Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Resolution 1983-173CITY OF PLYMOUTH Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a sggcial meeting of the City Council of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, was held on the lith day of A ril . 1983. The following members were present:moi xnr Davenport. Co,unci]members Moen, Nell s The following members were absent: Councl imember ScIlnelder Cnuncilmember Moen introduced the following Resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 83-173 APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE SITE PLAN AMENDMENT FOR U.S. HOME CORPORATION FOR "TRENTON PLACE" (81043) WHEREAS, U.S. Home Corporation has requested approval of an amended Conditional Use Site Plan for the first phase of a multi -family residential high density development in an R-4 Zoning District located east of Trenton Lane and north of County Road 9; and, WHEREAS, the City Council approved the Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan on April 19, 1982 under Resolution No. 82-183; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the requested amendment at a duly called ® Public Hearing; and, WHEREAS, the petitioner in a letter dated April 7, 1983 has withdrawn its request for approval of the tennis court which was contemplated by the proposed amendment; and, WHEREAS, the revised proposed Site Plan is otherwise consistent with that reviewed by the Planning Commission; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA, that It should and hereby does approve the revised Conditional Use Site Plan for "Trenton Place" for U.S. Home Corporation per Site Plan dated April 7, 1983 subject to the following conditions: 1. Compliance with the applicable Engineer's Memorandum. 2. Compliance with the executed Development Contract for "Trenton Place First Addiotion" and with Resolution Nos. 82-182, 82-183, and 82-184. 3. Per the April 7, 1933 letter from the petitioner's attorney, the approved amendment does not contemplate a tennis court and does not grant or imply future approval of said tennis court. The motion for adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by ils , and upon vote being taken t ereon, t e following voted n favor thereof: May Davenport. Councilmembers Moen, Neils and ThCpinan The following voted against or abstained: non 10 Whereupon the Resolution was declared duiy passed arid adopted. dsk2