session.
Also attached are responses to certain of those follow up items.
I have placed a number in the upper right -hand corner of each of
the attachments which correspond with the item number on the
follow up list.
The attachments address items number 1, 2, 5, 9a, and 9c. Item
number 3a, b, and c will be incorporated in my oral presentation
at the November 25 budget hearing.
JW:kec
attachment
FOLLOW UP ITEMS FROM NOVEMBER 20, 1991
BUDGET STUDY SESSION
1. Provide the Council with a listing of wage and insurance
increases by employee group for 1991.
2. Provide the City Council with all letters received about the
Truth in Taxation notices.
3. At the November 25 budget hearing, briefly discuss the
following:
a. Explain in budget presentation the tax shifting brought
about by the change of tax classification rates from 3%
to 2.5 %.
b. Remind the public to contact their Legislators thanking
them for the shift from 3% to 2.5% in tax classification
rates and reminding them that of the second half of the
adjustment is from 2.5% to 2.0% for residential valuation
exceeding $72,000.
C. Provide a description of general purpose and special
levies at the November 25 budget hearing.
4. Talk about the vacant position in the Planning Department in
light of the fact that building permit activity is down.
5. Provide the City Council with a copy of the five year budget
projections showing 1992 through 1996 expenditures.
6. Include in the next Plymouth News and in the sewer and water
bill, a notice that sewer rates will be increased because of
increases in the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission rates
which have been escalated by 9 %.
7. Investigate plans by cities such as Burnsville to move to a
twice per month, rather than weekly recycling collection,
including the anticipated impact both in recycling amounts
and costs to the City of Plymouth.
8. Provide a consolidated HRA budget to the City Council showing
all three programs under a single heading.
9. Directive follow up items for 1992 budget sessions.
a. Provide the City Council with the number of students
participating in the DARE program, the cost per student,
and the total cost to the City by school.
FOLLOW UP ITEMS FROM NOVEMBER 20, 1991 BUDGET STUDY SESSION
Page 2
b. Provide recommendations for the formulation of a Drug
Task Force, the composition of which would represent each
school district and the police department. Such a task
force would be responsible to recommend funding sources
for any suggestions they make to the City Council.
C. Provide Council with number of police calls per school,
type of call, and enrollment of that school for the past
two years.
d. Set a time for the City Council to meet with the City
Manager to talk about the department personnel matters.
e. Schedule meetings between the City Council and PRAC in
February to revisit the role of PRAC.
f. Discuss the concept of Police Chief versus Public Safety
Director with the City Council.
g. Discuss the concept of recycling fees for the 1992
budget, together with the review of this budget item.
h. Schedule a study session with the Financial Task Force.
i. Discuss a community survey using the Plymouth News,
together with the communications budget during February
or March issues.
j. Ask the Risk Management Coordinator to prepare a memo on
the benefits of creating a community safety committee.
k. Consider whether a budget allocation should be made now
for the Water Quality Task Force.
1. Delete the $5 non resident fee for city recreation
programs.
M. Leave the 1991 tournament fees the same in 1992, with no
waiver for any organization. Advise the associations
accordingly.
n. Incorporate athletic associations in the "Adopt A Park"
program. Specifically contact Gordie Engle.
o. Do not consider further drainage system improvements in
Shiloh Park.
p. Discuss Weston Lane drainage problems at the December 3
Council meeting.
I
1991 WAGE INCREASE
BY EMPLOYEE GROUP
General Employees
Maintenance Employees
Police Officers
Sergeants
3.9 %*
4.0%
4.0%
4.27%
Department heads receive no salary increase.
1991 INSURANCE CONTRIBUTION INCREASE
BY EMPLOYEE GROUP
General Employees
Maintenance Employees
Police Officers
Sergeants
40.00 per month
16.40 per month
40.00 per month
3.95 per month*
Cap placed on city contribution. Contract provides
for $28 per month increase for 1992 contribution.
Mr. Kent D. Warden -
Executive Director
Greater Minneapolis
Building Owners &
Managers Association
121 South 8th Street
Suite 610
Minneapolis, MN 55402 -2841
Dear Mr. Warden:
Thank you for your letter of November 18 addressed to the Mayor
and Council. We appreciate your comments regarding the need to
constrain governmental spending.
You and the members of your association are carrying far more
than your fair share of the property tax burden. The tax
classification rate structure, by design, shifts a
disproportionate share of the property tax burden to the owners
of commercial and industrial properties. While the Legislature
has indicated its intent to make "reforms" in this area, an
enormous disparity continues to exist.
