HomeMy WebLinkAboutCouncil Information Memorandum 05-04-1995MAY 4, 1995
UPCOMING MEETINGS AND EVENTS ....
I. COUNCIL MEETING SCHEDULE FOR MAY:
MAY 8 7:00 P.M. GENERAL COMMUNITY MEETING
Topic: Open Space/Trails Referendum and
other City Projects and Programs -
City Council Chambers
Following WARD MEETINGS
Public Tufo Mtg . Room locations for Ward Meetings will be posted
in City Center foyer
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MAY 16 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL MEETING
City Council Chambers
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MAY 24 5:00 P.M. SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING
Canvass Results of May 23 Special Election
City Council Chambers
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. HRA SPECIAL MEETING -- MONDAY, MAY 8, 6:30 P.M., City Center Large
Conference Room. (M-2)
3. PUBLIC MEETING ON CHARTER AMENDMENTS -- TUESDAY, MAY 9, 7:00
P.M., Council Chambers.
4. CHARTER COMMISSION -- TUESDAY, MAY 9, following public meeting, Council
Conference Room.
5. ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMMITTEE -- TUESDAY, MAY 9, 7:00 P.M.,
City Center Large Conference Room.
CITY COUNCIL INFORMATION MEMO
MAY 4, 1995
Page 2
6. PLANNING COMMISSION -- WEDNESDAY, MAY 10, 7:00 P.M., Council
Chambers.
7. D.A.R.E. GRADUATIONS -- A listing of D.A.R.E. graduation dates and locations is
attached. (M-7)
8. PLANT SALE -- SATURDAY;, MAY 13, Parkers Lake Park, 9 a.m. - 6 p.m.
9. TWINWEST CHAMBER "STATE OF THE CITY" COFFEE BREAK -- TUESDAY,
MAY 16, 7:30 A.M., City Council Chambers. (M-9)
10. METRO MEETINGS ---- The weekly calendar of meetings for the Metropolitan Council
and its advisory commissions is attached. (M-10)
11. MEETING CALENDAR -The May meeting calendar is attached. (M-11)
>
.
.......... V�.:....1T�..�...�.�ak"................
...:.:::::::.
1. DEPARTMENT REPORTS
a. Weekly Building Permit Report for Commercial/Industrial/Public and Use Types.
(I-1)
2. NEWS ARTICLES, RELEASES, PUBLICATIONS, ETC.
a. City news release on the Arbor Day (Mayl7) Plymouth Creek replanting project. (I-
3. MINUTES & AGENDAS:
a. Environmental Quality Committee, April 11, 1995. (I -3a)
4. CORRESPONDENCE
a. Letter from City Attorney's office to Barbara Cox giving an update on the current
law on the regulation of train whistles by municipalities. (I -4a)
b. Letter from Shawn Huckleby, U.S. Dept. of Housing & Urban Development, on the
results of the on-site review of Plymouth's Community Development Block Grant
program. The review was conducted on March 28 - 30. (I -4b)
c. Memo from Sergeant Larry Holzerland and Sara Cwayna, on the plan for a traffic
enforcement program in the South Shore Drive area. (I -4c)
d. Letter from Representative Richard Stanek, to Kathy Lueckert, commenting on the
property tax freeze proposal. (I -4d)
e. Letter to Tom Hill, Plymouth/Wayzata Boys Baseball, from Eric Blank, thanking
members of the organization for meeting with the Youth Sports Study Committee,
and extending an invitation to participate in the May 17 annual park tour. (I -4e)
CITY COUNCIL INFORMATION MEMO
MAY 4, 1995
Page 3
f. Memo from City Assessor Nancy Bye regarding 1995 residential property value
distribution. (I -4f)
g. Memo from IMS Manager Stan Birnbaum regarding information system issues. (I -
4g)
h. Letter from Suburban Rate Authority Counsel, Holmes and Graven, regarding the
proposed SRA 1996 budget. (I -4h)
i. Letter from Bob Renner, Municipal Legislative Commission, on Livable
Communities Compromise communications. (I -4i)
j. Letter from James Tiller, Attorney representing Hollydale Golf Course, regarding
drainage issues involving the Lundgren Brothers preliminary plat. (I -4j)
Dwight Johnson
City Manager
PLYMOUTH COMMUNITY MEETING
May 8, 1995
7:00 P.M.
I. Welcome and Introductions
II. Current Issues in Plymouth
A. Open Space/Trails Referendum
B Wayzata High School
C. Downtown Plymouth --mini survey
D. Traffic Enforcement Activities
E. Sump Pump Program
F. Green Lawns/Blue Water Video
III. Questions and Answers
Mayor Tierney
City Staff
Eric Blank
Eric Blank
Anne Hurlburt
Craig Gerdes
Dale Hahn
Dwight Johnson
Dwight Johnson
- Adjourn to Ward Break-out Sessions -
IV. Ward Break-out Sessions
Rooms: Council Chambers
Public Safety Training Room
Council Conference Room
Lower Atrium or Large Conference Room
Time Allotted
20 minutes
5 minutes
5 minutes
5 minutes
5 minutes
5 minutes
25 minutes
40 minutes
Staff members will rotate between ward sessions to answer any specific questions.
Fred Moore will provide construction updates as appropriate.
ME
Alt
PLYMOUTH HOUSING AND L EDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
NOTICE OF SP IXIAL .MEETING
MONDAY, MAY 89 1995, 6:30pm
PLYMOUTH CITY HALL, 3%0 PLYMOUTHS BOULEVARD
A special meeting of the Board of Commissioi i tzs of the Plymouth Housing and Redevelopment
Authority is hereby called for the time and p:,= indicated above to consider the pending IRS
public auction of the property at the northeas corner of Rockford Road (County Road 9) and
Fembrook Lane, North.
Questions regarding this special meeting can b referred to Edward Goldsmith, HRA Supervisor
at 550-5047 or at Plymouth ity Hall, 3400 Pl, mouth Boulevard, Plymouth, MN 55447.
-�-- Dated: May 3, 1995
David Crain, Chair
Plymouth Housing and Redevelopment Authori y
Posted: %lay 4, 1995
D.A.R.E. GRADUATION SIGN-UP LIST.
May 9th (Tuesday):
Gleason Lake Elementary -- 7:00 p.m.
Nicholas Granath Craig Gerdes
Greenwood Elementary -- 1:25 p.m.
Joy Tierney Craig Gerdes
May 11 th (Thursday):
Pilgrim Lane Elementary -- 1:30 p.m.
Chuck Lymangood Craig Gerdes
Sunset Hill Elementary -- 2:00 p.m.
Joy Tierney John Ward
Sunny Hollow Elementary -- 7:00 p.m.
Carole Helliwell John Ward
May 12th (Friday):
Oakwood Elementary-- 2:00 p.m.
Tim Wold Craig Gerdes
May 17th (Wednesday):
Kimberly Lane Elementary -- 2:00 p.m.
David Anderson Craig Gerdes
May 18th (Thursday):
Zachary Lane Elementary -- 1:45 p.m.
John Edson Craig Gerdes
May 23rd (Tuesday):
Plymouth Creek Elementary -- 1:30 p.m.
John Edson Craig Gerdes
May 30th (Tuesday):
Birchview Elementary -- 1:00 p.m.
John Edson Craig Gerdes
;ift-1
CfTY 7"rUSTAL
1OFLOUIST.
City of Golden Valley
n
GAS Y OT
W HO
0
TWI NWEST
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
State of the City Coffee Breaks
Tuesday, May 2
Crystal City Hall - Co-sponsored by: McManus Babcock &
4141 Douglas Drive Company Ltd.
Wednesday, May 3
St. Louis Park City Hall
5005 Minnetonka Boulevard McManus Babcock & Company Ltd
Tuesday, May 9
Golden Valley City Hall - Co-sponsored by: Marquette Bank
7800 Golden Valley Road Golden Valley
Tuesday, May 16
Plymouth City Hall
3400 Plymouth Boulevard
Wednesday, May 17
Minnetonka City Hall
14600 Minnetonka Boulevard
Tuesday, May 23
Hopkins City Hall
1010 South First Street
Thursday, May 25
Wayzata City Hall
600 East Rice Street
Wednesday, May 31
New Hope City Hall
4401 Xylon Avenue North
AlfMarquette Bank
� Golden Valley
During May, TwinWest brings its Coffee Breaks to city hall for a "State
of the City" presentation from 7:30 - 9:00 a.m. This is your opportunity
to hear about local happenings while enjoying the usual coffee, rolls and
networking with fellow members. The presentations will include new
and proposed developments, public improvement projects, proposed
ordinances and other matters that affect businesses in our communities.
