Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Resolution 1983-134e,C CITY OF PLYMOUTH Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, aL meeting of the City Council .of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, was held Onre i,�„ day of March 1983, r The following cambers were present: Maven t).we;oort_ ou4ciimembersm^en`�`-weils, I ne T0110R1ng memaers were absent: none rgoinrilmPmher Moen ._ introduced the following Resolution and moved its adoption*. RESOLUTION NO. 83-134 APPROVAL OF LAND USE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT AND MIXED USE PLANNED UNIT DFVFLOPMFNT CONCEPT PLAN FOR LUNDGREN BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY FOR THE CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS (82066) WHEREAS, Lundgren Brothers Construction Company on behalf of the City of Minneapolis has requested approval of a Mixed Use Planned Unit Development Concept Plan for approximately 425 acres of land located in portions of Sections 28, 29, and 33; and, WHEREAS, the petitioner has also requested approval of an amendment to the Land Use Guide Plan for approximately 56 acres in the east portion of the property adjacent to Niagara Lane from LA -3 (high medium density residential) to IP (planned industrial); and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered the requests following a duly sche- duled public hearing and has recommended approval; and, WHEREAS, the City of Minneapolis received approval of a Planned U -It Development Concept plan on November 21, 1977 under Resolution No. 77-666; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the requests by Lundgren Rrothers Constructaion Company on behalf of the City of Minneapolis for a Land Use Guide Plan Amendment and for a Mixed Planned Unit Development Concept Plan on property located In portions of Sections 28, 29, and 33, subject to the following: 1. The reguiding is based upon the findings that the proposed classification is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan criteria; provides an extension of the existing industrial area; and that the proposal would not adversely Impact the City's utility and transportation systems. Approval is contin- gent upon and subject to the required review and response by the Metropoli- tan Council. 2. Compliance with the City Engineer's Memorandum. 3. The information for an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (FAW) shall be submitted as part of the PUD Preliminary Plan/Plat application; the required Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) procedures shall be initiated upon City Council approval of the Preliminary Plat/Plan. 4. Staging of the development shall be in accordance with utility availability as approved by the City Engineer. Page two Resolution No. 83- 134 5. Density shall not exceed 1,845 units. The actual number of dwelling units allowed shall be determined at the Preliminary Plan/Plat stage and shall be within the defined range. Final density shall be based upon the criteria defined in the Ordinance, including the assignment of any bonus points. 6. The PUD Preliminary Plan/Plat shall respond to the applicable Special Pro- tection District regulations. 7. Detailed boundaries of proposed public park and open space shall be final- ized with the Preliminary Plan/Plat including identification of existing accessory structures which shall be retained for park purposes. All other accessory structures shall be removed at the developer's expense. 8. The Preliminary Plan/Plat shall demonstrate compliance with the Ordinance transition requirements, specifically addressinq Areas B, D, E, 3, and K. 9. Street names shall comply with the City's street naming policy. 10. The petitioner shall address, with the Preliminary Plan/Plat, the potential provision for affordable housing. 11. The following items shall also be addressed with the Preliminary Plan design: Providing potential locations for bus pull -overs for Mass Transit use; further investigation of potential access points to the roadways iden- tified in the Concept Plan (Vicksburg Lane, Dunkirk Lane, Niagara Lane, and the east/west streets), and provide additional attention to internal cir- culation; consideration of Shoreland Management regulations (Parkers Lake is classified as Recreational Development), and preservation of natural wood- lands; and, provision for right-of-way needs per Hennepin County correspond- ence. 12. A Traffic Generation Analysis, prepared at the developer's expense by the City's consultant, shall be submitted for review and approval concurrent with the Preliminary Plan and Plat. 13. The approximate 3 acre parcel south of the Luce Line trail shall be planned for single family residential development. 14. The preliminary plat and plans, relative to the park and woodland in the northwest corner (Area A), shall reflect the "compromise agreement" set forth in the March 18, 1983 letter from Lundqren Brothers Construction Company, and the developer shall prepare the necessary covenant documents for City Attorney approval to execute the agreement. 15. The developer will provide copies of the overall PUD Plan and its conditions as an addendum to their purchase agreements. 