HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Resolution 1984-089CITY OF PLYMOUTH
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a Aaecial meeting of the City Council of
the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, was held On the 27th day of February . 1984-
The following members were present:, Mavnr Davenport, Muncilreawei's'i�Rit8Td8F
and amain
The iollaw ng rs were a sent: rnunci me e'1 mfrs Moen i<na NEVIS
HrR
stf
Councilmember Crain introduced the followinm R --solution and moved its
adoptions
RESOLUTION NO. 84- 89
SETTING CONDITIONS TO BE MET PRIOR TO FILING AND REGARDING LOT DIVISION/VARIARCFS FOR
ROBERT SEVEY (83060)
WHEREAS, the City Council has approved a Lot Division/Variance for Robert Sevey for
two parcels located at 14100 County Road 6 under Resolution "o.84-a0_,-
NOW,
o.84-gg;NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH,
MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does direct the following conditions to he met
prior to filing of and regarding said Lot Division:
1. Compliance with the City Engineer's Memorandum
2. No yard setback variances are granted or implied.
3. Payment of park dedication fees -in -Lieu of dedication prior to Issuance of
Building Permit in accordance with City Policy in effect at the time of
Building Permit issuance.
4. No Building Permit to be issued until the Lot Division is filed with Hennepin
County.
5. Submittal of all necessary utility easements prior to filing Lot Division with
Hennepin County.
6. Approved Variances are:
a.) Dividing the property by means of metes and bounds description rather
than platting.
b.) Dividing property for development without the extension of utilities.
c.) Parcel B does not front onto a public road.
d.) Parcels 8 is less than the Ordinance defined minimum lot size ft acre
vs. 2 acres).
e.) No dedication of right-of-way for County Road 6/I-494 interchange which
is shown on the Thoroughfare Guide Plan, but which is not desinned or
scheduled for construction.
Page two
Resolution No. 84- 89
• 7, This Lot Division and the related Lot Consolidation (proposed by Warner Spray
Tech, A-564) shall be filed within thirty days of approval. This approval
shall be null and void if, for any reason, the Lot Division is not recorded
with the Wagner Tech Lot Consolidation.
The motion for adoption of the foreqoinq Resolution was duly seconded by
Councilmember- Schneider and upon vote being taken thereon Te
0 owing voted in favor thereof: Mawr- Dave nport, -Counciimembers Schneider and Crain
one roitowinq voceo aga;nst or aostalnae: ---none ........................ -.
whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
dsk8