The Plymouth City Council is just beginning its study of my
proposed 1992 city budgets. I know the Council will consider
your observations as they proceed with their review of the
budgets. Thank you for sharing your thoughts with us.
Yours truly,
c7rt
s G. Willis
Mana ger
JW : kec
cc: Mayor & City Council
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447. TELEPHONE (612) 550 -5000
IL AIL LEI
t, tt r i (ttp s r i' 1` ii r.y Z Itt -r ( '++ ,_.
121 S. 8th Street, Suite 610 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 -2841 Telephone: 612/338 -8627 Fax 612/340 -9744
November 18, 1991
City Council
City of Plymouth
Plymouth City Center
3400 Plymouth Road
Plymouth MN 55447
Dear Council Members:
Please accept this as our written testimony for the Truth in Taxation
Hearing for your City on November 25, 1991.
Our Association consists of the owners and managers of more than 35
million square feet of office space in the Minneapolis and Suburban
area, including a number of buildings in your City.
Our membership is very concerned about the extremely adverse economic
conditions now confronting our industry. Due to the excess of office
space on the market at this time and greatly reduced absorption of
space due to the recession and other factors, vacancies are high and
rents are depressed, and market values are declining rapidly as the
outlook for any near term improvement of the situation dims. The
problem is compounded by,a tax classification rate structure that
places the property tax burden on commercial properties in Minnesota
among the highest in the nation.
Many of our member buildings are at this time struggling for
survival. Budget cutting and belt tightening in every conceivable way
is being pursued. We know that you too in managing the affairs of the
City are dealing with scarce resources and demands for improved
services. However, we would ask as you finalize your budget
deliberations, that you use the maximum restraint possible in spending
decisions, for the sake of our members and all of the taxpayers in the
City.
Thank you and good luck in this
assist you in any way we can to
place to live and do business.
important process. We stand ready to
make the City of Plymouth a better
Yours truly,
Kent D. Warden, RPA
Executive Director
a o''
tit
KDW:sgOFFICERS 1991 -92 JOHN P KELLY, JR., RPA" President, THOMAS J. PARISH. Vice President. CLIFFORD HABECK, RPA" Secretaryi Treasurer.
DIRECTORS THOMAS CLAIRMONT, DEAN FREEMAN, BETSY GEORGE. RPA.' CLIFFORD HABECK, RPA" JAMES JACHYMOWSKI, DOUGLAS JOHNSON,
JOHN P KELLY. JR., RPA.' JANET MOE, THOMAS J PARISH, KENT D. WARDEN, RPA' Executive Director
j ,r; (I —,l,d 0 rel,,Ild P.(—
November 19, 1991
Mr. Bill Ramsey
1215 Kingsview Lane
Plymouth, MN 55447
Dear Mr. Ramsey:
PLYMOUTR
I have received a copy of a letter which you sent to the County
Commissioners with respect to your property tax notice which
reflects a 27.2% projected increase in your county taxes.
In reviewing your truth and taxation statement, I note that the
market valuation for your property in 1992 has increased $14,600
to $140,300. This increase reflects the improvements you made to
your house since 1989 when you took out a permit for remodeling.
In a brief conversation with the City Assessor, I am informed
that some of the improvements to your home included the expansion
of your deck, a room addition, and a fireplace. At the time the
building permit was taken out, the estimated cost of the
improvements was $20,000.
If your property value had not been increased by virtue of the
improvement you made to it in the last couple of years, your
projected 1992 property taxes would have, in fact, decreased
slightly. We all recognize that the property tax burden is
particularly high on residential properties over $72,000. The
Legislature has taken steps to move in the direction of
correcting this problem commencing with taxes payable in 1992.
There is much work yet to be done.
I appreciate your sensitivity to this issue and your sharing your
views with us.
Yours truly,
a)nes G. Willis
Manager
kec
cc: Scott Hovet, City Assessor
Mayor & City Council
Hennepin County Commissioners
3406 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD. PLYMOUTH- MINNESOTA 55447. TELEPHONE (612) 550 -5000
Food ,service ,sales
5656 LINCOLN DRIVE EDINA, MINNESOTA 55436 PHONE: 933 -6602
November 15, 1991
County Commissioners
Hennepin County
A2400 Government Center
Minneapolis, MN 55487
Dear Commissioners:
Regarding the attached, I have a hard time accepting
a request to increase my property tax by 27.2 %.
