HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Resolution 1986-459CITY OF PLYMOUTH
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meting of the City Council of
the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, was held on the 4thday of .1u st 1986.
The following members were present: Mayor Schneider�a_ 11members s as lion
and Zitur
The
following rs were absent: CouncilCrain
Council■ember Sisk introduced the following Resolution and moved its
adoption:
RESOLUTION NO. 86-459
APPROVING PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PRELIMINARY PLAN/PLAT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS
FOR RYAN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY FOR GROVES OFFICE PARK (MPUD 86-1) (86044)
WHEREAS, Ryan Construction Company has requested approval for a Mixed Planned Unit
Development Preliminary Plan/Plat and Conditional Use Permit for Groves Office Park, a
development of four commercial lots on approximately 44.41 acres in the northwest quad-
rant of State Highway 55 and County Road 18; and,
WHEREAS, Ryan Construction Company has requested approval of a Conditional Use Permit
to increase the heights of one building in Phase I to 14 stories; and, two buildings in
Phase II to 11 stories; and,
WHEREAS, Ryan Construction Company has requested approval of a Conditional Use Permit
to make modifications within the Floodway in accordance with Section 6, Subdivision A;
and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the request at a duly called Public Hear-
ing and recommends approval;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MIN-
NESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the Mixed Planned Unit Development Pre-
liminary Plan/Plat and three Conditional Use Permits for Ryan Construction Company for
Groves Office Park in the northwest quadrant of State Highway 55 and County Road 18,
subject to the following conditions:
1. Compliance with the City Engineer's Memorandum.
2. Removal of all dead or dying trees from the property at the owner's expense.
3. No Building Permits shall be issued until a Contract has been awarded for sewer
and water.
4. Payment of park dedication fees -in -lieu of dedication in accordance with the Dedi-
cation Policy in effect at the time of issuance of Building Permit, based on the
calculation for that land at or above the 100 Year High Water Elevation.
5. Street names shall comply with the City Street Naming System.
6. Compliance with Policy Resolution No. 79-80 regarding minimum floor elevations for
new structures in subdivisions adjacent to, or containing any open storm water
drainage facility.
PLEASE SEE PAGE TWO
Page two
10 Resolution No. 86-459
7. Development shall comply with Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) approved by
the City.
S. No Building Permits shall be issued until the Final Plat is filed and recorded
with Hennepin County.
9. Final Plat mylars shall refer to MPUD No. 86-1.
10. Appropriate legal documents regarding covenants and restrictions for private open
areas, as approved by the City Attorney, shall be filed with the Final Plat.
11. Development shall comply with the Indirect Source Permit as approved by the Min-
nesota Pollution Control Agency.
12. A Conditional Use Permit is approved for the increased building height of 14
stories for Phase I; and, 11 stories for Phase II and III as shown on the PUD
Plan; building setbacks are approved as shown on the FUD Plan.
13. A Conditional Use Permit is approved for modifications to Floodway based on
engineering data for net gain of storm water drainage capacity and within para-
meter_ Enginee•'s Memorandum, and in accordance with Section 6, Subdivision A.
14. Should the Tax Increment Financing package as proposed not be realized, develop-
, ment shall comply with the alternate Concept Plan.
15. Development shall comply with the Engineering Department recommended roadway
Improvements, based on the Traffic Study completed by the City's Traffic Consult-
ing Engineer.
16. Lot coverage by structures has been and will be calc-- lated on the basis of that
land at or above the High Water Elevation establishes by the adopted City Storm
Water Drainage Plan as verified by the City Engineer.
The motion for adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by
Council■e■ber Zitur , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following
voted n favor thereof: or der Councilmembers Sisk Vasiliou and Zitur
eo ow ng
voted against orabstained: none Whereupon the
Resolution was declared duly pass .