HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Resolution 1987-757CITY OF PLYMOUTH
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a Regular meeting of the City Council of the
City of Plymouth, Minnesota, was held on the 16th day of November , 1997. Thr
following members were present: Mayor Schneider, Councilmembers Vasiliou, Crain, anct
Sisk The
following members were absent: Councilmember Zitur
Councilmember Sisk introduced the following Resolution and moved its
adoption:
RESOLUTION NO 87-757
AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 87-66 WHICH APPROVED A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
CONCEPT PLAN, PRELIMINARY PLAN/PLAT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR IMAGE HOMES FOR
HERITAGE RIDGE (86087) (RPUD 87-2)
WHEREAS, the City Council approved the Residential Planned Unit Development Concept
Plan, Preliminary Plan/Plat and Conditional Use Permit for Image Homes for Heritage
Ridge at the February 2, 1987 meeting under Resolution No. 87-66; and,
WHEREAS, Condition No. 9 of Resolutic- No. 87-66 states: "No yard setback modifica-
tions are ganted or implied, and shall comply with Ordinance standards for the R -1A and
R-2 Districts"; and,
WHEREAS, the land use classification of the property is LA -1 (low density residential)
and the basic zoning is R -IA; and,
WHEREAS, City staff has reviewed the approved plans to determine which areas of this
development shall have the R -1A (low density single family residential) and R-2 (low
density multiple residence) District standards;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MIN-
NESOTA, that it should and hereby does amend Condition No. 9 of Resolution No. 87-66 to
read as follows:
No yard setback modifications are granted or implied, and shall comply with the
Ordinance standards as follows: R -1A setback standards shall apply to Outlot C,
Plymouth Parkview; and, R-2 setback standards shall apply to that portion known as
Outlot B, Plymouth Parkview.
The motion for adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by
Councilmember Vasiliou , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following—
voted
ol owingvoted in favor thereof: 4 Ayes -
The fo owing
voted against or abstained: one hereupon the
Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a Regular meeting of the City Council of the
City of Plymouth, Minnesota, was held on the 16th day of November , 1987. The
following members were present: Mayor Schneider, Councilmembers Vasiliou, Crain, and
Sisk The
following members were absent: Councilmember Zitur
Councilmember Sisk introduced the following Resolution and moved its
adoption:
RESOLUTION NO. 87-757
AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 87-66 WHICH APPROVED A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
CONCEPT PLAN, PRELIMINARY PLAN/PLAT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR IMAGE HOMES FOR
HERITAGE RIDGE (86087) (RPUD 87-2)
WHEREAS, the City Council approved the Residential Pianned Unit Development Concept
Plan, Preliminary Plan/Plat and Conditional Use Permit for Image Homes for Heritage
Ridge at the February 2, 1987 meeting under Resolution No. 87-66; and,
WHEREAS, Condition No. 9 of Resolution No. 87-66 states: "No yard setback modifica-
tions are ganted or implied, and shall comply with Ordinance standards for the R -1A and
R-2 Districts"; and,
WHEREAS, the land use classification of the property is LA -1 (low density residential)
and the basic zoning is R -1A; and,
WHEREAS, City staff has reviewed the approved plans to determine which areas of this
development shall have the R -1A (low density single family residential) and R-2 (low
density multiple residence) District standards;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MIN-
NESOTA, that it should and hereby does amend Condition No. 9 of Resolution No. 87-66 to
read as follows:
No yard setback modifications are granted or implied, and shall comply with the
Ordinance standards as follows: R -1A setback standards shall apply to Outlot C,
Plymouth Parkview; and, R-2 setback standards shall apply to that portion known as
Outlot B, Plymouth Parkview.
The motion for adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by
Councilmember Vasiliou , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following
voted in favor thereof: 4 Ayes
The following
voted against or abstained: None hereupon the
Resolution was declared duly passed and adopt