Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Resolution 1985-303CITY Of PLVNDM Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, was held on the6thL_ day of May 1965. The following members were present: Mayor Davenport, Councilmembers Neils, Schneider. Crain and Vasiliou The following members were absent: none a+Ft twf #tf Councilmember Schneider introduced the following Resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 85- 303 APPROVING VARIANCE FOR PAUL AND LOIS HAGEMEISTER FOR TWO RESIDENCES ON TWO PARCELS WHICH DO NOT HAVE REQUIRED FRONTAGE ON A PUBLIC ROAD WEST OF KINCSVIEW LANE, GENERAL- LY NORTH OF 13TH .AVENUE NORTH IN SECTION 33 (85015) WHEREAS, Paul and Lois Hagemeister have requested approval for a Variance from the Subdivision Code to allow the construction of two residences on two parcels which do not have Ordinance required frontage on a public road west of Kingsview Lane and gen- erally north of 13th Avenue North in Section 33; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed said request and recommends approval; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, • MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve a Variance to allow the construc- tion of two residences on two parcels which do not provide Ordinance minimum required frontage on a public road on property located west of Kingsview Lane and generally north of 13th Avenue North in Section 33, subject to the following: 1. Compliance with the Engineer's Memorandum. Parcel A shall have a 24 ft. front yard setback (a variance of 11 ft.); and Par- cel B shall have a 35 ft, front yard setback measured from the north property line. 3. Prior to issuance of any Building Permits, appropriate legal documents shall be filed and recorded at Hennepin County on Parcels A and B, allowing for the shared driveway. 4. Submittal of all utility and drainage easements as approved by the City Eng- ineer, prior to issuance of Building Permits. 5. Variances are approved on the basis that the two parcels were created when oo public frontage was provided, and on the basis that the situation is unique in that it is not feasible to extend a public road westerly from Kingsview Lane. The motion for adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by Councilmemler Vasiliou , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Mayor Daienport, Councilmembers Neils, Schneider, Crain and Vasiliou . The following voted against or abstained: none Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.