HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Resolution 1985-667CITY OF PLYMOUTH
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a special meeting of the City Council of
the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, was held on the 9th day of September . 1985.
The following members were present: Mayor Davenportt Councilmembers Neils,
Schneider, Crain and Vasiliou
The following members were absent: none
Councilmember Schneider introduced the following Resolution and moved its
adoption:
RESOLUTION NO. 85- 667
APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT FOR ARTHUR AND MARILYN ZENZEN TO ALLOW FOR
REDUCED REAR YARD SETBACK WITHIN THE MISSION HILLS RPUD (850-9)
WHEREAS, Arthur and Marilyn Zenzen have requested a Conditional Use Permit Amendment to
allow for reduced rear yard setback within the Mission Hills RPUD at 3975 Balsam Lane;
and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed said request at a duly called Public
Hearing and recommends approval;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MIN-
NESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the request by Arthur and Marilyn Zenzen
for a Conditional Use Permit Amendment to allow for reduced rear yard setback within
the Mission Hills RPUD at 3975 Balsam Lane, subject to the following conditions:
1. Appropriate building permits to be obtained prior to initiation of construction.
2. No other variances are granted or implied.
3. Approval is granted for a 21 ft. rear yard setback to the west property line based
on the fact that an existing sliding glass patio door was installed in this
residence; that the porch design is small; that the lot is on a cul-de-sac which
reduces the rear yard; and, that the 4 ft. variance request will not have a large
impact for this development.
4. The Amendment is based upon the findings that there is a terrain condition unique
to this lot; a 12 ft. dimension is reasonable for a deck; the window presents a
design constraint that renders relocation of the deck unreasonable; and the
overall lot coverage will not exceed 20%.
The motion for adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by
Councilmember Neils, and upon vote being taken thereon, the
following voted n favor thereof:ayor Cyenport, Councilmembers Neils,
The following voted against or abstained: Councilmember Crain
Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.