HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Resolution 1984-656CITY OF PLYMOUTH
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of
the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, was held on the 17th day of Septe:;iber . 1984.
The following members were present: Mayor Davennori Councilmembers k5en,
Neyls, Sc`L-leider and Crain
The following members were absent: none
Councilm em ber Schneider introduced the following Resolution and moved its
adoption:
RESOLUTION NO. 84- 656
APPROVING APPEAL BY TONY M. BENTHIN OF BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENTS AND APPEALS RULING
WHEREAS, Tony M. Benthin, pursuant to Section 11, Subdivision C of the Plymouth Zoning
Ordinance, has appealed the September 10, 1954 ruling of the Board of Zoliing Adjust-
ments and Appeals relative to his request for a variance at 10030 South Shore Drive,
also described as Lot 6, EAST MEDICINE LAKE ADDITION; and,
WHEREAS, the petitioner has requested a variance for 23 ft. from the Ordinance minimum
requirement of 50 ft. minimum setback from the Ordinary High Water Mark of Medicine
Lake to a principal structure, in order to construct a deck and three -season porch onto
his existing home; and,
WHEREAS, the Board of Zoning Adjustments and Appeals considered the matter on September
.10, 1984 at which time the ruling was made to deny the variance request as submitted;
and,
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the proceedings of the Board of Zoning Adjust-
ments and Appeals, as well as the petitioner's application for the variance and for the
Appeal;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MIN-
NESJTA, that it should and hereby does approve the Appeal by Tony M. Benthin from the
Board of Zoning Adjustments and Appeals ruling, and does hereby approve a 23 ft. vari-
ance as requested, subject to the following:
1. The Variance is approved based upon the finding that the petitioner has satisfied
the Ordinance standards for granting variances.
2. The Variance is granted to allow the addition design reflected on the plan in the
Staff Report dated September 10, 1984.
3. No other variances are granted or implied by this action.
4. There are similar situations in this neighborhood.
5. The addition does not constitute an expansion of the permanent dwelling.
The motion for adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by
Co and upon vote being taken thereon, the
following voted in favor twof: Maynr DavPn;nrt,, rr%imn; 1 mr1m'harc mnnn,,,
Neils. Schneider and Q
- fo ow ng vo ag ns Or`Tabs a n : none
Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.