HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Resolution 1987-321CITY OF PLVHiWH
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a Regular meeting of the City Council of the
City of Plymouth, Minnesota, was held on the^ 1day of _ May 19_j The
following members were present: Mayor Schneider, Councilmembers r- Cain,
Sisk Vasiliou and Zitur _ The
following members were absent: none
•tom rrK rr�
Councilmember Sisk introduced the following Resolution and moved Its
adoption:
RESOLUTION NO. 87- 321
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING LETTER RESCINDING PREVIOUS ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER
WHEREAS, Raymond Moles, 11200 46th Avenue North, was issued an administrative order to
remove, relocate, or modify the height of a 6 ft. fence constructed In the required
front yard to achieve compliance with the Zoning Ordinance; and,
WHEREAS, following appeals of that order to the Board of Zoning Adjustments and Appeals
and the City Council, Mr. Moles served a Summons d Complaint upon the Mayor and City
Council members contesting the rulings by the Board of Zoning Adjustments and Appeals
and City Council; and, claiming that the fence was not in violation of the Zoning
Ordinance provisions in effect at the time the fence was erected; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council did review and clarify the Zoning Ordinance fence standards
as a result of the appeal and did review the subsequent Notice of intended litigation
with the City Attorney;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF °LYMOUTH, MIN-
NESOTA, that it should and hereby does direct the City Manager to have a letter pre-
pared and sent to Mr. Raymond Moles, rescinding the original administrative order to
relocate the fence or reduce the height of the fence erected In the front yard at 11200
46th Avenue North;
FURTHER, be it hereby resolved that this direction is based upon the finding that the
Zoning Ordinance fence standards were not clear as to the definition of required front
yard at the time this fence was erected; the Zoning Ordinance standards have since been
clarified.
The motion for adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by
Councilmember Zitur , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following
voted in favor thereof:r c Heider Councilmembers Crain Sisk
a iliou and ZitUr The following
voted against or abstained: none Whereupon the
Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.