The "State of the City" Coffee Breaks are always TwinWest's most highly
attended and informative Coffee Breaks of the year. Please join us!
METRO MEETINGS
A weekly calendar of meetings and agenda items for the Metropolitan Council, its advisory and standing committees, and
three regional commissions: Metropolitan Airports Commission, Metropolitan Parks and Open Space Commission, and
Metropolitan Spoits Facilities Commission. Meeting times and agendas are occasionally changed. Questions about meetings
should be directed to the appropriate organization. Meeting information is also available on the Metro Information Line at
229-3780 and by computer modem, through the Twin Cities Computer Network at 33775400.
DATE: April 28, 1995
WEEK OF: May 1 - May 5, 1995
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL
Finance Committee - Thursday, May 4, 4 p.m., Room 2A. The committee will consider: the 1994
Performance Evaluation Report submittal to Legislature; authorization to issue a request for proposal for a
consultant for financial system needs development; review budget calendar; and other business.
Legislative Coordinating Committee (TENTATIVE) - Friday, May 5, Noon, Room IA.
TENTATIVE MEETINGS THE WEEK OF MAY 1 THROUGH MAY 5, 1995
Community Development Committee - Monday, May 8, Noon, Room IA.
Sewer Rate/Cost Allocation Task Force - Tuesday, May 9, 7:30 a.m., Room 2A.
Environment Committee - Tuesday, May 9, 4 p.m., Room 2A.
Transportation Technical Advisory Committee to the Transportation Advisory Board - Wednesday,
Mav 11, 9 a.m., Chambers.
Land Transportation Committee - Thursday, May 11, 1:30 p.m., Room 2A.
SPECIAL MEETING: Finance Committee - Thursday, May 11, 3:30 p.m., Room 2A.
Metropolitan Council - Thursday, May 11, 4 p.m., Chambers.
Committee of the Whole - Thursday, May 11, immediately following the Council meeting.
Lower Minnesota River Technical Advisory Group - Friday, May 12, 9:30 a.m., location to be
determined.
Legislative Coordinating Group - Friday, May 12, Noon, Room IA.
The Metropolitan Council is located at Mears Park Centre, 230 E. Fifth St., St. Paul. Meeting times and
agenda are subject to change. For more information or confirmation of meetings, call 291-6447, (TDD 291-
0904). Call the Metro Information Line at 229-3780 for news of Council actions and coming meetings.
METROPOLITAN AIRPORTS COMMISSION
Planning and Environment Committee - Tuesday, May 2, 1 p.m., Room 301, West Mezzanine, Lindbergh
Terminal, Wold -Chamberlain Field. The committee will consider: May ADNE levels; final contract
payments on the Glycol storage facility and 1993-94 Part 150 sound insulation program; contract bids
received for the Revenue Control building and beacon rehabilitation at the St. Paul Downtown Airport;
ratification of acceptance of grant offers; review of upcoming construction project bids; Lindbergh Terminal
passenger waiting area rehabilitation; Crystal long-term comprehensive plan presentation; Airlake Airport
south building area; reliever airports philosophy; Differential Global Positioning System ground station;
consultant interviews for dual track airport planning process economic analysis; and other business.
Metropolitan Airports Commission offices are located at 6040 28th Av. S., Minneapolis, MN 55450. For
more information, call Lynn Sorensen at 726-8186.
METROPOLITAN SPORTS FACILITIES COMMISSION
Intergovernmental Relations Committee - Tuesday, May 23, 8 a.m., Sheraton Midway Inn, 400 N.
Hamline Ave., St. Paul. The committee will consider legislative issues and other business.
The Metropolitan Sports Facilities Commission office is located at 900 South 5th St., Minneapolis, MN
55415. All meetings are held in the Commission office conference room, unless noted otherwise. Meeting
times and agendas occasionally may be changed. To verify meeting information, please call Lori Peltier, 335-
3310.
r
� OFFICIAL CITY MEETINGS
May 1995
Sunday...y
Tuesday
Wednesday..
..Saturday
1
2
3
4
5
6
PLANE PLYMOUTH ENTRANCE
WAYS -1-494 & Carlson Parkway
7�b0 PM $G1AR0OF
f (Recanveried)
i,Ct3uiIm�ieii
100 PM COUNCIL MEET
IN = Council Chsmbers
7:00 PM Downtown Plymo-
uth Workshop - Council
Chambers
7:30 PM HUMAN RIGHTS
COMMISSION -Pub. Safety
Training Room
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
PLANT SALE - Parkers Lake
Park 9 ant. - 6p.m
6:30 PM Special HRA Mtg
- Large Conf. Rm
7:00 PM ENVIRONMENTAL
QUALITY COMMITTEE - Pub.
Safety Trng Room
7:00 PM PLANNING COMMISSION
Council Chambers
PUBLIC INFO. MEETING ON
OPEN SPACErrRAILS REFEREN
DUM - 7:00 P.M., Council
Chambers; WARD MEETINGS
follow
7:00 PM PUBLIC MTG ON CHAR -
TER AMENDMENTS -Council
Chambers
CHARTER COMMISSION following
Public MtO -Council Coat Rm
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
City Center Counter Open for
Absentee Doting -1- 3 p.m.
7:30 AM TwinWest Chamber
"State of the City" Coffee
Break - Council Chambers
7:00 AM PLYMOUTHHOUSING
ALLIANCE - Council Con,. Rm.
7:00 PM HRA - Council
Chambers
1: 00 PMARBOR DAY -
7:00 PM COUNCIL MEE
' ING - Council, Cltambe'
Plymouth Creek School
7:00 PM PACT - Pub. Safety Library
PARK TOUR - Leave City
Center 4 p.m.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
PLYMOUTH TOWNE
SQUARE -RECEPTION,
2:00 P.M.; OPEN HOUSE,
3:00 - 5:00 P.M.
City Center Counter Open to
7p.nL -Absentee Voting
SPECIAL CITY ELECTION
-Polls Open 7 a.m.; Close 8
p.m.
500 rM SPECIAL COUN ,
fC MEETirIc GgWt
cil"7aambera;F,.
7:00 PM BOARD OF ZONING -
Council Chambers
7:00 PM PLANNING COMMISSION
- Council Chambers
28
30
31
April June
Memorial Day (Observed)
City Offices Closed
S M T W T F S S M T W T F S
2 3 4 5 6 7 E 1 2 3
9 10 11 12 13 14 15 4 S 6 7 8 9 10
16 17 18 19 20 21 22 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
23 24 25 26 27 28 29 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
30 25 26 27 28 29 30
7:00 PM Downtown Plymo-
uth Workshop - Council
Chambers
Rev. 5/4/95
DATE: MAY 4, 1995
TO: DWIGHT JOHNSON, CITY MANAGER
�n
FROM: CARLYS SCHANSBERG, DATA CONTROL/INSPECTION
CLERK
SUBJECT: BUILDING PERMIT ISSUED REPORT FOR
COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL/PUBLIC & CHURCH USE TYPES
APRIL 27, 1995 THROUGH MAY 3, 1995
Permit #66274 was issued to Opus Corporation for construction of a new building at
13100 15th Avenue North, valuation $3,120,000.00.
Permit #65918 was issued to A P Technology Mgmt. for remodeling of Protein Design
Labs at 3955 Annapolis Lane North, valuation $330,000.00.
Permit #66061 was issued to Olson Company for remodeling of existing office space at
14600 21st Avenue North, valuation $100,000.00.
