HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Resolution 1984-485CITY of PLYNMM
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a _special meeting of the Board of Zoning
Adustments and Appeals of the City of Plymouth,, Minnesota, was held on the 23rd
day of July . 1984. The following members were present: Acting Mayor
ilmers
Schneider. CouncembNeils and Crain
The following members were absent: Mayor Davenport an
Counciimember Moen
_Councilmember Crain introduced the following Resolution and moved its
adoption:
RESOLUTION NO. 84- 485
APPROVING APPEAL BY FRANK J. KNOUREK OF BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENTS AND APPEALS RULING
WHEREAS, Frank J. Knourek pursuant to Section 11, Subdivision C of the Plymouth Zoning
Ordinance, has appealed the July 9, 19&: ruling of the Board of Zoning Adjustments and
Appeals relative to his request for a variance at 16925 - 11th Avenue North, also
described as Lot 1, Block 1, CITYVIEW ACRES SECOND UNIT; and
WHEREAS, the petitioner has requested a 1 foot variance from the Ordinance maximum
height of 3 feet in the required front yard in order to construct a 4 foot high fence;
and,
WHEREAS, the Board of Zoning Adjustments and Appeals considered the matter on June 11
and July 9, 1984, at which time the ruling was made to deny the variance request as
submitted, and to approve a variance for 6 inches; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the proceedings of the Board of Zoning Adjust-
ments and Appeals, as well as the petitioner's application for the variance and for the
appeal;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MIN-
NESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the appeal by Frank J. Knourek of the
Board of Zoning Adjustments and Appeals ruling, does hereby approve a 1 foot variance
as requested, subject to the following:
1. The Variance is approved based upon the finding that the petitioner has satisfied
the Ordinance standards for granting variances.
2. The Variance is granted to allow the fence design reflected on the plan in the
Staff Report dated June 6, 1984.
3. No other Variances are granted or implied by this action.
4. The petitioner be allowed only one gate accevs for his driveway.
5. The property located outside of the fence shall be maintained.
The motion for adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by
Councilmember Neils and upon vote being taken thereon,,
the
followbig voGa In favor thereof: Actinu Mayor Schneider, Councilmembers Neils
and Crain
The following voted against or abstained: none
Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passed and ad1opted.