HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Resolution 1985-549CITY OF PLYMOUTH
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a Special meeting of the City Council of
the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, was held on the 22nd day of July 1985.
The following mewbers were present:_ Mayor Davenport, Councilmembers Crain.
Neils, Schneider and Vasiliou
The following members were absent: none
wfa �� fff
Councilmember Neils introduced the following Resolution and moved its
adoption:
RESOLUTION NO. 85- 549
APPROVING RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT PLAN, PRELIMINARY PLAN/PLAT
AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR JOHN KAROS FOR HERITAGE KNOLL (RPUD 85-3) (85041)
WHEREAS, John Karos has requested approval for a Residential Planned Unit Development
Concept Plan, Preliminary Plan/Plat, Rezoning, and Conditional use permit for
Heritage Knoll for 23 single family residential lots and one otitlot on approximately
19 acres located southeast of Northwest Boulevard at West Medicine Lake Drive; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the request at a duly called Public Hearing
on June 1911 1985; reconsidered the application at a regularly scheduled meeting on
July 9, 1985; and, recommends approval;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH,
MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the Residential Planned Unit
Development, Concept Plan, Preliminary Plan/Plat and Conditional Use Permit for John
Karos for Heritage Knoll located southeast of Northwest Boulevard at West Medicine
Lake Drive, subject to the following conditions:
1. Compliance with the City Engineer's Memorandum.
2. Removal of all dead or dying trees from the property at the owner's expense.
3. No Building Permits shall be issued until a Contract has been awarded for sewer
and water.
4. Provisions for a 30 ft. wide trail easement and outlot per Comprhensive Park
Plan, as verified by the Parks and Engineering Departments, with submittal of
detailed plans as to construction of the trail per City standards.
5. Payment of Park Dedication fees -in -lieu of dedication with appropriate credits
In an amount determined according to verified acreage and paving costs and ac-
cording to the Dedication Policy in effect at the time of filing the Final Plat
with Hennepin County.
6. Street names shall comply with the City Street Naming System.
7. Rezoning shall be finalized with filing of the Final Plat.
8. No Building Permits shall be issued until the Final Plat is filed and recorded
with Hennepin County.
PLEASE SEE PAGE TWO
Page two
Resolution No. 85- 549
9. No yard setback variances are granted or implied.
. 10. Access for single family lots shall be limited to internal public roads and re-
stricted from Northwest Boulevard and West Medicine Lake Drive.
11. Final Plat mylars shall refer to PUD No. 85-3.
12. Appropriate legal documents regarding Homeowner Association documents, covenants
and restrictions as approved by the City Attorney, shall be filed with the Final
Plat.
13. Lot 1, Block 3 is subject to Ordinance required reviews, subsequent to Final
Platting.
14. Two access points to Lot 1, Block 3, one to Northwest Boulevard, and one to West
Medicine Lake Drive will be considered at the time the Site Plan is submitted.
15. Access to Lot 1, Block 4, shall be directed to 30th Avenue North only.
16. Access to Lot 1, Block 1, and Lot 1, Block 2 shall be directed to 32nd Avenue
North only.
17. Setbacks for the residential Blocks (1, 2, and 4) are a minimum 35 ft. front
yard; 10 ft. side yard and, 25 ft. rear yard.
18. Maximum lot coverage by structures for Blocks 1, 2, and 4 is 20% per Ordinance
provisions.
. 19. Maximum number of units shall be 23 single family detached dwellings; maximum
density shall be 1.7 units per acre for the land at or above the established
high water elevation per the adopted City Storm Water Drainage Plan as verified
by the City Engineer. Density bonus points are assessed as follows:
a. One bonus point for affirmative design.
20. Approval includes a waiver of the PUD size requirements on the basis that natur-
al features of the site are retained and the land to the south was developed
under similar provi!�:ons of previous Ordinance provisions.
21. This does not constitute approval of a conditional use permit, site plan, or
concept plan, for a church or subsequent residential development on the proposed
Lot 1, Block 3. Revised concept plans for development of this property shall be
responsive to concerns exiressed by the City Council.
22. An analysis shall be made by the petitioner of the front yard setbacks for Lots
8, 9, 10, 11, 13, and 14, Elock 1 and Lot 8, Block 2. Such analysis to include
protection of natural treed' area in back of those lots. To save the trees for
buffering, it may be appropriate to consider a 25 ft. rather than a 35 ft. mini-
mum front yard setback.
The action for adoption of the furegoing Resolution was duly seconded by
rnnnrilmamhar Srhnaidar and upon Mote being taken thereon, the
following voted in favor thereof: Mayor Davenport_ Councilmemberc_ Crain.
ine o ow voted against or ata .
Whereupon the Resolution was deLlarad duly pas a .