I don't know of anyone getting a 27% wage increase
or any item going up price wise 27 %. In a day of cut
backs, I'd suggest you start by;
A. Not using your car phones and
B. Selling your car phones for a start
If tax payers have to use phone booths to make calls,
so should the people we employ.
Government spending is getting out of hand and this
is a good example.
Regards,
Bill Ramsey
BR: cjc
Enc.
Your Proposed Property Tax for 1992
THIS IS NOT A BILL - DO NOT PAY
The amounts shown below are being proposed by your county, city /town and school district.
ILLIAM & KAREN RAMSEY
215 KINGSVIEW LANE
LYMOUTH MN 55447 -4584
Property ID: 33- 118 -22 12 0009
Market Value for 1991 taxes: 125,700 HMSTD
Market Value for 1992 taxes: 140,300 HMSTD
The market values have already been finalized.
If you have any questions concerning them,
please contact your assessor.
Your county board of commissioners, your city council or township electors
and your school board will hold meetings soon to decide on the amount of
property taxes to collect in 1992 to pay for services they provide. The
county board and city council or township electors will also discuss theirproposedbudgetfor1992andtheschoolboardwilldiscussitsbudgetfor
UIC curreill blaluu1 yCdf'.
The first column of figures below shows the 1991 property tax you paid to
your county, city or town, school district and special taxing districts.
The second column of figures below shows the total amounts of property tax
your county, city or town, and school district will collect from you in 1992
if they approve the property tax amounts they are now considering. Any
upcoming referendums, legal judgments, natural disasters and special
assessments could result in increasing these amounts.
The amounts shown below for special taxing districts - such as watershed
districts - are the totals for all special taxing districts in which your
property is located. No meeting is required for these districts.
Your county commissioners, city council or township electors and school
board members invite you to attend their meetings at the times and places
shown below to express your opinions on the proposed property tax amounts
for 1992. If you cannot attend the meetings, you may send your comments to
the addresses listed below in the left column.
otals: $2,053.10 $2,444.65 391.55 19.1%
Property
Tax
You paid
For 1991
Property
Tax
Proposed
For 1992
Increase
or
Decrease
Over 1991
Percent
Increase
or
Decrease
Budget Hearing
Dates, Times
and locations
ounty_ of Hennepin 599.56 5762.66 163.10 27.2% NOV 19, 1991 7:00 PM
ar..ni"ii`:T.ssiONER ED Ran 1WWII \1TVi:rENNE IN' ..uul\ 1 A2400 GOVERNMENT CTRA2400GOVERNMENTCTRMPLSMN55487MINNEAPOLISMN55487
348 -3011
ity of PLYMOUTH 287.59 338.10 50.51 17.6% NOV 25, 1991 7:00 PM
PLYMOUTH CITY CENTER
CITY OF PLYMOUTH 3400 PLYMOUTH BLVD
3400 PLYMOUTH BLVD PLYMOUTH MN 55447
PLYMOUTH MN 55447
550 -5000
chool District 284 1,021.96 1,213.10 191.14 18.7% DEC 09 ,
ADMINISTRATION
19917:00 PM
WAYZATA SCHOOLS 210 HWY
PO BOX 660 PLYMOUTH MN 55447
WAYZATA MN 55391
476 -3100
pecial Taxing Dist No meeting required
Fiscal Disparity No meeting required
Tax Increment
Other Districts 143.99 130.79 13.20 9.2% No meeting required
otals: $2,053.10 $2,444.65 391.55 19.1%
November 15, 1991
Ms. Gwendolyn P. Ryding
15376 40th Avenue No.
Plymouth, MN 55446
Dear Ms. Ryding:
kn
Thank you for your letter of November 7 addressing your concerns
about property taxes. I appreciate very much your writing to us
and understand the serious problems the property tax burden is
placing upon you with a limited fixed income. I trust that you
are aware of the State's "circuit breaker" tax relief program for
people of modest means. Based upon the statements in your
letter, it would appear that you would be eligible for this
program which would have the effect of providing some relief from
your property taxes.
I wish it were possible for me to assure that property taxes will
not increase. I cannot make that promise. The fact is, as the
cost of local government (city, county, schools) continue to
increase, it is probably that property taxes will also increase.
I can assure you that the Plymouth City Council spends a great
deal of effort trying to keep our share of your property taxes in
line. Nonetheless, they too are faced with enormous problems
seeking to provide the various services which citizens seem to
require, recognizing that many of those same citizens do not
desire to have their property taxes increased.
