HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Resolution 1981-721CITY OF PLYMOUTH
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of
the City Council of the City of Plymouth, 1n esota was a on the
19,._ t---V
day of October ig 8� . e fol1owin re
present: sting Mayor bersyioryt, chneider an9d ir1TAei
The follow nc. ers wprp a can
•w*
f*�
Acting Mayor Neils introduced the following Resolution and
moved its adoption__.
RESOLUTION NO. 81-721
GRANTING VARIANCES AND WAIVING VARIANCE PERMIT FEES FOR SCREEN FENCING
BETWEEN KIMBERLY MEADOWS DEVELOPMENT AND ADJACENT SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
LOTS (79062)
WHEREAS, the City Council approved a site plan and conditional use permit
fo:• a thirty-nine unit townhouse development known as "Kimberly Meadows"
easterly of Highway 101 and north of County Road 6 under Resolution No. 80-221
on April 7, 1980; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the transitional design elements in
the south yard area between the townhouse units and the single-family residential
properties at the request of adjacent single-family residential property owners;
and,
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that additional transitional features such
as screen fencing would be appropriate to enhance the privacy of the yard;
and,
WHEREAS, owners of adjacent single-family residential properties have proposed
the construction of screen fencing not to exceed eight feet in height along
the common property line; and,
WHEREAS, the Zoning Ordinance establishes a maximum six foot height for
residential fencing, and the City Code establishes a fee for requesting a
variance from the height standards;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does grant necessary variances
from the Ordinance S*andards to permit construction of privacy fencing up
to eight feet in height along the property line between the "Kimberly Meadows"
development and the ad-Jacent single-family residential properties;
FURTHER, fees for the applicable height variances for said screen fencing
are hereby waived.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing Resolution was duly seconded by
Councilmember Hoyt , and upon vote being taken thereon, the
following vo a in avor t ereo : _Acting Mayor Neils, Councilmembers Hoyt,
The following voted against or abstained:
Whereupon the Resolution was declared duly painsoend and adopted.
+trtt .rt
•ter