HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Resolution 1988-449CITY OF PLYMOUTH
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the
City of Plymouth, Minnesota, was held on the - sarday of Au ust - , 1988. The
following members were present: - Mayor Schneider r-ouncilmembers Vasillou, Ricker
Zitur and Sisk ---------- -- --- - e
following me ers were absent: one
Councilmember Vasiliou introduced the following Resolution and moved its
adoption:
RESOLUTION NO. 88-449
DENIAL OF LAND USE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT FOR VANTAGE COMPANIES (88054)
WHEREAS, Vantage Companies has requested approval for a Comprehensive Plan Land Use
Guide Plan Amendment to reclassify approximately 20 acres located at the northwest
corner of County Road 9 and Interstate Highway 494 from CL (limited business) to IP
(planned industrial) classification; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered the request following a duly scheduled
public hearing;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MIN-
NESOTA, that it should and hereby does deny the request by Vantage Companies for a
Comprehensive Plan Land Use Guide Plan Amendment for the reclassification of property
located at the northwest corner of County Road 9 and Interstate Highway 494 from CL
(limited business) to IP (planned industrial) classification, for the following
reasons:
I. It has not been demonstrated that it would be infeasible to develop this property
within the current guide plan and zoning classification.
2. There is not a lack of developable IP/I-1 (planned industrial) property to support
the proposed uses.
3. Other property in the IP (planned industrial) classification may be adversely
affected by this action.
4. There is less than clear public need or benefit demonstrated.
5. The proposal is primarily based upon this owner's interests in this site.
6. The CL (limited business) Guide Plan classification is deemed to be the highest
and best use for this area.
7. The applicant has not demonstrated that anything significant has changed regarding
this property since the Council action under Resolution No. 88-186, approved on
March 21, 1988.
The nation for adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by - - - - -
Councilmember Zitur , and upon vote being taken thereon, the followrn5
voted In favor thereof: yor nelder, - Counclimiemibers Vasillou- and- Zitur - - -
e foMo g
voteoFagainst or abstained: ounc me ers Ricker and Siskhereupon the
Resolution was declared duly passe .