HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Resolution 1983-134e,C
CITY OF PLYMOUTH
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, aL meeting of the City Council .of
the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, was held Onre i,�„ day of March 1983, r
The following cambers were present: Maven t).we;oort_ ou4ciimembersm^en`�`-weils,
I ne T0110R1ng memaers were absent: none
rgoinrilmPmher Moen ._ introduced the following Resolution and moved its
adoption*.
RESOLUTION NO. 83-134
APPROVAL OF LAND USE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT AND MIXED USE PLANNED UNIT DFVFLOPMFNT
CONCEPT PLAN FOR LUNDGREN BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY FOR THE CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS
(82066)
WHEREAS, Lundgren Brothers Construction Company on behalf of the City of Minneapolis
has requested approval of a Mixed Use Planned Unit Development Concept Plan for
approximately 425 acres of land located in portions of Sections 28, 29, and 33; and,
WHEREAS, the petitioner has also requested approval of an amendment to the Land Use
Guide Plan for approximately 56 acres in the east portion of the property adjacent to
Niagara Lane from LA -3 (high medium density residential) to IP (planned industrial);
and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered the requests following a duly sche-
duled public hearing and has recommended approval; and,
WHEREAS, the City of Minneapolis received approval of a Planned U -It Development
Concept plan on November 21, 1977 under Resolution No. 77-666;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH,
MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the requests by Lundgren Rrothers
Constructaion Company on behalf of the City of Minneapolis for a Land Use Guide Plan
Amendment and for a Mixed Planned Unit Development Concept Plan on property located
In portions of Sections 28, 29, and 33, subject to the following:
1. The reguiding is based upon the findings that the proposed classification is
consistent with the Comprehensive Plan criteria; provides an extension of
the existing industrial area; and that the proposal would not adversely
Impact the City's utility and transportation systems. Approval is contin-
gent upon and subject to the required review and response by the Metropoli-
tan Council.
2. Compliance with the City Engineer's Memorandum.
3. The information for an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (FAW) shall be
submitted as part of the PUD Preliminary Plan/Plat application; the required
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) procedures shall be initiated upon City
Council approval of the Preliminary Plat/Plan.
4. Staging of the development shall be in accordance with utility availability
as approved by the City Engineer.
Page two
Resolution No. 83- 134
5. Density shall not exceed 1,845 units. The actual number of dwelling units
allowed shall be determined at the Preliminary Plan/Plat stage and shall be
within the defined range. Final density shall be based upon the criteria
defined in the Ordinance, including the assignment of any bonus points.
6. The PUD Preliminary Plan/Plat shall respond to the applicable Special Pro-
tection District regulations.
7. Detailed boundaries of proposed public park and open space shall be final-
ized with the Preliminary Plan/Plat including identification of existing
accessory structures which shall be retained for park purposes. All other
accessory structures shall be removed at the developer's expense.
8. The Preliminary Plan/Plat shall demonstrate compliance with the Ordinance
transition requirements, specifically addressinq Areas B, D, E, 3, and K.
9. Street names shall comply with the City's street naming policy.
10. The petitioner shall address, with the Preliminary Plan/Plat, the potential
provision for affordable housing.
11. The following items shall also be addressed with the Preliminary Plan
design: Providing potential locations for bus pull -overs for Mass Transit
use; further investigation of potential access points to the roadways iden-
tified in the Concept Plan (Vicksburg Lane, Dunkirk Lane, Niagara Lane, and
the east/west streets), and provide additional attention to internal cir-
culation; consideration of Shoreland Management regulations (Parkers Lake is
classified as Recreational Development), and preservation of natural wood-
lands; and, provision for right-of-way needs per Hennepin County correspond-
ence.
12. A Traffic Generation Analysis, prepared at the developer's expense by the
City's consultant, shall be submitted for review and approval concurrent
with the Preliminary Plan and Plat.
13. The approximate 3 acre parcel south of the Luce Line trail shall be planned
for single family residential development.
14. The preliminary plat and plans, relative to the park and woodland in the
northwest corner (Area A), shall reflect the "compromise agreement" set
forth in the March 18, 1983 letter from Lundqren Brothers Construction
Company, and the developer shall prepare the necessary covenant documents
for City Attorney approval to execute the agreement.
15. The developer will provide copies of the overall PUD Plan and its conditions
as an addendum to their purchase agreements.