16. Should development on the property west of Vicksburg Lane precede the upgrading of Dunkirk Lane, which is contemplated by the 1983-1987 Capital Improvements Program, the developers shall construct on-site ponding to retain all additional surface water runoff on this site at their expense. 17. Maximum effort to be provided at preliminary plat/plan stage to protect and enhance wooded area in 'Area A' (eq, throuqh width of street, qradinq, setbacks, house location, etc.). FURTHER, Resolution No. 77-666 Is hereby rescinded. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED pursuant to request of Lundgren and Minneapolis, the City has aSreed to a segmented review of the parkers Lake MPUD in accordance with the general terms as outlined on attached Exhibit 'A', dated June 6, 1983. The motion for adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by Councilme4er Threinen , and upon vote being taken thereon, to following voted n favor thereof: Mayor Davenport, Councilmember Moen, Neils, The roilowing voted against or abstained: none Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passedt dsk2A 1. The proposed Parkers Lake Planned Development MPUD will be split stages: a) Stage A: Lane; and Into two "The Vicksburg West Property," is that portion west of Vicks',,urq b) Stage B: "The Parkers Lake North Property," is that portion Vicksburg Lane. STAGE A: The Vicksburg West Property - Parkers Lake hPUD r east of 2. The preliminary plat/plan, conditional use permit, and rezoning application will be submitted for Stage A. It will he reviewed on its own merits and measured against the approved Concept Plan and the City Ordinance Planned Unit Development standards. 3. The required Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) for Stage A will also he submitted with the application, and review of the EAW will commence with the review of the petition. The intent is that the EAW will be processed per the required Environmental Quality Board MOB) regulation review process,so that the eventual finding by the City Council, as to whether an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is required, could be made concurrently with action on the preliminary plat. 4. The PUD application for Stage A will involve only this stage, and density would be calculated for only this stage. 5. Park dedication requirements will be calculated for Stage A based upon the approved density according to the Park Dedication Policy. 6. Upon approval of the preliminary plat/PUD Plan, conditional use permit, and rezoning for Stage A, the developer will submit the final plat for Stage A; consisting of two phases: Phase I will be the approximate 20 acres platted as Blocks and Lots, including one or more Outlots for public purposes; Phase II will be the balance of Stage A and be platted as one or more Outlots. 7. No further platting of Stage A, Phase II outlot(s) will be allowed until the Initial final plat for Stage B has been approved and filed at the Counter. STAGE B: The Parkers Lake North Property - Parkers Lake PPUD 8. An application for preliminary plat/PUD Plan, conditional use permit, and rezoning for Stage B will be submitted, as will the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) which is required for Stage B, not later than 60 days from the date the Stage A final plat is filed at Hennepin County. The PUD Plan submitted will include the approved PUD Plan for Stage A. 9. The Stage B application will be reviewed on its merits and measured against the approved Concept Plan and the Ordinance PUD requirements. The + determination of density for Stage 8 will include an evaluation of the approved Stage A PUD Plan for purposes of calculating any applicable density bonus points. Any density bonus points assignable to the entire PUD Plan will be applies: to the Stage 8 PUD Plan. Ite#olutf_un 83-134 83- ` Page two 10. Any park dedication requirements for the Stage A not satisfied by land dedication in Stage A will be carried over to Stage 8, and all final park dedication requirements or credits, including timing of transfer to the City, will be determined or applied with the final plat for Stage B. 11. The required Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) will be processed according to Environmental Quality Hoard (EOP) regulations and final findings by the Council will precede or coincide with action on the preliminary plat. 12. The petitioner will submit the initial final plat for Staqe H which may consist of one or more phases and which may be platted as one or more outlots. 13. The initial final plat for Stage 8 will be filed prior to submittal of any plat for Stage A, Phase II outlets. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW 14. The City of Minneapolis and Lundgren Brothers, Inc., will agree that any administrative and/or legal requirements and costs resulting from, and durina the processing of the Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) and Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) per the Environmental Duality Hoard (EQH) regulations will be borne by the petitioner in support of the City as the Responsible Governmental Unit.