I am sharing your letter to all members of our City Council in
order that they may be aware of the concerns of a senior citizen
on a fixed income. We recognize that many people in our
community are on fixed incomes with little capacity to absorb
ever - increasing property taxes.
Thank you for your very thoughtful letter. I can assure you that
it will not be relegated to the "round file" by anyone here at
the City of Plymouth!
Yours truly,
ames G. Willis
City` Manager
JW_._!.c
3400 PI YMOUTH ROULEVARD. PLYMOUTH. MINNESOTA 55447. TELEPHONE (612) 550 -5000
r/
County of Tisennopi.n
A2 00 Government CTP
Minne }apoliss, 9t. 55467
f/ City of Plymouth
3400 Plymouth Blvd.
Plymouth, sfn. 55447
School Dist. 264
P.O. Box 660
Wayzata, Mn. 55391
Vo C)
15376 — 40th Ave. No.
Plymouth, 14n. 55446
Uovember 7, 1991
S'JJ9
U.
I as in ray 70th year any' this will be the first base in my life I have
written anyone in Hennepin County oomnenting on taxes of any type.
I vase born in ?forth Mirneapolis and except for a period of yflayss when the
Croat Depression, edueaticn and employment nocesgitated living elsewhere,
Z nave lived, worked and paid all say taxes to the State of 'dinnescta and
F:ennc;An County.
1 a_--i cognizant of the financial burden and demands by so many segments of
societq in an are of social dependency and irresponsibility. As a result,
the County and its taxaayerrs become the bottom line. Now, therefore, in
behalf of all the taxpayers who have concientiou"ly and heuleasatly become
the source for bankrolling the irresponsible, and many have spent a
lifetime doing so, I believe the time has come at last for the responsible
to assert theanoolves and "expect" some consideration as well for at least
having, lived responsibly and honestly. We no longer car, afford to bee the
f'si lent" xinority or majority.
y fixed income presently totally 6945.00 per month ... °495.00 of tria from
oci.al Security. According to your mailing which I Jubt received eantitled#
Your Proposed Property Tax for 1992" ray Property Texas will be raised by
6.97 ... a total of 5705.691 uzd that • e a lot for ' income, They Inieotion
I'm now aslArz is:
1) JuQt how long ... or hov many years will I be able to absorb
theses yearly increases?
2) when I cannot. what happens to roe than?
It baffles me that neither legislators of County officials seem to look
beyond tho "below ` the povearty 1evel" citizen and hone these ghastly increases
affect the slightly "exbove" the poverty level tnx+yer and his/her struggle
tr make ends meet. The tax increases keep cowing and YOU psay...or else)
as if there were no tomorrow. Xtat will be the and of all this? l
run -away Budget iv prepared &1ways assuming that the little mouse taxpayer
will pick up the tab. I must live within a limited budget with no tax
incre;aents to turn to. Why not the State said County, esspeciaslly during
this recession period? Actually, you would esye a lot of mQnefy, eventually,
by -reducing the taxes of those on limited, fixed incomes wbo have paid their
taxer: through the years and lived honestly and responsibly within the Mate
send County. If the tax increasen continue, thousands of Seniors will be
Forced onto your wel `'s:re rolls! Now, what seneea does that auka? Why isn't
siencone uiinE same forsaight? Ien+t anyone planning now to reduce this
L' Alfarc burden? exercise some corawn sense and spare us
sumo human dignity nrd the glop =ay proa;tect of government assi"tance l
Gila Ngd 15 '91
z 1 Voo
6 County of Hennepin
City of Plymouth
School Dist. 264 Page 2 11`7 -91
After one reaches age 65 or 70, certainly we could also be spared the
taxes demanded by the school system...especially after having already
spent a lifetime supporting it and helping our children and grandchildren.
I oould say a lot more. However, as a life -long taxpayer I trust the
comments herein will be read and not relegated to the "round file" but
will be digested, considered and acted upon.
Thank you for this, my first opportunity to express myself.
Sincerely,
Gwendolyn P. &yding
CIM N N 15 '91
N
Lam/
November 15, 1991
Mr. LeRoy Reinke
14411 County Road 6
Plymouth, MN 55447
Dear Mr. Reinke:
Thank you for your letter of November 12 inquiring on certain
aspects of the City's 1992 budget.
I will respond to your questions in the order which they appear
in your letter.
1. Legal expenses billed and paid to date amount to
283,193.