16. Should development on the property west of Vicksburg Lane precede the
upgrading of Dunkirk Lane, which is contemplated by the 1983-1987 Capital
Improvements Program, the developers shall construct on-site ponding to
retain all additional surface water runoff on this site at their expense.
17. Maximum effort to be provided at preliminary plat/plan stage to protect and
enhance wooded area in 'Area A' (eq, throuqh width of street, qradinq,
setbacks, house location, etc.).
FURTHER, Resolution No. 77-666 Is hereby rescinded.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED pursuant to request of Lundgren and Minneapolis, the City
has aSreed to a segmented review of the parkers Lake MPUD in accordance with the
general terms as outlined on attached Exhibit 'A', dated June 6, 1983.
The motion for adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by
Councilme4er Threinen , and upon vote being taken thereon, to
following voted n favor thereof: Mayor Davenport, Councilmember Moen, Neils,
The roilowing voted against or abstained: none
Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passedt
dsk2A
1. The proposed Parkers Lake Planned Development MPUD will be split
stages:
a) Stage A:
Lane; and
Into two
"The Vicksburg West Property," is that portion west of Vicks',,urq
b) Stage B: "The Parkers Lake North Property," is that portion
Vicksburg Lane.
STAGE A: The Vicksburg West Property - Parkers Lake hPUD
r
east of
2. The preliminary plat/plan, conditional use permit, and rezoning application
will be submitted for Stage A. It will he reviewed on its own merits and
measured against the approved Concept Plan and the City Ordinance Planned Unit
Development standards.
3. The required Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) for Stage A will also he
submitted with the application, and review of the EAW will commence with the
review of the petition. The intent is that the EAW will be processed per the
required Environmental Quality Board MOB) regulation review process,so that
the eventual finding by the City Council, as to whether an Environmental
Impact Statement (EIS) is required, could be made concurrently with action on
the preliminary plat.
4. The PUD application for Stage A will involve only this stage, and density
would be calculated for only this stage.
5. Park dedication requirements will be calculated for Stage A based upon the
approved density according to the Park Dedication Policy.
6. Upon approval of the preliminary plat/PUD Plan, conditional use permit, and
rezoning for Stage A, the developer will submit the final plat for Stage A;
consisting of two phases: Phase I will be the approximate 20 acres platted as
Blocks and Lots, including one or more Outlots for public purposes; Phase II
will be the balance of Stage A and be platted as one or more Outlots.
7. No further platting of Stage A, Phase II outlot(s) will be allowed until the
Initial final plat for Stage B has been approved and filed at the Counter.
STAGE B: The Parkers Lake North Property - Parkers Lake PPUD
8. An application for preliminary plat/PUD Plan, conditional use permit, and
rezoning for Stage B will be submitted, as will the Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS) which is required for Stage B, not later than 60 days from the
date the Stage A final plat is filed at Hennepin County. The PUD Plan
submitted will include the approved PUD Plan for Stage A.
9. The Stage B application will be reviewed on its merits and measured against
the approved Concept Plan and the Ordinance PUD requirements. The
+ determination of density for Stage 8 will include an evaluation of the
approved Stage A PUD Plan for purposes of calculating any applicable density
bonus points. Any density bonus points assignable to the entire PUD Plan will
be applies: to the Stage 8 PUD Plan.
Ite#olutf_un 83-134
83-
` Page two
10. Any park dedication requirements for the Stage A not satisfied by land
dedication in Stage A will be carried over to Stage 8, and all final park
dedication requirements or credits, including timing of transfer to the City,
will be determined or applied with the final plat for Stage B.
11. The required Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) will be processed according
to Environmental Quality Hoard (EOP) regulations and final findings by the
Council will precede or coincide with action on the preliminary plat.
12. The petitioner will submit the initial final plat for Staqe H which may
consist of one or more phases and which may be platted as one or more
outlots.
13. The initial final plat for Stage 8 will be filed prior to submittal of any
plat for Stage A, Phase II outlets.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
14. The City of Minneapolis and Lundgren Brothers, Inc., will agree that any
administrative and/or legal requirements and costs resulting from, and durina
the processing of the Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) and
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) per the Environmental Duality Hoard (EQH)
regulations will be borne by the petitioner in support of the City as the
Responsible Governmental Unit.