HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Resolution 1986-308CITY OF PLYMOUTH
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a Regular meeting of the City Council of
the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, was held on the Zn�3c day of June 1966.
The following members were present: Mayor Schne end r, Councilmem ers rain, —
Sisk, Vasiliou and Zitur The
following members were absent: none
rw• tws ***
Councilmember Crain introduced the following Resolution and moved its
adoption:
RESOLUTION 86- 308
APPROVING THE APPEAL BY THE PLYMOUTH CIVIC LEAGUE ON THE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENTS
AND APPEALS RULING
WHEREAS, The Plymouth Civic League, pursuant to Section 11, Subdivision C., of the
Plymouth Zoning Ordinance, has appealed the May 13, 1986 ruling of the Board of Zoning
Adjustments and Appeals, relative to the request for a variance from the Sign Ordinance
in order to construct and erect three temporary advertising signs exceeding 32 sq. ft.
in area; and,
WHEREAS, the petitioner has requested a 40 sq. ft. enlargement of the Ordinance allowed
32 sq. ft. temporary sign requirements in order to place a temporary sign of 72 sq.
ft. at 4445 Nathan Lane; a 28 sq. ft. enlargement of the Ordinance allowed 32 sq. ft.
temporary sign requirement in order to place a temporary sign of 60 sq. ft. at 17340
'County Road 6; and, a 268 ft. enlargement of the Ordinance allowed 32 sq. ft. temporary
sign requirement in order to place a temporary sign of 300 sq. ft. at 3005 Plymouth
Blvd; and,
WHEREAS, the Board of Zoning Adjustments and Appeals considered the matter on May 13,
1986 and the ruling was made to deny the Variance request as submitted; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the proceedings of the Board of Zoning Adjust-
ments and Appeals, as well as the petitioner's application for the Variance and for the
appeal;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MIN-
NESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the appeal by the Plymouth Civic League
from the Board of Zoning Adjustments and Appeals ruling subject to the following:
1. The Variance is approved based upon the findings that the petitioner has satisfied
the Ordinance standards for granting Variances.
2. The Variance is granted to allow the signs as described in the staff report dated
May 2, 1986.
3. No other variances are granted or implied by this action.
The motion for adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by
Councilmember Zitur *and upon vote being taken thereon, the followingne
voted in favor thereof: _ Mayor Schider. Councilmambers Crain_
Sisk_ Vasilinu and 7it1wr The following
voted against or abstained: nnnp thereupon the
Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.