HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Resolution 1986-014CIT:' OF PLYMOUTH
ORDINANCE NO. 86-14
AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO LICENSE FEES;
AMENDING PLYMOUTH CITY CODE
SUBSECTION 1010.01
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Plymouth City Code, Subsection 1010.01, is amended to read as follows:
1010.01. Fees Subdivision 1. Fees set. The fees for the various licenses
required by Ms Code are set fort -R nMrs subsection under the headings listed
for subdivision 5.
Type of License Section Requiring License Fee Schedule
Subd. 5. (b) Consumption and Display: 1205
Regular 200
Non Profit 100
Sec. 10. This ordinance is effective on July 1, 1986.
Attest:
..CLerk
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City
Council of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota was held on the 6th day
® of January 1986. The following members were present: Mayor Schneider,
Councilmembers Sisk. Crain and Vasiliou
The following members were absent:
none
Councilmember Crain introduced the following Resolution and moved
its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO. 86-14
RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF REPORT ON IMPROVEMENT
STREET LIGHTING - TAMMIE MIDDLEMIST ADDITION
WHEREAS, it is proposed to improve Pineview Lane, 48th Avenue North and 49th
Avenue North, all in the Tammie Middlemist Addition by the installation of
ornamental street lights and to assess the benefited property for all or a
portion of the cost of the improvement, pursuant to Minn. Stats., Seca. 429 011
to 429 111 (Laws 1953, Ch. 398, as amended),
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA: That the proposed improvement be referred to the City
Engineer for study and that he is instructed to report to the Council with all
convenient speed advising the Council in a preliminary way as to whether the
L proposed improvement is feasible and as to whether it should best be made as
proposed or in connection with some other improvement, and the estimated cost
of the improvement as recommended.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by
Councilmember Sisk , and upon vote being taken thereon, the
following voted in favor thereof: Mayor Schneider, Council mhars Sicic,,_,_
Crain and Vasiliou
The following voted against or abstained: none
Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
�* int,t thktlr