HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Resolution 1981-817r
suant to due call and notice thereof, a; regular meeting of the City Council
the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, was held on a ar7th day of December
B- The following members were present: Mayor Davenport, Counci mem ers Hui,
ell Schneider and Threinen
following members were absent: none
*t*
Councilmember Neils introduced the following Resolution and moved its
adoption:
RESOLUTION NO. 81- 817
DENYING VARIANCE REQUEST FOR GARY IRENE FOR LAND IN SECTION 8 EAST OF PEONY LANE
WEST OF THE PLYMOUTH GUN CLUB AND NORTH OF THE SOO LINE RAILROAD TRACKS (79039)
WHEREAS, Gary Irene has requested approval of variance from Section 500.43 of
the City Code and from City Council Policy Resolution No. 75-664 to permit
issuance of building permits on four parcels which are not served by municipal
utilities and which do not abut a City street; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the request and has recommended
denial; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council considered the matter on September 22, 1980, and deferred
final action with direction to the petitioner for revisions to the petition; and,
WHEREAS, the petitioner has not responded to the Council direction or to correspondence
and inqueries from the administrative staff regarding the status of the petition;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does deny the variance request
of Gary Irene to permit construction of four single family residential dwellings
on parcels in Section 8 east of Peony Lane, west of the Plymouth Gun Club and
north of the Soo Line Railroad tracks for the following reasons:
1. Petitioner has not established in accordance with the Policy
regulating urban development that divergence from the policy
will not cause an unreasonable burden upon the City in pro-
viding services and utilities or cause a deleterious impact
upon the natural environment, as evidenced by the objection
to the construction of a private rural road per City standards.
2. Similarly, the variance from the City Code is not in order
since the parcels do not abut a public street and since the
petitioner is not prepared to provide an equivalent road.
The motion for adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconced by
1 Councilmember Threinen and upon vote being taken thereon, the following
voted in favor thereof: Mayor Davenport, Councilmembers Hoyt, Neils, Schneider
and Threinen
The following voted against or abstained: none
Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly passea ind s opte .