Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Resolution 1985-351CITY OF PLYMOUTH Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, Was held on the ZUth day of May . 1985. The following members were present: Mayor Davenporl—,rouncilmembers Crain, Neils, _ Schneider and Vasiliou The following members were absent: none Councilmember Schneider introduced the following Resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 85- 351 APPROVING SITE PLAN AMENDMENT AND VARIANCES FOR LSI CORPORATION (85021) WHEREAS, LSI Corporation has requested approval of a Site Plan Amendment and Variances to expand the existing facility and associated parking area at 2100 Xenium Lane; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed said request at a duly called Public Hearing and recommends approval; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the request for LSI Corpration for • a Site Plan Amendment and Variances to expand the existing facility and associated parking area at 2100 Xenium Lane, subject to the following conditions: 1. Compliance with City Engineer's Memorandum 2. Payment of park dedication fees -in -lieu of dedication in accordance with the Dedication Policy in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance, based upon the area of the parcel being consolidated. 3. Submission of required financial guarantee and Site Performance Agreement for completion of site improvements. 4. Any signage shall be in compliance with the Ordinance. 5. Any subsequent phases or expansions are subject to required reviews and approv- als per Ordinance provisions. 6. All waste and waste containers shall be stored within the structure, and no out- side storage is permitted. 7. No Building Permit to be issued until the Lot Division/Consolidation is filed and recorded with Hennepin County. 8. Approved Variances include: a. 5 ft. setback from parking to the building b. 0 ft. setback to east property line for parking and drive aisle PLEASE SEE PACE TWO Paqe two Resolution No. 85- 351 9. Appropriate leqal documents establishing a covenant on the property shall bf approved by the City Attorney and filed at Hennepin County, identifying that the future use of the building may require the construction of a parking ramp to satisfy Ordinance parking requirements, prior to issuance of a Building Permit. 10. Curbinq along the east parking area and driving lane may be an alternate to B-612 as approved by the City Engineer. The motion for adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember Neils , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: venport, Councilmembers Crain, Neils, Schneider and Vasiliou The following voted against or abstained: none Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.