PERMITLIST LIST OF PERMITS ISSUED
05/04/95 AGING DAYS
FROM 04/27/95 TO 05/03/95
r
PAGE
2
PIN NUMBER CLASS OF WORK DATE PERMIT #
APPLICANT NAME LEGAL USE TYPE ISSUED ERMT.TYPE
SITE ADDRESS DESCRIPTION OUTLOT/TRACT
UNIT# STATE LICENSE # VALUATION TOTAL FEE
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
23 118 22 32 0026
GATES ROOFING
2990 NORWOOD LA N
0006783
30 118 22 11 0060
STEVEN L & BRENDA E HUKRIEDE
2330 CO RD NO 101
0006783
27 118 22 43 0017
OPUS CORP
13100 15TH AVE N
29 118 22 42 0083
PLYMOUTH ROOFING
1799 BLACK OAKS LA N
0005358
REPAIR 04/27/95 66225
LOT BLK SFD BUILDING
7 3 WESTMINSTER
$3,500.00 $64.75
ADDITION 05/03/95 66259
LOT BLK SFD BUILDING
LLS30QQ110060
$3,000.00 $90.60
NEW CONST 05/02/95 66274
LOT BLK INDUSTRIAL BUILDING
LLS27QQ430017
$3,120,000.00 $81,735.17
REPAIR 05/01/95 66276
LOT BLK SFD BUILDING
3 3 CHELSEA WOODS 2ND
$3,700.00 $105.80
PERMITLIST LIST OF PERMITS ISSUED
05/04/95 AGING DAYS
FROM 04/27/95 TO 05/03/95
PAGE 4
PIN NUMBER CLASS OF WORK DATE PERMIT ##
APPLICANT NAME LEGAL USE TYPE ISSUED ERMT.TYPE
SITE ADDRESS DESCRIPTION OUTLOT/TRACT
UNIT# STATE LICENSE ## VALUATION TOTAL FEE
---------------------------------------------------------------------
19 118 22 22 0059
SCOTT MULLIN CONST
3430 ZIRCON LA N
0006290
28 118 22 13 0028
GEORGE P & PHYLLIS A NORGREN
2005 JUNEAU LA N
0006290
�✓ 15 118 22 31 0008
A P TECHNOLOGY MGMT
3955 ANNAPOLIS LA N
28 118 22 13 0004
OLSON COMPANY
14600 21ST AVE N
35 118 22 43 0018
MARTINE, LENORE
11700 RIDGEMOUNT AVE N
08 118 22 44 0037
GREGORY J & MICHELLE S PULLES
4625 XENE LA N
ADDITION 05/03/95 65731
LOT BLK SFD BUILDING
3 3 CHURCHILL FARMS 5TH
$7,500.00 $167.10
ADDITION 05/02/95 65910
LOT BLK SFD BUILDING
43 1 CIMARRON EAST
$12,096.00 $243.65
ALTERATION 04/28/95 65918
LOT BLK COMMERCIAL BUILDING
1 1 PLYMOUTH BUS CTR 3RD
$330,000.00 $7,248.42
ALTERATION 05/02/95 66061
LOT BLK INDUSTRIAL BUILDING
LLS28QQ130004
$100,000.00 $1,105.17
ADDITION 04/28/95 66082
LOT BLK SFD BUILDING
LLS35QQ430018
$3,500.00 $105.70
ADDITION 05/03/95 66096
LOT BLK SFD BUILDING
7 1 AUTUMN HILLS
$4,000.00 $105.95
19 118 22 14 0031 ADDITION 04/28/95 66116
MARK L & KAREN A FRANKEL LOT BLK SFD BUILDING
17810 32ND PL N 16 3 HEATHER RUN
$7,000.00 $152.00
For Immediate Release
May 3, 1995
For More Information:
Paul Buck, 550-7462
Students, Parents, Teachers to Help City of Plymouth Plant for the Future
Plymouth City Forester Paul Buck expects this year's Arbor Day in Plymouth to
be the biggest yet. The City is joining forces with Plymouth Creek Elementary School
students to undertake a large replanting project. The project will include about 1,000
people. Arbor Day activities will be on Wed., May 17 at Plymouth Creek Elementary
School, 16005 - 41st Ave. N. The planting project will begin at 10 a.m. and continue
throughout the day. The official Arbor Day ceremony will begin at 1 p.m. The public is
encouraged to participate in one or both parts of the day.
Students, teachers, parents, city officials and residents will plant 1,700 trees,
shrubs, saplings and flowers. The Arbor Day planting had been planned on a smaller
scale along Plymouth Creek but it grew into a larger event as a result of a routine creek
maintenance project that caught the attention of the Plymouth Creek School students.
Because Plymouth Creek was flooding upstream, the City had plans to dredge the creek.
The project required the removal of some trees in an area the students used as a
nature/education area. When the students learned of the project, they contacted city
officials to let them know how important the site was to them and their school.
"This year's project was truly inspired by community activism, specifically the
students of Plymouth Creek School. What started as routine maintenance of Plymouth
Creek became much more. We heard the students' voices and were able to work with
them to address their concerns," Buck said.
"It was a great example of a community working together to solve a problem and
improve the environment. We ultimately dredged the creek, but because we had the
interest, energy and effort of the students we are able to do more than restore the
disturbed areas as we originally planned. With their hard work, we will be able to
enhance the area. I think this has been a good learning experience for all involved," Buck
added.
Plymouth Creek Principal Carol Bryant agrees. "The students turned their
activism into stewardship and are making a lasting statement by reforesting their school
environment. The focus has shifted from what needed to be disturbed to solve flooding
problems to what we can do as citizens to restore and actually improve the natural
environment," she said.
The students will plant a:
Windbreak/buffer along the west side of the school playfield.
Wildlife sanctuary along the creek;
Butterfly garden; and
Native prairie grass community.
"The students, teachers and families of Plymouth Creek School can feel proud
that they have alerted the City to the importance the creek plays not only to wildlife but
to the education of our students. As a result of the students' efforts, the City wanted to
work in partnership with the school to not only restore the area disturbed by the creek
dredging but to go farther. It has worked with the students and school administrators to
design and plant along both sides of the Plymouth creek," said Cathy Bruer-Thompson,
PTA Earth Day/Arbor Co -Chair.
991111
'1� " '' a
MIlVLJTES
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMMITTEE
MEETING NO. 37
TUESDAY, APRIL 115, 1995
7:00 P.M.
PRESENT: Members - Mary McKee, Rita O'Donnell, David Shea, Jeffrey Shopek,
Sharon Meister, Bridgett Jodell. Staff Ex -officio -Dan Faulkner; Shane Missaghi,
Councilmember-Tim Wold,
ABSENT: Members - Craig Twinem, Staff Ex -officio -Eric Blank
The meeting was called to order by Chairperson Mary McKee. The minutes from the
March meeting were approved as received.
OLD BUSINESS
♦ REPORT FROM THE COMMITTEE MEMBERS ON FISH HOUSE
STANDARDS POSTED SIGNS AND AS POINT OF PURCHASE
Signs regarding fish houses were well posted and nicely designed. A thank you
should go to Eric Blank for a job well done. Permits are available at local outlets
where fishing licenses are sold (i.e.: baitshops) as well as courthouses. A list can be
obtained from the DNR for all Plymouth sites where licenses are sold. Place this topic
on the fall agenda.
♦ STENCILING OF CATCH BASINS
Shane shared a packet on how to do stenciling. Several groups were suggested to
help with the stenciling. They are: Boy Scouts - (Mary has been in contact with
two troop leaders), Lake Associations, Neighborhood Committees, Schools, and 4-
H clubs. A cover letter inviting their help should be devised to send to these
groups. Permission from industries needs to be obtained before any stenciling can
be done before any stenciling can be done on their property. Other suggestions
included using lake association groups, students older than elementary age. It was
suggested that a small project be completed just to assure its success.
IMPLEMENTING THIS PROGRAM:
1. City Council needs to be in agreement with work plan.
2. Need 15 people for 4 hours to paint 50 catch basins.
3. Start with one area such as Plymouth Blvd., Parkers Lake, or South Medicine
Lake.
4. Get funds approved from City Council:
Stencils
$250.00
Paint
$ 75.00
Safety Equipment
$200.00
Other
$ 25.00
TOTAL
$550.00
This is a one time charge for pilot program
5. Target date to begin is late May or early June.
The Committee reviewed and approved the work plan. City Council needs to adopt the
Program as well. The Committee recommended that staff ask the City Council at their
May 2 meeting to approve the plan.
♦ REPORT ON VISIT TO WATER QUALITY TASK FORCE
Tim reported on the activities of the Water Task Force. The Water Task Force has
focused on issues such as phosphate free fertilizer, sump pump connections, and
general water quality education project. Consideration is being given to creating an
ordinance governing commercial fertilizer applications to limit the phosphorus
content. The May 23 bond election for funding trail construction and open space
purchase was also discussed.
