Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Resolution 1985-598CITY OF PLYMOUTH Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a special meeting of the City Council of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, was held on the 12th dayy of August 1985. . The following members were present: Mayor Davenpor , ouncilmembers Neils, -'— Schneider and Vasiliou The following members were absent: Councilmember Crain Councilmember Schneider introduced the following Resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 85- 598 RESOLUTION DENYING THE REQUEST OF BOYER PALMER dba PARKVIEW MANOR OF PLYMOUTH FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A PUBLIC HEARING FOR CONSIDERATION OF THE ISSUANCE OF MULTI FAMILY RENTAL REVENUE BONDS WHEREAS, the City Council has received an application from Boyer Palmer and Ronald Libby, dba Parkview Manor of Plymouth; and WHEREAS, said application requests that the City Council establish a public hearing date to preliminarily consider the issuance of such bonds; and WHEREAS, a report dated August 9, 1985 from the Assistant City Manager recommends that no public hearing date be set for this petition based upon previous City Council positions established with respect to this issue; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, that it should and hereby does deny the request to establish a public hearing date to consider multi family rental revenue bonds for Mr. Boyer Palmer and Mr. Ronald Libby, dba Parkview Manor of Plymouth, and further, such action is based upon: 1. The City Council has discontinued the experimental Loans to Lenders program for financing residential units using public funding; 2. That the City Council has previously taken the position that it is inappro- priate to utilize public funding for residential facilities except as provided for in the Loans to Lenders program and except for facilities located in Downtown Plymouth; 3. That the petitioner has previously received direction from the Council that public funding for this project would not be favorably considered by the City Council. The motion for adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember Vasiliou, and upon vote being taken tt er�eon, the following vote n favor thereof: ayor avenport, Councilmembers Neils, Schneider and Vasiliou The following voted against or abstained: none Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.