HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Resolution 1982-119CITY OF PLYMOUTH
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meting of the City Council of
the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, was held on the 1st day of March , 1982.
The following members were present: Mayor Davenport, Councilmembers Hoyt, en, —
Schnieder and Threinen
The following members were absent: none
Councilmember-Hoyt Introduced the following Resolution and moved its
adoption:
RESOLUTION NO. 92- 119
ESTABLISHING CONDITIONS TO BE MET RELATIVE TO APPROVAL OF PARKING PLAN AND VARIANCE
APPROVAL AND LOT CONSOLIDATION APPROVAL FOR DICO ENTERPRISES, INCORPORATED (A-475)
WHEREAS, the City Council has approved the request of DICO Enterprises,
Incorporated for approval of a Parking Plan and Parking Variances, and for the
Consolidation of Platted Property at 1605 County Road 18 North; and,
WHEREAS, the City has previously entered Into supplemental agreements with the
petitioner as Gruman Steel (aka M. B. G. Incorporated); and,
WHEREAS, the City has previously approved Site Plans and Land Division/Copse U dation
approvals for the petitioner under Resolution No. 73-414 and Resolution No. 74-220;
and,
WHEREAS, developments and land consolidations directed by those Resolutions have not
been realized; and,
WHEREAS, the petitioner seeks to sell and convey a portion of the property which
includes the south portion of the main industrial building whereby the ownership and
use of the south portion of the building and related property would be legally
distinct and separate from the north portion; and,
WHEREAS, the City finds that It Is desirable and In the public Interest to amend the
previous supplemental agreements between the City and the petitioner; and,
WHEREAS, applicable State and City Codes require certain agreements and easements,
both public and private, In circumstances such as those proposed where there would he
separate and distinct ownerships and uses;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL Of THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH,
MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does direct the following conditions to be met
In consideration of the aforementioned approvals:
1. There shall be filed as a Notice of Record against the Title of the property
known as Tract A Registered Land Survey No. 942 a memorial of the variance
approval in a manner and form approved by the City Attorney.
Page 2
Resolution No. 82-119
2. The petitioner shall prepare and submit for approval by the City Attorney
prior to filing, appropriate agreements cross -easements regarding shared
water service; emergency vehicle access across the sites; and internal access
between the structures including common liability for fire, theft,
Intrusion and the like (the latter being in -lieu of the required fire
rated separation wall).
3. Execution of an agreement between the petitioner and the City amending
previous agreements and supple -,Intal agreements as ,ecommended by the
Director of Public Works and as approved as to form and content by the
City Attorney.
4, The Resolution consolidating Tracts A and B Registered Land Survey
No. 1376 shall be filed at Hennepin County by the City Attorney.
5. The requirement of Resolution No. 74-220 requiring that Tract R of
Registered Land Survey No. 921 be consolidated with neighboring prop-
erty known as Registered Land Survey No. 1252 is hereby rescinded.
6. The requirement of Resolution No. 73-414, that Tract A Registered
Land Survey No. 942 be consolidated with Tract A Registered Land
. Survey No. 1376 is hereby rescinded unless, for whatever reason,
the circumstances of the present petition change to the extent that
the property remains under single ownership; in that case, the City
shall consider the adoption of a Resolution consolidating the prop-
erty into a single parcel, as required by the City Zoning Ordinance,
with direction to the City Attorney that said Resolution be filed
Immediately upon adoption.
The motion for adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by
Councilmember Threinen , and upon vote being taken thereon, the
0 ow ng voted In favor thereof: Counci members Hoyt, Moen, Schneider and Threinen
The following voted against or abstained: Ma or Davenport
. Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.