♦ COMMUNICATION VEHICLES BETWEEN COUNCIL AND COMMITTEE
Change format of Environmental Quality Committee's Minutes to make reading
easier for Council. Issues reach the EQC through staff members. Tim will ask
how other committees get their information to the City Council. He also mentioned
he would appreciate a call from the chairperson whenever he can't make a meeting
to stay informed of the meeting results.
NEW BUSINESS
♦ REPORT ON PRAIRIE RESTORATION
A suggestion was made to have an article on how to do buffer zones in a 1996
newsletter. French Park has 1 1/2 acres near the Visitor Center. Coon Rapids has
an expert, Karen Colby, on prairie restoration. Professional slides and training can
be obtained through this person. The City's weed ordinance also needs to be
revisited. It was suggested that the City could develop a list of acceptable plantings
and provide this to developers. It was noted that the new Plymouth County Library
will have prairie grasses planted.
♦ MUSIC IN PLYMOUTH
Dave will get in contact with Eric for suggestions on what to have for the booth.
Dave will come back to the next meeting with this information. He would like to
include information on prairie grasses. The Committee consensus was that we need
a "draw" to attract people to our booth.
♦ BEGIN REVIEW OF THE SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
This topic will be discussed at a special meeting scheduled for April 20 at 5:00
p.m. The draft RFP was handed out for review at the special meeting.
♦ VIDEO ON WATER QUALITY "GREEN LAWNS AND BLUE LAKES"
This video was watched and the Committee agreed that it is a good video. The
video is airing as often as possible on Community News on Northwest Cable,
Channels 23 and 41 and at schools.
♦ ADDITIONAL COMMENTS
Rita suggested that there is a need for a brochure on wetland buffers and plant types
for developer education in order to meet the requirements of the Wetland and
Erosion Control Ordinances. Mary suggested this be discussed at the next regular
committee meeting.
The meeting was adjourned at 9:30 p.m.
Submitted by:
Diane Moyes
T 3�
CAMPBELL, KNUTSON, SCOTT & FUCHS, P. (01"'Lli
�i
Attorneys at 1_mv
Thomas J. Campbell
Roger N. Knutson
Thomas \l. Scott
Gary G. Fuchs
James R. Wid ton
Elliott B. Knetsch
Ms. Barbara Cox
City of Plymouth
3400 Plymouth Boulevard
Plymouth, MN 55447-1482
Re: Train Whistle Ordinance
Dear Ms. Cox:
(612) 452-5000
Fax (612) 452-5550
May 1, 1995
Ands" \tchowcll 110chlcr
Told L. Ni,sen
\1at;euc+ite \i. \1cC:11ron
Gc,n;,c T. Stej,hcn>on
Pursuant to your request, Roger Knutson asked that I review the current law
regarding the regulation of train whistles by municipalities.
In 1994, Congress enacted and amended the High -Speed Rail Development Act, 49
U.S.C. § 20101, et seq. The High -Speed Rail Development Act, as amended in November
1994, directs the Secretary of Transportation to promulgate regulations requiring the
sounding of a locomotive horn at every crossing. 49 U.S.C. § 20153(b).. The High -Speed
Rail Development Act contains provisions for exceptions to the requirement for audible
warnings as well as for waivers and exemptions. 49 U.S.C. § 20153(c) and (d). The
Secretary has not, however, promulgated such regulations.
Recent federal lawsuits have addressed the validity of city ordinances that prohibit
railroads from sounding audible warnings (whistles or horns) at railroad grade crossings and
the fines imposed for violation of the ordinances. The railroads have argued that the High -
Speed Rail Development Act preempts cities from prohibiting the use of train whistles.
However, the two most recent federal cases to address this issue have concluded that, until
the Secretary of Transportation promulgates regulations requiring the sounding of a
locomotive horn at every crossing, their 'is no federal law that preempts a municipality's right
to prohibit or regulate a railroad's use of audible warnings at a grade crossing. These court
cases indicate that the amended High -Speed Railway Act of 1994 was the likely catalyst for
the railroads' decision to resume sounding audible warnings despite ordinances.
In addition to the foregoing argument, the railroads asserted that the cities were
preempted by federal regulations requiring that lead locomotives have an audible warning
device of specified capabilities. However, the courts disagreed holding that the regulation of
the use of equipment is distinct from limiting the possession of the equipment or regulating
the equipment itself.
Suite 317 • Engandiile Office Center 1 3,ti0 C()1_1,o1_,1tc Center Cun'c Eat ui, `1N 55121
Ms. Barbara Cox
May 1, 1995
Page 2
While these cases tend to support a municipality's regulation of railroad audible
warning devices, it is only a matter of time before the Secretary of Transportation complies
with the High Speed Rail Development Act and promulgates rules requiring the sounding of
whistles or horns at grade crossings. Such rules would preempt a municipality's regulation
of the sounding of railroad audible warning devices. Until the Secretary of Transportation
promulgates such rules, it would appear that the City may charge railroads for violations of
the City ordinance. However, since the federal legislation is very recent and there are very
few cases on the subject, the railroad could conceivably challenge the City ordinance. The
City would then be involved in a costly lawsuit, which might be a waste of time and money
should the Secretary of Transportation promulgate the rules mandated by the High -Speed Rail
Development Act.
I would also like to direct your attention to the recent decision by the Newport City
Council not to adopt an ordinance that completely bans the sounding of train whistles from
10:00 p.m. to 6:00 a.m. The city council expressed concerns regarding the City's liability in
the event an accident occurs when a railroad engineer fails to blow the whistle in reliance on
a City ordinance.
Very truly yours,
CAMPBELL; KNUTSON, SCOTT
& FUCHS
By �i/2 Cl'�i✓ 11'�
Andrea M. Poehler
AMP
cc: Mr. Dwight Johnson �'I
Mr. Dwight Johnson
City Manager
City Hall
3400 Plymouth Boulevard
Plymouth, MN 55447
Dear Mr. Johnson:
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
Minnesota State Office
220 Second Street South
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401-2195
SUBJECT: On Site Monitoring
Community Development Block Grant Program
This letter discusses the results of our review of Plymouth's Community Development
Block Grant (CDBG) program. This review was conducted on March 28 - 30, 1995.
The monitoring was conducted by John Swanson of my staff. It included an
examination of program files and documents, and site visits to homes that received First Time
Home -Buyers or Rehabilitation assistance and to a park that received improvements that were
financed with CDBG funds. In addition we spoke with Ms. Ann Hulburt, Director of
Community Development; Mr. Ed Goldsmith, HRA Supervisor; and Mr. Milt Dale, Housing
Specialist, and Mr. Larry Jacobson, Assistant Finance Director. The following projects were
reviewed:
A. First Time Homebuyers
B. Housing Rehabilitation
C. Community Action Suburban Hennepin (County)
D. Park Improvements
E. Hammer Residences, Inc.
F. The Community Home Program
G. Community Builders
Each project was reviewed to ensure that it was an eligible, that it met with one of the
program's national objective, and that it complied with the Uniform Relocation Assistance
and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act, when applicable.
Overall, we are pleased with the manner in which the City/HRA staff are administering
the CDBG program. We observed several improvements in areas that in our last monitoring
were noted as problems. Any discussion of program deficiencies should be within the
context that the City has a generally well run program.
Earlier we provided to your staff a six page detailed DRAFT report of the conclusions
reached as a result of the monitoring. The report contained three (3 ) findings of non-
compliance__ _It also contained four (4) "concerns". A "concern" generally pertains to an
-. --L� !,-
2
issue that has not resulted in a violation of a statutory or regulatory requirement.. However,
if the issue were to go uncorrected, it would likely lead to such a violation.
Your staff have already responded to each of the findings and concerns that were
raised in the DRAFT report. We believe there is Pomerit to re -raising to you now those
m-a�fers w�ic we elieve have been resolved. If you would li e more rn orma ion a ouT-the
indings n concerns w is emerged from the monitoring, we would gladly discuss them
with you or you may obtain a copy of the DRAFT report from your staff.
