Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Resolution 1986-378Cm MIF PLYMOUTH Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a social meeting of the City Council of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, was held on the 23rd day of June . 1986. The following members were present: Mayor S hneider. CouncilyambarsCrain- Sick_ . vaiailinn- anti 7.41-nr The following members were absent: none .-tf ta+r t+rf Councilmember Zitur introduced the following Resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 86- 378 APPROVING SITE PLAN FOR JOHN DUFFY (86045) WHEREAS, John Duffy has requested approval of a Site Plan to construct an approximate 8,000 sq. ft. office building south of Highway 55 and northeast of County Road 15; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed said request and recommends approval; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MIN- NESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the request by John Duffy for a Site Plan to construct an approximate 8,000 sq. ft, office building south of Highway 55 and northeast of County Road 15, subject to the following conditions: 1. Compliance with City Engineer's Memorandum 2. Payment of park dedication fees -in -lieu of dedication in accordance with the Dedication Policy in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 10 3. Submission of required financial guarantee and Site Performance Agreement for completion of site improvements. 4. Any signage shall be in compliance with the Ordinance. 5. Any subsequent phases or expansions are subject to required reviews and approvals per Ordinance provisions. 6. Variance from the Ordinance regarding the location of fire lanes per April 21, 1986 Fire Chief memorandum. 7. All waste and waste containers shall be stored within the enclosure, and no out- side storage is permitted. The enclosure shall meet minimum Ordinance standards S. Approved Variances include: building setback of 6 ft. vs. 50 ft.; parking setback of 8 ft. vs. 20 ft.; drive aisle setback of 3 ft. and 8 ft. vs. 10 ft. 9. The retaining wall and drive for the adjoining property to the east shall be removed as part of this development. The motion for adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by CgunriloCmher Sisk , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted In favor thereof: Mayor Schneider, Councilmembers Crain, Sisk, Vasiliou. and he following vot aga nst or abstained: none Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.