HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Resolution 1986-649CITY OF PLYMOUTH
.Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, aregular meeting of the City Council of the
City of Plymouth, Minnesota, was held on the 6th day of October 1986. The
following members were present: Mayor Schneider,Zrouncilmembers rain, Vasiliou and
Zitur The
T-ollowIng members were a sent: Councilmember Sisk
Councilmember Crain introduced the following Resolution and moved its
adoption:
RESOLUTION NO. 86-649
SETTING CONDITIONS TO BE MET PRIOR TO FILING AND REGARDING LOT DIVISION FOR ERWIN &
KEVIN STOBBE FOR 12220 28th AVENUE NORTH (86103)
WHEREAS, the City Council has approved a Lot Division and Variances for Erwin & Kevin
Stobbe for property located at 12220 28th Avenue North, under Resolution No. 86-648;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MIN-
NESOTA, that it should and hereby does direct the following conditions to be met prior
to filing of and regarding said Lot Division:
1. Compliance with the City Engineer's Memorandum
2. No yard setback variances are granted or implied.
. 3. Compliance with Policy Resolution No. 79-80 regarding minimum floor elevations for
new structures on sites adjacent to, or containing open storm water drainage
f.E-�ilities.
4. Payment of park dedication fees -in -Lieu of dedication prior to issuance of Build-
ing Permit in accordance with City Policy in effect at the time of filing of the
Division.
5. No Building Permit to be issued until the Lot Division is filed with Hennepin
County.
6. Submittal of all necessary utility easements prior to filing Lot Division with
Hennepin County.
7. Approved Variances are on the basis that the proposal represents a reasonable use
of the land; is consistent with the area; incorporates land from vacated Larch
Lane; will enhance the existing lots; and, meets the Variance Criteria:
A) lot sizes of 9,867 sq. ft. and 7,470 sq. ft. vs. 18,500 sq. ft.
B) lot width of 76.61 ft. and 101.6 ft. vs. 110 ft.
The motion for adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by
Councilmember Zitur , and upon vote being taken thereon, the o ow nq
voted in favor thereof: a or chneider, Councilmembers Crain Vasiliou, and Zitur
The following
voted against or abstained: none Whereupon the
Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.