Our reviews have an important goal other than compliance monitoring. This is the
provision of technical assistance in the administration of the program. A considerable amount
of time was devoted to this goal. We do not want to summarize all the technical assistance
discussion that was held. However, as you are aware, the Department of Housing and Urban
Development is undergoing some significant reinvention efforts. Two of these efforts are
detailed in the attached report, as we think they may have some impact on the direction of
Plymouth's CDBG program. First, the Department has worked to make easier the use of
CDBG funds for economic development activities. Secondly, the Department is increasing
its efforts to provide assistance to the homeless and to those that are danger of becoming
homeless. It is attempting to do this with communities as each of them develops its own
Continuum of Care for homeless individuals and families.
appreciate the cooperation and courtesy your staff extended to mine during his visit.
Each individual was helpful in providing the needed information, and in resolving matters that
arose. If you have any questions about the information contained in this report, please
contact John Swanson at 370-3022.
Sincerely yours,
Shawn G. Huckleby
Director, CPD Division
Attachment
cc:
Ed Goldsmith, HRA Supervisor
Milt Dale, Housing Specialist
f;
DATE: April 25, 1995
TO: Chief Gerdes
FROM: Sgt. Hozerland and Sara Cwayna
SUBJECT: 1995 Traffic Enforcement Effort, Southshore Drive
We met today to discuss a plan for a traffic enforcement program in the Southshore
Drive Area.
We have decided to go home to home (@50 homes) in this area with printed
information the upcoming work of the Traffic Enforcement Unit. Working with
Helen Lafave, we have designed a flyer and an informational brochure to be provided
to the Plymouth Southshore community and, if appropriate, to the Medicine Lake
City Council for review and adaptation in their community.
As we door knock the community, we will provide flyers to the residents who are
home and will discuss with them and ask for their assistance with our effort to reduce
traffic speed in their neighborhood. For those residences in which the occupants are
not home, we will write down their address and mail to them a brochure of the
program.
The information on the brochure and flyer will be presented in bullet form under the
headings of:
Issue -Almost one out of two vehicles are being driven in excess of the speed limit on
Southshore Drive.
Community Impact -Life safety issues and a deterioration of the quality of life in this
neighborhood
Police Action Plan -Strict Traffic Law Enforcement, Traffic Ticket and Insurance
Penalties, Digital Speed Display Unit, Posting of Traffic Enforcement Signs
Be a Good Neighbor -Obey Traffic Speed Limits, Wear Your Seatbelts, Drive Sober,
Speak to all Drivers in Your Home, Be Alert to Pedestrian Traffic.
Providing Information to the Police/For more Information.
Helen plans to have the first draft of our brochure and flyer completed by
Wednesday, April 26 and we will provide you with a copy as soon as it is completed.
-L— tet' Q/
South Shore Drive
Issue
We need your help. Traffic along South Shore Drive is moving too fast.
A recent speed survey showed many vehicles traveling ten miles or more
above the speed limit. The Plymouth Police Department is targeting this
area for strict compliance with traffic laws.
Impact
• Such speeds are not only dangerous, they deteriorate the quality of
life in the neighborhood.
• Almost one out of every two vehicles is moving faster than the
speed limit.
Action Plan
• The Police Department plans strict enforcement of traffic laws.
• Speeding violations will be given little or no tolerance along with
other violations that may be observed.
• Consequences:
The fine for moving violations are:
A. $70.50 for first violation.
B. $82. for second violation.
C. Increased car insurance premium.
Be a Good Neighbor
• Obey speed limit.
Discuss traffic safety with all of the driverswig your family.
• Drive sober.
• Use seat belts.
• Be aware of pedestrian traffic.
Ifyou witness a violation of traffic law, obtain the license number
and description of the vehicle and driver. Please notify the Trak
Enforcement Unit at SSO-SM' SoG y
DATE: April 26, 1995
TO: Director Craig Gerdes r
FROM: Lt. Thomas Saba
SUBJECT: Historical Perspective Of The Plymouth Police Answering
Calls In The City Of Medicine Lake:
The Hennepin County Sheriff's Department has always been responsible for answering
law enforcement calls for service in the City of Medicine Lake. Routine calls and
reports were never a problem for the county. Medical and other emergency calls often
presented a problem in response time by the county. Hennepin has few patrol units and
a large area to cover. Often they are so far from Medicine Lake that time becomes
critical. The Plymouth Police Department has a long history of serving the emergency
service needs of the people of Medicine Lake by mutual aid assistance to the county.
In the early 1980's, if my memory is correct, it could have been late 1970's, the
Plymouth City Manager, James Willis, and the Plymouth City Council, researched the
isssue of the Plymouth Police responding to calls in Medicine Lake. Their concern was
that the calls were becomming too numerous and there was no remuneration for
Plymouth. In other words, the question was asked, Are they taking advantage of the
situation?
A study was conducted and a lengthy dialog took place between the two cities.
Plymouth sought some form of compensation from Medicine Lake. Every proposal
and compromise was unsatisfactory, too expensive, for Medicine Lake. An order was
issued from the City Council, City Manager, Chief of Police to police officers. Do not
respond to calls in Medicine Lake. Formally, the order was not to respond to any
calls. Informally, the officers said they couldn't let someone die because of this issue.
The practice became that officers would respond to life threatening medical
emergencies and calls for help from another officer or deputy. This general practice
continues today.
Richard W. Stanek
State Representative
District 33B
Hennepin County
April 27, 1995
Kathy Lueckert
Assistant City Manager
City of Plymouth
3400 Plymouth Blvd.
Plymouth, MN 55447
Dear Kathy:
'���TIII; SI; •..Minnesota
I€House of
Representatives
COMMITTEES: JUDICIARY; EDUCATION; U OF M FINANCE
Thank you for contacting me regarding your opposition to the Senate property tax freeze
proposal and your concern with the effect it would. have on your community. I share your
uneasiness over the impact this will have on your current budgeting strategy and your long-
term project development.
As you know, a bill to freeze property taxes was passed by the Senate and sent to the House
as part of HF 602. This measure has not received support from members of the House
Independent -Republican Caucus or the Democratic House leadership.
We must remember that a property tax freeze is not reform. I believe that a property tax
freeze without reform will not lift the crushing burden of taxes or provide a funding source
for education. It will, however, have. a drastic impact on community education and local
services. This plan will only, force iocai governments to cut services, put off construction
spending and further increase taxes once the freeze is lifted. We should be working toward
meaningful reform and not use political maneuvering to postpone the tough decisions that
we were elected to make by using a spending control mandate on local units of government.
Last week, the House DFL proposed a constitutional amendment as part of their response
to the freeze. While attractive in its vaguely written form, it does not show leadership by
elected officials, is not specific as to where the state will get the $3 billion to fund 100% of
school expenses and will not effect spending or force reform until 1998.
At this time, I do not support the Senate's proposal to freeze property taxes or the
constitutional amendment in their current forms. I hope that we can achieve property tax
reform in some other fashion that will provide immediate relief.
14890 91"Ave., Maple Grove, Minnesota 55369 (612) 420-4497
State Office Building, 100 Constitution Ave., St. Paul, Minnesota 55155-1298 (612) 296-5502
IR FAX (612) 296-8803
�w
Property Tax Freeze
Page Two
In an effort to provide additional funding for schools, the House Republicans have proposed
using the additional $91 million recently found available for property tax relief. This will
bring the relative current state share of public education to 62%. While this is not perfect,
it will help us toward removing the burden of education financing from the property tax and
increasing the state contribution.
Sincerely,
Richard W. Stanek .5�
State Representative ��'
District 33B (Maple Grove/Plymouth)
10
r�
1
a
� t
a+;
April 28, 1995 CITY OF
PLYMOUTH+
Tom Hill
Plymouth/Wayzata Boys Baseball
3045 Alvarado Ln N
Plymouth, MN 55447
Dear Tom:
On behalf of the Youth Sports Study Committee, I would like to thank you and the other
members of your organization for taking the time to meet with the committee. The committee
has found the wealth of information you provided to be of utmost interest and importance in
their better understanding of the youth sports needs of our community. In the months ahead,
as the committee continues its work, I am sure that your input will be quite valuable.
At this time, I would to extend an invitation to you and other members of your committee to
join the Park and Recreation Advisory Commission and City Council on the annual park tour
which is scheduled for Wednesday, May 17, at 4:00 in the afternoon. During this tour, we
will be visiting many of the facilities that were discussed at the study sessions. It will also
provide you another opportunity to interact with the mayor and council members with regards
to youth sports needs in our community. If you would like to register for the tour, just call
my secretary, Nancy, at 550-5130.