2. Legal services through the City's General Fund for 1991
are budgeted at $299,500. In addition to this, charges
for legal services are incurred with our public
improvement projects. These costs are reflected in
response to question number 1, but not included in the
General Fund budget.
3. The proposed General Fund legal budget for 1992 is
304,000.
4. The City uses one primary law firm: Holmes & Graven. On
occasion, we may engage an additional law firm for
certain specialized work.
5. Legal services is not put out for bid as one public
improvement projects. Under state law, professional
services, including legal services, are not required to
be bid. The attorney for the City is selected by the
City Manager and that selection is approved by the City
Council. At the City Council's direction, we recently
solicited proposals from various law firms interested in
doing work for the City. Following the process of
evaluating those proposals, I anticipate reporting to the
City Council with my recommendations. My report will
indicate the hourly fees charged by the various firms.
6. Engineering consultants for city projects are selected by
the City Council at the time the project is undertaken.
The City Council has previously prepared a list of
engineering consultants who have been interviewed by the
City Council and been deemed qualified to work for the
City.
om tv11111r'
91
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447. TELEPHONE (612) 550 -5000
S \ U AV
Mr. LeRoy Reinke
November 13, 1991
Page 2
7. It takes only a few days to place a new truck in service
once it has been delivered. Depending on the amount of
work needed to be done to the truck, e.g., mounting of
specialized equipment such as frames for snowplows, and
availability of that equipment, it is possible that the
installation time may be longer. In some instances, the
City acquires equipment well in advance of it being
needed. Police squad cars, for example, are purchased in
advance as a result of productions schedules of the
automobile manufacturers and joint purchasing agreements
with Hennepin County.
8. The City is divided into 17 snowplowing districts. Each
district has its own route which the snowplow operator
follows in plowing. It is not the practice of the City
to divert plowing resources to plow city parks and paths
before the streets are initially opened. We do utilize
different equipment for plowing our streets as compared
to our sidewalks and trails. During large snowfalls,
particularly such as the one we recently experienced,
qualified persons within U)e Park Maintenance Division,
as well as the Sewer and Water Maintenance Division are
pressed into service to assist in snowplowing in order to
open up our streets. Thereafter, they are released to
undertake other work responsibilities. If you desire
further information on the routes used by our snowplow
operators, I invite you to contact our Public Works
Director Fred Moore.
As you may know, the City Council will be holding public hearing
on the proposed 1992 city budgets on Monday, November 25 at 7:00
p.m. You are invited to attend and share your observations with
the Council. In the meantime, if you have further information
requirements, please do not hesitate to contact me or the Finance
Director, Mr. Dale Hahn.
Yours truly,
C\Jlmes G. Willis
Ci y Manager
kec
November 12, 1991
Jim Willis
Plymouth City Manager
3`100 Plymouth Blvd.
Plymouth Fin, 55`t't'7
Dear Mr Willis
Nei ; s,,
I would like to get some inFormation From the city For a
possible presentaion on the city budget.
1. What is the total amount spent to date For legal
services?
2. ghat is the total legal budget for 1991? This would be
the total From all depetments.
3. What is the proposed total legal budget for 1592? This
would be the total of all proposed iega.i expenses to be
spent For the year of 1992.
i. How many different law firms does the cite use for the
legal work: that is done?
S. is this work out out For bids? IF not how is the
selection process done? How is the rate determined.
6. I have noticed that a large amount of engineering work on
city roads and street is being done Streger- Roscoe- Fausch
Inc is this work put out on bid or how is it determined
that they are the proper engineering firm to do the job.
7. From the time the city takes deliver of say a new truck,
how long does it take to get that truck into service?
B. How is the proity on snow plowing determined? I have
noticed that the city parks and paths are plowed before
city street are plowed. Do we have seperate equipment for
plowing snow on the streets in the city parks.
IF you need to contact me you ca reach me at 227 7371.
