HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Resolution 1987-068CITY OF PLVNDUTH
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a re lar meeting of the City Council of the
City of Plymouth, Minnesota, was held on the day of February , 1987. The
following members were present: Mayor Schnelder,Councilmembers Crain, Sisk, Vasillou,
and Zitur The
following mem ers were absent: none
Mayor Schneider introduced the following Resolution and moved Its
adoption:
RESOLUTION NO. 87-68
DENIAL OF LAND USE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT PLAN FOR
ZAREMBA MIDWEST, INC. (86141)
WHEREAS, Zaremba Midwest, Inc. has requested approval of reclassification of Land Use
Guiding for an approximate 29 acres located west of County Road 18, north of State
Highway 55, east of South Shore Drive, and south of 10th Avenue North, a/k/a Ford Golf -
Driving Range from CL (limited business) designation to CN (neighborhood shopping
center) designation; and,
WHEREAS, Zaremba Midwest, Inc. has requested approval of a Planned Unit Development
Concept Plan for 41 acres; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered the request following a duly scheduled
public hearing;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MIN-
NESOTA, that it should and hereby does deny the reclassification of land use guiding
for Zaremba Midwest, Inc., for the approximate 29 acres located west of County Road 18,
north of State Highway 55, east of South Shore Drive, and south of 10th Avenue North,
a/k/a Ford Golf Driving Range from CL (limited business) designation to CN (neighbor-
hood shopping center) designation and the PUD Concept Plan for 41 acres, based on the
following findings:
1. Compliance with the Locational Criteria for the CN (neighborhood shopping
center) Land Use Designation has not been demonstrated.
2. Development under the proposed Land Use classification would have a significant
impact on the public road system.
3. There is no clear public need or benefit provided by approving the request.
4. There are sites with the appropriate Guide Plan designation and Zontnlq classifi-
cation which would allow this development type.
5. The petitioner not demonstrated that it is unfeasible to develop this land with
Its current Guide Plan designation and Zoning.
The motion for adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by
Councilmember Zltur , and upon vote being taken thereon, the � o ow nq
voted n favorthereof: or Heider Councilmembers Crain and Zitur
eo ow nq
voted against or a sta n s ounc rs Sisk and VasIlLou reupon the
Resolution was declared duty passea ana WPM.