Again, thank you for your time and effort on this matter. We will be in touch with you as the
study and review goes forward.
Sincerely,
Eric J. Blank
Director of Parks & Recreation
FO-1-Tre
cc City Manager
City Council
Park Commission
We Listen • We Solve • We Care
3400 PLYMOUTH BOULEVARD • PLYMOUTH. MINNESOTA 55447 • TELEPHONE (612) 550-5000
,1 J
DATE: May 3,1995
TO: Joy Tierney, Mayor
FROM: Nancy Bye, City Assessor WA
SUBJECT: 1995 Residential Property Value Distribution .
The attached graph and figures illustrate Plymouth's 1995 residential property value
distribution. This includes all residential property types in the city except for apartment
units. This breakdown was provided to us by the Hennepin County Assessor's office.
cc: Dwight Johnson, City Manager
Kathy Lueckert, Assistant City Manager
Dale Hahn, Finance Director
Anne Hurlburt, Community Development Director
Ed Goldsmith, Housing Supervisor
PLYMOUTH RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY VALUE DISTRIBUTION 1995
60.00%
671
3.82%
$50,0001 to $100,000
4,019
22.88%
$100,001 to 200,000
9,997
56.91 %
Y
2,359
13.43%
$300,001 to $400,000
436
2.48%
$400,001 to $500,000
67
0.38%
Over $500,001
16
0.09%
50.00%
40.00%
x
ci 30.00%-
20.00%
10.00%
�
0.00%
Under
$50,0001
$100,001
$200,001 $300,001 $400,001 Over
$50,000
to
to
to to to $500,001
$100,000
200,000
$300,000 $400,000 $500,000
VALUE
$ VALUE # OF HOMES PERCENT
Under $50,000
671
3.82%
$50,0001 to $100,000
4,019
22.88%
$100,001 to 200,000
9,997
56.91 %
$200,001 to $300,000
2,359
13.43%
$300,001 to $400,000
436
2.48%
$400,001 to $500,000
67
0.38%
Over $500,001
16
0.09%
TOTAL 17,565 100.00%
1L_ 42
DATE: May 2, 1995
TO: Dale Hahn
FROM: Stan Birnbaum
SUBJECT: Current directions
After my first two months here, and after conducting a comprehensive review with the
Information Systems Steering Committee, I would like to suggest that we pursue three
critical issues aggressively:
Updating our core applications, all of which are at the end of their life cycle.
believe that migrating any one of these systems is a mid-sized project.
However, migrating all eight applications becomes a very large project. We
will also make significant, long-term decisions about key vendors and
hardware/software/database platforms in the course of this process. While we
will be able to move the least challenging of these applications from the
mainframe as early as this summer, and can make continued progress
throughout calendar year 1996, I expect that we will not be able to move the
last of the applications until the end of 1997.
2. Managing our A -series Unisys system resources through the end of the
migration process. While it is clearly in our interests to move away from
proprietary systems, we cannot `implug" the Unisys A -series system until we
reach the tail end of our migration process. Unisys' pricing is extremely
unfavorable to users of old technology. We pay prices for hardware support
and on-going software licensing that far exceed these costs with newer
technology. At the same time, our limited tape and disk resources impede our
operational efficiency. We perform many tasks manually, with regular
monitoring of system resources, that could be automated with additional disk
space and a better tape backup solution. It is very possible that we can update
this class of equipment, reduce the monthly operating costs, and save the city
z- �o
costs over the remaining 30 -month `window" during which we need A -series
capability.
3. `Muscling up" our network environment. Our network infrastructure was
purchased to meet the requirements of about a dozen users in 1991. Since that
time, our user count has increased more than eight -fold. The range of tasks we
do on the network are far more demanding, and will become increasingly more
demanding as we look to integrate imaging technology and graphical systems
(including GIS). Currently, network limitations make it nearly impossible to
pursue a number of current strategies. We are working on solutions for both
the server environment as well as how we handle the physical data traffic both
to resolve current problems and give us a low-cost, manageable growth path
for the intermediate-term future.
I believe that these directions will quickly become concrete proposals and suggestions
for implementation. I look forward to working with you and the Council as we pursue
solutions for the City's needs.
TO: SRA City Managers/Administrators,
Delegates and Alternates
FROM: Holmes & Graven, Chartered
SRA Counsel
DATE: May 1, 1995
RE: Proposed SRA 1996 Budget
s- 4
JAMW M. STROMMEN
JAMES J. THOMSON, 3R.
LARRY M. WERTHEIM
BONNIE L. WD.RINS
GARY P. WINTER
JOE Y. YANG
DAVID L. GRAVEN (1929.1991)
OF COUNSEL
ROBERT C. CARLSON
ROBERT L. DAVD)8ON
WELLINGTON H. LAW
T. JAY SALMEN
Attached is the proposed 1996 SRA Budget recommended by the SRA
Board for approval by the City Council of each SRA Member. This
process will be completed at the July 19, 1995 SRA Quarterly
Meeting when the SRA Board votes to finally approve an SRA 1996
Budget.
We urge you to review this information carefully and discuss it
with your Mayor and Council. We intend that the material attached
to the budget .will answer some of the questions the Council may
have regarding recent activities of the SRA and the anticipated
issues underlying the budget items.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
JMS:cam
Attachments
JMS87295
SU160-3
HOLMES & GRAVEN
CHARTERED
Attorneys at Law
470 Pillsbury Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402
ROBERT A. ALSOP
(612) 337.9300
RONALD H. BATTY
STEPHEN J. BUSUL
Facsimile (612) 337-9310
JOHN B. DEAN
MARY G. DOBBINS
STEFANIE N. GALEY
CORRINE A. HEINE
JAMES S. HOLMES
WRITER'S DIRECT DIAL
DAVID J. KENNEDY
JOHN R. LARSON
CHARLES L. LEFEVERE
JOHN M. LEFEVRE, JR.
337-9233
ROBERT J. LINDALL
ROBERT C. LONG
M B M 0 R A N D U N
TO: SRA City Managers/Administrators,
Delegates and Alternates
FROM: Holmes & Graven, Chartered
SRA Counsel
DATE: May 1, 1995
RE: Proposed SRA 1996 Budget
s- 4
JAMW M. STROMMEN
JAMES J. THOMSON, 3R.
LARRY M. WERTHEIM
BONNIE L. WD.RINS
GARY P. WINTER
JOE Y. YANG
DAVID L. GRAVEN (1929.1991)
OF COUNSEL
ROBERT C. CARLSON
ROBERT L. DAVD)8ON
WELLINGTON H. LAW
T. JAY SALMEN
Attached is the proposed 1996 SRA Budget recommended by the SRA
Board for approval by the City Council of each SRA Member. This
process will be completed at the July 19, 1995 SRA Quarterly
Meeting when the SRA Board votes to finally approve an SRA 1996
Budget.
We urge you to review this information carefully and discuss it
with your Mayor and Council. We intend that the material attached
to the budget .will answer some of the questions the Council may
have regarding recent activities of the SRA and the anticipated
issues underlying the budget items.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
JMS:cam
Attachments
JMS87295
SU160-3
-41'7
April 19, 1995
1996 Suburban Rate Authority Proposed Budget
1995
Assets:
Cash and Investments (12/31/94) $25,076
Receivables (1995 assessments) 64,800
Interest Income (estimate as of 12/31/95) 2,000
TOTAL $91,876
Anticipated 1995 Expenses:
1994 and 1995 Minnegasco Cases
legal $4,000
expert 1,000
1995 NSP Electric and Gas Matters
legal 6,000
expert 3,000
Legislative Matters 10,000
Local Calling Area Investigation 4,000
Electric and Gas Franchise Matters 5,000
Legislative Study of Franchises 14,000
General (fees and disbursements) 18,000
TOTAL
Reserve at December 31, 1995: $26,876
1996
Assets:
Carryover from 1995 $26,876
Membership Assessment ($400 per vote) 64,800
Interest Income (estimate as of 12/31/95) 2,000
TOTAL $93,676
Anticipated 1996 Ext)enses:
Minnegasco legal
$ 7,000
expert
3,000
NSP legal
10,000
expert
4,000
Telephone- legal
8,000
expert
1,000
Legislative Matters
9,000
General Matters (fees and disbursements)
18,000
($60,000 )
Reserve at December 31, 1996:
$33,676
JMS68238
SU160-3
T_
1
SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY ANNUAL REVIEW 1994
The following is a brief summary intended for the city councils of Suburban Rate Authority ("SRA") member
cities. It highlights the major activities and achievements of the SRA during 1994. The SRA is a joint
powers association of 32 Twin Cities suburban municipalities that monitors rates and rate design issues of
electric, gas, telephone utilities and Metropolitan Council Wastewater Services. The SRA was very active
and successful in several far-reaching issues affecting member city ratepayers and Minnesota cities generally.