Your Truly
464T
Lerou Reinke
1'1`t l l County Road 6
Plymouth Vin, 55'147
7::: - \ --'
Taxes
License Fees
Permits
Fines and Forfeitures
Use of Money and Property
Intergovernmental Revenues
Charges for Current Services
Transfers
Other Revenue
Fund Total
GENERAL FUND SUMMARY OF REVENUE
FOR YEARS 1992 -1996
1992 1993 1994
Estimated Estimated Estimated
Revenue Revenue Revenue
7,824,9-00 $ 8,212,780 1) $ 8,636,806 1)
79,900 83,096 86,420
1,107,300 1,128,339 1,152,034
435,000 443,265 452,574
274,000 282,220 290,687
74,200 75,610 77,198
410,200 412,530 430,971
615,000 639,600 665,184
80,000 80,000 80,000
10,900,500 11,357,440 11,871,874
GENERAL FUND SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES
1995
Estimated
Revenue
9,064,932 1)
89,877
1,173,923
461,172,
299,408
78,665
450,082
691,791
80,000
12,389,850
1996
Estimated
Revenue
9,523,618 1)
93,472
1,197,401
470,395
308,390
80,238
470,287
719,463
80,000
12,943,264
1) Assumes levy limit increase of estimated growth percentage plus 3 %.
F,
1992 1993 1994 1995 1996
Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated
Revenue Revenue Revenue Revenue Revenue
Personal Services 4,992,000 5,279,000 5,605,665 5,949,863 6,266,308
Materials and Supplies 824,900 876,494 929,084 983,829 1,043,919
Contractual Services 4,615,900 4,961,874 5,271,678 5,600,120 5,936,326
Capital Outlay 467,700 493,747 515,966 539,184 563,448
Total 10,900,500 11,611,115 12,322,393 13,073,996 13,810,001
SHORTFALL 0- 253,675) 450,519) 684,146) 866,737)
1) Assumes levy limit increase of estimated growth percentage plus 3 %.
F,
M
MEMO
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
DATE: November 21, 1991
TO: James G. Willis - City Manager
FROM: Lieutenant Dennis Paulson
SUBJECT: 1992 D.A.R.E. PROGRAM
In the 1991/92 school year we will be teaching D.A.R.E. in ten elementary
schools as follows:
1. Zachary Lane 4 classes 118 students @ 60 = 7,080
2. Pilgrim Lane 4 classes 100 students @ 60 = 6,000
3. Sunny Hollow 4 classes 95 students @ 60 = 5,700
4. Plymouth Creek 4 classes 89 students @ 60 = 5,340
5. Greenwood 3 classes 77 students @ 60 = 4,620
6. Gleason Lake 4 classes 107 students @ 60 = 6,420
7. Oakwood 3 classes 69 students @ 60 = 4,140
8. Birchview 4 classes 96 students @ 60 = 5,760
9. Sunset Hill 3 classes 72 students @ 60 = 4,320
10. Kimberly Lane 1 class 36 students @ 60 = 2,160
Totals 34 classes 859 students @ 60 = 51,540
DP /gk
MEMO
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
3400.PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55447
DATE: November 21, 1991
TO: James G. Willis - City Ma "r
FROM: Lieutenant Dennis Paulso
SUBJECT: CALLS FOR SERVICE AND ATTENDANCE STATISTICS FOR SENIOR
AND JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOLS IN PLYMOUTH
Total number of students attending each school (1991/92):
Armstrong Senior High - 2,033
Plymouth Middle School - 1,108
Wayzata Senior High - 1,570
Wayzata East Junior High - 810
The following statistics reflect calls for service for the period
September 1, 1990 through November 20, 1991. This time period
includes the entire 1990/91 school year as well as the 1991/92
school year to date (November 20, 1991). See attached for a
break down of types of calls for service for each school.
Total calls for service:
Armstrong Senior High - 87
Plymouth Middle School - 36
Wayzata Senior High - 35
Wayzata East Junior High - 27
DP /sb
1
15 Assaults (1 threat with
a knife, 1 substantial
injury fist fight, 12
minor fist fights)
1 Burglary
1 Arson
1 Bomb threat
7 Disturb
peace /disorderly
1 Indecent exposure
9 Vandalism
24 Thefts
2 Weapon possessions
1 Criminal sexual conduct
22 Truant
1 Liquor violation
1 Trespass
1 Possess stolen property
5 Assaults (1 substantial
injury fist fight, 2
minor fist fights, 2
terroristic threats to
commit bodily harm)
1 DWI
15 Thefts
4 Vandalism
7 Truant
2 Liquor violations
1 Disorderly conduct
7 Assaults (7 minor fist 4 Assaults (1 threat with
fights ) a knife, 3 minor fist
5 Burglaries fights)
1 Arson 11 Thefts
1 Alcohol 2 Trespass
8 Truant 1 Disorderly conduct
1 Disorderly 1 Arson
1 Trespass 7 Truant
6 Thefts 1 Drug violation
2 Weapon possessions
4 Vandalism