Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Resolution 1987-746CITY OF PLYMOUTH Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a pular meeting of the City Council of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, was held on the 2nd day of November , 1987. The following members were present: Mayor Schneider, Counclimembers VasiliOU, Zitur, Crain Iand Sisk The following members were absent: None ire►* Councilmember Sisk introduced the following Resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 87-746 SETTING CONDITIONS TO BE MET PRIOR TO FILING THE LOT DIVISION AND REGARDING A SUB- DIVISION VARIANCE AND DIVISION OF LAND BY METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTION FOR JOHNSON & SCHROEDER PARTNERSHIP (87077) WHEREAS, the City Council has approved a Lot Division for Johnson & Schroeder Partner- ship for property located northeast of the intersection of Vicksburg Lane and Schmidt Lake Road, under Resolution No. 87-745; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MIN- NESOTA, that it should and hereby does direct the following conditions to be met prior to filing of and regarding said Lot Division: 1. Compliance with the City Engineer's Memorandum. 2. No yard setback or public street frontage and access variances are granted or Implied. 3. Payment of park dedication fees -in -lieu of dedication prior to issuance of Build- ing Permit in accordance with City Policy in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 4. Submittal of all necessary utility easements prior to filing Lot Division with Hennepin County. 5. The following variances are approved: a.) From Urban Development Policy Resolution No. 75-664; b.) From the platting requirements of the Subdivision Code; for the following reasons: The circumstances are unique to this parcel of land; the action will not cause an unreasonable burden upon the City nor cause a deleterious impact upon the natural environment; and, the Subdivision Variance Criteria are met. The motion for adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember Zitur , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: 5 Ayes -n`, k The following vo a aga nst or a sta n one hereupon the Resolution was declared duly pass an a op e .