Telecommunications Lejaislation
In the fall of 1994, the SRA Board authorized counsel to participate in legislative issues affecting cities
relating to the alternative telephone regulation bill (local service de -regulation) then expected to be offered
in the 1995 legislative session. The SRA assisted the lobbying efforts of the League of Minnesota Cities in
two important issues relating to that legislation: clarifying and broadening the police power of cities in the
new competitive environment for a local telephone service and addressing cities rights to compensation for
telecommunications utility use of public property. As of the date of this report, those SRA supported issues
have been incorporated into the bill which passed out of both the Senate and House Committees and is being
debated in the legislature at the time of this Review. The Department of Public Service will be authorized
by this bill to issue a comprehensive report by February 15, 1996 recommending a uniform state policy on
franchise fees for use of public property by utilities. Currently no telecommunications companies to pay
franchise fees to Minnesota cities and the law is unclear regarding the rights of cities to require fees over and
above regulatory cost. The SRA advocated a clarification on this issue and actively assisted in the inclusion
of this study, in lieu of the right to require franchise fees in the current bill. The SRA will be actively
involved in the DPS study if this bill passes.
Model Telecommunications Permit Ordinance
The SRA also drafted a model telecommunications permit ordinance to establish uniform requirements
regarding important issues to cities in the new competitive telecommunications environment: permit fees,
location and relocation requirements, repair requirements, performance bonds, Gopher State One information
and other provisions. The telephone deregulation bill language broadening city police power would further
ensure the enforceability of these telecommunications permit ordinances. The Minnesota League of Cities
has requested that the model permit ordinance be used as a basis for the League's model ordinance for
distribution to its members.
Minnegasco 1994 Rate Case
The SRA won a significant victory for residential ratepayers served by Minnegasco in limiting
increases in the fixed customer service charge Minnegasco sought. In 1993 Minnegasco won a 67% increase
(from $3 to $5) in a fixed non -usage based customer charge for its residential customers. This increase was
augmented by the elimination of a credit for gas usage. In the 1994 filing, Minnegasco sought again to
increase its $5 charge to $6, stating that it intended to continue these increases in subsequent rate filings.
The SRA was the sole party to criticize this increase as contrary to conservation goals established by the
legislature and otherwise unsupported by evidence in the record. The DPS supported the increase. The PUC
agreed with the SRA and denied Minnegasco's increase, citing conservation concerns and lack of customer
acceptance. This PUC decision has ramifications for both gas and electric utilities and places a greater burden
on the utilities in future rate filings to justify an increase in non -usage based charges.
JMS87296
SU160-3
f
1995-96 SRA Projects & Anticipated Protects
To assist in the 1996 SRA Budget review process, the following is information describing the types of issues
the SRA is currently addressing and those in which we believe the SRA will be involved to protect residential
business, and city government ratepayers of SRA members. Given the quantity of important issues, it is
possible that the SRA will be required to focus only on two of three of these issues to stay within its budget
constraints. These matters are in addition to the General budget item that usually carries the largest
component of any SRA annual budget. The General category includes quarterly meetings, member and non-
member communications and on-going identification of new issues that may arise.
1. UTILITY FRANCHISE FEE LEGISLATIVE STUDY. Assuming passage of the telephone
deregulation bill as it currently reads, the SRA will play an active and important role in the DPS study of
franchise fees in gas, electric, telephone and cable services in Minnesota. This issue is clearly of great
importance to SRA members and to all Minnesota cities. It will provide a forum for cities to make their case
for the discretionary right to charge franchise fees for use of public property by telecommunication utilities.
2. GAS - ELECTRIC RATE INCREASES. It is anticipated that Minnegasco will file for a
general rate increase later in 1995. The SRA will intervene and monitor issues that may affect SRA cities,
specifically including the residential customer service charge which the SRA succeeded in limiting in the
1994 Minnegasco case. It is not known at this time whether NSP will seek a general rate increase in 1995.
Historically, NSP has sought general rate increases every two years and has not filed since 1993.
3. LOCAL TELEPHONE CALLING AREA INVESTIGATION. The 1994 legislature
authorized a PUC investigation of local telephone calling area policy in Minnesota. The PUC commenced
this investigation in 1994 and hearings will be held in the fall of 1995. The SRA's dual interest in these
proceedings is to maintain the existing uniform calling rate across the metro area and to ensure the scope of
toll free metro calling, which is the largest in the United States. There is no proposal thus far presented that
would jeopardize either of those SRA concerns. The primary focus of this proceeding is to establish the size
of out -state toll-free calling area and policies.
4. GAS -ELECTRIC MODEL FRANCHISE. Several SRA cities are negotiating with NSP for
new franchise agreements. The increasingly deregulated gas and electric service environment creates a need
for review of the previously approved SRA model franchises. The SRA will review the need for revisions
to its model ordinance to better assist SRA members in negotiating new franchise agreements.
5. LONG-TERM ELECTRIC SERVICE CONTRACTS. Cities collectively comprise a
significant electric load for municipal services such as street lighting and municipal pumping. The
increasingly deregulated environment raises new issues regarding the source of energy and city ability to
negotiate discounted long-term rates in exchange for commitment to electric energy. The SRA is exploring
this issue as it may benefit SRA cities.
.�ms87296
su160-3
05/03/95 14:52 MESSERLI KRAMER 4 612'505060
MUNICIPAL
L(
LFGISLATf VE
C0MMTgSION
llll' MO
DATE:
May 3, 1995
TO:
MLC Operating Committee
FROM:
Bob Denner, Jr.
RE:
Livable Communities Compro- : rise
N0.652 P02
1800 Fifth Street Towers
150 South Fifth Street
Minneapolis, MN 55402-4218
Telephone: (612) 672-3600
Facsimile: (612) 672-3777
Please find attached a copy of a memo from ; 3enator Ted Mondale to Senator Ed Oliver.
Also attached is Senator Oliver's response.
The provision suggested by Senator Mondal is a very positive step toward arriving at a
compromise. Senator Oliver has not accept( -1 this language. He believes the 85%.
calculation should only be applied against c' 4es that receive matching funds (fiscal
disparities losers). As drafted, all cities in I!ie metro area would have to achieve an 8510
compliance rate.
Senator Oliver's concern is that eommunitiEs such as Richfield, Blaine and Columbia
Heights (examples only) could, due to their ' ack of voluntary participation, cause the
mandatory prgvision to blink on. It is my s ,nse that Senator Mondale will accept
language which will alleviate Senator Olive , 's concern. Conceptually, this provision is one
that -the MLC mayors agreed to as point fiv- in their April 28 letter to Governor Carlson.
Once them
I datory" versus "voluntary" p{ licy is agreed to, it is much more probable
that an agree ent can be reached between A parties involved in this dispute. This bill
will be discussed on the floor of the Senate -n Friday or Saturday of this week.
The House companion bill authored by Rep. esentative Long passed out of the House Tax
Committee yesterday on a voice vote. Mosi , if not all, of the IR committee members voted
no. The bill was re-referred to the House Vi ays and Means Committee. I will send you
revised engro$sments of the Senate and House versions in the near future.
