HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Resolution 1984-280CM OF PLYMOUTH
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, ameeting of the City Council of
the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, was held on theme 70dor of may . 19 84
The following members were present: Acting Mayor Schneidir, Counc imem ers Men,
Neils and Crain
following mober3 were sent: Mayor Davenport
Councilmember Moen introduced the following Resolution and moved its
adoption:
RESOLUTION No. 84- 280
APPROVING APPEAL BY FREDERICK G. ADERHOLD OF BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENTS AND APPEALS
RULING
WHEREAS, Frederick G. Aderhold, pursuant to Section 119 Subdivision C of the Plymouth
Zoning Ordinance, has appealed the March 26, 1984 ruling of the Board of Zoning
Adjustments and Appeals relative to his request for a variance at 2:60 Olive Lane,
also described as Lot 7, Block 5, CANDLELIGHT TERRACE; and,
WHEREAS, the petitioner had requested a variance from the Ordinance requirement for a
3 ft. minimum setback from the side property line to a private drivewy in order to
correct an existing encroachment onto the neighboring lot; and,
WHEREAS, the Board of Zoning considered the matter on March 12, 1984, and on March
26, 19840 at which time the ruling was made to deny the variance request; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the proceedings of the Board of Zoning Adjust-
ments and Appeals, as well as the petitioner's application for the variance and for
the appeal;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH,
MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve Frederick G. Aderhold's appeal of
the Board of Zoning Adjustments and Appeals ruling, and does hereby approve a 3 ft.
variance as requested subject to the following:
1. The Variance is approved based upon the finding that the petitioner has
satisfied the Ordinance standards for granting variances.
2. The variance is needed to reasonably resolve an existing and improper en-
croachment onto the neighboring property.
3. The Variance is granted to allow the driveway and turnaround design re-
flected on the plan staff dated May 7, 1984.
No other Variances are granted or implied by this action.
The motion for adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by
Councilmember Neils 6 and upon vote being taken t on, the
following vo n ravor thereof: Acting MaXor Schneider, Caunrilmignbars Moan and
The following votes against or abstained: GounciimemDer crai
Whereupon the Resolution was declared y pa .