HUH;�p;1101�.1.Wb1�
Member Cities: Apple Valley, Bloomir ;ton, Eagan, Eden Prairie, Edina, Lakeville,
Maplewood, Minnetonka, Plymi uth, Roseville, Shoreview, Woodbury
05/03/95 14:53
MESSERLI KRAMER i 612'505060
N0.652 903
IT
TED A, MONDALE
Senator 44th District
Room 226
Sate Capitol Building
Avenue
Senate +
75 Constllutinn
St. Paul. MN 55155.1606
(612) 297-806-S
State of Minnesota
Facsimile: (612) 296.6511
May 2, 1995
TO: Senator
Ed Oliver
Senator
Ted Mondale
FROM;
RE: S.F.10t9-AhgkWjj=hg
AL4,. "Volunt
Corr�Pli
The disagreement as to this bill, as currently dr;:fted, is basically it's mandatory "use -it or
lose -it" feature. The provision states that if a c iy does not spend the required amount
on agreed to housing activities within three yea! s, the money would go into a regional
pool.
In essence,
the amendment changes the progrE!n to voluntary compliance. Only if the
metropolitan cities fail to voluntarily comply w'11 the mandatory mechanism kick in, and
then, for only one year. The voluntary mechanism in the amendment works as follows:
,After the first three years a calculation .3 made. If, at the regional
level, at least 85% of the funds identiflc I for affordable and
life -cycle housing have, in fact, been sp(, at on these
activities, then ail the money in escrow 13 released, even to
those cities which have not been spend :)g their money on
agreed activities.
There are two major policy benefits to this an yndment:
1. Cities will encourage other citier to be in compliance
in order to keep the program vclluntary. This will
encourage dialogues and cooper :ttion among communities
and will keep compliance activities at the local level;
2. The 15010 out will be a strong it ..',entive for the Metropolitan
Council to be reasonable when iiegotiating with cities over
goals.
I hope you will find that this approach answe is the legitimate concerns of those opposed
to this provision.
cc: Senator Belanger
Senator Robertson
Committees - Vice Chair. N, trOpolitan and'Awal Government
Chair, Subcommittee on ',IctropoEitarl Affairs • member,
Fnvironntent and Natural I;esources • Member. Gaming
/t4,„Ird Pgvr Regulation - Mcmber, TW and Tax Laws • Chair, Hennepin r.,s
"'r Aw. Count Delegation
CM,, -et ra+r.
05/03/95 14:53 MESSERLI KRAMER 4 612'505060
N0.652 PO4
EDWARD C. OLIVER
Senator - District 43
121 Sttiie office: Building
St. Paul, Minnesolu 55155
(612) 296.4817
May 3, 1995
TOs Senator -Ted Mondale
FROMs Senator Ed Oliver
Senate
State of Minnesota
RE: Amendment to S.F. 1C 19
Thank you , for your 5-2 note a>> -j your proposal that the 85%
cover theformula amounts available to Ali metropolitan
manic ipaties .
Last evening I shared your proposal with a member of the
Governor*s staff. It is his Tlnderstanding that the Governor
would not be inclined to favor_ your proposal.
The Gove or's offices is hapyj with the voluntary system which
I presen d to you with a marAd up copy of S.F. 1pl9. The
Governor office also has bo-.ght in to the three-year
voluntary Compliance period u=sing the formula amounts of those
cities that apply for and rec.-Ave the matching amount from the
Local Housing Incentives Accoint.
This approach puts the spotli_5ht on cities.such as Eden
Prairie, Minnetonka, Maple Gr►ve, etc. These cities have borne
the brunt of the criticism an.I are now set up to perform or.
else.
I urge you to consider adopting this approach as it has broad
support among IR senators and approval by the Governor's
office. I will see the Govexaor personally to make sure that
he fully understands and ends ,,:seats this program.
EOspr
i�il
Rrprinl Arpn
��,. l�nr• Chanhassen • DCephave�� •Eden Pi irie l3xcclsior •Greenwood Minnetonka
Minnetonka Bench • Orono • Sho ,wood • Tonka Bay 0 Victoria • Woodland
MAIN OFFICE
145 HAMEL ROAD
FARMERS STATE BANK BLDG.
HAMEL, MINNESOTA 55340
JAMES E. TILLER
ATTORNEY AT LAW
(6 12) 478-6767
May 3, 1995
Mr. Dwight Johnson
Plymouth City Manager
3400 Plymouth Blvd.
Plymouth, MN 55447
In Re: Lundgren Brothers
Soo Line East
File No. 94090
Dear Mr. Johnson:
Preliminary Plat
CORCORAN OFFICE
BY APPOINTMENT
FARMERS STATE BANK BLDG.
CORCORAN, MINNESOTA 55340
I am an attorney representing Hollydale Golf Inc. with
regard to the above referenced Lundgren Brothers preliminary
Plat. A substantial portion of the surface water from the
proposed platted area will drain through Hollydale Golf
Course Inc. property. This is the seventh recent plat in
which water is routed through Hollydale Golf property.
The increased water volume has resulted in permanent
water ponding between the golf course and County Road 9.
years prior to development, water would temporarily pond In
after a heavy rain and would exit through the County Road 9
culvert with the remainder gradually seeping into the
ground. The new developments have increased the water
volume dramatically and it flows into the area at a steady,
if delayed, rate which causes the area to remain at a high
level at all times.
This increased water ponding creates a condition where
there is no reserve capacity to hold water, and in the event
of a heavier than normal rain the Deziel's foresee flooding
of their golf course property.
�, _
Mr. Dwight Johnson
Plymouth City Manager
In Re: Lundgren Brothers Preliminary Plat
Soo Line East
May 3, 1995 - Page Two
Flooding of the golf course could cause severe economic
loss to the Deziel's even if the flooding was somewhat
temporary. Loss of income from play, debris removal and
grass restoration, and in an aggravated case, killing of the
sod if under water for more than several days, would cause
damages which we believe would be the responsibility of the
City.
The proposed Lundgren Plat will add additional water to
the Deziel property and aggravate an already tenable
situation.
In addition, Hollydale has incurred potential monetary
liability based on a threatened lawsuit by a resident of
Northbrook Addition due to Hollydale's cleaning of the -
drainage ditch of brush and trees. This ditch maintenance
is necessary to maintain flow of the water in the event of a
heavy rainfall. The City does not have drainage easements
over a portion of the ditch just north of County 9. My
client's believe easements are necessary when the City
continues to add water volume to this drainage area.
Hollydale Golf Inc. opposes the Lundgren subdivision
until the City obtains drainage easements for the entire
ditch between Hollydale Golf and County 9 so that the City
can perform maintenance of the ditchway. Hollydale Golf
also believes the City must not use the area as a permanent
ponding area, but rather the area should revert to its,
former function as temporary overflow holding area for
heavier than normal rains.
This holding area has always functioned as a "reserve",
in its present use there is much less reserve capacity. One
way to handle the extra water volume would be to place a
smaller culvert lower than the current culvert under 9, this
would allow the area to drain down slowly after heavy rain
and to restore its, use as a reserve for storage of water on
a temporary basis.
J" - L� J
Mr. Dwight Johnson
Plymouth City Manager
In Re: Lundgren Brothers Preliminary Plat
Soo Line East
May 3, 1995 - Page Three
Hollydale feels the City has not fully addressed the
drainage implications of the Lundgren project. Until the
drainage issues are resolved Hollydale respectfully opposes
the Lundgren Brothers development.
Sincerely,
JES E.iTILLER,
A TORN Y AT LAW
Copy To: Hollydale Golf
Lundgren Bros. Construction Inc.
Michael Stulberg
Linda Oja
Virginia Black
Allen Ribbe
Barb Stimson
Saundra Spigner
JET: ma
r
PLYMOUTH COMMUNITY MEETING
May 8, 1995
7:00 P.M.
I. Welcome and Introductions
II. Current Issues in Plymouth
A. Open Space/Trails Referendum
B Wayzata High School
C. Downtown Plymouth --mini survey
D. Traffic Enforcement Activities
E. Sump Pump Program
F. Green Lawns/Blue Water Video
III. Questions and Answers
Mayor Tierney
City Staff
Eric Blank
Eric Blank
Anne Hurlburt
Craig Gerdes
Dale Hahn
Dwight Johnson
Dwight Johnson
- Adjourn to Ward Break-out Sessions -
IV. Ward Break-out Sessions
Rooms: Council Chambers
Public Safety Training Room
Council Conference Room
Lower Atrium or Large Conference Room
Time Allotted
20 minutes
5 minutes
5 minutes
5 minutes
5 minutes
5 minutes
25 minutes
40 minutes
Staff members will rotate between ward sessions to answer any specific questions.
Fred Moore will provide construction updates as appropriate.